Podcasts about feuerbach

Tach ihr Stromer! Die heutige Folge schreibt Geschichte, denn es ist nicht nur die 50. Folge von #VOLLHORSED, sondern Alex und Sascha werden heute mal ein wenig die Rollen tauschen - und zwar nicht im Nebenjob auf irgendwelchen Raststätten-WCs, sondern in der aktuellen Ausgabe deines Lieblings-Podcasts. Das heißt im konkreten Fall, dass sich Sascha intellektuell ein gutes Stück weit runterlevelt und in die ulkigen Lack-Schnabeletten unseres Kult-Moderators Alex schlüpft. Und der Moderations-Debütant erfährt beispielsweise von seinem Vorgänger, weswegen er 50 Cent locker in die Tasche stecken konnte, wieso er mit dem dicken Timo das Duo-Infernale auf dem Jürgen Klinsmann-Gymnasium in Feuerbach bildete oder warum blaue Tonnen nicht gleich blaue Tonnen sind. Natürlich quetscht der aufstrebende Investigativ-Journalist noch viele weitere, spannende und interessante Infos aus dem sympathischen Stuttgarter. Ihr werdet euch sicherlich eure Ohren reiben ob einiger bahnbrechender Erkenntnisgewinne. Außerdem rufen ständig Gratulanten an. Voll nice von denen. Was haben beide wohl noch ausgeheckt? Wird Sascha mit romantischen Kehllauten selbst Zwiebeln zum weinen bringen? Ist Alex nach der Show weiterhin kritisch gegenüber rechten Winkeln? Schafft Filip es endlich Hardware downzuloaden? Findet es heraus! Fun Fact: Filip schläft nicht. Er lauert. Tschüssinger - eine Folge wie ein gelungener Heiratsantrag.

La historia de la filosofía occidental en El Abrazo del Oso sigue su curso, podríamos decir que, inevitable. Llegamos al Siglo XIX para pasar del idealismo al materialismo; de Hegel y su dialéctica que marcará de forma total la filosofía hasta el Siglo XX, a Feuerbach y Marx que será quien abandere principalmente esta influencia en el pensamiento de Occidente y más allá durante mucho tiempo. Conoceremos la evolución de sus ideas pasando después por la praxis leninista y estalinista hasta llegar, en el final del episodio, a la destrucción total del pensamiento con las figuras de Schopenhauer y Nietzsche. Junto a Francisco J. García seguimos por tanto acercándonos al pensamiento occidental en nuestra serie sobre historia de la Filosofía. Si te gusta el Abrazo del Oso y quieres acceder a más contenidos extra, puedes ayudarnos pinchando en el botón 'apoyar' aquí en iVoox. O pásate por www.patreon.com/elabrazodeloso ¡GRACIAS! www.elabrazodeloso.es Programa realizado por videoconferencia y publicado originalmente el 20 de noviembre de 2022. www.latostadora.com/elabrazodeloso Escucha el episodio completo en la app de iVoox, o descubre todo el catálogo de iVoox Originals

A bespoke showcase uniquely incorporating Porsche DNA at its heart. Authenticity and legitimacy due to the family position of the company's founder and international car designer, Christopher Reitz. Design and styling cues interpreted from iconic road & racing Porsches of the past combined with Feuerbach hand built craftsmanship and ultra-low production creating for each owner a supercar that's like no other. With over 20 years of experience in the automotive market our guest can source and sell that specific exotic collector car that you desire. Some of you might know or have bought from William Ross, the founder of the Exotic Car Marketplace (formerly: Porsche and Ferrari Marketplaces). But most recently, he has taken on the role as Sales Director at FEUERBACH PORSCHE and he's here to talk to us about how you can purchase your first (or maybe your next) collector car. 

