Podcasts about ethical theory

Should we sacrifice the present for a better future?Join the team at the IAI for three articles about effective altruism, longtermism, and the complex evolution of moral thought. Written by William MacAskill, James W. Lenman, and Ben Chugg, these three articles pick apart the ethical movement started by Peter Singer, analysing its strengths and weaknesses for both individuals and societies.William MacAskill is a Scottish philosopher and author, best known for writing 2022's "What We Owe the Future." James W. Lenman is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Sheffield, as well as the former president of the British Society for Ethical Theory. Ben Chugg is a BPhD student in the machine learning department at Carnegie Mellon University. He also co-hosts the Increments podcast.To witness such debates live buy tickets for our upcoming festival: https://howthelightgetsin.org/festivals/And visit our website for many more articles, videos, and podcasts like this one: https://iai.tv/You can find everything we referenced here: https://linktr.ee/philosophyforourtimesSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In this episode, we explore the role of imagination in social movements and the ongoing fight for justice. We investigate both how the imagination helps us think of how the world might be better and identify the problems of the moment. Our guest scholar in this episode is Dr. Michele Moody-Adams, Joseph Straus Professor of Political Philosophy and Legal Theory at Columbia University. --- Michele Moody-Adams is Joseph Straus Professor of Political Philosophy and Legal Theory at Columbia University, where she served as Dean of Columbia College and Vice President for Undergraduate Education from 2009-2011. Before Columbia, she taught at Cornell University, where she was Vice Provost for Undergraduate Education and Director of the Program on Ethics and Public Life. She has also taught at Wellesley College, the University of Rochester, and Indiana University, where she served as Associate Dean for Undergraduate Education.  She has published on equality and social justice, moral psychology and the virtues, moral objectivity and moral relativism, and the philosophical implications of gender and race.  She is the author of Making Space for Justice: Social Movements, Collective Imagination and Political Hope, published in 2022.  She is also the author of a widely cited book on moral relativism, Fieldwork in Familiar Places: Morality, Culture and Philosophy, and a co-author on the multi-author work Against Happiness (May 2023).  Her current work also includes articles on academic freedom, equal educational opportunity, democratic disagreement, and what constitutes an epistemically and morally defensible understanding of history. A special focus of her work on democracy is the connection between democracy and the civic art and architecture of remembrance. ---While her full catalog of articles and books is far too long to list here, the publications below provide a useful introduction to her scholarship addressing the topic of imagination and justice: Moody-Adams, M. (2022). Making Space for Justice: Social Movements, Collective Imagination, and Political Hope. Columbia University Press. Moody-Adams, M. (2015). The enigma of forgiveness. The Journal of Value Inquiry, 49, 161-180. Moody-Adams, M. M. (2018). Democratic conflict and the political morality of compromise. Nomos, 59, 186-219. Moody-Adams, M. M. (2017). Moral progress and human agency. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 20, 153-168. --- The Social Science for Public Good Podcast is a project of the ⁠Virginia Tech Institute for Policy and Governance⁠ and ⁠VT Publishing⁠ intended to make social science theories accessible and available to individuals and organizations seeking to promote social change. Music: purple-planet.com

Is ethics objectively true?Recorded at the Mises Institute in Auburn, Alabama, on July 31, 2024.Mises University is the world's leading instructional program in the Austrian School of economics, and is the essential training ground for economists who are looking beyond the mainstream.

The purpose of medicine is to heal and maintain the health of the patient. Abortion does neither one of those two things for either the woman or the child. Since the dawn of western medicine abortion was rejected as quackery. What changed?  When a patient entrusts herself to a physician, it is only medical ethics that insulate her best interests from being subordinated to a political agenda or the pocketbook of an abortionist. Every life is valuable and deserving of protection, and fostering a culture that respects and supports life can lead to a more compassionate and just society. Check out this episode with Nina, Shy, and Rev. James R. Harden, M.Div., CEO of CompassCare Pregnancy Services as they navigate the topic of Ethical Theory and Pertinent Standards in Women's Reproductive Health. Check out the book here: https://www.amazon.com/Ethical-Theory-Pertinent-Standards-Reproductive/dp/195443779X

Andrea Borghini is Associate Professor in the Philosophy Department at the University of Milan, Italy, and Director of Culinary Mind, an international center promoting philosophical thinking on food with a multi-disciplinary and cross-disciplinary approach. His research develops theoretical tools to rethink how we speak, structure, sense, and feel about food, eating, and culinary cultures.  Born and raised in two small towns of central Tuscany, he professionally trained and worked in New York City and the Boston area for over 15 years. His recent articles include:  ‘Seven Philosophical Questions About Recipes' (Bloomsbury, 2022);  ‘Cooking and Dining as Forms of Public Art' (Food, Culture, and Society, 2021, with Andrea Baldini); 'Hot Grapes: How to Locally Redesign Geographical Indications to Address the Impact of Climate Change' (with Nicola Piras and Beatrice Serini), World Development Sustainability, Volume 2 (2023); 'The Justice and Ontology of Gastrospaces' (with Matteo Bonotti, Nicola Piras, and Beatrice Serini), Ethical Theory and Moral Practice (2023). ‘Defective Food Concepts' (Synthese, 2021, with Nicola Piras and Beatrice Serini); ‘Eating Local: A Philosophical Toolbox' (Philosophical Quarterly, 2021, with Nicola Piras and Beatrice Serini); ‘From Obesity to Energy Metabolism. Ontological Perspectives on the Metrics of Human Bodies' (Topoi, 2021, with DavideSerpico); Andrea co-edited the collection of essays: A Philosophy of Recipes: Making, Experiencing, and Valuing (Bloomsbury, 2022, co-curated with Patrik Engisch). On this episode, Andrea joins host Mitchell Davis and discusses the philosophical implications of cooking, deriving meaning through food, and the question of who really owns a recipe. For more on Andrea, visit: https://sites.unimi.it/borghini/ and https://www.culinarymind.org/  

In questo audio il prezioso incontro con Simone Verde manager culturale ed Emanuela Ceva teorica politica. L'intervista è in Contemporaneamente di Mariantonietta Firmani, il podcast divulgato da Artribune e Parallelo42 Simone Verde ed Emanuela Ceva ci parlano di musei, cultura e politica, argomenti assonanti e confluenti. I musei nascono come promozione e competizione tra civiltà e l'opera è oggetto di codificazione sociale. La parola “Democrazia” individua una forma di governo che riconosce uguale autorità a tutte le persone, concetto attuabile, per esempio, nel processo di democratizzazione delle aziende. Le identità sono rinegoziazioni continue e nell'evoluzione semantica dell'esistenza, le parole acquistano significati rinnovati. La corruzione è sostanziata da un vasto ambito di valori e relazioni deviate, e il lusso è storicamente autorappresentazione dell'élite, e molto altro. ASCOLTA L'INTERVISTA!! GUARDA IL VIDEO!! https://youtu.be/buuqCVieG4Q BREVI NOTE BIOGRAFICHE DEGLI AUTORISimone Verde Direttore del Complesso monumentale della Pilotta dal 2017, precedentemente responsabile della Ricerca scientifica e Pubblicazioni per il AFM/Louvre di Abu Dhabi. Dalla laurea in filosofia teoretica a Roma, master in Filosofia Antica a Parigi, diploma in Storia dell'Arte all'École du Louvre, al dottorato in Antropologia dei Beni Culturali all'EHESS di Parigi.Negli anni collabora come producer e corrispondente con quasi tutte le tv nazionali francesi e con la radio France Culture. Storico dell'arte è curatore e autore per cataloghi e mostre; ha tradotto dal francese per gli editori Adelphi, Fazi e Sellerio e ha lavorato come editor per numerose case editrici italiane. Inoltre, èstato assistente di Antonio Tabucchi di cui ha curato il volume L'oca al passo, autore del volume Cultura senza Capitale, 2014, vincitore del Premio Pisa 2016. Emanuela Ceva è professore ordinario di Teoria Politica all'Università̀ di Ginevra, dottorato in teoria politica all'università̀ di Manchester. Dal 2005 ha ricoperto incarichi di didattica e ricerca presso diverse Università̀: Pavia, Princeton, Oxford, Hitotsubashi (Tokyo), St Andrews, Montréal, Amburgo, Leuven. anzitutto, la sua ricerca si centra sulla teoria normativa delle istituzioni, rispetto a questioni di democrazia, corruzione e fiducia.Nel 2018, è Fulbright Research Scholar in Philosophy presso l'Edmund J. Safra Center for Ethics dell'Università di Harvard. Co-fondatrice dello Swiss Political Theory Network, dal 2022 dirige il progetto di ricerca The Margins of Corruption. Direttrice della rivista Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, redattrice responsabile della sezione teoria politica del Journal of Politics. Tra i suoi libri: Interactive Justice (Routledge 2016), e Political Corruption. The Internal Enemy of Public Institutions (Oxford University Press 2021). I suoi articoli più recenti sono pubblicati su riviste quali The Journal of Political Philosophy and The American Journal of Political Science.

In questo audio il prezioso incontro con Simone Verde manager culturale ed Emanuela Ceva teorica politica. L'intervista è in Contemporaneamente di Mariantonietta Firmani, il podcast divulgato da Artribune e Parallelo42Simone Verde ed Emanuela Ceva ci parlano di musei, cultura e politica, argomenti assonanti e confluenti. I musei nascono come promozione e competizione tra civiltà e l'opera è oggetto di codificazione sociale. La parola “Democrazia” individua una forma di governo che riconosce uguale autorità a tutte le persone, concetto attuabile, per esempio, nel processo di democratizzazione delle aziende. Le identità sono rinegoziazioni continue e nell'evoluzione semantica dell'esistenza, le parole acquistano significati rinnovati. La corruzione è sostanziata da un vasto ambito di valori e relazioni deviate, e il lusso è storicamente autorappresentazione dell'élite, e molto altro.ASCOLTA L'INTERVISTA!! GUARDA IL VIDEO!! https://youtu.be/buuqCVieG4QBREVI NOTE BIOGRAFICHE DEGLI AUTORISimone Verde Direttore del Complesso monumentale della Pilotta dal 2017, precedentemente responsabile della Ricerca scientifica e Pubblicazioni per il AFM/Louvre di Abu Dhabi. Dalla laurea in filosofia teoretica a Roma, master in Filosofia Antica a Parigi, diploma in Storia dell'Arte all'École du Louvre, al dottorato in Antropologia dei Beni Culturali all'EHESS di Parigi.Negli anni collabora come producer e corrispondente con quasi tutte le tv nazionali francesi e con la radio France Culture. Storico dell'arte è curatore e autore per cataloghi e mostre; ha tradotto dal francese per gli editori Adelphi, Fazi e Sellerio e ha lavorato come editor per numerose case editrici italiane. Inoltre, èstato assistente di Antonio Tabucchi di cui ha curato il volume L'oca al passo, autore del volume Cultura senza Capitale, 2014, vincitore del Premio Pisa 2016.Emanuela Ceva è professore ordinario di Teoria Politica all'Università̀ di Ginevra, dottorato in teoria politica all'università̀ di Manchester. Dal 2005 ha ricoperto incarichi di didattica e ricerca presso diverse Università̀: Pavia, Princeton, Oxford, Hitotsubashi (Tokyo), St Andrews, Montréal, Amburgo, Leuven. anzitutto, la sua ricerca si centra sulla teoria normativa delle istituzioni, rispetto a questioni di democrazia, corruzione e fiducia.Nel 2018, è Fulbright Research Scholar in Philosophy presso l'Edmund J. Safra Center for Ethics dell'Università di Harvard. Co-fondatrice dello Swiss Political Theory Network, dal 2022 dirige il progetto di ricerca The Margins of Corruption. Direttrice della rivista Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, redattrice responsabile della sezione teoria politica del Journal of Politics. Tra i suoi libri: Interactive Justice (Routledge 2016), e Political Corruption. The Internal Enemy of Public Institutions (Oxford University Press 2021). I suoi articoli più recenti sono pubblicati su riviste quali The Journal of Political Philosophy and The American Journal of Political Science.

Rev. James R. Harden Rev. Harden, Author & CEO of CompassCare, discusses his latest book “Ethical Theory & Pertinent Standards in Women's Reproductive Health” that highlights the lack of medical ethics surrounding the abortion industry's claim that abortion is health care.

Paul Grenier discusses his article "Konstantin Krylov's Ethical Theory and What It Reveals about the Propensity for Conflict between Russia and the West" from Telos 201 (Winter 2022).

A Handbook of Ethical Theory

I'm joined by Matthew Adelstein of Deliberation Under Ideal Conditions for Utilitarianism 101. We also talk about a few basic things everyone needs to know to be conversant in moral philosophy.  YouTube Matthew's Channel  Matthew's Blog (Bentham's Bulldog) Consider supporting the show on Patreon here or Counter Apologetics here Listen to our sister show, Counter Apologetics here Music by ichika Nito and used with permission. Twitter @waldenpod @OnPanpsychism linktr.ee/emersongreen

Jovana Davidovic (PhD, University of Minnesota, 2011) is an Associate Professor of Philosophy at University of Iowa, where she also holds a complimentary appointment at the Law School and the Center for Human Rights. Her research focuses on military ethics and philosophy of international law and has been published in venues such as Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, Journal of Military Ethics, Ethics and International Affairs, Journal of Applied Ethics, and others. Davidovic has also worked extensively as an ethics consultant, most recently serving as the Chief Ethics Officer for BABL AI, an algorithmic bias auditing and ethics consultancy. She is a resident Fellow at the Stockdale Center for Ethical Leadership.

Jovana Davidovic (PhD, University of Minnesota, 2011) is an Associate Professor of Philosophy at University of Iowa, where she also holds a complimentary appointment at the Law School and the Center for Human Rights. Her research focuses on military ethics and philosophy of international law and has been published in venues such as Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, Journal of Military Ethics, Ethics and International Affairs, Journal of Applied Ethics, and others. Davidovic has also worked extensively as an ethics consultant, most recently serving as the Chief Ethics Officer for BABL AI, an algorithmic bias auditing and ethics consultancy. She is a resident Fellow at the Stockdale Center for Ethical Leadership.

As a licensed RDH we are bound by an oath to uphold specific standards of professional responsibility. We also have a moral obligation to our community - our patients - and ourselves. Our ADHA Code of ethics provides us with an ethical framework to make decisions that protect the health and well-being of every patient we serve. This episode will cover ethical theories and the code of ethics which are the foundation in the decision making process of an ethical dilemma. Take a look at a recent product I tried and recommend. BRIO https://bit.ly/thehappyflosser Promo Code: HAPPYFLOSSER --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/billie43/message

In this podcast we explore the ethical underpinnings of deciding with children when providing medical care. We recognise that children of all ages have varying levels of capacity to understand and participate in medical decisions that affect their own bodies. We cover the following ethical principles in our exploration of deciding with children: the intrinsic and instrumental value of asking and considering the child's view; respect for personhood, bodily sovereignty and liberty; the child's right to a view; truth-telling and children's best interests. Host: Prof John Massie. Guests: Prof Lynn Gillam and Prof Clare Delany, Children's Bioethics Centre, RCH.

In this podcast we explore the ethical underpinnings of deciding with children when providing medical care. We recognise that children of all ages have varying levels of capacity to understand and participate in medical decisions that affect their own bodies. We cover the following ethical principles in our exploration of deciding with children: the intrinsic and instrumental value of asking and considering the child's view; respect for personhood, bodily sovereignty and liberty; the child's right to a view; truth-telling and children's best interests. Host: Prof John Massie. Guests: Prof Lynn Gillam and Prof Clare Delany, Children's Bioethics Centre, RCH.

------------------Support the channel------------ Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/thedissenter PayPal: paypal.me/thedissenter PayPal Subscription 1 Dollar: https://tinyurl.com/yb3acuuy PayPal Subscription 3 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/ybn6bg9l PayPal Subscription 5 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/ycmr9gpz PayPal Subscription 10 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/y9r3fc9m PayPal Subscription 20 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/y95uvkao ------------------Follow me on--------------------- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thedissenteryt/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/TheDissenterYT This show is sponsored by Enlites, Learning & Development done differently. Check the website here: http://enlites.com/ Dr. James Lenman is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Sheffield. He is known for his expertise on ethics. Dr. Lenman is a former president of the British Society for Ethical Theory (2002-2008). In this episode, we talk about ethics. Topics include: motives; justifications; consequentialism; the objectivity of morality; and if it is possible to end discussions on morality and ethics. -- Follow Dr. Lenman's work: Faculty page: http://bit.ly/34hhuzQ Website: http://bit.ly/37p6Adx PhilPeople page: https://bit.ly/3mqDgYi -- A HUGE THANK YOU TO MY PATRONS/SUPPORTERS: KARIN LIETZCKE, ANN BLANCHETTE, PER HELGE LARSEN, LAU GUERREIRO, JERRY MULLER, HANS FREDRIK SUNDE, BERNARDO SEIXAS, HERBERT GINTIS, RUTGER VOS, RICARDO VLADIMIRO, BO WINEGARD, CRAIG HEALY, OLAF ALEX, PHILIP KURIAN, JONATHAN VISSER, ANJAN KATTA, JAKOB KLINKBY, ADAM KESSEL, MATTHEW WHITINGBIRD, ARNAUD WOLFF, TIM HOLLOSY, HENRIK AHLENIUS, JOHN CONNORS, PAULINA BARREN, FILIP FORS CONNOLLY, DAN DEMETRIOU, ROBERT WINDHAGER, RUI INACIO, ARTHUR KOH, ZOOP, MARCO NEVES, MAX BEILBY, COLIN HOLBROOK, SUSAN PINKER, THOMAS TRUMBLE, PABLO SANTURBANO, SIMON COLUMBUS, PHIL KAVANAGH, JORGE ESPINHA, CORY CLARK, MARK BLYTH, ROBERTO INGUANZO, MIKKEL STORMYR, ERIC NEURMANN, SAMUEL ANDREEFF, FRANCIS FORDE, TIAGO NUNES, BERNARD HUGUENEY, ALEXANDER DANNBAUER, OMARI HICKSON, PHYLICIA STEVENS, FERGAL CUSSEN, YEVHEN BODRENKO, HAL HERZOG, NUNO MACHADO, DON ROSS, JOÃO ALVES DA SILVA, JONATHAN LEIBRANT, JOÃO LINHARES, OZLEM BULUT, NATHAN NGUYEN, STANTON T, SAMUEL CORREA, ERIK HAINES, MARK SMITH, J.W., JOÃO EIRA, TOM HUMMEL, SARDUS FRANCE, DAVID SLOAN WILSON, YACILA DEZA-ARAUJO, IDAN SOLON, ROMAIN ROCH, DMITRY GRIGORYEV, TOM ROTH, DIEGO LONDOÑO CORREA, YANICK PUNTER, ADANER USMANI, CHARLOTTE BLEASE, MIRAN B, NICOLE BARBARO, ADAM HUNT, PAWEL OSTASZEWSKI, MAX BEILBY, AL ORTIZ, NELLEKE BAK, AND KATHRINE AND PATRICK TOBIN! A SPECIAL THANKS TO MY PRODUCERS, YZAR WEHBE, JIM FRANK, ŁUKASZ STAFINIAK, IAN GILLIGAN, SERGIU CODREANU, LUIS CAYETANO, TOM VANEGDOM, CURTIS DIXON, BENEDIKT MUELLER, VEGA GIDEY, AND NIRUBAN BALACHANDRAN! AND TO MY EXECUTIVE PRODUCERS, MICHAL RUSIECKI, ROSEY, JAMES PRATT, AND MATTHEW LAVENDER!

This lecture was given on October 24, 2020 as part of "The Bonds of Love" Intellectual Retreat at the University of Texas, Austin. For more information on upcoming events, please visit our website: thomisticinstitute.org Speaker Bio: Prof. Osborne is the chair of the philosophy department at the University of St. Thomas in Houston. His research focuses on medieval, late scholastic, and contemporary philosophy. He is particularly concerned with the way in which philosophical concepts are changed and created historically. His research focuses on Ethical Theory, Moral Psychology, Ethics, and Metaphysics. He also has related interests in Philosophy of Religion and Political Philosophy.

In this episode, we are joined by Cennydd Bowles, author of Future Ethics, and Director of NowNext, the ethical design and futures studio. In the episode, we talk about Future Ethics, and how we can use methods from disciplines such as speculative design and future studies to stimulate moral imagination. We also discuss the role of ethical guidelines, bringing those into practice, and how you can start having more conversations within your team or organisation around ethics. 

This lecture was given on October 24, 2020 as part of "The Bonds of Love" Intellectual Retreat at the University of Texas, Austin. For more information on upcoming events, please visit our website: thomisticinstitute.org Prof. Osborne is the chair of the philosophy department at the University of St. Thomas in Houston. His research focuses on medieval, late scholastic, and contemporary philosophy. He is particularly concerned with the way in which philosophical concepts are changed and created historically. His research focuses on Ethical Theory, Moral Psychology, Ethics, and Metaphysics. He also has related interests in Philosophy of Religion and Political Philosophy.

This conversation is part of the Immanuel Kant Series | 'Dare to know!' Philosophy Podcast. Today we are joined by Lawrence Pasternack. Lawrence Pasternack is Professor of Philosophy & Director of Religious Studies at Oklahoma State University. His research focuses on Immanuel Kant, Ethical Theory, & Philosophy of Religion. Today, we will talk in particular about Professor Pasternack’s book ‘Kant’s Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason: An Interpretation and Defense’.

João Costa é coordenador do Mecanismo Nacional de Prevenção contra a tortura e maus-tratos. É também Doutorando na Universidade de Cambridge, com um projecto que passa por desenvolver uma ferramenta de resolução de conflitos armados em comunidades de zonas de conflito.  -> Apoie este projecto e faça parte da comunidade de mecenas do 45 Graus em: 45graus.parafuso.net/apoiar Durante a conversa falámos de uma série de temas. Começámos pela visão política do convidado, que nos levou a abordar questões marcantes dos tempos actuais, como a desigualdade económica, o progresso moral e questões de costumes, e também como construir uma sociedade onde o poder político tem legitimidade e evitar derivas populistas. A conversa levou-nos também à investigação do convidado, que é particularmente original, uma vez que junta conclusões da filosofia política -- como a Teoria de Justiça de John Rawls -- a evidência que vem das ciências sociais, sobretudo da área da psicologia, com o propósito de desenhar uma técnica de resolução de conflitos armados em zonas de conflito, em que os habitantes das comunidades locais são levados a compreender a posição do outro lado de forma a alterar o seu comportamento e gerar um acordo benéfico para todos. Embora a investigação nesta área estude sobretudo zonas de conflito, há paralelos óbvios entre esses conflitos acesos e a necessidade de aumentar o capital social e melhorar as instituições políticas das nossas sociedades.  A terminar a conversa, tivemos ainda tempo de voltar ao tema quente da justiça económica, em particular a tensão entre, por um lado, a necessidade de evitar uma desigualdade económica extrema e de promover a igualdade possível de oportunidades e, por outro, assegurar que o rendimento gerado legitimamente não é expropriado levianamente e que a sociedade é capaz de continuar a gerar prosperidade e crescimento económico.   Temas abordados durante a conversa: Origem do pensamento político do convidado Movimeto MUD juvenil David Hume - A Treatise of Human Nature: “It has been observed, that nothing is ever present to the mind but its perceptions; and that all the actions of seeing, hearing, judging, loving, hating, and thinking, fall under this denomination.” Problema de portugal: desigualdade de oportunidades vs desenvolvimento Como aproximar o cidadão médio das elites Como construir uma sociedade justa e estável, com poder político legítimo Jeffrey Sachs: Why Rich Cities Rebel Histórica Recente Evolução da desigualdade económica em Portugal Casamento homossexual Argumentos contra o voto das mulheres Abraham Maslow, Émile Durkheim A emoção enquanto alavanca de progresso moral Ligação à investigação do convidado Induzir emoções para obter resultados socialmente benéficos. Artigos (Intuitive Prosociality; Building peace through systemic compassion; The effects of induced emotions on pro-social behaviour; Gratitude as Moral Sentiment: Emotion-Guided Cooperation in Economic Exchange; Beyond Reciprocity: Gratitude and Relationships in Everyday Life) Racismo Democracia Étnica John McCain a defender Obama Progresso moral na sociedade John Rawls Legitimidade política Livro: Choosing Justice - An Experimental Approach to Ethical Theory, de Norman Frohlich e Joe A. Oppenheimer  Paper: Veil-of-ignorance reasoning favors the greater good, de Karen Huang, Joshua D. Greene e Max Bazerman Opting Out of War: Strategies to Prevent Violent Conflict, de Mary B. Anderson  e Marshall Wallace A Teoria de Justiça de John Rawls aplicada à resolução de conflitos Imposto sobre o património Crescimento económico enquanto jogo de soma positiva Estudo da OXFAM sobre desigualdade Argumento Wilt Chamberlain de Nozick Desigualdade e justiça económica Thick and Thin: Moral Argument at Home and Abroad, de Michael Walzer Why Things Matter To People - Social Science, Values And Ethical Life, de Andrew Sayer What I Believe, de Bertrand Russell Man's Search for Meaning, de Viktor E. Frankl Livros recomendados   Obrigado aos mecenas do podcast: Gustavo Pimenta; Eduardo Correia de Matos Joana Faria Alves, Joao Manzarra, João Baltazar, Mafalda Lopes da Costa, Salvador Cunha, Tiago Leite, Duarte Dória, Carlos Martins Abilio Silva, António Padilha, Carmen Camacho, Daniel Correia, Diogo Sampaio Viana, Francisco Fonseca, Helder Miranda, Joao Saro, João Nelas, Mafalda Pratas, Rafael Melo, Rafael Santos, Ricardo Duarte, Rita Mateus, Tiago Neves Paixão, Tiago Queiroz, Tomás Costa, José Soveral, João Almeida, André Oliveira, João Silveira, Miguel Cabedo e Vasconcelos, Joao Salvado, Rui Oliveira Gomes, José Jesus, Filipa Branco Duarte, Filipe Ribeiro, Francisco Aguiar , Francisco Arantes, Francisco dos Santos, Francisco Vasconcelos, Henrique Lopes Valença, Henrique Pedro, Hugo Correia, isosamep, Joana Margarida Alves Martins, Joao Diogo, Joao Pinto, Jose Pedroso, José Galinha, José Oliveira Pratas, JosÉ Proença, JoÃo Diogo Silva, JoÃo Moreira, JoÃo Raimundo, Luis Ferreira, Luis Marques, Luis Quelhas Valente, Marco Coelho, Mariana Barosa, Marise Almeida, Marta Baptista Coelho, Marta Madeira, Miguel Coimbra, Miguel Palhas, Nuno Gonçalves, Nuno Nogueira, Pedro, Pedro alagoa, Pedro Rebelo, Pedro Vaz, Renato Vasconcelos, Ricardo Delgadinho, rodrigo brazÃo, Rui Baldaia, Rui Carrilho, Rui Passos Rocha, Telmo, Tiago Costa da Rocha, Tiago Pires, Tomás Félix, Vasco Lima, Vasco Sá Pinto, Vitor Filipe, Ricardo Nogueira, Alexandre Almeida, Francisco Arantes, João Crispim, Paulo dos Santos, Élio Mateus, André Peralta Santos, João Pinho, Paulo Fuentez, Simão Morais, Andrea Grosso, Robertt, Fonsini, João Barbosa, Jose António Moreira, Luís Pereira, João Martins, Sérgio Catalão, Vasco Faden Araujo, João Castanheira, Cátia Prudêncio, Telmo Damião, Gerson Castro, Rodrigo Murteira Pedrosa, Alexandre Freitas, Andreia Esteves, Renato Mendes, Carlos Magalhães Lima   Bio: João Costa é coordenador do Mecanismo Nacional de Prevenção contra a tortura e maus-tratos, resultante da ratificação, por Portugal, do Protocolo Adicional das Nações Unidas à Convenção contra a Tortura. É também Doutorando na Universidade de Cambridge, onde se encontra a desenvolver uma ferramenta de resolução de conflitos armados em comunidades locais, alterando o comportamento dos seus habitantes. João tem experiência no terreno e headquarters em peacebuilding, conflito e segurança e desenvolvimento. Como consultor, trabalhou em projetos em vários países Africanos, do Médio Oriente e da América do Sul, para clientes como o Banco de Desenvolvimento Africano, Ministérios dos Negócios Estrangeiros Holandês e Norueguês, Interpeace ou Anglo American. Foi, ainda, delegado do Comité Internacional da Cruz Vermelha na Colômbia, e parte do sistema das Nações Unidas em Haia, Genebra e Nova Iorque, em diferentes posições – a última das quais no Tribunal Penal Internacional para a Antiga Jugoslávia. Completou um M.Phil em criminologia na Universidade de Cambridge (distinção) e mestrado e licenciatura na Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Coimbra (ambos como melhor aluno). Deu aulas na Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Católica, em Lisboa. Publicou um livro e vários artigos científicos, tendo recebido vários prémios e bolsas.

I didn't know much about Icelandic Sagas before I heard about Aoife's project, I just knew that they were long and complicated and involved feuds and fate. But Aoife, a philosophy student at Queen's University Belfast, knew a lot more and wanted to try to make sense of all the heavyweight moral decisions and decisive actions that go on in them. Her project is partly an investigation of a moral framework, and partly a research project into historical and anthropological reconstruction, but along the way she tries out a number of philosophical different approaches to understanding character traits. Here are some things that Aoife's suggested for you to read: * The saga that Aoife is talking about is called Hrafnkel Saga Freygoda. There's a wikipedia article about it here (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hrafnkels_saga) which has links to several translations, and Aoife was working from Gwyn Jones' edition. * Óskar Halldórsson (1989) “The Origin and Themes of Hrafnkels Saga”, Sagas of the Icelanders, edited by John Tucker, Garland Publishing: New York. * Tomasson, Richard F. (1980) Iceland : The First New Society, University of Minnesota Press. * Kristán Kristánsson (1998), "Liberating Moral Traditions: Saga Morality and Aristotle’s “Megalopsychia”", Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, Vol.1, No.4, pp397-422. (Appears on the publisher's page here (https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1009990801822), paywalled but consider using twitter and the hashtag #icanhazpdf). * Vilhjálmur Árnason (1991), "Morality and Social Structure in the Icelandic Sagas", The Journal of English and Germanic Philosophy, Vol. 90, No.2. (Appears on JStor here (https://www.jstor.org/stable/27710482), paywalled, consider #icanhazpdf). As ever, please get in touch to send any thoughts, responses, ideas, reactions, feedback or ideas about this episode or any of the others, it's always great to hear from you, particularly if you want to say encouraging things. To drop me a line you can just head over to the contact (https://www.generousquestions.co.uk/contact) page, or tweet at me on twitter (@drjoemorrison (https://twitter.com/DrJoeMorrison)) The theme music is from li_serios05 (https://store.broken20.com/album/li-series-05-jack-on-piano) by TVO on Broken20 records (https://store.broken20.com/) under Creative Commons license BY-NC-SA (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/).

This episode of Knowing Animals features Dr. John Hadley. John is Senior Lecturer in Philosophy at the University of Western Sydney. We discuss John’s paper ‘From Welfare to Rights without Changing the Subject’ which appear in the journal Ethical Theory and Moral Practice in 2017. This episode of Knowing Animals is brought to you by AASA. AASA is the Australasian Animal Studies Association. You can find AASA on Facebook here: https://www.facebook.com/AASA-Australasian-Animal-Studies-Association-480316142116752/. Join AASA today!

Ethics in marketing? Yes. Marketing needs ethics, too. After all, many people say “marketing” like it's a four-letter word. Senior Staff Instructor at LinkedIn Learning, Morten Rand-Hendriksen joins us this week on WPblab to talk about ethics in marketing. With a passion for learning new things (including ballroom dancing with his wife), philosophy, and accessibility, Morten is well-known as an advocate for all things forward-facing in tech but realizes the ethics implications. Join us this week for the live chat to ask Morten your questions.Twitter: @mor10Site: http://mor10.com/LinkedIn Learning & Lynda.comStudied Philosophy at UniversityEthics 101 (definition) … there are two terms you hear all the time – ethics & morals – two different aspects of the same thing (two sides of the same coin)Morals – internalized understanding of what is right and wrongEthics – a human definition of systems that you use to define what is right and wrongIf you look at Ethical Theory, you are looking at Moral Traditions – confusingly!There is often a disconnect in understanding the terminology between the two“Cryptomining is a good example of why the web design industry needs ethics”Ethics (as defined by Moren) – the rules that we create to allow us to judge individual actions and see if they are justifiable in a moral context“Why don’t people in the WordPress community copy each others themes and release them in a different name” – there’s nothing that explicitly prevents it, but there are ethics that keep them from doing soKant’s Categorical Imperative (wikipedia) – act as if you want your act to be a universal law – this is how people should always behaveWe need ethics in marketing – as you release this thing into the world, how do you want it to be handledThere’s a common misunderstanding that ethics provides you a list of dos and don’ts – it doesn’t – that is dogmatic moralism. Rather, ethics give you the tools to at least attempt to think through the decisions you make, before you turn those decisions to action (and see what the consequences might be)Example: There is code that you can currently install on your site that runs crypto mining processes on the computers of everyone who visits your site – generates money and sends it back to the owner of the siteSalon is using adblocking readers' CPU power to mine cryptocurrencySalon to ad blockers:Can we use your browser to mine cryptocurrency?Salon has every right to hijack your laptop to mine cryptocurrency while you read it – businessinsider.comThe JavaScript Supply Chain Paradox:SRI, CSP and Trust in Third Party LibrariesDonate Your TabConsequentialism – what are the consequences of your actions and do those consequences improve the common good? It is okay if some people are disadvantaged as long as the large majority are advantaged.In the case of the Crypto code – everyone is disadvantaged but the website owner, so Consequentialism would say – don’t do this!Duty ethics – you have to perform acts in a way that you would want every other person to behave in that same situation, not because you have to, but because you actually believe that’s how it should be doneYou have a duty of care to everyone who interacts with your website – unless you explicitly state that you are doing this, you are failing your visitorsVirtue Ethics – what kind of person do you become by performing the act. This is the oldest of these theories.  The idea is that a human can only become virtuous by aspiring to a set of virtues.Is this the type of person that I want to be?  That I would want everyone else to be?Capability Approach – the morality of an act has to be judged on what capabilities it grants the person it is acted upon. Does it improve their capabilities?Start thinking about how what we are doing effects the ends user. What kind of future am I building for the people who are using this site?A tiny toolkit to help you answer your own questions!What kind of world am I building for the end user?Who do I become by doing this?Do I want every other person to do this in the same circumstance?Am I increasing the overall utility for everyone? (everyone might be end user)What is the value of getting an influencer to say something about your product?You think they have more authority (there is value / money in that)It’s because people innately believe what they say – even if not true – and respond to that influenceIf you “ghost write” a review and make it seem as if it’s written entirely from the influencer, then the whole trust equation falls apart – your duty of care (ethically) would require you to disclose that information to your audienceThe “Milli Vanilli” effect100% GPL – if you aren’t 100% compliant, you can’t sponsor a WordCamp – how do ethics apply hereSomeone has to make a decision about who is affected and who is not, it can become a very subjective decision. In WordPress, that person is often Matt Mullenweg – we are granting him license to do this by following alongThe WordPress community largely rises and falls based on whether people are willing to buy into the importance and need of GPLEthics is complicated – every single person who is in the conversation will have a different viewpoint – if it’s a good ethical conversation, you touch on all the pain points enough that people are satisfied and everything has been accounted forIf we start over – what capabilities should we grant the end user and how do those capabilities help them improve their lives. One of the big values is that WordPress is free and (relatively) safe to use … you can formulate some overall idea.  We are granting the capability to publish to the internet anyone who has access to any internet connectionThere is a constant battle between wanting to be the type of person who creates things for the WordPress community to freely use (open source) and also needing to be able to provide an income for yourself and your family – what is our ethical responsibility to ourselves and the end user?Bridget: If you’re going to build a product and you decide to start with those 4 ‘toolkit’ questions as part of your branding standards, then you would already be about 70% of the way thereWe are building a world for our end users – what kind of world do we want to build for them? What are the consequences of our choices? Ethics should not be a wet blanket on our creativity, it should be a hearth that keeps all that creativity from ‘burning down the house’What did we do wrong here? How did we end up in the place? What can we do to keep it from happening again?Tools of the Week—Bridget: HemmingwayApp.comJason: still using SetApp – but wishes it had Magnet (allows you to move items around on the screen to the edges and makes the windows snap)Morten: Pocket – save articles to read later – strips out all the ads and just gives you the text – it can also read it back to you!  Even works with the Kobo e-Reader!!Suggested reading for everyone: Virtual Reality As Possibility SpaceLet us know who helped us out with the show notes (we’ll link to you)Cheryl LaPrade @yaycherylSherie LaPrade @heysherieJames Tryon @jamestryon (but not enough for a true bi-line)The post WPblab EP94 – Exploring the Ethics of Marketing with Morten Rand-Hendriksen appeared first on WPwatercooler. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

During this episode (recorded live during a class lecture) we look at the Ethical Theory of Utilitarianism, and note some of its significant problems. 

Episode 1 aims to introduce the learner to fundamental concepts and theories of morals, the history and development of ethical theories, and a systematic study of right and wrong with a critical application of ethical theories to current social problems.

We will have a conversation with Sharon Hartline, PhD, a Professor of Philosophy at Radford University, where she teaches Ethical Theory and Bio-ethics. She is also a consulting member of a medical ethics committee at Carillon New River Valley Medical … Continue reading →

We will have a conversation with Sharon Hartline, PhD, a Professor of Philosophy at Radford University, where she teaches Ethical Theory and Bio-ethics. She is also a consulting member of a medical ethics committee at Carillon New River Valley Medical … Continue reading →

Recorded Mon, 17 Mar 2014 14:57:32 -0500

Enhanced Video PodcastAired date: 10/29/2009 2:30:00 PM Eastern Time

Enhanced Audio PodcastAired date: 10/29/2009 2:30:00 PM Eastern Time

Walter Glannon, Ph.D., Canada Research Chair in Medical Bioethics and Ethical Theory at the University of Calgary, spoke on "Neuroethics: The Promises and Pitfalls of Intervening in the Brain" on March 24, 2008 as part of the UNE's Crosley Lecture Series.

Walter Glannon, Ph.D., Canada Research Chair in Medical Bioethics and Ethical Theory at the University of Calgary, spoke on "Neuroethics: The Promises and Pitfalls of Intervening in the Brain" on March 24, 2008 as part of the UNE's Crosley Lecture Series.