POPULARITY
Does Donald Trump have a rhyme or reason for starting the 21st century's first major trade war? The Financial Times' Martin Sandbu isn't sure but he has some ideas and also helpful hints about how to interpret Trump's "deals" that aren't anything of the sort. He gives FRDH podcast host a 44 minute long tutorial in the rhyme and reason behind Trump's actions and how the rest of the world is likely to react.
In the Sunday Book Review, Tom Fox considers books that would interest the compliance professional, the business executive, or anyone who might be curious. These could be books about business, compliance, history, leadership, current events, or anything else that might interest Tom. Today, we look at five books that help to explain the current trade, tariff, and sanctions situation. 1. Why Politicians Lie About Trade: … and What You Need to Know About It by Dmitry Grozoubinski 2. Trade Wars Are Class Wars: How Rising Inequality Distorts the Global Economy and Threatens International Peace by Matthew C. Klein & Michael Pettis 3. Misadventures of the Most Favored Nations: Clashing Egos, Inflated Ambitions, and the Great Shambles of the World Trade System by Paul Blustein 4. Kicking Away the Ladder: Development Strategy in Historical Perspective by Ha-Joon Chang 5. No Trade Is Free: Changing Course, Taking on China, and Helping America's Workers by Robert Lighthizer Resources: Five books to boost your understanding of tariffs and trade wars by Martin Wolf, Alan Beattie, and Martin Sandbu in the FT Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
For the past few years, Germany has begun to look like the ‘sick man of Europe' again. Its economy has barely grown since 2019, while its famous manufacturing sector has shrivelled. But earlier this month, financial markets were buoyed by a vote in the German parliament to relax the constitutional limit on government borrowing, the so-called debt brake. It means that Germany's likely new conservative-led coalition government will be free to borrow unlimited amounts to fund a defence sector build-up, and can also draw on a €500bn fund to spend on infrastructure over the next 10 years. But will more government spending be enough to address Germany's structural economic problems? The FT's Martin Sandbu speaks to economist Ulrike Malmendier of the University of California, Berkeley, who is a member of the German Council of Economics Experts, which evaluates the government's economic policies.Martin Sandbu writes a regular column for the Financial Times, which you can find here. It includes recent columns on Berlin's about-turn on debt spending, and the economic choice facing Germany.Subscribe on Apple, Spotify, Pocket Casts or wherever you listen.Presented by Martin Sandbu. Produced by Laurence Knight. Manuela Saragosa is the executive producer. Audio mix and original music by Breen Turner. The FT's head of audio is Cheryl Brumley. Read a transcript of this episode on FT.com Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
The war in Ukraine is a humanitarian crisis. It is also an economic problem. Sanctions from the US and Europe are meant to make war too expensive for Russia to continue. President Vladimir Putin claims those sanctions have failed and his economy is strong. But what is propaganda and what is reality? Today on the show, host Martin Sandbu poses these questions to Sergei Guriev, dean of the London Business School, and an economic adviser to Russian opposition figures, as they try to figure out what is really going on in Russia's economy. Martin Sandbu is a columnist for the Financial Times, and writes the Free Lunch newsletter. You can find it here: https://www.ft.com/free-lunch. Subscribe to Soumaya's show on Apple, Spotify, Pocket Casts or wherever you listen.Read a transcript of this episode on FT.com Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Tariffs have historically been an important tool of industrial policy. They were used in the last century by east Asian nations to promote infant industries, and are being used today by the EU to help spur the energy transition. But do Donald Trump's threats to impose a 25% across-the-board tariff on imports from Canada and Mexico, or his actual 10% tax rise on all imports from China, have any kind of thought-out policy rationale behind them? And should other countries respond in kind? To find out, the FT's European economics commentator Martin Sandbu speaks to Dani Rodrik, professor of international political economy at Harvard. Rodrik is one of the world's most acclaimed experts on industrial policy, and someone Martin first got to know as a PhD student in the 1990s.Martin Sandbu writes a regular column for the Financial Times. You can find it hereSubscribe on Apple, Spotify, Pocket Casts or wherever you listen.Presented by Martin Sandbu. Produced by Laurence Knight and Edith Rousselot. Manuela Saragosa is the executive producer. Audio mix and original music by Breen Turner. The FT's head of audio is Cheryl Brumley.Read a transcript of this episode on FT.com Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
'The end of the free market and free trade in Europe?' The recent imposition of tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles by the EU, which won the support of member states including Ireland, is just one illustration of how the potential downsides of free trade have been given greater prioritisation in Europe in recent years. The appointment of a European Commissioner for Trade and Economic Security for the first time underscores a fundamental rethinking of core EU competences such as competition policy, state aids, and trade. Elvire Fabry, Martin Sandbu, and Sander Tordoir will discuss the origins of this rethink and how it will shape future policy outcomes in the EU. Elvire Fabry is Senior Research Fellow at the Jacques Delors Institute, in charge of the geopolitics of trade and rapporteur of the working group on EU-China relations. Her areas of expertise include EU bilateral trade negotiations, EU-US relations, EU-China relations, investment, global governance, WTO reform, Brexit, and perceptions of globalisation. Martin Sandbu is the European Economics Commentator at the Financial Times where he writes on a range of international affairs issues drawing insight from the intersection of economics, politics, and ethics. He is the also the author of a number of books, including The Economics of Belonging: A Radical Plan to Win Back the Left-Behind and Achieve Prosperity for All. Before joining the Financial Times, he worked in policy consulting and academia, including at Harvard, Columbia, and the Wharton School. Sander Tordoir is Chief Economist at the Centre for European Reform where he works on eurozone monetary and fiscal policy and the institutional architecture of EMU and European integration. Prior to joining the CER, he worked at the ECB in Frankfurt, as advisor to the ECB Representative at the International Monetary Fund in Washington DC and at the German Federal Finance Ministry.