Andrea Bizzozzero"Il cibo del pensiero: mangio dunque sono"Food&ScienceFestival, MantovaSabato 1° ottobre, MantovaIl cibo del pensiero: mangio dunque sonoRadici antiche e motivazioni attualicon Andrea BizzozzeroQuando Ludwing Feuerbach, recensendo il libro di Moleschott, Dottrina dell'alimentazione per il popolo (1850), concludeva con l'ormai celebre affermazione «L'uomo è ciò che mangia», suscitava non poco scandalo. Dall'opinione pubblica venne considerata come «sentenza scurrile della pseudo scienza sensualissima moderna», espressione di un materialismo grossolano e un po' infantile. Da parte sua Feuerbach era fermamente convito della relazione che intercorre tra la nutrizione, ciò che si mangia e ciò che si è, al punto da poter affermare che «come è il cibo, così è l'essenza, com'è l'essenza, così è il cibo».Anche Bernard Stiegler è persuaso che il divenire dell'umano dipenda dal cibo, ma non solo da quello che nutre il corpo, bensì anche quello che nutre e plasma la sua capacità simbolica. Dipendendo questa sia dall'io che dal noi e dal contesto sociale, culturale e tecnico nel quale si trova a vivere, è urgente perdersi cura non solo dell'eventuale tossicità del cibo del corpo, ma parimenti anche di tutto ciò che oggi viene prodotto ai fini di una modulazione della capacità simbolica umana e, di conseguenza, della libido, ridotta molto spesso a compulsione.Andrea Bizzozero è professore aggiunto di Storia della filosofia presso la Facoltà di filosofia della Pontificia Università Antonianum (Roma). Si occupa del pensiero di Agostino di Ippona, di Jacques Derrida e della filosofia francese contemporanea. Studia come l'ermeneutica e la pratica della decostruzione possano favorire un rapporto prospettico e non egemonico alla realtà, nella molteplicità delle sue istanze e delle sue problematicità. Coordina il gruppo di ricerca in antropologia della suddetta Facoltà. Tra lesue pubblicazioni: Fare la verità. Rilettura della decostruzione di Jacques Derrida, Roma 2019; Il malessere dell'umano e l'urgenza della filosofia in Bernard Stiegler, in Crisi dell'umano oggi? Tra immanenza e trascendenza, a cura di A. Bizzozero-A. Clemenza-C. Gutiérrez, Milano-Udine 2021; Approcci sistemici, interdisciplinari e transdisciplinari all'educazione, in Antonianum 1(2021) 187-214; Ilparadigma tecnocratico nella Laudato si' e oltre, in Frate Francesco, 2 (2020) 243-272.IL POSTO DELLE PAROLEAscoltare fa Pensarehttps://ilpostodelleparole.it/

Einführung in das Werk Ludwig Feuerbachs, seine Rolle unter Linkshegelianern während des Vormäzr. Schwerpunkt bildet siene Schrift Das Wesen des Christentums mit seiner Sozial- und Kirchenkritik, den pädagogischen Reformen und seiner Milieu-These Der Mensch ist, was er isst.

Der Mensch schuf Gott nach seinem Bilde, so lautet eine Kernthese des Philosophen Ludwig Feuerbach (1804 – 1872), dessen Todestag sich am 13. September 2022 zum 150. Mal jährt. Alle Werte und Ideale, die dem Menschen erstrebenswert erscheinen, schreibt der Mensch laut Feuerbach einem imaginären höheren Wesen zu. Feuerbachs Religionskritik liefert bis heute bedeutende Impulse Der Beitrag Freigeist (53) • Ludwig Feuerbach und das Wesen des Christentums • Hör-Kolumne von Helmut Fink erschien zuerst auf Kortizes-Podcast.

Wie stellst du dir Gott vor? Sind es vielleicht alle deine Wünsche, wie du gerne wärst vereint? Das denkt Feuerbach. in dieser Folge sprechen wir darüber und auch wie wir das sehen, wer Gott eigentlich ist. Hört mal rein!

