Podcasts about suppress

idaho gps constitution true crime warrants cpl suppress fourth amendment bryan kohberger kohberger brett payne

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 8, 2025 11:39

This document is a motion to suppress evidence filed by Bryan Kohberger's defense team regarding a search warrant executed on his AT&T mobile account. The defense argues that the warrant, obtained by law enforcement in December 2023, was unconstitutional and overbroad, violating Kohberger's rights under both the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and Article I, Section 17 of the Idaho Constitution. The warrant authorized law enforcement to obtain extensive data from Kohberger's AT&T account, including subscriber information, call and text records, cell site location data, GPS estimates, cloud storage content, and other highly invasive digital records — far beyond what was stated in the attached exhibit, which only referenced “historical” and “prospective” phone records for a two-day window.The defense claims the supporting affidavit submitted by Cpl. Brett Payne either recklessly or intentionally omitted material facts, failed to establish probable cause, and lacked proper particularization, which made the warrant facially deficient. They further argue that all information used to justify the warrant was derived from the allegedly unconstitutional use of Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG), contaminating the warrant and rendering all derived data inadmissible under the "fruit of the poisonous tree" doctrine. Because of these issues, the motion asks the court to suppress all evidence obtained through this AT&T warrant, asserting that the warrant process failed both in legal standard and in execution, compromising Kohberger's constitutional protections.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:111424-Motion-Supress-Memorandum-Support-ATT-First-Warrant.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The State Objects To Kohberger's Motion To Suppress The First Apple Warrant (Part 2)

united states apple state idaho true crime motion objects warrants suppress fourth amendment bryan kohberger kohberger apple icloud

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 8, 2025 15:22

In this filing dated December 6, 2024, the State of Idaho formally objects to Bryan Kohberger's motion to suppress evidence obtained from his Apple iCloud account via a federal grand jury subpoena and a subsequent search warrant issued on August 1, 2023. Kohberger's defense claimed the searches violated his Fourth Amendment rights, but prosecutors countered that the data falls under the “third-party doctrine,” which permits law enforcement access to user data voluntarily shared with companies like Apple. The State emphasized that the Apple data acquired was limited to account subscriber information—such as email addresses and registration dates—and did not include detailed location tracking or sensitive content. This, they argue, negates any assertion that the warrant violated Kohberger's reasonable expectation of privacy.Further, the State rebuts the claim that the search warrant lacked probable cause or specificity, asserting that the accompanying affidavit clearly outlined the basis for the request and was legally incorporated into the warrant under well-established legal standards. They cite relevant federal cases supporting their position, such as United States v. SDI Future Health, which allows an affidavit to “cure” any alleged warrant deficiencies if it is referenced and available to the executing officers. The State maintains that there were no intentional or reckless misstatements in the affidavit and urges the court to deny the suppression motion, emphasizing that all procedural safeguards were met and the information obtained was narrow in scope and lawfully collected.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.211.0_2.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The State Objects To Kohberger's Motion To Suppress The First Apple Warrant (Part 1)

united states apple state idaho true crime motion objects warrants suppress fourth amendment bryan kohberger kohberger apple icloud

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 8, 2025 10:43

In this filing dated December 6, 2024, the State of Idaho formally objects to Bryan Kohberger's motion to suppress evidence obtained from his Apple iCloud account via a federal grand jury subpoena and a subsequent search warrant issued on August 1, 2023. Kohberger's defense claimed the searches violated his Fourth Amendment rights, but prosecutors countered that the data falls under the “third-party doctrine,” which permits law enforcement access to user data voluntarily shared with companies like Apple. The State emphasized that the Apple data acquired was limited to account subscriber information—such as email addresses and registration dates—and did not include detailed location tracking or sensitive content. This, they argue, negates any assertion that the warrant violated Kohberger's reasonable expectation of privacy.Further, the State rebuts the claim that the search warrant lacked probable cause or specificity, asserting that the accompanying affidavit clearly outlined the basis for the request and was legally incorporated into the warrant under well-established legal standards. They cite relevant federal cases supporting their position, such as United States v. SDI Future Health, which allows an affidavit to “cure” any alleged warrant deficiencies if it is referenced and available to the executing officers. The State maintains that there were no intentional or reckless misstatements in the affidavit and urges the court to deny the suppression motion, emphasizing that all procedural safeguards were met and the information obtained was narrow in scope and lawfully collected.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.211.0_2.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Bryan Kohberger Moves To Suppress The First AT&T Warrant (Part 2)

idaho gps constitution true crime warrants cpl suppress fourth amendment bryan kohberger kohberger brett payne

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 7, 2025 11:39

This document is a motion to suppress evidence filed by Bryan Kohberger's defense team regarding a search warrant executed on his AT&T mobile account. The defense argues that the warrant, obtained by law enforcement in December 2023, was unconstitutional and overbroad, violating Kohberger's rights under both the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and Article I, Section 17 of the Idaho Constitution. The warrant authorized law enforcement to obtain extensive data from Kohberger's AT&T account, including subscriber information, call and text records, cell site location data, GPS estimates, cloud storage content, and other highly invasive digital records — far beyond what was stated in the attached exhibit, which only referenced “historical” and “prospective” phone records for a two-day window.The defense claims the supporting affidavit submitted by Cpl. Brett Payne either recklessly or intentionally omitted material facts, failed to establish probable cause, and lacked proper particularization, which made the warrant facially deficient. They further argue that all information used to justify the warrant was derived from the allegedly unconstitutional use of Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG), contaminating the warrant and rendering all derived data inadmissible under the "fruit of the poisonous tree" doctrine. Because of these issues, the motion asks the court to suppress all evidence obtained through this AT&T warrant, asserting that the warrant process failed both in legal standard and in execution, compromising Kohberger's constitutional protections.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:111424-Motion-Supress-Memorandum-Support-ATT-First-Warrant.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Bryan Kohberger Moves To Suppress The First AT&T Warrant (Part 1)

news gps constitution true crime sean combs breaking news warrants cpl suppress fourth amendment bryan kohberger kohberger brett payne

