Podcast appearances and mentions of Hannah Arendt

☞ SŁUCHAM ☞ Dlaczego Bóg pozwala na zło? ✢ Kwestia dyskusyjna ✢ dr Grzegorz Chrzanowski OP | Radosław Więcławek OP✢ Dlaczego dobry Bóg pozwala na cierpienie? W tym odcinku o. Radosław Więcławek OP wraz z o. dr. Grzegorzem Chrzanowskim OP, filozofem z UPJPII w Krakowie, analizuje problem zła. Poznaj różnicę między złem naturalnym a moralnym oraz dowiedz się, czym jest teodycea Leibniza i dlaczego bywa krytykowana. W odcinku jest mowa o koncepcji zła banalnego Hannah Arendt, wolnej woli i antyteodycei. Sprawdź, jak wiara i filozofia pomagają nadać sens trudnym doświadczeniom. #kwestiadyskusyjna #UPJPII #filozofia #dominikanie Cykl rozmów filozoficznych "Kwestia dyskusyjna" powstał we współpracy z Wydziałem Filozoficznym Uniwersytetu Papieskiego Jana Pawła II w Krakowie.Więcej informacji o Wydziale Filozoficznym: https://wf.upjp2.edu.pl/00:00:00 Wstęp00:00:10 Czym jest problem zła i dlaczego od wieków fascynuje filozofów?00:03:22 Skąd bierze się zło na świecie? Najważniejsze teorie i odpowiedzi00:06:41 Czy zło można powstrzymać? Jak działa prewencja i odpowiedzialność człowieka00:10:02 Dlaczego szukamy odpowiedzi na problem zła?00:13:24 Czy zło ma charakter metafizyczny, czy jest tylko ludzkim doświadczeniem?00:16:46 Jak filozofia, historia i kultura tłumaczą istnienie zła?00:20:05 Czy zło naprawdę istnieje, czy jest tylko brakiem dobra?00:23:28 Czy istnieje obiektywne dobro i zło, na które wszyscy się zgadzają?00:26:50 Dlaczego istnieją choroby, cierpienie i tragedie niewinnych ludzi?00:30:08 Czy cierpienie może mieć sens? Kiedy zło zmienia człowieka?00:33:29 Czy zło może prowadzić do dobra? Największy filozoficzny paradoks00:36:52 Jak Holocaust zmienił sposób myślenia o złu?00:40:11 Dlaczego filozofowie nie zgadzają się w kwestii natury zła?00:43:32 Czy istnieje powszechna definicja dobra i zła?00:46:54 Jak dziś analizować problem zła i czego możemy się z niego nauczyć?

Hva skjer med mennesket når kunstig intelligens blir stadig mer menneskelig – og vi selv stadig mer maskinlignende? I denne episoden av «Snakk med Silje» møter jeg filmskaper, forfatter og filosof Grethe Bøe til en samtale om kunstig intelligens, bevissthet, teknologi og hva det egentlig vil si å være menneske. Vi snakker om AI, Neuralink og transhumanisme – men også om film, skuespill og hvordan Grethe arbeider med å skape troverdige filmkarakterer. Hva kreves for å forstå et annet menneske innenfra? Hvordan påvirker kunstig intelligens menneskelig interaksjon? Hvordan formidle følelser og skape karakterer vi tror på? Grethe forteller også om sitt forhold til filosofen Hannah Arendt og hennes tanker om ondskap, ansvar og menneskets evne til å tenke selv. Hva skjer når mennesker slutter å reflektere kritisk og bare innretter seg etter systemet? Og kan algoritmer, propaganda og kunstig intelligens gjøre oss lettere å styre? Samtalen beveger seg inn på overvåkning, meningsdannelse, psykologi og følelser, og på tenkere som Carl Jung og Ian McGilchrist. Vi diskuterer også hvordan teknologi påvirker måten vi tenker, kommuniserer og forholder oss til hverandre på – og hvorfor ekte samtaler blir stadig viktigere i en polarisert tid. Dette er en episode om AI og fremtidens teknologi, men kanskje først og fremst en samtale om mennesket, friheten og ansvaret for å tenke selv. ► DONASJONER Vipps: Søk opp “Snakk med Silje” eller bruk vippsnummer: 806513 Bitcoin lightning adresse: psykologsilje@bb.no PayPal: NOK: https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=LZBFC3PKM8ECA Internasjonal bankoverføring: BIC: DNBANOKKXXX IBAN: NO9015068887892 ► KANALER Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/3XIJBJlX8FyZkyluivEch7 Apple podkaster: https://podcasts.apple.com/no/podcast/snakk-med-silje/id1684607083 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@SnakkMedSilje Substack: https://open.substack.com/pub/psykologsilje ► SOME Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/psykologsilje?igsh=MW84MDE0MWplc2FwbA== TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@psykologsilje?_t=8oc3HBC1r4z&_r=1 Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/psykologsilje Twitter: https://x.com/Silje_Schevig LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/silje-schevig-243750101?utm_source=share&utm_campaign=share_via&utm_content=profile&utm_medium=See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Den tyske filosofen Hannah Arendt var opptatt av totalitære regimer og ondskap. I denne samtalen får du høre om statsløshet, Arendts syn på Israel, bruk av sosiale medier og ytringsfrihet.Gjest: Filosof og forfatter av boken Hannah Arendt, Tenkning, terror og det totalitære, Einar Øverenget.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

A seus postos, Aliança Rebelde!Está no ar mais um episódio do Desnazificando! E hoje nós vamos voltar para a série sobre as organizações do Terceiro Reich!Essa série tem episódios mais curtos e se propõe a analisar as instituições do regime nazista, contribuindo para a complexificação desse fenômeno e para compreender os diversos graus de responsabilidade que operavam dentro do séquito nazista, sobretudo em se tratando da responsabilidade pelo extermínio.E no quinto episódio da nossa série, nós discutimos um grande mito da história do século XX: a ideia de que a exército alemão teria mantido as "mãos limpas" durante a Segunda Guerra Mundial.No episódio de hoje, mergulhamos na história da Wehrmacht — as forças armadas da Alemanha nazista.Afinal, qual era o papel dos militares no projeto genocida do Terceiro Reich? Eles eram apenas soldados cumprindo ordens e alheios à ideologia, ou foram parte integrante e ativa da engrenagem do extermínio?Analisar a Wehrmacht é um passo fundamental para compreender a complexidade do regime nazista e os diversos graus de responsabilidade que operavam dentro dele. Como nos lembra Hannah Arendt, o totalitarismo tem raízes profundas — olhar criticamente para essas instituições nos ajuda a refletir sobre o como a barbárie se estrutura institucionalmente.

Ann Heberlein söker sig till Hannah Arendt när hon behöver tröst och har så gjort sedan sin egen studietid. Jag passar inte in, sade 1900-talstänkaren en gång om sig själv. Hon kunde inte placeras i ett fack, varken politiskt eller filosofiskt. I detta avsnitt binder Ann samman Arendts resonemang om förlåtelse och hopp med sitt eget liv. Så släppte Ann kravet på att förlåta och behöll hoppet. Ann Heberlein bjuder på det femte av sex specialavsnitt av Ideologipodden. Vi kallar det för Ideologisommar: Sex personer från olika delar av det politiska spetrat berättar om sin ideologiska resa.

(01:07) Vierenzeventig jaar lag het op de bodem van de Atlantische Oceaan: een Pan Am-toestel dat in 1952 vlak na de start in zee stortte. En juist die ramp staat aan de wieg van iets wat we tegenwoordig allemaal kennen en de meesten van ons straal negeren: de veiligheidsdemonstratie voor vertrek, het reddingsvest onder de stoel en de weg naar de nooduitgang. Benno Baksteen, voormalig piloot, gezagvoerder bij de KLM en voorzitter van de Vereniging van Nederlandse Verkeersvliegers, met een grote kennis van de luchtvaartgeschiedenis, vertelt meer.  (09:20) Oude woorden nieuwe wereld- de serie van OVT over historische boeken die ons het heden beter doen begrijpen. Welke echo's uit het verleden schudden ons wakker, geven houvast of bieden troost? Deze week praten we met filosoof en schrijver Joke J. Hermsen over Totalitarisme (1951) van Hannah Arendt.  (53:00) Deze zomer duiken we in een wereld van muziek die meer deed dan alleen vermaken. In onze rubriek Historische Protestsongs hoor je de verhalen achter de liedjes die wereldwijd aanzette tot denken, actie of verzet. In deze tweede aflevering duiken we in in het korte, harde leven van liedschrijver Pieter Cornelis de Ruijter (1855-1888). Historicus Dennis Bos is te gast.  Meer info:  https://www.vpro.nl/ovt/artikelen/ovt-26-juli-2026  (https://www.vpro.nl/ovt/artikelen/ovt-26-juli-2026)    

In this digest Amanda and Samuel look at if and when writing and reading help us make a difference. Amanda shares some of her reflections in writing her new book Conscious Tribes, and together they compare the idea of writing as a conversation with the reader and writing as an act of persuasion used to convince the reader of a particular way of thinking.Borrowing insights from Chris Nolan's adaptation of Homer's Odssey and Hannah Arendt's exploration of public and private, and story, they explore what it means to tell (and retell) our stories, and to share stories with others in mind.You can find our more and order Amanda's book Conscious Tribes: thinking differently about making a difference here.========For more about ChangeMakers check us out:Via our Website - https://changemakerspodcast.org (where you can also sign up to our email list!)Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ChangeMakersPodcast/Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/changemakerspodcast/Threads: https://www.threads.com/@changemakerspodcastBlue Sky: https://www.threads.com/@amandatattersall.bsky.socialFor more about Samuel:Personal site: https://www.samuelmchu.comThe Campaign for Hong Kong: https://www.thecampaignforhongkong.orgDemocracy in Flight: https://www.democracyinflight.orgLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/samuelmchuTwitter/X: https://x.com/samuelmchuFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/samuelmchuInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/samuelmchuFor more about Amanda:Personal site: https://amandatattersall.com/ On LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/amandatattersall/Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/amanda.tattersallBlueSky: https://bsky.app/profile/amandatattersall.bsky.socialThreads: https://www.threads.com/@amandatattersallAmanda's new books are called People Power in Cities & Conscious Tribes: thinking differently about making a difference. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this digest Amanda and Samuel look at if and when writing and reading help us make a difference. Amanda shares some of her reflections in writing her new book Conscious Tribes, and together they compare the idea of writing as a conversation with the reader and writing as an act of persuasion used to convince the reader of a particular way of thinking.Borrowing insights from Chris Nolan's adaptation of Homer's Odssey and Hannah Arendt's exploration of public and private, and story, they explore what it means to tell (and retell) our stories, and to share stories with others in mind.You can find our more and order Amanda's book Conscious Tribes: thinking differently about making a difference here.========For more about ChangeMakers check us out:Via our Website - https://changemakerspodcast.org (where you can also sign up to our email list!)Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ChangeMakersPodcast/Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/changemakerspodcast/Threads: https://www.threads.com/@changemakerspodcastBlue Sky: https://www.threads.com/@amandatattersall.bsky.socialFor more about Samuel:Personal site: https://www.samuelmchu.comThe Campaign for Hong Kong: https://www.thecampaignforhongkong.orgDemocracy in Flight: https://www.democracyinflight.orgLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/samuelmchuTwitter/X: https://x.com/samuelmchuFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/samuelmchuInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/samuelmchuFor more about Amanda:Personal site: https://amandatattersall.com/ On LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/amandatattersall/Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/amanda.tattersallBlueSky: https://bsky.app/profile/amandatattersall.bsky.socialThreads: https://www.threads.com/@amandatattersallAmanda's new books are called People Power in Cities & Conscious Tribes: thinking differently about making a difference. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Este texto es una crónica personal en formato de guion de podcast que relata el descubrimiento fortuito de una biografía ilustrada sobre Hannah Arendt durante un viaje a Chihuahua. El autor narra con nostalgia su visita a la librería Kosmos y una tarde lluviosa en una cafetería local, donde comenzó a explorar la obra de Ken Krimstein. A través de una prosa descriptiva, se resalta la estructura poco convencional del libro, la cual utiliza el humor y la narrativa gráfica para abordar la compleja vida de la filósofa. El relato vincula el placer de la lectura con la memoria de los viajes, subrayando cómo ciertos libros transforman nuestra visión del mundo. Finalmente, la fuente sirve como una reflexión íntima sobre la curiosidad intelectual y el legado de una mujer que nunca dejó de pensar frente a la adversidad

Rose Horowitch, staff writer for The Atlantic, joins Preet to unpack her recent article, “The End of Reading is Here.” They break down the data behind reading trends, how new technologies like generative AI have affected our reading comprehension and attention spans, and what it means to live in a post-literate world. Then, Preet pays tribute to someone who did as much for justice as anyone he's ever known, and he answers a listener question about the recent arrests of Andrew Tate and his brother and explains how the extradition process works. In the bonus for Insiders, Preet and Horowitch discuss her senior thesis on German-American philosopher Hannah Arendt. Join the Insider community for access to bonus content from Stay Tuned and weekly episodes of the Insider podcast hosted by Preet and Joyce Vance. Visit staytuned.substack.com to sign up. Thank you for supporting our work. Show notes and a transcript of the episode are available on our website.  Watch this episode on our Youtube channel. Shop Stay Tuned merch and featured books by our guests in our Amazon storefront. Have a question for Preet? Ask @PreetBharara on BlueSky, or Twitter with the hashtag #AskPreet. Email us at staytuned@cafe.com, or call 833-997-7338 to leave a voicemail. Stay Tuned with Preet is brought to you by CAFE and the Vox Media Podcast Network. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Matthew Longo, The Picnic: A Dream of Freedom and the Collapse of the Iron Curtain. Thirty years after the event, Matthew Longo returns to the border to reflect on the legacy of the picnic and the nature of freedom. The site of the former "death zone" has ironically become the most green part of Europe—a "green belt" of pastoral woodlands. Longo interviews the aging survivors, including Nemeth, Agnes, and Laslo, a curator of documents who describes the unremarkable-looking spot as Anus Mundi. The final discussion explores the evolving meaning of liberty, contrasting Isaiah Berlin's "negative liberty" (freedom from state interference and freedom of movement) with Hannah Arendt's concept of "plurality" and solidarity. Longo notes a "perverse irony": many East Germans who successfully fled to the West were ultimately disappointed by the version of freedom they found, which lacked the sense of community and solidarity they had experienced in the East. In a modern world where walls are being rebuilt and xenophobia is rising, the story of the Pan-European Picnic serves as a prompt to rethink how the euphoria of 1989 transitioned into the embattled state of liberalism today. (4)

Entre Espanha e Argentina, o futebol mostrou, mais uma vez, que nunca se separa da política. As acusações de racismo contra os dois países não devem deixar esquecer que o esporte deve ser também um espaço de resistência. Thomás Zicman de Barros, analista político Apesar de só ter marcado no final da prorrogação, não há dúvida de que a Espanha dominou a final da Copa do Mundo contra a Argentina. Muita gente no Brasil comemorou a derrota dos nossos vizinhos. Para além da rivalidade e do futebol ruim apresentado pela alviceleste, muitos justificavam a torcida por motivos políticos. Como disse antes mesmo do início do torneio, política e futebol são inseparáveis. Para alguns, torcer pela Argentina significaria legitimar o racismo que marca o país. Houve até quem transformasse essa escolha numa forma conveniente de expiar o racismo brasileiro, apontando o dedo para os outros. A Argentina convive, sim, com um grave problema de racismo. Os episódios se repetem nas arquibancadas, nas redes sociais e, por vezes, entre os próprios jogadores. O silêncio de muitos de seus principais atletas diante desse fenômeno também é eloquente. Como se diz hoje, não basta não ser racista: é preciso ser antirracista. Neste aspecto, porém, a Espanha também leva cartão vermelho. Trata-se do país onde Vini Jr. foi alvo de uma escancarada campanha racista, que no entanto tentaram apagar. Até mesmo Javier Tebas, presidente da La Liga, em vez de enfrentar o racismo que se abatia contra o jogador, insinuou que era Vinicius que provocava as torcidas. Fenômeno atravessa séculos O racismo espanhol e argentino vem de longa data. A Espanha foi uma das grandes potências coloniais da era moderna. Ainda que tenha perdido esse protagonismo ao longo do século XX, enfrentando décadas de decadência, conservou por muito tempo uma imagem de si mesma como centro civilizador. A Argentina percorreu uma história diferente, mas chegou a um lugar parecido. Desde o século XIX, parte das elites de Buenos Aires procurou apresentar o país como uma espécie de Europa transplantada para a América do Sul. Domingo Faustino Sarmiento, intelectual que viria a ser presidente do país, resumiu esse projeto na fórmula que atravessou gerações: "civilização ou barbárie". A civilização era a Europa. A barbárie eram os povos indígenas, os mestiços, os gaúchos, todos aqueles que não cabiam no ideal de uma nação branca e europeia. Mas há algo curioso nessa frase. Se Sarmiento precisou opor civilização e barbárie é porque a chamada “barbárie” não branca existia e resistia. E isso vale para os dois finalistas desta Copa do Mundo. A Espanha nunca foi apenas Madri. É, na prática, uma comunidade plurinacional, onde catalães, bascos, galegos e tantos outros disputam há séculos diferentes maneiras de entender o próprio país. Foi também nessas periferias que se organizaram algumas das resistências mais duradouras ao franquismo. E a Espanha do século XXI tampouco é a Espanha sonhada pelos nacionalistas. É um país profundamente transformado pela imigração. Basta olhar para Lamine Yamal, prodígio da seleção espanhola, para perceber isso. Ele é o filho de imigrantes que mostra que a Espanha real é muito mais diversa do que o imaginário construído pelos supremacistas. Algo parecido se vê na Argentina. Por trás da fantasia de uma nação exclusivamente europeia sempre existiu outro país: indígena, mestiço, popular. A Argentina dos chamados cabecitas negras, mobilizados pelo peronismo contra as elites portenhas. Uma Argentina que nunca aceitou desaparecer. Maradona: a Argentina que resiste Maradona talvez tenha sido seu símbolo mais poderoso. Reivindicava sua origem guarani, fazia questão de afirmar sua identidade latino-americana, abraçava causas anti-imperialistas quando isso podia custar muito caro. Era, talvez sem o dizer, a revanche daquela Argentina que Sarmiento havia chamado de “barbárie”. É curioso notar que os jogadores argentinos de hoje, tão omissos quando o assunto é racismo, tenham encontrado tanta convicção para defender a soberania argentina sobre as Malvinas. Depois da vitória sobre a Inglaterra, exibiram uma faixa reafirmando a reivindicação do arquipélago. O gesto lembrava algo que Hannah Arendt observou ao analisar o imperialismo moderno: as hierarquias raciais e a lógica imperial nasceram da mesma visão de mundo. Não é possível combater uma e ignorar completamente a outra. Nada disso transforma a Argentina em exemplo de antirracismo. Nem absolve a Espanha de sua dificuldade em enfrentar o preconceito arraigado. Agora, se política e futebol são inseparáveis, é preciso celebrar os momentos de resistência. O futebol continuará sendo um campo de disputa. Que seja também um espaço de luta antirracista.

Orit Halpern on Knowledge, Data and Democracy Shownotes Orit Halpern Prof. Dr. Orit Halpern at TU Dresden: https://tu-dresden.de/gsw/slk/germanistik/digitalcultures/die-professur/inhaber-in Orit Halpern's website: https://orithalpern.net/ Halpern, O. (2015). Beautiful data: A history of vision and reason since 1945. Duke University Press. https://www.dukeupress.edu/beautiful-data Halpern, O., & Mitchell, R. (2023). The smartness mandate. MIT Press. https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262544511/the-smartness-mandate/  Hayek, F. A. (2013). The use of knowledge in society. In Modern understandings of liberty and property (pp. 27-38). Routledge. https://home.uchicago.edu/~vlima/courses/econ200/spring01/hayek.pdf  Bush, V. (1945). As we may think. The atlantic monthly, 176(1), 101-108. https://www.ias.ac.in/article/fulltext/reso/005/11/0094-0103  on CERN: https://home.cern/about/who-we-are/ on the Event Horizon Telescope: https://eventhorizontelescope.org/ on the IPCC: https://www.ipcc.ch/ on critiques of the Enlightenment: https://polsci.institute/modern-political-philosophy/critiques-enlightenment-modernity/ Horkheimer, M., Adorno, T. W., & Noeri, G. (2002). Dialectic of enlightenment. Stanford University Press. https://www.sup.org/books/theory-and-philosophy/dialectic-enlightenment  on Keynesianism: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keynesianismus on MAGA: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Make_America_Great_Again  on the Frankfurt School: https://www.britannica.com/topic/Frankfurt-School on high modernism: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_modernism on totalitarianism according to Hannah Arendt: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Origins_of_Totalitarianism Friedrich Hayek: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedrich_August_von_Hayek  on strict constitutionalism/constructionism: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strict_constructionism on the Electoral College: https://www.archives.gov/electoral-college/about on Stafford Beer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stafford_Beer https://www.kybernetik.ch/en/fs_beer.html  on post-sovereign planning: Mohammed, S. Z. (2025). Post-sovereign planning? Nature, culture and care in the new socialist calculation debate. In Creative Construction (pp. 265-278). Bristol University Press. https://bristoluniversitypressdigital.com/edcollchap/book/9781529235142/ch014.xml Latour, B. (2012). We have never been modern. Harvard university press. https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674948396  on the cultural revolution: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_Revolution on the Belt and Road initiative: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belt_and_Road_Initiative on Mao Zedong: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mao_Zedong on Planetary Experiments: https://orithalpern.net/planetaryexperiments Halpern, O. (2019). The Planetary Test. Zeitschrift für Medien and Kulturforschung, Vol 10. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5e2c7ee53de3f756cfd6cbbc/t/65a808813c02ca697d90089a/1705511045522/planetarytestarticleZMK.pdf Halpern, O. (2020). Planetary intelligence. In The cultural life of machine learning: An incursion into critical AI studies (pp. 227-256). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-56286-1_8 on Large Language Models (LLMs): https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_Language_Model  on Victor Papanek: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victor_Papanek Groos, J., & Sorg, C. (Eds.). (2025). Creative construction: Democratic planning in the 21st century and beyond. Bristol University Press. https://bristoluniversitypress.co.uk/creative-construction  on Terraforming: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terraforming on Geoengineering: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geoengineering on NVIDIA Earth 2: https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/high-performance-com on Destination Earth: https://www.esa.int/Applications/Observing_the_Earth/Destination_Earth on Piketty's inequality equation r > g: https://equitablegrowth.org/pareto-distribution-r-g/ Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Harvard University Press. https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674430006  the mentioned quote on the ‘weak cyborg dream' in Orit Halpern (2019, p. 22):  https://publish.fid-media.de/server/api/core/bitstreams/73aba255-56d2-4595-83b5-bfdad3740ffb/content Against Catastrophes: https://againstcatastrophe.net/ Orit Halpern on resilience: Halpern, O. (2025). The geo-politics of resilience: On the historical convergence between ecology, artificial intelligence, and corporate strategy. new media & society, 27(8), 4581-4605. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/14614448251336420  on Ground Truth: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ground_Truth  on benchmark data: https://brilliantfuture.se/en/glossaries/benchmark-data Related Episodes of Future Histories S03E34 | Cecilia Rikap on Intellectual Monopoly Capitalism and Corporate Power in the Age of AI https://www.futurehistories.today/episoden-blog/s03/e34-cecilia-rikap-on-intellectual-monopoly-capitalism-and-corporate-power-in-the-age-of-ai/ S02E44 | Evgeny Morozov on Discovery Beyond Competition https://www.futurehistories.today/episoden-blog/s02/e44-evgeny-morozov-on-discovery-beyond-competition/ S02E43 | Samia Mohammed zur Zukunft jenseits des Marktes https://www.futurehistories.today/episoden-blog/s02/e43-samia-mohammed-zur-zukunft-jenseits-des-marktes/ — Future Histories Contact & Support If you like Future Histories, please consider supporting us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/join/FutureHistories Contact: office@futurehistories.today  Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/futurehpodcast/ Mastodon: https://mstdn.social/@FutureHistories English webpage: https://futurehistories-international.com Episode Keywords #OritHalpern #JanGroos, #Interview, #TUDresden, #FutureHistoriesInternational, #FutureHistories, #Knowledge, #Data, #Democracy, #Technology, #Society, #ArtificialIntelligence, #AI, #Data, #Capitalism, #Neoliberalism, #PlanetaryExperiments, #PostSovereignPlanning, #DemocraticPlanning, #Alternatives

Hannah Arendt gilt als eine der einflussreichsten politischen Denkerinnen des 20. Jahrhunderts – unkonventionell, ideologiekritisch, streitbar. Ihr Denken, entstanden aus den Erschütterungen von Flucht, Exil und Staatenlosigkeit, bleibt 50 Jahre nach ihrem Tod von erstaunlicher Gegenwartskraft. «Denken ohne Geländer» – diesem Anspruch widmete Arendt ihr ganzes Leben. Sie durchlebte die Katastrophen des 20. Jahrhunderts, floh vor den Nationalsozialisten, stellte sich in den USA neu auf und widmete ihr Leben der Suche nach Wahrheit und Freiheit. Sie beharrte auf intellektuelle Beweglichkeit statt Zugehörigkeit und war konsequent ideologiekritisch. Freundschaft wurde für sie zur politischen Tugend, Pluralität zum Grundprinzip menschlichen Zusammenlebens. Wie wirken die biografischen Brüche und Neuanfänge in ihr Werk hinein? Warum spielt Zwischenmenschlichkeit und Freundschaft eine so zentrale Rolle in ihrer politischen Theorie? Und weshalb gewinnen Arendts Ideen gerade heute so an Brisanz? Olivia Röllin im Gespräch mit Grit Strassenberger, Professorin für Politische Theorie und Autorin der neuen Biografie «Die Denkerin. Hannah Arendt und ihr Jahrhundert». Wiederholung vom 7. Dezember 2025

Hannah Arendt gilt als eine der einflussreichsten politischen Denkerinnen des 20. Jahrhunderts – unkonventionell, ideologiekritisch, streitbar. Ihr Denken, entstanden aus den Erschütterungen von Flucht, Exil und Staatenlosigkeit, bleibt 50 Jahre nach ihrem Tod von erstaunlicher Gegenwartskraft. «Denken ohne Geländer» – diesem Anspruch widmete Arendt ihr ganzes Leben. Sie durchlebte die Katastrophen des 20. Jahrhunderts, floh vor den Nationalsozialisten, stellte sich in den USA neu auf und widmete ihr Leben der Suche nach Wahrheit und Freiheit. Sie beharrte auf intellektuelle Beweglichkeit statt Zugehörigkeit und war konsequent ideologiekritisch. Freundschaft wurde für sie zur politischen Tugend, Pluralität zum Grundprinzip menschlichen Zusammenlebens. Wie wirken die biografischen Brüche und Neuanfänge in ihr Werk hinein? Warum spielt Zwischenmenschlichkeit und Freundschaft eine so zentrale Rolle in ihrer politischen Theorie? Und weshalb gewinnen Arendts Ideen gerade heute so an Brisanz? Olivia Röllin im Gespräch mit Grit Strassenberger, Professorin für Politische Theorie und Autorin der neuen Biografie «Die Denkerin. Hannah Arendt und ihr Jahrhundert». Wiederholung vom 7. Dezember 2025

In the spirit of Hannah Arendt's natality principle (that new things are always and should always be being born, each one unique and endowed with limitless potential) we at RTB love it when a new podcast appears. Especially one as thoughtful and original as The Caste Pod, which assembles scholars and activists to make sense of what caste is, how it's experienced and how it has travelled globally. Join us to discuss and share an extended excerpt is its widely published (check out her earlier books!) founder Ajantha Subramanian, Professor of Anthropology at CUNY Graduate Center, and producer (with Lori Allen) of the “Violent Majorities” series here at RTB. John and Ajantha delve into the founding of the podcast, and then enter into the business end of the series, which is to explore the complex interplay between caste, race and class as organizing features of economic inequality and its corresponding features of cultural discrimination and oppression. Ajantha's extended conversation with Prachi and Ram of Savera, a multiracial, interfaith, anti-caste coalition of Indian Americans from The Caste Pod episode 10 lays bare its premise: to put scholars and activists into conversation and opens a space engineered for each to learn form the other. Before introducing the Savera excerpt, Ajantha frames the topic by way of Isabel Wilkerson's influential (if problematic) book Caste and its neglect of class and economic issues, and also the case against Cisco for caste discrimination in California that in significant ways internationalized the fight around caste's role in perpetuating economic and political inequity. Listen and Read Here. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

In the spirit of Hannah Arendt's natality principle (that new things are always and should always be being born, each one unique and endowed with limitless potential) we at RTB love it when a new podcast appears. Especially one as thoughtful and original as The Caste Pod, which assembles scholars and activists to make sense of what caste is, how it's experienced and how it has travelled globally. Join us to discuss and share an extended excerpt is its widely published (check out her earlier books!) founder Ajantha Subramanian, Professor of Anthropology at CUNY Graduate Center, and producer (with Lori Allen) of the “Violent Majorities” series here at RTB. John and Ajantha delve into the founding of the podcast, and then enter into the business end of the series, which is to explore the complex interplay between caste, race and class as organizing features of economic inequality and its corresponding features of cultural discrimination and oppression. Ajantha's extended conversation with Prachi and Ram of Savera, a multiracial, interfaith, anti-caste coalition of Indian Americans from The Caste Pod episode 10 lays bare its premise: to put scholars and activists into conversation and opens a space engineered for each to learn form the other. Before introducing the Savera excerpt, Ajantha frames the topic by way of Isabel Wilkerson's influential (if problematic) book Caste and its neglect of class and economic issues, and also the case against Cisco for caste discrimination in California that in significant ways internationalized the fight around caste's role in perpetuating economic and political inequity. Listen and Read Here. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

In the spirit of Hannah Arendt's natality principle (that new things are always and should always be being born, each one unique and endowed with limitless potential) we at RTB love it when a new podcast appears. Especially one as thoughtful and original as The Caste Pod, which assembles scholars and activists to make sense of what caste is, how it's experienced and how it has travelled globally. Join us to discuss and share an extended excerpt is its widely published (check out her earlier books!) founder Ajantha Subramanian, Professor of Anthropology at CUNY Graduate Center, and producer (with Lori Allen) of the “Violent Majorities” series here at RTB. John and Ajantha delve into the founding of the podcast, and then enter into the business end of the series, which is to explore the complex interplay between caste, race and class as organizing features of economic inequality and its corresponding features of cultural discrimination and oppression. Ajantha's extended conversation with Prachi and Ram of Savera, a multiracial, interfaith, anti-caste coalition of Indian Americans from The Caste Pod episode 10 lays bare its premise: to put scholars and activists into conversation and opens a space engineered for each to learn form the other. Before introducing the Savera excerpt, Ajantha frames the topic by way of Isabel Wilkerson's influential (if problematic) book Caste and its neglect of class and economic issues, and also the case against Cisco for caste discrimination in California that in significant ways internationalized the fight around caste's role in perpetuating economic and political inequity. Listen and Read Here. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In the spirit of Hannah Arendt's natality principle (that new things are always and should always be being born, each one unique and endowed with limitless potential) we at RTB love it when a new podcast appears. Especially one as thoughtful and original as The Caste Pod, which assembles scholars and activists to make sense of what caste is, how it's experienced and how it has travelled globally. Join us to discuss and share an extended excerpt is its widely published (check out her earlier books!) founder Ajantha Subramanian, Professor of Anthropology at CUNY Graduate Center, and producer (with Lori Allen) of the “Violent Majorities” series here at RTB. John and Ajantha delve into the founding of the podcast, and then enter into the business end of the series, which is to explore the complex interplay between caste, race and class as organizing features of economic inequality and its corresponding features of cultural discrimination and oppression. Ajantha's extended conversation with Prachi and Ram of Savera, a multiracial, interfaith, anti-caste coalition of Indian Americans from The Caste Pod episode 10 lays bare its premise: to put scholars and activists into conversation and opens a space engineered for each to learn form the other. Before introducing the Savera excerpt, Ajantha frames the topic by way of Isabel Wilkerson's influential (if problematic) book Caste and its neglect of class and economic issues, and also the case against Cisco for caste discrimination in California that in significant ways internationalized the fight around caste's role in perpetuating economic and political inequity. Listen and Read Here. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/critical-theory

In the spirit of Hannah Arendt's natality principle (that new things are always and should always be being born, each one unique and endowed with limitless potential) we at RTB love it when a new podcast appears. Especially one as thoughtful and original as The Caste Pod, which assembles scholars and activists to make sense of what caste is, how it's experienced and how it has travelled globally. Join us to discuss and share an extended excerpt is its widely published (check out her earlier books!) founder Ajantha Subramanian, Professor of Anthropology at CUNY Graduate Center, and producer (with Lori Allen) of the “Violent Majorities” series here at RTB. John and Ajantha delve into the founding of the podcast, and then enter into the business end of the series, which is to explore the complex interplay between caste, race and class as organizing features of economic inequality and its corresponding features of cultural discrimination and oppression. Ajantha's extended conversation with Prachi and Ram of Savera, a multiracial, interfaith, anti-caste coalition of Indian Americans from The Caste Pod episode 10 lays bare its premise: to put scholars and activists into conversation and opens a space engineered for each to learn form the other. Before introducing the Savera excerpt, Ajantha frames the topic by way of Isabel Wilkerson's influential (if problematic) book Caste and its neglect of class and economic issues, and also the case against Cisco for caste discrimination in California that in significant ways internationalized the fight around caste's role in perpetuating economic and political inequity. Listen and Read Here. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/anthropology

In the spirit of Hannah Arendt's natality principle (that new things are always and should always be being born, each one unique and endowed with limitless potential) we at RTB love it when a new podcast appears. Especially one as thoughtful and original as The Caste Pod, which assembles scholars and activists to make sense of what caste is, how it's experienced and how it has travelled globally. Join us to discuss and share an extended excerpt is its widely published (check out her earlier books!) founder Ajantha Subramanian, Professor of Anthropology at CUNY Graduate Center, and producer (with Lori Allen) of the “Violent Majorities” series here at RTB. John and Ajantha delve into the founding of the podcast, and then enter into the business end of the series, which is to explore the complex interplay between caste, race and class as organizing features of economic inequality and its corresponding features of cultural discrimination and oppression. Ajantha's extended conversation with Prachi and Ram of Savera, a multiracial, interfaith, anti-caste coalition of Indian Americans from The Caste Pod episode 10 lays bare its premise: to put scholars and activists into conversation and opens a space engineered for each to learn form the other. Before introducing the Savera excerpt, Ajantha frames the topic by way of Isabel Wilkerson's influential (if problematic) book Caste and its neglect of class and economic issues, and also the case against Cisco for caste discrimination in California that in significant ways internationalized the fight around caste's role in perpetuating economic and political inequity. Listen and Read Here. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/sociology

In the spirit of Hannah Arendt's natality principle (that new things are always and should always be being born, each one unique and endowed with limitless potential) we at RTB love it when a new podcast appears. Especially one as thoughtful and original as The Caste Pod, which assembles scholars and activists to make sense of what caste is, how it's experienced and how it has travelled globally. Join us to discuss and share an extended excerpt is its widely published (check out her earlier books!) founder Ajantha Subramanian, Professor of Anthropology at CUNY Graduate Center, and producer (with Lori Allen) of the “Violent Majorities” series here at RTB. John and Ajantha delve into the founding of the podcast, and then enter into the business end of the series, which is to explore the complex interplay between caste, race and class as organizing features of economic inequality and its corresponding features of cultural discrimination and oppression. Ajantha's extended conversation with Prachi and Ram of Savera, a multiracial, interfaith, anti-caste coalition of Indian Americans from The Caste Pod episode 10 lays bare its premise: to put scholars and activists into conversation and opens a space engineered for each to learn form the other. Before introducing the Savera excerpt, Ajantha frames the topic by way of Isabel Wilkerson's influential (if problematic) book Caste and its neglect of class and economic issues, and also the case against Cisco for caste discrimination in California that in significant ways internationalized the fight around caste's role in perpetuating economic and political inequity. Listen and Read Here. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The conversation explores one central question: What should ordinary people do when a government begins crossing moral lines? Matt Robison sits down with Gal Beckerman of The Atlantic to discuss his powerful new book How to Be a Dissident—drawing lessons from Václav Havel, Alexei Navalny, Hannah Arendt, Nelson Mandela, the Civil Rights Movement, Soviet dissidents, and more.This isn't a conversation about performative outrage or easy answers. It's about the difficult moral choices every democracy eventually asks of its citizens:• When should you resist?• What kinds of resistance actually matter?• Is protest enough?• Does political satire accomplish anything?• How do ordinary people find the courage to stand up to power?Whether you agree or disagree with every conclusion, this discussion explores one of the defining questions of our time.Subscribe for more conversations about democracy, politics, elections, and the future of America.Substack:https://worthknowing.substack.comYouTube:https://www.youtube.com/@WorthKnowingwithMattRobisonChapters00:00 Introduction: When Government Turns Evil04:05 Why Gal Beckerman wrote How to Be a Dissident05:20 Do Americans need dissidents today?08:15 The nightmare that inspired the book10:00 When do you decide to resist?12:00 Hannah Arendt and moral courage15:00 Milgram, Stanford Prison & conformity18:00 Why dissent begins with standing alone20:20 The surprising traits real dissidents share22:00 Why being loud isn't enough24:00 Do protests actually accomplish anything?26:00 Political humor vs. authoritarianism29:00 Truth, lies, and fact-checking dictators35:00 Havel vs. Kundera: What really changes history?37:00 The power of bearing witness40:00 MLK, LBJ, and why successful movements need both insiders and outsiders42:00 The Children's Crusade and strategic moral risk46:00 Israel, Gaza, and personal moral responsibility47:45 The hardest question: "What are you prepared to do?"50:00 Living a meaningful life through moral choices52:00 Closing thoughtsKeywordsauthoritarianism, democracy, resisting authoritarianism, Gal Beckerman, The Atlantic, How to Be a Dissident, Donald Trump, democracy in America, political resistance, authoritarian government, civil rights movement, Václav Havel, Alexei Navalny, Hannah Arendt, Nelson Mandela, Soviet dissidents, political courage, moral courage, democratic backsliding, constitutional democracy, political philosophy, American politics, Matt Robison, Worth KnowingHashtags#Politics #Democracy #Authoritarianism #Trump #GalBeckerman #TheAtlantic #WorthKnowing #Resistance #DemocracyMatters #PoliticalDiscussion #CurrentEvents #MattRobison

Kate is joined by returning guest and friend of the show, Kim Lane Scheppele, the Laurance S. Rockefeller Professor of Sociology and International Affairs at Princeton, and one of the world's leading scholars of democratic backsliding, autocracy, and the rule of law. They discuss how the Supreme Court has been “captured,” the ways Donald Trump is attempting to remake Washington, D.C., in his image, and what Hungary can teach us about autocracy and how to recover from it.Favorite things: Kate:Emil Bove Defended Trump in Court. Then Trump Made Him a Judge, Mattathias Schwartz (NYT); Mailman: My Wild Ride Delivering the Mail in Appalachia and Finally Finding Home, Stephen Starring Grant Kim:Regime Change: Inside the Imperial Presidency of Donald Trump, Maggie Haberman & Jonathan Swan; Into the Wood Chipper: A Whistleblower's Account of How the Trump Administration Shredded USAID, Nicholas Enrich; The Dual State, Ernst Fraenkel; The Origins of Totalitarianism, Hannah Arendt; It Can't Happen Here, Sinclair Lewis; Borgen - Power & Glory (Netflix); Gok Wan's Easy Asian (Prime Video) Get tickets for STRICT SCRUTINY LIVE on November 6th in Washington, DC: Crookedcon.comBuy Melissa's book, The U.S. Constitution: A Comprehensive and Annotated Guide for the Modern ReaderBuy Leah's book, Lawless, now out in paperbackFollow us on Instagram, Threads, and BlueskyFor a transcript of an episode of Strict Scrutiny please email transcripts@crooked.com

Tomorrow's inauguration may spell the end for Donald Trump's disastrous presidency, but the monster he unleashed upon us January 6th will be with us for a generation. Michael discusses how the rioters were not some extraordinary group of hardened extremists, but rather, they come from our own communities; representing, as writer Hannah Arendt noted in her landmark 1963 New Yorker essay about the trial of Adolf Eichmann, "the banality of evil." The Lincoln Project's Rick Wilson joins Michael to discuss how we go about dismantling Trump's ugly legacy and hold the rioters and those who supported them accountable. For cool Mea Culpa gear, check out www.meaculpapodcast.com/merchTo learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policyLearn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Emie R. Roussel has just released a new record TERR with her trio, Nicolas Bédard on Contrebasse & basse électrique, and Dominic Cloutier on Drums. This record, made by good friends who have played together for years, is inspired by love of Earth, of friends, of life.  The music is lovely and surprising, passionate and surreal. Emie has a long relationship with music and with the piano, starting with classical and then jazz and then creating her own thing. Her bandmates are both accomplished players, and together they create beautiful musical space. • Emie R. Roussel on YouTube This episode of Paradigms is dedicated to Hannah Arendt. • When Arendt Knew by E. A. Hanks • Hannah Arendt at the Library – Marianne Williamson Music by: Emie R. Roussel Trio The post Emie R. Roussel – The Emie R. Roussel Trio “TERR” appeared first on Paradigms Podcast.