Randall shows Chris some of Hitler's favorite artists, and some of Hitler's own paintings.  *** Download slides here: https://mega.nz/file/VpllnD4D#hy3_24eqWYTHTM3SR3x2XNOACkZ57XmwC5_8kBd1a0I *** Hitler's favorite fine artists according to Albert Speer: 1) Eduard von Grützner 2) Wilhelm Leibl 3) Hans Thoma 4) Hans Makart 5) Carl Spitzweg 6) Arno Breker 7) Paris Bordone 8) Titian 9) Anselm Feuerbach (Nana) 10) Giovanni Paolo Panini 11) Eduard von Steinle *** In the book, The Mind of Adolf Hitler, Hanisch reports: "He (Hitler) was never an ardent worker, was unable to get up in the morning, had difficulty in getting started, and seemed to be suffering from a paralysis of the will."[6]  *** This episode based on Inside the Third Reich, 1970 edition, first US printing You may read a different edition online here: https://archive.org/details/Inside_the_Third_Reich_Albert_Speer ... p43 One of Hitler's as well as Hoffman's favorite painters was Eduard Grützner... ... For all departments of art Hitler regarded the late nineteenth century as one of the greatest cultural epochs in human history. That is was not yet recognized as such, he said, was only because we were too close to it in time. But his appreciation stopped at Impressionism, whereas the naturalism of a Leibl or a Thoma suited his activistic approach to art. Makart ranked highest; he also thought highly of Spitzweg. In this case I could understand his feeling, although what he admired was not so much the bold and often impressionistic brushwork as the staunch middle-class genre quality, the affable humor with which Spitzweg gently mocked the small-town Munich of his period. ... p90 Along the opposite wall stood a massive chest containing built-in speakers, and adorned by a large bronze bust of Richard Wagner by Arno Breker. Above this hung another tapestry which concealed the movie screen. Large oil paintings covered the walls: a lady with exposed bosom ascribed to Bordone, a pupil of Titian; a picturesque reclining nude said to be by Titian himself; Feuerbach's Nana in a very handsome frame; an early landscape by Spitzweg; a landscape of Roman ruins by Pannini; and surprisingly, a kind of altar painting by Eduard von Steinle, one of the Nazarene group, representing King Henry, founder of cities. But there was no Grützner. Hitler occasionally let if be known that he had paid for these paintings out of his own income. ... Occasionally the movies were discussed, Hitler commenting mainly on the female actors and Eva Braun on the males. No one took the trouble to raise the conversation above the level of trivialities by, for example, remarking on any of the new trends in directing. Of course the choice of films scarcely allowed for any other approach, for they were all standard products of the entertainment industry. Such experiments of the period as Curt Ortel's Michelangelo film were never shown, at least not when I was there.  ... Later, during the war, Hitler gave up the evening showings, saying that he wanted to renounce his favorite entertainment "out of sympathy for the privations of the soldiers." Instead records were played. But although the record collection was excellent, Hitler always preferred the same music. Neither baroque nor classical music, neither chamber music nor symphonies, interested him. Before long the order of the records became virtually fixed. First he wanted a few bravura selections from Wagnerian operas, to be followed promptly with operettas. That remained the pattern. Hitler made a point of trying to guess the names of the sopranos and was pleased when he guessed right, as he frequently did.  ... p27 To decorate the Goebbels house I borrowed a few watercolors by Nolde from Eberhard Hanfstaengl, the director of the Berlin National Gallery. Goebbels and his wife were delighted with the paintings—until Hitler cane to inspect and expressed his severe disapproval. Then the minister summoned me immediately: "The pictures have to go at once; they're simply impossible!" ... p42 Thus, in the realm of architecture, as in painting and sculpture, Hitler really remained arrested in the world of his youth: the world of 1880 to 1910, which stamped its imprint on his artistic taste as on his political and ideological conceptions.  *** Topics discussed include:  Rudolf von Alt birth of the modern world Reich Culture Chamber Abstract art Emil Nolde Eduard von Grützner Wilhelm Leibl Hans Thoma Hans Makart Carl Spitzweg Arno Breker Richard Wagner Paris Bordone Titian Anselm Feuerbach (Nana) Reich Culture Chamber The Degenerate Art Exhibition Jazz Swing Kids (1993) Fraktur https://chrisandrandall.com/ep32-does-art-influence-the-public-mind-part-3-of-3-authoritarians-and-the-cias-art-war *** Timeline: 1863 -- Salon de Refuses 1910 -- First abstract painting 1914 -- WWI 1919 -- Bauhaus founded  1933 -- Hitler attains power in Germany 1933 -- Reich Culture Chamber established with Goebbels in charge ... Goebbels and some others believed that the forceful works of such artists as Emil Nolde, Ernst Barlach and Erich Heckel exemplified the Nordic spirit; as Goebbels explained, "We National Socialists are not un-modern; we are the carrier of a new modernity, not only in politics and in social matters, but also in art and intellectual matters."[14] However, a faction led by Rosenberg despised Expressionism, leading to a bitter ideological dispute which was settled only in September 1934, when Hitler declared that there would be no place for modernist experimentation in the Reich.  Also outlawed Jazz and the font Fraktur ... 1933 -- Bauhaus closes ... The Nazi movement, from nearly the start, denounced the Bauhaus for its "degenerate art", and the Nazi regime was determined to crack down on what it saw as the foreign, probably Jewish, influences of "cosmopolitan modernism".[1]  ... 1937 -- The Degenerate Art Exhibition ... Hitler had been an artist before he was a politician—but the realistic paintings of buildings and landscapes that he preferred had been dismissed by the art establishment in favor of abstract and modern styles. So the Degenerate Art Exhibition was his moment to get his revenge. He had made a speech about it that summer, saying "works of art which cannot be understood in themselves but need some pretentious instruction book to justify their existence will never again find their way to the German people".  *** recorded April 21, 2022 *** Visit us at https://chrisandrandall.com/