The effective altruism movement has been on a wild ride over the past decade. EA started – in the popular consciousness, at least – as a forum for mindful questions about where best to put charitable dollars. Think bed nets and de-worming pills. But, since then, EA seems to have devolved into rationalisations for making tons of money, freak-outs about AI and the end of humanity. Today, on the show, Soumaya and guest Martin Sandbu, the FT economics editorial writer, discuss EA's evolution, its future and whether it even makes any sense.Soumaya Keynes writes a column each week for the Financial Times. You can find it hereSubscribe to Soumaya's show on Apple, Spotify, Pocket Casts or wherever you listen.Read a transcript of this episode on FT.com Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
As Jay Powell's Federal Reserve contemplates making the first interest rate cut in more than two years, we're taking a step back with the FT's US financial commentator Robert Armstrong. How did Powell tame inflation without crashing the economy? And how might history judge his leadership?Clips from Associated Press - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - For further reading:Is Jay Powell lucky or good?Remain calm Martin Sandbu's column: A self-congratulatory inflation narrative at Jackson Hole - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - On X, follow Robert Armstrong (@rbrtrmstrng) and Michela Tindera (@mtindera07), or follow Michela on LinkedIn for updates about the show and more. Want to hear more from Rob? Listen to the Unhedged podcast. Read a transcript of this episode on FT.com Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
At a recent meeting of the G20, Brazil invited economist Gabriel Zucman to address the most powerful nations in the world, and argue for a global tax on the super-rich. Today on the show, European economics commentator Martin Sandbu joins Robert Armstrong to discuss whether a worldwide tax on the very richest could even happen, and how it might work. Also, we short the commercial real estate crisis and go long liberal democracy. For a free 30-day trial to the Unhedged newsletter go to: https://www.ft.com/unhedgedofferYou can email Robert Armstrong at robert.armstrong@ft.com and Katie Martin at katie.martin@ft.com. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Martin Sandbu, European economics commentator at the Financial Times, discusses the challenges and opportunities involved in using Russia's currently frozen Central Bank assets to support Ukraine's economy and reconstruction. The hashtag ‘Russia Must Pay' is frequently trending on social media, boosted by politicians, civil society organisations and individuals outraged by Russia's continued aggression. But while this sentiment is easy for politicians and financiers to articulate, it has yet to be matched in deeds. Martin Sandbu joins host Tom Keatinge to explore how the $300 billion of immobilised Russian Central Bank assets could be unlocked and deployed to support the Ukrainian economy and fund the huge costs associated with the reconstruction of a country devastated by Russia's illegal war.
Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: Unpacking Martin Sandbu's recent(ish) take on EA, published by JWS on January 20, 2024 on The Effective Altruism Forum. The original article is here: https://www.ft.com/content/128f3a15-b048-4741-b3e0-61c9346c390b Why respond to this article? When browsing EA Twitter earlier this month, someone whose opinions on EA I respect quote-tweeted someone that I don't (at least on the topic of EA[1]). The subject of both tweets was an article published at the end of 2023 by Martin Sandbu of the Financial Times titled "Effective altruism was the favoured creed of Sam Bankman-Fried. Can it survive his fall?" Given that both of these people seem to broadly endorse the views, or at least the balance, found in the article I thought it would be worthwhile reading to see what a relatively mainstream commentator would think about EA. The Financial Times is one of the world's leading newspapers and needs very little introduction, and Sandbu is one of its most well-known commenters. What gets printed in the FT is often repeated across policy circles, not just in Britain but across the world, and especially in wonky/policy-focused circles that have often been quite welcoming of EA either ideologically or demographically. As always, I encourage readers to read and engage with the original article itself to get a sense of whether you think my summarisation and responses are fair. Reviewing Sandbu's Article Having read the article, I think it's mainly covering two separate questions related to EA, so I'll discuss them one-at-a-time. This means I'll be jumping back-and-forth a bit across the article to group similar parts together and respond to the underlying points, though I've tried to edit Sandbu's points down as little as possible. 1) How to account for EA's historical success? The first theme in the article is an attempt to give a historical account of EA's emergence, and also an attempt by Sandbu to account for its unexpected success. Early on in the article, Sandbu clearly states his confusion at how a movement with the background of EA grew so much in such a short space of time: "Even more puzzling is how quickly effective altruism rose to prominence - it is barely a decade since a couple of young philosophers at the University of Oxford invented the term ... nobody I knew would have predicted that any philosophical outlook, let alone this one, would take off in such a spectacular way." He doesn't explicitly say so, but I think a reason behind this is EA's heavy debt to Utilitarian thinkers and philosophy, which Sandbu sees as having been generally discredited or disconfirmed over the 20th century: "In the 20th century, Utilitarianism… progressively lost the favour of philosophers, who considered it too freighted with implausible implications." The history of philosophy and the various 20th century arguments around Utilitarianism are not my area of expertise, but I'm not really sure I buy that argument, or even accept how much it's a useful simplification (a potted history, as Sandbu says) of the actual trends in normative ethics. First, Utilitarianism has had plenty of criticism and counter-development before the 20th century.[2] And even looking at the field of philosophy right now, consequentialism is just as popular as the other two major alternatives in normative ethics.[3] I suspect that Sandbu is hinting at Bernard Williams' famous essay against utilitarianism, but I don't think one should consider that essay the final word on the subject. In any case, Sandbu is telling a story here, trying to set a background against which the key founding moment of EA happens: "Then came Peter Singer. In a famous 1972 article... [Singer] argued that not giving money to save lives in poor countries is morally equivalent to not saving a child drowning in a shallow pond... Any personal luxury...
On this week's episode, Max and Maria are joined by Federico Steinberg, a CSIS Visiting Fellow and economist, and Martin Sandbu of the Financial Times. Martin has closely followed the debate around sanctions, with a particular focus on Russian financial reserves that have been frozen by Western governments. His thorough breakdown of this topic is a must-listen for anyone trying to understand the Russian economy today.
Inflation is back and in this FRDH podcast, Michael Goldfarb speaks with Financial Times columnist Martin Sandbu about the difference between inflation now and then, then being the 1970s. Nothing inspires fear in policy makers like inflation. It is the economic problem that more than any other can change a nation's trajectory in history. Take 29:30 to learn about inflation now, and what it was like back then.
Martin Sandbu is European Economics Commentator at the Financial Times, where he also writes Free Lunch, a weekly newsletter about global economic policy. And he's the author of The Economics of Belonging: A Radical Plan to Win Back the Left Behind and Achieve Prosperity for All, which has just been released in paperback. Martin joins Cardiff to discuss: – How the failures of the social market economy threaten political stability and undermine openness to the rest of the world – The pervasive economic effects of the loss of manufacturing jobs – How policymakers failed– Why it's necessary to be honest about the jobs of the future– Ideas for how policymakers can improve their management of the economy – Why the world is experiencing high inflation, and the case for patienceRelated links: The Economics of Belonging book page Martin's writing at the Financial Times See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.
Today we frame the invasion of Ukraine as a war against the "idea" of the EU. For Putin, Ukraine is only the start. The big prize is destabilizing the EU. So far he has miscalculated, but it's early days. We examine the Ukrainian economy, who will stand up to Putin and we chat to the brilliant Norwegian economist, Martin Sandbu of the Financial Times. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.
Are regional agreements the future for global trade networks? Moderator: Rem Korteweg, Senior Research Fellow, Clingendael Institute Panellists: Martin Sandbu, European Economics Commentator, Financial Times James Crabtree, Executive Director, International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), Asia Wendy Cutler, Vice President, Asia Society Policy Institute (ASPI) This podcast episode was recorded on October 12, 2021 The AIG Global Trade Series 2021 examines the ongoing transformation of the world's multilateral trading system. Regional and plurilateral trade agreements are on the rise and changing in nature. Post pandemic, the search for supply chain resilience could accelerate the trend towards regionalism, and away from globalization. In this podcast, moderator Rem Korteweg of the Clingendael Institute is joined by Martin Sandbu, European Economics Commentator, Financial Times; James Crabtree, Executive Director, International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), Asia; and Wendy Cutler, Vice President, Asia Society Policy Institute (ASPI). Listen as they discuss whether regionalism is the future for global trade networks or a harbinger for deglobalization, fragmentation and fracturing of the global trade system. Do regional agreements complement or undermine the multilateral trading system underpinned by the World Trade Organization? Will trade, geopolitics and national security issues become ever more entangled through regional and bilateral agreements? And can greater regional integration be a positive force in creating a fairer, greener, and more sustainable global trading system? Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this podcast series are those of the speakers and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of American International Group, Inc. or its subsidiaries or affiliates (“AIG”). Any content provided by our speakers are of their opinion and are not intended to malign any religion, ethnic group, club, organization, company, individual or anyone or anything. AIG makes no representations as to accuracy, completeness, correctness, or validity of any information provided during this podcast series and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses injuries, or damages arising from its use.
Sarah Chayes, a writer and former journalist who worked as a special adviser to the US military leadership in Afghanistan, talks to Martin Sandbu about what will be the legacy of America's 20-year involvement.Clips: White House; ITV News; ABC 7 Chicago See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.
Hello! A big theme of the podcast has been the need for big change. We’re chatting to two people with really interesting perspectives on that. FT writer Martin Sandbu talks about why this is a moment that demands a transformation of our economy and what it could look like. Then Heather McGhee, one of the leading thinkers on the US left, talks about her new book on building coalitions for progressive change. Plus documentary maker Jerry Rothwell on his film The Reason I Jump.If you pre-order Ed’s book Go Big from waterstones.com before Wednesday (2nd June) and use the promo code ‘cheerful’ at the checkout you’ll get 30% off the full price. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.
Accountant Peter knows that to grow a business, you have to take on debt. But can he apply that same logic to his personal finances? He tells Claer how he is tempted to take out a bigger mortgage against his London flat and invest that money in a buy-to-let property - or even in the stock market. Has he come up with a brilliant shortcut to making some extra money, or is his plan to leverage up a recipe for disaster? Personal finance expert and FT columnist Jason Butler stresses that debt is no shortcut to wealth, while the FT’s European economics commentator Martin Sandbu looks at recent consumer debt trends.If you are a regular Money Clinic listener and want to be in with a chance of winning £250, then let us know what you think of the show at www.ft.com/moneyclinicsurvey If you would like to be a guest on Money Clinic and chat to Claer about a money issue that’s bugging you, get in touch — our email is money@ft.comClaer and Jason will be doing an Instagram Live on Tuesday 18th May at 7.30pm UK time discussing the issues raised on this episode. If you would like to take part and ask questions, follow Claer @ClaerB or Jason @JBtheWealthman on InstagramFurther readingHere’s our Money Clinic episode on how to get out of problem debt, and here’s the one about whether it's a good idea to pay off credit cards Follow Martin on Twitter and check out his book, The Economics of BelongingJason’s FT columns are available here. You can follow him on twitter and instagram and be sure to checkout his podcastJason recommends reading John Kenneth Galbraith’s The Great Crash 1929 and watching Capital in the Twenty-First CenturyFor the latest on market trends, follow the FT’s markets page. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.
Subscribe at cjpeconomics.substack.com
Martin Sandbus 2020-bok «The Economics of Belonging: A Radical Plan to Win Back the Left Behind and Achieve Prosperity for All» lover en radikal ny tilnærming til økonomisk politikk som adresserer symptomene og årsakene til ulikhet i det vestlige samfunnet i dag. Har Sandbu oppskriften på hvordan vi skal skape et samfunn som får alle med? Martin Sandbu er økonomikommentator i Financial Times og dekker europeisk økonomi for avisen. Sandbu bokbades av rådgiver i Tankesmien Agenda Hilde Nagell.
As President Biden tours the American heartland touting his administration’s 1.9 trillion USD Covid-19 relief package laced with numerous tax tweaks and giveaways, we are convening two economic scholars to explore the confusing in-between that both America and the EU find themselves in—Bertrand Badré, who wrote Do We (Seriously) Wish to Change the World? (2020) upon serving as World Bank MD, and Martin Sandbu, the Financial Times' European Economics Commentator. On one hand, the imperative to relieve businesses, families and governments of the prolonged financial shock to their finances. On the other, the luring temptation to remake the economy on healthier grounds, socially and environmentally. Is the latter a siren song that could turn against the former? What are the lessons to be drawn from the interaction of policy and economic fundamentals over the past year, Covid-19 itself, and even prior crises in recent memory? Rate and review Uncommon Decency on Apple Podcasts, and send us your comments or questions at @UnDecencyPod or uncommondecencypod@gmail.com.
Vincent is joined by Martin Sandbu European Economics Commentator with The Financial Times and Author of The Economics of Belonging; A Radical Plan to Win Back the Left Behind and Achieve Prosperity for All. Taking Stock with Vincent Wall on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts and Spotify. Download, listen and subscribe on the Newstalk App. You can also listen to Newstalk live on newstalk.com or on Alexa, by adding the Newstalk skill and asking: 'Alexa, play Newstalk'.
Studio Tegengif blikt terug op de belangrijkste politieke momenten van 2020. Niet de ophef, maar wat daar achter zit. We bespreken wat we kunnen leren en doen alledrie flink wat voorspellingen voor 2021. We bespreken: 1. de gekte van de week: wat de ophef rond de 7000 euro aan ontvangen boodschappen van een mevrouw in de bijstand zegt over ons politieke systeem. 2. wat de lijst met vitale beroepen ons zegt over wat wij waarderen in onze maatschappij. 3. hoe de aanpak van de Corona Vaccinaties ons iets zeggen over vakkennis en competentie bij de overheid en waarom een ode aan de uitvoering nodig is. 4. waarom Hans de Boer van VNO-NCW een groot compliment verdient. 5. hoe de EU een van de politieke winnaars werd van 2020. 6. waarom in 2021 sociale rechtvaardigheid en duurzaamheid in elk mogelijk regeerakkoord centraal zullen staan. 7. waarom in 2020 bleek dat rechts populistische partijen simpelweg niet kunnen functioneren. 8. hoe 2021 het jaar gaat worden van de mensheid vs Big Tech. We zijn benieuwd wat je denkt van deze aflevering. Laat het weten in een review of schrijf het op social media en wij danken u. In deze aflevering komen flink wat artikelen en boeken voorbij. De belangrijkste hieronder in de shownotes: ***SHOWNOTES*** Teletekst bericht 15 maart 2020 vitale beroepen in: Rob Wijnberg, ‘In een crisis wordt plotseling helder waar we toe in staat zijn’ https://decorrespondent.nl/11058/in-een-crisis-wordt-plotseling-helder-waar-we-toe-in-staat-zijn/649760759604-d7d051f9 Analyse en Quote Robin Fransman nav burgers in de knel in Tweede Kamer https://twitter.com/RF_HFC/status/1343876174695591937 Harvard Business Review, ‘How Apple is Organized for Innovation’ https://hbr.org/2020/11/how-apple-is-organized-for-innovation Johan Snel, ‘De zeven levens van Abraham Kuyper’ https://www.bol.com/nl/p/de-zeven-levens-van-abraham-kuyper/9200000132783003/ Martin Sandbu, ‘The Economics of Belonging: A Radical Plan to Win Back the Left Behind and Achieve Prosperity for All’ https://www.bol.com/nl/f/the-economics-of-belonging/9200000123182506/ The Guardian, ‘Facebook faces antitrust allegations over deals for Instagram and WhatsApp’ https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2020/dec/08/facebook-antitrust-lawsuits-instagram-whatsapp
I Stjørdal ber kommunen folk ikke treffe andre enn dem de bor med; i Trondheim sprader folk rundt i gatene og handler i butikkene. Kanskje på tide å gjøre noe med det - vi spør kommendirktøren. Huseiere mener vi får altfor lite igjen når Enova vil støtte færre og større tiltak til strømsparing. I tolvte time fikk EU og Storbritannia en avtale. Er det sant at Boris Johnson gav blaffen i nærlingslivet? Vi spør Finacial Times-kommentator Martin Sandbu. Leger har laget genesere med bilde av den kjente assisterende helsedirektøren Espen Rostrup Nakstad - til inntekt for Leger uten grenser.
Med boken The Economics of Belonging tar Martin Sandbu til orde for de etterlatte i kjølvannet av et stadig mer automatisert arbeidsliv. Han mener at løsningen er å tenke politisk bærekraft, for å stoppe den voksende ulikheten i vestlige demokratier.Gjester:Cilia Holmes Indahl leder den filantropiske stiftelsen EQT Foundation, har erfaring som bærekraftssjef i Aker BioMarine, og har en dobbel mastergrad i business og bærekraft.Martin Sandbu er økonomikommentator i Financial Times, og har en PhD i politisk økonomi fra Harvard. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Få nordmenn har like mye innflytelse på hvordan de mektigste og rikeste i verden tenker om utviklingen i politikk, samfunn og økonomi, som Martin Sandbu. Til daglig er han økonomikommentator i Financial Times og spaltist i Aftenposten. Nå er han aktuell som forfatter av boka The Economics of Belonging: A Radical Plan to Win Back the Left Behind and Achieve Prosperity for All. I denne episoden av TaxCast ringer vi opp Martin Sandbu i London, og tar en prat om boka hans. Boka beskriver en slags livbøye –hvordan redde vestlige samfunn som er i ferd med å rives i stykker av polarisering, utenforskap og ulikhet. For å lykkes med dette kreves blant annet en radikal skatteplan.I studio var progamleder Peter Ringstad og Ingrid Hjertaker. Miks og musikk av Kristoffer Lislegaard. Foto: Aron Urb (Flickr)
The Economics of Belonging:Book by Martin Sandbu Fueled by populism and the frustrations of the disenfranchised, the past few years have witnessed the widespread rejection of the economic and political order that Western countries built up after 1945. Political debates have turned into violent clashes between those who want to “take their country back” and those viewed as defending an elitist, broken, and unpatriotic social contract. There seems to be an increasing polarization of values. The Economics of Belonging argues that we should step back and take a fresh look at the root causes of our current challenges. In this original, engaging book, Martin Sandbu argues that economics remains at the heart of our widening inequality and it is only by focusing on the right policies that we can address it. He proposes a detailed, radical plan for creating a just economy where everyone can belong. Economic Dignity When Gene Sperling was in charge of coordinating the shaping and execution of the US government's economic policy in the Obama White House, he found himself surprised and dismayed when serious people in Washington worried out loud to him that the Obama focus on health care was a distraction because it was "not focused on the economy." How, he asked, was millions of Americans' fear that they were a single pink slip or a loved one's serious illness away from financial ruin somehow not considered an economic issue? To him, it was just one more example of a more profound truth he witnessed in his many years in our national economic debate: that when it comes to America's economic policy, there is too little focus on what the end goal should be. --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/pbliving/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/pbliving/support
Martin Sandbu has been writing about economics for the Financial Times since 2009. Having started out as the newspaper's economics leader writer, he is currently FT's European economics commentator and writes its Free Lunch premium economics newsletter. Previously, he was a senior research fellow at the Zicklin Center for Business Ethics Research at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. His books include Just Business and Europe's Orphan (Princeton). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Martin Sandbu has an exciting new book, The Economics of Belonging: A Radical Plan to Win Back the Left Behind and Achieve Prosperity for All (Princeton University Press).Martin argues that the western social order has rested on three crucial pillars. First, political principles centered on individual rights, equality before the law, robust and independent institutions and regular, free and meaningful elections. The second pillar consists of a social market economy, that is a capitalist system in which prosperity is broadly shared. And the third pillar is economic and political openness to the outside world for the joint realization of this social order.Much of the political debate in recent years, especially in the United States and in parts of Europe, has questioned the purpose and value of this western economic and political order that has been in place since 1945. This has been in part been fueled by widening income inequality, growing political polarization, and the rise of populist leaders. Some have also blamed globalization for such discontentment. But Martin argues that it is not globalization that is to blame for many of our current problems, but rather technological change and flawed domestic policies that have made it difficult for some groups in society to particulate fully and justly in the economy. The real problem, he writes, is that “The western social order no longer fulfills its promise of an economy that provides a good place for everyone."Martin Sandbu is the European Economics Commentator for the Financial Times. He also writes Free Lunch, the FT's weekly newsletter on the global economic policy debate.Martin Sandbu on TwitterDan Banik on TwitterIn Pursuit of Development on Twitter
Financial Times kommentator Martin Sandbu viser til de politiske erfaringene som de nordiske landene har, og forslår radikale politiske endringer for vestens liberale demokratier
Financial Times kommentator Martin Sandbu har skrevet boken The Economics of Belonging: A Radical Plan to Win Back the Left Behind and Achieve Prosperity for All. Han forklarer hva som har gått galt de siste 40 årene.
In this episode of the podcast we revisit our Dash Café ON THE BORDER, which explored the experience of living on the border through the prism of art, film, music, literature and economics.We reflected on the actual borders that existed for our speakers growing up on the edges of the Iron Curtain and today’s visible and invisible borders with Berlin-based author, composer and editor-in-chief of Flaneur Magazine Fabian Saul, visual artist Mariana Gordan (originally from Romania), Norwegian-born economist and Financial Times columnist Martin Sandbu and live music from Slovakian vocalist Lori Secanska and Greek-Cypriot guitarist Iakovos Loukas.For more information and episodes, head to our website hereGet Mariana Gordan's book State Property hereFabian Saul's project Traces of Resistance hereGet Martin Sandbu's new book The Economics of Belonging: A Radical Plan to Win Back the Left Behind and Achieve Prosperity for All hereWe are taking a much-needed Summer break from the podcast in August. In the meantime, we wish listeners a sunshine-filled August and we'll be back in September with more audio delights! Don't forget to rate, review and subscribe to the podcast to help boost us in the charts!Originally recorded March 2019 at Rich Mix London, with support from Goethe-Institut London. Podcast artwork by Mariana Gordan.Dash Arts is a small charity that bridges divides between communities, cultures, borders and languages by creating incredible artistic experiences. Our work brings together international artists, nurtures new talent and tells powerful stories. Click here to find out more about how you can support our work. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.
Martin Sandbu, European Economics Commentator at the FT and author of "The Economics of Belonging", talks to Paul Adamson about his new book and the prospects for a new radicalism post Covid-19.
Martin Sandbu, European Economics Commentator at the FT and author of "The Economics of Belonging", talks to Paul Adamson about his new book and the prospects for a new radicalism post Covid-19.
Can we design recovery measures to address deep-seated issues of economic inequality and insecurity? Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer Anneliese Dodds MP and the FT’s Martin Sandbu share policy ideas to improve job quality and increase prosperity for people and places in every part of the UK. This conversation was broadcast online on the 1st July 2020. Discover more at: www.thersa.org/events/bridges-to-the-future
An interview with Martin Sandbu of the Financial Times about his new book, The Economics of Belonging. Even before coronavirus struck many people did not feel a sense of belonging to the economy. Sandbu's book is an analysis of the problem and some suggestions for how to address it post-pandemic. He explains just how to FRDH host Michael Goldfarb in this clear and direct economic discussion.
On this episode Mark talks with Martin Sandbu, a journalist at the Financial Times and author of 'The Economics of Belonging.' In addition to having a great title, the book provides a penetrating explanation for why so many people have come to feel so left behind in wealthy Western countries. Mark and Martin discuss the role economics plays in this discontent, and look at how radical economic policy could help not just boost national GDP's and employment rates in the West, but renew a widespread sense of citizenship and belonging. You can read or download a transcript of this episode here: [https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zj_lSC-q7JOXG2lqkeNQWqL_Comg83Az/view?usp=sharing] You can learn more about and purchase Martin's book here: [https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691204529/the-economics-of-belonging]
Martin Hellwig is the director of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, and he joins Macro Musings to talk about the Eurozone and the implications of the recent German Constitutional Court (GCC) ruling for the future of the monetary union. David and Martin specifically discuss the background of the perceived Eurozone crisis, the power struggle between the GCC and the European Court of Justice, and how this case may lead to a total breakdown of the Eurozone. Transcript for the episode can be found here: https://www.mercatus.org/bridge/tags/macro-musings Martin’s MPI profile: https://www.coll.mpg.de/martin-hellwig Related Links: Bonus segment with Martin: https://youtu.be/1POrO_8VcM0 *The Leverage Ratchet Effect* by Anat Admati, Peter DeMarzo, Martin Hellwig and Paul Pfleiderer https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/faculty-research/working-papers/leverage-ratchet-effect *German Court Has Set a Bomb Under the EU Legal Order* by Martin Sandbu https://www.ft.com/content/79484c01-b66b-4f81-bdc6-fd4def940821 David’s blog: macromarketmusings.blogspot.com David’s Twitter: @DavidBeckworth
Rate and review our Coronavirus special podcast episode The coronavirus pandemic has already turned global politics and economics upside down. Are there lessons to be learnt from previous crises? What will happen to the nation state and how will Covid-19 impact the European project? What happens when millions of people are forced to stay at home and have time to imagine a world run differently than in the past? In this Coronavirus special live event join us for a preview of Ivan Krastev’s new book on the coronavirus pandemic and its implications for Europe. He was also joined by EBRD Chief Economist Beata Javorcik, and Martin Sandbu, the Financial Times columnist and author of the FT’s “Free Lunch”. Like what you hear? Review our podcast on iTunes or tweet us @EBRD #EBRDEconTalks
Ukens gjest er Martin Sandbu, Europa-kommentator i Financial Times. Den europeiske sentralbanken har signalisert at de vil gjøre hva det skal være for å begrense den nye økonomiske krisen i Europa. Men hvor går grensen? Og står euroen trygt i en situasjon hvor mange land har mer enn nok med seg selv?
Aidan Regan speaks to the Financial Times' Martin Sandbu about his forthcoming book, The Economics of Belonging. How can politicians and policymakers across address social and economic discontent? Does the European Union help them or limit their options in this context?-More information on the book: https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691204529/the-economics-of-belonging-And about our project: http://www.newpoliticaleconomyeurope.eu/
Alicia García Herrero, Senior Fellow at Bruegel, and Martin Sandbu, European Economics Commentator at the Financial Times, discuss Europe's role between an increasingly protectionist and belligerent US, and the ever-growing technological superiority of China.
Martin Sandbu discusses the prospects that leaders attending this year's G20 summit in Osaka will be able to patch up their differences on trade and climate with Chris Giles and Leslie Hook. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.
**Bruegel's Maria Demertzis welcomes Yale Law School professor Yair Listokin to this Director's Cut of 'The Sound of Economics', to discuss how law might be deployed as a macroeconomic tool to counter financial crisis.** In this episode of Director's Cut, Bruegel's deputy director Maria Demertzis talks to Yair Listokin, a professor at Yale Law School, about the effect law could have on achieving macroeconomic objectives. In his new book titled 'Law and Macroeconomics', Yair Listokin puts forward the idea that law has the ability to function as an instrument of macroeconomic policy. He argues that the time it took for private spending to recover after the 2008 financial crisis could have been cut, had legislation played a more vital role in the process. Here the two elaborate on these ideas, focusing particularly on the perceived trade-off between law's role in maintaining stability, and its potential to be used as a real-time response to economic shocks. They also discuss the applicability of this policy approach in the European reality of multiple legal frameworks and central banks struggling to stimulate aggregate demand at the zero lower interest rate bound. You can find more on macroeconomic policy in previous editions of the Director's Cut. First, we recommend Bruegel director Guntram Wolff's conversation about [the growth and stability challenges facing the global financial system,](http://bruegel.org/2018/10/directors-cut-how-to-reform-and-fortify-the-global-financial-system/) with Tharman Shanmugaratnam, deputy prime minister of Singapore and chair of the G20 Eminent Persons Group, and Jean Pisani-Ferry, mercator senior fellow at Bruegel. Second, consider Maria Demertzis' discussion with Martin Sandbu of the Financial Times, on the topic of [what the field of economics has learned in the decade since the financial crisis](http://bruegel.org/2018/10/directors-cut-is-economics-asking-the-right-questions/).
John McDonnell tipped the Labour party towards supporting a second Brexit referendum this week. Does this make it any more likely to happen? And we dig into the "Norway Plus" model and discuss whether it is the Brexit plan B Westminster is hunting for. Presented by Sebastian Payne. With Jim Pickard, Robert Shrimsley, Martin Sandbu and Miranda Green. Produced by Anna Dedhar and Harry Robertson See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.
Ahead of the launch of the 2018 FT and McKinsey Business Book of the Year prize, this series discusses the six shortlisted books with its authors. In this final episode, Helen Barrett, the FT’s Work & Careers editor, and FT economics commentator Martin Sandbu, talk to Jeremy Heimans, who together with Henry Timms co-wrote New Power: How it’s changing the 21st century — and why you need to know, and Annie Lowrey, author of Give People Money. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.
**Bruegel deputy director Maria Demertzis welcomes Financial Times commentator Martin Sandbu to explore the journey taken by the field of economics since the financial crisis struck 10 years ago, and discusses what new tools economics has now that it didn't have then.** In this Director's Cut of ‘The Sound of Economics', we trace the journey upon which the field of economics has embarked since the financial crisis, what lessons it has learnt and what it can do differently now with the benefit of hindsight. Economists and financial specialists failed to identify the burgeoning threat of financial imbalances, excessive risk-taking and housing bubbles that led to the crisis that first broke a decade ago. Can economics provide answers to the right questions – and in good time? Bruegel deputy director Maria Demertzis is joined by Martin Sandbu of the Financial Times to look at what new tools and approaches can help economists make a difference in the event that any similar such crisis strikes again. For further consideration we recommend [another edition of the Director's Cut podcast series](https://audioboom.com/posts/6856399-director-s-cut-post-crisis-prognosis-for-macroeconomics), featuring a discussion between Maria Demertzis, Nicola Viegi – South African Reserve Bank professor of monetary economics at the University of Pretoria – and Frank Smets – director general of economics at the European Central Bank – on the topic of macroeconomics' post-crisis reinvention and the flourishing of new models. **FURTHER READING** [Rebuilding macroeconomics: Initial reflections on a major theory project](http://bruegel.org/2018/01/rebuilding-macroeconomics-initial-reflections-on-a-major-theory-project/) [The DSGE Model Quarrel (Again)](http://bruegel.org/2017/12/the-dsge-model-quarrel-again/) [Tales from a crisis: diverging narratives of the euro area](http://bruegel.org/2018/02/tales-from-a-crisis-diverging-narratives-of-the-euro-area/)
Hva om alle fikk en fast inntekt fra staten, uten forpliktelser eller krav? Ville mange slutte å jobbe? Ville flere etterutdanne seg, engasjere seg i frivillig arbeid. eller kanskje starte egen bedrift? Du møter: Moderator: Sigrun Aasland, fagsjef i Tankesmien Agenda - Hadia Tajik, nestleder i Arbeiderpartiet - Ingeborg Eliassen, forfatter og tidligere utenriksjournalist i Stavanger Aftenblad - Sven Egil Omdal, forfatter og kommentator i Stavanger Aftenblad - Kalle Moene, professor i økonomi De nærmeste årene vil føre med seg teknologiske endringer som vil fjerne mange arbeidsplasser. Roboter truer jobbene til både butikkmedarbeidere, reiseagenter, sjåfører og fondsmeglere. Stadig flere skyves ut av et arbeidsliv som ikke trenger dem lenger. Velferdsstaten som skal sørge for dem, er under press. For å unngå et framtidig sosialt sammenbrudd må vi tenke nytt om forholdet mellom arbeid og kapital, fritid og velferd. Det er her den gamle ideen om borgerlønn har fått ny aktualitet. Forfatterne Sven Egil Omdal og Ingeborg Eliassen tar i sin bok «Borgerlønn. Ideen som endrer spillet», den internasjonale diskusjonen om borgerlønn hjem til Norge. De møter professor i økonomi Kalle Moene og kommentator i Financial Times, Martin Sandbu (venter på bekreftelse) til debatt - ledet av Sigrun Aasland fra Tenkesmien Agenda. «Borgerlønn. Ideen som endrer spillet» utgis av Res Publica og kan kjøpes på arrangementet og i bokhandleren. Velkommen til boklansering og debatt, torsdag 30. august, kl. 17.30 på Kulturhuset i Oslo.
US officials have accused Latvia’s third-largest bank of laundering money that helped fund North Korea’s missile programme. To make matters worse, the country’s central bank governor is the subject of a bribery probe. Elaine Moore discusses what’s behind the banking crisis in the Baltic state and why the European Central Bank failed to spot the problem with Claire Jones, Martin Sandbu and Neil Buckley. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.
Yascha Mounk and Martin Sandbu discuss the best way to fight inequality; why we need predistribution rather than (just) redistributive taxation to fight populism; and how to ensure that individuals and corporations alike pay their fair share Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Yascha Mounk and Martin Sandbu discuss the best way to fight inequality; why we need predistribution rather than (just) redistributive taxation to fight populism; and how to ensure that individuals and corporations alike pay their fair share Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
It is a hundred years since Finland declared independence following the Russian Revolution. Amol Rajan asks what is unique about Europe's most sparsely populated country. The conductor Sakari Oramo celebrates Finland's greatest composer Sibelius, while the curator Sointu Fritze looks at the work of Tove Jansson, famed for her cartoon creatures the Moomins as well as her daring political cartoons and images of the sea. The writer Horatio Clare travels around the frozen seas of Finland on board a government icebreaker, discovering stories of its history and character, while the economist Martin Sandbu evaluates a region seen as a capitalist utopia. Producer: Katy Hickman.
Ten years ago a Harvard economist suggested that it might not be possible to combine democracy, national sovereignty and economic integration forever. Something would have to give. 2016 might just have proved him right. In this edition of Economic Tectonics, Martin Sandbu from The Financial Times explores how –in his view – today's fractious politics might change the global economy of the future. Producer: Sandra Kanthal (Image: Child at Protest holding placard, Credit: Shutterstock)
FT economics writer Martin Sandbu joins host Cardiff Garcia to discuss economic ideas that would have been considered unthinkably radical or excessive a few years ago, but which are now generating serious discussion. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.
With economic growth reviving in the eurozone, is the euro crisis now over, or is this just a lull before another euro storm? Gideon Rachman puts the question to Claire Jones, FT correspondent in Frankfurt, and Martin Sandbu, economics commentator. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.
In this episode, Martin Sandbu and Christian Dustmann discuss 'How should governments respond to migration fears?' In November 2016, the CER took more than 50 of Europe's top economists to Ditchley Park in Oxfordshire for a conference on 'The economics of populism’. This CER podcast series offers an insight into the discussions of that weekend.
Analyzing Trump As I watch intensely this election cycle there are moments that fill me with intense rage. It seems that Trump supporters believe that every thing that comes Donald's way is false and politically motivated. Even when it comes straight from the mans mouth. Now I want to say that I too believe that Hillary has flaws, but what has come out about her as what has come out about Mr. Trump I have researched Now we have had some pretty purvey presidents and so I don't think this alone disqualifies Trump, based on policy knowledge of international affairs, and an understanding on how the office of the president works should ultimately be the reasons to elect. If Donald had sent time learning about the system he wants to tear down and had insightful responses as to how to do that I wouldn't give a shit about his personal shit, but he has no clue in the end about what he can legally do as president and what he can not. Now we have foreign countries at our door step. Hacking and testing our government. We have the lives of our brave serves men and women on the line here. Economic situations that hang in the balance, and every American life on the line. Should we really give a guy the chance that has absolutely now idea? Someone that has only opinions and conspiracies in his head? Maybe if I explain it like this. Our government is a big rig and is speeding down the highway. There are hazards on every side. Hillary at least knows the truck. Shifter, Buttons, pedals/ Mr. Trump does not. Do we really want to risk our safety and freedoms until he figures it out. If you actually wanted to have an agent for change maybe you should have looked at Ralph Nader more. I do believe that Washington need major changes. But to destroy it as quickly as Trump would would risk every thing we have, and could cost us more. Find someone now to run next election. Teach them the system. That way they can dismantle it without opening us up to the Chinese or Soviets. I think one day Donald woke up and said, Why not run, someone has to and since no one else is I guess I have to. NO! Please NO!Your thought process is flawed. We do need change I agree, but please trust me when I say this man, Donald J Trump is not the one to do it. He knows what is wrong with the system but has no compahension as to how to fix it. I love America, I hate Washington, but this is not the answer. Thank you The Truth About Donald Trump https://youtu.be/4ean30zXpuE --Our in-depth investigation into Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump including an analysis of his policy proposals, outrageous comments, and background as a supposedly hugely successful businessman Research and editing by Noah Ferguson Trumponomics | PunkFT https://youtu.be/sEDhTJB9CRg In the latest collaboration between Punk Economics and the FT, Martin Sandbu delves into the economic realities of a Donald Trump presidency Subscribe to the Financial Times on YouTube: http://bit.ly/FTimeSubs For more video content from the Financial Times, visit http://www.FT.com/video Twitter https://twitter.com/ftvideo Facebook https://www.facebook.com/financialtimes How Donald Trump Answers A Question https://youtu.be/_aFo_BV-UzI Published on Dec 30, 2015
Of all the issues raised by this election that could have an impact on the rest of the world, the economy is the biggest – and the scariest. Economic decisions in the US can have an outsized influence elsewhere: if the US is motoring along nicely, so are the rest of us; if the wheels fall off there, the crash will be felt elsewhere too. Monocle’s Steve Bloomfield is joined by Harvard economics professor Ken Rogoff, economist and broadcaster Linda Yueh and Martin Sandbu of the ‘Financial Times’ to discuss the potential ramifications of a Trump and Clinton presidency.
The Bank of England's bond buying programme intended to cushion an expected slowdown in the economy caused by the British vote to quit the European Union had a dramatic effect on financial markets this week, with yields on UK government bonds turning negative for only the second time in history. Hugh Carnegy asked FT markets editor Michael Mackenzie and economics writer Martin Sandbu to explain what happened and why it matters. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.
Sir Vince Cable, the former business secretary, joins Kiran Stacey, Martin Wolf and Martin Sandbu of the Financial Times to discuss whether there is a future for the British steel industry and if the new national living wage will cost jobs. Presented by Sebastian Payne. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.
How much progress is likely at this week's global talks on combating climate change? Gideon Rachman discusses the prospects for agreement on reducing carbon emissions with Michael Stothard and Martin Sandbu. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.
Concerns about the Chinese economy and the country’s stock market gyrations have shown little sign of abating this week. Martin Sandbu asks the FT's economics editor Chris Giles, and US economics editor, Sam Fleming what impact this is likely to have on the wider global economy. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.
The impact of China's stock market volatility has been felt around the world this week. Martin Sandbu is joined by the FT's economics editor Chris Giles, and US economics editor Sam Fleming, to discus show risky this is for the health of the global economy. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.
Is Greece about to default on its debts and if so, what happens next? Gideon Rachman and his guests Tony Barber and Martin Sandbu discuss what has gone wrong between Greece and its eurozone creditors and whether the political rifts can be repaired. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.
Greece is said to be about to run out of money and yet there's no sign of a deal with its creditors. Gideon Rachman is joined by Martin Sandbu and Kerin Hope to discuss whether a further crisis can be avoided. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.
Chris Cook is joined by Jonathan Eley, Martin Sandbu and Sarah Neville to discuss the political, economic and personal finance consequences of the UK Budget announcement. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.
Politicians in Washington have managed to avoid plunging the United States off the "fiscal cliff", which would have imposed deep spending cuts and tax rises. Instead, President Obama and Congress agreed limited tax rises, while deferring discussion of spending cuts. But is this a solution, or just a respite? Richard Macgregor, Washington bureau chief, and Martin Sandbu, economics leader writer, join Gideon Rachman. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.
Robert Shrimsley, editor of FT.com, is joined by economic leader writer Martin Sandbu, personal finance editor Matthew Vincent and Chris Cook of the public policy team to discuss the political, economic and personal finance consequences of the UK budget announcement. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.
In this week's podcast: Libya - a week on from the fall of Gaddafi; the eurozone and the state of play as we come out of the summer break; and, an Indian hunger striker forces parliament to support his anti-corruption crusade. Presented by Gideon Rachman with James Blitz in Paris, James Lamont in Delhi and Martin Sandbu in the studio in London. Produced by LJ Filotrani See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.
In this week’s podcast: Obama and the US debt limit – the president avoids default at the 11th hour; Greece, we ask whether the second bail-out package is enough to stem contagion across the eurozone; and, Indonesia’s growth trajectory attracts foreign investment. Presented by Rob Minto with James Crabtree, Martin Sandbu and Gideon Rachman, in the studio in London and Anthony Deutsch in Jakarta - interviewed by Serena Tarling. Produced by LJ Filotrani See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.
In this week's podcast: Terror in Norway: a lone attack or a signal that the far right is rising? Libya – what next for Gaddafi? And, China's ambitions for high speed rail are dealt a blow. Presented by Gideon Rachman with Robin Wigglesworth, Martin Sandbu and David Gardner in the studio in London and Simon Rabinovitch in Beijing - interviewed by Serena Tarling. Produced by LJ Filotrani See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.
"A budget for making things, not making things up." So began UK chancellor George Osborne, as he set out his stall for encouraging growth and stabilising the country's economy. So, how did he fare? The FT's Sarah Neville put this question to Chris Cook, the FT's education correspondent, Martin Sandbu, the FT's economic leader writer and Matthew Vincent, editor of FT Money. Produced by LJ Filotrani See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.
In the podcast this week: We ask whether the resignation of four officials earlier this week marks the end of the Berlusconi era; we look at the results of the Food and Agriculture Organization food outlook report, published yesterday, about rising prices and what this means for emerging markets and we ask what is the future for Ireland as it teeters on the edge of accepting a bailout loan from the EU and the IMF. Presented by Gideon Rachman with David Gardner, Martin Sandbu and Stefan Wagstyl in the studio, Geoff Dyer in Beijing and Guy Dinmore in Rome. Produced LJ Filotrani See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.
UK chancellor George Osborne delivered the government's review on spending today. He spoke of fairness, of bringing the years of ever rising borrowing to an end, of making those with the broadest shoulders bear the greatest burden and of building a country which only buys what it can afford. But what to these mantras really mean in terms of spending and cuts? To try and answer this question the FT's Sarah Neville is joined in the studio by FT correspondents Chris Cook, Martin Sandbu and Alice Ross. Produced by LJ Filotrani See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.