Podcasts about Stanford prison experiment

On episode 8, we chat with our wonderful guest Kristine Seguin of The Big House Sanctuary and Rehab for chonky kitties. We discuss so much, including weight loss for beautiful chonks, nutless-cat/blanket romances, the wonders of farm vets, and the secret Flamingo Club (for which Russ was all dressed and ready.) As always, swearing abounds! Cover your ears, my delicate flowers.   "A semi-feral cat could send any grown-ass man screaming!" "I never made the Stanford Prison Experiment; I just learnt from it." "All the fat cats get Brazilians. All of them."   Check out The BIg House and all the great work Kristine does with overweight cats in danger of being euthanized: https://www.thebighousecats.com/ IG: https://www.instagram.com/thebighousesanctuary/ FB: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61555964357928   About The Big House Cats The Big House is a registered non-profit Cat Rescue that provides Sanctuary and Rehabilitation for the world's most overweight cats. We are dedicated to providing these cats with the resources to succeed, finding them loving homes, and educating the public about feline health and well-being.

In an episode from 2012, we looked at what Sleep No More and the Stanford Prison Experiment can tell us about who we really are. SOURCES:Felix Barrett, artistic director of Punchdrunk.Steven Levitt, professor of economics at the University of Chicago.Philip Zimbardo, professor emeritus at Stanford University. RESOURCES:“Philip Zimbardo, the psychologist behind the ‘Stanford Prison Experiment,' dies at 91,” by Melissa De Witte (Stanford Report, 2024).“Debunking the Stanford Prison Experiment,” by Thibault Le Texier (American Psychologist, 2019).“The Lifespan of a Lie,” by Ben Blum (GEN, 2018).Punchdrunk. EXTRAS:“How Is Live Theater Still Alive?” by Freakonomics Radio (2025).

Friday Night Live 4 April 2025In this episode, I critically analyze the Stanford Prison Experiment in light of Thibaut Le Texier's recent book and Russell T. Warne's critique, which questions the experiment's integrity and ethical violations. I challenge the notion of an inherent capacity for cruelty within humans, advocating for a more hopeful perspective on human nature. Discussions on societal perceptions of morality and the impact of social norms on self-worth lead to an emphasis on honesty in relationships. As I critique sensationalized narratives that foster mistrust, I encourage listeners to reflect on their instincts and engage in genuine connections while advocating for moral accountability amidst life's complexities.GET MY NEW BOOK 'PEACEFUL PARENTING', THE INTERACTIVE PEACEFUL PARENTING AI, AND THE FULL AUDIOBOOK!https://peacefulparenting.com/Join the PREMIUM philosophy community on the web for free!Subscribers get 12 HOURS on the "Truth About the French Revolution," multiple interactive multi-lingual philosophy AIs trained on thousands of hours of my material - as well as AIs for Real-Time Relationships, Bitcoin, Peaceful Parenting, and Call-In Shows!You also receive private livestreams, HUNDREDS of exclusive premium shows, early release podcasts, the 22 Part History of Philosophers series and much more!See you soon!https://freedomain.locals.com/support/promo/UPB2025

Recorded live from our sofa directly after watching S2 Ep10 (Cold Harbor), here's our instant reaction. We also cover The Crystal Maze, The Stanford Prison Experiment, and, bizarrely, Savage Garden.    How to support the show   Follow us on Instagram: @elainegwrites / @mark_greg Sign up to Elaine's newsletter Find us on Letterboxd Leave us a review on Apple Podcasts or a star rating on Spotify. AND, if you like what we've been doing on the pod these past 5 years, and fancy buying us a coffee, you can do so here. Thanks so much.

[Rerun] Dr Kirk Honda talks about the famous Stanford prison experiment of 1971.This episode is sponsored by BetterHelp. Give online therapy a try at betterhelp.com/KIRK to get 10% off your first month.Become a member: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCOUZWV1DRtHtpP2H48S7iiw/joinBecome a patron: https://www.patreon.com/PsychologyInSeattleEmail: https://www.psychologyinseattle.com/contactWebsite: https://www.psychologyinseattle.comMerch: https://teespring.com/stores/psychology-in-seattleInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/psychologyinseattle/Facebook Official Page: https://www.facebook.com/PsychologyInSeattle/TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@kirk.hondaNovember 14, 2016The Psychology In Seattle Podcast ®Trigger Warning: This episode may include topics such as assault, trauma, and discrimination. If necessary, listeners are encouraged to refrain from listening and care for their safety and well-being.Disclaimer: The content provided is for educational, informational, and entertainment purposes only. Nothing here constitutes personal or professional consultation, therapy, diagnosis, or creates a counselor-client relationship. Topics discussed may generate differing points of view. If you participate (by being a guest, submitting a question, or commenting) you must do so with the knowledge that we cannot control reactions or responses from others, which may not agree with you or feel unfair. Your participation on this site is at your own risk, accepting full responsibility for any liability or harm that may result. Anything you write here may be used for discussion or endorsement of the podcast. Opinions and views expressed by the host and guest hosts are personal views. Although, we take precautions and fact check, they should not be considered facts and the opinions may change. Opinions posted by participants (such as comments) are not those of the hosts. Readers should not rely on any information found here and should perform due diligence before taking any action. For a more extensive description of factors for you to consider, please see www.psychologyinseattle.com

The Dark Side of Psychology: Little Albert, Stanford Prison, and Fear ConditioningTime to dive into the dark side of psychology—from Little Albert's trauma-inducing experiment to the Stanford Prison Experiment that turned ordinary college students into sadistic guards in just six days.What happens when science goes too far? And how does classical conditioning shape our fears and phobias? We'll break it all down with some humor, eerie insights, and a few wild phobias you won't believe are real.

Die Folgen von Harrys Ausflug in die Dunkelheit machen sich auf vielfältige Weise bemerkbar. Manche hat er vorausgesehen, andere fatalerweise nicht.

TTO-212 Husker Talk, Recruiting, Pop Tarts Dumb Sponsorships, 18 Week Season, Kansas City, KC hate, MSN Messenger, Manhattan Kansas, Smart Dust, Thirteen, Kids, Fleshlight Cum Keeper, EDC, Feminism Satire, Buying Body Parts, Metal Band Names, Cattle Decapitation, Breathalyser, Nebraska Cornhusker Balloon School, Polo Invented, Submarines, Castlevania, Squid, Stanford Prison Experiment, Russian 9 Year Old, Docu-series, Molly Cyrus Song Miley, KottonMouth Kings

 In this episode, we'll learn about the notorious Stanford Prison Experiment, known for revealing human behaviour's dark side in simulated prison conditions.   We'll discuss its purpose, dramatic events, the ethical concerns it raised, and question what it truly tells us about human nature.  Purpose of the Stanford Prison Experiment Recruitment and setup of the experiment Guards' roles and behaviour Prisoners' arrest and treatment Escalating conflict and rebellion Psychological impact on participants Christina Maslach's intervention Ethical criticisms and flaws Impact on psychology and debates Lessons on human behaviour and power dynamics Full interactive transcript, subtitles and key vocabulary available on the website: https://www.leonardoenglish.com/podcasts/stanford-prison-experiment ---You might like:

Der neue Held, der weise alte Zauberer und der strahlende Vogel aus Feuer treffen aufeinander.

In this gripping episode, we explore one of the most infamous psychological studies ever conducted: the Stanford Prison Experiment. What started as a two-week simulation in a mock prison quickly spiraled out of control, exposing the disturbing ease with which ordinary people can slip into roles of power and submission.Join us as we unravel the controversial methods and shocking outcomes of Dr. Philip Zimbardo's 1971 study. We'll discuss how the experiment has shaped our understanding of human behavior, the ethical firestorm it sparked, and whether the results hold up to scrutiny today.Are we all capable of cruelty under the right circumstances? Tune in to uncover the chilling lessons from this psychological experiment gone wrong.Stanford Prison ExperimentPhilip ZimbardoPsychological experimentsHuman behaviorPower dynamicsAuthority and obedienceEthical controversyRole-playing studiesMock prisonSocial psychologyHuman crueltyPrisoners and guardsConformityDehumanizationExperiment ethics4oBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/beyond-the-shadows--6218555/support.

Drei intelligente Menschen geben sich alle Mühe, die Rätsel der Flucht von Bellatrix Black zu durchschauen.

Zwei Gestalten, ein dunkler Raum, erhellt von einem kalten, eisblauen Licht. Zwei wache Geister, ein Thema.

Harry setzt einen hochbrisanten Plan um, damit er den Dementoren mitsamt seiner Mitstreiter doch noch entfliehen kann. Frohe Weihnachten, liebe Hörer! Wir nähern uns dem Ende des dritten Buchs, und damit auch dem Bergfest dieses Mammutprojekts. Ein Grund zur Freude, liegen doch viele, viele Stunden des Aufnehmens, Lernens, der Vor- und auch der Nachbereitung des […]

Subscriber-only episodeTW: SAVeronica goes deep undercover at a sorority house, while a beloved figure from Stacey's childhood acts like a complete monster out of nowhere. Veronica's main character energy really shows, when she asks very few questions of her late-to-return-home-from the desert father. We map out Veronica's unnecessarily long walk through an office. Plus we sing you TWO test songs! The experiment we were referencing is called the Stanford Prison Experiment from the 70s. There is a recent 3-part docuseries about this on Hulu. However, what they were actually referencing in the show was what U.S. soldiers did at the Abu Ghraib prison during the Iraq War.Subscribe to our Patreon to access the video version, our Discord community, plus all of our other bonus content.Send us a text

Get ready for another chilling episode of Not For the Faint with your favorite true crime girls!Summer talks about the shocking psychological experiment, the Stanford Prison Experiment. What seemed like a controlled academic study quickly spiraled into a chaotic look at authority, obedience, and the human capacity for cruelty.Alyssa dives into the horrifying story of Marcus Wesson, a man whose disturbing vampire-cult and disgusting actions left nine dead. This is a case of unthinkable darkness.As always, remember that this podcast is Not For the Faint! Listener discretion is advised.

This is a preview of our all-new Patreon exclusive episode where Shannon and Cathy discuss the psychology documentary The Stanford Prison Experiment - Unlocking the Truth. Want more? Head on over to Patreon and become a patron for exclusive bonus content, to join our Discord and enjoy other perks depending on your level of support! Follow us on ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Facebook⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ | ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Instagram⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ | ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Patreon⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ | ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠YouTube⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Music by Mannequin Uprising. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/terrortalk/support

Josh takes a break as Rubin and Don discuss one of the worst psychological experiments ever—an experiment that proved just how quickly humanity can be usurped for the want of power. And for those wondering why Rubin isn't talking much for the first half, don't worry—he has plenty to say; he's just storing it up for the end.

