Secular Left

We start with Doug's past as a member of the College Republicans, a segment of his life that seems almost distant now but also eerily relevant to the political climate we face today. His college experience at Ohio State in the mid-'80s was marked by a growing awareness of the discrepancies in the political narrative he had been raised with. Doug recounts how the rising tide of conservatism he once embraced began to clash with the realities he encountered—especially when it came to grappling with issues of race, free speech, and the responsibility of politicians towards their constituents.Then we examine the current political theater in Los Angeles, where President Trump's administration has been deploying the National Guard to suppress protests—despite local law enforcement asserting that the situation was under control. This aggressive response is less about maintaining order and more about sending a message, punishing California for its dissent against Trump's dictatorial tendencies. The reckless display of power raises critical concerns about a government that no longer feels the need to ask for cooperation but rather demands compliance. Digging deeper into the issue of immigration enforcement, we highlight the detrimental impact of ICE's recent actions in Los Angeles, a situation that reflects a broader pattern of racial profiling and abuse of power. The targeting of undocumented workers not only perpetuates a cycle of fear but also threatens the very fabric of our economy, as these individuals contribute significantly to industries that many Americans overlook. Local economies are disrupted, and the communities that rely on these workers suffer as well. We draw parallels between my college disillusionment and the current political landscape, where the values we once accepted are now recognized as harmful to the principles of justice and equity.Through personal anecdotes and current events, we emphasize the importance of free speech and peaceful protest, recalling a significant moment during Doug's college years when a counter-protester challenged a political figure's narrative. It served as a crucial reminder of the necessity for dissent in a democracy, a point that resonates strongly with the protests happening in response to Trump's actions today. We must resist the toxic mix of nationalism and authoritarianism that has taken root in our political discourse.Full Show Notes & Links Used Send us a textSupport the showSubscribe to our free newsletterCheck out our MerchFollow us on BlueskyFind us on Twitter(for now) Find us on InstagramFind us on Counter SocialFind us on Mastadon

In this episode, we look at the State of Utah's Health Department-commissioned review, which confirmed the safety and mental health benefits of gender-affirming treatments for youth. Despite its clear findings, the review was dismissed by lawmakers determined to uphold a state ban, highlighting a disturbing political hypocrisy. This resistance to science in favor of ideological control exposes a deeper moral failure among those in power who choose to ignore expert guidance to further political ends.On the national political stage, we analyze the 2024 election and President Biden's decision to endorse Kamala Harris. The media's fixation on Biden's mental fitness, as detailed in Jake Tapper's book, reflects a shallow narrative more interested in spectacle than substance. We critique the media's failure to prioritize pressing issues—like civil rights and healthcare—in favor of sensationalist coverage about President Biden while President Trump has escaped the same kind of drum beat over his mental issues.Full Show Notes & Links UsedSend us a textSupport the showSubscribe to our free newsletterCheck out our MerchFollow us on BlueskyFind us on Twitter(for now) Find us on InstagramFind us on Counter SocialFind us on Mastadon

We start by focusing on the ongoing debate around school vouchers in Ohio, particularly as the state legislature is poised to debate the new budget bill, which proposes cuts to public school funding while simultaneously increasing financial support for private institutions. We clarify how these so-called "scholarships" are essentially vouchers that funnel taxpayer dollars into private religious schools, often in direct violation of the constitutional separation of church and state. Currently, despite 90% of students attending public schools, nearly $900 million has been funneled into private school vouchers, highlighting a bizarre funding disparity that raises questions about equity and accountability.There are stark statistics illustrating that the majority of voucher funds benefit families already enrolled in private institutions. This misleading premise of "school choice" is particularly concerning for low-income families and those in rural areas, where no private options are available. Then we look at the ramifications of the 2010 Citizens United Supreme Court decision, elucidating how it has contributed to the erosion of our democracy and facilitated the ascent of figures like Donald Trump. The decision has fundamentally altered campaign finance laws, allowing unlimited corporate spending in elections, which has skewed the political landscape in favor of wealthy interests and diluted the voices of the average citizen.We discuss the broader implications of campaign finance reforms, the necessity for rigorous regulations to ensure that the influence of money doesn't overshadow the democratic process. We advocate for constitutional amendments that clarify the rights of corporations versus individuals to establish a fairer electoral landscape.Full Show Notes & Links UsedSend us a textSupport the showSubscribe to our free newsletterCheck out our MerchFollow us on BlueskyFind us on Twitter(for now) Find us on InstagramFind us on Counter SocialFind us on Mastadon

We start this episode by discussing the ongoing controversy surrounding Release Time Religious Instruction (RTRI) in Ohio, spearheaded by LifeWise Academy. This initiative allows public school students to leave school for religious education in the middle of the day, exploiting legal loopholes to introduce religious content into public education. As part of my advocacy against these policies, we expose the tactics being employed by LifeWise representatives, including aggressive legal threats aimed at school districts adopting more cautious policies, particularly concerning promotional materials like treats and trinkets that facilitate recruitment into their programs.Then we do an analysis of President Donald J. Trump's approval ratings after his first 100 days in office during his second administration. We provide insights into how these ratings can serve as a barometer for his political effectiveness, drawing comparisons with historical figures and past administrations. The consensus is clear—Trump's numbers are significantly underwater, reflecting dissatisfaction across multiple demographics and even within core support bases.We assess what Trump's low approval ratings mean for the Republican Party and democracy at large. By drawing parallels with Trump's past actions and the historical context of his presidency, we convey a sense of urgency regarding the potential consequences of his policies and rhetoric. Recent protests against his administration's immigration policies highlight the public's growing discontent and the strategic missteps that may lead to political upheaval.We conclude with a sobering reflection on the tumultuous first 100 days of Trump's presidency and provide a call to action for listeners to engage with their political communities actively while remaining informed.Full Show Notes & LinksSend us a textSupport the showSubscribe to our free newsletterCheck out our MerchFollow us on BlueskyFind us on Twitter(for now) Find us on InstagramFind us on Counter SocialFind us on Mastadon

We mark the 100th episode of Secular Left with a reading from the show manifesto that was read in Episode 1 in April 2020. We highlight its birth during a tumultuous time marked by political uncertainty and a public health crisis. The initial goal was to provide a platform to voice critical perspectives against the tide of misinformation and extreme conservatism proliferating in mainstream discourse, especially during the latter stages of the 1st Trump administration. We also revisit memorable moments throughout the first episodes, like the establishment of our guiding manifesto, which articulates our commitment to progressive values and the importance of secularism in navigating social issues.Our guest is Dr. Juhem Navarro-Rivera, Political scientist and partner at Socialanalitica Research, who walks us through the latest Pew Research Religious Landscape Survey. He sheds light on the trends reflected in the Pew survey, most notably the rise of what he terms "cradle seculars." This demographic, comprised of individuals raised without religious affiliation who remain non-religious into adulthood, is growing at an unprecedented rate. The survey indicates an impressive upward trajectory: from 16% of the population identifying as secular in 2007 to nearly 29% in 2024. This surge challenges long-standing assumptions about religious identity, suggesting that many young people are increasingly less likely to return to religious practices as they age.Delving into methodological considerations, Dr. Navarro-Rivera discusses the shift from telephone surveys to more inclusive methods incorporating online and paper formats. This change may have important implications for survey responses, particularly concerning sensitive topics like religious affiliation. We explore the effect of social stigma on reporting non-religious identities, emphasizing the need for transparency in polling methodologies to achieve more accurate insights.As we unpack the nuances of the survey, our guest emphasizes the significance of understanding the growing secular identity not merely in terms of percentages but as a profound cultural shift representing approximately 76 million individuals in the U.S. We examine the evolving landscape of religious affiliation, noting a decline in Christian identification among younger demographics, and discuss how these trends can inform strategies for fostering secular communities that resonate with new generations.Full Show Notes & LinksSend us a textSupport the showSubscribe to our free newsletterCheck out our MerchFollow us on BlueskyFind us on Twitter(for now) Find us on InstagramFind us on Counter SocialFind us on Mastadon

Amanda Quintero, an economist and author, is our guest and we explore her powerful new book, "We Said Farewell." Having left Venezuela during its tumultuous transition into authoritarianism, Amanda shares her personal journey and the inspiration behind her collection of fictionalized short stories. The narratives stem from real experiences of her friends, illustrating the dire consequences of political oppression and the erosion of democratic values in Venezuela.Amanda wrote the novel with a desire to document the struggle for freedom and to counter the prevailing narratives that misrepresent the Venezuelan reality. Through the stories, she captures the complexities of life under an authoritarian regime, weaving together the frustrations of her own experiences with those of her friends to create compelling narratives steeped in truth and emotional resonance.The heart-wrenching accounts of kidnappings, political imprisonment, and the gradual disintegration of the rule of law serve as stark reminders of how quickly a democracy can devolve into tyranny.Throughout our conversation, we discuss the broader implications of these stories, as Amanda insights how authoritarianism manifests in various contexts, including the United States. Her reflections on personal experiences encourage listeners to recognize the fragility of democratic institutions and how complacency can lead to disastrous outcomes. The exploration of economic inequality as a root cause of political instability further enriches our discussion, offering nuanced perspectives on the intersection of economics and governance.Amanda expresses her hopes for readers to grasp the speed at which democracies can crumble and the critical importance of safeguarding rights and freedoms. Full Show Notes & LinksSend us a textSupport the showSubscribe to our free newsletterCheck out our MerchFollow us on BlueskyFind us on Twitter(for now) Find us on InstagramFind us on Counter SocialFind us on Mastadon

