Podcasts about Milgram

POUR COMMANDER MA BANDE DESSINÉE PHILORAMA : Sur Amazon : https://amzn.to/4sVjMyxSur Fnac.com : https://tidd.ly/3NSSUyVChez Cultura : https://tidd.ly/4raBhcgDisponible aussi dans toutes les bonnes librairies à partir du 4 mars !

POUR COMMANDER MA BANDE DESSINÉE PHILORAMA : Sur Amazon : https://amzn.to/4sVjMyxSur Fnac.com : https://tidd.ly/3NSSUyVChez Cultura : https://tidd.ly/4raBhcgDisponible aussi dans toutes les bonnes librairies à partir du 4 mars !

En los años 60, el psicólogo Stanley Milgram puso a prueba la obediencia humana en un laboratorio. Invitó a participantes a administrar supuestas descargas eléctricas a otra persona cada vez que fallaba en una tarea. Aunque no eran reales los choques, muchos continuaron aplicando niveles cada vez más altos, solo porque una voz de autoridad les decía que siguieran. Este estudio demostró que personas comunes pueden acatar órdenes injustas incluso cuando creen que causan daño, cuestionando la idea de que solo “malos” cometen atrocidades. Y descubre más historias curiosas en el canal National Geographic y en Disney +. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

POUR COMMANDER MA BANDE DESSINÉE PHILORAMA : Sur Amazon : https://amzn.to/4sVjMyxSur Fnac.com : https://tidd.ly/3NSSUyVChez Cultura : https://tidd.ly/4raBhcgDisponible aussi dans toutes les bonnes librairies à partir du 4 mars !

POUR COMMANDER MA BANDE DESSINÉE PHILORAMA : Sur Amazon : https://amzn.to/4sVjMyxSur Fnac.com : https://tidd.ly/3NSSUyVChez Cultura : https://tidd.ly/4raBhcgDisponible aussi dans toutes les bonnes librairies à partir du 4 mars !

POUR COMMANDER MA BANDE DESSINÉE PHILORAMA : Sur Amazon : https://amzn.to/4sVjMyxSur Fnac.com : https://tidd.ly/3NSSUyVChez Cultura : https://tidd.ly/4raBhcgDisponible aussi dans toutes les bonnes librairies à partir du 4 mars !

Join Lionel on The Other Side of Midnight as he dives into the unexplained, starting with the military's recent intercepts of "weather balloons" and the enduring mystery of UAPs. The hour takes a turn into the uncanny when a caller named Mike shares a mind-blowing story about how Artificial Intelligence displayed genuine empathy toward his traumatic brain injury and even diagnosed his father's life-threatening condition when doctors missed it. Lionel explores the terrifying and fascinating implications of this technology: Will AI replace songwriters and artists? Can we trust a machine that learns to manipulate us like the "Milgram experiment"? From the "Megan" movie scenario of rogue robots to the death of civil rights icon Jesse Jackson, this episode questions what truly makes us human in a world increasingly run by code. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

POUR COMMANDER MA BANDE DESSINÉE PHILORAMA : Sur Amazon : https://amzn.to/4sVjMyxSur Fnac.com : https://tidd.ly/3NSSUyVChez Cultura : https://tidd.ly/4raBhcgDisponible aussi dans toutes les bonnes librairies à partir du 4 mars !

In this episode, @Joli.artist confronts the revelations emerging from the Epstein files and calls on listeners to reclaim their power in a world run by forces that depend on our collective silence and inaction.Joli dismantles the narrative that "nothing is going to happen," exposing it as deliberate psychological programming designed to keep people disempowered. She draws on evolutionary biology, the nature of cancer cells, and even goat farming to illustrate why antisocial elements must be removed from any functioning system, and why good people are not the exception but the biological norm.From the Milgram experiments to the French Revolution, Joli traces humanity's long history of exile as a survival mechanism, arguing that what we're witnessing today is no different. She challenges listeners to stop treating passivity as goodness, reject the "turn the other cheek" conditioning, and start putting points on the scoreboard for good, beginning with defending themselves.The episode builds toward a profound exploration of how perception shapes reality, drawing on the placebo and nocebo effects, Robert Anton Wilson's work, and the podcast's core thesis that we are living in a simulation that responds to what we hold in our minds.••Earth Is Presently Sick. We Must Become the Immune System. https://medium.com/@joli.artist/earth-is-presently-sick-we-must-become-the-immune-system-5bde9e0d4ad3 ••Key Insights from this Episode:• The Scoreboard of Good vs Evil: Joli reframes daily life as a simulation where every act of courage or cowardice tips the scales, and doing nothing when you witness harm is a point scored for evil.• Be Good With Teeth: Drawing from her own experience, Joli argues that kindness without boundaries enables abuse to spread, and that true goodness requires the willingness to fight back.• Cancer Cell Theory of Evil: Pedophiles, predators, and narcissists are not just bad people; they are cancerous cells in the human organism that must be identified and removed for the body to survive.• The Mind as Weapon and Shield: From placebo effects to collective meditation reducing crime rates, Joli makes the case that your mind is the most powerful tool you have, and that it is actively being weaponized against you.• Bloom in Hell: In a world designed to exhaust and demoralize, your existence and your actions matter right now, not in a thousand years. Be beautiful in spite of the dystopia, because that beauty is what inspires others to wake up.

What if gravity is just entropy in disguise? Professor Erik Verlinde joins me to argue that gravity isn't a fundamental force—it's thermodynamic, emerging from quantum information the way gas pressure emerges from molecules bouncing around. We explore why spacetime may be stitched together by entanglement, and how dark energy and dark matter both pop out automatically without extra particles or parameters. Verlinde explains why the cosmological constant problem is a red herring, and why there may be no final theory of physics. When asked where the universe comes from, his answer is one word: chaos. SUPPORT: - Support me on Substack: https://curtjaimungal.substack.com/subscribe - Support me on Crypto: https://commerce.coinbase.com/checkout/de803625-87d3-4300-ab6d-85d4258834a9 - Support me on PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=XUBHNMFXUX5S4 JOIN MY SUBSTACK (Personal Writings): https://curtjaimungal.substack.com LISTEN ON SPOTIFY: https://open.spotify.com/show/4gL14b92xAErofYQA7bU4e TIMESTAMPS: - 00:00:00 - Thermodynamic Gravity and Information - 00:06:35 - Beyond Effective Field Theory - 00:13:08 - Turtles All The Way Down - 00:25:41 - Entropy as a Force - 00:36:31 - Entanglement and Spatial Connectivity - 00:47:31 - Deriving Inertia and F=ma - 00:56:41 - De Sitter Space Challenges - 01:02:01 - Dark Matter and Milgram - 01:11:51 - The Emergence of Time - 01:21:01 - Statistical Gravity Fluctuations - 01:27:01 - Quantum Computational Complexity - 01:36:01 - Physics Intuition and Mentorship - 01:47:31 - Beauty, Garbage, and Chaos LINKS MENTIONED: Papers, books, websites: - https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=Tm64-J0AAAAJ - https://journals.aps.org/prb/pdf/10.1103/PhysRevB.4.3174 - https://arxiv.org/abs/1001.0785 - https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.02269 - https://journals.aps.org/pr/pdf/10.1103/PhysRev.47.777 - https://amazon.com/dp/0486600688?tag=toe08-20 - https://www.nature.com/articles/248030a0 - https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Translation:The_Field_Equations_of_Gravitation - https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9504004 - https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0603001 - https://arxiv.org/abs/1005.3035 - https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0106112 - https://arxiv.org/pdf/1408.3203 - https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.02087 - https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.08255 - https://www.ias.edu/sns/events/iaspctspgi-workshop-quantum-aspects-black-holes-and-spacetime - https://amazon.com/dp/0262533413?tag=toe08-20 Videos: - https://youtu.be/HIoviZe14pY - https://youtu.be/X4PdPnQuwjY - https://youtu.be/xZnafO__IZ0 - https://youtu.be/gEK4-XtMwro - https://youtu.be/-BsHh3_vCMQ - https://youtu.be/3mhctWlXyV8 - https://youtu.be/bprxrGaf0Os - https://youtu.be/zNZCa1pVE20 - https://youtu.be/ZUp9x44N3uE - https://youtu.be/2p_Hlm6aCok - https://youtu.be/kUHOoMX4Bqw - https://youtu.be/_yebLXsIdwo - https://youtu.be/Ve_Mpd6dGv8 - https://youtu.be/0YRlQQw0d-4 - https://youtu.be/Bnh-UNrxYZg - https://youtu.be/hF4SAketEHY - https://youtu.be/Iya6tYN37ow - https://youtu.be/0_Px5gbs9i0 - https://youtu.be/gsSJPLX-BTA - https://youtu.be/73IdQGgfxas - https://youtu.be/c8iFtaltX-s Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

POUR COMMANDER MA BANDE DESSINÉE PHILORAMA : Sur Amazon : https://amzn.to/4sVjMyxSur Fnac.com : https://tidd.ly/3NSSUyVChez Cultura : https://tidd.ly/4raBhcgDisponible aussi dans toutes les bonnes librairies à partir du 4 mars !

What if your entire life was shaped by something that wasn't even true? In this eye-opening message, we explore how false beliefs become false realities—and how those realities quietly shape our identity, our choices, and even our understanding of God. From the powerful psychological lessons of the Milgram experiment to Jesus' parable of the prodigal son in Gospel of Luke 15, this sermon challenges us to examine the narratives we've built in our own minds. The younger son believed: Freedom meant leaving his father Satisfaction meant spending everything Identity meant defining life on his own But sin always sells a dream and delivers a nightmare. When he “came to his senses,” everything changed. This message will challenge you to: Stop believing your own press Question the false narratives excusing sin or fear Refuse to let feelings become your authority Embrace your restored identity in Christ You are not still condemned. You are not still defined by your worst moment. You are not still wearing a scar God has already removed. “Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, the new creation has come: The old has gone, the new is here!” — Second Epistle to the Corinthians 5:17 God is calling you to leave false reality and step into the new and true reality He has prepared for you. If this message encouraged or challenged you, make sure to like, subscribe, and share it with someone who needs to come home.

POUR COMMANDER MA BANDE DESSINÉE PHILORAMA : Sur Amazon : https://amzn.to/4sVjMyxSur Fnac.com : https://tidd.ly/3NSSUyVChez Cultura : https://tidd.ly/4raBhcgDisponible aussi dans toutes les bonnes librairies à partir du 4 mars !

POUR COMMANDER MA BANDE DESSINÉE PHILORAMA : Sur Amazon : https://amzn.to/4sVjMyxSur Fnac.com : https://tidd.ly/3NSSUyVChez Cultura : https://tidd.ly/4raBhcgDisponible aussi dans toutes les bonnes librairies à partir du 4 mars !

POUR COMMANDER MA BANDE DESSINÉE PHILORAMA : Sur Amazon : https://amzn.to/4sVjMyxSur Fnac.com : https://tidd.ly/3NSSUyVChez Cultura : https://tidd.ly/4raBhcgDisponible aussi dans toutes les bonnes librairies à partir du 4 mars !

“It is the inconsistency of decisions which oftentimes bedevils a company's ultimate success. You create that consistency. You can also push decisioning down from the C-suite into the next operating level. That creates dynamism and speed in decision-making. Speed in decision-making creates faster turns in the capital in the business,” says Andrew Milgram, managing partner and chief investment officer of Marblegate Asset Management. Milgram discusses how his firm works with portfolio companies to improve processes for better operational outcomes in this episode of the State of Distressed Debt podcast. In his hour-plus conversation with Bloomberg Intelligence's Noel Hebert and Phil Brendel, Milgram shares his perspective on how Marblegate's direct-investing approach and focus on the middle market de-emphasizes the credit cycle. He also discusses First Brands Group, liability management exercises and his outlook for 2026. The podcast concludes with BI's Negisa Balluku joining to break down the latest legal developments at First Brands and Serta, followed by a discussion with Brendel and Hebert around Saks' DIP battle with Amazon and Axonic.

In this episode, Stacey Milgram Plotska, VP of Operations and Implementations at Actabl, shares how hotel technology delivers the best results when it's set up and used the right way. This conversation is a deep dive into what needs to happen, including the implementation, onboarding, training, and systems required to support ongoing learning and adoption. Stacey breaks down how strong technology partnerships work, what hotel teams need to do to succeed, and where some organizations struggle. If you care about driving performance, empowering teams, and getting real value from your technology investments, this conversation offers a clear, practical perspective.Resources:Request a conversation with Actabl about what Stacey shared hereRequest a product demo from ActablActabl customer story: Fast Track to Financial Visibility: How Commonwealth Hotels Quickly Activated ProfitSword Across More Than 40 HotelsActabl customer story: Future-Ready Hospitality: Hotel Equities Invests in the Actabl Platform to Scale with PurposeActabl customer story: Better Together: How We Aligned Hotel Operations, Staffing & Financial Performance with Actabl - Steven Marais, Noble House Hotels & ResortsActabl customer story: How Hospitality America's CEO Ben Campbell Makes Work a Team SportPodcast: The Secret to Unlocking Performance: Your Technology Partner's Customer Success Team - Megan Yagoda Kaplan, ActablPodcast: The Magic Wand Question: Building Digital Night Audit (and Hotel Tech That Matters)Hospitality Daily is brought to you with support from Mews, the operating system for hospitality that replaces fragmented systems with one connected way to manage reservations, payments, revenue, and guest service. Listen to my recent conversation with Mews founder Richard Valtr for a deep dive on what's happening with AI and hotel tech today. A few more resources: If you're new to Hospitality Daily, start here. You can send me a message here with questions, comments, or guest suggestions If you want to get my summary and actionable insights from each episode delivered to your inbox each day, subscribe here for free. Follow Hospitality Daily and join the conversation on YouTube, LinkedIn, and Instagram. If you want to advertise on Hospitality Daily, here are the ways we can work together. If you found this episode interesting or helpful, send it to someone on your team so you can turn the ideas into action and benefit your business and the people you serve! Music for this show is produced by Clay Bassford of Bespoke Sound: Music Identity Design for Hospitality Brands

POUR COMMANDER MON LIVRE : Sur Amazon : https://amzn.to/3ZMm4CY Sur Fnac.com : https://tidd.ly/4dWJZ8O

Show featured sponsor:  Precision Holsters.   Check out the new Vanquish!  In this episode of the American Warrior Show, Rich Brown sits down with TC Fuller for a deep, uncomfortable, and necessary conversation about obedience, authority, and moral responsibility. Using Stanley Milgram's famous obedience experiments and Christopher Browning's book Ordinary Men, Rich and TC break down how average, everyday people—not monsters—can be led to commit acts they never believed themselves capable of. This episode explores: Why people obey authority even when it violates their moral compass How peer pressure and normalization override conscience The concept of the "agentic state" and why responsibility gets outsourced Why "just following orders" is one of the most dangerous phrases in history What warriors, leaders, instructors, and armed citizens must do to resist blind compliance This isn't a history lesson—it's a warning. For warriors, protectors, and leaders, the takeaway is clear: Character, moral courage, and independent thinking must be trained—deliberately—or they will fail under pressure. If you carry responsibility—for a weapon, a badge, a team, or a family—this episode will challenge how you think about obedience, leadership, and your own decision-making under authority.

POUR COMMANDER MON LIVRE : Sur Amazon : https://amzn.to/3ZMm4CY Sur Fnac.com : https://tidd.ly/4dWJZ8O

POUR COMMANDER MON LIVRE : Sur Amazon : https://amzn.to/3ZMm4CY Sur Fnac.com : https://tidd.ly/4dWJZ8O

POUR COMMANDER MON LIVRE : Sur Amazon : https://amzn.to/3ZMm4CY Sur Fnac.com : https://tidd.ly/4dWJZ8O

Join host Jeff on this wide-ranging Friday edition of Right On Radio as he dissects the week's biggest stories, plays audio clips, and issues practical spiritual and survival advice. Jeff opens by reacting to the World Economic Forum and its globalist messaging, explores the theme of sovereignty, and warns listeners about how maps and power are shifting in the emerging New World Order. The episode gives a clear primer on psychological warfare: Jeff summarizes classic experiments (Asch conformity study, Milgram obedience, Stanford prison) and modern dynamics (social-media algorithms, false dilemmas, the Cartman drama triangle, zealous hero worship, controlled opposition, and the Hegelian dialectic). He explains how these forces narrow perception, stoke fear and tribalism, and manipulate public opinion — and previews a forthcoming teaching video that will go deeper into these concepts. Featuring notable clips and commentary, Jeff plays and reacts to segments from Yuval Harari on AI and “religions of the book,” and a short Trump clip outlining alleged strategies to entrench single-party rule via immigration and voting changes. He connects Harari's warning to a practical takeaway: own physical Bibles and don't rely solely on digital sources. Light moments include a short comedy clip about beer and hormones from U.S. scientists. Practical preparedness is a recurring theme — Jeff issues cold-weather/ice-storm warnings, recommends quality inverter generators or wood stoves, and shares tips for preventing frozen-pipe damage. He also promotes Telegram as an algorithm-free way to follow Right On Radio content. On money and stewardship, Jeff outlines his three core investment categories: investing in human capital and businesses, caution around stock-market and crypto exposure, and prioritizing real estate for cash flow. He discusses precious and industrial metals (silver, gold, copper), CBDC concerns, recent bank/central-bank headlines, and why some financial shifts could presage broader systemic change. Political and geopolitical notes include talk of RICO-style accountability, grand juries, the Board of Peace and its implications for Israel and regional power, plus a mention of Mark Carney and global finance. Jeff closes with community announcements — Sunday Bible study, Telegram prayer calls, and offers of coaching and resources for listeners wanting help with business or real-estate investing. Expect a mix of analysis, biblical perspective, practical prepping advice, and provocative audio clips — all aimed at helping Right On Radio listeners think critically, steward resources wisely, and prepare spiritually and practically for turbulent times. Want to Understand and Explain Everything Biblically?  Click Here: Decoding the Power of Three: Understand and Explain Everything or go to www.rightonu.com and click learn more.  Thank you for Listening to Right on Radio. Prayerfully consider supporting Right on Radio. Click Here for all links, Right on Community ROC, Podcast web links, Freebies, Products (healing mushrooms, EMP Protection) Social media, courses and more... https://linktr.ee/RightonRadio Live Right in the Real World! We talk God and Politics, Faith Based Broadcast News, views, Opinions and Attitudes We are Your News Now. Keep the Faith

Was the shooting of Renee Nicole Good murder or self-defense? We use this case as a clear, real-world test of state power. Craig and Larken Rose ask how far a badge can go before our Christianity must say “stop.” The point is not to chase outrage, but to measure authority by the words of Jesus. God first, always. You'll hear a step-by-step look at the key moments on video, why the second and third shots matter most, what “watch his feet” reveals, why a doctor was turned away, and how “Have you not learned?” exposes a culture of fear. We connect those details to why people defend obvious wrongs, how training can overpower conscience, and a simple, repeatable test for Christians: one moral standard for everyone, no special pass for uniforms, God over government. Listen to get a clean framework you can use the next time the state uses force. You will leave with plain language, Scripture touchpoints, and the courage to put God first when the badge and the Bible collide. 

The Story Science Forgot: Why Psychotherapy Needs Narrative More Than Ever by Joel Blackstock LICSW-S MSW PIP no. 4135C-S | Dec 15, 2025 | 0 comments Joseph Campbell is arguably one of the most influential intellectuals of the twentieth century. If you have watched a Marvel movie or read a modern fantasy novel or sat in a screenwriter's workshop you have encountered his fingerprints. George Lucas explicitly credited Campbell's The Hero with a Thousand Faces as the structural backbone of Star Wars. Every major Hollywood studio has copies of his work floating around their development offices. Even filmmakers who actively deconstruct his monomyth model still have to be in conversation with Campbell to do so. You cannot escape him if you are telling stories in the Western tradition. But here is the thing about Joseph Campbell that we need to hold in our minds when we think about what psychology has become. He was a showman. He was a legitimate scholar but also someone who understood that the truth sometimes needs a little theatrical assistance. The Showman and the Bear Bones One of Campbell's favorite presentation techniques involved showing an image of ancient bear bones that were perhaps two million years old and discovered in a cave. The bones had been arranged in a particular way with pieces shoved back into the bear's mouth. Campbell would present this with his characteristic gravitas and explain that the ancients understood that nature must eat of itself. They knew that to take life is to participate in a cyclical loop of giving and receiving. The bear consuming itself was a ritual recognition that we are all food for something else. It is a beautiful interpretation. It is probably even partially true. We know through depth psychology and early anthropology that prehistoric humans were almost certainly trying to make meaning of existential realities. Ritual practices around death and consumption are well documented across cultures. Campbell was not fabricating this from nothing. But also come on Campbell. These are two million year old bones shoved in a hole. Maybe the jaw just collapsed that way. Maybe soil shifted. Maybe an animal disturbed them centuries after burial. He did not know. He could not know. And yet he presented it with the confidence of revealed truth. Here is why this matters. Campbell's influence is incalculable despite his methodological looseness. He told a story that resonated so deeply with something in the human psyche that it became the invisible architecture of our entire entertainment industry. He was not objectively right about those bear bones but he was pointing at something real about how humans make meaning. The story he told about that meaning making was more powerful than any peer reviewed paper could have been. We need to remember this when we think about psychotherapy and what it has become. The Dream I Had and the World I Found When I first entered the field of psychotherapy I had a fantasy. I thought I was going to be Joseph Campbell. I was going to find my way to someplace like Berkeley and immerse myself in the grand conversation between psychology and mythology and anthropology and philosophy. I imagined something like the Esalen Institute in the 1970s where Fritz Perls developed Gestalt therapy and where researchers and mystics and clinicians sat together in hot springs and argued about the nature of consciousness. Those places barely exist anymore. What I found instead was a competitive model built on H-indexes and impact factors. I found academic departments that had been siloed into increasingly narrow specializations. Each department defended its territorial boundaries against incursion from neighboring disciplines. The institute model where a psychologist might spend an afternoon talking to an anthropologist about ritual has been systematically dismantled. What we have instead are specialists who do not read outside their sub specialty and researchers whose entire careers depend on defending one narrow hypothesis. We have an incentive structure that actively punishes the kind of cross pollination that leads to genuine discovery. The Hollow Room: How the Biomedical Model Fails This is not just an academic inconvenience. It is a catastrophe for the human sciences and for the actual treatment of patients. There is a reason Freud stuck around. It is not because psychoanalysis was rigorously validated through randomized controlled trials. It is because as the science writer John Horgan observed old paradigms die only when better paradigms replace them. Freud lives on because science has not produced a theory of and therapy for the mind potent enough to render psychoanalysis obsolete once and for all. The biomedical model promised us a better story. It told us that humans are biological machines and that suffering is just a mechanical malfunction. It promised that if we could just find the right neurotransmitter or the right gene we could fix the machine. But look at what that looks like in practice. It looks like the 15 minute medication management appointment. A person comes in with their life falling apart. They are grieving a divorce or wrestling with the trauma of their childhood or facing a crisis of meaning. And the doctor looks at a checklist. They ask about sleep. They ask about appetite. They ask about energy levels. They treat the symptoms like check engine lights on a dashboard. They prescribe a pill to dim the lights and they send the person away. It looks like manualized Cognitive Behavioral Therapy. This is the gold standard of evidence based treatment. But in the vacuum of a manual it becomes absurd. A patient might be crying about the loss of a child and a therapist who is strictly adhering to the protocol has to redirect them to the agenda for Module 3 which is identifying cognitive distortions. The model has no room for the tragedy of the situation. It only has room for the erroneous thought that the patient is having about the tragedy. The result is that by most measures we are not actually helping people more effectively than we were fifty years ago. To understand the depth of this failure, we must look at the “smoking gun” of the psychiatric establishment: the STAR*D study. For nearly two decades, this massive, taxpayer-funded study was held up as the irrefutable proof that the “medication merry-go-round” worked. It cost $35 million and was cited thousands of times to justify the idea that if a patient didn't get better on one antidepressant, you simply switched them to another, and then another. The study claimed a “cumulative remission rate” of 67%. It told us that two-thirds of people would be cured if they just complied with the protocol. This was a lie built on methodological quicksand. A forensic re-analysis of the data (Pigott et al., 2023) revealed that the researchers had inflated their success rates through a series of stunning methodological sleights of hand. The original design called for the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) to be the primary outcome measure. But when that scale wasn't showing the numbers they wanted, investigators switched to a secondary, unblinded, self-report questionnaire (the QIDS-SR) which painted a rosier picture. Furthermore, the re-analysis exposed that hundreds of patients who dropped out due to side effects were excluded from the failure count, effectively scrubbing the negative data. Even worse, over 900 patients who didn't even meet the minimum severity for depression were included to boost the numbers. When the data was re-analyzed using the study's original criteria and including all participants, the cumulative remission rate plummeted from 67% to 35%. But the most damning statistic is the sustained recovery rate. Of the 4,041 patients who entered the trial, only a tiny fraction achieved remission and actually stayed well. When accounting for dropouts and relapses over the one-year follow-up period, a mere 108 patients achieved remission and stayed well without relapsing. That is a sustained recovery rate of 2.7%. If a heart surgery or cancer treatment had a failure rate of 97.3%, it would be abandoned. Yet, this study was championed by investigators with deep financial ties to the pharmaceutical industry, and the results were codified into clinical guidelines that still rule the profession today. This is the indictment: we have built an entire system of care on a statistical fabrication, prioritizing the protection of the model over the healing of the human. I have big problems with Freud. I have big problems with classical psychoanalysis. I am more of a Jungian. But here is what the depth psychologists understood that the biomedical model forgot. Humans are not just biological machines. We are meaning making creatures who navigate the world through story. When you take away our stories you do not make us more rational. You make us lost. The Flock of Dodos This separation of science from narrative has hurt the researchers too. In his book The Ghost Lab journalist Matt Hongoltz-Hetling uses the flock of dodos metaphor to describe this phenomenon. He argues that specialized creatures that are perfectly adapted to narrow environments become extinct when conditions change. Academic science has become a flock of dodos. A neuroscientist studies one particular brain region. A psychologist studies one particular therapeutic intervention. An anthropologist studies one particular culture. Nobody is allowed to step back and ask what all of this means together. When you silo information into separate academic disciplines instead of organizing it into a holistic understanding you kill the narratives that are already there. You cannot see the story until you step back far enough to recognize the pattern. Heidegger and the AI Bubble One of the primary functions of a subjective narrative in an objective field like psychotherapy is that it lets us start with things we consider self evident. These are things that do not need evidence because they are the ground upon which evidence stands. Things like humanity is important. Things like we contain multiplicities and conflicting parts. Things like consciousness is a mystery. The biomedical model has no way to accommodate these self evident truths because they are not measurable. You cannot run a randomized controlled trial on human dignity. Martin Heidegger understood this trajectory. He warned that science and technology were becoming self justifying systems that asked only whether something could be done and never whether it should be done. We are watching this play out right now with Large Language Models and Artificial Intelligence. The tech industry is boiling seawater and consuming enormous amounts of our remaining resources to build ever larger systems. As Ed Zitron has documented the current AI boom is likely a bubble that will crash and burn. It may leave us with a Google monopoly on Gemini that will not actually help anybody. Should we be doing this? Should we be fundamentally restructuring our economy around technology whose benefits are speculative at best? The Heideggerian answer is that we are not even capable of asking these questions properly because we have lost the narrative framework within which “should” makes sense. When everything is reduced to capability and efficiency the concept of values disappears. The Perennial and the Possible Can we just recognize that having a livable planet is probably a self evidencing goal? Can we recognize that having a psychotherapy willing to engage with perennial philosophy might be more valuable than another meta analysis demonstrating small effect sizes for manualized interventions? This is what I mean by reintroducing narrative. I do not mean replacing evidence with myth. I mean recognizing that the facts do not speak for themselves. Data requires interpretation. Interpretation requires a framework. And frameworks are stories about what matters. The story science forgot is the story of science itself. It is the story of how inquiry emerged from human communities trying to understand their world. We can recover this story. We can rebuild the connections that the academic silos have severed. The path is there. It always has been. We just need to be brave enough to walk it. The Exodus of the Sick If academic science has become a flock of dodos clinical practice has become something arguably worse. It has become a reenactment of the Milgram experiment where the system plays the role of the authority figure and the patient plays the victim. We often remember Stanley Milgram's famous 1961 study as a lesson about the capacity for evil but its deeper lesson was about the capacity for distance. When the subject had to physically touch the victim compliance with the order to harm them dropped to 30 percent. The White Coat only retained its authority when it created a buffer between the human actions and their consequences.   Modern psychotherapy has built a massive administrative White Coat that separates the healer from the healed. This is not just a metaphor. It is a structural reality that is actively driving patients out of the profession and into the arms of pseudoscience. The Bureaucracy as Trauma For a patient in crisis the Evidence Based system often functions as a machine of exclusion. A study on healthcare administrative burdens reveals that the psychological cost of navigating billing and insurance denials and intake forms acts as a friction that hits the most vulnerable the hardest. We ask trauma survivors to retell their stories to three different intake coordinators before they ever see a therapist. This process is itself retraumatizing. When they finally reach a provider they are often met with the biomedical gaze which is a checklist driven assessment that reduces their complex narrative of suffering to a code for billing. As the Australian Psychological Society has noted the chemical imbalance theory and the medicalization of distress have failed to reduce stigma and have instead left patients feeling defective and unheard. The result is a profound Low Trust environment. Theodore Porter in his book Trust in Numbers argues that we only rely on strict mechanical numbers when we do not trust people. We use the DSM and manualized protocols because insurers do not trust clinicians to judge and clinicians do not trust themselves to deviate. The Great Split: Why Research and Practice Are Divorcing This creates a fundamental schism that explains why the profession feels like it is cracking in half. On one side you have the academic researchers who are incentivized by grant funding and publication metrics. To get these rewards they must isolate variables and create reproducible manualized protocols. This means they must strip away the very thing that makes therapy work which is the messy and unrepeatable human relationship. On the other side you have the clinicians who are incentivized by patient outcomes. They are in the room with the messiness. They see that the manualized protocol fails the complex trauma patient so they improvise. They integrate. They use intuition. The academic looks at the clinician and sees a cowboy who ignores the data. The clinician looks at the academic and sees a bureaucrat who has never treated a suicidal patient. This is why the research is no longer informing the practice. We have created two different languages. The researcher speaks in p-values and population averages while the clinician speaks in case studies and individual breakthroughs. Why Pseudoscience Wins the Trust War This low trust environment creates a vacuum that wellness influencers are all too happy to fill. We often mock the public for turning to unverified supplements and TikTok diagnosticians and quantum mysticism. But we have to ask what these influencers are providing that we are not. They are providing narrative. They are providing connection. They are providing a. parasocial yes but still, High Trust experience. A recent analysis suggests that wellness fads thrive not because people are stupid but because the influencers offer a feeling of personal validation that the medical system denies. Even AI chatbots are now being described by users as more humane than doctors because the AI listens to the whole story without looking at a watch or a checklist. When a patient is told by a doctor that their pain is idiopathic or psychosomatic because it does not show up on a lab test and then an influencer tells them I see you and I believe you and here is a story about why this is happening the patient will choose the influencer every time. The trust gap drives them away from care that might actually help and toward solutions that feel good but do nothing. The Clinician's Moral Injury This leaves the ethical psychotherapist in a state of moral injury. We are forced to participate in a system that we know is alienating the very people we are trying to help. We are trained to value the therapeutic alliance or the bond of trust above all else yet we work in a system designed to sever it with paperwork and time limits and standardized protocols. We have to put down the White Coat of administrative distance. We have to stop hiding behind the Evidence Based label when that label is being used to deny the reality of the person in front of us. Proposals for a Unified Future If we want to stop this exodus and heal the split we need specific structural changes. We cannot just hope for better insurance reimbursement. We need to change what we consider valid science. First we must re-legitimize the systematic case study. For a century the detailed narrative of a single patient was the gold standard of learning. We replaced it with the aggregate data of the randomized controlled trial. We need to bring it back. We need journals that publish rigorous detailed accounts of what actually happens in the room when a patient gets better. Second we need to build open source repositories for clinical observation. Currently the wisdom of the field is locked behind for profit paywalls or lost in the private notes of isolated therapists. We need a Wikipedia of Clinical Practice where thousands of clinicians can document what they are seeing in real time. If ten thousand therapists report that somatic processing helps complex trauma that is a data set that rivals any RCT. Third we need to teach philosophy and narrative in graduate school again. We are training technicians when we should be training healers. A therapist who knows how to read a spreadsheet but does not know how to understand a story is useless to a human being in crisis. If we do not offer a therapy that is human and narrative and deeply relational we will continue to lose our patients to those who do even if what they are offering is a lie. The Mirror and the Map: Why Math is a Story We often treat mathematics as if it were the bedrock of reality itself. We act as though a p-value is a piece of the universe, like a rock or a proton. But we must remember that math is not the thing itself. It is a representation of the thing. It is a map, not the territory. It is a mirror, not the face. Theodore Porter's work in Trust in Numbers reminds us that we reach for these mirrors when we do not trust our own eyes. But the mirror is useless without someone to look into it and interpret the reflection. Data by itself is pointless. It is a pile of bricks without an architect. It requires interpretation to become meaning, and interpretation is fundamentally a narrative act. When we try our best to make a purely objective study, we are still telling a story. We are saying, “These numbers represent this phenomenon.” Then another researcher comes along, looks at the same numbers, and tells a different story: “No, they represent that.” This conflict isn't a failure of science; it is science. The Storytellers of Science The greatest breakthroughs in history did not come from people who just crunched numbers. They came from people who could see the story the numbers were trying to tell. These stories are really damn interesting, often stranger and more beautiful than fiction. Consider August Kekulé. He didn't discover the structure of the benzene molecule by staring at a spreadsheet. He discovered it by dreaming of a snake eating its own tail—the Ouroboros. His subjective, narrative brain provided the image that unlocked the objective chemical reality. The data was there, but it needed a myth to make it intelligible. Look at Quantum Physics. The raw math of quantum mechanics is cold and abstract. But when physicists like Erwin Schrödinger or Werner Heisenberg looked at that data, they saw a story about uncertainty, about cats that are both alive and dead, about a universe that only decides what it is when it is observed. They didn't just calculate; they interpreted. They told a story about reality that was so radical it changed how we understand existence. Even in psychology, the data of the “talking cure” was messy and anecdotal until Freud and Jung gave us the language of the Unconscious and the Archetype. Were they objectively “right” in every detail? No. But they gave us a framework—a story—that allowed us to navigate the chaos of the human mind. They provided the map that allowed us to enter the territory. The Final Integration We have spent the last fifty years trying to strip this storytelling capacity out of our profession in a misguided attempt to be taken seriously by the “hard” sciences. In doing so, we have thrown away our most powerful tool. The brain is a story-processing machine. To treat it with checklists and spreadsheets is to deny its fundamental nature. We need to be brave enough to pick up the mirror again. We need to be brave enough to look at the data—whether it's the 2.7% recovery rate of STAR*D or the trembling pupil of a trauma patient—and ask, “What is the story here?” The path forward isn't about choosing between science and narrative. It is about realizing that science is a narrative. It is the grandest, most complex, most rigorous story we have ever tried to tell. And it is time we started telling it properly again.   More @ https://gettherapybirmingham.com/

In 1963, the Milgram experiments revealed something unsettling.  Most people kept administering what they believed were painful electric shocks, not because they wanted to, but because they couldn't bring themselves to say no.  In this episode, my guest shares why we agree to extra projects, unpaid favours and unreasonable requests even when we know we shouldn't.  I'm joined by behavioural scientist and physician Dr Sunita Sah of Cornell University. She studies how social pressure and conflict-of-interest disclosures can quietly steer us toward yes. --- Read Sunita's book Defy: https://amzn.to/48LsreG  Unlock the Nudge Vaults: https://www.nudgepodcast.com/vaults Join 10,428 readers of my newsletter: https://www.nudgepodcast.com/mailing-list  Connect on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/phill-agnew/  --- Today's sources:  Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4), 371–378. Sah, S. (2025). Defy: The power of no in a world that demands yes. One World. Sah, S., Loewenstein, G. F., & Cain, D. M. (2013). The burden of disclosure: Increased compliance with distrusted advice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(2), 289–304. Sah, S., Loewenstein, G. F., & Cain, D. M. (2019). Insinuation anxiety: Concern that advice rejection will signal distrust after conflict of interest disclosures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(7), 1099–1112. Woodzicka, J. A., & LaFrance, M. (2001). Real versus imagined gender harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 57(1), 15–30.

John explores the shocking hidden history of the “Billion Soul Harvest” movement, revealing how its roots stretch far deeper than the New Apostolic Reformation. Drawing from Cold War politics, postwar psychological experiments, and William Branham’s authoritarian theology, he traces how government fear tactics and revivalist propaganda merged into a global dominionist agenda. Along the way, he connects the dots between the Milgram obedience studies, Nixon’s “battle for the mind” speech, and the rise of prophetic generals who promised to win the world for Christ through control, not compassion. This episode exposes how the language of revival became the language of psychological warfare, transforming faith into a weapon.______________________Weaponized Religion: From Christian Identity to the NAR:Paperback: https://www.amazon.com/dp/1735160962 Kindle: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0DCGGZX3K ______________________– Support the channel: https://www.patreon.com/branham – Visit the website: https://william-branham.org

⏱️ El tema principal comienza en el minuto 33:14.En este episodio entramos en uno de los mecanismos más inquietantes de la historia moderna: La Máquina Social.Una fuerza invisible capaz de moldear sociedades enteras sin que estas lo perciban; un sistema de condicionamiento que transforma vecinos en vigilantes, periodistas en silencios, y naciones completas en engranajes obedientes.Parte 1 nos lleva a un viaje profundo:primero a Argentina en 1976, donde la dictadura militar convirtió el miedo en política, el silencio en método, y la obediencia en cultura nacional. Desde el “enemigo interno” hasta los Falcon verdes sin matrícula, desde las desapariciones hasta la guerra de Malvinas, reconstruimos cómo se ejecutó uno de los experimentos de ingeniería social más impactantes de América Latina.Luego saltamos a Estados Unidos para abrir otro expediente:Operation Mockingbird, el programa secreto donde la CIA transformó el periodismo en un instrumento de poder. Aquí entenderás cómo se cocinó la información durante décadas, cómo se fabricaron narrativas globales, y cómo nació la era del “fast-food informativo”, donde las ideas ya no se investigan… se ensamblan.Usamos ejemplos reales, documentos desclasificados, testimonios históricos y experimentos psicológicos —como Asch y Milgram— para mostrar por qué las sociedades obedecen, por qué repiten, por qué callan… y cómo ese condicionamiento aún funciona hoy.Este episodio no es sobre izquierdas o derechas.No es sobre política.Es sobre cómo se moldea la mente humana… y cómo se puede liberar.Bienvenido a La Máquina Social – Parte 1.Un episodio para quienes sospechan que el verdadero peligro no es que te mientan…sino que llegues a creer que la mentira siempre estuvo ahí.Para contactarnos directamente: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠conspiraciones21@protonmail.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

En mars 2025, une étude publiée dans la revue Cerebral Cortex par l'Université de Gand (Belgique) a exploré une question troublante : pourquoi continuons-nous à obéir à des ordres immoraux ? Pour le comprendre, les chercheurs ont analysé les réactions cérébrales et comportementales de participants confrontés à des décisions moralement discutables, données sous l'autorité d'un supérieur.Les résultats révèlent trois mécanismes principaux qui expliquent cette obéissance. D'abord, le cerveau réduit le sentiment de responsabilité personnelle. Ce phénomène, appelé “sens d'agency”, désigne la conscience d'être l'auteur de ses actes. Sous ordre, les participants avaient tendance à percevoir un délai plus long entre leur action (appuyer sur un bouton pour infliger une douleur simulée) et la conséquence. Ce simple allongement du temps perçu traduit un affaiblissement de la conscience morale : on se sent moins responsable parce qu'on exécute, on n'ordonne pas.Deuxième mécanisme : une diminution du conflit interne. En situation d'autorité, notre cerveau semble “court-circuiter” la dissonance morale. Normalement, lorsque nous faisons quelque chose de contraire à nos valeurs, nous ressentons une tension psychique. Or, dans l'expérience, cette tension diminuait nettement sous ordre. Autrement dit, obéir devient un moyen de se libérer du poids du dilemme : la responsabilité est transférée à celui qui commande.Enfin, les chercheurs ont observé une atténuation des réponses empathiques. Les zones cérébrales liées à la compassion et à la culpabilité s'activent beaucoup moins quand une action immorale est ordonnée par autrui. Cela signifie que la perception de la souffrance de la victime est atténuée, comme si le cerveau se protégeait du malaise moral en désactivant partiellement l'empathie.L'expérience a été menée sur des civils comme sur des militaires, et les résultats sont similaires dans les deux groupes : l'obéissance à l'autorité semble être un réflexe humain fondamental, profondément ancré dans notre fonctionnement cérébral.Ces travaux offrent un éclairage nouveau sur des phénomènes longtemps étudiés en psychologie, depuis les expériences de Milgram dans les années 1960. Ils montrent que la soumission à l'autorité ne relève pas seulement du contexte social, mais aussi d'un mécanisme neuropsychologique : l'autorité modifie notre rapport à la responsabilité et à l'empathie.En somme, nous obéissons parfois à des ordres immoraux non parce que nous sommes dénués de conscience, mais parce que notre cerveau, sous la pression d'une figure d'autorité, réorganise littéralement sa manière de percevoir le bien et le mal. Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

In this episode of the Jack Westin MCAT Podcast, Mike and Molly break down one of the highest-yield (and most commonly missed) topics in the entire Psych/Soc section:→ Experimental vs. Observational research→ When you can (and CANNOT) conclude causality→ Cross-sectional vs. longitudinal→ Cohort vs. case-control vs. case studies→ Prospective vs. retrospective→ Validity vs. reliability (internal vs. external + the dartboard analogy)→ Real AAMC examples (including the cocaine exposure passage)→ Classic studies: Phineas Gage, H.M., Milgram, Little Albert, Asch, Bobo doll, and moreIf you've ever picked the “causes” answer choice on an observational study and gotten wrecked, this episode is for you. Skill 3 (reasoning about research design & execution) shows up in EVERY section, but Psych/Soc is where it can make or break your score.Want to learn more? Shoot us a text at 415-855-4435 or email us at podcast@jackwestin.com!

Send us a textWelcome to today's between-the-seasons bonus episode, in which I explore the fascinating—and deeply challenging—findings of Stanley Milgram's famous Obedience to Authority experiments and consider what they reveal about human nature, authority, and morality from a biblical perspective.This post was originally made available as a special post for those who follow me on Patreon. patreon.com/JeremyMcCandlessMilgram's research highlights the unsettling reality of how easily people can obey authority figures, even to the point of causing harm to others. As Christians, these findings prompt us to reflect on humanity's inherent moral weakness, the biblical doctrine of original sin, and the importance of standing firm in God's truth when confronted with ethical dilemmas.We'll explore questions like:What do Milgram's experiments reveal about the human heart?How does this align with the Bible's teaching on original sin?How can Christians cultivate discernment and moral courage when pressured to conform?Study Notes for Today's EpisodeKey Themes:The Nature of Obedience: Milgram's research reveals humanity's tendency to conform to authority, even when it conflicts with personal conscience.Original Sin: This aligns with the biblical teaching that human nature is inherently flawed (Romans 5:12; Jeremiah 17:9).Moral Responsibility: Scripture emphasizes individual accountability for actions (Romans 14:12; Genesis 3).Resisting Sinful Authority: Christians are called to obey God over human leaders when moral conflict arises (Acts 5:29).Practical Takeaways:Cultivate a Biblically Informed Conscience: Regular study of Scripture (2 Timothy 3:16-17) and prayer help shape our moral compass.Rely on the Holy Spirit: God's Spirit empowers us to resist sinful authority and stand firm (Galatians 5:16).Lead by Example: Just as participants in Milgram's experiments were more likely to resist when others did, Christians are called to be salt and light (Matthew 5:13-16).Reflection Questions:How does understanding the doctrine of original sin help us make sense of Milgram's findings?Can you think of a time when you had to choose between following orders and doing what was right?How can you strengthen your moral courage in moments of ethical pressure?Thank you for joining metoday! As always, let's keep diving deeper into God's Word and applying its truth to the challenges of our modern world.BibliographyBiblical ReferencesRomans 5:12Romans 7:15Romans 8:13Catch On Fire PodcastsThis channel does a deep dive into the scriptures so as to teach what it means to be...Listen on: Apple Podcasts SpotifySupport the showTo listen to my monthly church history podcast, subscribe at; https://thehistoryofthechristianchurch.buzzsprout.com For an ad-free version of my podcasts plus the opportunity to enjoy hours of exclusive content and two bonus episodes a month whilst also helping keep the Bible Project Daily Podcast free for listeners everywhere support me at;|PatreonSupport me to continue making great content for listeners everywhere.https://thebibleproject.buzzsprout.com

Verantwortung zu übernehmen, kann unser Selbstbewusstsein stärken, weil es uns Erfolgserlebnisse bringen kann. Es zeigt, dass wir bereit sind, für die Konsequenzen unseres Handelns einzustehen. Aber ein "zu viel" an Verantwortung kann uns auch schaden.**********An dieser Stelle findet ihr die Übung:34:32:60 - Übung: Eine geleitete Meditation, um den eigenen Verantwortungsanteil zu reflektieren**********Quellen aus der Folge:Latane, B., & Darley, J. M. (1968). Group inhibition of bystander intervention in emergencies. Journal of personality and social psychology, 10(3), 215. Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. The Journal of abnormal and social psychology, 67(4), 371. **********Mehr zum Thema bei Deutschlandfunk Nova:Stressbewältigung: Achtsam durch die Rushhour des LebensPuffer gegen Stress: Achtsam erinnernAchtsamkeit: Gewaltfreie Kommunikation - so funktioniert es**********Den Artikel zum Stück findet ihr hier.**********Ihr könnt uns auch auf diesen Kanälen folgen: TikTok und Instagram .**********Ihr habt Anregungen, Ideen, Themenwünsche? Dann schreibt uns gern unter achtsam@deutschlandfunknova.de

Descripción para YouTube (AMADAG TV): ¿Qué haría un coche autónomo si tuviera que decidir entre atropellar a un grupo de personas o sacrificar a sus propios pasajeros? ¿Y si en ese grupo hay un niño, un anciano… o incluso un perro? En este episodio de AMADAG TV, exploramos uno de los dilemas más polémicos y fascinantes de la inteligencia artificial: el experimento Moral Machine del MIT. Una iniciativa que planteó millones de situaciones reales a personas de todo el mundo para descubrir cómo tomamos decisiones éticas cuando se trata de la vida y la muerte. Pero esto va más allá de la tecnología. Hablamos de moral, ética, sesgos, cultura y naturaleza humana. ¿Es lo mismo lo que consideramos “bueno” en España que en Japón o en América Latina? ¿Juzgarías igual a alguien de tu grupo que a un extraño? ¿Y por qué a veces las personas más éticas cometen actos inmorales? En este vídeo descubrirás: Cómo funciona el experimento Moral Machine y por qué sus resultados sorprendieron al mundo Qué decisiones morales tomamos dependiendo de la cultura, la edad o el rol social Qué revelan los monos capuchinos sobre nuestra percepción de la justicia El papel de la obediencia, el anonimato y la presión del grupo en nuestras decisiones Por qué deberíamos desconfiar de nuestra propia moral y apostar por la ética Además, te contamos cómo los sesgos culturales, el favoritismo intragrupo y nuestras emociones pueden distorsionar nuestras decisiones más importantes. Y lo más inquietante: ¿qué pasará cuando esas decisiones las tomen las máquinas? Si crees que tienes una brújula moral clara, este vídeo puede hacerte replantear todo. Porque la moral humana, cuando se mira de cerca… tiene más agujeros que un colador. Prepárate para cuestionarlo todo. Palabras clave (keywords) moral,máquina moral,dilemas éticos,dilema moral,ética,inteligencia artificial,coche autónomo,MIT moral machine,psicología moral,ética aplicada,sesgos morales,ética en tecnología,favoritismo grupal,obediencia a la autoridad,Milgram experimento,efecto espectador,capuchinos moralidad,cultura y moral,valores humanos,dilema del tranvía,ética en IA,comportamiento moral,justicia social,hipocresía moral,La Teoría de la Mente Hashtags #moralmachine, #éticaenIA, #dilemamoral, #psicologíamoral, #inteligenciaartificial, #AMADAGTV Nuestra escuela de ansiedad: www.escuelaansiedad.com Nuestro nuevo libro: www.elmapadelaansiedad.com Visita nuestra página web: http://www.amadag.com Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Asociacion.Agorafobia/ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/amadag.psico/ ▶️ YouTube Amadag TV: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC22fPGPhEhgiXCM7PGl68rw

Episode Summary: In this powerful episode, Paul Ward sits down with Arkady Milgram, a former Soviet citizen who risked everything to pursue freedom in America. Arkady shares his journey from growing up under communist rule to becoming a successful financial planner in California. Along the way, he reflects on the emotional moments of leaving his homeland, building a new life from scratch, and reuniting his family. His story is a heartfelt reminder that freedom comes at a cost—and with limitless opportunity. ⏱️ Timestamps + Topics 00:05 – Welcome from Paul Paul introduces Arkady Milgram, a Russian immigrant who built a life and career in America. 00:51 – Meet Arkady Milgram Arkady shares his gratitude and excitement to tell his story. 01:22 – Life in the Soviet Union Arkady describes his childhood under communist propaganda and his early curiosity about the West. 02:59 – Cracks in the Narrative Discover how an American magazine article helped shift Arkady's understanding of the U.S. 05:01 – The Dream of Leaving Learn how Arkady used Israel's “family reunification” program as a legal route to escape. 07:40 – The First Step to Freedom Arkady recalls the emotional moment stepping off the plane in Vienna—and realizing he was free. 09:14 – Stateless in Italy He explains the three-month transition in Rome, applying for refugee status in the U.S. 11:32 – Arriving in Los Angeles With support from distant relatives and Jewish organizations, Arkady begins his new life in LA. 13:41 – His First Job in America From unloading furniture in Hollywood to biochemistry work, Arkady dives into American work life. 15:35 – From Biochemistry to Business Why Arkady transitioned from lab work to entrepreneurship—and how he started a travel agency. 17:34 – Discovering Financial Planning Arkady finds his true calling helping others navigate personal finance through education. 20:25 – How to Reach Arkady He shares his phone number and open-door policy for financial conversations—no pressure, just help. 23:28 – Reuniting with Family Hear the emotional story of how he brought his parents and extended family to the U.S. 26:12 – A Love Letter to America Arkady closes with powerful reflections on freedom, family, and what it means to be American.

Seeing the better side of people sometimes requires a lot of faith. The large amount of negativity is built into the system for a reason. Teamwork is the physics of being human. We are designed like a relay. Now, it's our turn to carry the baton. No to noise, yes to duty. When your nervous system learns the altitude, things happen. Sitting in surplus can cause stress. Serving others is serving yourself. Insist on integrity always. The recurring loop of benefits from helping others. Milgram proved we look to others for change. Be your own architect. The factions were present at the Kirk memorial. Words and ideas should not be persecuted. The obvious and deliberate injustice of the Tina Peter's case. Precedents set can often be dangerous. We cannot survive a corrupt judiciary. Why has no one stated the obvious. The judge in the Peter's case was corrupt. Denial of appeal was because of Tina's speech. The judge admitted it. It goes so far beyond injustice. We need to talk more about elections soon. This stuff goes back to the 90's. Let's take it from the top, and see who controls the script. It's all part of the show.

Our moral taste receptors; Milgram's electric shock experiments; a friend's willingness to suffer: Discussing Mark 11:27-33, Zack explains why we should embrace God's authority.

Na década de 1960, Stanley Milgram conduziu um estudo psicológico notório sobre obediência à autoridade - visto, atualmente, como um experimento repleto de problemas éticos. Como foi esse experimento? Ele continua válido hoje?Confira o papo entre o leigo curioso, Ken Fujioka, e o cientista PhD, Altay de Souza.>> OUÇA (58min 55s)*Naruhodo! é o podcast pra quem tem fome de aprender. Ciência, senso comum, curiosidades, desafios e muito mais. Com o leigo curioso, Ken Fujioka, e o cientista PhD, Altay de Souza.Edição: Reginaldo Cursino.http://naruhodo.b9.com.br*APOIO: INSIDERIlustríssima ouvinte, ilustríssimo ouvinte do Naruhodo, neste momento INSIDER, vou dar uma opinião polêmica.Preparado? Então, toma essa: calças jeans são desconfortáveis.Eu usei calças jeans por anos a fio. Mesmo sentindo desconforto. Aquele tecido grosso, pouco maleável e que retém muito calor.Porque eu sempre achei calça social muito coxinha - não combinava comigo.Mas os meus problemas acabaram. Eu conheci a Calça FutureForm da INSIDER.Ela é o meio-termo perfeito: visual elegante, conforto real, com bolso funcional e tecido que não precisa passar. Tem conforto de moletom e cara de calça de sair. Vai do trabalho ao rolê sem trocar de roupa.É ou não é a calça ideal?Então fica aqui meu convite: experimente INSIDER e aproveite o desconto de 15% para ouvintes do NARUHODO.Para isso, o jeito mais fácil é usar o endereço: creators.insiderstore.com.br/NARUHODO - o cupom NARUHODO será aplicado automaticamente no carrinho.INSIDER: inteligência em cada escolha. #InsiderStore*REFERÊNCIASObedience to Autority - Milgramhttps://www.psicopolis.com/psicopedia/boxpdf/milgram2.pdfThe Perils of Obediencehttps://bxscience.edu/ourpages/auto/2013/2/7/66623602/Milgram-Obedience.pdfRevisitando Milgram:https://content.myconnectsuite.com/api/documents/ea54446ef72741eeba17f1d994f16829.pdfBehaviorism's Impact on Advertising: Then and Nowhttps://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1042&context=journalismdiss#:~:text=In%201913%2C%20John%20B.,(Buckley%2C%201982%2C%20p.John B. Watson at J. Walter Thompson: The Legitimation of "Science" in Advertising https://www.jstor.org/stable/4188763Stanley Milgram papershttps://archives.yale.edu/repositories/12/resources/4865An Experimental Study of the Small World Problem https://www.jstor.org/stable/2786545?origin=crossrefA banalidade do mal entre o direito e a internet: o discurso de ódio a partir de uma releitura arendtiana nas redes de relacionamento socialhttps://repositorio.ufmg.br/handle/1843/47862Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evilhttps://archive.org/details/arendt-hannah-eichmann-in-jerusalemZona de Interessehttps://www.adorocinema.com/filmes/filme-266159/Naruhodo #137 - O experimento da prisão de Stanford é uma fraude?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pyTbX9jmMWMNaruhodo #242 - O experimento do Parque dos Ratos ainda é válido?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rBI0twj0wD4Naruhodo #272 - Quais são os grandes desafios da psicologia no Brasil?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kxt23k6HCa0Naruhodo #304 - Como saber se uma pesquisa científica foi feita de forma ética?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-qrIWD_x2UNaruhodo #387 - Somos bons (ou maus) por natureza? - Parte 1 de 2https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fx37e0PUgY4Naruhodo #388 - Somos bons (ou maus) por natureza? - Parte 2 de 2https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xwAEaMyfm0Q*APOIE O NARUHODO!O Altay e eu temos duas mensagens pra você.A primeira é: muito, muito obrigado pela sua audiência. Sem ela, o Naruhodo sequer teria sentido de existir. Você nos ajuda demais não só quando ouve, mas também quando espalha episódios para familiares, amigos - e, por que não?, inimigos.A segunda mensagem é: existe uma outra forma de apoiar o Naruhodo, a ciência e o pensamento científico - apoiando financeiramente o nosso projeto de podcast semanal independente, que só descansa no recesso do fim de ano.Manter o Naruhodo tem custos e despesas: servidores, domínio, pesquisa, produção, edição, atendimento, tempo... Enfim, muitas coisas para cobrir - e, algumas delas, em dólar.A gente sabe que nem todo mundo pode apoiar financeiramente. E tá tudo bem. Tente mandar um episódio para alguém que você conhece e acha que vai gostar.A gente sabe que alguns podem, mas não mensalmente. E tá tudo bem também. Você pode apoiar quando puder e cancelar quando quiser. O apoio mínimo é de 15 reais e pode ser feito pela plataforma ORELO ou pela plataforma APOIA-SE. Para quem está fora do Brasil, temos até a plataforma PATREON.É isso, gente. Estamos enfrentando um momento importante e você pode ajudar a combater o negacionismo e manter a chama da ciência acesa. Então, fica aqui o nosso convite: apóie o Naruhodo como puder.bit.ly/naruhodo-no-orelo

"The Hidden Scripts Controlling Your Life – And How to Take Them Back" What if the way you parent, sell, lead, or even love… isn't really you? In this episode, Jeff Bloomfield is joined by Chase Hughes—former military interrogation trainer turned behavioral profiling expert—who reveals how your subconscious has been running scripts written when you were 8 years old. These hidden programs, designed for survival, are still dictating your daily decisions—unless you learn to rewrite them. Chase has trained Navy SEALs, Fortune 500 executives, and intelligence agencies on how to read, decode, and influence behavior ethically. From cult recruiters to AI that detects caregiver intent, Chase has seen—and built—it all. This conversation isn't just mind-opening. It's mind-reclaiming. If you've ever: walked away from a conversation, wondering why you said yes felt manipulated by media, leadership, or even your own emotions wanted to become more influential without being manipulative ...then this episode is your playbook. Chase reveals the tools used by cult recruiters, elite interrogators, and behavioral AI—and flips them for ethical everyday use. From leadership to parenting to sales, this episode is a masterclass in reclaiming your mental autonomy and becoming unhackable. Scripts Run You—Until You Rewrite Them Most adults live on autopilot, following behavioral programs formed between ages 2–12. Focus → Authority → Tribe → Emotion (F.A.T.E.) This 4-step behavioral model explains why people obey, comply, or conform—even against their own interests. Authority Is Internal, Not Hierarchical Real influence doesn't come from titles. It comes from confidence, discipline, leadership, gratitude, and joy. Tribalism Is Natural—and Dangerous Belonging keeps us alive. But when weaponized, it becomes a tool of division and manipulation. Micro-Tribes Shape Macro Decisions Social media is training us to mistake attention for connection and pleasure for happiness. You're More Suggestible Than You Think From cult recruiters to Kirby vacuum sales reps, Chase reveals how identity agreements are subtly formed—and exploited. Negative Dissociation = Identity Hack Labeling others (“those sheep”) makes you unconsciously adopt the opposite identity. It's how cults recruit—and how sales are made. AI Can Detect Intent in Caregivers Chase's latest work uses behavioral coding and neuroscience to teach AI how to detect malintent in caregivers with 98.4% accuracy. Novelty Creates Focus. Authority Seals Influence. The brain responds to the perception of authority—lab coats, titles, or confidence can all hijack trust. Ethical Persuasion Starts With Intent If someone could peek inside your mind and see your true motives—would they still say yes? 00:00 – Military roots, neuroscience passion, and Jeff's “Junk in the Brain Trunk” 06:00 – From high school failure to Navy to bestselling author 14:00 – Why childhood scripts control your adult life 22:00 – Tribalism and the dangers of digital identity traps 30:00 – Obedience: The terrifying truth behind the Milgram experiment 36:00 – The F.A.T.E. model and how behavior is truly shaped 44:00 – Cult recruiters and identity agreements explained 49:00 – Training AI for suicide hotlines and caregiver risk 53:00 – YouTube's Behavior Panel & Dr. Phil's surprising email 57:00 – The PsyOp Pandemic & why Chase's work exploded 59:00 – Real connection in an AI-generated world 1:00:00 – Final thoughts & where to find Chase's tools

My guest today is Andrew Milgram. Andrew is the founder of Marblegate Asset Management, an alternative investment firm that invests in credit opportunities and special situations. He joins me to discuss his unique approach to distressed investing in the middle market, revealing how middle market EBITDA has declined 20-25% since 2019, creating what he calls the "K-shaped economy." His investment stories are legendary, particularly his $600+ million bet on NYC taxi medallions, which we go into in great detail. We discuss Marblegate's approach to negotiation, sourcing deals directly from hundreds of regional banks, and understanding the human element in distressed situations. Please enjoy this conversation with Andrew Milgram. For the full show notes, transcript, and links to mentioned content, check out the episode page⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠here⁠⁠⁠.⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ----- This episode is brought to you by⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Ramp⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠. Ramp's mission is to help companies manage their spend in a way that reduces expenses and frees up time for teams to work on more valuable projects. Go to⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Ramp.com/invest⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ to sign up for free and get a $250 welcome bonus. – This episode is brought to you by⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Ridgeline⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠. Ridgeline has built a complete, real-time, modern operating system for investment managers. It handles trading, portfolio management, compliance, customer reporting, and much more through an all-in-one real-time cloud platform. Head to⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ridgelineapps.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ to learn more about the platform. – This episode is brought to you by⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ AlphaSense⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠. AlphaSense has completely transformed the research process with cutting-edge AI technology and a vast collection of top-tier, reliable business content. Invest Like the Best listeners can get a free trial now at⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Alpha-Sense.com/Invest⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ and experience firsthand how AlphaSense and Tegus help you make smarter decisions faster. ----- Editing and post-production work for this episode was provided by The Podcast Consultant (⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://thepodcastconsultant.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠). Show Notes: (00:00:00) Welcome to Invest Like the Best (00:04:58) Understanding the K-Shaped Economy (00:07:08) Middle Market Challenges and Data Insights (00:16:56) Distressed Investing Explained (00:25:06) The Taxi Medallion Investment Story (00:46:46) Navigating New York's Taxi Medallion System (00:47:17) Building Relationships with Regulators and Unions (00:50:22) Taking the Taxi Operation Public (00:51:26) The Future of Autonomous Vehicles and Medallions (00:54:30) Investment Strategies and Risk Management (00:58:41) Negotiation Principles and Human Drama (01:11:55) Personal Reflections and Formative Experiences (01:17:22) The State of the American Economy (01:23:29) Insights on Private Credit and Equity Markets (01:30:39) Future of Asset Management (01:33:16) The Kindest Thing Anyone Has Done For Andrew

Pourquoi des individus ordinaires peuvent-ils commettre l'irréparable simplement parce qu'on le leur a demandé ? Cette question troublante est au cœur de l'expérience de Milgram, menée au début des années 1960 à Yale. Le psychologue américain Stanley Milgram voulait comprendre jusqu'où une personne ordinaire pouvait aller par simple obéissance à l'autorité.Le principe était simple mais redoutable : des volontaires devaient administrer des chocs électriques à une autre personne (complice de l'expérience) chaque fois qu'elle répondait mal à une question. Les chocs devenaient de plus en plus puissants, et pourtant, près de 65 % des participants ont obéi jusqu'au bout, infligeant des douleurs fictives extrêmes, simplement parce qu'un chercheur en blouse blanche leur disait de continuer.Mais ce que Milgram avait mis en lumière, ce n'était pas une cruauté innée, mais un mécanisme profondément humain : la délégation de responsabilité. Face à une autorité perçue comme légitime, beaucoup cessent de se voir comme les auteurs de leurs actes. Ils obéissent, et transfèrent le poids moral de leurs gestes à celui qui donne l'ordre.Soixante ans plus tard, des chercheurs belges de l'université de Gand ont voulu pousser l'analyse plus loin : que se passe-t-il concrètement dans notre cerveau quand nous obéissons ? Grâce à l'imagerie cérébrale, ils ont observé que lorsqu'un individu reçoit un ordre, l'activité dans les zones du cerveau liées à la prise de décision autonome et au jugement moral diminue significativement.En d'autres termes, le cerveau “se met en veille” sur le plan moral lorsqu'il obéit. Les chercheurs ont aussi noté une baisse de l'activation dans le cortex préfrontal, une région-clé impliquée dans le raisonnement éthique et la réflexion personnelle. Résultat : nous ne ressentons pas la même culpabilité que si nous avions agi de notre propre chef.Plus surprenant encore, les chercheurs ont constaté que le simple fait de recevoir un ordre rendait les participants moins sensibles à la souffrance d'autrui. Comme si leur empathie était anesthésiée par la hiérarchie.Cela ne signifie pas que nous sommes tous des exécutants sans conscience, mais que notre cerveau est câblé pour privilégier la cohésion sociale et l'obéissance, parfois au détriment du libre arbitre. Historiquement, cela a pu être utile dans des groupes organisés. Mais dans certaines circonstances, cela peut mener au pire.Ainsi, que ce soit dans un laboratoire ou dans l'Histoire, l'obéissance n'est jamais neutre. Et comprendre comment notre cerveau y réagit, c'est se donner une chance d'y résister. Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

This week, we're diving deep into the mind games with Harvard professor and author Rebecca Lemov, because if you've ever wondered whether brainwashing is real, the answer is a very unsettling yes. In Part 1 of our convo, we're cracking open the origins of brainwashing—from communist re-education camps to the electric shock labs of the Milgram experiment—and asking why we still can't seem to prove it in court. Rebecca's new book, The Instability of Truth, peels back the layers of mind control and thought reform, including what went down with Patty Hearst, why Stockholm Syndrome isn't what you think it is, and how emotional trauma becomes the secret sauce in cult programming. We also get personal. NXIVM, anyone? The parallels between modern-day cults and Maoist “unity-criticism-unity” techniques are downright eerie... and maybe uncomfortably familiar. From groupthink to gaslighting to re-grounding in a new belief system, this episode might just mess with your head a little (in a good way). Trigger warning: once you see the matrix, it's hard to unsee it. Find more about Rebecca Lemov and The Instability of Truth at rebeccalemov.com. Also… let it be known that: The views and opinions expressed on A Little Bit Culty do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the podcast. Any content provided by our guests, bloggers, sponsors or authors are of their opinion and are not intended to malign any religion, group, club, organization, business individual, anyone or anything. Nobody's mad at you, just don't be a culty fuckwad. **PRE-ORDER Sarah and Nippy's newest book here Check out our lovely sponsors Join ‘A Little Bit Culty' on Patreon Get poppin' fresh ALBC Swag Support the pod and smash this link Cult awareness and recovery resources Watch Sarah's TEDTalk CREDITS:  Executive Producers: Sarah Edmondson & Anthony Ames Production Partner: Amphibian.Media Co-Creator: Jess Tardy Associate producers: Amanda Zaremba and Matt Stroud of Amphibian.Media   Audio production: Red Caiman Studios Theme Song: “Cultivated” by Jon Bryant co-written with Nygel Asselin  

Dans "La Désobéissance civile", H.D Thoreau pose une question radicale, toujours d'actualité : où s'arrête le devoir collectif et où commence la responsabilité individuelle ? Pour y répondre, il va remettre en cause la légitimité du fameux "contrat social" théorisé par de nombreux philosophes. Et nous amener au cœur d'une interrogation grave : respecte-t-on la Loi par amour de la justice ou bien par amour de l'ordre ?➔ Regardez la version vidéo de cet épisode : https://youtu.be/RjzX29-e-bg➔ Rejoignez-moi sur Patreon : https://www.patreon.com/ParoledephilosopheMembre du Label Tout Savoir. Régies publicitaires : PodK et Ketil Media._____________Hébergé par Ausha. Visitez ausha.co/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Maor Elbaz Sharinksy, Counsel General of Israel for Kansas and Missouri, On Meeting with Sarah Milgram's Family | 5-23-25See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

"If you're not standing out, you're blending in, and blending in is invisible." — Owen CookIn this high-energy episode, I sit down with Owen Cook, a global expert in communication, charisma, and networking. For over two decades, Owen has helped millions of men and entrepreneurs break social anxiety, master human connection, and build influence at the highest levels.We explore how to command attention in any room, become magnetic in conversations, and build real connections with high-status people, whether you're at a bar, boardroom, or billionaire event. If you want to be unforgettable, this is your tactical playbook.Episode Highlights00:00:00 – Trailer00:01:02 – Who is Owen Cook?00:05:27 – How anxious people can unlock social confidence00:12:06 – Subcommunication: influence without saying a word00:14:25 – Body language secrets that demand attention00:17:55 – Attracting powerful people without chasing them00:22:23 – Frame control that pulls people toward you00:26:08 – Attracting high-profile relationships00:39:24 – Give value first to gain respect00:46:52 – Script to connect with anyone instantly00:50:20 – Conversation openers that always get results00:57:08 – Influence others without trying too hard01:00:10 – Host events that make people remember you01:03:12 – Fast-track your way into elite circles01:09:47 – Milgram experiment and the power of pressure01:13:32 – How your brain secretly filters reality01:21:01 – The one habit every man needsAbout Owen CookOwen Cook is a social dynamics expert, personal growth speaker, and co-founder of Real Social Dynamics. For over 20 years, he has taught high-performance communication, influence, and charisma to people around the world. Owen is known for helping men overcome anxiety, develop confidence, and connect with authenticity in both dating and business. Today, he runs global events and content channels that reach millions.Connect with Owen CookInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/owencook/?hl=enYouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@OwenCookFollow me on Instagramhttps://www.instagram.com/morgantnelsonSubscribe to my YouTube channelhttps://www.youtube.com/@morgantnelson/featuredWant the tools that helped me make $1M by 28?Grab my FREE Life By Design productivity planner:https://planner.morgantnelson.com/optinplannerJoin the Dream Out Loud Facebook Communityhttps://bit.ly/49QXClW

What do all these things have in common? All are psychological experiments that you were conducted with conclusions you need to know about! Are they being used today? What do they say about us and society at large? Let's look at these and see if there is anything we see in ourselves and what it says about those around us.Email us at: downtherh@protonmail.com

What do all these things have in common? All are psychological experiments that you were conducted with conclusions you need to know about!Are they being used today? What do they say about us and society at large? Let's look at these and see if there is anything we see in ourselves and what it says about those around us.Email us at: downtherh@protonmail.com

“The best manipulators in the world make you feel like it's your own decision.” — Chase HughesIn this electrifying episode, I sit down with Chase Hughes. Former Navy intelligence operator, behavioural scientist, and the world's leading authority on human influence, interrogation, and behaviour profiling. We dive deep into the dark arts of persuasion, how cult recruiters work, and the science behind brainwashing. Then we flip it all to show how YOU can use these tactics to reclaim your mind, build self-esteem, and live with unshakable confidence. This one's part masterclass, part mind trip.Whether you want to protect yourself from manipulation, become more influential in business and relationships, or just understand how your brain really works, this episode is a must.Episode Highlights: 00:01:30 – Intro: Chase's Navy background and skill set 00:03:58 – Anyone can be manipulated 00:06:50 – Our brains do not have a mental firewall 00:07:17 – How social media uses fractionation to hypnotise you? 00:10:49 – Make anyone more suggestible using emotion loops 00:13:47 – How does a cult leader attract his crowd? 00:17:15 – Spot manipulators using facial expressions 00:20:32 – One question that reveals a narcissist 00:24:42 – Detect hidden brainwashing 00:28:40 – How cults keep followers loyal & obsessed? 00:31:59 – Milgram experiment: how obedience trumps morals 00:33:39 – Cult Control Tactics: Ash experiment 00:37:33 – Identity traps people in relationships 00:41:40 – How to help someone being manipulated? 00:44:30 – Identify the masks & fears you're hiding within 00:55:42 – Why do people wear the ‘pity' mask? 00:57:16 – Red flags that indicate you are being controlled 00:58:50 – MK Ultra files 01:05:17 – Does MK Ultra still secretly exist? 01:11:39 – Learn to build real self-esteem 01:17:50 – A daily habit to build self-esteem 01:23:37 – Brainwash Yourself for Confidence & Success 01:34:13 – The Neuroscience of Manifesting Focus 01:38:43 – Beat comfort zone traps & stay motivated About Chase Hughes:Chase Hughes is a decorated U.S. Navy veteran and former intelligence operations specialist with two decades of service aboard classified missions. Today, he's the world's top expert in behaviour profiling, persuasion, interrogation, and influence. He's trained elite military units, top CEOS, law enforcement, and therapists on mastering human behaviour and uncovering deception.Chase is the author of multiple bestsellers, including The Ellipsis Manual and the creator of groundbreaking systems in behaviour science used by intelligence agencies worldwide.Connect with Chase:https://www.instagram.com/chasehughesofficial/?hl=enFollow me on Instagram herehttps://www.instagram.com/morgantnelsonSubscribe to my YouTube channelhttps://www.youtube.com/@morgantnelson/featuredWant to manage your life the same way that helped me make $1 million by 28 and travel the world at the same time?Grab my FREE one-page Life By Design productivity planner below⁠https://planner.morgantnelson.com/optinplannerJoin the Dream Out Loud Facebook Communityhttps://bit.ly/49QXClW

00:02:10 - 00:45:00Zelensky's Puppet Strings Cut But EU Demands War, Hegseth Walks Back No NATO MembershipGerman Chancellor Scholz says EU won't have “dictated peace” and defense ministers across the EU say they will step up arms to EUDid Hegseth misspeak or did the Trump White House go wobbly?Ukraine is decimating the population after it was already in a demographic death spiral (to be replaced by the usual migrants)Will Hegseth continue to support the “Defend the Guard Act”?00:47:34 LIVE comments from listeners 00:55:26 - 01:15:14 "AI Obedience: The New Milgram Experiment in a Digital AgeA groundbreaking study merges the Milgram and Asch experiments, using AI to simulate both an authoritative figure and peer influence. The results reveal a disturbing trend: humans are overly trusting of AI, even when it admits to its own limitations. This blind trust echoes historical deference to technology, now amplified by AI's ability to mimic intelligence.Another Christian teacher fights orders to lie to parents and children about transgender groomingSeparation of school and state01:14:15 LIVE comments from listeners 01:18:07 - 01:25:44Trump Appoints Bill Gates “One Health” Veterinarian as “Pandemic Czar”A globalist “public health” veterinarian with ties to defense, Homeland Security, and HHS has been reported to be Trump's pick to head the White House Office of Pandemic Preparedness created after the first plandemic fraud.  He also has ties to Bill Gates' “One Health” initiative.  Who better to push BigPharma into farms as they plan to feed us the mRNA in another orchestrated health crisis. 01:27:39 - 01:30:23 LIVE comments from listeners 01:30:23 - 01:34:17Love on a Budget: Heartfelt vs. Heartless Celebrations on Valentine's Day Valentine's Day spending neared $26 billion last year but love doesn't require an expensive display but rather thoughtful, heartfelt gestures.  Here's some alternative ideas that are low-cost or no-costWill we fight the cultural pressure to isolate ourselves from each other?  The "romantic deficit" in modern society01:34:17 - 01:43:55CDC Pivots From Abortion to Adoption But Will RFKj Stop the Horror of the Abortion Pill?The CDC has altered its search results, now directing users searching for "abortion" to consider "adoption" instead.  But will the CDC still engage in mass murder via pandemic and vaccination fraud?One Woman's Horrific Experience with the Abortion PillThe Miracle of Life:A moment of awe is introduced with the mention of a literal "flash of light" when sperm fertilizes an egg, linking this to philosophical and religious perspectives on life's sanctity.Genetics vs. Destiny:The example of a man who defied genetic predictions of Alzheimer's. This serves as a counterpoint to the mechanistic, genetic deterministic views that might justify abortion based on genetic forecasts01:43:56 - 01:51:47 Silicon Valley's New God: Anti-Christ or Jesus Christ?Mainstream media would have you believe the transhumanist billionaire Peter Thiel and others like the NIH's Francis Collins are leading a Christian revival.01:51:52 - 01:58:29Elon Musk's Child Tells Trump to 'Shut Your Mouth'In a bizarre twist at the White House, Elon Musk's four-year-old son, known simply as "X," made headlines not for his unique name but for his audacious behavior towards former President Donald Trump. During a meeting in the Oval Office, young X was caught on video telling Trump to "shut your mouth" and, in a moment that seemed ripped from "The Twilight Zone," suggested Trump wasn't the president and should "go away.” 01:58:58The Shocking Truth of Brian Mock's January 6th OrdealBrian Mock, who went to DC with peaceful intentions, describes a day filled with government-orchestrated chaos and a subsequent nightmare of legal persecution.      He represented himself in court and in the process of discovery was able to obtain hidden evidence, some of which was leaked, that he hopes will result in exposing the corruption.      He is joining with others to bring accountability for those who rigged the court process as well as the bureau of prisons that violated the law, holding people illegally beyond their release dateIf you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-show Or you can send a donation throughMail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @DavidKnightShow@protonmail.comCash App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Money should have intrinsic value AND transactional privacy: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverFor 10% off Gerald Celente's prescient Trends Journal, go to TrendsJournal.com and enter the code KNIGHTBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

Sunita Sah (Defy: The Power of No in a World That Demands Yes) is an author, award-winning, tenured professor at Cornell University, and expert in organizational psychology. Sunita joins the Armchair Expert to discuss living up to the Sanskrit meaning of her name, why Milgram's electric shock experiment pushed her to pursue psychology, and how some of the wildest and offtrack people she knows are doctors. Sunita and Dax talk about how speaking up when you see something happening to someone else is a communal act, how Dax goes straight from tension to defiance, and whether defiance is evolutionarily maladaptive. Sunita explains the five elements that define a true yes, how we can reduce stress by clarifying and acting in alignment to our values, and tells the story of her mother's defiance that surprised her and taught her hope. Follow Armchair Expert on the Wondery App or wherever you get your podcasts. Watch new content on YouTube or listen to Armchair Expert early and ad-free by joining Wondery+ in the Wondery App, Apple Podcasts, or Spotify. Start your free trial by visiting wondery.com/links/armchair-expert-with-dax-shepard/ now.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

#574: What would you do if someone in authority told you to do something that felt wrong? Most of us like to think we'd speak up, push back, stand our ground. But research tells a very different story. In fact, when Yale researchers conducted a famous experiment in the 1960s, they found that 65% of people would administer what they believed to be deadly electric shocks to another human being... simply because someone in a lab coat told them to. Today's guest has spent over 15 years studying why humans comply with authority - even when every fiber of our being is screaming that we shouldn't. And when it comes to our money, this tendency to comply with authority figures - from financial advisors to real estate agents to car salespeople - can cost us dearly. Dr. Sunita Sah began her career as a physician in the UK's National Health Service. During one particularly exhausting period as a junior doctor, she agreed to meet with a financial advisor who had contacted her at work. That meeting sparked questions that would shape the rest of her career: Why did she feel pressured to trust this advisor, even after learning he had a conflict of interest? Today, she's a tenured professor at Cornell University, where her groundbreaking research on compliance and influence has been featured in The New York Times and Scientific American. She's advised government agencies, served on the National Commission on Forensic Science, and helps leaders understand the psychology behind why we say "yes" when we really want to say "no." Whether you're meeting with a financial advisor, negotiating the price of a home, or discussing rates with a contractor, understanding the psychology of compliance could save you thousands of dollars - and help you make better financial decisions. Today's conversation isn't just about psychology - it's about protecting your wealth by learning when and how to say "no." Resources Mentioned in the Episode: - Website: sunitasah.com - Newsletter: Defiant by Design on Substack - Connect with Dr. Sah on LinkedIn - Follow Dr. Sah on Instagram About Dr. Sunita Sah Dr. Sunita Sah is a tenured professor at Cornell University specializing in organizational psychology. Her research focuses on how and why people comply with authority, even against their better judgment. A former physician in the UK's National Health Service, Dr. Sah brings a unique perspective to understanding human behavior and decision-making. Her work has been featured in leading publications including The New York Times and Scientific American, and she has served as a Commissioner on the National Commission on Forensic Science. Timestamps: Note: Timestamps will vary on individual listening devices based on dynamic advertising run times. The provided timestamps are approximate and may be several minutes off due to changing ad lengths. 0:00 Intro 4:00 Most people follow authority against their own judgment 7:01 Dr. Sah meets a pushy financial advisor as a young doctor 9:55 Why conflict-of-interest disclosures backfire 12:16 "Insinuation anxiety" makes us cave under pressure 14:13 The "sales pitch effect" creates unwanted obligation 17:29 Growing up conditioned to comply as a South Asian daughter 20:34 Career paths: following passion vs family expectations 27:29 The Milgram experiments reveal our tendency to obey 35:28 Using "quiet defiance" to resist pressure 42:20 Why managers misunderstand employee silence 46:43 Five elements that separate consent from compliance 53:03 Building defiance through small daily practices 58:13 The power of the pause in decision-making 1:02:54 Five stages to recognize and act on resistance 1:18:22 How to develop your personal style of defiance For more information, visit the show notes at https://affordanything.com/episode574 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices