POPULARITY
3 episodes with David Dunning
7 episodes with David Dunning
2 episodes with David Dunning
2 episodes with David Dunning
2 episodes with David Dunning
2 episodes with David Dunning
3 episodes with David Dunning
2 episodes with David Dunning
2 episodes with David Dunning
Rediffusion d'un des épisodes les plus écoutés du Podcast du Marketing.Aux Etats-Unis en 1995, il y a un type qui a attaqué deux banques avec le visage enduit de jus de citron... Alors évidemment il a été arrêté, et sans sourciller il explique que le jus de citron le rend invisible aux caméras de sécurité, comme le fait l'encre sympathique... Les psychologues David Dunning et Justin Kruger Spar, qui travaillaient sur son cas, ont tenté de comprendre la raison de cette assurance. Ca a donné l'effet Dunning-Kruger... C'est l'effet qui décrit le mécanisme de l'apprentissage, et il montre notamment que les incompétents surestiment leurs capacités et leurs performances...Dans cet épisode, je vous explique en détail ce qu'est cet effet Dunning-Kruger et comment il s'applique dans nos vies professionnelles, que l'on soit manager ou indépendant. -------------------
Charles Darwin once wrote that “Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge”, and real-life situations which reflect that are all too common. To cite just one prominent example, in January 1995, American men MacArthur Wheeler and Clifton Earl Johnson were arrested after carrying out coordinated bank robberies in the state of Pennsylvania. Incredibly, they didn't bother wearing masks, as they believed that rubbing lemon juice on their faces would make them invisible to security cameras. Actually no, but bear with me; I'm getting there. The case got a lot of media coverage, and piqued the curiosity of social psychologists David Dunning and Justin Kruger at Cornell University. They wanted to know how on earth someone could be so damn sure of themselves while believing something completely stupid. Where does this effect come from? Is that what the Dunning and Kruger effect is then? What are the consequences of the Dunning Kruger effect? In under 3 minutes, we answer your questions! To listen to the last episodes, you can click here: Why do some people believe in ghosts? What is the placebo effect and how does it work? Could chronoworking make you work more efficiently? A podcast written and realised by Joseph Chance. First broadcast: 15/2/2023 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Unser zweites Thema heute ist der Dunning-Kruger-Effekt. Übernehmen Kinder dauerhaft zu viel Verantwortung innerhalb der Familie, kann das Folgen für ihre psychische Entwicklung haben – bis ins Erwachsenenalter hinein. Fachleute sprechen in solchen Fällen von Parentifizierung – einem Phänomen, das oft unerkannt bleibt. Anke Lingnau-Carduck, Sozialpädagogin und systemische Therapeutin, erklärt, unter welchen Bedingungen es dazu kommt und wie Betroffene sich aus alten Mustern befreien können. Hier erfahrt Ihr mehr über Parentifizierung: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1467-6427.2008.00423.x Und hier findet Ihr die Studie von David Dunning und Justin Kruger: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10626367/ "Aha! Zehn Minuten Alltags-Wissen" ist der Wissenschafts-Podcast von WELT. Wir freuen uns über Feedback an wissen@welt.de. Redaktion: Juliane Nora Schneider Produktion: Serdar Deniz Impressum: https://www.welt.de/services/article7893735/Impressum.html Datenschutz: https://www.welt.de/services/article157550705/Datenschutzerklaerung-WELT-DIGITAL.html
The Dunning-Kruger effect is a cognitive bias that refers to the tendency of individuals with low ability or expertise in a particular domain to overestimate their competence and mistakenly believe they possess above-average skills. At the same time, those who are highly skilled or knowledgeable in a specific area tend to underestimate their abilities and assume others are equally capable.The effect was first identified by psychologists David Dunning and Justin Kruger in 1999 through a series of experiments. They found that people who performed poorly on tasks related to humor, grammar, and logic consistently rated their abilities higher than they actually were. Conversely, individuals who performed well on these tasks tended to underestimate their performance relative to others.The Dunning-Kruger effect can be attributed to a lack of metacognitive skills, which refers to one's ability to accurately evaluate their own competence. Incompetent individuals often fail to recognize their own limitations because they lack the necessary expertise to accurately assess their own performance. This leads them to overestimate their abilities and be unaware of their shortcomings.Another contributing factor to the Dunning-Kruger effect is the cognitive bias of illusory superiority.This bias causes individuals to believe they are better than average in various aspects of life, regardless of their actual skill level. This bias is particularly strong among those with limited knowledge or experience in a particular area.Interestingly, as individuals gain more expertise and knowledge in a specific domain, they tend to become more aware of the complexities and nuances involved.This increased awareness leads to a more accurate self-assessment of their abilities and often results in a decrease in overconfidence.The implications of the Dunning-Kruger effect can be far-reaching. Incompetent individuals who overestimate their abilities may take on tasks or responsibilities beyond their capabilities, leading to poor decision-making or ineffective performance. Additionally, the effect can hinder individuals from seeking feedback or further education, as they believe they already possess sufficient expertise.In this episode, we take a look at how this applies to the Jeffrey Epstein case and how the legacy media overall continues to miss the overall picture.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:What you WEREN'T told about Jeffery Epstein - TheBlazeBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
The Dunning-Kruger effect is a cognitive bias that refers to the tendency of individuals with low ability or expertise in a particular domain to overestimate their competence and mistakenly believe they possess above-average skills. At the same time, those who are highly skilled or knowledgeable in a specific area tend to underestimate their abilities and assume others are equally capable.The effect was first identified by psychologists David Dunning and Justin Kruger in 1999 through a series of experiments. They found that people who performed poorly on tasks related to humor, grammar, and logic consistently rated their abilities higher than they actually were. Conversely, individuals who performed well on these tasks tended to underestimate their performance relative to others.The Dunning-Kruger effect can be attributed to a lack of metacognitive skills, which refers to one's ability to accurately evaluate their own competence. Incompetent individuals often fail to recognize their own limitations because they lack the necessary expertise to accurately assess their own performance. This leads them to overestimate their abilities and be unaware of their shortcomings.Another contributing factor to the Dunning-Kruger effect is the cognitive bias of illusory superiority.This bias causes individuals to believe they are better than average in various aspects of life, regardless of their actual skill level. This bias is particularly strong among those with limited knowledge or experience in a particular area.Interestingly, as individuals gain more expertise and knowledge in a specific domain, they tend to become more aware of the complexities and nuances involved.This increased awareness leads to a more accurate self-assessment of their abilities and often results in a decrease in overconfidence.The implications of the Dunning-Kruger effect can be far-reaching. Incompetent individuals who overestimate their abilities may take on tasks or responsibilities beyond their capabilities, leading to poor decision-making or ineffective performance. Additionally, the effect can hinder individuals from seeking feedback or further education, as they believe they already possess sufficient expertise.In this episode, we take a look at how this applies to the Jeffrey Epstein case and how the legacy media overall continues to miss the overall picture.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:What you WEREN'T told about Jeffery Epstein - TheBlazeBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Hi, in this episode Ben will discuss the Dunning Kruger effect. A cognitive bias that was created in 1999 by David Dunning and Justin Kruger. It gives a graphical representation of the development when learning new things. It's very applicable to us divers, as we can easily become the victim of incomplete education and/or a false sense of security by our own doing. For more information, contact us here:https://utdscubadiving.com/contact/Here is a link to the graph:https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/46/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_Effect_01.svgHere are the videos:Episode 1: https://youtu.be/h-elWmoQ3I0?si=QT2380wwAeOCwTPgEpisode 2: https://youtu.be/zRc-2kADCrI?si=kJENf3TP_tcdAA0PEpisode 3: https://youtu.be/Gl4vf6UyLgc?si=BgJlMDfIj-vaOoCz
The Dunning-Kruger effect is a cognitive bias that refers to the tendency of individuals with low ability or expertise in a particular domain to overestimate their competence and mistakenly believe they possess above-average skills. At the same time, those who are highly skilled or knowledgeable in a specific area tend to underestimate their abilities and assume others are equally capable.The effect was first identified by psychologists David Dunning and Justin Kruger in 1999 through a series of experiments. They found that people who performed poorly on tasks related to humor, grammar, and logic consistently rated their abilities higher than they actually were. Conversely, individuals who performed well on these tasks tended to underestimate their performance relative to others.The Dunning-Kruger effect can be attributed to a lack of metacognitive skills, which refers to one's ability to accurately evaluate their own competence. Incompetent individuals often fail to recognize their own limitations because they lack the necessary expertise to accurately assess their own performance. This leads them to overestimate their abilities and be unaware of their shortcomings.Another contributing factor to the Dunning-Kruger effect is the cognitive bias of illusory superiority.This bias causes individuals to believe they are better than average in various aspects of life, regardless of their actual skill level. This bias is particularly strong among those with limited knowledge or experience in a particular area.Interestingly, as individuals gain more expertise and knowledge in a specific domain, they tend to become more aware of the complexities and nuances involved.This increased awareness leads to a more accurate self-assessment of their abilities and often results in a decrease in overconfidence.The implications of the Dunning-Kruger effect can be far-reaching. Incompetent individuals who overestimate their abilities may take on tasks or responsibilities beyond their capabilities, leading to poor decision-making or ineffective performance. Additionally, the effect can hinder individuals from seeking feedback or further education, as they believe they already possess sufficient expertise.In this episode, we take a look at how this applies to the Jeffrey Epstein case and how the legacy media overall continues to miss the overall picture.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:What you WEREN'T told about Jeffery Epstein - TheBlazeBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
In this episode of Choiceology with Katy Milkman, we look at the often-misunderstood and surprisingly common Dunning-Kruger effect with an interview featuring one of the researchers who first identified it, David Dunning.But we start with the story of Cecilia Jimenez, the humble Spanish grandmother and amateur landscape painter who took it upon herself to restore a fresco in her local church. The results made international headlines—and briefly made Ceclia Jimenez a household name—for all the wrong reasons.Andrew Flack has a lot of compassion for Cecilia. He met with her several times in the process of writing an opera with composer Paul Fowler called Behold the Man about Ceclia's ill-fated but ultimately beneficial project. Next, David Dunning explains how—contrary to popular belief—we are all at the mercy of the Dunning-Kruger effect from time to time, and that we should be more humble in recognizing what we don't know about what we don't know.David Dunning is the Ann and Charles R. Walgreen, Jr., Professor of the Study of Human Understanding at the University of Michigan. The paper "Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments," co-authored with Justin Kruger, led to the bias being named The Dunning-Kruger effect. Important DisclosuresThe comments, views, and opinions expressed in the presentation are those of the speakers and do not necessarily represent the views of Charles Schwab.Data contained herein from third party providers is obtained from what are considered reliable source. However, its accuracy, completeness or reliability cannot be guaranteed and Charles Schwab & Co. expressly disclaims any liability, including incidental or consequential damages, arising from errors or omissions in this publication. All expressions of opinion are subject to change without notice in reaction to shifting market conditions.All names and market data shown above are for illustrative purposes only and are not a recommendation, offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security. Supporting documentation for any claims or statistical information is available upon request.Investing involves risk including loss of principal.The book How to Change: The Science of Getting From Where You Are to Where You Want to Be is not affiliated with, sponsored by, or endorsed by Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. (CS&Co.). Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. (CS&Co.) has not reviewed the book and makes no representations about its content.(0824-M9R6)
On this episode of the Utterly Moderate Podcast, the authors of the brand new book, The Poisoning of the American Mind, talk about the book and its implications for America. So what is their argument? A significant amount of research suggests that most people seek out news and information sources that mirror their worldviews, avoid ones that don’t, and interpret information using cognitive filters that force an alignment with what they already believe. As social psychologist David Dunning writes, “Each of us possesses certain foundational beliefs—narratives about the self, ideas about the social order—that essentially cannot be violated. . . And any information that we glean from the world is amended, distorted, diminished, or forgotten in order to make sure that these sacrosanct beliefs remain whole and unharmed.” As they document in their brand new book and their free online documentary of the same name, the evidence suggests that this problem afflicts both conservative and liberal Americans. Conservative Americans tend to place their trust in very few sources of news and information, and those sources tend to be low-quality, like the openly partisan Fox News. Conservatives also tend to cocoon themselves within a partisan media ecosystem of like-minded low-quality outlets, an “internally coherent, relatively insulated knowledge community, reinforcing the shared worldview of readers and shielding them from journalism that challenge[s] it.” Liberal Americans are more likely than conservatives to trust legitimate journalistic outlets, but those sources often unknowingly spread misleading claims that they truly believe are backed by “the science.” Why do they believe this? Sometimes it’s because the outlet doesn’t fully grasp the preponderance of the evidence on the issue at hand. But too often it is because irresponsible experts, who news outlets should be able to trust, said “the science” backed their claims when it didn’t. Consider the following statements that many on the left assume are backed by “the science”: Discrimination is a primary cause of the gender pay gap (this is more than likely not true in America today). Gender affirming care reduces suicide risk for gender dysphoric individuals (the weight of the empirical evidence does not support this claim at the moment). Police officers kill a disproportionate number of African Americans due to racial bias on the part of officers (this is a claim being vigorously debated and without a clear answer at the moment). We can reliably identify microaggressions, whether they are motivated by racial bias, and whether they cause harm (the evidence for this claim is extraordinarily weak). None of these claims are backed by strong evidence. At best, the research is mixed, not clearly pointing in one direction or the other. At worst, the evidence supports the opposite conclusion. But many on the left believe these statements are backed by “the science” because prominent academics have made big, irresponsible claims that go far beyond what the preponderance of the evidence supports. In Poisoning, the authors give equal attention to epistemic failings on both sides. They believe the evidence shows that Americans across the political spectrum fall for questionable assertions from sources that they believe to be trustworthy and authoritative, sources which often present the information in a manner that appeals to the sacred beliefs of consumers’ in-groups. They make no assertions about which side’s epistemic failings are “worse” due to their honest inability to quantify such a thing—and they are not sure it matters as much as some may think. Both red and blue America face epistemic crises that act like serious illnesses that sicken American society—even if you could measure which one makes us feel “worse” as a nation, the reality is that either one would make our country seriously ill, and experiencing them simultaneously is a nightmare. In Poisoning the authors discuss not only the misleading information that is hurting American, but a variety of possible ideas for how to get ourselves out of this mess. You can buy the book, watch the free documentary, and read the other work they have published on this topic. And of course don’t forget to sign up for our FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTER in just one click! ------------- ------------- Episode Audio: "Air Background Corporate" by REDCVT (Free Music Archive) "Please Listen Carefully" by Jahzzar (Free Music Archive) "Last Dance" by Jahzzar (Free Music Archive) “Happy Trails (To You)” by the Riders in the Sky (used with artist’s permission)
Charles Darwin once wrote that “Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge”, and real-life situations which reflect that are all too common. To cite just one prominent example, in January 1995, American men MacArthur Wheeler and Clifton Earl Johnson were arrested after carrying out coordinated bank robberies in the state of Pennsylvania. Incredibly, they didn't bother wearing masks, as they believed that rubbing lemon juice on their faces would make them invisible to security cameras. Actually no, but bear with me; I'm getting there. The case got a lot of media coverage, and piqued the curiosity of social psychologists David Dunning and Justin Kruger at Cornell University. They wanted to know how on earth someone could be so damn sure of themselves while believing something completely stupid. Where does this effect come from? Is that what the Dunning and Kruger effect is then? What are the consequences of the Dunning Kruger effect? In under 3 minutes, we answer your questions! To listen to the last episodes, you can click here: Why do some people believe in ghosts? What is the placebo effect and how does it work? Could chronoworking make you work more efficiently? A podcast written and realised by Joseph Chance. First broadcast: 15.02.2023 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
C'est la question à laquelle ont tenté de répondre David Dunning et Justin Kruger après un fait divers qui s'est déroulé aux Etats-Unis en 1995. Après avoir lu plusieurs articles sur l'encre invisible, un homme, du nom de MacArthur Willer, se persuada qu'il pouvait utiliser du jus de citron pour devenir invisible. Un phénomène de sur-confiance Le jus de cet agrume est réputé pour faire apparaître de l'encre invisible sur du papier. Il eut l'idée de s'enduire le visage de jus de citron et de braquer une banque. Il fut évidemment arrêté par la police, après avoir été détecté par les caméras de vidéo surveillance. Curieux de savoir comment l'on pouvait être aussi sûr de soi et aussi stupide, les deux psychologues - David Dunning et Justin Kruger - vont se lancer dans une recherche. Mais à quoi bon ? Et que constatent les psychologues ? Et quelles sont les conséquences de cet effet ? Écoutez la suite de cet épisode de "Maintenant vous savez". Un podcast Bababam Originals, écrit et réalisé par Johanna Cincinatis Première diffusion : 9 février 2023 À écouter aussi : Qu'est-ce que l'effet Ikea ? Qu'est-ce que l'effet Vache-qui-rit ? Qu'est-ce l'effet Lucifer ? Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
The Dunning-Kruger effect is a rare psychological concept that has achieved pop culture fame. David Dunning -- the lead author and one of the world's most-cited psychologists -- joins Adam to discuss his famous findings about the arrogance of ignorance, the challenges of knowing what you don't know, and the dangers of “doing your own research.” Then David and Adam uncover strategies for overcoming overconfidence among amateurs as well as experts.Transcripts for ReThinking are available at go.ted.com/RWAGscripts
The Dunning-Kruger effect is a rare psychological concept that has achieved pop culture fame. David Dunning -- the lead author and one of the world's most-cited psychologists -- joins Adam to discuss his famous findings about the arrogance of ignorance, the challenges of knowing what you don't know, and the dangers of “doing your own research.” Then David and Adam uncover strategies for overcoming overconfidence among amateurs as well as experts.Transcripts for ReThinking are available at go.ted.com/RWAGscripts
David Dunning hosts Andy Bell, Neil Patterson and Birol Akkus to chat about the Euros and the Reds.
Co-hosts Drs. John Gartner and Harry Segal discuss the presidential debate with famed psychologist David Dunning, co-author of the “Dunning-Krueger Effect. The nation must deal with the shock, panic, and trauma created by Biden's poor performance. But what caused it? Age, stuttering, illness, cognitive decline, poor debate preparation and strategy, or some combination? How concerned should we be? Make sure you join us here on Patreon to support our work and gain access to exclusive perks: patreon.com/ReallyAmericanMedia Our site: https://cms.megaphone.fm/channel/shrinking-trump Subscribe on iTunes: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/really-political/id1742461616 Subscribe on Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/6AEHmPMAqDlLJEbMgXq1iJ Subscribe on Amazon Music: https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/83ca7283-59fb-4cb7-a34b-03c4b0218f29 Subscribe on iHeartRadio: https://www.iheart.com/podcast/269-really-political-169545670/ We started this show to call out the media for failing to recognize Trump's early signs of dementia and to contrast that with Biden's normal aging. “It's what John referred to as, ‘the aging brain versus the dementing brain',” Dr. Segal said. “And our goal is really to raise clinical awareness and sophistication on the part of you, our viewers, but also of the media.” Week after week we have offered a series of progressive hypotheses to explain Trump's behavior, his language, and even his physical bearing. And now, after the debate sent shockwaves through the media and the public, we thought it important to look at what actually happened that night. “As far as a performance and as far as the political impact, I would say it couldn't have been worse,” Dr. Gartner said. “In terms of understanding what happened, however, I think we are actually going to have a very interesting discussion today because it's actually quite complex. You'll hear our hosts share their very relatable personal reactions to the debate and help us all understand the trauma Americans suffered that evening. “I felt like the walls were closing in,” John said. “I felt the floor actually fall beneath me like I was falling into the void.” “I felt that I had just experienced a trauma - like my whole world had changed,” Dr. Segal said. “This was not normal functioning. This was terrifying and traumatizing.” We'll run through some of the clips to analyze how the candidates' body language made Trump's answers sound better than they were - and Biden's WAY worse than they actually were. While Trump had a more commanding performance, our hosts argue that he had a clever way of hiding his cognitive decline. “Trump is stringing together his slogans - he gums them together,” Harry said. “We've been watching him do this in rallies. But through the forcefulness of his tone and his ability to create rhythm in his speech, it seems to make sense in a cohesive, coherent way. This is a way that Trump is managing his own decline, which is not being expressed through a weakness in his voice, but in other ways.” We'll also analyze the physical signs of advanced aging Biden displayed, and discuss what role the debate prep likely played in his delivery. And we weigh the impact of Biden's traditional stutter on his performance and how that can often be confused with actual signs of aging. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Humans can be poor judges of their own ability. So, you might not be as good, or as bad, as you think you are. Psychologists have found the less expertise you have in something, the more likely you are to overestimate your competence in it. And in a digital era where self-assured social media influencers give you 'life hacks', and face-to-face conversation is more limited, this psychological phenomenon seems important to remember. 人类对自己的能力判断不佳。所以，你可能不像你想象的那么好，也可能不像你想象的那么坏。心理学家发现，你在某件事上的专业知识越少，你就越有可能高估自己在这方面的能力。在数字时代，自信的社交媒体影响者为你提供“生活窍门”，而面对面的对话更加有限，记住这种心理现象似乎很重要。 This concept is called the Dunning-Kruger effect, named after the psychologists David Dunning and Justin Kruger. Back in the 90s, they found a correlation between a person's lack of skills and ability and a lack of awareness of lack of ability. They are ignorant to their own limitations. This plays out in various areas of life, such as in medical diagnosis. For example, Dunning told BBC Radio 4 that, one third of the time, doctors disagree with patients who self-diagnose using internet sources rather than seeing a medical professional. Whether it's judging jokes, logical reasoning, or grammar, the pattern is the same: the less skilled you are, the more over-confident you are. 这个概念被称为邓宁-克鲁格效应，以心理学家大卫·邓宁和贾斯汀·克鲁格的名字命名。早在90年代，他们就发现一个人缺乏技能和能力与缺乏对能力缺乏的认识之间存在关联。他们对自己的局限性一无所知。这体现在生活的各个领域，例如医疗诊断。例如，邓宁告诉 BBC 广播四台，三分之一的情况下，医生不同意患者使用互联网资源进行自我诊断而不是去看医疗专业人员。无论是判断笑话、逻辑推理还是语法，模式都是一样的：你越不熟练，你就越过度自信。 On the flip side is intellectual humility. This means having a modest or low view of your importance or abilities. Elizabeth J. Krumrei-Mancuso, Professor of Psychology at Pepperdine University, found that a higher willingness to acknowledge cognitive limitations, and the ability to embrace diverse perspectives, is connected with a more accurate perception of intelligence. 另一方面是知识分子的谦逊。这意味着对自己的重要性或能力持谦虚或低的看法。佩珀代因大学心理学教授伊丽莎白·J·克鲁姆雷-曼库索发现，承认认知局限性的更高意愿以及接受不同观点的能力与对智力的更准确感知有关。 How can we use this knowledge to help us in everyday life? Tenelle Porter, a psychologist at Rowan University, told the BBC that knowing this "opens us up to being intellectually humble, to admitting everything that we don't yet know". And current studies suggest that those with higher intellectual humility are more open to negotiating, compromising and exploring information. 我们如何利用这些知识来帮助我们的日常生活？罗文大学心理学家特内尔·波特告诉英国广播公司，了解这一点“让我们在智力上变得谦虚，承认我们还不知道的一切”。目前的研究表明，那些智力谦逊的人更愿意谈判、妥协和探索信息。 So, embrace the unknown and remember, there's always more to learn. 因此，拥抱未知并记住，总是有更多东西需要学习。词汇表judge 评判者，裁判expertise 专业知识overestimate 高估competence 能力self-assured 自信的phenomenon 现象lack 缺乏ignorant 无知的limitation 局限skilled 有技能的over-confident 过度自信的，自负的intellectual humility 智性谦逊，认识并承认自己能力的局限性modest 谦逊的willingness 意愿perspective 观点，看待问题的角度humble 谦虚的
Nos visitaron David Dunning y Justin Kruger, y nos quejamos todos juntos. ¿Cómo salir de ahi? La reco de la semana es. Marius Hornberger https://www.youtube.com/@MariusHornberger Somos Bruno (@eltallerdenino), Juan Manuel (@juanpintero), José (@customs.maker) y esto es Maker Chat. En este espacio vamos a hablar sobre qué significa ser maker, qué nos moviliza, qué nos inspira y cómo es el día a día en el taller.
How well do you understand yourself? For investors, it is an important question. We're co-conspirators in self-deception and this prevents us from having accurate self-knowledge. This does not lead to good results in the markets. To explain, Barry Ritholtz welcomes David Dunning to the podcast. Dunning is a professor of psychology at the University of Michigan. Dunning's research focuses on decision-making in various settings. In work on economic games, he explores how choices commonly presumed to be economic in nature actually hinge more on psychological factors, such as social norms and emotion.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
David Dunning und Justin Kruger entdeckten um die Jahrtausendwende, dass oft die am wenigsten Kompetenten besonders selbstsicher sind. Nun, die selbstsichere Inkompetenz ist zu neuer Höchstform aufgelaufen. Und pflegt das Misstrauen gegen Kompetente. Von Dagmar Henn
Investor incompetence might play a larger role in poor performance than you think. That's thanks to a phenomenon called the Dunning-Kruger Effect. To explain, Barry welcomes David Dunning to the podcast. Dunning is a professor of psychology at the University of Michigan. Dunning's research focuses on decision-making in various settings. In work on economic games, he explores how choices commonly presumed to be economic in nature actually hinge more on psychological factors, such as social norms and emotion.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
The Dunning-Kruger effect is a cognitive bias in which people wrongly overestimate their knowledge or ability in a specific area. This tends to occur because a lack of self-awareness prevents them from accurately assessing their own skills. The concept of the Dunning-Kruger effect is based on a 1999 paper by Cornell University psychologists David Dunning and Justin Kruger. The pair tested participants on their logic, grammar, and sense of humor, and found that those who performed in the bottom quartile rated their skills far above average. For example, those in the 12th percentile self-rated their expertise to be, on average, in the 62nd percentile. The researchers attributed the trend to a problem of metacognition—the ability to analyze one's own thoughts or performance. “Those with limited knowledge in a domain suffer a dual burden: Not only do they reach mistaken conclusions and make regrettable errors, but their incompetence robs them of the ability to realize it,” they wrote. Tune in and learn how pervasive this issue is in our world!
The Dunning-Kruger effect is a cognitive bias in which people wrongly overestimate their knowledge or ability in a specific area. This tends to occur because a lack of self-awareness prevents them from accurately assessing their own skills. The concept of the Dunning-Kruger effect is based on a 1999 paper by Cornell University psychologists David Dunning and Justin Kruger. The pair tested participants on their logic, grammar, and sense of humor, and found that those who performed in the bottom quartile rated their skills far above average. For example, those in the 12th percentile self-rated their expertise to be, on average, in the 62nd percentile. The researchers attributed the trend to a problem of metacognition—the ability to analyze one's own thoughts or performance. “Those with limited knowledge in a domain suffer a dual burden: Not only do they reach mistaken conclusions and make regrettable errors, but their incompetence robs them of the ability to realize it,” they wrote. Tune in and learn how pervasive this issue is in our world!
Social scientist David Dunning and Justin Kruger published a study in 1999 that examined how people viewed their level of competence compared to their objective levels of competence. Their findings, and the implications in the field of code enforcement are explored in this episode where I speak with Tony Apfelbeck, Director of Building and Fire Safety in Altamonte Springs, Florida. Tony has been involved in code enforcement and development – including fire and building codes – for more than 20 years and is a frequent speaker on leadership within code enforcement agencies. Any feedback, comments, or questions email IFMA@NFPA.org
Porque las personas IDIOTAS se creen INTELIGENTES: El Efecto Dunning-Krugger.En este fascinante episodio, exploramos la intrigante paradoja de la incompetencia descrita por los psicólogos David Dunning y Justin Kruger en su revelador artículo de 1999. Sumérgete en el sorprendente mundo donde aquellos con habilidades limitadas tienden a sobreestimar sus capacidades, mientras que los verdaderos expertos a menudo las subestiman.Descubre cómo esta tendencia se manifiesta en la vida cotidiana, desde el aula hasta la cancha de baloncesto. Analizamos casos emblemáticos, como el legado de Kobe Bryant, quien no necesitaba proclamarse el mejor jugador del mundo, ya que su grandeza se infería naturalmente. Por otro lado, exploramos cómo algunos se autopromocionan sin cesar, a pesar de carecer de habilidades reales.Exploramos datos reveladores que revelan que el 85% de las personas se autocalifican como excelentes amigos, mientras que el 70% de los profesores creen estar en el top 25%. ¿Por qué las personas caen en la trampa de la sobreestimación?No te pierdas los consejos prácticos sobre cómo evitar caer en la trampa de la incompetencia. Desde ser humilde en tus habilidades hasta buscar retroalimentación constante y aceptar la posibilidad de estar equivocado, desglosamos las características de aquellos que son inconscientemente incompetentes y cómo puedes mantenerte aprendiendo y evitando caer en esta trampa psicológica.Únete a nosotros mientras exploramos las complejidades de la incompetencia, desentrañamos sus características y ofrecemos estrategias para superarla. Prepárate para un episodio revelador que cambiará la forma en que ves las habilidades y la autoevaluación.Estamos expandiendo nuestro equipo, si quieres ayudarnos a impactar 1,000,000 de personas, deja tu nombre aqui:https://forms.gle/HrFRmr4sDZB2wHbv9Si quieres crear una estrategia para tu vida, coordina tu cita aquí: https://linktr.ee/CarlosFigueroaRedes Carloshttp://www.tiktok.com/carlosefigueroaprhttp://www.instagram.com/carlosefigueroaRedes Gana Tu Díahttp://www.instagram.com/ganatudia http://www.tiktok.com/ganatudiahttp://www.ganatudia.cominfo@ganatudia.com
The Deadline Report - Ben Vidgen Investigates. A double shot of reality.
Can we ever really know ourselves, or are we destined to always make overly optimistic self-assessments? David Dunning joins Igor and Charles to discuss the Dunning-Kruger effect, the importance of asking the right questions, why arriving at an accurate view of ourselves is so challenging, and the implications for teaching, medicine, and even scientific research. Igor explores the possible reemergence of group assessments in education as a result of advances in AI, David shares why conversations with smart people often end up as competitions to ask the most questions, and Charles reflects on the wisdom-enhancing experience of jury service. Welcome to Episode 57. Special Guest: David Dunning.
The Dunning-Kruger effect is a cognitive bias that refers to the tendency of individuals with low ability or expertise in a particular domain to overestimate their competence and mistakenly believe they possess above-average skills. At the same time, those who are highly skilled or knowledgeable in a specific area tend to underestimate their abilities and assume others are equally capable.The effect was first identified by psychologists David Dunning and Justin Kruger in 1999 through a series of experiments. They found that people who performed poorly on tasks related to humor, grammar, and logic consistently rated their abilities higher than they actually were. Conversely, individuals who performed well on these tasks tended to underestimate their performance relative to others.The Dunning-Kruger effect can be attributed to a lack of metacognitive skills, which refers to one's ability to accurately evaluate their own competence. Incompetent individuals often fail to recognize their own limitations because they lack the necessary expertise to accurately assess their own performance. This leads them to overestimate their abilities and be unaware of their shortcomings.Another contributing factor to the Dunning-Kruger effect is the cognitive bias of illusory superiority.This bias causes individuals to believe they are better than average in various aspects of life, regardless of their actual skill level. This bias is particularly strong among those with limited knowledge or experience in a particular area.Interestingly, as individuals gain more expertise and knowledge in a specific domain, they tend to become more aware of the complexities and nuances involved.This increased awareness leads to a more accurate self-assessment of their abilities and often results in a decrease in overconfidence.The implications of the Dunning-Kruger effect can be far-reaching. Incompetent individuals who overestimate their abilities may take on tasks or responsibilities beyond their capabilities, leading to poor decision-making or ineffective performance. Additionally, the effect can hinder individuals from seeking feedback or further education, as they believe they already possess sufficient expertise.In this episode, we take a look at how this applies to the Jeffrey Epstein case and how the legacy media overall continues to miss the overall picture.(commercial at 7:26)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:What you WEREN'T told about Jeffery Epstein - TheBlazeThis show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5080327/advertisement
The Dunning-Kruger effect is a cognitive bias that refers to the tendency of individuals with low ability or expertise in a particular domain to overestimate their competence and mistakenly believe they possess above-average skills. At the same time, those who are highly skilled or knowledgeable in a specific area tend to underestimate their abilities and assume others are equally capable.The effect was first identified by psychologists David Dunning and Justin Kruger in 1999 through a series of experiments. They found that people who performed poorly on tasks related to humor, grammar, and logic consistently rated their abilities higher than they actually were. Conversely, individuals who performed well on these tasks tended to underestimate their performance relative to others.The Dunning-Kruger effect can be attributed to a lack of metacognitive skills, which refers to one's ability to accurately evaluate their own competence. Incompetent individuals often fail to recognize their own limitations because they lack the necessary expertise to accurately assess their own performance. This leads them to overestimate their abilities and be unaware of their shortcomings.Another contributing factor to the Dunning-Kruger effect is the cognitive bias of illusory superiority.This bias causes individuals to believe they are better than average in various aspects of life, regardless of their actual skill level. This bias is particularly strong among those with limited knowledge or experience in a particular area.Interestingly, as individuals gain more expertise and knowledge in a specific domain, they tend to become more aware of the complexities and nuances involved.This increased awareness leads to a more accurate self-assessment of their abilities and often results in a decrease in overconfidence.The implications of the Dunning-Kruger effect can be far-reaching. Incompetent individuals who overestimate their abilities may take on tasks or responsibilities beyond their capabilities, leading to poor decision-making or ineffective performance. Additionally, the effect can hinder individuals from seeking feedback or further education, as they believe they already possess sufficient expertise.In this episode, we take a look at how this applies to the Jeffrey Epstein case and how the legacy media overall continues to miss the overall picture.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:What you WEREN'T told about Jeffery Epstein - TheBlazeThis show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5003294/advertisement
This podcast is a commentary and does not contain any copyrighted material of the reference source. We strongly recommend accessing/buying the reference source at the same time. ■Reference Source https://www.ted.com/talks/david_dunning_why_incompetent_people_think_they_re_amazing ■Post on this topic (You can get FREE learning materials!) https://englist.me/67-academic-words-reference-from-david-dunning-why-incompetent-people-think-theyre-amazing-ted-talk/ ■Youtube Video https://youtu.be/7vdOBDYvCCo (All Words) https://youtu.be/rY67dM2si2A (Advanced Words) https://youtu.be/sUZS4PJi_gs (Quick Look) ■Top Page for Further Materials https://englist.me/ ■SNS (Please follow!)
The Dunning-Kruger effect is a cognitive bias that refers to the tendency of individuals with low ability or expertise in a particular domain to overestimate their competence and mistakenly believe they possess above-average skills. At the same time, those who are highly skilled or knowledgeable in a specific area tend to underestimate their abilities and assume others are equally capable.The effect was first identified by psychologists David Dunning and Justin Kruger in 1999 through a series of experiments. They found that people who performed poorly on tasks related to humor, grammar, and logic consistently rated their abilities higher than they actually were. Conversely, individuals who performed well on these tasks tended to underestimate their performance relative to others.The Dunning-Kruger effect can be attributed to a lack of metacognitive skills, which refers to one's ability to accurately evaluate their own competence. Incompetent individuals often fail to recognize their own limitations because they lack the necessary expertise to accurately assess their own performance. This leads them to overestimate their abilities and be unaware of their shortcomings.Another contributing factor to the Dunning-Kruger effect is the cognitive bias of illusory superiority.This bias causes individuals to believe they are better than average in various aspects of life, regardless of their actual skill level. This bias is particularly strong among those with limited knowledge or experience in a particular area.Interestingly, as individuals gain more expertise and knowledge in a specific domain, they tend to become more aware of the complexities and nuances involved.This increased awareness leads to a more accurate self-assessment of their abilities and often results in a decrease in overconfidence.The implications of the Dunning-Kruger effect can be far-reaching. Incompetent individuals who overestimate their abilities may take on tasks or responsibilities beyond their capabilities, leading to poor decision-making or ineffective performance. Additionally, the effect can hinder individuals from seeking feedback or further education, as they believe they already possess sufficient expertise.In this episode, we take a look at how this applies to the Jeffrey Epstein case and how the legacy media overall continues to miss the overall picture.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:What you WEREN'T told about Jeffery Epstein - TheBlazeThis show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5080327/advertisement
The Dunning-Kruger effect is a cognitive bias that refers to the tendency of individuals with low ability or expertise in a particular domain to overestimate their competence and mistakenly believe they possess above-average skills. At the same time, those who are highly skilled or knowledgeable in a specific area tend to underestimate their abilities and assume others are equally capable.The effect was first identified by psychologists David Dunning and Justin Kruger in 1999 through a series of experiments. They found that people who performed poorly on tasks related to humor, grammar, and logic consistently rated their abilities higher than they actually were. Conversely, individuals who performed well on these tasks tended to underestimate their performance relative to others.The Dunning-Kruger effect can be attributed to a lack of metacognitive skills, which refers to one's ability to accurately evaluate their own competence. Incompetent individuals often fail to recognize their own limitations because they lack the necessary expertise to accurately assess their own performance. This leads them to overestimate their abilities and be unaware of their shortcomings.Another contributing factor to the Dunning-Kruger effect is the cognitive bias of illusory superiority.This bias causes individuals to believe they are better than average in various aspects of life, regardless of their actual skill level. This bias is particularly strong among those with limited knowledge or experience in a particular area.Interestingly, as individuals gain more expertise and knowledge in a specific domain, they tend to become more aware of the complexities and nuances involved.This increased awareness leads to a more accurate self-assessment of their abilities and often results in a decrease in overconfidence.The implications of the Dunning-Kruger effect can be far-reaching. Incompetent individuals who overestimate their abilities may take on tasks or responsibilities beyond their capabilities, leading to poor decision-making or ineffective performance. Additionally, the effect can hinder individuals from seeking feedback or further education, as they believe they already possess sufficient expertise.In this episode, we take a look at how this applies to the Jeffrey Epstein case and how the legacy media overall continues to miss the overall picture.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:What you WEREN'T told about Jeffery Epstein - TheBlazeThis show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5003294/advertisement
The Dunning-Kruger effect (also Mount Stupid or Smug Snake), named after David Dunning and Justin Kruger of Cornell University, occurs where people fail to adequately assess their level of competence — or specifically, their incompetence — at a task and thus consider themselves much more competent than everyone else. This lack of awareness is attributed to their lower level of competence robbing them of the ability to critically analyse their performance, leading to a significant overestimation of themselves. Watch till the end to see some strategies to overcome the Dunning-Kruger Effect.
In this episode of GODMODE™, William Lam and Michael Mahoney sit down with Dr. Emily Dr. Emily Balcetis, an American social psychologist and associate professor of psychology at New York University. The discussion centers around Dr. Emily Balcetis's research on how people's perceptions of the world are influenced by their motivations, goals, and emotions. Dr. Emily Balcetis shares insights from her lab's work on uncovering tools that people may not be aware of and helping them to develop intentionality and explore their own personal body, mindset, and social environment.William and Michael also highlight Dr. Emily Balcetis's meticulous nature in her work and her compassion for individuals and humanity. Dr. Chavez shares moving stories from her experiences with the Upgrade program, which has transformed people's lives.The conversation also delves into mental construals and how they can affect decision-making. Dr. Emily Balcetis explains a 90-year timeline exercise that helps clients prioritize their goals and focus on achieving what truly matters to them. They also explore the concept of inattentional blindness and its impact on face-to-face communication, referencing the famous gorilla experiment. Dr. Emily Balcetis touches on how filters from past beliefs and conversations can limit human potential, and they discuss the importance of gaining different perspectives to see the bigger picture.Overall, the episode offers fascinating insights into psychology and how we can improve our decision-making and perceptions of the world.About Dr. Emily Balcetis:Dr. Emily Balcetis is an American social psychologist and Associate Professor of Psychology at New York University. Her research focuses on people's perception of the world and how their motivations, goals, and emotions influence it, especially with regard to visual perception.She was a recipient of the SAGE Young Scholars Award from the Foundation for Personality and Social Psychology in 2011. Also in 2011 Her co-authored paper with David Dunning titled Considering the Situation: Why People are Better Social Psychologists than Self-Psychologists was named Best Paper by the International Society of Self and Identity. In 2016, she received the International Society for Self and Identity Outstanding Early Career Award and the Early Career Impact Award from the Federation of Associations in Behavioral & Brain Sciences. She is also the author of Clearer, Closer, Better: How Successful People See the World Currently, she is the Lab Director of New York University's - SOCIAL PERCEPTION ACTION and MOTIVATION LAB.---HIGHLIGHTS:Dr. Emily Balcetis discusses her research on people's perception of the world and how their motivations, goals, and emotions influence it.She is working to discover the tools that people are using but are not aware of and to help them uncover other tools that they have within their own personal bodies, mindset, and social environment.She shares her experience of the transformative conversations she had with people who went through the Upgrade program.Dr. Emily Balcetis explains the concept of mental construals and how they can affect decision-making. She discusses a 90-year timeline exercise that can help clients prioritize their goals and focus on what they really want to achieve in life.Inattentional blindness and its relation to the use of mirrors in face-to-face communication are also discussed. The importance of gaining different perspectives to see the whole picture and become aware of what we may be missing is explored.—TIME STAMPS:00:00 - Introduction to the Podcast00:58 - Introduction to the new episode01:40 - Who is Dr. Emily Balcetis?03:10 - The lab takes a science-based approach to their work05:06 - The meticulous nature of Dr. Emily Balcetis' work and careful attention to detail06:39 - The power of encouragement07:36 - Keeping a curious mind and curiosity at the forefront08:40 - Understanding human behavior as a behavioral scientist10:00 - The power of visual motivation11:01 - The single icon that reflects the vision of self12:20 - What is standing in your way of achieving your goals?12:59 - How the difficulty of coming up with 100 things prompts a deeper conversation with oneself and others16:04 - No one right answer for people17:55 - The 90-year timeline18:15 - The high level of mental construal18:44 - The 90-year challenge and its impact20:06 - The 90-year plan puts people in a bigger, higher-level mindset21:12 - Legacy planning21:58 - Getting the brain into the 90-year prompt23:55 - Leveraging the power of visual sparks24:25 - What we see predicts what we do27:06 - Dopamine is a neurotransmitter27:48 - Visual sparks can do the same thing30:18 - Inattentional blindness and the gorilla video31:46 - How to experience it for yourself, inattentional blindness32:32 - The importance of seeing the whole picture33:11 - The importance of a mirror35:56 - What people notice when they face their mirrors38:04 - The power of mirrors at the individual level39:13 - Feedback from Ryan shifted from cooperation to cooperation and away from competition42:29 - What changed the game?43:13 - Fresh starts and goal setting44:25 - The importance of psychologically meaningful events46:36 - Designing a 90-year plan in advance48:38 - ENDThank you for listening to GODMODE™: Win or Win BiggerIf you are interested in UPGRD Your Mind, visit us at: https://upgrd.com to book a call with one of our team members.
Scientists are increasingly finding their expertise questioned by non-experts who claim they've done their own “research.” Whether advocating Ivermectin to treat Covid, insisting that climate change is a hoax, or asserting that the Earth is flat, doubters are now dismissed by being told to “do your own research!” But is a Wiki page evidence? What about a YouTube video? What happens to our quest for truth along the way? Plus, a science historian goes to a Flat Earth convention to talk reason. Guests: Yvette Johnson-Walker – epidemiologist at the University of Illinois College of Veterinary Medicine, and affiliate faculty with the University of Illinois Chicago School of Public Health. Nathan Ballantyne – Professor of Philosophy at Fordham University, in New York. David Dunning – Social psychologist and Professor of Psychology at the University of Michigan. Lee McIntyre – Research fellow at the Center for Philosophy and History at Boston University, author of “Post-Truth,” and “How to Talk to a Science Denier: Conversations with Flat Earthers, Climate Deniers, and Others Who Defy Reason.” *Originally aired February 7, 2022 Featuring music by Dewey Dellay and Jun Miyake Big Picture Science is part of the Airwave Media podcast network. Please contact advertising@airwavemedia.com to inquire about advertising on Big Picture Science. You can get early access to ad-free versions of every episode by joining us on Patreon. Thanks for your support! Please take our listener survey! Help us get to know you and enter to win a $500 Amazon gift card! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Today's guest is David Dunning, professor of psychology at the University of Michigan - known from the "Dunning-Kruger effect" - who focuses in this interview on the psychology underlying human misbelief. In the interview, we talk about what is going on in the human psyche that's allowing people to trust, and why people trust other people when, according to the economics of rational analysis, they shouldn't. Trust often turns out to be not really an economic decision. When you go to a doctor there's a norm that if your doctor says X, unless you have excellent reasons to ignore him, you should go with the doctor's advice. Trust is crucial not just for established relationships. It's also especially vital between strangers with no responsibility toward each other outside of a single interaction. Psychologists found “excessive” trust rates rising much higher than anticipated, given people's aversion to risk and rather cynical expectations of their peers' trustworthiness. Many trust even though they expect their trust not to be honored. David is most well-known for the Dunning-Kruger effect when a person's lack of knowledge and skills in a particular area causes him to overestimate his own competence. We talk about the 1986 negotiations between Reagan and Gorbachev, both walked away from a potentially historic agreement that would have eliminated nuclear threats. They famously walked away from a deal because they couldn't get themselves to trust one another.
Charles Darwin once wrote that “Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge”, and real-life situations which reflect that are all too common. To cite just one prominent example, in January 1995, American men MacArthur Wheeler and Clifton Earl Johnson were arrested after carrying out coordinated bank robberies in the state of Pennsylvania. Incredibly, they didn't bother wearing masks, as they believed that rubbing lemon juice on their faces would make them invisible to security cameras. Actually no, but bear with me; I'm getting there. The case got a lot of media coverage, and piqued the curiosity of social psychologists David Dunning and Justin Kruger at Cornell University. They wanted to know how on earth someone could be so damn sure of themselves while believing something completely stupid. Where does this effect come from? Is that what the Dunning and Kruger effect is then? What are the consequences of the Dunning Kruger effect? In under 3 minutes, we answer your questions! To listen to the last episodes, you can click here: Can you improve your relationship by learning your love language? Why is going to the cinema so romantic? What is prowling, yet another toxic dating trend? A Bababam Originals podcast, written and produced by Joseph Chance. In partnership with upday UK. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
In 1999, two social psychologists, David Dunning and Justin Kruger, published a seminal paper on a cognitive bias that can affect nearly everyone. Since the paper was published, it has given a name to something which most people have recognized and, at times, may have been guilty of themselves. However, most people who are familiar with the effect only know half the story. Learn more about the Dunning-Kruger Effect, what it is, and how to avoid it on this episode of Everything Everywhere Daily. Subscribe to the podcast! https://link.chtbl.com/EverythingEverywhere?sid=ShowNotes -------------------------------- Executive Producer: Charles Daniel Associate Producers: Peter Bennett & Thor Thomsen Become a supporter on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/everythingeverywhere Update your podcast app at newpodcastapps.com Discord Server: https://discord.gg/UkRUJFh Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/everythingeverywhere/ Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/EverythingEverywhere Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/everythingeverywheredaily Twitter: https://twitter.com/everywheretrip Website: https://everything-everywhere.com/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
C'est la question à laquelle ont tenté de répondre David Dunning et Justin Kruger après un fait divers qui s'est déroulé aux Etats-Unis en 1995. Après avoir lu plusieurs articles sur l'encre invisible, un homme, du nom de MacArthur Willer, se persuada qu'il pouvait utiliser du jus de citron pour devenir invisible. Le jus de cet agrume étant réputé pour faire apparaître de l'encre invisible sur du papier. Il eut l'idée de s'enduire le visage de jus de citron et de braquer une banque. Il fut évidemment arrêté par la police, après avoir été détecté par les caméras de vidéo surveillance. Curieux de savoir comment l'on pouvait être aussi sûr de soi et aussi stupide, les deux psychologues - David Dunning et Justin Kruger - vont se lancer dans une recherche. Mais à quoi bon ? Et que constatent les psychologues ? Et quelles sont les conséquences de cet effet ? Écoutez la suite de cet épisode de "Maintenant vous savez". Un podcast Bababam Originals, écrit et réalisé par Johanna Cincinatis À écouter aussi : Qu'est-ce que l'effet Ikea ? Qu'est-ce que l'effet Vache-qui-rit ? Qu'est-ce l'effet Lucifer ? Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Cornell University social psychologist David Dunning, studied the tendency for people to overestimate themselves. He found that those who were the least competent performers have the most inflated view of themselves. The study also revealed that their over-inflation wasn't due to arrogance, but ignorance. Obviously, this can be true for Christians as well. We routinely flatter ourselves with false assessments of our own competence. We aren't even aware of our pride, because we think we're simply being honest. Jeremiah 17:9 ESV The post The Book That Reads Us appeared first on Grace Presbyterian Church (PCA).
PJ hears from journalist David Dunning about hopes a man missing from Yorkshire may be living in West Cork. Includes YorkMix audio from from Rory Johnson-Hatfield's mum Liz. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
In the most innocent interpretation, suggesting someone should ‘do their own research' is a reasonable bit of advice. But in the superheated world of social media discourse, #DoYourOwnResearch is a spicy rejoinder that essentially challenges someone to Google the subject since they clearly don't know what they're talking about. But Googling, social psychologist David Dunning pointedly notes, is not research. “The beauty and the terror of the internet,” he tells interviewer David Edmonds in this Social Science Bites podcast, “is that there's a lot of terrific information, but there's also a lot of misinformation and sometimes outright fraud. “People often don't have the wherewithal to distinguish.” This distinguishing is an area where Dunning, a professor at the University of Michigan, does his own research. While doing your own internet sleuthing isn't toxic on its face, Dunning suggests that often “you don't know when you're researching your way into a false conclusion, and … you don't know when to stop. The real hard problem with DYOR is when do you know when to stop: you go and you look at a couple of web pages, and ‘Well, you've learned something! Terrific!' But you don't know how much there is behind it that you still need to learn.” One driver of DYOR, Dunning adds, is the idea that gaining (and deploying) knowledge is one's own responsibility, which pretty much runs counter to science, which sees gaining knowledge as a collective enterprise. One piece of collective effort in which Dunning has made a very public mark is in describing what's come to be known as the Dunning-Kruger effect, named for Dunning and fellow social psychologist Justin Kruger of New York University, after work they originally described two decades ago in “Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments” in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. The popular definition of the Dunning-Kruger effect, Dunning explains, is that “people who are incompetent or unskilled or not expert in a field lack expertise to recognize that they lack expertise. So they come to conclusions, decisions, opinions that they think are just fine when they're, well, wrong.” Dunning and Kruger's initial research was based on simple tests – of grammar, logical thinking, classical psychology quizzes, even sense of humor – asking subjects how well they think they're doing relative to everyone else. They found that the bottom 25 percent of participants tended to think they were doing above average. “But no.” “To know what you don't know,” he offers, “you need to know what you need to know to realize that your thinking diverges from that.” It's not true in every endeavor, he adds. “I'm a terrible golfer,” Dunning says. “And I'm fully aware that I‘m a terrible golfer!” The effect tends to show up when the skill of assessing outcomes is roughly similar to the skill of achieving outcomes. So when your golf ball flies into the nearby body of water, you don't need special skills to know that's bad. Becoming an expert in everything is out of the question; the real skill will be in identifying who is a legitimate expert and drawing on their insights. (And the right expert, Dunning notes “is the right experts. With an S on the end.”) For the record, the pair – who just received the 2023 Grawemeyer Award in Psychology for their Dunning-Kruger effect work - did not name the concept after themselves, although, as Dunning says, they're “tickled pink that our names will forever be associated with the nincompoops, incompetent ignorant cranks, if you will.”
Today I'm talking about imposter syndrome and Idiots Mountain--a topic which came up at dinner with friends this week.In 1999, David Dunning and Justin Kruger came up with a Dunning Kruger Effect based on the realization that high competence individuals often underestimated their ability. In this episode, I'll teach you how to use this phenomenon to get the most out of where you are in your journey.
================================================== ==SUSCRIBETEhttps://www.youtube.com/channel/UCNpffyr-7_zP1x1lS89ByaQ?sub_confirmation=1================================================== == DEVOCIÓN MATUTINA PARA MUJERES 2022“SIN MIEDOS NI CADENAS”Narrado por: Sirley DelgadilloDesde: Bucaramanga, ColombiaUna cortesía de DR'Ministries y Canaan Seventh-Day Adventist Church 23 DE SEPTIEMBRE EL EFECTO DUNNING-KRUGER“Pues, así como los cielos están más altos que la tierra, así mis caminos están más altos que sus caminos y mis pensamientos, más altos que sus pensamientos” (Isaías 55:9, NTV).EI 19 de abril de 1995, McArthur Wheeler asaltó dos bancos en Pittsburgh, Estados Unidos. McArthur, un hombre de 1,70 my más de 120 kg, robó los bancos a mano armada, a plena luz del día y sin usar ninguna máscara o disfraz para proteger su identidad. Las cámaras de seguridad lo capturaron apuntándoles a las cajeras. La policía compartió las imágenes con el noticiero local, y en cuestión de minutos recibió suficiente información para apresar a McArthur. Cuando la policía golpeó a su puerta, McArthur no podía creer que lo encontrarían. “¡Pero me puse jugo de limón!” Les dijo a los oficiales de la policia. McArthur había leído en algún lado que el jugo de limón se usa como tinta invisible. Él pensó que, si se untaba la cara con jugo de limón, esto lo volvería invisible a las cámaras de seguridad. McArthur verificó su teoría untándose la cara con jugo de limón y tomándose una foto con su cámara Polaroid. Coincidentemente, la foto salió y McArthur creyó que había encontrado una forma práctica y eficaz de robar bancos oscuros sin ser reconocido. McArthur fue llevado a prisión; sin embargo, su historia inspiró a David Dunning, un profesor de psicología de la universidad de Cornell, a investigar lo sucedido. David realizó una serie de experimentos junto con Justin Kruger. Ambos debido a que las personas que menos saben -justamente aquellos más incompetentes- tienden a necesitar más inteligentes y preparados. Es precisamente este sentimiento de superioridad ilusorio el que les impide reconocer su propia ineptitud. la foto salió oscura y McArthur creyó que había encontrado una forma práctica y eficaz de robar bancos sin ser reconocido. McArthur fue llevado a prisión; sin embargo, su historia inspiró a David Dunning, un profesor de psicología de la universidad de Cornell, a investigar lo sucedido. David realizó una serie de experimentos junto con Justin Kruger. Ambos debido a que las personas que menos saben -justamente aquellos más incompetentes- tienden a necesitar más inteligentes y preparados. Es precisamente este sentimiento de superioridad ilusorio el que les impide reconocer su propia ineptitud. la foto salió oscura y McArthur creyó que había encontrado una forma práctica y eficaz de robar bancos sin ser reconocido. McArthur fue llevado a prisión; sin embargo, su historia inspiró a David Dunning, un profesor de psicología de la universidad de Cornell, a investigar lo sucedido. David realizó una serie de experimentos junto con Justin Kruger. Ambos debido a que las personas que menos saben -justamente aquellos más incompetentes- tienden a necesitar más inteligentes y preparados. Es precisamente este sentimiento de superioridad ilusorio el que les impide reconocer su propia ineptitud. a investigar lo sucedido. David realizó una serie de experimentos junto con Justin Kruger. Ambos debido a que las personas que menos saben -justamente aquellos más incompetentes- tienden a necesitar más inteligentes y preparados. Es precisamente este sentimiento de superioridad ilusorio el que les impide reconocer su propia ineptitud. a investigar lo sucedido. David realizó una serie de experimentos junto con Justin Kruger. Ambos debido a que las personas que menos saben -justamente aquellos más incompetentes- tienden a necesitar más inteligentes y preparados.Estoy convencida de que todas tenemos la cara pintada con limón en alguna área de nuestra vida, pero especialmente cuando se trata de entender los caminos de Dios. La perspectiva de Dios es infinitamente más grande y más alta que la nuestra. Dios ve el pasado, el presente y el futuro de un solo vistazo. Su inteligencia y su poder son ilimitados. A veces, nos sentimos tentadas a sospechar que Dios no sabe lo que está haciendo o que realmente no nos ama. En esos días, pensamos en la historia de McArthur Wheeler y, con humildad, pidámosle a Dios que nos lave la cara.Señor, tus caminos son infinitamente más altos que los míos. En los días en que me sienta tentada a pensar que yo sé más ya soltarme de tu mano, recuérdame que tengo la cara untada con limón. Límpiame de mi orgullo, Señor. Dame un corazón humilde que reconozca tu sabiduría. Amén.
Years before Boardroom Buzz fans celebrated their 100th episode, Paul participated as a guinea pig back in his Cornell college days. It turns out the research became of one psychology's most recognized studies, the Dunning-Kruger effect. Is there a better way to celebrate 100 episodes than sitting down with Dunning-Kruger's David Dunning PhD? Maybe you've made it this far in life without taking a psychology class. Take a seat because class is in session. From self-awareness to intellectual humility, it's time to re-think things. Seth Garber joins Paul and Patrick to discuss the depth of Dr. Dunning's infamous research to his current day work. Cutting class can be cool, but make sure you don't skip this one. Audio Mixing and Editing by www.verbell.ltd
Eric chats with David Dunning, Professor of Psychology at the University of Michigan, where he directs the Self and Social Insight Lab. The lab studies questions such as how well do people know themselves–and their competence and character? How and when do people successfully engage in self-deception? How good are people as amateur psychologists–trying to anticipate the thoughts, feelings, and actions of others? Most famously, Dave has worked on what is called the Dunning Kruger Effect, where the least competent individuals in a domain tend to be the most overconfident in their skills.In this episode, Eric chats with Dave about trust. Who do we trust? How accurate are we in assessing another's trustworthiness? Why do we sometimes trust people we think to be selfish? Why do we distrust people who are actually kind? What does trust have to do with respect? Is our kindness actually driven be negative, not positive emotions? Finally, Dave shares how to find a research idea worth pursuing and gives general advice for young academics curious about a career in psychology.Paper on trust: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0963721419838255?casa_token=ODY183oabCgAAAAA%3AfFg8_lJbAtXmuKK2Zggx8-v918AT2qJv1pkh_5KC3UMCiSlOyhrC_QiGWzx5416Xyza9gMXGgohf Paper on respect: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2215091915300031
Knowledge humbles. Ignorance boasts. This week we're talking about The Dunning-Kruger Effect. SOURCES: "What's behind the confidence of the incompetent? This suddenly popular psychological phenomenon." (Angela Fritz, The Washington Post, 01/07/2019), [Original 1999 Study]: "Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessment." (Justin Kruger and David Dunning, Cornell University, 1999), "The Dunning-Kruger Effect: Why Incompetence Begets Confidence" (Allison He, The New York Times, 05/07/2020), "Chapter five - The Dunning–Kruger Effect: On Being Ignorant of One's Own Ignorance" (Davind Dunning, Science Direct, 2011), "Dunning-Kruger Effect" (Psychology Today). Wikipedia, "The Dunning-Kruger Effect" (Kendra Cherry, Very Well Mind, 08/06/2021. MUSIC: "Upside Down & Inside Out (OKGO), "Heads Up" (Ori Kul). ©2021 Charlie Quirk, Britton Rice.
Episode Notes Opening and Biosketch 0:00:00 Warning, discretion advised 0:02:00 Airway, Breathing, Circulation 0:46:40 Calling 911 and being on hold 1:07:40 Justin Kruger and David Dunning 1:42:40 Factual Summary 2:02:00 Final thoughts 2:05:00
Today's episode comes to you from the lovely drive home to Illinois where I will be suffering through final exams (not dramatic at all). With the semester coming to a close I've been pondering the notion of what it really means to be an expert. A term that once seemed rare and highly esteemed, in my experience is getting a bit fuzzy and certainly overused in the fitness world. Here I discuss a famous paper on research that led to what's now known as the “Dunning-Kruger Effect”, how that applies to fitness and examples of such from my own personal training experience. Resources: Kruger, Justin, and David Dunning. “Unskilled and Unaware of it: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Dec. 1999. Taylor Eckel 's (PT DPT CSC) IG post Like this episode? Please leave a review! If you have suggestions for future episodes please DM me on my IG.
Wildfire Safety (0:00:00) Over the last few years, we have seen an alarming increase in the number of wildfires happening in the US. In 2019 alone, wildfires burned 4.7 million acres nationwide, affecting the lives of both our loved ones and wild animal populations. And this year is no different. People living on the West Coast especially are looking up at apocalyptic, orange skies caused by the fires and smoke raging through their states. So how can we be fully prepared in case one of these fires reaches us? Joining us this morning is Daniel Leavell, an associate professor and extension forester at Oregon State University, here with us to share his expertise on wildfire safety. International Disasters (0:20:09) If you didn't hear about it, last month a large amount of ammonium nitrate exploded in the city of Beirut, Lebanon, killing over a hundred people and leaving hundreds of thousands of people homeless. Now when things like this happen in our home country, there are easy things we can do to help—volunteer somewhere, sign a petition, or donate. But when a disaster happens across the world, action seems a little more difficult. We want to help—so what can we do? Here to give us her advice is Emily Brouwer, managing director for UNICEFUSA's Northwest Region. The Dunning-Kruger Effect (0:35:46) We've all seen it—the drawn-out and poisonous debates on various social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter. This polarized interaction is comprised of 2 or more users who are each convinced of their own “correctness” and the superiority of their argument. Everyone thinks they're always right. The truth is, we're all wrong now and then. However, according to the Dunning-Kruger effect, the catch-22 is that we don't recognize when we're wrong. But why? And what's the solution? Here with us to discuss the Dunning-Kruger Effect and how we can combat it is Professor of Psychology at the University of Michigan, Dr. David Dunning himself. 9/11 from the Perspective of a Child (1:09:27) As we sat and watched from afar, we couldn't help but feel great pain for those close to the tragedy—the victims, the first responders, and the family members of all involved. Well today, we feel honored to speak with one of those people—someone whose life has been molded by the events of 9/11. We are meeting with Matt Bocchi, a man who was nine years old when his father died in the World Trade Center. His story begins with heartbreak and despair. But it is also full of lessons about how to find happiness and hope. We're excited to hear from him. Weekend Review (1:30:02) Lisa and Richie talk about what there is to do this weekend, from new releases coming to streaming services to the New York Times Bestseller list.
Richard and Eric essentially live out the Dunning-Kruger effect by talking about the Dunning-Kruger effect. They introduce the concept and land on an important question: To what degree do we recognize incompetence — not just in others, but in ourselves? Does it matter? This troubling phenomenon is seemingly (and unfortunately) a ubiquitous feature of the human psyche.Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121–1134. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121Dunning, D., Johnson, K., Ehrlinger, J., & Kruger, J. (2003). Why People Fail to Recognize Their Own Incompetence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(3), 83–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.01235https://www.verywellmind.com/an-overview-of-the-dunning-kruger-effect-4160740
© 2020-2025 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
