Podcasts about amade

Rincón de la Victoria se suma un año más a la campaña nacional `Un Millón de Pasos por la Epilepsia´ con la celebración de una caminata solidaria el próximo domingo 25 de mayo, con motivo del Día Nacional de la Epilepsia. La acción está organizada por la Asociación Malagueña de Epilepsia (AMADE) y el Área de Bienestar Social del Ayuntamiento, en el marco de la campaña impulsada por la Federación Española de Epilepsia, bajo el lema `Epilepsias: Un futuro esperanzador´. La concejala del Área, Belén Gutiérrez (PP), ha explicado que, “la jornada pretende visibilizar la enfermedad y contribuir a romper el estigma social que aún la rodea. La epilepsia es una enfermedad neurológica, no mental, que requiere de comprensión y apoyo, por ello la concienciación y la educación son clave para mejorar la calidad de vida de las personas con epilepsia y sus familias”. Por su parte, el alcalde de Rincón de la Victoria, Francisco Salado (PP), ha destacado la importancia de este tipo de iniciativas “para sensibilizar y dar visibilidad a una enfermedad que afecta a millones de personas en el mundo, además de fomentar la investigación y el desarrollo de nuevos tratamientos y terapias”. Asimismo, ha hecho un llamamiento a la ciudadanía para sumarse a la caminata, “con el objetivo de superar la cifra de casi 200 participantes registrada el año pasado”. La caminata solidaria partirá a las 12:00 horas desde la Plaza Pepe El Boticario, y recorrerá el trayecto hasta el arroyo Granadillas, para regresar posteriormente al punto de partida, donde se celebrará una jornada con actividades lúdicas, música y actuaciones de baile. El presidente de AMADE, Fernando Mendoza, ha señalado la importancia de “dar a conocer las causas, síntomas y tratamientos de la epilepsia para mejorar la calidad de vida de los pacientes, y promover los avances médicos necesarios”. Mendoza ha recordado que “la epilepsia afecta a cerca de 400.000 personas en España, con más de 20.000 nuevos casos diagnosticados cada año”. La epilepsia es una enfermedad neurológica crónica que afecta a más de 50 millones de personas en todo el mundo, y a seis millones en Europa. Se estima que entre el 5% y el 10% de la población podría experimentar una crisis epiléptica en algún momento de su vida, y hasta un 20% podrían presentar crisis recurrentes. La participación en la caminata es gratuita, y las inscripciones pueden realizarse de forma online a través del siguiente enlace: https://forms.gle/Kp4w5r4U3HBTDpQ76 o presencial antes del inicio de la caminata. Para más información, se puede contactar con AMADE a través del teléfono 657 951 847, el correo electrónico info@amadeepilepsia.org, o en la página web: www.amadeepilepsia.org

El pasado 18 de diciembre la Asociación Madrileña de Atención a la Dependencia, AMADE, entregó sus premios anuales. Unos galardones que son el justo reconocimiento a la labor que, día a día, realizan los profesionales del sector de los cuidados en la Comunidad de Madrid.Escuchar audio

As the 2025 Austria Alpine ski season begins, I interview travel ski journalist Cian Byrne about our recent December trip to the towns of Maria Alm in the Hochkonig region and Bad Gastein in the Gastein region, which are both part of the huge 760km ski area of Ski Amade near Salzburg. Visit https://www.skiamade.com/en for tips, trips and deals.If you haven't already, I'd ask you to give me a follow on whichever platform you listen to your podcasts and you will be the first to get a new episode. Fergal O'Keeffe is the host of Ireland's No.1 Travel Podcast Travel Tales with Fergal which is now listened to in 120 countries worldwide. The podcast aims to share soul-lifting travel memoirs about daydream worthy destinations. Please follow me onInstagram @traveltaleswithfergalFacebook @traveltaleswithfergalTwitter @FergalTravelYouTube @traveltaleswithfergal#IrelandsBlueBook #Meath Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Em derbarê helbijartinên Perlemanî li Herêma kurdistanê hin pirsan ji nûçegîhanê SBS Kurdî Ehmed Xefûr ji Hewlêrê dipirsin. Helbijartin di 20 vê mehê, Oktober de dest pê dikin ku di heman demê de bangeşên helbijartinê temam bûn. Her weha rêberên partiyên siyasî jî gotarên xwe pêşkêş kirin, gelo pêşkêşkirina gotaran çi bandorê li ser dengderan dike? Zêdetir derbarê wan mijarên li jor û yên din di raporta ji Hewlêrê de hene.

Phillip Stokes joined Racing Pulse after Amade won the Sandown Cup after bombing the start. The 10YO has been an iron horse for the stable.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

This episode of the Brave New Bookshelf delves into the integration of AI in publishing, exploring its transformative role in improving efficiency, editing, and marketing. Steph Pajonas and Danica Favorite, along with their guest, Melle Amade Melkumian, discuss how authors can leverage AI tools to understand their business, connect with readers, and adapt to market dynamics while maintaining their unique voice and brand identity in the evolving landscape of the publishing industry.

Trainer Phillip Stokes looks at the hopes of Amade in the Sydney Cup today at Royal Randwick.

Phillip Stokes has a host of runners racing around Australia Saturday and he joined Racing Pulse with an update on the key chances. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Stokes Racing's Shae Dinunzio previews the stables runners in three states on Saturday, headlined by Amade in the G1 Sydney Cup and Stretan Angel in the Redelva Stakes at Morphettville. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Zac Spain's ride on Amade in the Adelaide Cup was certainly the talking point after the race! He spoke about the drama with Michael Felgate on Racing Pulse on Tuesday. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Zac Spain showed remarkable horsemanship to ride Amade without stirrup irons for the majority of the 3200M of the Adelaide Cup. Spain said one of the stirrup straps broke on the way to the gates.

SynopsisOn this date in 1785, a new Piano Concerto in C major was given its premiere at the Burgtheater in Vienna, with its composer, Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, at the keyboard.Years later, this piano concerto was labeled as Mozart's 21st, and given the number 467 in the chronological list of his works compiled by Ludwig Ritter von Koechel, an Austrian botanist, mineralogist and Mozart enthusiast.Today, this work is popularly referred to as the Elvira Madigan Concerto, for the simple reason that its romantic slow movement was used to great effect in a 1967 Swedish film of that name to underscore a passionate love story.That Swedish movie helped to bring Mozart's concerto to the attention of a far wider audience than ever before, as did the 1984 movie Amadeus, with Mozart's music in general.Musicologists might wince when they hear the title Amadeus. It's a matter of historical record that Mozart signed his name “Amadeo” or “Amadé.” Others object that a Swedish film should provide a nickname for one of Mozart's most sublime works — but, for better or worse, both Amadeus and Elvira Madigan are labels that seem to have stuck to Mozart's name and his concerto.Music Played in Today's ProgramWolfgang Amadeus Mozart (1756-1791): Piano Concerto No. 21; Alfred Brendel, piano; Academy of St. Martin-in-the-Fields; Neville Marriner, cond. Philips 412 856

When coming across an advertisement for a job that interests you, understanding the subsequent steps is crucial. Preparing the requisite documentation and comprehending the recruiter's expectations will enhance your likelihood of securing that position. - Dema ku ji bo karekî ku we eleqedar dike, hûn rastî reklamekê tên, têgihîştina gavên li pêş pir girîngin. Nivîsandina kaxezên daxwaza kar dikare tirsinak be, lê têgihîştina hêviyên peywirdar dê şansê we ji bo bi destxistina kar zêde bike.

Het was een belangrijk thema bij de verkiezingen: migratie. Termen als ‘stromen', ‘de migratiecrisis' en grote pijlen op kaarten maken van migratie een soort ongrijpbaar fenomeen. Terwijl: het gaat om mensen. Hoogleraar wetenschapsantropologie Amade M'charek onderzoekt wie precies op de boten stappen, en waarom. Met Pieter van der Wielen praat ze over waarom het belangrijk is de doden in de Middellandse Zee namen te geven, zodat familie weet wat er met hun geliefden gebeurd is. En over haar onderzoek in haar geboorteland Tunesië, naar waaróm mensen naar Europa vluchten. Ze stuit daar op de ongemakkelijke waarheid dat een deel van die oorzaken direct gelinkt is aan onszelf. Presentatie: Pieter van der Wielen Redactie: Mira Zeehandelaar Mixage: Audiochef Muziek: Rufus van Baardwijk Zie het privacybeleid op https://art19.com/privacy en de privacyverklaring van Californië op https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

SynopsisOn today's date in 1979, a new play by Peter Schaffer titled Amadeus opened at the National Theatre in London.Schaffer's play tells the story of Mozart's final years in Vienna, including some posthumous gossip that it was the petty jealousy and back-stabbing intrigue of Mozart's Italian contemporary Antonio Salieri that hastened Wolfgang's untimely demise. There was even a Romantic legend that Salieri had actually poisoned Mozart, a legend Shaffer gave a psychological spin.Music historians were quick to attack Shaffer's play as wildly inaccurate and downright unfair to poor old Salieri, who, they said, was not all that bad a fellow. Accurate or not, Schaffer's play was a big hit, and five years later was made into a wildly successful film. That movie version of Amadeus prompted millions of new classical music fans to snap up any recordings of Mozart's Requiem they could find.And what about the music historians? They couldn't even find comfort in the old public relations adage, “There's no such thing as bad press as long as they spell your name right!” They felt even the movie's title was bogus. Mozart never signed his middle name “Amadeus,” preferring the French version, “Amadé.”Music Played in Today's ProgramWolfgang Mozart (1756 – 1791) Requiem; La Chapelle Royale and Orchestre des Champs Elysees; Philippe Herreweghe, cond. Harmonia Mundi 901620

Phillip Stokes joined RSN on Thursday after Amade's stunning win in the Geelong Cup.