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 7, 2025 12:38

This document is a motion to suppress evidence filed by Bryan Kohberger's defense team regarding a search warrant executed on his AT&T mobile account. The defense argues that the warrant, obtained by law enforcement in December 2023, was unconstitutional and overbroad, violating Kohberger's rights under both the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and Article I, Section 17 of the Idaho Constitution. The warrant authorized law enforcement to obtain extensive data from Kohberger's AT&T account, including subscriber information, call and text records, cell site location data, GPS estimates, cloud storage content, and other highly invasive digital records — far beyond what was stated in the attached exhibit, which only referenced “historical” and “prospective” phone records for a two-day window.The defense claims the supporting affidavit submitted by Cpl. Brett Payne either recklessly or intentionally omitted material facts, failed to establish probable cause, and lacked proper particularization, which made the warrant facially deficient. They further argue that all information used to justify the warrant was derived from the allegedly unconstitutional use of Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG), contaminating the warrant and rendering all derived data inadmissible under the "fruit of the poisonous tree" doctrine. Because of these issues, the motion asks the court to suppress all evidence obtained through this AT&T warrant, asserting that the warrant process failed both in legal standard and in execution, compromising Kohberger's constitutional protections.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:111424-Motion-Supress-Memorandum-Support-ATT-First-Warrant.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

'Grand Plan' to Suppress Silver Falling Apart as Short Sellers Panic: Ed Steer

Commodity Culture

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 6, 2025 36:34

Ed Steer thinks the bullion banks and massive institutions suppressing the price of silver are being violently shaken out of their short positions and are scrambling to cover as price actions escapes their control. Ed emphasizes we could be in the 'suddenly' phase of silver rising closer to its true value, and he lays out where he sees the market headed in the face of unprecedented government debt and deficits and increasing geopolitical turmoil.Ed Steer's Gold and Silver Digest: https://edsteergoldsilver.comFollow Jesse Day on X: https://x.com/jessebdayCommodity Culture on Youtube: https://youtube.com/c/CommodityCulture

gold panic silver falling apart steer suppress grand plan short sellers

Judge denies former Cass County deputy's bid to suppress evidence

InForum Minute

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 4, 2025 5:14

Today is Wednesday, June 4. Here are some of the latest headlines from the Fargo, North Dakota area. InForum Minute is produced by Forum Communications and brought to you by reporters from The Forum of Fargo-Moorhead and WDAY TV. For more news from throughout the day, visit InForum.com.

judge forum north dakota fargo deputy denies suppress cass county fargo moorhead inforum inforum minute

A quiet Tiananmen Square anniversary displays China's ability to suppress history

AP Audio Stories

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 4, 2025 1:03

AP correspondent Charles de Ledesma reports for most Chinese, the 36th anniversary of a bloody crackdown that ended pro-democracy protests in China passed like any other weekday. But some people have strong memories.

history china chinese quiet ability displays tiananmen square suppress ledesma

Do Not Suppress the Truth

Pineville Presbyterian Church

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 1, 2025 25:36

Embrace the truth of God's revelation rather than suppressing it. I. ALL MEN KNOW THERE IS A GOD II. THE UNRIGHTEOUS SUPRESS THE TRUTH

god embrace suppress

Deepfakes and AI are rewriting the rules of truth

Democracy and Z

Play Episode Listen Later May 28, 2025

Kathrine Nero Chances are within the last few days you've seen an image or a video you weren't quite sure was real. Is it artificial intelligence? A deepfake? Asking those questions is the first step. We've entered the era of synthetic truth, where deepfakes and AI-generated content are muddying the waters between fact and fiction. And while this may sound like the plot of a Black Mirror episode, it's a very real, very current problem. The question now is: Can journalism — especially local journalism — keep up? What Is a Deepfake, anyway? Let's back up. A deepfake is video or audio that has been digitally manipulated to make someone appear to say or do something they didn't. Thanks to powerful AI tools, creating these fakes no longer requires Hollywood-level tech or expertise. Anyone with the right app and enough motivation can generate a convincing fake in minutes. In January 2024, a deepfake robocall impersonating Joe Biden made national news. It urged voters in New Hampshire to “stay home” from the primary. The voice sounded like him. The timing was perfect. The goal? Suppress votes through confusion. That wasn't a fringe stunt. It was a glimpse of what's coming. Now imagine that kind of tactic at a local level — a fake video of aCincinnati mayoral candidate making a controversial statement days before an election. Or a doctored news clip suggesting a city council member said something offensive. Without careful scrutiny and fast correction, damage like that could spread before anyone knows it's fake. Journalism vs. Generative Chaos Here's the good news: Journalists are adapting. Some are learning forensic media skills, using tools to spot the tiny glitches and metadata trails that expose a deepfake. Others are working with AI in a responsible way, using it to transcribe meetings faster or analyze public records more efficiently, so they can spend more time investigating. But the real power lies in journalistic skepticism. The best reporters question everything. They verify, re-verify, and then explain what they've found in clear, plain language. This is especially true for local journalists, who know their communities and can spot when something doesn't add up. They're the ones who know how a council member speaks, or whether a certain policy proposal sounds like something a candidate would say. That context is everything. The Role of the Public: Don't Just Consume — Think But this isn't just the responsibility of journalists alone. Healthy skepticism can stop misinformation from spreading, and that's on all of us. As traditional media has morphed into social media, our consumption can't be blind any more. We need to ask questions and verify if something doesn't quite feel right. Bottom line: we have to take responsibility as consumers of information. Don't assume a video is real because it looks real. Don't trust a screenshot just because it came from a friend. Do you know where they got it? Is it being reported anywhere else? If not, why? Journalists can't fight this alone. Democracy, after all, depends on a well-informed public. We have the tools right there in the palm of our hand. The very device that brings us sometimes questionable information is also the solution to figuring out if that information is truthful. And if we don't support reporters — by reading, subscribing, sharing, and holding them accountable — the deepfakes will win. Not because they're perfect. But because we stopped asking whether they were real in the first place. So the next time you see something shocking, ask, “Has anyone credible reported this?” If not, stop before you share. The truth - and our democracy - might just depend on it.

ai hollywood joe biden healthy journalists journalism democracy bottom new hampshire black mirror deepfakes rewriting suppress

Dr. Baliga's Internal Medicine Podcasts

Play Episode Listen Later May 26, 2025 3:36

showdown areas af voltage suppress atrial fibrillation fibrosis subgroup pvi

Mega Edition: Diddy's Attempt To Suppress The Cassie Ventura Videos He Called Heavily Edited (5/16/25)

news cnn manhattan videos mega true crime sean combs breaking news edited ventura bad boy combs heavily sean diddy combs suppress homeland security dhs

Play Episode Listen Later May 16, 2025 26:59

Sean "Diddy" Combs' legal team has alleged that CNN altered and destroyed the original surveillance footage depicting Combs assaulting his then-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura, in a 2016 incident. According to a letter filed in Manhattan federal court, Combs' attorneys claim that a forensic video analysis revealed significant alterations, including the removal of timestamps, sequence changes, and speed adjustments, which they argue misrepresent the events. They assert that CNN purchased the sole known copy of the footage from the hotel, edited it using free software, and subsequently destroyed the original, despite being aware of an ongoing federal investigation.CNN has refuted these allegations, stating that they neither modified the video nor destroyed the original footage, which was retained by their source. Cassie Ventura's attorney, Douglas Wigdor, dismissed the claims as disingenuous attempts to exclude the video from evidence, expressing confidence that the footage accurately depicts the incident and will be admitted in court. This dispute arises as Combs faces charges of racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking, with his trial scheduled to commence on May 5, 2025.Sean "Diddy" Combs' legal team is currently engaged in a battle to prevent the use of a video showing him assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura, from being used as evidence in his upcoming trial. The video, reportedly from a 2016 incident at a hotel, surfaced publicly through CNN in May 2024. Diddy's lawyers argue that the government, specifically the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), unlawfully leaked the footage to tarnish his reputation and compromise his right to a fair trial.In their legal filings, Diddy's team claims that the release of the video was strategically aimed at influencing public opinion and tainting the potential jury pool. They have requested an evidentiary hearing to investigate the alleged government misconduct, along with access to related documents and communications. Additionally, they are pushing for a gag order to prevent further leaks from government personnel and seeking to suppress the video from being admitted in court as evidence.The legal strategy centers on the argument that the video's publication has led to damaging pre-trial publicity, which they claim jeopardizes Diddy's ability to receive an impartial trial. Meanwhile, Diddy faces serious charges, including racketeering and sex trafficking, and remains in custody awaiting his trial, scheduled for May 2025.This legal move reflects the high stakes for both Diddy and his legal team, as the video serves as a critical piece of evidence in the broader criminal case against him, alongside multiple civil lawsuits alleging abuse and misconduct.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:CNN Diddy video beating Cassie altered, lawyers claim; network defends

FBR Podcast 43 - Your Greatness, and Why Government Tries to Suppress It

The Faith By Reason Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later May 16, 2025 51:01

Your greatness is a HUGE threat to human governments! So much so that governments are designed to suppress it. Greatness comes from uniqueness, and when you operate in your uniqueness, you have the capacity to be great! And since we are ALL unique, we can all be great! The problem is that by its nature, the human government can only function if greatness (including your greatness) is limited to the rulers. So the Mystics do everything in their power to homogenize us (make us all think and act the same), in order to curtail our individual uniqueness. The Mystics of Force (rulers) do it through laws. The Mystics of Spirit (social engineers) do it by using our tendency for comparative thinking (pride) to get is to homogenize ourselves! They convince us that uniqueness is unfair! And since we tend to fear that another's greatness might be more valuable than our own, we do their job for them by peer pressuring others to behave and think in an “acceptable” way! The mystics use (or misuse) reactionary terms like Equality, Social Justice, Patriotism, Race, Gender Equality, and even Religion to get us to police each other. The result is monotonous conformity. But the God of the Bible embraces our uniqueness! In fact, the ONLY way for God's Plan to work is if we are ALL great! God needs your greatness in order for Heaven to be what He wants. We'll discuss it in this week's podcast.For exclusive content, Q&A Videos, and private Bible study, become a Faith By Reason Patreon www.patreon.com/faithbyreason

Mega Edition: Diddy's Attempt To Suppress The Cassie Ventura Videos He Called Heavily Edited (5/16/25)

news cnn manhattan videos mega true crime sean combs breaking news edited ventura bad boy combs heavily sean diddy combs suppress homeland security dhs

Play Episode Listen Later May 16, 2025 26:59

Sean "Diddy" Combs' legal team has alleged that CNN altered and destroyed the original surveillance footage depicting Combs assaulting his then-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura, in a 2016 incident. According to a letter filed in Manhattan federal court, Combs' attorneys claim that a forensic video analysis revealed significant alterations, including the removal of timestamps, sequence changes, and speed adjustments, which they argue misrepresent the events. They assert that CNN purchased the sole known copy of the footage from the hotel, edited it using free software, and subsequently destroyed the original, despite being aware of an ongoing federal investigation.CNN has refuted these allegations, stating that they neither modified the video nor destroyed the original footage, which was retained by their source. Cassie Ventura's attorney, Douglas Wigdor, dismissed the claims as disingenuous attempts to exclude the video from evidence, expressing confidence that the footage accurately depicts the incident and will be admitted in court. This dispute arises as Combs faces charges of racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking, with his trial scheduled to commence on May 5, 2025.Sean "Diddy" Combs' legal team is currently engaged in a battle to prevent the use of a video showing him assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura, from being used as evidence in his upcoming trial. The video, reportedly from a 2016 incident at a hotel, surfaced publicly through CNN in May 2024. Diddy's lawyers argue that the government, specifically the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), unlawfully leaked the footage to tarnish his reputation and compromise his right to a fair trial.In their legal filings, Diddy's team claims that the release of the video was strategically aimed at influencing public opinion and tainting the potential jury pool. They have requested an evidentiary hearing to investigate the alleged government misconduct, along with access to related documents and communications. Additionally, they are pushing for a gag order to prevent further leaks from government personnel and seeking to suppress the video from being admitted in court as evidence.The legal strategy centers on the argument that the video's publication has led to damaging pre-trial publicity, which they claim jeopardizes Diddy's ability to receive an impartial trial. Meanwhile, Diddy faces serious charges, including racketeering and sex trafficking, and remains in custody awaiting his trial, scheduled for May 2025.This legal move reflects the high stakes for both Diddy and his legal team, as the video serves as a critical piece of evidence in the broader criminal case against him, alongside multiple civil lawsuits alleging abuse and misconduct.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:CNN Diddy video beating Cassie altered, lawyers claim; network defendsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Mega Edition: Diddy's Attempt To Suppress The Cassie Ventura Videos He Called Heavily Edited (5/15/25)

news cnn manhattan videos mega true crime sean combs breaking news edited ventura bad boy combs heavily sean diddy combs suppress homeland security dhs

Play Episode Listen Later May 15, 2025 26:59

Sean "Diddy" Combs' legal team has alleged that CNN altered and destroyed the original surveillance footage depicting Combs assaulting his then-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura, in a 2016 incident. According to a letter filed in Manhattan federal court, Combs' attorneys claim that a forensic video analysis revealed significant alterations, including the removal of timestamps, sequence changes, and speed adjustments, which they argue misrepresent the events. They assert that CNN purchased the sole known copy of the footage from the hotel, edited it using free software, and subsequently destroyed the original, despite being aware of an ongoing federal investigation.CNN has refuted these allegations, stating that they neither modified the video nor destroyed the original footage, which was retained by their source. Cassie Ventura's attorney, Douglas Wigdor, dismissed the claims as disingenuous attempts to exclude the video from evidence, expressing confidence that the footage accurately depicts the incident and will be admitted in court. This dispute arises as Combs faces charges of racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking, with his trial scheduled to commence on May 5, 2025.Sean "Diddy" Combs' legal team is currently engaged in a battle to prevent the use of a video showing him assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura, from being used as evidence in his upcoming trial. The video, reportedly from a 2016 incident at a hotel, surfaced publicly through CNN in May 2024. Diddy's lawyers argue that the government, specifically the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), unlawfully leaked the footage to tarnish his reputation and compromise his right to a fair trial.In their legal filings, Diddy's team claims that the release of the video was strategically aimed at influencing public opinion and tainting the potential jury pool. They have requested an evidentiary hearing to investigate the alleged government misconduct, along with access to related documents and communications. Additionally, they are pushing for a gag order to prevent further leaks from government personnel and seeking to suppress the video from being admitted in court as evidence.The legal strategy centers on the argument that the video's publication has led to damaging pre-trial publicity, which they claim jeopardizes Diddy's ability to receive an impartial trial. Meanwhile, Diddy faces serious charges, including racketeering and sex trafficking, and remains in custody awaiting his trial, scheduled for May 2025.This legal move reflects the high stakes for both Diddy and his legal team, as the video serves as a critical piece of evidence in the broader criminal case against him, alongside multiple civil lawsuits alleging abuse and misconduct.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:CNN Diddy video beating Cassie altered, lawyers claim; network defendsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Part Two – Boast About Jobs, Suppress Worker Power

theAnalysis.news

Play Episode Listen Later May 10, 2025 7:29

Trump sells his tariff agenda as a jobs boom for American workers — but it's a smokescreen for a global attack on labor. At home, new factories are routed to anti-union states, while Trump's appointees quietly dismantle the NLRB to block worker organizing. Abroad, tariffs target export economies like China, Vietnam, and Bangladesh, fueling layoffs and driving down wages to benefit U.S. corporate margins. It's a calculated campaign to suppress labor power worldwide. But the chaos it's unleashed — from domestic legal battles to global economic disruption — suggests the plan may be backfiring. Even some of Trump's allies are starting to question whether the madness is strategic… or just madness.

american donald trump china jobs vietnam worker abroad bangladesh boast suppress nlrb

405: No, Internet Age Verification Has Not Been “Solved”

Tech Policy Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 30, 2025 49:21

Eric Goldman (Santa Clara Law) discusses his new paper, “The ‘Segregate-and-Suppress' Approach to Regulating Child Safety Online.”Topics include:The many kinds of online age-verification lawAge verification as an information problemFancy tech as deus ex machinaData collection today; state surveillance tomorrowWhat about devices and app stores?The internet and Maslow's hierarchy of needsChild safety: it takes a villageThe parental consent nightmareLinks:The “Segregate-and-Suppress” Approach to Regulating Child Safety OnlineAge-Verification Laws Are a Verified MistakeTech Policy Podcast 354: Online Age Verification (Sucks)

solved maslow verification suppress internet age no internet segregate

Can Science Make You Dumb and Suppress Natural Human Abilities?

The Ecosystem Approach Show with Jason & Patricia Rohn: A revolutionary way to infinite potential!

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 28, 2025

Science owns the frames and determines what is acceptable to consider in any scientific inquiry! If there is no data on a subject does that mean it becomes invisible? Science is ALWAYS confined to what can be seen in the tangible world, not subtle energy or the message about what could be or what should be that have been available! If you listen all the way until the end, we’ll talk about our vision for using a subtle energy approach that develops human capability and evolution, that could be integrated within science training that could create a new frontier for the Sciences and all other disciplines! Watch: https://youtu.be/q6J3tNeUTpM

science natural sciences abilities suppress

Stephan Sterns Tries to Suppress Graphic Evidence in Maddie Soto Murder Case as Death Penalty Looms

Surviving the Survivor

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 24, 2025 87:55

All Things STS: Https://linktr.ee/stspodcastGet Joel's Book: Https://amzn.to/48GwbLxSupport the show on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/SurvivingTheSurvivorCatch us live on YouTube: Surviving The Survivor: #BestGuests in True Crime - YouTubeVenmo Donations: @STSPodcast#STSNation, Welcome to Surviving the Survivor, the show that brings you the #BestGuests in all of #TrueCrime… In a chilling courtroom showdown, Stephan Sterns — the man accused of raping and murdering 13-year-old Madeline Soto, his girlfriend's daughter — appeared in court this week fighting to suppress digital evidence that prosecutors say contains years of abuse. Sterns took the stand himself in a rare legal move, claiming police violated his rights when they accessed his phone without a warrant. The evidence includes hundreds of sexually explicit photos allegedly stored in his Google account and device, but his defense argues he only consented to a limited search. Prosecutors say a factory reset and verbal consent justify the seizure — and they plan to use any guilty verdict in the sex abuse case as an aggravator in the murder trial to seek the death penalty. #BestGuests: 1. Ryan Vescio – Former homicide prosecutor and criminal defense attorney in Orlando 2. Sonny Slaughter – Victims' rights advocate 3. John Tompkins - Criminal Defense attorney We'll break down what happened in the courtroom, what's next in the trial, and whether this evidence will make it in front of a jury.#StephanSterns #MadelineSoto #JusticeForMaddie #SurvivingTheSurvivor #TrueCrime #ChildMurder #SexualAbuse #SuppressionHearing #CourtTV #BestGuests #CriminalLaw #DeathPenalty #VictimsRights #TrueCrimeCommunity

google surviving survivors soto graphic prosecutors death penalty looms murder case suppress sterns

Stephan Sterns in Court to Testify, Trying to Suppress Cell Phone as Evidence | Crime Alert 8AM 04.24.25

Crime Alert with Nancy Grace

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 24, 2025 6:44 Transcription Available

Stephan Sterns made a rare court appearance, where he testified during a motions hearing aimed at dismissing critical evidence against him. Sterns faces charges for the murder of Madeline Soto, his girlfriend's daughter, who was killed shortly after her 13th birthday. Nicole Partin reporting See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

crime court cell phone testify suppress sterns

Curbing Antisemitism on College Campuses & Does IHRA Definition of Antisemitism Suppress Free Speech?

Third Opinion Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 23, 2025 57:13

This week, the show features ADL CEO Jonathan Greenblatt's testimony before the House Ways & Means Committee on efforts to curb antisemitism on college campuses. We also hear from Ken Stern, one of the original drafters of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's (IHRA) definition of antisemitism, who raises concerns about its use in ways that may restrict free speech. Thank you for listening, subscribing and sharing the Third Opinion Podcast!

definition free speech antisemitism college campuses suppress curbing ihra ken stern house ways means committee

The Problems With Age Verification

Techdirt

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 22, 2025 49:22

It's hard to create a law about children online without first identifying who the children are. We've written a lot about the problems that arise with mandated age verification, and a new paper by Eric Goldman, The "Segregate-and-Suppress" Approach to Regulating Child Safety Online, digs into why the entire popular approach to such laws is paradoxical and broken. This week, Eric joins us on the podcast for a discussion about why regulators should develop a wider and more thoughtful toolkit of online child safety measures. Read the paper: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5208739

verification suppress eric goldman segregate

15th April 1861: President Abraham Lincoln calls for 75,000 volunteer soldiers to suppress the growing insurrection in the southern states

HistoryPod

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 15, 2025

Lincoln's call for volunteers was part of his effort to maintain the authority of the federal government after several southern states seceded from the ...

soldiers volunteers abraham lincoln insurrection suppress southern states

#987 Is This BETTER Than Ozempic? How To Activate Thermogenesis, Suppress Hunger, & Trigger Fat Loss With These 5 Daily Drinks with Ben Azadi

The Keto Kamp Podcast With Ben Azadi

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 13, 2025 17:12

hunger trigger drinks activate ozempic fat loss pique suppress jason fung cynthia thurlow ben azadi thermogenesis megan ramos ketokamp

Murder In Moscow: The State Objects To Kohberger's Motion To Suppress The First Apple Warrant (Part 2) (4/9/25)

united states apple state news murder idaho true crime motion moscow objects warrants suppress fourth amendment bryan kohberger xana kohberger apple icloud

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 9, 2025 15:22

In this filing dated December 6, 2024, the State of Idaho formally objects to Bryan Kohberger's motion to suppress evidence obtained from his Apple iCloud account via a federal grand jury subpoena and a subsequent search warrant issued on August 1, 2023. Kohberger's defense claimed the searches violated his Fourth Amendment rights, but prosecutors countered that the data falls under the “third-party doctrine,” which permits law enforcement access to user data voluntarily shared with companies like Apple. The State emphasized that the Apple data acquired was limited to account subscriber information—such as email addresses and registration dates—and did not include detailed location tracking or sensitive content. This, they argue, negates any assertion that the warrant violated Kohberger's reasonable expectation of privacy.Further, the State rebuts the claim that the search warrant lacked probable cause or specificity, asserting that the accompanying affidavit clearly outlined the basis for the request and was legally incorporated into the warrant under well-established legal standards. They cite relevant federal cases supporting their position, such as United States v. SDI Future Health, which allows an affidavit to “cure” any alleged warrant deficiencies if it is referenced and available to the executing officers. The State maintains that there were no intentional or reckless misstatements in the affidavit and urges the court to deny the suppression motion, emphasizing that all procedural safeguards were met and the information obtained was narrow in scope and lawfully collected.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.211.0_2.pdf

Murder In Moscow: The State Objects To Kohberger's Motion To Suppress The First Apple Warrant (Part 1) (4/9/25)

united states apple state news murder idaho true crime motion moscow objects warrants suppress fourth amendment bryan kohberger xana kohberger apple icloud

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 9, 2025 10:43

In this filing dated December 6, 2024, the State of Idaho formally objects to Bryan Kohberger's motion to suppress evidence obtained from his Apple iCloud account via a federal grand jury subpoena and a subsequent search warrant issued on August 1, 2023. Kohberger's defense claimed the searches violated his Fourth Amendment rights, but prosecutors countered that the data falls under the “third-party doctrine,” which permits law enforcement access to user data voluntarily shared with companies like Apple. The State emphasized that the Apple data acquired was limited to account subscriber information—such as email addresses and registration dates—and did not include detailed location tracking or sensitive content. This, they argue, negates any assertion that the warrant violated Kohberger's reasonable expectation of privacy.Further, the State rebuts the claim that the search warrant lacked probable cause or specificity, asserting that the accompanying affidavit clearly outlined the basis for the request and was legally incorporated into the warrant under well-established legal standards. They cite relevant federal cases supporting their position, such as United States v. SDI Future Health, which allows an affidavit to “cure” any alleged warrant deficiencies if it is referenced and available to the executing officers. The State maintains that there were no intentional or reckless misstatements in the affidavit and urges the court to deny the suppression motion, emphasizing that all procedural safeguards were met and the information obtained was narrow in scope and lawfully collected.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.211.0_2.pdf

Murder In Moscow: The State Objects To Kohberger's Motion To Suppress The First Apple Warrant (Part 1) (4/9/25)

united states apple state news murder idaho true crime motion moscow objects warrants suppress fourth amendment bryan kohberger xana kohberger apple icloud

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 9, 2025 10:43

In this filing dated December 6, 2024, the State of Idaho formally objects to Bryan Kohberger's motion to suppress evidence obtained from his Apple iCloud account via a federal grand jury subpoena and a subsequent search warrant issued on August 1, 2023. Kohberger's defense claimed the searches violated his Fourth Amendment rights, but prosecutors countered that the data falls under the “third-party doctrine,” which permits law enforcement access to user data voluntarily shared with companies like Apple. The State emphasized that the Apple data acquired was limited to account subscriber information—such as email addresses and registration dates—and did not include detailed location tracking or sensitive content. This, they argue, negates any assertion that the warrant violated Kohberger's reasonable expectation of privacy.Further, the State rebuts the claim that the search warrant lacked probable cause or specificity, asserting that the accompanying affidavit clearly outlined the basis for the request and was legally incorporated into the warrant under well-established legal standards. They cite relevant federal cases supporting their position, such as United States v. SDI Future Health, which allows an affidavit to “cure” any alleged warrant deficiencies if it is referenced and available to the executing officers. The State maintains that there were no intentional or reckless misstatements in the affidavit and urges the court to deny the suppression motion, emphasizing that all procedural safeguards were met and the information obtained was narrow in scope and lawfully collected.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.211.0_2.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Murder In Moscow: The State Objects To Kohberger's Motion To Suppress The First Apple Warrant (Part 2) (4/9/25)

united states apple state news murder idaho true crime motion moscow objects warrants suppress fourth amendment bryan kohberger xana kohberger apple icloud

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 9, 2025 15:22

In this filing dated December 6, 2024, the State of Idaho formally objects to Bryan Kohberger's motion to suppress evidence obtained from his Apple iCloud account via a federal grand jury subpoena and a subsequent search warrant issued on August 1, 2023. Kohberger's defense claimed the searches violated his Fourth Amendment rights, but prosecutors countered that the data falls under the “third-party doctrine,” which permits law enforcement access to user data voluntarily shared with companies like Apple. The State emphasized that the Apple data acquired was limited to account subscriber information—such as email addresses and registration dates—and did not include detailed location tracking or sensitive content. This, they argue, negates any assertion that the warrant violated Kohberger's reasonable expectation of privacy.Further, the State rebuts the claim that the search warrant lacked probable cause or specificity, asserting that the accompanying affidavit clearly outlined the basis for the request and was legally incorporated into the warrant under well-established legal standards. They cite relevant federal cases supporting their position, such as United States v. SDI Future Health, which allows an affidavit to “cure” any alleged warrant deficiencies if it is referenced and available to the executing officers. The State maintains that there were no intentional or reckless misstatements in the affidavit and urges the court to deny the suppression motion, emphasizing that all procedural safeguards were met and the information obtained was narrow in scope and lawfully collected.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.211.0_2.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Murder In Moscow: Bryan Kohberger Moves To Suppress The First AT&T Warrant (Part 3) (4/8/25)

news murder idaho gps constitution true crime moscow warrants cpl suppress fourth amendment bryan kohberger xana kohberger brett payne

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 8, 2025 11:39

This document is a motion to suppress evidence filed by Bryan Kohberger's defense team regarding a search warrant executed on his AT&T mobile account. The defense argues that the warrant, obtained by law enforcement in December 2023, was unconstitutional and overbroad, violating Kohberger's rights under both the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and Article I, Section 17 of the Idaho Constitution. The warrant authorized law enforcement to obtain extensive data from Kohberger's AT&T account, including subscriber information, call and text records, cell site location data, GPS estimates, cloud storage content, and other highly invasive digital records — far beyond what was stated in the attached exhibit, which only referenced “historical” and “prospective” phone records for a two-day window.The defense claims the supporting affidavit submitted by Cpl. Brett Payne either recklessly or intentionally omitted material facts, failed to establish probable cause, and lacked proper particularization, which made the warrant facially deficient. They further argue that all information used to justify the warrant was derived from the allegedly unconstitutional use of Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG), contaminating the warrant and rendering all derived data inadmissible under the "fruit of the poisonous tree" doctrine. Because of these issues, the motion asks the court to suppress all evidence obtained through this AT&T warrant, asserting that the warrant process failed both in legal standard and in execution, compromising Kohberger's constitutional protections.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:111424-Motion-Supress-Memorandum-Support-ATT-First-Warrant.pdf

Murder In Moscow: Bryan Kohberger Moves To Suppress The First AT&T Warrant (Part 1) (4/8/25)

news murder idaho gps constitution true crime moscow warrants cpl suppress fourth amendment bryan kohberger xana kohberger brett payne

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 8, 2025 12:38

This document is a motion to suppress evidence filed by Bryan Kohberger's defense team regarding a search warrant executed on his AT&T mobile account. The defense argues that the warrant, obtained by law enforcement in December 2023, was unconstitutional and overbroad, violating Kohberger's rights under both the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and Article I, Section 17 of the Idaho Constitution. The warrant authorized law enforcement to obtain extensive data from Kohberger's AT&T account, including subscriber information, call and text records, cell site location data, GPS estimates, cloud storage content, and other highly invasive digital records — far beyond what was stated in the attached exhibit, which only referenced “historical” and “prospective” phone records for a two-day window.The defense claims the supporting affidavit submitted by Cpl. Brett Payne either recklessly or intentionally omitted material facts, failed to establish probable cause, and lacked proper particularization, which made the warrant facially deficient. They further argue that all information used to justify the warrant was derived from the allegedly unconstitutional use of Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG), contaminating the warrant and rendering all derived data inadmissible under the "fruit of the poisonous tree" doctrine. Because of these issues, the motion asks the court to suppress all evidence obtained through this AT&T warrant, asserting that the warrant process failed both in legal standard and in execution, compromising Kohberger's constitutional protections.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:111424-Motion-Supress-Memorandum-Support-ATT-First-Warrant.pdf

Murder In Moscow: Bryan Kohberger Moves To Suppress The First AT&T Warrant (Part 2) (4/8/25)

news murder idaho gps constitution true crime moscow warrants cpl suppress fourth amendment bryan kohberger xana kohberger brett payne

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 8, 2025 11:39

This document is a motion to suppress evidence filed by Bryan Kohberger's defense team regarding a search warrant executed on his AT&T mobile account. The defense argues that the warrant, obtained by law enforcement in December 2023, was unconstitutional and overbroad, violating Kohberger's rights under both the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and Article I, Section 17 of the Idaho Constitution. The warrant authorized law enforcement to obtain extensive data from Kohberger's AT&T account, including subscriber information, call and text records, cell site location data, GPS estimates, cloud storage content, and other highly invasive digital records — far beyond what was stated in the attached exhibit, which only referenced “historical” and “prospective” phone records for a two-day window.The defense claims the supporting affidavit submitted by Cpl. Brett Payne either recklessly or intentionally omitted material facts, failed to establish probable cause, and lacked proper particularization, which made the warrant facially deficient. They further argue that all information used to justify the warrant was derived from the allegedly unconstitutional use of Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG), contaminating the warrant and rendering all derived data inadmissible under the "fruit of the poisonous tree" doctrine. Because of these issues, the motion asks the court to suppress all evidence obtained through this AT&T warrant, asserting that the warrant process failed both in legal standard and in execution, compromising Kohberger's constitutional protections.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:111424-Motion-Supress-Memorandum-Support-ATT-First-Warrant.pdf

Murder In Moscow: Bryan Kohberger's Motion To Suppress The Arrest Warrant (4/7/25)

news murder pennsylvania idaho true crime motion moscow arrest swat warrants franks citing suppress fourth amendment bryan kohberger xana kohberger

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 7, 2025 11:34

In this motion to suppress, Bryan Kohberger's defense team argues that law enforcement violated his constitutional rights during his December 2022 arrest by relying on a legally insufficient arrest warrant. The defense claims the Idaho arrest warrant had no legal authority in Pennsylvania, where Kohberger was apprehended, and that Pennsylvania authorities were required to obtain their own warrant to lawfully enter the home. Citing both Idaho and Pennsylvania law, the defense argues that the forced entry into the home without a Pennsylvania-issued warrant rendered the arrest unconstitutional. The motion also criticizes the heavily armed SWAT raid, despite federal surveillance showing Kohberger to be unarmed and nonviolent, and seeks suppression of any statements or evidence gathered during and after the arrest on Fourth Amendment grounds.Furthermore, the defense alleges that the affidavit used to support the Idaho arrest warrant was flawed, asserting that it included information gathered through unconstitutional means — including the use of Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG) and invalid cellphone data — and that it omitted material facts necessary for a fair probable cause determination. They have requested a Franks hearing, which challenges the integrity of the affidavit by asserting that law enforcement either recklessly or intentionally excluded key information. They argue that once tainted or improperly gathered information is removed, the warrant lacks sufficient probable cause, and therefore all resulting evidence and statements must be excluded from trial. The motion frames the arrest as a product of procedural shortcuts and overreach, violating both state and federal constitutional protections.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:111424-Motion-Supress-Memorandum-Support-ATT-First-Warrant.pdf

Murder In Moscow: Bryan Kohberger Moves To Suppress The First AT&T Warrant (Part 3) (4/7/25)

news murder idaho gps constitution true crime moscow warrants cpl suppress fourth amendment bryan kohberger xana kohberger brett payne

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 7, 2025 11:39

This document is a motion to suppress evidence filed by Bryan Kohberger's defense team regarding a search warrant executed on his AT&T mobile account. The defense argues that the warrant, obtained by law enforcement in December 2023, was unconstitutional and overbroad, violating Kohberger's rights under both the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and Article I, Section 17 of the Idaho Constitution. The warrant authorized law enforcement to obtain extensive data from Kohberger's AT&T account, including subscriber information, call and text records, cell site location data, GPS estimates, cloud storage content, and other highly invasive digital records — far beyond what was stated in the attached exhibit, which only referenced “historical” and “prospective” phone records for a two-day window.The defense claims the supporting affidavit submitted by Cpl. Brett Payne either recklessly or intentionally omitted material facts, failed to establish probable cause, and lacked proper particularization, which made the warrant facially deficient. They further argue that all information used to justify the warrant was derived from the allegedly unconstitutional use of Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG), contaminating the warrant and rendering all derived data inadmissible under the "fruit of the poisonous tree" doctrine. Because of these issues, the motion asks the court to suppress all evidence obtained through this AT&T warrant, asserting that the warrant process failed both in legal standard and in execution, compromising Kohberger's constitutional protections.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:111424-Motion-Supress-Memorandum-Support-ATT-First-Warrant.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Murder In Moscow: Bryan Kohberger Moves To Suppress The First AT&T Warrant (Part 2) (4/7/25)

news murder idaho gps constitution true crime moscow warrants cpl suppress fourth amendment bryan kohberger xana kohberger brett payne

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 7, 2025 11:39

This document is a motion to suppress evidence filed by Bryan Kohberger's defense team regarding a search warrant executed on his AT&T mobile account. The defense argues that the warrant, obtained by law enforcement in December 2023, was unconstitutional and overbroad, violating Kohberger's rights under both the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and Article I, Section 17 of the Idaho Constitution. The warrant authorized law enforcement to obtain extensive data from Kohberger's AT&T account, including subscriber information, call and text records, cell site location data, GPS estimates, cloud storage content, and other highly invasive digital records — far beyond what was stated in the attached exhibit, which only referenced “historical” and “prospective” phone records for a two-day window.The defense claims the supporting affidavit submitted by Cpl. Brett Payne either recklessly or intentionally omitted material facts, failed to establish probable cause, and lacked proper particularization, which made the warrant facially deficient. They further argue that all information used to justify the warrant was derived from the allegedly unconstitutional use of Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG), contaminating the warrant and rendering all derived data inadmissible under the "fruit of the poisonous tree" doctrine. Because of these issues, the motion asks the court to suppress all evidence obtained through this AT&T warrant, asserting that the warrant process failed both in legal standard and in execution, compromising Kohberger's constitutional protections.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:111424-Motion-Supress-Memorandum-Support-ATT-First-Warrant.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Murder In Moscow: Bryan Kohberger Moves To Suppress The First AT&T Warrant (Part 1) (4/7/25)

murder idaho gps constitution true crime moscow warrants cpl suppress fourth amendment bryan kohberger kohberger brett payne

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 7, 2025 12:38

This document is a motion to suppress evidence filed by Bryan Kohberger's defense team regarding a search warrant executed on his AT&T mobile account. The defense argues that the warrant, obtained by law enforcement in December 2023, was unconstitutional and overbroad, violating Kohberger's rights under both the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and Article I, Section 17 of the Idaho Constitution. The warrant authorized law enforcement to obtain extensive data from Kohberger's AT&T account, including subscriber information, call and text records, cell site location data, GPS estimates, cloud storage content, and other highly invasive digital records — far beyond what was stated in the attached exhibit, which only referenced “historical” and “prospective” phone records for a two-day window.The defense claims the supporting affidavit submitted by Cpl. Brett Payne either recklessly or intentionally omitted material facts, failed to establish probable cause, and lacked proper particularization, which made the warrant facially deficient. They further argue that all information used to justify the warrant was derived from the allegedly unconstitutional use of Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG), contaminating the warrant and rendering all derived data inadmissible under the "fruit of the poisonous tree" doctrine. Because of these issues, the motion asks the court to suppress all evidence obtained through this AT&T warrant, asserting that the warrant process failed both in legal standard and in execution, compromising Kohberger's constitutional protections.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:111424-Motion-Supress-Memorandum-Support-ATT-First-Warrant.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Murder In Moscow: Bryan Kohberger's Motion To Suppress The Arrest Warrant (4/6/25)

murder pennsylvania idaho true crime motion moscow arrest swat warrants franks citing suppress fourth amendment bryan kohberger kohberger

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 6, 2025 11:34

In this motion to suppress, Bryan Kohberger's defense team argues that law enforcement violated his constitutional rights during his December 2022 arrest by relying on a legally insufficient arrest warrant. The defense claims the Idaho arrest warrant had no legal authority in Pennsylvania, where Kohberger was apprehended, and that Pennsylvania authorities were required to obtain their own warrant to lawfully enter the home. Citing both Idaho and Pennsylvania law, the defense argues that the forced entry into the home without a Pennsylvania-issued warrant rendered the arrest unconstitutional. The motion also criticizes the heavily armed SWAT raid, despite federal surveillance showing Kohberger to be unarmed and nonviolent, and seeks suppression of any statements or evidence gathered during and after the arrest on Fourth Amendment grounds.Furthermore, the defense alleges that the affidavit used to support the Idaho arrest warrant was flawed, asserting that it included information gathered through unconstitutional means — including the use of Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG) and invalid cellphone data — and that it omitted material facts necessary for a fair probable cause determination. They have requested a Franks hearing, which challenges the integrity of the affidavit by asserting that law enforcement either recklessly or intentionally excluded key information. They argue that once tainted or improperly gathered information is removed, the warrant lacks sufficient probable cause, and therefore all resulting evidence and statements must be excluded from trial. The motion frames the arrest as a product of procedural shortcuts and overreach, violating both state and federal constitutional protections.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:111424-Motion-Supress-Memorandum-Support-ATT-First-Warrant.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Murder In Moscow: Bryan Kohberger Moves To Suppress The USB/Cell Phone Data (Part 3) (3/21/25)

news data murder idaho true crime moscow cell phone suppress bryan kohberger xana kohberger

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 21, 2025 14:33

In case number CR01-24-31665, defendant Bryan Kohberger filed a motion to suppress evidence obtained from the search of a Seagate 2TB External USB Drive (Serial Number #NA87T1GN), which contained a copy of his cell phone data. The defense argued that the affidavit supporting the January 9, 2023, search warrant omitted material information and included details derived from what they claimed were unconstitutional investigative methods, specifically the use of Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG). They contended that the warrant lacked particularity, effectively functioning as a general warrant, and that the affidavit was not properly incorporated into the warrant, potentially leading to an overbroad search of Kohberger's digital data.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:111424-Motion-Supress-Memorandum-Support-Cellphone-Data.pdf

Murder In Moscow: Bryan Kohberger Moves To Suppress The USB/Cell Phone Data (Part 1) (3/21/25)

news data murder idaho true crime moscow cell phone suppress bryan kohberger xana kohberger

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 21, 2025 12:10

In case number CR01-24-31665, defendant Bryan Kohberger filed a motion to suppress evidence obtained from the search of a Seagate 2TB External USB Drive (Serial Number #NA87T1GN), which contained a copy of his cell phone data. The defense argued that the affidavit supporting the January 9, 2023, search warrant omitted material information and included details derived from what they claimed were unconstitutional investigative methods, specifically the use of Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG). They contended that the warrant lacked particularity, effectively functioning as a general warrant, and that the affidavit was not properly incorporated into the warrant, potentially leading to an overbroad search of Kohberger's digital data.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:111424-Motion-Supress-Memorandum-Support-Cellphone-Data.pdf

Murder In Moscow: Bryan Kohberger Moves To Suppress The USB/Cell Phone Data (Part 2) (3/21/25)