El Dr. José Miguel Gaona es psiquiatra forense. Ha peritado algunos de los crímenes más difíciles de explicar de este país y, a la vez, es uno de los pocos médicos que ha estado dentro de exorcismos reales, tras formarse en el curso para exorcistas del Vaticano en Roma. Su último libro, "Posesión: Un viaje profundo entre la ciencia y el misterio de los exorcismos"(https://amzn.to/3ThBoqG), no va, en realidad, de demonios: va de la mente humana, del mal y de esa frontera incómoda en la que la ciencia se queda sin palabras. En esta conversación hablamos del cerebro que fabrica sus propios fantasmas: epilepsia, disociación, criptomnesia, parálisis del sueño, del "casco de Dios" que él mismo se puso en el laboratorio de Persinger, de la banalidad del mal de Hannah Arendt y del caso de Pioz, del libre albedrío de Libet, y de los casos que, siendo un escéptico riguroso, reconoce no poder explicar. Y de una pregunta que lo atraviesa todo: ¿el mal está fuera de nosotros, o dentro? Una charla larga, sin prisa, entre la neurociencia y el misterio, con un hombre que ha aprendido a mirar el mal de frente sin apartar la vista. Síguenos en Redes Twitter: https://twitter.com/radioelrespeto Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/radioelrespeto/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/radioelrespeto Redes Sociales del Equipo: | Pablo Fuente | https://www.instagram.com/pablofuente/ | Nacho Sevilla | https://twitter.com/nachorsevilla | Fernando Sierra | https://twitter.com/Peeweeyo1

E.A. Hanks joins Marianne to talk about Hannah Arendt, the philosopher who saw fascism coming in Germany before it arrived.  She names what many of us are feeling about the moment in which we live. EA Hanks' Substack EAHanks.Substack.com Subscribe to Marianne's Substack: MarianneWilliamson.Susbtack.com Subscribe to Marianne's YouTube Channel Follow Marianne on Instagram Follow Marianne on Facebook Follow Marianne on TikTok Learn more at Marianne.com

On this episode we welcome back Ginie Servant-Miklos, founder and director of the Bildung Climate School in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, to check in on how this initiative has evolved and also about her recent book, Pedagogies of Collapse: A Hopeful Education for the End of the World as We Know it. The Bildung Climate School is in its third year and set to receive formal accreditation within Erasmus University Rotterdam, one of the great research universities of Europe. Deeply informed by the vision of "Bildung," the model of human development expressed in the Danish folk high schools, BCS seeks to empowers young people drawn from all sectors of post-secondary education in the Netherlands to "face sustainability challenges with resilience, creativity, and care" in the context of "an interdisciplinary learning community, combining science, hands-on skills, and personal development to prepare the next generation for a just and sustainable world." Ginie is an experienced experimental educator and a scholar with a broad range of expertise, as well as a passionate practitioner and promoter of martial arts. She pulls no punches in her book and in our conversation about the dire situation we are in as a species and about how challenging it is to be a young person coming of age today. But her message, and the mission of the Bildung Climate School, is ultimately about hope and an embrace of the most profound facets of what it means to be human. Her work and writing is deeply marked by her own life experiences and the ideas of her intellectual heroes, including Simone de Beauvoir, Paulo Freire, Viktor Frankl, and Hannah Arendt, whose work we discuss in this conversation.Ginie Servant-Miklos is an engaged environmental educator with fifteen years of experience in education practice, research, and advocacy. She currently holds an Associate Professorship with an Education Profile at the Erasmus School of Social and Behavioural Sciences in Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Her research and education work focuses on developing innovative pedagogies for societal impact. She developed the Experimental Pedagogics educational design framework, is the Director of the Bildung Climate School and the author of "Pedagogies of Collapse: A Hopeful Education for the End of the World as We Know It". She is a Leadership Fellow of the Comenius Network for educational innovators in the Netherlands. She is the founder and chair of the board of the FairFight Foundation, an organisation that provides girls and women from Zambia, Zimbabwe, and India with the mental and physical benefits of martial arts practice, as well as educational support. Ginie is a vocal activist for sustainability and gender equality, advocating for change through public engagements like TEDx talks, debates, podcasts, and other digital media outlets. Ginie obtained a Bachelor of Arts in Politics, Philosophy and Economics from the University of Kent, an LLM in International Law from Kent Law School, an MA in International Relations from Sciences Po Lille, a PhD in Education Philosophy and Psychology from Erasmus University Rotterdam, and a post-doctoral research grant in Sustainability Education from Aalborg University in Denmark. She was also a visiting professor in Experimental Pedagogics at Tyumen University in Russia.Bildung Climate School - https://www.bildungclimateschool.com/Pedagogies of Collapse - https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/pedagogies-of-collapse-9781350400498/https://thoreaucollege.org/

Welcome to another episode of the Peaceful Political Revolution in America podcast.I want to begin today with a passage that has been sitting with me for some time. It comes from the Swiss scholar Pascal Lottaz, host of the Neutrality Studies podcast, in his March 2026 introduction to an interview with the political scientist Dr. Aaron Good. Lottaz opened that conversation this way. "Crime in the United States is not a bug; it's a feature. That actually explains a lot also about its illegal foreign policies. The US as a political entity is deeply intertwined with crime syndicates and explicitly illegal acts under international and local law. Epstein was not at all an exception. These shady dealers are part and parcel of how US politics works."Good's argument, in brief, is this. After the Second World War, the United States built what he calls a "tripartite state" — the public democratic state we learn about in civics class, the national-security state of the Pentagon and the intelligence agencies, and, behind both of them, a deep state that he defines as an obscured, dominant, supranational source of antidemocratic power. That deep state, he argues, did not emerge from any constitutional design. It emerged from the pursuit of empire — from a postwar project that required, in his words, an endless exception to the rule of law in order to function.That's quite a diagnosis. And it is a powerful one. But it leaves an obvious question hanging. If the rot is structural, what do we do about it? That question is what brings me to today's guest.Dr. Camila Vergara is a Senior Lecturer and Director of Research and Innovation at the Essex Business School at the University of Essex. She is the editor of Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory, and the author of Systemic Corruption: Constitutional Ideas for an Anti-Oligarchic Republic, published by Princeton University Press.Where Aaron Good gives us a forensic account of how the American state has been hollowed out by elite criminality, Camila Vergara takes a longer view. Drawing on Machiavelli, Condorcet, Rosa Luxemburg, and Hannah Arendt, she argues that the corruption we are describing is not a recent betrayal of an otherwise sound design — it is the predictable trajectory of representative government itself. Republics, she contends, decay into oligarchies. They always have. And the question is not whether the United States is corrupt, but whether the constitutional architecture we inherited contains the tools to push back against that decay — or whether we need to build new ones.Her answer, of course, is the latter. She proposes what she calls plebeian institutions — a network of local assemblies, independent of parties and government, designed to give ordinary people a permanent, structural check on the power of the few.Today, we are going to walk through that argument. We will talk about how she defines systemic corruption, why she thinks reform from within is unlikely to be enough, what plebeian power could actually look like in twenty-first century America, and whether the U.S. Constitution — as it stands — is part of the cure or part of the disease.Dr. Camila Vergara, it is a pleasure to have you on the Peaceful Political Revolution in America podcast. Welcome to the conversation.Quick LinksSYSTEM CORRUPTION by Camila Vergarahttps://a.co/d/0eEmbDAFPascal Lottaz, Neutrality Studies:https://youtu.be/WjgvH8xCbv4?si=gjQVXmbCbwhk3al1YouTube:https://youtu.be/0KUlGYE6apw

No novo episódio do Linhas Cruzadas, Thaís Oyama e Luiz Felipe Pondé investigam a força mais sombria da experiência humana: o mal. O programa percorre os caminhos que moldam a nossa moral hoje, indo do clássico mito de Fausto — que troca a alma por poder — à assustadora "banalidade do mal" de Hannah Arendt, onde a crueldade se esconde atrás de uma mesa de escritório e de uma rotina burocrática.Para levar o debate ao limite, o episódio traz a participação exclusiva de um padre exorcista. Ele revela como a Igreja Católica hoje dialoga com a psicologia e a psiquiatria para traçar a linha invisível entre a mente humana e o que ainda desafia a ciência como manifestação espiritual.Do demônio aos diagnósticos psiquiátricos, do pecado à lógica das redes, o mal mudou de linguagem, mas continua à espreita. O grande desafio do nosso tempo não é descobrir de onde ele vem, mas reconhecer para onde ele está nos levando.#LinhasCruzadas #TVCultura #SomosCultura # ▶️ BAIXE O APLICATIVO CULTURA PLAY ▶️- Play Store: http://bit.ly/3KUUHhI- Apple Store: http://apple.co/3LgEK72Inscreva-se no canal e clique no sininho para ser notificado das novidades!Siga as redes do Jornalismo TV Cultura!Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/jornalismotvculturaTwitter: https://twitter.com/jornal_culturaInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/jornalismotvcultura/TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@jornalismotvcultura?lang=pt-BRSite: https://tvcultura.com.br/

The often extremely quotable Hannah Arendt once wrote that “the French Revolution, which ended in disaster, has made world history, while the American Revolution, so triumphantly successful, has remained an event of little more than local importance.”My guest Richard Bell emphatically disagrees. In The American Revolution and the Fate of the World (Penguin, 2025), Bell argues that the Revolution was global from the very beginning. It drew participants from multiple continents, reshaped patterns of migration and trade, altered imperial policy from Canada to India, and inspired movements for liberty around the world. What Americans often remember as a national story was, in reality, a global convulsion.Richard Bell is Professor of History at the University of Maryland, College Park. He is the author of Stolen: Five Free Boys Kidnapped into Slavery and Their Astonishing Odyssey Home, was the focus of a conversation on this podcast that was published on December 30th, 2019.

Ben-Hur: A Tale of the Christ by Lew Wallace w/John Hill & Jesan Sorrells---In this episode, the hosts dive deep into Ben-Hur by Lew Wallace, exploring the novel's themes of sacred vs. profane worldviews, the challenges of re-sacralizing modern Western culture, and how historical shifts in meaning affect society today. They examine the influence of religion, technology, and literature on leadership and personal identity, drawing parallels between ancient struggles and contemporary moral dilemmas. The episode also addresses America's unique cultural experiment in pluralism, the role of skepticism, and the power of books to transmit ideas across generations.Book Title: Ben HurAuthor: Lew WallaceGuest: John HillHost: Jesan Sorrells---Time-Stamped Overview---00:00 Transformation of Western Society12:23 Introducing Ben-Hur by Lew Wallace24:03 The struggle of modern times38:52 Understanding your target audience52:36 Why I Avoid Politics Here55:36 Evolution from Ethnos to Race01:08:21 Hannah Arendt on the Eichmann trial01:16:01 Discussing morality without religion01:34:24 Balancing work, productivity, and purpose01:36:17 Questioning traditional approaches01:51:21 Discussing cultural criticism and religion02:02:44 Discussing sales motivation and beliefs02:10:01 Gen Z's religious beliefs shifting02:24:01 Embracing change and personal growth02:30:05 Meaningful conversations at rallies---Opening theme composed by Felipe Sarro - Bach - Silotti - "Air"  from Orchestra Suite No. 3, BWV 1068 Closing theme composed by Brian Sanyshyn of Brian Sanyshyn Music.---Pick up your copy of 12 Rules for Leaders: The Foundation of Intentional Leadership NOW on AMAZON!Check out the Leadership Lessons From the Great Books podcast reading list!---Subscribe to the Leadership Lessons From The Great Books Podcast: https://bit.ly/LLFTGBSubscribeCheck out Leadership ToolBox at: https://leadershiptoolbox.us/ ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

Who's that co-hosting this week's podcast; is it Jean-Paul Sartre? Is it Hannah Arendt? Is it Ronan Keating? Sure, they've all opined on the nature of existence, but has our very own philosopher Johnny JR finally hit the nail on the head?John presents a new thesis for existence, but Elis and Dave aren't buying it…After watching a room full of people cheer Paul McCartney's every word, Elis is inspired to tap into his own musical talents. Plus a cracking zen-based Made Up Game and a return to the Cymru Connecting arena.Do you see life as a memory collecting exercise? Let us know on hello@elisandjohn.com.For more information on Elis's Royal Albert Hall gig, Pressure is a Privilege, head here.For lots of exclusive EJJR #content, join our Patreon at patreon.com/elisandjohn.For weekly visual highlights, head to youtube.com/@elisandjohn.For everything else, head to elisandjohn.com.The Elis James and John Robins Show is a Significant Production. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Cette semaine, Pierre-Édouard Deldique reçoit Aurélie Julia, la directrice de La Revue des Deux Mondes, qui dans son dernier numéro en date (mai-juin) nous propose une réflexion sur les « Mécaniques de la haine ». À l'heure où la violence verbale, les antagonismes identitaires, l'intolérance dominent les débats sur les réseaux dits sociaux notamment, la publication propose une exploration à la fois philosophique, politique, historique de la haine. Dans son éditorial, et au cours de ce numéro d'Idées, Aurélie Julia fait un diagnostic sans détour : la haine est partout, donnant ainsi raison à Pascal qui disait que « tous les hommes se haïssent naturellement l'un l'autre ». Dans un monde saturé d'incertitudes, la haine offre une identité, une posture, parfois même une appartenance. La directrice de la revue n'est pas du genre à baisser les bras mais elle est réaliste aussi : « il faut beaucoup de lucidité et de courage pour bannir, en son for intérieur, cette habitude délétère d'affirmer le soi par la haine » écrit-elle. Au fil des pages, les articles de ce numéro abordent la haine sous plusieurs aspects. Catherine Van Offelen analyse Internet comme une « fabrique de la haine connectée ». Selon elle, l'utopie initiale d'un espace d'émancipation a laissé place à un environnement où l'anonymat, l'immédiateté et le mimétisme favorisent la radicalisation des affects. Le numérique n'invente pas la haine : il la déchaîne, la rend virale, la désinhibe. Dans un article intitulé : « Une pulsion contemporaine ? » Astrid du Lau d'Allemans, psychanalyste, interroge la dimension anthropologique de la haine. Elle montre comment la peur, l'insécurité et l'humiliation nourrissent une pulsion ancienne. Jean‑Dominique Merchet décrit, lui, la manière dont les États mobilisent la haine pour souder les identités, désigner des ennemis et légitimer la violence. La haine devient un outil stratégique, un levier de mobilisation collective. Agrégée de le lettres, Delphine Jouenne montre comment la dégradation du langage — insultes, simplifications, slogans — prépare le terrain à la violence politique. Le langage n'est pas seulement un symptôme : il est un vecteur de haine. On ne peut que la remercier, Aurélie Julia nous offre un florilège de citations de la philosophe Hannah Arendt. Comme celle-ci : « C'est dans le vide de la pensée que s'inscrit le mal ». La haine prospère lorsque la pensée se retire. Jacques de Saint Victor analyse la manière dont les accusations de fascisme — parfois instrumentalisées — saturent le débat public. Dans un article troublant, Philippe Delaroche, quant à lui, rappelle que « le nazisme a été tendance », soulignant combien la fascination collective peut précéder la catastrophe. On lira également la contribution très actuelle, hélas, de David Reinharc, intitulée « La cible juive » consacrée à la résurgence de l'antisémitisme.   Programmation musicale :  Y'a d'la haine - Rita Mitsouko LangaJ RaLaviré - Jowee Omicil Direction Technopole - Baby Boom.

Cette semaine, Pierre-Édouard Deldique reçoit Aurélie Julia, la directrice de La Revue des Deux Mondes, qui dans son dernier numéro en date (mai-juin) nous propose une réflexion sur les « Mécaniques de la haine ». À l'heure où la violence verbale, les antagonismes identitaires, l'intolérance dominent les débats sur les réseaux dits sociaux notamment, la publication propose une exploration à la fois philosophique, politique, historique de la haine. Dans son éditorial, et au cours de ce numéro d'Idées, Aurélie Julia fait un diagnostic sans détour : la haine est partout, donnant ainsi raison à Pascal qui disait que « tous les hommes se haïssent naturellement l'un l'autre ». Dans un monde saturé d'incertitudes, la haine offre une identité, une posture, parfois même une appartenance. La directrice de la revue n'est pas du genre à baisser les bras mais elle est réaliste aussi : « il faut beaucoup de lucidité et de courage pour bannir, en son for intérieur, cette habitude délétère d'affirmer le soi par la haine » écrit-elle. Au fil des pages, les articles de ce numéro abordent la haine sous plusieurs aspects. Catherine Van Offelen analyse Internet comme une « fabrique de la haine connectée ». Selon elle, l'utopie initiale d'un espace d'émancipation a laissé place à un environnement où l'anonymat, l'immédiateté et le mimétisme favorisent la radicalisation des affects. Le numérique n'invente pas la haine : il la déchaîne, la rend virale, la désinhibe. Dans un article intitulé : « Une pulsion contemporaine ? » Astrid du Lau d'Allemans, psychanalyste, interroge la dimension anthropologique de la haine. Elle montre comment la peur, l'insécurité et l'humiliation nourrissent une pulsion ancienne. Jean‑Dominique Merchet décrit, lui, la manière dont les États mobilisent la haine pour souder les identités, désigner des ennemis et légitimer la violence. La haine devient un outil stratégique, un levier de mobilisation collective. Agrégée de le lettres, Delphine Jouenne montre comment la dégradation du langage — insultes, simplifications, slogans — prépare le terrain à la violence politique. Le langage n'est pas seulement un symptôme : il est un vecteur de haine. On ne peut que la remercier, Aurélie Julia nous offre un florilège de citations de la philosophe Hannah Arendt. Comme celle-ci : « C'est dans le vide de la pensée que s'inscrit le mal ». La haine prospère lorsque la pensée se retire. Jacques de Saint Victor analyse la manière dont les accusations de fascisme — parfois instrumentalisées — saturent le débat public. Dans un article troublant, Philippe Delaroche, quant à lui, rappelle que « le nazisme a été tendance », soulignant combien la fascination collective peut précéder la catastrophe. On lira également la contribution très actuelle, hélas, de David Reinharc, intitulée « La cible juive » consacrée à la résurgence de l'antisémitisme.   Programmation musicale :  Y'a d'la haine - Rita Mitsouko LangaJ RaLaviré - Jowee Omicil Direction Technopole - Baby Boom.

Orlando Paris"Pensare l'odio"L'umano di fronte all'estremoLuca Sossella Editorewww.lucasosselaeditore.itLa cronaca mondiale restituisce immagini di distruzione e sofferenza: un genocidio si consuma nella Striscia di Gaza sotto gli occhi della società civile internazionale; una guerra infuria alle porte dell'Europa, mentre altri conflitti insanguinano molte regioni del mondo. Allo stesso tempo, nelle democrazie occidentali, si assiste a una legittimazione pubblica del discorso d'odio: retoriche xenofobe riemergono nei linguaggi della politica, nei media e nello spazio digitale, trovando eco in movimenti che fanno dell'ostilità verso l'altro un principio identitario. Questo libro nasce dalla necessità, insieme etica e scientifica, di confrontarsi con questo scenario per renderne leggibili le logiche profonde, mettendo a fuoco l'intreccio tra odio, potere e società. Il volume dialoga con una tradizione di pensiero che, dalla metà del novecento, ha interrogato le forme storiche della disumanizzazione: da Hannah Arendt a Michel Foucault, da Giorgio Agamben a Zygmunt Bauman, fino agli sviluppi degli Hate Studies e dei Genocide Studies. Quanto emerge è un archivio concettuale capace di orientare lo sguardo sul presente e di indicare pratiche di resistenza alle sue derive estreme.Orlando Paris, professore di filosofia e teoria dei linguaggi all'Università per Stranieri di Siena. I suoi studi vertono sulle patologie del discorso pubblico – discorsi d'odio, stereotipi, infodemia – e si estendono fino al campo degli Hate Studies. Sul tema dell'odio discorsivo ha pubblicato libri e articoli scientifici.Diventa un supporter di questo podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/il-posto-delle-parole--1487855/support.IL POSTO DELLE PAROLEascoltare fa pensarehttps://ilpostodelleparole.it/

"Ho solo eseguito gli ordini", "Me lo ha chiesto il capo", "Non potevo fare diversamente". Quante volte usiamo l'obbedienza come scudo per fuggire dalle nostre responsabilità? In questa puntata di Pensiero Stupendo, Matteo Saudino ci guida nel cuore oscuro del potere. Dal "no" di ANTIGONE alla scandalosa "servitù volontaria" di LA BOÉTIE, fino all'agghiacciante esperimento di MILGRAM e alla "banalità del male" di HANNAH ARENDT. Un viaggio per scoprire che il tiranno non ha forza se noi smettiamo di sostenerlo e che, come insegnava DON MILANI, disobbedire agli ordini ingiusti è l'unico atto veramente umano e politico che ci resta.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

John Zmirak. Hero Tina Peters Released from Demoncrat Gulag. The Eric Metaxas Show John Zmirak  Jun 03 2026   Today On The Eric Metaxas Show, Eric celebrates the launch of Revolution before talking with John Zmirak about the release of Tina Peters, the Colorado election official imprisoned after challenging the 2020 election narrative. They discuss election integrity, weaponized government, political persecution, January 6 defendants, the Save Act, Tina Peters's refusal to say the 2020 election was honest, and why John compares her case to the Dreyfus affair. Eric and John also discuss George Washington, providence, the retreat from Long Island, and why America's founding story still matters today. Subscribe for clips from The Eric Metaxas Show to hear politics and culture from a Christian perspective.⭐ ORDER TODAY:Revolution: The Birth of the Greatest Nation in the History of the World

Machado de Assis escreveu O Anjo Rafael em 1869. Oito anos depois, a psiquiatria daria nome ao fenômeno que ele descreveu com precisão impressionante: a psicose compartilhada, quando uma crença delirante se espalha entre pessoas unidas por vínculos emocionais e isolamento. Neste episódio, partimos desse conto extraordinário para explorar um tema inquietante: como ideologias, líderes, grupos e algoritmos podem criar realidades paralelas que parecem mais atraentes do que os fatos. Uma viagem que passa por Machado, Hannah Arendt, Eric Hoffer e pelas bolhas digitais do século XXI.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode, I reflect on Matthew Potts' Cormac McCarthy and the Signs of Sacrament, especially chapter 2, “Fate: Nietzsche against Holden.” Potts is quickly becoming one of my favorite readers of McCarthy because he brings a deeply theological imagination to the novels without reducing them to easy Christian answers.I explore Potts' reading of fate, Judge Holden, Anton Chigurh, and the fragile possibility of something beyond violence. At the center of the episode is Hannah Arendt's powerful emphasis on forgiveness and promise: forgiveness as the answer to the irreversibility of the past, and promise as the answer to the uncertainty of the future.This is an episode about McCarthy's darkness, but also about the small signs that still matter: a wife's hand, a stone trough, a father carrying fire, and the possibility that even in a world of blood and fate, human beings may still be capable of beginning again.