El 26 de octubre, en la sede del Imserso en Madrid, se celebra la jornada "Impulsando los centros día", organizada por la Asociación de Empresas de Servicios para la Dependencia, AESTE, y por la Asociación Madrileña de Atención a la Dependencia, AMADE. La presidenta de AMADE, Pilar Ramos, aclara por qué es tan importante este tipo de encuentros.  Escuchar audio

* Listen on Spotify or Apple Podcasts* Be sure to check out and follow Holly's Substack and org Pause AI. Blurb and summary from ClongBlurbHolly and Aaron had a wide-ranging discussion touching on effective altruism, AI alignment, genetic conflict, wild animal welfare, and the importance of public advocacy in the AI safety space. Holly spoke about her background in evolutionary biology and how she became involved in effective altruism. She discussed her reservations around wild animal welfare and her perspective on the challenges of AI alignment. They talked about the value of public opinion polls, the psychology of AI researchers, and whether certain AI labs like OpenAI might be net positive actors. Holly argued for the strategic importance of public advocacy and pushing the Overton window within EA on AI safety issues.Detailed summary* Holly's background - PhD in evolutionary biology, got into EA through New Atheism and looking for community with positive values, did EA organizing at Harvard* Worked at Rethink Priorities on wild animal welfare but had reservations about imposing values on animals and whether we're at the right margin yet* Got inspired by FLI letter to focus more on AI safety advocacy and importance of public opinion* Discussed genetic conflict and challenges of alignment even with "closest" agents* Talked about the value of public opinion polls and influencing politicians* Discussed the psychology and motives of AI researchers* Disagreed a bit on whether certain labs like OpenAI might be net positive actors* Holly argued for importance of public advocacy in AI safety, thinks we have power to shift Overton window* Talked about the dynamics between different AI researchers and competition for status* Discussed how rationalists often dismiss advocacy and politics* Holly thinks advocacy is neglected and can push the Overton window even within EA* Also discussed Holly's evolutionary biology takes, memetic drive, gradient descent vs. natural selectionFull transcript (very imperfect)AARONYou're an AI pause, Advocate. Can you remind me of your shtick before that? Did you have an EA career or something?HOLLYYeah, before that I was an academic. I got into EA when I was doing my PhD in evolutionary biology, and I had been into New Atheism before that. I had done a lot of organizing for that in college. And while the enlightenment stuff and what I think is the truth about there not being a God was very important to me, but I didn't like the lack of positive values. Half the people there were sort of people like me who are looking for community after leaving their religion that they grew up in. And sometimes as many as half of the people there were just looking for a way for it to be okay for them to upset people and take away stuff that was important to them. And I didn't love that. I didn't love organizing a space for that. And when I got to my first year at Harvard, harvard Effective Altruism was advertising for its fellowship, which became the Elite Fellowship eventually. And I was like, wow, this is like, everything I want. And it has this positive organizing value around doing good. And so I was totally made for it. And pretty much immediately I did that fellowship, even though it was for undergrad. I did that fellowship, and I was immediately doing a lot of grad school organizing, and I did that for, like, six more years. And yeah, by the time I got to the end of grad school, I realized I was very sick in my fifth year, and I realized the stuff I kept doing was EA organizing, and I did not want to keep doing work. And that was pretty clear. I thought, oh, because I'm really into my academic area, I'll do that, but I'll also have a component of doing good. I took giving what we can in the middle of grad school, and I thought, I actually just enjoy doing this more, so why would I do anything else? Then after grad school, I started applying for EA jobs, and pretty soon I got a job at Rethink Priorities, and they suggested that I work on wild animal welfare. And I have to say, from the beginning, it was a little bit like I don't know, I'd always had very mixed feelings about wild animal welfare as a cause area. How much do they assume the audience knows about EA?AARONA lot, I guess. I think as of right now, it's a pretty hardcore dozen people. Also. Wait, what year is any of this approximately?HOLLYSo I graduated in 2020.AARONOkay.HOLLYYeah. And then I was like, really?AARONOkay, this is not extremely distant history. Sometimes people are like, oh, yeah, like the OG days, like four or something. I'm like, oh, my God.HOLLYOh, yeah, no, I wish I had been in these circles then, but no, it wasn't until like, 2014 that I really got inducted. Yeah, which now feels old because everybody's so young. But yeah, in 2020, I finished my PhD, and I got this awesome remote job at Rethink Priorities during the Pandemic, which was great, but I was working on wild animal welfare, which I'd always had some. So wild animal welfare, just for anyone who's not familiar, is like looking at the state of the natural world and seeing if there's a way that usually the hedonic so, like, feeling pleasure, not pain sort of welfare of animals can be maximized. So that's in contrast to a lot of other ways of looking at the natural world, like conservation, which are more about preserving a state of the world the way preserving, maybe ecosystem balance, something like that. Preserving species diversity. The priority with wild animal welfare is the effect of welfare, like how it feels to be the animals. So it is very understudied, but I had a lot of reservations about it because I'm nervous about maximizing our values too hard onto animals or imposing them on other species.AARONOkay, that's interesting, just because we're so far away from the margin of I'm like a very pro wild animal animal welfare pilled person.HOLLYI'm definitely pro in theory.AARONHow many other people it's like you and formerly you and six other people or whatever seems like we're quite far away from the margin at which we're over optimizing in terms of giving heroin to all the sheep or I don't know, the bugs and stuff.HOLLYBut it's true the field is moving in more my direction and I think it's just because they're hiring more biologists and we tend to think this way or have more of this perspective. But I'm a big fan of Brian domestics work. But stuff like finding out which species have the most capacity for welfare I think is already sort of the wrong scale. I think a lot will just depend on how much. What are the conditions for that species?AARONYeah, no, there's like seven from the.HOLLYCoarseness and the abstraction, but also there's a lot of you don't want anybody to actually do stuff like that and it would be more possible to do the more simple sounding stuff. My work there just was consisted of being a huge downer. I respect that. I did do some work that I'm proud of. I have a whole sequence on EA forum about how we could reduce the use of rodenticide, which I think was the single most promising intervention that we came up with in the time that I was there. I mean, I didn't come up with it, but that we narrowed down. And even that just doesn't affect that many animals directly. It's really more about the impact is from what you think you'll get with moral circle expansion or setting precedents for the treatment of non human animals or wild animals, or semi wild animals, maybe like being able to be expanded into wild animals. And so it all felt not quite up to EA standards of impact. And I felt kind of uncomfortable trying to make this thing happen in EA when I wasn't sure that my tentative conclusion on wild animal welfare, after working on it and thinking about it a lot for three years, was that we're sort of waiting for transformative technology that's not here yet in order to be able to do the kinds of interventions that we want. And there are going to be other issues with the transformative technology that we have to deal with first.AARONYeah, no, I've been thinking not that seriously or in any formal way, just like once in a while I just have a thought like oh, I wonder how the field of, like, I guess wild animal sorry, not wild animal. Just like animal welfare in general and including wild animal welfare might make use of AI above and beyond. I feel like there's like a simple take which is probably mostly true, which is like, oh, I mean the phrase that everybody loves to say is make AI go well or whatever that but that's basically true. Probably you make aligned AI. I know that's like a very oversimplification and then you can have a bunch of wealth or whatever to do whatever you want. I feel like that's kind of like the standard line, but do you have any takes on, I don't know, maybe in the next couple of years or anything more specifically beyond just general purpose AI alignment, for lack of a better term, how animal welfare might put to use transformative AI.HOLLYMy last work at Rethink Priorities was like looking a sort of zoomed out look at the field and where it should go. And so we're apparently going to do a public version, but I don't know if that's going to happen. It's been a while now since I was expecting to get a call about it. But yeah, I'm trying to think of what can I scrape from that?AARONAs much as you can, don't reveal any classified information. But what was the general thing that this was about?HOLLYThere are things that I think so I sort of broke it down into a couple of categories. There's like things that we could do in a world where we don't get AGI for a long time, but we get just transformative AI. Short of that, it's just able to do a lot of parallel tasks. And I think we could do a lot we could get a lot of what we want for wild animals by doing a ton of surveillance and having the ability to make incredibly precise changes to the ecosystem. Having surveillance so we know when something is like, and the capacity to do really intense simulation of the ecosystem and know what's going to happen as a result of little things. We could do that all without AGI. You could just do that with just a lot of computational power. I think our ability to simulate the environment right now is not the best, but it's not because it's impossible. It's just like we just need a lot more observations and a lot more ability to simulate a comparison is meteorology. Meteorology used to be much more of an art, but it became more of a science once they started just literally taking for every block of air and they're getting smaller and smaller, the blocks. They just do Bernoulli's Law on it and figure out what's going to happen in that block. And then you just sort of add it all together and you get actually pretty good.AARONDo you know how big the blocks are?HOLLYThey get smaller all the time. That's the resolution increase, but I don't know how big the blocks are okay right now. And shockingly, that just works. That gives you a lot of the picture of what's going to happen with weather. And I think that modeling ecosystem dynamics is very similar to weather. You could say more players than ecosystems, and I think we could, with enough surveillance, get a lot better at monitoring the ecosystem and then actually have more of a chance of implementing the kinds of sweeping interventions we want. But the price would be just like never ending surveillance and having to be the stewards of the environment if we weren't automating. Depending on how much you want to automate and depending on how much you can automate without AGI or without handing it over to another intelligence.AARONYeah, I've heard this. Maybe I haven't thought enough. And for some reason, I'm just, like, intuitively. I feel like I'm more skeptical of this kind of thing relative to the actual. There's a lot of things that I feel like a person might be skeptical about superhuman AI. And I'm less skeptical of that or less skeptical of things that sound as weird as this. Maybe because it's not. One thing I'm just concerned about is I feel like there's a larger scale I can imagine, just like the choice of how much, like, ecosystem is like yeah, how much ecosystem is available for wild animals is like a pretty macro level choice that might be not at all deterministic. So you could imagine spreading or terraforming other planets and things like that, or basically continuing to remove the amount of available ecosystem and also at a much more practical level, clean meat development. I have no idea what the technical bottlenecks on that are right now, but seems kind of possible that I don't know, AI can help it in some capacity.HOLLYOh, I thought you're going to say that it would increase the amount of space available for wild animals. Is this like a big controversy within, I don't know, this part of the EA animal movement? If you advocate diet change and if you get people to be vegetarians, does that just free up more land for wild animals to suffer on? I thought this was like, guys, we just will never do anything if we don't choose sort of like a zone of influence and accomplish something there. It seemed like this could go on forever. It was like, literally, I rethink actually. A lot of discussions would end in like, okay, so this seems like really good for all of our target populations, but what about wild animals? I could just reverse everything. I don't know. The thoughts I came to on that were that it is worthwhile to try to figure out what are all of the actual direct effects, but I don't think we should let that guide our decision making. Only you have to have some kind of theory of change, of what is the direct effect going to lead to? And I just think that it's so illegible what you're trying to do. If you're, like, you should eat this kind of fish to save animals. It doesn't lead society to adopt, to understand and adopt your values. It's so predicated on a moment in time that might be convenient. Maybe I'm not looking hard enough at that problem, but the conclusion I ended up coming to was just like, look, I just think we have to have some idea of not just the direct impacts, but something about the indirect impacts and what's likely to facilitate other direct impacts that we want in the future.AARONYeah. I also share your I don't know. I'm not sure if we share the same or I also feel conflicted about this kind of thing. Yeah. And I don't know, at the very least, I have a very high bar for saying, actually the worst of factory farming is like, we should just like, yeah, we should be okay with that, because some particular model says that at this moment in time, it has some net positive effect on animal welfare.HOLLYWhat morality is that really compatible with? I mean, I understand our morality, but maybe but pretty much anyone else who hears that conclusion is going to think that that means that the suffering doesn't matter or something.AARONYeah, I don't know. I think maybe more than you, I'm willing to bite the bullet if somebody really could convince me that, yeah, chicken farming is actually just, in fact, good, even though it's counterintuitive, I'll be like, all right, fine.HOLLYSurely there are other ways of occupying.AARONYeah.HOLLYSame with sometimes I would get from very classical wild animal suffering people, like, comments on my rodenticide work saying, like, well, what if it's good to have more rats? I don't know. There are surely other vehicles for utility other than ones that humans are bent on destroying.AARONYeah, it's kind of neither here nor there, but I don't actually know if this is causally important, but at least psychologically. I remember seeing a mouse in a glue trap was very had an impact on me from maybe turning me, like, animal welfare pills or something. That's like, neither here nor there. It's like a random anecdote, but yeah, seems bad. All right, what came after rethink for you?HOLLYYeah. Well, after the publication of the FLI Letter and Eliezer's article in Time, I was super inspired by pause. A number of emotional changes happened to me about AI safety. Nothing intellectual changed, but just I'd always been confused at and kind of taken it as a sign that people weren't really serious about AI risk when they would say things like, I don't know, the only option is alignment. The only option is for us to do cool, nerd stuff that we love doing nothing else would. I bought the arguments, but I just wasn't there emotionally. And seeing Eliezer advocate political change because he wants to save everyone's lives and he thinks that's something that we can do. Just kind of I'm sure I didn't want to face it before because it was upsetting. Not that I haven't faced a lot of upsetting and depressing things like I worked in wild animal welfare, for God's sake, but there was something that didn't quite add up for me, or I hadn't quite grocked about AI safety until seeing Eliezer really show that his concern is about everyone dying. And he's consistent with that. He's not caught on only one way of doing it, and it just kind of got in my head and I kept wanting to talk about it at work and it sort of became clear like they weren't going to pursue that sort of intervention. But I kept thinking of all these parallels between animal advocacy stuff that I knew and what could be done in AI safety. And these polls kept coming out showing that there was really high support for Paws and I just thought, this is such a huge opportunity, I really would love to help out. Originally I was looking around for who was going to be leading campaigns that I could volunteer in, and then eventually I thought, it just doesn't seem like somebody else is going to do this in the Bay Area. So I just ended up quitting rethink and being an independent organizer. And that has been really I mean, honestly, it's like a tough subject. It's like a lot to deal with, but honestly, compared to wild animal welfare, it's not that bad. And I think I'm pretty used to dealing with tough and depressing low tractability causes, but I actually think this is really tractable. I've been shocked how quickly things have moved and I sort of had this sense that, okay, people are reluctant in EA and AI safety in particular, they're not used to advocacy. They kind of vaguely think that that's bad politics is a mind killer and it's a little bit of a threat to the stuff they really love doing. Maybe that's not going to be so ascendant anymore and it's just stuff they're not familiar with. But I have the feeling that if somebody just keeps making this case that people will take to it, that I could push the Oberson window with NEA and that's gone really well.AARONYeah.HOLLYAnd then of course, the public is just like pretty down. It's great.AARONYeah. I feel like it's kind of weird because being in DC and I've always been, I feel like I actually used to be more into politics, to be clear. I understand or correct me if I'm wrong, but advocacy doesn't just mean in the political system or two politicians or whatever, but I assume that's like a part of what you're thinking about or not really.HOLLYYeah. Early on was considering working on more political process type advocacy and I think that's really important. I totally would have done it. I just thought that it was more neglected in our community to do advocacy to the public and a lot of people had entanglements that prevented them from doing so. They work sort of with AI labs or it's important to their work that they not declare against AI labs or something like that or be perceived that way. And so they didn't want to do public advocacy that could threaten what else they're doing. But I didn't have anything like that. I've been around for a long time in EA and I've been keeping up on AI safety, but I've never really worked. That's not true. I did a PiBBs fellowship, but.AARONI've.HOLLYNever worked for anybody in like I was just more free than a lot of other people to do the public messaging and so I kind of felt that I should. Yeah, I'm also more willing to get into conflict than other EA's and so that seems valuable, no?AARONYeah, I respect that. Respect that a lot. Yeah. So like one thing I feel like I've seen a lot of people on Twitter, for example. Well, not for example. That's really just it, I guess, talking about polls that come out saying like, oh yeah, the public is super enthusiastic about X, Y or Z, I feel like these are almost meaningless and maybe you can convince me otherwise. It's not exactly to be clear, I'm not saying that. I guess it could always be worse, right? All things considered, like a poll showing X thing is being supported is better than the opposite result, but you can really get people to say anything. Maybe I'm just wondering about the degree to which the public how do you imagine the public and I'm doing air quotes to playing into policies either of, I guess, industry actors or government actors?HOLLYWell, this is something actually that I also felt that a lot of EA's were unfamiliar with. But it does matter to our representatives, like what the constituents think it matters a mean if you talk to somebody who's ever interned in a congressperson's office, one person calling and writing letters for something can have actually depending on how contested a policy is, can have a largeish impact. My ex husband was an intern for Jim Cooper and they had this whole system for scoring when calls came in versus letters. Was it a handwritten letter, a typed letter? All of those things went into how many points it got and that was something they really cared about. Politicians do pay attention to opinion polls and they pay attention to what their vocal constituents want and they pay attention to not going against what is the norm opinion. Even if nobody in particular is pushing them on it or seems to feel strongly about it. They really are trying to calibrate themselves to what is the norm. So those are always also sometimes politicians just get directly convinced by arguments of what a policy should be. So yeah, public opinion is, I think, underappreciated by ya's because it doesn't feel like mechanistic. They're looking more for what's this weird policy hack that's going to solve what's? This super clever policy that's going to solve things rather than just like what's acceptable discourse, like how far out of his comfort zone does this politician have to go to advocate for this thing? How unpopular is it going to be to say stuff that's against this thing that now has a lot of public support?AARONYeah, I guess mainly I'm like I guess I'm also I definitely could be wrong with this, but I would expect that a lot of the yeah, like for like when politicians like, get or congresspeople like, get letters and emails or whatever on a particular especially when it's relevant to a particular bill. And it's like, okay, this bill has already been filtered for the fact that it's going to get some yes votes and some no votes and it's close to or something like that. Hearing from an interested constituency is really, I don't know, I guess interesting evidence. On the other hand, I don't know, you can kind of just get Americans to say a lot of different things that I think are basically not extremely unlikely to be enacted into laws. You know what I mean? I don't know. You can just look at opinion. Sorry. No great example comes to mind right now. But I don't know, if you ask the public, should we do more safety research into, I don't know, anything. If it sounds good, then people will say yes, or am I mistaken about this?HOLLYI mean, on these polls, usually they ask the other way around as well. Do you think AI is really promising for its benefits and should be accelerated? They answer consistently. It's not just like, well now that sounds positive. Okay. I mean, a well done poll will correct for these things. Yeah. I've encountered a lot of skepticism about the polls. Most of the polls on this have been done by YouGov, which is pretty reputable. And then the ones that were replicated by rethink priorities, they found very consistent results and I very much trust Rethink priorities on polls. Yeah. I've had people say, well, these framings are I don't know, they object and wonder if it's like getting at the person's true beliefs. And I kind of think like, I don't know, basically this is like the kind of advocacy message that I would give and people are really receptive to it. So to me that's really promising. Whether or not if you educated them a lot more about the topic, they would think the same is I don't think the question but that's sometimes an objection that I get. Yeah, I think they're indicative. And then I also think politicians just care directly about these things. If they're able to cite that most of the public agrees with this policy, that sort of gives them a lot of what they want, regardless of whether there's some qualification to does the public really think this or are they thinking hard enough about it? And then polls are always newsworthy. Weirdly. Just any poll can be a news story and journalists love them and so it's a great chance to get exposure for the whatever thing. And politicians do care what's in the news. Actually, I think we just have more influence over the political process than EA's and less wrongers tend to believe it's true. I think a lot of people got burned in AI safety, like in the previous 20 years because it would be dismissed. It just wasn't in the overton window. But I think we have a lot of power now. Weirdly. People care what effective altruists think. People see us as having real expertise. The AI safety community does know the most about this. It's pretty wild now that's being recognized publicly and journalists and the people who influence politicians, not directly the people, but the Fourth Estate type, people pay attention to this and they influence policy. And there's many levels of I wrote if people want a more detailed explanation of this, but still high level and accessible, I hope I wrote a thing on EA forum called The Case for AI Safety Advocacy. And that kind of goes over this concept of outside versus inside game. So inside game is like working within a system to change it. Outside game is like working outside the system to put pressure on that system to change it. And I think there's many small versions of this. I think that it's helpful within EA and AI safety to be pushing the overton window of what I think that people have a wrong understanding of how hard it is to communicate this topic and how hard it is to influence governments. I want it to be more acceptable. I want it to feel more possible in EA and AI safety to go this route. And then there's the public public level of trying to make them more familiar with the issue, frame it in the way that I want, which is know, with Sam Altman's tour, the issue kind of got framed as like, well, AI is going to get built, but how are we going to do it safely? And then I would like to take that a step back and be like, should AI be built or should AGI be just if we tried, we could just not do that, or we could at least reduce the speed. And so, yeah, I want people to be exposed to that frame. I want people to not be taken in by other frames that don't include the full gamut of options. I think that's very possible. And then there's a lot of this is more of the classic thing that's been going on in AI safety for the last ten years is trying to influence AI development to be more safety conscious. And that's like another kind of dynamic. There, like trying to change sort of the general flavor, like, what's acceptable? Do we have to care about safety? What is safety? That's also kind of a window pushing exercise.AARONYeah. Cool. Luckily, okay, this is not actually directly responding to anything you just said, which is luck. So I pulled up this post. So I should have read that. Luckily, I did read the case for slowing down. It was like some other popular post as part of the, like, governance fundamentals series. I think this is by somebody, Zach wait, what was it called? Wait.HOLLYIs it by Zach or.AARONKatya, I think yeah, let's think about slowing down AI. That one. So that is fresh in my mind, but yours is not yet. So what's the plan? Do you have a plan? You don't have to have a plan. I don't have plans very much.HOLLYWell, right now I'm hopeful about the UK AI summit. Pause AI and I have planned a multi city protest on the 21 October to encourage the UK AI Safety Summit to focus on safety first and to have as a topic arranging a pause or that of negotiation. There's a lot of a little bit upsetting advertising for that thing that's like, we need to keep up capabilities too. And I just think that's really a secondary objective. And that's how I wanted to be focused on safety. So I'm hopeful about the level of global coordination that we're already seeing. It's going so much faster than we thought. Already the UN Secretary General has been talking about this and there have been meetings about this. It's happened so much faster at the beginning of this year. Nobody thought we could talk about nobody was thinking we'd be talking about this as a mainstream topic. And then actually governments have been very receptive anyway. So right now I'm focused on other than just influencing opinion, the targets I'm focused on, or things like encouraging these international like, I have a protest on Friday, my first protest that I'm leading and kind of nervous that's against Meta. It's at the Meta building in San Francisco about their sharing of model weights. They call it open source. It's like not exactly open source, but I'm probably not going to repeat that message because it's pretty complicated to explain. I really love the pause message because it's just so hard to misinterpret and it conveys pretty clearly what we want very quickly. And you don't have a lot of bandwidth and advocacy. You write a lot of materials for a protest, but mostly what people see is the title.AARONThat's interesting because I sort of have the opposite sense. I agree that in terms of how many informational bits you're conveying in a particular phrase, pause AI is simpler, but in some sense it's not nearly as obvious. At least maybe I'm more of a tech brain person or whatever. But why that is good, as opposed to don't give extremely powerful thing to the worst people in the world. That's like a longer everyone.HOLLYMaybe I'm just weird. I've gotten the feedback from open source ML people is the number one thing is like, it's too late, there's already super powerful models. There's nothing you can do to stop us, which sounds so villainous, I don't know if that's what they mean. Well, actually the number one message is you're stupid, you're not an ML engineer. Which like, okay, number two is like, it's too late, there's nothing you can do. There's all of these other and Meta is not even the most powerful generator of models that it share of open source models. I was like, okay, fine. And I don't know, I don't think that protesting too much is really the best in these situations. I just mostly kind of let that lie. I could give my theory of change on this and why I'm focusing on Meta. Meta is a large company I'm hoping to have influence on. There is a Meta building in San Francisco near where yeah, Meta is the biggest company that is doing this and I think there should be a norm against model weight sharing. I was hoping it would be something that other employees of other labs would be comfortable attending and that is a policy that is not shared across the labs. Obviously the biggest labs don't do it. So OpenAI is called OpenAI but very quickly decided not to do that. Yeah, I kind of wanted to start in a way that made it more clear than pause AI. Does that anybody's welcome something? I thought a one off issue like this that a lot of people could agree and form a coalition around would be good. A lot of people think that this is like a lot of the open source ML people think know this is like a secret. What I'm saying is secretly an argument for tyranny. I just want centralization of power. I just think that there are elites that are better qualified to run everything. It was even suggested I didn't mention China. It even suggested that I was racist because I didn't think that foreign people could make better AIS than Meta.AARONI'm grimacing here. The intellectual disagreeableness, if that's an appropriate term or something like that. Good on you for standing up to some pretty bad arguments.HOLLYYeah, it's not like that worth it. I'm lucky that I truly am curious about what people think about stuff like that. I just find it really interesting. I spent way too much time understanding the alt. Right. For instance, I'm kind of like sure I'm on list somewhere because of the forums I was on just because I was interested and it is something that serves me well with my adversaries. I've enjoyed some conversations with people where I kind of like because my position on all this is that look, I need to be convinced and the public needs to be convinced that this is safe before we go ahead. So I kind of like not having to be the smart person making the arguments. I kind of like being like, can you explain like I'm five. I still don't get it. How does this work?AARONYeah, no, I was thinking actually not long ago about open source. Like the phrase has such a positive connotation and in a lot of contexts it really is good. I don't know. I'm glad that random tech I don't know, things from 2004 or whatever, like the reddit source code is like all right, seems cool that it's open source. I don't actually know if that was how that right. But yeah, I feel like maybe even just breaking down what the positive connotation comes from and why it's in people's self. This is really what I was thinking about, is like, why is it in people's self interest to open source things that they made and that might break apart the allure or sort of ethical halo that it has around it? And I was thinking it probably has something to do with, oh, this is like how if you're a tech person who makes some cool product, you could try to put a gate around it by keeping it closed source and maybe trying to get intellectual property or something. But probably you're extremely talented already, or pretty wealthy. Definitely can be hired in the future. And if you're not wealthy yet I don't mean to put things in just materialist terms, but basically it could easily be just like in a yeah, I think I'll probably take that bit out because I didn't mean to put it in strictly like monetary terms, but basically it just seems like pretty plausibly in an arbitrary tech person's self interest, broadly construed to, in fact, open source their thing, which is totally fine and normal.HOLLYI think that's like 99 it's like a way of showing magnanimity showing, but.AARONI don't make this sound so like, I think 99.9% of human behavior is like this. I'm not saying it's like, oh, it's some secret, terrible self interested thing, but just making it more mechanistic. Okay, it's like it's like a status thing. It's like an advertising thing. It's like, okay, you're not really in need of direct economic rewards, or sort of makes sense to play the long game in some sense, and this is totally normal and fine, but at the end of the day, there's reasons why it makes sense, why it's in people's self interest to open source.HOLLYLiterally, the culture of open source has been able to bully people into, like, oh, it's immoral to keep it for yourself. You have to release those. So it's just, like, set the norms in a lot of ways, I'm not the bully. Sounds bad, but I mean, it's just like there is a lot of pressure. It looks bad if something is closed source.AARONYeah, it's kind of weird that Meta I don't know, does Meta really think it's in their I don't know. Most economic take on this would be like, oh, they somehow think it's in their shareholders interest to open source.HOLLYThere are a lot of speculations on why they're doing this. One is that? Yeah, their models aren't as good as the top labs, but if it's open source, then open source quote, unquote then people will integrate it llama Two into their apps. Or People Will Use It And Become I don't know, it's a little weird because I don't know why using llama Two commits you to using llama Three or something, but it just ways for their models to get in in places where if you just had to pay for their models too, people would go for better ones. That's one thing. Another is, yeah, I guess these are too speculative. I don't want to be seen repeating them since I'm about to do this purchase. But there's speculation that it's in best interests in various ways to do this. I think it's possible also that just like so what happened with the release of Llama One is they were going to allow approved people to download the weights, but then within four days somebody had leaked Llama One on four chan and then they just were like, well, whatever, we'll just release the weights. And then they released Llama Two with the weights from the beginning. And it's not like 100% clear that they intended to do full open source or what they call Open source. And I keep saying it's not open source because this is like a little bit of a tricky point to make. So I'm not emphasizing it too much. So they say that they're open source, but they're not. The algorithms are not open source. There are open source ML models that have everything open sourced and I don't think that that's good. I think that's worse. So I don't want to criticize them for that. But they're saying it's open source because there's all this goodwill associated with open source. But actually what they're doing is releasing the product for free or like trade secrets even you could say like things that should be trade secrets. And yeah, they're telling people how to make it themselves. So it's like a little bit of a they're intentionally using this label that has a lot of positive connotations but probably according to Open Source Initiative, which makes the open Source license, it should be called something else or there should just be like a new category for LLMs being but I don't want things to be more open. It could easily sound like a rebuke that it should be more open to make that point. But I also don't want to call it Open source because I think Open source software should probably does deserve a lot of its positive connotation, but they're not releasing the part, that the software part because that would cut into their business. I think it would be much worse. I think they shouldn't do it. But I also am not clear on this because the Open Source ML critics say that everyone does have access to the same data set as Llama Two. But I don't know. Llama Two had 7 billion tokens and that's more than GPT Four. And I don't understand all of the details here. It's possible that the tokenization process was different or something and that's why there were more. But Meta didn't say what was in the longitude data set and usually there's some description given of what's in the data set that led some people to speculate that maybe they're using private data. They do have access to a lot of private data that shouldn't be. It's not just like the common crawl backup of the Internet. Everybody's basing their training on that and then maybe some works of literature they're not supposed to. There's like a data set there that is in question, but metas is bigger than bigger than I think well, sorry, I don't have a list in front of me. I'm not going to get stuff wrong, but it's bigger than kind of similar models and I thought that they have access to extra stuff that's not public. And it seems like people are asking if maybe that's part of the training set. But yeah, the ML people would have or the open source ML people that I've been talking to would have believed that anybody who's decent can just access all of the training sets that they've all used.AARONAside, I tried to download in case I'm guessing, I don't know, it depends how many people listen to this. But in one sense, for a competent ML engineer, I'm sure open source really does mean that. But then there's people like me. I don't know. I knew a little bit of R, I think. I feel like I caught on the very last boat where I could know just barely enough programming to try to learn more, I guess. Coming out of college, I don't know, a couple of months ago, I tried to do the thing where you download Llama too, but I tried it all and now I just have like it didn't work. I have like a bunch of empty folders and I forget got some error message or whatever. Then I tried to train my own tried to train my own model on my MacBook. It just printed. That's like the only thing that a language model would do because that was like the most common token in the training set. So anyway, I'm just like, sorry, this is not important whatsoever.HOLLYYeah, I feel like torn about this because I used to be a genomicist and I used to do computational biology and it was not machine learning, but I used a highly parallel GPU cluster. And so I know some stuff about it and part of me wants to mess around with it, but part of me feels like I shouldn't get seduced by this. I am kind of worried that this has happened in the AI safety community. It's always been people who are interested in from the beginning, it was people who are interested in singularity and then realized there was this problem. And so it's always been like people really interested in tech and wanting to be close to it. And I think we've been really influenced by our direction, has been really influenced by wanting to be where the action is with AI development. And I don't know that that was right.AARONNot personal, but I guess individual level I'm not super worried about people like you and me losing the plot by learning more about ML on their personal.HOLLYYou know what I mean? But it does just feel sort of like I guess, yeah, this is maybe more of like a confession than, like a point. But it does feel a little bit like it's hard for me to enjoy in good conscience, like, the cool stuff.AARONOkay. Yeah.HOLLYI just see people be so attached to this as their identity. They really don't want to go in a direction of not pursuing tech because this is kind of their whole thing. And what would they do if we weren't working toward AI? This is a big fear that people express to me with they don't say it in so many words usually, but they say things like, well, I don't want AI to never get built about a pause. Which, by the way, just to clear up, my assumption is that a pause would be unless society ends for some other reason, that a pause would eventually be lifted. It couldn't be forever. But some people are worried that if you stop the momentum now, people are just so luddite in their insides that we would just never pick it up again. Or something like that. And, yeah, there's some identity stuff that's been expressed. Again, not in so many words to me about who will we be if we're just sort of like activists instead of working on.AARONMaybe one thing that we might actually disagree on. It's kind of important is whether so I think we both agree that Aipause is better than the status quo, at least broadly, whatever. I know that can mean different things, but yeah, maybe I'm not super convinced, actually, that if I could just, like what am I trying to say? Maybe at least right now, if I could just imagine the world where open eye and Anthropic had a couple more years to do stuff and nobody else did, that would be better. I kind of think that they are reasonably responsible actors. And so I don't know. I don't think that actually that's not an actual possibility. But, like, maybe, like, we have a different idea about, like, the degree to which, like, a problem is just, like, a million different not even a million, but, say, like, a thousand different actors, like, having increasingly powerful models versus, like, the actual, like like the actual, like, state of the art right now, being plausibly near a dangerous threshold or something. Does this make any sense to you?HOLLYBoth those things are yeah, and this is one thing I really like about the pause position is that unlike a lot of proposals that try to allow for alignment, it's not really close to a bad choice. It's just more safe. I mean, it might be foregoing some value if there is a way to get an aligned AI faster. But, yeah, I like the pause position because it's kind of robust to this. I can't claim to know more about alignment than OpenAI or anthropic staff. I think they know much more about it. But I have fundamental doubts about the concept of alignment that make me think I'm concerned about even if things go right, like, what perverse consequences go nominally right, like, what perverse consequences could follow from that. I have, I don't know, like a theory of psychology that's, like, not super compatible with alignment. Like, I think, like yeah, like humans in living in society together are aligned with each other, but the society is a big part of that. The people you're closest to are also my background in evolutionary biology has a lot to do with genetic conflict.AARONWhat is that?HOLLYGenetic conflict is so interesting. Okay, this is like the most fascinating topic in biology, but it's like, essentially that in a sexual species, you're related to your close family, you're related to your ken, but you're not the same as them. You have different interests. And mothers and fathers of the same children have largely overlapping interests, but they have slightly different interests in what happens with those children. The payoff to mom is different than the payoff to dad per child. One of the classic genetic conflict arenas and one that my advisor worked on was my advisor was David Haig, was pregnancy. So mom and dad both want an offspring that's healthy. But mom is thinking about all of her offspring into the future. When she thinks about how much.AARONWhen.HOLLYMom is giving resources to one baby, that is in some sense depleting her ability to have future children. But for dad, unless the species is.AARONPerfect, might be another father in the future.HOLLYYeah, it's in his interest to take a little more. And it's really interesting. Like the tissues that the placenta is an androgenetic tissue. This is all kind of complicated. I'm trying to gloss over some details, but it's like guided more by genes that are active in when they come from the father, which there's this thing called genomic imprinting that first, and then there's this back and forth. There's like this evolution between it's going to serve alleles that came from dad imprinted, from dad to ask for more nutrients, even if that's not good for the mother and not what the mother wants. So the mother's going to respond. And you can see sometimes alleles are pretty mismatched and you get like, mom's alleles want a pretty big baby and a small placenta. So sometimes you'll see that and then dad's alleles want a big placenta and like, a smaller baby. These are so cool, but they're so hellishly complicated to talk about because it involves a bunch of genetic concepts that nobody talks about for any other reason.AARONI'm happy to talk about that. Maybe part of that dips below or into the weeds threshold, which I've kind of lost it, but I'm super interested in this stuff.HOLLYYeah, anyway, so the basic idea is just that even the people that you're closest with and cooperate with the most, they tend to be clearly this is predicated on our genetic system. There's other and even though ML sort of evolves similarly to natural selection through gradient descent, it doesn't have the same there's no recombination, there's not genes, so there's a lot of dis analogies there. But the idea that being aligned to our psychology would just be like one thing. Our psychology is pretty conditional. I would agree that it could be one thing if we had a VNM utility function and you could give it to AGI, I would think, yes, that captures it. But even then, that utility function, it covers when you're in conflict with someone, it covers different scenarios. And so I just am like not when people say alignment. I think what they're imagining is like an omniscient. God, who knows what would be best? And that is different than what I think could be meant by just aligning values.AARONNo, I broadly very much agree, although I do think at least this is my perception, is that based on the right 95 to 2010 Miri corpus or whatever, alignment was like alignment meant something that was kind of not actually possible in the way that you're saying. But now that we have it seems like actually humans have been able to get ML models to understand basically human language pretty shockingly. Well, and so actually, just the concern about maybe I'm sort of losing my train of thought a little bit, but I guess maybe alignment and misalignment aren't as binary as they were initially foreseen to be or something. You can still get a language model, for example, that tries to well, I guess there's different types of misleading but be deceptive or tamper with its reward function or whatever. Or you can get one that's sort of like earnestly trying to do the thing that its user wants. And that's not an incoherent concept anymore.HOLLYNo, it's not. Yeah, so yes, there is like, I guess the point of bringing up the VNM utility function was that there was sort of in the past a way that you could mathematically I don't know, of course utility functions are still real, but that's not what we're thinking anymore. We're thinking more like training and getting the gist of what and then getting corrections when you're not doing the right thing according to our values. But yeah, sorry. So the last piece I should have said originally was that I think with humans we're already substantially unaligned, but a lot of how we work together is that we have roughly similar capabilities. And if the idea of making AGI is to have much greater capabilities than we have, that's the whole point. I just think when you scale up like that, the divisions in your psyche or are just going to be magnified as well. And this is like an informal view that I've been developing for a long time, but just that it's actually the low capabilities that allows alignment or similar capabilities that makes alignment possible. And then there are, of course, mathematical structures that could be aligned at different capabilities. So I guess I have more hope if you could find the utility function that would describe this. But if it's just a matter of acting in distribution, when you increase your capabilities, you're going to go out of distribution or you're going to go in different contexts, and then the magnitude of mismatch is going to be huge. I wish I had a more formal way of describing this, but that's like my fundamental skepticism right now that makes me just not want anyone to build it. I think that you could have very sophisticated ideas about alignment, but then still just with not when you increase capabilities enough, any little chink is going to be magnified and it could be yeah.AARONSeems largely right, I guess. You clearly have a better mechanistic understanding of ML.HOLLYI don't know. My PiBBs project was to compare natural selection and gradient descent and then compare gradient hacking to miotic drive, which is the most analogous biological this is a very cool thing, too. Meatic drive. So Meiosis, I'll start with that for everyone.AARONThat's one of the cell things.HOLLYYes. Right. So Mitosis is the one where cells just divide in your body to make more skin. But Meiosis is the special one where you go through two divisions to make gametes. So you go from like we normally have two sets of chromosomes in each cell, but the gametes, they recombine between the chromosomes. You get different combinations with new chromosomes and then they divide again to bring them down to one copy each. And then like that, those are your gametes. And the gametes eggs come together with sperm to make a zygote and the cycle goes on. But during Meiosis, the point of it is to I mean, I'm going to just assert some things that are not universally accepted, but I think this is by far the best explanation. But the point of it is to take this like, you have this huge collection of genes that might have individually different interests, and you recombine them so that they don't know which genes they're going to be with in the next generation. They know which genes they're going to be with, but which allele of those genes. So I'm going to maybe simplify some terminology because otherwise, what's to stop a bunch of genes from getting together and saying, like, hey, if we just hack the Meiosis system or like the division system to get into the gametes, we can get into the gametes at a higher rate than 50%. And it doesn't matter. We don't have to contribute to making this body. We can just work on that.AARONWhat is to stop that?HOLLYYeah, well, Meiosis is to stop that. Meiosis is like a government system for the genes. It makes it so that they can't plan to be with a little cabal in the next generation because they have some chance of getting separated. And so their best chance is to just focus on making a good organism. But you do see lots of examples in nature of where that cooperation is breaking down. So some group of genes has found an exploit and it is fucking up the species. Species do go extinct because of this. It's hard to witness this happening. But there are several species. There's this species of cedar that has a form of this which is, I think, maternal genome. It's maternal genome elimination. So when the zygote comes together, the maternal chromosomes are just thrown away and it's like terrible because that affects the way that the thing works and grows, that it's put them in a death spiral and they're probably going to be extinct. And they're trees, so they live a long time, but they're probably going to be extinct in the next century. There's lots of ways to hack meiosis to get temporary benefit for genes. This, by the way, I just think is like nail in the coffin. Obviously, gene centered view is the best evolutionarily. What is the best the gene centered view of evolution.AARONAs opposed to sort of standard, I guess, high school college thing would just be like organisms.HOLLYYeah, would be individuals. Not that there's not an accurate way to talk in terms of individuals or even in terms of groups, but to me, conceptually.AARONThey'Re all legit in some sense. Yeah, you could talk about any of them. Did anybody take like a quirk level? Probably not. That whatever comes below the level of a gene, like an individual.HOLLYWell, there is argument about what is a gene because there's multiple concepts of genes. You could look at what's the part that makes a protein or you can look at what is the unit that tends to stay together in recombination or something like over time.AARONI'm sorry, I feel like I cut you off. It's something interesting. There was meiosis.HOLLYMeiotic drive is like the process of hacking meiosis so that a handful of genes can be more represented in the next generation. So otherwise the only way to get more represented in the next generation is to just make a better organism, like to be naturally selected. But you can just cheat and be like, well, if I'm in 90% of the sperm, I will be next in the next generation. And essentially meiosis has to work for natural selection to work in large organisms with a large genome and then yeah, ingredient descent. We thought the analogy was going to be with gradient hacking, that there would possibly be some analogy. But I think that the recombination thing is really the key in Meadic Drive. And then there's really nothing like that in.AARONThere'S. No selection per se. I don't know, maybe that doesn't. Make a whole lot of sense.HOLLYWell, I mean, in gradient, there's no.AARONG in analog, right?HOLLYThere's no gene analog. Yeah, but there is, like I mean, it's a hill climbing algorithm, like natural selection. So this is especially, I think, easy to see if you're familiar with adaptive landscapes, which looks very similar to I mean, if you look at a schematic or like a model of an illustration of gradient descent, it looks very similar to adaptive landscapes. They're both, like, in dimensional spaces, and you're looking at vectors at any given point. So the adaptive landscape concept that's usually taught for evolution is, like, on one axis you have fitness, and on the other axis you have well, you can have a lot of things, but you have and you have fitness of a population, and then you have fitness on the other axis. And what it tells you is the shape of the curve there tells you which direction evolution is going to push or natural selection is going to push each generation. And so with gradient descent, there's, like, finding the gradient to get to the lowest value of the cost function, to get to a local minimum at every step. And you follow that. And so that part is very similar to natural selection, but the Miosis hacking just has a different mechanism than gradient hacking would. Gradient hacking probably has to be more about I kind of thought that there was a way for this to work. If fine tuning creates a different compartment that doesn't there's not full backpropagation, so there's like kind of two different compartments in the layers or something. But I don't know if that's right. My collaborator doesn't seem to think that that's very interesting. I don't know if they don't even.AARONKnow what backup that's like a term I've heard like a billion times.HOLLYIt's updating all the weights and all the layers based on that iteration.AARONAll right. I mean, I can hear those words. I'll have to look it up later.HOLLYYou don't have to full I think there are probably things I'm not understanding about the ML process very well, but I had thought that it was something like yeah, like in yeah, sorry, it's probably too tenuous. But anyway, yeah, I've been working on this a little bit for the last year, but I'm not super sharp on my arguments about that.AARONWell, I wouldn't notice. You can kind of say whatever, and I'll nod along.HOLLYI got to guard my reputation off the cuff anymore.AARONWe'll edit it so you're correct no matter what.HOLLYHave you ever edited the Oohs and UMS out of a podcast and just been like, wow, I sound so smart? Like, even after you heard yourself the first time, you do the editing yourself, but then you listen to it and you're like, who is this person? Looks so smart.AARONI haven't, but actually, the 80,000 Hours After hours podcast, the first episode of theirs, I interviewed Rob and his producer Kieran Harris, and that they have actual professional sound editing. And so, yeah, I went from totally incoherent, not totally incoherent, but sarcastically totally incoherent to sounding like a normal person. Because of that.HOLLYI used to use it to take my laughter out of I did a podcast when I was an organizer at Harvard. Like, I did the Harvard Effective Alchruism podcast, and I laughed a lot more than I did now than I do now, which is kind of like and we even got comments about it. We got very few comments, but they were like, girl hosts laughs too much. But when I take my laughter out, I would do it myself. I was like, wow, this does sound suddenly, like, so much more serious.AARONYeah, I don't know. Yeah, I definitely say like and too much. So maybe I will try to actually.HOLLYRealistically, that sounds like so much effort, it's not really worth it. And nobody else really notices. But I go through periods where I say like, a lot, and when I hear myself back in interviews, that really bugs me.AARONYeah.HOLLYGod, it sounds so stupid.AARONNo. Well, I'm definitely worse. Yeah. I'm sure there'll be a way to automate this. Well, not sure, but probably not too distant.HOLLYFuture people were sending around, like, transcripts of Trump to underscore how incoherent he is. I'm like, I sound like that sometimes.AARONOh, yeah, same. I didn't actually realize that this is especially bad. When I get this transcribed, I don't know how people this is a good example. Like the last 10 seconds, if I get it transcribed, it'll make no sense whatsoever. But there's like a free service called AssemblyAI Playground where it does free drAARONased transcription and that makes sense. But if we just get this transcribed without identifying who's speaking, it'll be even worse than that. Yeah, actually this is like a totally random thought, but I actually spent not zero amount of effort trying to figure out how to combine the highest quality transcription, like whisper, with the slightly less goodAARONased transcriptions. You could get the speaker you could infer who's speaking based on the lower quality one, but then replace incorrect words with correct words. And I never I don't know, I'm.HOLLYSure somebody that'd be nice. I would do transcripts if it were that easy, but I just never have but it is annoying because I do like to give people the chance to veto certain segments and that can get tough because even if I talk you.AARONHave podcasts that I don't know about.HOLLYWell, I used to have the Harvard one, which is called the turning test. And then yeah, I do have I.AARONProbably listened to that and didn't know it was you.HOLLYOkay, maybe Alish was the other host.AARONI mean, it's been a little while since yeah.HOLLYAnd then on my I like, publish audio stuff sometimes, but it's called low effort. To underscore.AARONOh, yeah, I didn't actually. Okay. Great minds think alike. Low effort podcasts are the future. In fact, this is super intelligent.HOLLYI just have them as a way to catch up with friends and stuff and talk about their lives in a way that might recorded conversations are just better. You're more on and you get to talk about stuff that's interesting but feels too like, well, you already know this if you're not recording it.AARONOkay, well, I feel like there's a lot of people that I interact with casually that I don't actually they have these rich online profiles and somehow I don't know about it or something. I mean, I could know about it, but I just never clicked their substack link for some reason. So I will be listening to your casual.HOLLYActually, in the 15 minutes you gave us when we pushed back the podcast, I found something like a practice talk I had given and put it on it. So that's audio that I just cool. But that's for paid subscribers. I like to give them a little something.AARONNo, I saw that. I did two minutes of research or whatever. Cool.HOLLYYeah. It's a little weird. I've always had that blog as very low effort, just whenever I feel like it. And that's why it's lasted so long. But I did start doing paid and I do feel like more responsibility to the paid subscribers now.AARONYeah. Kind of the reason that I started this is because whenever I feel so much I don't know, it's very hard for me to write a low effort blog post. Even the lowest effort one still takes at the end of the day, it's like several hours. Oh, I'm going to bang it out in half an hour and no matter what, my brain doesn't let me do that.HOLLYThat usually takes 4 hours. Yeah, I have like a four hour and an eight hour.AARONWow. I feel like some people apparently Scott Alexander said that. Oh, yeah. He just writes as fast as he talks and he just clicks send or whatever. It's like, oh, if I could do.HOLLYThat, I would have written in those paragraphs. It's crazy. Yeah, you see that when you see him in person. I've never met him, I've never talked to him, but I've been to meetups where he was and I'm at this conference or not there right now this week that he's supposed to be at.AARONOh, manifest.HOLLYYeah.AARONNice. Okay.HOLLYCool Lighthaven. They're now calling. It looks amazing. Rose Garden. And no.AARONI like, vaguely noticed. Think I've been to Berkeley, I think twice. Right? Definitely. This is weird. Definitely once.HOLLYBerkeley is awesome. Yeah.AARONI feel like sort of decided consciously not to try to, or maybe not decided forever, but had a period of time where I was like, oh, I should move there, or we'll move there. But then I was like I think being around other EA's in high and rational high concentration activates my status brain or something. It is very less personally bad. And DC is kind of sus that I was born here and also went to college here and maybe is also a good place to live. But I feel like maybe it's actually just true.HOLLYI think it's true. I mean, I always like the DCAS. I think they're very sane.AARONI think both clusters should be more like the other one a little bit.HOLLYI think so. I love Berkeley and I think I'm really enjoying it because I'm older than you. I think if you have your own personality before coming to Berkeley, that's great, but you can easily get swept. It's like Disneyland for all the people I knew on the internet, there's a physical version of them here and you can just walk it's all in walking distance. That's all pretty cool. Especially during the pandemic. I was not around almost any friends and now I see friends every day and I get to do cool stuff. And the culture is som

Becoming an Australian citizen is an exciting and rewarding experience for many migrants. But to achieve citizenship, you must first pass the Australian citizenship test. It measures your knowledge of Australia's history, culture, values, and political system.  - Bûyîna hemwelatiya Australî ji bo gelek koçberan ezmûneke balkêş û bikêrhatî ye. Lê ji bo bidestxistina hemwelatiyê, divê hûn pêşî têsta hemwelatiya Austuralî derbas bikin. Ew zanîna we ya dîrok, çand, nirx û sîstêma siyasî ya Australya dipîve.

- Radyoya Swêdê bea kurdî

'Ieder mens heeft het recht op geluk.' Dat ongelijkheid diep in elke samenleving geworteld zit ondervind Amade M'charek, hoogleraar antropologie van de wetenschap, al op jonge leeftijd. Haar leraar op de Haarlemse basisschool geeft haar een huishoudschool advies. De leraar wil haar voorbereiden op een vroom leven als huisvrouw die haar man dient, zoals de islam dat voorschrijft. Maar Amade wil dokter worden! Vooroordelen en onwetendheid zijn vaak de oorzaak van een hoop ellende in de maatschappij, zo ondervindt M'charek als ze onderzoek doet naar de begrippen ras en identiteit. Op dit moment onderzoekt ze de gevolgen van de migratiecrisis in de Tunesische stad Zarzis waar ze in haar vroege jeugd woonde. Ze pleit voor een radicaal andere benadering van migratie. Het is geen crisis maar een chronisch probleem waarin de koloniale verhoudingen van weleer nog altijd doorklinken. Sophie Derkzen in gesprek met Amade M'charek in dit drie uur durend marathoninterview, over ongelijkheid, ras, identiteit en migratie. - Uur 2: (0:50:24) - Uur 3: (1:40:38)

The Australian Kurdish Society was launched in February, 2023. The aim of establishing another kurdish organisation is to bring the community closer together. Nader Gariban is the president of the Society, he speaks to us about organising a function on Sunday June 11 for the community to have some fun with music and dancing. - Civata Kurdên Australya di Şibata 2023 de hat damezrandin. Armanca damezrandina rêxistineke din ya kurdî ew e ku civakê nêzîkî hev bike. Nadir Gariban serokê Komeleyê ye, ew ji me re li ser amadekariyên yekem aheng diaxafe ku roja Yekşemê 11 Hezîranê bi muzîk û dîlan ê bi rêve biçe.

Ayudamos a emprendedores de HOSTELERÍA y MODA a CATAPULTAR sus empresas. ¿Cómo lo hacemos? A través de nuestros másteres en colaboración con los empresarios y directivos más exitosos del sector, y a través de nuestro podcast, Talent Talks: MÁSTER DE EMPRENDIMIENTO Y GESTIÓN EN HOSTELERÍA, impartido por fundadores y directivos de compañías como Goiko, VICIO, VIPS, Ginos, Burger King, Starbucks, Grupo Larrumba, Domino's Pizza, Grupo Lalala, Lizarrán, Pomodoro, Grosso Napoletano, Fitzgerald Burger Company, Foster's Hollywood, Glovo, Levaduramadre, Foodbox, LaMafia, Manolo Bakes... entre otros 150+ empresarios de la industria. MÁSTER DE EMPRENDIMIENTO Y GESTIÓN EN MODA Y ACCESORIOS, impartido por fundadores y directivos de compañías como Scalpers, Silbon, Blue Banana, Jack & Jones, Zalando, Asos, Pompeii, Edmmond Studios, HOFF, Brownie, MIM Shoes, Singularu... entre otros 100+ empresarios del sector. Solicita más información aquí: https://www.talent-class.com/

Hoy escuchamos: Avalanch- Horizonte eterno, Avalanch- Torquemada, Amadeüs- Hijos de Medea, Vandenberg- House of fire, L.A.Guns- Shattered into silence, Elure- Locked into silence, Siddharta- Lo mejor de mí, Canciones con Historia: Saurom- Wallada la Omeya, Docka Pussel- Disomnia, Arrival of Autumn- Scars. Escuchar audio

Hoy escuchamos: Amadeüs- El dolor fantasma, Amadeüs- Nunca más, Saxon- Never surrender, Magic Opera- Elixir of life, Alestorm- Party, Saurom- Wallada la Omeya, Saratoga- Si amaneciera, Hora Zulú- Agua de mayo, Xuorum- Hdp, Wild Dogs- Speelshock, Machine Head- Block, Angelus Apatrida- Martyrs of Chicago. Escuchar audio

Ukusungula ibalansi ngomndeni nomsebenzi kuyinto enzima. Uma sifaka wonke umqondo wethu emsebenzini yethu, umndeni ngapha uyalimala, manje futhi sidinga ukwenza imali eyanele ukunakekela yona imindeni yethu.

La sobrecarga emocional y las lesiones musculares resultantes de una incorrecta inmovilización de personas, son los riesgos labores más importantes a los que se enfrentan los trabajadores de los centros residenciales. Así se confirma en el informe que acaba de publicar la Asociación Madrileña de Atención a la Dependencia, AMADE, con el nombre: "Riesgos laborales representativos en centros de atención a las personas mayores en la Comunidad de Madrid".   Escuchar audio

El estereotipo del creativo es el de una persona desordenada, caótica y que llega a unos resultados distintos por encontrarse con el famoso momento eureka. Pero este momento eureka es improbable que llegue si antes este creativo no ha definido bien el problema, para enfocarse en una posible solución realmente efectiva, y si no se […] La entrada El proceso creativo de un creativo, con Pablo Amade (Morbo) – CREATIVIDAD #232 se publicó primero en Toni Colom.

Hoy escuchamos: Delalma- Mañana vuelve a oscurecer, Dawn of Extinction- Beyond the fear, Marea- Buena muerte, Amadeüs- Nunca más, Adventus- Lo siento, Avalanch- Torquemada, Ad Infinitum- Somewhere better, Cruachan- The crow, Canciones con Historia: Gojira- The chant. Borealis- Burning tears. Escuchar audio

In the last decade, Australia has experienced some of its worst flooding events in recorded history. Between 2020-2022, large areas have gone underwater three to four times. - Di deh salên dawîn de, Australya di dîroka tomarkirî de hin bûyerên herî xirab derbarê lehiyê dîtin. Di navbera 2020-2022 de, hin dever sê-çar caran di bin avê de man.

-- . Nûçeyên giring yên Swêdê îro 14.11.2022 ji vê podkasta beê kurdî yê Radyoya Swêdê. Derhîner: Lorin IbrahimPêkêkar: Sidki Hirori

A good deal of Western Swing,  some early country and a wee bit of blues. Have to give I haven't got a pot to cook(1936)  another airing. Naughtiness from The Sweet Violet Boys. Jimmie Revard and his Oklahoma Playboys- Ride 'em Cowboy(1936). A Bob Wills song. My only Bob Skyles and his Skyrockets trabk on vinyl next- The Rhythm King. Milton Brown and his Brownies- Yes sir(1936). Chicken Reel Stomp(1937)-The Tune Wranglers. The also performed as Tono Hombres and sang in Spanish. Wonderful blues from Buddy Jones- Settle down blues(1939) Buddy recorded over 80 sides for Decca. On piano is Moon Mulligan. Not Max as I say 'on air.' Bob Dunn on Steel guitar. Amade' Ardoin- La Valse a Abe and Two Step Eunice. A pioneer of Cajun and Zydeco music on record. Much legend surrounds his death. It now appears he probably died of V.D in 1942.  A unique voice and great accordion. The Georgia Crackers-  Joe Diamond(1927). The duo also performed as the Coffer Brothers. Dupree's Rome Boys- 12th Street Blues(1929). A popular dance band number of the time, adapted perfectly for guitar and fiddle. Lil McClintock- Don't think I'm Santa Clause(1930). McClintock was a street musican in Clinton South Carolina and only recorded four sides for Columbia. Nothing is known of his origins or what happened to him. An obscure but talented artist that came and went. Frank Hutchinson- K.C Blues(1929.)  Hutchinson is considered the best musician and singer of white country blues music and recorded around 40 sides for the Okeh label between 1926 and 1929. He played the steel guitar using a pen knife as a slide.  He'd worked as a miner in Virginia. Died young at 48.  I love this laid back track and his wee shout toward the end. We finish with that man Milton Brown and Hesitation Blues.  

Hoy escuchamos: Rhapsody- Dawn of victory, Amadeüs- Hijos de Medea, Girish and The Chronicles- Primeval desire, Saurom- Fiesta de la cerveza, Accept- Fast as a shark, Black Sabbath- Symptom of the universe, Wasp- Miss you, El Último Ke Zierre-Fornicare est pecatum, Reincidentes- J´artos de aguantar, Parabellum- Peligroso animal de compañía, Amon Amarth- Raven´s flight, Perpetual Night- Aconitum. Escuchar audio

State and territory attorneys-general have agreed to consult on national principles to address the form of domestic violence known as 'coercive control'. Lawyers have been pushing for improvements to women's safety with state and territory government in agreement that a coordinated plan is needed. - Parêzerên giştî yên wîlayet û herêman li hev kirin ku li ser bingehên neteweyî şêwirê bikin da ku şêwaza tundûtûjiya malbatî ku wekî 'kontrola bi zorê' tê zanîn çareser bikin. Parêzer ji bo baştirkirina ewlehiya jinan bi hukemetên wîlayet û herêman re li hev kirin ku planeke hevrêzî hewce dike.

Conto Erótico - To Com a Pele Boa, Né Amade? Grazi tem um vibro discreto, e sempre que ela esta com tesão, corre pro banheiro dizendo que vai retocar a maquiagem, pois dessa vez, em uma festa, ela conhece um maquiador que promete deixar ela com a pele ótima. Quer saber como? Vem conferir.

-- . Nûçeyên giring yên Swêdê Îro 21.07.2022 ji vê podkasta beê kurdî yê Radyoya Swêdê.

Een aantal weken geleden hoorde je, in deze podcast, het levensverhaal van de in Indonesië geboren en in Nederland opgegroeide Stef Amade. We hebben echter nog restmateriaal over zijn korte werkzame leven en de reden waarom hij daar al vroeg mee op moest houden en die informatie wil ik je toch niet onthouden. Stef maakt op het eind van het interview de opmerking dat muziek en het spelen in bandjes in zijn leven een grote rol heeft gespeeld en dat is iets wat we in deze podcast uitgebreid zullen laten horen.

Bas Barendregt spreekt ook deze week weer met de 74 jarige visueel gehandicapte Stef Amade. Het gaat vandaag hoofdzakelijk over zijn verblijf in het blindeninstituut in Bussum. Hij refereert in dit interview veel aan muziek. Niet zo gek want hij speelde in zijn leven zelf ook vaak in bandjes. Je hoort daarom ook muziek van de Beat builders jazz band. Het zijn opnames uit 12 juni 1965 dat is opgenomen in het lokaal van juffrouw Meulendijk in het blindeninstituut te Bussum. Daar naast komt de band van Hans van der Kley voorbij. Daar was Stef Amade indertijd, in 1969, de gitarist was.

Bas Barendregt spreekt deze en de volgende week in deze podcast met de visueel gehandicapte Stef Amade. Hij is geboren in Bandung, op het eiland Java in Indonesië op 21 juli 1948. Hij kwam in 1960 naar Nederland. Uiteraard wordt daar ook over gesproken, maar de nadruk ligt vandaag op zijn kinderjaren in Indonesië.

-- . Nûçeyên giring yên Swêdê. îro 10.06.2022 ji vê podkasta beê kurdî yê Radyoya Swêdê. Derhîner: Nishtman IrandoustPêkêkar: Sidki Hirorî

Conheça a história de um negócio sobre rodas, que começou pela cultura familiar e rapidamente se transformou numa paixão, que levou a uma trajectória empreendedora de sucesso e à construção de uma das mais importantes empresas de mobilidade em Moçambique.

DNA offers us the promise of an objective forensic science. Rather than following our own racially-biased hunches, technology can deliver us the unvarnished truth. Yet, we always interpret technology through our own particular lens, and within a society that produces technology in a particular sort of way.  In this episode, we look at how forensic … Read More Read More

Jinên kurd îsal jî 8'ê Adarê Roja Jinên Cîhanê di nava tundûtujiyê de pêşwazî kirin. Di nava salekî de 280 jin hatin kuştin. Baş e dema jinek rastî tundiyê tê û serî li dadgehê dide rastê helwesteke çawa tê? Medya bi çi awayî cih dide kuştina jinan? Bersiva van pirsan di vê podcestê de ye. Amade kirin Gonul Markoç

Ukusungula ibalansi ngomndeni nomsebenzi kuyinto enzima. Uma sifaka wonke umqondo wethu emsebenzini yethu, umndeni ngapha uyalimala, manje futhi sidinga ukwenza imali eyanele ukunakekela yona imindeni yethu.

-- Nûçeyên giring yên îro 20.12.2021 ji vê podkasta beê kurdî yê Radyoya

-- Nûçeyên giring yên îro 16.11.2021 ji vê podkasta beê kurdî yê Radyoya Derhîner: Nishtman IrandoustPêkêkar: Sidki Hirorî

Dayn Amade is founder of the Community Tablet and speaks to Nathi Mcetywa about this initiative aimed at bridging the digital divide between rural and urban communities in Mozambique. Get in touch: Visit https://civictech.africa/ Follow @CivicTechAfrica on Twitter Follow Civic Tech Innovation Network on Facebook Follow Civic Tech Innovation Network on LinkedIn Share your civic tech initiative with us

Dayn Amade is founder of the Community Tablet and speaks to Nathi Mcetywa about this initiative aimed at bridging the digital divide between rural and urban communities in Mozambique. Get in touch: Visit https://civictech.africa/ Follow @CivicTechAfrica on Twitter Follow Civic Tech Innovation Network on Facebook Follow Civic Tech Innovation Network on LinkedIn Share your civic tech initiative with us

Our weekly catch up with OTI Racing. Terry Henderson joins Andrew Bensley to chat about their team heading towards Cup week in both Sydney and Melbourne. We get an update on AMADE following his run in the Bendigo Cup, and find out more about REVE DE VOL ahead of the Golden Eagle.

Jockey Ben Allen joins Andrew Bensley to chat about his Bendigo Cup mount AMADE. We chat about how he is likely to measure up and just what Ben thought about his run in the Geelong Cup.

Terry joins Gerard ahead of today's Bendigo Cup, where runners Barade and Amade are in contention. Terry also discusses how scanning protocols ahead of the Melbourne Cup have been received in the industry.

Phillip Stokes, Amade is one the top hopes in this afternoon's Bendigo Cup

Our weekly catch up with OTI Racing. This week, Andrew Bensley is joined by Shayne Driscoll to chat about their big Spring team, including AMADE following his run in yesterday's Geelong Cup. We also touch on their runners heading towards next week's Golden Eagle, including an international runner for Annabel Neasham.

Trainer Phillip Stokes joins Andrew Bensley to provide an update on a few of his Spring contenders, most importantly, AMADE who contests today's Geelong Cup.

Sesli Köşe-Murat Ağırel-'Tabiat Varlıkları MUÇEV'in emrine amade'

Students across Australia are poised to begin Term 4 but for many, it's still a matter of weeks before they can enter the schoolyard. While they learn at home, schools are preparing classrooms with COVID-safe measures. - Xwendekarên li seranserê Australya amade ne ku Terma 4an dest pê bikin lê ji bo pir kesan, hîn çend hefte divên ji bo ew bikaribin têkevin hewşa xwendegehan. Tev ku xwendekar li mal fêr dibin, xwendegeh bi tedbîrên COVID-ewle polan amade dikin e.

Island Edition and Amade go around at Caulfield on Saturday whilst a host of runners head to Morphettville Parks

Acteur, mime, clown Juraj Bencik a fait partie de l'ensemble Cirque du Soleil. L'hotel historique Amade.

-- Nûçeyên giring yên îro 29.06.2020 ji vê podkasta beê kurdî yê Radyoya Swêdê bibihîzin. Derhîner: Lorîn Berzincî Pêkêkar: Sidqî Hirorî

Wetenschapsantropoloog Amade M’charek onderzoekt hoe genetica onze wereld, wie we zijn, en hoe we ons tot elkaar verhouden verandert. Dit is haar eerste column voor Vrij Nederland. Hoofdredacteur Ward Wijndelts leest hem voor. Audio door Hans Poel.

On this date in 1785, a new Piano Concerto in C major was given its premiere at the Burgtheater in Vienna, with its composer, Wolfgang Mozart, at the keyboard. Years later this piano concerto was labeled as Mozart’s 21st, and given the number 467 in the chronological list of his works compiled by Ludwig, Ritter von Koechel, an Austrian botanist, mineralogist, and Mozart enthusiast. Today this work is popularly referred to as the “Elvira Madigan” Concerto, for the simple reason its romantic slow movement was used to great effect in a 1967 Swedish film of that name to underscore a passionate love story. That Swedish movie helped to bring Mozart’s concerto to the attention of a far wider audience than ever before, as did the 1984 movie “Amadeus,” with Mozart’s music in general. Musicologists may wince when they hear the title “Amadeus”–it’s a matter of historical record that Mozart signed his name “Amadeo” or “Amadé.” Others object that a Swedish film should provide a nickname for one of Mozart’s most sublime works–but, for better or worse, both “Amadeus” and “Elvira Madigan” are labels that seem to have stuck to Mozart’s name and his concerto.

On this date in 1785, a new Piano Concerto in C major was given its premiere at the Burgtheater in Vienna, with its composer, Wolfgang Mozart, at the keyboard. Years later this piano concerto was labeled as Mozart’s 21st, and given the number 467 in the chronological list of his works compiled by Ludwig, Ritter von Koechel, an Austrian botanist, mineralogist, and Mozart enthusiast. Today this work is popularly referred to as the “Elvira Madigan” Concerto, for the simple reason its romantic slow movement was used to great effect in a 1967 Swedish film of that name to underscore a passionate love story. That Swedish movie helped to bring Mozart’s concerto to the attention of a far wider audience than ever before, as did the 1984 movie “Amadeus,” with Mozart’s music in general. Musicologists may wince when they hear the title “Amadeus”–it’s a matter of historical record that Mozart signed his name “Amadeo” or “Amadé.” Others object that a Swedish film should provide a nickname for one of Mozart’s most sublime works–but, for better or worse, both “Amadeus” and “Elvira Madigan” are labels that seem to have stuck to Mozart’s name and his concerto.

. -- Nûçeyên giring yên îro 05.03.2021 ji vê podkasta beê kurdî yê Radyoya Swêdê bibihîzin. Derhîner: Nishtman Irandoust Pêkêkar: Sidki Hirori

Ukusungula ibalansi ngomndeni nomsebenzi kuyinto enzima .Uma sifaka wonke umqondo wethu emsebenzini yethu, umndeni ngapha uyalimala, manje futhi sidinga ukwenza imali eyanele ukunakekela yona imindeni yethu.

Semaine spéciale associations dans "Le Guest" sur Radio Monaco en partenariat avec CFM-Indosuez. Jérôme Froissard, secrétaire général de l'AMADE lance cette série. 

. 23.11.2020 Nûçeyên giring yên îro 23.11.2020 ji vê podkasta beê kurdî yê Radyoya Swêdê bibihîzin.

On today’s date in 1979 a new play by Peter Schaffer titled “Amadeus” opened at the National Theatre in London. Schaffer’s play tells the story of Mozart’s final years in Vienna, including some posthumous gossip that it was the petty jealousy and back-stabbing intrigue of Mozart’s Italian contemporary Antonio Salieri that hastened Wolfgang’s untimely demise. There was even a Romantic legend that Salieri had actually poisoned Mozart, a legend Shaffer gave a psychological spin. Music historians were quick to attack Shaffer’s play as wildly inaccurate and downright unfair to poor old Salieri, who, they said, was not all that bad a fellow. Accurate or not, Schaffer’s play was a big hit, and five years later was made into a wildly successful film. That movie version of “Amadeus” prompted millions of new classical music fans to snap up any recordings of Mozart’s “Requiem” they could find. And what about the music historians? They couldn’t even find comfort in the old public relations adage, “There’s no such thing as bad press as long as they spell your name right!” They felt even the movie’s title was bogus. Mozart never signed his middle name “Amadeus,” preferring the French version, “Amadé.”

On today’s date in 1979 a new play by Peter Schaffer titled “Amadeus” opened at the National Theatre in London. Schaffer’s play tells the story of Mozart’s final years in Vienna, including some posthumous gossip that it was the petty jealousy and back-stabbing intrigue of Mozart’s Italian contemporary Antonio Salieri that hastened Wolfgang’s untimely demise. There was even a Romantic legend that Salieri had actually poisoned Mozart, a legend Shaffer gave a psychological spin. Music historians were quick to attack Shaffer’s play as wildly inaccurate and downright unfair to poor old Salieri, who, they said, was not all that bad a fellow. Accurate or not, Schaffer’s play was a big hit, and five years later was made into a wildly successful film. That movie version of “Amadeus” prompted millions of new classical music fans to snap up any recordings of Mozart’s “Requiem” they could find. And what about the music historians? They couldn’t even find comfort in the old public relations adage, “There’s no such thing as bad press as long as they spell your name right!” They felt even the movie’s title was bogus. Mozart never signed his middle name “Amadeus,” preferring the French version, “Amadé.”

Juraj Bencik, acteur, mime et clown a fait partie du Cirque du Soleil. Invitation a l'hôtel historique Amade.

Nûçeyên giring yên îro 30.06.2020 ji vê podkasta beê kurdî yê Radyoya Swêdê bibihîzin. . 30-06-2020 Pêkêker: Newzad Hirorî Derhêner: Lorîn Berzincî

Ras: het is een besmet begrip geworden. Maar juist omdat wetenschappers zich er niet aan willen branden, sijpelen raciale denkbeelden wetenschap en samenleving binnen. Om die reden houdt hoogleraar antropologie van de wetenschap Amade M'charek zich er wél mee bezig. Aan de hand van muziek spreekt ze met Johan Fretz.

Nûçeyên giring yên îro 06.02.2019 ji vê podkasta beê kurdî yê Radyoya Swêdê bibihîzin. . 06-02-2019 Pêkêker: Newzad Hirorî Derhêner: Nitiman Îrandost

Caros ouvintes, sejam bem-vindos ao primeiro boletim do NoticiÁudio de 2019.Os destaques desta edição: Manuel Chang continua detido na África do Sul PGR pede responsabilização financeira de Chang e mais 16 pessoas Helena Taipo a caminho do Tribunal Continuam ataques extremistas em Cabo Delgado; jornalista do NoticiAudio detido Por motivo da detenção do nosso colega Amade, lamentamos que esta semana não haverá a edição do NoticiAudio na língua Kimwani.

Caros ouvintes, sejam bem-vindos ao primeiro boletim do NoticiÁudio de 2019.Os destaques desta edição: Manuel Chang continua detido na África do Sul PGR pede responsabilização financeira de Chang e mais 16 pessoas Helena Taipo a caminho do Tribunal Continuam ataques extremistas em Cabo Delgado; jornalista do NoticiAudio detido Por motivo da detenção do nosso colega Amade, lamentamos que esta semana não haverá a edição do NoticiAudio na língua Kimwani.

Caros ouvintes, sejam bem-vindos ao primeiro boletim do NoticiÁudio de 2019. Os destaques desta edição: Manuel Chang continua detido na África do Sul PGR pede responsabilização financeira de Chang e mais 16 pessoas Helena Taipo a caminho do Tribunal Continuam ataques extremistas em Cabo Delgado; jornalista do NoticiAudio detido Por motivo da detenção do nosso colega Amade, lamentamos que esta semana não haverá a edição do NoticiAudio na língua Kimwani.

Nûçeyên giring yên îro 02.01.2019 ji vê podkasta beê kurdî ya Radyoya Swêdê bibihîzin. 02.01.2019 Pêkêkar: Lorîn Berzincî Derhêner: Nishtman Irandoust

Amade for beards shampoo and conditioner from Woodsman Beard Company

Word je ziek? Ga je op het criminele pad? Of word je een Nobelprijswinnaar? Veel ligt vast in onze genen. Zijn we voorgeprogrammeerd en bepaalt onze genenset hoe ons leven gaat verlopen? Een ding is zeker. De invloed van de genetica op de samenleving kan niet overschat worden. Erfelijkheidsleer heeft al lang de laboratoria verlaten en speelt een centrale rol op maatschappelijke visies over ziekte en gezondheid, criminaliteit en veiligheid, verleden en toekomst. Maar welke rol speelt de genetica op onze visie over wie we zijn? Op welke manier draagt de genetica bij aan de klassieke spanning tussen nature en nurture? Amade M'Charek is hoogleraar Antropologie van de wetenschap aan de Universiteit van Amsterdam. M'Charek is specialist op het gebied van genetische diversiteit, forensische identificatie en relaties tussen wetenschap en raciale classificaties. Meer info: http://www.ru.nl/radboudreflects/terugblik/terugblik-2015/terugblik-2015/terugblik-mcharek/ Geen podcast meer missen? Abonneer je op dit kanaal. Radboud Reflects organiseert verdiepende lezingen voor iedereen over filosofie, religie, ethiek, samenleving en cultuur. www.ru.nl/radboudreflects Wil je op de hoogte blijven van onze activiteiten? Schrijf je dan in voor de tweewekelijkse nieuwsbrief: https://www.ru.nl/radboudreflects/nieuwsbrief/aanmelden-mailnieuwsbrief-radboud-reflects/

This month’s interview is a special one. When we recorded it way back in the fall of 2015 Celeste was in the process of transitioning from her folky roots to collaborating and creating more electronic pop productions with Steven Tracy of Saint Cecilia Studios. I’m glad we waited to publish this episode because now we […]