Podcasts about Claus

Dans la « tanière du loup », le quartier général du Führer en Prusse-Orientale, un groupe d'officiers allemands passe à l'action le 20 juillet 1944. Au cœur du complot, le colonel Claus von Stauffenberg dépose une bombe destinée à éliminer Hitler. Le plan est minutieux et pourtant, ce jour-là, le cours de l'histoire n'a pas été changé. Revivez l'opération Walkyrie, ce complot de l'intérieur destiné à mettre un terme à la guerre. Crédits : Lorànt Deutsch, Bruno Calvès.Hébergé par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Dans la « tanière du loup », le quartier général du Führer en Prusse-Orientale, un groupe d'officiers allemands passe à l'action le 20 juillet 1944. Au cœur du complot, le colonel Claus von Stauffenberg dépose une bombe destinée à éliminer Hitler. Le plan est minutieux et pourtant, ce jour-là, le cours de l'histoire n'a pas été changé. Revivez l'opération Walkyrie, ce complot de l'intérieur destiné à mettre un terme à la guerre. Crédits : Lorànt Deutsch, Bruno Calvès.Hébergé par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

200 Folgen „Energie im Wandel“ – Zeit für einen besonderen Rückblick. In dieser Solofolge schaut Claus Hartmann zurück auf die Entwicklung des Podcasts seit dem Start im Februar 2020, damals noch unter dem Namen „nachhaltig reich“. Was ist seitdem passiert? Welche Folgen wurden besonders häufig gehört? Und warum funktionieren manche Episoden auf Podcast-Plattformen ganz anders als auf YouTube? Claus spricht über die meistgehörten Interviews, über prägende Gäste wie Andreas Wulff, Gerald Hüther, Tim Meyer und Markus Baumann – und darüber, warum echte Beteiligung für ihn der Schlüssel zu authentischer Kommunikation ist. Ob PV-Anlage, Batteriespeicher, Wallbox oder Smart Meter: Wer über Energiewende spricht, sollte sie auch selbst erleben. Außerdem gibt es ein neues Format: LinkedIn-Umfragen werden künftig im Podcast aufgegriffen. Den Auftakt macht die Diskussion um eine mögliche gemeinsame Strompreiszone für Schleswig-Holstein, Hamburg und Dänemark. Eine Idee mit Chancen, Konflikten und einer großen Frage: Wie verteilen wir die Vorteile der Energiewende fair?

Hitler och hans soldater var rejält påtända. Fredrik Sjöberg läser om drogernas roll i Tredje riket och funderar över litteratur som kan råda bot på bristande läsförståelse hos pojkar och unga män. Lyssna på alla avsnitt i Sveriges Radios app. ESSÄ: Detta är en text där skribenten reflekterar över ett ämne eller ett verk. Åsikter som uttrycks är skribentens egna. Essän sändes ursprungligen 2017-01-23.Ett återkommande katastroflarm i samhällsdebatten är den bristande läsförståelse som särskilt utmärker pojkar och yngre män. Problemet är nog ofta överdrivet, men det kan heller inte förnekas, och en mindre armé av pedagoger försöker därför tänka ut hur man ska få pojkarna att läsa lika många böcker som flickorna gör. Lätt är det inte. Eftersom ingen har lyckats fylla tomrummet efter Frans G Bengtsson, erbjuds inte mycket mer än torftiga deckare och biografiska hjälteepos om onaturligt rika män som har lyckats förlänga sin barndom genom att sparka boll.Och allt det där är nog bra, men kanske kräver pojkarnas nu rent epidemiska indolens ändå tyngre doningar, och då är det noga taget bara två typer av böcker som duger: sådana som handlar om Hitler, och sådana som handlar om droger. Bägge dessa ämnen har en förunderligt vitaliserande inverkan också på mycket trötta existenser – så låt oss ett ögonblick tala om den från tyska översatta fackboken Droger i Tredje riket, av Norman Ohler. En svårslagen kombination, en form av litterärt blandmissbruk som lovar att höja läsförståelsen både hos datorspelande hemmapojkar och tröga haschtomtar med större frisyr än förstånd.Redan här bör dock inflikas att Norman Ohler inte är någon muntergök, utan en djupt seriös arkivdykare med ambitionen att vara historiskt objektiv, och att hans bok av det skälet inte riktigt når upp till samma stilistiska nivå som den avlägset besläktade satiren Jägarna på Karinhall, Carl-Henning Wijkmarks debutroman från 1972 – en klassiker som förutom sin rollbesättning av råsupande nazister på kalas hemma hos morfinisten Hermann Göring, även har fördelen av att vara både rolig och djupsinnig samt, inte minst, pornografisk. Den kombinationen slår ingen.Hur som helst, Droger i Tredje riket utgår från tidigare svåråtkomliga dokument som speglar dels användningen av amfetamin inom Wehrmacht och Luftwaffe, dels omfattningen av det drogmissbruk som förvandlade führern själv till en darrande pundare utan större verklighetskontakt. Det är onekligen fascinerande läsning. Skrämmande också, med tanke på att kemisterna knappast har legat på latsidan sen dess och sannolikt kan förse nutidens makthavare och mördarmaskiner med ännu effektivare blandningar av uppiggande och avtrubbande preparat.Den tyska drogindustrin var tidigt världsledande. Opiater hade man sysslat med länge och redan i slutet av 1800-talet lanserade läkemedelsbolaget Bayer en medicin mot hosta och huvudvärk som kallades Heroin. Senare, under Weimarrepubliken, sköt produktionen av morfin och andra opiater i höjden. Bara under ett enda år – 1928 – förädlades närmare 200 ton opium, och vid det laget hade de tyska bolagen även lagt under sig hela 80 procent av världsmarknaden för kokain. Tonvis. Inte var man så noga med restriktioner heller; lagstiftningen hängde inte med i svängarna, så när nazisterna i början av 30-talet formerade sig för en attack mot den unga demokratin, fanns många missbrukare man kunde stigmatisera som depraverat slödder i den förment sunda, ariska staten. Hitler själv gällde för att vara en renlevnadsman, så nu skulle drogträsket saneras. Det gick inget vidare.Som så ofta var det sportfånarna som testade gränserna. Under Berlinolympiaden 1936 nåddes tidigare oanade resultat med hjälp av prestationshöjande medel. Dopning. Framför allt lyckades amerikanerna vinna tack vare en sorts amfetamin som hette Benzedrine. Det var fullt accepterat inom idrotten på den tiden, och tyskarna vill nu inte vara sämre. Redan året därpå hade man utvecklat en mångdubbelt starkare variant av metylamfetamin som kom att kallas Pervitin. Ett uppåttjack av guds nåde, renare och bättre än allt vad den fiktive drogfabrikören Walter White lyckas koka ihop i TV-serien Breaking Bad.Pervitin blev snabbt en folkdrog i Tredje riket. Medlet användes för att integrera simulanter och gnällspikar i arbetslivet, för att motverka depressioner, sjösjuka, klimakteriebesvär, hösnuva och allmän håglöshet. Koncentrationsförmågan stegrades, liksom sexualdriften, och inte behövde man sova så mycket heller, vilket naturligtvis öppnade för användning i det militära. En sovande soldat gör inte mycket nytta. Efter en lagom dos Pervitin kunde man kriga flera dygn i sträck. Dessutom försvann rädslan, andra hämningar också. När Wehrmacht väl hade gjort sin beställning låg produktionen på i runda slängar 800 000 Pervitintabletter – per dag.Amfetaminmissbruket är såklart inte hela förklaringen till de tyska framgångarna i början av kriget, men blixtanfallen i Polen och Frankrike låter sig åtminstone delvis begripas i ljuset av att åtskilliga soldater faktiskt var påtända. Även generalerna. Den ryktbare fältherren Erwin Rommel krossade allt motstånd på västfronten tack vare en för tjackpundaren typisk form av hänsynslös självöverskattning. Först långt senare, i höjd med Stalingrad, började drogbrukets nackdelar bli märkbara.Om allt detta berättar Norman Ohler i sin bok, men till historien hör också huvudpersonen själv, Adolf Hitler, och hans livläkare, sedermera langare, Theodor Morell. Att Hitler mot slutet av kriget behandlades med fullkomligt fantastiska mängder hormoner, steroider och mediciner av alla slag är sedan länge väl känt, men forskarna har hittills varit ovilliga att betrakta honom som narkoman. Snarare har bilden varit att Hitler hade ett pressande jobb, och därför gott kunde behöva lite speed för att komma i form, och att hans vegetariska diet påkallade diverse kosttillskott.Nu framträder en helt annan bild. Av Theodor Morells bevarade anteckningar framgår att han ordinerar allt starkare doser av narkotika, inte bara Pervitin. Särskilt efter attentatet i Varglyan, 20 juli 1944, när Hitler sånär dödades av Claus von Stauffenbergs portföljbomb, behövdes också alltmer smärtstillande, och lugnande. Morell petade i honom duktiga doser kokain, gärna i kombination med Eukodal, ett morfinliknande preparat som gavs intravenöst. Tidvis var patientens vener lika illa åtgångna som på en durkdriven heroinist. Framåt vintern det året, när kriget i praktiken redan var förlorat, var han mycket nära att sluta sina dagar genom en överdos.Hur det sedan gick vet alla. Det nya i Norman Ohlers historieskrivning är tanken att Hitler möjligen inte alls drabbades av Parkinson eller någon annan sjukdom som till sist förvandlade honom till ett kraftlöst vrak, utan att han istället, på vårkanten 1945, kort före självmordet i bunkern, huvudsakligen led av abstinens. Vid det laget hade nämligen de allierade bombat läkemedelsfabrikerna till grus och aska. Och langarens lager av droger var slut.Likt alla tyska författare är Ohler mycket noga med att inte förringa eller bortförklara Hitlers ansvar för krigets bestialiteter, och han befinner sig sålunda, litterärt sett, långt ifrån Frans G Bengtssons lediga legender om brutala hjältekonungar och flugsvampdrogade bärsärkar, så när allt kommer omkring är kanske den bristande läsförståelsen bland pojkar bäst avhjälpt genom att skolbiblioteken köper in klassuppsättningar av Röde Orm. Eller varför inte Jägarna på Karinhall. I alla händelser är Droger i Tredje riket, komplett med register och notapparat, en förnämlig bredvidläsningsbok.Fredrik Sjöberg, författare och biolog LitteraturNorman Ohler: ”Droger i tredje riket – det dopade blixtkriget” (Lind & co), översättning Henrik Lindberg.

Ein schwarzer Aston Martin rast durch die Nacht. Die Straßen glänzen im Regen, während ein Mann im Smoking seinen nächsten Auftrag entgegennimmt. Wenige Sekunden später fällt jener Satz, der Filmgeschichte geschrieben hat: „The name's Bond. James Bond.“ Seit mehr als sechs Jahrzehnten gehört 007 zu den bekanntesten Figuren der Popkultur, ist britisches Kulturgut, Kino-Ikone und eine der erfolgreichsten Filmreihen aller Zeiten. In dieser Folge BRITPOD – England at its best widmen sich Alexander-Klaus Stecher und Claus Beling einer Frage, die Bond-Fans weltweit beschäftigt: Wer wird der nächste James Bond? Nach dem Abschied von Daniel Craig und dem Wechsel der kreativen Kontrolle zu Amazon MGM Studios beginnt für das Franchise eine neue Ära. Regisseur Denis Villeneuve arbeitet bereits am nächsten Film, während hinter den Kulissen intensiv nach dem neuen Gesicht von 007 gesucht wird. Namen wie Callum Turner, Aaron Taylor-Johnson oder Tom Francis werden immer wieder gehandelt – eine offizielle Entscheidung steht jedoch noch aus. Gleichzeitig wird eine Debatte geführt, die weit über die Besetzung hinausgeht. Wie viel Tradition braucht James Bond, wie viel Veränderung verträgt die Figur? Die langjährige Bond-Produzentin Barbara Broccoli, die das Franchise über Jahrzehnte geprägt hat, vertritt dabei teilweise andere Positionen als Hollywood-Stars wie Pierce Brosnan, Halle Berry oder Helen Mirren. Während viele an der klassischen Figur festhalten möchten, sehen andere die Chance, Bond neu zu interpretieren und an eine veränderte Welt anzupassen. Die Geschichte von James Bond war immer auch ein Spiegel ihrer Zeit. Von Sean Connerys Kalter-Krieg-Abenteuern über Roger Moores charmante Einsätze bis hin zu Daniel Craigs moderner Interpretation hat sich die Figur immer wieder neu erfunden. Nun steht die berühmteste Geheimagenten-Reihe der Filmgeschichte erneut an einem Wendepunkt, der ihre Zukunft für Jahrzehnte prägen könnte. Wer hat die besten Chancen auf die Lizenz zum Töten? Warum bewegt die Suche nach einem neuen Bond Fans rund um den Globus? Und wie wird sich 007 in einer neuen Ära behaupten? WhatsApp: Du kannst Alexander und Claus direkt auf ihre Handys Nachrichten schicken! Welche Ecke Englands sollten die beiden mal besuchen? Zu welchen Themen wünschst Du Dir mehr Folgen? Warst Du schon mal in Great Britain und magst ein paar Fotos mit Claus und Alexander teilen? Probiere es gleich aus: +49 8152 989770 - einfach diese Nummer einspeichern und schon kannst Du BRITPOD per WhatsApp erreichen. BRITPOD – England at its best. Ein ALL EARS ON YOU Original Podcast.

Claus Hessler  is an internationally acclaimed German drummer, author, and educator widely recognized as a foremost authority on drum technique and history. He is especially renowned for preserving and expanding complex coordination styles and historical rudimental methodologies.Technical ExpertiseMoeller Technique: Regarded as a legitimate successor to his mentor Jim Chapin, Hessler is a premier authority on teaching the fluid, forearm-driven Moeller method in its purest formOpen-Handed Playing: He is a global pioneer of this style, where drummers play the hi-hat with the left hand and the snare with the right (for right-handed kits), avoiding crossing their arms to increase ergonomic comfort and expand creative options.Rudimental Frameworks: He specializes in combining traditional European rudiments (like Basel drumming) with modern drum set orchestration.Hessler has written several highly acclaimed books that have earned award nominations from major industry publications like Modern Drummer and DRUM! magazineOpen-Handed Playing Vol. 1 & 2 (co-authored with legendary educator Dom Famularo)Daily Drumset WorkoutDrumming KairosCollapsed Rudiments (Completing and expanding upon structural concepts initially conceptualized by Jim Chapin)Huge thanks to Claus for giving up his time so generously to do this interview.Claus is performing masterclasses on July 4th in Rotherham Yorkshire for Bobs Drum School, please checkout Bobs Drum School on Social Media for More Information.July 5th finds Claus Performing 2 masterclasses in Denbigh North Wales, please contact me for further details if you are interested mathewroberts@btinternet.com

En af Claus' første gerninger efter en større fusion var at etablere et governance board. Ikke for at skabe mere styring eller flere møder, men for at træffe bedre beslutninger. Siden har boardet været en central del af NIRAS' arbejde med at prioritere, afveje og skabe retning på tværs af en kompleks organisation med høj faglig autonomi.Dagens gæst i Dataklubben er Claus Birkholm – CIO i NIRAS og årets CIO i 2025.Foruden governance boardet tager vi fat i et af de varmeste emner på CIO-agendaen lige nu: Copilot, ChatGPT Enterprise eller Claude? Claus deler sine erfaringer med at navigere i et marked, hvor AI-udviklingen går hurtigere end beslutningsprocesserne. For hvordan skaber man både frihed til innovation og kontrol med sikkerhed, økonomi og governance?Vi taler også om NIRAS' næste skridt på AI-rejsen. For personlig produktivitet er én ting. Noget andet er at flytte AI ind i værdikæden gennem agenter og løsninger, der skaber værdi i forretningen og ikke kun hos den enkelte medarbejder.Det blev den sidste episode, inden Dataklubben går på sommerferie – men vi vender selvfølgelig stærkt tilbage efter sommerferien.Du ønskes god lyttelyst & en dejlig sommer ☀️

Be The Ferrari And Build A Life That FitsSome conversations start as fun and end up telling the truth you didn't know you needed. Kelly sits down with Paula, a professional speaker, AI trainer, MC, podcaster, and the woman behind “Be The Ferrari,” a keynote built around identity, confidence, and the freedom of realizing you are not for everyone. Along the way, you'll also hear how a simple yes turned into an unexpectedly joyful side life as Mrs Claus, booked out a year in advance, because real entrepreneurship is often stranger and better than the plan.We go deeper into what happens when motherhood comes first and life forces a pivot: divorce, blended family dynamics, adoption, and the long tentacles conflict can leave behind. Paula shares what she's navigating now, including estrangement, and how she keeps moving forward with prayer, counseling, and community. Content note: the conversation includes suicidal ideation and the impact suicide has on the people left behind, plus the practical tools that help when isolation and shame get loud.On the business side, we talk organic networking, building a trusted referral network, spotting marketing “shoulds,” and pricing yourself like you mean it, especially for women entrepreneurs who have been trained to ask for less. If you're a mompreneur craving alignment, a faith driven business owner searching for purpose, or a speaker ready to claim your value, this one brings both heart and strategy.Subscribe for more conversations that help you reclaim your hue, share this with a friend who needs it, and leave a quick rating and review so more women can find the show.Connect with Paula:Website: Princess Paula ConsultingLinkedIn: Paula SkovieraIG: @princess_paula_consultingTiktok: PrincessPaulaConsultingContact the Host, Kelly Kirk:Email: info.ryh7@gmail.comGet Connected/Follow:The Hue Drop Newsletter: Subscribe HereIG: @ryh_pod & @thekelly.tanke.kirkFacebook: Reclaiming Your Hue Facebook PageCAKES Affiliate Link: KELLYKIRKCredits:Editor: Joseph KirkMusic: Kristofer Tanke Thanks for listening & cheers to Reclaiming Your Hue! 

Hello, and Merry Christmas everyone! So it's been awhile... but I'm so glad to be back, bringing you all the cozy Christmas vibes and classic stories of our favorite holiday season. In today's episode, I take a few minutes to share some family updates and tell you how our last Christmas went. Then, I offer a couple of book recommendations in the Cozy Christmas Book Corner before we settle in by the Christmas fire for a lovely old story called Christmas Under the Snow, by Olive Thorne Miller. Today's tale is a classic story about a pioneer family on the prairie who find themselves snowed into their lonely log cabin just days before Christmas. With their father stranded in the village while gathering supplies, food running low, and winter's grip tightening around them, the family faces an uncertain holiday. Yet even in the harshest conditions, Christmas has a way of bringing hope, warmth, and unexpected blessings. So grab a warm drink, settle into your favorite chair, and join me for this heartwarming Christmas tale! Books Recommended: Mrs. Claus and the Very Vicious Valentine by Liz Ireland Around the Yule Log by Willis Boyd Allen O Deadly Night by Vicki Delany Timestamps 00:00 Around the Yule Log 03:55 Life and Family updates, Christmas 2025 10:13 Cozy Christmas Book Corner Recommendations 16:23 Christmas Under the Snow by Olive Thorne Miller 34:23 Story Reflections   #podcast #christmas #christmasstories

Skriv til os med kommentarer og spørgsmål på askov@nordcommunications.dkI dette afsnit skal det handle om frygten. Sammen med dagens gæst, Claus Springborg, går vi på opdagelse i hvid og sort essens, og hvordan de hænger sammen med et særligt step på The Hero's Journey: heltens møde med dragen.

Eine Frau schwebt mit einem schwarzen Regenschirm über die Dächer Londons. Der Wind trägt sie durch den grauen Himmel, während unten zwei Kinder staunend nach oben blicken. Wenige Augenblicke später landet sie vor dem Haus der Familie Banks in der Cherry Tree Lane. Mit ihrer Ankunft beginnt eines der größten Filmmärchen des 20. Jahrhunderts: Mary Poppins. In dieser Folge BRITPOD – England at its best widmen sich Alexander-Klaus Stecher und Claus Beling einer Frau, die weit mehr war als nur das berühmteste Kindermädchen der Filmgeschichte. Schauspielerin Julie Andrews, die im vergangenen Jahr ihren 90. Geburtstag feierte, zählt bis heute zu den größten britischen Künstlerinnen aller Zeiten. Von ihren Anfängen als Wunderkind im Londoner West End über den Triumph von My Fair Lady bis zu ihren Welterfolgen in Mary Poppins und The Sound of Music zeichnet diese Episode den außergewöhnlichen Weg einer Britin nach, die Generationen von Menschen begeistert hat. Dabei hätte vieles ganz anders kommen können. Obwohl Julie Andrews am Broadway als Eliza Doolittle in My Fair Lady gefeiert wurde, erhielt sie die Hauptrolle in der Verfilmung nicht. Stattdessen machte Walt Disney sie mit Mary Poppins über Nacht zum Weltstar. Es folgten ein Oscar, internationale Berühmtheit und mit The Sound of Music einer der erfolgreichsten Filme der Kinogeschichte. Doch auch schwere Rückschläge, darunter der Verlust ihrer legendären Singstimme, konnten ihren Lebensmut und ihre Ausstrahlung nicht brechen. Wie wurde aus einem englischen Mädchen aus Walton-on-Thames eine der größten Filmikonen des 20. Jahrhunderts? Warum prägen Mary Poppins und The Sound of Music bis heute das Bild Großbritanniens in aller Welt? Und weshalb berührt Julie Andrews auch Jahrzehnte nach ihren größten Erfolgen noch immer Millionen Menschen? WhatsApp: Du kannst Alexander und Claus direkt auf ihre Handys Nachrichten schicken! Welche Ecke Englands sollten die beiden mal besuchen? Zu welchen Themen wünschst Du Dir mehr Folgen? Warst Du schon mal in Great Britain und magst ein paar Fotos mit Claus und Alexander teilen? Probiere es gleich aus: +49 8152 989770 - einfach diese Nummer einspeichern und schon kannst Du BRITPOD per WhatsApp erreichen. BRITPOD – England at its best. Ein ALL EARS ON YOU Original Podcast. Quellen: Youtube: "The Julie Andrews Archive"

In this episode of the Independent Thinking Show for ⁠⁠@FifthWrist⁠⁠ Radio, Roman (⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@TimesRomanAU⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠) and Claus (⁠⁠@tapir_ffm⁠⁠) are joined by Felipe Pikullik (@felipepikullik), a fantastic German independent watchmaker.We chat about Felipe's early fascination with watches, persistence in gaining entry to watchmaking school in Glashütte, and formative work with Stefan Kudoke (skeletonization) and Rolf Lang (restoration and prototyping from scratch). Felipe describes the evolution of his watchmaking from decorating stock calibers to his most recent release of an in-house calibre Sternenhimmel FPA1; and explains his “in-house architecture” definition (FPA1 uses mostly in-house parts but not 100%), choices like German silver for finishing and patina, a handcrafted balance wheel displayed front-side, a retrograde date adjusted via lug mechanism to avoid pushers and danger zones, and his unique use of aventurine in the dial and movement construction.In our opinion, Felipe is one of the most exciting indie talents, delivering outstanding value and a unique voice in the indie horology space.We hope you enjoy this episode as much as we did.Make sure to check out Felipe's work @felipepikullik and www.felipe-pikullik.de Follow us on Instagram: ⁠⁠@FifthWrist ⁠⁠#fifthwrist #fifthwristradio #fifthwristradiopodcastIndependent Thinking Show is a place dedicated to showcasing the great people doing interesting and cool things in the world of horology.  To join our crew group chat then please email us at contact@fifthwrist.com and if you have time please leave us a review wherever you listen to our podcast.We remain fiercely independent with no commercial partners, or sponsored content. We only speak to people we respect and like - and that's a pretty rare thing these days! Thank you for joining us.Theme Music:  ⁠⁠The Wrong Time by Silent Partner⁠⁠ (via YouTube Free Music Channel)

Fiskemulighetene i OslomarkaDe færreste hovedsteder i verden kan tilby det Oslo kan: hundrevis av fiskevann innenfor kort avstand fra sentrum. I denne episoden møter vi Claus Pedersen, leder i OFA – Oslomarkas Fiskeadministrasjon. Vi snakker om hvordan fisket i marka forvaltes, hvordan ørretbestandene kultiveres og hva som gjøres for å sikre gode fiskeopplevelser også i framtiden. Hvor er fisket best, hvilke vann egner seg for familieturer, og hvor bør storfiskjegerne prøve lykken? Vi er også innom settefiskanlegget i Sørkedalen, fiskeregler, klimaendringer og hvordan markafisket har utviklet seg de siste tiårene. Claus forteller om arbeidet som legges ned bak kulissene, hvordan vann restaureres og fiskebestander styrkes, og hvorfor Oslomarka fortsatt er et av landets mest tilgjengelige og spennende områder for sportsfiske. Enten du er tilreisende eller har marka som nærmeste nabo, får du tips som kan gjøre neste fisketur enda bedre.Les mer:FacebookPodkasten VillmarkslivDu støtter oss ved å abonnere på Villmarksliv, Jakt eller Alt om Fiske. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Die Tore des Buckingham Palace sind verschlossen. Die Wachen stehen vor den Mauern. Doch auch sie können nicht verhindern, dass immer wieder neue Geschichten aus dem Inneren der Monarchie an die Öffentlichkeit dringen. Jahrzehnte nach den ersten Vorwürfen werfen ehemalige Sicherheitsbeamte und neue Aussagen erneut die Frage auf: Was wusste Queen Elizabeth II. wirklich über das Privatleben ihres Sohnes Andrew? In dieser Folge BRITPOD – England at its best spricht Alexander-Klaus Stecher gemeinsam mit Königshausexperte Andy Englert über die Rolle der Queen im Fall Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor. Während Andrew seine Titel und öffentlichen Aufgaben längst verloren hat, rückt zunehmend die Frage in den Mittelpunkt, was im Buckingham Palace bekannt war und wer über Jahre hinweg wegsah. Ehemalige Sicherheitsbeamte berichten von einem ständigen Kommen und Gehen von Frauen im Palast. Gleichzeitig geht es um Andrews Verbindungen zu Jeffrey Epstein, die millionenschwere Einigung im Fall Virginia Giuffre und die Bemühungen der Queen, weiteren Schaden vom Königshaus abzuwenden. Auch die Rolle von Prinz Philip sowie mögliche Ermittlungen und neue Vorwürfe werden eingeordnet. Darüber hinaus richtet sich der Blick auf die Folgen für das Haus York. Die Prinzessinnen Beatrice und Eugenie stehen bis heute im Schatten der Affäre, obwohl gegen sie selbst keinerlei Vorwürfe bestehen. Die Geschichte zeigt, wie eng familiäre Loyalität, öffentlicher Druck und der Ruf der Monarchie miteinander verbunden sind. Wusste Queen Elizabeth II. mehr, als jemals öffentlich bekannt wurde? Wer schützte Andrew über Jahre hinweg? Und wie sehr belastet die Affäre das Ansehen der Royal Family bis heute? BRITPOD – England at its best. WhatsApp: Du kannst Alexander und Claus direkt auf ihre Handys Nachrichten schicken! Welche Ecke Englands sollten die beiden mal besuchen? Zu welchen Themen wünschst Du Dir mehr Folgen? Warst Du schon mal in Great Britain und magst ein paar Fotos mit Claus und Alexander teilen? Probiere es gleich aus: +49 8152 989770 - einfach diese Nummer einspeichern und schon kannst Du BRITPOD per WhatsApp erreichen. BRITPOD – England at its best. Ein ALL EARS ON YOU Original Podcast.

Im September 2016 werden in der Wohnung des Berliner Abgeordneten Gerwald Claus-Brunner zwei Leichen gefunden. Claus-Brunner hat sich das Leben genommen. In seiner Wohnung liegt auch der 29-jährige Jan Mirko L., den er zuvor getötet hat. Doch die Geschichte beginnt nicht erst an diesem Tag.Wochen vor der Tat war Mirko bereits zur Polizei gegangen. Er hatte Anzeige erstattet.In dieser Folge geht es um den Mord an Jan Mirko L., um die Vorgeschichte zwischen Opfer und Täter, um Stalking, Macht, Kontrolle und die Frage, warum Warnzeichen manchmal erst dann ernst genommen werden, wenn es zu spät ist.Und es geht um die rechtsmedizinischen Befunde von Prof. Dr. Michael Tsokos und die vielen offenen Fragen, die nach der Einstellung des Verfahrens blieben.2026 Live Tour: 17.10.26 Mainz, 23.10. und 24.10.26 Berlin - Tickets unter www.wahreverbrechen-podcast.deTriggerwarnung: In dieser Folge geht es um Stalking, psychische Gewalt, körperliche Gewalt, Mord, Suizid und rechtsmedizinische Details.*Enthält Werbung*Enthält Affiliate-Links*++++Unser Buch: DIE ZEUGEN - Fiktive Ich-Erzähler berichten über ihre Begegnungen mit der dunklen Seite der Täter.

Vor den Toren Londons erhebt sich ein Palast, in dessen Mauern sich einige der dramatischsten Geschichten der britischen Geschichte abgespielt haben. Hampton Court Palace war über zwei Jahrhunderte hinweg Residenz von Königen und Königinnen, Schauplatz politischer Intrigen, rauschender Feste und tragischer Schicksale. Und für viele Besucher ist es bis heute einer der unheimlichsten Orte Englands. In dieser Folge BRITPOD – England at its best nehmen Euch Alexander-Klaus Stecher und Claus Beling mit nach Hampton Court Palace. Hier herrschte Heinrich VIII., hier wandelten seine berühmten Ehefrauen durch die endlosen Gänge des Palastes, und hier soll bis heute der Geist von Catherine Howard erscheinen. Die junge Königin wurde wegen angeblicher Untreue verhaftet und später hingerichtet. Der Legende nach läuft sie noch immer schreiend durch die sogenannte „Haunted Gallery“, auf der verzweifelten Suche nach Gnade. Besucher berichten bis heute von einer seltsamen Atmosphäre an genau diesem Ort. Doch Hampton Court ist weit mehr als eine Geistergeschichte. Alexander und Claus erkunden die gewaltige Great Hall mit ihrem beeindruckenden Hammerbalkendach, besuchen die historischen Küchen, in denen einst hunderte Mitarbeiter täglich Mahlzeiten für den königlichen Hof zubereiteten, und entdecken einen der ältesten Tennisplätze der Welt. Lange bevor Wimbledon existierte, spielte Heinrich VIII. hier bereits eine frühe Form des Tennissports. Außerdem führt die Reise zu Thomas Wolsey, dem mächtigen Kardinal, der den Palast ursprünglich errichten ließ, zu Elisabeth I., die hier königliche Empfänge veranstaltete, und zu Charles I., der während des Englischen Bürgerkriegs in Hampton Court festgehalten wurde und der Überlieferung nach sogar kurz vor seiner Hinrichtung noch Tennis gespielt haben soll. WhatsApp: Du kannst Alexander und Claus direkt auf ihre Handys Nachrichten schicken! Welche Ecke Englands sollten die beiden mal besuchen? Zu welchen Themen wünschst Du Dir mehr Folgen? Warst Du schon mal in Great Britain und magst ein paar Fotos mit Claus und Alexander teilen? Probiere es gleich aus: +49 8152 989770 - einfach diese Nummer einspeichern und schon kannst Du BRITPOD per WhatsApp erreichen. BRITPOD – England at its best. Ein ALL EARS ON YOU Original Podcast.

La franja dels 7 als 12 anys

Join Scott Bursey as he hosts Santa and Steve Jamieson to explore innovative real estate engagement strategies and cutting-edge interactive technology platforms. Discover how these experts leverage authentic connections and advanced tools to transform client relationships and business growth.   Professional Real Estate Investors - How we can help you: Investor Fuel Mastermind:  Learn more about the Investor Fuel Mastermind, including 100% deal financing, massive discounts from vendors and sponsors you're already using, our world class community of over 150 members, and SO much more here: http://www.investorfuel.com/apply   Investor Machine Marketing Partnership:  Are you looking for consistent, high quality lead generation? Investor Machine is America's #1 lead generation service professional investors. Investor Machine provides true 'white glove' support to help you build the perfect marketing plan, then we'll execute it for you…talking and working together on an ongoing basis to help you hit YOUR goals! Learn more here: http://www.investormachine.com   Coaching with Mike Hambright:  Interested in 1 on 1 coaching with Mike Hambright? Mike coaches entrepreneurs looking to level up, build coaching or service based businesses (Mike runs multiple 7 and 8 figure a year businesses), building a coaching program and more. Learn more here: https://investorfuel.com/coachingwithmike   Attend a Vacation/Mastermind Retreat with Mike Hambright: Interested in joining a "mini-mastermind" with Mike and his private clients on an upcoming "Retreat", either at locations like Cabo San Lucas, Napa, Park City ski trip, Yellowstone, or even at Mike's East Texas "Big H Ranch"? Learn more here: http://www.investorfuel.com/retreat   Property Insurance: Join the largest and most investor friendly property insurance provider in 2 minutes. Free to join, and insure all your flips and rentals within minutes! There is NO easier insurance provider on the planet (turn insurance on or off in 1 minute without talking to anyone!), and there's no 15-30% agent mark up through this platform!  Register here: https://myinvestorinsurance.com/   New Real Estate Investors - How we can work together: Investor Fuel Club (Coaching and Deal Partner Community): Looking to kickstart your real estate investing career? Join our one of a kind Coaching Community, Investor Fuel Club, where you'll get trained by some of the best real estate investors in America, and partner with them on deals! You don't need $ for deals…we'll partner with you and hold your hand along the way! Learn More here: http://www.investorfuel.com/club   —--------------------

London im viktorianischen England: Während junge Frauen ihrer Zeit auf Ehe und Gesellschaft vorbereitet werden, interessiert sich Beatrix Potter für Kaninchen, Frösche, Pflanzen und Pilze. Aus ihren Zeichnungen und Geschichten entsteht später eine der erfolgreichsten Kinderbuchwelten aller Zeiten. In dieser Folge BRITPOD – England at its best sprechen Alexander-Klaus Stecher und Claus Beling über das außergewöhnliche Leben von Beatrix Potter: Schriftstellerin, Illustratorin, Unternehmerin und Schöpferin von Peter Rabbit. Mit ihren liebevoll illustrierten Geschichten verkauft sie weltweit mehr als 250 Millionen Bücher und prägt das Bild des idyllischen Englands bis heute. Der Ursprung ihres berühmtesten Charakters entsteht 1892 während eines Urlaubs in Schottland: In einem Brief an den kleinen Noel Moore erzählt Potter erstmals die Geschichte eines frechen Kaninchens namens Peter Rabbit. Mehrere Verlage lehnen das Manuskript zunächst ab, bis sie das Buch kurzerhand selbst drucken lässt. Der Beginn eines weltweiten Erfolgs. Doch Beatrix Potter war weit mehr als Kinderbuchautorin. Sie kämpfte gegen die Zwänge der viktorianischen Gesellschaft, verdiente ihr eigenes Geld, entwickelte frühe Merchandising-Ideen und engagierte sich leidenschaftlich für Natur- und Landschaftsschutz. Im Lake District kaufte sie Farmen und rettete große Teile der Region vor der Bebauung. Nach ihrem Tod vermachte sie über 1.600 Hektar Land dem National Trust. Wie wurde aus einer zurückhaltenden jungen Frau eine weltberühmte Erzählerin? Warum faszinieren Peter Rabbit und seine Welt bis heute Millionen Menschen? Und weshalb verdankt nicht nur die Kinderliteratur, sondern auch der Lake District Beatrix Potter so viel? WhatsApp: Du kannst Alexander und Claus direkt auf ihre Handys Nachrichten schicken! Welche Ecke Englands sollten die beiden mal besuchen? Zu welchen Themen wünschst Du Dir mehr Folgen? Warst Du schon mal in Great Britain und magst ein paar Fotos mit Claus und Alexander teilen? Probiere es gleich aus: +49 8152 989770 - einfach diese Nummer einspeichern und schon kannst Du BRITPOD per WhatsApp erreichen. BRITPOD – England at its best. Ein ALL EARS ON YOU Original Podcast. Quellen: Youtube: "The modern Age"

Discover why Newberry Springs is much more than just a quick pit stop on your road trip through the high desert. In this episode, Chamber Officer/Ambassador and entrepreneur Karla Claus shares her insider secrets on the historic Route 66 landmarks, hidden petroglyphs, and local gems that will make this town a must-visit multi-day destination. Tune in to learn how to plan your perfect getaway and support the small businesses that are putting this vibrant community on the map. DISCUSSION00:00 Promoting Newberry Springs tourism04:48 Creating a visitor center and park08:07 Exploring Newberry Springs attractions13:05 Starting a Route 66 tour business15:01 Launching a lakeside wedding business17:40 Promoting Newberry Springs tourismLEARN MORENewberry Springs Chamber of Commerce: https://newberryspringschamber.comRoute 66 Tours CA: https://Route66toursca.comDiscover Newberry Springs: https://discovernewberrysprings.com/Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/NewberrySpringsChamber/NEXT STEPSVisit us at https://outdooradventureseries.com to like, comment, and share our episodes.KEYWORDSKarla Claus, Route 66 Tours CA, Newberry Springs Chamber of Commerce, Route 66 Centennial, Outdoor Adventure Series, Podcast Interview#KarlaClaus #NewberrySpringsChamberofCommerce #Route66Centennial #OutdoorAdventureSeries #PodcastInterviewMy Favorite Podcast Tools:  Production by DescriptHosting BuzzsproutShow Notes by CastmagicWebsite powered by PodpageBe a Podcast Guest by PodMatchBanner Customization by Nano Banana & Canva

2009. Jeffrey Epstein steht nach seiner Haftentlassung unter Hausarrest. Trotzdem reisen Sarah Ferguson und ihre Töchter Beatrice und Eugenie zu ihm in die USA. Jahre später sorgen genau diese Begegnungen erneut für Schlagzeilen und werfen bis heute Fragen rund um die Familie von Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor auf. In dieser Folge BRITPOD – England at its best spricht Alexander-Klaus Stecher gemeinsam mit Andy Englert, stellvertretender Chefredakteur von Frau im Spiegel und Frau im Spiegel Royale, über die Folgen der Epstein-Affäre für Sarah Ferguson und ihre Töchter. Während Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor seine öffentlichen Aufgaben und Titel längst verloren hat, richtet sich der Blick inzwischen zunehmend auf die Menschen in seinem direkten Umfeld und darauf, wie stark der Skandal auch ihr Leben verändert hat. Dabei geht es um das Leben der York-Familie nach Andrews öffentlichem Absturz, um gemeinsame Auftritte, verschwundene öffentliche Präsenz und die Frage, wie stark der Name Andrew bis heute auf Fergie und ihre Töchter zurückfällt. Thematisiert werden finanzielle Probleme, frühere Kontakte zu Epstein sowie die öffentliche Wahrnehmung einer Familie, die über Jahre fest zum erweiterten inneren Kreis der Royals gehörte. Auch Beatrice und Eugenie geraten immer wieder in den Fokus, obwohl gegen sie selbst keinerlei Vorwürfe bestehen. Beide galten lange als moderne und beliebte Vertreterinnen der jüngeren Royal-Generation, heute werden ihre Namen jedoch regelmäßig im Zusammenhang mit der Affäre ihres Vaters genannt. Gleichzeitig wird deutlich, wie schwierig der Umgang des Königshauses mit familiären Loyalitäten und öffentlichen Skandalen geworden ist. Daneben geht es um die Rolle von Prinz William, die Distanz der Royal Family zur Familie York und die Frage, wie Sarah Ferguson heute überhaupt noch lebt und finanziert wird. Zwischen gesellschaftlichem Abstieg, alten Loyalitäten und öffentlicher Isolation entsteht das Bild einer Familie, die den Schatten der Epstein-Affäre bis heute nicht loswird. Wie groß ist der Schaden für Fergie und ihre Töchter inzwischen wirklich? Warum verschwindet Sarah Ferguson immer mehr aus der Öffentlichkeit? Und wie geht die Royal Family intern mit einer Affäre um, die sie bis heute begleitet? WhatsApp: Du kannst Alexander und Claus direkt auf ihre Handys Nachrichten schicken! Welche Ecke Englands sollten die beiden mal besuchen? Zu welchen Themen wünschst Du Dir mehr Folgen? Warst Du schon mal in Great Britain und magst ein paar Fotos mit Claus und Alexander teilen? Probiere es gleich aus: +49 8152 989770 - einfach diese Nummer einspeichern und schon kannst Du BRITPOD per WhatsApp erreichen. BRITPOD – England at its best. Ein ALL EARS ON YOU Original Podcast.

Get a shoutout on Congratulations: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠holler.baby/chrisdelia⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

WhatsApp: Du kannst Alexander und Claus direkt auf ihre Handys Nachrichten schicken! Welche Ecke Englands sollten die beiden mal besuchen? Zu welchen Themen wünschst Du Dir mehr Folgen? Warst Du schon mal in Great Britain und magst ein paar Fotos mit Claus und Alexander teilen? Probiere es gleich aus: +49 8152 989770 - einfach diese Nummer einspeichern und schon kannst Du BRITPOD per WhatsApp erreichen. BRITPOD – England at its best. Ein ALL EARS ON YOU Original Podcast.„Hallo, hier spricht Edgar Wallace.“ Kaum ein Satz hat sich so tief in das deutsche Kinogedächtnis eingebrannt wie diese berühmte Stimme aus den Edgar Wallace Filmen der 1960er Jahre. Für eine ganze Generation wurde das neblige London mit Scotland Yard, düsteren Herrenhäusern und geheimnisvollen Verbrechern zum Sinnbild eines faszinierenden, gefährlichen und zugleich zutiefst britischen Englands. Ausgerechnet ein britischer Krimiautor entwickelte sich damals zu einem der größten Kultphänomene des deutschen Kinos. In dieser Folge BRITPOD – England at its best sprechen Alexander Klaus Stecher und Claus Beling gemeinsam mit Journalist und Filmkenner Thomas Voigt über Edgar Wallace, die legendären deutschen Wallace Verfilmungen und die besondere Faszination, die von diesen Filmen bis heute ausgeht. Warum traf ausgerechnet ein britischer Krimiautor den Nerv der deutschen Nachkriegsgesellschaft? Weshalb wurden Joachim Fuchsberger, Heinz Drache oder Eddie Arent zu Ikonen eines scheinbar britischen Kinos? Und warum funktionierte die Mischung aus Grusel, Humor und Ordnung so perfekt? Die Reise führt zurück in eine Zeit, in der Deutschland von England träumte. London wurde zur Projektionsfläche für Eleganz, Gefahr und Abenteuer, während Produzenten, Regisseure und Schauspieler in Berlin eine eigene britische Schattenwelt erschufen. Es geht um Klaus Kinski, um die legendäre Musik von Peter Thomas, um schwarz weiße Ästhetik, künstlichen Nebel und die erstaunliche Kreativität einer Filmreihe, die mit begrenzten Mitteln Kultstatus erreichte. Auch Edgar Wallace selbst steht im Mittelpunkt dieser Geschichte. Der Sohn einer Schauspielerin, aufgewachsen im Londoner East End, arbeitete als Journalist und Kriegsberichterstatter und schrieb mehr als 170 Romane. Seine Geschichten voller Tempo, Spannung und skurriler Figuren machten ihn zu einem der erfolgreichsten Autoren seiner Zeit und Jahrzehnte später in Deutschland zu einer beinahe mythischen Figur der Popkultur. Warum wirken die alten schwarz weißen Wallace Filme bis heute atmosphärischer als viele moderne Thriller? Weshalb wurde aus der Spree die Themse? Und was erzählen diese Filme über die deutsche Sehnsucht nach dem geheimnisvollen England der Nachkriegszeit? WhatsApp: Du kannst Alexander und Claus direkt auf ihre Handys Nachrichten schicken! Welche Ecke Englands sollten die beiden mal besuchen? Zu welchen Themen wünschst Du Dir mehr Folgen? Warst Du schon mal in Great Britain und magst ein paar Fotos mit Claus und Alexander teilen? Probiere es gleich aus: +49 8152 989770 - einfach diese Nummer einspeichern und schon kannst Du BRITPOD per WhatsApp erreichen. BRITPOD – England at its best. Ein ALL EARS ON YOU Original Podcast.

This is a free preview of our Weekender episode. Unlock the whole podcast and get access to our Discord and Live Show by visiting: http://patreon.com/muckrakepodcast The Boys are back in town and the world is moving faster than ever. This week, we dive into the "Groundhog Day" nightmare of U.S. foreign policy as the administration begs China to help broker a deal with Iran. Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia is pushing back against U.S. hegemony, and economic "zero hour" is fast approaching with a potential June 1st deadline for total fiscal meltdown. We also discuss: The Next Pandemic?: A cruise ship quarantine involving human-to-human hantavirus transmission and why firing CDC inspectors was a catastrophic mistake. Betting on Democracy: New reports of campaign staffers using insider information to place bets on elections and the dangerous rise of predictive markets. The Unserious Empire: From Kash Patel's personal bourbon transport to the "Uno card" strategy of modern diplomacy. Culture Watch: Nick's Broadway trip, the decline of There's Something About Mary, and why The Greatest American Hero is a time capsule for special education in the 80s.

Wem gehört eigentlich die Tiefsee? Wer darf sie ausbeuten, wer muss sie schützen? Die globale Rohstoffgewinnung - von Kupferminen bis Offshore-Plattformen - hat die Tiefsee längst im Visier. Leggewie, Claus www.deutschlandfunk.de, Essay und Diskurs

Ein rauer Wind über dem Atlantik. Gischt trifft auf dunklen Basalt, Möwen kreisen über einer Landschaft, die wirkt, als wäre sie gerade erst entstanden. Und mitten darin eine Höhle, die eher an eine Kathedrale erinnert als an Natur. In dieser Folge BRITPOD - England at its best geht es gemeinsam mit Alexander-Klaus Stecher und Claus Beling auf eine Reise zu vier der spektakulärsten Landschaften Großbritanniens. Orte in Schottland, Südengland und Nordirland, die viele Reisende kaum kennen. Die aber zeigen, wie vielfältig und eindrucksvoll Natur in Großbritannien sein kann. Auf den Inneren Hebriden in Schottland liegt die kleine Insel Staffa. Ihr bekanntester Ort: Fingal's Cave, eine der faszinierendsten Höhlen Europas. Perfekt geformte, sechseckige Basaltsäulen ragen wie Orgelpfeifen aus dem Meer. Wenn die Wellen in die Höhle schlagen, entsteht ein Klang, der schon Felix Mendelssohn zu seiner Hebriden-Ouvertüre inspirierte. Weiter südlich, an der Küste von East Sussex, erheben sich die Seven Sisters - eine der schönsten Küstenlandschaften Englands. Sieben Kreideklippen, die sich wie eine Wellenbewegung entlang des Ärmelkanals ziehen. Eingebettet in den South Downs National Park entsteht ein eindrucksvoller Kontrast aus sattem Grün, strahlendem Weiß und tiefem Blau – ideal für Wanderungen und Naturerlebnisse nahe London. An der Nordküste Nordirlands wartet mit dem Giant's Causeway ein UNESCO-Welterbe und eines der bekanntesten Naturwunder Großbritanniens. Rund 40.000 Basaltsäulen formen eine scheinbar künstliche Straße ins Meer. Entstanden durch vulkanische Prozesse vor Millionen von Jahren - und doch bis heute umgeben von der Legende eines Riesen, der diesen Weg nach Schottland gebaut haben soll. Im Nordwesten Englands liegt schließlich der Lake District National Park - eines der beliebtesten Reiseziele des Landes. Seen, Hügel, Trockenmauern und kleine Dörfer prägen diese Landschaft, die seit Jahrhunderten Dichter und Reisende inspiriert. William Wordsworth machte sie zum Zentrum der englischen Romantik, Orte wie Grasmere oder Hawkshead stehen bis heute für britische Idylle und Ruhe. Wie entsteht aus Lava eine Kathedrale aus Stein? Warum gehören die Seven Sisters zu den eindrucksvollsten Küsten Englands? Was steckt hinter der Legende des Giant's Causeway? Und warum lässt der Lake District seine Besucher nicht mehr los? WhatsApp: Du kannst Alexander und Claus direkt auf ihre Handys Nachrichten schicken! Welche Ecke Englands sollten die beiden mal besuchen? Zu welchen Themen wünschst Du Dir mehr Folgen? Warst Du schon mal in Great Britain und magst ein paar Fotos mit Claus und Alexander teilen? Probiere es gleich aus: +49 8152 989770 - einfach diese Nummer einspeichern und schon kannst Du BRITPOD per WhatsApp erreichen. BRITPOD – England at its best. Ein ALL EARS ON YOU Original Podcast.

This magical arranger turned his genius to the Broadway canon with timeless results. Listen to Sinatra, Jobim, Sammy Davis, Jr., DianA Krall, Streisand and more in thrilling versions of songs from Fiddler on the Roof, Kismet, Zorba, My Fair Lady and more.

Gilt das Völkerrecht nur in Schönwetterzeiten? Seit dem Beginn des russischen Angriffskriegs gegen die Ukraine drängt sich dieser Eindruck auf. Die regelbasierte Weltordnung steht erheblich unter Druck. Was können Deutschland und Europa tun, um das Völkerrecht zu schützen? Claus Kreß diskutiert mit Helene Bubrowski über die Angriffe auf das Völkerrecht und wie die Weltgemeinschaft es zukunftssicher machen kann. [08:35]Es sind nur wenige Details über den mutmaßlichen Attentäter von Washington bekannt. Sicher scheint nur, dass es Cole Allen aus Kalifornien auf Mitglieder der Trump-Administration abgesehen hatte. [01:09]Hier geht es zur Anmeldung für den Space.TableTable Briefings - For better informed decisions.Sie entscheiden besser, weil Sie besser informiert sind – das ist das Ziel von Table.Briefings. Wir verschaffen Ihnen mit jedem Professional Briefing, mit jeder Analyse und mit jedem Hintergrundstück einen Informationsvorsprung, am besten sogar einen Wettbewerbsvorteil. Table.Briefings bietet „Deep Journalism“, wir verbinden den Qualitätsanspruch von Leitmedien mit der Tiefenschärfe von Fachinformationen. Professional Briefings kostenlos kennenlernen: table.media/testenHier geht es zu unseren WerbepartnernHol dir deine persönlichen Daten mit Incogni zurück und hol dir 60 % Rabatt auf ein Jahresabo:https://incogni.com/tabletodayImpressum: https://table.media/impressumDatenschutz: https://table.media/datenschutzerklaerungBei Interesse an Audio-Werbung in diesem Podcast melden Sie sich gerne bei Laurence Donath: laurence.donath@table.media Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Ein verregneter Nachmittag irgendwo in einer englischen Kleinstadt. Die Tür eines kleinen Ladens öffnet sich mit einem leisen Klingeln. Drinnen: enge Gänge, überfüllte Kleiderstangen, der Duft von Stoffen, Holz und ein wenig Vergangenheit. Zwischen Tweed-Sakkos, Seidenschals und Porzellan mit königlichen Motiven hängen Kleidungsstücke, die schon ein Leben geführt haben und nun darauf warten, ein neues zu beginnen. In dieser Folge BRITPOD – England at its best sprechen Alexander-Klaus Stecher und Claus Beling mit Königshausexperte Andy Englert, stellvertretender Chefredakteur von Frau im Spiegel und Frau im Spiegel Royal über eine typisch britische Institution: Charity Shops und die Welt der Vintage-Kleidung. Orte, die auf den ersten Blick unscheinbar wirken und doch tief in der britischen Alltagskultur verankert sind. Von London bis in die entlegensten Regionen des Landes bilden sie ein Netzwerk aus Spenden, Ehrenamt und Wiederverwertung. Dieses System ist in dieser Form einzigartig: Kleidung, Bücher, Haushaltsgegenstände - nahezu alles kann gespendet werden. Verkauft wird nicht nur für den guten Zweck, sondern auch mit einem feinen Gespür für Qualität und Geschichte. Zwischen Alltagsgegenständen finden sich immer wieder außergewöhnliche Stücke: handgestrickte Pullover aus schottischer Wolle, klassische Duffelcoats, Vintage-Tweed oder sogar Designerware zu niedrigen Preisen. Nicht selten sind es gerade die Dinge ohne Label, die den größten Reiz ausmachen. Gleichzeitig erzählen diese Läden von einer Gesellschaft, die stark auf freiwilliges Engagement setzt. Ehrenamtliche prägen das Bild hinter den Ladentheken, oft über Jahrzehnte hinweg. Charity ist hier kein abstrakter Begriff, sondern gelebter Alltag - ein Zusammenspiel aus Geben, Weitergeben und Unterstützen. Jeder Einkauf wird Teil eines größeren Zusammenhangs, der von lokalen Initiativen bis hin zu nationalen Organisationen reicht. Und doch bleibt die Suche immer auch ein persönliches Erlebnis. Zwischen Portobello Road, Camden Lock oder kleinen Orten entlang der Küste stellt sich die gleiche Frage: Wo verbergen sich die besten Fundstücke? Was macht den Unterschied zwischen Second Hand und echtem Vintage? Und warum erzählen gerade diese Dinge so viel über Stil, Haltung und britische Lebensart? WhatsApp: Du kannst Alexander und Claus direkt auf ihre Handys Nachrichten schicken! Welche Ecke Englands sollten die beiden mal besuchen? Zu welchen Themen wünschst Du Dir mehr Folgen? Warst Du schon mal in Great Britain und magst ein paar Fotos mit Claus und Alexander teilen? Probiere es gleich aus: +49 8152 989770 - einfach diese Nummer einspeichern und schon kannst Du BRITPOD per WhatsApp erreichen. BRITPOD – England at its best. Ein ALL EARS ON YOU Original Podcast.

Heute sprechen Masha & Claus über die Auswirkungen der allgemeinen Lage auf der Welt, nicht politisch - sondern konkret über Dinge, die geschehen könnten und unser aller Leben beeinflussen würden. Als Flugbegleiterin oder Pilot trainiert man ständig Situationen, in denen man auf unerwartete Ereignisse reagieren muss. Aber wie ist dies beispielsweise mit einem flächendeckenden Stromausfall zu Hause. Und was haben wir Ähnliches schon unterwegs erlebt. Kann man etwas davon übertragen. Oder können wir von Menschen in anderen Gebieten der Welt lernen...

You think you know the Duggars' rules. The matching outfits. The courtship rituals. The no-kissing-before-marriage thing. But there's a list behind the list — and it starts with Santa Claus. In the IBLP, Santa's name was treated as an anagram of Satan. The Duggars erased him from Christmas entirely. And that was just the beginning of a blacklist that went far beyond holiday traditions.Tony Brueski lays it all out. Cabbage Patch dolls, declared demonic — families were told to burn them, not throw them away. Disney, torched in a backyard bonfire. Rock music, even worship music with a beat, taught to give Satan a piece of your child's soul. Harry Potter, Pokémon cards, Monster Energy drinks, Barbies — all gone. The Duggar daughters published the family's “Nike” code word in their own book — yelled in public so every male in the family stared at his shoes when an attractive woman walked by.Then the list moves past toys and into territory that matters. Therapy, called satanic. Psychiatrists, called evil. Mental health medication, called a trap. IBLP published materials linking illnesses to sins — migraines to guilt, osteoporosis to envy. Birth control forbidden even when pregnancy threatened a mother's life. Former members described having tampons confiscated. Infants struck for crawling off a blanket in a practice the family called “encouragement.”Tony connects the dots: every banned item removes one more window to the outside world. And the man who sealed those windows shut was himself accused of harassing 34 women who worked for him. The blacklist isn't about faith. It's about control. Robin Dreeke, Ret. FBI Behavioral Unit Chief, joins Tony for this episode.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS! https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#Duggar #SatanClaus #IBLP #BillGothard #JosephDuggar #JimBobDuggar #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #DuggarBlacklist #CultSurvivors

They called him “Satan Claus.” Not as a joke. As a warning. In the world of Bill Gothard's IBLP, Santa's name was an anagram for the enemy, and the Duggar family raised their children accordingly. No Santa. No stockings. No magic. And that was just the first item on a blacklist that consumed nearly every piece of an American childhood.Tony Brueski walks through the full catalogue of ordinary life that the IBLP taught families like the Duggars to fear. Cabbage Patch dolls, declared demonic and burned — not thrown away, burned. Disney movies, piled on a backyard bonfire. Rock music, including Christian rock, taught children that a syncopated beat gave Satan a foothold in their soul. Harry Potter, banned. Monster Energy drinks, forbidden. Board games swapped for an in-house creation where kids landed in the “venomous pit of bitterness” instead of jail.From there the list escalates. Pants on women — ungodly. Movie theaters — worldly amusement. The “Nike” code word — confirmed by the Duggar daughters themselves — yelled in public so the men could avert their eyes from any woman deemed immodest. Therapy declared satanic. Mental health medication called evil. A published IBLP disease catalogue linking illnesses to specific sins. Birth control forbidden even when doctors warned that pregnancy could kill the mother. Former members describing tampons seized and labeled instruments of pleasure. And blanket training — striking infants for crawling off a blanket — called “encouragement.”Tony reveals the thread connecting every item on the list: isolation. Each prohibition removes one more link to the outside world. That's not a belief system. That's a quarantine. And the architect of that quarantine, Bill Gothard, was accused of harassing 34 women who worked for him. Robin Dreeke, Ret. FBI Behavioral Unit Chief, joins Tony for analysis.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS! https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#Duggar #SatanClaus #IBLP #BillGothard #JosephDuggar #JimBobDuggar #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #DuggarBlacklist #CultSurvivors

The Danish-British author, broadcaster and comedian recalls her unusual early life with glee, including how she came to be holding the hand of Neil Armstrong's assistant at NASA's headquarters on July 20, 1969. (R)Sandi's interest in the world was stoked from a young age by her father, Claus, who was Denmark's first Foreign Correspondent, and who was incredibly famous in his homeland.It was her dad who believed experiences were more important than day-to-day schooling, which is how Sandi came to be holding the hand of Neil Armstrong's assistant at NASA's mission control on the day of the Apollo moon landing.Sandi's irrepressible curiosity in the world and its people has been a source of renewal for her, from moments of crippling loneliness and homophobia to joyful occasions and performances.Further informationOriginally broadcast November 2022.This episode was produced by Alice Moldovan. The Executive Producer was Carmel Rooney. This episode references LGBTQIA+, Cambridge, Footlights, QI, The Great British Bake Off, Danish news, NASA, astronaut, moon, space, ovarian cyst, two mums,To binge even more great episodes of the Conversations podcast with Richard Fidler and Sarah Kanowski go the ABC listen app (Australia) or wherever you get your podcasts. There you'll find hundreds of the best thought-provoking interviews with authors, writers, artists, politicians, psychologists, musicians, and celebrities.

En blæsende solrig mandag på Den Danske Riviera, 66 timer i Island fra Island-korrespondenten, der er bjergtagende smukt og jordslående jysk som samme tid, masser af filmpriser – dårlig løn, invitationen havde en enorm indflydelse på min holdning til turen - ligesom Politiken, Dan Jørgensen har brugt al flybenzin i Europa og priserne stiger med 23 %, en gennemført militæroperation, uden menneskelig fremmarch - dronen er så dystopisk, og et tegn på død, den originale influencer i form af paven, #ugenfilm er Pulp Fiction og et fejlcitat fra den amerikanske forsvarsminister Pete Hegseth, det 11. bud i Biblen: snyd ikke med vægtene på bænken, skriv til Claus fra Motorstyrelsen der har lækket dine private oplysninger, Helge fra Nordea har fået nok og nu skal folk slappe af, tilbudsaviser er en dansk nationalsklenodie og folkesport, vi bruger penge på boliger og biler, men ikke på fødevarer, et nyt ord for en riiigtig varm dag i Japan, Corydon med den laveste hvilepuls nogensinde, – og nu kommer guldet hjem til Aarhus.Få 30 dages gratis prøveperiode (kan kun benyttes af nye Podimo-abonnenter) - http://podimo.dk/hgdg (99 kroner herefter)Værter: Esben Bjerre & Peter FalktoftRedigering: PodAmokKlip: PodAmokMusik: Her Går Det GodtInstagram:@hergaardetgodt@Peterfalktoft@Esbenbjerre

Ein abgedunkelter Raum, schwarze Roben, in der Mitte ein Tisch – darauf ein menschlicher Schädel mit leuchtenden Augenhöhlen. Sein Name: „Eric“. Wer hier eintritt, legt einen Eid ab. Kein gewöhnlicher Schwur, sondern ein Versprechen: den Leser niemals zu täuschen. Willkommen im Detection Club. – London, 1930: In der Zwischenkriegszeit entsteht ein exklusiver Zirkel, wie ihn die Literaturwelt noch nie gesehen hat. Agatha Christie, Dorothy L. Sayers, G. K. Chesterton – die größten Namen der britischen Kriminalliteratur kommen zusammen. Ihr Ziel: ein Genre retten, das zunehmend von billigen Tricks lebt. Keine Zufälle, keine versteckten Täter, keine unfairen Wendungen. Der Krimi wird zum intellektuellen Duell zwischen Autor und Leser – logisch, präzise, kompromisslos. In dieser Folge BRITPOD CRIME tauchen Alexander-Klaus Stecher und Claus Beling ein in die Welt dieses geheimnisvollen Clubs. Gegründet aus einem Dinner unter Autoren, entwickelt sich der Detection Club schnell zur Elite der „Golden Age“-Kriminalliteratur. Mitglied wird nur, wer eingeladen wird und wer beweist, dass er die Regeln des „Fair Play“ beherrscht. Die Aufnahmerituale wirken wie aus einem düsteren Roman: Der Kandidat legt die Hand auf den Schädel, schwört, niemals mit Zufällen, Tricks oder verborgenen Hinweisen zu arbeiten – ein Kodex, der die Qualität des Genres sichern soll. Doch der Detection Club bleibt nicht bei der Fiktion. Seine Mitglieder verfolgen reale Verbrechen mit derselben Akribie wie ihre Romane, analysieren sie mit der Logik erfahrener Ermittler und bringen diese Expertise in die öffentliche Debatte ein. Ein Fall wird dabei legendär: der Mord an Julia Wallace in Liverpool. Ein scheinbar perfektes Verbrechen, ein Ehemann mit Alibi, eine Polizei, die sich festlegt – und ein Zeitablauf, der kaum möglich erscheint. Die Autoren analysieren den Fall wie ein Puzzle: Fahrpläne, Blutspuren, Bewegungsabläufe. Sie zerlegen die Theorie der Ermittler und stellen zentrale Fragen: Kann ein Mord in wenigen Minuten begangen werden, ohne Spuren zu hinterlassen? Ist das präsentierte Szenario realistisch oder reine Konstruktion? Für sie ist klar: Die offizielle Version hält der Logik nicht stand. Ihre Analysen bleiben nicht ohne Wirkung. Der verurteilte William Herbert Wallace wird freigesprochen – auch, weil sich die öffentliche Wahrnehmung durch diese ungewöhnliche „Ermittlergruppe“ verschiebt. Doch trotz aller Scharfsinnigkeit bleibt ein entscheidender Punkt ungelöst: Der wahre Täter wird nie eindeutig überführt. Agatha Christie bringt es später auf den Punkt: „Nichts, was man erfinden kann, ist so spannend wie die Realität.“ WhatsApp: Du kannst Alexander und Claus direkt auf ihre Handys Nachrichten schicken! Welche Ecke Englands sollten die beiden mal besuchen? Zu welchen Themen wünschst Du Dir mehr Folgen? Warst Du schon mal in Great Britain und magst ein paar Fotos mit Claus und Alexander teilen? Probiere es gleich aus: +49 8152 989770 - einfach diese Nummer einspeichern und schon kannst Du BRITPOD per WhatsApp erreichen. BRITPOD – England at its best. Ein ALL EARS ON YOU Original Podcast. Quellen: Youtube: "Shedunnit" Youtube: "Juniverse"

The Alan Cox Show

The Alan Cox ShowSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

AP correspondent Julie Walker reports a popular SantaCon charity fundraiser was more con than Claus, according to authorities.

It's time to talk about Season 18 and the girls! First up, Nico & Kevo – along with Jonah, Tori, & TK, weigh in on Snatch Game of Love: Island Edition featuring Athena Dion as OC Greta Feta Onassis, Darlene Mitchell as Mrs. Claus, Discord Addams as The Pope, Jane Don't as Truman Capote, Juicy Love Dion as JoJo Siwa, Kenya Pleaser as Lizzo, Mia Starr as Bloody Mary, Myki Meeks as Drew Barrymore, Nini Coco as Sir David Attenborough – and it doesn't go how ANYONE expects! Then, check in with the near-end of the season with our coverage of the Roast, leading up to the LaLaPaRuZa & finale! Don't miss it all on a new HTML / X Is For Show! X IS FOR SHOW is a talk show for your favorite media, the same way THE OFFICE was a documentary about a paper company. Every week, THE ACTION PACK gathers to discuss a wide range of entertainment media and news, from film & TV to comics to gaming, music, and beyond. Led by NICO (@NicoAction) and TK (@TKAccidental) with producer KEVO (@KevoReally), as well as a variety of friends and special guests, these LIVE discussions are not to be missed - so be sure to tune in and join us for all the fun!

Happy Monday, Christmas Fanatics! And Happy Easter season! The elves are back together at last, reunited and basking in the Christmas spirit after a brief hiatus, and this week all three of them are here: Julia, Anthony, and your guest host for the evening, Thom! Before diving into the main event, the crew catches up on all things post-Easter, including the Artemis mission, “Project Hail Mary's” pop culture moment, the upcoming Stephen Colbert ”Lord of the Rings” project, therapy rabbits at the Easter egg hunt, the Flemish Giant bunnies that stole the show, and a spirited debate about Chuck E. Cheese tokens on eBay. Anthony has, as always, been to the movies constantly. And somehow, the elves manage to discover that one of them has never once set foot inside a Chuck E. Cheese. Then it's time for the main event: the 2025 Chuck E. Cheese Christmas special on Amazon! Not to be confused with the one from the 80s. It's 50 minutes of familiar late-90s/early-2000s animation style, a Tolkien-referencing villain, a surprisingly chic Mrs. Claus, a surprise party for Santa, and a dog who is surprisingly well-connected (but not that well-connected). Will this long-dormant franchise's animated holiday outing earn a spot in your seasonal rotation? The elves have thoughts. Some of them are generous. So settle back, relax, and enjoy this festive reunion episode that is the perfect way to kick off your week! And get excited: there are only eight months until Christmas. As always, thanks for your love and support, y'all!

Ce jour là, en pleine Seconde Guerre mondiale, Hitler revient d'une visite sur le front de l'Est. À bord de son avion, sans le savoir, une bombe est dissimulée dans sa soute. Le plan est simple et audacieux : provoquer une explosion en vol pour éliminer le Führer et, espèrent les conspirateurs, précipiter la chute du IIIe Reich.Derrière cette tentative se trouve un officier allemand, Henning von Tresckow, membre de la résistance intérieure au sein de la Wehrmacht. Profondément choqué par les crimes nazis, il décide d'agir. Avec ses complices, il introduit un explosif britannique camouflé dans une boîte censée contenir deux bouteilles de liqueur.Le mécanisme repose sur un détonateur chimique : une ampoule d'acide doit se briser, déclenchant une réaction qui amorce l'explosion après un délai d'environ 30 minutes. Tout semble parfaitement calculé. L'avion décolle… mais la bombe n'explose jamais.Pourquoi ? Le froid extrême en altitude aurait ralenti, voire empêché, la réaction chimique. Le détonateur ne fonctionne pas. Hitler atterrit sain et sauf. Le lendemain, dans un geste presque irréel, un complice récupère discrètement la bombe intacte, évitant que le complot ne soit découvert.Cet épisode n'est qu'un parmi plusieurs tentatives d'assassinat contre Hitler. L'une des plus célèbres survient le 20 juillet 1944, lors de l'attentat du 20 juillet 1944 mené par Claus von Stauffenberg. Cette fois, une bombe explose bien dans le quartier général du Führer, la “Wolfsschanze”. Mais Hitler survit, protégé en partie par une table massive qui dévie le souffle de l'explosion.D'autres complots, moins connus, ont également été envisagés : attaques-suicides, tirs à bout portant, sabotage. Mais tous échouent, souvent pour des raisons imprévisibles — timing, hasard, ou simples détails techniques.Ces échecs successifs nourrissent après coup une image presque mythique d'Hitler, celle d'un homme “protégé par le destin”. Une illusion dangereuse, qui renforce son aura auprès de certains partisans.En réalité, ces complots révèlent surtout l'existence d'une résistance allemande courageuse, prête à risquer sa vie pour mettre fin au régime nazi. Beaucoup de ces conspirateurs seront arrêtés, torturés et exécutés après l'échec du complot de 1944.En résumé, le 13 mars 1943 est un moment clé où l'histoire aurait pu basculer. Une simple défaillance technique — quelques degrés de trop en altitude — a suffi à laisser Hitler en vie… et à prolonger de deux années encore l'un des régimes les plus meurtriers du XXe siècle. Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

Most organizations approach change as something to manage. A new strategy, a new structure, a new set of goals. But what if real transformation doesn't come from plans or policies, but from experiences that change how people see themselves and each other? Claus Raasted and Paul Bulencea design those kinds of experiences. Through the College of Extraordinary Experiences, they bring together people from very different worlds and immerse them in something unfamiliar, often uncomfortable, and deeply human. The goal isn't just learning. It's transformation.In this episode, Dart, Claus, and Paul discuss what it means to design for transformation, why difficulty is often a necessary part of growth, and how leaders can create the conditions for meaningful change inside organizations.Claus Raasted is an experience designer and entrepreneur known for his work in live-action role-play and organizational transformation.Paul Bulencea is an experience designer, author, and educator focused on creating co-creative, transformational experiences.In this episode, Dart, Claus, and Paul discuss:- What makes an experience truly transformative- Why discomfort is often required for real growth- How immersive design changes how people think and behave- Why traditional learning often fails to create lasting change- What leaders get wrong about driving transformation- How environment and context shape human behavior- The difference between entertainment and transformation- How to design experiences people carry back into work- Why transformation can't be forced- And other topics…Claus Raasted is a Danish entrepreneur, speaker, and experience designer. He is a pioneer in live-action role-play and has authored more than 40 books. His work focuses on mindset change, leadership, and designing experiences that drive behavioral transformation.Paul Bulencea is an experience designer, author, and educator working at the intersection of innovation and transformation. He has collaborated with organizations including IKEA and Google to design co-creative experiences, and is co-founder of the College of Extraordinary Experiences. He holds a master's degree in Innovation in Tourism from Salzburg University of Applied Sciences.Together, Claus and Paul co-founded the College of Extraordinary Experiences, a five-day immersive program that brings together people from around the world to explore transformation through lived experience.Resources Mentioned:World Experience Organization: https://worldxo.org/ London Experience Week: https://londonexperienceweek.com/ College of Extraordinary Experiences: https://www.extraordinary.college/Connect with Claus and Paul:https://www.clausraasted.com/https://de.linkedin.com/in/paulbulenceahttps://dk.linkedin.com/in/clausraastedWork with Dart:Dart is the CEO and co-founder of the work design firm 11fold. Build work that makes employees feel alive, connected to their work, and focused on what's most important to the business. Book a call at 11fold.com.

About Claus Enevoldsen: Claus Enevoldsen is the founder of Elsie AI, an AI-powered business partner built for solo e-commerce founders, operating out of 1848 Ventures, a B2B SaaS venture studio focused on SMBs. Before building Elsie, Claus spent years at Flipboard, where the platform scaled to 145 million active users and became the fourth-largest referral traffic source for publishers ahead of Google News. A self-described builder with a growth mindset, Claus brings both large-scale product experience and a scrappy zero-to-one mentality to everything he builds. About Elsie AI: Elsie AI is an AI-powered business partner designed specifically for solo e-commerce founders, the segment Claus believes has been the last to benefit from the AI revolution. Built inside 1848 Ventures, Elsie was co-designed from day one with real e-commerce solopreneurs to address the unique challenge of wearing ten hats at once: prioritizing what to do next, creating marketing content, and monitoring website health. The goal is simple but ambitious: to become the first thing founders open every morning.Show Notes: 00:00 Introduction: what founders will take away from this episode 00:46 What the first 24 hours after launch actually looks like 01:56 How to find your ICP before you have a single customer 04:59 Why going narrow is a wedge, not a limitation 09:48 Lessons from scaling Flipboard to 145M users 11:52 How AI changes the zero-to-one game for founders 13:13 "Sell to build" vs. "intentional speed to market" 14:55 Building micro apps for marketing and lead gen 17:50 Unconventional go-to-market decisions at Elsie AI 19:20 What metrics matter on launch day (and the next two weeks) 21:07 Signups vs. PQLs: why activation rate is the real signal 22:03 The AI churn trap: front-loading value and losing retention 22:25 How Elsie builds habits instead of features 25:23 Churn prediction and behavior-based retention 25:48 Using pricing experiments to test willingness to pay 26:29 Balancing startup life with a creative practice 30:28 AI art, generative work, and the future of creative tools 33:42 Claus asks Luke: What stage is Baremetrics in? 35:00 Hypothesis-driven experimentation and what startups get wrong 39:11 Wrap-up and what's next for Elsie AI

Claude Cowork came out of an accident.Felix and the Anthropic team noticed something interesting with Claude Code: many users were using it primarily for all kinds of messy knowledge work instead of coding. Even technical builders would use it for lots of non-technical work.Even more shocking, Claude cowork wrote itself. With a team of humans simply orchestrating multiple claude code instances, the tool was ready after a brief week and a half.This isn't Felix's first rodeo with impactful and playful desktop apps. He's helped ship the Slack desktop app and is a core maintainer of Electron the open-source software framework used for building cross-platform desktop applications, even putting Windows 95 into an Electron app that runs on macOS, Windows, and Linux.In this episode, Felix joins us to unpack why execution has suddenly become cheap enough that teams can “just build all the candidates” and why the real frontier in AI products is no longer better chat, but trusted task execution.He also shares why Anthropic is betting on local-first agent workflows, why skills may matter more than most people realize, and how the hardest questions ahead are about autonomy, safety, portability, and the changing shape of knowledge work itself.We discuss* Felix's path: Slack desktop app, Electron, Windows 95 in JavaScript, and now building Claude Cowork at Anthropic* What Claude Cowork actually is: a more user-friendly, VM-based version of Claude Code designed to bring agentic workflows to non-terminal-native users* Why “user-friendly” does not mean “less powerful”: Cowork as a superset product, much like how VS Code initially looked simpler than Visual Studio but became more hackable and extensible* Anthropic's prototype-first culture: why Cowork was built in 10 days using many pre-existing internal pieces, and how internal prototypes shaped the final product* Why execution is getting cheap: the shift from long memos, specs, and debate toward rapidly building multiple candidates and choosing based on reality instead of theory* The local debate: why Felix thinks Silicon Valley is undervaluing the local computer, and why putting Claude “where you work” is often more powerful* Why Claude gets its own computer: the VM as both a safety boundary and a capability unlock, letting Claude install tools, run scripts, and work more independently without constant approval* Safety through sandboxing: why “approve every command” is not a real long-term UX, and how virtual machines create a middle ground between uselessly safe and dangerously autonomous* How Cowork differs from Claude Code: coding evals vs. knowledge-work evals, different system-prompt tradeoffs, longer planning horizons, and heavier use of planning and clarification tools* Why skills matter: simple markdown-based instructions as a lightweight abstraction layer for reusable workflows, personalized automation, and portable agent behavior* Skills vs. MCPs: why Felix is increasingly interested in file-based, text-native interfaces that tell the model what to do, rather than forcing everything through rigid tool schemas* The portability problem: why personal skills should move across agent products, and the unresolved tension between public reusable workflows and private user-specific context* Real use cases already happening today: uploading videos, organizing files, handling taxes, managing calendars, debugging internal crashes, analyzing finances, and automating repetitive browser workflows* Why AI products should work with your existing stack: Anthropic's bias toward integrating with Chrome, Office, and existing workflows instead of rebuilding every app from scratch* Computer use one year later: how much better it has gotten, why vision plus browser context is such a superpower, and why letting Claude see the thing it is working on changes everything* Why many “AI verticals” may get compressed: specialized wrappers may matter in the short term, but better general models and stronger primitives could absorb a lot of narrow use cases* The future of junior work: Felix's concerns about entry-level roles, labor-market disruption, and whether AI can compress early-career learning into denser simulated experience* Why Waterloo grads stand out: internships, shipping experience, and learning how real teams build products versus purely theoretical academic preparation* The agentic future of the desktop: what it means for Claude to have its own computer, whether AI should act on your machine or a remote one, and how intimacy with personal data changes the product design space* Why Electron still mattered: shipping Chromium as a controlled rendering stack, the limits of OS-native webviews, and why browser engines remain one of the great software abstractions* Anthropic's Labs mentality: wild internal experiments, half-broken future-looking prototypes, and the broader effort to move users from asking questions to delegating increasingly long and valuable tasks* Why the endgame is not just more capability, but more independence: teaching users to trust AI with bigger scopes of work, for longer durations, with fewer interventionsFelix Rieseberg* X: https://x.com/felixrieseberg* LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/felixrieseberg* Website: https://felixrieseberg.com/Anthropic* Website: http://anthropic.comFull Video PodTimestamps00:00 — Cheap execution and building all the candidates00:44 — Intro in the new Kernel studio02:47 — What Claude Cowork is04:18 — Why user-friendly can be more powerful05:33 — How Anthropic built Cowork07:09 — Prototype-first product development08:00 — Why local computers still matter09:20 — Skills, primitives, and platform leverage12:13 — Cowork's architecture: VM + Chrome + system prompt15:38 — Felix's own bug-fixing Cowork workflows17:38 — Local-first agents20:16 — Evals, planning, and knowledge-work optimization23:14 — What Anthropic means by evals24:21 — Scaffolding, tools, and why skills matter27:44 — Demo: YouTube uploads and self-generated skills31:03 — Calendar automation and cleaning your desktop34:47 — Browser context and why DOM access matters37:47 — Skills portability and plugins44:36 — Which AI categories survive?46:19 — Junior jobs, simulated work, and labor disruption52:00 — Gradual takeoff vs big-bang takeoff53:42 — Finance, taxes, and enterprise verticals56:24 — Vision and the improvement in computer use57:31 — Why Claude writes its own scripts58:06 — Should Claude have its own computer?1:01:26 — Windows 95 in JavaScript1:03:19 — VM tradeoffs and sandbox design1:07:23 — Approval fatigue and safe delegation1:11:18 — The future of Cowork1:12:27 — What comes next for agentic knowledge work1:15:13 — Electron, Chromium, and desktop software lessons1:22:16 — Multiplayer agents and coworker-to-coworker workflows1:26:05 — Anthropic Labs and closing thoughtsTranscriptAlessio: Hey everyone. Welcome to the Latent Space Podcast, our first one in the new studio. This is Alessio, founder of Kernel Labs, and I'm joined by swyx, editor of Latent Space.swyx: Yeah, so nice to be here. Thanks to, uh, TJ, Alessio, Allen helping to set everything up. It looks beautiful. We even have the logo outside.Yeah, kind.Felix: It's like really nice, right? When you walk in here as a guest, you're like, ah, this is a serious production. You're like, feel it immediately.swyx: Yeah. Felix, you've been, you're, you're currently a product manager of Cowork or,Felix: uh, really Technicswyx: Eng. Yeah. The, the identities are kind of vague member technical staff.Felix: I know member staff is like, the official title will carry around forever.swyx: Yeah. I basically kind of wanted, like we've been. Kinda obsessed. I, I've been using it a lot, even for managing latent space. Like, uh, cowork helps me upload videos and like title things and like edit and everything. It's, it's like really amazing.Alessio: Cool. He said multiple times Cowork has said gi in the group track.swyx: Yeah, yeah, yeah. So, so we have a second, uh, we have a second channel, uh, for latent space tv. Uh, and I, uh, and uh, we basically, this is our Discord meetup. Um, and I I, we have like Claude Coworks, it might be a GI, I don't know if we, we have, uh, uploaded it yet, but one of the sessions was like a, like a Claude cowork thing.Felix: I, you have to see, I would love to see it. Like, I'm so curious, like one of the most fun parts of my job is like constantly see the weird things people use Cowork for because it's obviously like very hard for us to actually design for specific use cases we do. But like every single person who's like most amazed is usually amazed about a thing that I didn't even expect cowork would be good at.Um, we have a new designer and it's one of the first small tasks. I was like, Hey, we need like a new emoji for cowork for our internal stock. It's like a pretty small thing. I like, can you please do it? And he drew an SVG and just gave it to coworker was like, can you animate this emoji? And now it has like this beautiful loopy animation.Um, and I mean, I think obviously this goes down to like, it turns out you can do more things with code than you expected, but it, it's like that kind of stuff that is really fun to me. So, long story short, I would love to see like, the kind of things you're doing.swyx: I'll pull it up. I'll pull it up.Felix: Yeah. Yeah.swyx: Uh, but before we get into it, I, I think always wanna start with like a top level. What is Claude Cowork for people who haven't heard of it? Haven't tried it out.Felix: Okay. Uh, real quick, Claude Cowork is a user friendly version of Claude Code. So the way it basically works is we have Claude Code and for us, fairly impressive agent harness that over December we noticed more and more people are using either, even though they're not technical, they, they're not at home in the terminal or they are at home in the terminal, but they started using Claude Code for non-coding workloads, right?Like managing expenses or like filling out receipts or organizing a knowledge base. Like there was a big obsidian moment that a lot of people liked and we wanted to capitalize on that, but also bring, bring this capability to people who are not terminal native and who might not know how to like brew and store something.So cowork is Claude Code running in original machine with a little bit of padding, a little bit more guardrails, making it a little safer and a little bit more convenient for people who don't wanna first open up the terminal when they go to work.swyx: It's interesting, uh, that is kind of. Pitch that way as a more user friendly thing because I always feel like it, it, to me, I I treat it as like why I'm familiar with Claude Code.Like we, we did a Claude Code episode Yeah. A year ago. But this one is like even more power user tools ‘cause it, uh, it kind of integrates much better with like clotting Chrome and, uh, in all the, all the other tooling. But like, maybe, maybe that's like a perception thing, right? LikeFelix: No, honestly, I don't think you're wrong.This is like a, a thing I've been thinking a lot about for like the last two weeks. So,swyx: but when they say user friendly, it's like, oh, it's the dumb down version. But no, actually this is the superset.Felix: Yeah. Like, I think a similar thing happened, A similar thing happened to me about 10 years ago, like maybe 12 years ago when I was at Microsoft and we started working on, on Electron and like browser-based technologies and cross-platform stuff.And one of the first use cases was Visual Studio Code, which used to be a website. And the initial narrative was, or Visual Studio Code is, is like a more user-friendly version of Visual Studio. But in a similar vein, I think there was some voices saying, oh, this is. For serious developers, like, we're not gonna use this.Right? For like anything. And I think in the end what happened is people have different stories about why Visual Studio Code became such a big thing. But my personal, my personal belief is that the Hackability and the extendability has like played a pretty big role, right? You can hook in Visual Studio Code that like almost any workload, it's so easy to hack on, so easy to put extensions for it.And I think cowork might be hitting a similar thing where it's very easy to extend and it's very easy to bring into your workflows. Uh, so the convenience I think is a bit of a, it's obviously the thing we strive for as developers, but I think the way people find value in it then is by probably mapping it onto whatever they actually have to do in their job.Alessio: So end of last year, you see the spike of like non-technical usage and clock code. What's the design process to say we should make clock code work? Because I mean, you built it in only 10 days. Um, I'm sure there was some discussion before on whether it's easier to use mean. You know, like making, making like a desktop GUI is obviously one way to do it, but like there's a lot of nuance in the product.Like maybe talk people through what was like the trigger of like, we should build a separate thing. We should not build like a different plot code thing. And then maybe some of the more interesting design decisions that maybe you didn't take.Felix: Yeah, I think philanthropic, we've been thinking about ways to move people who are comfortable with using Claude to answer questions and bring more of the power of like this thing to now like, execute tasks for you.I can like solve problems for you can like build things for you. How do we bring that capability to people who are currently mostly comfortable with like a like question answer paradigm within the chat. And we've had a lot of prototypes around that. Just going back as far as like easily a year and a half.Like we had a lot of people working on that. Um, and internally philanthropic is a very prototype demo, first culture. We have a lot of like internal prototypes that don't reach the public. What Cowork actually became is like we sort of picked the right pieces out of the many prototypes that we had.Right. And that's, that's maybe also like, I think an important qualifier whenever people mention this like 10 day number. I do think it's important to me to mention that within Double Scratch there was like a lot of stuff already happening, right? Like, and I think it's important for people to remember that when you build a website, you use React, you use like a bunch of other things.And this is like a similar scenario with like a lot of pieces we already had. Um, and in terms of decision path, I think we live in like an interesting new world where execution is actually quite cheap.swyx: Mm-hmm.Felix: So maybe, maybe what you would do That's so crazy. The year. I know it's wild.swyx: You should be, ideas are cheap.Execution is the hard part. IFelix: know. And like the, we, we used to live in this world maybe where you would take a product manager and the product manager would go to a number of potential customers and in this like very low bandwidth way, would try to. Try to like tease out what are the problems they're having, what are they willing to buy?Um, and then maybe what can you build to like drive out that need and then you go back and you like draft a spec and you think about it and then like you make a design and you execute it. We internally philanthropic app, not pretty much closer to the point where we're like, don't even write a memo, just like build, like let's build all the candidates very quickly.Let's just build all of them and then pick the best ones. I think the, the decision that is most impactful both for the product as well for the users right now is like the way we put value on your local computer. I think that's a big decision point a lot of people have thought about. Should this thing, whatever it is, should it ultimately run into computer or should it run in the cloud?‘cause they're big trade offs, right?Alessio: I guess like if we solve auth, it would be easy to do in the cloud. But I think like the fact that I can just download any file from anywhere and then put it and cowork there, it's like a big unlock. Um, I mean it's interesting you mentioned reusing certain pieces. I think this is something I've been thinking about even with Claude Code, right?The price of like writing code is going to zero, blah, blah, blah. But it actually seems like the value of having some sort of platform substrate is like increasing because as you build these new things, you can kind of plug them together.Felix: Yeah.Alessio: So I almost feel like when people are saying, oh, the value of a lot of software is gonna zero because you can recreate it, to me it's almost like the opposite.It's like having an existing platform to build on top of. It's like even more valuable because you can kind of bolt things on.Felix: Yeah.Alessio: You have obviously mcps, you have skills, you have like obviously the models, which is a big part. All these things kind of come together. Do you feel like that's a valid way to think about it, where people should invest even more in kind of like primitives.To rebuild on or are you like recreating a lot of it each time because like things change and it's easier to rewrite than reuse?Felix: You know, I think, I think you're right. I think you're right that the holistic platform is really useful. And this is maybe a whole like a somewhat contrarian view to a lot of people in ai.I actually don't think that the future is going to be hyper personalized software down to the point where everyone is running their own version. Like, I actually think it's going to be quite hard for all of us to have our own internal chat tool and like, if I wanna talk to you, likeswyx: howFelix: is that gonna work, right?In the, in the context of cowork and how we build it, I think it's a bit of a combination. Like what the, the execution that gets cheap is not necessarily rebuilding all the primitives. I think our priori, there's also not a lot of value in it. So for instance, my team did not think about rebuilding clock code.We're like very much started with the. The core thesis of this should be Claude Code.Mm-hmm.Felix: And then we'll like build things on top of it. The part of the execution that gets a little cheaper is like, how do you take all of these Lego pieces and put them together in a way that makes sense for users?It's like actually valuable. You have so many different approaches now in terms of what kind of, what kind of things do you actually elevate to a primitive, do you strongly believe that all your products should be built by just combining primitive that the public also has available? Do you keep some things internal?Um, and I think that's still evolving, but I think what's probably gonna go away is like, I'm not sure if it's gonna fully go away, but I'm gonna say, I think for me personally, I will probably no longer try to come up with a really good product without testing up with people. This is not a new concept, but wherever you used to have to make costly decisions around, do we pick technology A or technology B, or do we like, um, build it this way, build it the other way.I really strongly believe now you just build all of them and try them out with a small focus group and then whatever, whatever is better is what you go with. Right. And that, that is probably quite different even from how we maybe worked a year ago. Right. Like, I think, I think this happened very recently.Alessio: Yeah. I started building something in on Electron since you're here. Coincidence. Uh, but then Electron and like SQL Light are like, there's like some issues that like between development and like, uh, building anyway. And I was like, let's just rebuild the whole thing in Swift and just recreated the whole thing in Swift.And it's like, I. It's done.swyx: You know, I didn't take any effort. I, I, I don't even know Swift.Alessio: Yeah, exactly. I was like, I'm the, I'm not reviewing it anyway, whatever. You can write in whatever language you pick, but the important stuff that I did was not write the electron bindings. Yeah. It was like the logic of what happens in the app, you know, and then the model is like, yeah, I can just recreate the same thing as withswyx: Yeah.I, I think you still want, especially for people who are doing like high performance software or like very complex software, uh, you still want like, some view of the architecture. Uh, but you can use markdown for that,Felix: right? Yeah.swyx: Uh, you don't actually have to read the code again. I, I'm still like on a sort of like a definitional thing.Um, can we build a good mental model of Claude Cowork? Um, this is what I have, right? Like you you said it's like fundamentally cloud co. We don't wanna touch it. There's the cloud app, there's clouding Chrome. I think you guys do something different in planning, but, uh, I've been talking with Tariq who is on the cloud co team, and you guys are, he's like, no, we just exposed planning.Maybe we can clarify like, what are the major pieces. That people should be aware. It goes into cowork, like,Felix: okay, I think you basically have them. So really, um, you can, you can take planning more or less out. I think there's a few things that are really valuable in cowork. Um, the virtual machine is probably the most powerful thing.So we currently run like a, we currently run like a lightweight VM and we put clocked out into the vm and we do that for, for, um, a number of reasons. Safety and security is a big one, but even if you, even if you ignore for a second safety and security and you're just like, okay, Yolo, I want this thing to do whatever.It is quite powerful to give Claus on computer that is like generally a good idea. And in terms of architecture and UX and everything else that we've been working on, philanthropic, it often is quite useful for you to like anthropomorphize, um, clot aggressively and just be like, this is a person. What will you do if you give a, if you had a person, right?Yeah. And the analogy I've given my dad this morning who is still like quite insistent on using chat even for like coding things, is if you were a developer and your employer told you that you don't need a computer, they're just gonna like, send you emails with a code and you send emails with code back like that, maybe work for Patrick Miles in the back, but that it's not very effective.Um, so what we can do with the VM is because it's a, it's a Linux system, Claude Code has more or less free reign to install whatever needs to install. It can install Python, it can install no js. We do have strict network ingress and egress controls. So you can still, as, as a user in like plain human language, make it clear to, to the entire system what you're okay with and what you're not okay with.But at no point do we have to ask a real person, like a, like a person who might be in marketing or a lawyer. I'd have to go to a lawyer and be like, are you okay with me installing Homebrew?Alessio: Yeah, yeah.Felix: Right. Because the implications of the question and the answer are complex and nuanced and like, not, not easy to reason about.This gives us a lot of distraction that makes Cloud very powerful. Now then around it, we, we do probably have a number of things that also keeps growing almost every single week that you're probably noticing that make cowork maybe better for certain tasks than just cloud. Cloud on its own. Yeah. But most of those actually live in the system prompt.They're about like, what can we infer about the work that you do? What can we, what can we intru in the system prompt to make that more effective? It's of course the like very tight integration with Cloud and Chrome. You're noticing that a lot of people, especially as the models get better, a lot of people throw up their hands when it comes to MCP connectors in this area.I'm not gonna, I'm not gonna go through like 25 M CCP connectors, click off everywhere and then like half of them don't let me do the things anyway. So Cloud and Chrome is quite powerful because we can just talk to the cloud and Chrome sub agent and that will just do things for you.swyx: Yeah, so, so one example right in MCPI, honestly, I think that the state of MCP is kind of, kind of.Really hard to integrate. Um, I need to, I needed to add, uh, Figma MCP to the coding agent that I use.Felix: Yeah.swyx: Uh, and, but I didn't wanna read the docs, so I just had caught to it. And it's, it's great at reading docs and the same, same way I had to set up like a Google Cloud, um, account for some project I was working on and get some API keys somewhere.And Google Cloud is famously super hard to navigate, so I just didn't wanna deal with any of it. I just used Claude CoworkFelix: within the first week of developing on Core. This happened very, very quickly. Um, I caught myself by starting to use cowork for coding tasks, which is not ostensibly what we built it for, right?We don't need to. But I found myself, um, I found myself like on our internal, internal tool that we have for, to collect crashes and just like debugging information and I found myself sort like picking out the ones that I think we can easily fix versus the ones that might be like kernel corruption or something else on the operating system.And I found myself sort of picking these out and then just telling Clark, go fix this bug. I was like, what am I doing here? Go one level up, tell a cowork, I want you to go to all these crash tools. I want you to find all the bugs that you think are fixable and not like an operating system crash. And then I want you to tell another cloud to like fix all of that.Um, and that's, that's, that's sort of another cloud,swyx: just so it can spin up another instance or,Felix: uh, it, currently what I do is, um, and this is a bit of a hack, but I tell it to use clockwork remote to which website itself? Yeah, that's interesting. So you basically take, if you, if you imagine like a dashboard with like 20 bucks, you, this is remote control or clock or remote, or, sorry, I just wanted to confirm what, the way I'm using it is.I have cowork running and I'm telling cowork, here's where I normally go every morning to find the latest bugs. Go read the entire bug list, separate out which ones are fixable, which ones are, are fixable, and then for the fixable ones, four is this almost loop. For each bug, write a markdown file with a prompt.And then for each markdown v, that is a prompt. Start of a cloud set. So natively Claude Code hasswyx: this concept of subagents. Mm-hmm. And this is basically a subagent, but you're not using the subagent functionality.Felix: I'm not using the subagent functionality. And the reason I'm not is because I'm firing that off as a Claude Code remoteswyx: task.Felix: Yes. That's kind of nice. ‘cause then I can just fire it off. I can go to my next meeting and in Claude Code remote. Now the work is happening.swyx: Mm-hmm. Yeah. You, you see like you're already starting to use the cloud over your local machine. And I think this is one of those things where like. Shouldn't just everything just be cloud first, right?Felix: Ah, this is such a good group. I'm like solely bad about this. I have so many thoughts about that. Okay. So I generally believe that Silicon Valley overall is undervaluing the local computer. And my default argument for that is always how come we're all using MacBooks and not like an iPad or a Chromebook?Um, that there is like still value in, in having a local machine. And now when I think about Clot, it's this entity that is supposed to be very useful to you, like it tremendously useful to you. I think that entity needs to have access to all the same tools you have access to. Otherwise it's gonna be hamstrung in like all these complex ways.And there's, there's sort of two approaches we could take. We could say, okay, we're gonna like one by one chip away at everything that is at your computer and move it into the cloud. That's, that's one way to do it. Um, and I think other products have taken that path. I personally, this is a very personal opinion, but I personally, for the amount of tools that I use.Just don't have the patience to give another tool like permissions to every single thing and keep those permissions up to date. The second thing that I'm still grappling with, and I don't have a good answer for anyone just yet, but the second thing I'm still grappling with is what does it look like for someone to slurp up your entire work and put that in the cloud?Like if I, just as an example, like if you could click a button and it just clone your entire computer into the cloud, is that something that you would want? I'm not totally convinced yet that all everyone will. Mm-hmm. And that is sort of like upstream of all the technical issues we're gonna have. ‘cause like in general, I think the world is not ready for this kind of stuff.Like, I'll give you one quick example that would probably be very easy for us. So as a desktop app, we in theory with your permission, can do a lot of things on your computer, including reading your Chrome cookies. If we really want to do right, we could take your Chrome cookies, you would have to decrypt them for us.We could put those on the cloud if we really felt like it. Pretty easy solution. That would be super cool. We could just be like, oh, we can do all your tasks in the cloud now. Um, a lot of websites, thanks, include it. If, if they see the same authentication from like two different locations, we'll just lock down your account and now you have to go to the branch and be like, okay, I, I'm here with my passport.You actually know that. Wow. Yeah. As tired as well are of the term agent for the age agent future, I think there's a lot of stuff that sort of slowly needs to catch up and until that's the case, the way I, as someone's working on clock and make Cloud most effective is to like put it where you are working.swyx: Anything else? I thought with our mental model, so like, basically like, uh, part of me also just want, like the more I understand how it works, the more I can use it to its full potential. Right?Felix: Yeah.swyx: And so what I'm get hearing from you is you told me to delete the planning thing. You're not doing anything special on, on the, that's only exclusive to Qua cowork.Felix: We have some tricks for this sort of like change week over week. We eval cowork maybe against different use cases than he would evil clock code, right? If you think about it this way. Okay, so like clock code is our eval clock cowork. Yeah. So clock code is like quite optimized for coding tasks and we mostly value it whether or not we're getting better or worse depending on how good it is at like a typical suite job.And Clark Cowork on the other hand, we evaluate more against typical knowledge work, the kind of stuff he would find in finance or in like maybe a, like in like a legal office. Um, my personal use case is always like managing my things, like managing my personal mortgage or something like that, right? Or like wealth planning for me and my family.Those are the kinds of use cases we eval, clock cowork on. And what you might be picking up on is like the subtle changes we make to the system. Prompt what we put in the system, prompt how we steer, clot with the tools we give it. Um, like either it'd be better in one or the other direction and whether there's a trade off, try us exist a lot.CLO code will be better of a code and Claude Cowork will be better. For non-coding tasks, will those gaps still exist in the next three generations of models? It's like a little unclear to me though.swyx: Yeah,Felix: because right now these like hyper optimizations we make, I'm not sure for how long they're still be relevant.swyx: I think what I was referring to was also, it, it just, uh, it qualitatively felt different when I probably, it's just all prompting and I'm reading too much into it, but like the, the fact that it comes out with like a nine step plan, I can edit the plan and give feedback and, and, and see it execute the plan.Yeah. It felt more long range than in Claude Code, but maybe that already existed in Claude Code and you just build a nicer UI for it.Felix: It's kind of both. Um, like if the Clark Code people who build the planning functionalities would city, they probably say yes, we have all of those things in Clark code and they do.Um, I think people tend to give cowork. Tasks that are maybe of longer time horizon, I thought isswyx: so long. Yeah.Felix: That's like one thing, right? It's just like that the, the chunk of work tends to be maybe a little bigger. And then the second thing is that because the work, when it gets longer, it gets a little bit more ambiguous.We do tell co-work to make heavy use of the planning tool or to make heavy use of the ask user question tool, right? We do want it to come up with like. Different scenarios of, okay, tease out what the user actually wants. Don't go off to work for like four hours and then come back with the wrong thing.And you're probably picking up on that.swyx: Yeah.Felix: Um, I wish I could tell you I like built this magical thing and it's like, there's some secret sauce,swyx: but No, no, no. I mean, it's, it's just clarity is good that, you know, engineers just want to know. Yeah. They can, they can plan around it. And then I think also for me, um, I am realizing I have to switch to my, my other machine because this is a new machine that doesn't have my session.But, uh, yeah, the, the, the planning is really important for, for me to like approve or like to see whether it's like, it's right. The ask is, the question is so beautifully presented. I mean, it also, it also available in like cursor and, and in Claude Code. But like, I, I think like it's so nice to see that it, like it's kind of for me like to understand that it gets me, it gets what I want to do.Felix: Yeah.swyx: Yeah.Felix: It probably very hardswyx: just on the topical evals. Mm-hmm. When you say eval, I think people are very vague about what it means. Is it just like vibe testing or do you have like automated programmatic evals of Claude Cowork?Felix: When we say eval, uh, what we really mean is that we essentially take the entire transcript, including all the tools that clot has available ultimately to it, and we then measure what are the outputs, depending on what we tweak, right?So we do run that a lot. We use that in training. Um, we use that in, in like, if you sort of separate out post training from like the scaffolding around it. Cowork sort of exists in the scaffolding space, but obviously we also train on it a little bit. Um, so when we say eval, we mean given the certain transcript, what do the outputs look like?Including the file outputs as well as like the actual token outputs, like the ones that you see in the chat window.Alessio: I'm curious, um, how much of the failure modes are the model intelligence versus like the usage of the end tool to put the intelligence in? Like the well planning is like a good example, right?It's like one thing is to come up with a plan. The other thing is like make a nice spreadsheet. Yeah. That kind of runs you through the plan. Like how have you seen that? Well,Felix: the thing that I grapple with a lot is that whatever scaffolding you come up with, I think we still have a bit of sort of like model overhang where the model is dramatically more capable than right.Users end up using it for. And I think part of that is that we're just not getting the model all the tools to do all the things that's theory capable of, right? There's like one thing, um, however, whenever you do build the scaffolding, I'm sort of wondering at what point, at what point will that scaffolding go away and like how much you invest in figuring out what the right scaffolding is.It's kind of up to, it's a little bit of a bet. And one thing that I as an NJ quite enjoy is that like working in philanthropic and working at a frontier lab, I maybe have a little bit more insight into what's coming, coming down the chute in terms of like, what's the next model, what is the model capable of?What is good at, what is it bad at? And I'm, I'm increasingly wondering, is the right thing for us to like really invest too much in sort of these like scaffolding corrections where the model might otherwise not misbehave, but just not do the thing that you want?Alessio: Yeah.Felix: Or is it to just like give it as many capabilities as possible, try to make those safe so there's the worst case scenarios, likeno status might be otherwise.And then just simply wait a second for the next model drop. I'm personally, currently more leaning into the ladder. I think we're gonna see a lot of like applications and companies that do very impressive things with ai that in the short term might seem very effective ‘cause they're very specialized to individual use cases.But I think once models get better generalization and get better at like those specific use cases without being super guided on those, I'm not sure how long that's gonna stick around. And you can kind of, kind of already see this in like skills and NCP servers, right? Mm-hmm. We've, we've already seen sort of this like slow shift from MCP service to skills.And like, maybe a good example is Barry who made skills. He was initially hacking on something that honestly looked a lot, looked, looked a lot like what Cowork does today. It was sort of thinking about what if cowork, but for like people who don't wanna build code. Mm-hmm. And, um, he too did that as a prototype inside the desktop app.One of the first use cases we thought of were, okay, what, what are like coding like use cases that could really benefit from graphical interfaces and like from being a little separated from the actual underlying code. And everyone comes with the same answers. Data analysis,Alessio: right?Felix: Yeah. Or saying how many users do we have today?How many, like, it's always data analysis. And I think the thing that ultimately led to skills is that we wanted to connect this little prototype to our data warehouse and. The team very quickly discovered that like instead of building a custom tool for the thing to talk our data warehouse, they just like meet and embarked on follow like mm-hmm.Dear Claude, if you want to get data, here's the end point. Here's what the API looks like. You'll figure it out.swyx: Ah.Felix: And then it be hand over control. Yeah, yeah. Also just like maybe go one step up in the layer of abstractions, right. Just, yeah. Instead of, instead of telling the thing, here's ACL I, please call the CLI, or here's an MCP.Please call this ECT shape. Just like this is the end point. If you wanna know something, if you post here, maybe you can do post sql. It's gonna be okay. And that ended up being so effective that they started trying the same pattern of like just giving the model a markdown file that describes whatever it needs to do.That the whole thing eventually became skills and we're like. We should package this up. This is a good idea.swyx: Yeah. Um, we've had Barry Mahesh, uh, on, on our conference and uh, he's uh, definitely got a good idea there.Felix: Yeah.swyx: I wanted to show you the, how I've been using Claude Cowork.Felix: Uh, this is was my favorite part.swyx: This is this. So this is like me, uh, this is how we run the Discord. Uh, we literally, uh, at first I didn't trust Cloud Core. This was my very first usage.Felix: Okay.swyx: Right. So then I was like, okay, I will just try to manually download from Zoom all my recordings and upload it to YouTube. Yeah. Because this is a very laborious process.I got a click, click, click YouTube, um, isn't super user friendly. Uh, and it just did it. And then I was like, actually, you know, even the download from Zoom part, I should also. Put into Claude Cowork, and then I did it right. Here's a bunch of, and it starts compacting here, and it, and it, it starts to even be able to do things like look through the individual frames of the video to name the video so I can upload it auto automatically.Oh, that is, and this replaces my job as a YouTuber. We will forever appreciate your creative Yes. You know, and so that's great. Uh, but then by the way, it compacts and makes, makes like a new thing, right? So I, I don't, I don't have the initial, initial thing, but then I asked it to make its own skills so that it, so that something that's repetitive and one-off and human guided becomes more automated and I can use the skills independently and reuse them.Uh, and it obviously you can write skills and that goes into context and skills at the bottom here, which is, which is so nice. Um, so I have all these skills that, that I now sort of do on a weekly basis. Uh, I know you've released scheduled Coworks, which I haven't done yet, butFelix: course I should try them. I, I think this is like so wonderful and fun for me to see because.One thing that is very fun for me about skills in particular is that they're so easy to make. Like anyone can make a skill, like a text message, could be a skill, and they can be so hyper personalized to you. And this is like sort of the subtraction layer, right? Like, um, I, I'm just guessing, but I assume, heck, you are very good at your job.You're probably given this thing some guidance about how to do it, right? I,swyx: I just said, wrap everything up into, into a skill, right?Felix: Yeah.swyx: And then, uh, and then I was like, actually, sometimes I might need to break, uh, things apart because some parts fail or some parts might be needed in individually. So I told it to split one skill into three skills.So it's like a skill splitting thing, and then there's like a parent skill that just orchestrates all of them if I want to use that. You know, like, um, I think that's, that's like really good. Uh, and, and, uh, there's, there's one more part, which is the, uh, Google Chrome thing that I told you about.Felix: Yeah.swyx: Where I'm like, okay, you know, what's better than uploading, using Claude Coworks to YouTube?Like actually. Looking at the docs to like programmatically upload to YouTube and then putting that in a skill. And I've never done that before. I don't want to deal with Google Cloud. Yeah. So Claude Cowork does it for me.Felix: That is really cool.swyx: So, so I, I just, I don't care. I just, like, I do a thing. I don't, it doesn't really matter.Felix: That is really cool. And then you've, I assume paired the skill just with the script that it's built.swyx: Yeah, no, I just update, update the skills.Felix: Oh, that is beautiful. Yeah. That's wonderful.swyx: It's kind of like a skill, like, uh, uh, basically I think like the way that people ease into Claude Cowork is like take a knowledge work task that you would normally be clicking around for and then, uh, try to turn, turn that, and then you do the, okay, well what if you went further?Okay. And then when, if you went further, when, if you, and it sort of expand the scope of cowork as you gain trust with it and, and also teach it how to replace you.Felix: Yeah. It's like a little bit like playing factorial, but for your own life. Uh, like you say, you start really small.swyx: Yeah.Felix: You start automating something really tiny and like.Once it clicks, you keep adding onto this like automation empire. Just like make your life easier and easier. My favorite skill has been, um, every single morning Kohlberg starts looking at my calendar and make sure that there's conflicts because people tend to schedule a lot of meetings, sometimes last minute, sometimes miss it soft and painful.And a lot of products have existed like that A lot. I've written in the custom prompt there. I haven't made it a skill, um, honestly should.swyx: Yeah.Felix: But I've given it like pretty clear instructions about okay, here are some people, if they book over other meetings, I'm probably gonna go to their meeting. Like if Dario schedules a meeting.swyx: Right.Felix: Not try to reschedule down. Right. Um, and I think there's some other rules in there about like what kind of meetings I care more about what kind of meetings I care less about. What is okay to like, maybe pun like when I want to be, when I want to be working, when I don't want to be working. And it's those really small things that I can think kind of click with people.Right. When we launch co-work, I think one of the US races that went most viral on Twitter. X was clean up your desktop, which is stuff, because silly, that's such a smart thing, right? Like you don't need to model to clean up your desktop. Not really. Um,swyx: like this, like clean up my desktop.Felix: Yeah, exactly. Yeah.swyx: I need to, I need to choose my desktop, right? I guess give it access to my desktop.Felix: Yeah.swyx: Okay. Uh, okay. This is very scary. Oh, we'll do it.Alessio: I did, I did it with my downloads folder. It was like, you have so many term sheets and there's like eight copies of your rental lease for your office. I was like, all right.Like, don't yell at me.Felix: It's like, it's not such a small task. And then like, I, I would never go out there and normally otherwise and tell people I've pulled a product. It can organize your folder. Right. Um, because it feels small. But I think to your point like,swyx: oh, here's, here's the, here's the ask user questions.Felix: Yeah.swyx: Uh,Felix: beautiful. Right. Elite obvious junk. You probably shouldn't click that.Alessio: No.Felix: If he's not done right.swyx: As long as it's reversible, I don'tAlessio: make up blend to,swyx: yeah. Uh, yeah. No, I, I have a, I have a typical, everything is super messy folder. So, yes. I think this, this is super helpful. So this is a pretty simple task.Mm-hmm. But I've, okay, here it is. Right. Here's the progress. I don't see this in, that's why I'm like, this gotta be something different than, uh, than Claude Code, because I'm like, weFelix: do. Yeah. That's, we do system prompt that. We're like, all right. We want you to think about like, this task Yeah. Methodology.Yeah.swyx: And then I can, I can, I can do like little suggestions for, for, for these things. It's beautiful. Look at this. I, I can, I can like say like, oh, don't do that. Don't do this. It's amazing.Felix: I'm so happy. You like it. Um, I mean, the other way around, like we're part of the Clark core team, if you would like this in Clark COVID.swyx: Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Uh, so, so yeah, I mean, uh, this is really good. Obviously I, I'm like kind of raving about it. Uh, you know, I have other things like sign up for pg e so if you can do phone calls for me, that'd be great. Um, I, I do, peopleFelix: have done that. Obviously you can't do that natively, but people have done that with like, various other providers.swyx: Yeah. Uh, and then this is like signing up for the Figma MCP. Um, I, I really am trying to do like everything, um, data analysis as well. I do think, um, oh, design to code, uh, very, very good. Right? So like, here's a Figma file, take it. And then this is where like a lot of other tasks is like knowledge work, like replace my manual clicking, but this is no, I would normally use Claude Code or uh, Claude Code for this, but because I perceive that you have better Chrome integrationFelix: mm-hmm.swyx: I, I think you can actually do a better job of this. And I, this, this is one shot at my, uh, conference website.Felix: That's pretty cool. Like at some point I would love to like, hear how you feel about code. In the desktop apps, which is like I never use, which is the, the same team. Same team.swyx: So I use the call code in terminal, which I, I perceive to be the default way of cloud coding.Felix: So one thing this has,swyx: sorry, I'm just like, I'm notFelix: here, I'm not here. All products. Can I talk about other stuff? Like I, I'm not sure if people out there wanna like hear me advertise my stuff for like an hour. Please do that. Um, this thing is like a builtin browser, which is a thing a lot of products have said.Yeah, it's a builtin browser. And I think giving cloud eyes into like what you're actually working on makes it so much more effective. And that's probably what you've seen in cohort because it can see Chrome, it can like debug the dom, it can like see things. Um, that does make it more powerful.swyx: Yeah. So, so I think, uh, my mental model was kind broken.‘cause I only use this cowork because I thought it had a, a browser thing in it. But I understand that the Claude Code app. The app version of Claude Code does have a built-in browser. I've seen, I've seen this preview thing.Felix: Yeah.swyx: I just, I've never used it.Felix: But in the end, in the end, you sort of have it by hard.Yeah. You basically get the same thing. Right? Like the, the, the additional skill that you're describing is chart is better if we can see what it's working on. Right. That's, that's sort of like the summary here and like whether it's using your Chromeswyx: Yeah.Felix: Or it's just like making up its own little like browser.It doesn't really make a big difference because either way it's gonna see what it's working on and that just makes it much better. And then you don't have to run QA for your cloud.swyx: Why doesn't it pick up my existing Claude Code sessions? ‘cause I, I mean, obviously I've used Claude Code, but Excellent question.Um, don't have a good answer other than like, we're honest. Just haven't Yeah. This is what the Open AI team does. Okay. Uh, cool. I I I don't have other, like, I, I just, I, I do wanna expand people's minds and also maybe show people if they haven't really done it, but like, I, I think it's very interesting how I sometimes use this more than I use, I mean, I use dia, right?Yeah. Um, I, and I use, uh, I've used like all the other agentic browsers and philanthropic didn't have to build an agentic browser because you just had Claude Cowork and that's enough.Felix: Yeah. I also think like maybe integrating with number of excellent browsers out there, it's like currently on my personal priority list, a little higher than like trying to rebuild a browser from scratch.Yeah. You know, never say never, but I think going back to this idea of like, we wanna plug this into an entire existing workflow, I think our goal is actually to not replace any of the applications we have in your computer. But instead of like, work really well within a new workflow,Alessio: make the new one. Yeah.Are, it seems that nowadays, especially on the browser, most of the innovation is like user ergonomics. It's not really like the underlying browser engine. So I feel like to call it, it doesn't really matter if it's like the, uh, or Chrome or Alice, whatever.Felix: Yeah. We wanna, we wanna meet you wherever you are.Which is like, like obviously I would say that, but it's also just generally true because I don't wanna shrink my potential user base artificially by saying, okay, like, I'm gonna start building for the people who are willing to switch browsers.Alessio: Right.Felix: That's such a, like, you know, like many lawsuits have been filed over who gets to review the browser and like a lot of money has switched hands over the question of like, which browser is default and which search engine is default within the browser.Um, I just wanna build for, yeah, I wanna build for swyx essentially. Like, I wanna, I wanna, I wanna build for people who have a number of annoying tasks that they feel like. Maybe clock could do it. Could do it for them.Alessio: Yeah. What do you think about skills portability? I think there's been one thing, I use another thing called zo, which is kinda like a cloud computer plus agent.And I have a skill to add visitors to the office. Yeah. So whenever somebody has to come in after hours, they need to check in downstairs. Um, but I wanna like text the thing, so it doesn't really work in, in cowork, but now that skill is in the zone harness and it's not in my cowork thing. And then if I make a change, it's gotta, I gotta sync them.How do you see that going? Like I see memory as like. Cloud personal, kinda like, I don't necessarily want my memories to be cross thing.Felix: Yeah.Alessio: But I do want my skills to be cross agent that I use. I think with MTPs, people do the same thing. It's like, oh, Mt. P Gateway. Mt P registry. I don't really know if that's like a business.So I'm curious like if you've had any thoughts in the area.Felix: I think for me, this is sort of where I go back to the really basic primitives for our skills are file-based instead of like this complicated thing that exists inside a place somewhere that is like super proprietary. I'm really leaning into the idea of like, it's all just files and vultures, and that makes it very portable on its own.Right. We do have skills as part of this container format, which was just called plugins.Alessio: Mm-hmm.Felix: And plugins are available both for Claude Code and Claude Code work the same format, and you can install plugins. This works in cowork today. You can basically say, I'm gonna add a whole, like just a GitHub repo as a.Skills marketplace or like a plugin marketplace. And that's how we're doing portability. I think we have a lot of room left to grow in. How do we make it easy for people to know that they can write skills? How do we make it easy for them to just like, share a skill with you? Because obviously all the words I just said, right?Like I'm losing most of the knowledge worker base out there, right. And start by saying, oh, you can connect to GitHub repo. It's not exactly how most people will end up working in like a general knowledge worker space. Um, but I think there's something there. And another thing that's there that I think has not really been properly explored is the, the, the combination of which part of the skill is very portable and then which part of the skill is like very personal to you.Right. And I think that's something we haven't really solved as an industry. Hmm.swyx: It's like, which, how you wanna introduce more structure to the skill or have always have like. Public skill, private skill, you know, pair. Yeah, yeah. Kind of. I think there'sFelix: like a, like the easiest way to do this, which is we do like use string interpolation or something.Right, right. Yeah, yeah. Insert username here, insert like phone number, insert, like known folder, locations, that kind of stuff. Um, that's probably clunky. That's why we haven't built it. Um, but I do think someone is going to come up with like an interesting way to keep everything we like about skills. The portability is just a file, it's just marked down.It's just text, honestly. Right. Like a text file words. The complete lack of structure, which means you don't need any kind of tutorial to write a skill. Just like explain it to Claude the way he would explain it to me and Claude will probably get it before I work. Mm-hmm. Right? You're just like, for booking a flight, tell Claude how to book a flight the same way we tell him somewhere.I just started working here today. But combine that with a very like, personal thing. Um, maybe we'll stick with a booking a flight example. I don't actually think. AI should be booking flights. I think the tools we have is yes.swyx: Yeah. Finally, somebody says it. It's the default demo that everyone's making.Felix: I'mswyx: like, I even against like booking demos, it is not a good showcase.Felix: Yeah. I'm like, I just wanna book my flight myself. But, um, I think there's a lot of things that have a personal and a non-personal component and that's maybe why people reach for flight booking because some things are very universal. Yeah. Super flight is usually better, right? Like few people try to book the most expensive flight.And then some things are quite personal about like what times you prefer, which seat you prefer, which airports you prefer. Combining that and like a skill format that is actually portable, compatible, easy to understand for people. I think that would be very exciting. We just haven't figured it out yet.Alessio: Yeah, I think the text part every, I think everybody by now has some sort of like cloud file thing. Either Dropbox, Google Drive, whatever. So it feels like in a way it should basically like sim link. My skills into all my agent harnesses. Yeah. Just keep those ing like we have internally this like valuable tokens repo, which is like all the commands sub agents.It's good. Uh, and then I build like a TUI where you can start it and be like, you know, install this command and this three sub agents into this agent in this folder and just copy paste this. It doesn't do anything. It literally cp the file into that. But I feel like there should be something similar where like whenever I go into a new thing, it's like, hey, here's like the link to exactly the cloud folder and just bring down these skills into this.Yeah. Like today it doesn't quite work like that. Like if I install a new agent, I cannot, I have to like copy paste all the skills and I don't even know where they are.Felix: Yeah.Alessio: That's like the big problem. It's like where do I find them?Felix: Yeah.Alessio: Um, so I'm curious like in the future like that, that almost feels like my personal productivity thing will be my skills.Felix: Yeah.Alessio: Is not really the product that I use. Everybody has access to the same product. But today there's, that just looks like copy pasting ME files, IFelix: think so many things I, I really like thinking about agents and LLMs just as like another coworker. So many attempts have made to build documentation companies that are like, oh, we're gonna solve oil documentation problems.Um, I myself, like spend a little bit of time working in notion, right? I'm like deeply familiar with the concept of let's get everyone on the same page. Mm-hmm. Right? And what you're basically saying here is you want all your agents to be on the same page about your preferences, about the skills, about the way they ought to work and like how they ought to execute.And I'm not sure what the right thing is going to be if it's going to be some, some company that can say, all right, we're as an independent body, we're not trying to like, push into any particular product. It's our job to be like the skill authority, and we provide, I don't know, we're gonna be the Dropbox of skills and we can just sim link us into all the products we want to use.I'm not sure that's gonna be viable business, but as, as an idea, it would be cool.Alessio: Yeah. Yeah. I think so many things are just going away as businesses. It's like, how am I supposed to do it? I'm not even asking somebody to make a product about it. Like yeah. I wanna personally know. And there's things like you said, it's like you almost wanna skill and then interpolate it between personal and work.So if I'm booking a fly for work, it's different than I'm booking a flight personally.Felix: Yeah.Alessio: In some ways, yeah. But like a lot of the scaffolding is the same, you know? Cool.Felix: I mean, as an engineer I will tell you like, you know, technic a person to technic a person. I will just be like siblings.Alessio: Well that's what, that's what I do.We call that MD and agents that MD's just the same how sim length. And so it is like, that works, but it feels like, yeah, I don't know. MaybeFelix: you can always go one, you can always tell cowork problem and then cowork will solve it for you. Just make the siblings. That's like one way to do it.Alessio: That's true.That's true. All right. Everything is called cowork.Felix: Uh, potentially spicy. Question for both of you.swyx: Uh, which of these industries will go away?Alessio: Okay, so what Felix was saying before is interesting. There's busy like. The short term pressure of like, we need to turn these tokens into valuable things, which is I should build the last mile product that harness the model.And then there's the question of like, long term, which ones are gonna still be valuable? And I think you're kind of seeing this today with like, uh, you know, the coding space in a way is kind of like everybody's moving up and up in stack because you need more than just turning tokens into code. I think search, like enterprise search is kind of saying the same thing.Like with G Clean and like all these different companies is like, at the end of the day, if Cowork is the one doing all the work, the search itself is like such a small part that like, I don't know if I'm really gonna pay that much money just to do search. It's almost like everything is like a cowork vertical.So like how much can cowork first party support?swyx: Mm-hmm.Alessio: And how much can it not? I think for a lot of these things, the planning thing that you were showing do Which one? The planning. The planning.swyx: Okay. Yeah. Yeah.Alessio: That's one thing where like most of the value that these agents provide is like they're better at planning for specific tasks.Yeah. And have better tools for it.swyx: Yeah.Alessio: But I think the models are now moving in that direction and they have the right harnesses and they're on your computer. So for me it's almost like if for the end customer trusts your startup to be the provider of that task result, then I think that works. This is, uh, something that, this is a shortswyx: spike that we're, we're working on.Uh, yeah.Felix: I think, look, I'll, I'll, I'll tell you this, like I don't think I'm the best person to like actually estimate which industry is going to be hit the hardest. But I do think that at philanthropic as a group of people, we're deeply worried about the impact. That the tools are going to have on the labor market, especially for like junior employees that, because I think, I think it's only honest to say that when we talk about automating a lot away, a lot of the work that we personally find annoying that we maybe think's not the best use of our time.In a lot of industries, that kind of work would've been given to a junior entry level employee. Yeah. Right. And I think it's, it's only, it's only right to be really worried about that and like worry what that's going to do in particular to people like enter the shop market.Alessio: Mm-hmm. I have a solution for that.Which you make them, you create simulative jobs for them.Felix: Okay.Alessio: So this is, this is like half joke, half true. So if you think about software engineering, when you're like a junior engineer, you work like 1, 2, 3 years. And in those three years there's like maybe like a handful of moments where like you really learn something.And then a bunch of other days where like you're not really progressing.Felix: Yeah.Alessio: I think now we can use AI and these models to actually like shortcut these careers and almost like simulate the early years of your work and like just make them like super dense and like these learnings, it's like, hey, we're working on this feature, which is like a distributed system and you need to learn this thing that might take three months at a company.And so you take three months here, it's like we're just simulating the whole thing. It's actually not a real thing. And in one week we kind of speed run through the whole thing and you kind of learn your lesson from there. And we kind of repeat that in like one year. You basically get like three years worth of like projects and experience.Yeah. I think it's harder for like things like sales or for things like, you know, marketing because you don't really have a way to get the feedback loop. But I think a lot of it, it sounds kind of silly, it's like you're making the new effect job, but it's almost like you go to college, right? People pay to learn how to do it, and this might feel similar where it's like, hey, we have the.Jane Street Simulator is like, you wanna come work at Jane Street? We'll just put you in the simulator for like three months.Felix: Wow.Alessio: And you'll come out of it. It's like, you know, I'm ready.Felix: So there, there is an aspect here. I'm not an expert enough to like actually know what, what is going to happen to marketing or legal or finance, right?Like, I don't work in those jobs and I, I don't think I should talk about them, but I am an engineer and I think I have a pretty good idea of what engineering is like. And I think one thing we're sort of seeing is that as a company and also as, as the public, we're like deeply worried about entry level, but we're also seeing more senior engineers accelerate it.If like they're more productive. They, they actually increase the value they provide. And the thing that I'm thinking about a lot is the fact that even before all of this happened, um, I've always had a lot of respect for the University of Waterloo and the, the new grads that have joined my teams as from coming from the University of Waterloo always felt like.More ready than new grads will like literally spend their entire time at the university regardless of how good, but never actually had to work inside an environment where you have to ship things that eventually will be used by users. And I'm, I'm, I'm German. I like initially went to German University and I think the, the, the like information systems programs, there tend to be very theoretical, right?Like I often give people the example of like trying

Happy Monday, Christmas Fanatics!   This week, Julia, Thom, and Anthony sit down to discuss the only Christmas episode of "St. Denis Medical" to date — Season 1, Episode 6: “Ho-Ho-Hollo!"   What do they think of this new comedy that feels reminiscent of "The Office"? You'll have to tune in to find out! But spoiler alert: there are plenty of laughs and some truly quotable lines in this one. Trust us when we say this is an episode you don't want to miss — it's the festive start to your Monday that you need!   So settle back, relax, and enjoy! And as always, thank you for your love and support, y'all!

This week, the queens trade the classic panel format for a revamped Snatch Game of Love Island, bringing their celebrity impersonations to a dating-show parody. On the runway, the category is 80s Ladies, serving up big hair, bold shoulders, and even bigger references. In the end, Nini Coco takes the win, while Kenya Pleaser and Mia Star land in the bottom two. After a lip sync to “Head Over Heels” by The Go-Go's, Mia Star is asked to sashay away. A New Snatch Game Format The queens are surprised with a format shake-up: instead of sitting behind desks, they must flirt and volley with three suitors in a Love Island-style setting. Joe questions whether the twist helped or hurt the queens, while Nathan appreciates the physicality and change in pace. Made-Up Characters vs. Real Celebrities A major discussion point: should Snatch Game always require a real celebrity? With multiple queens opting for invented personas, the debate centers on whether fictional or generic characters dilute the challenge. Standout Performances Mikey Meeks as Drew Barrymore delivers a fully realized impersonation with strong voice work and confident interaction. Jane Doe as Truman Capote gives a polished, studied performance that checks all the technical boxes. Discord Adams as The Pope splits opinion — bold and committed, though not a traditional celebrity choice. Struggles of the Week Mia Star's Bloody Mary fails to generate consistent jokes or a strong comedic premise. Kenya Pleaser's Lizzo leans heavily into blue humor without sharp punchlines. Darlene Mitchell's Mrs. Claus receives limited airtime, raising questions about just how close she may have been to the bottom. The queens pay homage to iconic women of the 1980s. Highlights include: A vibrant Celia Cruz tribute with dramatic color and presence. A recognizable Olivia Newton-John moment, complete with era-accurate styling. A Dolly Parton-inspired silhouette that captures classic 80s glamour. Kenya's runway look draws criticism for fabrication and finish, further sealing her bottom placement. Kenya Pleaser vs. Mia Star Song: “Head Over Heels” – The Go-Go's The lip sync sparks debate. While Mia delivers strong musicality and performance, Kenya survives the week — suggesting that overall challenge performance weighed heavier than the final showdown. This episode raises bigger questions about Snatch Game strategy: Is it better to play it safe with a polished impersonation? Should fictional characters be allowed? And does a disastrous Snatch Game outweigh a winning lip sync? With the competition tightening and multiple queens proving technically strong, the margins are getting thinner — and the judging decisions more controversial. Be sure to join us next week as we continue to discuss, dissect, and deconstruct every moment of RuPaul's Drag Race Season 18. Follow Afterthought Media for bonus content, extended discussions, and exclusive episodes. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

What does it take to kill a dictator? In this episode, we explore the most dramatic assassination attempts on Adolf Hitler. From Georg Elser, the lone-wolf carpenter who built a bomb by hand, to the Polish underground's relentless plots under occupation, and finally Claus von Stauffenberg, the one-eyed officer whose briefcase bomb nearly took out the Führer.Joining us for this is Roger Moorhouse, author of 'Killing Hitler'.Produced by James Hickmann and edited by Dougal Patmore.Dan Snow's History Hit is now available on YouTube! Check it out at: https://www.youtube.com/@DSHHPodcastSign up to History Hit for hundreds of hours of original documentaries, with a new release every week and ad-free podcasts. Sign up at https://www.historyhit.com/subscribe.We'd love to hear your feedback - you can take part in our podcast survey here: https://insights.historyhit.com/history-hit-podcast-always-on.You can also email the podcast directly at ds.hh@historyhit.com. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Weirdos!! On today's episode Alaina announced the third chapter in the Wren Muller series- The Butcher Legacy . Be sure to visit to PREORDER NOW by visiting butcherlegacy.com . Order NOW to get exclusive signed editions from BN.com  AND the Special Edition from Target!In the winter of 1980, wealthy socialite Martha “Sunny” von Bulow was found unconscious in the bathroom of the mansion she shared with her husband, Claus, in Newport, Rhode Island. An ambulance was called and Sunny was rushed to the nearest emergency room, but paramedics and doctors were unable to revive her and Sunny would remain in a coma until her death in 2008. At first, Sunny's coma was a mystery to doctors, but soon suspicion fell on her husband, Claus, who appeared indifferent to her condition and was openly carrying on an affair with another woman. The family launched a private investigation and eventually turned up strong evidence they believed implicated Claus in the attempted murder of Sunny, but, as they soon learned, believing it and proving it were two very different things.ReferencesAssociated Press. 1985. "von Bulow stepchildren sue him for $56 million." New York Times, July 20: 30.Burton, Tony, and William Kutik. 1981. "Charge socialite tried to kill wife." Daily News (New York, NY), July 7: 4.Clendinen, Dudley. 1982. "von Bulow trial going to the jury." New York Times, March 11: 20.Friendly, Jonathan. 1985. "von Bulow's mistress told of plea not to tesitfy about their affair." New York Times, June 6: B15.Kutik, William. 1981. "Claus returns to the scene." Daily News (New York, NY), July 9: 4.—. 1981. "In her will, $35M for hubby." Daily News (New York, NY), July 8: 189.Nemy, Enid. 2019. "Claus von Bulow, tarred by scandal in the death of his wife, dies at 92." New York Times, May 31.—. 2008. "Sunny von Bulow, whose near death started a society drama, dies at 76." New York Times, December 7.New York Times. 1982. "von Bulow lover testifies on affair." New York Times, February 19: B14.State of Rhode Island v. Claus von Bulow. 1984. 82-462-CA (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, May 24).The Economist. 2019. "Did he or didn't he?" The Economist, June 15.1997. American Justice.  Performed by Towers Productions. Cowritten by Alaina Urquhart, Ash Kelley & Dave White (Since 10/2022)Produced & Edited by Mikie Sirois (Since 2023)Research by Dave White (Since 10/2022), Alaina Urquhart & Ash KelleyListener Correspondence & Collaboration by Debra LallyListener Tale Video Edited by Aidan McElman (Since 6/2025) Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Santa Claus stops by the studio to talk with Adam about all things Christmas! From Santa's shaky marriage with Mrs. Claus and Elf on the Shelf to a fond Christmas memory from the Carolla household, it's a festive conversation all around. Merry Christmas, everyone!Thank you to Guy Stevenson for playing our Santa Claus! You can find him on Instagram at @guy.stevenson and catch his Podcast ‘Good Company' here: youtube.com/@GoodCompanyComedyPodcastLIVE SHOWS: January 8 - Loveland, COJanuary 9 - Colorado Springs, COJanuary 10 - Colorado Springs, CO (2 shows)January 11 - Greenwood Village, COJanuary 16 - Grants Pass, ORJanuary 17 - Bend, ORThank you for supporting our sponsors:BetOnlinehomes.comoreillyauto.com/ADAMpluto.tvSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.