Cette semaine, dans ce numéro d'Idées, Pierre-Édouard Deldique reçoit le journaliste Pierre Haski. Avec lui, cinquante ans de reportages au long cours nous contemplent. Il est aujourd'hui un des plus fins analystes du monde qui vient. Dans son livre qui s'intitule La fin d'un monde (Stock),  il revient sur son parcours, les lieux, les visages, les événements qui ont façonné sa compréhension du monde. Il analyse les soubresauts du monde hérité de l'après-guerre. « Je suis né en un lieu et à une époque qui ont sans doute décidé du reste de ma vie : Tunis, en 1953… » écrit-il. Sa vie est un roman. On le constate en l'écoutant, Pierre Haski écrit depuis une position enviable : celle d'un journaliste qui a traversé la fin de l'apartheid, la transition post‑maoïste en Chine, les guerres du Moyen‑Orient, l'effondrement des régimes communistes, la mondialisation triomphante puis sa remise en question aujourd'hui. Ses souvenirs ne sont pas des anecdotes : ils constituent des points d'observation privilégiés pour saisir les lignes de force du présent et du passé. Ainsi, raconte-t-il, par exemple, son arrivée à Zanzibar dans les années 1970, jeune reporter découvrant un pays marqué par les séquelles du colonialisme et les tensions de la guerre froide. Son expérience sud‑africaine est l'un des fils rouges du livre. Il y observe la chute de l'apartheid, la transition démocratique, puis les désillusions. Ces souvenirs nourrissent une réflexion plus large. Les transitions sont longues, fragiles, souvent décevantes. D'ailleurs le continent africain est fort présent dans son livre et dans ses propos tenus au micro où il nous parle par exemple de Thomas Sankara, l'ancien président du Burkina-Faso. Correspondant à Pékin dans les années 2000, Haski voit la Chine passer du statut « d'usine du monde » à celui de puissance technologique et stratégique. Il raconte les illusions occidentales, les erreurs d'analyse, la fascination mêlée d'aveuglement. Ses souvenirs personnels — conversations, scènes de rue, rencontres avec des dissidents — donnent chair à une idée force. La Chine donne le ton dans le monde d'aujourd'hui. « Pour guetter l'avenir, regarder vers la Chine ». De la Roumanie à la Russie, Haski décrit les espoirs de 1989, puis les dérives autoritaires, les nationalismes, les frustrations économiques. Ses souvenirs montrent comment les promesses non tenues ont nourri les populismes actuels. Fervent européen, il précise que l'Europe n'est pas réductible à l'UE : « On ne tombe pas amoureux d'une structure politique », lance-t-il. Son constat est d'une implacable lucidité : l'ordre international né en 1945 — multilatéralisme, droit international, leadership occidental — est remis en question. Au fil de ce numéro du magazine Idées et des pages du livre, Pierre Haski se livre aussi à une méditation sur le journalisme : la transformation des médias par le numérique, la difficulté croissante de « voir » le monde derrière les propagandes, les réseaux sociaux, les récits nationaux. Il cite Hannah Arendt qui soulignait qu'avec les mensonges, un peuple ne croit plus en rien, ne peut se faire une opinion, et se trouve placé sous la menace de quiconque veut le manipuler. Malgré le titre, le journaliste - qui tient à préciser que son livre ne s'intitule pas La fin du monde mais La fin d'un monde - ne cède ni au catastrophisme ni à la nostalgie, il croit encore à la possibilité d'un monde commun — à condition de repenser nos institutions, nos alliances et notre façon de voir les peuples. Pierre Haski a créé sa chaîne sur YouTube : « Le Monde de Pierre Haski ».   Programmation musicale :  Amakhamandela - BCUC Sankara  - Gabin Dabiré Karma Code - Skai Isyourgod Mopti - Ray Lema ; Ensemble Partage.

Frédéric Samama est auteur de L'énigme de l'inaction climatique et pionnier de la finance verte et alors que nous vivons un de ces épisodes de canicule aujourd'hui, il m'a semblé essentiel d'essayer de comprendre pourquoi nous savons depuis 70 ans et nous ne faisons rien. En 2009, il a monté le premier centre de recherche mondial sur la finance et le climat, lancé les premiers indices low carbone et créé la première coalition d'investisseurs à la COP21. Et pourtant, son livre ne parle pas de finance. Il parle de cerveau, d'histoire, de philosophie et d'une question qui l'obsède depuis cinq ans : pourquoi, sur un problème que tout le monde connaît, que l'on a créé, et qui nous menace en tant qu'espèce, on n'arrive pas à bouger ?Dans cet épisode, nous parlons de neurosciences cognitives, d'inférence bayésienne, de moments fromages dans l'histoire de l'humanité, et du lien entre capitalisme, néolibéralisme et perte de nos réflexes moraux. J'ai questionné Frédéric sur l'overview effect des astronautes, sur Lévinas et la philosophie du visage, sur Jean Cavaillès et la résistance, et sur ce que tout ça dit de notre capacité à réinventer nos représentations du monde face à l'urgence climatique.Citations marquantes"Sur un problème où tout le monde est au courant, qu'on a créé, et qui nous menace en tant qu'espèce — pourquoi diable, on n'arrive pas à se mettre en mouvement ?" (0:29:00)"Le capitalisme, c'est comment tu fais vivre des gens ensemble en dehors de règles morales et religieuses. Et maintenant qu'on fait face à un défi moral, qui est le défi du climat, on ne sait plus faire." (0:19:30)"Face à l'enjeu moral, c'est l'action qui doit prévaloir — et pas la réflexion de est-ce qu'on est optimiste, négatif, et ainsi de suite." (1:06:44)"On a voulu détendre le lien social. En cas de problème, il n'y a plus personne, et donc il n'y a plus de devoir — on ne demande que des droits." (0:26:30)"Le climat, ce n'est plus seulement la plus grosse menace. C'est aussi la plus belle opportunité de réapprendre à vivre ensemble, nous, les 8 milliards de personnes sur Terre." (1:12:00)Big Ideas1. Notre cerveau construit des modèles à partir de signaux — et s'y enferme L'inférence bayésienne selon Stanislas Dehaene : le cerveau observe des signaux et fabrique des lois du monde. Agassi qui lit le service de Becker, le bébé qui comprend la gravité, le rat dans le labyrinthe — tous fonctionnent pareil. Le problème : une fois le modèle établi, on arrête de le mettre à jour. On entre en surconfiance. C'est exactement ce qui se passe avec le climat : on sait, mais on ne change pas de modèle. (0:02:37)2. L'histoire humaine s'est organisée autour de "moments fromages" — et le climat en exige un nouveau Deux grandes ruptures : l'agriculture et la science moderne (accès aux ressources naturelles), puis le néolibéralisme (accès aux ressources humaines mondiales). À chaque fois, l'humanité a réorganisé ses représentations. Le climat est la première fois qu'on nous demande de limiter l'accès aux ressources — un défi sans précédent pour des cerveaux conditionnés à l'expansion. (0:07:43)3. Le capitalisme a délibérément mis la morale hors jeu Au XVIIe siècle, la grande question était : comment faire vivre des gens ensemble sans passer par la morale ou la religion, qui créent des guerres ? La réponse : l'intérêt personnel. Adam Smith, Montesquieu, Hirschman ont construit un système où l'égoïsme profite à la société. Ça a marché. Mais le climat est un problème moral (les plus faibles meurent en premier) — et on n'a plus les réflexes pour ça. (0:14:55)4. L'overview effect comme signal de bascule possible Les astronautes dans l'espace deviennent poètes. Ils voient la planète fragile, belle, vivante. Frédéric propose ces trois perceptions comme signal capable de réécrire nos représentations. La fragilité déclenche la responsabilité (Lévinas). La beauté prépare à la morale (Kant). Le vivant nous réintègre dans la nature après des siècles d'extraction. Pas un programme politique — une hypothèse sur comment les cerveaux humains peuvent changer. (0:39:00)5. Face à un enjeu moral, la question n'est plus l'espoir — c'est l'action Jean Cavaillès, philosophe-mathématicien résistant, incarne la réponse. En mai 1941, zéro espoir objectif. Et pourtant il agit — parce que face à un enjeu moral, la question n'est plus "quelle est la probabilité ?" mais "quelle est mon obligation ?". C'est la même logique que d'appeler les pompiers pour quelqu'un qui fait une crise cardiaque dont on sait qu'elle sera fatale. On agit. Pas parce qu'on espère, mais parce qu'on doit. (1:04:06)Questions poséesQu'est-ce que l'anecdote d'Agassi et Becker révèle sur le fonctionnement du cerveau humain ?Quels sont les grands "moments fromages" de l'histoire de l'humanité, et où en sommes-nous aujourd'hui ?Comment définirais-tu le capitalisme à son origine — et en quoi diffère-t-il du néolibéralisme ?Pourquoi le néolibéralisme a-t-il dissous le lien social, et quelles en sont les conséquences concrètes ?Sur un problème aussi connu et aussi grave que le climat, pourquoi l'humanité n'arrive-t-elle pas à se mettre en mouvement ?Qu'est-ce que l'inférence bayésienne nous apprend sur notre incapacité à mettre à jour nos modèles face au climat ?Qu'est-ce que les astronautes et l'overview effect peuvent nous apprendre sur comment changer nos représentations collectives ?Comment Lévinas et Kant peuvent-ils nous aider à repenser notre rapport au problème climatique ?Qui était Jean Cavaillès, et pourquoi son histoire est-elle une réponse au problème de l'inaction ?Si le signal qui change nos représentations n'est pas encore arrivé, qu'est-ce qui pourrait en tenir lieu à l'échelle de nos sociétés ?Références citéesPersonnes et penseursStanislas Dehaene — chaire de sciences cognitives, Collège de France (0:04:00)André Agassi / Boris Becker — anecdote du service et de la langue (0:02:37)Max Weber — thèse sur la naissance du capitalisme (0:13:00)Albert Hirschman — économiste, auteur sur l'origine du capitalisme (0:13:00)Marcel Enaf — sur le commerce pré-capitaliste (0:17:29)Machiavel, Spinoza, Galilée, Montesquieu, Adam Smith — généalogie du capitalisme (0:15:25)Milton Friedman — article dans le New York Times sur le néolibéralisme (0:19:54)Emmanuel Lévinas — philosophe lituanien, "le visage d'autrui" et l'éthique (0:42:44)Emmanuel Kant — la beauté, le désintérêt et la morale (0:44:30)Michel Serres — "on mesure l'ampleur d'un problème à la durée qu'il a mise à se former" (0:33:34)Robin Dunbar — nombre de 150, limite de coordination des groupes humains (0:34:22)Hannah Arendt et Karl Polanyi — fascisme comme réaction au libéralisme du XIXe siècle (1:07:50)Henri Bergson — envoyé aux États-Unis pour convaincre Wilson d'entrer en guerre (0:53:43)Président Wilson — discours d'entrée en guerre au nom de valeurs morales, 1917 (0:54:30)Jean Cavaillès — philosophe-mathématicien résistant, fusillé (1:02:11)Raymond Aron — "Si Jean Cavaillès avait vécu, j'aurais dit moins de bêtises" (1:04:06)Pierre Brossolette, Jean Moulin — résistants évoqués en parallèle (1:05:00)Concepts et événementsInférence bayésienne — mécanisme cognitif de construction de modèles (0:47:50)Overview effect — phénomène de bascule perceptuelle chez les astronautes (0:39:30)Théorie des "moments fromages" — concept central du livre (0:07:43)Bulle des tulipes — première crise financière spéculative, XVIIe siècle (0:50:23)COP21 — coalition d'investisseurs créée par Frédéric (0:27:33)Passage à l'an 2000 (bug Y2K) — contre-exemple de mobilisation rapide (0:30:00)Protocole de Montréal / couche d'ozone — résolu en 18 mois (0:51:43)Timestamps clés00:00 Introduction — Et si on se réjouissait à nouveau du futur ? Gregory présente Frédéric Semama, pionnier de la finance verte et auteur de L'énigme de l'inaction climatique. 02:37 L'anecdote Agassi / Becker Comment Agassi a découvert le code du service de Becker en s'asseyant dans la foule — et ce que ça révèle sur le cerveau humain. 04:00 Comment le cerveau construit ses modèles du monde Stanislas Dehaene au Collège de France : inférence bayésienne, le bébé, le rat dans le labyrinthe. 07:43 Les "moments fromages" de l'histoire humaine Agriculture, science moderne, néolibéralisme : trois grandes ruptures où l'humanité a réorganisé ses représentations pour accéder à de nouvelles ressources. 13:00 L'origine du capitalisme — bien au-delà de l'argent Comment le capitalisme est né comme solution à la guerre de religion : faire vivre des gens ensemble sans morale ni religion. 20:56 Tout le monde veut un village mais personne ne veut être villageois La concierge qui sauve Frédéric pendant le Covid — et le choc quand il essaie de la remercier avec des cadeaux. 27:00 Pourquoi on n'agit pas sur le climat Trois raisons structurelles : c'est la première limite à l'accès aux ressources, il n'y a pas de signal à hauteur du problème, et nos modèles sont inadaptés. 36:22 La bulle sociétale — on peut savoir et continuer quand même De la bulle internet à la bulle des tulipes : le mécanisme d'enfermement conscient à l'échelle d'une planète. 39:00 L'overview effect — les astronautes comme piste de bascule Fragile, belle, vivante : les trois perceptions que les astronautes rapportent de l'espace — et ce qu'elles activent dans le cerveau. 42:44 Lévinas : le visage d'autrui comme début de l'éthique Quand voir la fragilité de l'autre nous oblige à agir au-delà de notre instinct de conservation. 52:07 La couche d'ozone vs le climat En 18 mois, tous les pays du monde se sont mis d'accord. Qu'est-ce qui est fondamentalement différent avec le climat ? 53:43 Bergson à la Maison-Blanche La France envoie le philosophe Henri Bergson convaincre Wilson d'entrer en guerre. Il réussit. Ce que ça dit du pouvoir des valeurs morales en politique. 1:00:14 Je ne cherche pas à avoir de l'espoir Frédéric explique pourquoi la question n'est pas l'espoir — avec mai 1941 comme exemple. 1:02:11 Jean Cavaillès — le héros oublié de la résistance Fils de militaire, philosophe-mathématicien, major de Normale Sup tout seul. Et résistant. Fusillé dans une fosse commune. 1:06:29 La crise cardiaque et l'obligation morale "La probabilité que tu survives est nulle. Et pourtant, tu vas tout faire pour me sauver." Ce que ça dit du rapport entre morale et action. 1:14:54 La solution concrète : recommencer à regarder le vivant Pourquoi enseigner la vie des animaux et des plantes à l'école changerait plus de choses que n'importe quelle taxe carbone. Suggestion d'autres épisodes à écouter : #286 Le cynisme politique face à l'urgence climatique? avec Fabrice Nicolino (https://audmns.com/SHnNoJp) #292 Les enjeux de la géopolitique climatique avec David Djaiz (https://audmns.com/BoZGVQa) #178 Les technologies vont-elles nous permettre de faire face au défi climatique? avec Philippe Bihouix (https://audmns.com/ktZSlzb)Hébergé par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Ruth Ben-Ghiat (historian of fascism +NYT bestselling author of Strongmen) is an internationally recognised expert in how psychologically unstable men come to power and use corruption, sexual predation, staged victimhood and violence to rule. She's recently, however, turned her focus to how societies subjected to such tyranny have survived and fought back…using moral authority.Ruth is an American history professor at New York University and a political commentator with an expertise in fascism and authoritarian leaders. Her 2020 book Strongmen: Mussolini to the Present was a global bestseller. She publishes the hugely popular Substack Lucid, a newsletter on threats to democracy and will publish her next book, Resisting Autocracy: What History Teaches About Fighting Back, next year.SHOW NOTESBe sure to check out her Substack LucidPurchase Strongmen: Mussolini to the Present hereYou can catch up on the Ece Temelkuran episode hereThis episode with Lindsey Stonebridge on Hannah Arendt's ideas on resistance might also interest you-----Watch on YouTube or SubstackIf you need to know a bit more about me… head to my "about" pageFor more such conversations, subscribe to my Substack newsletter, it's where I interact the most!Let's connect on Instagram Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

