Podcasts about Technologic

>listen to music >it's good thank you music Slap City picks: "Technologic" by Daft Punk, "Rainbow Connection" by Kermit the Goddamn Frog. Listen to our playlist here Join our Discord here Join us in 2 weeks when we'll discuss what is apparently Josh's pick, Jason Mraz's Mystical Magical Rhythmical Radical Ride!

Episode 048 - In this episode Justin and I sit down with a guest I've recently had the pleasure of meeting, Shane Rodgers (Owner of Technologic Motorsport Engineering). I recently reached out to Shane to get some coaching on my driving after some time away from the track and it helped immensly! We talk about a whole heap of motorsport related content along with some food recommendations as well haha. We deep dive into a few topics including Targa West, entry level motorsport (time attack and point 2 point etc).Shane's Socials:Facebook PageYouTube - Track content, build videos etcInstagramEnjoying the pod? Shoot us a text and let us know!Lonely Drivers Driving Club: Website: https://lonelydriversdriving.club/ Insta: https://www.instagram.com/lonelydriversdriving.club/ Justin's Socials: Personal: https://www.instagram.com/justinarmarego/ Photo / Video IG Insta: https://www.instagram.com/rusteeze_media/

Hello guys, I'm back from vacation and I've brought you my new playlist and I'm working my way through it and have fun listening I am overjoyed to finally present you “DJTOTO PLAYLIST LIVE IN THE MIX VOL 85”! This mix is ​​my lifeblood and brings together the liveliest vibes of house, tech house and progressive house in a playlist made for you all. With tracks like the Clean Extended Mix of Callie Reiff's “Special” I want to give you special moments on the dance floor. “Techno Logic” by Daft Punk Vs The Shooters will take you into a new world with its unique sound. The “Somebody 2024 (Uh13 Remix)” is a homage to old times and at the same time a step into the future of music. And the Dario Valli remix of John Summit and Hayla's "Shiver" will give you exactly that - a shiver of excitement. I enjoyed every second I put into this mix and I hope you feel that passion in every beat. Let's dance together, celebrate and live the music that connects us all. Your DJTOTO

NJ Daily managing editor Ledyard King checks in on the status of technology policy and funding in Washington with technology correspondent and editor of National Journal's Policy View AI Philip Athey. They discuss budget cuts to science and technology agencies, the status of artificial intelligence funding, the House passing legislation to ban TikTok, and what Policy View AI offers. Episodes of National Journal Radio are also avail­able on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. Sign up for Policy View AI here.

01. Wild (Badjokes Remix) 02. Gimme Love (Sentinel Remix) 03. I Like It (MAVE. Remix) [Intro Clean] 04. Walking Away (Kolya Funk Extended Mix) The Egg x Tocadisco 05. DJ DimixeR - Lamantine (Kolya Funk Remix) 06. We Want Summer 2.0 (Extended mix) DJ DimixeR DJ DIMIXER House 07. DJ DimixeR, Greenjelin - One More Night (feat Cali Fornia, Misha Zam) club mix 2 08. Technologic vs Crank vs Be Somebody (Alex Guesta Mashup) 09. DJ DimixeR, Денис Клявер - Половинка (Alex Shik Remix) 10. Piyala (Kolya Funk Extended Mix) Aigel 11. Альянс - На заре (Soulmate Remix) 12. Проект НаЗаре & DJ DimixeR - На заре (MIKIS Remix) 13. Klubbheads - Kickin' Hard (Alexx Slam & Vova Hunter Extended Remix) 14. DJ DimixeR - Ass Like That (Extended Mix) 15. Last Christmas (Extended Mix) DJ DimixeR, FAVIA, Dmitrii G DJ DimixeR, FAVIA, Dmitrii G House 16. Peggy Gou - Nanana ( Viduta Remix )

01 - 00:00:00 - Bop - Untiled Pattern 65 02 - 00:00:59 - Rockwell - Please Please Please (Play This On The Radio) 03 - 00:02:59 - IVY - Close To Me 04 - 00:04:43 - Moving Fusion - Black Hole 05 - 00:06:22 - Raiden - The Bells (Bootleg dnb Mix) 06 - 00:09:30 - Enei - Full Metal 07 - 00:12:19 - Sub Focus - Timewarp (VIP) 08 - 00:14:13 - Buunshin - CANCELLED 09 - 00:16:02 - Jam Thieves - Disco 45 10 - 00:19:12 - Klute - Jamm The Boxx 11 - 00:22:51 - Mandidextrous - Don't Be Scared 12 - 00:25:22 - Benny L - Invasion 13 - 00:27:18 - WAS A BE - PASSIVE AGGRESSIVE (SKANTIA REMIX) 14 - 00:29:22 - MOB TACTICS - Thumper 15 - 00:32:26 - Phace, Task Horizon - Shrink Ray (Phace Remix) 16 - 00:35:11 - Enei - Acid Shot 17 - 00:37:43 - Mandidextrous - Every Night 18 - 00:40:14 - Calvin Harris, Ellie Goulding - Miracle (Wilkinson Remix) 19 - 00:43:27 - MC Stretch, Andromedik - To The Dark feat. MC Stretch 20 - 00:45:14 - tunnl vision - Runnin 21 - 00:47:49 - Mandidextrous - Keep Me High 22 - 00:49:52 - ShockOne - Say Woah 23 - 00:51:47 - Konflict - The Beckoning 24 - 00:54:33 - Break - Solvent 25 - 00:57:10 - Pegboard Nerds, Teddy Killerz - Pump 26 - 00:59:48 - The Prodigy, Camo & Krooked, Mefjus - Breathe (Mefjus & Camo & Krooked Remix) 27 - 01:02:39 - Dillinja - Thugged Out Bitch 28 - 01:04:40 - QZB - Riot Gear Romance 29 - 01:08:28 - Annix - Depth Charge 30 - 01:09:44 - Hive - Surreal Killer 31 - 01:14:37 - Emperor - Spooked 32 - 01:16:12 - Sam Foxx - The Golden Path 33 - 01:19:26 - Mampi Swift - Gangster 34 - 01:21:57 - Wilkinson, Kioto Bug - Never B Mine (Sota Remix) 35 - 01:24:20 - Digital & Response - Broken Dub 36 - 01:28:46 - Calculon and the Colonel - Reach Out My Junglists 37 - 01:30:37 - Grafix - Dance All Day 38 - 01:32:05 - Freeland - We Want Your Soul (Ed Rush & Optical Remix) 39 - 01:35:26 - S.Murk - Comin' Back 40 - 01:37:23 - Buunshin - Hindsight 41 - 01:39:01 - Gydra - Alpha (Grinder remix) 42 - 01:41:26 - Addison Groove - Brand New Drop (Thys Remix) 43 - 01:44:59 - Fracture, Neptune - Chal Dub 44 - 01:47:08 - The Vanguard Project | L-Side - D.I.T.U. (L-Side Remix) 45 - 01:50:43 - D.O.D - So Much In Love (Sub Focus Extended Remix) 46 - 01:51:56 - [IVY] - Kill The Lights 47 - 01:54:34 - Deep Blue - Immersion 48 - 01:55:36 - Sub Focus - Vapourise

Will the nasdaq continue its wild ride? A deep dive into bond yields, passive vs. active, and why it may be time to be cautious on stocks. Thanks for listening!

Prepare to be plunged headfirst into the visceral world of Everlasting God Stopper as their latest single, "Techno Logic," unleashes an electrifying storm of industrial metal onto the airwaves. Hailing from Columbus, OH, and Detroit, MI, this formidable quartet defies conventions with a sound that effortlessly melds influences ranging from Rammstein to Coheed and Cambria, resulting in a sonic experience that is entirely their own. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/wewriteaboutmusic/support

They always told us that TV and video games were bad for us. Well, look at us now Mom. Sixty-something episodes deep into a podcast we generate no income from. So enjoy this conversation about Videodrome and The Lawnmower Man, done purely for the sake of brotherhood and cinema. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/mamfaw/support

Throughout their legendary career, Daft Punk continued to prove that the more robotic their music became, the more human they sounded. This dichotomy came to a head on their third album, aptly titled Human After All. Where their past two records wired their circuits and gave the robots a voice, on Human After All, Thomas Bangalter and Guy-Manuel de Homem-Christo gave Daft Punk sentience. On Human After All robots rock, but they also question their rigid programming. The record's ensuing tour and resulting live album, Alive 2007, furthered the narrative by ushering in a new age of live electronic performance. The impact of these two records range from the development of EDM to everlasting hits like “Technologic.” On episode three of our Listening 2 Daft Punk series, we take a look at these two records, and how both Alive and Human After All imbued the robots with super intelligence. Songs Discussed Daft Punk - Human After All Daft Punk - The Prime Time of Your Life Daft Punk - Robot Rock Breakwater - Release the Beast Daft Punk - Steam Machine Daft Punk - The Brainwasher Black Sabbath - Iron Man Daft Punk - Technologic Daft Punk - Emotion John Williams – Wild Signals Daft Punk – Touch It / Technologic Daft Punk – Oh Yeah Daft Punk – Technologic Busta Rhymes – Touch It Daft Punk – Around the World / Harder Better Faster Stronger Daft Punk – Face to Face / Short Circuit Daft Punk – Da Funk / Daftendirekt Kanye West – Stronger Kanye West – On Sight Daft Punk – Human After All / Together / One More Time / Music Sounds Better With You Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

00.00 : Drake - Massive (Noiz Edit) 02.15 : Cloonee - Sun Goes Down (White Remix) 03.45 : Dillon Francis, Vinne vs Daft Punk - Once Again x Technologic x Sticky (Xandor & Hrly Edit) 07.15 : Ownboss, Sevek vs The Black Eyed Peas - Move You Humps (Syence Tipsy Edit) 09.18 : J Balvin & Skrillex - In Da Getto (Truth vs Lies Edit) 13.26 : David Guetta - Love Is Gone (Justmylrd & Romain Dary Edit) 15.53 : Robin S - Show Me Love (WeDamnz Edit) 18.56 : Gala - Freed From Desire (Vol2Cat & Dyn Edit) 22.05 : Pitbull vs Pickle - I Know You Want La Fiesta (Justin Lama Mashup) 25.32 : Avicii - Wake Me Up (Dave Delly & Umberto Balzanelli Edit) 27.32 : San Pacho vs Akon - Trompeta vs Belly Dancer (WeDamnz Mashup) 31.17 : Bad Bunny - Me Porto Bonito (Hawk. & Booty Leak Edit) 34.02 : Farruko - Pepas (Keika Remix) 37.51 : Avicii - Levels (Steve Lima & Tommic Edit) 40.37 : Punjabi MC vs Pickle - Panjabi On The Drums (Ash Tee Mashup) 42.34 : Disclosure - You & Me (Flume vs Westend vs Local Singles Edit) 47.11 : Usher - DJ Got Us Fallin' In Love (Geses & Lusso Remix) 50.18 : Flamingo - 90's Rave (Original Mix) 55.49 : Mau P - Drugs from Amsterdam (Don Diaz Edit) 58.03 : DJ Jean - The Launch (Rogerson Edit) ----- TicTacTec has been performing at Swiss festivals since 2015. The band is specialized in remixes, bootlegs and electro mashups.

Where can I find other bitcoiners in real life? Brian is a philosopher,  Jiujitsu Athlete, Bitcoin educator,and writer, author  of the Amazon Best Seller Bitcoin Evangelism and is the Head of Marketing for Orange Pill App - a Bitcoin-only social media app that helps Bitcoiners connect in real life.   SHOWNOTES: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ► Bitcoin Evangelism. ►The Orange Pill App ► Connecting Bitcoiners . ► The Noise in Information At  Regular Social Media. ► Technologic and Value Revolution ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------   FOLLOW BRIAN -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------   TWITTER: LINKEDIN:   YOUTUBE:   ARTICLE:   ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ►SUBSCRIBE TO THE SHOW Fountain.fm: https://fountain.fm/show/761jhxFiibErm7eZZdlt Apple:https://podcasts.apple.com/au/podcast/bitcoin-peace-music-with-dj-valerie-b-love-friends/id14415408411 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/6kZfzFZ3wKmWiljDajrJZ5?si=a9433473b06f464b Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@djvalerieblove/featured ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ►MUSIC:  DJ Valerie B Love: https://djvalerieblove.com Satoshi The Cyber Opera: https://satoshiopera.com 11x LOVE Project: https://11xlove.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ►FOLLOW US  Twitter: https://twitter.com/djvalerieblove Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/djValerieBLove Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/djvalerieblove/ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/dj-valerie-b-love/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ►COLDCARD Discount 5%- Promo Code “CKBTC” store.coinkite.com/promo/PEACE   ►SHAMORY - Have Fun Learn Bitcoin 10% Discount shamory.com/love —---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Become Unruggable - Unusual interviews with the coolest, kindest, and smartest people in Bitcoin, music, human rights, psychedelics, finance, innovation, art, mental health, relationships, spirituality and beyond. ** It's never too late to be the change you wish to see in the world **  

Where can I find other bitcoiners in real life? Brian is a philosopher,  Jiujitsu Athlete, Bitcoin educator,and writer, author  of the Amazon Best Seller Bitcoin Evangelism and is the Head of Marketing for Orange Pill App - a Bitcoin-only social media app that helps Bitcoiners connect in real life.   SHOWNOTES: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ► Bitcoin Evangelism. ►The Orange Pill App ► Connecting Bitcoiners . ► The Noise in Information At  Regular Social Media. ► Technologic and Value Revolution ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------   FOLLOW BRIAN -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------   TWITTER: LINKEDIN:   YOUTUBE:   ARTICLE:   ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ►SUBSCRIBE TO THE SHOW Fountain.fm: https://fountain.fm/show/761jhxFiibErm7eZZdlt Apple:https://podcasts.apple.com/au/podcast/bitcoin-peace-music-with-dj-valerie-b-love-friends/id14415408411 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/6kZfzFZ3wKmWiljDajrJZ5?si=a9433473b06f464b Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@djvalerieblove/featured ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ►MUSIC:  DJ Valerie B Love: https://djvalerieblove.com Satoshi The Cyber Opera: https://satoshiopera.com 11x LOVE Project: https://11xlove.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ►FOLLOW US  Twitter: https://twitter.com/djvalerieblove Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/djValerieBLove Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/djvalerieblove/ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/dj-valerie-b-love/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ►COLDCARD Discount 5%- Promo Code “CKBTC” store.coinkite.com/promo/PEACE   ►SHAMORY - Have Fun Learn Bitcoin 10% Discount shamory.com/love —---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Become Unruggable - Unusual interviews with the coolest, kindest, and smartest people in Bitcoin, music, human rights, psychedelics, finance, innovation, art, mental health, relationships, spirituality and beyond. ** It's never too late to be the change you wish to see in the world **  

#54 RADIO SHOW BY MILAN LIESKOVSKY & DJ EKG JOIN US HERE www.instagram.com/djekg www.instagram.com/milanlieskovsky www.europa2.sk/moderatori INTRO TRACK CamelPhat & Anyma - The Sign MILAN LIESKOVSKY PLAYED 01, Eliza Rose x Interplanetary Criminal - B.O.T.A 02, Skiavo & Vindes - City Lights 03, Monroe - Come Dance With Me 04, Afrojack, Black V Neck - To The Floor 05, Jonasu & Karen Harding - True 06, Din & Vic, Cloudrider - Night in Amsterdam 07, KREAM ft. Marlo Rex - Rendezvous 08, Dannic - The Rhythm 09, Fisher - Yeah The Girls (feat. MERYLL) 10, Above & Beyond, Zoe Johnston - You Got To Go 11, WARED - Paradigm 12, Reflekt, Delline Bass, Dannic - Need To Feel Loved DJ EKG PLAYED Kryder, Natalie Shay - Rapture (Hugo Cantarra Extended Remix) Armin van Buuren, Diane Warren, My Marianne - Live On Love feat. My Marianne (Extended Mix) EDX, Nicky Romero  - Out Of Control (Extended Mix) Marcus Santoro, David Pietras, Marc Benjamin - Losing Focus (Feb) Joy Kitikonti, Freejak - Joyenergizer (Freejak Disco Tech Mix) Moreno Pezzolato - Give It To Me (Original Mix) David Guetta, MORTEN - Element Nicky Romero - Myriad (When I'm Gone) (ANNDY Mashup) BLOND:ISH, Nico de Andrea, Darla Jade - Hold Tight (feat. Darla Jade) (Dombresky Extended Remix) Supermode - Tell Me Why (MEDUZA Remix)
Steve Angello - Nothing Scares Me Anymore feat. Sam Martin (Corey James & David Pietras Remix Extended) GUESTMIX by OLIVER HEYDER 1. Diplo, Sidepiece x Zerky - Dark Side X On My Mind 
 2. Breach - Jack (Edit)
 3. Marie Davidson Feat. Soulwax - Work It (Edit)
 4. FISHER feat. MERYLL - Yeah The Girls (Extended Mix)
 5. Daft Punk x Dillon Francis x Drake - Once Again x Technologic x Sticky 6. Bacatme x Icona Pop - I Love It x High 7. Tom Enzy, Wilhelmina - London Bridge
 8. Malaa, Axwell & Ingrosso - More Than U Know x How It Is
 9. Odd Mob - LEFT TO RIGHT (Edit) 
11. Mau P x Kanye West - Praise God From Amsterdam (OLIVER HEYDER EDIT) 
12. Pimpo Gama x Sean Paul - Temperature x Play That Bass (OH Short Edit) 
13. Fred again.., SHM, Tony Romera, Julio Navas - Turn On The Lights Raw WEEKEND ANTHEMS CamelPhat, Jem Cooke, Cristoph - Breathe (Dark Matter Edit) 
Calvin Harris ft Kelis - Bounce (Aamon Remix)
 Jay Frog - Jaguar (Original Mix) Marcus Schossow, Years - Zulu (Original Mix)
 Julien Jabre - Swimming Places (Purple Disco Machine Re-Work)
 Ali Love, CamelPhat - Spectrum (Original Mix) Meduza - Tell It To My Heart (Ivan Gough & JYYE Remix)
 Nora En Pure - Come With Me (Original Mix) 
 Roland Clark, Vintage Culture, Fancy Inc - Free (Extended Mix)
 Joris Voorn - Goodbye Fly (Original Mix) D.Ramirez, Mark Knight, Underworld - Downpipe (Original Club Mix) Tom Staar, Ansolo - Totem (Original Mix)

【喜歡這個Set? 歡迎加入國民電音新生活！】 ▶️ Oxygen Formula EDM 紮背趴 https://www.facebook.com/edm18pa ▶️ O2F EDM紮背趴應援團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/edm18pa -- ※ Tracklist: CARMEN MASTER 8_18; duarte - abcdefu x Ugly Duck (Ed Please Mashup); James Hype, Edward Maya - Stereo Ferrari (Lolos + Saradis 2 AM Mashup); Avicii - LEVELS (STEVE LIMA & Tommic Remix); Once Again x Technologic x Sticky (XANDOR & HRLY Edit); G.Key & Glorious Vs Depeche Mode & Dirty South - Just Can't Guess Enough (BNM Bootleg); Calvin Harris x FUBU x Tobtok - You Used To Hold A Freak Like Me (Zillionaire Mashup); Oscar Jamo - In My Mind (Original Mix); Lucas & Steve vs David Guetta - SICK vs Love Don't Let Me Go (Armin van Buuren Mashup); Fred again.. x SHM x Retrovision - Better Turn Of The Lights (DBL TWIST); James Hype & Tita Lau - Disconnected (Wooddrowe Weapon); Ummet Ozcan vs Axwell, Ingrosso, Angello, Laidback Luke feat Deborah-Manipulated On Off Survive (Johnny de City Mashup); BLACKPINK - Pink Venom (KAZERR Remix); Masked Wolf, Jon Larsen - Astronaut in the Ocean X Rush (Jones Vendera Mashup); Fiyan - Naadan Parinde (Fiyan Private Edit); Darude x Ummet Ozcan - Sandstorm Manipulated (Jean Luc Mashup); The Pussycat Dolls & Busta Rhymes X Biscits X VANDAL ON DA TRACK X Joel Corry -DON'T CHA X LOCCO X THE PARADE (SIR GIO & AENNA CAELUM SMASH UP); - Powered by Firstory Hosting

Lil Kim VS Nicki Minaj beef brewing, Two new tragic shootings, Kim K defends he "talents", New NBA 2K and the evolution of video games, plus much more... -------------------------------- LIKE US ON FACEBOOK ~ @The5PercentPodcast SUBSCRIBE TO OUR YOUTUBE ~ "The 5 Percent Podcast" FOLLOW US ON IG ~ @The5PercentPodcast ** NEW EPISODES EVERY FRIDAY ** -------------------------------- TIME CARD: TBD -------------------------------- FOLLOW THE BROTHAS: Name: Brian Twitter - @life_ofbrian Instagram - @_its.just.brian_ Snapchat - @beezygotvocals Name: Mayor West Instagram - @callmemayorwest Twitter - @mrlonewolf_ Snapchat - @apollowest Name: DeeJay Instagram - @deetothejay23 Twitter - @deejones0023 Snapchat - @deejones.23 Name: Airrick Instagram - @getemrick_91 Snapchat - @vsvpliffted Name: Johvan Instagram - @johvanlockett Snapchat - @jojoclippers25 -------------------------------- #The5PercentPodcast #The5Percent #5PercentPodcast #5Percent #Culture #Music #Sports #TrendingTopics #Entertainment #TalkShow

Let's explore modules from XAOC Devices (http://xaocdevices.com/main/minsk/) , Music Thing Modular (https://www.musicthing.co.uk/) , Mystic Circuits (https://www.mysticcircuits.com/), Qu-Bit (https://www.qubitelectronix.com/shop/aurora), DPW (https://dpw.se/product/zero2-z-2-dual-zero-difference/), Schlappi Engendering (https://schlappiengineering.com/), Techno Logic (https://synthculture.com/about), [After Later Audio] Music from: Super Hydro (https://superhydro.bandcamp.com/album/kushman-in-cakefield) A Grape Dope (https://agrapedope.bandcamp.com/album/arthur-king-presents-a-grape-dope-backyard-bangers) VELOCITY (https://velocityseattle.com/) [PATREON]((https://www.patreon.com/podularmodcast) SPONSORS Tiny Crush Mixing (https://tinycrushmixing.com/booking/#ICare) OBSIDIAN SOUND MASTERING (https://obsidiansound.net/) After Later Audio:http://afterlateraudio.com/ Patchwerks: https://patchwerks.com/ WAVEFORM MAGAZINE: https://waveformmagazine.com/

Let's explore modules from Mystic Circuits (https://www.mysticcircuits.com/), Qu-Bit (https://www.qubitelectronix.com/shop/aurora), DPW (https://dpw.se/product/zero2-z-2-dual-zero-difference/), Schlappi Engendering (https://schlappiengineering.com/), Techno Logic (https://synthculture.com/about), After Later Audio (https://afterlateraudio.com/), Modular For The Masses (https://modularforthemasses.square.site/product/nyquistnightmare/4?cp=true&sa=true&sbp=false&q=false), Make Noise (https://makenoisemusic.com/synthesizers/black-and-gold-shared-system-plus), and 4ms (https://4mscompany.com/). Music from: Animals At Night (https://theanimalsatnight.bandcamp.com/album/duets) Strakt (https://strakt.bandcamp.com) VELOCITY (https://velocityseattle.com/) [PATREON]((https://www.patreon.com/podularmodcast) SPONSORS Tiny Crush Mixing (https://tinycrushmixing.com/booking/#ICare) OBSIDIAN SOUND MASTERING (https://obsidiansound.net/) After Later Audio:http://afterlateraudio.com/ Patchwerks: https://patchwerks.com/ WAVEFORM MAGAZINE: https://waveformmagazine.com/

This week we chat with Chelsea and Tobias from Techno Logic (https://technologicsynthculture.com/) about the unlikely synth-community they have built and cultivated in Spokane, WA VELOCITY (https://velocityseattle.com/) [PATREON]((https://www.patreon.com/podularmodcast) SPONSORS Tiny Crush Mixing (https://tinycrushmixing.com/booking/#ICare) OBSIDIAN SOUND MASTERING (https://obsidiansound.net/) After Later Audio:http://afterlateraudio.com/ Patchwerks: https://patchwerks.com/ WAVEFORM MAGAZINE: https://waveformmagazine.com/ NYQUIST NIGHTMARE (https://modularforthemasses.square.site/product/nyquistnightmare/4?cp=true&sa=true&sbp=false&q=false)

Oggi abbiamo parlato del rapporto con la tecnologia con i simpaticissimi Djstivo. Ascolta l'episodio per saperne di più!

In this weeks show we talk all things Artificial intelligence with Professor Barry O Sullivan.Barry  is an award-winning academic working in the fields of artificial intelligence, constraint programming, prescriptive analytics (operations research), ethics, and public policy. He contributes to global Track II diplomacy related to disruptive emerging technologies. He recently was elected as a fellow of The Association for the Advancement of Artificial intelligence and is president of the European Association for AI.We hope you enjoy the show. 

0322 DaftPunkMix 1. WBDK 87.3 FM [00:00] 2. Something About Us [00:27] 3. Lose Yourself To Dance [05:05] 4. Daftendirekt [09:38] 5. Short Circuit [11:04] 6. Television Rules The Nation, Around The World [13:10] 7. Burnin' (Alive 2007), Around The World, Burnin' [15:15] 8. Da Funk, Voyager [18:26] 9. High Life [23:22] 10. Technologic [25:26] 11. Aerodynamic, Around The World [26:04] 12. Superheroes[28:52] 13. Voyager [31:30] 14. Human After All [33:36] 15. One More Time, Music Sounds Better With You [38:02] 16. Around The World (Alive 2007), Around The World [42:51] 17. Digital Love (Boris Dlugosh Remix) [46:40] 18. Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger [50:20] 19. Together/One More Time/Music Sounds Better With You (Alive 2007) [53:30]

This Episode is Dedicated to TDott Woo! Beep Boop Morp. Technologic, technologic! In this episode KDTime, takes time to talk about technology that should definitely exist. The most obvious answers and ones that you may not have thought about. It's hard to believe there was a time where technology was a more "futuristic" idea, but here we are using technology literally every single day. I don't think I ever want to go back to a time where we didn't have certain technologic products, although there are some things I don't think we need to have. What's some technology you think should exist? SUBSCRIBE!!!! Q&A Available ONLY on Spotify! Twitter/Instagram: @kdtimepodcast Linktr.ee/kdtime Blogger: kdtimepodcast.blogspot.com --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/kdtime/message

V úterý pořádal deník E15 Technologic Festival, na kterém se mluvilo o umělé inteligenci nebo kyberbezpečnosti a vyhlašoval se i nejlepší startup. Na záznam celé konference se můžete podívat na webu E15, v dnešním vydání E15 Castu vám ale s redaktorem Filipem Zelenkou představíme to nejzajímavější, co na festivalu zaznělo.  www.e15.cz

On Voyager Mix Sessions this week, Veteran Swiss DJ/producer - Roger Lavelle - takes to the airwaves with a signature showcase guest mix featuring a selection of his most recent material, including a few tracks releasing soon on Airborne Black, Orange Recordings and Technologic. Recorded in his home studio especially for the show, prepare to enter a higher state of consciousness as he explores the diverse shades of driving peak-time techno for your absolute pleasure. Genre : Techno Sub-Genre : Driving / Melodic / Peak-Time ➤ Soundcloud : @rogerlavelle ➤ Instagram : instagram.com/rogerlavelleofficial ➤ Facebook : facebook.com/rogerlavelleofficial ➤ Twitter : twitter.com/roger_lavelle ➤ Beatport : beatport.com/artist/roger-lavelle/648999 ➤ Spotify : open.spotify.com/artist/3ZHqvLocrTfSbtm9DDJnqT Based in the small Swiss town of Staad near St.Gallen, Roger Lavelle's career within the electronic music industry spans over 25 years. Originally influenced by Trance, he took a break from the scene in 2016 and returned a year later with a renewed desire to explore the ever evolving sound of techno. Since then, he's become a Beatport Top 100 techno producer, releasing on labels such as Black Snake Recordings, Codex, EXTIMA, IAMT, Phobiq, Prospect Records, Sbert Records and Space Kraft Recordings with many projects due for release towards the end of the year. He's successfully performed at several sold out events throughout Europe and supported some of the biggest names within techno including Boxia, Dave Clarke, DJ Emerson, Cosmic Boys, Julian Jeweil, Luigi Madonna, Marco Bailey, Metodi Hristov and Skober. Be sure to follow him across all social media platforms to find out more about his future projects. Tracklist: 01. Roger Lavelle - This Is The Reality | Orange Recordings

Dean Johnson, futurist and head of innovation at Brandwidth, explains how the Internet of things relies on continuity of experience. 2:02 — About Dean Johnson and what he does 5:14 — Mobile technologies 8:50 — Story how we developed our first gadget 18:38 — Singlisly taking content 20:27 — How does an iBook work 21:05 — Urban environments 23:50 — The thing about library 25:42 — How do we actually interact with this content 37:26 — Why iPad was so popular and successful 42:19 — Back to the future The lecture took place at Strelka Institute in 2014 in the framework of Urban Routinees. To find more lectures from this conference — follow the YouTube link: https://stre.lk/HN4M

Technologic innovations are key to helping luxury brands update their business model. Pierre-Nicolas Hurstel, CEO of Arianee, the leading NFT platform for the luxury and fashion industries, explains what consumers can expect from blockchain and other technological leaps forward.  Mentioned in this episode: “Conscious, collaborative, connected: making over the luxury business model” a study by Mazars in partnership with Arianee.  

In this conversation, Dr. Stephen Dean talks about how he created the 1976 US fusion program plan, how it played out and the history of fusion power in the US, technology program planning and management more broadly, and more. Stephen has been working on making fusion energy a reality for more than five decades. He did research on controlled fusion reactions in the 60s and in the 70s became a director at the Atomic energy commission which then became the Energy Research and Development Administration which *then* became the department of energy. In 1979 he left government to form the consultancy Fusion Power associates, where he still works. In 1976, he led the preparation of a report called “Fusion power by magnetic confinement” that laid out a roadmap of the work that would need to be done to turn fusion from a science experiment into a functional energy source. References Fusion Power by Magnetic Confinement Executive Summary Volume 1 Volume 2 Volume 3 Volume 4 Fusion Power Associates The notorious fusion never plot Adam Marblestone on technological roadmapping My hypotheses on program design (which were challenged by this conversation!) Fusion Energy Base (a good website on fusion broadly) ITER Transcript  (Machine generated, so please excuse errors) [00:00:00]  In this conversation, Dr. Steven Dean, and I talk about how he created the 1976 S fusion program plan, how it played out in the history of fusion power in the U S technology program, planning and management more broadly, and even more things. Steven has been working on making fusion energy a reality for more than five decades. He did research on control, fusion reactions in the 1960s and seventies, he became a director [00:01:00] at the atomic energy commission, which then became the energy research and development of administration, which then became the department of energy in 1979. He left government to form the consultancy fusion, power associates, where you still want. In 1976, he led the preparation of a report called fusion power by magnetic confinement that laid out a roadmap of the work that needed would need to be done to turn fusion from a science experiment, into a functional energy source. And if I can sort of riff about this for a minute, the thing is. Unlike what I sort of see as modern roadmaps, it lays out not just the sort of like plan of record to getting fusion, to be a real energy source, but lays out all the different possible scenarios in terms of funding, in terms of new technology that we can't even think of being created and lays everything. Yeah. In a way that you can actually sort of make decisions off of it. [00:02:00] And I think one of the most impressive things is that it has several different what it calls logics of funding, which is like different, different funding levels and different funding curves. And it actually, unfortunately, accurately predicts that if you fund fusion below a certain level, even if you're funding it continually you'll never get to. An actual useful fusion source because you'll never have enough money to build these, these demonstrator missions. And so in a way it's sort of predicts the future. This, this document is super impressive. If you haven't seen it you should absolutely check it out there. There are links in the show notes and it's sort of, one of the reasons I wanted to talk to Dr. Dean is because this, this document. Is one of the pieces of evidence behind my hypothesis. That to some extent, program design and program management for advanced technologies is a bit of a lost art. And so I wanted to learn more about how he thought about it and built [00:03:00] it. So without further ado, here's my conversation with Steven Dean. To start off, what was the context of creating the fusion plan? Well, I guess I would have to say that it started a few years earlier in a sense that in 1972 the I was in the fusion office and in the atomic energy commission and the office of men and mission management and budget at the white house put out instructions to, I guess, all the agencies that they should prepare an analysis of their programs under a system, they called management by objectives. And this was some, this was a formalism that was, had a certain amount of popularity at that time. And I was asked to prepare something on the fusion program as a part of the agency, doing this for all of its programs. And [00:04:00] in doing that I looked at our program and I Laid out a map basically that showed the different parts of the program on a map like a roadmap and what the timelines might be and what the functions of those of facilities would be. And when the decisions might be and what decisions would work into into, into what, and that was never published in, in a report, but it w except internally, but the map itself was published and widely distributed. And I have it on my wall and it's in my book. So that was the first, my first venture into. Into doing something that resembled plan, it was not a detailed plan, but it was an outline of decision points and flow this sort of a flow diagram, but it did connect all the different parts of the [00:05:00] program and the identified sub elements, you know, not in great detail and, and budgets were not asked for at that time. So that's how I got into this idea and a little experience in, in the planning area. And then a few years later, we had the gasoline crisis in the U S where there were long lines and we couldn't get gas and people were sitting in their cars over overnight. And the, the white house at that time said that you know, we had to become energy, independent oil you know, the OPEC. And, and so Bob Hirsch, who was at that time about to transition from the director of the fusion program to an assistant minister traitor of Urdu in, I think it was 74, late 74, 75. The, the government decided to Congress decided, or the [00:06:00] administration decided to abolish the atomic energy commission and transition it into something called the energy research and development administration or arena. And the reason for that was to. It create an agency whose function was clearly for all of energy and not just for atomic energy in order to respond to the energy crisis and to get us off of the dependence on foreign oil imports for, for vehicles and things. And so when, when, when that happened, my boss, who was Bob Hirsch at the time he became, he was actually appointed in assistant administrator of errata for basically all the long range energy programs, which included fusion. And as he was at transition, he, he came up with the idea that we should create a detailed long range plan for the, [00:07:00] for the program. And he, he was obviously becoming sort of a senior manager for the many things and he wasn't certainly going to try and do this himself. And so he and I were very close. I was at that point he had three divisions in the fusion program and I was the director of the largest division, which had all of the main experimental programs. And so he asked me to prepare this plan. And if you look at the plan at the very beginning, there's this there's a chart that shows Bob's basically guidance, which was to note that that there needed to be a multiplicity of pathways because no one organization or, or group or division or program was in response could be in full control. And that in order to have a plan that might have some hope of [00:08:00] Last thing that you had to take into account a number of policy variables he said, and technical variables, which meant that he said, because need for the, for the, for fusion and the intent of the government and the funding is all in control by other people in the government. We had to have a number of plans by which the program could be conducted. So he came up with the idea that, well, let's have five plans, which he called logic. So he basically created that framework and turned it over to me at the beginning, I guess, of 1975, I think it was. And to, to create this. This plant. So that's how it all got started. And I had been doing a number of things with the program in terms of the major [00:09:00] experiments that were under my control as a director of the confinement systems, division magnetic confinement systems. I was forcing all, all the people that were that whose budget I had to control over to, to tell me what they were doing and what they needed to do. And so on. It's all right though, I had already been and working on a lot of these things in, within my area, but at that point I took over the responsibility of creating the, in the entire plant. And so I, I, I took it over and I started I created a, a small working group within our office. And we added people that we thought were responsible that could do this for us, or give us the details out in the various parts of the program, all elements of the program. And we created a team and we, we launched this and and this was the result. We were determined to look to these five [00:10:00] logics. They ranged from both, you know, basically a steady level of effort to a maximum level of effort. And and we just started creating these things. During that six months, first six months of 1976, And this was the result. Nice. And did you, so, so each of the logics is kind of a, a wiggly curve. Did, did you go in knowing what the shape of the funding curve for each logic would be, or did you just go in with the framework that there would be five logics and over the course of designing the program, you figured out what the actual shape of those curves would be? Well, we created a definition, a rough definition of what each of the logics was supposed to look like, not in detail, but for example, a [00:11:00] logic to what says moderately. Expanding. But the tech progress would be limited by the availability of funds. But new projects were not started unless we knew that funds would be available. And so we knew that we could not address a lot of problems in parallel. And so we had a general idea that this was a program that was not running at a maximum maximum feasible. Pace. And then the logic three, we said, well, let's look at one, that's a little more aggressive. And we would lay out in that one that as soon as these projects were scientifically justified, they would be in the plan. We would not wait till we knew that there were probably people that wanted them were when he was available. But, and we also said in this scenario, we would address a number of things concurrently rather than in [00:12:00] series. So we assume that the funding was ample. We didn't have a number in mind. At that point, we started laying these things out and asking people. If you had all the money you needed, what could you do if you didn't have quite enough money, what would you do? And people started responding to us that we're working on all of these subtopics. We were mostly working at the beginning laying out what the topics were and what had to be worked on eventually to get to the end point and that these topics could proceed at different rates and with different amounts of risks, depending upon the budget. So this was a sort of an iterative thing that went back and forth with the community and the areas, and our team kept putting these together until they made some sense. Got it. And just to, to sort of step back a second so before [00:13:00] you created this plan sort of all the activities were happening already. Is that, is that right? There were activities in all these areas that were going ongoing. Yes, that's right. They were at, at relatively low level at that stage at the early seventies, the total fusion budget was $30 million. And by the mid seventies, because of the energy crisis, we were told, you know, tell us what you want. And we had raised that budget from 30 million to 300 million. So the program had been undergoing the first five years between 72 and 75, a very rapid expansion. And we had started a lot of new programs. And so the program had been built up quite a bit, although with all of these programs, of course, because they were new. They were at a, still a fairly early stage of their. Their development. The other thing that drove the, the the curves was the [00:14:00] ignition that getting to a fusion power plant required a couple of identifiable major facility steps. And these actually came from that map. I mentioned from 72, which said that from the experiments that we want to do in the near term, which were to build like a physics proof of principle experiment that had to be followed by an engineering step, that was an engineering test reactor. And that had to be then followed by a demonstration power plant. And that those steps were big facilities. Each one, much more expensive than the previous one and making a much more definitive demonstration of fusion that was on a. And, and the wiggly curves that you see, not the, the, the the smooth ones have these bumps on them.[00:15:00]  And those bumps reflect the fact that these major experiments were going to cost a lot of money. And depending on how fast you build them would, would also reflect a different path pace to an end point you know, the faster you build them, the faster you get there, because these major steps really drove the progress and drove the budget. And do you think that sort of, I guess it's hard to think about, but like do you think that the plan helped anything in the sense of. If, if instead you just sort of had continued with the, the program as it started, where I imagined it was like much more sort of bottom up. Do you, do you think that the, the outcome, how do you think the outcome would have been different? I think without the [00:16:00] plan, I don't know what would have happened. I don't think we would've gotten the support that we got in the next few years during the seventies that we got, because the outcome of this cut was that. The plan, the plan was published with all of its detail and all of its budget. It was published publicly. The office of management and budget tried to stop us from publishing this plan because they didn't want budgets out there that said, well, if the Congress would give you so much money, then, then you'd get the job done because that would tie their hands because, you know, they like to be in control of how much money they're going to give to every program. And so they don't want the agencies to put out plans with budgets. And so we had to fight that. And luckily for us, the energy research and development administration, which was fairly new and I [00:17:00] actually only lasted a couple of years before it transitioned to the department of energy, had a a head of it. Bob Siemens, who came from NASA. He overruled the office of management and budget. He said, I'm in charge of this and I'm putting whole plan out. So we probably pushed it. And it got picked up over in the Congress by Congressman Mike McCormick and his staff. And they became champions for this plan and they came. What's the a legislative agenda and they got the Senator from Massachusetts and the Senate to get on board. And and by 1980, I think it was in October, 1980. Congress had passed the magnetic fusion engineering act of 1980, which basically adopted our plan for getting to the end point by the year 2000. [00:18:00] And so the result of our plan was that Congress picked it up. It passed a legislation, making it national policy. And it was signed by president Carter in October 7th, 1980. And we thought at that point we were in that we had a commitment of the United States government at the presidential level to implement this the, the plan for getting there by the year 2000. And so the, the problem, the only problem was that he president Carter signed it in October and lost the election for reelection in November. And as you probably know, whenever there's a change of administration to, especially if it's a change of party in here, Almost everything that the previous administration has decided to do. The other, the new people want to either not do, or they [00:19:00] want to completely reevaluate and start over. And so that's what, that's what happened to this plan in 1981. Got it. And so, because as far as I can tell we've, we've sort of like the, the, the way that it's panned out is that we've, we've sort of followed below logic one, right? Oh yeah. Oh yeah. It was less and less than a, less than ever Guinea. It's the never get their logic. There's one, but there's one caveat to that is that in the 1980s Ronald Reagan was a post to all of this energy stuff until 1985. When he met with Gorbachev. And they decided to work together on fusion and build our first major step that was in our plan. We were going to build this engineering device in the 1980s and he and Grover Jeff decided let's get together and build it together with Europe.[00:20:00]  And this became the eater project, which is under construction in France. So what the program really did to work around this problem of the budget being so low was to say, okay, we're not on our own track, but we're on a wall track and we're all working together. And so they're building this multi tens of billions of dollars engineering test reactor and it's taken them a long time to get it going, but it's hopefully going to be finished in a few years. It's going to turn on by hopefully 20, 25 is plasma, so we're way behind, but, but that was a response to being on this. Their thing was to say, we're all in this together. And we don't have our own plan to get there, but the world has a plan and we'll get there together that that's how this all evolved. Got it. And so I guess the, if, if I'm understanding this correctly, the, the sort of the, [00:21:00] the purpose and the value of this plan was less as a coordination mechanism for the people doing the work and more as a sort of communication mechanism with people sort of outside the organization in terms of. What the work would entail is that, is that accurate? I, I can tell you that when I was doing this plan and I was in a senior management position there, I had responsibility for the bulk of the program. I didn't have the basic pilot, the physics program and universities, and I didn't have the technology part, but I had all the major experiments in my ballywick. And when Bob Hirsch was, I was still reporting to Bob Hirsch and he had all the energy programs in Herta, it was our intent to manage his program, to implement this plan internally. It did turn out that part of the plan, part of our implementation required us getting the money and that all went through this energy building in [00:22:00] Congress. We thought we had the whole thing put together that not only we did, we eventually have the Congress on board, but we also had a management and we had 80 staff in the office then. And And we were prepared to manage the program to, to implement this if we got, get the money in detail. So it was both the management plan for implementation within the within an arena. But of course the other thing that happened in all of this was that Erna was abolished and became the department of energy. So I think Jane and I left, I left in 1979 because I thought we were about to implement this plan. And I formed fusion power associates, and I got a dozen electric utilities. I mean, a dozen major industries like Westinghouse and companies like that to, to form this organization, to bring industry in, to actually bring industry into the, into the implementation phase of this program plan, we were all set to [00:23:00] go. And even in the early eighties, before the whole thing sort of fell apart, I had a dozen electric utilities in fusion, power associates. And so we had both industry that wanted to do this and the electric utilities that were on board and all we needed really was for the new department of energy to to follow through with the management of this thing and try to get, get the money, but. The money never, never came through. And the industries and fusion power associates in the early eighties realized that there wasn't going to be any money for industry because there wasn't any money coming through. And the electric utilities were deregulated by Ronald Reagan and they abandon all their R and D departments, which were the ones that were in, you know, in our organization that were interested in developing fusion. And they became taken over by [00:24:00] business people in the utilities whose main purpose was to make money. And they were not interested in getting involved in brand new technologies. They are only comfortable with the technologies that they had. Yeah. But that makes a lot of sense. And I guess to sort of go, go back to you. You mentioned earlier that this plan was sort of part of a bigger trend of management by objectives. Do you think that that was effective management by objectives? And just because I feel like sort of the, the modern idea, very much like projects, plans like this that like, you know, multi-decade technical plans are at, at best foolish and at worst detrimental. And so, so what do you, what do you think about sort of like big plans for technology projects? More generally, [00:25:00] just sort of say that management objectives was an OMB guidance in the early seventies. And it's soon disappeared from the the roof work, if you will, as the the OMB. One of the things that happens in Washington every two years is that people change in administrations changed. Whatever one group is wanting to do it just a lot, go by the wayside. So by the mid seventies, when the came about there was there was no management by objectives, formalism still going on in the government. Basically they start all over again with how they're going to try. Do these things. And as this thing all evolved, you know, up to the present at the OMB I don't know, probably more than 10 years ago, 10 or 15 years ago, the OMB said to fusion, you are guys are not an energy [00:26:00] program anymore. You are a science program and we are going to evaluate you and have you managed like a science program. And so they stopped even asking us for both aimed towards an energy program. They said that we should go to the scientific community, take unsolicited proposals from the community to do good science, evaluate them under peer review by other scientists. And if it was good science, we should fund. And we should not be trying to make them into seeing we should not evaluate these proposals as to whether or not they are getting us to an energy source. So for over a decade now, the fusion program has not had an energy source as it's, as its goal, and it hasn't been funded or evaluated within the government as an energy program. Now, this has all changed in the [00:27:00] last year, but up until just very recently they're trying to put now the energy mission back into the, into the mission, but it hasn't actually formally happened at OMB yet. Got it. And just, just to sort of pull us back to well mentioned by objectives and just more broadly having very concrete plans W w w do you think it was useful or do you think it was just sort of like a a fad almost. Well, it's been disappointing from him personally. I think that it's been disappointing that like, we haven't actually done the plan. Right? Well, it's just a point. You spent so much effort laying out how you, how you would do it and how you would make decisions and you get everybody that's under your purview out in the in the community of people that you're funding, you get them all set up to try to achieve these things and you try to get them the [00:28:00] money and then it all falls apart. And then somebody tells you that, well, we don't care because we don't really think we really don't care if you ever get there. It's been the attitude until very recently. So it's very demoralizing, you know, to everybody, except the scientific community itself is kind of immune from this to some degree, as long as they get funded for research. As long as the universities getting money for basic research in this area, and they're training students in these trainings and these students can get jobs either in the private sector or they start their own companies, or they go to work at government laboratories, as long as that is moving along at some reasonable degree of success for people getting trained and getting in doing work and publishing papers. There's a certain degree of apathy if you will, or there even a certain degree [00:29:00] of satisfaction in the scientific community since nobody seems to care, if you should never goes on the grid. Yeah. Yeah. And so I guess like counterfactually, if the money had been there, so actually one thing that I, I still do find really impressive about the plan, although it is disappointing is that you basically predicted that. Right. Like you, you said, you said here's logic one. If you're below this line fusion won't happen and indeed you were right. So that's, let's just say like, that is one of the reasons why I'm I'm so impressed by it. Because it, it really did, it made a very precise prediction and that prediction came true, although it is disappointing. If you, if you could imagine that, like the say the money came through, do you think that this plan would have been useful in the sense of like, like how much confidence do you have that you sort of [00:30:00] accounted for all the things that you would need to do over the course of several decades? In order to, to get to fusion as an energy. Well, as it says in sort of early part of the plan, these plans are not bent to be followed blindly in their detail. They are guidance to management and management has to keep updating them and looking to see how they're doing and keeping an eye out for new discoveries and revising the plans in detail to see if new things are emerging or some things are failing. Or the money is coming in in such a way that that the plan schedule has to be changed. That's why you need management structure that's in place and following it, but not blindly following it. Yeah. So I personally believe if the management structure that we had in the [00:31:00] mid seventies had been maintained and, you know, right now I think we had 80 people in the office and they were all management oriented. And right now I think they probably have about, I don't know, maybe, maybe 15 people in the office because they're running it like a research program. So they just taking proposals and getting them evaluating and sending out money. So they're not managing in the way that we would have managed if we had had 80 people and we'd had the divisions that we had divided up and we revise the management structure from time to time. Along the way. And I know if I hadn't been there and what we had in mind, we were going to transition the money starting out into industry to get these things built and to bring engineering oriented people in more into the program, because even in the mid seventies, the pro was dominated by plasma physicists. And we were only in the process at that point of starting to bring in engineering [00:32:00] people, but still the money. The government's laboratories in their technology. People like Oak Ridge has a big technology laboratory. And so there was technology programs being developed in these laboratories. And other a little bit of it was going out into industries as on a job basis for the labs, but we didn't have a big industry program. And you know, one of the things I did just before I left was I brought in McDonald Douglas, which a big aerospace company to build an engineering center at Oak Ridge for fusion. That was sort of the last. Done and you know, and when this whole thing folded in the eight earlier eighties McDonald Douglas basically was told to shut down and they went away. They were, they were eventually bought out by Boeing. So we had started a transition where part of the implementation of this plan was to implement it by bringing industry in to bring [00:33:00] that talent from, we had a bunch of people, for example, in fusion power associates at the beginning, who were the architect engineers that were building nuclear power plants. So, you know, those were the people that we needed to implement the plan, but they were not quite in the program by now, 1980. And when the money didn't come through them, they just all disappeared from any plan that the government had because the government in the eighties and was only interested in trying to make their scientists survive. Yeah. And I guess you don't really see plans like this today. It feels like. And so I get the sense that creating plans like this, and more generally like technology management, like competence, technology management is a bit of a lost art. Do you, do you think that's true or, or am I, or is it like, am I missing something?[00:34:00]  Well, I don't know if it's true or not across the board that they must be out there somewhere. I think when you look at big construction projects and the people that do those projects know how to manage and they know how to cost things out and they know how to, they know the importance of, of keeping things on the schedule and they know how important it is to have pieces of the schedule coming in on the right time timing so that the whole project comes together. And, and we tried to do lay that out so that, that could be done for fusion, but I don't see it being done in the department of energy. And I don't know about any other agencies. I I can I have the feeling that maybe the defense department does it a little better on weapons systems and aircraft systems and fighter systems with some of the big aerospace companies? I mean, I think my observation from a fire department of defense is that [00:35:00] they, they do it the right way, but they're not on top of the cost and schedule and they do get taken to the cleaners by these companies, but somehow or another, they do get the job done, even if it's costing more than it should and taking longer. Yeah. That's, that's the thing that there's sort of been this like wider observation that since the 1970s things just take like sort of complex projects like this take longer and cost, like have, have dramatic like cost and time overruns. And it's sort of like this, there's like this trend of that happening more and more. And so, so I wonder if it's like w what it is about the world. That's changed. Do you have any hypotheses there? Well, you know, I'm not sure if it was ever that good first place ever, because when we, when I was there [00:36:00] in the seventies and we were laying out our plans, we thought we knew how, how to do it and do it right. But at the same time, within the atomic energy commission, there was a a nuclear fission program called the breeder reactor program. And it was a mess. And, and yet the industries out there like Westinghouse and general electric, they were actually building nuclear power plants in those days. And they were building nuclear reactors for submarines in those days. And so those programs were actually working, but at the department, they were working on advanced reactors and they weren't getting them done. And they eventually had to shut down the breeder reactor program because it just wasn't just wasn't seemed to be working. So I'm not sure the government, at least the part that I knew ever did that. Well, you know, when Admiral Rick over wanted to put a. I nuclear reactor in the submarine. The Navy wanted to fire [00:37:00] him as a department of energy, wanted him to put this program into the Lac, their national laboratories. And he had a fight them tooth and nail through his friends in Congress to get put in charge of the program and be allowed to put this out to general electric and Westinghouse. He had to fight them, and this was back in the sixties. So I'm not, I'm not sure that the government itself ever was very efficient at any of these things. Now, I have to say that NASA seems to have a good reputation and I, if it's true, it's I attributed to the fact that Kennedy went public and made it a national priority to get there by the end of the decade. And he demanded that they do it in a way to make it. And he, he had the backing of the Congress and he completely set up a whole new agency focused on [00:38:00] just that. And they got there. So I have to say that that was a success story and it remains a success story today with the evolution of a commercial industry. That's coming out of all of that. All this is quite a few decades later, but nevertheless they seem to have done a good job. I've never, I've, I've never been in NASA. So I only can see it from a farm. I'm sure there's some problems within it, but you know, somehow or another, it proved that we could get it done. And going back further to the Manhattan project for the atomic bomb was clear that when there was a commitment from president Truman, I guess it was, or or maybe it was, maybe it was Roosevelt. To do it and the army set up to take charge of it. They put a general in charge of it and they went to Los Alamos and they forced to deploy the part, the atomic energy commission laboratories to, to work on the problem that was at hand to get it done in a short amount of time. And when you had that kind [00:39:00] of leadership and management, it seems like it can be done, but it all depends on management and it's rare in government. And I would say it's rare even outside of government as well. And, and so, so I guess the upshot of this for me is that and correct me if this is wrong, but that you feel like it's much more about sort of the, the individuals in charge. And then it is about sort of like the, the process of, of planning and roadmapping out the techniques. Yeah, absolutely. I can't tell you how many plans have made since the one that you were looking at that I, that I've gathered dust on shelves. They almost every other year, the program launches a new plan. It finishes the plan. Everybody says whether they like it or they don't, and it's not implemented in a couple weeks [00:40:00] later, they'll turn it over to the national academies to evaluate or proposal new a plan. And I can't tell you, it's countless number of plans in fusion that are gathering dust on shelves over the past 40 years. You mean, it's the managers and the people that are want to implement the plans that, that supervise the plan. And as long as they're there we'll implement the plan, but as soon as they're gone, they, somebody else comes in, maybe makes a new plan or makes no plans at all. You know, just try to keep things alive. And w what do you, what would you think about so I feel like the sort of modern ethos is that planning plenty. Is it that useful? That you should just go and just start doing stuff? So I guess if we, if we think of like a counterfactual world where you just [00:41:00] have a very, like, you, you have consistent management, but they don't have a plan. How do you think that would be. I'm not quite sure what you said, but let me, let me give you an example of this big international project. Either in France, it was, it was, it was started by Ronald Reagan in 1985, but it didn't really get launched as a serious construction project for 2006. And it very rapidly became something that was getting behind schedule and over budget. And it was completely out of control until about 10 years ago. They, they had a management review and they said, we've got to get control of this project. They brought in this guy, that's now the director, Bernard big go. And he, and he took charge of this. And now he's got the thing organized, reorganized. Countries [00:42:00] from all over the world on a schedule to deliver this piece of equipment or that piece of equipment on a certain time schedule, he's got them all being delivered in a sequence and he's having them put together in a sequence. And he's got a great management plan and he's been keeping the thing on schedule now for the last five years. And I have great confidence. He's going to get the job done, but it all started with putting somebody like him in charge that knew he had. Have a plan that was in detail for everybody working together because, and totally took charge every country that had part of the job wasn't controlled with the wrong piece. And there was no, there was no control if they got behind. Sometimes the director in, in France didn't even know until it was too late to get it back on schedule and, and he didn't control the money anyway, each country controlled its own money. So, you know, I think it all comes down to management and then the management [00:43:00] makes the plan. Yeah. And w we'll see, so that's that I do think is worth noting in the sense that there's, there's also sort of a philosophy of management that says management shouldn't actually be imposing a plan on people. They should just like. Let it be very bottom up. Right. And just like, instead of planning, like, you don't know what's going to happen, so you should just sort of like let ideas bubble up from, from the bottom and let people work on what they think is the best thing to work on. Right? Well, you know, managers are managers of people and they oversee people. And so in a company, there's somebody at the top when there's somebody under him, but underneath them, It companies, there are thousands of people they're doing their bit. So a managers is not just say, Hey, we're going to get this done by tomorrow or next week he, he supervises all these people and these [00:44:00] people feed him up the information and help create this plan. And they all have to be on board and supervised properly all the way down the line through it, through a management chain. So it's not like one person does the whole plan by himself or with a couple of people in his office. He supervised the preparation of a plan with the community. So I had, you know, dozens of people around the country who helped prepare this plan. I helped them piece it together. And, you know, I helped organize the structure of the whole thing, but it was, it was an ongoing interaction that went from. And then guidance from top down, it was back and forth through the whole process. Got it. So you could almost think of the plant as a coordination mechanism in a way. Absolutely. Because the managers can actually do the work. Yeah. [00:45:00] Yeah. And they probably like don't, the managers can't know enough to be able to say accurate. They don't know the level of detail. If there's a problem. For example, if there is a problem they can say, okay, let's fix that problem. And they go back to the people that know about it and they tell them, okay, you guys go out and find out how you're going to fix this problem and come back and tell me how you're going to do it. But then the manager has to approve it. You know, if he doesn't, if he thinks it doesn't been done, right. He will go back to them and until they get her. Right. So, and I guess another interesting thing about Th the, the plan is that at some point someone was willing to make a prediction but a decade or more out. And that's sort of an attitude. I, I see people as being very hesitant to make that predictions on that timescale now do you feel like there's, or at least with that amount of w with like that [00:46:00] amount of precision, right? Like people make very, like hand-waving predictions now. Do you think, like there's been some kind of attitude shift around making predictions like that? Well, it's changing in the last year or so. There's been a lot of planning activities going on here and you'll see some time schedules and all of these, like right now there's a whole bunch of the companies that are all saying. But by 2030 or 2040 or 2050 and so on and so forth. And there's sort of a goal that's been proposed to have fusion on the grid by 2050 and in order to participate in the climate change solutions. So there's a lot of thinking about this and there's a lot of people putting out what they think is a reasonable timeframe that is achievable. And it's interesting that these, these timetables are all. One two or three decades out, which is sort of like almost the timescale [00:47:00] with the timescale that we had. So it's not uncommon to think that almost anything that's technically thought to be feasible can be done in 10, 20 or 30 years, depending on how difficult it is. So it's pretty easy for people to think that something can be done in those kinds of timescales and then start backfilling the details to see how it can be done and what it costs. Yeah. I think, I think the thing that strikes me is different between the predictions that I see now. And what you worked on is that. I, I feel like the, the fusion plan was a, the producers were very precise. Like it wasn't like, oh, we'll get this thing working by this time. It was like, okay, we need to show this experiment, this experiment and this experiment. And then there are also like very clear sort of intermediate results and, and like different pathways. All of which I, I don't [00:48:00] see in, in modern modern predictions where there, who are, who it feels like it's like, step one, start project. Step two, question mark. Question mark. Question mark. Step three 30 years later, have this amazing result. And I feel like that well, and you see our times scale to look to around the year 2000. Come out of whole cloth, it was set by the fact that we were in a physics phase and we had just authorized the construction of a physics demonstration called Tokamak fusion test reactor at Princeton. In 1975, we had already launched construction of that, and we knew that to get to a power plant. We had to make two major steps. One was an engineering facility and next was a demonstration power plant. And the time to construct those things is, is kind of known that it takes [00:49:00] five years to build them and five years to run them. So that kind of for each step was a 10 year step. And that gets you to a 20 year timetable. And so that really the time to build those two facilities and operate them, set the timescale. Of 20 years, more or less, depending upon how, you know, give or take a few years how fast the money came in and so on. So you know, we had a, we had a reason that that 20 year time frame was sort of set that we couldn't get there any faster because we couldn't go direct to a power plant. Right. And, and I guess like, so, so two questions one is, how do you think about the difference between a engineering project and a physics project and then two, like how did you know that you couldn't go direct to a. Well, if you [00:50:00] look at all the pieces of a power plant, you'll know that there's an awful lot of stuff in there that is not needed for a physics experiment, you know, a physics experiment, you know, what makes up a fusion plasma, and it has a whole bunch of diagnostics on it, and you're not sure what it's going to do. And so you're, you have to allow for surprises and then you'll have to do theory and computation to see if you understand what's going on. And all of that requires people who, who understand the physics for a power plant. You have to actually have confidence that the plasma that you're making is actually going to sustain fusion for a long period of time and produce heat. That can then be converted into electricity. And that means that these power plant has to be doesn't have room for a lot of diagnostics to be doing experiments, to try to figure out [00:51:00] what's happening. You have to have high confidence that when it turns on it's going to run and not have to be shut down every day or every week to be fixed. Right? So all those things require technology and engineering development, where components, you know, there may be a thousand major components or hundreds if you combine them in the right way into a power plant that has certain functions. And each of these has to be developed by engineers as a company. It has to be run and tested for long periods of time to see you with your breaks, to see how to fix it. How long does it take all of these things have to be demonstrated before you put it all together. Otherwise when you put it all together in Nepal plant it's too late because you can't just hate the far plan a party again, and start over. So the engineering and technology has a whole separate track of development that requires [00:52:00] testing and and development of codes of, of of a manufacture materials have to have codes. How long they'll last in this environment? Yeah. When will they fail? There's a whole skill set called Time to failure and time to repair the engineers, work with that physicists don't work with, if it breaks, it breaks, they just, you know, you know, they, they, they fix it because it's a small piece and they put pieces in, it takes them maybe a few weeks, but it a major piece of a power plant. It might take you a year to take that piece out and repair it and put a new piece in. Yeah. So, so like, meanwhile, you're not making any money selling electricity, electric utility will not buy a power plant like that until someone's shown that every piece works and worked all, all together can be sex if it breaks, you know, in a week. [00:53:00] Yeah. Interesting. So, so in a sense engineering work has a lot more to do with robustness than, than physics. Once, you know, the physics, it's an engineering problem to power commercial aviation. Okay. Yeah. I think that, I guess in my mind that that's still, like, there's still a lot of like research work to be done in engineering problems, even if it is just an engineering problem. There's a, there's a melding of physics in it. That's what they call applied physics and there's basic physics. And so, and there's technology and then there's engineering and all of things. I have slightly different slants and slightly different communities, but they all have, and that's one of the functions of management is to work on a timeframe and with money to meld these things in the proper sequence to get to where you need to. Yeah. That's why a program has to, that's why a program like fusion has to evolve from [00:54:00] totally physicists to mix of physicists and technology, people to a mixtures of engineers, to commercial companies that do costs and schedules and all of this stuff. This all has to be supervised by management. Got it. And so sort of a nitty gritty that I'm interested in is like, how did you think about budgets and like how much things would cost? Cause I feel like there's, there's no good canonical resources about like, how to think about how much research programs cost. Well, the way we did it was we divided it into systems and subsystems. And we went to the people that were working in each area and we asked them to go into more depth and that's, what's in our other volumes. So we had teams of people in all these areas, and [00:55:00] then we use you know, people that from industry and from utilities. Had done similar things. He found, we looked at the cost of nuclear power plants. That was a big part of our, our thinking as to what we knew that the fusion plant had to compete. So, you know, the, the, the skillset was all out there. Technologic technology wise for the power plants because of fusion plant is almost like a nuclear power plant, except a fuel is different in the center. I mean, it doesn't look the same, but it has all the same pieces to get the power. So there, there was a lot of skills out there that we, we were able to draw from. And, and we did the best we could. We know we can't claim that. And we put some contingencies in there, you know, we didn't let them low ball or high ball us, you know, because we had, they had to fit into the different logics as to how much money might be available and stuff like that. So, and we didn't say that this number is where we're, you know, in [00:56:00] stone that they were, they were absolutely. Yes. Yeah. And how did you think about like, places where there's just like, sort of deep uncertainty like where you would need to actually, in terms of a physics problem where you would actually need like some kind of discovery in order to get the thing work? Because it seems like there, there could be a situation where like, you know, it's like you can make that discovery next year, or you could, it could take you 10 years to figure it out. Well, if you look at the say the logic three reference option to page 12 of the blue colored volume you will see. That there are a variety of paths the Tokamak with the lead path and freed, laid out a reference a lot for that to get there by a certain date. But underneath that, there's a path for authentic concepts. And there were decision points, which said that well, if these [00:57:00] things come along and there's even one.at the bottom that says other things that were in very early stages of proof of principle, but we weren't knew that these things might come to fruition. We laid out a timeframe for hoping that we would fund those so that they could be evaluated. And so if those things came to fruition, then they would transition to a next step. And so that would all, that was all sort of taken into account as to the decision point as to when some of these things might, might happen. And, and of course, if, if something really radical were to come along a long, one of these other paths it's listed, I'll say can see one if you'll, I don't know if you have it in front. But under other, you'll see a decision point in 1985 that we're going to try to bring some of those things to a decision.[00:58:00]  If it looked like a positive one, we would proceed to what we call a prototype engineering, power reactor. And so it would take the place of that one up above that was called the Tokamak EPR that would have already been under construction if we kept following the back path. But, but it might still be. But if this other one came along, we would start its own track to compete. 1985 and then it would pick up at its own track and then it would come in later and we'd have to, at that point, if that became the favorite path, or maybe even there'd be three paths, you know, we didn't say that there could only be one winner. So you had a, you could eventually wind up with several of the earliest ones might come on around the year two thousands, but some of these other ones like abandoned 2005 or 2006, if they were better and they'd be a options for the [00:59:00] utilities, if they were better. Got it. Yeah, this is so cool. One of the really big takeaways that like, just like keeps coming through is almost just like consistency of, of management and not so much like the plan, but like of, of a plan. And, and I think like that's what you see. Not happening. And I guess sort of pulling us to today. Do you have a sense of which things that are happening in fusion now that you think are most. Well, you know, I don't want to get out on a limb to pick winners and losers because fusion power associates really is a home for all of these people. And I encourage the ball and there are people that we will not let into fusion, power associates as they're out there because they're so re almost crazy. And their claims are almost crazy that I wouldn't want to be associated with them. There are few and far between [01:00:00] fortunately, most of the alternates that are out there and these little companies they've been formed by good fusion. People who have, who have fallen on bad times because the government started funding all their money into tokamaks and stopped funding their off and net ideas. And so these people branched out and got support on their own. And I know some of these people and they're good people and their ideas need deserve to be pursued. But the truth is that most all of these are at what we used to call the proof of principle stage on their physics. They are not fully thought through power plants and their physics is not fully developed or at least not even far enough along to develop to know how probable their success is. They should be pursued. What was the room in the program for these, because improvements all those come along, any tech technology. So the first thing that comes out is it not going to be the best [01:01:00] thing 20 years after it? So I encourage all these things if they're credible people and you know, right now there are a couple of. Things in the Tokamak area, you know, the Tokamak mainline is the conventional Tokamak that is represented by either, but there are variations. There's one Commonwealth fuse and the systems at spying out of MIT. That's almost the exact same concept as the mainline Tokamak, except they're using high field new superconductors, which make the machine smaller. And which allows them also to be able to disassemble and repair it faster than the conventional tokamaks because the Magnus come apart in a different way. And the exhaust system that they've designed is more efficient. So that may help with some of the materials problems as the conventional talking back. So it does look like a much improved Tokamak and they're getting money and they're trying. You know, [01:02:00] they've got a facility that they're, that they've committed to in Massachusetts, and they're trying to build one step, a physics demonstration followed by a electricity generator. And so I, I have great hopes for them. If they can get money, they're privately funded. Now they're not getting hardly any government money at all. I think the government's helping them a little bit with some support work in the labs, but basically it's a private sector venture. And I think that one of the most promising, and there's another variation of the Tokamak called the spherical story. Or physical Toca Mac the British are going gangbusters on that. They've got one in operation. They've got a company that's also built one and they've got a site for building as a next step one, which they a site where they hope though will the actual power electricity generator. So that variation of the Tokamak is also looking very seeing. And it's the British are way out in front on that. Although [01:03:00] that idea first came. Ascend Princeton is actually had built one of those. And as another one coming in operation in a couple of years, that would support that line. So there's a couple of variations along the token back line that are looking, looking very good. All the other things that you hear about there are at a somewhat earlier stage of develop. They're all doing good work. T a E a tri alpha energy. Your TA in California is probably the most radical of the mall. But they are the farthest along of these alternates. And they've all, they've had success along the way. They built two or three generations. So machine, and they're all trying to get money for a really major step that would really demonstrate most everything they want to demonstrate before going on to a real power producing machine. So, you know, I think I have for them too, there's another company in Canada called general fusion that perhaps is a little bit farther behind, but they're working with the British and a [01:04:00] two. And so that's a promising area. And you know, I hope I have hope that that will evolve. This actually made me think of a question, which is Was sort of now all as, as you alluded to all the fusion development is being done by these sort of separate private companies which sort of stands in contrast to the, the fusion plan, which sort of implicitly is that everything is being at least managed from a central like a central management team. Do you think that w w what do you think about those two, two sort of different approaches towards getting to a technology of like, sort of the, the let a thousand flowers bloom in, in private companies versus a much broader program. Well, I think in the last maybe five years or so times have changed in that regard, you know, in the seventies and up until very recently, it was [01:05:00] only the governments that seem to be able to afford to do this. Those are the timescale and the cost. And so if was to come to pass, the government had to step up or the international governments had to step up and work together. And it was, seemed like the only way to get there was for the government to do it because of the cost. Now it seems that things have come along far enough, especially in the Tokamak area that some private companies are coming up with what they think are. Ways to fund what they want to do to demonstrate what they need to demonstrate because their ideas are at the moment, at least on relatively inexpensive facilities. Now they, they are going to run up against funding problem. If they're successful in the near term, you know, they're getting hundreds of millions of [01:06:00] dollars, some of them from private investors and they're building some things and hopefully they'll be successful, but these will not be powerful. And so they will have to be so successful that they will be able to get much, much larger amounts of money. They may have to be, be bought out by a Westinghouse or something in order to, to become real power plant manufacturers. These are not industries yet, even though they have an industry, what they call an industry association, there are small companies, and if there may be big by some companies standards, but they are not really money-making companies and they don't have their own money. So they have to continue to, to get money from investors and, and even maybe getting a hundred million dollars or $200 million from some billionaire venture capital company is doable. These days, getting a billion for the next step is a much different [01:07:00] problem because there isn't going to be a real fusion demonstration plant built for less than a couple of billion dollars. And private money doesn't come that easily at that Atlanta, unless the thing that's being built is going to make money back fast.  Steven Dean. Thanks for being part of idea machines.'  

This is Draw The Line Radio Show with Jacki-e, presenting the best music from female producers and DJs. Helping me Draw the Line with her guest mix in the second hour, it's ɆL11, a young DJ from Lithuania who is now based in London. She's been DJ-ing since 2019 and is currently studying electronic music production at university. Her inspiration is Dax J and she prefers industrial techno from 142bpm upwards. So strap in to your seatbelts!! Links for ɆL11:- Soundcloud:- https://soundcloud.com/laura-ma-iulaityt Instagram:- https://www.instagram.com/el11_official/ In my mix in the first hour I'm playing tracks by Onyvaa, Marie Vaunt, Mila Chiral, AK Sports, Ona V and lots more. If you like the tracks we play, please support the artists by buying their music. It's time to say NO to gender imbalance in dance music. It's time to Draw The Line!! Draw The Line Radio Show is produced for radio by Sergio Erridge and is A Darker Wave production. Track list 1st hour mixed by Jacki-E 1, Sama Abdulhadi – Reverie (original mix) Circoloco Records. 2. Magit Cacoon – Jalel ft Nasrim Kahdi (original mix) Mago Music. 3. Beth Lydi, Damiel Jaeger – Psychonautics (original mix) Snoe. 4. Sydney Blu – Monologue ft Fritz Heider (original mix) Blu Music. 5. Fairmont – Gazebo (Anna remix) Sapiens 6. Deborah de Luca – Resolve (original mix) SolaMente. 7. Mila Chiral – Dancing With Werewolves and Vampires (original mix) Bandcamp release https://milachiral.bandcamp.com/album/naftfteot-nightmares-fairy-tales-for-the-end-of-times 8. BEC – Pleasure Seeker (original mix) Second State. 9. Tremonjai – Kick (Jose Baher & Marisol Garcia remix) Black Vogue Records. 10. Milos Vujovic – Reaching (Jesika Jane remix) Technologic/ 11. Ilona – The Light (original mix) Layer 909. 12. Mha Iri – Angels Cry (original mix) 1605. 13. Charlotte de Witte – Doppler (original mix) KNTXT. 14. Ona V – Fugacious (original mix) The Rave School Bandcamp release https://theraveschool.bandcamp.com/album/the-rave-school-vol-1 15. Alice Deejay – Better Off Alone (Marie Vaunt remix) Free Download https://soundcloud.com/marievaunt/better-off-alone-marie-vaunt-remix 16. Onyvaa – Lost Angeles (original mix) KNTXT. 17. Mila Chiral – Life in 7 Mins (original mix) Bandcamp release https://milachiral.bandcamp.com/album/naftfteot-nightmares-fairy-tales-for-the-end-of-times 18. AK Sports – Achilles (original mix) Club Glow Bandcamp release https://clubglow.bandcamp.com/album/club-glow-vol-3 19. AK Sports - 5am No Hot Water (original mix) Club Glow Bandcamp release https://clubglow.bandcamp.com/album/club-glow-vol-3 ɆL11 – An exclusive guest mix for Draw The Line Radio Show. 1. Incident Prism – Boidshot (original mix) Molekul. 2. Balrog - Intense Motherfucker (original mix) Agathism Records. 3. Dica – Faust (original mix) Fluctuat Records. 4. Tim Tama - Blood Christening (original mix) Dreamscape Bandcamp release https://timtama.bandcamp.com/track/blood-christening 5. Y-Not – Tombs (original mix) Khazad Records. 6. Draugr – Escaped (original mix) TITDM. 7. J - Kwon - Tipsy (Bours? Lockdown mix) Bandcamp release Free Download https://bours1.bandcamp.com/track/j-kwon-tipsy-bours-lockdown-mix 8. NTBR & Mac Declos - To The Club (original mix) Maison Close Records. 9. TIARNOLA - Pele, Ronaldo or Messi (original mix) Kriminal Records. 10. Alighment – Power (original mix) KNTXT. 11. Brutalismus 3000 - Diskoteka Avantgarde (original mix) Bandcamp release. 12. Incident Prism - Gang Bounce (Hector Oaks as DJ KAOS11 remix) Molekul. 13. Vizionn - Arcane Venoms (original mix)Everyone on Acid Bandcamp release https://everyoneonacid.bandcamp.com/album/everyone-on-acid-x-jaelos-01 14. Schwefelgelb - Wie Viel Haut (Randomer remix) n-Plex. 15. Tanzkarte – Sinner (original mix) Expel Your Demons Records.

chào các bạn, mình là hafnh. Dưới chiếc podcast này là hai kĩ năng mình tự ti nhất của bản thân. Mong rằng hai kỹ năng này sẽ được chú ý hơn nữa.

Playlist: 01 Joel Corry x David Guetta x RAYE vs. GUZ - BED (Schxzo Set U Free Edit) 02 Nelly Furtado - Promiscuous (HÄWK Remix) 03 Cece Peniston - Finally (JNR x Joe Stone Mashup) 04 Daft Punk - Technologic (Stereo Nine Edit) 05 Masters At Work - Work (Level Up & K-Kyoto Work Edit) 06 Queen - Another One Bites The Dust (DJ Sergio Koba Remix) 07 Tag Team - Whoomp! There It Is (Rowan Lace "Rattle" Edit) 08 Goodboys, Imanbek - Goodbye (James Hype Extended Mix) 09 Grandmaster Flash - The Message (Ravage Remix) 10 Madonna - Music (Leakim Reittoh Remix) 11 Swedish House Mafia - One (Hypelezz Mashup) 12 Major Lazer Ft. J Balvin & El Alfa - Que Calor (IKENN Remix) 13 ATB x TOPIC x A7S - Your Love 9PM (Fab Toulouse Remix) 14 Robin S - Show Me Love (Soulmatic Remix) 15 Fred Kantis & Nooryt - Wake Up For Detroit (Original Mix) 16 Lana Del Rey - Summertime Sadness (Rick Wonder Remix) 17 The Black Eyed Peas - My Humps (Dankless & Quotes Bootleg) 18 Edward Maya & Vika Jigulina - Stereo Love (Hypelezz I Love My Friends Edit) Follow Me: Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/nicko.vibe Twitter: https://twitter.com/#!/Nicko_Vibe Instagram: http://instagram.com/nickovibe

Like the Radio Show? Click the [Repost] ↻ button so more people can hear it! Follow @love-vibration-nation Follow us on Soundcloud: @data-transmission Follow us on Soundcloud: @datatransmission Follow our House Music Spotify Playlist: goo.gl/dHX1Cr Want more house music, tech house, deep tech, minimal? Subscribe to our Youtube Channel - bit.ly/dtytube Listen to DT Radio: Website: bit.ly/DTSite1 Pop Up: bit.ly/DTRadioPopUp1 Tracklist 1. One Day……………………….Saison 2. Telefonica……………………...Oleg Mass 3. Sax Hustler…………………….Joeski 4. Sweat The Tech………………..Mario Cruz 5. Timba…………………………….Norty Cotto 6. Yeah Yeah……………………….David Penn 7. Gypsy…………………………….Plaster Hands 8. Technologic……………………...Kevin McKay 9. My Desire………………………...Sam Divine 10. Who Dares to Believe in me….Plaster Hands

Deijhon and Aaron answers the question are robots going to increase or decrease our quality of life?

After almost 30 years, Daft Punk announced their break up in late February 2021. 20 years ago, 5,000 miles apart, and before ever meeting each other, kid Sean and Dan purchased their first albums -- both Daft Punk records. Since the duo has been a part of Audioface since before Audioface, it felt right to dive deep into the hidden history of Daft Punk.Subscribe to Audioface wherever you're listening so you always get new episodes. Follow @audiofacepod on Twitter, Instagram, or YouTube for extra Audioface.  Check out Syndicate 23's semi-monthly news and politics show Power Report if you haven't already (and catch videos on the Dan From The Internet YouTube channel).  We appreciate it, and you.

01. Robot Rock x Oh Yeah (Live) 02. Digital Love 03. Burnin 04. Revolution 909 05. Around The World x Television Rules The Nation 06. Get Lucky 07. Human After All 08. Aerodynamic (Daft Punk Remix) 09. High Life (eSQUIRE 2011 Remix) 10. Crescendolls 11. Alive (New Wave Final Mix) 12. Rollin x Scratchin 13. Derezzed 14. Face To Face 15. Harder Better Faster Stronger 16. Da Funk 17. Touch It x Technologic 18. Rock n Roll 19. Human x Together x One More Time x Stardust

Back to lockdown, back to work out 1. Summer Exotica (RAKast mash) - Purple Disco Machine vs Lana del Rey 2. Vibrating vs We Come We Rave We Love - Redfield vs Swedish House Mafia 3. Knas (Brohug remix) w/ Make your move (RAKast mash) - Steve Angello vs Pink Panda 4. Grapevine - Tiesto 5. 555 w. Rinse & Repeat - Steve Angello & Sebastian Ingrosso vs Riton & Kah-Lo 6. House of Zulu w. Technologic w. 555 (RAKast mash) - Rawtek vs SA/SI vs Daft Punk 7. Alternate - Shapov 8. Dreams - David Guetta 9. Last call to Lose myself (RAKast mash) - Vilda vs Ashton Shuffle 10. Otherside Levels (RAKast mash) - Tom Staar vs Avicii

This is Draw The Line Radio Show with Jacki-e, presenting the best music from female producers and DJs. Helping me Draw the Line this week it’s Jessica Platz aka Djane JP who is from Mannheim in Germany. Her mixes are uplifting combinations of techno, tech house and hard minimal with the occasional diversion into dark techno. With her German-Colombian temperament her sets create a really special style. Link for DJaneJP:- Mixcloud:- https://www.mixcloud.com/jessicaplatz16/ Soundcloud:- https://soundcloud.com/jessica-platz You Tube :- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3zYki2oEQOsT5NOImm2OuQ... In my mix in the first hour I’m playing tracks by Risa Taniguchi, Mha Iri, 11 Unicorns, Christina Semmler, and lots more. It's time to say NO to gender imbalance in dance music. It's time to Draw The Line!! Track list 1st hour mixed by Jacki-E 1. Anna Delamaine – Prisme (original mix) https://soundcloud.com/annedelamaine/prisme 2. Dally Cat – The Door (original mix) Free Download https://soundcloud.com/user-232097378/door?in=user-232097378/sets/new-free-download 3. Uon – What If (original mix) Bandcamp release https://listentouon.bandcamp.com/album/catharsis 4. La Fleur – Hunting Grounds (Justin Massei remix) Power Plant. 5. Invinta – Gud (original mix) Landr self-release. 6. Gudrun Gut – Baby I Can Drive My Car (Dasha Rush Remix) Bandcamp release https://gudrungut.bandcamp.com/ 7. Erika Krall – Cbhiribim, Chiribom (original mix) Human Dreams. 8. Rosana Nun – New Era (original mix) Yokai Recordings. 9. Charmain Love – Red Sun (original mix) Jeepers Music. 10. Peaches – Operate (original mix) XL Recordings. 11. Christina Semmler – Perception (original mix) Drehmoment. 12. Christina Semmler – Base (original mix) Kamarad Meyer Musik. 13. 11 Unicorns – Sonder (original mix) 11 Unicorns Music. 14. Anfisa Letyago – Push the Button (original mix) Hotflush Recordings. 15. Lady Wax, Mr X, Hardy Hard - Minimal (original mix) Menu Music. 16. Mha Iri – Parallel (original mix) Insectum Records. 17. 11 Unicorns – Follow (original mix) 11 Unicorns Music. 18. Risa Taniguchi – Lost in a Daydream (original mix) Free Download https://soundcloud.com/risataniguchi/lost-in-a-daydream-1 19. Sara Krin – Nothing to Hide (original mix) IAMT. 2nd hour:- Djane JP - An Exclusive Guest Mix for Draw The Line Radio Show. 1. Shay De Castro - Intricacies and Realities (original mix) Respekt Recordings. 2. Jay Lumen - Reincarnation (original mix) Octopus Records. 3. Dorian Parano - The Glue (original mix) SMR Underground. 4. SGARRA - Lady Ecstasy (Sopik remix) Finder Records. 5. BlazV, Lim Nylon - Sound Sculpture (original mix) Technologic. 6. Thomas Hoffknecht - Push (original mix) STRGHT. 7. Guillermo DR - Darkness In Your Space (original mix) Dreizehn Schallplatten. 8. iMiKe - Tell me (original mix) Finder Records. 9. Teenage Mutants - Time (original mix) TRAGEDIE. 10. Anna Reusch - Knocking (original mix) Tronic. 11. Rave Syndicate - Hollow (original mix) Parallel Thoughts. 12. Danny Fontana - Alexis (Drumsauw remix) Dolma. 13. Lopez DJ, Steyber - Dark Storm (original mix) Dolma. 14. Thomas Hoffknecht - Nature’s Plan (original mix) Power Plant. 15. H! Dude - I'm A Object (original mix) Dolma. 16. Fabio Guarriello, Andrea Sorbo - No Vision ([ WEX10 ] remix) dig dis. 17. Gabros - Blessing (original mix) DSR Digital. Draw The Line Radio Show is produced for radio by Sergio Erridge and is A Darker Wave production.

Tornem amb un nou episodi, i parlant de feines i emprenedors, els nostres temes favorits! Parlem de la Gig Economy, o "Economia de Col·laborativa" i "Economia de Plataforma", les noves formes d'explotació capitalista que permeten les noves tecnologies. Parlem de com aquestes empreses (Uber, AirBnb, Deliveroo, Glovo) no només no són disruptives ni ens milloren la vida si no que són empreses profundament deficitàries, que mai seran rendibles i que han de desaparèixer quan abans millor. També parlem dels grans monopolis tecnològics, els "Technologic Barons", coneguts sota l'acrònim "GAFA" (Google, Apple, Facebook i Amazon) i com, des del seu oligopoli tecnològic, escanyen la competència i impedeixen que apareguen alternatives, i perquè la millor solució tant per a nosaltres com per al negoci de la tecnologia i les comunicacions és que desapareguen o siguen trossejades en empreses més menudes. Per últim, ens fem ressò de dos alternatives i possibles solucions al poder del nou capitalisme tecnològic: la plataforma todostuslibros.com i la cooperativa de riders Rodant Bicimissatgería.

Tornem amb un nou episodi, i parlant de feines i emprenedors, els nostres temes favorits! Parlem de la Gig Economy, o "Economia de Col·laborativa" i "Economia de Plataforma", les noves formes d'explotació capitalista que permeten les noves tecnologies. Parlem de com aquestes empreses (Uber, AirBnb, Deliveroo, Glovo) no només no són disruptives ni ens milloren la vida si no que són empreses profundament deficitàries, que mai seran rendibles i que han de desaparèixer quan abans millor. També parlem dels grans monopolis tecnològics, els "Technologic Barons", coneguts sota l'acrònim "GAFA" (Google, Apple, Facebook i Amazon) i com, des del seu oligopoli tecnològic, escanyen la competència i impedeixen que apareguen alternatives, i perquè la millor solució tant per a nosaltres com per al negoci de la tecnologia i les comunicacions és que desapareguen o siguen trossejades en empreses més menudes. Per últim, ens fem ressò de dos alternatives i possibles solucions al poder del nou capitalisme tecnològic: la plataforma todostuslibros.com i la cooperativa de riders Rodant Bicimissatgería.

Guest Mix for PowerTools - America's #1 Underground Mix Show On this weeks show we have a 1 hour take over mix from Kerry Glass alongside Richard Vission & Swedish Egil. Tune in every Saturday night/Sunday Morning @ 12am-2am on @1043NOW @Rev927 @977KRCK @Rhythm1059 & @z1063 Tracklist Dom Dolla vs Format B - San Frandisco (Kerry Glass ‘Chunky’ Bootleg) Billie Eilish vs Fisher - Bad Guy (Kerry Glass ‘Stop It’ Bootleg) Felguk vs Pickle - Ok (Kerry Glass ‘Rump’ Bootleg) Felguk vs Jenil & DJ Young - Ok (Kerry Glass ‘Bring The House Down’ Bootleg) HUGEL vs Wrecks-n-Effect - Gym Quarantine (SABER ‘Rump Shaker’ Bootleg) MOTi & BODYWORX - Sweat (Kerry Glass ‘Deep Inside’ Acapella Intro) Diplo vs SHAED vs Dombresky - On My Mind (Kerry Glass ‘Trampoline Soul Sacrifice’ Bootleg) Dua Lipa vs Daft Punk vs Steve Angello - Don’t Start Now (Kerry Glass ‘One More Time KNAS’ Bootleg) RetroVision vs Kanye West - Get Down (Kerry Glass ‘Stronger’ Bootleg) Valentino Khan vs Tchami vs Cajmere - JustYourSoul (Kerry Glass ‘Deep Down Low Brighter Days’ Bootleg) Post Malone vs Martin Garrix & RetroVision - Circles (Kerry Glass ‘Project T Around The World’ Bootleg) Tag Team vs Siks - Whoomp There It Is (SQUARED ‘Vibe’ Bootleg) Tom Budin vs Sugarhill Gang - Sugars Delight (Kerry Glass ‘Rappers Delight’ Bootleg) SIDEPIECE vs Masters At Work - Wanna See You (Kerry Glass ‘Work’ Edit) Purple Disco Machine vs Daft Punk - Body Funk (Kerry Glass ‘Technologic’ Edit) FISHER vs Toga Audion - Wanna Go Dancin (Cazes ‘Let’s Go Dancing’ Edit) Riton & Oliver Heldens vs Martin Ikin - Turn Me On (Schxzo ‘Hooked’ Edit) Meduza vs Eurythmics - Piece of Your Heart (Kerry Glass ‘Sweet Dreams’ Bootleg) Calvin Harris vs Meduza vs Route 94 - I Need Your Love (Kerry Glass ‘Lose Control My Love’ Bootleg) Trevor Daniel vs Tiesto - Falling (JD Live ‘Frequency’ Bootleg) Felguk vs Roddy Ricch - Take Control (Kerry Glass ‘The Box’ Bootleg) Pop Culture & Hawk - Stoppin Travis Scott & Drake - Sicko Mode (James Hype Remix) (Kerry Glass Edit) Cazztek & Kiyoshi - Dominator (Kerry Glass Edit) Dua Lipa vs DallasK - Electricity (Kerry Glass ‘I Know’ Bootleg) Post Malone vs DallasK - Circles (Ladato ‘I Know’ Bootleg) Diplo vs Red Hot Chili Peppers - Otherside (Kerry Glass ‘Hold You Tight’ Bootleg) Diplo vs Everything But The Girl - Hold You Tight (Joe Maz ‘Missing’ Bootleg) MK & Sonny Fodera vs Tove Lo vs Kid Cudi - One Night (Kerry Glass ‘Talking Body Day N Night’ Bootleg) Diplo & Sleepy Tom vs Quavo - Be Right There (Kerry Glass ‘A Million’ Bootleg)

We've kicked off yet another series, the Two-Mate Debate, where we settle in to decide the objective truth on a topic. This week we're finding out which Daft Punk song takes the cake as the absolute best: Crescendolls, or Technologic?

On this weeks show we have a 1 hour take over mix from Kerry Glass alongside Richard Vission & Swedish Egil. Tune in every Saturday night/Sunday Morning @ 12am-2am on @1043NOW @Rev927 @977KRCK @Rhythm1059 & @z1063. Follow Us @ www.Facebook.com/Wearepowertools www.Instagram.com/Wearepowertools www.Twitter.com/Wearepowertools www.Twitter.com/Richardvission www.Twitter.com/SwedishEgil www.Twitter.com/IamDjChristo www.Twitter.com/DavidDelano Get Tracklists Below! May 30th - NOW 104.3 - REV 92.7 - KRCK 97.7 - RHYTHM KRYC - C 89.5 - Z106.3 - Mix93fm Richard Vission Tracklist: 1. Jansons Ft. Dope Earth Alien - Switch (TCTS Remix) 2. Chris Lake - I Remember 3. HUGEL - Gym Quarantine 4. Pickle - Rump 5. BYOR - Feeling Right 6. Mike Dunn - Natural High (Dirty Channels Remix) 7. Boys Noize - Mvinline 8. Camilo Do Santos, Daniel Moreno, Amezquit - El Apogeo 9. Diplo, SIDEPIECE - On My Mind (Purple Disco Machine Remix) 10. Disclosure - Energy Kerry Glass Tracklist: Part 1 1. Dom Dolla vs Format B - San Frandisco (Kerry Glass ‘Chunky’ Bootleg) 2. Billie Eilish vs Fisher - Bad Guy (Kerry Glass ‘Stop It’ Bootleg) 3. Felguk vs Pickle - Ok (Kerry Glass ‘Rump’ Bootleg) 4. Felguk vs Jenil & DJ Young - Ok (Kerry Glass ‘Bring The House Down’ Bootleg) 5. HUGEL vs Wrecks-n-Effect - Gym Quarantine (SABER ‘Rump Shaker’ Bootleg) 6. MOTi & BODYWORX - Sweat (Kerry Glass ‘Deep Inside’ Acapella Intro) 7. Diplo vs SHAED vs Dombresky - On My Mind (Kerry Glass ‘Trampoline Soul Sacrifice’ Bootleg) 8. Dua Lipa vs Daft Punk vs Steve Angello - Don’t Start Now (Kerry Glass ‘One More Time KNAS’ Bootleg) 9. RetroVision vs Kanye West - Get Down (Kerry Glass ‘Stronger’ Bootleg) 10. Valentino Khan vs Tchami vs Cajmere - JustYourSoul (Kerry Glass ‘Deep Down Low Brighter Days’ Bootleg) 11. Post Malone vs Martin Garrix & RetroVision - Circles (Kerry Glass ‘Project T Around The World’ Bootleg) 12. Tag Team vs Siks - Whoomp There It Is (SQUARED ‘Vibe’ Bootleg) 13. Tom Budin vs Sugarhill Gang - Sugars Delight (Kerry Glass ‘Rappers Delight’ Bootleg) 14. SIDEPIECE vs Masters At Work - Wanna See You (Kerry Glass ‘Work’ Edit) 15. Purple Disco Machine vs Daft Punk - Body Funk (Kerry Glass ‘Technologic’ Edit) Kerry Glass Tracklist: Part 2 1. FISHER vs Toga Audion - Wanna Go Dancin (Cazes ‘Let’s Go Dancing’ Edit) 2. Riton & Oliver Heldens vs Martin Ikin - Turn Me On (Schxzo ‘Hooked’ Edit) 3. Meduza vs Eurythmics - Piece of Your Heart (Kerry Glass ‘Sweet Dreams’ Bootleg) 4. Calvin Harris vs Meduza vs Route 94 - I Need Your Love (Kerry Glass ‘Lose Control My Love’ Bootleg) 5. Trevor Daniel vs Tiesto - Falling (JD Live ‘Frequency’ Bootleg) 6. Felguk vs Roddy Ricch - Take Control (Kerry Glass ‘The Box’ Bootleg) 7. Pop Culture & Hawk - Stoppin 8. Travis Scott & Drake - Sicko Mode (James Hype Remix) (Kerry Glass Edit) 9. Cazztek & Kiyoshi - Dominator (Kerry Glass Edit) 10. Dua Lipa vs DallasK - Electricity (Kerry Glass ‘I Know’ Bootleg) 11. Post Malone vs DallasK - Circles (Ladato ‘I Know’ Bootleg) 12. Diplo vs Red Hot Chili Peppers - Otherside (Kerry Glass ‘Hold You Tight’ Bootleg) 13. Diplo vs Everything But The Girl - Hold You Tight (Joe Maz ‘Missing’ Bootleg) 14. MK & Sonny Fodera vs Tove Lo vs Kid Cudi - One Night (Kerry Glass ‘Talking Body Day N Night’ Bootleg) 15. Diplo & Sleepy Tom vs Quavo - Be Right There (Kerry Glass ‘A Million’ Bootleg) Swedish Egil Tracklist: 1. MOGUAI - Everybody's Got To Learn Sometime (Daddy's Groove Extended Remix) 2. Moreno Pezzolato - Sing It Back 3. Chris Lake - I Remembe 4. HODA - BTTB 5. Deniz Koyu - GO 6. MING & LOSH - Stand Back 7. BARILAN - Resistance 8. Sharam Jey, Andruss & Bob Musella - Rise On My Soul

The 1980s brings the midi revolution and the machines threaten to take over the music.To purchase a written copy of the book, Gigs and Guitars, email jeffsanty@yahoo.com

Michael Skywalker, the host of the Cheesecake and Coffee podcast joins me to discuss the evolution of 20th-century technologies and the future of our society based on these advancements. Our conversation turns philosophic and is easily one of the best episodes I've ever had. I look forward to making more episodes with him. You can listen to his podcast here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/id1448993834 Intro music: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aNzLERKtgMY Outro Music: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aq4xhldVpQc

Daft Punk are childhood heroes of ours. It was only right we did a second part to this podcast series! This week, we discuss what has been said to be "the best-sounding album in modern history". Random Access Memories has been a five years process. The album cost upwards of one million dollars to produce. Several recording and mixing engineers. A slew of session players who changed the history of music. All the classic analog gear one could ever dream of. And the result? You'll have to listen to the episode in its entirety to know what WE think about it.Support the show (https://delicatebeats.com/collections/all)

EDM has seen a huge surge in the last 10 years. Oddly enough, a group that helped define greatly what superstars of today rely on for success, is merely an afterthought because of their recluse nature. Daft Punk, a duo of french dance musicians, has opened the doors of the mainstream for upwards two generations of electronic dance artists and DJs. Their production techniques have spawned an entire cult of sound. Their live sets have defined the audio and visual experiences of live dance shows and DJ performances. Their branding, from live gig props, to poster designs, to show visuals has become the blueprint for seemingly uninteresting computer geeks with powerful musical messages. IN this episode, BK and JT trace back their EDM lineage, talking about their favourite Daft Punk albums, songs, production techniques, pieces of gear, and discuss what the true legacy of the french duo is.Support the show (https://delicatebeats.com/collections/all)

This week Adam and Brooke talk about the robots in their lives. They also play a game that proves they don't know a thing about inventors...or poets.

How NPs can help expand telehealth services By Teresa A. Rincon, PhD, RN, CCRN-K, FCCM Consumers of healthcare services are demanding more convenient and accessible options to care. Technologic advancements can support this demand, but telehealth knowledge is lacking. This article will describe the current state of telehealth and examine the role that NPs can play in furthering its adoption (Retrieved from https://nursing.ceconnection.com/public/modules/12729/steps/29703) Merry Christmas!!! GUMBO Educational Services is a Non-Profit Organization that believes: MISSION STATEMENT Sharing knowledge and educating those in the community for a healthier stronger safer community. MOTTO: GUMBO We'll teach your Grandma, Uncles, Mama, Brothers, and Others (GUMBO) The book is complete.  It was written to help raise money for the Non-profit. "Casey and the Crawfish" will be sold starting in January 2019. Everyone can purchase from http://gumboeducation.com/casey-and-the-crawfish Thanks again for your support.

Hay apps para meditar, contar calorías, medir horas de sueño, ser efectivas... pfff. ¿Cuáles usa María?

We talk with aeronautical engineer Mark French about degrees and careers in Engineering Technology, as well as delving into wind tunnels, guitars, and how to launch a ping-pong ball at supersonic speeds. While Carmen is unsure if he's a technologist, he's pretty certain that Daft Punk is Technologic. Our guest for this episode is Mark … Continue reading Episode 59 — Engineering Technology →