On the News Reel today, we talk to Doug McMurdo, editor of the Times-Independent, about the dismissal of a lawsuit between the county and the city and OHV businesses regarding a noise ordinance that went into effect in 2022. We also discuss healthcare provider Angie Settle, who won an award for her work bringing dental services to low-income and uninsured patients. We finish off with a story about a Moab resident who was featured in a new documentary about the Stanford Prison Experiment, which he participated in over 50 years ago. - Show Notes - • Court dismisses OHV lawsuit against Moab, Grand County https://www.moabtimes.com/articles/court-dismisses-ohv-lawsuit-against-moab-grand-county/ • Settle honored for work at Moab Free Health Clinic https://www.moabtimes.com/articles/settle-honored-for-work-at-moab-free-health-clinic/ • Moab resident reflects on role in Stanford Prison Experiment and new documentary https://www.moabtimes.com/articles/moab-resident-reflects-on-role-in-stanford-prison-experiment-and-new-documentary/ • KZMU: Moab local reflects on his experience in the Stanford Prison Experiment https://soundcloud.com/user-452372146-352514478/moab-local-reflects-on-his-experience-in-the-stanford-prison-experiment

Matthew Sweet is joined by guests including Dr Jack Symes, philosopher at Durham University; Professor Lyndsey Stonebridge, Interdisciplinary Chair of Humanities & Human Rights at the University of Birmingham; novelist Ruth Ware; Dr Oliver Scott Curry, Chief Science Officer at Kindness.org and Research Affiliate in the Anthropology Department at the University of Oxford; and campaigner Zrinka Bralo, Director of Migrants Organize.Topics include the classical philosophical problem of evil, the psychology of evil, Hannah Arendt's concept of the banality of evil, and the question of why the Devil gets the best lines in literature. Plus, we look at t6he work and legacy of social psychologist Philip Zimbardo, who devised the controversial Stanford Prison Experiment in 1971, and who died in October 2024.Producer: Luke Mulhall

In 1971, Stanford psychologist Philip Zimbardo conducted an experiment with college students to evaluate behavior in a mock prison. Within days, the guards were abusing their power and mistreating the prisoners so badly the study was shut down early. The “Stanford Prison Experiment” was heralded in academia and in pop culture as a landmark study into the corrupting power of authority. But a re-examination of Zimbardo's methods questions whether he manipulated the subjects into those behaviors, challenging whether its shocking results - and its legacy - should be discredited.The three-part series “The Stanford Prison Experiment: Unlocking the Truth,” is produced by Nat Geo and is available on several streaming services. It unearths Zimbardo's scientifically dubious methods that steered the study toward its violent conclusion. It also reunites the former guards and prisoners - some for the first time - to explain what was really driving their actions.OUR SPOILER-FREE REVIEWS OF "THE STANFORD PRISON EXPERIMENT" BEGIN IN THE FINAL TEN MINUTES OF THE EPISODE.In Crime of the Week: If the shoe splits... For exclusive podcasts and more, sign up at Patreon.Sign up for our newsletter at crimewriterson.com.

The series THE STANFORD PRISON EXPERIMENT: UNLOCKING THE TRUTH, which premiered at this year's Tribeca Film Festival, is an unprecedented look at one of history's most infamous psychology studies through the firsthand accounts of the original “guards” and “prisoners,” many of whom are speaking on camera for the very first time. Their stories unravel a new narrative that interrogates the motives of the man in charge, the late Dr. Philip Zimbardo, while exploring larger questions of human nature and the power of perspective.Through unparalleled access, THE STANFORD PRISON EXPERIMENT: UNLOCKING THE TRUTH embarks on a gripping, ticking-clock journey through the six-day Stanford Prison Experiment with a deluge of reveals, new subjects and a smoking-gun archive. The docuseries weaves together shocking, poignant and sometimes humorous firsthand accounts from the very participants who were at the heart of the experiment. Then, in an unexpected turn, the series brings the participants to a replica film set of the “prison,” where they revisit pivotal moments and attempt to find consensus — and closure — about what really happened over the course of those six days.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/arroe-collins-unplugged-totally-uncut--994165/support.