Recent decisions that can significantly impact public welfare have emerge from a lack of contextual awareness. We explore the dangerous consequences of this mismanagement, particularly with the current administration's interactions with Elon Musk, who has been given unwarranted access to vital government resources without accountability.We recount the chaotic beginnings of the Trump administration, laying bare the questionable movements made during high-profile meetings, such as the infamous one with Ukrainian President Zelensky, which underscores the abysmal state of media influence and misinformation. An alarming trend emerges where individuals associated with the administration, lacking real expertise or credibility, direct crucial governmental maneuvers with minimal oversight, raising significant concerns over the vulnerabilities within our institutions.There is an alarming trend of “slash and burn” approaches by Musk and his DOGE incels, who are indiscriminately accessing sensitive personal private information held by the Federal government. The implications of their superficial cuts are dire—jobs eliminated in vital sectors, such as the Veterans Administration, without understanding the significance of those roles. Reforms should stem from legislative actions and not arbitrary dismissals by unqualified individuals. We look at a push, in the Ohio legislature, for the display of specific historical documents in public schools. This initiative serves as a front for instituting religious ideologies—specifically the Ten Commandments—under the guise of educational reform. We dissect this bill, explaining the historical context of legislative overreach and drawing parallels to past incidents where the separation of church and state has been tested and challenged.We examine the motivations behind such legislative efforts, challenging the idea that simply placing these texts in schools could enrich the moral fabric of society. Instead, we argue that true education should empower students through critical thinking and contextual learning, rather than a superficial introduction to selected historical texts. The drive for these displays is less about education and more about a strategic push from Christian nationalist groups seeking to embed specific ideologies in public institutions.Full Show Notes & LinksSend us a textSupport the showSubscribe to our free newsletterCheck out our MerchFollow us on BlueskyFind us on Twitter(for now) Find us on InstagramFind us on Counter SocialFind us on Mastadon

In this episode, we engage with Martin Armitage, co-author of the book "Tyrant in a Top Hat," which challenges the conventional narrative surrounding President Abraham Lincoln and the Civil War. We delve into thought-provoking questions: Did Lincoln ignite a civil war unnecessarily? Are the consequences of that conflict still reverberating through our society today? And could the United States benefit from a reevaluation, perhaps even division, based on differing cultural values?Armitage, bringing a rich background in history and political service, aims to encourage listeners to think critically about Lincoln's decision-making in 1861. His book seeks not to indoctrinate its readers with a particular viewpoint but rather to provoke discussion and self-reflection regarding historical interpretation and its implications for modern governance. We explore the historical context in which Lincoln operated, including the possibility that alternative measures could have been taken to address rising tensions rather than resorting to war.One of the compelling arguments in the book is the exploration of Lincoln's suspension of habeas corpus, a controversial move that prioritized national security over individual rights during a time of crisis. Armitage explains the significance of habeas corpus as a cornerstone of civil liberties, and we discuss whether Lincoln's actions set a troubling precedent for future governance.As our conversation evolves, we also touch upon Armitage's proposals for how modern-day America, which he describes as a "fractured nation," might navigate its profound ideological divides. He suggests the potential for regions within the U.S. to separate based on cultural lines, advocating for a new political structure that emphasizes local governance while maintaining overarching national protections for rights. While these ideas might seem radical, they stem from a desire to find practical solutions to contemporary issues of polarization and disenfranchisement.Throughout the episode, listeners are invited to engage with these challenging concepts and to reflect on what they mean for our understanding of modern democracy. At the end of the interview, Doug provides his own perspective, critiquing Armitage's conclusions while acknowledging the value of his inquiries. Doug emphasizes the importance of spirited debate and the necessity for a strong central government dedicated to protecting universal rights for all citizens, expressing his belief that the fight for equality and civil liberties must continue unabated.Full Show Notes and LinksSend us a textSupport the showSubscribe to our free newsletterCheck out our MerchFollow us on BlueskyFind us on Twitter(for now) Find us on InstagramFind us on Counter SocialFind us on Mastadon

We explore the troubling narrative surrounding President Trump's administration and its move to shut down USAID, a crucial foreign aid agency established by President Kennedy. We highlight how the dismantling of USAID can severely undermine America's relationships with democratic allies, turning foreign policy into a transactional affair where friendship is bargained rather than earned.We see how this aligns with the broader strategy laid out in Project 2025 – to eliminate foreign aid altogether, thereby creating a vacuum that could benefit adversaries like Russia and China. I also discuss the complexities of USAID's legacy, from humanitarian efforts to its controversial political ramifications, all in the context of a government that seems increasingly willing to sacrifice long-standing institutions in favor of short-term gains.We then shift to Ohio Attorney General David Yost, who has announced his run for governor, embodying a brand of conservative politics that is deeply entrenched in hypocrisy and moral failure. We examine Yost's record, from his opposition to reproductive rights to his role in targeting marginalized individuals while neglecting corporate misconduct. His political motivations, rooted in Christian nationalism and a disdain for progressive values, raise serious questions about his leadership potential and the implications for Ohio's future.Finally, we discuss recent comments made by Trump regarding a proposed takeover of Gaza, exploring how such rhetoric reverberates through the Arab-American community and beyond. This segment connects to the consequence of political decisions leading to the rise and fall of candidate support, specifically focusing on the uncommitted movement within Michigan that emerged in response to dissatisfaction with Biden's policies and the fallout of their choices during the elections. The episode is a critical examination of how protest votes can inadvertently strengthen opponents, underscoring the need for strategic electoral engagement.Full Show Notes and LinksSend us a textSupport the showSubscribe to our free newsletterCheck out our MerchFollow us on BlueskyFind us on Twitter(for now) Find us on InstagramFind us on Counter SocialFind us on Mastadon

Ohio's recent legislative developments have sparked significant controversy. The state's governor signed a "Don't Say Gay" bill into law, which not only limits discussions on LGBTQ+ topics in schools but also permits a Christian Nationalist group to remove children to bible study in the middle of the school day. Meanwhile, a federal judge ruled that using preferred pronouns constitutes a violation of the First Amendment, deepening the national debate on LGBTQ+ rights. Professor Jerry Coyne has come under fire for his use of biological arguments to justify discrimination, while in a positive turn, a Trans woman has been appointed to a city council, offering a glimmer of hope amid these challenges. These events reflect the growing cultural and legal tensions surrounding LGBTQ+ issues, free speech, and the role of religion in public education.We start with the contentious signing of a "Don't Say Gay" bill into law by Ohio's governor, which has drawn sharp criticism for not only silencing conversations around sexual orientation in schools, especially for younger students, but also for enabling a Christian Nationalist group to indoctrinate public school children during school hours. The bill, now formalized under House Bill 8, imposes significant restrictions on discussing sexuality and mandates that educators inform parents of any changes in a student's wellness services, particularly concerning their gender identity. The legislation aims to erase LGBTQ+ visibility while perpetuating a culture of fear and secrecy among students questioning their identities.A federal judge's recent decision, which declared that requiring teachers to use transgender students' preferred pronouns violates First Amendment rights, characterized such requirements as coercive. We emphasizes the chilling effect this ruling has on educators and students alike, reinforcing stigma and hostility against transgender individuals. We also critique the rationale used by the judge, criticizing the failure to recognize the basic dignity and rights of individuals as a cornerstone of this democracy.In a more hopeful turn, we celebrate a victory for representation as Arienne Childry, a trans woman, was appointed to the city council for St. Mary's, Ohio. This appointment marks a significant milestone as it reflects the progress being made at local levels despite the oppressive legislative environment. We underscore the importance of having representatives who genuinely embody the values of inclusion and secular humanism within governmental structures, marking Childry's presence as a beacon of hope in a state riddled with anti-LGBTQ+ sentiment.Full Show Notes & Links UsedSend us a textSupport the showSubscribe to our free newsletterCheck out our MerchFollow us on BlueskyFind us on Twitter(for now) Find us on InstagramFind us on Counter SocialFind us on Mastadon

We dive into the recent tumult surrounding two significant topics affecting public policy and religious freedom in Ohio. The spotlight is first placed on LifeWise Academy's attempts to ingratiate itself into Ohio public schools, alongside the ongoing case involving Dad's Place Church in Bryan, Ohio, as the Ohio Attorney General, David Yost, enters the fray. With rising tensions and opposing viewpoints, Doug dissects these developments, providing new insights into the legal and social landscape of the state.We get a comprehensive update on House Bill 8, a contentious piece of legislation that combines both anti-LGBT elements and provisions for Release Time Religious Instruction (RTRI). Doug reflects on the dynamics at play in the Ohio Senate's late-session debate, highlighting how amendments to the bill were pieced together amidst a growing coalition of concerned residents and advocacy groups opposed to the bill for one reason or another.Moving on to the case of Dad's Place Church, we contextualize the ongoing legal struggles faced by Pastor Chris Avell, who operates a makeshift homeless shelter in his church. A prior agreement between the city and Avell fell apart due to the pastor's lack of adherence to necessary zoning regulations.The situation escalated as the city issued citations, resulting in a federal lawsuit propelled by the Christian nationalist legal organization First Liberty. We discuss how Yost's recent input in support of Avell raises critical questions about government interference in religious endeavors, especially in light of accusations that the city is selectively enforcing regulations against the church under the guise of public safety. We dissect Yost's statements, questioning the narrative of animosity and exploitation that shapes the discourse around this case.Full Show Notes and Links UsedSend us a textSupport the showSubscribe to our free newsletterCheck out our MerchFollow us on BlueskyFind us on Twitter(for now) Find us on InstagramFind us on Counter SocialFind us on Mastadon

The recent murder of Brian Thompson, the CEO of United Healthcare, unearthed lingering debates about health care reform from back during President Obama's administration. The murder, occurring outside a high-profile hotel in New York City, ignites discussions about the frustrations directed at health insurance corporations, reminiscent of grievances voiced during the 2009 health care debates. We reflect on how the tragic event serves as a grim backdrop to the ongoing conversation about making health care universally accessible and the long-overlooked promise of a public option.We examine the discontent over how progressives were misled into believing that the ACA could be the first step toward more comprehensive reform, which has yet to materialize more than a decade later. The lack of subsequent development towards a public option or Medicare-for-all only deepens the disenchantment among many supporters of health care reform, echoing similar frustrations that arose during the passage of the ACA.We then shift to a significant legislative issue in Ohio: the proposed House Bill 8, which mirrors the contentious “Don't Say Gay” laws previously enacted in Florida. This bill threatens the existing protections for LGBTQ+ students, requiring educators to disclose a student's questioning of their identity to their parents, regardless of the potential risks involved. We articulate my concerns regarding the bill's impacts on both secular education and the welfare of vulnerable students, who could face dangerous repercussions from such mandatory disclosures.We scrutinize the underhanded political maneuvers involved in the Ohio legislature that aim to push this bill through under the guise of parental rights while ignoring the necessary considerations for the well-being of children in precarious home environments. By equating education with indoctrination, the proponents of House Bill 8 jeopardize crucial inclusivity and awareness in public schools, which are designed to expand children's horizons beyond their immediate experiences.The strategies employed by proponents of Ohio House Bill 8 reveal the extent to which political agendas can distort education and silence essential dialogues around diversity and inclusion. As we navigate this landscape, it becomes evident that the fight for equitable health care and just policies for all students is far from over, requiring vigilant advocacy from citizens and allies in the progressive movement.Full Show Notes and Links UsedSend us a textSupport the showSubscribe to our free newsletterCheck out our MerchFind us on Twitter(for now) Find us on InstagramFind us on Counter SocialFind us on Mastadon

In this episode, we delve into the current legislative climate in Ohio as the state legislature rushes through a series of controversial bills during the lame duck session. The urgency to pass these bills stems from the impending expiration of the General Assembly at the end of December, compelling lawmakers to push through legislation that aligns with their agendas. One such bill is an alarming proposal would force public-schools to allow LifeWise Academy, an evangelical organization, to conduct religious instruction during school hours, undermining the secular nature of public education.The bills — House Bill 445 and Senate Bill 293 — would mandate public school districts to adopt a release time religious instruction policy, facilitating LifeWise's access to students for indoctrination under the guise of education. We emphasize the inconsistencies in the motivations of those advocating for such legislation, noting the hypocrisy of their concerns about indoctrination when it comes to secular subjects like critical race theory, while simultaneously promoting religious teachings in public schools.The episode features insights from bill hearings earlier this month, where key figures, including LifeWise founder Joel Penton, faced scrutiny over the lack of guidelines for their proposed programs. In a particular clip, Penton struggles to understand why there is growing opposition to LifeWise's encroachment into public education, attributing it to their increasing popularity rather than genuine concerns about the integrity of educational institutions and the rights of parents and children.Throughout the episode, we juxtapose comments made by LifeWise representatives with those of concerned parents and activists, such as Keith Comer, drawing attention to a disturbing trend where religious entities are increasingly seeking to integrate their agendas into public education under the cover of community service. Interestingly, the conversation shifts to how these legislative machinations are not just about religious freedom, but about securing a foothold for a particular ideology within our educational framework.Finally, we reflect on the implications of these policies if enacted, questioning whether public schools should be used as platforms for religious indoctrination under any circumstance. This episode serves not only as a critique of specific bills but as an urgent appeal for vigilance in protecting educational integrity from sectarian influences.Full show notes and links usedSend us a textSupport the showSubscribe to our free newsletterCheck out our MerchFind us on Twitter(for now) Find us on InstagramFind us on Counter SocialFind us on Mastadon

We take a deep dive into the recent election and its ramifications, focusing particularly on the Democrats' surprising loss and the implications for future campaigns. We look at both the evident and subtle factors that contributed to this outcome. Being a black woman was a significant hurdle for Vice President Kamala Harris, which I argue led to a disheartening decline in support from key demographics, particularly among white women.We reflect on the expansive backing Harris had throughout her campaign—endorsements from high-profile figures, a massive fundraising effort, and relentless campaigning in critical swing states. Despite these advantages, we dissect several conventional narratives that emerged post-election, including claims about "wokeness" hurting her candidacy. These perspectives fail to recognize the historical biases that women, and especially women of color, face in political arenas. The correlation between Harris's identity and the voting decisions by constituents shines a light on the entrenched prejudices in the electorate.The the role of the media can't be overlooked in shaping public perception and the electoral outcome. We draw stark contrasts between how the media covered the candidacy of Trump versus Harris. The disparity in coverage serves as a significant barrier to the Democrats' message and outreach. Right-wing media not only sets the news agenda but also propagates narratives that undermine Democratic candidates.We highlight the absurdity of critiques directed at Democratic strategies, especially in the face of a system that fundamentally prioritizes white male leadership and often disregards the complexities of intersectionality in politics.There is a vital requirement for a counterbalance to the dominant right-wing platforms that distort narratives for political gain. If the Democrats are to regain ground, establishing robust media channels to promote liberal perspectives and to advocate for equitable policies is paramount.Full Show Notes and Links UsedSend us a textSupport the showSubscribe to our free newsletterCheck out our MerchFind us on Twitter(for now) Find us on InstagramFind us on Counter SocialFind us on Mastadon

We speak with secular political activist Sarah Levin about the evolving landscape for secular voters within the Democratic Party, the implications of interfaith coalitions, and the role of non-religious constituents in upcoming elections.We also explore Sarah's substantial activism, including her role as founder of Secular Strategies and her efforts to establish secular representation within the Democratic National Committee (DNC). She emphasizes the significant strides made since her last appearance, particularly the inclusion of non-religious voices in the DNC's interfaith efforts and the official endorsement of the principle of separation of church and state in the party's platform for the first time. Doug and Sarah also discuss the challenges that still exist, including the perception issues surrounding secular candidates among both voters and the party apparatus.Sarah reflects on the importance of building a political identity that resonates with both non-religious voters and religious individuals, stressing the necessity of intersectionality in politics. We also focus on voter engagement and the upcoming elections.A critical segment of the conversation addresses the complex U.S. relationship with Israel amidst the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. Sarah articulates her belief that while the U.S. has historically provided unquestioned support to Israel, this is a moment for reevaluation—especially in light of the potential ramifications of a Trump administration, which promises more extreme measures than current policies.Finally we encourage listeners to actively participate in the political process, follow updates on secular candidates, and engage in conversations that amplify the non-religious voice. With Sarah Levin's groundwork laying the foundation for future progress, this episode serves as a clarion call to recognize both the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead for secular individuals in politics.Full Show Notes & LinksSend us a textSupport the showSubscribe to our free newsletterCheck out our MerchFind us on Twitter(for now) Find us on InstagramFind us on Counter SocialFind us on Mastadon

We look into the murky waters of political dishonesty prevalent during the current election cycle, particularly focusing on the blatant lies propagated in political advertisements. With election day swiftly approaching, it's easy to lose sight of the facts amidst the barrage of misleading ads from large PACs like the Congressional Leadership Fund and American Prosperity Fund. Unlike other forms of advertising that are subject to regulatory scrutiny, political ads enjoy the protections of the First Amendment, allowing candidates to misrepresent facts without penalty.Then we look at the recent vice presidential debate, which we approach with skepticism, arguing that these events are mere vehicles for candidates to produce soundbites for future commercials rather than genuine discussions of policy. C.F. Vance's performance is scrutinized, particularly his fabrications regarding Trump's stance on Obamacare. The focus shifts to Trump's ongoing legal battles, highlighting the critical distinction made by prosecutor Jack Smith about what constitutes official actions versus private actions in the context of election interference. It's crucial for voters to grasp that the president's attempts to influence the election were not part of his official duties—a point we argue could play a significant role in the upcoming election.Next we grapple with the aftermath of a devastating hurricane that recently struck Florida and made its way through the southeast. The political ramifications of disaster recovery aid, particularly the outrage from conservatives about federal assistance, are examined. We  clarify the purpose of the $750 immediate assistance offered by FEMA, juxtaposing it against the broader and more complex recovery efforts needing more time to be processed. This sense of urgency is contrasted with the indifference displayed by congressional leaders who postpone aid packages for political gain.Lastly, we celebrate a recent victory for school districts standing up against LifeWise Academy — an evangelical initiative that seeks to impose religious instruction during the school day, rather than as an extracurricular activity. We break down the controversy surrounding a school board in Westerville, Ohio, which voted to rescind its policy that allowed LifeWise to operate during school hours. This decision was driven not only by concerns over curriculum disruption and liability but also by broader implications about maintaining the secular integrity of public education. LifeWise's attempts to portray itself as a victim of circumstance and its extensive funding sources underscore the lengths to which such organizations will go to infiltrate public schools.Full Show Notes plus LinksSend us a textSupport the showSubscribe to our free newsletterCheck out our MerchFind us on Twitter(for now) Find us on InstagramFind us on Counter SocialFind us on Mastadon

We look at the alarming trend of Republican rhetoric surrounding immigration, particularly their attempts to vilify Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio. Drawing comparisons to the divisive strategies of Ronald Reagan in the 1980s, we explore how the GOP is leveraging fear and misinformation to distract voters from their lack of substantial policy proposals. During the debate, Trump absurdly suggested that immigrants in Springfield were resorting to eating pets—a claim that sparked ridicule from Vice President Kamala Harris and has since been debunked by local authorities and independent fact-checkers. The persistence of such lies indicates a broader strategy by Republicans to unite their base through fear-mongering and scapegoating marginalized communities. With no concrete plans for critical issues like healthcare or the economy, the GOP resorts to these gimmicks to rally support.Republican Vivek Ramaswamy hosted a town hall event, where local residents expressed concerns about the integration of immigrants. Notably absent from this discussion were representatives from the Haitian community, which raises questions about the inclusivity of the dialogue surrounding immigration. While Ramaswamy blamed the role of federal policies in the situation, much of the conversation was steeped in fear and blame directed at the newcomers rather than seeking solutions collaboratively.We then expose the hollow messages underpinning the campaign of Derek Merrin, a Republican candidate for Ohio's 9th Congressional District. Marrin focuses on immigration as a key issue while neglecting to address pressing concerns like economic development and resources for existing residents. His vague promises of returning high-paying jobs to the area are juxtaposed against a history of Republican governance that has failed to deliver tangible results.The current immigration discourse often overlooks the positive contributions of immigrants, focusing instead on exaggerated fears. This conversation serves as a reminder of the importance of dialogue grounded in facts and compassion rather than fear and misinformation.Full Show NotesSend us a textSupport the showSubscribe to our free newsletterCheck out our MerchFind us on Twitter(for now) Find us on InstagramFind us on Counter SocialFind us on Mastadon

We investigate the political tactics of the Republican Party as we approach the election season, highlighting their reliance on divisive rhetoric around immigration rather than substantive policy proposals. With a convicted felon leading the party, it's become apparent that their strategy is to invoke fear rather than offer solutions. We examine how they've resurrected the illegal immigrant narrative to scare voters, particularly targeting older white demographics and the more gullible segments of their base. We debunk the myths surrounding undocumented immigrants voting, emphasizing the legal complexities and safeguarding mechanisms in place that prevent such occurrences.Transitioning to a critical toolkit developed to counter the rise of Christian nationalism in public education, we share insights from Doug's involvement with the Honesty for Ohio Education advocacy group. This toolkit serves as a comprehensive guide for parents, educators, and community members looking to navigate the treacherous waters of Release Time Religious Instruction (RTRI) policies, which allow students to leave school for religious instruction during the day. We explain the manipulative strategies deployed by groups like Lifewise Academy, which disguises its religious agenda under a veneer of character-based education, while the reality is an aggressive attempt to convert schoolchildren to Christianity.A major component of the tool-kit is a critical review of the data backing Lifewise Academy's claims of positive outcomes for students participating in their program. By exposing the statistical manipulation and selective reporting methodologies, we argue that such claims are more about marketing than genuine educational benefits. Good education should prioritize the well-being and development of the student, free from religious indoctrination.Full show notesSend us a textSupport the showSubscribe to our free newsletterCheck out our MerchFind us on Twitter(for now) Find us on InstagramFind us on Counter SocialFind us on Mastadon

We Don't Want Empty Promises, Party Manipulations, Or Politcal Bridge BurningWe look into the ongoing political landscape in Ohio, dissecting the implications of a proposed constitutional amendment aimed at curbing gerrymandering that could potentially end the Republican supermajority in the state. The Ohio Ballot Board's recent attempt to manipulate the ballot summary for this measure raises serious concerns about transparency and fairness. We examine the political maneuvering behind this effort and discuss how it fits into the larger narrative of electoral integrity.We reflect on Senator Chuck Schumer's remarks to reporters during the 2024 Democratic National Convention. Schumer's bold assertion that voting Democrat in November will lead to significant changes in the filibuster deserves scrutiny. We explore the skepticism that surrounds these promises, given past experiences where similar assertions did not materialize into action once the Democrats had power. The question remains: can we trust the Democratic leadership to follow through on commitments that can reshape legislative processes critical to our democracy?Then we unpack the disappointing political ad from Rep. Marcy Kaptur, a longtime House Democrat facing re-election. The ad's attempt to appeal to conservative constituents while alienating progressives highlights a troubling trend within the party. Kaptur's rhetorical decisions, particularly her invocation of "the far left," indicate a strategy that sacrifices progressive values in a bid for political survival. We analyze the implications of such messaging and question whether it will succeed in winning over voters who are fundamentally opposed to her party's principles.Throughout the episode, we engage with the underlying themes of accountability, representation, and the challenges facing candidates in a polarized political environment. As Ohioans prepare for a pivotal election, the conversations surrounding these issues become increasingly crucial. How can we encourage a more inclusive political discourse that genuinely represents the diversity of opinions and needs within our communities?Full Show NotesSend us a Text Message.Support the Show.Subscribe to our free newsletterCheck out our MerchFind us on Twitter(for now) Find us on InstagramFind us on Counter SocialFind us on Mastadon

In this spicy episode, we give you many reasons why voting for Donald Trump in the upcoming election is not a wise choice. We look into the history of the 2024 presidential election, highlighting the lack of merit in considering Trump as a viable candidate due to his questionable character and numerous controversies during his previous presidency. We call out the absurdity in Trump's behavior, highlighting his divisive rhetoric and lack of concern for the well-being of the American people.We look at the potential implications of a Trump presidency, drawing parallels to historical events and emphasizing the dangers of embracing divisive ideologies. We urge listeners to critically analyze the information presented to them, especially in the age of social media where misinformation can easily spread. Additionally, we touch on the importance of understanding the motives behind political posts and the responsibility of individuals to engage in meaningful conversations based on facts and context.We then highlight the potential scenarios surrounding the upcoming election, expressing concerns about possible election interference and the need for vigilance in protecting democracy. We emphasize the importance of making informed choices and not falling prey to divisive tactics or fear-mongering strategies employed by certain political factions. Consider the long-term implications of your voting decisions and prioritize the well-being of the country and future generations by making informed and thoughtful choices at the ballot box.Full Show NotesSend us a Text Message.Support the Show.Subscribe to our free newsletterCheck out our MerchFind us on Twitter(for now) Find us on InstagramFind us on Counter SocialFind us on Mastadon

In this jammed packed episode, we talk with Zach and Molly, parents who are taking a stand against LifeWise Academy, an evangelical Christian nationalist group that has found a way to seep into public schools through a legal loophole. They have formed Parents Against LifeWise to shed light on the group's questionable tactics, lack of background checks on members, and the concerning activities they are engaged in. The episode paints a grim picture of how school districts are turning a blind eye to the situation, emphasizing the urgent need for public awareness and action to combat the influence of such groups in educational settings.We touch on the frustrating moments of silence encountered when reaching out to organizations like FFRF and Ohio ACLU, who have failed to address the issues at hand adequately. This inaction leaves children vulnerable and without proper representation, highlighting the crucial role parents play in advocating for their rights. The responsibility falls on schools to ensure they are held accountable for any violations, rather than letting external groups like LifeWise escape blame for any harmful activities.The discussion exposes the deceptive nature of LifeWise, presenting itself as non-denominational while promoting exclusive evangelical beliefs, potentially preying on susceptible communities. Their curriculum, based on the Southern Baptist Convention, spreads harmful ideologies among impressionable young minds, as evidenced by documents detailing their damaging teachings. The podcast also shines a light on individuals like Joel Penton, involved in the group's questionable practices under the guise of motivational speeches with underlying religious agendas. The dubious funding sources and misleading petition strategies employed by LifeWise raise significant concerns about their true motives.We finally explore the legal challenges faced by Zach, who shared LifeWise's curriculum online and is now embroiled in a lawsuit with the group. Despite accessing the material lawfully and with no profit motive, Zach finds himself in a legal battle against LifeWise, showcasing the community rallying behind him for support. We touch on a recent scandal involving a former LifeWise employee, adding layers of complexity to the situation. Zach expresses gratitude for the solidarity received and discusses avenues for assistance in his legal defense as the podcast concludes with well-wishes for his upcoming court proceedings, directing listeners to their website for further information and updates.Full Show NotesSend us a Text Message.Support the Show.Subscribe to our free newsletterCheck out our MerchFind us on Twitter(for now) Find us on InstagramFind us on Counter SocialFind us on Mastadon

In this episode, we open with noting a recent US Supreme Court decision in a social media censorship case. Then we discuss the hysteria in Ohio over trans women playing sports and the unconstitutional Ten Commandments law recently enacted in Louisiana. We explore how these laws are impacting individuals and communities, especially the LGBTQ+ community, and the arguments against them.The discussion highlights the origin story of the anti-trans athlete hysteria in Ohio and how misinformation led to legislative actions. The episode also covers the significance of the Ten Commandments law in Louisiana and its potential unconstitutionality, drawing parallels to historical cases and legal precedents. We delve into the implications of displaying religious texts in public schools and the violation of religious freedom for students.Moreover, the conversation touches on the motivations behind these initiatives, such as Christian nationalism and power dynamics. The focus on history and tradition in legal arguments is critiqued for distorting facts and misrepresenting the founding principles of the country. The role of separation of church and state in ensuring individual freedoms is emphasized, contrasting with attempts to influence laws based on religious beliefs.Constitutional lawyer Andrew Seidel's perspective on the Ten Commandments law and the legal challenges it may face adds depth to the analysis. The conversation also delves into the broader context of conservative legal strategies, including originalism and the manipulation of history to advance specific agendas. Ultimately, the episode advocates for upholding secular foundations and individual rights enshrined in the Constitution, emphasizing the relevance of separation of church and state in protecting diverse beliefs and promoting equality.Full Show NotesSend us a Text Message.Support the Show.Subscribe to our free newsletterCheck out our MerchFind us on Twitter(for now) Find us on InstagramFind us on Counter SocialFind us on Mastadon

A recent bill introduced by Christian Nationalists in Ohio labels the existence of trans individuals as obscene. We look into the implications of such legislation and questions the necessity for laws that perpetuate bigotry towards the LGBTQ community. The significance of Pride Month in June is highlighted, emphasizing the celebration of the LGBTQ community's progress and their ongoing fight for acceptance and equal rights. The origin of Pride events stemming from the Stonewall Riots in 1969 is discussed, shedding light on the struggles faced by the community in the past.The episode revisits historical events such as the AIDS epidemic in the 1980s, demonstrating the ongoing marginalization faced by the LGBTQ community. The discussion also touches on the resistance faced by Pride festivals in conservative towns like Celina, Ohio, where Christian Nationalists attempted to obstruct drag performances under the guise of obscenity. We dissect the motives behind such legislation and expose the underlying bigotry and discrimination embedded within.The subsequent introduction of Ohio House Bill 245 to ban drag performances in the presence of children is scrutinized, with a focus on the testimonies provided during the bill's hearings. We look into the arguments presented by proponents of the bill, highlighting the discriminatory nature of the proposed legislation. The episode outlines the concerns raised by lawmakers and activists regarding the potential impact of such laws on the LGBTQ community, emphasizing the need to combat institutionalized discrimination and bigotry.Our overarching theme of promoting inclusivity, acceptance, and equal rights for all individuals, irrespective of their gender identity or sexual orientation, is reiterated. The call to action to challenge discriminatory laws and elect representatives who champion equality and diversity forms a pivotal message, emphasizing the ongoing struggle for LGBTQA+ rights and the importance of fostering an inclusive society.Full show notesSend us a Text Message.Support the Show.Subscribe to our free newsletterCheck out our MerchFind us on Twitter(for now) Find us on InstagramFind us on Counter SocialFind us on Mastadon

We delve into the upcoming 2024 election and the current political landscape. There is disbelief in polls showing Trump ahead of Biden, emphasizing the concerning reality of Trump's character and actions. We highlight the stark differences between the two major candidates, pointing out Trump's history of dishonesty, racism, and legal troubles, juxtaposed with Biden's relatively honest and family-oriented background.We address the media's focus on election predictions and the tactics used to create drama and anxiety among voters. We express frustration with the attempt to predict election outcomes before they happen and touch on polling data showing Trump's popularity among specific demographics and how this relates to trust in government and not voting.We move on to discuss the unique challenges Ohio faces as a state no longer considered a bellwether in elections. We look at various social and political issues plaguing Ohio, such as overrepresentation in certain crimes and corruption scandals, and how they contribute to the state's current situation.We find the primary anxiety fueling Trump's popularity is rooted in racism and bigotry rather than economic concerns. We emphasize the impact of racist beliefs on voting behavior, highlighting the influence of conservative media and talk radio in promoting such ideologies.Wrapping up we urge listeners to consider the consequences of not voting for the lesser of two evils in the upcoming election stressing the importance of confronting racism and bigotry in politics and the potential dangers of allowing such beliefs to shape the country's future.Full Show NotesSend us a Text Message.Support the Show.Subscribe to our free newsletterCheck out our MerchFind us on Twitter(for now) Find us on InstagramFind us on Counter SocialFind us on Mastadon

Could Ohio's latest law be a seismic shift toward religious indoctrination in public schools? We grapple with the state's decision to allow Bible classes during school hours, and the societal tremors it's causing. Explore with me the backlash from an Ohio State Representative against cities supporting abortion rights, despite Ohio's recent Abortion Rights Amendment. We also mention the electric atmosphere surrounding former President Donald Trump's trial in NYC, scrutinizing the charges of hush payments and the potential courtroom chess game.The meat of the episode lays out LifeWise's aggressive expansion, as this organization plants religious instruction within the fabric of public education – raising red flags over transparency and ethicality. We also scrutinize the recent Reproductive Rights Amendment's rocky road to enforcement and the polarizing legislation that threatens the rights of transgender individuals in Ohio. As we connect the dots between these critical issues, we underscore the importance of civic participation and the power of your vote to shape the future. From controversial amendments to the "bathroom ban" bill and beyond, this episode is a clarion call for social justice and an informed electorate ready to stand against the incursions of Christian nationalism into our public institutions.Full Show NotesSend us a Text Message.Support the Show.Subscribe to our free newsletterCheck out our MerchFind us on Twitter(for now) Find us on InstagramFind us on Counter SocialFind us on Mastadon

America is facing a tipping point in potentially losing its democracy in 2024, particularly if Trump wins the upcoming election. White Christian nationalists are identified as a significant influence pushing the country towards this tipping point. We take a deep dive into the concept of Christian nationalism, which conflates American identity with an exclusive form of religious identity, seeking to concentrate power in a select group based on anti-democratic notions of white supremacy, nativism, patriarchy, and authoritarianism.We next hear a speech given by Dr. Anthea Butler, at the recent Summit for Religious Freedom. Dr. Butler underscores the political nature of Christian nationalism, emphasizing its goal of power and influence over religious or theological positions. The discussion also touches on the historical ties between Christian nationalism and racial subjugation, tracing back to the justification of slavery using Christian scriptures.Dr. Butler calls upon listeners to educate themselves, advocate for inclusivity, and actively resist the encroachment of Christian nationalist ideals into public spheres.Show NotesSupport the Show.Subscribe to our free newsletterCheck out our MerchFind us on Twitter(for now) Find us on InstagramFind us on Counter SocialFind us on Mastadon

We delve into the complex topic of free speech and its limits. Free speech is not an absolute right and there can be the regulation of speech in certain contexts. A prime example is in a nearby conservative town where a vocal individual disrupts city council meetings with personal attacks on the mayor, correctly leading to the consideration of new public comment rules.Transitioning to economic matters, we discuss a minimum wage increase in California and its impact on fast-food workers. We challenge the notion that corporations cannot afford wage hikes, emphasizing the importance of fair compensation for workers. Corporate greed and price gouging is driving inflation, highlighting the concentration of power in the hands of a few corporations as a key factor. Drawing on insights from economist Robert Reich, we argue that corporate dominance leads to higher prices and record profits, rather than inflation being solely to blame.Full Show NotesSupport the showSubscribe to our free newsletterCheck out our MerchFind us on Twitter(for now) Find us on InstagramFind us on Counter SocialFind us on Mastadon

We update a local school busing dispute involving families wanting better accommodations for their children being transported to a Catholic school, citing concerns about early start times and religious freedom violations.In the discussion on Ohio's school voucher expansion, concerns were raised about the diversion of public funds to private schools without proper oversight. Despite the intention to aid students in struggling public schools, data showed that isn't happening and is probably a feature of the scam.Racist Derek Merrin won his nomination for a congressional seat and we also delved into progressive discontent with President Biden over his handling of Israel-Palestine issues, leading to debates on voting strategies and allegiance to party lines. Moreover, we highlighted Robert Kennedy Jr.'s anti-vaccination stance and his unlikely prospects as a political candidate, underlining the challenges of third-party competition in the US political landscape.We conclude with a critical examination of justice disparities for wealthy individuals like Trump compared to the average citizen, questioning the fairness of the legal system. Show NotesSupport the showSubscribe to our free newsletterCheck out our MerchFind us on Twitter(for now) Find us on InstagramFind us on Counter SocialFind us on Mastadon

We delve into the Ohio 2024 primary elections where three white Republican candidates in the congressional race are resorting to racist rhetoric in their campaign ads. These candidates include State Representative Derek Merrin, who is a Christian nationalist known for his anti-LGBT stance and attacks on trans kids. The episode explores how these candidates dehumanize undocumented individuals by perpetuating a false narrative of a border invasion by dangerous drug smugglers. Their campaign materials depict imagery of fear and urgency surrounding border security, echoing Trump's policies and advocating for a fortified wall. The lack of compassion is apparent.We then dissect misleading claims made in campaign literature against Derek Merrin, painting him as a liberal based on selective votes. We meticulously fact-check these claims, revealing the nuanced context behind Merrin's decisions and highlighting the manipulation of facts in political messaging. The discussion also touches on the shortcomings of campaign regulations, allowing for deceptive practices in advertising.00:49 Racism Is A Deplorable MAGA Feature18:31 Derek Merrin the liberal??Full Show NotesSupport the showSubscribe to our free newsletterCheck out our MerchFind us on Twitter(for now) Find us on InstagramFind us on Counter SocialFind us on Mastadon

Do political and religious conservatives really understand DEI? We challenge popular misconceptions about Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, confronting the unfounded fears that it poses a threat to traditional values. We dissect the essence of DEI, illustrating how it nurtures communities where every individual, irrespective of their background, is acknowledged, valued, and given equitable opportunities. Contrary to the myth about affirmative action, DEI seeks representation and fairness, not unearned advantage—an idea powerfully echoed in a featured clip from The Root that we'll explore, shedding light on DEI's transformative role across various sectors.Tensions rise as we scrutinize the recent inflammatory comments from Ohio's 9th Congressional District candidate JR Majewski and their ripple effects within the political landscape. Assessing his suitability for office, we confront the wider issues facing the Republican Party in the wake of his divisive rhetoric. Shifting focus to the heated battle over reproductive rights, we unravel the complexities of IVF and the ramifications of classifying embryos as legal persons in Alabama. The episode probes the intersection of humanism with the separation of church and state, bringing to the forefront the profound societal consequences of these deeply personal and contentious legal challenges and the clueless Republicans who don't know what IVF is.This is our 75th Episode!Full Show NotesSupport the showSubscribe to our free newsletterCheck out our MerchFind us on Twitter(for now) Find us on InstagramFind us on Counter SocialFind us on Mastadon

We explore the controversial subject of police conduct, particularly in situations where an individual seeks to commit 'suicide by cop.' We then shift to the media's fixation on President Biden's age, questioning why it garners such attention and criticizing how coverage distracts from more substantive political discourse. Finally, we share our thoughts on the disappointing return of Jon Stewart to the Daily Show and how he plays into unneeded political equivocation.Show NotesSupport the showSubscribe to our free newsletterCheck out our MerchFind us on Twitter(for now) Find us on InstagramFind us on Counter SocialFind us on Mastadon

Former evangelical minister Bruce Gerencser joins us to unravel a legal tangle where religious freedom clashes with municipal zoning laws. We dissect the contentious situation surrounding Pastor Chris Avell, a friend of Bruce's, who's currently embroiled in a federal lawsuit against the city of Bryan, Ohio. We dissect the merits of Avell's decision to transform his church into a 24/7 sanctuary for the homeless. With Christian Nationalists making this a national story and the First Liberty Insitute being involved, we see a repeat of a pattern where there is a claim of perscution that is actually just incovience and friendly courts help the religious avoid laws and regulations that apply to everyone else.We take a deeper look at the ramifications of homelessness in rural communities, particularly how small churches like Dad's Place are caught in the crossfire of wanting to help and being hindered by red tape. We question the consistency and impact of health and safety laws on church start-ups operating in repurposed buildings. By examining the struggle to navigate outdated codes and the lack of political momentum to tackle the homelessness crisis, this conversation aims to shine a light on the poignant narrative of small churches wrestling with their role in social outreach amid legal constraints. We agree with Bruce that Pastor Avell needs to follow the law while the city needs to do better to help the homeless.Show NotesSupport the showSubscribe to our free newsletterCheck out our MerchFind us on Twitter(for now) Find us on InstagramFind us on Counter SocialFind us on Mastadon

Humanists International just released their 2023 Freedom of Thought Report that documents the efforts to protect or not protect religious freedom in all the countries in the world. The US government created the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom in 1998 to call out countries that violate religious freedom.One of these efforts is trying to hold the powerful accountable for religious freedom and the other is a bad faith attempt to privilege Christianity using the power of the state.We examine the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom and ask why haven't any atheists been appointed yet several Christian Nationalists have been.Finally we hear clips of comments made at the Humanists International press conference about the newest report. We hear from Reps. Jaime Raskin and Jared Huffman from the Congressional Freethought Caucus and others about the importance of the report and religious freedom for all.00:40 Introduction of the 2023 Freedom of Thought Report05:04 Why The Freedom Of Thought Report Came Into Existence10:06 Bad Faith Religious Freedom Protection16:57 No Atheists On The United States Commission On International Religious Freedom20:00 Selected Clips From The Humanist International Press Conference.Full Show NotesSupport the showSubscribe to our free newsletterCheck out our MerchFind us on Twitter(for now) Find us on InstagramFind us on Counter SocialFind us on Mastadon

How far are you willing to go for the truth? How much are you ready to risk for justice and freedom of speech? Join us as we traverse the treacherous terrain of investigative journalism with our guest Dr. Anthony Feinstein, author of the book 'Moral Courage 19 Profiles of Investigative Journalists'. Dr. Feinstein takes us through the intricate concept of moral courage, a crucial attribute for journalists navigating danger, standing on principles, and displaying extraordinary endurance.Imagine getting up every day, knowing your job could be a life and death situation, and still choosing to do it. That's the reality for conflict journalists covering the ongoing strife amd corruption in the world. Our episode takes a detour into the heart of this hazardous world with a researcher and filmmaker, who shares the psychological burden journalists bear.We pivot towards the significance of journalism in authoritarian regimes. What does it mean to report the truth in perilous environments? How does one navigate the daunting challenges and psychological impacts? Our guest explores these questions and more, unmasking the alarming tactics of authoritarian leaders that suppress the press and can even infiltrate democratic societies. We uncover the dangers of corporate sway on media and the critical need to safeguard a free press. Tune in, as this isn't just about journalists fighting oppressive regimes, but a battle for preserving democracy and freedom of speech. And remember, every word matters.Full Show Notes00:40 All About The Moral Courage Research Project11:49 Importance Of Moral Courage To A Free Press16:21 Attacks On The Press Are Dangerous To Democracy30:41 State Of Journalism In The Social Media EraSupport the showSubscribe to our free newsletterCheck out our MerchFind us on Twitter(for now) Find us on InstagramFind us on Counter SocialFind us on Mastadon

Ever wondered why the separation of church and state is a formidable pillar of modern democracies? Join us as we dissect this essential concept with no other than Andrew Seidel, the vice president of strategic communications for Americans United, an accomplished author, and a relentless defender of the First Amendment. With over a decade of experience in law, Andrew's insights into the legal concept of 'standing' and how the ever-important separation of church and state influences the issues we face today, promise to be both fascinating and educational.This not so subtle weaponization of religious freedom threatens democracy by privileging a select few such as the new speaker of the US House Michael Johnson, a Christian Nationalist of the first order. As we weave through the integral threads of church-state separation within the fabric of our republic, the significance of authentic religious freedom and the strive for unexceptional equality becomes evident. Andrew concludes our engrossing dialogue on a positive note, expressing optimism in the growing awareness of people towards this significant struggle. Eye-opening and enlightening, this conversation is a must for those keen on comprehending the profound correlation between religion, state, and the fight for equality in America.Show NotesSupport the showSubscribe to our free newsletterCheck out our MerchFind us on Twitter(for now) Find us on InstagramFind us on Counter SocialFind us on Mastadon

Jam-packed with insights and experiences, we sit down with Keith Semple, an eminent musician with a quarter-century-long journey in the industry. Starting his career in Northern Ireland, he's now making waves in the US, not just with his music, but with his engaging podcast, The Semple Truth. Keith shares his thoughts about his secular humanist beliefs and how atheists often demonstrate the highest level of religious literacy. His straightforward and bold views on the importance of challenging stereotypes and misconceptions are sure to strike a chord!We step into the realm of music as Keith shares the inspiration behind his songs, his bands, and his religious observances. His song "Double X" stirred a discussion, inspired by Roe vs. Wade. Also, an upcoming song focusing on climate change teases to add a new dimension to his repertoire. He speaks candidly about his time on "The Voice" and the shocking religious undertones he experienced on the show.Our conversation takes a fascinating turn as we explore the captivating world of fiction, focusing on the works of fantasy author R. A. Salvatore, particularly his protagonist, Drizzt Do'Urden. We look at how Salvatore's characters navigate through religion, morality, and social issues. We also shed light on the influence of progressive activists such as Liz Plank on their communities. And as a cherry on top, we share some useful insights on inviting potential guests for the podcast and the diversity they bring to the table. Tune in to savor this eclectic mix of music, religion, and fiction!Show NotesSupport the showSubscribe to our free newsletterCheck out our MerchFind us on Twitter(for now) Find us on InstagramFind us on Counter SocialFind us on Mastadon

We delve into the life and philosophy of Herb Kay, a man with diverse experiences ranging from being an NSA analyst, a salesman, to serving time in prison. His stint in prison, as result of bad choices during the 2008 real estate collapse, helped him experience people with underprivileged backgrounds and shaped his views on issues such as gun control, mass incarceration, other societal issues and inspired him to conceive 'The 1964 Plan'.Herb claims his political approach transcends party lines and addresses societal problems like the breakup of the nuclear family, the war on drugs and the welfare state. He claims government welfare implementation replaced familial support leading to poverty more permanent than temporary.He decided to call his plan 'The 1964 Plan' to refer to Lyndon B. Johnson's Great Society program which Herb claims had good intentions but institutionalized poverty across generations. The plan also talks about the importance of involvement of fathers - traditionally providing discipline and setting boundaries contrasted with the nurturing role mothers play. Kay also emphasizes the impact on child development including lessons like deferred gratification. Herb also believes that women were happier before the sexual revolution.Our discussion burns hot at times as Herb defends his ideas and his plan. How is it not just warmed over conservative 'hate the poor' with a dash of misogyny? After the interview our host, Doug, offers some final thoughts.Show Notes01:45 Prison is just an extension of the welfare state08:16 Destruction of the Nuclear Family - Fatherlessness13:03 Women unhappy since the sexual revolution19:32 Equality of the sexes is a myth24:47 The problem with progressives27:43 Prison Reform31:12 Welfare shouldn't be a federal program - leave it to the states38:51 Drug Legalization41:12 Doug's EpilogueSupport the showSubscribe to our free newsletterCheck out our MerchFind us on Twitter(for now) Find us on InstagramFind us on Counter SocialFind us on Mastadon

We meet the person behind the Rooster, DJ Byrnes. He is a renowned video blogger and former political candidate, known for his audacity in unveiling the political landscape of Ohio and who sparks fear in the religious zealots infecting the Ohio Statehouse. He made his name when he posted the infamous video that ultimately cost Urban Meyer his NFL job. Rooster shares how video blogging can significantly impact politics, his experiences capturing content on social media platforms and his insights into Ohio's battles on cultural war issues.As we dabble in Ohio's most hot-button issues, Rooster's perspectives on the upcoming constitutional amendment for reproductive rights, and the court case regarding the ballot language, are especially enlightening. We tackle the possible overturning of the vote for legal weed in the Ohio legislature and the role popular issues play in shaping the state's political landscape. Rooster's thoughts on potential investments for the amendment, Center for Christian Virtue's prayer hour at the Statehouse, and the contentious ads by anti-abortion groups make for an engaging conversation that you wouldn't want to miss.Finally, we touch on the issues closest to Rooster's heart - the decline of local newspapers in rural districts and the subsequent political apathy. His take on the power of video as a social change tool and his upcoming projects promise hope and action for the future. As a bonus, he also talks about his merch store and how you can support his efforts to fight social injustice in Ohio. Get ready to be inspired and enlightened by Rooster's politically charged journey.Show Notes02:41 Urban Meyer Bar Story08:11 Ruining Derek Merrin Speakership12:40 Holding the powerful accountable21:33 House Taco23:47 State Issue 1 and 2 Prospects36:33 Future PlansSupport the showSubscribe to our free newsletterCheck out our MerchFind us on Twitter(for now) Find us on InstagramFind us on Counter SocialFind us on Mastadon

Can a reformed Islamophobe be redeemed and can a non-Muslim speak about the complex relationship between progressive and orthodox Islam with any creditability? Eric Brazau's look at Islam began in an unexpected place - while he was incarcerated. His enlightening perspectives and observations are shared in his book, 'Muslim Reformers versus Fundamentalists.' This provocative work tackles the pressing question of how Islam is interacting with, and shaping, Western civilization. Eric's book further raises inquiries on which form of Islam - the reformist or fundamentalist - will ultimately gain prominence. But beyond pointing out the differences he offers no solutions or why we should really care. We challenge Eric on his complaints about laws to prevent Islamophobia, the same kind that landed him in jail years ago. Personal harassment of religious people is just wrong. Get ready for an information-loaded session that fails to offer fresh perspectives on Islam and lightly touches on the western concern about radical Islam which is really no different than concern about Christian Nationalism here in the US.Show Notes04:28 Muslim Reformers versus Fundamentalists18:29 Religious Extremism: both sides of the same coin36:10 Hate Speech Laws in Canada49:46 Host NoteSupport the showSubscribe to our free newsletterCheck out our MerchFind us on Twitter(for now) Find us on InstagramFind us on Counter SocialFind us on Mastadon

Prepare yourself for an enlightening ride into the obscure frontiers of political intrigue and misinformation warfare, as we shine a light on a heated conflict unfolding in Ohio. Learn about the conservative and Christian Nationalist groups opposing the Reproductive Rights Amendment, the sly tactics they employ, and the false narratives they propagate to hinder its passage. We focus on a particular social media post that has been circulating and scrutinize the distortion of facts in it. We also delve deep into the history and activities of the American Policy Roundtable, founded as a Christian ministry but now known for their advocacy of school voucher and their attempts to block gambling in the state.Show Notes00:41 Introducing the American Policy Roundtable08:13 Refuting the top partion of APR's amendment social media post25:56 Refuting the bottom partion of APR's amendment social media postSupport the showSubscribe to our free newsletterCheck out our MerchFind us on Twitter(for now) Find us on InstagramFind us on Counter SocialFind us on Mastadon

We explore the latest twist in the tale of closed St Anthony Church in Toledo. Saved from demolition to be a place for affordable housing and/or a community event space. The Lucas County Land Bank decided to ditch what the community wanted and went with the idea of converting the church into a climbing gym, a project proposed by a company known for a similar creation near Wildwood Metro Park. Why did the Land Bank ignore the community?Our episode also looks at controversial decisions around chemical abortions and public schools. We'll dissect the Republican attorney generals' lawsuit in Texas aimed at removing FDA authorization of one abortion drug, the surprising argument used by Judge James Ho, and the latest from the US Supreme Court. Then, we'll address the controversy around State Senator Theresa Gavarone's presence at a school opening despite her support for universal vouchers and lack of support for adequate public school funding. All this and more awaits. Don't miss out!Show Notes01:14  St. Anthony's Totally Uncalled For Transformation24:42 Gov. DeWine and the Bishops32:40 Abortion Pill Court Decision41:36 State Senator Gaverone and the Public School Photo-opSupport the showSubscribe to our free newsletterCheck out our MerchFind us on Twitter(for now) Find us on InstagramFind us on Counter SocialFind us on Mastadon

Today's episode takes us to Northwest Ohio as we probe into the intriguing life and ideologies of Professor Lee Strang. Engulfed in legal and societal debates, Strang plays multiple roles - a University of Toledo Law School professor, public charter school founder, anti-abortion activist, and advocate for conservative think tanks at Ohio law schools. We navigate the highs and lows of his highly charged Christian nationalist perspective, addressing his influence on law, education, and society.We peer into Strang's interpretation of the First Amendment and discuss why atheism and secular humanism do not fit into his definition of religion. We unveil his stance on the constitutional protection of unborn fetuses and how this belief fuels his anti-abortion activism. Unmasking the educational philosophy behind the Northwest Ohio Classical Academy, Strang's brainchild, we bring to light its approach to controversial topics and commitment to a classical education curriculum that tries to hide its religious underpinnings.Finally, we bare the threads of Strang's Christian Nationalist influence and the appearance of a quid pro quo with the leaders of the Ohio Republican Party and state anti-abortion groups like the Center for Christian Virtue. We scrutinize his endeavors to pass State Issue 1 alongside State Senator and former student Rob McColley and the implications for Ohio's political landscape. Regardless of personal agreement or dissent with Strang's beliefs, his impact on Ohio and beyond is undeniable. Tune in for an exploration of modern conservatism through the lens of one influential figure.Show Notes00:45 Wanting To Hear Different Voices On The Podcast04:48 Introducing Professor Lee Strang11:01 Strang Supports Originalism17:32 Strang Claims 1St Amendment Doesn't Apply To Atheists And Secular Humanists24:50 Strang Is An Anti-Abortion Activist29:45 Strang Founds Religiously Based Charter School Disguised As A Non-Religious School43:23 Strang Gets Favorable Local Press Stories Because Of Personal ConnectionsSupport the showSubscribe to our free newsletterCheck out our MerchFind us on Twitter(for now) Find us on InstagramFind us on Counter SocialFind us on Mastadon

People like Christian Nationalist Charlie Kirk and the US Supreme Court get affirmative action in college admissions wrong. The racist assumption is a marginalized group would be automatically unqualified to attend an elite college without it. Affirmative action doesn't elevate unqualified people it levels the playing field. Then we look at Christian Nationalists who use the argument that they must save the children when targeting gender affirming care and Drag Queens, while ignoring religious exemptions to child abuse and vaccination laws that can cause real harm. It isn't about protecting children.Show Notes[00:35] Charlie Kirk Is Wrong About Affirmative Action [15:16] Using Children To Cram Your Religious Bigotry Down Our ThroatSupport the showSubscribe to our free newsletterCheck out our MerchFind us on Twitter(for now) Find us on InstagramFind us on Counter SocialFind us on Mastadon

We tackle the controversial Supreme Court decision, 303 Creative LLC versus Elenis. This case revolves around a Christian graphic designer from Colorado who refuses to provide services to same-sex couples. We unpack the court's ruling, which distorts the First Amendment, and the potential implications for both religious and non-religious individuals. We explore the nuances of the case, including the alleged made-up injury, and the designer's willingness to provide services to LGBT individuals, but not for same-sex weddings. We continue the conversation by examining how the US Supreme Court has used a historical narrative to permit legislative prayer that is not in line with actual historical events. In the final part of the episode, we broaden our discussion to religious diversity in the workplace and the potential implications of religious accommodation on employment discrimination. We provide an insightful look at how businesses can exploit loopholes to avoid accommodating religious or LGBT individuals, leading to potentially unfair treatment and discrimination. Tune in to understand how the Supreme Court's recent rulings may impact the rights of business owners and the potential for discrimination in the future.Show Notes00:45 Preemptive Religious Privilege Based On Fake Evidence19:46 The Traitor Jacob Duche and Legislative Prayer27:53 Religious Privilege In The WorkplaceSupport the showSubscribe to our free newsletterCheck out our MerchFind us on Twitter(for now) Find us on InstagramFind us on Counter SocialFind us on Mastadon

Can you imagine converting a historic church into a rock climbing gym? This week, we tackle the controversy surrounding the potential repurposing of St. Anthony's Catholic Church in Toledo, Ohio. As plans emerge to transform the church, we question the suitability of one idea for the distressed neighborhood and explore possible alternatives.We also touch on the deletion of a scene in the 1971 film The French Connection. What are the implications of the scene's removal, and how does it affect our perception of the characters played by Gene Hackman and Roy Schneider? Is this just a political issue?Lastly, we discuss the anti-LGBTQ advocacy of the American College of Pediatricians and the introduction of the transgender ban on gender-affirming care in Ohio. The group colluded with another hate group to manufacture medical justification to harm LGBTQ+ people.Show Notes01:00 Five Years Later Still No Use For Old Church19:43 Revising Classic Media Properties33:16 Hate Groups Colluding To Harm The LGBTQ CommunitySupport the showSubscribe to our free newsletterCheck out our MerchFind us on Twitter(for now) Find us on InstagramFind us on Counter SocialFind us on Mastadon

We meet Ohio House Representative Pastor Gary Click who introduced an anti-Trans bill and lies about his motivation for it. Next Republican bullies try to intimidate Ohio public school boards complaining about vouchers. And finally we find out that Nebraska legislator Megan Hunt, a darling of the secular democratic movement doesn't like labels or atheism.Show Notes00:50 Rep. Gary Click Lied About Motivation For Anti-Trans Bill15:21 Ohio GOP Tries to Intimidate Ohio School Boards Complaining about School Vouchers28:10 Megan Hunt Hates Labels and AtheismSupport the showSubscribe to our free newsletterCheck out our MerchFind us on Twitter(for now) Find us on InstagramFind us on Counter SocialFind us on Mastadon

The last time the word contagion was used to scapegoat a group of people, six million Jews perished in the Holocaust. Transgender people, a minority of a minority, are currently the target of scapegoating in statehouses across the country. These efforts are being lead by conservatives to distract from their failed policies and unconstitutional gerrymandering.Show Notes00:50 CBS Fumbles Zooey Zephyr Story09:55 Montana Republican Would Let Daughter Die than Allow Her to Transition17:52 Riley Gaines Is A Bigot. Pure and Simple27:40 Thank You Billboard MagazineSupport the showSubscribe to our free newsletterCheck out our MerchFind us on Twitter(for now) Find us on InstagramFind us on Counter SocialFind us on Mastadon

Rep. Jim Jordan attempts to obstruct a state criminal case, VP Kamala Harris is a master politician, a rule giving religious student groups that discriminate school funding should go away, and we find out that vaccine hesitancy is NOT a new thing.Show Notes00:45 Rep. Jim Jordan Attempts To Obstruct Trump's Indictment13:06 VP Kamala Harris Deflects Comedian's Question23:28 Student Groups That Discriminate Shouldn't Get Funding37:46 Medical Show From The 1970s Shows Vaccine HesitancySupport the showSubscribe to our free newsletterCheck out our MerchFind us on Twitter(for now) Find us on InstagramFind us on Counter SocialFind us on Mastadon

In Ohio, a proposed amendment to protect abortion was allowed to start collecting signatures. Meanwhile, the forced-birth zealots are spending $5 million dollars to lie to Ohio voters about the amendment and their friends at the state house want to change the rules. Why do Republicans hate democracy??Show Notes00:45 Forced-birth Ad Lies15:09 Changing the rules23:15 Other ShenaigansSupport the showSubscribe to our free newsletterCheck out our MerchFind us on Twitter(for now) Find us on InstagramFind us on Counter SocialFind us on Mastadon

Protestors on the left are more likely to be charged as domestic terrorists. MAGAs are more threatened by drag shows than guns and Universal vouchers reward conservative selfishness.Show Notes00:35 Protesting Cops Gets You A Terrorism Charge19:45 Maybe Drag Shows Should Hand Out Guns To Kids36:25 Universial Vouchers Take Money Away From Public SchoolsSupport the showSubscribe to our free newsletterCheck out our MerchFind us on Twitter(for now) Find us on InstagramFind us on Counter SocialFind us on Mastadon

It isn't everyday that a conservative wants to be a guest on a secular left podcast but it happened. Doug talks to a conservative podcast host about topics they will never agree on and there was no name calling. Slowly drive past the scene of this accident.Show Notes[00:45] Why would a religious conservative want to guest on a secular left podcast?[19:17] What if God was a liberal?[35:47] There is no such thing as merit scholars[46:17] Being a fan of Reagan even if he couldn't get elected todaySupport the showSubscribe to our free newsletterCheck out our MerchFind us on Twitter(for now) Find us on InstagramFind us on Counter SocialFind us on Mastadon