Podcasts about Stroock

Journey to Your Authentic Self with Paru RadiaToday's episode is with Paru Radia. Paru is rare! Most people fall into one camp as either left brained or right brained. Paru, however, has always mixed her logical side with her creative side to thrive while navigating challenging environments, whether it be in the corporate world or as a founder and entrepreneur.Becoming a C-Suite Whisperer® and Execution Ninja was a natural path for Paru as she has a keen understanding of the corporate world having been both an employee and a consultant, holding multiple senior level positions and working with senior executives at British Airways, King and Spalding, Stroock, Indeed, Vornado, Square, and Planned Parenthood to name a few. This experience is what led to the formation of her business — having gained immeasurable Insights working with many different personalities across industries, functions, countries and cultures it has given her the ability to cut through the noise to help her clients crystalize their goals to become more effective leaders.Today, we are going to be discussing how to embark on the journey to your authentic self personally and professionallyConnect with Paru Radia:Paru's LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/paruradia/Paru's Website: https://www.paruradia.com/Connect with Tayo Rockson and the As Told By Nomads Podcast:Tayo's Website: https://tayorockson.com/Tayo on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/tayorockson/Tayo on Twitter: https://twitter.com/TayoRocksonTayo on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/tayorocksonTayo on TikTok: https://www.youtube.com/tayorocksonAs Told by Nomads Podcast: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/as-told-by-nomads/id910739730UYD Management: https://www.uydmanagement.com/UYD Collective: https://tayorockson.com/uyd-collective Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

This Day in Legal History: Pledge of AllegianceOn December 28, 1945, a significant moment in American educational and legal history occurred when Congress officially recognized the Pledge of Allegiance, urging its recitation in schools nationwide. The Pledge, originally composed in 1892 by Francis Bellamy, a Baptist minister, was intended to mark the 400th anniversary of Columbus Day. It underwent a critical change in 1954 when Congress added the words "under God," reflecting the era's heightened religious sentiment during the Cold War. This inclusion of "under God" in the Pledge later sparked legal challenges, notably involving Michael Newdow, who contested his daughter's school district's policy of daily Pledge recitation. Newdow argued that this practice infringed upon the separation of church and state. His case eventually reached the United States Supreme Court, which, in a pivotal decision, ruled that Newdow lacked standing, thereby not addressing the constitutional issue he raised.The legal journey of the Pledge of Allegiance illustrates the dynamic relationship between national identity, religion, and education in the United States. Over the years, the Pledge has been both a symbol of unity and a point of contention, reflecting the nation's evolving perspectives on patriotism and religious expression. The Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life, among other institutions, has provided extensive resources and insights into the ongoing debates surrounding the Pledge.The recognition of the Pledge by Congress in 1945 marked a formal endorsement of a practice that had already taken root in many schools. It solidified the Pledge's role in American culture, embedding it into the daily lives of millions of students. This action by Congress highlighted the importance of patriotic rituals in fostering a sense of national unity, especially in the aftermath of World War II.Today, the Pledge remains a staple in many educational institutions, symbolizing allegiance to the nation while also serving as a reminder of the ongoing discussions about the role of religion in public life and the meaning of patriotism in a diverse society.Apple Inc. is engaged in a complex legal and technical battle following a U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) ruling that some of its Apple Watch models infringed patents held by Masimo Corp., a medical-device maker. The ban initially led to a halt in U.S. sales of the Apple Watch Series 9 and Ultra 2, but Apple won a temporary reprieve from a federal appeals court, allowing the sales of these models to resume.Apple's multifaceted strategy to counter the ban includes appealing the ITC decision, developing software modifications to avoid patent infringement, and submitting these changes to U.S. customs for approval. The company hopes this approach will enable it to continue selling non-infringing versions of the devices. The Federal Circuit has given the ITC until January 10 to respond to Apple's request for a stay of the ban for the duration of the appeal process.Despite the current pause in enforcement of the ITC's decision, the import ban stands. The outcome of the upcoming Customs tribunal will be crucial, as a favorable decision would reinforce the ITC's original ruling and could impact the ongoing appeal. Apple's legal efforts are accompanied by attempts to find technical workarounds, such as software updates that might modify or disable the contested pulse-oximetry feature.This situation is unusual, as large companies like Apple typically settle such disputes rather than endure prolonged legal battles and sales disruptions. The company's assertive approach may indicate a strategic decision to demonstrate its unwillingness to settle in patent disputes. Apple is also pursuing legal action against Masimo in Delaware district court, alleging infringement by Masimo's W1 watch.The appeals court's pause is expected to last around three weeks, coinciding with Customs' decision on the redesigned products. If Apple does not receive a favorable ruling from Customs, it has the option to appeal to the US Court of International Trade and potentially further to the Federal Circuit. This protracted legal battle illustrates the intricate interplay between patent law, technological innovation, and corporate strategy.Apple's ‘Unusual' Watch Fight Continues After Pause on BanIn 2023, New York's legal scene, often a trendsetter for the U.S. legal industry, experienced significant changes and challenges, raising questions for the year ahead. Two of New York's oldest law firms, Stroock & Stroock & Lavan and Shearman & Sterling, faced major transitions. Stroock is dissolving, while Shearman plans a merger with Allen & Overy, indicating a shift in the legal landscape.These developments reflect broader industry headwinds such as intense competition for talent, inconsistent client demand, and a slowdown in the global mergers-and-acquisitions market. Consolidation became a notable trend, with numerous law firm mergers throughout 2023, including high-profile combinations like Maynard Cooper & Gale with Nexsen Pruet, and Holland & Knight with Waller Lansden Dortch & Davis. A total of 41 law firm combinations were completed in the first three quarters of 2023, compared to 37 in the same period in 2022.In response to a slower growth environment and cost pressures, small and regional law firms are expected to pursue more mergers and acquisitions in 2024. Meanwhile, the end of 2023 saw major law firms, starting with New York's Milbank, raising associate salaries, with first-year associates now starting at $225,000. These salary hikes have raised concerns about whether less profitable firms can keep pace.Another significant shift is occurring in the structure of law firm partnerships. The traditional single-tier partnership model, where all partners share ownership, is dwindling. Firms like Cravath and Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison are reportedly adding or considering salaried partner tiers. However, some firms, like Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton, are holding onto the single-tier partnership model for now.These changes mark a transformative period for New York's legal firms, reshaping how they operate, compete, and adapt in a rapidly evolving industry.New York legal scene faces tests after tumultuous 2023 | ReutersIn 2023, lawsuits against major chemical companies for polluting U.S. drinking water with PFAS, or "forever chemicals," resulted in over $11 billion in settlements. These chemicals, used in numerous consumer and commercial products, are known for their persistence in the environment and human body. With new federal regulations and growing awareness, 2024 is expected to see an increase in litigation and settlements related to PFAS contamination.Companies like 3M, Chemours, Corteva, and DuPont de Nemours have faced thousands of lawsuits, many consolidated in multidistrict litigation (MDL) in South Carolina. These include claims by water utilities for cleanup costs and personal injury claims linked to health issues caused by PFAS exposure. A significant settlement was reached in June, with 3M and water utilities agreeing to a $10.3 billion settlement, followed by another involving DuPont, Chemours, and Corteva for $1.19 billion.U.S. District Judge Richard Gergel, overseeing the MDL, has warned that these lawsuits could pose an existential threat to companies facing PFAS claims. The litigation's potential liabilities could lead defendants to settle to avoid large verdicts or seek bankruptcy protection, as seen in the case of Carrier Global subsidiary Kidde-Fenwal Inc in May.In 2024, legal experts anticipate more PFAS-related lawsuits, including those against consumer brands and more personal injury claims. At least one trial is scheduled in August in the MDL, focusing on firefighting foam manufacturers. Additionally, the process for selecting bellwether trials for personal injury cases is underway, with trials expected for various PFAS-related health issues.Outside of South Carolina, other trials are anticipated, including one involving North Carolina residents and another by Maine homeowners against a local paper mill. More settlements between chemical firms and state attorneys general are also expected, following the trend set by New Jersey and Ohio in 2023.The number of consumer class action lawsuits against companies producing PFAS-containing products like clothing, dental floss, and food wrappers is also on the rise. With the EPA moving forward with regulations that could set enforceable limits for PFAS in drinking water and potentially designate some as hazardous under the U.S. Superfund law, a surge in litigation is likely to continue into 2024 and beyond.‘Forever chemicals' were everywhere in 2023. Expect more litigation in 2024 | ReutersThe U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has filed a lawsuit against Grand Canyon University for engaging in deceptive advertising, illegal telemarketing practices, and misrepresenting itself as a nonprofit organization. The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, targets Grand Canyon Education Inc (GCE), its CEO, and the university.The FTC's complaint alleges that the university misled prospective doctoral students regarding the cost and course requirements of its doctoral programs. It also accuses the university of deceptive and abusive telemarketing practices. The FTC contends that despite claims of being a nonprofit, Grand Canyon University operates for the profit of GCE and its stockholders, with GCE receiving 60% of the university's revenue.The Arizona-based university has denied these allegations, calling them unsubstantiated, and expressed confusion over the federal government's decision to target a Christian university positively addressing issues in higher education.This lawsuit follows a significant $37.7 million fine imposed on the university by the U.S. Education Department for misrepresenting the costs of its doctoral programs. According to the Education Department, fewer than 2% of the school's doctoral program graduates completed their program within the advertised cost, and almost 78% of these students took five or more continuation courses. The university has stated its intention to refute the allegations vigorously.US FTC sues Grand Canyon University for deceptive advertising, illegal telemarketing | Reuters Get full access to Minimum Competence - Daily Legal News Podcast at www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

On this day in legal history, November 9, 1970, the Supreme Court of the United States voted 6-3 in Massachusetts v. Laird not to hear the case of Massachusetts' anti-draft law. Massachusetts v. Laird was a landmark legal case that reached the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit and was not taken up by the Supreme Court, on this day in legal history. The case centered on the constitutionality of U.S. involvement in Cambodia during the Vietnam War without an official declaration of war from Congress. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, along with other plaintiffs, including citizens and members of the military, challenged the executive authority, questioning whether President Nixon and his Secretary of Defense, Melvin Laird, had overstepped constitutional limits by ordering military operations in neutral Cambodia.This legal challenge was rooted in the broader context of the anti-war movement of the late 1960s and early 1970s, which had gained momentum following the widespread draft for the Vietnam War and the subsequent expansion of the conflict into neighboring countries. The plaintiffs contended that such military actions without congressional approval violated the War Powers Clause of the U.S. Constitution.The Nixon administration defended its actions by invoking the President's role as Commander in Chief, asserting the necessity of the Cambodian campaign to protect American troops and support the overall objectives in Vietnam. They argued that executive discretion in military affairs was essential for the conduct of foreign policy and national security.The case was significant for its implications regarding the separation of powers and the checks and balances system. The central issue was whether the President had the unilateral power to commit American forces to combat in foreign nations without a formal declaration of war by Congress.Ultimately, the First Circuit court decided in favor of Secretary Laird, upholding the administration's action. The court's ruling underscored the President's broad powers in foreign affairs and military operations, which became a subject of ongoing debate and eventually led to the passage of the War Powers Resolution in 1973. This legislation aimed to set boundaries on the President's authority to deploy U.S. forces without congressional consent.Massachusetts v. Laird remains a pivotal case in American legal and political history, reflecting the tensions between executive power and congressional authority, as well as the limitations on state power as against federal, and the efforts to define jurisdictional limits in times of war.Hogan Lovells has confirmed the acquisition of 28 partners from the recently dissolved law firm Stroock & Stroock & Lavan, including several former heads of practice groups. The announcement comes after Hogan Lovells indicated last month their intention to hire over 30 partners from Stroock, a move which preceded Stroock's decision to wind up operations after nearly a century and a half. Among the notable hires is Jeff Keitelman, Stroock's former co-managing partner and co-leader of its real estate practice. Other ex-Stroock leaders making the transition are Brian Diamond, Joseph Giminaro, Michael Kosmas, Christopher Doyle, Richard Madris, Jeffrey Uffner, and James Bernard, each a former head of various key practice areas ranging from real estate to tax certiorari, hospitality, corporate, infrastructure funds, tax, and general litigation. The majority of these partners, 23 in total, will bolster Hogan's corporate and finance practice, while the remaining five will enhance its disputes practice. Hogan Lovells CEO Miguel Zaldivar emphasized the strategic nature of this acquisition, aiming to strengthen their presence in key markets such as New York and attracting high-performing talent to the firm.Hogan Lovells Confirms 28 Partners Joining From Failed StroockDuring the civil fraud trial of the Trump Organization, evidence was presented showing Ivanka Trump's concerns about Donald Trump's wealth during a 2011 Florida golf course deal. She distanced herself from the company's valuation methods, stating she did not recall specific details about the financial statements. The New York Attorney General, Letitia James, is seeking over $250 million in penalties and potential control over Trump's properties, accusing the Trump family business of inflating asset values to mislead lenders and insurers. While Ivanka is not a defendant, her involvement in profitable deals, like the redevelopment of the Doral golf course and the Old Post Office, was highlighted. Contrastingly, her brothers and father are defendants, with her father admitting to inaccuracies in property valuations but denying their relevance to financial institutions. The trial featured Ivanka's composed testimony, differing from the defensive stance of her father and brother Eric. The judge's previous ruling found fraudulent practices within the organization, affecting Trump's property control, currently on appeal. This lawsuit is among four other criminal cases against Trump, who remains a strong contender for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination despite these legal challenges.Trump's daughter worried he was not wealthy enough, emails in NY fraud trial show | ReutersThe U.S. House Oversight Committee, under Republican leadership, has escalated its impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden by subpoenaing his son, Hunter Biden, and brother, James Biden, for depositions. This move follows allegations that the Biden family profited from policy decisions made during Biden's vice presidency. Hunter Biden's lawyer has dismissed the subpoena as a political maneuver but stated Hunter is willing to address the matters with the Committee. A former associate, Devon Archer, claimed Hunter Biden sought to create an impression of access to his father, citing multiple instances of putting Biden on calls with foreign associates. The White House has branded the investigation a smear campaign, with press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre stating it has found no evidence against the president after a year. The inquiry has been backed by former President Donald Trump, who is also facing his own legal challenges. The Oversight Committee, which has previously obtained financial records of the Biden family, has conducted a public hearing and plans to issue more subpoenas and interview requests. Hunter Biden has acknowledged his past struggles with substance abuse and has not held a White House or campaign position. The possibility of the House impeaching President Biden remains uncertain, despite the narrow Republican majority and the support of Speaker Mike Johnson for the inquiry.US House Republicans subpoena Biden's son, brother to appear | ReutersA recent study has shown that while artificial intelligence, specifically GPT-4, can speed up legal writing tasks for law students, it does not necessarily improve the quality of their work. The study, conducted by law professors from the University of Minnesota and the University of Southern California, observed that law students with lower initial grades benefited more significantly from using AI than their higher-achieving peers. The study titled "Lawyering in The Age of Artificial Intelligence" suggests AI could become an essential tool for lawyers, akin to legal research databases. Sixty law students participated in the study, receiving training on GPT-4 before completing writing tasks with and without the technology. The only task that showed a statistical improvement with AI was contract drafting. However, the use of AI notably reduced the time taken to complete these tasks, with tasks like drafting a complaint being completed 32% faster. The study recommends that law schools prohibit AI in foundational courses and exams, as it disproportionately aids lower-performing students, but also advises the development of advanced courses to teach effective AI usage.AI improves legal writing speed, not quality - study | Reuters Get full access to Minimum Competence - Daily Legal News Podcast at www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

On this day in legal history, November 6, 1917, New York state adopted a state constitutional amendment granting the vote to women. On November 6, 1917, a pivotal moment in legal history unfolded as the state of New York adopted Amendment 1, a legislatively referred constitutional amendment, which granted women equal voting rights. This landmark decision was the culmination of nearly seven decades of tireless advocacy since the first women's rights convention in Seneca Falls, New York, in 1848​. The suffrage movement in New York was spearheaded by notable figures such as Susan B. Anthony, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, and Sojourner Truth, among others, who were instrumental in pushing for this change.The approval of women's suffrage in New York was significant not only for the state but also for the national movement, setting a precedent three years prior to the ratification of the 19th Amendment, which would grant women the right to vote across the United States​. The efforts of suffragists like Alice Paul, who demonstrated and were arrested for protesting outside the White House, were crucial in influencing President Wilson to support what would eventually become the 19th Amendment​.This adoption represented a significant leap forward for women's rights and was a testament to the dedicated activism of the suffrage movement. New York's decision to enfranchise women was a critical step towards the broader national recognition of women's suffrage, reinforcing the state's role as a leader in the fight for gender equality.Stroock & Stroock & Lavan, a venerable New York law firm with a storied 150-year history, has commenced layoffs of 140 employees as it initiates its dissolution. Founded in 1876, Stroock became a legal institution, renowned for its work in corporate and financial law, with offices across the United States. Despite its longevity and the respect garnered in legal circles, reflected in its attorneys' recognition in industry publications, the firm faced an insurmountable crisis leading to a mass exodus of partners to Hogan Lovells and an eventual vote by the remaining partners to dissolve the firm in late October 2023​. The firm's closure marks the end of an era for a law firm that once played a pivotal role in New York's legal landscape, having advised multinational corporations and cultivated long-standing relationships with Wall Street's financial companies since its early days​.Stroock to Lay Off 140 Employees in New York as Firm CollapsesPrivate equity firms are seeking legal advice regarding the Department of Justice's (DOJ) new policy on M&A disclosures, which offers a safe harbor for self-reporting misconduct. This new initiative provides a clearer path for buyers to avoid prosecution and is causing a stir among companies that are habitual acquirers. The policy resonates due to clearer self-reporting timelines and is under scrutiny for potentially increasing M&A activity, which some criticize for fostering market concentration. The DOJ now gives companies six months post-acquisition to self-report for declinations and a year to rectify misconduct. This has prompted companies to be more diligent in due diligence, with law firms coordinating corporate and white-collar expertise to advise on identifying potential offenses during this process. While some lawyers don't see this as a significant change, it does offer more concrete guidance for in-house compliance and could encourage more rigorous post-acquisition reviews. However, the complexity of deciding to self-disclose remains, with reputational and investigative costs being significant considerations.Private Equity Seeks Legal Guidance on New M&A Disclosure PolicyThe U.S. Supreme Court is set to hear a case challenging a federal law that prohibits individuals under domestic violence restraining orders from possessing firearms. The appeal comes after the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the law unconstitutional, influenced by the Supreme Court's Bruen decision, which dictates that gun laws must align with the nation's historical tradition of firearm regulation. While gun rights advocates back the challenge, the Biden administration, some prosecutors, and former state chief justices argue for the law's necessity in protecting domestic violence victims. The case has crossed typical partisan lines, with some conservative figures supporting the law and public defenders, typically liberal, challenging it on grounds of over-criminalization and procedural fairness. The Supreme Court's decision will address the balance between gun rights and public safety in cases of domestic violence.Guns rights and domestic violence protections collide at US Supreme Court | ReutersElon Musk's restructuring of Twitter, now referred to as 'X', has significantly impacted disinformation research. Over 100 studies were canceled or altered due to limited access to Twitter's data, affecting researchers' ability to analyze misinformation spread during critical events. A previously free data tool used by researchers was discontinued in a cost-cutting move, with paid tiers now too expensive for most academics. This has led to concerns about the ability to conduct research ahead of major elections. Musk's legal action against the Center for Countering Digital Hate has also instilled fear of legal repercussions among researchers, further stifling independent scrutiny of the platform's handling of disinformation. This comes amid investigations by the EU into Twitter's compliance with new internet laws, which demand access to data for researchers under certain conditions.Elon Musk's X restructuring curtails disinformation research, spurs legal fears | Reuters Get full access to Minimum Competence - Daily Legal News Podcast at www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

The 2017 Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, seized the nation's attention as a gathering of white nationalists opposing the removal of a Confederate statue soon turned deadly. What came next was a years-long legal fight to hold the rally's organizers accountable for the violence, which was chronicled in the recent HBO documentary “No Accident.” This week on Pro Say, we're joined by attorneys Michael Bloch and Benjamin White, who successfully litigated the case. They share details about the complex trial strategy that may lead to success in future efforts to use the legal system to fight against hate. Also this week, the real estate industry is rocked by $1.8 billion antitrust verdict finding collusion between realtors and brokerage companies to keep commission fees artificially high, and the demise of former BigLaw stalwart Stroock & Stroock offers lessons for struggling shops. Finally, it must be exhausting always rooting for the law school curriculum, as Taylor Swift steps into the world of legal academia.

Stroock strikes out. -------------- We thought the end might be near for Stroock & Stroock & Lavan when we recorded this episode. We were right. And with that, the Biglaw world moves to exclusively one or fewer ampersands. A senior lawyer tried to pull a prank on an airplane. It ended badly. And we discuss the last time newly elected Speaker of the House Mike Johnson tried to run something. It was a law school and it failed in epic fashion.

Stroock strikes out. -------------- We thought the end might be near for Stroock & Stroock & Lavan when we recorded this episode. We were right. And with that, the Biglaw world moves to exclusively one or fewer ampersands. A senior lawyer tried to pull a prank on an airplane. It ended badly. And we discuss the last time newly elected Speaker of the House Mike Johnson tried to run something. It was a law school and it failed in epic fashion.

Schuyler (“Sky”) M. Moore is a partner in the corporate entertainment department of Greenberg Glusker LLP, practicing entertainment, corporate, and tax law. Sky has been practicing in the entertainment industry since 1981, represents producers, sales agents, foreign distributors and financiers, and has handled some of the largest financing transactions in Hollywood. He is Chair of Stroock's Entertainment Practice Group. Sky is the author of 'The Biz', currently in its 5th edition - a popular book on the film industry, and the treatise, Taxation of the Entertainment Industry. He is a mainstay on Hollywood Reporter's “Power Lawyers” list of the top 100 entertainment lawyers in the country. He is consistently listed as one of the top entertainment lawyers by Variety and was recently recognized in the publication's annual “Dealmakers Impact Report.” The Daily Journal honored Sky as one of its Top 100 Lawyers in California, and The National Law Journal named him to its list of “Most Influential Lawyers.”

The Government Law Center at Albany Law School, New York University School of Law, and the New York Fair Trial/Free Press Conference convened the 2023 Fair Trial/Free Press Conference: Local Media, the Law, and Alleged Police Misconduct on April 24, 2023. The conference combines a discussion of a hypothetical scenario with an overview of media law. A panel of judges, prosecutors, journalists, and attorneys discussed the legal, political, and ethical issues that arise in the fictional scenario after a reporter is arrested while covering a police-involved shooting. Panelists: Richard Chacón - Director of News Standards and Practices, NBC News Hon. Jill Konviser - Acting Justice, New York County Supreme Court, Criminal Term, First Judicial District Anne LaBarbera - Principal Attorney, Anne LaBarbera Professional Corporation Darren LaVerne - Partner, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP Thomas Maier - Investigative Journalist, Newsday Hon. Robert M. Mandelbaum – Acting Justice, New York County Supreme Court, First Judicial District Hon. Shira A. Scheindlin (ret.) - Former Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, and Of Counsel, Stroock & Stroock & Lavan, LLP Tanvi Valsangikar - Attorney specializing in First Amendment and media law and co-host, SLANDERTOWN Steven Wu - Chief of the Appeals Division, Manhattan District Attorney's Office Moderators: Hon. Albert Rosenblatt (ret.) - Former Associate Judge, New York State Court of Appeals, and Counsel, McCabe & Mack LLP Rex Smith – Former Editor, Albany Times Union

In this episode, it's a real pleasure to be joined by the American writer and former History professor, William Stroock.William's historical interests are many, but his book on the WW1 American general John J "Blackjack" Pershing is a fascinating insight into one of the Great War's most complex and colourful characters.We talk about Pershing's early life and military career, examine whether some of the more disagreeable traits in his character were compatible with Generalship, and consider his legacy, as well as look at the often strained relationship between Blackjack and other members of Allied high command during the Great War.You can find a copy of William's book by clicking on the following link:https://amzn.eu/d/hhhd8cgSupport the podcast:https://www.patreon.com/footstepsofthefallenhttps://www.buymeacoffee.com/footstepsblog

04/05/23: Joel is joined by Jerry Goldfeder to talk about the indictment of Donald Trump. The Manhattan district attorney's office unveiled an indictment charging former President  Trump with 34 counts of falsifying business records in the first degree.  Jerry is currently Special Counsel at Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP, and serves as Director of the Fordham Law School Voting Rights and Democracy Project.  Previously, he served as Special Counsel for Public Integrity to the New York State Attorney General.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

About This EpisodeParu Radia is no stranger to being bold. Growing up with conservative, immigrant parents, there were few opportunities for her to take chances and pursue the kind of life that she really wanted. For the first time publicly, Paru opens up about her experience and how she made the bold decision to go against the cultural and societal norms in order to live the independent life she wanted. Through her own experiences, Paru explains the importance of being able to uncover the possibilities and to explore who you truly are and could be. Paru emphasizes the importance of finding clarity first, especially when it comes to your motivations and reasonings. From there, it is easier to find the courage to move forward along the path that is best for you. So tune in to hear an inspirational story about being authentic to who you are, standing up to power, and pursuing the life you want. About Paru Radia For Paru Radia, becoming a C-Suite Whisperer and Execution Ninja was a natural path as she has a keen understanding of the corporate world having been both an employee and a consultant, holding multiple senior level positions and working with senior executives at British Airways, King and Spalding, Stroock, Indeed, Vornado, Square, and Planned Parenthood to name a few. These experiences are what led to the formation of her business, providing advisory, consulting, and coaching services. Paru launched her company to help executives at various stages and points in their career to accurately assess their mindset, patterns, behaviors, strengths, success criteria, development needs, understand who they really are, articulating what they really want, and creating specific action plans to achieve their desired results. Born and raised in London, U.K., growing up in a family of hard-working entrepreneurs, Paru has become known for being a pragmatic optimist and turning entrepreneurial ideas into successful companies.  Additional ResourcesWeb: https://www.paruradia.com/LinkedIn: @ParuRadiaCheck Out Her Upcoming Book, Messes Behind Successes: https://www.paruradia.com/messes-behind-successes

03-24-2023 William Stroock Learn more about the interview and get additional links here: https://usadailypost.com/2023/03/24/how-i-became-a-successful-midlist-author/ Subscribe to the best of our content here: https://priceofbusiness.substack.com/ Subscribe to our YouTube channel here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCywgbHv7dpiBG2Qswr_ceEQ

Harold Krent, a professor at the Chicago-Kent College of Law, discusses Supreme Court oral arguments over President Joe Biden's plan to slash the student debt of more than 40 million people.Allen Denson, a partner at Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP, discusses the Supreme Court deciding to take a case challenging the structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.June Grasso hosts.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Harold Krent, a professor at the Chicago-Kent College of Law, discusses Supreme Court oral arguments over President Joe Biden's plan to slash the student debt of more than 40 million people.Allen Denson, a partner at Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP, discusses the Supreme Court deciding to take a case challenging the structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.June Grasso hosts.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Joe spoke with Thomas Firestone, Partner at Stroock & Stroock & Lavan, former Assistant U.S. Attorney on Brittney Griner's release and prisoner swap for a Russian arms dealer, Bloomberg Government Congress reporter Jack Fitzpatrick on where negotiations stand on the spending bill to fund the government just days before the deadline to avert a shutdown. Plus, our politics panel Bloomberg Politics Contributors Jeanne Sheehan Zaino and Rick Davis on the Brittney Griner prisoner swap for a Russian arms dealer with no release deal for former US Marine Paul Whelan, Pentagon funding passes in the House with the military Covid vaccine mandate stripped out, and landmark legislation passed that would enshrine marriage equality in federal law, granting protections to same-sex and interracial couples. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The REIT industry is closing out 2021 in a position of strength, with ample financing available, brisk merger and acquisition activity, high and rising rents, and elevated asset levels, according to Evan Hudson, partner and real estate capital markets legal expert at Stroock.“The credit markets are incredibly active, they're liquid, they're deep,” Hudson said. He noted that in addition to common and preferred equity deals, largely through at-the-market (ATM) offerings, his firm is also seeing a high level of joint venture activity.Following a productive year for M&A deals in 2021, Hudson expects all property sectors to be active in 2022. “Even though we have price agreement (between buyer and seller) and the price is very high, a lot of deals are still happening.” He stressed that what is new in the current environment is the entrance of “colossal” non-traded REITs with hefty amounts of cash to deploy.

Today on That Tech Pod, Laura and Gabi chat with Michael Quartararo, the President of the Association of Certified E-Discovery Specialists (ACEDS). ACEDS provides training and certification in e-discovery and professional development courses to corporate legal departments, law firms and the broader legal community. With 1400 CEDS-certified professionals and 2500 members active in 22 chapters throughout major US cities, Canada, the UK, Benelux, South Africa and Australia, ACEDS is the gold standard in e-discovery training. Mike is also the author of the 2016 book Project Management in Electronic Discovery and has been teaching, consulting and solving problems in information governance, e-discovery, project management and legal technology for over two decades. He is considered one of the foremost authorities on legal project management and built his career upon strategic and innovative thinking, leadership and operational skills honed at the best legal organizations in the world. Following 10-year stints at both Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP and Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP, Mike launched his own successful company, eDPM Advisory Services, a consulting firm providing legal operations, e-discovery and project management advisory services to corporate legal departments and law firms. As a part-time graduate professor, Mike designed and taught a curriculum on e-discovery project management at Bryan University. A graduate of the State University of New York, he is a certified Project Management Professional (PMP) and a Certified E-Discovery Specialist (CEDS). He frequently writes and speaks on e-discovery, legal operations, project management and technology topics. Reach him via email at mquartararo@aceds.org or on Twitter @mikequartararo. Follow That Tech Pod: Twitter-@thattechpod LinkedIn: LinkedIn.com/thattechpod website: thattechpod.com

Episode 76 Series: Well-Being in Legal Episode Description: Today, well-being should be at the top of every legal marketer's mind; however, prioritizing one's mental health often falls to the back burner. As a follow up to the recent Legal Marketing Mental Wellness survey conducted by fSquared Marketing, in partnership with the LMA, this LMA Podcast episode will focus on some of the reasons behind stress and mental well-being issues that were identified in the survey. Lynn Foley and Trish Lilley will share their experience and tips so legal marketers can lessen stress before it begins. They’ll also discuss why so many respondents (72%) felt that Legal Marketing is far more stressful than marketing in other industries. Speakers: Trish Lilley, Chief Marketing and Business Development Officer, Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP Lynn Foley, CEO and Co-Founder, fSquared Marketing Series Description: LMA’s Well-Being in Legal podcast series is focused on shining a light on ways legal marketing professionals can be healthy, resilient and whole. Episodes focus on everything from mental health to physical health, mindfulness, healthy work habits and much more.

In this Episode of the FCPA Compliance Report, I am joined by Quyen Truong, partner at Stroock & Stroock & Lavan. During her career in government, she worked at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. She joins me to talk about the CFPB under the Biden Administration.  Highlights of this podcast include: What is the CFPB? What does it regulate? What is the likely impact of Rohit Chopra to head the CFPB? What will he need to do to rebuild the morale of the CFPB?  What do you see as the direction by the CFPB in regulation and enforcement? Any new policy initiatives or directives? What is the interaction between the CFPB and the states? How might that change under the Biden Administration? Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The year 2020 is not our country's final election. After an election dominated by rule changes, court battles, and allegations of fraud, what have we learned? On December 16, 2020, the Federalist Society's Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Harrisburg, New Jersey, and Delaware Lawyers Chapters co-hosted a panel on the 2020 presidential elections, tackling questions about possible election reforms and the future of election law.Featuring: Hans von Spakovsky, Senior Legal Fellow, The Heritage FoundationHarmeet Dhillon, Founding Partner, Dhillon Law Group Inc.Jerry Goldfeder, Special Counsel at Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP and Adjunct Professor, Fordham University School of LawModerator: Prof. Michael Moreland, University Professor of Law and Religion & Director of the Eleanor H. McCullen Center for Law, Religion and Public PolicyIntroduction: Louis Capozzi, The Federalist Society's Philadelphia Lawyers Chapter* * * * * As always, the Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speaker.

Kevin Curnin is the Founding Director of the Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP nationally acclaimed Public Service Project. Kevin spearheads a vast array of pro bono projects carried out by the lawyers at Stroock. This initiative sends Stroock lawyers into courtrooms to advocate for clients in education, housing, family and criminal matters, just to name a few. Kevin discusses the impact that handling pro bono matters has upon the lawyers involved, their clients and the firm culture. Kevin candidly explains that this type of raw and often bare knuckles litigation places lawyers into uncomfortable situations that support their growth as advocates and people. This growth directly benefits all of the clients represented by Stroock. Kevin also shares the firm’s humble view toward addressing issues of diversity, equality and inclusion. It is with this humility that Kevin and his colleagues at Stroock have identified areas for progress and are implementing meaningful strategies for change. Kevin credits his personal wellness regime for much of his creativity and vision in continuing to lead by example as he makes a difference inside and outside of the law. Enjoy this episode of Iron Advocate as we continue to explore how lawyers can kill it in the practice of law without it killing us.You can find Kevin at https://www.stroock.com/people/kcurnin

Podcast host Howard Miller interviews Stephen Newman of Stroock about the impact on robocalls and jurisprudence of recent U.S. Supreme Court case Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants.

Jerry Goldfeder, election law attorney at Stroock, with the Constitution, outlines steps and procedures leading to the election of the US President. States and the Congress have the power to make certain that the Election for President takes place.

In this Episode, I visit with Quyen Truong, a partner at Stroock & Stroock & Lavan in Washington DC. In this podcast we discuss the firm’s recent article on the national impact of this proposed mini-CFPB, part of a major California’s major push to dominate the consumer protection landscape; and the key aspects of the proposed agency expansion, particularly the top enforcement threats facing the industry. Some of the highlights include: Some of the highlights include: An overview of the California proposal to create a mini-Consumer Financial Protection Bureau in California. What types of businesses does the proposal cover? What will be the role of the California Dept. of Business Oversight? What are the similarities with the federal law and CFPB? Could this law be expanded to B2B companies? Could this law serve as a model for other states? With the Trump Administration’s recent rollback on CFPB enforcement, will states likely take up the slack? For a copy of the article California’s Mini-CFPB: National Impact and Enforcement Threat, click here. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

On this week's podcast, we check in with three lawyers to ask how they're coping with remote work in the age of COVID-19. Hear from Facebook deputy GC Paul Grewal, Orrick partner Kelsi Corkran and Stroock partner Kim Pagotto about the challenges, from sharing Wi-Fi and staying connected with colleagues to maintaining a schedule and juggling work and child care. Legal Speak is brought to you by Econ One and Planet Depos.  

On this episode of the Business Podcast, sponsored by Bell, our guests include “Rocket Ron” Epstein, PhD, of Bank of America Merrill Lynch, Richard Aboulafia of the Teal Group consultancy and Sash Tusa of Agency Partners, as well as Chris Griner and Tatiana Sullivan, attorneys from of Stroock, Stroock & Lavan  Topics: — Analysis of Phase One US-China trade deal and impact on leading manufacturers like Boeing — Chinese air traffic figures and implications for new jet orders — Bombardier’s 2019 guidance and outlook for A220 jetliner and Global Express business jet line — New software issues with Boeing’s 737 Max airliner and investor concerns whether plane will ever return to service — Financial impact of prolonged Max grounding on Boeing — Update on Australia’s ambitious program — awarded to France’s DCNS in 2016— to modernize the nation’s submarine force — Thales-Alenia’s big geostationary satellite wins in 2019 — Decision by France’s Dassault to slow production of Rafale fighter aircraft as part of strategy to win Indian and Swiss orders — New Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States regulations as called for in the Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act of 2018, or FIRRMA

On the October 25, 2019 CRE News Hour, guests are Paul Galvin, CEO of SGBlocks; Patrick McGregor of Commercial Cafe; Tatiana O'Sullivan and Chris Griner of the Stroock law firm. The post CRE News Hour 10/25/2019: Foreign CRE Investment, 10 Year Office Trends, and Marine Container Construction appeared first on .

Traditionally, when structuring a US lending transaction, parties would omit guarantees and collateral support from a US borrower’s foreign subsidiaries in order to avoid the adverse tax impact under Internal Revenue Code section 956. It’s that potential penalty that led to, among other things, the ubiquitous credit agreement provision that limits borrowers’ pledge of the voting stock in any first-tier controlled foreign corporation to 66%. But all that changed on 23 May, 2019, when US tax authorities issued final regulations under Section 956 that reduced or eliminated the tax imposed on a “deemed dividend” concerning controlled foreign corporations that are subsidiaries of US corporations. As a result, US borrowers and lenders can now secure their loans with foreign collateral without the risk of attendant tax consequences. While this might appear to be all rainbows and unicorns for the institutional lender community, seeking to enforce liens against and foreclose upon foreign collateral could come with exorbitant costs and expenses, thus begging the question – is the juice worth the squeeze? To help answer that question and discuss the significant impact that these final regulations could have on the US leveraged loan landscape, Stroock & Stroock & Lavan debt finance and restructuring partner Alex Cota, and tax partner Michelle Jewett, recently joined Debtwire’s Richard Goldman for the latest episode of Debtwire Radio. During the podcast, Alex and Michelle explain the new reform, its practical implications on US leveraged loans and the market’s response to date. They also offer some cautionary points that lenders and advisors should consider before incorporating the reform into future credit agreements.

What are oaths? When do morality and oaths conflict? The oaths that many of us take in our professional and personal lives are complex and sometimes contradictory. Rabbi Mintz sits down with Joel Cohen to discuss oaths and his new book "I Swear." Joel Cohen practices law at Stroock, Stroock and Lavan and teaches at Fordham Law.

Join David Ackert as he interviews Trish Lilley and Kevin Iredell of Stroock & Stroock & Lavan on this episode of the Market Leaders Podcast. Tune in to hear them discuss: – Key leadership skills that legal marketing and business development leaders need to foster amongst their team – Specific strategies that increase the credibility and trust factor of the marketing team in the firm – How to handle failures effectively, and how to apply healthy criticism and praise to your team members

Jerry Goldfeder, Stroock & Stroock & Lavan, an activist, writer, and legal expert specializing in election and campaign finance law, discusses voting laws and states' rights, the Electoral College, the Supreme Court, urging citizen participation.

On this episode of the Defense & Aerospace Report Interviews Podcast, sponsored by L3 Technologies, Chris Griner, a partner in the Washington office of the Stroock & Stroock & Lavan law firm, discusses the Foreign Investment Risk Review Management Act (or FIRRMA) and what it means for the future of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (also known as CFIUS), national security and much more in a wide-ranging, Aug. 16, 2018, interview with Defense & Aerospace Report Editor Vago Muradian in Washington.

The development of people, culture, brand, products, and structure necessary for growing and scaling a business - sponsored by Knotel… This MouthMedia Network Live event was recorded in front of a live audience at Experience Knotel, a interactive space located in the heart of Noho in New York City (666 Broadway) designed to showcase the experience of working in a flexible, adaptable, always energized environment. Sponsored by Knotel - Your agile business deserves an agile space. Knotel will find, customize, and operate your ideal office while you focus on your business. Discover more at www.knotel.com Panel: Steven Balasiano – CEO of MHR Advisory, Counsel at Sills Cummis Terri DiPaolo - Head of Licensing, Sponsorships, & Endorsements at TKO Jodd Readick – CEO of LymeLog, Founder of Roam Coin, Co-Founder of User Centric Communications Moderated by: Avani Patel, Co-Founder of Ember, Founder of TrendSeeder All of the panelists have scaled businesses, but it was not easy Building infrastructure, scaling people In hindsight – what the panelists wish they knew when getting started: One thing missed – human capital cost, expanding rapidly, then pulling back when it didn’t work out Utilizing freelancers as hires when scaling rapidly Sometimes always looking for best talent out there, and, if found, will find them the right seat Trust your gut Finding the right people, with an eye on the future: Always recruiting, keeping an eye out for talent, keeping controls in place When someone is not the right fit, handling without harming the company morale Damage control, avoiding piecemeal job firing Scaling the brand, keeping consumers happy, keeping brand identity Building with an eye on what you want to be in the coming years Making sure there is consistent growth, not opening in a new market unless confident of strength in that market, undertaking systematic expansion Continuing to maintain the culture internally as you scale large Considerations in integrating different businesses or department that merge Mentors Being around and consulting the people that are around you, mentoring each other And it is a clerk’s world Q and A Brandon McKenzie, Metrobutler In an evolving real estate ecosystem: Tremendous opportunities that didn’t exist before Marie Chestnut, CareerList Finding opportunities for a startup that has differentiation in a market with challenges: The value of a cold call, get approach new marketplace, geography or industry with a lot of competition but you have differentiation but requires investment, need one big fish by any means necessary The value of grassroots efforts, the ability to make something really relevant is so available today Figure out a niche within an industry or brand Xian Horn, Positively Positive Importance in leadership of emotional maturity: Dealing with time management, expanding and becoming more than a brand, especially as one person Why you need to have a notebook, and the importance of a personal assistant Prioritizing, quick wins The importance of being focused The Pomodoro time management technique Panelist bios: Steven Balasiano After a successful bankruptcy practice at the premier New York law firms of Kelley Drye & Warren and Stroock, Steven Balasiano joined The Children’s Place and was part of the executive team (Chief Administrative Officer) that scaled the company from 70 stores and $70 million in sales to 1...

Women represent private parties in civil litigation just 18.5% of the time in New York according to a New York State Bar Association report released earlier this month. Judge Shira Scheindlin backed up those findings during a recent podcast recording: “what I witnessed in the courtroom was a great gender disparity in privately retained counsel.” Judge Scheindlin, a former Federal District Court Judge, was one of the members of the task force that prepared the report. Last week she also published, “Female Lawyers Can Talk, Too” an op-ed about the report that ran in The New York Times and clearly struck a nerve; it received 274 comments before the Times closed commenting. Earlier this week, Josh Block travelled to Stroock & Stroock & Lavan, the law firm where Scheindlin is Of Counsel, to record this podcast interview with her about the report, her own career experiences, and her thoughts about the continued disparity and gender imbalance in big law. Big Law Business https://bol.bna.com/ Subscribe to the Big Law Business podcast on iTunes. https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/big-law-business/id1074067483?mt=2 Podcast Sponsors DMX http://www.epiqsystems.com/how-we-help/ediscovery/project-based-ediscovery/dmx-demo Bloomberg Law https://www.bloomberglaw.com Show Notes If Not Now, When? Achieving Equality for Women Attorneys in the Courtroom and in ADR http://www.nysba.org/WomensTaskForceReport/ Female Lawyers Can Talk, Too https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/08/opinion/female-lawyers-women-judges.html?_r=0 Stark Gender Divide Between Private and Public Sector Cases in New York https://bol.bna.com/stark-gender-divide-between-private-and-public-sector-cases-in-new-york/ Judge Scheindlin on Women's Absence in Courts https://bol.bna.com/judge-scheindlin-on-womens-absence-in-courts/ Mistaken For The Court Reporter: Litigating As A Woman https://bol.bna.com/mistaken-for-the-court-reporter-litigating-as-a-woman/

Leading election law lawyer, Jerry Goldfeder, a keen observer of democratic politics, discusses the importance of a more welcoming Democratic Party, urging young and old to join, bringing ideas, energy, and enthusiasm to their local Democratic Party.

Sky Moore joins Online Editor Anthony Zangrillo on the Fordham IPLJ Podcast to discuss the recent implosion of certain China-Hollywood co-production financing deals. Sky is a partner in the corporate entertainment department of Stroock, practicing entertainment, corporate, and tax law. Sky has been practicing in the entertainment industry since 1981, and represents a broad spectrum of clients throughout the entertainment industry, including producers, sales agents, foreign distributors and financiers, and has handled some of the largest financing transactions in Hollywood. Earlier in March, Eldridge Industries, which owns TV unit Dick Clark Productions, terminated the $1 billion sale agreement with Wang Jianlin's Dalian Wanda Group decided upon in November. Wanda had only paid $25 million of this purchase price. Additionally, Paramount’s deal with Huahua Media and Shanghai Film Group is floundering because Paramount hasn’t seen a cent of the promised $1 billion. Even though Hollywood deals fall apart all the time, there appears to be less security in these Chinese-invested projects. Are Chinese film investors just “tourist investors,” arriving with great fanfare, taking meetings with players across town, kicking the tires of every studio and production company that may be interested in Chinese investment, suggesting that a deal might be imminent, and then going back to China without agreeing to anything? Furthermore, is this a bigger issue because the Chinese yuan is a regulated currency? Are the fractured deals more of a result of the government rather than the film studios? Chinese regulators appear to be clamping down on foreign investment deals, due to the hundreds of billions of dollars leaving the country. The podcast addresses these issues and speculates on what movie subject will finally be the breakaway co-production hit both Hollywood and China are searching for. Don’t forget to also subscribe to the podcast on iTunes (https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/fordham-intellectual-property/id1158550285?mt=2) and leave a review! Editor's Note: This podcast was recorded before President Trump's reversed his position on labeling China a currency manipulator.

James Sammataro, Managing Partner of Stroock, Stroock, & Lavan’s Miami office returns to the podcast to discuss Paul McCartney's recent declaratory action against music publisher Sony/ATV over the ownership of some of the Beatles’ most famous songs! Mr. McCartney’s suit involves a claim of copyright termination. Under this legal concept, authors — or any creators — have the right to reclaim ownership of their works from publishers after a specific length of time has passed. This concept originated in the 1976 Copyright Act and performers and songwriters have utilized the remedy to regain control of their work. Initially, Mr. McCartney and John Lennon signed a series of publishing contracts in Britain beginning in 1962. The suit contends that in a series of remarks and emails to Mr. McCartney’s lawyers, Sony/ATV executives alluded to the recently decided Duran Duran case and refused to confirm that he could reclaim his rights in popular songs like “Love Me Do,” “I Want to Hold Your Hand” and “All You Need Is Love.”1 The suit asks for a declarative judgment that Mr. McCartney would not be violating any contract by exercising his termination rights.

The Fordham IPLJ Podcast tackles two different topics this week. First, Online Editor Anthony Zangrillo and James Sammataro, Managing Partner of Stroock, Stroock, & Lavan’s Miami office discuss the increase in DMCA takedown requests associated with the increase in music streaming subscribers. According to Google’s Transparency Report, the tech giant is now fielding more than 24 million individual takedown requests per day, compared to 11.2 million last year and 1.7 million in 2012. This equates to a 115.2% increase in one year and a 14-fold increase in just four years. While Google believes that this unprecedented growth pattern is a signal that the takedown process is working efficiently, the music industry sees the situation as an unbeatable game of whack-a-mole that’s only getting worse. James states that content holders want “a system of notice and stay-down.” This advocates a policy to identify and stamp out repeat offenders, while also shifting the burden away from content holders to police the marketplace. James mentions that the current system follows the policy that “with great rewards, comes great obligations [for content holders].” Despite the role that artists and their music play in attracting eyeballs to search engines and content platforms, there remains a large gap between the financial state of the music and technology industries: Google, for example, is valued at just under $500 billion while the entire recorded record industry is valued at around $15 billion. For more, visit: http://www.fordhamiplj.org/2016/11/15/dmca_takedown_requests_music_streaming/ Secondly, Staff Member Christina Sauerborn and Attorney Jordan Greenberger discuss the trademark troubles in the Craft Beer Industry. he craft beer industry has exploded over the past decade, representing a twelve percent market share of the beer industry overall. With more than 4,600 breweries now in the United States, increased competition finds craft breweries turning to litigation to protect their brands. Additionally, because beer trademarks are lumped into the same international trademark class as non-alcoholic beverages, for new entrants to the beverage industry, finding a non-infringing trademark is even more difficult. Because trademark disputes are often extremely costly, most of them are resolved out of court. The collaborative community spirit within the industry has also encouraged alternative, sometimes unconventional forms of dispute resolution. Such solutions can generate goodwill and allow breweries to capitalize on what could otherwise become a protracted, expensive legal battle. Another workaround that can be used to navigate trademark disputes is a “coexistence agreement,” where two or more parties consent to one another’s registrations and mutually plan how they will distinguish themselves in the marketplace. However, the existence of such an agreement does not automatically tip the scale away from finding a likelihood of confusion. Thriving perhaps the most in this changing landscape?  The self-described “craft beer attorneys,” some of whom have authored blogs and books to educate new entrants to the industry.  With new breweries popping up almost daily, there remains a steady flow of trademark questions for this niche group of lawyers. For more visit: http://www.fordhamiplj.org/2016/11/08/trademark-craft-beer-industry/ Don't forget to also subscribe to the podcast on Itunes (https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/fordham-intellectual-property/id1158550285?mt=2) and leave a review!

Starting with the "deal" made in 1787 giving States control over the voting process, on to acrimonious conventions of the 1800's, to the advent of primaries and caucuses, to our "crazy quilt" of states' rules and regulations: is this the best we can do?

There is a group of shareholders out in Queens that is fed up with its board. In fact, it is trying to organize a coup. But because the shareholders are basically law-abiding citizens, they’re not taking to the hallways - they’re calling their co-op’s attorney. They want to find out what they should do to get elected at the upcoming annual meeting. Listen as Theresa Racht, partner at Racht & Taffae, and Dale Degenshein, special counsel at Stroock & Stroock & Lavan, give them some unexpected advice.

EE Markets Podcast interviews Gail Suchman, an attorney at the New York law firm, Stroock & Stroock & Lavan, who discusses forces that drive today’s building retrofits. She explains how building owners can offset the cost of retrofitting by following state green building codes and pursuing efficiency tax credits.