POPULARITY
Send us a textYou'll find a link to a public google document below, as Jess gave me LOADS of supporting information for anyone who is curious! Because of the character limit for shownotes this is my creative solution. You'll find Jess' resources at the bottom, happy diving!I was thrilled to sit down with my new friend artist activist Dr. Jess Allen to discuss the intersection of art and activism. Here's what you'll hear:Is art activism? (TL;DR: No) 3:00Jess responds to a critic who insists that art and activism cannot go together 11:50Defining durational work and Jess' walking art practice (did y'all know that was a thing? cause I didn't) 21:15View the webpage for "Drop in the Ocean" the piece we discuss most here: https://awyrol.co.uk/drop-in-the-ocean 28:50Adrian Howells wikipedia page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adrian_HowellsAdvice from Jess for artists looking to use their art for activism 30:50What is emancipated pedagogy? As defined by Jacques Rancière (1991) The Ignorant Schoolmaster. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 35:00The only model that most of us are exposed to in learning is hierarchical- so what would it look like practically to be in a learning environment that was non-hierarchical? 41:00Art activism and accessibility 47:00An adorable story about weeping over some chilis in a plastic bag 1:01View Jess' complete resources here! (They would not fit into the character allowance on Buzzsprout, this link will take you to a public google document that you can view freely) Please do yourselves a great favor and peruse more of Jess' work here on her portfolio: PortfolioYou can also follow Jess here on IGDon't go back to sleep.xoRachelSign up here for monthly blasts and functional wooFind me on InstagramSupport this podcast on Patreon
durée : 01:24:23 - Les Nuits de France Culture - par : Antoine Dhulster - En 1993, au moment où paraît le 43e tome du "Dictionnaire biographique du mouvement ouvrier français" créé par Jean Maitron et qui en marque l'achèvement, interrogeons-nous sur ce que l'on peut dire et penser sur cette question qui semble obsolète : où en est la lutte des classes ? - réalisation : Thomas Jost - invités : Claude Pennetier Chercheur au CNRS; Jacques Rancière Philosophe, professeur émérite à l'Université de Paris VIII (Saint-Denis); Michel Verret Philosophe et sociologue; Patrick Tort Philosophe, linguiste et théoricien des sciences, directeur de l'Institut Charles Darwin International, chercheur au Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, et lauréat de l'Académie des sciences.; Daniel Bensaïd
Dans le cadre de ses apéro livres, ARTCENA recevait jeudi 30 janvier 2025 le philosophe Jacques Rancière, à l'occasion de la parution de son ouvrage « Au loin la liberté, essai sur Tchekhov », aux éditions La Fabrique. Il était interviewé par Gwénola David, directrice générale d'ARTCENA. Crédits : Production : ARTCENA Son et montage : Margaux Coratte Création sonore : Marc Sayous
Jusqu'au 6 janvier prochain, dans la galerie 4 du Centre Pompidou, vous accueille une grande installation de liège, comme une coulée de lave venue s'emparée des espaces du musée. Cette lave, elle éructe des mains et du coeur de l'artiste Gaëlle Choisne qui le 14 octobre dernier s'est vue décernée le Prix Marcel Duchamp 2024. Une récompense créée en 2000 par l'Adiaf, l'Association pour la diffusion de l'art français. Cette année, la curatrice du prix était Jeanne Brun, directrice adjointe du Musée d'Art Moderne. Elles sont toutes les deux les invitées de cet épisode de PRÉSENT·E enregistré en live le 16 octobre dernier au Centre Pompidou. Références citées dans l'épisode : - La perspective inversée de Pavel Florensky, - Jacques Rancière, - Audrey Parisot, conférencière et chamane, - Chaordique de Dee Hock, - Entreprise les liégeurs, - Bill Mollison, scientifique, père de la permaculture Crédits : Cet épisode est produit par le Centre Pompidou, il a été enregistré en live en septembre 2024 dans l'exposition du Prix Marcel Duchamp au Centre Pompidou. Écriture et montage : Camille Bardin. Générique : David Walters.
Tchekhov plutôt que Lénine. Voilà ce que nous propose gaiement Jacques Rancière dans Au loin la liberté (éditions La Fabrique), de la même façon que Joseph Jacotot répandait, dans Le maître ignorant, la bonne nouvelle de l'égalité des intelligences. Dans ce nouvel ouvrage cependant, il n'est pas question d'égalité, mais de liberté ; et il n'est pas question des rêves d'un philosophe, mais de ceux que met en scène un écrivain russe qui peut-être n'évoquera de prime abord pas grand-chose (sauf de s'être vaguement, une fois ou deux, ennuyé.e devant La Mouette).Les nouvelles de Tchekhov offrent pourtant matière à parler d'émancipation, de révolution, de communisme : ce que fait Rancière une nouvelle fois, infatigable. Il serait faux néanmoins de considérer ces récits comme une simple « matière » ; en réalité, c'est comme si un dialogue se tissait entre l'auteur de la Nuit des prolétaires, et celui du Récit d'un inconnu, un dialogue se déployant à partir du « sentiment d'une ouverture indécise du temps ». Ce temps est avant tout celui de la servitude, celui de l'ordre de la police et des vies brisées où tant bien que mal, dans un horizon aux contours un peu flous, se dessinent des brèches. On a donc lu et parlé sur la servitude et de liberté, sur la puissance de consolation qui sommeille dans l'ordinaire des petites histoires issues de la mélancolie « ironique et rieuse » de Tchekhov. Est-ce que la consolation mène à l'inaction ? « Changer les manières de sentir », à quoi ça sert ? On a peut-être eu l'impression d'entendre une adresse amicale aux révolutionnaires : vous, qui vous demandez « que faire ? » : ne devenez pas Trotskystes, ne figez pas sociologiquement la servitude, croyez toujours que les pas de côté sont possibles, sachez admirer les banales émancipations qui à coup sûr mènent ailleurs et par-delà, au sens radical du terme. La liberté est loin, mais comme les vies enfin délivrées de ce qui les mutile, elle est au loin.
durée : 00:37:26 - Bistroscopie - par : Charline Vanhoenacker - Philosophe de l'émancipation, Jacques Rancière nous livre son analyse de la situation politique actuelle mais répond aussi, à la lecture des nouvelles de Tchekhov, à ces questions fondamentales: Qu'est-ce que la servitude? Comment émerge la possibilité d'une vie nouvelle? - invités : Jacques Rancière - Jacques Rancière : Philosophe, professeur émérite à l'Université de Paris VIII (Saint-Denis) - réalisé par : François AUDOIN
We are joined by philosopher Stuart Blaney to discuss the thought of Jacques Rancière, his work on 19th century worker autodidacts and his theories of emancipation, aesthetics and equality. This conversation is based around a forthcoming book by Stuart Blaney that is entitled, Equality and Freedom in Rancière and Foucault with Bloomsbury Books. Please join our Patreon community to get early access to our interviews and seminars (https://www.patreon.com/torsiongroups).
In seinem Buch „Das Unvernehmen" begreift Jacques Rancière Herrschaft als eine Aufteilung des Sinnlichen: In der Ordnung haben alle ihre Funktion, ihren Platz, dass was sie sagen, wird vernommen. Doch es gibt diejenigen, die keinen Anteil haben, deren Sprechen nicht gehört wird, sondern von denen in der Ordnung nur als störendes Geräusch wahrgenommen wird. In der Repräsentation der bestehenden Aufteilungen der Gemeinschaft kommen viele Menschen und deren Situationen, deren Handeln, nicht vor - sie werden nicht gezählt. Doch jede Ordnung der Ungleichheit und des Befehls hat zur Grundlage die Gleichheit der Beliebigen mit den Beliebigen. Es gibt den Streit um die Maßstäbe. Und plötzlich kann unter Berufung auf Gleichheit durch die Beliebigen der „Anteil der Anteilslosen“ eingefordert werden. Subversion und Emanzipation sind zentrale Ziele von Rancière. Ihn interessiert, wie in der Ordnung Brüche entstehen, Konsense aufgebrochen und verschoben werden, die Teile neu angeordnet werden. Die Bekämpfung dieser gesellschaftlichen Ordnung ist daher nicht zu begreifen als ein bloßes Gegeneinander von bestehenden Interessen; vielmehr müssen die Anteillosen die Normalität, die Aufteilung des Sinnlichen durch Wortergreifung, durch eine neue Anordnung der Körper die Koordinaten für eine neue Subjektivierung und Verteilung der Teile schaffen. Im „Unvernehmen" entfaltet sich somit ein Subversionsdenken, das Revolution als Verschiebung von Normalität erachtet. Zu Gast bei Alex Demirović ist in dieser Folge Ruth Sonderegger, Professorin für Philosophie und ästhetische Theorie an der Akademie der bildenden Künste Wien. Sie hat zusammen mit Jens Kastner das Buch «Pierre Bourdieu und Jacques Rancière» herausgegeben.
J'adore regarder mes filles jouer ensemble. Certes c'est un grand moment de répit pour moi mais c'est avant tout un bonheur immense de les voir s'épanouir ensemble, rire et inventer leur propre monde. Le jeu participe depuis toujours à l'évolution de l'enfant. C'est en jouant qu'il socialise, qu'il découvre, qu'il invente et qu'il progresse… L'importance du jeu est même notée dans la Convention des Nations Unies relative aux droits de l'enfant de 1989 qui stipule : que « les États parties reconnaissent à l'enfant le droit au repos et aux loisirs, de se livrer au jeu et à des activités récréatives propres à son âge, et de participer librement à la vie culturelle et artistique ». Samah Karaki est neuroscientifique et la fondatrice du Social Brain Institute. Elle est à l'origine d'un rapport fourni et interdisciplinaire sur l'importance du jeu libre. Le jeu comme principal vecteur d'apprentissage. Mais comment ça se passe concrètement, dans leur cerveau mais aussi dans leurs liens sociaux ? Les réponses dans cet échange. L'épisode est passionnant et nous encourage à leur rendre leur liberté de jouer… pas facile quand on est parents… Je vous souhaite une très bonne écoute. Pour lire le livre mentionné par Samah Karaki : Le maître ignorant de Jacques Rancière.
Dimitri and Khalid continue exploring the long strange trip of the word “parapolitics” into the 1990s. Topics include: Jacques Rancière's book “Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy”, calling out Aristotle for not actually doing a heckin' democracy, policing the polis, the undergrad thesis that accurately nailed SJ's bricoleur nature, inhabiting the space between, squaring Peter Dale Scott's sus elite background with his valuable work on deep politics, Poetry and Terror in Scott's “Coming To Jakarta”, doing free verse silk topper self-crit, being “a victim of excessive inheritance”, the 2009 academic essay collection “Government of the Shadows: Parapolitics and Criminal Sovereignty”, how “parapolitics” differs from “grand conspiracy theory”, and more. For access to premium episodes, upcoming installments of DEMON FORCES, live call-in specials, and the Grotto of Truth Discord, become a subscriber at patreon.com/subliminaljihad.
O diálogo platônico como superação da tragédia. Jacques Rancière sobre o caráter ética da discussão da República III. Referências bibliográficas Aristóteles. Poética. SP: Editora 34, 2015. COOPER, J. M. (Org.). The Complete Works of Plato. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co., 1997. GEIGER, R. Literarische Aspekte der Schriften Platons. In: HORN, C.; MÜLLER, J.; SÖDER, J. (Org.). Platon Handbuch: Leben – Werke – Wirkung. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler Verlag, 2009, p. 363-386. JANOUCHOVÁ, P. The cult of Bendis in Athens and Thrace. Graeco-Latina Brunensia, v. 18, n. 1, p. 95-106, 2013. Petraki, Zacharoula. The Poetics of Philosophical Language: Plato, Poets and Presocratics in the Republic. Göttingen: De Gruyter, 2011. PLANEAUX, Christopher. The date of Bendis' entry into Attica. The Classical Journal, v. 96, n. 2, p. 165-192, 2000. Platão. A República (ou, sobre a justiça). SP: Martins Fontes, 2006. PLUTARCO. L. The lives of the noble Grecians and Romans. Chicago; London; Toronto: Encyclopaedia Britannica, 1951, p. 354-367. PURSHOUSE, L. Plato's Republic. London: Continuum, 2006. Rancière, Jacques. The Politics of Aesthetics. The Distribution of the Sensible. London: Continuum International Publishing, 2004. Rosen, S. Plato's Republic: a study. London; New Haven: Yale University Press, 2005. Rothenberg, Molly Anne. “Rancière's Aesthetic Regime. Modernism, Politics, and the Logic of Excess.” In: RABATÉ, Jean-Michael. A Handbook of Modernism Studies. Chicester: John Willey & Sons, 2013, p. 431-444. Silva, F. V. & Costa, S. F. A literariedade do discurso platônico: uma análise cenográfica da República I (327a a 331d). Leitura, Maceió, n. 65, maio/ago. 2020, p. 41-47. Cidade de Deus, dirigido por Fernando Meirelles e Kátia Lund, roteiro por Paulo Lins e Bráulio Mantovani. Brasil, 2002.
durée : 01:24:21 - Les Nuits de France Culture - par : Albane Penaranda - En 1993, au moment où paraît le 43e tome du "Dictionnaire biographique du mouvement ouvrier français" créé par Jean Maitron et qui en marque l'achèvement, interrogeons-nous sur ce que l'on peut dire et penser sur cette question qui semble obsolète : où en est la lutte des classes ? - invités : Claude Pennetier Chercheur au CNRS; Jacques Rancière Philosophe, professeur émérite à l'Université de Paris VIII (Saint-Denis); Michel Verret Philosophe et sociologue; Patrick Tort Philosophe, linguiste et théoricien des sciences, directeur de l'Institut Charles Darwin International, chercheur au Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, et lauréat de l'Académie des sciences.; Daniel Bensaïd
Terminábamos el episodio anterior un poco mohínos (https://www.elsaltodiario.com/pol-pop-podcast/filosofia-criptobros-marco-aurelio-te-echa-bronca-no-ir-al-gimnasio). Si la hipótesis que elaboramos es cierta —que el renovado éxito en estos días de los estoicos romanos, y su propuesta de huida hacia el interior de nuestro yo, es el resultado de que entre ellos, chusma imperial, y nosotres, chusma contemporánea, compartimos una impotencia política que hace rimar nuestras experiencias— la cosa no está, ciertamente, para tirar cohetes. Pero la política tiene mucho de ambiente. No ciertamente de ese tipo de ambiente externo e inamovible, sino más bien como corrientes de aire que pueden hacerse circular de otros modos. Si se sabe cómo, claro. Por cierto, que aquí no se sabe. Pero, inasequibles al desaliento, hemos querido pensar de la mano de alguien, Jacques Rancière, que a sus 83 años está en condiciones de ofrecernos una visión de la política de largo alcance. Del ciclo largo que une y separa la segunda mitad del siglo XX y este tercio del siglo XXI, con sus altas y sus bajas, sus momentos de efervescencia, sus mayos del 68, sus 15M, y sus momentos de bajón. Un autor que a lo largo de su vida y su obra ha pensado, como decíamos, en la política de largo alcance (El odio a la democracia), en las relaciones humanas desde la igualdad (El maestro ignorante) y en la desnaturalización de los ciclos de explotación de la vida (La noche de los proletarios). Así que hemos aprovechado la traducción de este compendio de artículos de Jacques Rancière, “Los Treinta Ingloriosos. Escenas políticas 1991-2021”, de Katakrak, para aprender algo sobre nuestro futuro a partir del pasado más plano que recordamos en esas décadas de consenso, clausura de la historia y paranoia securitaria. Aprovechamos esta pausa (respira) para recordarte que puedes escuchar nuestro capítulo en la cajita de enlace justo encima de este artículo. Fin de la publicidad. Si un concepto se encuentra tergiversado en nuestro mundo es la igualdad. Noción abstracta, casi rutinaria. Casi como un objetivo al que, con todo cinismo, se hace ver como que nos dirigimos porque se sabe que apenas se da un paso por cada dos que se desandan. En Rancière, por el contrario, la igualdad no es el punto de llegada, sino la premisa de la relación —política, educativa, etc.— que puede provocar otra distribución de lo sensible. Es decir, una realidad donde cualquiera pueda participar en su composición efectiva. Dicho así, puede parecer bonito, pero se entiende mucho peor que si se invierte la fórmula y se mira a unas sociedades que condicionan ese formar parte de la ciudadanía al mérito. Que llevan al fondo de la habitación —si no a la cola que se forma fuera de la puerta— la palabra o la presencia de quienes no han pasado las pruebas del “merecer” nacional, educativo o estético. En estas sociedades, cada vez más, las condiciones de una vida decente se garantizan a los grupos de ciudadanos, cada vez menos, que “lo merecen” y se cierran a todas las demás. No es difícil ver aquí ya cómo tal jerarquización de la vida social va de la mano de una elitización de la democracia. Se consolida así una política en la que la masa de los y las cualesquiera es un peligro para la propia democracia, que se reduce a gestionar desde arriba los asuntos públicos y a representar a un pueblo estrecho y prefijado. Rancière opone a esto una política de la imaginación, pero no como el carnaval constante y callejero, sino como la producción de acontecimientos que interrumpen esa naturalización de la jerarquía y la exclusión que es el pasar de los días y del business as usual. Como aporte personal conclusivo, algo que no deja de sorprendernos es cómo el sentido común político va oscilando década a década entre los extremos de la política institucional a la movimentista y de vuelta a la primera. Como si el único menú de las opciones posibles fueran la alternativa entre el empacho y el ayuno. En este bamboleo del que no somos capaces de escapar, Rancière se sitúa del lado de la afirmación expresiva de la autonomía política que, a nosotros, nos deja con la pregunta de cómo, como masa de los cualquiera que somos, somos capaces también de hacer saltar de escala los procesos políticos más potentes. En todo caso, el problema y la pregunta, parece muchas, muchas y muches nos hacemos en la izquierda estos días. ¡Comenzamos! Puedes escuchar el programa completo aquí
durée : 02:20:00 - Les Nuits de France Culture - par : Philippe Garbit - En 1999, en direct et en public au Théâtre de l'Odéon, France Culture organise une soirée en hommage à la philosophe Françoise Proust disparue un an auparavant. Celle-ci concevait la philosophie comme un acte de résistance à la bêtise ambiante et mettait la "résistance à l'ordre du jour". - invités : Bernard Sichère; Jean Claude Ameisen Auteur; Jacques Rancière Philosophe, professeur émérite à l'Université de Paris VIII (Saint-Denis); Jacob Rogozinski Philosophe et professeur de philosophie à l'université de Strasbourg; Jacques Derrida; Eric Alliez; Olivier Morel Auteur, documentariste et maître de conférences au département de Film, Télévision et Théâtre et de langues romanes à l'University of Notre-Dame (South Bend, Indiana)
Qu'est-ce que c'est d'ailleurs, un podcast ? Dans cette fiction tendue et sobre, il va se jouer un affrontement entre deux hommes sous le canevas d'un entretien qui bascule et se décale. « Rouge Vif » a remporté le prix international de la fiction 2021 aux Phonurgia Nova Awards, avant d'être jouée à Paris sur la scène de la Maison de la Poésie. Une fiction librement inspirée d'un essai de Jacques Rancière : « Le Spectateur Emancipé ». / Réalisation: Mehdi Bayad / Mixage: Mehdi Bayad / Montage: Mehdi Bayad / Prise de son: Mehdi Bayad / Scénario: Mehdi Bayad
J'adore regarder mes filles jouer ensemble. Certes c'est un grand moment de répit pour moi mais c'est avant tout un bonheur immense de les voir s'épanouir ensemble, rire et inventer leur propre monde. Le jeu participe depuis toujours à l'évolution de l'enfant. C'est en jouant qu'il socialise, qu'il découvre, qu'il invente et qu'il progresse… L'importance du jeu est même notée dans la Convention des Nations Unies relative aux droits de l'enfant de 1989 qui stipule : que « les États parties reconnaissent à l'enfant le droit au repos et aux loisirs, de se livrer au jeu et à des activités récréatives propres à son âge, et de participer librement à la vie culturelle et artistique ». Samah Karaki est neuroscientifique et la fondatrice du Social Brain Institute. Elle est à l'origine d'un rapport fourni et interdisciplinaire sur l'importance du jeu libre. Le jeu comme principal vecteur d'apprentissage. Mais comment ça se passe concrètement, dans leur cerveau mais aussi dans leurs liens sociaux ? Les réponses dans cet échange. L'épisode est passionnant et nous encourage à leur rendre leur liberté de jouer… pas facile quand on est parents… Je vous souhaite une très bonne écoute. Pour lire le livre mentionné par Samah Karaki : Le maître ignorant de Jacques Rancière.
Parce que la terre inquiète, le philosophe enquête. Depuis que le monde est langage, y a toujours un lutin de la pensée qui passe devant, pour nous éclairer. Celui-là porte des p'tits chapeaux, fait de la batterie, fredonne parfois des comptines yiddish, a un sens entêtant de la ritournelle (que ce soit en musique, en littérature ou en philo : il en a même fait sa thèse), il fréquente de façon gourmande la partition des Sartre, Jacques Rancières et autres Deleuze. Mais parce que la terre inquiète, Aliocha Wald Lasowski arpente le tout-monde - des outremers en Afrique jusqu'en France et aux États-Unis - à la rencontre de ceux et celles qui ont approché Édouard Glissant. S'ensuit une conversation autour des défis écologiques, culturels, identitaires qui guettent notre humanité. Imaginaire et politique de la créolisation (avec Raphaël Confiant, Souleymane Bachir Diagne, Amin Maalouf, Regis Debray notamment) paraît aux Éditions de l'Aube.Les choix musicaux de Aliocha Wald LasowskiChic Good TimesGalactic Storm Stupid Boss.
William MarxLittératures comparéesCollège de FranceAnnée 2022-2023Colloque - Valéry au Collège de France : Le cycle sensori-moteur, l'implexe et la création poétiqueAtsuo MorimotoAtsuo Morimoto, né en 1970 à Tokyo. Il est professeur à l'Institut de Recherches en Sciences humaines de l'Université de Kyoto. Il est l'auteur de Paul Valéry. L'imaginaire et la genèse du sujet. De la psychologie à la poïétique (2009) et l'éditeur des recueils d'articles Marguerite Duras, une voix fantôme : roman, théâtre, cinéma (Zinbun, n° 50) et Les belles lettres dangereuses : Le destin de l'épistolarité littéraire du XVIIe au XIXe siècle (Zinbun, n° 53). Parmi ses traductions en japonais figurent entre autres celles de Valéry, Le Tombeau d'Œdipe de William Marx et Politique de la littérature de Jacques Rancière.
Covering Part 7 of Alain Badiou's Being and Event on “Forcing the Generic,” Alex and Andrew discuss the four truth procedures as a way to force the generic into existence. Guest Madhavi Menon presents a queer universalist approach through indifference to difference. Menon is Professor of English at Ashoka University in India. She is the author of five books, including Indifference to Difference: On Queer Universalism published by University of Minnesota Press. Concepts related to Forcing the Generic, The Four Truth Procedures (Love, Science, Politics, Art), Critiquing the Encyclopedia of Knowledge, Generic Procedures as Constructing through Negation, The Figure of the Militant, Naming, Jacques Rancière, Generic versus Universal, Gender and Genre, The Undocumented Family, Supernumerary, the Young Marx, Indifference to Difference, Rousseau's General Will. Interview with Madhavi Menon Reading as Surprise, Queerness and Superabundance, Universalism of Failure, Indifference to Difference, Cultural and Identity Politics, Scene of the Street, Frantz Fanon, Black Skin White Masks, Comic Books, the Hijab, Anti-Philosophy, Anti-Identity, GWF Hegel and the Fury of the Absolute, Indian Transgender, Against the Sovereign. Links Menon profile, https://www.ashoka.edu.in/profile/madhavi-menon/ Menon, Indifference to Difference: On Queer Universalism, https://www.upress.umn.edu/book-division/books/indifference-to-difference
Frank Ruda and Agon Hamza resume their discussion with philosopher Jacques Rancière. In the second instalment, they talk about the aesthetic regime of art, films and TV series, time, ecology and communism… and more! You can listen to our podcast here: https://anchor.fm/crisisandcritique If you like this and other episodes, please consider subscribing and supporting us at our Patreon page: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=71723553
Agon Hamza and Frank Ruda sit down in the first of a two-instalment interview with philosopher Jacques Rancière. Hear Rancière discuss his years at the École Normale Supérieure, his earliest work, the events and consequences of May '68, the significance of philosophy, the ongoing strikes in France, workers and proletarians, as well as the division of labour…and more…. You can listen to our podcast here: https://anchor.fm/crisisandcritique If you like this and other episodes, please consider subscribing and supporting us at our Patreon page: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=71723553
Based on critical theory and ethnographic research, Gediminas Lesutis' book The Politics of Precarity: Spaces of Extractivism, Violence, and Suffering (Routledge, 2021) explores how intensifying geographies of extractive capitalism shape human lives and transformative politics in marginal areas of the global economy. Engaging the work of Judith Butler, Henri Lefebvre, and Jacques Rancière with ethnographic research on social and political effects of mining-induced dispossession in Mozambique, in the book Lesutis theorises how precarity unfolds as a spatially constituted condition of everyday life given over to the violence of capital. Going beyond labour relations, or governance of life in liberal democracies, that are typically explored in the literature on precarity, the book shows how dispossessed people are subjected to structural, symbolic, and direct modalities of violence; this simultaneously constitutes their suffering and ceaseless desire, however implausible, to be included into abstract space of extractivism. As a result, despite the multifarious violence that it engenders, extractive capital accumulation is sustained even in the margins, historically excluded from contingently lived imaginaries of a "good life" promised by capitalism. Presenting this theorisation of precarity as a framework on, and a critique of, the contemporary politics of (un)liveability, the book speaks to key debates about precarity, dispossession, resistance, extractivism, and development in several disciplines, especially political geography, IPE, global politics, and critical theory. It will also be of interest to scholars in development studies, critical political economy, and African politics. Shraddha Chatterjee is a doctoral candidate at York University, Toronto, and author of Queer Politics in India: Towards Sexual Subaltern Subjects (Routledge, 2018). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network
Based on critical theory and ethnographic research, Gediminas Lesutis' book The Politics of Precarity: Spaces of Extractivism, Violence, and Suffering (Routledge, 2021) explores how intensifying geographies of extractive capitalism shape human lives and transformative politics in marginal areas of the global economy. Engaging the work of Judith Butler, Henri Lefebvre, and Jacques Rancière with ethnographic research on social and political effects of mining-induced dispossession in Mozambique, in the book Lesutis theorises how precarity unfolds as a spatially constituted condition of everyday life given over to the violence of capital. Going beyond labour relations, or governance of life in liberal democracies, that are typically explored in the literature on precarity, the book shows how dispossessed people are subjected to structural, symbolic, and direct modalities of violence; this simultaneously constitutes their suffering and ceaseless desire, however implausible, to be included into abstract space of extractivism. As a result, despite the multifarious violence that it engenders, extractive capital accumulation is sustained even in the margins, historically excluded from contingently lived imaginaries of a "good life" promised by capitalism. Presenting this theorisation of precarity as a framework on, and a critique of, the contemporary politics of (un)liveability, the book speaks to key debates about precarity, dispossession, resistance, extractivism, and development in several disciplines, especially political geography, IPE, global politics, and critical theory. It will also be of interest to scholars in development studies, critical political economy, and African politics. Shraddha Chatterjee is a doctoral candidate at York University, Toronto, and author of Queer Politics in India: Towards Sexual Subaltern Subjects (Routledge, 2018). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/critical-theory
Based on critical theory and ethnographic research, Gediminas Lesutis' book The Politics of Precarity: Spaces of Extractivism, Violence, and Suffering (Routledge, 2021) explores how intensifying geographies of extractive capitalism shape human lives and transformative politics in marginal areas of the global economy. Engaging the work of Judith Butler, Henri Lefebvre, and Jacques Rancière with ethnographic research on social and political effects of mining-induced dispossession in Mozambique, in the book Lesutis theorises how precarity unfolds as a spatially constituted condition of everyday life given over to the violence of capital. Going beyond labour relations, or governance of life in liberal democracies, that are typically explored in the literature on precarity, the book shows how dispossessed people are subjected to structural, symbolic, and direct modalities of violence; this simultaneously constitutes their suffering and ceaseless desire, however implausible, to be included into abstract space of extractivism. As a result, despite the multifarious violence that it engenders, extractive capital accumulation is sustained even in the margins, historically excluded from contingently lived imaginaries of a "good life" promised by capitalism. Presenting this theorisation of precarity as a framework on, and a critique of, the contemporary politics of (un)liveability, the book speaks to key debates about precarity, dispossession, resistance, extractivism, and development in several disciplines, especially political geography, IPE, global politics, and critical theory. It will also be of interest to scholars in development studies, critical political economy, and African politics. Shraddha Chatterjee is a doctoral candidate at York University, Toronto, and author of Queer Politics in India: Towards Sexual Subaltern Subjects (Routledge, 2018). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/african-studies
Based on critical theory and ethnographic research, Gediminas Lesutis' book The Politics of Precarity: Spaces of Extractivism, Violence, and Suffering (Routledge, 2021) explores how intensifying geographies of extractive capitalism shape human lives and transformative politics in marginal areas of the global economy. Engaging the work of Judith Butler, Henri Lefebvre, and Jacques Rancière with ethnographic research on social and political effects of mining-induced dispossession in Mozambique, in the book Lesutis theorises how precarity unfolds as a spatially constituted condition of everyday life given over to the violence of capital. Going beyond labour relations, or governance of life in liberal democracies, that are typically explored in the literature on precarity, the book shows how dispossessed people are subjected to structural, symbolic, and direct modalities of violence; this simultaneously constitutes their suffering and ceaseless desire, however implausible, to be included into abstract space of extractivism. As a result, despite the multifarious violence that it engenders, extractive capital accumulation is sustained even in the margins, historically excluded from contingently lived imaginaries of a "good life" promised by capitalism. Presenting this theorisation of precarity as a framework on, and a critique of, the contemporary politics of (un)liveability, the book speaks to key debates about precarity, dispossession, resistance, extractivism, and development in several disciplines, especially political geography, IPE, global politics, and critical theory. It will also be of interest to scholars in development studies, critical political economy, and African politics. Shraddha Chatterjee is a doctoral candidate at York University, Toronto, and author of Queer Politics in India: Towards Sexual Subaltern Subjects (Routledge, 2018). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/anthropology
Based on critical theory and ethnographic research, Gediminas Lesutis' book The Politics of Precarity: Spaces of Extractivism, Violence, and Suffering (Routledge, 2021) explores how intensifying geographies of extractive capitalism shape human lives and transformative politics in marginal areas of the global economy. Engaging the work of Judith Butler, Henri Lefebvre, and Jacques Rancière with ethnographic research on social and political effects of mining-induced dispossession in Mozambique, in the book Lesutis theorises how precarity unfolds as a spatially constituted condition of everyday life given over to the violence of capital. Going beyond labour relations, or governance of life in liberal democracies, that are typically explored in the literature on precarity, the book shows how dispossessed people are subjected to structural, symbolic, and direct modalities of violence; this simultaneously constitutes their suffering and ceaseless desire, however implausible, to be included into abstract space of extractivism. As a result, despite the multifarious violence that it engenders, extractive capital accumulation is sustained even in the margins, historically excluded from contingently lived imaginaries of a "good life" promised by capitalism. Presenting this theorisation of precarity as a framework on, and a critique of, the contemporary politics of (un)liveability, the book speaks to key debates about precarity, dispossession, resistance, extractivism, and development in several disciplines, especially political geography, IPE, global politics, and critical theory. It will also be of interest to scholars in development studies, critical political economy, and African politics. Shraddha Chatterjee is a doctoral candidate at York University, Toronto, and author of Queer Politics in India: Towards Sexual Subaltern Subjects (Routledge, 2018). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/sociology
Based on critical theory and ethnographic research, Gediminas Lesutis' book The Politics of Precarity: Spaces of Extractivism, Violence, and Suffering (Routledge, 2021) explores how intensifying geographies of extractive capitalism shape human lives and transformative politics in marginal areas of the global economy. Engaging the work of Judith Butler, Henri Lefebvre, and Jacques Rancière with ethnographic research on social and political effects of mining-induced dispossession in Mozambique, in the book Lesutis theorises how precarity unfolds as a spatially constituted condition of everyday life given over to the violence of capital. Going beyond labour relations, or governance of life in liberal democracies, that are typically explored in the literature on precarity, the book shows how dispossessed people are subjected to structural, symbolic, and direct modalities of violence; this simultaneously constitutes their suffering and ceaseless desire, however implausible, to be included into abstract space of extractivism. As a result, despite the multifarious violence that it engenders, extractive capital accumulation is sustained even in the margins, historically excluded from contingently lived imaginaries of a "good life" promised by capitalism. Presenting this theorisation of precarity as a framework on, and a critique of, the contemporary politics of (un)liveability, the book speaks to key debates about precarity, dispossession, resistance, extractivism, and development in several disciplines, especially political geography, IPE, global politics, and critical theory. It will also be of interest to scholars in development studies, critical political economy, and African politics. Shraddha Chatterjee is a doctoral candidate at York University, Toronto, and author of Queer Politics in India: Towards Sexual Subaltern Subjects (Routledge, 2018). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/geography
durée : 00:57:37 - Avec philosophie - par : Géraldine Muhlmann - Pour J. Rancière, la littérature est une révolution qui s'installe en Occident en opposition aux belles-lettres. Sa politique tient au désordre qu'elle institue dans le partage du sensible : la littérature opère une destruction des hiérarchies, notamment entre les sujets nobles et les sujets vils. - invités : Jacques Rancière philosophe, professeur émérite à l'Université de Paris VIII (Saint-Denis); Jean-Marie Schaeffer philosophe, directeur d'études à l'EHESS, spécialiste d'esthétique philosophique de théorie des arts. ; Anne Kupiec professeure de sociologie à l'Université Paris Diderot (Paris 7). Elle a été bibliothécaire à la bibliothèque Cujas et à la Bibliothèque publique d'information (la BPI) à Paris.
durée : 00:57:40 - Avec philosophie - par : Géraldine Muhlmann - Jacques Rancière tente de contrer l'idée selon laquelle l'image est quelque chose de passif. En tant qu'elles sont des relations, et non de simples copies, les images de l'art agissent. Pour autant, il défend aussi que l'image peut résister à la façon dont on veut la regarder et la penser. - invités : Jacques Rancière philosophe, professeur émérite à l'Université de Paris VIII (Saint-Denis); Marie-José Mondzain philosophe, écrivaine et directrice de recherche au CNRS; Georges Didi-Huberman Historien de l'art et philosophe, maître de conférences à l'EHESS
durée : 00:58:12 - Avec philosophie - par : Géraldine Muhlmann - Jacques Rancière définit l'émancipation comme la sortie d'une situation de minorité qui, loin de se réduire à un résultat, implique une autre manière d'être au monde. Comment expliquer le déclin de l'intérêt porté à l'émancipation aujourd'hui ? N'est-elle pas masquée par la notion de domination ? - invités : Jacques Rancière philosophe, professeur émérite à l'Université de Paris VIII (Saint-Denis); Philippe Corcuff maître de conférences de science politique à Sciences Po Lyon et militant libertaire ; Antonia Birnbaum professeur à l'Université Paris 8, elle est actuellement détachée à l'Université des Arts appliqués de Vienne.
durée : 00:59:20 - Avec philosophie - par : Géraldine Muhlmann - Souvent qualifiés de post-marxistes, Jacques Rancière et Étienne Balibar ont œuvré à un renouvellement de la théorie politique, gardant comme optique l'émancipation collective. Près de soixante ans après le séminaire de Louis Althusser à l'ENS Ulm en 1965, ont-ils dit adieu à Marx et au marxisme ? - invités : Jacques Rancière philosophe, professeur émérite à l'Université de Paris VIII (Saint-Denis); Etienne Balibar professeur émérite en philosophie à l'Université de Paris-Ouest (Nanterre)
Hatred of Sex (U Nebraska Press, 2022) links Jacques Rancière's political philosophy of the constitutive disorder of democracy with Jean Laplanche's identification of a fundamental perturbation at the heart of human sexuality. Sex is hated as well as desired, Oliver Davis and Tim Dean contend, because sexual intensity impedes coherent selfhood and undermines identity, rendering us all a little more deplorable than we might wish. Davis and Dean explore the consequences of this conflicted dynamic across a range of fields and institutions, including queer studies, attachment theory, the #MeToo movement, and “traumatology,” demonstrating how hatred of sex has been optimized and exploited by neoliberalism. Advancing strong claims about sex, pleasure, power, intersectionality, therapy, and governance, Davis and Dean shed new light on enduring questions of equality at a historical moment when democracy appears ever more precarious. Matthew Pieknik is a psychoanalyst in private practice in New York City. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/psychoanalysis
Hatred of Sex (U Nebraska Press, 2022) links Jacques Rancière's political philosophy of the constitutive disorder of democracy with Jean Laplanche's identification of a fundamental perturbation at the heart of human sexuality. Sex is hated as well as desired, Oliver Davis and Tim Dean contend, because sexual intensity impedes coherent selfhood and undermines identity, rendering us all a little more deplorable than we might wish. Davis and Dean explore the consequences of this conflicted dynamic across a range of fields and institutions, including queer studies, attachment theory, the #MeToo movement, and “traumatology,” demonstrating how hatred of sex has been optimized and exploited by neoliberalism. Advancing strong claims about sex, pleasure, power, intersectionality, therapy, and governance, Davis and Dean shed new light on enduring questions of equality at a historical moment when democracy appears ever more precarious. Matthew Pieknik is a psychoanalyst in private practice in New York City. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network
Hatred of Sex (U Nebraska Press, 2022) links Jacques Rancière's political philosophy of the constitutive disorder of democracy with Jean Laplanche's identification of a fundamental perturbation at the heart of human sexuality. Sex is hated as well as desired, Oliver Davis and Tim Dean contend, because sexual intensity impedes coherent selfhood and undermines identity, rendering us all a little more deplorable than we might wish. Davis and Dean explore the consequences of this conflicted dynamic across a range of fields and institutions, including queer studies, attachment theory, the #MeToo movement, and “traumatology,” demonstrating how hatred of sex has been optimized and exploited by neoliberalism. Advancing strong claims about sex, pleasure, power, intersectionality, therapy, and governance, Davis and Dean shed new light on enduring questions of equality at a historical moment when democracy appears ever more precarious. Matthew Pieknik is a psychoanalyst in private practice in New York City. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/gender-studies
Hatred of Sex (U Nebraska Press, 2022) links Jacques Rancière's political philosophy of the constitutive disorder of democracy with Jean Laplanche's identification of a fundamental perturbation at the heart of human sexuality. Sex is hated as well as desired, Oliver Davis and Tim Dean contend, because sexual intensity impedes coherent selfhood and undermines identity, rendering us all a little more deplorable than we might wish. Davis and Dean explore the consequences of this conflicted dynamic across a range of fields and institutions, including queer studies, attachment theory, the #MeToo movement, and “traumatology,” demonstrating how hatred of sex has been optimized and exploited by neoliberalism. Advancing strong claims about sex, pleasure, power, intersectionality, therapy, and governance, Davis and Dean shed new light on enduring questions of equality at a historical moment when democracy appears ever more precarious. Matthew Pieknik is a psychoanalyst in private practice in New York City. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/critical-theory
Hatred of Sex (U Nebraska Press, 2022) links Jacques Rancière's political philosophy of the constitutive disorder of democracy with Jean Laplanche's identification of a fundamental perturbation at the heart of human sexuality. Sex is hated as well as desired, Oliver Davis and Tim Dean contend, because sexual intensity impedes coherent selfhood and undermines identity, rendering us all a little more deplorable than we might wish. Davis and Dean explore the consequences of this conflicted dynamic across a range of fields and institutions, including queer studies, attachment theory, the #MeToo movement, and “traumatology,” demonstrating how hatred of sex has been optimized and exploited by neoliberalism. Advancing strong claims about sex, pleasure, power, intersectionality, therapy, and governance, Davis and Dean shed new light on enduring questions of equality at a historical moment when democracy appears ever more precarious. Matthew Pieknik is a psychoanalyst in private practice in New York City. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/lgbtq-studies
Hatred of Sex (U Nebraska Press, 2022) links Jacques Rancière's political philosophy of the constitutive disorder of democracy with Jean Laplanche's identification of a fundamental perturbation at the heart of human sexuality. Sex is hated as well as desired, Oliver Davis and Tim Dean contend, because sexual intensity impedes coherent selfhood and undermines identity, rendering us all a little more deplorable than we might wish. Davis and Dean explore the consequences of this conflicted dynamic across a range of fields and institutions, including queer studies, attachment theory, the #MeToo movement, and “traumatology,” demonstrating how hatred of sex has been optimized and exploited by neoliberalism. Advancing strong claims about sex, pleasure, power, intersectionality, therapy, and governance, Davis and Dean shed new light on enduring questions of equality at a historical moment when democracy appears ever more precarious. Matthew Pieknik is a psychoanalyst in private practice in New York City. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Today we present the first part of our discussion of the polemic “Hatred of Sex”, exploring how our hatred of sex (like hatred of democracy!) is endemic to the structure of sex itself, and exists in the “open minded” and “sex-positive” just as within the Puritanical and conservative. As a psychoanalytic companion to Bataille's erotocism, we look how we hate sex because it challenges the walls we build and the flags we plant—amongst all this hatred, what does it mean to insist that sex is still of the utmost importance, to find pleasure in being undone, and to locate meaning in the uniquely singular messiness of our embodied experiences? Show notes:"Hatred of Sex" by Oliver Davis and Tim Dean"Hatred of Democracy" by Jacques Rancière"Risking sexuality beyond consent: overwhelm and traumatisms that incite" by Avgi Saketopoulou"Erotism: Death and Sensuality" by Georges BatailleIntro song is "Bless You" by the Ink Spots Get access to full bonus episodes, an exclusive RSS feed, and more by subscribing our Patreon! Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Aujourd'hui le A de association. Caroline Fayolle, historienne, va nous parler de ce qui agite le monde ouvrier du milieu du 19eme et en particulier chez les femmes ouvrières. Emancipation par le travail, organisation et solidarité au programme. Comme d'habitude, j'essaie de noter ici toutes les références que nous abordons dans l'épisode si vous voulez en savoir plus: Livre de Caroline Fayolle, Samuel Hayat et Carole Christen S'unir, travailler, résisterLes associations ouvrières au XIXe sièclehttps://www.septentrion.com/fr/livre/?GCOI=27574100334850&fa=author&person_ID=14087 InterviewFrançois Jarrigetechnocritiqueshttp://tristan.u-bourgogne.fr/CGC/chercheurs/Jarrige/Francois_Jarrige.htmlhttp://tristan.u-bourgogne.fr/CGC/publications/utopie_jour_le_jour/utopie_jour_le_jour.htmlhttps://www.arte.tv/fr/videos/103447-011-A/et-si-on-arretait-le-progres/ Robert Owen, utopiste socialistehttps://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Owen Féministes ouvrières:Pauline Roland : https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pauline_RolandJeanne Deroin : https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeanne_DeroinDésirée gay : https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Désirée_GayFlora tristan : https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flora_Tristan Ecole de pensée d'histoire :Michèle Riot-Sarcey :https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michèle_Riot-SarceyWalter Benjamin : https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Benjamin Cornelius Castoriadis : https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cornelius_Castoriadis Partie Archives Nationales : La nuit des Prolétaires de Jacques Rancièrehttps://www.revue-ballast.fr/jacques-ranciere-peuple-construction/http://www.autrefutur.net/Jacques-Ranciere-l-anarchique où il parle notamment de Gabriel Gaunyhttps://lintervalle.blog/2017/11/27/jean-gauny-ouvrier-mangeur-didees-par-le-philosophe-jacques-ranciere/https://journals.openedition.org/chrhc/12438 Autre féministe citée : Elisa Lemonnierhttps://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89lisa_Lemonnier Martin Nadaud qui participe à l'élaboration de statuts pour les ouvriershttps://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Nadaudhttps://www.persee.fr/doc/espat_0339-3267_1978_num_8_1_2984 Elisabeth Dimitrieff: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89lisabeth_Dmitrieff
Neste segundo episódio do Acervo Boitempo recuperamos a conversa “Psicanálise como crítica”, com Christian Dunker, Vera Iaconelli e mediação de Paulo Bueno, que faz parte da série “Democracia no divã”, em que Christian Dunker recebe diversos convidados para pensar como a psicanálise contribui para a tradição crítica, para a reflexão histórica sobre a democracia e também para a revalorização da palavra em sua ação direta pelos sujeitos. A série marca o lançamento de LACAN E A DEMOCRACIA, de Christian Dunker.
No primeiro episódio do Acervo Boitempo, quadro em que resgatamos debates e aulas da TV Boitempo conectados ao tema da temporada, recuperamos uma das aulas mais vistas em nosso canal do YouTube: uma breve história da democracia, com Marilena Chaui, filósofa e professora da Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas da USP. A aula fez parte do Seminário Democracia em colapso, realizado pelo Sesc São Paulo e pela Boitempo em 2019. Marilena Chaui explicita como o nascimento da política na Grécia dá origem à democracia, conceito que desaparece no decorrer da história ocidental até ressurgir como democracia liberal (no século XIX) e como democracia social (no século XX). Neste amplo panorama da democracia ao longo da história mundial, são ainda abordadas as diferenças entre essas duas formas democráticas e sua destruição pelo neoliberalismo.
Kim talks with Gina about Jacques Rancière's concept of dissensus. Gina refers to several major works of philosophy including: Jacques Rancière's Dissensus Immanuel Kant's Critique of Judgement Jacques Derrida's The Truth In Painting Plato's Republic She also takes a small dig at Althusser, in the spirit of Rancière Gina is a PhD candidate at NYU and an amazing teacher. She studies medieval literature and critical theory. She loves Theodor Adorno and really really hates the dialectic. This week's image is an illuminated miniature from a 15th C manuscript held by the British Museum, depicting the “Debate for the Soul.” Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network
Kim talks with Gina about Jacques Rancière's concept of dissensus. Gina refers to several major works of philosophy including: Jacques Rancière's Dissensus Immanuel Kant's Critique of Judgement Jacques Derrida's The Truth In Painting Plato's Republic She also takes a small dig at Althusser, in the spirit of Rancière Gina is a PhD candidate at NYU and an amazing teacher. She studies medieval literature and critical theory. She loves Theodor Adorno and really really hates the dialectic. This week's image is an illuminated miniature from a 15th C manuscript held by the British Museum, depicting the “Debate for the Soul.” Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Kim talks with Gina about Jacques Rancière's concept of dissensus. Gina refers to several major works of philosophy including: Jacques Rancière's Dissensus Immanuel Kant's Critique of Judgement Jacques Derrida's The Truth In Painting Plato's Republic She also takes a small dig at Althusser, in the spirit of Rancière Gina is a PhD candidate at NYU and an amazing teacher. She studies medieval literature and critical theory. She loves Theodor Adorno and really really hates the dialectic. This week's image is an illuminated miniature from a 15th C manuscript held by the British Museum, depicting the “Debate for the Soul.” Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/critical-theory
durée : 00:33:00 - La Grande Table idées - par : Olivia Gesbert - Comment promouvoir et défendre l'émancipation dans notre société ? Aliocha Wald Lasowski pose la question à son principal théoricien, Jacques Rancière, dans un livre-dialogue : "Penser l'émancipation" (L'Aube). - invités : Aliocha Wald Lasowski Maître de Conférences en philosophie à l'Université catholique de Lille.; Jacques Rancière philosophe, professeur émérite à l'Université de Paris VIII (Saint-Denis)
durée : 02:00:42 - Les Matins - par : Guillaume Erner - .
Jacques Rancière Part 1 “Time Redivided”: the title sounds enigmatic. And the enigma can hardly be cleared up by the image that I choose as a point of departure: it is a detail from Jean-Baptiste-SiméonChardin's La Ratisseuse de navets (“the … Continue reading →
This is a conversation with Aurelien Mondon, he's a senior lecturer in politics, languages and international studies at the University of Bath and co-author of the 2020 book “Reactionary Democracy: How racism and the populist far right became mainstream” alongside Aaron Winter. Get early access + more perks at Patreon.com/firethesetimes Blog: https://thefirethisti.me You can follow on Twitter or Instagram @ firethesetimes too. Topics Discussed How has the far right been mainstreamed? Focus on US, UK and France Liberal racism versus illiberal racism The far right and why calling them ‘populism' is problematic What is ‘populist hype' and how can the media be complicit? How the ‘working class' become racialized into the ‘white working class' The role of elites in ‘reactionary democracy' How our knowledge of the world is constructed How the right has asphyxiated the media landscape On echo chambers The generational divide The question of race and ‘populism' ‘Populism' and elections The case of France Books Recommended Hatred of Democracy by Jacques Rancière Racism without Racists: Color-Blind Racism and the Persistence of Racial Inequality in America by Eduardo Bonilla-Silva Feminism, Interrupted by Lola Olufemi Music by Tarabeat.
Jorge Fontevecchia en entrevista con el profesor emérito de la Universidad de París VIII y de filosofía de la European Graduate School
Tyson E. Lewis is a professor of art education in the College of Visual Arts and Design at the University of North Texas. His research interests include educational philosophy, critical theory, phenomenological research methods, and aesthetics. He is the author of Education Out of Bounds: Rethinking Imagination in a Posthuman Age (2010), The Aesthetics of Education: Theatre, Curiosity, and Politics in the Work of Jacques Rancière and Paulo Freire (2012), On Study: Giorgio Agamben and Educational Potentiality (2013), Inoperative Learning: A Radical Rewriting of Educational Potentialities (2017), and Walter Benjamin's Anti-Fascist Education: From Riddles to Radio (2020). Links to Tyson's Work:Studio-D Project. https://onstead.cvad.unt.edu/studio-d Lewis T. and Kraehe, A. (2020). Rise: Emergent Strategies for Reclaiming Joy and Agency Against Neofascist and White Supremacist Assaultive Speech. Journal of Cultural Research in Art Education. Volume 37. https://jcrae.art.arizona.edu/index.php/jcrae/article/view/161 Lewis, T. (2020). Walter Benjamin's Anti-Fascist Education: From Riddles to Radio. New York: SUNY Press. http://www.sunypress.edu/p-6842-walter-benjamins-antifascist-ed.aspx Lewis, T. (2017). Inoperative Learning: A Radical Rewriting of Educational Potentialities. New York: Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Inoperative-Learning-A-Radical-Rewriting-of-Educational-Potentialities/Lewis/p/book/9780367363260Lewis T. and Valk, S. (2020). Educational realism: Defining Exopedagogy as the Choreography of Swarm Intelligence. Educational Philosophy and Theory. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00131857.2020.1803831