POPULARITY
Introduction: A picture is worth a thousand words. We now love video more than pictures. The short form of video has taken over the social media world and dominates much of our time. Video Evidence of things Deep fakes 11 But Mary stood weeping outside the tomb, and as she wept she stooped to look into…
In Episode 161 of Not on Record, Diana and Joseph dissect a recent sexual assault case where their client was acquitted due to critical inconsistencies in the complainant's testimony, which was undermined by dash cam footage and phone records. The complainant alleged a 12-minute assault, choking, and forcible confinement at her workplace, but the defense presented dash cam evidence showing the accused being waved into the office, another person entering during the alleged assault, and the accused leaving within a timeframe that contradicted her account; additionally, a five-minute phone call she made to her father during the alleged assault further weakened her timeline. Confronted with this evidence during cross-examination, the complainant was forced to admit details she previously denied, leading the defense to argue that the allegations were fabricated to preempt a racial discrimination complaint filed against her, and ultimately leading the judge to deem her testimony unbelievable and acquit the defendant. Website: http://www.NotOnRecordpodcast.com Sign up to our email list - http://eepurl.com/hw3g99 Social Media Links Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/NotonRecord Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/notonrecordpodcast/ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@notonrecordpodcast Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/notonrecord Telegram: https://t.me/NotOnRecord Minds: http://www.minds.com/notonrecord Audio Platforms Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/4F2ssnX7ktfGH8OzH4QsuX Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/not-on-record-podcast/id1565405753 SoundCloud: https://soundcloud.com/notonrecord Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-842207 For more information on criminal law issues go to Neuberger & Partners LLP http://www.nrlawyers.com. Produced by Possibly Correct Media www.PossiblyCorrect.com #Podcast #law #MeToo
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
The towing industry faces some of the highest insurance rates in any business sector - but new technology is creating a path to lower premiums and better protection. In this revealing conversation with Tim Smith, Senior Fleet Solutions Specialist at Azuga, we explore the dramatic shift in how insurance companies view telematics and camera systems for tow trucks.Just a few years ago, having cameras might earn you a small discount. Today, many insurers won't even write a policy without them. As Tim explains, "Tow trucks are just magnets for insurance claims" - whether it's property damage allegations, worker's comp issues, or even more serious claims. The video evidence these systems provide has become essential in an environment where "the burden of proof is on you, not the person making the claim."We dive into fascinating real-world examples of how camera footage has protected towing companies from fraudulent claims and dangerous roadside scenarios. Tim shares stories ranging from sexual harassment allegations disproven by video to footage capturing the extreme dangers tow operators face on highways.The conversation takes an exciting turn when Tim reveals Azuga's upcoming camera system specifically engineered for the towing industry. Unlike previous generations adapted from general fleet solutions, this new technology has been developed from the ground up with towing-specific challenges in mind. Attendees at the Florida Tow Show will get the first opportunity to experience this breakthrough technology.Beyond security applications, we explore how Azuga's platform offers comprehensive maintenance management capabilities that integrate with fuel cards to deliver precise operational costs per vehicle - giving tow operators unprecedented visibility into their business economics.Ready to see how these technologies could transform your towing business? Connect with Tim Smith directly at tims@azuga.com or 205-728-9135.
A call home, bruised knuckles, and two small witnesses. On the morning of August 10th, 2023, 32-year-old Spencer Moen called to report that his 30-year-old wife, Sonja Moen, was unresponsive and not breathing. When officers arrived on scene, Spencer suggested that his wife had fallen up the stairs and in the bathtub. But Sonja's injuries were extensive and soon Spencer told a whole different story. It wasn't long before investigators uncovered a horrifying truth. If you or someone you know is a victim of domestic violence in the US, visit the Domestic Violence Support | National Domestic Violence Hotline or text the word START to 88788. Resources are free and available 24/7. Sponsor: Beam Beam is giving my listeners their best off yet of up to 40% off. Try their best-selling Dream Powder and get up to 40% off for a limited time. Go to shopbeam.com/LEAST and use code LEAST at checkout. Solve the case of your bad sleep by trying Beam today! Least of These on Facebook: https://m.facebook.com/leastofthesepodcast/LeastofThese Discussion Group: https://m.facebook.com/groups/288046119723080/?ref=pages_profile_groups_tab&paipv=1 Least of These on Instagram: www.instagram.com/least_ofthese/ Support the show and get your episodes ad free at: https://www.patreon.com/leastofthesepodcast Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
The show-ending “Smoking Gun” segment on the Thursday Bob Rose Show 3-13-25
The case against Karen Read has taken yet another dramatic turn, and if you thought this legal rollercoaster was slowing down, think again. This week, Read's defense team filed a motion to dismiss all charges, citing "extraordinary governmental misconduct." That's not just a legal jab—it's a full-on haymaker, accusing prosecutors of withholding evidence, tampering with the jury, and even altering key video footage that could prove Read's innocence. For those just tuning in, Karen Read stands accused of killing her boyfriend, Boston police officer John O'Keefe, by allegedly running him over with her SUV on a snowy night in January 2022. The prosecution's story? Read was drunk, angry, and intentionally struck O'Keefe, then left the scene. The defense's story? Read is being framed, and the evidence against her has been manipulated to fit a narrative that conveniently ignores other possible explanations for O'Keefe's death. Her first trial, which kicked off in April 2024, was a chaotic spectacle featuring more than 65 prosecution witnesses, a much shorter defense witness list, and ultimately—no verdict. After days of deadlock, the jury just couldn't agree, and Judge Beverly Cannone declared a mistrial in July. Now, with a retrial scheduled for April 1, Read's attorneys are coming out swinging, arguing that the whole case should be thrown out before it even starts. So, what's the big bombshell this time? According to the defense, prosecutors withheld crucial surveillance footage that could exonerate Read. Specifically, a clip from the Canton Police Station's sallyport—a secured garage area—shows someone approaching the taillight of Read's SUV on the day she was arrested. If that doesn't set off alarm bells, consider this: the defense didn't get their hands on that footage until January 2025, nearly three years after the incident and after an entire trial had already played out. Why does that matter? Well, Read's defense has long argued that her tail light was tampered with and that shattered pieces were planted near O'Keefe's body to make it look like she hit him. If there's footage showing someone messing with her car at the police station, that theory suddenly holds a lot more weight. The motion to dismiss calls this “a mockery of Ms. Read's right to due process.” And honestly, it's hard to argue with that phrasing. But the missing footage doesn't stop there. The defense claims that there's a full 42-minute gap in the sallyport surveillance video from when Read's SUV first arrived. If that missing footage were to show the taillight intact before it mysteriously turned up shattered at the crime scene, it would blow a hole right through the prosecution's case. The defense is now demanding a copy of the original video, complete with metadata, so experts can determine whether it was altered or selectively edited. The prosecution, of course, is pushing back. They deny any ethical violations or misconduct, let alone anything serious enough to dismiss the case entirely. They also argue that Read's defense team is grasping at straws, trying to create doubt where there isn't any. But considering the prosecution has already been caught withholding evidence, that's a tough sell. And it doesn't end there. The defense is also battling accusations that they secretly paid accident reconstruction experts from ARCCA for their opinions. Read's attorneys insist that they never paid for testimony, only reimbursing travel expenses under guidance from the U.S. Attorney's Office. The prosecution, meanwhile, has been trying to get those same experts banned from the retrial. If you're wondering why, well—it's probably because their findings don't exactly support the state's theory. At this point, Read has already had multiple motions to dismiss denied, and she's appealed those rulings all the way up to Massachusetts' highest court and even federal court. But this latest motion to dismiss is the most explosive yet, accusing prosecutors of bending the system to secure a conviction at any cost. Whether the judge agrees remains to be seen, but one thing is clear—this case is far from over. Next up, Read and her team are set to return to Norfolk Superior Court for motion hearings on Tuesday and Wednesday, with a pre-trial conference scheduled for Friday. Meanwhile, the case is also heading to federal appeals court this week, adding yet another layer of complexity to an already tangled legal battle. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #LegalBattle #CourtroomDrama #TrueCrime Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
The case against Karen Read has taken yet another dramatic turn, and if you thought this legal rollercoaster was slowing down, think again. This week, Read's defense team filed a motion to dismiss all charges, citing "extraordinary governmental misconduct." That's not just a legal jab—it's a full-on haymaker, accusing prosecutors of withholding evidence, tampering with the jury, and even altering key video footage that could prove Read's innocence. For those just tuning in, Karen Read stands accused of killing her boyfriend, Boston police officer John O'Keefe, by allegedly running him over with her SUV on a snowy night in January 2022. The prosecution's story? Read was drunk, angry, and intentionally struck O'Keefe, then left the scene. The defense's story? Read is being framed, and the evidence against her has been manipulated to fit a narrative that conveniently ignores other possible explanations for O'Keefe's death. Her first trial, which kicked off in April 2024, was a chaotic spectacle featuring more than 65 prosecution witnesses, a much shorter defense witness list, and ultimately—no verdict. After days of deadlock, the jury just couldn't agree, and Judge Beverly Cannone declared a mistrial in July. Now, with a retrial scheduled for April 1, Read's attorneys are coming out swinging, arguing that the whole case should be thrown out before it even starts. So, what's the big bombshell this time? According to the defense, prosecutors withheld crucial surveillance footage that could exonerate Read. Specifically, a clip from the Canton Police Station's sallyport—a secured garage area—shows someone approaching the taillight of Read's SUV on the day she was arrested. If that doesn't set off alarm bells, consider this: the defense didn't get their hands on that footage until January 2025, nearly three years after the incident and after an entire trial had already played out. Why does that matter? Well, Read's defense has long argued that her tail light was tampered with and that shattered pieces were planted near O'Keefe's body to make it look like she hit him. If there's footage showing someone messing with her car at the police station, that theory suddenly holds a lot more weight. The motion to dismiss calls this “a mockery of Ms. Read's right to due process.” And honestly, it's hard to argue with that phrasing. But the missing footage doesn't stop there. The defense claims that there's a full 42-minute gap in the sallyport surveillance video from when Read's SUV first arrived. If that missing footage were to show the taillight intact before it mysteriously turned up shattered at the crime scene, it would blow a hole right through the prosecution's case. The defense is now demanding a copy of the original video, complete with metadata, so experts can determine whether it was altered or selectively edited. The prosecution, of course, is pushing back. They deny any ethical violations or misconduct, let alone anything serious enough to dismiss the case entirely. They also argue that Read's defense team is grasping at straws, trying to create doubt where there isn't any. But considering the prosecution has already been caught withholding evidence, that's a tough sell. And it doesn't end there. The defense is also battling accusations that they secretly paid accident reconstruction experts from ARCCA for their opinions. Read's attorneys insist that they never paid for testimony, only reimbursing travel expenses under guidance from the U.S. Attorney's Office. The prosecution, meanwhile, has been trying to get those same experts banned from the retrial. If you're wondering why, well—it's probably because their findings don't exactly support the state's theory. At this point, Read has already had multiple motions to dismiss denied, and she's appealed those rulings all the way up to Massachusetts' highest court and even federal court. But this latest motion to dismiss is the most explosive yet, accusing prosecutors of bending the system to secure a conviction at any cost. Whether the judge agrees remains to be seen, but one thing is clear—this case is far from over. Next up, Read and her team are set to return to Norfolk Superior Court for motion hearings on Tuesday and Wednesday, with a pre-trial conference scheduled for Friday. Meanwhile, the case is also heading to federal appeals court this week, adding yet another layer of complexity to an already tangled legal battle. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #LegalBattle #CourtroomDrama #TrueCrime Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The case against Karen Read has taken yet another dramatic turn, and if you thought this legal rollercoaster was slowing down, think again. This week, Read's defense team filed a motion to dismiss all charges, citing "extraordinary governmental misconduct." That's not just a legal jab—it's a full-on haymaker, accusing prosecutors of withholding evidence, tampering with the jury, and even altering key video footage that could prove Read's innocence. For those just tuning in, Karen Read stands accused of killing her boyfriend, Boston police officer John O'Keefe, by allegedly running him over with her SUV on a snowy night in January 2022. The prosecution's story? Read was drunk, angry, and intentionally struck O'Keefe, then left the scene. The defense's story? Read is being framed, and the evidence against her has been manipulated to fit a narrative that conveniently ignores other possible explanations for O'Keefe's death. Her first trial, which kicked off in April 2024, was a chaotic spectacle featuring more than 65 prosecution witnesses, a much shorter defense witness list, and ultimately—no verdict. After days of deadlock, the jury just couldn't agree, and Judge Beverly Cannone declared a mistrial in July. Now, with a retrial scheduled for April 1, Read's attorneys are coming out swinging, arguing that the whole case should be thrown out before it even starts. So, what's the big bombshell this time? According to the defense, prosecutors withheld crucial surveillance footage that could exonerate Read. Specifically, a clip from the Canton Police Station's sallyport—a secured garage area—shows someone approaching the taillight of Read's SUV on the day she was arrested. If that doesn't set off alarm bells, consider this: the defense didn't get their hands on that footage until January 2025, nearly three years after the incident and after an entire trial had already played out. Why does that matter? Well, Read's defense has long argued that her tail light was tampered with and that shattered pieces were planted near O'Keefe's body to make it look like she hit him. If there's footage showing someone messing with her car at the police station, that theory suddenly holds a lot more weight. The motion to dismiss calls this “a mockery of Ms. Read's right to due process.” And honestly, it's hard to argue with that phrasing. But the missing footage doesn't stop there. The defense claims that there's a full 42-minute gap in the sallyport surveillance video from when Read's SUV first arrived. If that missing footage were to show the taillight intact before it mysteriously turned up shattered at the crime scene, it would blow a hole right through the prosecution's case. The defense is now demanding a copy of the original video, complete with metadata, so experts can determine whether it was altered or selectively edited. The prosecution, of course, is pushing back. They deny any ethical violations or misconduct, let alone anything serious enough to dismiss the case entirely. They also argue that Read's defense team is grasping at straws, trying to create doubt where there isn't any. But considering the prosecution has already been caught withholding evidence, that's a tough sell. And it doesn't end there. The defense is also battling accusations that they secretly paid accident reconstruction experts from ARCCA for their opinions. Read's attorneys insist that they never paid for testimony, only reimbursing travel expenses under guidance from the U.S. Attorney's Office. The prosecution, meanwhile, has been trying to get those same experts banned from the retrial. If you're wondering why, well—it's probably because their findings don't exactly support the state's theory. At this point, Read has already had multiple motions to dismiss denied, and she's appealed those rulings all the way up to Massachusetts' highest court and even federal court. But this latest motion to dismiss is the most explosive yet, accusing prosecutors of bending the system to secure a conviction at any cost. Whether the judge agrees remains to be seen, but one thing is clear—this case is far from over. Next up, Read and her team are set to return to Norfolk Superior Court for motion hearings on Tuesday and Wednesday, with a pre-trial conference scheduled for Friday. Meanwhile, the case is also heading to federal appeals court this week, adding yet another layer of complexity to an already tangled legal battle. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #LegalBattle #CourtroomDrama #TrueCrime Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The case against Karen Read has taken yet another dramatic turn, and if you thought this legal rollercoaster was slowing down, think again. This week, Read's defense team filed a motion to dismiss all charges, citing "extraordinary governmental misconduct." That's not just a legal jab—it's a full-on haymaker, accusing prosecutors of withholding evidence, tampering with the jury, and even altering key video footage that could prove Read's innocence. For those just tuning in, Karen Read stands accused of killing her boyfriend, Boston police officer John O'Keefe, by allegedly running him over with her SUV on a snowy night in January 2022. The prosecution's story? Read was drunk, angry, and intentionally struck O'Keefe, then left the scene. The defense's story? Read is being framed, and the evidence against her has been manipulated to fit a narrative that conveniently ignores other possible explanations for O'Keefe's death. Her first trial, which kicked off in April 2024, was a chaotic spectacle featuring more than 65 prosecution witnesses, a much shorter defense witness list, and ultimately—no verdict. After days of deadlock, the jury just couldn't agree, and Judge Beverly Cannone declared a mistrial in July. Now, with a retrial scheduled for April 1, Read's attorneys are coming out swinging, arguing that the whole case should be thrown out before it even starts. So, what's the big bombshell this time? According to the defense, prosecutors withheld crucial surveillance footage that could exonerate Read. Specifically, a clip from the Canton Police Station's sallyport—a secured garage area—shows someone approaching the taillight of Read's SUV on the day she was arrested. If that doesn't set off alarm bells, consider this: the defense didn't get their hands on that footage until January 2025, nearly three years after the incident and after an entire trial had already played out. Why does that matter? Well, Read's defense has long argued that her tail light was tampered with and that shattered pieces were planted near O'Keefe's body to make it look like she hit him. If there's footage showing someone messing with her car at the police station, that theory suddenly holds a lot more weight. The motion to dismiss calls this “a mockery of Ms. Read's right to due process.” And honestly, it's hard to argue with that phrasing. But the missing footage doesn't stop there. The defense claims that there's a full 42-minute gap in the sallyport surveillance video from when Read's SUV first arrived. If that missing footage were to show the taillight intact before it mysteriously turned up shattered at the crime scene, it would blow a hole right through the prosecution's case. The defense is now demanding a copy of the original video, complete with metadata, so experts can determine whether it was altered or selectively edited. The prosecution, of course, is pushing back. They deny any ethical violations or misconduct, let alone anything serious enough to dismiss the case entirely. They also argue that Read's defense team is grasping at straws, trying to create doubt where there isn't any. But considering the prosecution has already been caught withholding evidence, that's a tough sell. And it doesn't end there. The defense is also battling accusations that they secretly paid accident reconstruction experts from ARCCA for their opinions. Read's attorneys insist that they never paid for testimony, only reimbursing travel expenses under guidance from the U.S. Attorney's Office. The prosecution, meanwhile, has been trying to get those same experts banned from the retrial. If you're wondering why, well—it's probably because their findings don't exactly support the state's theory. At this point, Read has already had multiple motions to dismiss denied, and she's appealed those rulings all the way up to Massachusetts' highest court and even federal court. But this latest motion to dismiss is the most explosive yet, accusing prosecutors of bending the system to secure a conviction at any cost. Whether the judge agrees remains to be seen, but one thing is clear—this case is far from over. Next up, Read and her team are set to return to Norfolk Superior Court for motion hearings on Tuesday and Wednesday, with a pre-trial conference scheduled for Friday. Meanwhile, the case is also heading to federal appeals court this week, adding yet another layer of complexity to an already tangled legal battle. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #LegalBattle #CourtroomDrama #TrueCrime Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
[EP 25-073] How much crazier can Leftists get? Oh trust me, they haven't reached bottom yet. I don't know what news sources you follow, but you don't need to be Einstein to see how Leftism works. LIE. REPEATEDLY.It's interesting to watch people lie, when they know that you know they are lying. Have you been in this situation before. You know, where you have VIDEO EVIDENCE of a lie, and yet the person caught on video, watching the video with you, clearly stating their name and address on VIDEO, declare, “That's not me!” Remember how Democrats claimed that we deep-faked Biden's appearances?Remember when Comey read the litany of abuses by Hillary Clinton, then didn't pursue charges? Remember all the media pundits who declared that Hunter Biden did NOTHING wrong, when we had his laptop that showed him documenting himself doing EVERYTHING wrong. Committing all kinds of crimes.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-kevin-jackson-show--2896352/support.
How has this never been pointed out? We've been studying this video for 61 years and no one noticed? Everything we were told up to this point has been a lie......Everything! Trump will reveal the whole truth!https://linktr.ee/the_orangemenpodcast
Get Joel's Book: Https://amzn.to/48GwbLxAll Things STS: Https://linktr.ee/stspodcastSupport the show on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/SurvivingTheSurvivorCatch us live on YouTube: Surviving The Survivor: #BestGuests in True Crime - YouTubeWhat's up, #STSNation!Welcome to Surviving The Survivor, the podcast that brings you the #BestGuests in all of true crime. The Feds argue the Alexander brothers should not be released on any sort of bail condition. They revealed new damning evidence against the brothers, including explicit video evidence of the crimes they are alleged to have committed. Oren, Tal and Alon Alexander face 15 years to life in prison for being accused of sex trafficking, coercing and assaulting women. So far more than 40+ women have come forward to share their stories of assault and trauma. These women reported their cases in LA, NYC, Miami, the Hamptons and Aspen. The Alexander Brothers are well known for being real estate moguls who have sold some of the country's most luxurious properties to the rich and the famous. Victims say they used their money and power along with drugs to lure victims in. #alexanderbrothers #Alexander #truecrimecommunity #truecrimepodcast #trial #court #newsupdate #truecrimestories #miami #newyork #crime_news #crimenews #crimestory
Hour 1 Audio from WGIG-AM and FM in Brunswick, GA
Police are still seeking a suspect in the fatal shooting of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson in Midtown Manhattan Wednesday morning. WNYC's Charles Lane has more. Meanwhile, jurors in the trial of Daniel Penny, who is accused of fatally choking a fellow subway rider on an uptown F train last year, ask to re-watch key video footage. Finally, New York state Senator James Skoufis is running to chair the Democratic National Committee after the party's election losses.
In the case of United States v. Combs (24-cr-542), Sean "Diddy" Combs' legal team has filed a reply memorandum to bolster their renewed motion for bail. They argue that new evidence undermines the prosecution's case, including claims that video evidence from 2016 depicts consensual interaction, contrary to the government's allegations of abuse. The defense contends that these developments diminish the justification for Combs' continued detention.Additionally, the defense addresses concerns about potential witness tampering and flight risk. They propose stringent bail conditions, such as home confinement with electronic monitoring and a substantial financial bond, to mitigate these risks. Combs' attorneys emphasize his strong community ties and lack of prior criminal history as factors supporting his release pending trial.(commercial at 7:59)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.80.0.pdf
In the case of United States v. Combs (24-cr-542), Sean "Diddy" Combs' legal team has filed a reply memorandum to bolster their renewed motion for bail. They argue that new evidence undermines the prosecution's case, including claims that video evidence from 2016 depicts consensual interaction, contrary to the government's allegations of abuse. The defense contends that these developments diminish the justification for Combs' continued detention.Additionally, the defense addresses concerns about potential witness tampering and flight risk. They propose stringent bail conditions, such as home confinement with electronic monitoring and a substantial financial bond, to mitigate these risks. Combs' attorneys emphasize his strong community ties and lack of prior criminal history as factors supporting his release pending trial.(commercial at 7:59)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.80.0.pdf
In the case of United States v. Combs (24-cr-542), Sean "Diddy" Combs' legal team has filed a reply memorandum to bolster their renewed motion for bail. They argue that new evidence undermines the prosecution's case, including claims that video evidence from 2016 depicts consensual interaction, contrary to the government's allegations of abuse. The defense contends that these developments diminish the justification for Combs' continued detention.Additionally, the defense addresses concerns about potential witness tampering and flight risk. They propose stringent bail conditions, such as home confinement with electronic monitoring and a substantial financial bond, to mitigate these risks. Combs' attorneys emphasize his strong community ties and lack of prior criminal history as factors supporting his release pending trial.(commercial at 7:59)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.80.0.pdf
In the case of United States v. Combs (24-cr-542), Sean "Diddy" Combs' legal team has filed a reply memorandum to bolster their renewed motion for bail. They argue that new evidence undermines the prosecution's case, including claims that video evidence from 2016 depicts consensual interaction, contrary to the government's allegations of abuse. The defense contends that these developments diminish the justification for Combs' continued detention.Additionally, the defense addresses concerns about potential witness tampering and flight risk. They propose stringent bail conditions, such as home confinement with electronic monitoring and a substantial financial bond, to mitigate these risks. Combs' attorneys emphasize his strong community ties and lack of prior criminal history as factors supporting his release pending trial.(commercial at 12:25)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.80.0.pdf
In the case of United States v. Combs (24-cr-542), Sean "Diddy" Combs' legal team has filed a reply memorandum to bolster their renewed motion for bail. They argue that new evidence undermines the prosecution's case, including claims that video evidence from 2016 depicts consensual interaction, contrary to the government's allegations of abuse. The defense contends that these developments diminish the justification for Combs' continued detention.Additionally, the defense addresses concerns about potential witness tampering and flight risk. They propose stringent bail conditions, such as home confinement with electronic monitoring and a substantial financial bond, to mitigate these risks. Combs' attorneys emphasize his strong community ties and lack of prior criminal history as factors supporting his release pending trial.(commercial at 7:59)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.80.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
In the case of United States v. Combs (24-cr-542), Sean "Diddy" Combs' legal team has filed a reply memorandum to bolster their renewed motion for bail. They argue that new evidence undermines the prosecution's case, including claims that video evidence from 2016 depicts consensual interaction, contrary to the government's allegations of abuse. The defense contends that these developments diminish the justification for Combs' continued detention.Additionally, the defense addresses concerns about potential witness tampering and flight risk. They propose stringent bail conditions, such as home confinement with electronic monitoring and a substantial financial bond, to mitigate these risks. Combs' attorneys emphasize his strong community ties and lack of prior criminal history as factors supporting his release pending trial.(commercial at 8:50)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.80.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
A CREEP OF THE WEEK SPECIAL! We adore your stories so we are driving into our inbox to share them! Also - did Hannah get haunted at home (again?)? Who's the weird man in the drive? What would the Huns put in ROOM101? We discuss sky diving and Joels peen, and whether or not you could snog someone with your siblings name. Story 1 - big S tells us a story called "Sarah's Whisper" from P Story 2 - Hannah has a story from R, a tale of two sisters and their purple dreams and of course the papasan chair Story 3 - big S recounts Skylar's spooky tale with VIDEO EVIDENCE?! Story 4 - Hannah's got a story from L about a mum being seen in more places than is possible... Story 5 - a Halloween story from B read by Big S "my crazy Halloween hookup'' Story 6 - Hannah has a story from San Diego by Selah "I slept next to a ghost" Finally we finish with a Hex Reversal (or is just compounding the OG hex?) Enjoy huns! xoxo JOIN US FOR OUR HALLOWEEN SHOW - 31ST OCT 2024 AT BUSH HALL, LONDON! TIX BELOW: https://linktr.ee/ghosthunspod JOIN OUR PATREON! EXTRA bonus episodes AND a monthly ghost hunt for just £4.50! Or £6 for AD-FREE EPS and weekly AGONY HUNS! We'll solve your problems huns! Sign up here: www.patreon.com/GhostHuns
We've learned more about the series of events that led up to the death of Patrick Hayes... a 61 year old man who was the victim of a suspected road rage homicide. Sheriff Jared Rigby says Patrick Hayes was killed two weeks ago yesterday... and his body was found near Jordanelle State Park. Rigby says a video obtained by police shows key moments leading up to Hayes' death.
In this episode Brian shares audio from the recent Ozark Mountain Bigfoot Conference where speaker Richard Taylor details a personal exploration and encounters with Bigfoot, featuring eerie observations and interactions captured through thermal imagery and auditory signals. He recounts instances of tracking the creature's movements in wilderness areas such as ravines and tree lines. Richard shares experiences of being watched, hearing distinctive sounds believed to be from Bigfoot, and observing unique natural formations potentially attributed to the creature's activity. Historical context is provided through references to the narrator's Cherokee ancestry and the impact of government decisions on Native tribes. Richard also touches on the challenges and skepticism surrounding the existence of Bigfoot, while reflecting on the technological and observational methods used to study purported sightings. Throughout, Richard conveys a mixture of curiosity, respect for nature, and a belief in the existence of these mysterious beings across the United States and possibly worldwide.Listen To Backwoods Horror Stories Get Our FREE NewsletterGet Brian's Book Sasquatch Unleashed The Truth Behind The LegendLeave Us A VoicemailVisit Our WebsiteSupport Our SponsorsVisit Hangar 1 Publishing 00:00 Thermal Imaging Insights 01:16 Close Encounters and Audio Evidence 01:28 Ravine Exploration and Speed Observations 04:36 Cherokee Heritage and Bigfoot Connections 05:53 Thermal Signatures and Night Observations 10:01 Missouri Expedition and Eye Shine 13:29 Shelby County Sighting 15:29 Communication and Mind Speak 17:19 Analyzing the Tree Line 18:27 Observations and Theories 18:49 Video Evidence and Commentary 21:04 Q&A Session Begins 21:55 Personal Experiences and Encounters 27:48 Speculations and Theories 32:53 Concluding Remarks and ResourcesBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/sasquatch-odyssey--4839697/support.
AP correspondent Mimmi Montgomery reports on a ruling allowing the public to see video recordings in a rape case in France.
Attorney Tony Buzbee has announced that his firm is representing over 50 individuals who have come forward to file lawsuits against Sean "Diddy" Combs. These lawsuits involve accusations of sexual assault and abuse, with Buzbee serving as lead counsel. The cases are part of a growing wave of legal challenges against Combs, who is already facing serious charges, including sex trafficking and racketeering. The lawsuits are expected to add significant pressure to the ongoing criminal investigations into Combs' alleged misconduct.In our second article...Recent developments in Sean "Diddy" Combs' legal case have taken a surprising turn. A male sex worker recently provided federal investigators with a video allegedly showing a sexual encounter involving himself, Diddy, and a woman. The encounter, which took place in May 2023, was reportedly filmed by Diddy. The male sex worker, who flew from Atlanta to Miami for the event, handed over the video after signing a proffer agreement with federal prosecutors. This agreement allows him to speak without fear of prosecution.The video is part of an ongoing investigation into Diddy's alleged involvement in sex trafficking and racketeering. The male sex worker also provided details about the types of drugs Diddy allegedly used during what were referred to as "freak-offs"—Diddy's notorious group sex parties. Diddy, who was arrested earlier in September 2024, has pleaded not guilty to the charges and remains in custody at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn. If convicted, he faces a potential life sentence.(commercial at 9:42)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Tony Buzbee law firm representing those suing Sean 'Diddy' Combs | khou.comsource:Male 'sex worker' hands over alleged Diddy 'freak off' tape to prosecutors after meeting feds in NYC | Daily Mail Online
Attorney Tony Buzbee has announced that his firm is representing over 50 individuals who have come forward to file lawsuits against Sean "Diddy" Combs. These lawsuits involve accusations of sexual assault and abuse, with Buzbee serving as lead counsel. The cases are part of a growing wave of legal challenges against Combs, who is already facing serious charges, including sex trafficking and racketeering. The lawsuits are expected to add significant pressure to the ongoing criminal investigations into Combs' alleged misconduct.In our second article...Recent developments in Sean "Diddy" Combs' legal case have taken a surprising turn. A male sex worker recently provided federal investigators with a video allegedly showing a sexual encounter involving himself, Diddy, and a woman. The encounter, which took place in May 2023, was reportedly filmed by Diddy. The male sex worker, who flew from Atlanta to Miami for the event, handed over the video after signing a proffer agreement with federal prosecutors. This agreement allows him to speak without fear of prosecution.The video is part of an ongoing investigation into Diddy's alleged involvement in sex trafficking and racketeering. The male sex worker also provided details about the types of drugs Diddy allegedly used during what were referred to as "freak-offs"—Diddy's notorious group sex parties. Diddy, who was arrested earlier in September 2024, has pleaded not guilty to the charges and remains in custody at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn. If convicted, he faces a potential life sentence.(commercial at 9:42)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Tony Buzbee law firm representing those suing Sean 'Diddy' Combs | khou.comsource:Male 'sex worker' hands over alleged Diddy 'freak off' tape to prosecutors after meeting feds in NYC | Daily Mail Online
Attorney Tony Buzbee has announced that his firm is representing over 50 individuals who have come forward to file lawsuits against Sean "Diddy" Combs. These lawsuits involve accusations of sexual assault and abuse, with Buzbee serving as lead counsel. The cases are part of a growing wave of legal challenges against Combs, who is already facing serious charges, including sex trafficking and racketeering. The lawsuits are expected to add significant pressure to the ongoing criminal investigations into Combs' alleged misconduct.In our second article...Recent developments in Sean "Diddy" Combs' legal case have taken a surprising turn. A male sex worker recently provided federal investigators with a video allegedly showing a sexual encounter involving himself, Diddy, and a woman. The encounter, which took place in May 2023, was reportedly filmed by Diddy. The male sex worker, who flew from Atlanta to Miami for the event, handed over the video after signing a proffer agreement with federal prosecutors. This agreement allows him to speak without fear of prosecution.The video is part of an ongoing investigation into Diddy's alleged involvement in sex trafficking and racketeering. The male sex worker also provided details about the types of drugs Diddy allegedly used during what were referred to as "freak-offs"—Diddy's notorious group sex parties. Diddy, who was arrested earlier in September 2024, has pleaded not guilty to the charges and remains in custody at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn. If convicted, he faces a potential life sentence.(commercial at 9:42)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Tony Buzbee law firm representing those suing Sean 'Diddy' Combs | khou.comsource:Male 'sex worker' hands over alleged Diddy 'freak off' tape to prosecutors after meeting feds in NYC | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Martino Jerian, CEO of Amped Software, joins the Forensic Focus Podcast to discuss AI's impacts on video forensics. In this episode, Martino delves into the growing role of artificial intelligence in automating forensic processes, as well as the benefits and challenges it brings to the field. He shares insights on how AI is reshaping image and video enhancement, deepfake detection, and the authentication of digital evidence, while also cautioning about the risks of over-reliance on these tools. Martino provides a detailed perspective on how AI is being applied responsibly to balance efficiency with accuracy, especially in high-stakes forensic investigations. The conversation also explores Martino's contributions to legislative discussions in the European Parliament, emphasizing the importance of educating practitioners, journalists, and the public on AI's proper use in digital forensics. If you're interested in the latest deepfake detection methods or the evolving regulatory landscape of AI, this episode offers an in-depth look at the future of video forensics. 00:00 Introduction and Guest Welcome 00:31 Discussing AI and Regulation 01:22 Challenges in Video Evidence 04:12 AI in Forensic Tools 07:52 Research and Trends in AI 10:48 Deepfake Detection and Legal Implications 14:45 Future of AI in Forensics 20:00 AI and Image Authentication 42:44 Staying Updated in AI and Forensics 47:12 Conclusion and Farewell Show Notes Video Evidence Principles, Amped Software – https://ampedsoftware.com/video-evidence-principles Judge Blocks Use of AI-Enhanced Video Evidence, NBC – https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/washington-state-judge-blocks-use-ai-enhanced-video-evidence-rcna141932 Ferrari Exec Foils Deepfake Attempt, Fortune – https://fortune.com/2024/07/27/ferrari-deepfake-attempt-scammer-security-question-ceo-benedetto-vigna-cybersecurity-ai/ Amped Blog – https://blog.ampedsoftware.com/ Martino's LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/in/martinojerian/ Can AI Be Used for Forensics and Investigations? – https://www.forensicfocus.com/news/can-ai-be-used-for-forensics-and-investigations/
Send us a Text Message. Slam the Gavel welcomes Marcus House, Gloria House and Hugh House Jr. to the podcast. Located in Rowan County, NC, Marcus House's case is in Cabarrus County NC. For two years, father Marcus House has been jailed several times and so has his mother who is on disability. Marcus, who has a good job and is a basketball coach, had been recently incarcerated for 30 days for Contempt of Court, because his children, ages 13 and 17 don't want to see their mother. There is video/film footage of abuse/evidence, Judge N. Knust of Cabarrus County, NC refuses to look at the evidence, speak with the boys or listen to their counselor. Gloria House, on disability, was incarcerated for asking a question of Judge Knust which was why was he sending the sole provider for the children to jail and not looking at evidence. Judge Knust answered back, "Give me a reason why I shouldn't lock you up?" The mother/grandmother was taken to jail and not given her prescribed medication. Gloria House and her son Marcus are TARGETS of the family court system in Cabarrus County, NC. Marcus and Gloria House have been jailed before AT TAXPAYER EXPENSE with the goal in mind to force the boys to be with their mother.To Reach Marcus House, Gloria House and Hugh House, Jr.: dismantlingfamilycourtcorruption.com Supportshow(https://www.buymeacoffee.com/maryannpetri)Maryann Petri: dismantlingfamilycourtcorruption.comhttps://www.tiktok.com/@maryannpetriFacebook: https://www.youtube.com/@slamthegavelpodcasthostmar5536Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/guitarpeace/Pinterest: Slam The Gavel Podcast/@guitarpeaceLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/maryann-petri-62a46b1ab/ YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@slamthegavelpodcasthostmar5536 Twitter https://x.com/PetriMaryann*DISCLAIMER* The use of this information is at the viewer/user's own risk. Not financial, medical nor legal advice as the content on this podcast does not constitute legal, financial, medical or any other professional advice. Viewer/user's should consult with the relevant professionalsSupport the Show.Supportshow(https://www.buymeacoffee.com/maryannpetri)http://www.dismantlingfamilycourtcorruption.com/
Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news. This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events. Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience. Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news. This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events. Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience. Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news. This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events. Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience. Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The Karen Read murder trial continues with Judge Beverly Cannone set to rule on a pivotal piece of video evidence. The video, captured by a surveillance camera in John O'Keefe's driveway, shows Read's black Lexus SUV backing out on January 29, 2022. Read's defense attorneys suggest that she may have accidentally reversed into O'Keefe's car, damaging her taillight. In a recent testimony, Trooper Joseph Paul, a Massachusetts State Police crash reconstructionist, stated that Read's SUV was traveling at a speed of up to 24 mph when it struck O'Keefe. This speed, according to Paul, would be sufficient to cause the damage observed. Paul testified that John O'Keefe was struck by Karen Read's SUV traveling in reverse at up to 24 mph, projecting him more than 30 feet. He described the impact on O'Keefe's arm and shoulder and addressed questions about the location of debris and key cycles recorded by Read's vehicle. During cross-examination, defense attorney Alan Jackson challenged Paul's qualifications and the methods he used to reach his conclusions. Paul's testimony is crucial as it attempts to establish the speed and dynamics of the collision. However, the defense laid into Trooper Paul's theory. The trial has seen several key witnesses take the stand. Forensics software expert Ian Whiffin testified about a Google search made by Jennifer McCabe, "how long to die in the cold," which was conducted at 6:23 a.m., raising suspicions about the timeline of events. Whiffin clarified that the timestamp initially thought to be 2:27 a.m. was misleading, as it only reflected when the search tab was opened which was 6:23am. He also discussed the possibility of data tampering, concluding it was highly unlikely. Nicholas Guarino detailed the analysis of electronic devices, including phones and computers, and the steps taken to bypass security measures on Read's phone. He highlighted the significant GPS data found on O'Keefe's phone, in contrast to Read's. He also read text messages between John and Karen, but before he did that, he muttered something to himself, did he say, " Kill me?" The trial has brought to light various technical and forensic details, with each side presenting evidence to support their narrative. The ruling on the video evidence by Judge Cannone is anticipated to have a significant impact on the case's outcome. - Judge Beverly Cannone to rule on crucial video evidence in the Karen Read trial. - Video shows Karen Read's SUV potentially damaging her taillight while backing out of John O'Keefe's driveway. - Trooper Joseph Paul testified that Read's SUV was traveling at 24 mph when it struck O'Keefe. - Forensics expert Ian Whiffin testified about Jennifer McCabe's suspicious Google search. - Trooper Nicholas Guarino analyzed electronic devices related to the case. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #JudgeCannone #JosephPaul #IanWhiffin #NicholasGuarino #CourtLiveUpdates Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
The Karen Read murder trial continues with Judge Beverly Cannone set to rule on a pivotal piece of video evidence. The video, captured by a surveillance camera in John O'Keefe's driveway, shows Read's black Lexus SUV backing out on January 29, 2022. Read's defense attorneys suggest that she may have accidentally reversed into O'Keefe's car, damaging her taillight. In a recent testimony, Trooper Joseph Paul, a Massachusetts State Police crash reconstructionist, stated that Read's SUV was traveling at a speed of up to 24 mph when it struck O'Keefe. This speed, according to Paul, would be sufficient to cause the damage observed. Paul testified that John O'Keefe was struck by Karen Read's SUV traveling in reverse at up to 24 mph, projecting him more than 30 feet. He described the impact on O'Keefe's arm and shoulder and addressed questions about the location of debris and key cycles recorded by Read's vehicle. During cross-examination, defense attorney Alan Jackson challenged Paul's qualifications and the methods he used to reach his conclusions. Paul's testimony is crucial as it attempts to establish the speed and dynamics of the collision. However, the defense laid into Trooper Paul's theory. The trial has seen several key witnesses take the stand. Forensics software expert Ian Whiffin testified about a Google search made by Jennifer McCabe, "how long to die in the cold," which was conducted at 6:23 a.m., raising suspicions about the timeline of events. Whiffin clarified that the timestamp initially thought to be 2:27 a.m. was misleading, as it only reflected when the search tab was opened which was 6:23am. He also discussed the possibility of data tampering, concluding it was highly unlikely. Nicholas Guarino detailed the analysis of electronic devices, including phones and computers, and the steps taken to bypass security measures on Read's phone. He highlighted the significant GPS data found on O'Keefe's phone, in contrast to Read's. He also read text messages between John and Karen, but before he did that, he muttered something to himself, did he say, " Kill me?" The trial has brought to light various technical and forensic details, with each side presenting evidence to support their narrative. The ruling on the video evidence by Judge Cannone is anticipated to have a significant impact on the case's outcome. - Judge Beverly Cannone to rule on crucial video evidence in the Karen Read trial. - Video shows Karen Read's SUV potentially damaging her taillight while backing out of John O'Keefe's driveway. - Trooper Joseph Paul testified that Read's SUV was traveling at 24 mph when it struck O'Keefe. - Forensics expert Ian Whiffin testified about Jennifer McCabe's suspicious Google search. - Trooper Nicholas Guarino analyzed electronic devices related to the case. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #JudgeCannone #JosephPaul #IanWhiffin #NicholasGuarino #CourtLiveUpdates Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The Karen Read murder trial continues with Judge Beverly Cannone set to rule on a pivotal piece of video evidence. The video, captured by a surveillance camera in John O'Keefe's driveway, shows Read's black Lexus SUV backing out on January 29, 2022. Read's defense attorneys suggest that she may have accidentally reversed into O'Keefe's car, damaging her taillight. In a recent testimony, Trooper Joseph Paul, a Massachusetts State Police crash reconstructionist, stated that Read's SUV was traveling at a speed of up to 24 mph when it struck O'Keefe. This speed, according to Paul, would be sufficient to cause the damage observed. Paul testified that John O'Keefe was struck by Karen Read's SUV traveling in reverse at up to 24 mph, projecting him more than 30 feet. He described the impact on O'Keefe's arm and shoulder and addressed questions about the location of debris and key cycles recorded by Read's vehicle. During cross-examination, defense attorney Alan Jackson challenged Paul's qualifications and the methods he used to reach his conclusions. Paul's testimony is crucial as it attempts to establish the speed and dynamics of the collision. However, the defense laid into Trooper Paul's theory. The trial has seen several key witnesses take the stand. Forensics software expert Ian Whiffin testified about a Google search made by Jennifer McCabe, "how long to die in the cold," which was conducted at 6:23 a.m., raising suspicions about the timeline of events. Whiffin clarified that the timestamp initially thought to be 2:27 a.m. was misleading, as it only reflected when the search tab was opened which was 6:23am. He also discussed the possibility of data tampering, concluding it was highly unlikely. Nicholas Guarino detailed the analysis of electronic devices, including phones and computers, and the steps taken to bypass security measures on Read's phone. He highlighted the significant GPS data found on O'Keefe's phone, in contrast to Read's. He also read text messages between John and Karen, but before he did that, he muttered something to himself, did he say, " Kill me?" The trial has brought to light various technical and forensic details, with each side presenting evidence to support their narrative. The ruling on the video evidence by Judge Cannone is anticipated to have a significant impact on the case's outcome. - Judge Beverly Cannone to rule on crucial video evidence in the Karen Read trial. - Video shows Karen Read's SUV potentially damaging her taillight while backing out of John O'Keefe's driveway. - Trooper Joseph Paul testified that Read's SUV was traveling at 24 mph when it struck O'Keefe. - Forensics expert Ian Whiffin testified about Jennifer McCabe's suspicious Google search. - Trooper Nicholas Guarino analyzed electronic devices related to the case. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #JudgeCannone #JosephPaul #IanWhiffin #NicholasGuarino #CourtLiveUpdates Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news. This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events. Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience. Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news. This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events. Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience. Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news. This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events. Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience. Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In the wake of serious allegations and a gut-wrenching video, hip-hop mogul Sean "Diddy" Combs issued a public apology on Sunday. However, the apology has been met with criticism from one of Cassie Ventura's attorneys, Meredith Firetog, who dismissed it as self-serving and insincere. "Combs' most recent statement is more about himself than the many people he has hurt," Firetog said in a statement. "When Cassie and multiple other women came forward, he denied everything and suggested that his victims were looking for a payday. That he was only compelled to ‘apologize' once his repeated denials were proven false shows his pathetic desperation, and no one will be swayed by his disingenuous words." Adding to the controversy, the Los Angeles County District Attorney's office announced they would not prosecute Diddy over the actions depicted in a 2016 video, citing the statute of limitations. "We find the images extremely disturbing and difficult to watch," read a statement from the office of L.A. District Attorney George Gascón on Instagram. "If the conduct depicted occurred in 2016, unfortunately we would be unable to charge as the conduct would have occurred beyond the timeline where a crime of assault can be prosecuted." The DA's office also mentioned that law enforcement had not presented a case related to the attack depicted in the video against Mr. Combs, but they encouraged any victims or witnesses to report crimes to law enforcement or reach out for support from their Bureau of Victims Services. The contents of the video closely match an assault allegation Ventura made in a lawsuit filed against Diddy in November. Ventura's lawsuit, now settled, also included allegations of rape and claims that Combs forced her to have sex with male sex workers while he masturbated. “The gut-wrenching video has only further confirmed the disturbing and predatory behavior of Mr. Combs,” said Ventura's attorney, Douglas Wigdor, in a statement to Billboard. “Words cannot express the courage and fortitude that Ms. Ventura has shown in coming forward to bring this to light.” Ventura and Combs had an on-again, off-again relationship for 11 years, ending in 2018. In her lawsuit, Ventura stated she met Combs in 2005 when she was 19 and he was 37. After signing to his Bad Boy Records label, she claimed that Combs “lured” her into a romantic relationship where he "asserted complete control" over her life. Since Ventura's lawsuit late last year, Combs has faced four more sexual misconduct lawsuits. In November, he stepped down as chairman of his digital media company, Revolt, and reportedly sold his stake in the company in March. Additionally, federal agents conducted raids on Combs' homes in Los Angeles and Miami as part of a federal sex trafficking investigation, according to CNN. Throughout these allegations, Combs has maintained his innocence. “Let me be absolutely clear: I did not do any of the awful things being alleged,” he said in a statement posted to social media on December 6. “I will fight for my name, my family, and for the truth.” Diddy's apology and the subsequent statements from Ventura's attorneys have intensified public scrutiny. The video evidence and ongoing legal battles have further complicated his public image, raising questions about accountability and justice in high-profile cases involving powerful figures in the entertainment industry. As the investigations continue, the responses from both the legal teams and the public will shape the unfolding narrative surrounding these serious allegations. The courage of Ventura and other victims coming forward highlights the ongoing need for transparency and justice in cases of sexual misconduct and abuse. The saga involving Sean "Diddy" Combs, marked by disturbing allegations and a controversial apology, underscores the complex dynamics of power, accountability, and justice in the entertainment world. The public and legal community will undoubtedly continue to watch closely as more details emerge and the pursuit of justice continues. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
In the wake of serious allegations and a gut-wrenching video, hip-hop mogul Sean "Diddy" Combs issued a public apology on Sunday. However, the apology has been met with criticism from one of Cassie Ventura's attorneys, Meredith Firetog, who dismissed it as self-serving and insincere. "Combs' most recent statement is more about himself than the many people he has hurt," Firetog said in a statement. "When Cassie and multiple other women came forward, he denied everything and suggested that his victims were looking for a payday. That he was only compelled to ‘apologize' once his repeated denials were proven false shows his pathetic desperation, and no one will be swayed by his disingenuous words." Adding to the controversy, the Los Angeles County District Attorney's office announced they would not prosecute Diddy over the actions depicted in a 2016 video, citing the statute of limitations. "We find the images extremely disturbing and difficult to watch," read a statement from the office of L.A. District Attorney George Gascón on Instagram. "If the conduct depicted occurred in 2016, unfortunately we would be unable to charge as the conduct would have occurred beyond the timeline where a crime of assault can be prosecuted." The DA's office also mentioned that law enforcement had not presented a case related to the attack depicted in the video against Mr. Combs, but they encouraged any victims or witnesses to report crimes to law enforcement or reach out for support from their Bureau of Victims Services. The contents of the video closely match an assault allegation Ventura made in a lawsuit filed against Diddy in November. Ventura's lawsuit, now settled, also included allegations of rape and claims that Combs forced her to have sex with male sex workers while he masturbated. “The gut-wrenching video has only further confirmed the disturbing and predatory behavior of Mr. Combs,” said Ventura's attorney, Douglas Wigdor, in a statement to Billboard. “Words cannot express the courage and fortitude that Ms. Ventura has shown in coming forward to bring this to light.” Ventura and Combs had an on-again, off-again relationship for 11 years, ending in 2018. In her lawsuit, Ventura stated she met Combs in 2005 when she was 19 and he was 37. After signing to his Bad Boy Records label, she claimed that Combs “lured” her into a romantic relationship where he "asserted complete control" over her life. Since Ventura's lawsuit late last year, Combs has faced four more sexual misconduct lawsuits. In November, he stepped down as chairman of his digital media company, Revolt, and reportedly sold his stake in the company in March. Additionally, federal agents conducted raids on Combs' homes in Los Angeles and Miami as part of a federal sex trafficking investigation, according to CNN. Throughout these allegations, Combs has maintained his innocence. “Let me be absolutely clear: I did not do any of the awful things being alleged,” he said in a statement posted to social media on December 6. “I will fight for my name, my family, and for the truth.” Diddy's apology and the subsequent statements from Ventura's attorneys have intensified public scrutiny. The video evidence and ongoing legal battles have further complicated his public image, raising questions about accountability and justice in high-profile cases involving powerful figures in the entertainment industry. As the investigations continue, the responses from both the legal teams and the public will shape the unfolding narrative surrounding these serious allegations. The courage of Ventura and other victims coming forward highlights the ongoing need for transparency and justice in cases of sexual misconduct and abuse. The saga involving Sean "Diddy" Combs, marked by disturbing allegations and a controversial apology, underscores the complex dynamics of power, accountability, and justice in the entertainment world. The public and legal community will undoubtedly continue to watch closely as more details emerge and the pursuit of justice continues. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In the wake of serious allegations and a gut-wrenching video, hip-hop mogul Sean "Diddy" Combs issued a public apology on Sunday. However, the apology has been met with criticism from one of Cassie Ventura's attorneys, Meredith Firetog, who dismissed it as self-serving and insincere. "Combs' most recent statement is more about himself than the many people he has hurt," Firetog said in a statement. "When Cassie and multiple other women came forward, he denied everything and suggested that his victims were looking for a payday. That he was only compelled to ‘apologize' once his repeated denials were proven false shows his pathetic desperation, and no one will be swayed by his disingenuous words." Adding to the controversy, the Los Angeles County District Attorney's office announced they would not prosecute Diddy over the actions depicted in a 2016 video, citing the statute of limitations. "We find the images extremely disturbing and difficult to watch," read a statement from the office of L.A. District Attorney George Gascón on Instagram. "If the conduct depicted occurred in 2016, unfortunately we would be unable to charge as the conduct would have occurred beyond the timeline where a crime of assault can be prosecuted." The DA's office also mentioned that law enforcement had not presented a case related to the attack depicted in the video against Mr. Combs, but they encouraged any victims or witnesses to report crimes to law enforcement or reach out for support from their Bureau of Victims Services. The contents of the video closely match an assault allegation Ventura made in a lawsuit filed against Diddy in November. Ventura's lawsuit, now settled, also included allegations of rape and claims that Combs forced her to have sex with male sex workers while he masturbated. “The gut-wrenching video has only further confirmed the disturbing and predatory behavior of Mr. Combs,” said Ventura's attorney, Douglas Wigdor, in a statement to Billboard. “Words cannot express the courage and fortitude that Ms. Ventura has shown in coming forward to bring this to light.” Ventura and Combs had an on-again, off-again relationship for 11 years, ending in 2018. In her lawsuit, Ventura stated she met Combs in 2005 when she was 19 and he was 37. After signing to his Bad Boy Records label, she claimed that Combs “lured” her into a romantic relationship where he "asserted complete control" over her life. Since Ventura's lawsuit late last year, Combs has faced four more sexual misconduct lawsuits. In November, he stepped down as chairman of his digital media company, Revolt, and reportedly sold his stake in the company in March. Additionally, federal agents conducted raids on Combs' homes in Los Angeles and Miami as part of a federal sex trafficking investigation, according to CNN. Throughout these allegations, Combs has maintained his innocence. “Let me be absolutely clear: I did not do any of the awful things being alleged,” he said in a statement posted to social media on December 6. “I will fight for my name, my family, and for the truth.” Diddy's apology and the subsequent statements from Ventura's attorneys have intensified public scrutiny. The video evidence and ongoing legal battles have further complicated his public image, raising questions about accountability and justice in high-profile cases involving powerful figures in the entertainment industry. As the investigations continue, the responses from both the legal teams and the public will shape the unfolding narrative surrounding these serious allegations. The courage of Ventura and other victims coming forward highlights the ongoing need for transparency and justice in cases of sexual misconduct and abuse. The saga involving Sean "Diddy" Combs, marked by disturbing allegations and a controversial apology, underscores the complex dynamics of power, accountability, and justice in the entertainment world. The public and legal community will undoubtedly continue to watch closely as more details emerge and the pursuit of justice continues. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
A mother's relentless fight for justice after her 6-year-old son's tragic death, allegedly at the hands of his abusive father, exposes the failings of a child protection system that ignored her desperate pleas for help. Subscribe on your favorite podcasting apps: https://talkmurder.com/subscribeSupport us on patreon: https://patreon.com/talkmurderSee our technology: https://talkmurder.com/gearContent warning: the true crime stories discussed on this podcast can involve graphic and disturbing subject matter. Listener discretion is strongly advised.Fair use disclaimer: some materials used in this work are included under the fair use doctrine for educational purposes. Any copyrighted materials are owned by their respective copyright holders. Questions regarding use of copyrighted materials may be directed to legal [@] Talkocast.com
In a shocking case that made international headlines, Brian Steven Smith was convicted of the brutal murder and sexual assault of Kathleen Jo Henry in Anchorage, Alaska after a woman discovered gruesome videos and photos of the crime on Smith's stolen phone. Subscribe on your favorite podcasting apps: https://talkmurder.com/subscribeSupport us on patreon: https://patreon.com/talkmurderSee our technology: https://talkmurder.com/gearContent warning: the true crime stories discussed on this podcast can involve graphic and disturbing subject matter. Listener discretion is strongly advised.Fair use disclaimer: some materials used in this work are included under the fair use doctrine for educational purposes. Any copyrighted materials are owned by their respective copyright holders. Questions regarding use of copyrighted materials may be directed to legal [@] Talkocast.com
See Us LIVE In-Person HERE: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/fresh-and-fit-live-in-person-show-miami-tickets-874145271037?aff=oddtdtcreator Exclusive Content HERE: castleclub.tv - https://freshandfit.locals.com/ Wanna be heard? SUPERCHAT BUTTON: fnfsuperchat.com - https://streamelements.com/freshandfitpodcast/tip Fuel Your Day With Coffee from 1775 HERE: https://1775coffee.com/?ref=FRESH ️Rumble️ ➜https://rumble.com/freshandfit -------------------------------- Clips Channel ➜ https://www.youtube.com/c/FreshandFitClips/videos -------------------------------- Purchase Our Merch ➜https://www.freshandfitstore.com/ Get 30% off your first box, plus a FREE gift, when you give Tiege Hanley a try at: https://tiege.com/fnf Use Code "fresh" for discount with Gorilla Mind: https://www.gorillamind.com/fresh Get Your Confidence Back With Blue Chew: https://www.get.bluechew.com/freshfit Order Myron's book "Why Women Deserve Less" here: https://a.co/d/9YdQI9d See Us LIVE In-Person HERE: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/fresh-and-fit-live-in-person-show-miami-tickets-874145271037?aff=oddtdtcreator ⏲️ TIME STAMPS ⏲️ 0:00 : Preview… 5:30 : Intro 6:30 : Show begins! - Myron will COOK today
Dedication opportunities are available for episodes and series at https://ohr.edu/donate/qa Questions? Comments? podcasts@ohr.edu Yeshivat Ohr Somayach located in the heart of Jerusalem, is an educational institution for young Jewish English-speaking men. We have a range of classes and programs designed for the intellectually curious and academically inclined - for those with no background in Jewish learning to those who are proficient in Gemara and other original source material. To find the perfect program for you, please visit our website https://ohr.edu/study_in_israel whatsapp us at https://bit.ly/OSREGISTER or call our placement specialist at 1-254-981-0133 today! Subscribe to the Rabbi Breitowitz Q&A Podcast at https://plnk.to/rbq&a Submit questions for the Q&A with Rabbi Breitowitz https://forms.gle/VCZSK3wQJJ4fSd3Q7 Subscribe to our YouTube Channel at https://www.youtube.com/c/OhrSomayach/videos 00:00 If Purim is the holiest day of the year, how is the holiest day manmade? 03:57 How could Yochanan Kohen Gadol have embraced heresy? 13:18 When are certain violations permitted during medical school? 20:24 Is there a way to use lettuce for maror given how difficult it is to check for bugs? 27:24 How does one maintain a positive attitude despite hardships? 32:33 If learning Torah is equal to everything, why have the everything? 35:03 Can this be classified as a normal war if the government helps the enemy in some ways? 40:31 Is there still a rule against wearing red even though it is no longer distinctly non-Jewish? 42:33 Can a chutznik who keeps one day in Israel fly on the second day? 49:41 Why do we say the hyrax chews its cud when it really doesn't? 58:01 When will we stop saying Tehillim after davening? 58:51 Are there common interpretations for the vowels just as there are for the letters? 1:06:07 Why are there such strictures against one who breaks Shabbos publicly but we seem not to enforce any of them today? 1:14:49 What merited Og to survive the Flood? 1:18:08 Why do people mention the comparison between splitting the sea and making a shidduch if Rashi says that applies only to a second marriage? 1:21:03 Why does R Moshe Feinstein sometimes claim that an Acharon didn't say what he said? 1:25:30 Should one give to children on Purim, and is that counted towards maaser? 1:27:34 Could the Sanhedrin allow video evidence and such? 1:30:00 Is it better to give tzedakah earlier in davening if it's bothersome to do it at the particular pasuk in Pesukei dZimrah? You can listen to this and many other Ohr Somayach programs by downloading our app, on Apple and Google Play, ohr.edu and all major podcast platforms. Visit us @ https://ohr.edu PRODUCED BY: CEDAR MEDIA STUDIOS
In a shocking crime of passion, a Texas man receives a controversial 10-year sentence after fatally shooting his wife on camera during an argument over alleged infidelity. Subscribe on your favorite podcasting apps: https://talkmurder.com/subscribeSupport us on patreon: https://patreon.com/talkmurderSee our technology: https://talkmurder.com/gearContent warning: the true crime stories discussed on this podcast can involve graphic and disturbing subject matter. Listener discretion is strongly advised.Fair use disclaimer: some materials used in this work are included under the fair use doctrine for educational purposes. Any copyrighted materials are owned by their respective copyright holders. Questions regarding use of copyrighted materials may be directed to legal [@] Talkocast.com