Podcasts about Pavlov

Master Your Mind: The NLP Anchoring Technique That Changes Everything

In this episode of the Mind Mountain Podcast, we chat with the tallented Emmy Lan. Emmy, a national titleholder with impressive elite race results, shares her journey in mountain biking. We explore how she maintains fun and light-heartedness during back-to-back races, the importance of internal focus over external comparisons, and balancing life with racing. This episode uncovers Emmy's mental strategies, her approach to training on and off the bike, and the significance of small goals and patience in achieving peak performance. Join us for insights, tips, and inspiring stories for anyone chasing progression on or off the trails.00:18 Introducing Emmy Lan: Rising Star in Mountain Bike Racing01:13 Emmy's Recent Race Successes and Community Impact02:21 Challenges and Strategies in Back-to-Back Races05:03 Emmy's Journey: From Struggles to Success08:23 The Importance of Balance in Life and Racing10:08 Navigating the Elite Racing Scene14:07 Training and Strength Building for Peak Performance18:41 Mental Strategies and the Role of Community Support21:32 Joining a Factory Team: Experiences and Learnings28:04 Pavlov's Positive Stimulus Response28:41 Pre-Race Rituals and Anchors29:25 The Power of Keywords30:21 Maintaining Control and Confidence33:14 Breathing Techniques for Racing35:31 Handling Pressure and External Influences40:37 Adapting to Unplanned Changes42:18 Balancing School and Racing48:39 Upcoming Races and Goals53:22 Final Thoughts and Acknowledgements___________________________

Interview Summary So, you two, along with a number of other people in the field, wrote a chapter for a recently published book called The Handbook of Children and Screens. We discussed that book in an earlier podcast with its editors, Dmitri Christakis and Kris Perry, the executive director of the Children and Screens organization. And I'd like to emphasize to our listeners that the book can be downloaded at no cost. I'd like to read a quote if I may, from the chapter that the two of you wrote. 'Screen time continues to evolve with the advent of continuous and immersive video reels, voice activated assistance, social media influencers, augmented and virtual reality targeted advertising. Immersive worlds where children can virtually shop for food and beverages, cook or work in a fast-food outlet from a smartphone, a tablet, a computer, or an internet connected tv and more.' So as much as I follow the field, I still read that and I say, holy you know what. I mean that's just an absolutely alarming set of things that are coming at our children. And it really sounds like a tidal wave of digital sophistication that one could have never imagined even a short time ago. Amanda, let's start with you. Can you tell us a little bit more about these methods and how quickly they evolve and how much exposure children have? I think you're right, Kelly, that the world is changing fast. I've been looking at screen media for about 20 years now as a researcher. And in the earlier years, and Tom can attest to this as well, it was all about TV viewing. And you could ask parents how much time does your child spend watching TV? And they could say, well, they watch a couple shows every night and maybe a movie or two on the weekend, and they could come up with a pretty good estimate, 1, 2, 3 hours a day. Now, when we ask parents how much time their children spend with media, they have to stop and think, 'well, they're watching YouTube clips throughout the day. They're on their smartphone, their tablet, they're on social media, texting and playing all these different games.' It really becomes challenging to even get a grasp of the quantity of screen time let alone what kids are doing when they're using those screens. I will say for this book chapter, we found a really great review that summarized over 130 studies and found that kids are spending about three and a half or four hours a day using screens. Yet some of these studies are showing as high as seven or eight hours. I think it's probably under-reported because parents have a hard time really grasping how much time kids spend on screens. I've got a one-year-old and a five-year-old, and I've got some nieces and nephews and I'm constantly looking over their shoulder trying to figure out what games are they playing and where are they going online and what are they doing. Because this is changing really rapidly and we're trying to keep up with it and trying to make sure that screen time is a safe and perhaps healthy place to be. And that's really where a lot of our research is focused. I can only imagine how challenging it must be to work through that landscape. And because the technology advances way more quickly than the policies and legal landscape to control it, it really is pretty much whatever anybody wants to do, they do it and very little can be done about it. It's a really interesting picture, I know. We'll come back later and talk about what might be done about it. Tom, if you will help us understand the impact of all this. What are the effects on the diets of children and adolescents? I'm thinking particularly when Amanda was mentioning how many hours a day children are on it that three to four hours could be an underestimate of how much time they're spending. What did kids used to do with that time? I mean, if I think about when you and I were growing up, we did a lot of different things with that time. But what's it look like now? Well, that's one of the important questions that we don't really know a lot about because even experimental studies that I can talk about that look at reducing screen time have not been very good at being able to measure what else is going on or what substitutes for it. And so, a lot of the day we don't really know exactly what it's displacing and what happens when you reduce screen time. What replaces it? The assumption is that it's something that's more active than screen time. But, you know, it could be reading or homework or other sedentary behaviors that are more productive. But we really don't know. However, we do know that really the general consensus across all these studies that look at the relationship between screen time and nutrition is that the more time children spend using screens in general, the more calories they consume, the lower the nutritional quality of their diets and the greater their risk for obesity. A lot of these studies, as Amanda mentioned, were dominated by studies of television viewing, or looking at television viewing as a form of screen use. And there's much less and much more mixed results linking nutrition and obesity with other screens such as video games, computers, tablets, and smartphones. That doesn't mean those relationships don't exist. Only that the data are too limited at this point. And there's several reasons for that. One is that there just haven't been enough studies that single out one type of screen time versus another. Another is what Amanda brought up around the self-report issue, is that most of these studies depend on asking children or the parents how much time they spend using screens. And we know that children and adults have a very hard time accurately reporting how much time they're using screens. And, in fact when we measure this objectively, we find that they both underestimate and overestimate at times. It's not all in one direction, although our assumption is that they underestimate most of the time, we find it goes in both directions. That means that in addition to sort of not having that answer about exactly what the amount of screen time is, really makes it much tougher to be able to detect relationships because it adds a lot of error into our studies. Now there have been studies, as I mentioned, that have tried to avoid these limitations by doing randomized controlled trials. Including some that we conducted, in which we randomized children, families or schools in some cases to programs that help them reduce their screen time and then measure changes that occur in nutrition, physical activity, and measures of obesity compared to kids who are randomized to not receive those programs. And the randomized trials are really useful because they allow us to make a conclusion about cause-and-effect relationships. Some of these programs also targeted video games and computers as well as television. In fact, many of them do, although almost all of them were done before tablets and smartphones became very common in children. We still don't have a lot of information on those, although things are starting to come out. Most of these studies demonstrated that these interventions to reduce screen use can result in improved nutrition and less weight gain. And the differences seen between the treatment and control groups were sometimes even larger than those commonly observed from programs to improve nutrition and increased physical activity directly. Really, it's the strongest evidence we have of cause-and-effect relationships between screen use and poor nutrition and risk for obesity. Of course, we need a lot more of these studies, particularly more randomized controlled studies. And especially those including smartphones because that's where a lot of kids, especially starting in the preteen age and above, are starting to spend their time. But from what we know about the amount of apparent addictiveness that we see in the sophisticated marketing methods that are being used in today's media, I would predict that the relationships are even larger today than what we're seeing in all these other studies that we reviewed. It's really pretty stunning when one adds up all that science and it looks pretty conclusive that there's some bad things happening, and if you reduce screen time, some good things happen. So, Amanda, if you know the numbers off the top of your head, how many exposures are kids getting to advertisements for unhealthy foods? If I think about my own childhood, you know, we saw ads for sugar cereals during Saturday morning cartoon televisions. And there might have been a smattering if kids watch things that weren't necessarily just directed at kids like baseball games and stuff like that. But, and I'm just making this number up, my exposure to those ads for unhealthy foods might have been 20 a week, 30 a week, something like that. What does it look like now? That is a good question. Kelly. I'm not sure if anyone can give you a totally accurate answer, but I'll try. If you look at YouTube ads that are targeting children, a study found that over half of those ads were promoting foods and beverages, and the majority of those were considered unhealthy, low nutritional value, high calorie. It's hard to answer that question. What we used to do is we'd take, look at all the Saturday morning cartoons, and we'd actually record them and document them and count the number of food ads versus non-food ads. And it was just a much simpler time in a way, in terms of screen exposure. And we found in that case, throughout the '90s and early 2000s, a lot of food ads, a lot of instances of these food ads. And then you can look at food placement too, right? It's not an actual commercial, but these companies are paying to get their food products in the TV show or in the program. And it's just become much more complicated. I think it's hard to capture unless you have a study where you're putting a camera on a child, which some people are doing, to try to really capture everything they see throughout their day. It's really hard to answer, but I think it's very prolific and common and becoming more sophisticated. Okay, thanks. That is very helpful context. Whatever the number is, it's way more than it used to be. Definitely. And it also sounds as if and it's almost all for unhealthy foods, but it sounds like it's changed in other ways. I mean, at some point as I was growing up, I started to realize that these things are advertising and somebody's trying to sell me something. But that's a lot harder to discern now, isn't it with influencers and stuff built in the product placements and all that kind of stuff. So, to the extent we had any safeguards or guardrails in the beginning, it sounds like those are going to be much harder to have these days. That's right. It really takes until a child is 6, 7, 8 years old for them to even identify that this is a commercial. That this is a company that's trying to sell me something, trying to persuade. And then even older children are having to really understand those companies are trying to make money off the products that they sell, right? A lot of kids, they just look at things as face value. They don't discriminate against the commercial versus the non-commercial. And then like you're suggesting with social influencers, that they're getting paid to promote specific products. Or athletes. But to the child that is a character or a person that they've learned to love and trust and don't realize, and as adults, I think we forget sometimes too. That's very true. Amanda, let me ask about one thing that you and Tom had in your chapter. You had a diagram that I thought was very informative and it showed the mechanisms through which social media affects the diet and physical activity of children. Can you describe what you think some of the main pathways of influence might be? That figure was pretty fun to put together because we had a wonderful wealth of knowledge and expertise as authors on this chapter. And people provided different insight from the scientific evidence. I will say the main path we were trying to figure out how does this exposure to screen really explain changes in what children are eating, their risk for obesity, the inactivity and sedentary behavior they're engaging in? In terms of food, really what is I believe the strongest relationship is the exposure to food advertisement and the eating while engaging in screen time. You're getting direct consumption while you're watching screens, but also the taste preferences, the brand loyalty that's being built over time by constantly seeing these different food products consistently emerge as one of the strongest relationships. But we identified some other interesting potential mechanisms too. While kids are watching screens or engaging in screens, there's some evidence to indicate that they're not able to read their body as well. Their feelings of hunger, their feelings of satiety or fullness. That they're getting distracted for long periods of time. Also, this idea of instant gratification, just like the reward process of instant gratification with using the screen. They're so interactive. You can go online and get what you want and reach what you want. And the same thing is happening with food. It becomes habitual as well. Children get off of school and they go home, and they grab a snack, and they watch tv or they watch their YouTube clips or play their games. And it becomes an eating occasion that may not have otherwise existed. But they're just associating screen time with eating. There's some evidence even on screen time impacting inhibition and controlling impulse and memory. And that's more emerging, but it's interesting to just consider how this prolonged screen time where you're not interacting with someone in person, your eyes are focused on the screen, might actually be having other cognitive impacts that we may not even be aware of yet. If we ask the question why Is screen time having a bad impact on children and their diets? It's almost let us count the ways. There are a lot of possible things going on there. And speaking of that, there's one question in particular I'd like to ask you, Tom. Certainly marketing might affect what kids prefer. Like it might make them want to have a cereal or a beverage A or snack food B or whatever it happens to be. But could it also affect hunger? How much kids want to eat? I mean, you think, well, hunger is biological, and the body sends out signals that it's time to eat. How does that all figure in? The research suggests it can. Advertising in particular but even non-advertising references or images of food can trigger hunger and eating whether or not you felt hungry before you saw them. And I'm guessing almost everyone's experienced that themselves, where they see an image of food, and all of a sudden, they're craving it. It can be as simple as Pavlov's dogs, you know, salivating in response to cues about food. In addition, I think one of the mechanisms that Amanda brought up is this idea that when you're distracted with a screen, it actually overruns or overwhelms your normal feelings of fullness or satiety during eating. When distracted, people are less aware of how much they're eating. And when you're eating while using a screen, people tend to eat until they've finished the plate or the bag or the box, you know? And until that's empty, till they get to the bottom, instead of stopping when they start to get full. Well, there's sort of a double biological whammy going on there, isn't there? It is affecting your likelihood of eating in the first place, and how hungry you feel. But then it also is affecting when you stop and your satiety happening. And you put those two together there's a lot going on, isn't there? Exactly. And it's really one of the reasons why a lot of our programs to reduce weight gain and improve nutrition really put a lot of emphasis on not eating in front of screens. Because our studies have shown it accounts for a large proportion of the calories consumed during the day. Oh, that's so interesting. Amanda, you mentioned influencers. Tell us a little bit more about how this works in the food space. These social influencers are everywhere, particularly Instagram, TikTok, et cetera. Kids are seeing these all the time and as I mentioned earlier, you often build this trusting relationship with the influencer. And that becomes who you look to for fads and trends and what you should and shouldn't do. A lot of times these influencers are eating food or cooking or at restaurants, even the ones that are reaching kids. As you analyze that, oftentimes it's the poor nutrition, high calorie foods. And they're often being paid for the ads too, which as we discussed earlier, kids don't always realize. There's also a lot of misinformation about diet and dieting, which is of concern. Misinformation that could be harmful for kids as they're growing and trying to grow in a healthy way and eat healthy foods. But kids who may look to overly restrict their foods, for example, rather than eating in a healthier manner. So that's definitely a problem. And then also, oftentimes these social influencers really have these unattainable beauty standards. Maybe they're using a filter or maybe they are models or whatnot. They're projecting these ideal body images that are very difficult and sometimes inappropriate for children to try to attain. Now, we've seen this in other forms, right? We've seen this in magazines going back. We've seen this on websites. But now as soon as a kid turns on their smartphone or their tablet and they're online, it's in front of them all the time. And, and they're interacting, they're liking it, they're commenting and posting. I think the social influencers have just really become quite pervasive in children's lives. Somebody who's an influencer might be recording something that then goes out to lots and lots of people. They're eating some food or there's some food sitting in the background or something like that. And they're getting paid for it, but not saying they're getting paid for it. Probably very few people realize that money is changing hands in all of that, I'm suspecting, is that right? Yes, I do believe they're supposed to do hashtag ad and there are different indicators, but I'm not sure the accountability behind that. And I'm also not sure that kids are looking for that and really understand what that means or really care what that means. Okay. Because they're looking to sense what's popular. But there's an opportunity to perhaps further regulate, or at least to educate parents and kids in that regard that I think would be helpful. Tom, while we're on this issue of conflicts of interest, there was recent press coverage, and then there were reports by reporters at the Washington Post and The Examination showing that the food industry was paying dieticians to be influencers who then posted things favorable to industry without disclosing their funding. How big of a problem do you think this is sort of overall with professionals being paid and not disclosing the payments or being paid even if they disclose things. What kind of a negative impact that's having? Yes, I find it very concerning as you would guess, knowing me. And I believe one of the investigations found that about half of influencers who were being paid to promote foods, drinks, or supplements, didn't disclose that they were paid. It was quite a large magnitude. It goes throughout all types of health professionals who are supposed to be sources of quality information and professional organizations themselves which take advertising or take sponsorships and then don't necessarily disclose it. And you know in this day when we're already seeing drops in the public's trust in science and in research, I think this type of information, or this type of deception just makes it a lot worse. As you know, Kelly, there's quite a bit of research that suggests that being paid by a company actually changes the way you talk about their products and even conduct research in a way that's more favorable to those products. Whether you think it does or not, whether you're trying to be biased or not. Tom, just to insert one thing in my experience. If you ask people in the field, does taking money from industry affect the way scientists do their work and they'll almost always say yes. But if you say, does it influence your work, they'll almost always say no. There's this unbelievable blind spot. And one might conclude from what you were telling us is that disclosure is going to be the remedy to this. Like for the half of people who didn't disclose it, it would be okay if they took the money as long as they disclosed it. But you're saying that's obviously not the case. That there's still all kinds of bias going on and people who are hearing some disclosure don't necessarily discount what they're hearing because of it. And it's still a pretty bad kettle of fish, even if disclosure occurs. It's especially pernicious when it doesn't, but it seems even when disclosure happens, it's not much of a remedy to anything. But you may not agree. No, I definitely agree with that. And that's only, you know, part of it too because there's the other side of the audience that Amanda brought up as well. And in particular what kids, but also adults, how they react to disclosures. And, while it's been possible to teach people to recognize potential bias, you know, when there's a disclosure. And to make people aware, which is a good thing, we want disclosure, I guess, so people are aware to be more vigilant in terms of thinking about what biases may be in the messages. There's not much evidence that teaching people that or making them aware of that changes their behavior. They still believe the advertising. Right. They still act in the same way. It's still just as persuasive to them. One more little editorial insertion. The thing that has always puzzled me about disclosure is that it implies that there's something bad going on or else, why would you have to disclose it? And the solution seems not to disclose it, but not to do the bad thing. And it's like, I could come up and kick you in the leg, but it's okay if I disclose that I kick you in the leg. I mean, it just makes no sense to me. But let me move on to something different. Amanda, I'd like to ask you this. I assume the food industry gets a lot more impact and reach per dollar they spend from when the only option was to run ads on national television and now, they're doing things at much less expense, I think, that can have, you know, orders of magnitude more impact and things. But is my perception correct? And how do you think through that? I think of it like the Tupperware model, right? You're building these trusted local or national celebrities, spokespeople for kids. Oftentimes these young adults or teenagers who are doing funny things and they're engaging, and so you're building this trust like you did with the Tupperware. Where you go and train people to go out to people's homes and their neighbors and their friends and their church and sell the product. It's really similar just in an online space. I think you're right; the cost is likely much less. And yet the reach and even the way these influencers are paid is all about the interaction, the likes, the comments, that sort of thing. The reposts. It's become quite sophisticated, and clearly, it's effective because companies are doing this. And one other thing to mention we haven't talked about yet is the food companies themselves have hired young people who use humor as a way to create a following for the different brands or products. It's not a person now, it's either the branded character or the actual company itself. And I think that has great influence of building some loyalty to the brand early in life. So that child is growing up and not only persuading their parents to purchase these products, but as they have more disposable income, they're going to continue purchasing the product. I wonder if Edward Tupper or I don't know if I remember his first name right, but I wonder if you could have ever imagined the how his plastic invention would permeate more of society than he ever thought? Tom, what about the argument that it's up to parents to decide and to monitor what their children are exposed to and the government needs to back off. Oh, it would be so nice if they were that easy, wouldn't it? If we could depend on parents. And I think every parent would love to be able to do that. But we're talking about individual parents and their kids who are being asked to stand up against billions, literally billions and billions of dollars spent every year to get them to stay on their screens as long as possible. To pay attention to their marketing, as Amanda was talking about the techniques they use. And to really want their products even more. If you could think of a parent with endless knowledge and time and resources, even they are really unable to stand up to such powerful forces working against them. Unfortunately, and this is not unique to the issues of screens in children's health, but really many of the issues around health, that in the absence of government regulation and really lack of any oversight, this really difficult job is dumped on parents. You know, not their choice, but it's sort of in their lap. We still try and help them to be better at this. While we're waiting for our elected representatives to stand up to lobbyists and do their jobs, we still in a lot of our interventions we develop, we still try and help parents as well as schools, afterschool programs, teachers, health professionals, develop the skills to really help families resist this pool of media and marketing. But that shouldn't be the way it is. You know, most parents are really already doing the best they can. But it's drastically unfair. It's really an unfair playing field. That all makes good sense. We've been talking thus far about the negative impacts of media, but Amanda, you've done some work on putting this technology to good use. Tell us about that if you will. I do enjoy trying to flip the script because technology is meant to help us, not harm us. It's meant to make our lives more efficient, to provide entertainment. Now with video chatting, to provide some social connection. A lot of my work over the past 20 years has been looking at what's commercially available, what kids are using, and then seeing let's test these products or these programs and can we flip them around to promote healthier eating? To promote physical activity? Can we integrate them for kids who are in a weight management program? Can we integrate the technology to really help them be successful? It doesn't always work, and we certainly aren't looking to increase screen time, but we also need to recognize that achieving zero hours of screen time is really unattainable pretty much universally. Let's try to evaluate the screen time that is being used and see if we can make it healthier. A few examples of that include when the Nintendo Wii came out about 18 years ago now. I was part of a group that was one of the first to test that video game console system because up until that point, most of the games you sat down to play, you held a remote in your hand. There were Dance Dance Revolution games and arcade halls so you could do a little bit of movement with games. But pretty much they were sedentary. Nintendo Wii came out and really changed a lot because now you had to get up off the couch, move your body, move your arms and legs to control the game. And we found it cut across all demographics. Men, women, boys, girls, different age groups. There was content available for a lot of different groups. These types of games became really popular. And I did some of the earlier studies to show that at least in a structured program that kids can engage in what we call moderate levels of physical activity. They're actually moving their bodies when they play these games. And over time, I and others have integrated these games into programs as a way to be an in with kids who may not be involved in sports, may not go outside to play, but they're willing to put on a video game and move in their living room at home. Building from that, we've developed and tested various apps. Some of these apps directly reach the parents, for example, teaching the parents. These are strategies to get your child to eat healthier. Prepare healthier meals, grocery shop, be more physically active as a family. We've looked at different wearables, wristwatches that can help kids and parents. Maybe they'll compete against each other to try to get the most steps of a day and that sort of thing. And then some of my recent work is now integrating chatbots and artificial intelligence as ways to provide some tailored feedback and support to kids and families who are looking to be more physically active, eat healthier. And then one study I'm really excited about uses mixed reality. This is virtual reality where you're putting on a headset. And for that study we are integrating children's homework that they would otherwise do on their Chromebook. And we're removing the keyboard and computer mouse so that they now have to use their body to click and point and drag and move the screen. And these are just a few examples. I do not think this is the magical solution. I think as Tom alluded to, there are different levels of government regulation, educating parents, working with schools. There's working with the food industry. There's a lot that we need to do to make this a healthier media space for kids. But I think this is something we should be open to, is figuring out if people are going to spend a lot of time using screens, what can we do to try to make those screens healthier? You make me smile when I'm hearing that because all these things sound really exciting and like there's plenty of potential. And you're right, I mean, if they're going to be on there anyway, maybe there can be some positive way to harness that time. And those all sound really important and really good. And let's hope that they spread enough to really touch lots and lots of children and their families. Tom, you and I keep caught up. We see each other at professional meetings or we just have periodic phone calls where we tell each other what we're up to. And you've been telling me over the past couple years about this really amazing project you're heading up tracking screen usage. Could you tell us a little bit about that? I'd love to. Really it addresses the problem that came up before, which is really how we measure what people are doing and seeing on their screens. Basically all the studies of media effects for the past a hundred plus years that the field has been studying media, has been dependent on people telling us what they do and what they saw. When in fact, we know that's not particularly accurate. So now we have technology that allows us to track exactly what people are doing and seeing on their screens. We call this screenomics, like genomics, except instead of studying how genes affect us, it's studying how screens affect us and how the screens we experience in our lives really are a reflection of our lives. The way we are doing this is we put software on your phone or your laptop, and it can be on other screens as well, and it runs in the background and takes a screenshot every five seconds. And it covers everything on the screen because it's just taking a picture of the screen. All the words, all the images. Then we use AI to help us decipher [00:34:00] what was on those screens. And so far, we've collected over 350 million screenshots from several hundred adults and teenagers who've participated in our studies for periods of six months to a year. Some of our most interesting findings, I think, is how much idiosyncrasy there is in people's screen use. And this has a huge impact on how we do research on the effects of screens, I believe. Because no two people really have the same screenomes, which is what we call the sequence of screenshots that people experience. And even for the same person, no two hours or days or weeks are the same. We're looking at both how different people differ in their screen use, and how that's related to their mental health, for example. But also how changes over time in a single person's screenome is related to their mental health, for example. Comparing your screen use this afternoon to your screen use this morning or yesterday, or last week or last month. And how that changes your health or is at least associated with changes in your health at this point. Eventually, we hope to move this into very precise interventions that would be able to monitor what your screen experience is and give you an appropriate either change in your screen or help you change your behavior appropriate to what you're feeling. One of our current studies is to learn really the details of what, when, how, why, and where foods and beverages appear in adolescent screenomes. And how these factors relate to foods and beverages they consume and their health. In fact, we're currently recruiting 13- to 17-year-olds all over the US who can participate in this study for six months of screenome collection and weekly surveys we do with them. Including detailed surveys of what they're eating. But this sort of goes back to an issue that came up before that you had asked us about how much is advertising? I can tell you that at least some of our preliminary data, looking at a small number of kids, suggests that food, it varies greatly across kids and what they're experiencing, especially on their phones. And, we found, for example, one young girl who 37% of all her screens had food on them. About a third, or more than a third of her entire screenome, had food in it. And it wasn't just through advertising and it wasn't just through social media or influencers. It was everywhere. It was pictures she was taking of food. It was influencers she was following who had food. It was games she was playing that were around food. There are games, they're all about running a restaurant or making food and serving and kitchen work. And then there were also videos that people watched that are actually fairly popular among where you watch other people eat. Apparently it's a phenomenon that came out of Korea first. And it's grown to be quite popular here over the last several years in which people just put on their camera and show themselves eating. I mean, nothing special, nothing staged, just people eating. There's all kinds of food exists everywhere throughout the screenome, not just in one place or another, and not just in advertising. Tom, a study with a hundred data points can be a lot. You've got 350 million, so I wish you the best of luck in sorting all that out. And boy, whatever you find is going to be really informative and important. Thanks for telling us about this. I'd like to end with kind of a basic question to each of you, and that is, is there any reason for hope. Amanda, let's, let's start with you. Do you see any reason to be optimistic about all this? We must be optimistic. No matter how we're facing. We have no choice. I think there's greater awareness. I think parents, policy makers, civic leaders are really recognizing this pervasive effective screen use on mental health, eating, obesity risk, even just the ability to have social interactions and talk to people face to face. And I think that's a good sign. I've seen even in my own state legislature in Louisiana, bills going through about appropriately restricting screens from schools and offering guidance to pediatricians on counseling related to screen use. The American Academy of Pediatrics changed their guidelines a number of years ago. Instead of just saying, no screens for the really little ones, and then limit to fewer than two hours a day for the older ones. They recognized and tried to be more practical and pragmatic with family. Sit down as a family, create some rules, create some boundaries. Make sure you're being healthy with your screen use. Put the screens away during mealtime. Get the screens out of the bedroom. And I think going towards those more practical strategies that families can actually do and sustain is really positive. I'd like to remain optimistic and let's just keep our eyes wide open and talk to the kids too. And ask the kids what they're doing and get them part of this because it's so hard to stay up to date on the technology. Thanks. I appreciate that positive note. Tom, what do you think? Yeah, I agree with Amanda. I can be positive about several things. First of all, I think last year, there were two bills, one to protect child privacy and the other to regulate technology aimed at children. COPPA 2.0 (Children's Online Private Protection Act) and KOSA (Kid's Online Safety Act). And they passed the Senate overwhelmingly. I mean, almost unanimously, or as close as you can get in our current senate. Unfortunately, they were never acted upon by the house, but in the absence of federal legislature regulation, we've had, as Amanda mentioned, a lot of states and also communities where they have actually started to pass bills or regulate social media. Things like prohibiting use under a certain age. For example, social media warning labels is another one. Limiting smartphone use in schools has become popular. However, a lot of these are being challenged in the courts by tech and media industries. And sadly, you know, that's a strategy they've borrowed, as you know well, Kelly, from tobacco and food industry. There also have been attempts that I think we need to fight against. For the federal legislature or the federal government, congress, to pass legislation to preempt state and local efforts, that would not allow states and local communities to make their own laws in this area. I think that's an important thing. But it's positive in that we're hearing advocacy against that, and people are getting involved. I'm also glad to hear people talking about efforts to promote alternative business models for media. I believe that technology itself is not inherently good or bad, as Amanda mentioned, but the advertising business models that are linked to this powerful technology has inevitably led to a lot of these problems we're seeing. Not just in nutrition and health, but many problems. Finally, I see a lot more parent advocacy to protect children and teens, especially around tech in schools and around the potential harms of social media. And more recently around AI even. As more people start to understand what the implications of AI are. I get the feeling these efforts are really starting to make a difference. Organizations, like Fair Play, for example, are doing a lot of organizing and advocacy with parents. And, we're starting to see advocacy in organizing among teens themselves. I think that's all really super positive that the public awareness is there, and people are starting to act. And hopefully, we'll start to see some more action to help children and families. Bios Developmental psychologist Dr. Amanda Staiano is an associate professor and Director of the Pediatric Obesity & Health Behavior Laboratory at Pennington Biomedical Research Center at Louisiana State University. She also holds an adjunct appointment in LSU's Department of Psychology. Dr. Staiano earned her PhD in developmental psychology and Master of Public Policy at Georgetown University, followed by a Master of Science in clinical research at Tulane University. Her primary interest is developing and testing family-based healthy lifestyle interventions that utilize innovative technology to decrease pediatric obesity and its comorbidities. Her research has involved over 2500 children and adolescents, including randomized controlled trials and prospective cohorts, to examine the influence of physical activity and sedentary behavior on body composition and cardiometabolic risk factors. Thomas N. Robinson, MD, MPH is the Irving Schulman, MD Endowed Professor in Child Health, Professor of Pediatrics and of Medicine, in the Division of General Pediatrics and the Stanford Prevention Research Center at Stanford University School of Medicine, and Director of the Center for Healthy Weight at Stanford University and Lucile Packard Children's Hospital at Stanford. Dr. Robinson focuses on "solution-oriented" research, developing and evaluating health promotion and disease prevention interventions for children, adolescents and their families to directly inform medical and public health practice and policy. His research is largely experimental in design, conducting school-, family- and community-based randomized controlled trials to test the efficacy and/or effectiveness of theory-driven behavioral, social and environmental interventions to prevent and reduce obesity, improve nutrition, increase physical activity and decrease inactivity, reduce smoking, reduce children's television and media use, and demonstrate causal relationships between hypothesized risk factors and health outcomes. Robinson's research is grounded in social cognitive models of human behavior, uses rigorous methods, and is performed in generalizable settings with diverse populations, making the results of his research more relevant for clinical and public health practice and policy.

In today's episode of the history of bad ideas, David talks to political philosopher Alan Finlayson about behaviourism, a theory of psychology that has penetrated to the heart of politics. How did we get from Pavlov's Dog to a prescription for a better society? What is the relationship between behavioural utopianism and contemporary economics? How did behaviourism get turned into something called ‘Nudge'? And if we are being nudged into better behaviour, what is left for politics? Next time on The History of Bad Ideas: Identity Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Rozhlasové studio krásně voní. Představíme vám Lenku Pavlovou, která je důkazem, že i mezi kukuřičnými poli v Iowě nebo pod texaským sluncem může vyrůst nádherný, sladký americký sen. Česká podnikatelka, která se přestěhovala do USA, dnes zásobuje Ameriku tradičními československými dezerty a zákusky.Všechny díly podcastu Host ve studiu můžete pohodlně poslouchat v mobilní aplikaci mujRozhlas pro Android a iOS nebo na webu mujRozhlas.cz.

This podcast episode explores the evolution of dog training, highlighting the shift from punitive methods to positive reinforcement techniques. It discusses key figures in the field, the impact of historical events, and the growing understanding of canine behavior. The conversation emphasizes the importance of humane training methods and the future of dog training practices.   Takeaways Dog training has evolved significantly over the past few decades. Many trainers are now using positive, reward-based techniques. The mantra 'from cruelty to kindness' reflects a major shift in training philosophy. Clever Hans's story highlighted the need for empirical study in animal behavior. Pavlov's classical conditioning laid the groundwork for understanding behavior. Thorndyke's law of effect explains how behaviors are reinforced. B.F. Skinner's work advanced the principles of learning in dog training. The rise of humane training methods began after World War II. Karen Pryor's book popularized clicker training and the use of positive reinforcement. Today's training methods are rooted in kindness and compassion.

Every protest sign you've ever waved, every petty theft you bragged about, every mask you wore — it's all been scraped up, timestamped, and tucked in a file with your name on it. Doesn't matter if you called it civil disobedience, harmless rebellion, or just youthful stupidity. You were noticed. America's surveillance state isn't a guard tower and barbed wire; it's a mansion rigged like Willy Wonka's factory — a candy-colored panopticon of bait and hidden cameras. The real prize isn't catching you red-handed — it's testing who you become when you think you're invisible.Broken Windows policing didn't die with Giuliani's New York; it metastasized. The idea that minor crimes signal bigger rot? Now it justifies a dragnet that hunts memes, phone pings, and moral slip-ups. Every unlocked door, every lootable Target, every liquor cabinet cracked during a riot — bait. See who steals, who doxxes, who brags. The walls watch. The house takes notes.And this mansion is wired to your head. A real fence is expensive; an invisible one is cheap. Pavlov knew this: one zap and the dog learns the line. America's shock collar is the same. Every Ring doorbell, Nest cam, loyalty card, smart TV mic — all hoovering up your data, freezing your worst impulses for the day you matter. That drunken riot you livestreamed at 21? It sits cold-stored, ready for quantum computing to revive it when you run for office, land a government job, or just get too loud. It's not pre-crime — it's permanent crime insurance.It's easy to tell yourself this is just China's social credit system — but the American version is more diabolical. Here, every tribe wants the fence. The Right wants it to crush anarchists and migrants. The Left wants it to snare January 6th rioters and trolls. Nobody wants to cut the wires — they just want the shock button. That's how you get 340 million people to stay in line with four million cops, soldiers, and spooks: you make everyone their own warden, a hive of unpaid informants.It's old too. Hoover's FBI had the prototype: COINTELPRO, secret files to blackmail MLK, Fred Hampton, the Panthers. The Stanford Prison Experiment, MKUltra, mind control ops — all real. That architecture didn't vanish; it scaled up. Now it's Palantir, Amazon Rekognition, “predictive policing,” a cold case lab waiting for your soul to weigh heavy enough to tip Ma'at's scale.Leaks didn't kill it. Snowden, Assange, the WikiLeaks cables — they didn't shut the machine down. They made you respect the fence. They showed you the collar. They broadcast the dragnet because a monster you can see is more effective than one you can't. You start triple-checking your words, your DMs, your gait in an airport. You become your own surveillance op. They can't post soldiers on every block — so they build the perimeter in your skull.This is the real genius: you're not the hero in a rebellion. You're a lab rat in an open-air experiment. Every door you test, every moral slip you rationalize, every shiny bait you grab — logged. And when the moment comes, the shock collar doesn't have to bark. It just zaps you back inside the fence you forgot was there.America's not a prison camp; it's a behavioral panopticon humming quietly under your feet, its files never closing. You tell yourself you're free because you can rant online. But the moment you act like you believe it — the file opens, the buzz hits, and you remember: the fence was always on.

Vad bevisade egentligen de berömda experimenten som Pavlov utförde, och som senare skulle komma att kallas "Pavlovs hundar"? Hur gick det till? Och varför gjorde man experimenten? Wikipedia säger sitt om ”Pavlos hundar.” Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

En nuestro programa anterior hablamos de lenguaje y conducta verbal, de la experiencia humana como experiencia verbal, de lo que nos decimos y lo que no y cómo seguir reglas verbales. Ahora, ahondamos en estos temas.

Seguimos a vueltas con el lenguaje y la conducta verbal, porque lo que decimos es importantísimo. De hecho, nuestra experiencia es verbal en su mayor parte. Todo lo pasamos por el lenguaje. De eso estábamos hablando anteriormente con Aitor Martos y vamos a ver cómo eso redunda en nuestra personalidad y mucho más.

Charlamos sobre el lenguaje y la conducta verbal, porque lo que decimos es importantísimo. De hecho, nuestra experiencia es verbal en su mayor parte. Todo lo pasamos por el lenguaje.

Besedu nad Božím Slovem přináší manželé Petr a Markéta Šanderovi z husitské fary v Kuřimi. Prozkoumejte spolu s nimi biblické texty ekumenického lekcionáře. Aktuálně se zastávkami v 2. Královské, Žalmech, Lukášově evangeliu a Pavlově dopise Galatské církvi.

We have a treat for all intellectuals, scholars, haters, and gunters today: a nearly FOURTEEN HOUR SUPERCUT of EVERY BAD BOOK CLUB WE'VE EVER DONE for your listening enjoyment. We got Angels and Demons, we got Breaking Dawn, we got The Da Vinky Chode, we got Breaking Dawn (yeah i know i already wrote that. we're all gonna die someday), we got Ready Player One, we got HPMOR. We've got it all, right here for you. Perfect for a long car ride, lo-fi beats to eat your food to, blasting at full volume to drive away friends and loved ones, or just dissociating while staring at a wall. Want to only hear specific episodes? The numbers are 209, 211 (Angels & Demons), 223 (Breaking Dawn), 233, 234 (Ready Player One), 254, 255 (The Da Vinci Code), 273, and 274 (HPMOR). Want to listen to all fourteen beautiful, mind-numbing hours of us being haters without having to hear the Acast jingle even I'VE been Pavlov'd into hating? And then ads for... I don't know, other, lesser podcasts? Girlkibble delivery? C... car...? Stuff? Then check out our Patreon and support the show at patreon.com/leightonnight to get AD FREE and VIDEO EPISODES FOR AS LOW AS $2 A MONTH. IT'S A LOSS LEADER BUT IT'S FOR THE LOVE OF THE POD, BABY!!! And other stuff but whatever who cares. Follow us on Twitter at @leightonnight and on Instagram/TikTok at @leighton_night. You can find Brian on Twitter/Instagram at @bwecht, and Leighton at @graylish (Twitter)/@buttchamps (Instagram). Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode of Small Business School, I chat with the hilarious and insightful Jill Pavlov — a comedian, copywriter, and queen of clear, connection-driven messaging. Jill shares how her background in theater and radio led her to the world of copywriting, and how she now helps brands use their words to truly resonate with their audience. From storytelling that sticks to copy strategies that convert (without the ick), Jill breaks it all down in the most relatable, entertaining way. Key topics covered:Jill's journey from theater and radio to comedy and copywriting (yes, it all connects!)The psychology behind persuasive copy—and why human connection is the secret sauceWhy you shouldn't write like you're selling to yourself (unless you're your ideal client!)Tips for finding and understanding your audience—plus why social media isn't where you should be sellingThe power of improv for business confidence, communication, and showing up boldlyWhy urgency and other marketing tactics don't have to feel grossHow conversations (not just content) are your best content strategyWhether you're writing your own content or working with a pro, this episode is a must-listen for anyone wanting to build real relationships through their brand.Mentioned in this episode: Find your entrepreneurial soulmates. Join the exclusive community of Canadian women entrepreneurs. Imagine finding your Work Wives™ who share the same bold, ambitious, entrepreneurial goals.https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__workwives.co&d=DwMFaQ&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=NgHx3ikc5TkuG2GbHk3F2xqAsEGb-mzfBI-Gys9vwYw&m=88CFq1oXxvHuveOHhLqQahTlm82SwWEfbi-P5aAdEDNKAzlUZcOm7G4LsPuYfzzq&s=ZGabyIGi8QeCQWYPVZP87NbEpvjTAj7omZneLouM2BQ&e=Connect with Jill:Website: https://copy-pop.com/Instagram: @comedyjillStaci's Links:Instagram. Website.The School for Small Business Podcast is a proud member of the Female Alliance Media. To learn more about Female Alliance Media and how they are elevating female voices or how they can support your show, visit femalealliancemedia.ca.Head over to my website https://www.stacimillard.com/ to grab your FREE copy of my Profit Playbook and receive 30 innovative ways you can add more profit to your business AND the first step towards implementing these ideas in your business!

Does a sunny day spark a craving for a cold alcoholic drink? Do pub gardens, barbecues, and outdoor gatherings feel like booze is suddenly everywhere, making it harder to stick to your goals? If the sun is your biggest trigger, this episode can help.Join Anna as she unpacks why sunshine is such a powerful cue for drinking, especially in UK culture, and how our brains build deep associations between warm weather and alcohol. She explores the neuroscience of habit (hello, Pavlov!), the biology of sunshine-boosted serotonin, the pull of “holiday mode,” and the classic FOMO that comes with social summer events.Anna introduces the SUN Framework, a quick, empowering tool to help you spot old scripts, update their meaning, and truly nourish the real needs beneath your cravings. Whether you're sober-curious, cutting back, or living alcohol-free, this episode will help you rewrite your summer story.Here are the highlights:00:00 Introduction05:26 Sun can trigger a Pavlovian response for drinking07:33 Old habits echo like Pavlovian responses, but you can learn new ones09:40 Sunlight boosts serotonin, enhancing mood, focus, and sleep17:36 Sunshine triggers a holiday mindset, linking relaxation and indulgence with alcohol21:31 Belonging feels safe, while standing out feels risky25:31 We don't crave beer, but the feelings of happiness, belonging, and relaxation we associate with it31:52 Identify and meet your needs by creating new, enjoyable rituals33:59 Reflect on your "new summer story" by journaling about it.

Nenad Pavlov is an ex-programmer turned into outbound sales expert. Today he's into public speaker, lecturing, and business advice.He's had the pleasure of serving companies from different industries: IT and marketing services, SaaS, industrial machinery, ground transportation, and sterile mosquito producers, to name a few.Hiring sales people? - get the SDR Interview Guide with exact questions to recognize TOP performers: https://sdrhire.com/sdr-interview-guide/Learn more about Nenad's business: https://simplygrow.co/Connect with Nenad on LI:   / nenad-pavlov  Connect with Stefan on LinkedIn:   / stefan-conic  

In this episode we talk about:  Pavlov's dogs Newbie gains Fathom as a participant Math is not our forte Full send has a new definition Kenyan mitochondria?? 50k as a first race… WUT? Underfeeding robs you from your life Why do we have to break bones to pay attention? PMS is not normal (PS buy my guide bitches) Genetic components to HA You can watch Netflix on 2000 calories. Thats it. Why you should care about your cycle health Needing iron infusions isn't normal (or always the answer) Is the data giving you anxiety?! Learn more about working with me  Shop my masterclasses (learn more in 60-90 minutes than years of dr appointments) Follow me on IG Follow Empowered Mind + Body on IG  Learn more about working with Kelsey Follow Kelsey on IG   

Záchranná stanice Pavlov na Havlíčkobrodsku zažívá jedno z nejnáročnějších období v roce. Každý den přijímá nová mláďata, nejčastěji ptáky vypadlé z hnízd.

challies on X: "Flashback: "The human heart retains a distorted copy, a smudged image of God’s original will...Like a ruined castle it is still possible to discern the glory for which we were created." https://t.co/mM5wRckPsg" / X Cause Fatigue Is Real, but Disengaging Isn’t the Answer - RELEVANT Protect Joy in a Doom-and-Gloom News Cycle Maxwell Leadership on X: "Most people dream too small and don’t think big enough. It’s important to remember that simply asking and challenging the people you lead to think bigger has the potential to make all the difference! This is your opportunity to receive exclusive mentoring and coaching from John https://t.co/lNJxYeXYVb" / X Trump signs executive order creating Religious Liberty Commission Gospel in Life on X: "There is no such thing as an irreligious person, really. There is no such thing as a secular person, really. You either believe in the true God or else you are a slave to worshiping something that you treat as a god, but really isn’t. – @timkellernyc Sermon, Enslaved to Non-Gods" / X See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

I don't need to be in your pockets every month: Hit me off once and I'll send you Breakup Gaming Society's cocktail booklet and your own adorable Defiant Frog sticker. Check it out, it's easy.Drink of the Week (3:14)Infused some Ketel One with medium-roast coffee beans and subbed Frangelico for Kahlua in a deluxe White Russian variation that got me ‘60s housewife drunk.Game of the Week (6:21)Can Stalingrad be fun in winter? Yes, if you don't think about it too much and enjoy David Thompson's outstanding first entry in Dan Verssen Games' popular Valiant Defense series.Track of the Week (16:27)Lots of rap acts stuck a house track on one of their albums in the late ‘80s, but “Club Scene” by Special Ed (feat. Kazaam) is a little more high-effort.

Why do we treat workouts, journaling, reading, and eating healthy like optional chores — but stress out over paying bills or going to work? In today's episode, I'm breaking down why the things that move our lives forward usually feel boring, hard, or unimportant in the moment...and how we can trick ourselves into doing them consistently.   You'll hear about the invisible “debt” we rack up when we skip out on personal growth, and how over time, it leads to self-resentment and self-sabotage. Plus, I'll share real strategies that helped me turn working out, reading, and eating better into things I actually look forward to — by using instant gratification and the Pavlov effect.   Whether you're struggling to stay consistent or just want to make discipline feel a little easier, this one's for you. It's time to stop making deals you can't pay back with yourself, and start setting yourself up for real wins.   If you liked the show, help it grow!   Leave a review and rate 5 stars on Apple Podcast, and Spotify!

En esta entrega de La Ruleta Rusa hemos escuchado y comentado los discos:Ritch Ruth Water Still Flows 2024Moonseeds Moonseeds 2024Lars Fredrik Frøislie Fire Fortellinger 2023Pavlov's Dog At The Sound of The Bell 1975The Third Mind Live Mind 2025Emil The Black Spider 2020Lynyrd Skynyrd Gold & Platinum 1979

#RingRust with my #StandAndDeliver & #Wrestlemania chat... & I refuse to travel Coach, in this week's #3WayDanceOff! #TagMeIn  ~ ~ ~ I'd like to hear from you! Please drop me a line @ ring-rust@hotmail.com {Subject Line: Ring Rust} & let me know what you like {or dislike} about my show! I'm always on the lookout for constructive criticism {if you want playlists again, start giving me feedback, people!}  ~ ~ ~ Check out my #Unboxing videos, all that snazzy anti-social media & support all my shows http://markjabroni.mysite.com/ ~ ~ ~ RECORDED LIVE @ the Holy Smackdown Hotel in Sunny St. John's NL!  If you want to contribute to Betty Cisneros' Stage 4 Cancer treatment, please donate @ https://www.gofundme.com/f/help-betty-battle-her-cancer-away & if you wanted to contribute to the surgeries of wrestling veteran Lufisto, you can check out her store @ http://www.lufisto.com/store-1/ SHOW NOTES... 0:04:11 Pre Per View: NXT's Stand & Deliver 1 0:05:53 Musicular Interlude 1 0:17:14 Pre Per View: NXT's Stand & Deliver 2 0:18:06 Musicular Interlude 2 0:27:17 Pre Per View: WWE's Wrestlemania 41 Night 1a 0:28:21 Musicular Interlude 3 0:36:54 Pre Per View: WWE's Wrestlemania 41 Night 1b 0:37:28 Musicular Interlude 4 0:44:56 Pre Per View: WWE's Wrestlemania 41 Night 2a 0:45:37 Musicular Interlude 5 0:53:10 Assuming the Intermissionary Position   0:58:17 This Week's Macho Fact 1:06:09 Pre Per View: WWE's Wrestlemania 41 Night 2b 1:06:33 Musicular Interlude 5 1:18:39 This Week's 3-Way Dance-Off: For 23 Years, the Revolutionary Force in Sports Entertainment Radio! 1:28:45 Pre Per View: WWE's Wrestlemania 41 Night 2c 1:29:15 Musicular Interlude 6 1:36:19 Battle Royale With Cheese: the Uneducated Feet of the 1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9-10 Kid! 1:37:35 Musicular Interlude 7  1:44:05 Podcast Extra 

Entramos en un bucle de hábitos no-tan-saludables que aplican muchas personas para mantener una relación "sana" y duradera, entre ellos entrenar a sus parejas como los perros de Pavlov.

Welcome back, Slick Talkers! In this episode, Wil Slickers sits down with Boris Pavlov, a European entrepreneur and expert in the hospitality industry, to discuss his journey and the innovations he's spearheading with Flataway. Boris shares his experience scaling a property management company from 0 to 700 properties, selling it, and moving forward with new ventures. We explore the current landscape of vacation rentals, the challenges with OTAs, and how the book direct movement is evolving. Boris also reveals his ambitious plans to create a more interconnected and personalized experience for travelers and property managers alike. Tune in for a deep dive into the future of hospitality, technology integration, and the human touch in guest experience! Connect with Boris: LinkedIn Flataway - Use code: UKPB2R to access the platform as a guest Connect with Wil: LinkedIn Instagram This episode is brought to you by our sponsors at: This episode is brought to you by Fido! Professionals know that taking out the trash suck and is often missed! Well, not anymore, because Fido offers amazing bin-to-curb service. If you mention the podcast, they will take great care of you! Go to getfido.com to learn more! Hostfully – $300 off onboarding fee using code HFM300 - Connect with Frank here! Send Squared, the Hubspot for Hospitality Brands & Professionals! Get your business and leads organized and automated with Send Squared, the industry's best CRM! ——– Thank you for tuning into our podcast! Slick Talk is a Hospitality.FM production, and you can find more of our shows at Hospitality.FM or anywhere else you listen to your podcasts! Listen to more episodes on our website and take a look at our amazing podcast and network sponsors that make this all possible! You can also listen to our Monday morning podcast, Good Morning Hospitality, where we discuss the industry in a more casual setting! If you ever want to contact us for guest suggestions or anything else related to the podcast, please fill out our contact form, and we will be in touch! Last but not least, we love to connect on LinkedIn! Let's connect there so you can see the daily content we post beyond the podcast! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Dr. Raffa and Catarina explore the history and work of Dr. Ivan Pavlov, and identify where his contributions can still be found today. Do you think his name rings any bells?Welcome to Talk Therapy CBT | Conversation about Educating, Connecting, Helping Individuals to the World of Psychology.We would like to thanks our sponsor : Dr. Alba Raphaela, you can buy her book about : Breaking the Mirror : A Story & Guide on how to recognize and deal with a narcissist. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B09HFRNWYC/ref=cm_sw_r_apan_3NW8EE01F8A6G4KGNW56This podcast is sponsored by (https://www.innerbalancepsychology.com/) -  Inner Balance Psychology Center, Psychological Treatment and Evaluations for Children, Adolescents and AdultsAs solution-focused therapists, our goal is to help you uncover your true potential and lead a life that is worth celebrating. While we can't change difficult situations of the past, we can work together to better understand and resolve challenges in your life. By applying complementary therapy approaches and techniques, we will unearth long-standing behavior patterns or negative perceptions that may be holding you back from experiencing a more fulfilling and meaningful life.Follow Us on Social Media:Blog : (https://www.innerbalancepsychology.com/blog/ )FAQs : ( https://www.innerbalancepsychology.com/faqs/ )Facebook : (https://www.facebook.com/ibpcllc)Instagram : (https://www.Instagram.com/innerbalancepsychology) Check out our website for more information :  (https://www.innerbalancepsychology.com/) or email Dr. Raffa : (dawnraffa@innerbalancepsychology.com)This podcast is hosted by  and produced by (https://www.innerbalancepsychology.com/) Please consider subscribing and sharing this episode if you found it entertaining or informative. If you want to go the extra mile, you can leave us a rating or review which helps the show with rankings and algorithms on certain platforms. you can leave us a review on Podchaser or Apple Podcasts Make sure you're subscribed to the podcast so you get the latest episodes. Our Podcast Page : (https://www.innerbalancepsychology.com/)(Subscribe with Apple Podcast)(Follow on Spotify)(Subscribe with Stitcher)(Subscribe on IHeartRadio )(Listen on other streaming platforms) DISCLAIMEROpinions expressed are solely the hosts and guest(s) and do not represent or express the views or opinions of Inner Balance Psychology

„Děti dál zůstávají v osamění. Jsou více na sítích, než aby spolu přirozeně mluvily, a trápí se. Sítě jim nastavují normy a tlačí je do uniformity,“ soudí psychiatr a psychoterapeut Ján Praško Pavlov. Jak dlouho potřebuje na pohovor s pacientem? Dají se diagnostikovat politici přes média? Jak často se psychiatři shodnou na diagnóze? Jsou léky jedinou cestou k duševnímu zdraví? Opakují se deprese?Všechny díly podcastu Blízká setkání můžete pohodlně poslouchat v mobilní aplikaci mujRozhlas pro Android a iOS nebo na webu mujRozhlas.cz.

„Děti dál zůstávají v osamění. Jsou více na sítích, než aby spolu přirozeně mluvily, a trápí se. Sítě jim nastavují normy a tlačí je do uniformity,“ soudí psychiatr a psychoterapeut Ján Praško Pavlov. Jak dlouho potřebuje na pohovor s pacientem? Dají se diagnostikovat politici přes média? Jak často se psychiatři shodnou na diagnóze? Jsou léky jedinou cestou k duševnímu zdraví? Opakují se deprese?

Il est parfois difficile de dépoussiérer des domaines de la biologie et de dépasser les grands noms qui leurs sont associés. Car oui, on a avancé dans la compréhension de l'évolution depuis Darwin, on sait plus de choses sur les microbes depuis Pasteur et l'éthologie ne se cantonne pas aux expériences de Pavlov ! Mais alors du coup, ça ressemble à quoi l'éthologie moderne ? Lors de cette émission 524 de Podcast Science, notre invitée nous dévoile tout sur l'éthologie 2.0 !Notes d'émission : https://www.podcastscience.fm/emission/2025/03/25/podcast-science-524-ethologie-2-0/Retrouvez-nous sur PodcastScience.fm, Bluesky, Facebook et Instagram.Soutenez-nous sur Tipeee Soutenez nous sur Patreon Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

The Prism of America's Education with Host Karen Schoen – We are graduating clones, who, given the right stimulus, give the correct pre-determined response. No reading, writing, or math is needed. Just respond the way you were taught! White people are bad, and the cause of your problems. If you are a minority, you are the victim and can blame someone else for your problems. You can riot without consequences...

I've had numerous conversations over the years with parents who have received troubling phone calls where they are given bad news about a child. Some parents have told me that after a few of these calls, they become like Pavlov's dog, being triggered into anxiety and fear by the ring of the phone, even though there's no reason to believe that the caller is calling with more bad news. Mental health professionals are now reporting on a similar trend among young people that's been labeled “telephobia”, which is a fear of phone calls sparked by social anxiety. Counselor Stephanie Wiijkstrom explains it this way: “In our digital age, texting and online messaging serve as our primary modes of communication, and we often feel less vulnerable and more comfortable than in a live conversation or phone call.” Parents, this is a consequence of our digital age, and we need to reverse this by involving our kids in verbal interactions and conversations with others from the time their born.

This week, we are talking Home Depot's b-hole reminiscent chatbot and vibecoding JD Vance's face. Plus—the biggest mystery in American shopping: why does TJ Maxx make people need to poop? Also on tap: Apple's iPad launch cringefest and a surprising rise in Android smartphone adoption among creatives AND finance bros alike.The Rise of Butthole LogosKey takeaways:Home Depot's "Magic Apron" and Lowe's "Milo" chatbots launched within hours of each other—proving that every brand now needs an AI assistant, even if they all look the same.AI is speeding towards eliminating websites as we know them—future shopping experiences will be conversations, not catalogs.Apple's recent marketing attempts are wildly out of touch—trends about trends are dead, but nobody told Tim Cook.Are we Pavlov-ing ourselves into using the bathroom at TJMaxx? All signs point to yesVibe coding is taking over—non-coders can now generate functional apps, proving that AI isn't just summarizing things anymore—it's building them from scratch.[00:01:19] “Eenie meenie miney Milo. Home Depot's chatbot looks like a b-hole.” - Phillip[00:55:05] “AI is fundamentally changing the way we interact with software. Convenience is the ultimate aim of technology, and we're just at the beginning of this shift.” - BrianLinks:In-show mention: Purchase The Lore JournalIn-show mention: Home Depot Chatbot and Press ReleaseIn-show mention: TJMaxx Reddit ThreadIn-show mention: Register for Shoptalk AfterpartyCheck out Future Commerce on YouTubeCheck out Future Commerce+ for exclusive content and save on merch and printSubscribe to Insiders and The Senses to read more about what we are witnessing in the commerce worldListen to our other episodes of Future CommerceHave any questions or comments about the show? Let us know on futurecommerce.com, or reach out to us on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, or LinkedIn. We love hearing from our listeners!This episode of Future Commerce is brought to you by Future Commerce Plus and our sponsors Omnisend and MotionApp and Keen Decision Systems.

„Prezident není automat, který musí vykonat, co si předseda vlády přeje.“ Zní to jako něco, co by při sestavování vlády řekl Miloš Zeman nebo Václav Klaus. Ve skutečnosti je to ale vzkaz z dnešního Hradu, konkrétně od prezidentova ředitele politického odboru Tomáše Lebedy.„Prezident se v závěru svého druhého roku probudil i na půdě domácí politiky. Přišel s nečekaným vetem, zatlačil na ministra Beka v otázce rozpočtu. Dává najevo, že vláda to s ním už nebude mít tak snadné,“ říká Lucie Stuchlíková k dvouletému výročí Pavla na Hradě.Pavla, který až dosud k domácím otázkám přistupoval spíš rezervovaně, aktivizoval předvolební rok. V něm si poprvé vyzkouší, jaké je sestavování vlády po volbách.„Hrad začal vysílat vzkazy, jak by se mohl zachovat po příštích volbách. Vyplývá z nich, že prezident by mohl mít problém s některými konkrétními jmény,“ říká Václav Dolejší. Přímo z Pavlových úst pak zaznělo, co by byl problém - například politik, který chce vystupovat z EU nebo NATO. Tedy třeba Tomio Okamura nebo Kateřina Konečná.„Myslím, že to Hrad říká takto předem, aby s podobnými jmény budoucí premiér na Hrad ani nechodil,“ myslí si Dolejší. A Stuchlíková dodává: „Jenže vynechat z vlády šéfa případné koaliční strany by byl docela problém.“Jaký byl druhý rok Petra Pavla? Věří na Hradě na mimozemšťany? A může mít rozlitá horká káva vliv na funkci podcastera? Poslechněte si v aktuální epizodě Vlevo dole!----Vlevo dole řeší politické kauzy, boje o vliv i šeptandu z kuloárů Sněmovny. Vychází každou středu v poledne.Podcast pro vás připravují Lucie Stuchlíková (@StuchlikovLucie) a Václav Dolejší (@VacDol), reportéři Seznam Zpráv.Další podcasty, ale taky články, komentáře a videa najdete na zpravodajském serveru Seznam Zprávy. Poslouchejte nás na webu Seznam Zpráv, na Podcasty.cz nebo ve své oblíbené podcastové aplikaci.Své názory, návrhy, otázky, stížnosti nebo pochvaly nám můžete posílat na adresu audio@sz.cz.Sledujte @SeznamZpravy na sociálních sítích: Twitter // Facebook // Instagram.Seznam Zprávy jsou zdrojem původních informací, nezávislé investigace, originální publicistiky.

KOMPLETNÍ DÍL NAJDETE NA HEROHERO.CO/STUDION, DOSTUPNÝ JE TAKÉ V RÁMCI KLUBOVÉHO PŘEDPLATNÉHO DENÍKU N „V našich končinách je Eurovize vykreslovaná jako šaráda, pro mě je to hudební olympiáda,“ říká slovenský zpěvák Adam Pavlovčin aka ADONXS, který bude letos v nejsledovanější hudební soutěži na světě reprezentovat Českou republiku s novým hitem Kiss Kiss Goodbye. Ve Studiu N otevřeně mluví o politice v hudbě, o kritice, že coby Slovák reprezentuje Česko, o šancích Slovenska na návrat do Eurovize i o tom, zda by Praha zvládla uspořádat tak velkolepou show. Podívejte se na celý rozhovor.  

Programa 5x103, amb Llu

Welcome back to your two favorite girlies! Today we are hitting it heavy with the reality tv recap!! Ali brings up an old show “Bridalplasty, and also hits on current reality tv drama like the breakup between Paige and Craig and the Valley Season 2 comin up! Maddy's birthday deals HAVE expired, but if you send her “BDAY DEALS”  in her dms, she'll honor those deals! Send it here: https://www.instagram.com/maddy.nourishandlift/  And don't forget, drop your questions anonymously here!  https://bit.ly/KHKH-ask-my-question  Snag Maddy's Lean Body Meals Guide here to learn how she teaches her clients how to Meal Prep- https://bit.ly/Lean-Body-Meals-Guide  Make sure to subscribe so you don't miss an episode and send us your health / relationship / life / just need advice on, questions to kindahotpod@gmail.com to have us answer your questions on the show.  Find us on all streaming platforms here, including the full video experience on our YouTube channel

Ewig durch Social Media scrollen und sich mit anderen vergleichen? Viele Menschen bemerken, dass sie erschreckend wenig Kontrolle darüber haben, wie viel Zeit sie auf Social Media verbringen. Leon und Atze besprechen, woran das liegt und ob Social Media so schlimm ist, wie immer behauptet wird. Außerdem geben sie Tipps, wie man das Smartphone wenigstens ab und zu mal zur Seite legen kann. Leon & Atze Start ins heutige Thema: 08:46 min. Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/leonwindscheid/ https://www.instagram.com/atzeschroeder_offiziell/ Mehr zu unseren Werbepartnern findet ihr hier: https://linktr.ee/betreutesfuehlen Buchempfehlung: Die Klavierspielerin von Elfriede Jelinek Zehn Gründe, warum du deinen Social Media Account sofort löschen musst von Jaron Lanier Empfehlung: https://www.instagram.com/buchantiquariat_willbrand/?hl=de Quellen in chronologischer Reihenfolge Spektrum der Wissenschaft. Lexikon der Neurowissenschaft: Dopamin. https://www.spektrum.de/lexikon/neurowissenschaft/dopamin/2959 Baskerville, T. A., & Douglas, A. J. (2010). Dopamine and oxytocin interactions underlying behaviors: potential contributions to behavioral disorders. CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics, 16(3), e92-e123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-5949.2010.00154.x Wise, R. A. (2004). Dopamine, learning and motivation. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(6), 483-494. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1406 Memorial Museum-estate of academician I. P. Pavlov. http://en.pavlovmuseum.ru/photos Sapolsky, R. M. (2017). Behave: the Biology of Humans at Our Best and Worst. Penguin Press. Fiorillo et al. (2003). Discrete coding of reward probability and uncertainty by dopamine neurons. Science.https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.1077349 Burkhard, P., & Rueegg, J. (2023) Warum wir den sozialen Netzwerken nicht widerstehen können. Neue Zürcher Zeitung. https://www.nzz.ch/technologie/warum-wir-den-sozialen-netzwerken-nicht-widerstehen-koennen-ld.1733551 Miltenberger, R. G. (2016). Behavior modification: Principles and procedures. Cengage Learning. Helle, M., & Helle, M. (2019). Psychotherapie: Von den Anfängen bis heute. Psychotherapie, 1-5. Kritik an Body Positivity: Körpergewicht: „Body Neutrality“ bevorzugt https://www.aerzteblatt.de/archiv/koerpergewicht-body-neutrality-bevorzugt-531249bd-9df5-47d2-ba93-3a59f1a1ef19 Haidt, J. (2024). The anxious generation: How the great rewiring of childhood is causing an epidemic of mental illness. Random House. Universität Würzburg. Generation Angst: Machen soziale Medien die Jugend psychisch krank? https://www.uni-wuerzburg.de/en/news-and-events/news/detail/news/generation-angst-thesenpapier/ Cunningham, S., Hudson, C. C., & Harkness, K. (2021). Social media and depression symptoms: a meta-analysis. Research on child and adolescent psychopathology, 49, 241-253. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/S10802-020-00715-7 Appel, M., Marker, C., & Gnambs, T. (2020). Are social media ruining our lives? A review of meta-analytic evidence. Review of General Psychology, 24(1), 60-74. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1089268019880891?journalCode=rgpa Marker, C., Gnambs, T., & Appel, M. (2018). Active on Facebook and failing at school? Meta-analytic findings on the relation- ship between online social networking activities and academic achievement. Educational Psychology Review, 30, 651-677. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10648-017-9430-6 Orben, A., & Przybylski, A. K. (2019). The association between adolescent well-being and digital technology use. Nature human behaviour, 3(2), 173-182. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-018-0506-1 Ivie, E. J., Pettitt, A., Moses, L. J., & Allen, N. B. (2020). A meta-analysis of the association between adolescent social media use and depressive symptoms. Journal of Affective Disorders, 275, 165-174. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0165032720323727 Redaktion: Dr. Jan Rudloff Produktion: Murmel Productions

There are plenty of zombie films, but none quite like Peter Jackson's 1992 horror comedyDead Alive (Braindead). This week,Bri and guestJohn-Michael Bond (album/comedy specialCry Uncle) dive into all the gory story details to convince Cozi that this film is a bloody gem.Will the amazing practical effects, great characters, and hilarious one-liners be enough to convince Cozi to give it a chance? Listen and find out!Recommendations:JOHN-MICHAEL – Shuffle songs fromGuided by Voices andFucked Up, Pavlov yourself to chill the fuck out without your phoneCOZI – Do your best to be true to yourselfBRI – Get yourself some hue/mood lights

The hottest craze is using archaic psychological manipulation trends on your wife.  Topics include OnlyFans safety, finding the right bell for your wife, recording your conversations, disrespecting your dead husband. Come see us perform live!  Feb. 20th, Black Sheep, Toronto.  Tickets available here! 

Las fuerzas del cielo aplaudían de pie y sin reparo al hombrecillo que ponía en palabras los pensamientos que algunos no se atrevían ni a postear en una red social El cantón suizo idílico y celestial volvió a congregar en su foro a los poderoso del mundo, , los que hacen y deshacen, los que marcan el camino que tomará la economía mundial ECDQEMSD podcast episodio 5966 Las Fuerzas del Cielo en Davos Conducen: El Pirata y El Sr. Lagartija https://canaltrans.com Noticias del Mundo: El show de Davos - Discursos rimbombantes - En nombre de quién habla Milei - Brasileños esposados - California y Trump - Es en serio Jennifer Aniston y Barack Obama? - Gracias a esos Nerd2 de El Pasquín Historias Desintegradas: Respuestas alternativas - Comunicación con I.A. - Tienda de apoyo - Todos los servicios - El ingenio popular - El perro de Pavlov mexicano - Enchilamiento mental - Los camioneros bandidos - La vulcanizadora de Vulcano - Dios del fuego - Respondiendo a la consigna - Los nervios inflamados - La nutrióloga mexicana - Mike Patton con pastel y más... En Caso De Que El Mundo Se Desintegre - Podcast no tiene publicidad, sponsors ni organizaciones que aporten para mantenerlo al aire. Solo el sistema cooperativo de los que aportan a través de las suscripciones hacen posible que todo esto siga siendo una realidad. Gracias Dragones Dorados!! NO AI: ECDQEMSD Podcast no utiliza ninguna inteligencia artificial de manera directa para su realización. Diseño, guionado, música, edición y voces son de  nuestra completa intervención humana.

The ECDC has declared January cervical cancer awareness month which we support 100%. We also want encourage local skeptical actions such as speaking up when companies promote nonsense and Pontus gives us an example of how easy it can be, if you just take a few minutes and speak up. We also mention that the planets are lined up in a cool way at the moment, so turn your eyes to the skies! In TWISH we hear about Vladimir Bekhterev who was at least as significant in psychology as Pavlov was, but made the mistake to talk badly about Stalin and as a result was almost entirely written out of history. Then, we look at the news:INTERNATIONAL: It's confirmed: 2024 was the first year with an average temperature 1.5°C above pre-industrial levelsINTERNATIONAL: Pro-Russia disinformation pops up on BlueSkyBALTIC SEA: Damaged cables in Baltic Sea not Russian sabotage?EU: X asked to disclose internal documents about algorithms over fears that far right gets boostUK: Meta and the scrapping of fact-checkingThe Croatian deputy prime minister Josip Dabro confirms all our preconceived ideas regarding stupid populist politicians and gets the week's award for being Really Wrong.Enjoy!https://theesp.eu/podcast_archive/theesp-ep-463.htmlSegments:0:00:27 Intro0:00:50 Greetings0:15:50 TWISH0:25:46 News0:45:49 Really Wrong0:49:16 Quote0:53:17 Outro0:54:32 Outtakes Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

(Had to repost. This is a rerun post Georgia) Patreon.com/ReedsRanch. Presented by the Garza Law Firm

Patreon.com/ReedsRanch. Presented by the Garza Law Firm. Vols beat Georgia, Tim Banks extension, aliens

In this week's episode, both of our storytellers share tales about birds that had a big impact in their lives.Part 1: Paula Croxson uses her neuroscience background to get rid of the pigeon family that has taken up residence on her window sill.Part 2: As a new urban park ranger, Tim Lopez gets a call to capture a swan on the loose.Paula Croxson is a neuroscientist, science communicator, musician and open water swimmer. She received an M.A. from the University of Cambridge and a M.Sc. and a Ph.D. from the University of Oxford before moving to New York to run a neuroscience lab. She changed career direction around 5 years ago to focus on public engagement with science, first at Columbia University and then at the Dana Foundation. She is also the flautist in alternative rock band Marlowe Grey and nerdy rock band Pavlov's Dogz. The swimming is apparently for “fun”.Tim Lopez is a storyteller and educator born and raised in Los Angeles. His stories have been featured on the Moth Radio Hour, KCRW in Los Angeles, and CBS Radio nationwide. He is currently an Interpretive Park Ranger at Channel Islands National Park, where he brings the stories of the natural environment and the history of California to life. He is also a Jeopardy! champion and is legally obligated to mention that fact as often as possible. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoicesSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In this week's episode, both of our storytellers share tales about birds that had a big impact in their lives. Part 1: Paula Croxson uses her neuroscience background to get rid of the pigeon family that has taken up residence on her window sill. Part 2: As a new urban park ranger, Tim Lopez gets a call to capture a swan on the loose. Paula Croxson is a neuroscientist, science communicator, musician and open water swimmer. She received an M.A. from the University of Cambridge and a M.Sc. and a Ph.D. from the University of Oxford before moving to New York to run a neuroscience lab. She changed career direction around 5 years ago to focus on public engagement with science, first at Columbia University and then at the Dana Foundation. She is also the flautist in alternative rock band Marlowe Grey and nerdy rock band Pavlov's Dogz. The swimming is apparently for “fun”. Tim Lopez is a storyteller and educator born and raised in Los Angeles. His stories have been featured on the Moth Radio Hour, KCRW in Los Angeles, and CBS Radio nationwide. He is currently an Interpretive Park Ranger at Channel Islands National Park, where he brings the stories of the natural environment and the history of California to life. He is also a Jeopardy! champion and is legally obligated to mention that fact as often as possible. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Do you ever feel strong urges to view pornography, tied to specific patterns, times, or emotions? I call this "over-desire" - and it's something many people struggle with. But here's the good news: just like the scientist Pavlov trained his dogs to stop salivating at the sound of a bell, we can train our brains to overcome these compulsions too.   I explain the science behind over-desire and share real-life examples of how people have successfully reconditioned their brains. I also share the importance of understanding the difference between over-desire and an addiction, and introduce the concept of mindfulness as a key tool in the process of building a healthier relationship with your sexuality.    Get full show notes, transcript, and more information here: https://centerforovercoming.com/post/over-desire   If you're ready to do this work and start practicing unconditional commitment towards quitting your porn habit, sign up to work with me: https://www.sarabrewer.com/workwithme

Episode #648: It's that time of year again, when Bryan complains…wait…that's all year. Well, there's some grievance airing and some EXPLOSIVE Yellowstone commentary. The holiday season of tesla cybertrucks & neighborhood dads Air your grievances like Bryan! Roundabouts Smokey & his “Gasms” Bryan does math! A TCB Retrospective…some of the darkest days of my life! Bryan's formative McDonald's days I (Christina) will literally never get Bryan & Krissy out of my head Yellowstone Some EXPLOSIVE trailers Ted Turner Letterman Text us or leave us a voicemail: +1 (212) 433-3TCB Follow Us: IG: @thecommercialbreak TikTok: @tcbpodcast YT: youtube.com/thecommercialbreak www.tcbpodcast.com Executive Producer: Bryan Green Hosts: Bryan Green & Krissy Hoadley Producer: Astrid B. Green Producer & Audio Editor: Christina Archer Christina's Podcast: Apple Podcasts & Spotify To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices

In this episode, my guest is Dr. Charan Ranganath, Ph.D., professor of psychology and neuroscience at the University of California, Davis, and a world expert on the neuroscience of memory. We discuss how memory works, what causes diseases of dementia like Alzheimer's, and science-based strategies to reduce age-related cognitive decline. We also cover the essential role of curiosity and the dopamine-curiosity link that can assist memory formation and neuroplasticity. We then discuss challenges with attention and focus, and how to overcome them, as well as how to manage task-switching and create home and work environments more conducive to cognitive health and longevity. Additionally, we explore the emotional aspect of memories, tools for overcoming rumination, and strategies for reframing past negative experiences. This episode will be of interest to anyone seeking to improve and maintain their cognitive health, focus, and memory across their lifespan, as well as for those struggling with ADHD. Access the full show notes for this episode at hubermanlab.com. Thank you to our sponsors AG1: https://drinkag1.com/huberman David Protein: https://davidprotein.com/huberman Levels: https://levels.link/huberman Waking Up: https://wakingup.com/huberman Function: https://functionhealth.com/huberman Timestamps 00:00:00 Dr. Charan Ranganath 00:02:06 Sponsors: David, Levels & Waking Up 00:06:48 Memory: Past, Present & Future; Sleep 00:13:23 Self, Memory & Age, Neuroplasticity 00:18:50 Tool: Curiosity & Dopamine 00:26:55 Dopamine, Forward Movement 00:33:09 Sponsor: AG1 00:34:22 Dopamine, Learning; Curiosity & Appraisal 00:40:31 Memory, Hippocampus 00:43:34 Prefrontal Cortex & Memory, Aging 00:50:07 Aging, Prefrontal Cortex & Memory; Depression, Rumination 00:58:53 Sponsor: Function 01:00:40 Tool: Lifestyle Factors, Minimizing Age-Related Cognitive Decline 01:09:39 Exercise, Brain Function; ADHD 01:17:26 Sense of Purpose, Tool: Values, Goals, Navigating ADHD 01:23:31 Forgetting, Intention vs. Attention 01:30:10 Tool: Smartphones, Task-Switching, Forgetfulness 01:36:36 Tool: Pictures, Memories, Intention 01:45:46 Deep Focus, Dopamine 01:49:36 Hearing, Vision, Oral Hygiene, Inflammation, Brain Health, Alzheimer's 01:59:51 Déjà Vu 02:09:00 Serotonin, Reframing Memories, Trauma 02:19:05 Psychedelics, Neuroplasticity, Perspective, Group Therapy 02:27:53 Rumination, Trauma, Nostalgia, Narrative 02:30:30 Music, Pavlov's Dogz Band 02:36:27 Zero-Cost Support, YouTube, Spotify & Apple Follow & Reviews, Sponsors, YouTube Feedback, Protocols Book, Social Media, Neural Network Newsletter Disclaimer & Disclosures

On Legal Docket, Brazil bans the social media platform X; on Moneybeat, the presidential candidates and economic policies; and on the World History Book, Pavlov discovers classical conditioning. Plus, the Monday morning newsSupport The World and Everything in It today at wng.org/donate.Additional support comes from Ambassadors Impact Network. Helping entrepreneurs with a purpose find the support they need to thrive with faith-aligned financing options. More at: ambassadorsimpact.com/From His Words Abiding in You, a Bible memorization podcast designed for truck drivers. His Words Abiding in You … on all podcast apps.And from The Master's University, equipping students for lives of faithfulness to The Master, Jesus Christ. More at masters.edu.The Master's University offers over 150 programs, all designed to disciple the next generation toward lives of faithfulness to The Master, Jesus Christ. We equip students with the knowledge, skills, and attitudes they need for their careers, while cultivating their spiritual growth, moral character, and leadership skills as they seek to glorify the Lord. If you're looking for an education uncompromisingly rooted in Christ and Scripture, we want to meet you. Learn more at https://www.masters.edu/.