Sarah's a happy bunny, and it's a long time coming. We discuss the Mike Tyson v. Jake Paul fight, whether it was fixed, and why the slap should've tipped us off. Susie explains how his lisp, his love of pigeons, and the death of his daughter made people see him differently. We hear how the Muhammad Ali documentary showed how learning to withstand suffering can be the sign of a champion. We hear about the Stanford Prison Experiment documentary showed how this famous psychology research was flawed, unethical, and doesn't demonstrate the findings the researcher claimed. We learn how the design of Navy speedboats and the technology that allows them to go fast are causing the crews to get CTE, suffer addiction, and making suicide far more likely. We hear about a couple who broke up, but ended up back together after one of them got a concussion and forgot they broke up. And Susie wants to talk about how hot Elvis was during his comeback special and how the entertainment industry and his handlers made him feel powerless after his initial fame.Listen to more podcasts like this: https://wavepodcastnetwork.comJoin our Candy Club, shop our merch, sign-up for our free newsletter, & more by visiting The Brain Candy Podcast website: https://www.thebraincandypodcast.comConnect with us on social media:BCP Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/braincandypodcastSusie's Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/susiemeisterSarah's Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/imsarahriceBCP on X: https://www.x.com/braincandypodSponsors:To get 15% off your next gift, go to https://www.uncommongoods.com/candyVisit https://cozyearth.com/braincandy and use my exclusive 40% off code BRAINCANDY to give the gift of luxury this holiday season.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Many experiments have been conducted on unsuspecting human beings over the years, and America leads the way in frequency and creativity. Biological agents were tested on the general public in the United States 239 times in the 1950s and 1960s, and children were given syphilis in Alabama and Guatemala just to see what would happen. Social experiments also play a role in understanding how the American government manages its flock of sheep. The Stanford Prison Experiment and the Milgram Experiment showcase just how easy it is to use authority to pressure people into committing atrocities. The Octopus of Global Control Audiobook: https://amzn.to/3xu0rMm Anarchapulco 2024 Replay: www.Anarchapulco.com Promo Code: MACRO Sponsors: Chemical Free Body: https://www.chemicalfreebody.com Promo Code: MACRO C60 Purple Power: https://c60purplepower.com/ Promo Code: MACRO Wise Wolf Gold & Silver: www.Macroaggressions.gold True Hemp Science: https://truehempscience.com/ Haelan: https://haelan951.com/pages/macro Solar Power Lifestyle: https://solarpowerlifestyle.com/ Promo Code: MACRO LegalShield: www.DontGetPushedAround.com EMP Shield: www.EMPShield.com Promo Code: MACRO Christian Yordanov's Health Transformation Program: https://christianyordanov.com/macro/ Privacy Academy: https://privacyacademy.com/step/privacy-action-plan-checkout-2/?ref=5620 Coin Bit App: https://coinbitsapp.com/?ref=0SPP0gjuI68PjGU89wUv Macroaggressions Merch Store: https://www.teepublic.com/stores/macroaggressions?ref_id=22530 LinkTree: linktr.ee/macroaggressions Books: HYPOCRAZY: https://amzn.to/3VsPDp8 Controlled Demolition on Amazon: https://amzn.to/3ufZdzx The Octopus Of Global Control: Amazon: https://amzn.to/3VDWQ5c Barnes & Noble: https://bit.ly/39vdKeQ Online Connection: Link Tree: https://linktr.ee/Macroaggressions Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/macroaggressions_podcast/ Discord Link:  https://discord.gg/4mGzmcFexg Website: www.Macroaggressions.io Facebook: www.facebook.com/theoctopusofglobalcontrol Twitter: www.twitter.com/macroaggressio3 Twitter Handle: @macroaggressio3 Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-4728012 The Union Of The Unwanted LinkTree: https://linktr.ee/uotuw RSS FEED: https://uotuw.podbean.com/ Merch Store: https://www.teepublic.com/stores/union-of-the-unwanted?ref_id=22643&utm_campaign=22643&utm_medium=affiliate&utm_source Brain Supreme: www.BrainSupreme.co

The infamous Stanford Prison Experiment wasn't really much of an experiment as it turns out. It was more like a poorly thought out exercise conducted by a professor who didn't dot the i's and cross the t's. Listen in to this classic episode as Josh and Chuck give this experiment some harsh treatment of their own.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The series THE STANFORD PRISON EXPERIMENT: UNLOCKING THE TRUTH, which premiered at this year's Tribeca Film Festival, is an unprecedented look at one of history's most infamous psychology studies through the firsthand accounts of the original “guards” and “prisoners,” many of whom are speaking on camera for the very first time. Their stories unravel a new narrative that interrogates the motives of the man in charge, the late Dr. Philip Zimbardo, while exploring larger questions of human nature and the power of perspective.Through unparalleled access, THE STANFORD PRISON EXPERIMENT: UNLOCKING THE TRUTH embarks on a gripping, ticking-clock journey through the six-day Stanford Prison Experiment with a deluge of reveals, new subjects and a smoking-gun archive. The docuseries weaves together shocking, poignant and sometimes humorous firsthand accounts from the very participants who were at the heart of the experiment. Then, in an unexpected turn, the series brings the participants to a replica film set of the “prison,” where they revisit pivotal moments and attempt to find consensus — and closure — about what really happened over the course of those six days. Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/arroe-collins-like-it-s-live--4113802/support.

We're unapologetically full of fun soda, Alicia's 30th birthday, Wicked Premier, astrology, Mrs. Claus working hard, Alicia's book club, RHOBH, WWHL, the Sanford Prison Experiment documentary, and Cobra Kai.  Check us out on Instagram, TikTok and YouTube @also_podcast. Join our patreon for exclusive content and early episode releases: patreon.com/alsopodcast  Browse our merch: also-podcast.myspreadshop.com/  Intro, Smol Celebrations and NEWS: 00:00-49:36 Alicia's book club: 49:36-1:03:11 RHOBH & WWHL: 1:03:11-1:21:37 Stanford Prison Experiment: 1:21:37-1:35:33 Cobra Kai: 1:35:33-1:46:18

Welcome to Part II! This week, Nick, Anthony, and Taylor recommend some American history-themed movies for Thanksgiving:  We kick off the festivities with a trip to D.C. in Wag the Dog (1997). Robert De Niro plays a Washington spin doctor who enlists the help of an eccentric movie producer (Dustin Hoffman) to create a fictional war in order to distract Americans from a presidential scandal. Then in 1971 students at Stanford University are selected to participate in a psychology study that goes terribly wrong. This true story is told in the independent film The Stanford Prison Experiment (2015).  Finally, The Reluctant Dragon (1941) is a truly odd curio found on Disney+. This scripted documentary provides viewers with a behind the scenes look at how Disney animation was created in the 1940s.   Listen in for more on these movies and several bonus recommendations!  __________ Taylor Zaccario…Host, Director, Producer, Writer Nick Zaccario…Host, Director, Producer, Editor  Anthony Graziani…Correspondent  Megan Zaccario…Holiday Trilogy Announcer

Pop in with us this week as we welcome back our favorite sports/music correspondent, Chris, to discuss the Mike Tyson vs Jake Paul fight and Netflix's future with livestreams, The Stanford Prison Experiment Hulu documentary, Sexiest Man Alive winner, and more!  Stanford Prison Experiment 1:08 People's Sexiest Man Alive 24:05 Question of the Week 34:45 A Real Pain review 46:27 The Penguin review 1:00:12 Cynthia Erivo & Ariana Grande 1:11:02 Mike Tyson Jake Paul fight 1:19:14

Kate discusses what to watch this week including The Lost Children (Netflix), Larger Than Life: Reign of the Boybands (Paramount+), Breath of Fire: Episode 4 (HBO/Max), The Stanford Prison Experiment: Unlocking The Truth (National Geographic), and The Golden Bachelorette finale (ABC). Reality Life with Kate Casey What to Watch List: https://katecasey.substack.com Patreon: http://www.patreon.com/katecasey Twitter: https://twitter.com/katecasey Instagram: http://www.instagram.com/katecaseyca Tik Tok: http://www.tiktok.com/itskatecasey Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/113157919338245 Amazon.com: www.amazon.com/shop/katecaseySee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Each weekend on Best Of The Gist, we listen back to an archival Gist segment from the past, then we replay something from the past week. This weekend, we do neither. Instead, we listen back to Mike's 2008 NPR interview with Philip Zimbardo, the psychologist who became famous for his Stanford Prison Experiment. Zimbardo died earlier this month. Then we listen to Mike's recent interview with NewsNation's Dan Abrams about Kamala Harris' 60 Minutes interview, in which editing occurred.    Produced by Joel Patterson and Corey Wara  Email us at thegist@mikepesca.com  To advertise on the show: https://advertisecast.com/TheGist  Subscribe to our ad-free and/or PescaPlus versions of The Gist: https://subscribe.mikepesca.com/  Follow Mike's Substack: Pesca Profundities | Mike Pesca | Substack  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Philip Zimbardo, the psychologist who's best known for running the Stanford Prison Experiment in 1971, died last week. That's a good excuse to discuss his legacy: what did his famous experiment tell us about the power of the situation to make normal people commit evil and sadistic acts?In this episode of The Studies Show, Tom and Stuart go back to the original report of one of the most famous psychology studies of all time, and then see how the experiment is looking after more than 50 years of discussion and debate (spoiler: not good).The Studies Show is brought to you by Semafor. You can sign up for their variety of online newsletters that give you in-depth information in digestible chunks. This week, we discussed the Semafor Business newsletter with Liz Hoffman, which included an interview with an electric vehicle company CEO who's making a bet, after something of a downturn, that EVs really are the future.Show notes* The first academic paper to describe the Stanford Prison Experiment, from 1973* More details on the study, including the prisoners' “rebellion”, on Zimbardo's website* The first critique from 2019, from social psychologists* The second critique from 2019, from Thibault le Texier* Zimbardo's response to the critiques* Zimbardo on the Abu Ghraib prison torture during the Iraq War* Zimbardo's cringeworthy BBC interview on the effects of videogames* Guardian critique of Zimbardo's videogame claims by Pete EtchellsCreditsThe Studies Show is produced by Julian Mayers at Yada Yada Productions. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.thestudiesshowpod.com/subscribe

The social science that supports our work with cults has been questioned in the last decade. We discuss the complaints about Zimbardo's Stanford Prison Experiment, Stanley Milgram's Yale shock machine studies, and Sherif's Robbers Cave Experiment. Note: this was recorded a few days before Dr. Zimbardo passed. He was truly a titan of our field and will be sorely missed. Links: Dr. Zimbardo's Heroic Imagination project At the center of 'Veneer Theory': Are people fundamentally good or evil? Jane Eliott's brown-eyed/ blue-eyed study on racism Muzafer Sherif's Robbers Cave Experiment A Painful Reminder #Zimbardo

What happens when you bring a number of bushy and bright-eyed college students to play guards and inmates for the awesome pay of $15 a day? We find out within the confines of Jordan Hall at Stanford University: a prestigious research institute that may like to remove this event from its history. During this morally questionable 1971 prison experiment, we see how situational variables may have transformed the researcher and participants into monsters… or maybe some were monsters all along?

August 14, 1971. An infamous psychological study into prison brutality begins at Stanford University. Support the show! Join Into History for ad-free listening and more.History Daily is a co-production of Airship and Noiser.Go to HistoryDaily.com for more history, daily.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

The Stanford Prison Experiment, created by Philip Zimbardo, began on 14th August, 1971. 24 male college students volunteered to be assigned roles as either ‘guard' or ‘prisoner' in a mock jail: the ‘prisoners' were ‘arrested' by real cops outside their family homes and marched down to a Police Station before being transferred to their imitation incarceration. Once inside, they were stripped, deloused, and given smocks and ID numbers; while guards were outfitted with khaki uniforms, mirrored sunglasses, and batons, establishing a stark power divide. The guards quickly embraced their roles, with some becoming cruel and abusive. They enforced strict, often humiliating regimens on the prisoners, such as roll calls and physical exercises, to instill a sense of powerlessness. But the guards were not aware they were also subjects of the study… In this episode, Arion, Rebecca and Olly interrogate the selection process and context that belies the study's impact; consider the distress supposedly experienced by the participants; and ask if this controversial experiment should now be scrubbed from the textbooks… Further Reading: • ‘The Stanford Prison Experiment: Philip Zimbardo defends his most famous work' (Vox, 2018): https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2018/6/28/17509470/stanford-prison-experiment-zimbardo-interview • ‘Philip Zimbardo Thinks We All Can Be Evil' (The New York Times, 2015): https://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/19/magazine/philip-zimbardo-thinks-we-all-can-be-evil.html • ‘The Stanford Prison Experiment Was One of the Most Disturbing Studies Ever' (Weird History, 2020): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRR7CwdHxUE Love the show? Support us!  Join 

Send us a Text Message.This week we take a look at the Stanford prison experiment from 1971, what was the point of it and what did we learn?Support the Show.JOIN OUR PATREON FOR EXCLUSIVE EPISODES! www.patreon.com/whatkastBUY US A BEER! www.buymeacoffee.com/whatkast

Hello and Welcome back to One Minute Remaining, today I'm sitting down with American social psychologist and a professor at the University of California, Santa Cruz DR Craig Haney. I am currently in the process of working on a new project with a gentlemen who is incarcerated in San Quentin prison, now I'm going to be annoying and say I wont be telling you at this stage what that is but as part of this project I was looking for certain experts to weigh in and take part, I do love an expert, one of those experts I found was a man by the name of Dr Craig Haney. I reached out to him and asked if he would chat with me to which he agreed. What I didn't know at the time was not only is he a highly regarded professor and psychologist who has spent his life studying capital punishment and the psychological impact of and the American Prison system but he was also one of the researchers who conducted the 1970s experiment known as the Stanford prison experiment. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

The gang finds out what kind of guard they would be this week, as they review the dramatization of one the most famous psychology experiments, The Standford Prison Experiment (2015). Featuring a stacked cast of young actors that would go on to do bigger and better thing, this bleak and harrowing look at just how far a normal person can and will push themselves when given absolute power of their fellow man. How far is too far? What would you be like as a prisoner? How about a guard? Follow along on AMC, Kanopy, Pluto, Plex, and Paramount, and email us with your takeawaysThank you to Class Clown, Jack, for this Patreon pick! Go check out his YouTube channel.https://www.youtube.com/c/LetsCrashThisParadeVisit the YouTube channel Saturdays @ 12:30 PM Pacific to get in on the live stream!Channel:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCI1lVsk1xjMSBgZK82uAzgQThis Episode:https://youtu.be/KN-_i8btBpMhttp://www.MCFCpodcast.comhttps://www.twitch.tv/MCFCpodcasthttp://www.facebook.com/MCFCpodcasthttp://www.twitter.com/podcastMCFChttp://www.tiktok.com/middleclassfilmclasshttp://www.instagram.com/middleclassfilmclass   Email: MCFCpodcast@gmail.comLeave us a voicemail at (209) 730-6010Merch store - https://middle-class-film-class.creator-spring.com/    Join the Patreon:www.patreon.con/middleclassfilmclass Patrons:JavierJoel ShinnemanLinda McCalisterHeather Sachs https://twitter.com/DorkOfAllDorksRyan  CorbinChris GeigerDylanMitch Burns Robert Stewart JasonAndrew Martin Dallas Terry Jack Fitzpatrick Mackenzie MinerBinge Daddy Dan Joseph Navarro     Pete Abeyta  and Tyler Noe

Host, Rachel discusses the Stanford Prison Experiment and its implications for understanding power dynamics and human behavior in high-stress environments like the military. She shares personal experiences with abuse of power, lack of accountability, and mental health challenges. Key Insights: - Situational and dispositional factors both influence human behavior - Power can corrupt even good people in certain contexts - Military leadership should focus on building trust and empathy APA Article referenced in episode: https://www.apa.org/topics/forensics-law-public-safety/prison More about the Stanford Prison Experiment: https://www.prisonexp.org/ ________________________________________________ If you are experiencing suicidal ideations or have experienced sexual assault and need help or someone to talk to, please reach out to the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline at 988 or the National Sexual Assault Hotline at 1-800-656-4673** **Any views discussed in this episode are strictly personal views and not views of the United States military. This podcast is in no way affiliated with any branch of the United States military. Some names have been changed in order to protect the identities of speakers and/or names mentioned throughout episodes. Subscribe to the podcast on ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠YouTube⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Support the podcast on Patreon: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠patreon.com/user?u=108419824⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Website: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠www.ysdeh.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Sign the petition for Better Mental Health Care in the United States Navy here: h⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ttps://chng.it/z2M6WR2WcM⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Follow Your Story Doesn't End Here on IG at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.instagram.com/_ysdeh/ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ FB: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.facebook.com/ysdeh⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Adam looks at evidence that the popular Stanford Prison Experiment was not as well run as we've heard which raises concerns about the conclusions we make from it.  Darren considers some recent events in the world of AI and wonders whether or not AI could soon be taking over some creative jobs.

In 1971, Philip Zimbardo recruited participants to take on the roles of “prisoners” and “guards” to investigate the psychological effects of perceived power; Zimbardo's primary reason for conducting the experiment was to focus on the power of roles, rules, symbols, group identity and situational validation of behavior that generally would repulse ordinary individuals. But the experiment had to be terminated over a week earlier than expected due to how the participants began to act. Today, the findings of Zimbardo are debated, as is the methodology and ethical considerations of the actual experiment. Click here to join our Patreon.  Connect with us on Instagram and join our Facebook group.  To submit listener stories or case suggestions, and to see all sources for this episode: https://www.inhumanpodcast.com/

Behavioral health is certainly within the bounds of medicine and, thereby, medical history. The Stanford Prison Experiment asked the question of whether the environment of prison compelled bad behavior from those within the system. In order to study this, this 1970's university psychology experiment went to extreme lengths to turn its research subjects (students) into faux prisoners and prison guards in the basement of the department's building. It might not surprise you to find out that it did not go well. Ethics in research are indeed important, as you'll appreciate after listening to this one.References:Wikipedia Page on the Stanford Prison Experiment: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_prison_experimentPDF of original publication of the Stanford Prison Experiment: http://pdf.prisonexp.org/ijcp1973.pdfPsychology Today interview with Philip Zimbardo: https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/articles/200009/emperor-the-edgeWikipedia Page on Philip Zimbardo: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_ZimbardoIncarceration Rates Reference: https://www.prisonpolicy.org/global/2021.html?gad_source=1&gclid=CjwKCAiAiP2tBhBXEiwACslfnvW5miAa1VS0WqISsYuBYwIY52hMWPMlcVUG3Kbs_xNgzE4pG2DAuxoC6gMQAvD_BwEFor further reading: The Milgram Experiment Wikipedia page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milgram_experiment“The Stanford Prison Experiment” website: https://www.prisonexp.org/New Yorker Magazine Column, ‘The Real Lessons of The Stanford Prison Experiment': https://www.newyorker.com/science/maria-konnikova/the-real-lesson-of-the-stanford-prison-experimentOne of many bootlegs on YouTube of a BBC documentary on the experiment containing actual video footage: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F4txhN13y6AHawthorne Effect, wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawthorne_effectPDF of October 1971 Congressional Testimony by Zimbardo: http://pdf.prisonexp.org/congress.pdfPreprint of Haslam's Article, “Identity Leadership in the Stanford Prison Experiment”, in press in American Psychologist: https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/b7crx to avoid paywall, noted on PubMed here: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31380665/#medicalhistory #medicine #history #podcast ----- Patreon Page (support the show) -----Submit a Question for Mike's Trivia Challenge Segment (website form with instructions)-----Podcast Linktree (social media links / reviews / ratings)-----DrMaxwell_MKE (gaming on Twitch.tv) - Dr. Max's side project playing retro games and a few modern games on Tuesdays and Thursdays (8pm CST). Stop by, hang out, chat about medicine or any other things.

Click HERE for more exclusive ICMAP content!www.icmap.co.ukThe boys are back for another (perhaps) unexpected but VERY interesting case: The Stanford Prison Experiment.The Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by psychologist Dr Philip Zimbardo in 1971, is shrouded in horrific controversies that continue to disturb its participants to date. Intended to examine the psychological effects of perceived power, the experiment involved college students assigned to play roles as guards and prisoners in a simulated prison environment.Please let us know what you think of this one! Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Historian and author Christopher R. Browning joins Tim to talk about his study of the Holocaust and the “Final Solution” in Poland. In this episode, Christopher discusses his book, “Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland” and how a group of otherwise average, everyday men turned into one of Hitler's most prolific killing squads in World War II. This episode was first released January 24, 2022. https://traffic.libsyn.com/secure/shapingopinion/223_-_Ordinary_Men_Making_a_Kill_Squad.mp3 Long before the world heard the term “Holocaust” in connection with the Second World War, and even before the mass killing started, it all began with an atmosphere in Germany that supported the expelling of Jewish people from territories controlled by Hitler's Germany. At some point, instead of expulsion, the movement would turn into the mass executions of millions of Jews in places like Poland. Historian and author Christopher Browning wrote the landmark book on how such horrific events could take place. It's called “Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland.” To set the stage for the larger story of the book, Browning tells us how it began. This passage is part of the opening chapter that book: “Pale and nervous, with choking voice and tears in his eyes, (Major) Trapp visibly fought to control himself as he spoke. The battalion, he said plaintively, had to perform a frightfully unpleasant task. This assignment was not to his liking, indeed it was highly regrettable, but the orders came from the highest authorities. If it would make their task any easier, the men should remember that in Germany the bombs were falling on women and children. He then turned to the matter at hand. The Jews had instigated the American boycott that had damaged Germany, one policeman remembered Trapp saying. There were Jews in the village of Jozefow who were involved with the partisans, he explained according to two others. The battalion had now been ordered to round up these Jews. The male Jews of working age were to be separated and taken to a work camp. The remaining Jews – the women, children, and elderly – were to be shot on the spot by the battalion. Having explained what awaited his men, Trapp then made an extraordinary offer: if any of the older men among them did not feel up to the task that lay before him, he could step out.” These were the major's comments to the battalion of mostly middle-aged men on the morning of July 13, 1942. They weren't Nazis. They weren't even members of the German army. They made up a police battalion of working-class men too old to serve in the army. Those men would round up and shoot 1,500 Jews in that Polish village on that one day. That battalion would eventually kill upwards of 83,000 captives during the war, making it one of the most efficient German killing squads in the war. But as the title of Christopher Browning's book suggests, before the war, he says these were considered Ordinary Men. Links Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland, by Christopher R. Browning (Barnes & Noble) Christopher R. Browning, University of North Carolina (website) The Stanford Prison Experiment (website) About this Episode's Guest Christopher Browning Christopher R. Browning was the Frank Porter Graham Professor of History at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill until his retirement in May 2014.  Before taking up this position in the fall of 1999, he taught for 25 years at Pacific Lutheran University in Tacoma, Washington. Browning received his B.A. degree from Oberlin College in 1967 and his M.A. and Ph.D. from the University of Wisconsin-Madison in 1968 and 1975 respectively.  He is the author of eight books: The Final Solution and the German Foreign Office (1978), Fateful Months:  Essays on the Emergence of the Final Solution (1985),

CinemAddicts Episode 229 features reviews of Land of Bad (5:19), Monolight (17:03), Lights Out (26:25), The Last Voyage of the Demeter (40:12), The Hobby (47:30), Air Force One Down (51:36), and The Stanford Prison Experiment (61:50).Use our Amazon movie links or SiteStripe for your purchases to support CinemAddicts (we receive a slight commission)!**Check out our CinemAddicts podcast feed for previous episodes on Acast: https://shows.acast.com/cinemaddicts**We spotlight the year 1993 for this month's CinemAddicts Patreon. Eric's pick is The Untold Story.**Check out the CinemAddicts crew on The Force Five Podcast.**Pete Abeyta's review of Land of Bad. Edited by Jack Fitzpatrick.1. Subscribe to our CinemAddicts YouTube Channel.2. Like Our CinemAddicts Facebook Page3. Join our CinemAddicts Facebook Group for daily movie recommendations! 4. Questions/comments on CinemAddicts email Greg Srisavasdi at info@findyourfilm.com.5. Find CinemAddicts recaps and coverage on our website Find Your Film.6. Contact Bruce Purkey for some What's in the Box recommendations: brucepurkey@gmail.com7. Eric Holmes can be reached at hamslime@gmail.com and on X. 8. Anderson Cowan's latest project is Loaded for Bear: The Documentary. For info and support: https://loadedforbeardoc.com/ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

On the latest Regional Roundup, an interview with Dr. Ethan Greene, the Director of the Colorado Avalanche Information Center, about trends in avalanches and what weather events lead to increased danger. Plus, we revisit our interview with a Moab resident who was a participant from the controversial 1971 Stanford Prison Experiment.

THIS IS THE SECOND PART OF A 2 PART EPISODE, LISTEN TO PART 1 FIRST!In August of 1971, Dr. Philip Zimbardo put 18 male college students into a basement and assigned half of them guard roles, and the other half prisoner roles. A two week "study" devolved into complete madness quickly and ended after just six days.✨If you'd like access to over 125 episodes that aren't on the regular feed, and you'd like them all ad free, join our Patreon for as little as $5 a month! There is actually now a new FREE version that you can try with no commitment! https://www.patreon.com/TSFU

Barbenheimer DONE and back to regularly scheduled TSFU Presents! This month Ash and Fallon talk about social psychology experiments that happened during the 20th century. It seems many men set out to prove how evil humans were, and succeeded, when they didn't perform experiments correctly and without bias and interference...In August of 1971, Dr. Philip Zimbardo put 18 male college students into a basement and assigned half of them guard roles, and the other half prisoner roles. A two week "study" devolved into complete madness quickly and ended after just six days.PART 2 AVAILABLE ON OUR FREE PATREON NOW!✨If you'd like access to over 125 episodes that aren't on the regular feed, and you'd like them all ad free, join our Patreon for as little as $5 a month! There is actually now a new FREE version that you can try with no commitment! https://www.patreon.com/TSFU

Comedians Chris O'Connor and Tommy Pope are making all kinds of Stuff on the paytch. Each week they talk about anything & everything under the sun. Tommy also chefs up some delicious meals. It's a goddamn blast, folks - SUB TO PATREON: https://www.patreon.com/StuffIsland - SUB ON ITUNES: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/stuff-island/id1448662475 - SUB ON SPOTIFY: https://open.spotify.com/show/3QvnmWtMlJ0ZC9uUu1Vvdk - Follow Chris on IG: https://www.instagram.com/achrisoconnor/?hl=en - Follow Tommy on IG: https://www.instagram.com/tommyjpope/?hl=en - Follow Andy on IG: https://www.instagram.com/imandyhaynes/?hl=en Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices