Recourse in law
POPULARITY
23 episodes with Habeas corpus
4 episodes with Habeas corpus
14 episodes with Habeas corpus
3 episodes with Habeas corpus
2 episodes with Habeas corpus
2 episodes with Habeas corpus
2 episodes with Habeas corpus
2 episodes with Habeas corpus
2 episodes with Habeas corpus
En esta edición del show del abogado Jonathan Shaw, hablamos sobre uno de los temas más polémicos del momento en inmigración: las denuncias de fraude relacionadas con aplicaciones VAWA y cómo algunos abogados están siendo investigados por presuntas prácticas deshonestas. El abogado Jonathan explica qué es realmente VAWA, cuándo puede ser un caso legítimo y por qué la comunidad inmigrante debe tener mucho cuidado con falsas promesas y “milagros” migratorios. También analizamos los cambios recientes en las detenciones de ICE y la batalla legal que actualmente se está librando en las cortes federales sobre el derecho a pedir fianza para inmigrantes que ingresaron sin visa. Jonathan explica cómo distintos circuitos federales están tomando decisiones opuestas y por qué este tema podría terminar en la Corte Suprema. En este episodio hablamos de: Qué es VAWA y cómo funciona legalmente Diferencias entre VAWA y la visa U Señales de alerta sobre posibles fraudes migratorios Arrestos de ICE y cambios en las fianzas migratorias Interpretación actual de las secciones INA 235 y 236 Qué es un habeas corpus en inmigración Circuitos federales a favor y en contra de las nuevas restricciones Qué sucede cuando alguien es detenido por inmigración Preguntas frecuentes sobre asilo, visa U, órdenes de deportación y permisos de trabajo Cómo identificar estafadores que se hacen pasar por abogados en redes sociales Este episodio es únicamente para información general y no constituye asesoría legal individual.Capítulos00:00 – Introducción y temas del programa01:42 – Noticias sobre casos VAWA y fraude migratorio03:15 – Qué es VAWA y quién califica05:08 – Diferencia entre VAWA y visa U06:30 – Demanda federal contra abogados de inmigración09:13 – Cómo identificar falsas promesas migratorias11:27 – Ejemplos reales de abuso vs. exageraciones en VAWA16:12 – Llamada con ICE y reflexión sobre honestidad legal18:31 – Cambios en las fianzas de inmigración20:59 – INA 235 vs INA 236 explicado23:20 – Circuitos federales divididos sobre las fianzas27:57 – Posible futura decisión de la Corte Suprema31:31 – Caso real de persona detenida por ICE35:22 – Preguntas y respuestas del público44:22 – Conversación sobre confianza, fe y honestidad57:06 – Preguntas sobre visa U, FOIA y asilo01:08:44 – Cómo evitar estafas en redes sociales01:15:58 – Reflexión final y despedida Contenido informativo general; no sustituye asesoría legal individual.
Confira nesta edição do JR 24 Horas: Os MCs Ryan SP e Poze do Rodo, que foram presos há um mês em uma operação da Polícia Federal, podem ser soltos ainda nesta quinta-feira (14). Os dois MCs foram autorizados a deixar a prisão depois da Justiça federal aceitar um pedido de habeas corpus. E ainda: Ministério da Saúde alerta para população se vacinar contra a gripe.
Rita Politte murhattiin kodissaan keskellä yötä vuonna 1998. Ainoat muut henkilöt kotona tapahtumahetkellä olivat hänen 14-vuotias poikansa Michael ja tämän kaveri Josh. Poliisi kiinnostui Michaelista välittömästi tapahtuneen jälkeen ja oli vakuuttunut siitä, että tämä murhasi oman äitinsä. Michael on kuitenkin koko ajan vannonut syyttömyyttään. * Tiedäthän, että tämä kuuntelemasi jakso on podcastin aiempaa tuotantoa. Podmessa voit kuunnella kaikki Jäljillä-podcastin viimeisten vuosien jaksot. Lisäksi uunituoreita jaksoja julkaistaan Podmessa joka viikko, ja mikä parasta – ilman mainoksia. Eli jos tykkäät kuulemastasi ja haluat lisää, sitä löytyy yllin kyllin osoitteesta podme.com. Uusi throwback-jakso julkaistaan joka perjantai. Ota yhteyttä: jaljillapodcast@gmail.comInstagram: @ jaljillapodcastMusiikki: This work contains Music Track Doug Maxwell Media Right Productions - Heartbeat of the Hood that is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution license. Source: https://directory.audio/free-music/ambient/5275-doug-maxwell-media-right-productions -heartbeat-of-the-hoodAuthor: Doug Maxwell Media Right Productions Lähteet:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZvt-NSA0bohttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZhpOAkYyGoAhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VeG-vTAP9Bchttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VTbrXPysysIhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tr0w9AVN7FAhttps://www.macarthurjustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/FILED_547.031-Motion-Hedgecorth.pdfhttps://www.macarthurjustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/2021.10.13_Petition-for-Writ-of-Habeas-Corpus-1.pdfhttps://www.macarthurjustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/FILED_547.031-Motion-Hedgecorth.pdfhttps://www.macarthurjustice.org/case/politte-v-falkenrath/https://www.macarthurjustice.org/wrongfully-convicted-of-his-mothers-murder-at-14-years-old-michael-politte-files-petition-of-innocence-after-20-years-in-prison/https://lawandcrime.com/crime/michael-politte-featured-on-mtv-show-involving-questionable-convictions-granted-parole-after-23-years-behind-bars-on-charges-he-killed-his-mother-at-age-14/https://www.macarthurjustice.org/wrongfully-convicted-of-his-mothers-murder-at-14-years-old-michael-politte-takes-fight-for-justice-to-missouri-supreme-court/https://www.macarthurjustice.org/wrongfully-convicted-of-his-mothers-murder-at-14-years-old-michael-politte-files-petition-of-innocence-after-20-years-in-prison/https://www.macarthurjustice.org/midwest-innocence-project-and-macarthur-justice-center-join-forces-to-expand-efforts-to-overturn-wrongful-convictions-in-missouri-midwest/https://missouriindependent.com/briefs/missouri-supreme-court-finds-prosecutor-has-no-jurisdiction-in-washington-county-innocence-claim-case/https://www.cbsnews.com/news/michael-politte-rita-politte-murder-missouri-48-hours/https://www.cbsnews.com/pictures/michael-polittes-fight-for-freedom/3/https://sandhillsexpress.com/cbs_national/man-convicted-as-a-teen-of-murdering-his-mom-says-the-real-killer-is-still-out-there-cbsid7902c50b/https://www.kansascity.com/news/local/crime/article271572122.htmlhttps://www.kansascity.com/news/state/missouri/article260680127.htmlhttps://www.kctv5.com/2022/04/14/this-kid-never-had-chanceteam-lawyers-work-prove-innocence-14-year-old-convicted-mothers-murder/
Ghislaine Maxwell's habeas corpus petition is, at its core, a reheated attempt to relitigate issues that were already raised, argued, and rejected at trial and on direct appeal—most notably her fixation on alleged juror misconduct. Maxwell centers her petition on the claim that a juror failed to fully disclose past experiences with sexual abuse during voir dire, arguing this tainted the verdict and violated her Sixth Amendment rights. But courts that have already examined this issue concluded that there was no evidence of intentional deception or bias sufficient to overturn the conviction. Habeas relief is not a “do-over” for defendants unhappy with a jury's conclusion, and Maxwell's petition conspicuously ignores the extremely high bar required to show that any alleged juror error had a decisive, unconstitutional impact on the outcome of the trial.Beyond the juror issue, the petition leans heavily on familiar defense talking points—claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, prosecutorial misconduct, and constitutional violations framed in sweeping, conclusory language rather than supported by new, compelling evidence. What's striking is how little the petition grapples with the overwhelming testimonial and documentary record that led to Maxwell's conviction for facilitating and participating in the sexual abuse of minors. Instead, it attempts to recast procedural disputes as fundamental injustices while sidestepping the reality that multiple courts have already found the trial to be fair, the evidence to be strong, and the verdict to be sound. In that sense, the habeas filing reads less like a serious constitutional challenge and more like a last-ditch effort to chip away at a lawful conviction by exhausting every remaining procedural avenue—no matter how thin the underlying arguments have become.to contact me:Ghislaine Maxwell files petition challenging sex trafficking convictionBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
Ghislaine Maxwell's habeas corpus petition is, at its core, a reheated attempt to relitigate issues that were already raised, argued, and rejected at trial and on direct appeal—most notably her fixation on alleged juror misconduct. Maxwell centers her petition on the claim that a juror failed to fully disclose past experiences with sexual abuse during voir dire, arguing this tainted the verdict and violated her Sixth Amendment rights. But courts that have already examined this issue concluded that there was no evidence of intentional deception or bias sufficient to overturn the conviction. Habeas relief is not a “do-over” for defendants unhappy with a jury's conclusion, and Maxwell's petition conspicuously ignores the extremely high bar required to show that any alleged juror error had a decisive, unconstitutional impact on the outcome of the trial.Beyond the juror issue, the petition leans heavily on familiar defense talking points—claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, prosecutorial misconduct, and constitutional violations framed in sweeping, conclusory language rather than supported by new, compelling evidence. What's striking is how little the petition grapples with the overwhelming testimonial and documentary record that led to Maxwell's conviction for facilitating and participating in the sexual abuse of minors. Instead, it attempts to recast procedural disputes as fundamental injustices while sidestepping the reality that multiple courts have already found the trial to be fair, the evidence to be strong, and the verdict to be sound. In that sense, the habeas filing reads less like a serious constitutional challenge and more like a last-ditch effort to chip away at a lawful conviction by exhausting every remaining procedural avenue—no matter how thin the underlying arguments have become.to contact me:Ghislaine Maxwell files petition challenging sex trafficking conviction
Ghislaine Maxwell has initiated a habeas corpus petition in a last-ditch attempt to challenge her imprisonment, signaling a dramatic escalation in her ongoing legal fight. The filing reveals that Maxwell plans to represent herself as she petitions the court for release, an unusual move that underscores both the desperation and the high-stakes maneuvering behind the scenes. While the petition itself has not yet laid out specific legal grounds, the timing is strategic: Maxwell is making this push just as scrutiny around the Epstein network is intensifying and new transparency measures threaten to expose previously sealed material tied to her case.At the same time, the Justice Department is moving to unseal grand jury records and related documents under newly mandated transparency rules, a shift that Maxwell fiercely opposes. Her legal team argues that releasing these materials could jeopardize any future appeal or post-conviction litigation she may pursue. Advocates for survivors, however, view her filing as yet another attempt to stall public accountability and keep critical details of the Epstein network shielded from view. The collision between Maxwell's habeas corpus bid and the government's unsealing push sets the stage for a pivotal legal showdown—one that could influence not only her own fate but the broader public reckoning surrounding Epstein's crimes.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Ghislaine Maxwell will plea for prison release, new court filing saysBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Venha visitar a nossa Loja:https://iconografia-da-historia-3.myshopify.com/?utm_medium=product_shelf&utm_source=youtubeSiga nosso canal de CORTES:https://www.youtube.com/@IconografiadaHistoria-cortesAJUDE-NOS A MANTER O CANAL ICONOGRAFIA DA HISTÓRIA: Considere apoiar nosso trabalho, participar de sorteios e garantir acesso ao nosso grupo de Whatsapp exclusivo: https://bit.ly/apoiaoidhSe preferir, faz um PIX: contato@iconografiadahistoria.comNos acompanhe no Spotify @iconocastSiga ICONOGRAFIA DA HISTÓRIA em todas as redes: https://linktr.ee/iconografiadahistoriaoficialSiga o JOEL PAVIOTTI: https://bit.ly/joelpaviottiApresentação: Joel PaviottiTexto e roteirização: Adriana de PaulaRevisão: Joel PaviottiCâmera e produção: Fernando ZenerattoEdição: Fernando ZenerattoDireção: Fernando Zeneratto / Joel Paviotti
¿Qué es un Habeas Corpus en inmigración? ⚖️Es una herramienta legal que puede usarse para pedir la liberación de una persona detenida cuando el gobierno no tiene justificación para mantenerla bajo custodia. Conocer tus derechos puede marcar la diferencia.¿Un familiar está detenido? Infórmate sobre tus opciones
En este episodio analizamos noticias críticas que impactan directamente a la comunidad inmigrante en Estados Unidos. Desde el preocupante aumento de muertes en centros de detención, hasta tensiones entre autoridades estatales y federales en Minnesota, y avances (limitados) sobre TPS en el Congreso.También respondemos preguntas clave del público sobre asilo, permisos de trabajo, audiencias en corte y opciones legales disponibles en situaciones complejas.En este episodio hablamos de: Aumento alarmante de muertes en centros de detención de inmigración Derechos básicos de personas detenidas y posibles violaciones Impacto de la salud mental en inmigrantes detenidos Caso en Minnesota y posible responsabilidad criminal contra agentes de ICE Debate político sobre inmigración y TPS en el Congreso Qué significa realmente la votación sobre TPS (y lo que NO significa) Opciones legales como habeas corpus para solicitar fianza Cambios potenciales en permisos de trabajo para solicitantes de asilo Respuestas a preguntas reales sobre asilo, visa U, corte migratoria y más Este contenido es información general y no sustituye asesoría legal individual. Mantente informado y busca apoyo profesional si lo necesitas. Contenido informativo general; no sustituye asesoría legal individual.
What does it look like when the government violates court orders in more than 350 separate immigration habeas cases?On today's episode, Lawfare Senior Editor Molly Roberts sits down with Lawfare Associate Editor Katherine Pompilio to discuss Lawfare's new interactive tracker, which documents what is known about instances in which the Trump administration has failed to comply with federal court orders in immigration habeas corpus proceedings.The two discuss why Lawfare built this tracker and why the project matters beyond any individual case, what the dataset reveals about a broader pattern of government non-compliance, the absence of institutional record-keeping, holding the government accountable, and more.To receive ad-free podcasts, become a Lawfare Material Supporter at www.patreon.com/lawfare. You can also support Lawfare by making a one-time donation at https://givebutter.com/lawfare-institute.Support this show http://supporter.acast.com/lawfare. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
En esta noche tan especial, marcada por la intensidad simbólica del Viernes Santo, ponemos el broche final a una semana cargada de ecos del pasado, de tradición, de fe… y también de esa parte más humana, más íntima y a veces contradictoria que todos llevamos dentro. Hoy viajamos juntos a través del tiempo para recordar cómo se vivían antaño estos días sagrados: las costumbres, los silencios, los rituales y las normas no escritas que marcaban el pulso de toda una sociedad. Desde la solemnidad de las procesiones hasta los pequeños gestos cotidianos que definían lo que estaba permitido… y lo que no. Pero también reflexionamos sobre cómo todo eso ha cambiado. Cómo hemos transformado, reinterpretado —o incluso olvidado— muchas de esas tradiciones, adaptándolas a una realidad distinta, más abierta, más compleja… y quizá también más sincera. Esta es una noche de confesiones entre amigos, de miradas hacia dentro, de cuestionar creencias y reconstruir otras. Una noche donde la fe se entrelaza con lo terrenal, donde lo “carnal” no habla del cuerpo, sino de la esencia, de lo humano en su estado más puro. Un encuentro para pensar, sentir y compartir. Presentan y opinan: Carlos Dueñas, Gerald Dean y David Santiso. https://www.edenex.es
Confesiones susurradas al oído, revelaciones lanzadas a quemarropa frente al micrófono… palabras que, lejos de reafirmar certezas, erosionan lentamente las posiciones que durante tantas —ya incontables— noches americanas creíamos inamovibles. Porque hay secretos que no caben en una sola noche. Hay verdades que exigen ser desgranadas con paciencia, casi con temor, como si cada sílaba pudiera alterar el delicado equilibrio entre lo que creemos y lo que realmente somos. Y en una semana marcada por lo simbólico, lo espiritual y lo inevitablemente político, las líneas que separan convicciones y dudas comienzan a difuminarse. Lo religioso y lo ideológico se entrelazan aquí como fuerzas vivas, sometidas al juicio de la experiencia, al peso de lo inconfesable y a la tensión constante entre fe y razón. Cada intervención, cada reflexión, no hace sino abrir nuevas grietas en discursos que parecían firmes. Y entonces surge la pregunta, inevitable, casi como un eco persistente en la penumbra: ¿habrá un volumen 3… o algunas verdades están destinadas a quedarse en la sombra? Presentan, reflexionan y se exponen sin red: Carlos Dueñas, Gerald Dean y David Santiso. https://www.edenex.es
Películas: "La historia oficial", "Made in Argentina", "Habeas Corpus", "En retirada", "Esperando la carroza", "La República perdida", "La noche de los lápices", "Cuarentena", "Juan, como si nada hubiera sucedido", etcétera. Conducción: Diego Cirulo Invitados: Anabella Bustos y Manuel Schifani Comenzamos una nueva temporada de nuestro querido podcast. Como también decidimos que no sólo saldremos por las plataformas de audio sino también en directo por youtube. Y para comenzar, nos introducimos en un tema tan complejo como apasionante: el cine argentino y la democracia. A 50 años del golpe de Estado en nuestro país, intentamos pensar qué pasó con el cine nacional, qué cambios fueron amaneciendo y, sobre todo, los desbocados intentos por construir algún tipo de memoria argentina. Este capítulo de lujo tiene como protagonistas a Anabella Bustos y Manuel Schifani, dos docentes UBA que llevan el cine en la sangre. Acompañanos, no hay nada mejor que estar juntos. Producción general: Diego Cirulo, Fabio Villalba, Luciana Eyras. Locución: Daniela Jorquera Música: Leonel Ibaña Webmaster: Andrés Cirulo
Nuestro compañero, el fotógrafo Makeda, lanzó hace unos meses una idea: documentar la última gira de Riot Propaganda. La banda —tanto Los Chikos del Maíz como Habeas Corpus— aceptó la propuesta. A lo largo de diez festivales celebrados el año pasado, Makeda se integró en cada viaje como un elemento inicialmente ajeno, pero que terminó capturando los múltiples momentos que se viven en una gira de este tipo. El resultado es un libro-CD sobresaliente, denso y exhaustivo, marcado por el acento fotográfico de Makeda y por la personalidad del combativo rock de Riot Propaganda. Sobre cómo ha sido todo el proceso de elaboración del libro hablamos con Makeda, acompañado por el fotógrafo vasco Ibai Arrieta, encargado de maquetar y seleccionar las fotografías. Además, contamos con un buen puñado de testimonios que aportan contexto al libro y ponen en valor el excepcional trabajo de Makeda. En la segunda parte, nos centramos en la relación entre una banda musical y un fotoperiodista es un tema del que rara vez se habla. Nos interesa descubrir cómo un fotógrafo se integra como parte del grupo humano y cómo se generan complicidades a partir de buenas anécdotas. Por eso, en esta Luna dedicada al fotógrafo Makeda, el grupo NoProcede era la banda perfecta para una entrevista acústica. Reunimos a Makeda con Javier Beltrán, cantante y fundador de la banda, y nos cuentan cómo se conocieron y repasan sus ya inolvidables aventuras por Colombia.
Nuestro compañero, el fotógrafo Makeda, lanzó hace unos meses una idea: documentar la última gira de Riot Propaganda. La banda —tanto Los Chikos del Maíz como Habeas Corpus— aceptó la propuesta. A lo largo de diez festivales celebrados el año pasado, Makeda se integró en cada viaje como un elemento inicialmente ajeno, pero que terminó capturando los múltiples momentos que se viven en una gira de este tipo. El resultado es un libro-CD sobresaliente, denso y exhaustivo, marcado por el acento fotográfico de Makeda y por la personalidad del combativo rock de Riot Propaganda. Sobre cómo ha sido todo el proceso de elaboración del libro hablamos con Makeda, acompañado por el fotógrafo vasco Ibai Arrieta, encargado de maquetar y seleccionar las fotografías. Además, contamos con un buen puñado de testimonios que aportan contexto al libro y ponen en valor el excepcional trabajo de Makeda.
“The issue's not the truth. The issue is the reality of the truth." Nick and his reporting team try to piece apart how much of Michael's story is true. SUPPORT OUR SPONSORS! https://mood.com Promo code: LOVERADIO SUPPORT THE SHOW! https://loveandradio.org/member PLAYLIST! https://sereptie.bandcamp.com/track/half-self https://tambien.bandcamp.com/album/memory-amb https://quixosis.bandcamp.com/track/san-gregorio-remastered-2 https://tambien.bandcamp.com/track/c-mulo-estelar https://tambien.bandcamp.com/track/acqua https://quixosis.bandcamp.com/track/tigre-de-papel-feat-king-klav https://quixosis.bandcamp.com/track/destrancadera-remastered https://sereptie.bandcamp.com/track/exit-man https://sereptie.bandcamp.com/track/only-us https://sereptie.bandcamp.com/track/asonata https://tambien.bandcamp.com/track/corporal Overlook by Sereptie (unreleased) https://tambien.bandcamp.com/track/se-ales https://sereptie.bandcamp.com/track/nonorganics https://sereptie.bandcamp.com/track/his-broom https://sereptie.bandcamp.com/track/two-skins https://ab-odnu.bandcamp.com/track/meaning https://ab-henrik-meierkord.bandcamp.com/track/erinnerungen-requiem-tomo-nakaguchi-remix https://quixosis.bandcamp.com/track/falso-paraiso-feat-biomigrant https://samarecordings.bandcamp.com/track/quixosis-descomposicion-1-kuna-feat-soios https://quixosis.bandcamp.com/track/ant-tesis-2 https://quixosis.bandcamp.com/track/buenas-noches-imposible-2 https://ab-strangebird-sounds.bandcamp.com/track/flowing https://distantfiresburning-ab.bandcamp.com/track/book-of-hope https://tambien.bandcamp.com/track/cet-cea https://sereptie.bandcamp.com/track/the-goodbye-clouds https://quixosis.bandcamp.com/track/descomposicion-2-stillness-2 https://inter-bellum.bandcamp.com/track/every-word-in-the-english-language-interbellum https://sereptie.bandcamp.com/track/hole-time https://wilbolton.bandcamp.com/track/going-nowhere https://tambien.bandcamp.com/track/vac-o https://run-ireland.bandcamp.com/track/paidir-poball-pupil https://quixosis.bandcamp.com/track/tierra-madera-y-fuego-2 CREDITS! Additional Voices: Bill Rohlfing, Roman Mars, Alice Lyons, Valinda Lee, Ellen Horne, Avery Trufelman, Brian Reed. Series Producer: Meera Kumar Managing Editor: Robin Amer Additional Reporting: Brian Krans and Anya Schultz Fact Checking: Nicole Pasulka Contributing Editor: Allison Herrera Visuals: Orla Mc Hardy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
The Trump administration came in promising mass deportation. What has followed goes well beyond border control to matters of local policing, detention, federal power, and the limits of the law inside the United States. On this episode of Stanford Legal, co-host Professor Richard Thompson Ford talks with immigration expert Jennifer Chacón, the Bruce Tyson Mitchell Professor of Law, about the Trump administration's immigration enforcement agenda and the profound consequences it is having in cities and communities across the country. They discuss racial profiling, ignored court orders, pressure on states and localities, and the widening reach of immigration enforcement into everyday civic life. Professor Chacón, author of a casebook on immigration law, elaborates on some of the themes in her recently published paper “The Law of the Immigration Raid.” Links: Jennifer Chacón >>> Stanford Law page Legal Phantoms >>> Stanford Law page Immigration Law and Social Justice >>> Stanford Law page Connect: Episode Transcripts >>> Stanford Legal Podcast Website Stanford Legal Podcast >>> LinkedIn Page Rich Ford >>> Twitter/X Pam Karlan >>> Stanford Law School Page Diego Zambrano >>> Stanford Law School Page Stanford Law School >>> Twitter/X Stanford Lawyer Magazine >>> Twitter/X (00:00:00) Immigration Enforcement in 2026 (00:03:47) The Economics of a Closed Border (00:09:58) Closing the Border to Asylum (00:10:44) Profiling in Immigration Enforcement (00:16:48) Courts, Defiance, and Detention (00:25:40) Sanctuary, Commandeering, and the Weaponization of Immigration (00:32:26) How States Can Restore the Humane Dimensions of Immigration Law Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
A federal judge in the Southern District of West Virginia issued a ruling that should be making national headlines but isn't. Hawk walks through the full 34-page opinion by U.S. District Judge Joseph Godwin, who found that ICE agents wearing masks, operating from unmarked vehicles with no license plates, and making warrantless civil arrests violate the Fourth and Fifth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution. The case centers on Anderson Jesus Urquilla Ramos, a 21-year-old Salvadoran national with a valid driver's license, lawful work authorization, and a pending asylum application, who was pulled over in West Virginia on a pretext stop. Masked federal agents in an unmarked vehicle with no license plate detained him without a warrant, without identifying themselves, and without legal justification. Judge Godwin's opinion traces the Fourth Amendment back to its founding-era roots, the colonial outrage over British general warrants and writs of assistance, and applies that history directly to modern ICE enforcement tactics. The ruling draws on James Madison, Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln, Justice Brandeis, and citations ranging from Marbury v. Madison to Katz v. United States. The opinion concludes that a law enforcement practice whose only operational effect is the elimination of accountability is not a safety measure. It is a constitutional deficiency. Hawk also highlights the Fifth Amendment due process violations and the habeas corpus petition that brought the case before the court. This is Fourth Amendment education at its finest, delivered through one of the most clearly reasoned federal opinions in recent memory. SUPPORT & CONNECT WITH HAWK- Support on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/mdg650hawk - Hawk's Merch Store: https://hawkmerchstore.com - Connect on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@mdg650hawk7thacct - Connect on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@hawkeyewhackamole - Connect on BlueSky: https://bsky.app/profile/mdg650hawk.bsky.social - Connect on Substack: https://mdg650hawk.substack.com - Connect on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/hawkpodcasts - Connect on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/mdg650hawk - Connect on Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/mdg650hawk ALL HAWK PODCASTS INFO- Additional Content Available Here: https://www.hawkpodcasts.comhttps://www.youtube.com/@hawkpodcasts- Listen to Hawk Podcasts On Your Favorite Platform:Spotify: https://spoti.fi/3RWeJfyApple Podcasts: https://apple.co/422GDuLYouTube: https://youtube.com/@hawkpodcastsiHeartRadio: https://ihr.fm/47vVBdPPandora: https://bit.ly/48COaTB
Ghislaine Maxwell's habeas corpus petition is, at its core, a reheated attempt to relitigate issues that were already raised, argued, and rejected at trial and on direct appeal—most notably her fixation on alleged juror misconduct. Maxwell centers her petition on the claim that a juror failed to fully disclose past experiences with sexual abuse during voir dire, arguing this tainted the verdict and violated her Sixth Amendment rights. But courts that have already examined this issue concluded that there was no evidence of intentional deception or bias sufficient to overturn the conviction. Habeas relief is not a “do-over” for defendants unhappy with a jury's conclusion, and Maxwell's petition conspicuously ignores the extremely high bar required to show that any alleged juror error had a decisive, unconstitutional impact on the outcome of the trial.Beyond the juror issue, the petition leans heavily on familiar defense talking points—claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, prosecutorial misconduct, and constitutional violations framed in sweeping, conclusory language rather than supported by new, compelling evidence. What's striking is how little the petition grapples with the overwhelming testimonial and documentary record that led to Maxwell's conviction for facilitating and participating in the sexual abuse of minors. Instead, it attempts to recast procedural disputes as fundamental injustices while sidestepping the reality that multiple courts have already found the trial to be fair, the evidence to be strong, and the verdict to be sound. In that sense, the habeas filing reads less like a serious constitutional challenge and more like a last-ditch effort to chip away at a lawful conviction by exhausting every remaining procedural avenue—no matter how thin the underlying arguments have become.to contact me:Ghislaine Maxwell files petition challenging sex trafficking convictionBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
DOCKET ALERTS:The Trump administration is tapping out on the lawsuits defending executive orders attacking law firms. Too bad, so sad for the Vichy law firms that pledged a billion dollars in “conservative pro bono” work.Justice Gorsuch says we can't take guns away from drug users because the Founders were drunk all the time.The Federal Circuit declines a request by the Trump administration to delay tariff refunds.Kansas's revocation of trans citizens' drivers licenses draws its first court challenge.And Virginia's redistricting referendum can go ahead.MAIN SHOW:We discuss the history of the president's power to commence hostilities and explain why Trump and his goons are so deeply invested in claiming that the war in Iran — which isn't a war at all! — was defensive, not offensive. Plus Andrew's got a deep dive into the War Powers Resolution and how it might bring about an end to this nightmare.We've got clips from 60 Minutes's very good story on the danger federal judges face when they go against the Trump administration. Judges in the Western District of West Virginia join the list of jurisdictions telling DHS/DOJ that contempt charges are coming if they keep relying on crackpot legal theories to kidnap residents.Judge John Tunheim issues class relief to refugees in Minnesota, barring DHS from interning them for recertification.And for subscribers: a discussion of the constitutionality of the War Powers Resolution.Trump Administration to Drop Defense of Law Firm Sanctionshttps://www.wsj.com/us-news/law/trump-administration-to-drop-defense-of-law-firm-sanctions-cb839c39US v. Hemani Oral Argumenthttps://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/audio/2025/24-1234V.O.S. Selections [Tariff mandate]https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cafc.23105/gov.uscourts.cafc.23105.173.0_2.pdfDoe v. Kansas [Trans drivers' licenses]https://assets.aclu.org/live/uploads/2026/02/Complaint-1.pdfVirginia redistricting election can move forward, court ruleshttps://www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/virginia-redistricting-election-can-move-forward-court-rulesFederal judges who've ruled against Trump administration denounce threats against themselves, their familieshttps://www.cbsnews.com/news/federal-judges-whove-ruled-against-trump-administration-denounce-threats-60-minutes-transcript/Judges in a Trump stronghold condemn ICE tacticshttps://www.politico.com/news/2026/03/01/west-virginia-immigration-rulings-00804575Dominguez Izaguirre v. Mason [West Virginia Habeas]https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.wvsd.243036/gov.uscourts.wvsd.243036.18.0.pdfWar Powers Resolution, 50 U.S.C. 1541 et seq.https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/chapter-33“Trump Can't Declare War On Iran (or Anyone)” [lawandchaospod.com]https://www.lawandchaospod.com/p/trump-cant-declare-war-on-iran-orLiz's YouTube video for Legal Eagle, “The Largest Bribe in American History”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RE2pm3omzMI&t=3sNat'l Treasury Employees' Union v. Nixon, 492 F.2d 587 (D.C. Cir. 1974)https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=4156385560315482496INS v. Chadha, 462 U.S. 919 (1983)https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2221871582286121199Show Links:https://www.lawandchaospod.com/BlueSky: @LawAndChaosPodThreads: @LawAndChaosPodTwitter: @LawAndChaosPodSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
In a timely conversation about the ACLU's massive docket of cases, Pam Karlan speaks with Anthony Romero, JD '90, executive director of the ACLU, about the surge of civil rights and civil liberties battles facing the country right now.Romero discusses major pieces of litigation spanning immigration, free speech, voting rights, and government accountability. A key focus is the Supreme Court showdown over birthright citizenship, where the Trump administration is attempting to deny citizenship to certain children born in the U.S., a move Romero calls an attack on one of the core promises of the Fourteenth Amendment. They also explore what happens when the government pushes the boundaries of compliance with court rulings and what that means for the rule of law.Tune in for a compelling conversation about the cases that could help define the next chapter of civil liberties law in the United States.Links:Anthony Romero >>> ACLU pageConnect:Episode Transcripts >>> Stanford Legal Podcast WebsiteStanford Legal Podcast >>> LinkedIn PageRich Ford >>> Twitter/XPam Karlan >>> Stanford Law School PageDiego Zambrano >>> Stanford Law School PageStanford Law School >>> Twitter/XStanford Lawyer Magazine >>> Twitter/X(00:00) Introduction and ACLU's Rapidly Expanding Docket(02:30) Small but Mighty—ACLU vs. Federal Power(07:00) Inside a Burgeoning Docket(11:30) Birthright Citizenship at the Supreme Court(16:00) Enforcement at Scale and the Rule of Law(21:00): An Inflection Point in Public Sentiment Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
On this episode, we'll be covering episode 4 of season 8 of Love During Lockup. On this episode, Titus' cousin helps him talk to Monique again, Emily and Justin debate on whether content is closer to cheating than prostitution, Bonita has got to find a way to keep Moo Moo finding out she sold his stuff, and Ayesha gets to the bottom of Mikhael's sentence. If you like what you hear, please give us a five star rating and leave a review. If you/ also watch 90 Day Fiance, you should check out our other podcast feed. You can reach us on Instagram (@90DayMmkay) or shoot us an email at 90DayMmkay@gmail.com We will be back next week to cover episode 5.
En vivo desde Colombia, el Abogado Jonathan comparte actualizaciones fuertes que pueden cambiar el panorama para inmigrantes en procesos de asilo defensivo y en cortes de inmigración. Explica decisiones recientes que impactan el acceso a fianza, posibles cambios en apelaciones, y cómo prepararse para evitar que un juez “pretermit” (cierre el caso con orden de deportación sin escuchar evidencias ni argumentos). También aclara la pausa de visas inmigrantes para ciertos países, diferencias entre visa inmigrante vs. no inmigrante, y repasa el Visa Bulletin (categorías familiares y tiempos de espera). En este episodio hablamos de: Decisión en el Quinto Circuito y el riesgo de detención sin fianza bajo la sección 235Qué es un Habeas Corpus como herramienta para pelear detencionesPropuesta de cambios en la Corte de Apelaciones de Inmigración (BIA): menos revisiones individuales, plazos más cortosEstrategias para enfocarse en lo que sí se puede controlar: evidencias, declaración, preparación para audienciaPausa de visas inmigrantes (desde el 21 de enero) y excepciones por doble nacionalidad y adopcionesExplicación del Visa Bulletin y categorías familiares (F1–F4), con ejemplos de Colombia y MéxicoPreguntas del público: citas con ICE, visa humanitaria por enfermedad, asilo después de 1 año, castigo permanente, 601A, cambio de sede, travel document, riesgos de estafas Contenido informativo general; no sustituye asesoría legal individual.
This week, explain if we didn't laugh we'd be sobbing all the time. New segment: What did the government do to radicalize you or activate the resistance this week? Coming to you straight from Minneapolis. Amy's arch nemesis Bovino got fired in shame from his job depriving people of their constitutional rights by the administration. Tom Morello of Rage Against The Machine fame came to town to give a protest concert at First Avenue with secret special guest The Boss, Bruce Springsteen. Amy and Maya didn't get tickets. Maya explains the bizarre dual worlds they are living in. The Boss wrote a song for Minneapolis celebrating the resistance. P.S. Minneapolis is an impossible word to rhyme and that's why you don't hear a lot of songs about this town. Maya drives through an ICE operation, looses hope, then gets a great message from a friend. Local journalist Georgia Fort and national newsmaker Don Lemon are arrested for journalism. First amendment much? Maya has fond middle school memories of Habeas Corpus. Can we just go back to being fly-over country. Our favorite resistance song this week is about how someone in the administration is a “Bird-legged Ho”. Apparently, kids don't drink out of the hose anymore. Maya reviews The Wrecking Crew starring friendly hunks Dave Bautista and Jason Momoa. Maya reviews Predator: Badlands. Amy explains a very specific Bad Bunny dance.
En esta edición del show del abogado Jonathan Shaw (inicio de febrero 2026), analizamos dos temas clave: el caso del niño de 5 años detenido junto a su padre en Minneapolis y lo más reciente del TPS para venezolanos tras una decisión del Noveno Circuito. También respondemos preguntas en vivo sobre citas con ICE, negaciones rápidas de asilo (pretermition), “tercer país seguro”, permisos de viaje y opciones tras una salida voluntaria. En este episodio hablamos de: El caso de Liam Conejo Ramos (5 años) y su padre: presión política, organizaciones legales y orden de un juez federal para su liberación.Reflexión: qué pasa con familias que no tienen congresistas, prensa o apoyo legal masivo.TPS Venezuela: por qué una decisión de apelaciones no cambia la vida diaria “de inmediato” y cómo influye lo que ya dijo la Corte Suprema mientras el litigio sigue.Preguntas del público: citas con ICE, riesgos reales y cómo prepararse con un plan.Por qué están dando órdenes de deportación sin audiencia final: pretermition por I-589 mal sustentada y el argumento de acuerdos con terceros países.Casos prácticos: asilo afirmativo cancelado, viajes con visa U, licencia de conducir en Utah, ajuste por matrimonio, y dudas sobre salida voluntaria.Capítulos00:00 – Introducción01:05 – Caso Minneapolis: niño arrestado y regreso a Minnesota desde ICE Texas02:13 – Presión de congresistas y rol de juez federal: por qué importa04:25 – Reflexión: apoyo mediático/legal vs. familias sin recursos06:34 – Transición a TPS: por qué “no hubo cambio” en la vida diaria08:48 – Explicación: “caprichoso y arbitrario” y el poder del Congreso en TPS11:13 – Por qué no regresa el TPS ya: litigio largo y postura de la Corte Suprema13:36 – Contexto político: figuras públicas, ICE y elecciones de medio término15:54 – Pregunta: “Tengo cita con ICE… no quiero ir” (riesgo y plan)18:15 – Pregunta: órdenes de deportación sin audiencia final (3 vías)23:01 – Alerta: apelaciones y aumento del costo a $1,010 (trampa financiera) 25:21 – Asilo afirmativo I-589 cancelado: cómo aprovechar el tiempo extra 31:50 – Llamada Esthefany (NC): salida voluntaria y opciones para regresar legal 38:21 – Seguro Social ya no llega automático: ir a oficina de Social Security 40:15 – Ajuste por matrimonio y corte: cómo pedir más tiempo al juez 50:28 – Viaje con green card + asilo (caso Venezuela/Colombia): cautela 54:13 – Llamada Hércules: I-130 sin pruebas al inicio + caso cerrado admin. 01:03:00 – Cierre: cómo agendar consulta por el sitio web y despedida Contenido informativo general; no sustituye asesoría legal individual.
Confira no Morning Show desta sexta-feira (30): O caso do Banco Master ganha novos desdobramentos. O ministro do STF Dias Toffoli retirou o sigilo dos depoimentos de Daniel Vorcaro, dono da instituição financeira. As oitivas, que ocorreram ainda em 30 de dezembro, foram finalmente liberadas e expõem conflitos: Vorcaro e o ex-presidente do Banco de Brasília (BRB) apresentaram versões divergentes sobre a origem das carteiras de crédito negociadas, aumentando as dúvidas e suspeitas sobre a operação. O depoimento de Daniel Vorcaro, dono do Banco Master, à Polícia Federal foi divulgado. O banqueiro negou ter recebido "ajuda de políticos" para viabilizar negócios, mas reconheceu que se encontrou com o governador do Distrito Federal, Ibaneis Rocha (MDB). Além disso, um auditor do Banco Central afirmou que o BRB (Banco de Brasília) apresentou falhas de controle e gestão no negócio com o Master, falhando ao não identificar as fraudes na operação que "quase foi vendida". A defesa de Daniel Vorcaro avalia ingressar com um pedido de Habeas Corpus para evitar que o banqueiro preste depoimento à CPMI que investiga fraudes contra aposentados do INSS. Além disso, a comissão entrou com mandado de segurança para tentar reaver documentos que foram bloqueados pelo ministro do STF Dias Toffoli em dezembro. O foco da investigação não são os títulos de R$ 12 bilhões, mas sim a suspeita de 250 mil contratos de empréstimos consignados feitos sem autorização dos pensionistas. Um novo levantamento divulgado pelo Instituto Paraná Pesquisas mostra o grau de popularidade entre os nomes mais cotados para enfrentar o presidente Lula (PT) nas eleições de 2026. No caso do atual mandatário, a rejeição ultrapassa 45%, enquanto 31% votariam nele para a reeleição. O governador de São Paulo, Tarcísio de Freitas (Republicanos), visitou o ex-presidente Jair Bolsonaro pela primeira vez no presídio da Papudinha. Após o encontro de duas horas, Tarcísio reafirmou sua lealdade e declarou que seu apoio a Flávio Bolsonaro para 2026 "já está consolidado", descartando sua própria candidatura ao Planalto. A reportagem também detalha a nova pesquisa do Paraná Pesquisas, que aponta um empate técnico entre Lula (44,8%) e Flávio Bolsonaro (42,2%) em um eventual segundo turno. Gilberto Kassab, presidente nacional do PSD, delineou o cenário para 2026: Tarcísio de Freitas deve apoiar Flávio Bolsonaro, enquanto o PSD lançará candidatura própria à presidência. O partido promoverá uma disputa interna entre Ratinho Júnior, Caiado e Eduardo Leite para definir o melhor nome para o Planalto. Mesmo com o avanço acelerado da tecnologia e dos aplicativos de mensagens instantâneas, o tradicional telegrama resiste e surpreende. Em 2025, os Correios registraram um aumento recorde na utilização do serviço, entregando mais de 4 milhões de telegramas. O número representa um crescimento de quase 30% em relação a 2024, mostrando que o formato ainda tem relevância no Brasil. O Morning Show traz atualizações sobre o caso do cão "Orelha". Dois dos adolescentes suspeitos de maus-tratos retornaram ao Brasil após viagem aos Estados Unidos e tiveram seus celulares imediatamente apreendidos pela polícia. Ao todo, quatro jovens são apontados como autores das agressões. A investigação também apura se o grupo tentou afogar outro cachorro comunitário na mesma praia. O caso segue em sigilo de justiça. Essas e outras notícias você confere no Morning Show.
The woman convicted in connection with the disappearance and death of Jennifer Farber Dulos, Michelle Troconis, has one more day for a habeas corpus hearing. Day two of the three-day hearing was last Friday and once again, News 8 investigative reporter, Jeff Derderian, was in the courtroom. We got the latest on this case and what to expect in day three later this week.
The Cheat Sheet is The Murder Sheet's segment breaking down weekly news and updates in some of the murder cases we cover. In this episode, we'll talk about cases from New Hampshire, California, and Texas.Fox 4 News's report on the sentencing of sex trafficker Emily Hutchins: https://www.fox4news.com/news/tarrant-county-human-trafficking-emily-hutchinsHoodline 's report on the sentencing of sex trafficker Emily Hutchins: https://hoodline.com/2025/12/arlington-woman-gets-30-years-for-sex-trafficking-girls/KXAN's report on the trial of Christopher Taylor in the death of Dr. Mauris DeSilva: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l3eagb2w8kwThe appellate court's decision over the conviction of Christopher Taylor in the death of Dr. Mauris DeSilva: https://law.justia.com/cases/texas/seventh-court-of-appeals/2025/07-25-00010-cr.htmlKXAN's report on the trial of Christopher Taylor in the death of Dr. Mauris DeSilva: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l3eagb2w8kwKXAN's report on Dr. Mauris DeSilva's father's civil lawsuit: https://www.kxan.com/news/local/austin/father-sues-city-of-austin-apd-officers-after-son-killed-during-2019-mental-health-call/Austin-American Statesman's report on Christopher Taylor's appeal in the case of Dr. Mauris DeSilva's death: https://www.statesman.com/news/courts/article/austin-police-taylor-appeal-8-things-21270154.phpKVUE's interview with one of Christopher Taylor's attorneys: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QokB0ZsY0Mc&list=PLG7WvHdg9adbLLTjwuIlNXMwuGy-wAN8v&index=2We also accessed reporting from the El Paso Times, Corpus Christi Caller Times, San Angelo Standard Times, and Houston Chronicle through Newspapers.com Pay It 2's fund regarding Pamela Smart's appeal: https://www.payit2.com/f/supportpamelasmartABC News's coverage of Pamela Smart's appeal: https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/pamela-smart-seeks-overturn-conviction-teenager-murder-husband-128959585USA Today's report on the latest news in the murders of Michele and Rob Reiner and the case against Nick Reiner: https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/celebrities/2026/01/07/nick-reiner-murder-charges-rob-michele-reiner-lawyer-withdraws/88069146007/Fox News's report on the latest news in the murders of Michele and Rob Reiner and the case against Nick Reiner: https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/nick-reiner-loses-attorney-alan-jackson-parents-murder-caseFind discounts for Murder Sheet listeners here: https://murdersheetpodcast.com/discountsCheck out our upcoming book events and get links to buy tickets here: https://murdersheetpodcast.com/eventsOrder our book on Delphi here: https://bookshop.org/p/books/shadow-of-the-bridge-the-delphi-murders-and-the-dark-side-of-the-american-heartland-aine-cain/21866881?ean=9781639369232Or here: https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/Shadow-of-the-Bridge/Aine-Cain/9781639369232Or here: https://www.amazon.com/Shadow-Bridge-Murders-American-Heartland/dp/1639369236Join our Patreon here! https://www.patreon.com/c/murdersheetSupport The Murder Sheet by buying a t-shirt here: https://www.murdersheetshop.com/Check out more inclusive sizing and t-shirt and merchandising options here: https://themurdersheet.dashery.com/Send tips to murdersheet@gmail.com.The Murder Sheet is a production of Mystery Sheet LLC.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Michelle Troconis, convicted for her role in the 2019 disappearance and death of Jennifer Farber Dulos, was back in front of a judge for a habeas corpus hearing. We got the latest from investigative reporter Jeff Derderian.Image Credit: Eric Urbanowicz
NotiMundo al Día - Sonia Vera - Niegan habeas corpus correctivo a Jorge Glas by FM Mundo 98.1
Ghislaine Maxwell's habeas corpus petition is, at its core, a reheated attempt to relitigate issues that were already raised, argued, and rejected at trial and on direct appeal—most notably her fixation on alleged juror misconduct. Maxwell centers her petition on the claim that a juror failed to fully disclose past experiences with sexual abuse during voir dire, arguing this tainted the verdict and violated her Sixth Amendment rights. But courts that have already examined this issue concluded that there was no evidence of intentional deception or bias sufficient to overturn the conviction. Habeas relief is not a “do-over” for defendants unhappy with a jury's conclusion, and Maxwell's petition conspicuously ignores the extremely high bar required to show that any alleged juror error had a decisive, unconstitutional impact on the outcome of the trial.Beyond the juror issue, the petition leans heavily on familiar defense talking points—claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, prosecutorial misconduct, and constitutional violations framed in sweeping, conclusory language rather than supported by new, compelling evidence. What's striking is how little the petition grapples with the overwhelming testimonial and documentary record that led to Maxwell's conviction for facilitating and participating in the sexual abuse of minors. Instead, it attempts to recast procedural disputes as fundamental injustices while sidestepping the reality that multiple courts have already found the trial to be fair, the evidence to be strong, and the verdict to be sound. In that sense, the habeas filing reads less like a serious constitutional challenge and more like a last-ditch effort to chip away at a lawful conviction by exhausting every remaining procedural avenue—no matter how thin the underlying arguments have become.to contact me:Ghislaine Maxwell files petition challenging sex trafficking conviction
Ghislaine Maxwell's habeas corpus petition is, at its core, a reheated attempt to relitigate issues that were already raised, argued, and rejected at trial and on direct appeal—most notably her fixation on alleged juror misconduct. Maxwell centers her petition on the claim that a juror failed to fully disclose past experiences with sexual abuse during voir dire, arguing this tainted the verdict and violated her Sixth Amendment rights. But courts that have already examined this issue concluded that there was no evidence of intentional deception or bias sufficient to overturn the conviction. Habeas relief is not a “do-over” for defendants unhappy with a jury's conclusion, and Maxwell's petition conspicuously ignores the extremely high bar required to show that any alleged juror error had a decisive, unconstitutional impact on the outcome of the trial.Beyond the juror issue, the petition leans heavily on familiar defense talking points—claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, prosecutorial misconduct, and constitutional violations framed in sweeping, conclusory language rather than supported by new, compelling evidence. What's striking is how little the petition grapples with the overwhelming testimonial and documentary record that led to Maxwell's conviction for facilitating and participating in the sexual abuse of minors. Instead, it attempts to recast procedural disputes as fundamental injustices while sidestepping the reality that multiple courts have already found the trial to be fair, the evidence to be strong, and the verdict to be sound. In that sense, the habeas filing reads less like a serious constitutional challenge and more like a last-ditch effort to chip away at a lawful conviction by exhausting every remaining procedural avenue—no matter how thin the underlying arguments have become.to contact me:Ghislaine Maxwell files petition challenging sex trafficking convictionBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
Ghislaine Maxwell's habeas corpus petition is, at its core, a reheated attempt to relitigate issues that were already raised, argued, and rejected at trial and on direct appeal—most notably her fixation on alleged juror misconduct. Maxwell centers her petition on the claim that a juror failed to fully disclose past experiences with sexual abuse during voir dire, arguing this tainted the verdict and violated her Sixth Amendment rights. But courts that have already examined this issue concluded that there was no evidence of intentional deception or bias sufficient to overturn the conviction. Habeas relief is not a “do-over” for defendants unhappy with a jury's conclusion, and Maxwell's petition conspicuously ignores the extremely high bar required to show that any alleged juror error had a decisive, unconstitutional impact on the outcome of the trial.Beyond the juror issue, the petition leans heavily on familiar defense talking points—claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, prosecutorial misconduct, and constitutional violations framed in sweeping, conclusory language rather than supported by new, compelling evidence. What's striking is how little the petition grapples with the overwhelming testimonial and documentary record that led to Maxwell's conviction for facilitating and participating in the sexual abuse of minors. Instead, it attempts to recast procedural disputes as fundamental injustices while sidestepping the reality that multiple courts have already found the trial to be fair, the evidence to be strong, and the verdict to be sound. In that sense, the habeas filing reads less like a serious constitutional challenge and more like a last-ditch effort to chip away at a lawful conviction by exhausting every remaining procedural avenue—no matter how thin the underlying arguments have become.to contact me:Ghislaine Maxwell files petition challenging sex trafficking convictionBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Ghislaine Maxwell has initiated a habeas corpus petition in a last-ditch attempt to challenge her imprisonment, signaling a dramatic escalation in her ongoing legal fight. The filing reveals that Maxwell plans to represent herself as she petitions the court for release, an unusual move that underscores both the desperation and the high-stakes maneuvering behind the scenes. While the petition itself has not yet laid out specific legal grounds, the timing is strategic: Maxwell is making this push just as scrutiny around the Epstein network is intensifying and new transparency measures threaten to expose previously sealed material tied to her case.At the same time, the Justice Department is moving to unseal grand jury records and related documents under newly mandated transparency rules, a shift that Maxwell fiercely opposes. Her legal team argues that releasing these materials could jeopardize any future appeal or post-conviction litigation she may pursue. Advocates for survivors, however, view her filing as yet another attempt to stall public accountability and keep critical details of the Epstein network shielded from view. The collision between Maxwell's habeas corpus bid and the government's unsealing push sets the stage for a pivotal legal showdown—one that could influence not only her own fate but the broader public reckoning surrounding Epstein's crimes.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Ghislaine Maxwell will plea for prison release, new court filing says
Ghislaine Maxwell has initiated a habeas corpus petition in a last-ditch attempt to challenge her imprisonment, signaling a dramatic escalation in her ongoing legal fight. The filing reveals that Maxwell plans to represent herself as she petitions the court for release, an unusual move that underscores both the desperation and the high-stakes maneuvering behind the scenes. While the petition itself has not yet laid out specific legal grounds, the timing is strategic: Maxwell is making this push just as scrutiny around the Epstein network is intensifying and new transparency measures threaten to expose previously sealed material tied to her case.At the same time, the Justice Department is moving to unseal grand jury records and related documents under newly mandated transparency rules, a shift that Maxwell fiercely opposes. Her legal team argues that releasing these materials could jeopardize any future appeal or post-conviction litigation she may pursue. Advocates for survivors, however, view her filing as yet another attempt to stall public accountability and keep critical details of the Epstein network shielded from view. The collision between Maxwell's habeas corpus bid and the government's unsealing push sets the stage for a pivotal legal showdown—one that could influence not only her own fate but the broader public reckoning surrounding Epstein's crimes.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Ghislaine Maxwell will plea for prison release, new court filing saysBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
As the Trump administration continues its aggressive mass deportation campaign, immigration lawyers are increasingly turning to a law the founding fathers established to protect against a king. The use of habeas corpus petitions has skyrocketed in recent months. Reporter: Gustavo Solis, KPBS Governor Gavin Newsom has shut down four prisons, with a fifth closure on its way. He's said those changes, along with some other reductions, are saving the state around $900 million a year. But according to a new report, the state's corrections department is still running a huge deficit. Reporter: Cayla Mihalovich, CalMatters Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
The legal action of habeas corpus ensures that a person's liberty is not being violated by unlawful detention. What does habeas corpus translate to? Play. Share. Listen with comedian Vic Dibitetto. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Clay and historian Beau Breslin discuss the doctrine of habeas corpus and its role in the current debate about how to handle undocumented immigrants in the United States. In a nutshell, habeas corpus means "hey, produce the body." You cannot just arbitrarily snatch someone off the street and make them disappear. Habeas corpus was so important to the Founding Fathers that they embedded it in the first Article of the Constitution, right off the top, and did not postpone it to the Bill of Rights. The United States has a mixed history of its adherence to the doctrine of habeas corpus, which Beau Breslin believes is THE fundamental right in America and all over the world. And yet, Professor Breslin, who teaches at an elite college in New York state, admitted that the majority of his students, even in a class on constitutional theory, would probably be unable to define just what habeas corpus means, where it came from, and why it is critically important to a free and enlightened society. This episode was recorded on September 12, 2025.
Is Lindsey Halligan, Trump's latest flavor of the month, gunning for Pam Bondi's job as Attorney General? And how much longer can a Bondi squint, scoff and roll her eyes in Senate Judiciary Committee meetings and still keep her job? How are Biden appointed judges viewing the deficient on their face indictments of Former FBI Director Comey and AG Leticia James? Did Trump just tell China we ware spying on them in order to indict his political critic John Bolton? Is Trump's DOJ helping Ghisilaine Maxwell with her writ of Habeas Corpus filing to get out of jail now that she's lost at the Supreme Court? Will the MAGA Supreme Court chastise federal judges who are trying to protect states from Trump's using of a standing army to punish Blue States and political rivals, or preserve our system of federalism and states' rights? Ben and Popok make it make sense on the #1 rated Law and Politics Podcast, Legal AF. Support Our Sponsors: Miracle Made: Upgrade your sleep with Miracle Made! Go to https://TryMiracle.com/LEGALAF and use the code LEGALAF to claim your FREE 3 PIECE TOWEL SET and SAVE over 40% OFF. Moink: Keep American farming going by signing up at https://MoinkBox.com/LEGALAF RIGHT NOW and listeners of this show get FREE BACON for a year! Magic Spoon: Save $5 OFF your next order when you go to http://magicspoon.com/LEGALAF Fatty 15: Get an additional 15% off their 90-day subscription Starter Kit by going to https://fatty15.com/LEGALAF and using code LEGALAF at checkout. Subscribe to Legal AF Substack: https://substack.com/@legalaf Check out the Popok Firm: https://thepopokfirm.com Remember to subscribe to ALL the MeidasTouch Network Podcasts: MeidasTouch: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/meidastouch-podcast Legal AF: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/legal-af MissTrial: https://meidasnews.com/tag/miss-trial The PoliticsGirl Podcast: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-politicsgirl-podcast The Influence Continuum: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-influence-continuum-with-dr-steven-hassan Mea Culpa with Michael Cohen: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/mea-culpa-with-michael-cohen The Weekend Show: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-weekend-show Burn the Boats: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/burn-the-boats Majority 54: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/majority-54 Political Beatdown: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/political-beatdown On Democracy with FP Wellman: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/on-democracy-with-fpwellman Uncovered: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/maga-uncovered Coalition of the Sane: https://meidasnews.com/tag/coalition-of-the-sane Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Seth takes a closer look at Trump thinking "habeas corpus" is the name of a person and Trump's threat to arrest Illinois Governor JB Pritzker.Then, Ryan Reynolds talks about the time he crossed paths with Johnny Carson and Johnny Cash in the same week, struggling with the heat while receiving the Order of Canada Honor and his work on the John Candy: I Like Me documentary.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Tom and Kevin discuss what really happened with ICE yesterday in the Hammond Police Department parking lot; NY Attorney General Leticia James indicted; Bad Bunny to perform at the Super Bowl halftime show; did Trump think Habeas Corpus was a person?
SEASON 4 EPISODE 2: COUNTDOWN WITH KEITH OLBERMANN A-Block (1:45) SPECIAL COMMENT: The United States of America does not have a functioning government. The Trump Dictatorship and the Library of Congress – Congress which Mike Johnson runs via a porn app – DELETED part of the official online edition of the Constitution – the part that limits the suspension of Habeas Corpus and bans presidents accepting foreign bribes. The Library says it was a coding error and would be fixed soon…ish. Yeah, the coding in Trump’s DNA. The White House had to DENY that the White House Chief of Staff was to meet last night with the Vice President, the Attorney General, the Deputy Attorney General, and the FBI Director to discuss what to DO about the Trump/Epstein cover-up scandal, and what to do WITH the RECORDING of the Deputy Attorney General’s two days’ of bargaining with a convicted pedophile and child sex trafficker… and nobody seemed to notice that the headline was that WHATEVER the Chief of Staff, A-G, Deputy A-G, and FBI Director WERE meeting with the Vice President ABOUT… the PRESIDENT WASN’T GOING TO BE THERE. There is no competent executive authority, no congressional or senate oversight, no reliable judiciary. The United States of America does NOT NOW have a functioning government. The nominal president has spent the last few days making up economic statistics and poll numbers and threatening his predecessors with prosecution for imaginary crimes punishable by death while wandering around the roof of the White House, and phoning in to a business network with racist moronity the content of which is just this side of a 19th century minstrel show, or continuing to get more and more in bed, figuratively, with a convicted pedophile and child sex trafficker, in a scheme to cover-up her crimes, her late partner crimes, and whatever the president’s role was or was not… in them. And the first and seventh people in the line of presidential succession were going to have dinner with their Epstein expert who just met with Gulaine Maxwell and the head of the FBI and the woman who RUNS the White House but NOT the president and you know it almost doesn’t MATTER if they were meeting to try to figure out what to do about Trumpsteen or not. By 3:14 PM Eastern the Library of Congress said Sections 8, 9 and 10 of the 1st Article were back online so, shrug emoji, I guess there are limits on emoluments and suspending Habeas Corpus… for now. Fifteen minutes later, however, there were still huge swaths of all three sections missing from the official online version of the Constitution. But coding. And so what, it’s just the ONLINE version, what’s the difference? Trump just fired the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics because she wouldn’t delete the official online jobs numbers and will soon find someone to post fabricated numbers online which will then be accepted as real – and official – because they’re ONLINE. There is no functioning government, just a mediocre Public Relations firm. Understaffed. Trying to sell Edsels, Google Glasses, New Coke, and fascism. B-Block (40:00) THE WORST PERSONS IN THE WORLD: Acting NASA "Director" Duffy wants to put nukes on the moon, even though that was the plot of the re-make of the movie "The Time Machine" in which nukes on the moon destroyed the moon and rendered earth uninhabitable good call reality TV boy. The New York Times won't stop trying to make Harvard-Fetch happen. And the Trump Council on Lack of Fitness, the one Super Bowl star Saquon Barkley turned down membership on? The Council announced he accepted. C-Block (55:00) THURSDAYS WITH THURBER: Of all his great stories, the one that might have been the most likely to have been written in order to be performed aloud, I humbly offer you this week: "The Night The Bed Fell." See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
When 14-year-old Michael Politte woke up to find his family home filled with smoke, he had no idea his life was about to change forever. After discovering his mother, Rita, on fire in the hallway, Michael ran for help—only to be arrested just days later and accused of her murder. Thank you to this week's sponsors! Feel the difference an extraordinary night's sleep can make with Boll & Branch. Get 15% off plus free shipping on your first set of sheets at Bollandbranch.com/moms and unlock free shipping. Exclusions apply. For 50% off your order, head to DailyLook.com and use code MOMS50. Save 25% on your first month of subscription by going to dosedaily.co/MOMS or entering MOMS at checkout. Check-out bonus episodes up on Spotify and Apple podcast now! Get new episodes a day early and ad free, plus chat episodes, discord access and zoom hangouts at Patreon.com/momsandmysteriespodcast Thank you to this week's sponsors! Get the best savings of the season during Boll & Branch's Annual Summer Event! Get 20% off plus free shipping on your first set of sheets at BollandBranch.com/MOMS. Limited time only. Exclusions apply. Give your summer closet an upgrade—with Quince. Go to Quince.com/moms for free shipping on your order and 365 day returns. Right now, Skylight is offering our listeners $30 off their 15 inch Calendars by going to SkylightCal.com/MOMS. To advertise on the show, contact sales@advertisecast.com or visit https://www.advertisecast.com/MomsandMysteriesATrueCrimePodcast. Listen and subscribe to Melissa's other podcast, Criminality!! It's the podcast for those who love reality TV, true crime, and want to hear all the juicy stories where the two genres intersect. Subscribe and listen here: www.pod.link/criminality Check-out Moms and Mysteries to find links to our tiktok, youtube, twitter, instagram and more. Sources: https://www.macarthurjustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Petition-for-Writ-of-Habeas-Corpus.pdf https://www.cbsnews.com/news/michael-politte-rita-politte-missouri-sleepover-murder-investigation/ https://themip.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Politte-Press-Release-8.23.pdf https://www.kcur.org/news/2025-04-27/years-after-michael-politte-won-parole-in-missouri-his-battle-for-exoneration-drags-on https://www.stlmag.com/news/michael-politte-juror-wrongful-conviction/ https://www.cbsnews.com/pictures/michael-polittes-fight-for-freedom/ https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/84665391/ollie_b-smith https://www.stlpr.org/show/st-louis-on-the-air/2021-09-29/michael-politte-has-served-22-years-for-murdering-his-mother-experts-say-hes-innocent https://www.newspapers.com/image/1208041899/?match=1&terms=marian%20smith
Tomorrow is the day Tina Peters' habeas corpus will be argued in court. Please send your prayers and show your support. You can find more information at tinapeters.us. Next, Hunter Biden joined Channel 5 for an interview, and to say it was an embarrassment is an understatement. Throughout the entire interview, Biden used vulgar language, levied threats against officials, posed ridiculous hypotheticals, and made baseless claims. The Biden PR team is going to have their work cut out for them after this one. Next, the DOJ and NIA are getting to work, with the DOJ investigating the Clinton emails and pursuing criminal charges against Jerome Powell, and Tulsi Gabbard continues to release more information implicating Obama in the RussiaGate hoax. All this and more on today's untamed!
It was a wild weekend. Donald Trump presided over a military parade on his birthday while an estimated 5 million Americans protested around the country. Phil, Skye, and Kaitlyn discuss the optics of both events and ask, with America's divided politics and media silos, is protesting still effective? They also unpack a new article by Abby McCloskey in CT that argues evangelicalism's focus on a private, personalized faith undermines learning, curiosity, and exercising the mind. Then, theologian and Holy Post Pundit, Michael Bird, is back. He offers an outsider's perspective on Trump's military parade, the “No Kings” protests, and why he thinks more Christians should be concerned about the suspension of habeas corpus. Also this week: More '50s slang and an update on Ed the zebra. Holy Post Plus: Getting Schooled - Ethics of Exile 101: https://www.patreon.com/posts/130879694/ Ad-Free Version of this Episode: https://www.patreon.com/posts/131691890/ 0:00 - Show Starts 3:25 - Theme Song 3:50 - Sponsor - Timeless designs, great fabrics. Perfect swimwear for your kids this summer! Check out Minnow at https://www.shopminnow.com enter SHOPMINNOW15 for 15% off your first order. 4:57 - Sponsor - AG1 - Heavily researched, thoroughly purity-tested, and filled with stuff you need. Go to https://www.drinkag1.com/HOLYPOST 6:18 - 50's Slang 9:44 - Ed the Zebra's Return! 14:35 - Military Parade 23:48 - What Does Protest Do? 32:05 - The Christian Mind Out of Practice 47:30 - Teaching Essentials of the Faith 50:21 - Sponsor - Rocket Money - Find and cancel your old subscriptions with Rocket Money at https://www.rocketmoney.com/HOLYPOST 51:28- Sponsor - World Relief - Join The Path as a monthly partner with World Relief! https://www.worldrelief.org/stand 52:24 - Interview 59:30 - Polarization of the Military 1:10:05 - Right to Protest 1:19:45 - End Credits Links from News Segment: A Christian Mind Out of Practice by Abby McCloskey: https://www.christianitytoday.com/2025/06/christian-mind-out-of-practice-mark-noll-discipleship/ Other Resources: Read the Introduction to Skye's new book and sign up to Holy Post Plus to follow along as the book is written: holypost.com/book Holy Post website: https://www.holypost.com/ Holy Post Plus: www.holypost.com/plus Holy Post Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/holypost Holy Post Merch Store: https://www.holypost.com/shop The Holy Post is supported by our listeners. We may earn affiliate commissions through links listed here. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Tonight's rundown: Hey BillOReilly.com Premium and Concierge Members, welcome to the No Spin News for Wednesday, May 21, 2025. Stand Up for Your Country. Talking Points Memo: Bill questions why Democrats aren't criticized for opposing spending cuts and rejecting President Trump's latest tax and spending proposal. A look at Bill's heated discussion on NewsNation last night, where he debated the potential Joe Biden cover-up. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem struggles to define habeas corpus during a Senate hearing. The latest on the Justice Department's investigation into former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo. Elon Musk states in a recent interview that he is scaling back on political spending. Final Thought: Why Bill was invited to go to China. Read Bill's latest column, The Comey Blunder Check out our new Dad's Deal Bundle! Get a Not Woke Baseball Cap and a Not Woke Mug for 20% off! Pre-order Bill's next book in the new Confronting Series, ‘Confronting Evil' NOW! Now's the time to get a Premium or Concierge Membership to BillOReilly.com, the only place for honest news analysis. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Episode 4486: Mass Momentum Behind Habeas Corpus
Could the Trump administration suspend habeas corpus? On this week's Insider episode, Preet is joined by Rachel Barkow, CAFE Contributor and professor at NYU Law School, while Joyce is out. In an excerpt from the show, Preet and Rachel discuss Trump advisor Stephen Miller's comments about suspending the constitutional right to habeas corpus. Also on the Insider docket: – Reflections on the legacy of Supreme Court Justice David Souter, who passed away last week at age 85; and – The Justice Department's court filing asking a federal judge to dismiss a lawsuit that seeks to restrict access to the abortion pill mifepristone. CAFE Insiders click HERE to listen to the full analysis. Not an Insider? Now more than ever, it's critical to stay tuned. To join a community of reasoned voices in unreasonable times, become an Insider today. You'll get access to full episodes of the podcast and other exclusive content. Head to cafe.com/insider or staytuned.substack.com. Subscribe to our Substack. Subscribe to our YouTube channel. This podcast is brought to you by CAFE and Vox Media Podcast Network. Executive Producer: Tamara Sepper; Supervising Producer: Jake Kaplan; Associate Producer: Claudia Hernández; Audio Producer: Nat Weiner; Deputy Editor: Celine Rohr; CAFE Team: David Tatasciore, Matthew Billy, Noa Azulai, and Liana Greenway. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Tonight's rundown: Hey BillOReilly.com Premium and Concierge Members, welcome to the No Spin News for Monday, May 12, 2025. Stand Up for Your Country. Talking Points Memo: The Trump administration is having its best day since the inauguration. Bill recaps President Trump's press conference from this morning. Why is Qatar offering to donate a jumbo jet to the U.S. Department of Defense? Bill breaks down Stephen Miller's claim that the Trump administration is considering suspending habeas corpus. Ukrainian President Zelenskyy has agreed to meet Russian President Putin in Turkey, marking their second meeting since 2019. Newark Mayor Ras Baraka was arrested at an ICE facility while joining Democrats to conduct an 'oversight' visit. Final Thought: Bill thanks everyone for the continued Holly condolences. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
© 2020-2026 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
