POPULARITY
30 episodes with video evidence
3 episodes with video evidence
2 episodes with video evidence
4 episodes with video evidence
4 episodes with video evidence
4 episodes with video evidence
2 episodes with video evidence
3 episodes with video evidence
3 episodes with video evidence
The TeacherCast Podcast – The TeacherCast Educational Network
Welcome to Digital Learning Today. In this episode, Jeff Bradbury explores the strategic systems that shape the future of education, focusing on Instructional Coaching, Artificial Intelligence, Professional Learning, and the latest Educational Technology Trends. In this episode, Jeffrey Bradbury interviews Andrew Caffrey, CEO of Canopy Education, discussing the latest developments in Google education tools, the integration of AI in classrooms, and the launch of Education Magazine. They explore the role of Canopy Education in professional development, the importance of structured training for teachers, and the potential of Google Vids as an educational tool. The conversation emphasizes the need for educators to adapt to new technologies while maintaining a focus on effective teaching and learning practices. Become a High-Impact Leader: This episode is just the beginning. To get the complete blueprint for designing and implementing high-impact systems in your district, get your copy of my book, "Impact Standards." Strategic Vision for Digital Learning: Learn how to create a district-wide vision that aligns digital learning with your educational goals, transforming how standards-based instruction is designed and supported. Curriculum Design and Implementation: Discover practical strategies for integrating digital learning into existing curricula, creating vertical alignment of skills, and mapping digital learning across grade levels. Effective Instructional Coaching: Master the art of coaching people rather than technology, building relationships that drive success, and measuring impact through student engagement rather than just technology usage. Purchase your copy of “Impact Standards” on Amazon today! Key Takeaways: Canopy Education focuses on training teachers to use technology effectively in classrooms. AI integration in education is evolving, with tools like Gemini being introduced. Professional development should be structured and focused on specific tools or areas. Google Classroom offers various tools to assist teachers in content creation. Education Magazine aims to provide resources specifically for teachers using Google and Canva. Google Vids is now available to all editions of Google, enhancing video use in classrooms. Teachers should not rush to adopt new tools without proper training and understanding. The importance of teaching and learning should guide the use of technology in education. Canopy Education is a community interest company focused on making a difference in education. Feedback from educators is crucial for improving educational tools and resources. Chapters: 00:00 Introduction to Canopy Education and ISTE Experience 02:42 Understanding Canopy Education's Role in Professional Development 05:56 Exploring Google Classroom and AI Integration 08:51 The Evolution of AI in Education 11:49 Navigating Google Classroom Features 14:33 Launching Canopy Education Magazine 17:48 Determining Content for Canopy Education Magazine 19:15 Teaching and Learning as a Core Focus 20:32 Selective Adoption of Educational Tools 21:38 Exploring Google Vids for Classroom Use 23:30 Video Evidence in Education 24:53 Integration of Google Tools in Classrooms 25:49 Classroom Management with Google Tools 28:37 Strategizing Instructional Coaching for New Tools 30:06 Professional Development Resources for Educators...
DOJ makes announcement on Epstein.. Trump responds to Elon Musk creating a third party and Mike Benz and Nate Morris joins the show Check Out Our Partners: Advantage Gold: Get your FREE wealth protection kit https://www.abjv1trk.com/F6XL22/4MQCFX/?sub1=Youtube Bon Charge: Go to https://www.boncharge.com/BENNY and use coupon code BENNY to save 15% BUNKR: Go to https://bunkr.life/BENNY and use code “BENNY” to get your 25% off your family plan Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
In Document 361, filed on May 27, 2025, federal prosecutors strongly opposed a request by news organizations to unseal sexually explicit video and photographic exhibits introduced in the criminal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs. The government argued that public disclosure of this material would inflict serious harm on the alleged victims—identified in court as Cassie Ventura and Jane Doe—both of whom were reportedly recorded without their consent during acts they claim were coerced. The government emphasized that these recordings were allegedly used by Combs as tools of blackmail and psychological control, and that releasing them—even to a limited audience—would risk retraumatizing the victims and effectively extend the abuse they endured.The filing further underscored that public access to these exhibits is neither necessary nor appropriate given the sensitive nature of the evidence. Prosecutors asserted that permitting open access would violate the victims' right to privacy and could chill future victims of sexual abuse from coming forward. They reassured the court that transparency would still be preserved through live testimony and verbal descriptions of the exhibits in open court, ensuring the public remains informed without compromising the victims' dignity or safety. Sealing the exhibits, they argued, is a narrowly tailored and essential measure to balance the public interest with the need to protect vulnerable individuals participating in the judicial process.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.361.0.pdf
In Document 361, filed on May 27, 2025, federal prosecutors strongly opposed a request by news organizations to unseal sexually explicit video and photographic exhibits introduced in the criminal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs. The government argued that public disclosure of this material would inflict serious harm on the alleged victims—identified in court as Cassie Ventura and Jane Doe—both of whom were reportedly recorded without their consent during acts they claim were coerced. The government emphasized that these recordings were allegedly used by Combs as tools of blackmail and psychological control, and that releasing them—even to a limited audience—would risk retraumatizing the victims and effectively extend the abuse they endured.The filing further underscored that public access to these exhibits is neither necessary nor appropriate given the sensitive nature of the evidence. Prosecutors asserted that permitting open access would violate the victims' right to privacy and could chill future victims of sexual abuse from coming forward. They reassured the court that transparency would still be preserved through live testimony and verbal descriptions of the exhibits in open court, ensuring the public remains informed without compromising the victims' dignity or safety. Sealing the exhibits, they argued, is a narrowly tailored and essential measure to balance the public interest with the need to protect vulnerable individuals participating in the judicial process.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.361.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
In Document 361, filed on May 27, 2025, federal prosecutors strongly opposed a request by news organizations to unseal sexually explicit video and photographic exhibits introduced in the criminal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs. The government argued that public disclosure of this material would inflict serious harm on the alleged victims—identified in court as Cassie Ventura and Jane Doe—both of whom were reportedly recorded without their consent during acts they claim were coerced. The government emphasized that these recordings were allegedly used by Combs as tools of blackmail and psychological control, and that releasing them—even to a limited audience—would risk retraumatizing the victims and effectively extend the abuse they endured.The filing further underscored that public access to these exhibits is neither necessary nor appropriate given the sensitive nature of the evidence. Prosecutors asserted that permitting open access would violate the victims' right to privacy and could chill future victims of sexual abuse from coming forward. They reassured the court that transparency would still be preserved through live testimony and verbal descriptions of the exhibits in open court, ensuring the public remains informed without compromising the victims' dignity or safety. Sealing the exhibits, they argued, is a narrowly tailored and essential measure to balance the public interest with the need to protect vulnerable individuals participating in the judicial process.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.361.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
In a sealed letter submitted to Judge Subramanian, legal counsel for Jane Doe—referred to as Victim-2 in the Sean Combs federal criminal case—opposed a media request filed on May 12, 2025, by attorneys Robert Balin and Alexandra Perloff-Giles. That request, made on behalf of several news organizations, sought courtroom access to view “sexually explicit and sensitive” audiovisual exhibits that are set to be shown to the jury but not played in open court. Jane Doe's counsel argued against the release, emphasizing the highly personal and traumatic nature of the content and citing her court-granted right to proceed anonymously. The letter underscores the importance of safeguarding Jane Doe's dignity and privacy during trial proceedings that already carry significant emotional weight for her.The opposition also stresses the unique harm that could arise from permitting the press to view such sensitive materials, especially given their graphic and intimate nature. Jane Doe's legal team asserts that allowing the media to access these exhibits, even if only while they are played for the jury, would essentially nullify the court's protective measures and could lead to secondary dissemination—further traumatizing the victim and potentially undermining the integrity of the trial. The letter frames the issue not as a matter of transparency, but one of protecting victims' rights, ensuring due process, and upholding the court's earlier rulings that prioritized the safety and anonymity of individuals involved in the case.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.350.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
In a sealed letter submitted to Judge Subramanian, legal counsel for Jane Doe—referred to as Victim-2 in the Sean Combs federal criminal case—opposed a media request filed on May 12, 2025, by attorneys Robert Balin and Alexandra Perloff-Giles. That request, made on behalf of several news organizations, sought courtroom access to view “sexually explicit and sensitive” audiovisual exhibits that are set to be shown to the jury but not played in open court. Jane Doe's counsel argued against the release, emphasizing the highly personal and traumatic nature of the content and citing her court-granted right to proceed anonymously. The letter underscores the importance of safeguarding Jane Doe's dignity and privacy during trial proceedings that already carry significant emotional weight for her.The opposition also stresses the unique harm that could arise from permitting the press to view such sensitive materials, especially given their graphic and intimate nature. Jane Doe's legal team asserts that allowing the media to access these exhibits, even if only while they are played for the jury, would essentially nullify the court's protective measures and could lead to secondary dissemination—further traumatizing the victim and potentially undermining the integrity of the trial. The letter frames the issue not as a matter of transparency, but one of protecting victims' rights, ensuring due process, and upholding the court's earlier rulings that prioritized the safety and anonymity of individuals involved in the case.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.350.0.pdf
In a sealed letter submitted to Judge Subramanian, legal counsel for Jane Doe—referred to as Victim-2 in the Sean Combs federal criminal case—opposed a media request filed on May 12, 2025, by attorneys Robert Balin and Alexandra Perloff-Giles. That request, made on behalf of several news organizations, sought courtroom access to view “sexually explicit and sensitive” audiovisual exhibits that are set to be shown to the jury but not played in open court. Jane Doe's counsel argued against the release, emphasizing the highly personal and traumatic nature of the content and citing her court-granted right to proceed anonymously. The letter underscores the importance of safeguarding Jane Doe's dignity and privacy during trial proceedings that already carry significant emotional weight for her.The opposition also stresses the unique harm that could arise from permitting the press to view such sensitive materials, especially given their graphic and intimate nature. Jane Doe's legal team asserts that allowing the media to access these exhibits, even if only while they are played for the jury, would essentially nullify the court's protective measures and could lead to secondary dissemination—further traumatizing the victim and potentially undermining the integrity of the trial. The letter frames the issue not as a matter of transparency, but one of protecting victims' rights, ensuring due process, and upholding the court's earlier rulings that prioritized the safety and anonymity of individuals involved in the case.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.350.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
STS is LIVE in NYC outside the courthouse where host Joel Waldman has been sitting in and watching as attorneys finalize their jury selection for the Sean "Diddy" Combs trial. The high-profile racketeering and sex-trafficking trial of music mogul Sean “Diddy” Combs kicked off with opening statements today and both prosecutors and the defense came out strong out of the gates. Diddy was arrested last September for racketeering conspiracy, sex trafficking and transportation to engage in prostitution. He has pleaded not guilty to all charged; and rejected a plea deal during his last pre-trial hearing. This is expected to be a high-profile case with not only Diddy but other celebrities and powerful names being named in the courtroom and on the witness list. Surviving The Survivor brings you the latest from New York City...⸻ #Support the show:All Things STS: Https://linktr.ee/stspodcastGet Joel's Book: Https://amzn.to/48GwbLxSupport the show on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/SurvivingTheSurvivorCatch us live on YouTube: Surviving The Survivor: #BestGuests in True Crime - YouTubeVenmo Donations: @STSPodcast
Introduction: A picture is worth a thousand words. We now love video more than pictures. The short form of video has taken over the social media world and dominates much of our time. Video Evidence of things Deep fakes 11 But Mary stood weeping outside the tomb, and as she wept she stooped to look into…
In Episode 161 of Not on Record, Diana and Joseph dissect a recent sexual assault case where their client was acquitted due to critical inconsistencies in the complainant's testimony, which was undermined by dash cam footage and phone records. The complainant alleged a 12-minute assault, choking, and forcible confinement at her workplace, but the defense presented dash cam evidence showing the accused being waved into the office, another person entering during the alleged assault, and the accused leaving within a timeframe that contradicted her account; additionally, a five-minute phone call she made to her father during the alleged assault further weakened her timeline. Confronted with this evidence during cross-examination, the complainant was forced to admit details she previously denied, leading the defense to argue that the allegations were fabricated to preempt a racial discrimination complaint filed against her, and ultimately leading the judge to deem her testimony unbelievable and acquit the defendant. Website: http://www.NotOnRecordpodcast.com Sign up to our email list - http://eepurl.com/hw3g99 Social Media Links Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/NotonRecord Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/notonrecordpodcast/ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@notonrecordpodcast Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/notonrecord Telegram: https://t.me/NotOnRecord Minds: http://www.minds.com/notonrecord Audio Platforms Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/4F2ssnX7ktfGH8OzH4QsuX Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/not-on-record-podcast/id1565405753 SoundCloud: https://soundcloud.com/notonrecord Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-842207 For more information on criminal law issues go to Neuberger & Partners LLP http://www.nrlawyers.com. Produced by Possibly Correct Media www.PossiblyCorrect.com #Podcast #law #MeToo
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
The towing industry faces some of the highest insurance rates in any business sector - but new technology is creating a path to lower premiums and better protection. In this revealing conversation with Tim Smith, Senior Fleet Solutions Specialist at Azuga, we explore the dramatic shift in how insurance companies view telematics and camera systems for tow trucks.Just a few years ago, having cameras might earn you a small discount. Today, many insurers won't even write a policy without them. As Tim explains, "Tow trucks are just magnets for insurance claims" - whether it's property damage allegations, worker's comp issues, or even more serious claims. The video evidence these systems provide has become essential in an environment where "the burden of proof is on you, not the person making the claim."We dive into fascinating real-world examples of how camera footage has protected towing companies from fraudulent claims and dangerous roadside scenarios. Tim shares stories ranging from sexual harassment allegations disproven by video to footage capturing the extreme dangers tow operators face on highways.The conversation takes an exciting turn when Tim reveals Azuga's upcoming camera system specifically engineered for the towing industry. Unlike previous generations adapted from general fleet solutions, this new technology has been developed from the ground up with towing-specific challenges in mind. Attendees at the Florida Tow Show will get the first opportunity to experience this breakthrough technology.Beyond security applications, we explore how Azuga's platform offers comprehensive maintenance management capabilities that integrate with fuel cards to deliver precise operational costs per vehicle - giving tow operators unprecedented visibility into their business economics.Ready to see how these technologies could transform your towing business? Connect with Tim Smith directly at tims@azuga.com or 205-728-9135.
A call home, bruised knuckles, and two small witnesses. On the morning of August 10th, 2023, 32-year-old Spencer Moen called to report that his 30-year-old wife, Sonja Moen, was unresponsive and not breathing. When officers arrived on scene, Spencer suggested that his wife had fallen up the stairs and in the bathtub. But Sonja's injuries were extensive and soon Spencer told a whole different story. It wasn't long before investigators uncovered a horrifying truth. If you or someone you know is a victim of domestic violence in the US, visit the Domestic Violence Support | National Domestic Violence Hotline or text the word START to 88788. Resources are free and available 24/7. Sponsor: Beam Beam is giving my listeners their best off yet of up to 40% off. Try their best-selling Dream Powder and get up to 40% off for a limited time. Go to shopbeam.com/LEAST and use code LEAST at checkout. Solve the case of your bad sleep by trying Beam today! Least of These on Facebook: https://m.facebook.com/leastofthesepodcast/LeastofThese Discussion Group: https://m.facebook.com/groups/288046119723080/?ref=pages_profile_groups_tab&paipv=1 Least of These on Instagram: www.instagram.com/least_ofthese/ Support the show and get your episodes ad free at: https://www.patreon.com/leastofthesepodcast Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
The show-ending “Smoking Gun” segment on the Thursday Bob Rose Show 3-13-25
The case against Karen Read has taken yet another dramatic turn, and if you thought this legal rollercoaster was slowing down, think again. This week, Read's defense team filed a motion to dismiss all charges, citing "extraordinary governmental misconduct." That's not just a legal jab—it's a full-on haymaker, accusing prosecutors of withholding evidence, tampering with the jury, and even altering key video footage that could prove Read's innocence. For those just tuning in, Karen Read stands accused of killing her boyfriend, Boston police officer John O'Keefe, by allegedly running him over with her SUV on a snowy night in January 2022. The prosecution's story? Read was drunk, angry, and intentionally struck O'Keefe, then left the scene. The defense's story? Read is being framed, and the evidence against her has been manipulated to fit a narrative that conveniently ignores other possible explanations for O'Keefe's death. Her first trial, which kicked off in April 2024, was a chaotic spectacle featuring more than 65 prosecution witnesses, a much shorter defense witness list, and ultimately—no verdict. After days of deadlock, the jury just couldn't agree, and Judge Beverly Cannone declared a mistrial in July. Now, with a retrial scheduled for April 1, Read's attorneys are coming out swinging, arguing that the whole case should be thrown out before it even starts. So, what's the big bombshell this time? According to the defense, prosecutors withheld crucial surveillance footage that could exonerate Read. Specifically, a clip from the Canton Police Station's sallyport—a secured garage area—shows someone approaching the taillight of Read's SUV on the day she was arrested. If that doesn't set off alarm bells, consider this: the defense didn't get their hands on that footage until January 2025, nearly three years after the incident and after an entire trial had already played out. Why does that matter? Well, Read's defense has long argued that her tail light was tampered with and that shattered pieces were planted near O'Keefe's body to make it look like she hit him. If there's footage showing someone messing with her car at the police station, that theory suddenly holds a lot more weight. The motion to dismiss calls this “a mockery of Ms. Read's right to due process.” And honestly, it's hard to argue with that phrasing. But the missing footage doesn't stop there. The defense claims that there's a full 42-minute gap in the sallyport surveillance video from when Read's SUV first arrived. If that missing footage were to show the taillight intact before it mysteriously turned up shattered at the crime scene, it would blow a hole right through the prosecution's case. The defense is now demanding a copy of the original video, complete with metadata, so experts can determine whether it was altered or selectively edited. The prosecution, of course, is pushing back. They deny any ethical violations or misconduct, let alone anything serious enough to dismiss the case entirely. They also argue that Read's defense team is grasping at straws, trying to create doubt where there isn't any. But considering the prosecution has already been caught withholding evidence, that's a tough sell. And it doesn't end there. The defense is also battling accusations that they secretly paid accident reconstruction experts from ARCCA for their opinions. Read's attorneys insist that they never paid for testimony, only reimbursing travel expenses under guidance from the U.S. Attorney's Office. The prosecution, meanwhile, has been trying to get those same experts banned from the retrial. If you're wondering why, well—it's probably because their findings don't exactly support the state's theory. At this point, Read has already had multiple motions to dismiss denied, and she's appealed those rulings all the way up to Massachusetts' highest court and even federal court. But this latest motion to dismiss is the most explosive yet, accusing prosecutors of bending the system to secure a conviction at any cost. Whether the judge agrees remains to be seen, but one thing is clear—this case is far from over. Next up, Read and her team are set to return to Norfolk Superior Court for motion hearings on Tuesday and Wednesday, with a pre-trial conference scheduled for Friday. Meanwhile, the case is also heading to federal appeals court this week, adding yet another layer of complexity to an already tangled legal battle. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #LegalBattle #CourtroomDrama #TrueCrime Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
The case against Karen Read has taken yet another dramatic turn, and if you thought this legal rollercoaster was slowing down, think again. This week, Read's defense team filed a motion to dismiss all charges, citing "extraordinary governmental misconduct." That's not just a legal jab—it's a full-on haymaker, accusing prosecutors of withholding evidence, tampering with the jury, and even altering key video footage that could prove Read's innocence. For those just tuning in, Karen Read stands accused of killing her boyfriend, Boston police officer John O'Keefe, by allegedly running him over with her SUV on a snowy night in January 2022. The prosecution's story? Read was drunk, angry, and intentionally struck O'Keefe, then left the scene. The defense's story? Read is being framed, and the evidence against her has been manipulated to fit a narrative that conveniently ignores other possible explanations for O'Keefe's death. Her first trial, which kicked off in April 2024, was a chaotic spectacle featuring more than 65 prosecution witnesses, a much shorter defense witness list, and ultimately—no verdict. After days of deadlock, the jury just couldn't agree, and Judge Beverly Cannone declared a mistrial in July. Now, with a retrial scheduled for April 1, Read's attorneys are coming out swinging, arguing that the whole case should be thrown out before it even starts. So, what's the big bombshell this time? According to the defense, prosecutors withheld crucial surveillance footage that could exonerate Read. Specifically, a clip from the Canton Police Station's sallyport—a secured garage area—shows someone approaching the taillight of Read's SUV on the day she was arrested. If that doesn't set off alarm bells, consider this: the defense didn't get their hands on that footage until January 2025, nearly three years after the incident and after an entire trial had already played out. Why does that matter? Well, Read's defense has long argued that her tail light was tampered with and that shattered pieces were planted near O'Keefe's body to make it look like she hit him. If there's footage showing someone messing with her car at the police station, that theory suddenly holds a lot more weight. The motion to dismiss calls this “a mockery of Ms. Read's right to due process.” And honestly, it's hard to argue with that phrasing. But the missing footage doesn't stop there. The defense claims that there's a full 42-minute gap in the sallyport surveillance video from when Read's SUV first arrived. If that missing footage were to show the taillight intact before it mysteriously turned up shattered at the crime scene, it would blow a hole right through the prosecution's case. The defense is now demanding a copy of the original video, complete with metadata, so experts can determine whether it was altered or selectively edited. The prosecution, of course, is pushing back. They deny any ethical violations or misconduct, let alone anything serious enough to dismiss the case entirely. They also argue that Read's defense team is grasping at straws, trying to create doubt where there isn't any. But considering the prosecution has already been caught withholding evidence, that's a tough sell. And it doesn't end there. The defense is also battling accusations that they secretly paid accident reconstruction experts from ARCCA for their opinions. Read's attorneys insist that they never paid for testimony, only reimbursing travel expenses under guidance from the U.S. Attorney's Office. The prosecution, meanwhile, has been trying to get those same experts banned from the retrial. If you're wondering why, well—it's probably because their findings don't exactly support the state's theory. At this point, Read has already had multiple motions to dismiss denied, and she's appealed those rulings all the way up to Massachusetts' highest court and even federal court. But this latest motion to dismiss is the most explosive yet, accusing prosecutors of bending the system to secure a conviction at any cost. Whether the judge agrees remains to be seen, but one thing is clear—this case is far from over. Next up, Read and her team are set to return to Norfolk Superior Court for motion hearings on Tuesday and Wednesday, with a pre-trial conference scheduled for Friday. Meanwhile, the case is also heading to federal appeals court this week, adding yet another layer of complexity to an already tangled legal battle. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #LegalBattle #CourtroomDrama #TrueCrime Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The case against Karen Read has taken yet another dramatic turn, and if you thought this legal rollercoaster was slowing down, think again. This week, Read's defense team filed a motion to dismiss all charges, citing "extraordinary governmental misconduct." That's not just a legal jab—it's a full-on haymaker, accusing prosecutors of withholding evidence, tampering with the jury, and even altering key video footage that could prove Read's innocence. For those just tuning in, Karen Read stands accused of killing her boyfriend, Boston police officer John O'Keefe, by allegedly running him over with her SUV on a snowy night in January 2022. The prosecution's story? Read was drunk, angry, and intentionally struck O'Keefe, then left the scene. The defense's story? Read is being framed, and the evidence against her has been manipulated to fit a narrative that conveniently ignores other possible explanations for O'Keefe's death. Her first trial, which kicked off in April 2024, was a chaotic spectacle featuring more than 65 prosecution witnesses, a much shorter defense witness list, and ultimately—no verdict. After days of deadlock, the jury just couldn't agree, and Judge Beverly Cannone declared a mistrial in July. Now, with a retrial scheduled for April 1, Read's attorneys are coming out swinging, arguing that the whole case should be thrown out before it even starts. So, what's the big bombshell this time? According to the defense, prosecutors withheld crucial surveillance footage that could exonerate Read. Specifically, a clip from the Canton Police Station's sallyport—a secured garage area—shows someone approaching the taillight of Read's SUV on the day she was arrested. If that doesn't set off alarm bells, consider this: the defense didn't get their hands on that footage until January 2025, nearly three years after the incident and after an entire trial had already played out. Why does that matter? Well, Read's defense has long argued that her tail light was tampered with and that shattered pieces were planted near O'Keefe's body to make it look like she hit him. If there's footage showing someone messing with her car at the police station, that theory suddenly holds a lot more weight. The motion to dismiss calls this “a mockery of Ms. Read's right to due process.” And honestly, it's hard to argue with that phrasing. But the missing footage doesn't stop there. The defense claims that there's a full 42-minute gap in the sallyport surveillance video from when Read's SUV first arrived. If that missing footage were to show the taillight intact before it mysteriously turned up shattered at the crime scene, it would blow a hole right through the prosecution's case. The defense is now demanding a copy of the original video, complete with metadata, so experts can determine whether it was altered or selectively edited. The prosecution, of course, is pushing back. They deny any ethical violations or misconduct, let alone anything serious enough to dismiss the case entirely. They also argue that Read's defense team is grasping at straws, trying to create doubt where there isn't any. But considering the prosecution has already been caught withholding evidence, that's a tough sell. And it doesn't end there. The defense is also battling accusations that they secretly paid accident reconstruction experts from ARCCA for their opinions. Read's attorneys insist that they never paid for testimony, only reimbursing travel expenses under guidance from the U.S. Attorney's Office. The prosecution, meanwhile, has been trying to get those same experts banned from the retrial. If you're wondering why, well—it's probably because their findings don't exactly support the state's theory. At this point, Read has already had multiple motions to dismiss denied, and she's appealed those rulings all the way up to Massachusetts' highest court and even federal court. But this latest motion to dismiss is the most explosive yet, accusing prosecutors of bending the system to secure a conviction at any cost. Whether the judge agrees remains to be seen, but one thing is clear—this case is far from over. Next up, Read and her team are set to return to Norfolk Superior Court for motion hearings on Tuesday and Wednesday, with a pre-trial conference scheduled for Friday. Meanwhile, the case is also heading to federal appeals court this week, adding yet another layer of complexity to an already tangled legal battle. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #LegalBattle #CourtroomDrama #TrueCrime Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The case against Karen Read has taken yet another dramatic turn, and if you thought this legal rollercoaster was slowing down, think again. This week, Read's defense team filed a motion to dismiss all charges, citing "extraordinary governmental misconduct." That's not just a legal jab—it's a full-on haymaker, accusing prosecutors of withholding evidence, tampering with the jury, and even altering key video footage that could prove Read's innocence. For those just tuning in, Karen Read stands accused of killing her boyfriend, Boston police officer John O'Keefe, by allegedly running him over with her SUV on a snowy night in January 2022. The prosecution's story? Read was drunk, angry, and intentionally struck O'Keefe, then left the scene. The defense's story? Read is being framed, and the evidence against her has been manipulated to fit a narrative that conveniently ignores other possible explanations for O'Keefe's death. Her first trial, which kicked off in April 2024, was a chaotic spectacle featuring more than 65 prosecution witnesses, a much shorter defense witness list, and ultimately—no verdict. After days of deadlock, the jury just couldn't agree, and Judge Beverly Cannone declared a mistrial in July. Now, with a retrial scheduled for April 1, Read's attorneys are coming out swinging, arguing that the whole case should be thrown out before it even starts. So, what's the big bombshell this time? According to the defense, prosecutors withheld crucial surveillance footage that could exonerate Read. Specifically, a clip from the Canton Police Station's sallyport—a secured garage area—shows someone approaching the taillight of Read's SUV on the day she was arrested. If that doesn't set off alarm bells, consider this: the defense didn't get their hands on that footage until January 2025, nearly three years after the incident and after an entire trial had already played out. Why does that matter? Well, Read's defense has long argued that her tail light was tampered with and that shattered pieces were planted near O'Keefe's body to make it look like she hit him. If there's footage showing someone messing with her car at the police station, that theory suddenly holds a lot more weight. The motion to dismiss calls this “a mockery of Ms. Read's right to due process.” And honestly, it's hard to argue with that phrasing. But the missing footage doesn't stop there. The defense claims that there's a full 42-minute gap in the sallyport surveillance video from when Read's SUV first arrived. If that missing footage were to show the taillight intact before it mysteriously turned up shattered at the crime scene, it would blow a hole right through the prosecution's case. The defense is now demanding a copy of the original video, complete with metadata, so experts can determine whether it was altered or selectively edited. The prosecution, of course, is pushing back. They deny any ethical violations or misconduct, let alone anything serious enough to dismiss the case entirely. They also argue that Read's defense team is grasping at straws, trying to create doubt where there isn't any. But considering the prosecution has already been caught withholding evidence, that's a tough sell. And it doesn't end there. The defense is also battling accusations that they secretly paid accident reconstruction experts from ARCCA for their opinions. Read's attorneys insist that they never paid for testimony, only reimbursing travel expenses under guidance from the U.S. Attorney's Office. The prosecution, meanwhile, has been trying to get those same experts banned from the retrial. If you're wondering why, well—it's probably because their findings don't exactly support the state's theory. At this point, Read has already had multiple motions to dismiss denied, and she's appealed those rulings all the way up to Massachusetts' highest court and even federal court. But this latest motion to dismiss is the most explosive yet, accusing prosecutors of bending the system to secure a conviction at any cost. Whether the judge agrees remains to be seen, but one thing is clear—this case is far from over. Next up, Read and her team are set to return to Norfolk Superior Court for motion hearings on Tuesday and Wednesday, with a pre-trial conference scheduled for Friday. Meanwhile, the case is also heading to federal appeals court this week, adding yet another layer of complexity to an already tangled legal battle. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #LegalBattle #CourtroomDrama #TrueCrime Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
[EP 25-073] How much crazier can Leftists get? Oh trust me, they haven't reached bottom yet. I don't know what news sources you follow, but you don't need to be Einstein to see how Leftism works. LIE. REPEATEDLY.It's interesting to watch people lie, when they know that you know they are lying. Have you been in this situation before. You know, where you have VIDEO EVIDENCE of a lie, and yet the person caught on video, watching the video with you, clearly stating their name and address on VIDEO, declare, “That's not me!” Remember how Democrats claimed that we deep-faked Biden's appearances?Remember when Comey read the litany of abuses by Hillary Clinton, then didn't pursue charges? Remember all the media pundits who declared that Hunter Biden did NOTHING wrong, when we had his laptop that showed him documenting himself doing EVERYTHING wrong. Committing all kinds of crimes.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-kevin-jackson-show--2896352/support.
Get Joel's Book: Https://amzn.to/48GwbLxAll Things STS: Https://linktr.ee/stspodcastSupport the show on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/SurvivingTheSurvivorCatch us live on YouTube: Surviving The Survivor: #BestGuests in True Crime - YouTubeWhat's up, #STSNation!Welcome to Surviving The Survivor, the podcast that brings you the #BestGuests in all of true crime. The Feds argue the Alexander brothers should not be released on any sort of bail condition. They revealed new damning evidence against the brothers, including explicit video evidence of the crimes they are alleged to have committed. Oren, Tal and Alon Alexander face 15 years to life in prison for being accused of sex trafficking, coercing and assaulting women. So far more than 40+ women have come forward to share their stories of assault and trauma. These women reported their cases in LA, NYC, Miami, the Hamptons and Aspen. The Alexander Brothers are well known for being real estate moguls who have sold some of the country's most luxurious properties to the rich and the famous. Victims say they used their money and power along with drugs to lure victims in. #alexanderbrothers #Alexander #truecrimecommunity #truecrimepodcast #trial #court #newsupdate #truecrimestories #miami #newyork #crime_news #crimenews #crimestory
Hour 1 Audio from WGIG-AM and FM in Brunswick, GA
Police are still seeking a suspect in the fatal shooting of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson in Midtown Manhattan Wednesday morning. WNYC's Charles Lane has more. Meanwhile, jurors in the trial of Daniel Penny, who is accused of fatally choking a fellow subway rider on an uptown F train last year, ask to re-watch key video footage. Finally, New York state Senator James Skoufis is running to chair the Democratic National Committee after the party's election losses.
In the case of United States v. Combs (24-cr-542), Sean "Diddy" Combs' legal team has filed a reply memorandum to bolster their renewed motion for bail. They argue that new evidence undermines the prosecution's case, including claims that video evidence from 2016 depicts consensual interaction, contrary to the government's allegations of abuse. The defense contends that these developments diminish the justification for Combs' continued detention.Additionally, the defense addresses concerns about potential witness tampering and flight risk. They propose stringent bail conditions, such as home confinement with electronic monitoring and a substantial financial bond, to mitigate these risks. Combs' attorneys emphasize his strong community ties and lack of prior criminal history as factors supporting his release pending trial.(commercial at 7:59)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.80.0.pdf
In the case of United States v. Combs (24-cr-542), Sean "Diddy" Combs' legal team has filed a reply memorandum to bolster their renewed motion for bail. They argue that new evidence undermines the prosecution's case, including claims that video evidence from 2016 depicts consensual interaction, contrary to the government's allegations of abuse. The defense contends that these developments diminish the justification for Combs' continued detention.Additionally, the defense addresses concerns about potential witness tampering and flight risk. They propose stringent bail conditions, such as home confinement with electronic monitoring and a substantial financial bond, to mitigate these risks. Combs' attorneys emphasize his strong community ties and lack of prior criminal history as factors supporting his release pending trial.(commercial at 7:59)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.80.0.pdf
In the case of United States v. Combs (24-cr-542), Sean "Diddy" Combs' legal team has filed a reply memorandum to bolster their renewed motion for bail. They argue that new evidence undermines the prosecution's case, including claims that video evidence from 2016 depicts consensual interaction, contrary to the government's allegations of abuse. The defense contends that these developments diminish the justification for Combs' continued detention.Additionally, the defense addresses concerns about potential witness tampering and flight risk. They propose stringent bail conditions, such as home confinement with electronic monitoring and a substantial financial bond, to mitigate these risks. Combs' attorneys emphasize his strong community ties and lack of prior criminal history as factors supporting his release pending trial.(commercial at 12:25)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.80.0.pdf
In the case of United States v. Combs (24-cr-542), Sean "Diddy" Combs' legal team has filed a reply memorandum to bolster their renewed motion for bail. They argue that new evidence undermines the prosecution's case, including claims that video evidence from 2016 depicts consensual interaction, contrary to the government's allegations of abuse. The defense contends that these developments diminish the justification for Combs' continued detention.Additionally, the defense addresses concerns about potential witness tampering and flight risk. They propose stringent bail conditions, such as home confinement with electronic monitoring and a substantial financial bond, to mitigate these risks. Combs' attorneys emphasize his strong community ties and lack of prior criminal history as factors supporting his release pending trial.(commercial at 7:59)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.80.0.pdf
In the case of United States v. Combs (24-cr-542), Sean "Diddy" Combs' legal team has filed a reply memorandum to bolster their renewed motion for bail. They argue that new evidence undermines the prosecution's case, including claims that video evidence from 2016 depicts consensual interaction, contrary to the government's allegations of abuse. The defense contends that these developments diminish the justification for Combs' continued detention.Additionally, the defense addresses concerns about potential witness tampering and flight risk. They propose stringent bail conditions, such as home confinement with electronic monitoring and a substantial financial bond, to mitigate these risks. Combs' attorneys emphasize his strong community ties and lack of prior criminal history as factors supporting his release pending trial.(commercial at 7:59)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.80.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
In the case of United States v. Combs (24-cr-542), Sean "Diddy" Combs' legal team has filed a reply memorandum to bolster their renewed motion for bail. They argue that new evidence undermines the prosecution's case, including claims that video evidence from 2016 depicts consensual interaction, contrary to the government's allegations of abuse. The defense contends that these developments diminish the justification for Combs' continued detention.Additionally, the defense addresses concerns about potential witness tampering and flight risk. They propose stringent bail conditions, such as home confinement with electronic monitoring and a substantial financial bond, to mitigate these risks. Combs' attorneys emphasize his strong community ties and lack of prior criminal history as factors supporting his release pending trial.(commercial at 8:50)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.80.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
A CREEP OF THE WEEK SPECIAL! We adore your stories so we are driving into our inbox to share them! Also - did Hannah get haunted at home (again?)? Who's the weird man in the drive? What would the Huns put in ROOM101? We discuss sky diving and Joels peen, and whether or not you could snog someone with your siblings name. Story 1 - big S tells us a story called "Sarah's Whisper" from P Story 2 - Hannah has a story from R, a tale of two sisters and their purple dreams and of course the papasan chair Story 3 - big S recounts Skylar's spooky tale with VIDEO EVIDENCE?! Story 4 - Hannah's got a story from L about a mum being seen in more places than is possible... Story 5 - a Halloween story from B read by Big S "my crazy Halloween hookup'' Story 6 - Hannah has a story from San Diego by Selah "I slept next to a ghost" Finally we finish with a Hex Reversal (or is just compounding the OG hex?) Enjoy huns! xoxo JOIN US FOR OUR HALLOWEEN SHOW - 31ST OCT 2024 AT BUSH HALL, LONDON! TIX BELOW: https://linktr.ee/ghosthunspod JOIN OUR PATREON! EXTRA bonus episodes AND a monthly ghost hunt for just £4.50! Or £6 for AD-FREE EPS and weekly AGONY HUNS! We'll solve your problems huns! Sign up here: www.patreon.com/GhostHuns
We've learned more about the series of events that led up to the death of Patrick Hayes... a 61 year old man who was the victim of a suspected road rage homicide. Sheriff Jared Rigby says Patrick Hayes was killed two weeks ago yesterday... and his body was found near Jordanelle State Park. Rigby says a video obtained by police shows key moments leading up to Hayes' death.
In this episode Brian shares audio from the recent Ozark Mountain Bigfoot Conference where speaker Richard Taylor details a personal exploration and encounters with Bigfoot, featuring eerie observations and interactions captured through thermal imagery and auditory signals. He recounts instances of tracking the creature's movements in wilderness areas such as ravines and tree lines. Richard shares experiences of being watched, hearing distinctive sounds believed to be from Bigfoot, and observing unique natural formations potentially attributed to the creature's activity. Historical context is provided through references to the narrator's Cherokee ancestry and the impact of government decisions on Native tribes. Richard also touches on the challenges and skepticism surrounding the existence of Bigfoot, while reflecting on the technological and observational methods used to study purported sightings. Throughout, Richard conveys a mixture of curiosity, respect for nature, and a belief in the existence of these mysterious beings across the United States and possibly worldwide.Listen To Backwoods Horror Stories Get Our FREE NewsletterGet Brian's Book Sasquatch Unleashed The Truth Behind The LegendLeave Us A VoicemailVisit Our WebsiteSupport Our SponsorsVisit Hangar 1 Publishing 00:00 Thermal Imaging Insights 01:16 Close Encounters and Audio Evidence 01:28 Ravine Exploration and Speed Observations 04:36 Cherokee Heritage and Bigfoot Connections 05:53 Thermal Signatures and Night Observations 10:01 Missouri Expedition and Eye Shine 13:29 Shelby County Sighting 15:29 Communication and Mind Speak 17:19 Analyzing the Tree Line 18:27 Observations and Theories 18:49 Video Evidence and Commentary 21:04 Q&A Session Begins 21:55 Personal Experiences and Encounters 27:48 Speculations and Theories 32:53 Concluding Remarks and ResourcesBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/sasquatch-odyssey--4839697/support.
AP correspondent Mimmi Montgomery reports on a ruling allowing the public to see video recordings in a rape case in France.
Attorney Tony Buzbee has announced that his firm is representing over 50 individuals who have come forward to file lawsuits against Sean "Diddy" Combs. These lawsuits involve accusations of sexual assault and abuse, with Buzbee serving as lead counsel. The cases are part of a growing wave of legal challenges against Combs, who is already facing serious charges, including sex trafficking and racketeering. The lawsuits are expected to add significant pressure to the ongoing criminal investigations into Combs' alleged misconduct.In our second article...Recent developments in Sean "Diddy" Combs' legal case have taken a surprising turn. A male sex worker recently provided federal investigators with a video allegedly showing a sexual encounter involving himself, Diddy, and a woman. The encounter, which took place in May 2023, was reportedly filmed by Diddy. The male sex worker, who flew from Atlanta to Miami for the event, handed over the video after signing a proffer agreement with federal prosecutors. This agreement allows him to speak without fear of prosecution.The video is part of an ongoing investigation into Diddy's alleged involvement in sex trafficking and racketeering. The male sex worker also provided details about the types of drugs Diddy allegedly used during what were referred to as "freak-offs"—Diddy's notorious group sex parties. Diddy, who was arrested earlier in September 2024, has pleaded not guilty to the charges and remains in custody at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn. If convicted, he faces a potential life sentence.(commercial at 9:42)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Tony Buzbee law firm representing those suing Sean 'Diddy' Combs | khou.comsource:Male 'sex worker' hands over alleged Diddy 'freak off' tape to prosecutors after meeting feds in NYC | Daily Mail Online
Attorney Tony Buzbee has announced that his firm is representing over 50 individuals who have come forward to file lawsuits against Sean "Diddy" Combs. These lawsuits involve accusations of sexual assault and abuse, with Buzbee serving as lead counsel. The cases are part of a growing wave of legal challenges against Combs, who is already facing serious charges, including sex trafficking and racketeering. The lawsuits are expected to add significant pressure to the ongoing criminal investigations into Combs' alleged misconduct.In our second article...Recent developments in Sean "Diddy" Combs' legal case have taken a surprising turn. A male sex worker recently provided federal investigators with a video allegedly showing a sexual encounter involving himself, Diddy, and a woman. The encounter, which took place in May 2023, was reportedly filmed by Diddy. The male sex worker, who flew from Atlanta to Miami for the event, handed over the video after signing a proffer agreement with federal prosecutors. This agreement allows him to speak without fear of prosecution.The video is part of an ongoing investigation into Diddy's alleged involvement in sex trafficking and racketeering. The male sex worker also provided details about the types of drugs Diddy allegedly used during what were referred to as "freak-offs"—Diddy's notorious group sex parties. Diddy, who was arrested earlier in September 2024, has pleaded not guilty to the charges and remains in custody at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn. If convicted, he faces a potential life sentence.(commercial at 9:42)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Tony Buzbee law firm representing those suing Sean 'Diddy' Combs | khou.comsource:Male 'sex worker' hands over alleged Diddy 'freak off' tape to prosecutors after meeting feds in NYC | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news. This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events. Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience. Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news. This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events. Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience. Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The Karen Read murder trial continues with Judge Beverly Cannone set to rule on a pivotal piece of video evidence. The video, captured by a surveillance camera in John O'Keefe's driveway, shows Read's black Lexus SUV backing out on January 29, 2022. Read's defense attorneys suggest that she may have accidentally reversed into O'Keefe's car, damaging her taillight. In a recent testimony, Trooper Joseph Paul, a Massachusetts State Police crash reconstructionist, stated that Read's SUV was traveling at a speed of up to 24 mph when it struck O'Keefe. This speed, according to Paul, would be sufficient to cause the damage observed. Paul testified that John O'Keefe was struck by Karen Read's SUV traveling in reverse at up to 24 mph, projecting him more than 30 feet. He described the impact on O'Keefe's arm and shoulder and addressed questions about the location of debris and key cycles recorded by Read's vehicle. During cross-examination, defense attorney Alan Jackson challenged Paul's qualifications and the methods he used to reach his conclusions. Paul's testimony is crucial as it attempts to establish the speed and dynamics of the collision. However, the defense laid into Trooper Paul's theory. The trial has seen several key witnesses take the stand. Forensics software expert Ian Whiffin testified about a Google search made by Jennifer McCabe, "how long to die in the cold," which was conducted at 6:23 a.m., raising suspicions about the timeline of events. Whiffin clarified that the timestamp initially thought to be 2:27 a.m. was misleading, as it only reflected when the search tab was opened which was 6:23am. He also discussed the possibility of data tampering, concluding it was highly unlikely. Nicholas Guarino detailed the analysis of electronic devices, including phones and computers, and the steps taken to bypass security measures on Read's phone. He highlighted the significant GPS data found on O'Keefe's phone, in contrast to Read's. He also read text messages between John and Karen, but before he did that, he muttered something to himself, did he say, " Kill me?" The trial has brought to light various technical and forensic details, with each side presenting evidence to support their narrative. The ruling on the video evidence by Judge Cannone is anticipated to have a significant impact on the case's outcome. - Judge Beverly Cannone to rule on crucial video evidence in the Karen Read trial. - Video shows Karen Read's SUV potentially damaging her taillight while backing out of John O'Keefe's driveway. - Trooper Joseph Paul testified that Read's SUV was traveling at 24 mph when it struck O'Keefe. - Forensics expert Ian Whiffin testified about Jennifer McCabe's suspicious Google search. - Trooper Nicholas Guarino analyzed electronic devices related to the case. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #JudgeCannone #JosephPaul #IanWhiffin #NicholasGuarino #CourtLiveUpdates Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
The Karen Read murder trial continues with Judge Beverly Cannone set to rule on a pivotal piece of video evidence. The video, captured by a surveillance camera in John O'Keefe's driveway, shows Read's black Lexus SUV backing out on January 29, 2022. Read's defense attorneys suggest that she may have accidentally reversed into O'Keefe's car, damaging her taillight. In a recent testimony, Trooper Joseph Paul, a Massachusetts State Police crash reconstructionist, stated that Read's SUV was traveling at a speed of up to 24 mph when it struck O'Keefe. This speed, according to Paul, would be sufficient to cause the damage observed. Paul testified that John O'Keefe was struck by Karen Read's SUV traveling in reverse at up to 24 mph, projecting him more than 30 feet. He described the impact on O'Keefe's arm and shoulder and addressed questions about the location of debris and key cycles recorded by Read's vehicle. During cross-examination, defense attorney Alan Jackson challenged Paul's qualifications and the methods he used to reach his conclusions. Paul's testimony is crucial as it attempts to establish the speed and dynamics of the collision. However, the defense laid into Trooper Paul's theory. The trial has seen several key witnesses take the stand. Forensics software expert Ian Whiffin testified about a Google search made by Jennifer McCabe, "how long to die in the cold," which was conducted at 6:23 a.m., raising suspicions about the timeline of events. Whiffin clarified that the timestamp initially thought to be 2:27 a.m. was misleading, as it only reflected when the search tab was opened which was 6:23am. He also discussed the possibility of data tampering, concluding it was highly unlikely. Nicholas Guarino detailed the analysis of electronic devices, including phones and computers, and the steps taken to bypass security measures on Read's phone. He highlighted the significant GPS data found on O'Keefe's phone, in contrast to Read's. He also read text messages between John and Karen, but before he did that, he muttered something to himself, did he say, " Kill me?" The trial has brought to light various technical and forensic details, with each side presenting evidence to support their narrative. The ruling on the video evidence by Judge Cannone is anticipated to have a significant impact on the case's outcome. - Judge Beverly Cannone to rule on crucial video evidence in the Karen Read trial. - Video shows Karen Read's SUV potentially damaging her taillight while backing out of John O'Keefe's driveway. - Trooper Joseph Paul testified that Read's SUV was traveling at 24 mph when it struck O'Keefe. - Forensics expert Ian Whiffin testified about Jennifer McCabe's suspicious Google search. - Trooper Nicholas Guarino analyzed electronic devices related to the case. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #JudgeCannone #JosephPaul #IanWhiffin #NicholasGuarino #CourtLiveUpdates Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news. This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events. Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience. Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news. This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events. Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience. Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In the wake of serious allegations and a gut-wrenching video, hip-hop mogul Sean "Diddy" Combs issued a public apology on Sunday. However, the apology has been met with criticism from one of Cassie Ventura's attorneys, Meredith Firetog, who dismissed it as self-serving and insincere. "Combs' most recent statement is more about himself than the many people he has hurt," Firetog said in a statement. "When Cassie and multiple other women came forward, he denied everything and suggested that his victims were looking for a payday. That he was only compelled to ‘apologize' once his repeated denials were proven false shows his pathetic desperation, and no one will be swayed by his disingenuous words." Adding to the controversy, the Los Angeles County District Attorney's office announced they would not prosecute Diddy over the actions depicted in a 2016 video, citing the statute of limitations. "We find the images extremely disturbing and difficult to watch," read a statement from the office of L.A. District Attorney George Gascón on Instagram. "If the conduct depicted occurred in 2016, unfortunately we would be unable to charge as the conduct would have occurred beyond the timeline where a crime of assault can be prosecuted." The DA's office also mentioned that law enforcement had not presented a case related to the attack depicted in the video against Mr. Combs, but they encouraged any victims or witnesses to report crimes to law enforcement or reach out for support from their Bureau of Victims Services. The contents of the video closely match an assault allegation Ventura made in a lawsuit filed against Diddy in November. Ventura's lawsuit, now settled, also included allegations of rape and claims that Combs forced her to have sex with male sex workers while he masturbated. “The gut-wrenching video has only further confirmed the disturbing and predatory behavior of Mr. Combs,” said Ventura's attorney, Douglas Wigdor, in a statement to Billboard. “Words cannot express the courage and fortitude that Ms. Ventura has shown in coming forward to bring this to light.” Ventura and Combs had an on-again, off-again relationship for 11 years, ending in 2018. In her lawsuit, Ventura stated she met Combs in 2005 when she was 19 and he was 37. After signing to his Bad Boy Records label, she claimed that Combs “lured” her into a romantic relationship where he "asserted complete control" over her life. Since Ventura's lawsuit late last year, Combs has faced four more sexual misconduct lawsuits. In November, he stepped down as chairman of his digital media company, Revolt, and reportedly sold his stake in the company in March. Additionally, federal agents conducted raids on Combs' homes in Los Angeles and Miami as part of a federal sex trafficking investigation, according to CNN. Throughout these allegations, Combs has maintained his innocence. “Let me be absolutely clear: I did not do any of the awful things being alleged,” he said in a statement posted to social media on December 6. “I will fight for my name, my family, and for the truth.” Diddy's apology and the subsequent statements from Ventura's attorneys have intensified public scrutiny. The video evidence and ongoing legal battles have further complicated his public image, raising questions about accountability and justice in high-profile cases involving powerful figures in the entertainment industry. As the investigations continue, the responses from both the legal teams and the public will shape the unfolding narrative surrounding these serious allegations. The courage of Ventura and other victims coming forward highlights the ongoing need for transparency and justice in cases of sexual misconduct and abuse. The saga involving Sean "Diddy" Combs, marked by disturbing allegations and a controversial apology, underscores the complex dynamics of power, accountability, and justice in the entertainment world. The public and legal community will undoubtedly continue to watch closely as more details emerge and the pursuit of justice continues. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
In the wake of serious allegations and a gut-wrenching video, hip-hop mogul Sean "Diddy" Combs issued a public apology on Sunday. However, the apology has been met with criticism from one of Cassie Ventura's attorneys, Meredith Firetog, who dismissed it as self-serving and insincere. "Combs' most recent statement is more about himself than the many people he has hurt," Firetog said in a statement. "When Cassie and multiple other women came forward, he denied everything and suggested that his victims were looking for a payday. That he was only compelled to ‘apologize' once his repeated denials were proven false shows his pathetic desperation, and no one will be swayed by his disingenuous words." Adding to the controversy, the Los Angeles County District Attorney's office announced they would not prosecute Diddy over the actions depicted in a 2016 video, citing the statute of limitations. "We find the images extremely disturbing and difficult to watch," read a statement from the office of L.A. District Attorney George Gascón on Instagram. "If the conduct depicted occurred in 2016, unfortunately we would be unable to charge as the conduct would have occurred beyond the timeline where a crime of assault can be prosecuted." The DA's office also mentioned that law enforcement had not presented a case related to the attack depicted in the video against Mr. Combs, but they encouraged any victims or witnesses to report crimes to law enforcement or reach out for support from their Bureau of Victims Services. The contents of the video closely match an assault allegation Ventura made in a lawsuit filed against Diddy in November. Ventura's lawsuit, now settled, also included allegations of rape and claims that Combs forced her to have sex with male sex workers while he masturbated. “The gut-wrenching video has only further confirmed the disturbing and predatory behavior of Mr. Combs,” said Ventura's attorney, Douglas Wigdor, in a statement to Billboard. “Words cannot express the courage and fortitude that Ms. Ventura has shown in coming forward to bring this to light.” Ventura and Combs had an on-again, off-again relationship for 11 years, ending in 2018. In her lawsuit, Ventura stated she met Combs in 2005 when she was 19 and he was 37. After signing to his Bad Boy Records label, she claimed that Combs “lured” her into a romantic relationship where he "asserted complete control" over her life. Since Ventura's lawsuit late last year, Combs has faced four more sexual misconduct lawsuits. In November, he stepped down as chairman of his digital media company, Revolt, and reportedly sold his stake in the company in March. Additionally, federal agents conducted raids on Combs' homes in Los Angeles and Miami as part of a federal sex trafficking investigation, according to CNN. Throughout these allegations, Combs has maintained his innocence. “Let me be absolutely clear: I did not do any of the awful things being alleged,” he said in a statement posted to social media on December 6. “I will fight for my name, my family, and for the truth.” Diddy's apology and the subsequent statements from Ventura's attorneys have intensified public scrutiny. The video evidence and ongoing legal battles have further complicated his public image, raising questions about accountability and justice in high-profile cases involving powerful figures in the entertainment industry. As the investigations continue, the responses from both the legal teams and the public will shape the unfolding narrative surrounding these serious allegations. The courage of Ventura and other victims coming forward highlights the ongoing need for transparency and justice in cases of sexual misconduct and abuse. The saga involving Sean "Diddy" Combs, marked by disturbing allegations and a controversial apology, underscores the complex dynamics of power, accountability, and justice in the entertainment world. The public and legal community will undoubtedly continue to watch closely as more details emerge and the pursuit of justice continues. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
A mother's relentless fight for justice after her 6-year-old son's tragic death, allegedly at the hands of his abusive father, exposes the failings of a child protection system that ignored her desperate pleas for help. Subscribe on your favorite podcasting apps: https://talkmurder.com/subscribeSupport us on patreon: https://patreon.com/talkmurderSee our technology: https://talkmurder.com/gearContent warning: the true crime stories discussed on this podcast can involve graphic and disturbing subject matter. Listener discretion is strongly advised.Fair use disclaimer: some materials used in this work are included under the fair use doctrine for educational purposes. Any copyrighted materials are owned by their respective copyright holders. Questions regarding use of copyrighted materials may be directed to legal [@] Talkocast.com
In a shocking case that made international headlines, Brian Steven Smith was convicted of the brutal murder and sexual assault of Kathleen Jo Henry in Anchorage, Alaska after a woman discovered gruesome videos and photos of the crime on Smith's stolen phone. Subscribe on your favorite podcasting apps: https://talkmurder.com/subscribeSupport us on patreon: https://patreon.com/talkmurderSee our technology: https://talkmurder.com/gearContent warning: the true crime stories discussed on this podcast can involve graphic and disturbing subject matter. Listener discretion is strongly advised.Fair use disclaimer: some materials used in this work are included under the fair use doctrine for educational purposes. Any copyrighted materials are owned by their respective copyright holders. Questions regarding use of copyrighted materials may be directed to legal [@] Talkocast.com
See Us LIVE In-Person HERE: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/fresh-and-fit-live-in-person-show-miami-tickets-874145271037?aff=oddtdtcreator Exclusive Content HERE: castleclub.tv - https://freshandfit.locals.com/ Wanna be heard? SUPERCHAT BUTTON: fnfsuperchat.com - https://streamelements.com/freshandfitpodcast/tip Fuel Your Day With Coffee from 1775 HERE: https://1775coffee.com/?ref=FRESH ️Rumble️ ➜https://rumble.com/freshandfit -------------------------------- Clips Channel ➜ https://www.youtube.com/c/FreshandFitClips/videos -------------------------------- Purchase Our Merch ➜https://www.freshandfitstore.com/ Get 30% off your first box, plus a FREE gift, when you give Tiege Hanley a try at: https://tiege.com/fnf Use Code "fresh" for discount with Gorilla Mind: https://www.gorillamind.com/fresh Get Your Confidence Back With Blue Chew: https://www.get.bluechew.com/freshfit Order Myron's book "Why Women Deserve Less" here: https://a.co/d/9YdQI9d See Us LIVE In-Person HERE: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/fresh-and-fit-live-in-person-show-miami-tickets-874145271037?aff=oddtdtcreator ⏲️ TIME STAMPS ⏲️ 0:00 : Preview… 5:30 : Intro 6:30 : Show begins! - Myron will COOK today
In a shocking crime of passion, a Texas man receives a controversial 10-year sentence after fatally shooting his wife on camera during an argument over alleged infidelity. Subscribe on your favorite podcasting apps: https://talkmurder.com/subscribeSupport us on patreon: https://patreon.com/talkmurderSee our technology: https://talkmurder.com/gearContent warning: the true crime stories discussed on this podcast can involve graphic and disturbing subject matter. Listener discretion is strongly advised.Fair use disclaimer: some materials used in this work are included under the fair use doctrine for educational purposes. Any copyrighted materials are owned by their respective copyright holders. Questions regarding use of copyrighted materials may be directed to legal [@] Talkocast.com
© 2020-2025 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
