POPULARITY
Categories
Target Market Insights: Multifamily Real Estate Marketing Tips
Leo Young is the founder and managing partner of Cornell Communities, a private equity real estate firm revitalizing manufactured housing communities across eight states. He studied finance in college, then moved into sales at Tesla to build the communication skills he knew he was missing, working his way up to top regional salesperson before leaving to pursue real estate full time. After earning his real estate license, working in brokerage, and investing passively in apartments, Leo launched his own firm. Cornell Communities acquires and operates middle market mobile home parks, expanding access to affordable housing while delivering risk managed returns to accredited investors. Make sure to download our free guide, 7 Questions Every Passive Investor Should Ask, here. Key Takeaways Stack skills deliberately, since finance, sales, and operations compound over a career Vet the operator harder than the pro forma, because execution drives returns Buy in the middle market where institutions with cheaper capital are not competing Underwrite infrastructure first, since older parks carry hidden CapEx risk Create value through expense discipline and rent normalization, not unit renovations Topics From Finance to Tesla Sales Leo studied finance but could not hold a presentation or speak in front of a room He joined Tesla to fix that weakness and became the top regional salesperson Why He Left a Dream Job for Real Estate Sales income required constant output and did not build lasting wealth A first passive apartment investment and distribution check convinced him to go all in Manufactured Homes vs. Mobile Homes Manufactured housing is the legal term tied to federal HUD construction standards Roughly 20 million Americans live in these communities, across a wide quality range Buying in the Middle Market Institutions and REITs with cheaper capital absorb the top quality assets Leo targets workable properties where his team can execute a clear value add What He Underwrites First Infrastructure leads: water, sewer lines, and roads on parks 50 to 70 years old Purchase price, location, and regulations follow, then his own team bandwidth How He Vets Sponsors as a Limited Partner Most decks oversell the property and undersell the team He asks for case studies and how the sponsor responds when a deal goes wrong Why the Economics Work Residents own their homes, which lowers the operating expense ratio and lifts NOI Heavy land improvement creates more depreciable value in a cost segregation study Lot rents sit at the low end of the housing market, so demand stays strong The Two Main Value Levers Expenses: rebuild vendor contracts and move home and utility costs to residents Rent: normalize lot rents toward market while keeping the value proposition intact Site improvements like roads, fencing, signage, and lighting support resident relations Why Homes Rarely Move Relocating a home can cost $7,000 to $10,000 and risks damage in transit Most residents sell in place and cash in the equity they built Community and Retention Turnover runs near 5%, compared with roughly 50% in apartments Private yards and driveways make the setting closer to a subdivision than a building
Brandon Sedloff and Mike Cordingley explore what it takes to build durable, scalable private markets firms in an era of constant disruption. Mike leads the strategy, leadership, and advisory group at Ferguson Partners, a talent management and strategic advisory firm that works with about half of the public REITs and many of the largest private equity and real estate platforms. His work takes him inside these organizations as they navigate fundamental shifts in leadership, operating models, and business strategy. The conversation on The Distribution covers how private markets firms have reached an inflection point where the entrepreneurial, founder-led models that drove early growth now face pressure from rising costs, compressed fees, and the need to retain next-generation talent. Mike explains why founders must move beyond an investment thesis to develop a true enterprise strategy, and why the CEO's role is evolving from chief decision-maker to platform architect who distributes decision rights across the organization. They discuss: - Why succession planning has become a business imperative as founder-led firms face generational transitions - How decision architecture creates competitive advantage by pushing decisions closer to where value is created - Why AI represents a people transformation challenge, not just a technology implementation - The concept of zero-based org design and what it means to treat operating models as design choices rather than fixed structures This episode offers practical frameworks for leaders wrestling with how to scale their organizations, develop talent, and prepare for the next phase of growth in private markets. Topics: (00:00:00) - Intro (00:00:33) - Why founders need an enterprise strategy (00:02:20) - Mike's path to management consulting (00:07:17) - The role of consultants in private markets (00:09:29) - Four big trends shaping private markets today (00:13:27) - How we got to this inflection point (00:17:49) - Navigating founder succession and talent retention (00:30:59) - Decision architecture as a competitive advantage (00:38:59) - Operating model as a design choice (00:42:28) - Distributed accountability and data access (00:46:27) - Precision talent matching (00:50:40) - AI as a people transformation, not just efficiency (00:53:17) - Closing Links: Brandon on LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/in/brandonsedloff/ Mike on LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/in/mikecordingley/ Ferguson Partners - https://www.fergusonpartners.com/ Juniper Square - https://www.junipersquare.com/
Welcome to HALO Talks, where host Pete Moore sits down with Rich Drengberg, CEO of EoS Fitness and a seasoned leader in the fitness industry. In a rare podcast appearance, Rich shares his journey from Gold's Gym SoCal to transforming EoS into a powerhouse of high-value, low-price gyms across the Sunbelt. Listeners will get an inside look at EoS's disciplined growth, the importance of industry relationships, lessons from private equity partnerships, and why knowing your brand's identity is crucial, straight from someone who's helped steer one of the fastest-growing health club chains in the country. Whether you're an operator, investor, or fitness enthusiast, this episode offers invaluable insights on building teams, scaling strategically, and staying ahead in a competitive landscape. Regarding chosing the right partner when looking to sell, Rich states, "We were in a great situation when we went to market that we didn't have to sell, and we were able to kind of pick who we wanted to partner with. And it was an interview process both ways. And because of that, we were able to have our cake and eat it too." Key themes discussed Transition from Gold's Gym to EoS Strategic and disciplined growth decisions Importance of experienced teams and industry relationships Private equity influence and operational mindset shift Real estate strategy and anchor tenant positioning Staying true to brand identity amidst trends Partner selection and aligning with TSG for expansion A Few Key Takeaways 1. The Power of Sticking to a Clear Identity: Staying true to the company's vision and brand identity was emphasized as vital for long-term success. EoS avoided "chasing every trend" and only adopted changes that matched their strategic direction, which helped them avoid diluting their brand and losing their core audience 25:23. 2. Disciplined, Focused Growth Strategies: EoS's growth was marked by a disciplined approach to new markets and acquisitions. Opportunities were critically evaluated, and only those fitting their model (right location, box size, and alignment with EoS values) were pursued. This sometimes meant saying "no" to enticing deals that didn't fit the vision 05:10. 3. Mentorship and Learning from Experience: Rich credited much of his development and EoS's success to mentors like Bob Giardina and Bruce Bruckman. Their guidance helped shift his mindset from operating a handful of gyms to building a scalable platform, and highlighted the importance of focusing on real estate and bigger picture growth rather than getting bogged down in minor operational optimizations 12:29. 4. Building Relationships is Key to Expansion: Entering new markets and securing prime real estate depended heavily on building trust and relationships with landlords, developers, and REITs. Early on, EoS was not the first choice for many landlords, but through perseverance and relationship-building, they became a preferred anchor tenant 15:28. 5. Industry Know-How Over Outsider Expertise: The episode stressed that having a team with deep industry experience ("gym rats" as described) was critical. EoS's management came from fitness, not coffee chains or hardware stores, enabling them to make better, faster decisions pertinent to the unique demands of the fitness business 17:26. Rich Drengberg: https://www.linkedin.com/in/rich-drengberg-5923046/ EoS Fitness: https://www.eosfitness.com Journey To A Billion Dollar Deal-2 Minute Financial Drill: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQtaGUQIyxY Integrity Square: https://www.integritysq.com Prospect Wizard: https://www.theprospectwizard.com Promotion Vault: https://www.promotionvault.com HigherDose: https://www.higherdose.com
Southeast Asia's venture market is not in a downturn. It is in a structural winter, and mid-2026 is when that distinction stopped being academic. Kristie Neo returns to break down what is actually happening across the region: Singapore's IPO revival is real but is being carried by data centres and REITs rather than homegrown tech; allocators now rank Southeast Asia at the bottom of Asia behind China, India, Japan, Korea and ANZ; and a generation of growth-stage companies is being kept alive past the point where a merger or a wind-down would have served everyone better. Jeremy Au and Kristie also work through what could actually restart the funding ladder, from encouraging tech M&A and fixing university IP commercialisation, to tax incentives for angels and support for syndicate leads who can assemble the $1 million to $5 million rounds that Singapore currently cannot fill. If you are a founder raising in Singapore, Indonesia, Vietnam, Philippines, Thailand or Malaysia, or an LP trying to work out where capital goes next in Asia, this is the honest state of the market. Watch, listen or read the full insight at https://www.bravesea.com/blog/kristie-neo-southeast-asia-zombie-unicorns BRAVE is Southeast Asia's leading tech podcast, hosted by Jeremy Au. Honest conversations with the region's top founders, investors, and operators on building startups in Southeast Asia. New episodes every week. Subscribe so you never miss one. Listen & Subscribe YouTube (English), YouTube (Bahasa Indonesia), Spotify (English), Spotify (Bahasa Indonesia), Spotify (Chinese), Spotify (Vietnamese), Apple Podcasts Follow BRAVE LinkedIn, X (Twitter), Instagram, TikTok, WhatsApp Follow Jeremy Au LinkedIn, X / Twitter, Instagram, TikTok, Facebook, Threads, Twitch Resources Get transcripts, startup resources & community discussions at www.bravesea.com #SoutheastAsia #VentureCapital #SingaporeIPO 00:00 Intro 01:00 Singapore's IPO revival and what is really lifting SGX 06:30 Safe haven status and the Indonesia allocation problem 09:34 Why Southeast Asia sits at the bottom of the allocator stack 14:58 A generation of zombie companies 18:07 The case for mergers, folds and consolidation 21:50 Fixing the funding ladder: who writes the first check 23:55 The IP commercialisation gap and university tech licensing 35:15 Rethinking how governments seed VC funds 41:24 Where can an LP put money today 45:00 Incentivising angels, syndicates and family offices 52:43 The information gap and parting thoughts
The ASX 200 drifted around to close down 5 points at 8,791, as the banks paused after last week's rise and resources came back into focus. US futures sliding lower sapped early enthusiasm.The Big Bank Basket was flat at $283.68 (-0.7%) with MQG falling 0.8% and NWL down 2.2%. Insurers were slightly firmer, with QBE up 1.8% and MPL rising 0.6%, although REITs eased, with SGP down 1.0% and GMG off 0.9%. Industrials were mixed again, with defensives such as the supermarkets slightly firmer, along with TLS and REA, which continued to find some friends. Retail was also mixed, with WES up 0.2%, while others failed to keep pace.In the tech space, selling continued, with XRO down 2.1% and WTC off 3.6%, although there were buyers in MAQ.Resources were mixed. BHP steadied, RIO slipped 1.9%, lithium stocks remained depressed, and the gold sector bounced back from earlier losses, with WGX up 2.1% and WAF rising 2.6%. S32 had a good day, up 4.6%, after beating quarterly guidance.Oil and gas stocks were firmer as crude prices continued to push higher, with WDS up 1.4% alongside STO. Coal stocks also edged higher, with WHC up 2.7%, while uranium stocks posted modest gains.It was a relatively quiet day on the corporate front. PPT rejected the latest proposal from EQT, while CEH surged 15.2% on plans to develop its Queensland site. We also saw interim chairman of WJL spend $1 million buying shares, lifting his stake to around 5%, or approximately 24.5 million shares. EQR rallied 34.1% after Andrew Forrest's Tattarang disclosed a 16.8% stake.It was a quiet day on the economic front.Asian markets were weaker, Nikkei 225 down 4%, HK up 1.8% and China up 0.5% - Korea down 4.5%US futures mixed - Dow down 50 and Nasdaq up 8. Oil above $91. European markets set to fall 0.3%Marcus Today – Daily Market InsightsMarcus Today provides clear, practical commentary for self-directed investors – covering markets, portfolios, education, and decision-making without the noise.If you'd like to go further:Start a free 14-day trial of Marcus Today http://bit.ly/mt-trial-podcastJoin Marcus Today Use code MTPODCAST for 10% off http://bit.ly/mt-join-podcast-offerMT20 – Managed ETF Portfolio A professionally managed portfolio run by Marcus Padley and the team, using ASX-listed ETFs with active market timing. http://bit.ly/mt20-podcastPrinciples – How We Think About Investing A short video series on timing, behaviour, and decision-making. No stock tips. http://bit.ly/mt-principles-podcast—Disclaimer This podcast is general information only and does not consider your personal circumstances. It is not personal financial advice.
The market is recalibrating after a powerful AI-driven rally. Ben Bajarin of Creative Strategies explains why semiconductor and hardware stocks are cooling off and whether the Magnificent Seven can continue to carry the market. Adam Crisafulli of Vital Knowledge makes the case that AI remains the defining investment theme despite the recent pullback. Ben Silverman of Propagate Content discusses the changing media landscape, Netflix's recent weakness and why live programming is becoming increasingly valuable. Our Eamon Javers reports on the close of the SEC's public comment period on proposed changes to quarterly reporting requirements. Jonathan Krinsky of BTIG explains why semiconductor charts have deteriorated while REITs are beginning to stand out on a technical basis. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
Nareit Senior Vice President for Research Ed Pierzak joined the REIT Report podcast to review key themes of Nareit's 2026 mid-year update. He noted that REITs have maintained their outperformance so far this year, with all but two sectors posting gains, and pointed to “really strong momentum” for REITs not only for the remainder of 2026, but beyond.Pierzak noted that often when REITs outperform early in the year, they tend to best broad equity market performance through the remainder of the year—barring any unexpected shocks.As for REIT sectors, he noted that data centers have been one of the top performers so far this year, after they were one of the worst performers in 2025. Taking the top spot this year to date is lodging and resorts, fueled by very strong leisure and business travel demand, Pierzak said.Elsewhere in the podcast, Pierzak discussed the valuation divergence seen between REITs and the broader equity market, as well as private real estate, and the potential for outperformance when that gap closes. He also commented on REIT M&A trends, as well as how REITs are increasingly being used to complement existing investment portfolios.0:00 — Why REITs Now0:21 — Welcome and Guest Intro0:40 — 2026 Performance in Context1:58 — Sector Winners and Losers3:13 — REITs vs Equity Valuations4:07 — Public vs Private Pricing Gap5:41 — What Divergence Means6:17 — M&A and Industry Consolidation7:15 — Capital Access and Financing8:10 — Outlook for Rest of 20269:07 — Wrap Up and Subscribe
The ASX 200 closed unchanged on futures expiry day at 8841, after an afternoon rally in the banks gathered pace, with CBA up 1.8% and NAB gaining 1.3%. The Big Bank Basket continued its recent run higher to $285.73. Financials were generally firmer, with SOL up 3.3% and GQG gaining 1.1%. REITs also pushed higher, led by SCG up 0.5% and SGP rising 2.0%. Industrials and technology stocks found buyers, with WES up 1.2% and ALL gaining 0.3%, while retailers edged higher as JBH rose 1.8%. Healthcare stocks also regained some poise, with CSL and RMD both moving higher. In the technology sector, buying returned to XRO and WTC, while REA had a strong session, up 6.6%, after reporting growth in listings. That helped lift CAR and SEK as well.Resources, however, were once again out of favour. BHP's quarterly failed to excite the bulls, with the stock down 2.3%. RIO also slipped, while FMG fell 1.1%. Lithium stocks remained under pressure, with PLS falling sharply and LTR following suit. Gold miners were mixed, with NST down 0.1% while GMD gained 1.5%. Oil and gas stocks eased as crude prices slipped, with WDS down 1.5%, while coal and uranium stocks also drifted lower.In corporate news, NWL reported record funds under administration (FUA). PPT announced it had received an improved takeover proposal from EQT, TNE maintained its FY26 guidance, and OBM warned of lower gold production in FY27 alongside higher all-in sustaining costs (AISC). On the economic front, Korean stocks were volatile again after the BoK raised rates.Asian markets were weaker, Japan down 3%, HK up 2.1% and China flat Kospi down 6%.US futures mixed - Dow up 45 and Nasdaq up 1. Oil off 0.5%. European markets set to rise a little.Marcus Today – Daily Market InsightsMarcus Today provides clear, practical commentary for self-directed investors – covering markets, portfolios, education, and decision-making without the noise.If you'd like to go further:Start a free 14-day trial of Marcus Today http://bit.ly/mt-trial-podcastJoin Marcus Today Use code MTPODCAST for 10% off http://bit.ly/mt-join-podcast-offerMT20 – Managed ETF Portfolio A professionally managed portfolio run by Marcus Padley and the team, using ASX-listed ETFs with active market timing. http://bit.ly/mt20-podcastPrinciples – How We Think About Investing A short video series on timing, behaviour, and decision-making. No stock tips. http://bit.ly/mt-principles-podcast—Disclaimer This podcast is general information only and does not consider your personal circumstances. It is not personal financial advice.
The ASX 200 finished unchanged at 8809, fighting back from earlier losses as resources found a footing. US futures helped, as did steady markets across Asia. Banks eased back, with CBA down %, leaving the Big Bank Basket at $281.76 (-0.6%). Other financials also weakened, NWL fell 2.2% and SOL dropped 0.8%. REITs were easier too, with GMG down 2.7% and CHC falling 1.3%. WOW and COL slid 1% as defensives were sold down. Healthcare picked up a little, with CSL rising 1.3% and COH up 1.6%. Industrials generally eased, WES flat and TCL dropped 0.8%, with SGH off 1.4%. Tech stocks were mixed, XRO and WTC found buyers, TNE fell 1.3% and NXT was 3.2% easier. All-Tech Index fell 0.3%. Resources staged a good turnaround, with BHP up 0.6% and FMG up 1.3%, while the gold miners recovered after early losses. Bullion pushed back above US$4,000. EVN rose 3.2% and VAU gained 1.4%. S32 also had a better session, while lithium stocks posted small gains. Oil and gas stocks rose as crude pushed higher, with WDS up 3.0% and STO rallying %. Coal stocks were firm, WHC up %, while uranium stocks were whacked again. PDN fell 6.0% and NXG lost 3.2%.In corporate news, KKR joined the consortium bidding for SDF. LNW powered 8.0% higher on a guidance update. CTD remains suspended as it tries to negotiate terms with the UK Government to stave off a liquidation event. GMD and VAU agreed terms for their merger.On the economic front, the ANZ-Roy Morgan Consumer Confidence Index rose slightly. The Westpac-Melbourne Institute Consumer Sentiment Index rose 4.1% to 83.9 in July from 80.6 in June.Asian markets were better, Japan up 0.5%, HK up 0.3% and China up 1.2%, Kospi up 1.2%.US futures slightly positive. Oil up 1.7%.Marcus Today – Daily Market InsightsMarcus Today provides clear, practical commentary for self-directed investors – covering markets, portfolios, education, and decision-making without the noise.If you'd like to go further:Start a free 14-day trial of Marcus Today http://bit.ly/mt-trial-podcastJoin Marcus Today Use code MTPODCAST for 10% off http://bit.ly/mt-join-podcast-offerMT20 – Managed ETF Portfolio A professionally managed portfolio run by Marcus Padley and the team, using ASX-listed ETFs with active market timing. http://bit.ly/mt20-podcastPrinciples – How We Think About Investing A short video series on timing, behaviour, and decision-making. No stock tips. http://bit.ly/mt-principles-podcast—Disclaimer This podcast is general information only and does not consider your personal circumstances. It is not personal financial advice.
The ASX 200 recovered from early losses to close up just 3 points at 8,809, despite weakness across the region, particularly in Korea. Once again, the banks held firm, with the Big Bank Basket rising to $283.41 (up 0.8%). ANZ was the best of the bunch, gaining 1.1%. Insurers also rallied, with IAG rising 2.0% and SUN adding 0.9%.Other financials eased, with BVS falling 5.5% on profit-taking after a strong week. Industrials were generally soggy. CSL fell 1.3%, RMD dropped 4.9%, and technology stocks remained unloved. XRO fell 4.3% following CEO share sales, WTC drifted another 2.0% lower, and WBT crashed back to earth, falling 10.6%.TLS recovered 1.6% after its week from hell. REITs were surprisingly firm, with SCG up 0.3% and GPT gaining 0.2%. The supermarkets were not so super, with WOW down 0.8% and COL falling 1.9%.In resources, it was once again heavy going as Treasury yields rose and the gold price came under pressure. Iron ore stocks held firm, but the gold miners succumbed. NST fell 2.8%, while GMD gained 3.7% as RRL pulled out.In corporate news, RRL threw in the towel on its bid for VAU. OML extended due diligence for the three interested parties, while CCX soared following a positive trading update. There was nothing of note on the local economic front.Asian markets were mixed with the Nikkei 225 down 2.6%, the Hang Seng down 0.2%, and the CSI index down 1.7%. Kopsi crashed 9.0% as SK Hynix fell hard.US futures were weaker with the Dow down 208 and the Nasdaq down 388. European market expected to open 0.6% weaker.Marcus Today – Daily Market InsightsMarcus Today provides clear, practical commentary for self-directed investors – covering markets, portfolios, education, and decision-making without the noise.If you'd like to go further:Start a free 14-day trial of Marcus Today http://bit.ly/mt-trial-podcastJoin Marcus Today Use code MTPODCAST for 10% off http://bit.ly/mt-join-podcast-offerMT20 – Managed ETF Portfolio A professionally managed portfolio run by Marcus Padley and the team, using ASX-listed ETFs with active market timing. http://bit.ly/mt20-podcastPrinciples – How We Think About Investing A short video series on timing, behaviour, and decision-making. No stock tips. http://bit.ly/mt-principles-podcast—Disclaimer This podcast is general information only and does not consider your personal circumstances. It is not personal financial advice.
Niklas Kunkel maps where the RWA market is heading next, from Centrifuge and Apollo's CLOs to Galaxy's first tokenized credit product, then turns to a cautionary tale: some SpaceX pre-IPO token buyers never actually owned the shares they thought they had. Host: Steven Ehrlich - Host of Bits + Bips and Head of Research at Sharplink Guest: Niklas Kunkel - Founder and CEO of Chronicle Labs This clip is from a longer conversation on crypto oracles, tokenized real-world assets, and Chronicle Labs' work verifying them. Full episode here: https://youtu.be/HW9Cu_E8DnU We go live every week - subscribe to catch it live. Cape: Your biggest crypto vulnerability isn't your wallet, it's your phone number. Cape is America's privacy-first mobile carrier that rotates your SIM identity daily and blocks SIM swaps before they happen. Get 33% off your first six months at https://cape.co/unchained (use code: UNCHAINED). Chapters
Will is the co-founder and CEO of Orbital, a legal AI platform built for the real estate industry. Founded in 2018, Orbital sits at the centre of property transactions, automating the legal work that has traditionally been slow and manual and connecting the parties who depend on it. It now handles over 200,000 transactions a year for some of the UK's top law firms including Mishcon de Reya and works directly with the real estate businesses behind those deals: the developers, owner-operators, investors and REITs shaping the built environment. By bringing law firms and their clients onto a single platform, Orbital is building the infrastructure for how real estate gets bought, sold and financed. It opened a New York office in 2025 and, in January, raised a $60 million Series B to scale further across the US.
CRE Exchange: Commercial Real Estate, Property Valuations, Real Estate Analytics and Property Tax
The first half of 2026 opened with a soft-landing story and closed with reignited inflation, sub-2% growth, and a hawkish Fed. In this midyear episode of CRE Exchange, Cole Perry and Omar Eltorai work through what did happen: four straight Fed holds, consumer confidence at its lowest in the survey's 70-plus year history, and a frozen housing market.Omar follows with the public markets story, where REITs returned nearly 14%, and REIT M&A is on pace for its most active year in a decade, even as private CRE remained in a gradual recovery mode. The episode closes with original Altus Group research on implied versus realized growth in CRE: when buyers price in growth at acquisition, does that growth actually materialize? And does it protect value?Key moments:01:29 Midyear economy recap02:08 Growth and inflation shocks04:06 Consumer and labor check06:56 Housing and construction trends08:30 Fed holds and rate reality10:14 Public markets snapshot11:50 Credit and data center capital14:12 Rates macro and REIT rally19:04 Fresh labor and construction prints23:22 Implied vs realized growth research29:41 How to access our in-depth research
What makes a real estate investment worth the risk?In this episode of Grow Your Business and Grow Your Wealth, Gary Heldt sits down with Jacob Vanderslice, Co-Founder of VanWest Partners, to break down what investors should know before putting money into private real estate.Jacob has helped oversee more than $375 million in self-storage investments and shares why the biggest mistake many investors make is focusing solely on projected returns rather than understanding the risks.You'll learn the differences between owning real estate directly, investing through REITs, and partnering in private real estate deals. Jacob also explains key investment terms such as preferred returns, IRR, waterfalls, and K-1s in plain English, making this a valuable conversation for both experienced investors and those just getting started.Whether you're looking to diversify your portfolio, create passive income, or better understand alternative investments, this episode provides practical insights to help you make more informed decisions.In This Episode You'll Learn:Why self-storage has become one of today's most attractive real estate asset classes.The pros and cons of direct ownership, REITs, and private real estate investments.What every investor should ask before committing capital.How to evaluate a sponsor, not just the investment opportunity.What preferred returns, IRR, waterfalls, and K-1s really mean.Why protecting your downside is often more important than maximizing returns.How private real estate can fit into a long-term wealth-building strategy.Connect with Jacob VandersliceWebsite: https://vanwestpartners.comLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jacob-vanderslice/Connect with Gary Heldt
The number of REITs (real estate investment trusts) listed in London has shrunk dramatically over the past five years. Now the biggest REIT on the market is the subject of a bid from a US buyer. In this week's personal finance edition of Merryn Talks Your Money, Bloomberg senior reporter and author of the Money Distilled newsletter, John Stepek, is joined by Bloomberg real estate team leader Jack Sidders to discuss the health of the UK's commercial property sector, whether there is more consolidation to come, and what it might say about REIT valuations. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Paul Schatz expects a Q3 market pullback driven by stretched sentiment and historical midterm election year trends. He discusses why a potential Fed rate cut could benefit REITs, utilities, and consumer staples, while setting the stage for new market highs in Q4.======== Schwab Network ========Empowering every investor and trader, every market day. Subscribe to the Market Minute newsletter - https://schwabnetwork.com/subscribeDownload the iOS app - https://apps.apple.com/us/app/schwab-network/id1460719185Download the Amazon Fire Tv App - https://www.amazon.com/TD-Ameritrade-Network/dp/B07KRD76C7Watch on Sling - https://watch.sling.com/1/asset/191928615bd8d47686f94682aefaa007/watchWatch on Vizio - https://www.vizio.com/en/watchfreeplus-exploreWatch on DistroTV - https://www.distro.tv/live/schwab-network/Follow us on X – https://twitter.com/schwabnetworkFollow us on Facebook – https://www.facebook.com/schwabnetworkFollow us on LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/company/schwab-network/ About Schwab Network - https://schwabnetwork.com/about
Chase MacLeod is the founder and principal of MacLeod & Co., a boutique industrial commercial real estate firm that has closed more than $850 million in transactions since launching in 2021 and over $1.5 billion throughout his 20+ year career across Southern California, Dallas, and Miami. Starting with just two agents in a converted guest bedroom, Chase has built a firm that specializes in large-format industrial tenant representation, investment sales, and seller advisory, serving publicly traded REITs, global logistics companies, and C-suite executives while sharing the behind-the-scenes stories behind some of the industry's biggest deals. Here's some of the topics we covered: How Chase Accidentally Built a Career in Industrial Real Estate The Sales Skills That Changed Everything Why Southern California Became an Industrial Powerhouse The Industrial Real Estate Boom Nobody Is Talking About Data Centers Are Fueling Massive Warehouse Demand Why Small Bay Industrial Is the Next Big Opportunity Where the Biggest Industrial Investing Opportunities Are Right Now To find out more about partnering or investing in a multifamily deal: Text Partner to 72345 or email Partner@RodKhleif.com For more about Rod and his real estate investing journey go to www.rodkhleif.com Please Review and Subscribe
Ian Anderson of Merchant West Investments discusses the sector's 4.2% return in June alone, Delta Property Fund's 50% surge and Hyprop and Vukile expanding in Europe.
Meb Faber, co-founder and CIO of Cambria Investment Management, joins Excess Returns to discuss his new book, Investing in America: The Rise of a 250 Year Bull Market.We explore why the United States became one of the greatest long-term compounding stories in market history, what investors can learn from 250 years of booms and busts, and why Meb can be optimistic about America while still cautious on today's expensive market-cap-weighted S&P 500.Investing in America: The Rise of a 250 Year Bull Markethttps://amzn.to/4f1H5AwMeb Faber on Xhttps://x.com/MebFaberMain topics coveredWhy America can be viewed as the ultimate venture capital success storyHow joint stock companies, risk-taking and ownership helped shape the U.S. economyWhy studying 250 years of market history changes how investors think about volatilityThe long-term case for stocks and why the time horizon matters so muchWhy bear markets are a natural part of capitalism and long-term compoundingHow U.S. market dominance happened and why it was not preordainedWhy expensive valuations, low dividend yields and new supply may matter todayThe role of dividends, buybacks, shareholder yield and reinvestment in long-term returnsWhy diversification across global stocks, bonds and real assets can help investors stay investedWhat gold, REITs and foreign stocks teach us about starting points and narrativesWhy early investing, child investment accounts and compounding can change investor behaviorHow creative destruction reshapes sectors, companies and the market leaders of each eraWhy Meb remains optimistic about America while still cautious on parts of the U.S. marketTimestamps00:00 Why America was not guaranteed to become the market winner01:15 Meb Faber on writing Investing in America02:25 America as the ultimate venture capital success story06:22 How a culture of ownership helped the U.S. stock market compound09:19 Why studying 250 years of market history matters12:00 Why ownership is the core investing lesson15:14 Bear markets, recessions and the danger of recent history18:16 Why U.S. stocks beat the rest of the world by so much22:20 Lessons from financial history that surprised Meb27:05 Why stocks can lose for long periods and bonds can win30:00 Why investors need to get used to being in a drawdown33:24 Dividends, buybacks and the importance of reinvestment37:27 Why gold and REITs beat the S&P 500 after 200040:55 How balanced portfolios survive different market regimes43:03 The power of starting early and letting compounding work48:16 Why global diversification matters outside the U.S.50:40 Creative destruction, sector change and market leadership55:20 Why Meb is still optimistic about investing in America59:33 Where to find the book, Cambria and Meb online
Only 20–30% of the AI data centers planned through 2030 are built today. The other 70–80% — the cement, the cooling, the chips, the memory, the power — are still coming. And the companies collecting the profits from that build-out are mostly names the mainstream isn't talking about.In this week's Money On Tap, Ben Brayshaw and Dan Michelon go beyond the Mag Seven and into the hidden companies powering the AI revolution. They trace how the AI trade rotated from the companies spending the money to the companies receiving it — the second-wave winners like Micron, SanDisk, Vertiv, Marvell, and Broadcom — and why Taiwan Semiconductor may be the king of the whole story. Then they go layer by layer through what's still ahead: electrical infrastructure, utilities and nuclear power, engineering, construction materials, and data center REITs.What you'll learn:Why only 20–30% of planned AI data centers exist — and what that means for the next decade of demandThe rotation out of the Mag Seven: from speculation and hope to follow-the-moneyThe AI stack, layer by layer: chips, memory (Micron), storage (SanDisk), cooling (Vertiv), networking (Marvell, Broadcom)Why Taiwan Semiconductor is the company nearly every AI player depends onThe risks worth respecting: valuation, capex pullbacks, competition, interest rates, and tariffsThe layers still to come: electrical, power and grid, engineering, materials, machinery, and data center REITsWhy high conviction — knowing why you own what you own — beats chasing every headlinePlus Money In The News:Trump Accounts for kids launch July 4: $1,000 at birth, up to $5,000 a year — and the math that could reach seven figures by retirementWhich financial stocks actually benefit when interest rates stay highTrump's rare earth agenda hits a milestone as the U.S. Army moves to break China's grip on defense metalsRead the companion blog: https://www.brayshawfinancial.com/blogSchedule a free consultation: https://app.greminders.com/t/9f3ce72e/initialconsultaBrowse the full Money On Tap library: https://www.brayshawfinancial.com/money-on-tapContact UsPhone: 855-226-8551Email: info@yourmoneyontap.comOffice: 116 South River Road, Bedford, NH 03110Web: brayshawfinancial.comSecurities and advisory services offered through Osaic Wealth, Inc., member FINRA/SIPC. All other services offered through Brayshaw Financial Group, LLC are independent of Osaic Wealth, Inc.If the S&P 500 is up 10%, why isn't my portfolio?Because the S&P 500 is cap-weighted: seven stocks absorb about a third of every dollar, and the top 10 holdings make up 35–55% of most S&P funds. In 2026 those mega-caps lagged — the Mag Seven are collectively negative — while sectors like energy (+28.1%) and technology (+26.8%) led. If your ETFs overlap in the same top names, you own the laggards several times over. The fix starts with knowing what you actually own.
David Auerbach, CIO of Hoya Capital Real Estate, makes the case for REITs, citing strong fundamentals, rising dividends, and attractive valuations. He highlights opportunities in small- and mid-cap REITs, data centers like Digital Realty Trust (DLR) and Equinix (EQIX), and explains how AI is creating new growth opportunities across the real estate sector.======== Schwab Network ========Empowering every investor and trader, every market day.Subscribe to the Market Minute newsletter - https://schwabnetwork.com/subscribeDownload the iOS app - https://apps.apple.com/us/app/schwab-network/id1460719185Download the Amazon Fire Tv App - https://www.amazon.com/TD-Ameritrade-Network/dp/B07KRD76C7Watch on Sling - https://watch.sling.com/1/asset/191928615bd8d47686f94682aefaa007/watchWatch on Vizio - https://www.vizio.com/en/watchfreeplus-exploreWatch on DistroTV - https://www.distro.tv/live/schwab-network/Follow us on X – https://twitter.com/schwabnetworkFollow us on Facebook – https://www.facebook.com/schwabnetworkFollow us on LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/company/schwab-network/About Schwab Network - https://schwabnetwork.com/about
Brendan Lynch, co-head of U.S. equity REIT research at Barclays, discussed data center REITs on the latest REIT Report episode, noting that the sector is rebounding as enterprise AI demand accelerates, leasing pipelines grow, and investors seek more direct exposure.Lynch said the recent Blackstone Digital Infrastructure Trust (NYSE: BXDC) IPO shows “there are investors who are looking for a specific type of exposure,” in the data center sector, notably stabilized assets.Meanwhile, record demand should support revenue growth, margin expansion, and cash flow growth as operators scale, he said. Development yields have improved from 6% to 7% in 2021–2022 to low double digits and, in some cases, the mid-teens, although customers' ability to self-build limits the upside.Power remains a key constraint, Lynch observed, but operators are getting more creative through retrofits, grid solutions, and behind-the-meter options. On regulatory pushback, “a lot of the things that are the cause of NIMBYism, I think, are misunderstandings about how data centers can fit into a given environment," he said.Chapters: 00:00 AI CapEx Runway00:39 Welcome to REIT Report00:58 Data Center REIT Comeback02:39 Leasing Pipelines Growth03:08 Development Yields Shift04:28 Power Constraints Markets05:38 Creative Power Solutions06:06 NIMBY Pushback Regulation07:41 Winners Ecosystem Pricing08:49 Is Now Good Entry09:53 Data Centers in Space10:53 Wrap Up Subscribe
Send us Fan MailIn this episode of The Real Estate Vibe Show, Vinki Loomba sits down with Will Harvey, Founder & Principal of Harvey Capital, to break down where real opportunities are emerging across public and private real estate markets in 2026. This conversation dives deep into mindset shifts, market inefficiencies, and how investors can position themselves ahead of the next wave of opportunity. Key TakeawaysWhy many investors unknowingly build “high-paying jobs” instead of wealth-generating systemsThe mindset shift from operator thinking to investor thinking and why disciplined capital allocation drives outcomesHow buying with margin of safety prevents catastrophic mistakes and unlocks long-term compoundingWhy understanding value drivers matters more than focusing only on revenue and short-term profit (P&L vs valuation thinking)The difference between public vs private market investing and why opportunity sets vary dramatically across bothEpisode Timestamps:00:00 – Introduction: Where smart investors are deploying capital in 202601:20 – Will's journey from loan officer to fund manager05:21 – Why rentals didn't feel like wealth creation09:18 – House flipping, leverage, and early capital stacking13:45 – Biggest investing mistakes and lessons learned20:32 – Operator vs investor mindset shift 24:25 – Where smart money is going in today's market29:00 – Public market arbitrage (JCPenney liquidation deal)33:52 – REITs vs private deals and return differences37:07 – How AI is changing underwriting and deal analysis39:39 – Best opportunities over the next 12–24 months
The default wealth-building playbook goes like this: buy something low, hope it's worth more someday, then sell to capture the gain. That's the appreciation model, and it can work. But it's not the only path, and for a lot of business owners and high-income professionals, it's not the most reliable one either. The Money Advantage is built around a different philosophy. Cash flow today is a stepping stone to cash flow tomorrow. Income you receive now compounds, funds the next asset, and stacks on top of what you're already earning, whether or not the underlying value ever moves. https://youtu.be/_ktX62qtXCE This article covers which assets actually produce reliable income, the honest tradeoffs of each, and the sequence in which to build them. That last part is where people most often go wrong. Table of ContentsKey TakeawaysCash Flow vs. Capital Gains: Two Very Different Ways to Build WealthThe Net Investable Income LoopWhat Makes an Asset Worth Owning for Cash FlowKnow Yourself Before You Know the AssetThe Best Cash-Flowing Assets and the Tradeoffs of EachRental Real EstateBusiness OwnershipPrivate Lending and NotesDividend-Paying Stocks and Traded REITsNon-Traded REITsWhy the Order You Build In Is More Important Than the Assets ThemselvesStage 1: FoundationStage 2: ProtectionStage 3: IncreaseThe Hidden Cost of Funding Your InvestmentsWe're Taught Capital Gains. It's Time to Learn Cash Flow.Frequently Asked QuestionsWhat is the difference between cash flow and capital gains?What are the best cash-flowing assets to start with?Is rental real estate really passive income?What does it mean to own a business versus operate one?What is the difference between traded and non-traded REITs?In what order should I build a cash-flowing portfolio?Do I have to be an accredited investor to invest for cash flow?How does Infinite Banking help fund cash-flowing assets? Key Takeaways Cash flow and capital gains are fundamentally different strategies, with different rules and different timelines The best cash-flowing assets offer predictable income, some ability to liquidate, and ideally some underlying growth There are no perfect assets, only tradeoffs Rental real estate, business ownership, private lending, dividend stocks, and REITs each have a place in an income-producing portfolio The order you build in is as important as the assets themselves Cash Flow vs. Capital Gains: Two Very Different Ways to Build Wealth Capital gain: you buy an asset at a cost basis, it appreciates in value, and you sell it. The difference between what you paid and what you sold it for is your gain. To access that money, you have to time the market and sell part or all of the asset. Cash flow: the asset pays you income on a regular schedule, regardless of what the underlying value does. You never have to sell to get the return. That's the core distinction. One requires a sale. The other just keeps paying. Bruce puts it simply: put $100,000 into something generating 12% a year, and you receive $12,000 while keeping the original $100,000. Net worth is now $112,000, and it repeats. With a capital gain, realizing that same $12,000 means selling a portion of the asset and redeploying it somewhere else. The Net Investable Income Loop Rachel frames cash flow in terms of what it does to your total income picture. When an asset produces income, it stacks on top of your earned income. A greater share of your total income can then flow into savings, which buys more assets. That process repeats, capital building incrementally, month after month. A salary arrives monthly, a cash-flowing portfolio can too. You're not waiting for a sale to realize value; you're receiving it continuously, and your liquidity is building the whole time. And the usual end goal of an appreciating asset is eventually to convert it into cash flow, to liquidate it someday and live off the proceeds. Starting the cash flow earlier just gives you the predictability sooner. What Makes an Asset Worth Owning for Cash Flow Three qualities define an ideal cash-flowing asset: Steady, predictable income The ability to liquidate if necessary Underlying growth, so if you do sell, you sell at a gain You rarely get all three at once. As Bruce puts it, drawing on economist Thomas Sowell, there are no solutions, only tradeoffs. Wanting instant liquidity means accepting weaker cash flow, because liquid money can't be committed to a long-term position. This is why we talk about liquidity diversification alongside asset diversification and tax diversification. Some capital should be reachable quickly. Some is committed long-term. Spreading across both means a business (which has very little liquidity) isn't your only holding. Know Yourself Before You Know the Asset Investor DNA, or unique ability investing, is the other half of the equation. Before evaluating any asset, the right questions are: does this match your value system? Does the knowledge required match your expertise, or are you willing to build it? Investing deliberately inside your sphere of knowledge gives you more control, a better read on the risks, and a cleaner exit strategy if you ever need one. "Where do you put your money?" is a question that only makes sense in the context of your goals, your timeline, and your risk tolerance. What works for one person doesn't automatically work for another. The Best Cash-Flowing Assets and the Tradeoffs of Each Rental Real Estate Real estate has more entry points than people often expect: single-family rentals, duplexes, multifamily, commercial space, self-storage, mobile home parks, short-term rentals, and syndications. Each has its own risk profile, capital requirement, and management burden. The goal in any of these is to be cash-flow positive: rent covers the mortgage, and insurance, and taxes, and every operating cost, with a surplus left over. That surplus is your monthly income. Add the tax depreciation side, and rental real estate stacks up as one of the more tax-efficient income-producing assets. The honest tradeoff: there's no truly passive income in rental real estate. Tenants, toilets, and termites are real. Even with a property manager, you're managing a person, and that takes time and attention. Bruce has owned close to a dozen properties and eventually moved away from direct ownership for exactly this reason. DIY versus turnkey is a cost-and-return decision. Doing everything yourself preserves margin. Paying for management reduces your burden but eats into cash flow. Neither is wrong; it depends on how much of your time the asset is worth. Real estate pairs well with Infinite Banking. A policy loan funds the down payment. Rental income repays the loan. The cash value in the policy keeps compounding uninterrupted the entire time, so you're building in two places at once. Business Ownership Operating a business is not the same as owning one. A cash-flowing business pays income without requiring all your time. If every dollar you earn is directly tied to the hour you spent working, that's self-employment, not an asset. The distinction is real, because only one of those is something you can eventually step back from. To move from self-employed to business owner, you need systems, processes, and team. Robert Kiyosaki's cash-flow quadrant makes the point clearly: the right side of the quadrant only works when the business can run without you as the bottleneck. What makes a business valuable is that it's hard. Businesses solve problems people don't want to solve for themselves. Jeff Bezos built Amazon around one insight: people don't want to leave the house for every item they need. The service was obvious in hindsight, painful to build, and enormously valuable precisely because it was. That's the pattern. Treat the business as a business, not a hobby. That means watching expenses, marketing, sustainability, succession planning, taxes, and accounting. Revenue without profitability isn't cash flow. Infinite Banking connects here in several ways: storing liquidity reserves and buffer capital, funding key-man insurance, deferred compensation,, and quarterly tax payments. The policy becomes the business's financial backbone. Private Lending and Notes Private lending means providing capital to a borrower, secured against collateral, at a stated interest rate, paid back as monthly income. Often structured as interest-only, which maximizes the cash flow to the lender. The principal is secured by the underlying asset. Terms vary: a fixed payoff date, a refinance trigger, or a short-term arrangement like a fix-and-flip hard money loan. A short-term flip might carry a 12% annualized rate, but since the loan only runs for four to six months, the actual dollar return is less than the rate suggests. IBC practitioners often use policy cash value for private lending. The borrower's repayments come back, pays down the policy loan, and then the cycle repeats, predictable monthly income from a controlled capital reservoir. The tradeoff: this is the debt side of real estate. Some investors prefer equity, owning a piece of something rather than lending against it. Both are valid; the preference depends on your risk tolerance and how you want to be positioned. Dividend-Paying Stocks and Traded REITs Dividend-paying stocks, like Coca-Cola and UPS, are common examples that pay a stated yield per share, typically quarterly, semi-annually, or annually. You can take the income as cash or reinvest it through a dividend reinvestment program (DRIP), which automatically buys additional fractional shares. Traded real estate investment trusts (REITs) work similarly: a trust holds a portfolio of real estate, rents are collected, and the yield is distributed to shareholders. The tradeoff is real: both carry market correlation....
Many people approaching retirement wonder whether they've saved enough, but the better question may be how to turn those savings into dependable income throughout retirement. In this episode, Coach Pete explains the difference between simply accumulating assets and creating a retirement paycheck designed to support long-term financial confidence. The discussion covers retirement income planning, common mistakes investors make when markets become volatile, considerations for federal employees using the Thrift Savings Plan (TSP), Roth conversion strategies, tax planning for retirees and business owners, and concerns surrounding non-traded REITs. Throughout the conversation, the emphasis remains on developing a written retirement plan that aligns investments, income needs, and long-term goals rather than relying on hope or market performance alone. Whether you're several years from retirement or preparing to retire soon, this episode offers practical planning concepts to help you make more informed financial decisions.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
In this episode, Liz Ann Sonders sits down with Keith McCullough, founder of Hedgeye, to revisit his “quads” framework—a model that categorizes market environments based on the direction of economic growth and inflation. McCullough emphasizes process over prediction, arguing that investors should focus on the momentum of these variables to adapt to rapidly shifting market conditions. The conversation explores a volatile macro backdrop marked by geopolitical shocks, leadership changes at the Fed, and evolving market structure. McCullough explains how increased instability has accelerated market cycles, requiring a more nimble, data-driven approach. He outlines his view that inflation likely peaked and is set to decelerate, setting up a shift toward disinflation, and potentially slower growth, over the coming quarters. They also discuss implications for asset allocation, including declining bond yields globally, a rotation away from mega-cap dominance, and opportunities in under-owned, rate-sensitive sectors like housing and real estate. McCullough highlights growing risks tied to market concentration, new equity supply (including major IPOs), and speculative activity, while stressing the importance of disciplined, rules-based investing. The episode concludes with a discussion of investor behavior, with McCullough urging listeners to detach from narratives and emotions, and instead rely on process, data, and adaptability in an increasingly fast-moving market environment. Finally, Collin and Liz Ann look ahead to next week's upcoming macroeconomic indicators and key data releases. To keep up with Keith McCullough, you can follow him on X: @KeithMcCullough On Investing is an original podcast from Charles Schwab. For more on the show, visit schwab.com/OnInvesting. If you enjoy the show, please leave a rating or review on Apple Podcasts. Important Disclosures The comments, views, and opinions expressed in the presentation are those of the speakers and do not necessarily represent the views of Charles Schwab. Investors in ETFs should consider carefully information contained in the prospectus, or if available, the summary prospectus, including investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses. You can request a prospectus via 1-800-435-4000. Please read the prospectus carefully before investing. This material is intended for general informational and educational purposes only. This should not be considered an individualized recommendation or personalized investment advice. The securities, investment products and investment strategies mentioned are not suitable for everyone. Each investor needs to review an investment strategy for his or her own particular situation before making any investment decisions. All expressions of opinion are subject to change without notice in reaction to shifting market, economic or political conditions. Data contained herein from third party providers is obtained from what are considered reliable sources. However, its accuracy, completeness or reliability cannot be guaranteed. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Investing involves risk, including loss of principal. Performance may be affected by risks associated with non-diversification, including investments in specific countries or sectors. Additional risks may also include, but are not limited to, investments in foreign securities, especially emerging markets, real estate investment trusts (REITs), fixed income, municipal securities including state specific municipal securities, small capitalization securities and commodities. Each individual investor should consider these risks carefully before investing in a particular security or strategy. Fixed income securities are subject to increased loss of principal during periods of rising interest rates. Fixed income investments are subject to various other risks including changes in credit quality, market valuations, liquidity, prepayments, early redemption, corporate events, tax ramifications, and other factors. Lower rated securities are subject to greater credit risk, default risk, and liquidity risk. Diversification and asset allocation strategies do not ensure a profit and do not protect against losses in declining markets. Currencies are speculative, very volatile and not suitable for all investors. Investing in cryptocurrencies involves risk, including the risk of total loss of principal invested. Cryptocurrencies such as bitcoin and ethereum are highly volatile, are not backed or guaranteed by the bank, any central bank or government; are not deposits; are not FDIC insured; are not SIPC protected; and lack many of the regulations and consumer protections that legal-tender currencies and regulated securities have. Due to the high level of risk, investors should view digital currencies as a purely speculative instrument. All names and market data shown are for illustrative purposes only and are not a recommendation, offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security. Forecasts contained herein are for illustrative purposes only, may be based upon proprietary research and are developed through analysis of historical public data. Schwab does not recommend the use of technical analysis as a sole means of investment research. Options carry a high level of risk and are not suitable for all investors. Certain requirements must be met to trade options through Schwab. Please read the Options Disclosure Document titled "Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options" before considering any option transaction. The policy analysis provided by Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., does not constitute and should not be interpreted as an endorsement of any political party. Indexes are unmanaged, do not incur management fees, costs, and expenses and cannot be invested in directly. For more information on indexes, please see schwab.com/indexdefinitions The book Diary of a Hedge Fund Manager is not affiliated with, sponsored by, or endorsed by Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. (CS&Co.). Schwab has not reviewed the book and makes no representations about its content. The PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index (SOX) is a capitalization-weighted index composed of 30 semiconductor companies. (0626-2U7S) Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
A concise assessment of the Shariah-compliant investment and wealth management solutions available to North American investors: ETFs, mutual funds, REITs, SMAs and model portfolios. The panel will evaluate where products meet investor needs on performance, diversification and cost, and where under-served areas remain, including income, alternatives and thematic exposures. Discussion will highlight the evolving role of wealth managers and advisers, alongside growing demand for broader financial solutions, including savings and home financing.Moderator:Tariq Al Rifai, Advisor, Economic PolicyPanelists:Ahmad Quqa, Founder & Chief Executive Officer, Crescent Private WealthAijaz Hussain, Executive Vice President of Sales & Director, UIF CorporationElias Scheker Da Silva, Portfolio Manager – Global Fixed Income, WafraDr Mohamad Sawwaf, Founder and CEO, ManzilSaad Malik, CEO & Co-founder, Zoya Finance
Elizabeth Warren is at it again. The Massachusetts senator is pushing legislation that should alarm anyone who believes in free markets, private investment, and access to healthcare. Most importantly, it should concern patients. Warren's so-called "Stop Corporate Crimes Against Healthcare Act" is being marketed as a way to protect Americans from corporate abuse. In reality, it threatens private investment and could accelerate hospital closures, particularly in rural communities. The most troubling part of the bill is simple: prison. Warren wants new criminal penalties for healthcare executives and investors based on government determinations about business decisions. The legislation would also allow officials to claw back compensation years after the fact. Think about that. Invest in healthcare and you could become the next political target. That's not accountability. That's intimidation. What's especially troubling is that Warren repeatedly conflates private equity firms with Real Estate Investment Trusts, known as REITs. The two are not the same. Private equity firms buy and manage companies. REITs own real estate. In healthcare, REITs often purchase hospital properties and lease them back to operators. This allows hospitals to unlock capital tied up in real estate and reinvest it into patient care, equipment, technology, and expansion. REITs don't run hospitals. They don't hire doctors. They don't fire nurses. They don't make patient care decisions. They own buildings and provide capital. For decades, this financing model has helped hospitals remain open and expand services. It is widely used throughout the American economy. Yet Warren wants Americans to believe these property owners are responsible for healthcare's problems. The reality is that many hospitals depend on outside investment to survive. If investors believe they could face prison, asset seizures, or political persecution, they will stop investing. Capital dries up. Projects stop. Services disappear. Hospitals close. The communities hit hardest will be rural America. Patients will travel farther for care. Emergency services become less accessible. Healthcare deserts expand. Ironically, the very people Warren claims to be helping could become the biggest victims of her legislation. What Warren ignores is the real crisis facing healthcare. The system is drowning in waste, fraud, abuse, and unsustainable government spending. Billions of taxpayer dollars disappear into bloated bureaucracies every year while politicians promise more benefits and more programs without meaningful reform. Instead of fixing the problems government helped create, Warren is searching for a scapegoat. That scapegoat is private investment. And that should concern every American. Because when politicians start threatening prison for legal business activity, investors leave. When investors leave, hospitals lose access to capital. When capital disappears, services disappear. And when services disappear, patients pay the price. This bill isn't really about protecting patients. It's about expanding government power. Like so many progressive proposals before it, the goal is more regulation, more bureaucracy, and more control concentrated in Washington. The result won't be better healthcare. It will be fewer hospitals, fewer choices, and fewer options for the communities that need healthcare the most. That is why Elizabeth Warren's latest healthcare proposal is so dangerous.SponsorsThe Maverick Systemhttps://TheMaverickSystem.comVRA Insiderhttps://VRAInsider.comPatriot Mobilehttps://www.PatriotMobile.com/GrantThe Wellness Companyhttps://Twc.Health/GrantUse Code: GRANT For 10% OffLost Soldier Oil And Gashttps://www.LostSoldier.comSugarfina Investment Opportunityhttps://invest.sugarfina.comSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
About the Guest(s):Amy Irvine is the CEO and founder of Rooted Planning Group, a financial planning firm dedicated to helping individuals and families achieve their financial goals. With years of experience in the financial industry, Amy has built a reputation as a trusted advisor and advocate for financial literacy. Her expertise spans areas such as debt management, budgeting, savings, and investment strategies. As the host of the podcast "Money Roots," Amy shares invaluable financial insights and tips to empower individuals in managing their finances more effectively.Episode Summary:In this episode of "Money Roots," Amy Irvine, the insightful CEO of Rooted Planning Group, dives into a rich tapestry of financial guidance relevant to both new graduates and seasoned investors alike. With 2026 mid-year approaching, Amy touches on pivotal topics including financial tips for recent graduates, strategies to protect against inflation, and a deeper understanding of market volatility and risk. By breaking down complex financial concepts, she provides listeners with actionable advice to bolster their financial resilience and prosperity.Amy begins by celebrating the monumental achievement of graduating, acknowledging the transition into financial independence. She outlines essential financial tips for grads, focusing on debt management, budgeting, saving, and investing. She emphasizes the significance of early and consistent saving, saying, "Study after study have showed if you start saving when you're 22 years old...those years of early savings are really critical." Shifting gears, Amy explores investment options to combat inflation, from TIPS and commodity mutual funds to equities and REITs, while stressing the importance of a diversified portfolio. Finally, she clarifies the distinction between market volatility and risk, encouraging investors to align their strategies with their financial goals.Key Takeaways:Financial Independence for Grads: Understand the importance of managing debt, creating a budget, saving early, and starting to invest, even with small contributions.Combat Inflation: Consider investment options such as TIPS, precious metal funds, and REITs to hedge against inflation, while maintaining a diversified portfolio.Understanding Risk: Differentiate between market volatility and market risk to make informed investment decisions.Start Saving Early: The power of compound interest can't be overstated; starting to save at a young age can drastically impact long-term financial health.Diversification is Key: Always strive for a diversified portfolio as a proactive strategy against unpredictable market shifts.Notable Quotes:"It is a moment of shift...this is a major change in somebody's life when they graduate from high school and college.""While you do this, be sure to pay attention to interest rates and make a plan for how to handle payments each month.""Start with savings consistent, you know that like monthly amount, put it aside in a place that you don't even notice it.""Volatility is a normal part of investing, but not all volatility equals risk.""It's important to break down these, these two key concepts of market volatility and risk because they are two different key concepts."Resources:Rooted Planning Group Website: Visit Rooted Planning GroupMonarch Money: Recommended financial tracking tool for budgeting.Rule of 72: Technique for estimating investment doubling period.TIPS, REITs, and Commodity Mutual Funds: Various investment vehicles discussed to combat inflation threats.Important Investment Considerations:TIPS: Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities, or TIPS, are purchased in multiples of $100 and are issued with terms of 5, 10, and 30 years. They may also be sold on the secondary market, where pricing is determined by supply and demand.Precious Metal Funds: Precious metal funds can experience significant price fluctuations, and initial costs may be high.Commodity Funds: Commodity funds are not appropriate for everyone. Certain market conditions may create a substantial risk of loss, so investors should carefully consider the potential risks before purchasing.REIT Funds: REIT funds hold Real Estate Investment Trusts in their portfolios and are subject to risks such as liquidity concerns and property devaluations due to adverse economic or real estate market conditions. These funds may not be suitable for all investors and can be sensitive to interest rates, national and local economic conditions, property tax rates, and other factors. Changes in real estate values or economic downturns may negatively affect issuers in the real estate industry. Stock markets are also volatile and can decline significantly in response to adverse issuer, political, regulatory, market, economic, or other developments.Engage with this episode for insightful financial strategies, and ensure to stay tuned for more enriching content on "Money Roots." Each episode is crafted to empower your financial journey and support your life events with robust fiscal planning.
{ "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "PodcastEpisode", "name": "Buying a Stock Is Easy. Knowing When to Sell Is Everything.", "description": "Tom Dupree, Mike Johnson, and James Dupree walk through the complete sell discipline used at Dupree Financial Group — covering valuation signals, dividend yield compression, tax-smart exits, emotional traps, and real portfolio examples.", "url": "https://dupreefinancial.com/blog/when-to-sell-stock-sell-discipline-retirement-investing/", "partOfSeries": { "@type": "PodcastSeries", "name": "The Tom Dupree Show", "url": "https://dupreefinancial.com" }, "author": { "@type": "Person", "name": "Tom Dupree" }, "publisher": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "Dupree Financial Group", "url": "https://dupreefinancial.com" } } { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "FAQPage", "mainEntity": [ { "@type": "Question", "name": "How do you know when to sell a stock?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "The best sell decisions are driven by valuation, not price alone. Before buying, establish the price or valuation level at which you would be satisfied selling. If the stock exceeds that target, revisit the thesis. For dividend stocks, watch current yield — when it compresses significantly due to price appreciation, the market may be pricing in too much optimism. For growth stocks, monitor revenue guidance and gross margin targets. The key is having objective criteria rather than letting emotion drive the decision." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "What is a sell discipline in investing?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "A sell discipline is a systematic, pre-defined set of criteria that guides when to reduce or exit a position — independent of emotion or market noise. It includes valuation targets, yield thresholds, risk profile limits, dividend sustainability checks, and tax considerations. Without a sell discipline, investors tend to hold winners too long out of greed and losers too long out of denial." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "Should I sell a stock that has doubled in price?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Not necessarily — but a doubling in price is a strong signal to re-examine the thesis. If the stock is a dividend payer, check the current yield: a stock that once yielded 6.5% and now yields 3.4% purely because of price appreciation may have priced in years of future growth. In that case, trimming a portion and capturing gains as dry powder for redeployment is a disciplined approach even if the company itself remains strong." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "How do taxes affect the decision to sell a stock?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "In taxable accounts, selling at a gain triggers capital gains tax — either short-term (ordinary income rates) or long-term (lower rates, for assets held over one year). A key strategy is tax-loss harvesting: selling positions with unrealized losses to offset realized gains. You can repurchase the same security after 30 days under the wash sale rule. For highly appreciated, low-basis positions, gifting shares directly to charity avoids tax entirely for both donor and recipient." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "What is FOMO in investing and how does it cause mistakes?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "FOMO — fear of missing out — causes investors to hold positions long after a rational sell signal has appeared, because they fear the stock will keep rising after they exit. It also leads investors to hold falling stocks in denial, hoping for a recovery. Both behaviors stem from emotional decision-making rather than objective analysis. Having pre-established valuation criteria and working with an investment committee helps counteract FOMO and its mirror image, paralysis." } } ] } Buying a Stock Is Easy. Knowing When to Sell Is Everything. The Tom Dupree Show | Dupree Financial Group | dupreefinancial.com | 859-233-0400 A sound sell discipline is one of the most overlooked parts of retirement investing — every investor knows how to buy a stock, but the moment that determines real wealth, or real loss, is the moment you decide to sell. In this episode of The Tom Dupree Show, Tom Dupree, Lead Advisor Mike Johnson, and in-house analyst James Dupree lay out the sell discipline that has guided Dupree Financial Group’s portfolios for decades. The conversation covers what triggers a trim, what triggers a full exit, and why waiting for someone else to tell you to sell is one of the costliest mistakes in investing. The team works through real examples — from Freddie Mac and WorldCom in the early 2000s to a local company that went up twenty times before going back to zero — and explains the framework behind each decision. Along the way, they address growth stocks, dividend payers, pipeline companies, oil stocks, and AI infrastructure plays, showing how the sell criteria differ by asset type even as the underlying discipline stays consistent. “Buying a stock is easy. Selling a stock — regardless of whether it’s up or down — is a lot harder to do.” — Tom Dupree Why Sell Discipline Matters in Retirement Investing Most investment conversations focus on what to buy. Sell discipline gets far less attention — yet it is the mechanism that actually converts paper gains into real money. As Tom put it on the show, you don’t realize anything until it’s sold. Dividends deliver income along the way, but capital appreciation only benefits you when you act on it. This is exactly the kind of sell discipline retirement investing question that Dupree Financial Group works through with every client. The team described the buy discipline as relatively straightforward: you find a company with a compelling valuation, a durable dividend, or a strong revenue growth story, and you build a position. The sell decision is far more nuanced because it involves not just the company’s fundamentals but also your portfolio’s overall risk profile, tax situation, current market conditions, and where you are in your financial life. Different Assets Require Different Sell Metrics One of the clearest takeaways from this episode is that sell criteria are not universal — they must be tailored to the type of asset you own. Growth stocks and AI companies often lack traditional earnings metrics, so James Dupree explained that the team evaluates them on revenue guidance and gross margin targets. When management demonstrates they can execute — beating their own guidance consistently — the market rewards them with premium valuations. When that execution story breaks down, or when the stock has priced in years of future growth, it is time to take some off the table. Dividend-paying stocks use a different lens: current yield. Tom described a stock the firm bought yielding 6.5% that now yields roughly 3.4% — not because the dividend was cut, but because the price nearly doubled. That yield compression is the market’s way of signaling that the optimism has been priced in. Capturing three years’ worth of dividends in two months of price appreciation is a compelling reason to trim. REITs are evaluated on price-to-adjusted cash flow rather than price-to-earnings. Pipeline companies may be held long past a traditional sell target because their dividend stream is so strong and growing that the income justifies continued ownership. Every sector, and every individual company within a sector, has its own intricacies. Trimming vs. Exiting: The Power of Partial Sales Mike Johnson emphasized that most sell decisions at Dupree Financial are not binary. Rather than exiting a position entirely, the team frequently trims — reducing a holding that has become overweight and redeploying the proceeds into money market as dry powder. That cash position carries real optionality: when a market pullback creates entry points in other names, the firm is already positioned to act. The team recently used this approach with oil stocks. Several integrated oil companies had appreciated 25–30% over the past year even as oil prices remained flat. The underlying businesses are excellent operators, but there is a ceiling on how much an oil company can grow — demand is finite, production costs are finite, and the economics do not allow for the kind of multiple expansion you can see in software or AI. Taking profits there freed up capital for infrastructure and reshoring plays that offer better forward returns at reasonable valuations. Risk Profile Is a Sell Signal Too Tom described a stock the firm added to significantly in April of the prior year — a diesel engine manufacturer that turned out to have strong AI-adjacent tailwinds. The position appreciated considerably. Even though the team still believed in the company, they trimmed because the position had grown so large it changed the portfolio’s overall risk profile. The question was not “do we still like this company?” but “does this concentration match what our clients are paying us to manage?” Similarly, a high-conviction AI holding trimmed in October had briefly become the largest position in the portfolio after rapid price appreciation. The mandate from clients calls for a diversified, income-oriented portfolio — not a concentrated bet on any single name, regardless of how strong the thesis is. The Emotional Traps: FOMO, Greed, and Legacy Holdings Tom shared two memorable examples of how emotions derail sell decisions. The first was a locally well-known company whose stock rose twenty times before collapsing back to zero. Investors who rode it all the way up — and all the way back down — had been told to take some off the table. They refused, emotionally unable to accept that paper gains only become real when you sell. The second example was a widow whose late husband had told her never to sell two particular stocks. She was holding roughly $300,000 in those two positions at a blended yield of about 2.1% — generating around $6,000 per year. A redeployment into holdings yielding 7% would have generated closer to $21,000 annually. The husband’s advice may have been reasonable at the time, but circumstances changed. Her income needs changed. The advice never got updated. Mike also drew the parallel to how individual investors today feel about broad index funds or the S&P 500 — looking at five-year performance charts and feeling unable to reduce exposure because “it might keep going up.” That mindset, he noted, is identical to the emotional pattern that preceded every major market drawdown. The antidote is asking a simple question: do the numbers still work for me if this drops 30% or 40%? The Tax Dimension of Selling In taxable accounts, selling is never just an investment decision — it is also a tax event. Tom and Mike outlined several strategies the firm uses to manage that dimension: Tax-loss harvesting: Selling positions with unrealized losses to offset realized gains elsewhere in the portfolio. The firm deliberately maintains a few losers for this purpose. Wash sale management: After harvesting a loss, you can repurchase the same security after 30 days and still recognize the tax benefit. Charitable gifting of appreciated shares: For long-held, low-basis positions, gifting shares directly to a charity allows the donor to take a deduction at full fair market value while the charity pays no capital gains tax. This also serves as a rebalancing tool — reducing concentration without triggering a taxable event. Stepped-up cost basis: For clients with health concerns, holding a highly appreciated position until death transfers it to heirs at the current market value, eliminating the embedded gain entirely. As the team noted: the right answer always depends on the individual’s situation — the tax shelter of the account, charitable inclinations, estate planning goals, and overall income needs. A Cautionary Tale from Wall Street Tom closed the first segment with a story from early in his career at a large brokerage firm. A prominent New York analyst had a buy list — the “focus list” — that brokers across the country used to build client portfolios. Through the late 1990s bull market, the list performed well, and the analyst became a star. When the market began its steep decline in 2000 through 2002, the analyst issued no sell ratings. He went quiet. Brokers and their clients waited for guidance that never came. Many lost significant sums as a result. The reason, Tom observed, was simple: issuing a sell rating would have been an admission that the original buy call was wrong. Professional reputation got in the way of professional responsibility. It is exactly why Dupree Financial conducts all research in-house, maintains an investment committee where theses are challenged regularly, and retains the authority to move quickly — without waiting for a third-party analyst to give permission. You can hear more episodes like this one on the Tom Dupree Show Radio archive. Frequently Asked Questions About Sell Discipline in Retirement Investing How do you know when to sell a stock? The best sell decisions are driven by valuation, not price alone. Before buying, establish the price or valuation level at which you would be satisfied selling. If the stock exceeds that target, revisit the thesis. For dividend stocks, watch current yield — when it compresses significantly due to price appreciation, the market may be pricing in too much optimism. For growth stocks, monitor revenue guidance and gross margin targets. The key is having objective criteria rather than letting emotion drive the decision. What is a sell discipline in investing? A sell discipline is a systematic, pre-defined set of criteria that guides when to reduce or exit a position — independent of emotion or market noise. It includes valuation targets, yield thresholds, risk profile limits, dividend sustainability checks, and tax considerations. Without a sell discipline, investors tend to hold winners too long out of greed and losers too long out of denial. Should I sell a stock that has doubled in price? Not necessarily — but a doubling in price is a strong signal to re-examine the thesis. If the stock is a dividend payer, check the current yield: a stock that once yielded 6.5% and now yields 3.4% purely because of price appreciation may have priced in years of future growth. In that case, trimming a portion and capturing gains as dry powder for redeployment is a disciplined approach even if the company itself remains strong. How do taxes affect the decision to sell a stock? In taxable accounts, selling at a gain triggers capital gains tax — either short-term (ordinary income rates) or long-term (lower rates, for assets held over one year). A key strategy is tax-loss harvesting: selling positions with unrealized losses to offset realized gains. You can repurchase the same security after 30 days under the wash sale rule. For highly appreciated, low-basis positions, gifting shares directly to charity avoids tax entirely for both donor and recipient. What is FOMO in investing and how does it cause mistakes? FOMO — fear of missing out — causes investors to hold positions long after a rational sell signal has appeared, because they fear the stock will keep rising after they exit. It also leads investors to hold falling stocks in denial, hoping for a recovery. Both behaviors stem from emotional decision-making rather than objective analysis. Having pre-established valuation criteria and working with an investment committee helps counteract FOMO and the paralysis it creates. Schedule a Complimentary Portfolio Review If you’re not sure whether your current portfolio reflects a real sell discipline — or whether you’re holding things longer than you should be — we’ll take a look. No charge. No pressure. Just an honest conversation about what you own and whether it’s working for you. Call: 859-233-0400 | Visit: dupreefinancial.com Dupree Financial Group is a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA) registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training. The information presented on this program is for educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Investing involves risk, including the potential loss of principal. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Please consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. The post When to Sell a Stock: Sell Discipline for Retirement Investors | Dupree Financial appeared first on Dupree Financial.
Have you ever wondered if the massive profits in commercial real estate are completely out of your reach? In this classic episode, Brent Daniels sits down with commercial real estate expert Hanifa Brown to demystify the commercial sector and prove that you absolutely can wholesale these massive deals! Hanifa also breaks down the fundamental differences between residential and commercial wholesaling, highlighting why building relationships with specialized commercial brokers is the absolute most critical step in evaluating your deals. If you are ready to transition from single-family houses to building true wealth through commercial assets, this episode is your blueprint. Be a part of the TTP training program now.---------Show notes:(0:00) Beginning of today's episode(2:25) Understanding the five main commercial real estate asset classes(4:32) Using Real Estate Investment Trusts to get started without experience(6:41) Why the current doom and gloom is strictly isolated to office spaces(9:22) The primary differences between residential and commercial wholesaling(10:48) Why building relationships with commercial brokers is critical for success(12:50) How commercial properties are evaluated using Net Operating Income(13:26) How Cap Rates dictate risk and forced appreciation in commercial deals(17:15) Why small multifamily properties are the perfect gateway into commercial(19:37) The importance of finding brokers specialized in specific asset classes(21:06) How commercial flippers evaluate risk and stabilize multi-year projects(25:00) Why you must target single-entity owners instead of corporate REITs(26:17) Using the "Wealth Foundations" ebook as a commercial investing blueprint(28:55) Why mixed-use properties offer the best long-term diversity and cash flow----------Resources:LoopNetCoStarCrexiReal Estate Riches by Dolph de RoosContact Hanifa Brown: HanifahBrown.comInstagram: @hanifah_brownInstagram: @realbrentdanielsTo speak with Brent or one of our other expert coaches call (281) 835-4201 or schedule your free discovery call here to learn about our mentorship programs and become part of the TribeGo to Wholesalingincgroup.com to become part of one of the fastest growing Facebook communities in the Wholesaling space. Get all of your burning Wholesaling questions answered, gain access to JV partnerships, and connect with other "success minded" Rhinos in the community.It's 100% free to join. The opportunities in this community are endless, what are you waiting for?
At his first Fed meeting as chair, Kevin Warsh signaled a more hawkish stance focused squarely on inflation, while launching a sweeping reform agenda. Policymakers are split between holding and potentially hiking, with strong emphasis on restoring price stability. Warsh introduced a significant shift in Fed governance and communication: shorter statements, less forward guidance, and five task forces aimed at rethinking policy frameworks. Liz Ann Sonders and Collin Martin explore the implications of that shift, particularly the risk that reduced transparency could lead to greater market volatility as investors react more sharply to incoming data. They also assess market dynamics: Rising short-term yields pressured equities, while longer-term yields may remain range-bound if inflation expectations stabilize. Finally, they offer practical portfolio takeaways—emphasizing diversification within equities, a focus on quality and earnings strength, and a disciplined approach to asset allocation in a higher-rate, more-uncertain policy regime. On Investing is an original podcast from Charles Schwab. For more on the show, visit schwab.com/OnInvesting. If you enjoy the show, please leave a rating or review on Apple Podcasts. Important Disclosures This material is intended for general informational and educational purposes only. This should not be considered an individualized recommendation or personalized investment advice. The securities, investment products and investment strategies mentioned are not suitable for everyone. Each investor needs to review an investment strategy for his or her own particular situation before making any investment decisions. All expressions of opinion are subject to change without notice in reaction to shifting market, economic or political conditions. Data contained herein from third party providers is obtained from what are considered reliable sources. However, its accuracy, completeness or reliability cannot be guaranteed. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Investing involves risk, including loss of principal. Performance may be affected by risks associated with non-diversification, including investments in specific countries or sectors. Additional risks may also include, but are not limited to, investments in foreign securities, especially emerging markets, real estate investment trusts (REITs), fixed income, municipal securities including state specific municipal securities, small capitalization securities and commodities. Each individual investor should consider these risks carefully before investing in a particular security or strategy. Fixed income securities are subject to increased loss of principal during periods of rising interest rates. Fixed income investments are subject to various other risks including changes in credit quality, market valuations, liquidity, prepayments, early redemption, corporate events, tax ramifications, and other factors. Lower rated securities are subject to greater credit risk, default risk, and liquidity risk. Diversification and asset allocation do not ensure a profit and do not protect against losses in declining markets. All names and market data shown are for illustrative purposes only and are not a recommendation, offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security. Forecasts contained herein are for illustrative purposes only, may be based upon proprietary research and are developed through analysis of historical public data. The policy analysis provided by Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., does not constitute and should not be interpreted as an endorsement of any political party. Indexes are unmanaged, do not incur management fees, costs, and expenses and cannot be invested in directly. For more information on indexes, please see schwab.com/indexdefinitions Inverse correlation refers to investments that tend to move in opposite directions: when one rises, the other falls. A hyperscaler is a large-scale cloud service provider that offers vast computing, storage, and networking resources through a distributed infrastructure of interconnected servers and software. (0626-05FT) Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
David Bahnsen recaps Tuesday, June 16 market action with the Dow up 329 points (+0.64%) while the S&P fell over 0.5% and the Nasdaq dropped 1.15% as big tech/AI names sold off. Oil fell another 4.5% with WTI around $77, and the 10-year yield declined three basis points to 4.437%. Financials rallied about 1.5% (helping the Dow), with strength also in some healthcare names, while energy mostly continued lower. Bahnsen argues Monday's rally was less about Iran/Strait of Hormuz headlines and more a return to AI-tech momentum, which reversed Tuesday, framing the key market tension as AI momentum and valuations versus more fundamental sectors like REITs, healthcare, industrials, and staples. He also defines “first-year maximum drawdown” as the largest peak-to-trough decline in a stock's first year post-IPO. 00:00 Market Recap Overview 00:38 Sector Rotation Snapshot 01:31 Bonds and Tech Divergence 02:11 Debunking the Iran Rally 03:04 AI Momentum vs Fundamentals 04:07 What Drawdown Means 05:02 Wrap Up and Contact Links mentioned in this episode: DividendCafe.com TheBahnsenGroup.com
Rick Chess, attorney, real estate strategist, capital-raising expert, and trusted advisor, is passionate about helping entrepreneurs, investors, and business owners navigate complex decisions that can dramatically impact enterprise value and long-term success. Throughout a career spanning more than five decades, Rick has raised over $100 million for multiple organizations, guided companies through acquisitions, governance challenges, and strategic growth, and helped owners prepare for successful exits. We explore The Capital Raising Framework — Focus on Individuals, Not “the Market”; Be Ready to Sell; Start With Who You Know; Connect on Emotion; and Find a Problem to Solve. Rick explains why raising capital is ultimately about understanding people, not pitching ideas, why investors care more about their needs than your opportunity, and how trust-based relationships create opportunities that compound over time. He also shares lessons from raising capital, building influential networks, serving on boards, and helping entrepreneurs avoid costly mistakes when pursuing funding, growth, and exit strategies. — How to be a Trusted Advisor with Rick Chess Good day, dear listeners. Steve Preda here with the Management Blueprint Podcast. And my guest today is Rick Chess, who is a real estate and exit strategist. He helps business and real estate owners, and the trusted advisors who guide them, turn complex decisions into strategic moves that grow enterprise value and maximize sale outcomes. Rick, welcome to the show. Thank you. Appreciate it, Steve. Well, it’s great to have you. And I’m going to ask you my favorite question, which I always ask: What is your personal ‘Why’, and what are you doing to manifest it in your practice? When you go back in my career, 50-some years, where I’ve been most happy is either growing an organization. That can be a community, that can be a business, it can be an association. And then, at some point, individuals in that association want to move on, whether that’s to retire, to go someplace else, or whatever. And I find that in that world, there are certain things where they might have a Steve Preda who helps them with how to manage day to day. But they get to certain big issues that they’ve never done before, and maybe they’ll never do again. That’s where I like to come in because I know I’m critically important to them. So you’re a trusted advisor. You like to grapple with the big challenges people have in their lives, whether it’s a big real estate transaction, getting ready for an exit, an acquisition, or something like that. Yeah. Yeah. So, I mean, the things that would be—for instance, most folks, if they’re talking about real estate, they have some idea how to fix a toilet. They have some idea how to buy a property. But when they get to a certain point, it’s like, “We need to raise $10,000. We need to raise $100 million,” whatever the amount is, because there’s either a great opportunity or they want to keep moving upward. And they have, again, a Steve Preda who can help them through the process. How they get that capital often is what trips people up. So that’s where I kind of first got into this. I was an acquisition guy. I knew how to spend other people’s money, but I didn’t know at that time how to raise the money. And I’ve done it several times. I’ve raised $100 million for three different companies. And like everything in life, like with Summit, there is a process that you go through. And I love doing it. I just love doing that kind of stuff. Okay. So when you are doing capital raising, fundraising, M&A deals, or real estate transactions, is there a framework that has helped you, that you figured out along the way? And think about something that is three to five steps. Maybe it’s a mental model of how you look at things, or maybe it’s a process. How would you describe that framework that you have, or that has helped you, so that the listeners would also benefit from it? The listeners are best served if they step back from their preconceived notions of, A, how they think capital is attracted, because they usually are wrong. And they step back from how wonderful they are. And those two things are difficult. Because the reality is, no one is waiting to give you money. That’s foolish. You’ve got to sell the concept like you have to sell everything else. And what you sell is not what you think is wonderful. It’s what the market is going to think is wonderful. It’s like with any other product you’re making. “Hey, I made this great widget.” And the population looks at it and says, “I don’t need it. I don’t want it. I don’t know what it does.” And depending on whether you’re trying to raise $100,000 from friends and family or $100 million on Wall Street, you look at who it is that you know. Because people that you know might at least return your phone call. So if you don’t know Bill Gates, thinking that you’re going to go to Bill Gates and get a billion dollars is, well, stup*d. But if you’re just trying to raise money from friends and family, and you have an aunt who lives three states away that you don’t see very often, and she has some money, okay, then you start with who you know. So, for instance, thinking about one of the many ways that you can raise money, there’s something called intrastate. And it is something that’s allowed by the Securities and Exchange Commission. If all of your money is raised within your own state, there are certain allowances for that. But if you do one transaction outside the state, it all collapses. So like everything else on the business side, where there are certain rules that you can’t violate without getting into trouble, it’s the same thing when raising money. And I get so many people saying, “I’m going to list this on Wall Street, and I’m going to make…” It’s like, “No, you don’t. You better be prepared. If you’re going to list something on Wall Street, you’d better have $25 million that you can risk just to get it out there. And nine times out of ten you’re going to fail.” Not because there’s anything wrong with you. It’s just that if you’re going to climb Mount Kilimanjaro with a pair of Keds, a T-shirt, and some shorts, you’re not prepared to climb that mountain. It’s no different when raising capital. And also think about when you were a kid. At a certain age, your parents let you cross the street to see your buddy. Then ten years later, they’ll let you get in the car and drive, but you’ve got to get home by midnight. It’s the same thing with raising money. And there aren’t a lot of folks who have done what I’ve done. So talking to your local lawyer or accountant—who may be wonderful people—but if they’ve never raised money, they’re not the people to talk to. One of the ways people get taken advantage of on a regular basis is they’ll go to a securities attorney. The securities attorney will charge them $100,000 and write this great offering document, and no one ever gives them a penny. Because lawyers generally have no clue what’s happening in the marketplace. I own my own securities broker-dealer. I’ve also raised money for three different companies. It’s not easy. But like having read your book, Steve, if you follow certain paths, there’s at least a chance for success. Same thing here. Fascinating. So what I’m taking away in terms of a framework: Be aware that people are not out there waiting to give you money. You have to sell them. So that’s the first step. The second one is: start with who you know. Don’t start on Wall Street. Start with the people you know, where you have some trust, the people you understand, and where you have a chance to get there. And then look at some special circumstance that’s going to give you a leg up. For example— Absolutely. Again, this is coming right out of your book on the business side. You create a widget. So what? But you create a widget that solves a problem. Ah. Then you have something. So it’s the same thing. When you get over onto the money-raising side, it’s: who do you know? Where do they live? How much money do they have? How do I approach them? But then, in the end, it’s not what’s in it for you, it’s what’s in it for them. And for them, if it’s friends and family, your mama may give you some money because she thinks you’re cute. Your aunt might give you some money because she’s related to your mama. But at some point, you’re going to people who really have a checkbook. They have money in the checkbook. They’re not going to give this up just because you’re cute or you have a great idea. You’re either going to get them because you have something they’ve never heard of, or you have something that really feels like it could solve one of their needs. And their needs are not always what you think. Some people think, “Well, what they need is high cash flow.” What if they don’t need cash flow, but they’re really interested in a cure for cancer? What if you think, “Well, it’s really going to go up in value”? Well, they have all the money they need. They’re not looking for that. But is this something that is going to allow their nephew to come work for you? Yeah. When you start thinking that you know what other people are thinking, that’s when you’re going to fail. When you can step back and just ask them, “Well, what’s important to you?” If you can’t have a conversation, one, you’re never going to date anybody, and you’re never going to raise any money. And don’t be slick. You can be slick for three sentences, and at that point they’re going to reject everything you say thereafter. So don’t talk about how much money you’re going to make and all the rest of it. No. Talk about them. Talk about them. Talk about them. Your document should talk about them. Your questions should talk about them. Now, does that mean there are certain people who won’t put money into your deal? Yes, because it doesn’t fit. If you sell high-heeled shoes and a runner comes in, they’re generally not going to buy your high-heeled shoes. They’re not going to invest money in high-heeled shoes. But if that high-heeled shoe actually is a running shoe, and you can break off the heel and then… I mean, I don’t know. You could come up with something there. And the folks that say no are sometimes your biggest advocates. What? The folks that… Yes. Because you’ve been able to get into their head, and they’ve shaken it around, and they’ve looked at it and said, “No, that’s probably not right for me. I’m not into high-heeled shoes, but I have a friend.” If you’ve done a sincere job, a thoughtful job, you’ve really asked them questions, and you’ve connected on an emotional level, they’ll open the next door. And that’s what it’s about. It’s often a lot of the same things that you teach people about how to sell their company. It’s how they sell— Rick, this is fascinating. So how do you connect with people on an emotional level? What’s the trick there? First thing is: why are they going to take a meeting with you? Why they take a meeting with you answers almost everything that we’ve just asked. If they’re taking a meeting with you because you’re related, okay, that’s the emotional connection. If they take a meeting with you because some friend of yours called them and said, “This is a great way to make money,” that’s another reason. If you found them in an article in the paper—yes, there are things called newspapers. They print them. There are words in them. And there’s somebody in there who has shown an interest in something you do. Then you’re talking to them about that interest. You want to try to avoid cold calls. Really, it’s a waste of your time and a waste of their time. It’s a random thing. It’s like asking every girl who walks by in college, “Do you want to go out on a date?” Sometimes it works. You get slapped a lot, get arrested, and what have you. There’s this thing called the internet, Steve. And what shocks me is how few people—not just my age, but young pups—say, “Well, that’s for watching YouTube videos.” No. Through the internet, you have so much information. So maybe I can’t find anything about Johnny Jones, but his kids are on there and what sports they play. Huh. Okay, so I used to do judo. I did three years of judo in high school. If somebody’s doing karate or whatever, I have an opening. I have something to talk about. Now, it’s great if what you have to talk about then connects to something else that they want. It’s a linking process of connecting various things together. It’s what I did… I told you I was a member of the General Assembly in Pennsylvania way back in the ’70s. And I learned there that if I could get people talking about themselves, or their next-door neighbor, or some relative… What’s funny is people are much more likely to tell you about somebody else. So when I go into a company—this is just a side note—when I’m doing due diligence and I really want to know their financial condition, I’m not going to get it from the CFO. I’m going to get it from somebody over in property management. Why? Because the property management person knows not to tell me anything secret about property management, but they’ll talk about finances all the time. And it’s the same thing. If I’m in a family and I want to know about Daddy, I talk to the daughter. If I want to know about a neighbor, I talk to a neighbor. I can go to the post office. Everything you ever need to position yourself to sell is out there waiting for you. But you’ve got to get out of your head what you think the market is about and start thinking about individuals within the market. And accept that when I’ve raised money, 70% to 80% of the people I call on don’t do a deal with me. But of that 70%, half of them lead me to somebody else. And I keep up with them. They become my support group. They become my unofficial advisors. Because I’m a decent guy, they want me to succeed. And once they know I’m not bugging them anymore, I say, “Hey, you told me I should go talk to such-and-such. Here’s what I heard.” And then the network just expands. And occasionally, that person who said no has somebody new come into their life and says, “You need to go talk to Rick Chess.” And sometimes the next time I’m raising money, their situation is different. So the person who told me no originally has seen me work the market and close the deal. It’s amazing how attractive an opportunity is once you can’t put any more money into it. And so you let them know, “I know it wasn’t the right time for you to come into my deal, but we did buy this company. We’ve doubled their…” Whatever it is. You continue to work with them. If somebody is willing to give you time on the phone, on Zoom, at a coffee shop, or wherever, they’re your friend for life. They don’t know that yet, but you’re going to make them your friend for life. It’s the old six degrees of separation—the Kevin Bacon game. Everybody’s related to somebody somewhere. And it’s what makes this fun for me. You were talking before about growing an exit. I love the process of putting together the network and feeding the network. There are people I’ve known for 50 years that I still talk with. You’re very good at connecting people and making them look good with other people that you connect them to. It’s very gratifying. So this is a long game, right? Absolutely. It’s a long game because you’re being decent. You listen to people. You find something that helps them. You learn what they need, what is the itch that needs to be scratched, and then you connect people who can help them scratch that itch. And then they will reciprocate, and it becomes a self-perpetuating process. Well, I mean, an example is the work that I do in North Carolina with a family that owns 44 hotels. A woman who was my CPA left the CPA firm and became the family officer for a large family here in Richmond. A friend of hers who does advisory work with family offices was giving up on a client. So she told my friend, who used to be a CPA. She introduced me to them and said, “Would you be willing to serve on the board of a private company?” I said, “Well, do they pay?” I used to be on the board of a public company, and after a certain age, you’re not attractive anymore. After a certain age, they want you off the board because the institutions say, “We want a mix on the board. So I got introduced to these people, and I’ve had a great time. Members of the family have hired me for other work, and it just goes on and on. But I’ve learned that you’ve got to pay it forward. So I have students of mine from VCU who I’ve helped place in jobs. I keep up with them. I give them ideas. And they’re often shocked to find that I’m still in touch with them. I’m not asking them for anything. I’m just saying, “Look, I paid it forward to you. Now it’s your turn to pay it forward to somebody else.” And some of them are doing it. Some of them haven’t caught on yet. But it is the circle of life, and it’s all tied together. And there are skills you have that I don’t have. There are skills I have that you don’t have. We both have folks that work with business brokers because they have a different drive. But it’s also self-selecting. There are a lot of people you’ve met that you don’t do business with. There are a lot of people I’ve met that I don’t do business with. If you’re going to get into raising money, doing governance, or doing exit planning, whatever it may be, one of the most important things is saying no. Or, “No, I don’t want to work with this person.” You can always be friendly with them. Yeah. But I try to fire a client every month. Somebody that just doesn’t fit for me ethically. Yeah. Or I don’t think there’s anything more I can do for them. I pass off legal work to other attorneys in Virginia. I’m the chair of the Real Property Section of the state bar. There are 1,550 attorneys. I have plenty of attorneys that I can pass things on to, and they’re happy to get the business, and I’m happy. I’ve got somebody that I’ve referred that’s happy that I’ve referred them. My biggest challenge, my wife would say, my son would say, is that I’m a squirrel chaser. Something new and interesting comes along, and I want to get involved with it. And I’ve wasted so much time. So I’m working with this hotel group down in North Carolina. The last time I had worked with a hotel company was 30 years earlier. Two owners couldn’t agree on a direction. I worked with them for six months. We made a decision. It was great work. I learned a lot about hotels. But I then went 30 years without applying the same skills. And that’s one thing that, with age, I’ve realized. I am better off saying: “I’ll help you with capital, I’ll help you with governance, and when you’re ready, I’ll help you exit.” That’s it. Yeah. If it’s not one of those three, I’ll talk about it. Yeah. I’ll listen to you. You don’t want to engage me. Yeah. I mean, people want deep expertise. They don’t want generalists. They want someone who knows what they’re talking about and who can link them to other resources who also know what they’re talking about. And in today’s age, I think this is becoming more important again. Because of the internet, there was a disintermediation going on, but now there is a reintermediation, I believe. Because there’s so much noise out there, you don’t know what is true and what is fake. AI is creating a lot of fake stuff. The only people you can really trust are the people who are in front of you, or someone recommends them whom you trust. It’s a transparency thing. So I think what you’re doing is very valuable. It’s going to become even more valuable. And knowledge is ubiquitous. You can ask ChatGPT, and it will give you an answer. But how do you get the trust? How do you get the emotion? How do you get the relationships? That’s all human stuff. And if you still have that, then you’ve got what is valuable. Well, I have a friend of mine who wrote a book, and he wrote it as a fable. What I love about it is that I know the true story behind the fable. And what comes across in every single chapter is that, with that trust, people who were afraid took a step. And often that is the hardest thing. So I go to the gym six days a week, and the gym is hard. Getting in the car to drive there is the hard part. Once I’m there, I’m around friends, I work hard, I sweat, I get better. Getting in that car and driving down the drive… So in your fable, in your book, and in most of where I’ve had success, I would love to say it was because I was brilliant. Eh, sometimes I will say I was brilliant. But let me give you an example. United Dominion Realty Trust, now based in Denver and originally based here in Richmond, has been around for 35 years. It was one of the original five REITs in the country—real estate investment trusts. I came in as acquisitions director. They hadn’t closed a deal in a year. I closed three in the first three months. I grew the firm tenfold in 10 years, and I had great people. Buddy Scott as an analyst. Catherine Surface as an attorney. But what I did was look at it and say, “Does anybody know what we’re trying to buy?” Because they had no acquisition criteria. So I wrote a one-page acquisition criteria document and put it out to everybody who had ever submitted a deal. Oh, and we weren’t responding to the submissions. So a submission would come in, they would look at it and say, “Okay, that doesn’t work.” But they never told anybody no. So one of my rules was that anything that came in would get a response within 48 hours. And it should be specific. “We don’t like this because of the city.” “We don’t like this because of the roof.” Something specific, because I knew they’d pay attention. And by responding within 48 hours, we went from struggling to get submissions to doubling our submissions within a year. Because people were like, “Oh, we know what they want. We know they will respond.” And then—and this probably sounds outrageous—we celebrated. We put out a newsletter every month. This is back when you mailed things, so we’re going way back into the dinosaur era. But anytime a broker brought us something that we bought, we would do a full-page spread on the broker. We were marketing him or her. People loved us. And they would tell others about us. So owners would know that if they came to us, we’d make a fair offer and we’d move on. So I would love to say that’s because I was a great attorney. I would love to say that’s because I was insightful. It was just like, “Well, damn, this is obvious.” And reading some of your stuff, I’ve seen you point that out to people time and time again. You give me too much credit. But yeah, I mean, if you’re there, they say that if you work hard for 25 years, you can become an overnight success. So yeah, it does get obvious when you’ve been studying it long and hard. Well, listen, Rick, that’s been wonderful. So what is your final thought for an entrepreneur, a young entrepreneur or founder who’s coming up? Maybe he’s in real estate. Maybe he’s trying to be successful. What’s the most important mindset for an entrepreneur to become successful? Well, I mean, you’ve got to know something. I mean, you either need to really know construction, or you’ve got to really know how to lease a space. If you’re going into it like they do on HDTV, like, “Oh, we’re going to find this property and it’s going to be…” You’re going to fail. So get good at something. Accept the fact that you’re not going to be good at everything. Find people who fill in the spots where you aren’t good. In the old days, you might have had to hire them. In today’s world, there are fractional CFOs. And then when you get down to picking your experts—your attorneys, your accountants, the people that cost you real money—ask them a simple question: When was the last time they did whatever it is that you’re trying to do? Not when was the last time they prepared a securities document. When was the last time they prepared a securities document that succeeded? And that’ll knock out two-thirds of them right there. Love it. That’s fantastic. Well, if you’re listening to this and you want to be successful in business, or you have a business and maybe you’re getting close to retirement and want to figure out how to transition it, how to exit right, and how to structure it… Or maybe you have a family company and you’re trying to put together a board, and you need someone who really understands governance. Or if you’re trying to do a transaction, a merger, or an acquisition, and you need a trusted advisor who will connect you to the right people and help you make it happen, then call Rick Chess. Rick Chess is here in Richmond. He is on LinkedIn. And you have a website as well, Rick, right? Yep, yep. What’s your domain? It’s chesslawfirm.com. Chesslawfirm.com. So you can go there, and Rick is going to respond because he always does within 24 hours, or 48 hours max, and he’ll help you. So Rick, thank you very much for coming on the show and sharing your wisdom with us. And if you’re listening to this and you like this show, please follow us on YouTube and Apple Podcasts. Give us a review, and make sure you listen to every episode because we have very exciting entrepreneurs and subject matter experts sharing their knowledge. So thank you for coming, and thank you for listening. Important Links: Rick's LinkedIn Rick's website
Hoya Capital's David Auerbach talks REITs, interest rates, and spiking volatility (0:30) M&A activity - more small/midcap in play (4:35) Retail one of the more positive sectors (9:25) Strawberry Fields and healthcare (14:30) HOMZ, RIET ETFs (16:40) A manufactured housing play (23:15) Recorded June 10, 2026Show Notes:REITs Are Boring And Boring Is GoodiREIT®+HOYA CapitalTranscriptsFor full access to analyst ratings, stock and ETF quant scores, and dividend grades, subscribe to Seeking Alpha Premium at seekingalpha.com/subscriptions
Americana Partners LLC Market Commentary is a financial podcast for investors, clients, and market-focused listeners who want clear perspective on the economy, investing, and portfolio strategy. Hosted by Melissa Giles and based on the market views and special reports of David M. Darst, Chief Investment Officer at Americana Partners, the show breaks down monthly market commentary, economic conditions, investment strategy, asset allocation themes, and the forces shaping today's financial markets. Each episode is designed to help listeners better understand market trends, long-term investing, and how to think clearly in changing environments. If you are looking for a smart, approachable source for market updates, economic outlook, wealth management insight, portfolio positioning, and investment commentary, subscribe to stay informed with timely perspectives from Americana Partners. Join Our Distribution List – For a full copy of our report. Americana Partners - https://www.americanapartners.com/contact/ Americana Partners Website - https://www.americanapartners.com/ Linked In - https://www.linkedin.com/company/americana-partners/ Spotify - https://open.spotify.com/show/3rX19ND89pwEob9efsFNNF iTunes - https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/americana-partners/id1496186853 Disclosures Americana Partners, LLC is registered as an investment adviser with the SEC. The firm only transacts business in states where it is properly registered, or is excluded or exempted from registration requirements. Registration as an investment adviser does not constitute an endorsement of the firm by securities regulators nor does it indicate that the adviser has attained a particular level of skill or ability. A copy of Americana Partners' current written disclosure brochure filed with the SEC which discusses among other things, Americana Partners' business practices, services and fees, is available through the SEC's website at: www.adviserinfo.sec.gov. The tax and legal information contained in this newsletter is general in nature. It should not be construed as legal or tax advice. Always consult an attorney or tax professional regarding your specific legal or tax situation. Foreign securities, foreign currencies, and securities issued by U.S. entities with substantial foreign operations can involve additional risks relating to political, economic, or regulatory conditions in foreign countries. These risks include fluctuations in foreign currencies; withholding or other taxes; trading, settlement, custodial, and other operational risks; and less stringent investor protection and disclosure standards in some foreign markets. All of these factors can make foreign investments, especially those in emerging markets, more volatile and potentially less liquid than U.S. investments. In addition, foreign markets can perform differently from the U.S. market. Investing involves certain risks, including possible loss of principal. You should understand and carefully consider a strategy's objectives, risks, fees, expenses and other information before investing. The views expressed in this commentary are subject to change and are not intended to be a recommendation or investment advice. Such views do not take into account the individual financial circumstances or objectives of any investor that receives them. The strategies described herein may not be suitable for all investors. There is no guarantee that the adviser will meet any of its investment objectives. All indices are unmanaged and are not available for direct investment. Indices do not incur costs including the payment of transaction costs, fees and other expenses. This information should not be considered a solicitation or an offer to provide any service in any jurisdiction where it would be unlawful to do so under the laws of that jurisdiction. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Exposure to an asset class represented by an index is available through investable instruments based on that index. The S&P 500® Index is a widely recognized, unmanaged index of 500 common stocks which are generally representative of the U.S. stock market as a whole. The Nasdaq Composite® Index is the market capitalization-weighted index of over 2,500 common equities listed on the Nasdaq stock exchange. The types of securities in the index include American depositary receipts, common stocks, real estate investment trusts (REITs) and tracking stocks, as well as limited partnership interests. The EAFE® Index is a stock index offered by MSCI that covers non-U.S. and Canadian equity markets. It serves as a performance benchmark for the major international equity markets as represented by 21 major MSCI indices from Europe, Australasia, and the Middle East. The EAFE® Index is the oldest international stock index and is commonly called the MSCI EAFE Index. The Russell 2500® is a market-cap-weighted index that includes the smallest 2,500 companies covered in the broad-based Russell 3000 sphere of United States-based listed equities. All 2,500 of the companies included in the Index cover the small- and mid-cap market capitalizations. The Russell 1000® Growth Index is an unmanaged index that measures the performance of the large-cap growth segment of the U.S. equity universe. It includes those Russell 1000® Index companies with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values. The CBOE Volatility Index (VIX) is a measure of expected price fluctuations in the S&P 500 Index options over the next 30 days. The VIX is calculated in real time by the Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE). P/E or Price to Earnings ratio is indicates the dollar amount an investor can expect to invest in a company in order to receive one dollar of that company's earnings. The Consumer Confidence Survey® reflects prevailing business conditions and likely developments for the months ahead. The Manufacturing Business Outlook Survey is a monthly survey of manufacturers in the Third Federal Reserve District; Participants indicate the direction of change in overall business activity and in the various measures of activity at their plants: employment, working hours, new and unfilled orders, shipments, inventories, delivery times, prices paid, and prices received. The ISM manufacturing index, also known as the purchasing managers' index (PMI), is a monthly indicator of U.S. economic activity based on a survey of purchasing managers at more than 300 manufacturing firms. The Composite Index of Leading Indicators, otherwise known as the Leading Economic Index (LEI), is an index published monthly by The Conference Board. It is used to predict the direction of global economic movements in future months. A bond rating is a letter-based credit scoring scheme used to judge the quality and creditworthiness of a bond. The option adjusted spread (OAS) measures the difference in yield between a bond with an embedded option, such as an MBS or callables, with the yield on Treasuries. Mean reversion, in finance, suggests that various phenomena of interest such as asset prices and volatility of returns eventually revert to their long-term average levels. A meme stock is a security that has seen an increase in trading volume after going viral on social media or an online forum. This document may contain forward-looking statements relating to the objectives, opportunities, and the future performance of the U.S. market generally. Forward looking statements may be identified by the use of such words as; “believe,” “expect,”“anticipate,”“should,”“planned,”“estimated,”“potential”and other similar terms. Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, estimates with respect to financial condition, results of operations, and success or lack of success of any particular investment strategy. All are subject to various factors, including, but not limited to general and local economic conditions, changing levels of competition within certain industries and markets, changes in interest rates, changes in legislation or regulation, and other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory and technological factors affecting a portfolio' operations that could cause actual results to differ materially from projected results. Such statements are forward-looking in nature and involve a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, and accordingly, actual results may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking statements. Prospective investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward looking statements or examples. This material is proprietary and may not be reproduced, transferred, modified or distributed in any form without prior written permission from Americana Partners. Americana Partners reserves the right, at any time and without notice, to amend, or cease publication of the information contained herein. Certain of the information contained herein has been obtained from third-party sources and has not been independently verified. It is made available on an "as is" basis without warranty. Any strategies or investment programs described in this presentation are provided for educational purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of securities offered for sale or private placement offerings available to any investor. The mention of any individual security should not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell that security.
The robotics industry is quietly emerging as one of the most undervalued opportunities for real estate investors today. While mainstream attention focuses heavily on software and AI, physical automation is simultaneously transforming how assets are constructed and operated. The global robotics market currently sits at roughly $70 billion and is projected by McKinsey to cross $260 billion by 2030. This exponential growth mirrors the e-commerce warehouse boom of 2010, offering massive upside for investors positioned ahead of the curve.In this episode, we break down the two primary avenues robotics will impact real estate: significantly lowering hard construction costs and drastically reducing ongoing operational expenses. From 3D-printed homes by ICON cutting building costs by 20% to 30%, to humanoid robots reducing hospitality labor expenses by up to 35%, the financial implications are profound. Listeners will learn exactly how to capitalize on this shift, including specific publicly traded companies, REITs, and upcoming IPOs directly exposed to real estate automation.Key Topics DiscussedThe current $70 billion valuation of the robotics industry and projections reaching $260 billion by 2030.How ICON Technology's 3D-printed homes are decreasing traditional stick frame construction costs by 20% to 30%.The impact of autonomous rebar-tying robots reducing structural labor needs by 40%.Keen Robotics and Figure AI streamlining commercial facility management and cutting hospitality labor costs.Why Prologis is capturing a 200 basis point occupancy premium for robotics-enabled industrial facilities.Specific actionable investment vehicles including REITs, automation infrastructure stocks, and upcoming AI IPOs.Key TakeawaysA 30% reduction in labor costs for a standard 200-room hotel can translate to over $11 million in added asset value based on standard cap rates.Investors who target companies building durable competitive advantages through robotics integration will secure a significant economic moat.Industrial REITs are already proving that commercial tenants are willing to pay a premium to occupy tech-forward, automation-ready buildings.The entire global robotics sector is currently valued lower than Home Depot's market cap, highlighting the immense remaining upside.Connect & Take Action:Wealth Intelligence Brief: Text "WIB" to 844-447-1555 to get Matty's free macro data, real estate intel, and crypto signals delivered to your inbox 3 times a week.Imagos Income Fund: Text "INCOME" or "DEALS" to 844-447-1555 to learn more about Matty A's private debt fund targeting 10% fixed returns paid out monthly.
In this episode, Collin Martin and Liz Ann Sonders focus on the outlook for equities, fixed income, and the overall U.S. economy in the second half of 2026. They begin by discussing recent inflation data, noting that while CPI remains elevated, core inflation came in slightly better than expected. Both agree inflation is not quickly returning to the Fed's target, but easing expectations and stable inflation expectations suggest the Federal Reserve can remain patient for now. The key risk is whether higher prices, especially at the pump, begin to erode consumer spending, as real wages have turned negative year over year. From a policy perspective, Collin expects the Fed to stay on hold through year-end, despite the fed funds futures market pricingin a potential hike. He emphasizes that short-term yields should remain steady, while longer-term Treasury yields may stay elevated due to persistent inflation, heavy Treasury issuance, and global rate pressures. In this environment, he suggests favoring short-to-intermediate bond durations and selectively considering credit risk via investment-grade corporates, high yields, and preferred securities. Liz Ann focuses on the outlook for equity investors, highlighting a shift back to a negative correlation between bond yields and stocks—more characteristic of inflation-driven regimes. Her midyear forecast points to a solid economic backdrop, led by resilient GDP growth, strong capital spending tied to AI, and a healthy labor market, though some early warning signals are emerging in survey-based employment data. The episode closes with a cautious but constructive outlook: no immediate recession signals, but investors should consider prioritizing diversification, risk management, and periodically rebalancing as markets navigate inflation, policy uncertainty, and evolving leadership trends. On Investing is an original podcast from Charles Schwab. For more on the show, visit schwab.com/OnInvesting. If you enjoy the show, please leave a rating or review on Apple Podcasts. Important Disclosures This material is intended for general informational and educational purposes only. This should not be considered an individualized recommendation or personalized investment advice. The securities, investment products and investment strategies mentioned are not suitable for everyone. Each investor needs to review an investment strategy for his or her own particular situation before making any investment decisions. All expressions of opinion are subject to change without notice in reaction to shifting market, economic or political conditions. Data contained herein from third party providers is obtained from what are considered reliable sources. However, its accuracy, completeness or reliability cannot be guaranteed. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Investing involves risk, including loss of principal. Performance may be affected by risks associated with non-diversification, including investments in specific countries or sectors. Additional risks may also include, but are not limited to, investments in foreign securities, especially emerging markets, real estate investment trusts (REITs), fixed income, municipal securities including state specific municipal securities, small capitalization securities and commodities. Each individual investor should consider these risks carefully before investing in a particular security or strategy. Fixed income securities are subject to increased loss of principal during periods of rising interest rates. Fixed income investments are subject to various other risks including changes in credit quality, market valuations, liquidity, prepayments, early redemption, corporate events, tax ramifications, and other factors. Lower rated securities are subject to greater credit risk, default risk, and liquidity risk. Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS) are inflation-linked securities issued by the US Government whose principal value is adjusted periodically in accordance with the rise and fall in the inflation rate. Thus, the dividend amount payable is also impacted by variations in the inflation rate, as it is based upon the principal value of the bond. It may fluctuate up or down. Repayment at maturity is guaranteed by the US Government and may be adjusted for inflation to become the greater of the original face amount at issuance or that face amount plus an adjustment for inflation. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities are guaranteed by the US Government, but inflation-protected bond funds do not provide such a guarantee. Preferred securities are a type of hybrid investment that share characteristics of both stock and bonds. They are often callable, meaning the issuing company may redeem the security at a certain price after a certain date. Such call features, and the timing of a call, may affect the security's yield. Preferred securities generally have lower credit ratings and a lower claim to assets than the issuer's individual bonds. Like bonds, prices of preferred securities tend to move inversely with interest rates, so their prices may fall during periods of rising interest rates. Investment value will fluctuate, and preferred securities, when sold before maturity, may be worth more or less than original cost. Preferred securities are subject to various other risks including changes in interest rates and credit quality, default risks, market valuations, liquidity, prepayments, early redemption, deferral risk, corporate events, tax ramifications, and other factors. High-yield securities and unrated securities of similar credit quality (junk bonds) are subject to greater levels of credit and liquidity risks and may be more volatile than higher-rated securities. High-yield securities are considered predominately speculative with respect to the issuer's continuing ability to make principal and interest payments. All names and market data shown are for illustrative purposes only and are not a recommendation, offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security. Forecasts contained herein are for illustrative purposes only, may be based upon proprietary research and are developed through analysis of historical public data. The policy analysis provided by Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., does not constitute and should not be interpreted as an endorsement of any political party. Indexes are unmanaged, do not incur management fees, costs, and expenses and cannot be invested in directly. For more information on indexes, please see schwab.com/indexdefinitions Negative correlation refers to investments that tend to move in opposite directions: when one rises, the other falls. A hyperscaler is a large-scale cloud service provider that offers vast computing, storage, and networking resources through a distributed infrastructure of interconnected servers and software. (0626-WG7N) Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
Episode Overview:In this episode of The World According to Boyar, Jonathan Boyar speaks with Lina Tetelbaum, a corporate partner at Wachtell Lipton, one of the world's most influential corporate law firms, where she heads the firm's shareholder engagement and activism defense practice.Lina takes us inside the world of shareholder activism — how activists choose targets, the small universe of ideas they typically push, how companies and boards respond, and why so many activist campaigns ultimately end in settlements rather than full proxy fights.We discuss the tension between the changes activists typically call for and long-term business strategy, the role of index funds and proxy advisors, how activists build positions, what really happens behind the scenes in settlement negotiations, and why even controlled companies are not completely immune from activist pressure.Lina also shares her perspective on Wachtell Lipton's history in takeover defense and activism, from the era of the poison pill to today's more complex battles between boards, activists, institutional investors, and other stakeholders.Topics discussed include: shareholder activism, proxy fights, activist settlements, board governance, index funds, ISS and Glass Lewis, activist nominees, controlled companies, capital allocation, M&A, and long-term value creation.To receive more of Boyar's research, interviews, and thoughts on investing, subscribe to our Substack at boyarresearch.substack.comAbout Lina Tetelbaum:Elina (Lina) Tetelbaum is a Corporate Partner and Head of Shareholder Engagement and Activism Defense at Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz. Lina regularly counsels on proxy fights, takeover defense, corporate governance, crisis management and mergers and acquisitions. Lina has been named a Dealmaker of the Year by The American Lawyer, one of The Deal's Top Women in Dealmaking, a Power Player in Shareholder Activism by Financier Worldwide, a Leading Partner in Shareholder Activism by Legal500, a Law360 Rising Star for M&A, and one of the 500 Leading Dealmakers in America by Lawdragon, among other honors.Lina has advised companies in numerous industries navigating activist situations across an array of established and new activists, including Phillips 66 in its response to three years of activism from Elliott Management and first-ever contested vote by Elliott in the United States, United States Steel Corporation in its successful defense against a proxy contest by Ancora, The J.M. Smucker Co. in its response to activism by Elliott Management, Hexcel Corporation in response to activism by Vision One, Macy's, Inc. in its response to activism and unsolicited takeover proposals, Match Group in its response to activism by Elliott Management and later Anson Funds, and numerous REITs in their response to activism by Land & Buildings. Lina has extensive expertise advising companies in response to unsolicited takeover offers, including National Instruments in its $8.2 billion acquisition by Emerson following its unsolicited offer, and Kansas City Southern in its unsolicited transaction with Canadian National Railway and $31 billion acquisition by Canadian Pacific Railway. Lina has also advised public and private companies in a wide range of industries in mergers and acquisitions, including The Free Press in its acquisition by Paramount, Allergan in its $83 billion acquisition by AbbVie, PDC Energy in its $7.6 billion acquisition by Chevron and successful proxy fight defense against Kimmeridge, Barnes Group in its $3.6 billion acquisition by Apollo Global Management, and Masonite International in its $3.9 billion sale to Owens Corning. Lina is the President of the Stuyvesant High School Alumni Association, an Advisory Board Member of the Harvard Law School Program on Corporate Governance, the John L. Weinberg Center for Corporate Governance at the University of Delaware, and the Yale Law School Center for the Study of Corporate law. She frequently lectures, presents and publishes on corporate governance and M&A at law schools and corporate governance conferences around the world. Lina received an A.B. magna cum laude in Economics from Harvard University and completed a J.D. from Yale Law School, where she served as editor-in-chief of the Yale Journal on Regulation and editor of the Yale Law Journal. After law school, Lina served as a law clerk to the Chief Judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Unlocking Investment Opportunities Since 1975At the Boyar Value Group, we've dedicated nearly five decades to the pursuit of value on behalf of our clients. Founded in 1975, our firm has earned a reputation as a trusted source for uncovering undervalued opportunities in the stock market.To find out more about the Boyar Value Group, please visit www.boyarvaluegroup.com
Can Apple Update the 16-Year-Old Siri? This week marked Apple's annual Worldwide Developers Conference (WWDC) in Cupertino, California. One of the biggest storylines is Apple's effort to reinvent Siri, which many users now view as one of the least capable AI assistants on the market… The Housing Market Is Finally Starting to Look Normal Again For the last several years, the housing market has felt anything but normal. Ultra-low mortgage rates, limited inventory, bidding wars, and rapidly rising home prices created an environment that left many buyers frustrated and many sellers expecting unrealistic prices… Inflation Hits a Three-Year High, But the Details Tell a Different Story The latest Consumer Price Index (CPI) report showed inflation rising 4.2% year-over-year, the highest reading since April 2023. At first glance, that sounds concerning. But a deeper look shows that the inflation story is being driven largely by a handful of categories, especially energy and travel… How long will the AI buildout cycle really last? The market has rewarded virtually every company connected to AI infrastructure. Chip manufacturers, networking companies, power providers, cooling suppliers, data center REITs, and cloud providers have all benefited from an unprecedented surge in spending. But history tells us that every capital spending boom eventually slows… SpaceX IPO Finally Come To the Market, Should You Buy Now? Live Market Discussion! Companies Discussed: Docusign, Inc (DOCU), Broadcom Inc. (AVGO), and Viasat, Inc. (VSAT)
Real estate mogul Grant Cardone made his Consensus mainstage debut to explain the unconventional investment strategy he's been building for the past 17 months: fusing Bitcoin directly into large-scale real estate deals to outcompete traditional REITs. Cardone, who first received Bitcoin as payment for a speaking gig and still holds those 115 coins today, argues the hybrid model can deliver 22–32% returns by combining the stability of cash-flowing properties with the upside of Bitcoin. He also shared why he believes this structure could disrupt the entire $4 trillion REIT industry. - Timecodes: 00:00 - Grant Cardone at Consensus Miami 2026 00:40 - How Grant First Discovered Bitcoin 02:02 - Real Estate Bitcoin Hybrid Strategy 05:45 - Why Real Estate Beats Other Asset Classes 08:03 - Disrupting The REIT Industry 14:22 - Going Public And Bypassing The Banks 16:57 - Final Advice: Get Fiat, Build Wealth
In this episode of the Matthews Mentality Podcast, Kyle Matthews sits down with Brian Finnegan, President and CEO of Brixmor Property Group (NYSE: BRX), one of the largest open-air shopping center owners and operators in the United States.Brian's story is a masterclass in leadership, patience, and long-term career growth. Starting as a leasing representative in 2004, he spent more than two decades working through nearly every operational role in the company before ultimately becoming CEO of a publicly traded real estate investment trust with 344 shopping centers, 62+ million square feet of retail space, and more than 900 million annual consumer visits.Time Stamps:00:00 Intro00:55 Welcome to the Show02:25 Understanding Brixmor Property Group05:10 Retail's Resurgence08:04 Supply and Demand Dynamics11:19 Same Store Growth12:51 How We Met15:13 Networking as a Young Professional16:49 Brixmor's Evolution and History20:41 Lessons from Being Young22:30 Philadelphia Roots24:29 Getting Into Real Estate26:49 Brokerage Lessons28:33 Cold Calling Stories30:56 Dealing with Rejection34:32 Time Blocking and Prospecting35:10 Maximizing Your Current Role38:01 Moving Across America39:37 Embracing New Cities40:54 National Portfolio Experience41:36 Market Expertise Matters43:14 Career Growth and Relocation45:20 Becoming CEO49:07 First Quarter Success51:59 CEO Responsibilities53:13 Redevelopment Strategy56:08 Work Life Balance01:00:13 Technology and AI01:05:07 Innovation and Young Talent01:07:50 Advice for Young Professionals01:10:01 Rapid Fire RoundIf you're interested in commercial real estate, investing, leadership, entrepreneurship, career growth, public companies, REITs, retail real estate, or business strategy, this episode is packed with practical insights and real-world experience.Follow Brian Finnegan:LinkedIn: Brian FinneganLearn More About Brixmor Property Group:Website: https://www.brixmor.com NYSE: BRXFollow Kyle Matthews:Instagram: @KyleMatthewsCEO TikTok: @KyleMatthewsCEO X: @KyleMatthewsCEO LinkedIn: Kyle MatthewsSubscribe for more interviews with CEOs, founders, investors, entrepreneurs, and industry leaders.#KyleMatthewsCEO #BrianFinnegan #Brixmor #BRX #CommercialRealEstate #RetailRealEstate #REIT #Investing #Leadership #BusinessPodcast #Entrepreneurship #RealEstateInvesting #CEO #Retail #ShoppingCenters #MatthewsMentality #BusinessGrowth #NYSE #CareerGrowth #CommercialProperty
In this episode of The Canadian Investor Podcast, Simon is joined by Daniel Foch to take a deep dive into Canadian REITs and the major forces reshaping the real estate market. They discuss why residential REITs are facing pressure from falling rents, rising vacancies, and slowing population growth, while retail REITs have been surprisingly resilient thanks to strong occupancy, rent increases, and valuable land redevelopment opportunities. They also cover the office sector, where return-to-office trends are helping at the margin but vacancy rates remain well above pre-pandemic levels, especially outside top-tier buildings. Simon and Daniel also look at industrial REITs, the impact of overbuilding, the role of higher interest rates, and whether areas like data centres could become an interesting opportunity for Canadian real estate investors. They wrap up with a discussion on office conversions, adaptive reuse, and what investors should watch before jumping into beaten-down REITs. Tickers discussed: CAR-UN.TO, BEI-UN.TO, IIP-UN.TO, KMP-UN.TO, REI-UN.TO, SRU-UN.TO, CHP-UN.TO, PMZ-UN.TO, AP-UN.TO, D-UN.TO, RPR-UN.TO, GRT-UN.TO, DIR-UN.TO. Subscribe to our Our New Youtube Channel! Check out our portfolio by going to Jointci.com Our Website Our New Youtube Channel! Canadian Investor Podcast Network Twitter: @cdn_investing Simon’s twitter: @Fiat_Iceberg Braden’s twitter: @BradoCapital Dan’s Twitter: @stocktrades_ca Want to learn more about Real Estate Investing? Check out the Canadian Real Estate Investor Podcast! Apple Podcast - The Canadian Real Estate Investor Spotify - The Canadian Real Estate Investor Web player - The Canadian Real Estate Investor Asset Allocation ETFs | BMO Global Asset Management Sign up for Fiscal.ai for free to get easy access to global stock coverage and powerful AI investing tools. Register for EQ Bank, the seamless digital banking experience with better rates and no nonsense.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Steve Cress shares Pro Quant Portfolio's impressive returns (0:45) 3 stocks from the brand-new Quant Growth & Income Portfolio (6:30) Q&A with Steve (13:30) Thoughts on SpaceX IPO (37:25)Show Notes:Know When To Hold 'Em And When To Fold 'EmA Free Peek Inside The Quant Growth & Income Portfolio: 3 Top Stocks3 Stocks To Buy From Alpha Picks/Pro Quant PortfolioTranscriptsFor full access to analyst ratings, stock and ETF quant scores, and dividend grades, subscribe to Seeking Alpha Premium at seekingalpha.com/subscriptions
In this episode we answer emails from Optimus Bill, Arun, and Aaron. We discuss why we do this show, how to build real friendships as an adult, and how to think clearly about investing without chasing fame or noise. Then we challenge the “gold returns zero” myth with a supply-and-demand lens that looks beyond popular US-centric group-think. And THEN we our go through our weekly portfolio reviews of the eight sample portfolios you can find at Portfolios | Risk Parity Radio.Additional Links:Fairfax CASA Donation Page: Donate - Fairfax CASAFather McKenna Center Donation Page: Donate - Father McKenna CenterSlides from the May 31 Zoom AMA; 2026-05-31 Risk Parity Radio AMA Summary Slides.pdf - Google DriveVideo from the May 31 Zoom AMA: 2026-05-31 Risk Parity Radio AMA Video Summary.mp4 - Google DriveBreathless Unedited AI-Bot Summary:A listener asks a deceptively simple question that a lot of personal finance repeats without thinking: if gold's expected real return is “about zero,” what does that imply about commodities, and why would you hold either one in a long-term portfolio? We take that head-on, starting with what the data actually shows in the post-1970 fiat currency era, then working outward into the real drivers that move gold: supply that barely budges, global demand that Americans often ignore, and the uncomfortable possibility that money supply growth helps explain why gold has compounded the way it has.Before we get there, we share two listener emails that land in a surprisingly human place. We talk about financial independence as “almost winning the game” and the tricky part of figuring out how to stop playing. We also reflect on why we keep Risk Parity Radio small and audienced-focused, why we avoid the usual podcast growth playbook, and how friendship, vulnerability, and alignment beat chasing money, fame, and power.We also shout out the community: creative “perfect number” donations for Fairfax CASA, a listener-organized Zoom AMA, and the kind of nerdy curiosity that makes building a risk parity style asset allocation feel less lonely. Then we close with our weekly market recap after a nasty Friday selloff and a full performance review of the sample portfolios, including stocks, Treasury bonds, REITs, gold, commodities, managed futures, and a clear warning on leveraged experimental mixes.If you like thoughtful investing talk that stays grounded in data, diversification, and real life, subscribe, share the show with a friend, and leave us a review so more do-it-yourself investors can find it.Support the show
Liz Ann Sonders and Collin Martin discuss the recent wave of IPO hype and the surge in investor interest driven by high-profile listings and large valuation headlines. They explain why headline market caps can be misleading, emphasizing the importance of float-adjusted valuations and how much stock is actually available to public investors. Despite attention-grabbing figures, the impact of these IPOs on major indexes like the S&P 500® may be smaller than many assume. Liz Ann and Collin discuss how potential changes to index inclusion rules, including shorter eligibility timelines and flexibility around profitability requirements, could alter how quickly newly public companies enter major benchmarks. In addition, they highlight structural dynamics such as lockup expirations and the gradual increase in share float over time, which can influence trading behavior well after the initial offering. Behavioral factors also play a central role in the discussion. Liz Ann revisits the risks of speculative investing, noting how FOMO and a "casino-like" market environment can lead investors to chase IPO hype rather than consider long-term portfolio fit. They stress the importance of discipline and context when evaluating new investment opportunities. The conversation then shifts to the broader macro backdrop, including the Federal Reserve's policy outlook and recent movements in the bond market. Collin outlines the Fed's likely wait-and-see approach amid rising inflation, noting that while the balance of risks has shifted, a single rate move may not signal a broader trend. They also discuss the potential impact of Fed decisions on long-term yields and overall market stability. Finally, Liz Ann and Collin preview upcoming economic data releases, including inflation reports, labor market indicators, and sentiment surveys, and discuss what they'll be watching in the week ahead. On Investing is an original podcast from Charles Schwab. For more on the show, visit schwab.com/OnInvesting. If you enjoy the show, please leave a rating or review on Apple Podcasts. Important Disclosures This material is intended for general informational and educational purposes only. This should not be considered an individualized recommendation or personalized investment advice. The securities, investment products and investment strategies mentioned are not suitable for everyone. Each investor needs to review an investment strategy for his or her own particular situation before making any investment decisions. All expressions of opinion are subject to change without notice in reaction to shifting market, economic or political conditions. Data contained herein from third party providers is obtained from what are considered reliable sources. However, its accuracy, completeness or reliability cannot be guaranteed. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Investing involves risk, including loss of principal. Performance may be affected by risks associated with non-diversification, including investments in specific countries or sectors. Additional risks may also include, but are not limited to, investments in foreign securities, especially emerging markets, real estate investment trusts (REITs), fixed income, municipal securities including state specific municipal securities, small capitalization securities and commodities. Each individual investor should consider these risks carefully before investing in a particular security or strategy. Fixed income securities are subject to increased loss of principal during periods of rising interest rates. Fixed income investments are subject to various other risks including changes in credit quality, market valuations, liquidity, prepayments, early redemption, corporate events, tax ramifications, and other factors. Lower rated securities are subject to greater credit risk, default risk, and liquidity risk. All names and market data shown are for illustrative purposes only and are not a recommendation, offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security. Forecasts contained herein are for illustrative purposes only, may be based upon proprietary research and are developed through analysis of historical public data. The policy analysis provided by Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., does not constitute and should not be interpreted as an endorsement of any political party. Indexes are unmanaged, do not incur management fees, costs, and expenses and cannot be invested in directly. For more information on indexes, please see schwab.com/indexdefinitions (0626-THZL) Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
Chief Fixed Income Strategist Vishy Tirupattur takes a look at how credit markets are adapting to fund the new phase of AI capex.Read more insights from Morgan Stanley.----- Transcript ----- Welcome to Thoughts on the Market. I am Vishy Tirupattur, Morgan Stanley's Chief Fixed Income Strategist. Today – The critical question behind the AI-driven capex cycle that is front and center for markets year to date. How is credit market financing this ecosystem evolving? It's Wednesday June 3rd at 2 pm in New York. When we first discussed the role of credit markets in financing the AI and data center build-out around the middle of last year, the direction of travel was clear. Realizing the transformative potential of AI requires unprecedented levels of capex. What has really surprised us since is the scale and speed of that spending, both of which have exceeded our expectations by a wide margin. The upward revision to capex expectations has been dramatic. A year ago, we projected the combined capex of the five large hyperscalers at roughly $450 billion in both 2026 and 2027. After the first quarter earnings reports, Morgan Stanley's internet equity analysts, led by Brian Nowak, now expect hyperscaler capex of roughly $800 billion in 2026 and $1.2 trillion in 2027. One data point really captures the surge in the underlying demand for compute. According to OpenRouter, the global weekly token usage, which is a key proxy for compute, has risen by roughly 350 percent since early January, increasing from about 6 trillion tokens to 28 trillion tokens. Credit channels for financing this capex have not only been broader and deeper than we anticipated, spanning public and private markets, but have seen remarkable in the structural innovation that is blurring the lines between public and private markets. Over $200bn of public AI-related issuance across the different credit channels has happened just in the first five months of this year. We had previously assumed unsecured issuance would be limited by the scale of the largest non-financial issuers, confined to investment grade credit only, and largely USD denominated. Instead, some hyperscaler issuance has now far exceeded even the largest telecom names; funding has expanded well beyond USD into EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY and CAD markets. The issuer base has also broadened to include data center REITs and neoclouds, particularly in the high-yield market. The scope of financing has also widened beyond the data center shells themselves. GPU financing, which we assumed would be funded entirely through equity capital, has begun to migrate into credit markets. Funding is now coming through broadly syndicated loans and asset based financing, with ABS structures not far behind. Structural innovation illustrates how rapidly the credit ecosystem is adapting to the complexities of demands of AI-driven capex. Financings that combine elements of project finance, tranching, and residual value guarantees, along with high-yield issuance backed by hyperscaler guaranteed leases – these are innovations that we have never seen before. These structures have expanded the investor base, reduced the funding frictions, and further blurred traditional boundaries – between both corporate and project finance, and public and private credit markets. At the same time, physical, operational, and political constraints are beginning to shape the pace and the composition of the AI infrastructure build-out – and, by extension, the demand for financing. Grid access, power generation equipment, skilled labor, and permitting delays are emerging as significant constraints. These are compounded by political and regulatory frictions at the local, national, and international level. As power availability becomes a gating factor, the AI build-out is likely to pull energy infrastructure financing more tightly into the orbit of AI infrastructure financing. The clear takeaway is this. The capex requirements underpinning AI infrastructure are expanding exponentially, and with them the role of credit markets in financing this build-out. Along the way, there will be winners and losers, periods of adjustment, and a range of physical, financial, and political constraints that shape outcomes on the margin. But the broader trajectory is certain. The scale, duration, and strategic importance of AI infrastructure investment mean that financing of this will remain a defining theme for credit markets and credit investors for years to come. Thanks for listening. If you enjoy the podcast, please leave us a review wherever you listen and share Thoughts on the Market with a friend or colleague today.
What financial conversations absolutely need to happen before a couple gets married — beyond just “how much money do we have”? What are the most common financial disagreements between couples? How can couples get control of their finances instead of constantly living “in the red”? When spouses come from very different financial backgrounds or mindsets, can those differences realistically be bridged? Host: Ari Wasserman with Rabbi Dr. Jeremy Wieder – Rosh Yeshiva at REITS – 9:30 with Mrs. Stacey Zrihen – Senior Director of Coaching for Living Smarter Jewish and Senior Financial Advisor for Achiezer – 34:02 with Mrs. Chani Juravel, LCSW – Author, lecturer and therapist – 1:03:50 with Rabbi Shimon Taub – Author, Laws of Tzedakah and Ma'aser – 1:35:56 Conclusions and Takeaways – 1:53:01 מראי מקומות
Tom and Don explore whether artificial intelligence is truly ready to replace financial advisors, sparked by a recent Wall Street Journal experiment using ChatGPT to build a long-term investment portfolio. They break down the AI-generated recommendations, highlighting both the surprisingly sensible use of low-cost index funds and the concerning inconsistencies, recency bias, and lack of academic factor tilts. Along the way, they discuss whether AI gives investors what they need or simply what they want, the future of fiduciary advice, and why human judgment still matters. Listener questions cover retirement planning basics, the foreign tax credit on international ETFs, cash “bucket” strategies in retirement, and why banks paying 0.01% on savings accounts still somehow get away with it.0:05 AI threatens financial advice jobs and why Don is oddly relieved to be old1:15 Product placement, affiliate marketing, and favorite AI assistants2:06 Wall Street Journal test of ChatGPT as a financial advisor3:24 AI portfolio recommendations: 80/20 allocation breakdown5:13 Concerns about cash, REITs, and taxable account inefficiencies6:16 Lack of value and small-cap tilts in AI-generated portfolios7:10 Same prompt produces different AI portfolio recommendations8:44 MIT professor says AI investing isn't “ready for prime time”9:50 AI personalization and the danger of confirmation bias11:09 Why AI is at least favoring low-cost indexing over active management12:14 How listeners can submit questions to the show12:51 Listener question: What actually goes into a financial plan?14:27 Retirement income planning basics and fixed income sources15:17 Using portfolios, home equity, and withdrawal strategies in retirement16:03 Estate planning, insurance, healthcare, and lifestyle considerations17:01 Why purpose and meaning matter in retirement planning19:17 Younger generations avoiding phone calls20:02 Foreign tax credits with VXUS, VT, AVGE, and AVGV22:33 How little foreign tax credits usually matter in practice23:36 Apple fandom, Cupertino, and Don's dead Apple TV dilemma25:35 Listener question about cash buckets and retirement withdrawals26:14 How much “safe money” retirees should keep available27:19 Why excessive cash drags long-term portfolio performance29:13 Bank savings accounts paying 0.01% APY31:17 Free fiduciary advisor meetings through TalkingRealMoney.com32:33 Tom's advancing age and the race to catch Stacking BenjaminsQuestions? Comments? Click!