durée : 00:30:46 - Entendez-vous l'éco ? - par : Aliette Hovine - Avec l'entrée dans la modernité, la notion de travail devient omniprésente. Mais Hannah Arendt estime que les économistes comme Smith ou Marx oublient son caractère laborieux. Une invisibilisation que dénoncent aussi les féministes, auxquelles Arendt ne s'est pourtant jamais associée. - réalisation : Tina Iung, Sorj Leroy Vous aimez ce podcast ? Pour écouter tous les épisodes sans limite, rendez-vous sur Radio France

durée : 00:58:46 - Entendez-vous l'éco ? - par : Aliette Hovine - D'Hannah Arendt à bell hooks, deux épisodes de cette série consacrée aux pensées féministes du travail - réalisation : Tina Iung, Sorj Leroy Vous aimez ce podcast ? Pour écouter tous les épisodes sans limite, rendez-vous sur Radio France

In this episode of Jewish Voices, American Stories, we'll explore the Jewish writers whose words helped shape not just literature—but the moral and spiritual conscience of America.We begin with Elie Wiesel, a Holocaust survivor whose powerful testimony in Night brought the reality of unimaginable suffering into classrooms and hearts across the country. Through his writing, Wiesel bore witness to both the horrors he endured and the enduring themes of faith, justice, and human dignity.Next, we meet Hannah Arendt, a brilliant thinker who fled Nazi Europe and later challenged the world to confront a difficult question: how ordinary people can become part of extraordinary evil. Through her reporting on the trial of Adolf Eichmann and her lifelong work, Arendt helped bring the moral complexities of the Holocaust into American thought—urging readers not only to remember history, but to learn from it.Finally, we turn to Emma Lazarus, a poet whose words helped define the American ideal. Moved by the plight of Jewish refugees, Lazarus gave voice to a vision of the United States as a place of refuge and hope. Her poem “The New Colossus” forever transformed the Statue of Liberty into a symbol of welcome—inviting the world's “tired” and “poor” to find a new beginning.These stories remind us that words have power. They can preserve memory, challenge injustice, and inspire a nation to live up to its highest calling. And through these Jewish voices, the story of America has been shaped—line by line—by truth, courage, and hope.To learn more about God's people—from the days of the Bible through the present—visit The Fellowship's Learn Center.

Forgiveness sounds simple… until you actually have to do it.In today's teaching, we begin a powerful journey into forgiveness—not as a vague idea, but as a real, practical process that leads to healing and freedom. Because the truth is: we all carry wounds… and we all need to forgive.Drawing from Scripture, the teachings of Everett Worthington, and real-life experience, this message introduces a proven pathway to forgiveness—one that is honest, challenging, and deeply transformative.Because forgiveness isn't natural… it's supernatural.But it is possible.Welcome home. Change starts today.

After a week of maniacally running The Dispatch in Steve's absence—firing employees at will, publishing screeds against pickled herring, etc.—Jonah Goldberg takes up his usual post to ruminate about Pam Bondi, Trump's speech on the Iran war, his old grievances on Cuba and the Times, the recent Meta case, receipts on John Rawls from last week's Ruminant, Hannah Arendt on truth in politics, Plato and the divine, and the future of the podcast. Plus, stick around for Jonah's spicy take on birthright citizenship. Show Notes:—“Trump Says ‘I Love' People Who Are ‘Nice To Me' – ‘Even if They're Bad People' ”—Fireside Chat with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche at CPAC 2026 - 03/26/26—Ross Douthat: “Trump's Second Term Has Ended the Conservative Era”—Jonah's G-File response to Douthat's article—Elliott Abrams in National Review: “The President's Not-So-Reassuring Iran Address”— Robert Timberg: The Nightingale's Song—Tuesday's Dispatch Podcast on Cuba—Friday's Dispatch Podcast—Last week's Ruminant on John Rawls—Hannah Arendt Remnant—Robby George Remnant—Harvey Mansfield Remnant—Advisory Opinions Pod: Birthright Citizenship Oral Arguments—Mediaite: “Hasan Piker Is the Left's Candace Owens. The Press Treats Him Like a Rock Star” The Remnant is a production of ⁠The Dispatch⁠, a digital media company covering politics, policy, and culture from a non-partisan, conservative perspective. To access all of The Dispatch's offerings—including access to all of Jonah's G-File newsletters—⁠click here⁠. If you'd like to remove all ads from your podcast experience, consider becoming a premium Dispatch member ⁠by clicking here⁠. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Who was Hannah Arendt? What did she believe about truth and politics? Was she wrong about the American Revolution? Today on The Remnant, Jonah Goldberg and Roger Berkowitz dive into these questions and more, discussing what intellectual category Arendt falls in, her understanding of truth, the question of human nature, Arendt's relationship with Martin Heidegger, the difference between forgiveness and reconciliation, Adolf Eichmann, the meaning of the banality of evil, Arendt's view of the American Revolution, and whether or not she was a small-“L” liberal. Show Notes:—Berkowitz's website—Arendt: The Origins of Totalitarianism—Arendt: Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil—Harvey Mansfield Remnant—Arendt: The Human Condition—Jonah's book, Suicide of the West—Arendt: “The Crisis of Education”—Arendt: “On Revolution”—Berkowitz: “Was Arendt Wrong?” The Remnant is a production of ⁠The Dispatch⁠, a digital media company covering politics, policy, and culture from a non-partisan, conservative perspective. To access all of The Dispatch's offerings—including access to all of Jonah's G-File newsletters—⁠click here⁠. If you'd like to remove all ads from your podcast experience, consider becoming a premium Dispatch member ⁠by clicking here⁠. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices