POPULARITY
32 episodes with cbsa
12 episodes with cbsa
12 episodes with cbsa
10 episodes with cbsa
5 episodes with cbsa
5 episodes with cbsa
4 episodes with cbsa
2 episodes with cbsa
3 episodes with cbsa
The President of the Canada Border Services Agency revealed that the agency can't find at least 32,000 illegal immigrants who were otherwise set for deportation. The "I am Alberta" rally at the Alberta Legislature in Edmonton saw thousands of attendees calling for an independent Alberta. Canada's subsidized auto industry is suffering more losses after General Motors dropped out of its pledge to produce electric vans. Tune into The Daily Brief with Isaac Lamoureux and Walid Tamtam! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Blacklock's Reporter's Tom Korski joins Alex Pierson to unpack the federal government's latest display of dysfunction—from 30,000 deportees with no known address to the Canada Border Services Agency losing track of its own firearms. Korski points to a culture of complacency and political distraction, where senior bureaucrats face no consequences and cabinet ministers seem more interested in photo ops than public administration. The two also discuss the troubling proposal to single out Israeli visitors for “war crime” screening and why chronic mismanagement across agencies like CRA and CBSA exposes how broken Ottawa's systems have become. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
CCFR Radio – Ep 197: The Gov't Lies but the Math Doesn't. Amnesty Extended. No New RCMP & CBSA Public safety hasn't hired any new RCMP nor CBSA as promised 6 months ago. But the buyback? Full steam ahead! Rod provides the math that the gov't won't pay for 98.7% of the firearms in circulation. […]
Windsor police are handling the city's third murder of the year, a third suspect is sought in the David Pavao case, and Windsor will receive 45 additional CBSA agents. All the evening headlines, and the weekend forecast, on the go.
Lewiston Police Chief Michael Salada joins the show to provide the latest on the persistent traffic delays caused by the CBSA systems outage Thursday, and how it is impacting travel in his jurisdiction.
Not much has changed on the traffic front since a CBSA systems outage halted commercial traffic from crossing the border in this neck of the woods on Tuesday, we continue to keep you updated on the ongoing delays in the wake of the outage.
** There are less than 10 tickets remaining for the live recording of Uncommons with Catherine McKenna on Thursday Oct 2nd. Register for free here. **On this two-part episode of Uncommons, Nate digs into Bill C-2 and potential impacts on privacy, data surveillance and sharing with US authorities, and asylum claims and refugee protections.In the first half, Nate is joined by Kate Robertson, senior researcher at the University of Toronto's Citizen Lab. Kate's career has spanned criminal prosecutions, regulatory investigations, and international human rights work with the United Nations in Cambodia. She has advocated at every level of court in Canada, clerked at the Supreme Court, and has provided pro bono services through organizations like Human Rights Watch Canada. Her current research at Citizen Lab examines the intersection of technology, privacy, and the law.In part two, Nate is joined by Adam Sadinsky, a Toronto-based immigration and refugee lawyer and co-chair of the Canadian Association of Refugee Lawyers' Advocacy Committee. Adam has represented clients at every level of court in Canada, including the Supreme Court, and was co-counsel in M.A.A. v. D.E.M.E. (2020 ONCA 486) and Canadian Council for Refugees v. Canada (2023 SCC 17).Further Reading:Unspoken Implications A Preliminary Analysis of Bill C-2 and Canada's Potential Data-Sharing Obligations Towards the United States and Other Countries - Kate Robertson, Citizen LabKate Robertson Chapters:00:00 Introduction & Citizen Lab03:00 Bill C-2 and the Strong Borders Act08:00 Data Sharing and Human Rights Concerns15:00 The Cloud Act & International Agreements22:00 Real-World Examples & Privacy Risks28:00 Parliamentary Process & Fixing the BillAdam Sadinsky Chapters:33:33 Concerns Over Asylum Eligibility in Canada36:30 Government Goals and Fairness for Refugee Claimants39:00 Changing Country Conditions and New Risks41:30 The Niagara Falls Example & Other Unfair Exclusions44:00 Frivolous vs. Legitimate Claims in the Refugee System47:00 Clearing the Backlog with Fair Pathways50:00 Broad Powers Granted to the Government52:00 Privacy Concerns and Closing ReflectionsPart 1: Kate RobertsonNate Erskine-Smith00:00-00:01Kate, thanks for joining me.Kate Robertson00:01-00:01Thanks for having me.Nate Erskine-Smith00:02-00:15So I have had Ron Debert on the podcast before. So for people who really want to go back into the archive, they can learn a little bit about what the Citizen Lab is. But for those who are not that interested, you're a senior researcher there. What is the Citizen Lab?Kate Robertson00:16-01:00Well, it's an interdisciplinary research lab based at University of Toronto. It brings together researchers from a technology standpoint, political science, lawyers like myself and other disciplines to examine the intersection between information and communication technologies, law, human rights, and global security. And over time, it's published human rights reports about some of the controversial and emerging surveillance technologies of our time, including spyware or AI-driven technologies. And it's also really attempted to produce a thoughtful research that helps policymakers navigate some of these challenges and threats.Nate Erskine-Smith01:01-02:50That's a very good lead into this conversation because here we have Bill C-2 coming before Parliament for debate this fall, introduced in June, at the beginning of June. And it's called the Strong Borders Act in short, but it touches, I started counting, it's 15 different acts that are touched by this omnibus legislation. The government has laid out a rationale around strengthening our borders, keeping our borders secure, combating transnational organized crime, stopping the flow of illegal fentanyl, cracking down on money laundering, a litany of things that I think most people would look at and say broadly supportive of stopping these things from happening and making sure we're enhancing our security and the integrity of our immigration system and on. You, though, have provided some pretty thoughtful and detailed rational legal advice around some of the challenges you see in the bill. You're not the only one. There are other challenges on the asylum changes we're making. There are other challenges on lawful access and privacy. You've, though, highlighted, in keeping with the work of the Citizen Lab, the cross-border data sharing, the challenges with those data sharing provisions in the bill. It is a bit of a deep dive and a little wonky, but you've written a preliminary analysis of C2 and Canada's potential data sharing obligations towards the U.S. and other countries, unspoken implications, and you published it mid-June. It is incredibly relevant given the conversation we're having this fall. So if you were to at a high level, and we'll go ahead and some of the weeds, but at a high level articulate the main challenges you see in the legislation from the standpoint that you wrote in unspoken implications. Walk us through them.Kate Robertson02:51-06:15Well, before C2 was tabled for a number of years now, myself and other colleagues at the lab have been studying new and evolving ways that we're seeing law enforcement data sharing and cross-border cooperation mechanisms being put to use in new ways. We have seen within this realm some controversial data sharing frameworks under treaty protocols or bilateral agreement mechanisms with the United States and others, which reshape how information is shared with law enforcement in foreign jurisdictions and what kinds of safeguards and mechanisms are applied to that framework to protect human rights. And I think as a really broad trend, what is probably most, the simplest way to put it is that what we're really seeing is a growing number of ways that borders are actually being exploited to the detriment of human rights standards. Rights are essentially falling through the cracks. This can happen either through cross-border joint investigations between agencies in multiple states in ways that essentially go forum shopping for the laws and the most locks, that's right. You can also see foreign states that seek to leverage cooperation tools in democratic states in order to track, surveil, or potentially even extradite human rights activists and dissidents, journalists that are living in exile outside their borders. And what this has really come out of is a discussion point that has been made really around the world that if crime is going to become more transient across borders, that law enforcement also needs to have a greater freedom to move more seamlessly across borders. But what often is left out of that framing is that human rights standards that are really deeply entrenched in our domestic law systems, they would also need to be concurrently meaningful across borders. And unfortunately, that's not what we're seeing. Canada is going to be facing decisions around this, both within the context of C2 and around it in the coming months and beyond, as we know that it has been considering and in negotiation around a couple of very controversial agreements. One of those, the sort of elephant in the room, so to speak, is that the legislation has been tabled at a time where we know that Canada and the United States have been in negotiations for actually a couple of years around a potential agreement called the CLOUD Act, which would quite literally cede Canada's sovereignty to the United States and law enforcement authorities and give them really a blanket opportunity to directly apply surveillance orders onto entities, both public and private in Canada?Nate Erskine-Smith06:16-07:46Well, so years in the making negotiations, but we are in a very different world with the United States today than we were two years ago. And I was just in, I was in Mexico City for a conference with parliamentarians across the Americas, and there were six Democratic congressmen and women there. One, Chuy Garcia represents Chicago district. He was telling me that he went up to ICE officials and they're masked and he is saying, identify yourself. And he's a congressman. He's saying, identify yourself. What's your ID? What's your badge number? They're hiding their ID and maintaining masks and they're refusing to identify who they are as law enforcement officials, ostensibly refusing to identify who they are to an American congressman. And if they're willing to refuse to identify themselves in that manner to a congressman. I can only imagine what is happening to people who don't have that kind of authority and standing in American life. And that's the context that I see this in now. I would have probably still been troubled to a degree with open data sharing and laxer standards on the human rights side, but all the more troubling, you talk about less democratic jurisdictions and authoritarian regimes. Well, isn't the U.S. itself a challenge today more than ever has been? And then shouldn't we maybe slam the pause button on negotiations like this? Well, you raise a number of really important points. And I think thatKate Robertson07:47-09:54there have been warning signs and worse that have long preceded the current administration and the backsliding that you're commenting upon since the beginning of 2025. Certainly, I spoke about the increasing trend of the exploitation of borders. I mean, I think we're seeing signs that really borders are actually, in essence, being used as a form of punishment, even in some respects, which I would say it is when you say to someone who would potentially exercise due process rights against deportation and say if you exercise those rights, you'll be deported to a different continent from your home country where your rights are perhaps less. And that's something that UN human rights authorities have been raising alarm bells about around the deportation of persons to third countries, potentially where they'll face risks of torture even. But these patterns are all too reminiscent of what we saw in the wake of 9-11 and the creation of black sites where individuals, including Canadian persons, were detained or even tortured. And really, this stems from a number of issues. But what we have identified in analyzing potential cloud agreement is really just the momentous decision that the Canadian government would have to make to concede sovereignty to a country which is in many ways a pariah for refusing to acknowledge extraterritorial international human rights obligations to persons outside of its borders. And so to invite that type of direct surveillance and exercise of authority within Canada's borders was a country who has refused for a very long time, unlike Canada and many other countries around the world, has refused to recognize through its courts and through its government any obligation to protect the international human rights of people in Canada.Nate Erskine-Smith09:56-10:21And yet, you wrote, some of the data and surveillance powers in Bill C-2 read like they could have been drafted by U.S. officials. So you take the frame that you're just articulating around with what the U.S. worldview is on this and has been and exacerbated by obviously the current administration. But I don't love the sound of it reading like it was drafted by AmericanKate Robertson10:22-12:43officials. Well, you know, it's always struck me as a really remarkable story, to be frank. You know, to borrow Dickens' tale of two countries, which is that since the 1990s, Canada's Supreme Court has been charting a fundamentally different course from the constitutional approach that's taken the United States around privacy and surveillance. And it really started with persons looking at what's happening and the way that technology evolves and how much insecurity people feel when they believe that surveillance is happening without any judicial oversight. And looking ahead and saying, you know what, if we take this approach, it's not going to go anywhere good. And that's a really remarkable decision that was made and has continued to be made by the court time and time again, even as recently as last year, the court has said we take a distinct approach from the United States. And it had a lot of foresight given, you know, in the 1990s, technology is nowhere near what it is today. Of course. And yet in the text of C2, we see provisions that, you know, I struggle when I hear proponents of the legislation describe it as balanced and in keeping with the Charter, when actually they're proposing to essentially flip the table on principles that have been enshrined for decades to protect Canadians, including, for example, the notion that third parties like private companies have the authority to voluntarily share our own. information with the police without any warrant. And that's actually the crux of what has become a fundamentally different approach that I think has really led Canada to be a more resilient country when it comes to technological change. And I sometimes describe us as a country that is showing the world that, you know, it's possible to do both. You can judicially supervise investigations that are effective and protect the public. And the sky does not fall if you do so. And right now we're literally seeing and see to something that I think is really unique and important made in Canada approach being potentially put on the chopping block.Nate Erskine-Smith12:44-13:29And for those listening who might think, okay, well, at a high level, I don't love expansive data sharing and reduced human rights protections, but practically, are there examples? And you pointed to in your writing right from the hop, the Arar case, and you mentioned the Supreme Court, but they, you know, they noted that it's a chilling example of the dangers of unconditional information sharing. And the commission noted to the potentially risky exercise of open ended, unconditional data sharing as well. But that's a real life example, a real life Canadian example of what can go wrong in a really horrible, tragic way when you don't have guardrails that focus and protect human rights.Kate Robertson13:31-14:56You're right to raise that example. I raise it. It's a really important one. It's one that is, I think, part of, you know, Canada has many commendable and important features to its framework, but it's not a perfect country by any means. That was an example of just information sharing with the United States itself that led to a Canadian citizen being rendered and tortured in a foreign country. Even a more recent example, we are not the only country that's received requests for cooperation from a foreign state in circumstances where a person's life is quite literally in jeopardy. We have known from public reporting that in the case of Hardeep Najjar, before he was ultimately assassinated on Canadian soil, an Interpol Red Notice had been issued about him at the request of the government of India. And the government had also requested his extradition. And we know that there's a number of important circumstances that have been commented upon by the federal government in the wake of those revelations. And it's provoked a really important discussion around the risks of foreign interference. But it is certainly an example where we know that cooperation requests have been made in respect of someone who's quite literally and tragically at risk of loss of life.Nate Erskine-Smith14:57-16:07And when it comes to the, what we're really talking about is, you mentioned the Cloud Act. There's also, I got to go to the notes because it's so arcane, but the second additional protocol to the Budapest Convention. These are, in that case, it's a treaty that Canada would ratify. And then this piece of legislation would in some way create implementing authorities for. I didn't fully appreciate this until going through that. And I'd be interested in your thoughts just in terms of the details of these. And we can make it as wonky as you like in terms of the challenges that these treaties offer. I think you've already articulated the watering down of traditional human rights protections and privacy protections we would understand in Canadian law. But the transparency piece, I didn't fully appreciate either. And as a parliamentarian, I probably should have because there's... Until reading your paper, I didn't know that there was a policy on tabling of treaties That really directs a process for introducing treaty implementing legislation. And this process also gets that entirely backwards.Kate Robertson16:09-17:01That's right. And, you know, in researching and studying what to do with, you know, what I foresee is potentially quite a mess if we were to enter into a treaty that binds us to standards that are unconstitutional. You know, that is a diplomatic nightmare of sorts, but it's also one that would create, you know, a constitutional entanglement of that's really, I think, unprecedented in Canada. But nevertheless, that problem is foreseen if one or both of these were to go ahead. And I refer to that in the cloud agreement or the 2AP. But this policy, as I understand it, I believe it was tabled by then Foreign Affairs Minister Maxime Bernier, as he was at the time, by Prime Minister Harper's government.Nate Erskine-Smith17:02-17:04He's come a long way.Kate Robertson17:07-18:12I believe that the rationale for the policy was quite self-evident at the time. I mean, if you think about the discussions that are happening right now, for example, in Quebec around digital sovereignty and the types of entanglements that U.S. legal process might impact around Quebec privacy legislation. Other issues around the AI space in Ontario or our health sector in terms of technology companies in Ontario. These treaties really have profound implications at a much broader scale than the federal government and law enforcement. And that's not even getting to Indigenous sovereignty issues. And so the policy is really trying to give a greater voice to the range of perspectives that a federal government would consider before binding Canada internationally on behalf of all of these layers of decision making without perhaps even consulting with Parliament First.Nate Erskine-Smith18:12-19:15So this is, I guess, one struggle. There's the specific concerns around watering down protections, but just on process. This just bothered me in particular because we're going to undergo this process in the fall. And so I printed out the Strong Borders Act, Government of Canada Strengthens Border Security and the backgrounder to the law. And going through it, it's six pages when I print it out. And it doesn't make mention of the Budapest Convention. It doesn't make mention of the Cloud Act. It doesn't make mention of any number of rationales for this legislation. But it doesn't make mention that this is in part, at least, to help implement treaties that are under active negotiation. not only gets backwards the policy, but one would have thought, especially I took from your paper, that the Department has subsequently, the Justice Department has subsequently acknowledged that this would in fact help the government implement these treaties. So surely it shouldKate Robertson19:15-19:57be in the background. I would have thought so. As someone that has been studying these treaty frameworks very carefully, it was immediately apparent to me that they're at least relevant. It was put in the briefing as a question as to whether or not the actual intent of some of these new proposed powers is to put Canada in a position to ratify this treaty. And the answer at that time was yes, that that is the intent of them. And it was also stated that other cooperation frameworks were foreseeable.Nate Erskine-Smith19:59-20:57What next? So here I am, one member of parliament, and oftentimes through these processes, we're going to, there's the objective of the bill, and then there's the details of the bill, and we're going to get this bill to a committee process. I understand the intention is for it to be a pretty fulsome committee hearing, and it's an omnibus bill. So what should happen is the asylum components should get kicked to the immigration committee. The pieces around national security should obviously get kicked to public safety committee, and there should be different committees that deal with their different constituent elements that are relevant to those committees. I don't know if it will work that way, but that would be a more rational way of engaging with a really broad ranging bill. Is there a fix for this though? So are there amendments that could cure it or is it foundationally a problem that is incurable?Kate Robertson20:58-21:59Well, I mean, I think that for myself as someone studying this area, it's obvious to me that what agreements may be struck would profoundly alter the implications of pretty much every aspect of this legislation. And that stems in part from just how fundamental it would be if Canada were to cede its sovereignty to US law enforcement agencies and potentially even national security agencies as well. But obviously, the provisions themselves are quite relevant to these frameworks. And so it's clear that Parliament needs to have the opportunity to study how these provisions would actually be used. And I am still left on knowing how that would be possible without transparencyNate Erskine-Smith22:00-22:05about what is at stake in terms of potential agreements. Right. What have we agreed to? If thisKate Robertson22:05-24:57is implementing legislation what are we implementing certainly it's a significantly different proposition now even parking the international data sharing context the constitutional issues that are raised in the parts of the bill that i'm able to study within my realm of expertise which is in the context of omnibus legislation not the entire bill of course yeah um but it's hard to even know where to begin um the the the powers that are being put forward you know i kind of have to set the table a bit to understand to explain why the table is being flipped yeah yeah we're at a time where um you know a number of years ago i published about the growing use of algorithms and AI and surveillance systems in Canada and gaps in the law and the need to bring Canada's oversight into the 21st century. Those gaps now, even five years later, are growing into chasms. And we've also had multiple investigative reports by the Privacy Commissioner of Canada being sent to Parliament about difficulties it's had reviewing the activities of law enforcement agencies, difficulties it's had with private sector companies who've been non-compliant with privacy legislation, and cooperating at all with the regulator. And we now have powers being put forward that would essentially say, for greater certainty, it's finders keepers rules. Anything in the public domain can be obtained and used by police without warrant. And while this has been put forward as a balancing of constitutional norms, the Supreme Court has said the opposite. It's not an all or nothing field. And in the context of commercial data brokers that are harvesting and selling our data, including mental health care that we might seek online, AI-fueled surveillance tools that are otherwise unchecked in the Canadian domain. I think this is a frankly stunning response to the context of the threats that we face. And I really think it sends and creates really problematic questions around what law enforcement and other government agencies are expected to do in the context of future privacy reviews when essentially everything that's been happening is supposedly being green lit with this new completely un-nuanced power. I should note you are certainly not alone in theseNate Erskine-Smith24:57-27:07concerns. I mean, in addition to the paper that I was talking about at the outset that you've written as an analyst that alongside Ron Deaver in the Citizen Lab. But there's another open letter you've signed that's called for the withdrawal of C2, but it's led by open media. I mean, BCCLA, British Columbia Civil Liberties Association, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, the Canadian Council for Refugees, QP, International Civil Liberties Monitoring Group, Penn Canada, the Center for Free Expression, privacy experts like Colin Bennett, who I used be on the Privacy Committee and that were pretty regular witnesses. You mentioned the Privacy Commissioner has not signed the open letter, but the Privacy Commissioner of both Canada and the Information Commissioner of Ontario, who's also responsible for privacy. In the context of the treaties that you were mentioning, the Budapest Convention in particular, they had highlighted concerns absent updated, modernized legislation. And at the federal level, we have had in fits and starts attempts to modernize our private sector privacy legislation. But apart from a consultation paper at one point around the Privacy Act, which would apply to public sector organizations, there's really been no serious effort to table legislation or otherwise modernize that. So am I right to say, you know, we are creating a myriad number of problems with respect to watering down privacy and human rights protections domestically and especially in relation to foreign governments with relation to data of our citizens here. And we could potentially cure those problems, at least in part, if we modernize our privacy legislation and our privacy protections and human rights protections here at home. But we are, as you say, a gap to chasm. We are so woefully behind in that conversation. It's a bit of an odd thing to pass the open-ended data sharing and surveillance piece before you even have a conversation around updating your privacy protections.Kate Robertson27:07-28:13Yeah, I mean, frankly, odd, I would use the word irresponsible. We know that these tools, it's becoming increasingly well documented how impactful they are for communities and individuals, whether it's wrongful arrests, whether it's discriminatory algorithms. really fraught tools to say the least. And it's not as if Parliament does not have a critical role here. You know, in decades past, to use the example of surveillance within Quebec, which was ultimately found to have involved, you know, years of illegal activity and surveillance activities focused on political organizing in Quebec. And that led to Parliament striking an inquiry and ultimately overhauling the mandate of the RCMP. There were recommendations made that the RCMP needs to follow the law. That was an actual recommendation.Nate Erskine-Smith28:14-28:16I'm sorry that it needs to be said, but yeah.Kate Robertson28:16-29:05The safeguards around surveillance are about ensuring that when we use these powers, they're being used appropriately. And, you know, there isn't even, frankly, a guarantee that judicial oversight will enable this to happen. And it certainly provides comfort to many Canadians. But we know, for example, that there were phones being watched of journalists in Montreal with, unfortunately, judicial oversight not even that many years ago. So this is something that certainly is capable of leading to more abuses in Canada around political speech and online activity. And it's something that we need to be protective against and forward thinking about.Nate Erskine-Smith29:05-29:58Yeah, and the conversation has to hold at the same time considerations of public safety, of course, but also considerations for due process and privacy and human rights protections. These things, we have to do both. If we don't do both, then we're not the democratic society we hold ourselves out as. I said odd, you said irresponsible. You were forceful in your commentary, but the open letter that had a number of civil society organizations, I mentioned a few, was pretty clear to say the proposed legislation reflects little more than shameful appeasement of the dangerous rhetoric and false claims about our country emanating from the United States. It's a multi-pronged assault on the basic human rights and freedoms Canada holds dear. Got anything else to add?Kate Robertson30:00-30:56I mean, the elephant in the room is the context in which the legislation has been tabled within. And I do think that we're at a time where we are seeing democratic backsliding around the world, of course, and rising digital authoritarianism. And these standards really don't come out of the air. They're ones that need to be protected. And I do find myself, when I look at some of the really un-nuanced powers that are being put forward, I do find myself asking whether or not those risks are really front and center when we're proposing to move forward in this way. And I can only defer to experts from, as you said, hundreds of organizations that have called attention towards pretty much every aspect of this legislation.Nate Erskine-Smith30:57-31:44And I will have the benefit of engaging folks on the privacy side around lawful access and around concerns around changes to the asylum claim and due process from the Canadian Association of Refugee Lawyers. But as we do see this move its way through Parliament, if we see it move its way through Parliament in the fall, if they're recognizing that the call was for withdrawal, but also recognizing a political reality where if it is to pass, we want to make sure we are improving it as much as possible. If there are amendments along the way, if there are other people you think that I should engage with, please do let me know because this is before us. It's an important piece of legislation. And if it's not to be withdrawn, we better improve it as much as possible.Kate Robertson31:46-32:02I appreciate that offer and really commend you for covering the issue carefully. And I really look forward to more engagement from yourself and other colleagues in parliament as legislation is considered further. I expect you will be a witness at committee,Nate Erskine-Smith32:02-32:06but thanks very much for the time. I really appreciate it. Thanks for having me.Part 2: Adam SadinskyChapters:33:33 Concerns Over Asylum Eligibility in Canada36:30 Government Goals and Fairness for Refugee Claimants39:00 Changing Country Conditions and New Risks41:30 The Niagara Falls Example & Other Unfair Exclusions44:00 Frivolous vs. Legitimate Claims in the Refugee System47:00 Clearing the Backlog with Fair Pathways50:00 Broad Powers Granted to the Government52:00 Privacy Concerns and Closing ReflectionsNate Erskine-Smith33:33-33:35Adam, thanks for joining me.Adam Sadinsky33:35-33:36Thanks for having me, Nate.Nate Erskine-Smith33:36-33:57We've had a brief discussion about this, by way of my role as an MP, but, for those who are listening in, they'll have just heard a rundown of all the concerns that the Citizen Lab has with data surveillance and data sharing with law enforcement around the world. You've got different concerns about C2 and you represent the Canadian Association of Refugee Lawyers. What are your concerns here?Adam Sadinsky33:57-35:31I mean, our biggest concern with this bill is new provisions that create additional categories of folks ineligible to claim asylum in Canada. And specifically to have their hearings heard at the Immigration and Refugee Board. The biggest one of those categories is definitely, a bar on individuals making refugee claims in Canada one year after they have arrived in Canada, and that's one year, whether they have been in Canada for that whole year or they left at some point and came back. Those folks who have been here, who came more than a year ago, if they now fear persecution and want to make a claim for refugee protection, this bill would shunt them into an inferior system where rather than having a full hearing in their day in court.Their application will be decided by an officer of immigration, alone, sitting in the cubicle, probably, with some papers in front of them. That person is going to make an enormous decision about whether to send that person back home where they feared persecution, torture, death. Our position is that this new form of ineligibility. Is unfair. it doesn't meet the government's goals, as we understand them, and we share, we share the views of organizations like, Citizen Lab, that the bill should be withdrawn. There are other ways to do this, but this bill is fundamentally flawed.Nate Erskine-Smith35:31-35:57Let's talk about government goals. Those looking at the influx of temporary residents in Canada specifically, and I don't, and I don't wanna pick on international students, but we've seen a huge influx of international students just as one category example. And they've said, well, if someone's been here for a year and they didn't claim right away, they didn't come here to claim asylum. Because they would've claimed within that first year, presumably, you know, what's the problem with, uh, with a rule that is really trying to tackle this problem.Adam Sadinsky35:57-38:33The issue is, I mean, Nate, you had mentioned, you know, people who had come to Canada, they didn't initially claim and it didn't initially claim asylum, temporary residents. What do we do about it? I wanna give a couple of examples of people who would be caught by this provision, who fall into that category. But there's legitimate reasons why they might claim more than a year after arriving in Canada. The first is someone who came to Canada, student worker, whatever. At the time they came to Canada, they would've been safe going back home they didn't have a fear of returning back home. But country conditions change and they can change quickly. The Taliban takeover of Afghanistan in 2021, was a stark example there may have been people who came to Canada as students planning to go back to Afghanistan and rebuild their country. As the bill is currently written. If there were to be a situation like that, and there will be some other Afghanistan, there will be some other situation down the line. Those people who weren't afraid when they originally came to Canada and now have a legitimate claim, will have an inferior, process that they go through, one that is riddled with issues, examples of unfairness compared to the refugee, the regular refugee system, and a lack of protection from deportation, pending any appeal.So that's one category. A second category is people who were afraid of going back home when they came to Canada but didn't need to claim asylum because they had another avenue to remain in Canada. So the government advertised, Minister Frazier was saying this often come to Canada, come as a student and there's a well-established pathway. You'll have a study permit, you'll get a post-graduation work permit. This is what the government wanted. The rug has been pulled out from under many of those people. Towards the end of last year when Canada said, okay, it's enough, too many temporary residents. But what about the temporary residents who had a fear of returning home when they came? They went through the system the “right way,” quote unquote. They didn't go to the asylum system. they went through another path. And now they're looking at it. They say, well, you know, I came to Canada to study, but also I'm gay and I'm from a country where, if people know about that, you know, I'll be tortured. Maybe since they've been in Canada, that person in that example, they've been in a relationship, they've been posting on social media with their partner. It is very dangerous so why, why shouldn't that person claim refugee protection through regular means?Nate Erskine-Smith38:33-39:06Is this right on your read of the law as it is written right now, if someone were to come with their family when they're a kid and they were to be in Canada for over a year and then their family were to move back to either the home country or to a different country, and, they wake up as a teenager many years later, they wake up as an adult many years later and their country's falling apart, and they were to flee and come to Canada. By virtue of the fact they've been here for a year as a kid, would that preclude them from making a claim?Adam Sadinsky39:06-39:10It's even worse than that, Nate.Nate Erskine-Smith39:09-39:10Oh, great.Adam Sadinsky39:10-39:47In your example, the family stayed in Canada for more than a year. Yes, absolutely. That person is caught by this provision. But here's who else would be someone comes when they're five years old with their family, on a trip to the United States. during that trip, they decide we want to see the Canadian side of Niagara Falls. They either have a visa or get whatever visa they need, or don't need one. They visit the falls, and at that point that they enter Canada, a clock starts ticking. That never stops ticking. So maybe they came to Canada for two hours.Nate Erskine-Smith39:44-39:45Two hours and you're outta luck.Adam Sadinsky39:45-39:47They go back to the USNate Erskine-Smith39:47-39:47Oh man.Adam Sadinsky39:47-40:09They never come back to Canada again. The way that the bill is written, that clock never stops ticking, right? Their country falls apart. They come back 15 years later. That person is going to have a very different kind of process that they go through, to get protection in Canada, than someone who wouldn't be caught by this bill.Nate Erskine-Smith40:09-40:34Say those are the facts as they are, that's one category. There's another category where I've come as a student, I thought there would be a pathway. I don't really fear persecution in my home country, but I want to stay in Canada we see in this constituency office, as other constituency offices do people come with immigration help or they've got legitimate claims. We see some people come with help with illegitimate claimsAdam Sadinsky40:34-42:46We have to be very careful when we talk about categorizing claims as frivolous. There is no question people make refugee claims in Canada that have no merit. You'll not hear from me, you'll not hear from our organization saying that every 100% of refugee claims made in Canada, are with merit. The issue is how we determine. At that initial stage that you're saying, oh, let's, let's deal quickly with frivolous claims. How do you determine if a claim is frivolous? What if someone, you know, I do a lot of appeal work, we get appeals of claims prepared by immigration consultants, or not even immigration consultants. And, you know, there's a core of a very strong refugee claim there that wasn't prepared properly.Nate Erskine-Smith42:46-42:46Yeah, we see it too. That's a good point.Adam Sadinsky42:46-42:46How that claim was prepared has nothing to do with what the person actually faces back home. We have to be very careful in terms of, quick negative claims, and clearing the decks of what some might think are frivolous claims. But there may be some legitimate and very strong core there. What could be done, and you alluded to this, is there are significant claims in the refugee board's backlog that are very, very strong just based on the countries they come from or the profiles of the individuals who have made those claims, where there are countries that have 99% success rate. And that's not because the board is super generous. It's because the conditions in those countries are very, very bad. And so the government could implement policies and this would be done without legislation to grant pathways for folks from, for example, Eritrea 99ish percent success rate. However, the government wants to deal with that in terms of numbers, but there's no need for the board to spend time determining whether this claim is in the 1%, that doesn't deserve to be accepted. Our view is that 1% being accepted is, a trade off for, a more efficient system.Nate Erskine-Smith42:46-43:30Similarly though, individuals who come into my office and they've been here for more than five years. They have been strong contributors to the community. They have jobs. They're oftentimes connected to a faith organization. They're certainly connected to a community based organization that is going to bat for them. There's, you know, obviously no criminal record in many cases they have other family here. And they've gone through so many appeals at different times. I look at that and I go, throughout Canadian history, there have been different regularization programs. Couldn't you kick a ton of people not a country specific basis, but a category specific basis of over five years, economic contributions, community contributions, no criminal record, you're approved.Adam Sadinsky43:30-44:20Yeah, I'd add to your list of categories, folks who are working in, professions, that Canada needs workers in. give the example of construction. We are facing a housing crisis. So many construction workers are not Canadian. Many of my clients who are refugee claimants waiting for their hearings are working in the construction industry. And the government did that, back in the COVID pandemic, creating what was, what became known as the Guardian Angels Program, where folks who were working in the healthcare sector, on the front lines, combating the pandemic, supporting, folks who needed it, that they were allowed to be taken again out of the refugee queue with a designated, pathway to permanent residents on the basis of the work and the contribution they were doing. All of these could be done.Adam Sadinsky44:20-45:05The refugee system is built on Canada's international obligations under the refugee convention, to claim refugee protection, to claim asylum is a human right. Every person in the world has the right to claim asylum. Individuals who are claiming asylum in Canada are exercising that right. Each individual has their own claim, and that's the real value that the refugee board brings to bear and why Canada has had a gold standard. The refugee system, replicated, around the world, every individual has their day in court, to explain to an expert tribunal why they face persecution. This bill would take that away.Nate Erskine-Smith45:05-46:18Yeah, I can't put my finger on what the other rationale would be though, because why the, why this change now? Well, we have right now, a huge number over a million people who are going to eventually be without status because they're not gonna have a pathway that was originally, that they originally thought would be there. The one frustration I have sometimes in the system is there are people who have come into my office with, the original claim, being unfounded. But then I look at it, and they've been here partly because the process took so long, they've been here for over five years. If you've been here for over five years and you're contributing and you're a member of the community, and now we're gonna kick you out. Like your original claim might have been unfounded, but this is insane. Now you're contributing to this country, and what a broken system. So I guess I'm sympathetic to the need for speed at the front end to ensure that unfounded claims are deemed unfounded and people are deported and legitimate claims are deemed founded, and they can be welcomed. So cases don't continue to come into my office that are over five or over six years long where I go, I don't even care if it was originally unfounded or not. Welcome to Canada. You've been contributing here for six years anyway.Adam Sadinsky46:18-46:33But if I can interject? Even if the bill passes as written, each of these individuals is still going to have what's called a pre-removal risk assessment.Nate Erskine-Smith46:31-46:33They're still gonna have a process. Yeah, exactly.Adam Sadinsky46:33-46:55They're still gonna have a process, and they're still going to wait time. All these people are still in the system. The bill is a bit of a shell game where folks are being just transferred from one process to another and say, oh, wow. Great. Look, we've reduced the backlog at the IRB by however many thousand claims,Nate Erskine-Smith46:53-46:55And we've increased the backlog in the process.Adam Sadinsky46:55-48:25Oh, look at the wait time at IRCC, and I'm sure you have constituents who come into your office and say, I filed a spousal sponsorship application two and a half years ago. I'm waiting for my spouse to come and it's taking so long. IRCC is not immune from processing delays. There doesn't seem to be, along with this bill, a corresponding hiring of hundreds and hundreds more pro officers. So, this backlog and this number of claims is shifting from one place to another. And another point I mentioned earlier within the refugee system within the board, when a person appeals a negative decision, right? Because, humans make decisions and humans make mistakes. And that's why we have legislative appeal processes in the system to allow for mistakes to be corrected. That appeal process happens within the board, and a person is protected from deportation while they're appealing with a pro. With this other system, it's different. The moment that an officer makes a negative decision on a pro that person is now eligible to be deported. CBSA can ask them to show up the next day and get on a plane and go home. Yes, a person can apply for judicial review in the federal court that does not stop their deportation. If they can bring a motion to the court for a stay of removal.Nate Erskine-Smith48:19-48:25You're gonna see a ton of new work for the federal court. You are gonna see double the work for the federal courtAdam Sadinsky48:25-48:39Which is already overburdened. So unless the government is also appointing many, many new judges, and probably hiring more Council Department of Justice, this backlog is going to move from one place to another.Nate Erskine-Smith48:39-48:41It's just gonna be industry whack-a-mole with the backlog.Adam Sadinsky48:41-48:52The only way to clear the backlog is to clear people out of it. There's no fair way to clear folks out of it in a negative way. So the only way to do that is positively.Nate Erskine-Smith48:52-49:37In the limited time we got left, the bill also empowers the governor and council of the cabinet to cancel documents, to suspend documents. And just so I've got this clearer in my mind, so if, for example: say one is a say, one is a student on campus, or say one is on a, on a work permit and one is involved in a protest, and that protest the government deems to be something they don't like. The government could cancel the student's permit on the basis that they were involved in the protest. Is that right? The law? Not to say that this government would do that. But this would allow the government to legally do just that. Am I reading it wrong?Adam Sadinsky49:37-50:46The bill gives broad powers to the government to cancel documents. I think you're reading it correctly. To me, when I read the bill, I don't particularly understand exactly what is envisioned. Where it would, where the government would do this, why a government would want to put this in. But you are right. I would hope this government would not do that, but this government is not going to be in power forever. When you put laws on the books, they can be used by whomever for whatever reason they can they want, that's within how that law is drafted. You know, we saw down south, you know, the secretary of State a few months ago said, okay, we're gonna cancel the permits of everyone from South Sudan, in the US because they're not taking back people being deported. It's hugely problematic. It's a complete overreach. It seems like there could be regulations that are brought in. But the power is so broad as written in this law, that it could definitely be used, for purposes most Canadians would not support.Nate Erskine-Smith50:46-51:07And, obviously that's a worst case scenario when we think about the United States in today's political climate. But, it's not clear to your point what the powers are necessary for. If we are to provide additional powers, we should only provide power as much as necessary and proportionate to the goal we want to achieve. Is there anything else you want to add?Adam Sadinsky51:07-51:43I just wanna touch, and I'm sure you got into a lot of these issues, on the privacy side but. The privacy issues in this bill bleed over into the refugee system with broad search powers, um, particularly requiring service providers to provide information, we are concerned these powers could be used by CBSA, for example, to ask a women's shelter, to hand over information about a woman claiming refugee protection or who's undocumented, living in a shelter, we have huge concerns that, you know, these powers will not just be used by police, but also by Canada Border Services and immigration enforcement. I'm not the expert on privacy issues, but we see it we see the specter of those issues as well.Nate Erskine-Smith51:43-52:22That's all the time we got, but in terms of what would help me to inform my own advocacy going forward is, this bill is gonna get to committee. I'm gonna support the bill in committee and see if we can amend it. I know, the position of CARL is withdraw. The position of a number of civil society organizations is to withdraw it. I think it's constructive to have your voice and others at committee, and to make the same arguments you made today with me. Where you have. I know your argument's gonna be withdrawn, you'll say then in the alternative, here are changes that should be made. When you've got a list of those changes in detailed, legislative amendment form, flip them to me and I'll share the ideas around the ministry and around with colleagues, and I appreciate the time. Appreciate the advocacy.Adam Sadinsky52:22-52:24Absolutely. Thank you. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.uncommons.ca
For the latest and most important news of the day | https://www.thecanadianpressnews.ca To watch daily news videos, follow us on YouTube | https://www.youtube.com/@CdnPress The Canadian Press on X (formerly Twitter) | https://twitter.com/CdnPressNews The Canadian Press on LinkedIn | https://linkedin.com/showcase/98791543
Lena Giroux, a young mother from LaSalle facing an extremely urgent and heartbreaking situation. Her husband, Erick Sanchez, was ordered removed to Mexico on September 30, despite already having received a CSQ (Québec Selection Certificate) and being in the process of obtaining permanent residency. She spoke to Andrew Carter.
How are importers adapting to major changes in Canada's importing process? In this episode of “Let's Get Surety,” we chat with Sheila Thompson of Rosenberg & Parker of Canada and Cristina Hagivreta, Commercial Surety Manager at Trisura Guarantee Insurance Company, who return to share insights on the rollout of the Canada Border Services Agency's CARM system and its financial security requirements. Hear what has worked, what bumps have occurred along the way, and what importers need to know now to stay compliant and avoid delays in importing goods into Canada. You can also check out the last episode on this topic, #121 Preparing for CARM: Changes in Canada's Importing Process, to see how far this process has come and check out the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) to stay up to date on this issue! With special guests: Sheila Thompson, President, Rosenberg & Parker of Canada, Inc. and Cristina Hagivreta, Manager, Commercial Surety, Trisura Guarantee Insurance Company Hosted by: Kat Shamapande, Director, Professional Development, NASBP and Mark McCallum, CEO, NASBP Sponsored by Old Republic!
Van der leyen survives confidence vote,PST on used cars? Saskatchewan is hosing you!CBSA and Police budget cuts,Stabbing at the calgary stampede, 3 in hospital,Coffee prices are out of control,10k jobs gone from ontario colleges - all because of the foreign students are gone,Update from the arrivecan app - the report is sealed by a judge,#Cpd #lpc, #ppc, #ndp, #canadianpolitics, #humor, #funny, #republican, #maga, #mcga,Sign Up for the Full ShowLocals (daily video)Sample Showshttps://canadapoli2.locals.com/ Spotify https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/canadapoli/subscribePrivate Full podcast audio https://canadapoli.com/feed/canadapoliblue/Buy subscriptions here (daily video and audio podcast):https://canadapoli.cm/canadapoli-subscriptions/Youtubehttps://www.youtube.com/c/CanadaPoli/videosMe on Telegramhttps://t.me/realCanadaPoliMe on Rumblehttps://rumble.com/user/CanadaPoli Me on Odysseyhttps://odysee.com/@CanadaPoli:f Me on Bitchutehttps://www.bitchute.com/channel/l55JBxrgT3Hf/ Podcast RSShttps://anchor.fm/s/e57706d8/podcast/rsso
They just never learn. The ArriveCan app was originally budgeted for $80,000 but cost Canadians at least $60 million dollars. However, Canadians will never know the total cost because the Auditor General found such poor record keeping at CBSA. This audit raises serious security concerns, finding that in half of the contracts there was no […]
Hello to all you patriots out there in podcast land and welcome to Episode 452 of Canadian Patriot Podcast. The number one live podcast in Canada. Recorded June 9th, 2025. We need your help! To support Canadian Patriot Podcast visit patreon.com/cpp and become a Patreon. You can get a better quality version of the show for just $1 per episode. Show you're not a communist, buy a CPP T-Shirt, for just $24.99 + shipping and theft. Visit canadianpatriotpodcast.com home page and follow the link on the right. What are we drinking And 1 Patriot Challenge item that you completed Gavin - signal hill and diet pepsi Pierre - forty creek and pepsi, Grab the Patriot Challenge template from our website and post it in your social media Listener Feedback We'd love to hear your feedback about the show. Please visit canadianpatriotpodcast.com/feedback/ or email us at feedback@canadianpatriotpodcast.com A version of the show is Available on iTunes at https://itunes.apple.com/ca/podcast/canadian-patriot-podcast/id1067964521?mt=2 Upcoming Events Strava https://www.strava.com/clubs/ragnaruck News Bill C-2 https://www.parl.ca/DocumentViewer/en/45-1/bill/C-2/first-reading 1Amendments to customs act Free facilities for CBSA for any purpose related to admin or enforcement of the customs act CBSA granted access to goods at specific locations destined to export Controlled Drugs Authority of minister of health to add precursor chemicals used in production of illegal drugs to schedule v Cannabis Act The Governor in Council under the recommendation of the Minister of Public Safety, exempts officers from certain drug related provisions, specifically attept, conspiracy counseling or aiding. This is done so that under cover cops can “simulate” criminal behavior to protect their cover Canada Post It permits the demand, seizure, detention or retention of any item in the course of post, in accordance with an act of parliament. They must follow the correct course and obtain a warrant Oceans Act Security added to official list of responsibilities of Coast Guard along with the previous responsibilities of Search & Rescue, Environmental Response, Aids to Navigation & Icebreaking Information Sharing Authorizes Minister of Immigration and Citizenship to collect, use and disclose personal information across different immigration and citizenship programs, with different federal departments, provincial or territorial governments & foreign governments when appropriate Immigration and Refugee protection act (Parts 7-10) Elimination of the Designated Country of Origin system which allowed Canada to fast track or limit asylum claims from countries considered safe, this is to be able to treat all claims equally Stricter timelines for asylum claims, must submit claim within 1 year of arriving in Canada, those who irregularly enter from the US and wait more than 14 days to file may be disqualified Automatic Removal Orders, if someone withdraws their claim a removal order is automatically issued the same day Support for Vulnerable Claimants, introduces designated representatives for minors & diminished individuals Control over Documents, The minister is granted new powers to cancel, suspend or modify immigration documents in the public interest, pause acceptance, or processing of application during an emergency Border crossing restrictions: Individuals who cross into Canada outside of official ports of entry will no longer be able to claim refugee status. Part 10-11 procedes of crime - Definition of "cash" is expanded to include Canadian and foreign coins and banknotes. - Restrictions on third-party cash deposits—financial entities are prohibited from accepting deposits from individuals who are not the account holder or authorized users. - Cash transaction limits—businesses, professionals, and charities cannot accept cash payments, donations, or deposits of $10,000 or more in a single or related transactions, unless prescribed exemptions apply. - Foreign currency transactions—large cash deposits in foreign currency must be converted using the Bank of Canada's exchange rate or the entity's usual rate. - Punishments for violations—those guilty of offences may face fines, with penalties for serious violations scaling up to three times the transaction amount. - Extended prosecution period—proceedings can now be initiated within eight years of the violation. - New classification for violations—accepting unauthorized third-party cash deposits is now considered "very serious." - Updated terminology—the heading of Part 1 of the Act is changed to reflect expanded requirements for record keeping, identity verification, and registration. Part 12 legislation related to financial institutions Expanded Supervisory Committee Membership – The Director of the Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (FINTRAC) is now officially included as a member of the supervisory committee under the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions Act. Enhanced Information Sharing – The Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act is updated to allow the Director of FINTRAC to share and receive information with other members of the supervisory committee. Disclosure Limitations – The Director can only share information related to compliance with specific parts of the Act. Part 13 sex offenders Expanded access to information: Both police services and other law enforcement agencies are granted rapid access to registrant details. Inclusion of Indigenous police services: Clarifies the role of Indigenous governing bodies in law enforcement. Stricter reporting requirements: Sex offenders must report changes in personal details, including vehicle information, within specific timeframes. Additional identification measures: Registration centers can record physical characteristics like eye color, hair color, tattoos, and distinguishing marks. Clarification on reasonable excuses: Certain family emergencies may be considered valid reasons for non-compliance. Disclosure provisions: The Canada Border Services Agency is authorized to share sex offender travel information with law enforcement. Expanded information access: Allows law enforcement agencies, victims, and government departments to access details for crime prevention and investigation. Offense and penalty: Anyone who knowingly violates subsections 16(1) to (5) of the Act may face a fine of up to $10,000 or imprisonment for up to six months, or both. However, individuals who believed they were acting in accordance with section 16 are not considered guilty. Terminology update: The term "gender" is replaced with "sex" in several provisions of the Act to align with current legislative language. Customs Act amendment: The Customs Act now includes a provision allowing the disclosure of sex offender registration information to authorized recipients for specific enforcement purposes. These changes aim to refine legal definitions, enhance accountability, and improve enforcement mechanisms. Need a deeper dive into any part? Canada's new government is rebuilding, rearming, and reinvesting in the Canadian Armed Forces https://www.pm.gc.ca/en/news/news-releases/2025/06/09/canadas-new-government-rebuilding-rearming-and-reinvesting-canadian Canada to meet NATO's 2% defence spending target this year: Carney https://globalnews.ca/news/11228169/mark-carney-defence-announcement-nato/ Carney says Canada is looking to join major European military buildup by July 1 https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/rearm-europe-deal-canada-carney-interview-1.7545303 Defence minister tells arms makers to prepare for accelerated federal spending https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/mcguinty-defence-spending-contractors-speech-1.7545797 Toronto man still allowed to employ staff despite owing more than $1M in wages, fines https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/toronto-businessman-owes-more-than-1-million-wages-fines-1.7554370 Outro Andrew - https://ragnaroktactical.ca/ Visit us at www.canadianpatriotpodcast.com We value your opinions so please visit www.canadianpatriotpodcast.com/feedback/ or email us at feedback@canadianpatriotpodcast.com and let us know what you think. Apologies to Rod Giltaca Remember, “you are a small fringe minority” with “unacceptable views”
Barb DiGiulio joins Party for Two to talk about the top stories of the day. Mayor Olivia Chow recommends a Chief Resilience Officer to deal with the next heat wave. John Tory, talks about the previous Resilience Officer, plus he weighs in on the province taking over four school boards, citing financial mismanagement. The Border Agency is investigating potential Iranian officials being allowed into Canada, Jerry talks to former CBSA officer, Kelly Sundberg, about what needs to be done. Touchdowns and Fumbles with Bob Reid!
NATO's secretary general thanked U.S. President Trump for driving the alliance's new defence-spending target of 5 per cent of GDP; and, the CBSA is investigating the ease with which Iranian officials with links to the Iranian regime appear to be able to enter Canada.
An evacuation in Wheatley after a foul odour is reported, the CBSA sent back six U.S. travellers who tried to bring guns into Windsor, and the heat returns to close out the week. All the evening headlines on the go.
Take your personal data back with Incogni! Use code elev8 at the link below and get 60% off an annual plan: https://incogni.com/elev8Trump Called ‘DADDY' by NATO Chief—CBSA FORCED to Expose Terror Network Linked to IranSend a one-time contribution to the show - https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=XARF5X38AMZULListen to our Podcast on the go: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/elev8podcastTikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@elev8podcast X: https://twitter.com/TheElev8Podcast0:00 - Intro2:05 - NATO Chief Calls Trump Daddy10:30 - What does this make Mark Carney?16:00 - CBSA Forced to Investigate Senior Iranian Officials Living in Canada
Send us a textI'm joined by Peter Copeland, Deputy Director of Domestic Policy at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute, to unpack the truths and myths around Canada's border security. From fentanyl trafficking and human smuggling to legal blind spots and our fractured jurisdictional model, Peter offers a research-backed, nonpartisan perspective on the known unknowns we face. What can Canada learn from its allies? Why are our legal frameworks outdated? And is our public safety strategy more reactive than proactive? This conversation brings much-needed depth to an issue that often escapes the spotlight.Support the showVisit my NEW Website! https://www.christopherbalkaran.comCheck out my Instagram/Tik Tok for daily posts: Instagram @openmindspodTiktok @openmindspodcast
Provide your feedback here. Anonymously send me a text message. In this episode, Mike discusses the Ontario Court of Appeal decision Shanthakumar Estate v. Canada Border Services Agency, 2025 ONCA 422 where a police officer continued an arrest made by CBSA of two seniors for breaching an undertaking condition based on a CPIC entry. Unfortunately, the charge related to the undertaking had been stayed but the CPIC entry had not been updated. It was only later learned, after the seniors had been transported to jail, that the undertaking had been vacated and the conditions were no longer in effect. The seniors — now plaintiffs in a civil action — sued the RCMP, CBSA & the police for negligence and arbitrary detention (under s. 9 of the Charter). Did the seniors have a case? Were their arrests unlawful? Did the police breach the standard of care expected of a reasonable officer in similar circumstances? Learning answers to these questions may help you with your decision making in like situations. Lower court ruling (2023 ONSC 3180).Thanks for listening! Feedback welcome at legalissuesinpolicing@gmail.com
Rights advocates in Canada are welcoming a new review and complaints body for the Canadian Border Services and the RCMP. A network of nine civil society organizations say the new commission is long overdue, but still falls short of what is needed. We talk with Tim McSorley, National Coordinator of the International Civil Liberties Monitoring Group.
The federal government's cracks down on the U.S/Canada border with new billGUEST: Kelly Sundberg, former CBSA officer and Professor at Mount Royal University's Department of Economics, Justice, and Policy Studies Did the Broadway Subway take one step forward at the expense of nearby businesses? GUEST: Neil Wyles, executive director of the Mount Pleasant Business Improvement Area Delayed and over budget: will the Broadway Subway see its finish line? GUEST: Frances Bula, Contributor for The Globe and Mail The First Ministers' Meeting: what was discussed between Prime Minister Carney and our provincial leaders GUEST: Gary Mar, President and CEO of the Canada West Foundation Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Liberal Leader Mark Carney unveils his party's plan for crime and public safety. The plan contains a series of measures that includes a continuation of the gun buyback program for assault-style weapons, a pledge to recruit 1,000 additional RCMP officers and train 1,000 new CBSA agents, as well as a commitment to tougher bail rules and sentencing guidelines for violent crime and car theft. Carney is joined by Liberal candidates Nathalie Provost (Châteauguay–Les Jardins-de-Napierville, Que) and Bill Blair (Scarborough Southwest, Ont.). The Liberal leader faces questions from reporters on the federal response to U.S. President Donald Trump's global trade war. Carney is also asked about reporting from the Globe and Mail that alleges that Peter Yuen, the Liberal candidate chosen to replace Paul Chiang in Markham-Unionville, has links to pro-Beijing groups. Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre announces that if his party forms government, he would reduce housing costs by incentivizing municipalities to cut home-building taxes. He also accuses Liberal Leader Mark Carney of failing to secure tariff relief for Canada, even as the U.S. offered a 90-day pause for other countries. Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/policy-and-rights--3339563/support.
CCFR Radio – Ep 183: Election in 3 Weeks? More Buyback Rumours, CBSA Union: Canada's Borders Wide Open Jagmeet Singh gets savagely owned by the Liberals, rumours of an election by March 10th. Is the buyback still marching forward? CBSA union says zero percent of rail traffic is inspected and 1% of containers while drugs […]
Join us for a great chat about Canadian and USA events not being talked about enough! Predictions about Carney, Freeland and the next Canadian PM. What about Carney's conflict of interests and the bogus polling? The Provinces and how they are handling the backlash Doug Ford... Authentic or flip flopper? Canadian Pension Plan won't even invest in Canada. Nice Team Canada Eh! Dairy tariffs already in place or is it subsidies or quality control from USA drugs? Why so much Milk Dumping in this Atlas Shrugged Canada Canada - the only country to have Production Supply Management? What?!? Borders and drugs... the 1% meme is not reality. What about all the busts and all the releases recently? Super labs? Truckers and the increase in driving schools, connected with above? Canada's non existent Stand Your Ground laws, but are they turning a bling eye? the recent CBSA border incident. Convenient timing to highlight this or just a coincidence The Canadian Rural Immigrant Program. Is this accepted by all? Support and extra content http://www.grimericaoutlawed.ca/support. Substack and Subscribe. https://grimericaoutlawed.substack.com/ or to our Locals https://grimericaoutlawed.locals.com/ or Rokfin www.Rokfin.com/Grimerica Patreon https://www.patreon.com/grimericaoutlawed Support the show directly: https://grimericacbd.com/ CBD and THC Tinctures and Gummies! https://grimerica.ca/support-2/ http://Grimerica.ca/shrooms and Micro Dosing The Eh-List YouTube Channel: https://youtube.com/@theeh-list?si=d_ThkEYAK6UG_hGX Our Adultbrain Audiobook Podcast and Website: www.adultbrain.ca Our Audiobook Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@adultbrainaudiobookpublishing/videos Darren's book www.acanadianshame.ca Check out our next trip/conference/meetup - Contact at the Cabin www.contactatthecabin.com www.grimerica.ca/Shrooms and Micro-Dosing Other affiliated shows: www.grimerica.ca The OG Grimerica Show www.Rokfin.com/Grimerica Our channel on free speech Rokfin Join the chat / hangout with a bunch of fellow Grimericans Https://t.me.grimerica https://www.guilded.gg/chat/b7af7266-771d-427f-978c-872a7962a6c2?messageId=c1e1c7cd-c6e9-4eaf-abc9-e6ec0be89ff3 Leave a review on iTunes and/or Stitcher: https://itunes.apple.com/ca/podcast/grimerica-outlawed http://www.stitcher.com/podcast/grimerica-outlawed Sign up for our newsletter http://www.grimerica.ca/news SPAM Graham = and send him your synchronicities, feedback, strange experiences and psychedelic trip reports!! graham@grimerica.com InstaGRAM https://www.instagram.com/the_grimerica_show_podcast/ Purchase swag, with partial proceeds donated to the show www.grimerica.ca/swag Send us a postcard or letter http://www.grimerica.ca/contact/ ART - Napolean Duheme's site http://www.lostbreadcomic.com/ MUSIC Tru Northperception, Felix's Site sirfelix.bandcamp.com Links to what we chatted about: https://lawyerlisa.substack.com/p/toad-mark-carney-declares-hes-european?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=1287362&post_id=156564972&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=24pqe&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email https://x.com/ZivoAdam/status/1882622185740837147 https://x.com/KirkLubimov/status/1886886719703920891 https://x.com/StephenPunwasi/status/1887253251831087263 https://x.com/davzhao/status/1886819245897474408 https://x.com/FPVaughanIII/status/1886922383665012736 Darren's Links: https://www.theepochtimes.com/world/ontario-musk-starlink-deal-revived-after-tariffs-paused-5804135?&utm_source=MB_article_free&utm_campaign=MB_article_2025-02-05-ca&utm_medium=email&est=fHbM8YKiNcqORbMPxroOCkr%2BKmLKn21hz%2BWAKOJnWUW4LoqiAJGVWeZOycO4YR8%3D&utm_content=more-top-news-5 https://x.com/bertaprouddad/status/1886947663779971542?s=43 https://x.com/guillaum3roy/status/1886595757521674504 https://www.thestar.com/politics/amid-u-s-tariff-threats-a-fight-may-be-brewing-over-canadian-supply-management/article_5f6111ae-6e55-5856-a425-a9b12c41765b.html?utm_medium=SocialMedia&utm_source=Twitter https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XrsrSe6LuhI https://css.umich.edu/publications/research-publications/over-6-billion-liters-canadian-milk-wasted-2012 https://tnc.news/2025/01/31/prosecution-budget-fentanyl-trafficking-charges-dropped3/ https://www.westernstandard.news/news/rcmp-near-swift-current-bust-calgarians-with-8-kgs-of-fentanyl/61756 https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/canada-fentanyl-super-lab-hot-spot https://x.com/carswitsonduren/status/1886891289838526774?s=43 https://www.ctvnews.ca/edmonton/article/rcmp-to-hold-news-conference-about-3-border-related-events-in-alberta-manitoba/?cid=sm%3Atrueanthem%3Actvnews%3Atwittermanualpost&taid=67a3f2e692497200012cb098&utm_campaign=trueAnthem%3A+New+Content+%28Feed%29&utm_medium=trueAnthem&utm_source=twitter If you would rather watch: https://rumble.com/v6hgb1p-outlawed-round-up.-2.5.25-got-waste-euro-carney.html https://rokfin.com/stream/57319 https://grimericaoutlawed.locals.com/post/6634265/outlawed-round-up-2-5-25-got-waste-euro-carney https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KK3LjHvDsoM
Tariffs on pause; what does it mean for B.C's budget? GUEST: Richard Zussman, Global BC Legislative Reporter How tight will Canada's border security actually be? GUEST: Kelly Sundberg, former CBSA officer and Professor at Mount Royal University's Department of Economics, Justice, and Policy Studies Over 2,000 lives lost to toxic drugs in B.C in 2024 GUEST: Josie Osborne, B.C's Minister of Health Is B.C doing enough with the province's toxic drug crisis? GUEST: Marshall Smith, Former Chief of Staff to the Premier of Alberta, and the Architect of the Alberta Recovery Model which has yielded a 40 percent reduction in drug fatalities Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
GUEST: Kelly Sundberg, former CBSA officer and Professor at Mount Royal University's Department of Economics, Justice, and Policy Studies Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Will stopping supportive housing plans solve the Downtown Eastside's biggest problems? GUEST: Pete Fry, Green Party Vancouver City Councillor B.C government remains silent on proposed IVF funding GUEST: Penny Blesch, founder and director of the Fertility Coalition of British Columbia The Week That Was in Politics GUEST: Keith Baldrey, Global BC Legislative Bureau Chief ABC Vancouver councilor speaks out on Ken Sim's DTES plans GUEST: Rebecca Bligh, ABC Vancouver City Councillor Does Trump really have the facts on Canada's border security? GUEST: Kelly Sundberg, former CBSA officer and Professor at Mount Royal University's Department of Economics, Justice, and Policy Studies The Wrap - Would you cancel any trips to the U.S or buy Canadian & Oscar nominees: which of these movies have you actually watched? GUEST: Sarah Daniels, real estate agent in South Surrey; author and broadcaster GUEST: Leah Holiove, TV Reporter and Radio Host Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
GUEST: Kelly Sundberg, former CBSA officer and Professor at Mount Royal University's Department of Economics, Justice, and Policy Studies Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
There has been much talk in Canada about incoming U.S. president Donald Trump telling PM Justin Trudeau at Mar-a-Lago that Canada might consider becoming the 51st state if $100 billion in trade tariffs would sink the Canadian economy, as Trudeau reportedly claimed. The migrant crisis in the U.S. which Donald Trump has referenced in future Canada/U.S. Relations. We found out from immigration lawyer Richard Kurland that CBSA documentation exists that illegal border crossings from Canada into the U.S. have been increasing since 2022. In Syria, the Assad dictatorship falls. Possible outcomes? Guest: Dr. Zuhdi Jasser. Medical internist in Phoenix, AZ. Former physician for members of the U.S. Congress and the Supreme Court of the United States. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Today's podcast: Jewish doctors consider fleeing Canada amid rising rates of antisemitism in their profession. National Post. Canada's former Ambassador to Israel posts to X that it's not just Jewish doctors in Ontario. The Assad regime is overthrown in Syria. Who are the rebels who managed this and has Iran lost its grip in the region is Israel's forces decimated Hamas and Hezbollah's leadership, leading to the downfall of the Assad family? Incoming U.S. vice president JD Vance has joined his university friend and Conservative Party MP Jamil Jivani's campaign for the protection of Canada's Christians. Jivani is promoting a petition he intends to present in Ottawa in February. On X, Jivani said, "We must protect Christians in Canada from governments and corporations abusing their power in our country and from anti-Christian bigotry. Guest: Vivian Bercovici, former Canadian Ambassador to Israel, from Israel. There has been much talk in Canada about incoming U.S. president Donald Trump telling PM Justin Trudeau at Mar-a-Lago that Canada might consider becoming the 51st state if $100 billion in trade tariffs would sink the Canadian economy, as Trudeau reportedly claimed. The migrant crisis in the U.S. which Donald Trump has referenced in future Canada/U.S. Relations. We found out from immigration lawyer Richard Kurland that CBSA documentation exists that illegal border crossings from Canada into the U.S. have been increasing since 2022. In Syria, the Assad dictatorship falls. Possible outcomes? Guest: Dr. Zuhdi Jasser. Medical internist in Phoenix, AZ. Former physician for members of the U.S. Congress and the Supreme Court of the United States. The much trumpeted but rejected by Canadians according to national Leger polling, Trudeau GST holiday and possible cheques for $250 for Canadians earning less than $150k in 2023 will not do anything to reduce food costs for Canadians in the new year. As 6.8 million Canadians live in daily food insecurity, including 2.1 million Canadian children, Canada's 2025 Food Price Report predicts a family of four in Canada will spend an additional $800 during calendar 2025. Guest: Professor Sylvain Charlebois. Director of the Agri Foods Lab at Dalhousie University. Roy's post to X last week: "I've had it with the vapid override for 'Merry Christmas.' If you're too fearful of committing an imagined offense by speaking the traditional Christmas greeting, just say nothing. I'd rather that than hear the numbingly meaning-absent 'happy holidays' for the next 3 weeks." He takes calls from across Canada on this issue Guest: Roy Green and listeners across Canada --------------------------------------------- Host/Content Producer – Roy Green Technical Producer - Leonardo Coelho Podcast Producer - Jonathan Chung If you enjoyed the podcast, tell a friend! For more of the Roy Green Show, subscribe to the podcast! https://globalnews.ca/roygreen/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
CanadaPoli - Canadian Politics from a Canadian Point of View
The budget cut funding for CBSA, but now that's on hold / not impacting front line staff? Social security is a scam, The Boss Mayor of EMO. Boaver update If you were able to invest your own retirement earnings in the maket you'd already be rich! Trump threatens Trudeau so Trudeau took a personal day on monday? Sign Up for the Full Show Locals (daily video) https://canadapoli2.locals.com/ Spotify https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/canadapoli/subscribe Private Full podcast audio https://canadapoli.com/feed/canadapoliblue/ Buy subscriptions here (daily video and audio podcast): https://canadapoli.com/canadapoli-subscriptions/ Sample Shows Me on Telegram https://t.me/realCanadaPoli Me on Rumble https://rumble.com/user/CanadaPoli Me on Odyssey https://odysee.com/@CanadaPoli:f Me on Bitchute https://www.bitchute.com/channel/l55JBxrgT3Hf/ Podcast RSS https://anchor.fm/s/e57706d8/podcast/rss
Rights advocates in Canada are welcoming a new review and complaints body for the Canadian Border Services and the RCMP. A network of nine civil society organizations say the new commission is long overdue, but still falls short of what is needed. We talk with Tim McSorley, National Coordinator of the International Civil Liberties Monitoring Group.
In this episode of the Simply Trade podcast, we dive deep into the challenges and complexities surrounding the implementation of Canada's new customs system, CARM (the Canadian Assessment and Revenue Management system). The inability to properly process temporary imports for high-profile events like Taylor Swift's concerts highlights the urgent need for CBSA to prioritize resolving these critical system failures before they disrupt major international events and shipments. Our guest, Kim Campbell, a seasoned industry expert, shares her firsthand experiences and insights, shedding light on the issues importers, customs brokers, and the government are facing during this critical transition. Resources: Connect with Kim: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kim-campbell-a9693b2/ IE Canada (formerly Canadian Association of Importers and Exporters): - Website: https://iecanada.com/ - Information about their upcoming event in Ottawa where Kim Campbell will be speaking Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA): - Website: https://www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/ - Information about the CARM system and resources for importers/exporters Connect with Simply Trade Podcast: - Subscribe: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdmyGU5foKm4aFlpo7Oms4g?sub_confirmation=1 - LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/showcase/simply-trade-podcast/ - Twitter: https://twitter.com/SimplyTradePod - Website: https://globaltrainingcenter.com/simply-trade-podcast/ Contact Us/ Suggest Topics Contact: SimplyTrade@GlobalTrainingCenter.com Credits: Host: Andy Shiles: https://www.linkedin.com/in/andyshiles/ Host/Producer: Lalo Solorzano: https://www.linkedin.com/in/lalosolorzano/ Co-Producer/Editor: Mara Marquez: https://www.linkedin.com/in/maramarquez85/
With Canada border agency confirming that Sandeep Singh Sidhu, who is wanted by NIA for 'promoting terrorist activities' & the murder of comrade Balwinder Singh Sandhu, is a CBSA employee. In Episode 1540 of #CutTheClutter, Editor-in-Chief Shekhar Gupta at the assassination of Shaurya Chakra winner Comrade Balwinder Singh Sandhu, his family, and their stirring 1990-1991 story, when Punjab terrorism was at its peak and over 5000 civilians plus 452 cops were killed. Read Punjab militants create conditions of anarchy, hold the state to ransom here: https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/cover-story/story/19910115-punjab-militants-create-conditions-of-anarchy-hold-the-state-to-ransom-813906-1991-01-15 Read police chief K.P.S. Gill turns the tide in Punjab with controversial and ruthless methods here: https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/special-report/story/19930415-police-chief-k.p.s.-gill-turns-the-tide-in-punjab-with-controversial-and-ruthless-methods-810969-1993-04-15 Read Operation Bluestar has no champions today: K.P.S. Gill here: https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/special-report/story/19930415-you-can-say-i-have-vested-interest-in-restoring-normalcy-in-punjab-k-p-s-gill-810952-1993-04-15 Read The New York Times' Sikh gunmen kill Hindu in Punjab: https://www.nytimes.com/1984/04/03/world/sikh-gunmen-kill-hindu-in-punjab.html Read Balwinder Singh Sandhu's Shaurya Chakra citation here: https://www.gallantryawards.gov.in/Awardee/balwinder-singh-sandhu Read the 15 January, 1991 issue of India Today magazine https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/15-01-1991 Read Blander Singh Sandy's shaurya Chakra citation here: https://www.gallantryawards.gov.in/awardee/3752
In this episode of Let's Get Surety®, we discuss the ongoing changes in Canada's importing process with Sheila Thompson of Rosenberg & Parker of Canada and Cristina Hagivreta, Surety Manager at Trisura Guarantee Insurance Company. They delve into the new Canada Border Service Agency Assessment and Revenue Management System (CARM), a timely initiative that shifts Canada from a process focused on customs broker bonds to importer bonds. Our guests also discuss the implementation process of CARM, covering its electronic nuances and practical adjustments required by importers and surety companies as the changes are set to go into place on October 21, 2024. For more information and to stay up-to-date on these dynamic changes check out the Canada Border Service Agency's CARM resource page. With special guests: Sheila Thompson, President, Rosenberg & Parker of Canada, Inc. and Cristina Hagivreta, Manager, Surety, Trisura Guarantee Insurance Company Hosted by: Kat Shamapande, Director, Professional Development, NASBP and Mark McCallum, CEO, NASBP Sponsored by EMC Bond!
Today's podcast: Canada's courts fail to apply proper sentencing to drunk drivers who kill. Criminal code permits life in prison, but most sentences in the 3-4 year range. Guest: Ari Goldkind. Criminal lawyer. Media commentator Sheri Arsenault's son Bradley and two of his friends were killed in 2012 when a drunk driver's truck smashed into the car they were driving. Sheri Arsenault has been challenging successive federal governments to change criminal legislation to hold drunk drivers who kill to a higher level of personal responsibility and with more severe consequences than delivered by Canadian courts. Her work was set to bear fruit until the 2015 federal election shelved legislation which had been approved by then Canadian justice minister and attorney general Peter MacKay. Guests: Sheri Arsenault, lost her son in 2012 to a drunk driver The Temporary Foreign Workers Program, introduced by Pierre Trudeau in 1972 is chaotic and a failure under the Justin Trudeau government. - Also, private lawyers in Canada have put in place a website where an individual's support of pro-terrorist organizations (such as publicly supporting Hamas) can be reported to CBSA as a likely immigration violation. Guest: Richard Kurland. Vancouver immigration lawyer who has advised the federal and Quebec governments on immigration --------------------------------------------- Host/Content Producer – Roy Green Technical Producer - Phil Figuerido Podcast Producer - Jonathan Chung If you enjoyed the podcast, tell a friend! For more of the Roy Green Show, subscribe to the podcast! https://globalnews.ca/roygreen/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
The Temporary Foreign Workers Program, introduced by Pierre Trudeau in 1972 is chaotic and a failure under the Justin Trudeau government. - Also, private lawyers in Canada have put in place a website where an individual's support of pro-terrorist organizations (such as publicly supporting Hamas) can be reported to CBSA as a likely immigration violation. Guest: Richard Kurland. Vancouver immigration lawyer who has advised the federal and Quebec governments on immigration Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
In this episode of TCN Talks, Chris interviews Annette Kiser, Chief Compliance Officer with Teleios and Judi Lund Person, Principal with Lund Person & Associates LLC. The conversation covers the need to know around the final published 2025 Wage Index for Hospices. Some of the key points discussed are: The rate increase of 2.9%.The CBSA is an important factor in determining rates for Hospices, and changes can significantly impact reimbursement.The CAHPS Hospice Survey is undergoing changes, including the introduction of online survey options and revisions to the survey questions.Hospices need to stay informed about these changes and adjust their operational planning to ensure compliance and quality care. The lag in reporting data can result in a delay of several years before the public sees the results of the Hospice Quality Reporting Program.Understanding and addressing patient care preferences is crucial for providing individualized and high-quality Hospice Care.Increased participation in the CAHPS Hospice Survey is necessary to gather valuable feedback from families and improve the quality of care.The implementation of the HOPE tool brings significant changes to the hospice industry, including additional questions and visits to assess symptom impact and social determinants of health.Regulatory changes regarding certification of terminal illness and the election statement provide clarity and align different sections of the Hospice Conditions of Participation.The future of Hospice Care involves a shift towards value-based arrangements and the collection of more detailed data to measure outcomes and improve quality of care. The conversation concludes with a discussion on the future of hospice care and the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead. Annette and Judi are a wealth of experience and knowledge. So join us, this is a great listen for staff, leaders, and Boards of hospice and palliative care organizations to become more educated about the changes that are coming and the tracks being laid with the 2025 Wage Index. This is timely and relevant. Guest: Annette Kiser, Chief Compliance Officer with Teleios Collaborative NetworkJudi Lund Person, Principal, Lund Person & Associates LLCHost:Chris Comeaux, President / CEO of TCN / TCGhttps://www.teleioscn.org/tcntalkspodcast/the-need-to-know-on-the-2025-hospice-wage-indexTeleios Collaborative Network / https://www.teleioscn.org/tcntalkspodcast
For the latest and most important news of the day | https://www.thecanadianpressnews.ca To watch daily news videos, follow us on YouTube | https://www.youtube.com/@CdnPress The Canadian Press on X (formerly Twitter) | https://twitter.com/CdnPressNews The Canadian Press on LinkedIn | https://linkedin.com/showcase/98791543
Canadian journalist Nora Loreto reads the latest headlines for Tuesday, June 11, 2024.TRNN has partnered with Loreto to syndicate and share her daily news digest with our audience. Tune in every morning to the TRNN podcast feed to hear the latest important news stories from Canada and worldwide.Find more headlines from Nora at Sandy & Nora Talk Politics podcast feed.Help us continue producing radically independent news and in-depth analysis by following us and becoming a monthly sustainer.Sign up for our newsletterLike us on FacebookFollow us on TwitterDonate to support this podcastReferenced articles:Story 1 - CBSA workers push their strike deadline to Friday. Story 2 - Hamilton holds people in solitary confinement more than anywhere else in Ontario, regularly breaking the limit of time for what the UN considers to be humane. Story 3 - MLA who was victim of police surveillance resigns, citing the culture of politics. Story 4 - Unanimous vote at the UN security council (w/Russia abstaining) calling for ceasefire in Gaza. Story 5 - EU parliament elections show that Europe is on a slide to the Right.
For the latest and most important news of the day | https://www.thecanadianpressnews.ca To watch daily news videos, follow us on YouTube | https://www.youtube.com/@CdnPress The Canadian Press on X (formerly Twitter) | https://twitter.com/CdnPressNews The Canadian Press on LinkedIn | https://linkedin.com/showcase/98791543
Canadian border workers could begin job action at 1 p.m. PT today if a deal isn't reached. We bring you the latest on the mediation talks. WestJet has announced a new "UltraBasic" fare that excludes carry-ons, seat choices and points. Our guest John Gradek, McGill University aviation lecturer and our callers weigh in on what this means for airline travel in Canada. Then, gardening columnist Brian Minter is back to answer your questions, and shares advice on how to make the best of the warmer, drier weather forecast in the week ahead.
Today is a super short one. Sorry. Meetings. Today we talk car insurance, interest rates, carbon taxes, A potential TTC and CBSA strike are on tap for tomorrow, and lots more. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
The Bank of Canada is finally showing a little compassion. They cut rates a little bit this morning. We discuss. Also: Alec Baldwin is getting a reality show, CBSA workers could start a work-to-rule tomorrow and TTC workers could strike starting tomorrow. The feds still won't say which MP's are implicated in the latest scandal where certain MP's were giving secret information to foreign spies. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Hey everybody! Scott has a raccoon problem brewing. It gets discussed in today's pod. We also discuss the data breach at Live Nation / Ticketmaster, A potential strike by CBSA workers on Thursday, An interest rate announcement is coming down on Wednesday, and lots more. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
For the latest and most important news of the day | https://www.thecanadianpressnews.ca To watch daily news videos, follow us on YouTube | https://www.youtube.com/@CdnPress The Canadian Press on X (formerly Twitter) | https://twitter.com/CdnPressNews The Canadian Press on LinkedIn | https://linkedin.com/showcase/98791543
We chat about some Canadian topics. What is going on with the Green tech grift, the Canadian pensions, house rental prices vs income, gov dental plans, jabs for kids in Ontario, digital inclusion and the challenge of implementing CBDC, CBSA threatening strike amidst another software implementation, and some comical government of Canada moments on video. In the last part we get into Climate Change - the movie - clips, kids and gender confusion - they grow out of it, the dangers of Lupron, heart failure, neuropathy and cancer up since jabs... To gain access to the second half of show and our Plus feed for audio and podcast please clink the link http://www.grimericaoutlawed.ca/support. For second half of video (when applicable and audio) go to our Substack and Subscribe. https://grimericaoutlawed.substack.com/ or to our Locals https://grimericaoutlawed.locals.com/ or Rokfin www.Rokfin.com/Grimerica Patreon https://www.patreon.com/grimericaoutlawed See links to the stuff Graham chatted about: https://x.com/WallStreetApes/status/1768425722467725505 https://x.com/JoshWalkos/status/1773407184933605870 https://kirschsubstack.com/p/new-survey-confirms-that-vaccines?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=548354&post_id=143114791&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=24pqe&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email https://substack.com/app-link/post?publication_id=1073841&post_id=143363456&utm_source=post-email-title&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=24pqe&token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjozNTc5MjA2LCJwb3N0X2lkIjoxNDMzNjM0NTYsImlhdCI6MTcxMjUxODg5MiwiZXhwIjoxNzE1MTEwODkyLCJpc3MiOiJwdWItMTA3Mzg0MSIsInN1YiI6InBvc3QtcmVhY3Rpb24ifQ.M-uey8WcM1AnICJoVzk8IrSu_O34DQtkzA1D_L5M_54 https://x.com/GreenThumbprper/status/1778127857534824505 https://x.com/PlumberAlberta/status/1770932796275515879 https://x.com/canindependent/status/1772435627688038855 https://substack.com/app-link/post?publication_id=548354&post_id=143114791&utm_source=post-email-title&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=24pqe&token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjozNTc5MjA2LCJwb3N0X2lkIjoxNDMxMTQ3OTEsImlhdCI6MTcxMjE1OTg3OSwiZXhwIjoxNzE0NzUxODc5LCJpc3MiOiJwdWItNTQ4MzU0Iiwic3ViIjoicG9zdC1yZWFjdGlvbiJ9.rSADQvi73v3dR2iRTzbYw_geL5PGu-94qRtlPh5PHFY https://substack.com/app-link/post?publication_id=579356&post_id=142739289&utm_source=post-email-title&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=24pqe&token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjozNTc5MjA2LCJwb3N0X2lkIjoxNDI3MzkyODksImlhdCI6MTcxMTExMjUzNiwiZXhwIjoxNzEzNzA0NTM2LCJpc3MiOiJwdWItNTc5MzU2Iiwic3ViIjoicG9zdC1yZWFjdGlvbiJ9.sgH7ssarF-c9flUQmtX1BKQHH-fpPQZYL2pF8_cgkcw https://substack.com/redirect/812a317e-7e9a-4431-ad8e-c749e6d5f97e?j=eyJ1IjoiMjRwcWUifQ.546JY9nFUTO_OtDYXDY02L-g7Q4QjzDSJSbGz0LSQH4 Links to topics Darren discussed: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88VhAPiMPrY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6fi_LqQ51o https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWLESi1wKBo https://www.albertadentalassociation.ca/cdcp/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ovsgeBcX8Ao https://doi.org/10.34989/sdp-2023-22 https://www.cppinvestments.com/the-fund/ https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/canadas-top-business-executives-urge-pension-funds-ramp-up-domestic-investments-2024-03-06/ https://www.cppinvestments.com/for-canadian/cpp-fund-facts/#:~:text=Myth%20%E2%80%93%20CPP%20is%20bankrupt%2C%20or,and%20secure%20for%20future%20generations If you would rather watch: https://rumble.com/v4oz0kn-outlawed-round-up-4.11.24-spent-pensions-and-canadian-green-tech-grifting.html https://rokfin.com/stream/47527 https://grimericaoutlawed.locals.com/post/5504955/outlawed-round-up-4-11-24-spent-pensions-and-canadian-green-tech-grifting https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JRqWcyFJEyI Support the show directly: https://grimerica.ca/support-2/ Outlawed Canadians YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@OutlawedCanadians Our Adultbrain Audiobook Podcast and Website: www.adultbrain.ca Our Audiobook Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@adultbrainaudiobookpublishing/videos Darren's book www.acanadianshame.ca Check out our next trip/conference/meetup - Contact at the Cabin www.contactatthecabin.com Other affiliated shows: www.grimerica.ca The OG Grimerica Show www.Rokfin.com/Grimerica Our channel on free speech Rokfin Join the chat / hangout with a bunch of fellow Grimericans Https://t.me.grimerica https://www.guilded.gg/chat/b7af7266-771d-427f-978c-872a7962a6c2?messageId=c1e1c7cd-c6e9-4eaf-abc9-e6ec0be89ff3 Get your Magic Mushrooms delivered from: Champignon Magique Get Psychedelics online Leave a review on iTunes and/or Stitcher: https://itunes.apple.com/ca/podcast/grimerica-outlawed http://www.stitcher.com/podcast/grimerica-outlawed Sign up for our newsletter http://www.grimerica.ca/news SPAM Graham = and send him your synchronicities, feedback, strange experiences and psychedelic trip reports!! graham@grimerica.com InstaGRAM https://www.instagram.com/the_grimerica_show_podcast/ Purchase swag, with partial proceeds donated to the show www.grimerica.ca/swag Send us a postcard or letter http://www.grimerica.ca/contact/ ART - Napolean Duheme's site http://www.lostbreadcomic.com/ MUSIC Tru Northperception, Felix's Site sirfelix.bandcamp.com
Jennifer O'Connell, Public Safety Parliamentary Secretary, Andrew Scheer, Conservative House Leader & Peter Julaian, NDP House Leader; John Manley, Former Finance Minister & David Dodge, Former Bank of Canada Governor; The Front Bench with: Elliot Hughes, Gary Mar, Kathleen Monk and Joël-Denis Bellavance.
On this episode of Tradeswork: The Rocky Mountain Mechanical Contractors Association Podcast, we welcome Elyse Blazevich, President & CEO of the Colorado BioScience Association. an organization that creates co-opportunity for the Colorado life sciences community. CBSA champions a collaborative life sciences ecosystem and advocates for a supportive business climate. From concept to commercialization, member companies and organizations drive global health innovations, products and services that improve and save lives. Here are some of the questions you can expect to be answered on this episode: Who is the Colorado BioScience Association and what kind of work do they do? What challenges and opportunities face your membership? What is the state of the workforce pipeline in this industry? How do the skilled trades and life sciences relate? What does the Colorado BioScience Association have its eye on from a policy perspective? This episode is available on podcatchers everywhere. Please rate, review and subscribe. For more information about Colorado BioScience Association, please visit their website. For more information about Rocky Mountain Mechanical Contractors Association, please visit our website.
Canadian journalist Nora Loreto reads the latest headlines for Tuesday, July 11, 2023.TRNN has partnered with Loreto to syndicate her daily news digest and share it with our audience—tune in every morning on the TRNN podcast feed to hear about the latest important news stories from Canada and around the world.Find more headlines from Nora at Sandy & Nora Talk Politics podcast feed.Help us continue producing radically independent news and in-depth analysis by following us and becoming a monthly sustainer:Donate: https://therealnews.com/donate-podSign up for our newsletter: https://therealnews.com/newsletter-podLike us on Facebook: https://facebook.com/therealnewsFollow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/therealnews
© 2020-2025 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