Get full episode here: https://www.patreon.com/posts/marx-reading-on-65865594?utm_medium=clipboard_copy&utm_source=copy_to_clipboard&utm_campaign=postshareIn the newest installment of the Marx reading series, David and Matt discuss Marx's Theses On Feuerbach, which ends with the famous contention: The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways; the point is to change it. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1845/theses/theses.htm

A metà del XIX secolo Feuerbach disse che "siamo ciò che mangiamo". Oggi possiamo ritenere questa frase ancora valida nonostante siano passati più di 150 anni?

Episode 78:This week we're continuing On Practice and Contradiction by Mao ZedongThe two halves of the book are available online here:https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/selected-works/volume-1/mswv1_16.htmhttps://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/selected-works/volume-1/mswv1_17.htmThe previous episode that already covered chapter 2 of this book can be found here:https://www.abnormalmapping.com/leftist-reading-rss/2020/8/31/guest-leftist-reading-oppose-book-worship[Part 1]1. A Single Spark Can Start a Prairie Fire[Bonus 1, from the archives]2. Oppose Book Worship[Part 2 - This Week]3. On Practice: On the Relation between Knowledge and Practice, between Knowing and Doing - 00:36[Part 3-5?]4. On Contradiction[Part 6]5. Combat Liberalism6. The Chinese People Cannot Be Cowed by the Atom Bomb7. US Imperialism Is a Paper Tiger[Part 7]8. Concerning Stalin's Economic Problems of Socialism in the USSR9. Critique of Stalin's Economic Problems of Socialism in the USSR[Part 8-10?]10. On the Correct Handling of Contradictions among the People[Part 11?11. Where Do Correct Ideas Come From?12. Talk on Questions of PhilosophyFootnotes:1) 07:14V. I. Lenin, ‘Conspectus of Hegel's The Science of Logic', Collected Works, Russian edition, Moscow, 1958, vol. XXXVIII, p. 205.2) 08:03See Karl Marx, ‘Theses on Feuerbach', in Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, Selected Works, Moscow, Foreign Languages Publishing House, 1958, vol. II, p. 403, and V. I. Lenin, Materialism and Empirio-Criticism, Moscow, Foreign Languages Publishing House, 1952, pp. 134–36.3) 10:19[San Kuo Yen Yi (Tales of the Three Kingdoms) is a famous Chinese historical novel by Lo Kuan-chung (written between the fourteenth and early fifteenth centuries).]4) 13:05Lenin, ‘Conspectus of Hegel's The Science of Logic', p. 161.5) 25:14‘In order to understand, it is necessary empirically to begin understanding, study, to rise from empiricism to the universal' (Lenin, ‘Conspectus of Hegel's The Science of Logic', p. 197).6) 28:33V. I. Lenin, What Is to Be Done?, in Collected Works, Moscow, Foreign Languages Publishing House, 1961, vol. V, p. 369.7) 31:07Lenin, Materialism and Empirio-Criticism, p. 141.8) 31:23J. V. Stalin, ‘The Foundations of Leninism', in Problems of Leninism, Moscow, Foreign Languages Publishing House, 1954, p. 31.9) 37:38See Lenin, Materialism and Empirio-Criticism, pp. 129–36.

Sam Feuerbach ist nicht nur ein erfolgreicher Selfpublisher, er hat auch seinen eigenen Verlag gegründet, damit seine Printbücher über den Buchhandel erworben werden können. Wie genau ein Buch in den Buchhandel gelangt, was das VLB und das Barsortiment sind und wie Verlagsgründung funktioniert, das erklärt Sam im heutigen Interview. Zum Abschluss gibt es noch eine Hörprobe aus Sams historischer Fantasy-Saga "Der Meister der Elixiere".

Max und Julius Göttl sind klassische Quereinsteiger im Brau- und Gastrogeschäft. Den letzten Stoß in die richtige Richtung gab ihnen ihr Vater, der eine Brauanlage zum Geschenk machte, aber als Gegenleistung jederzeit frisches, selbst gebrautes Bier verlangte. Schließlich kam noch eine geeignete Location in die Familie und schon war - allen Corona-Unbilden zum Trotz - im Juni 2021 das "Treber & Trester" in Stuttgart-Feuerbach eröffnet. Seitdem kreieren die beiden unermüdlich neue Biersorten, bieten eine feine facettenreiche Speisekarte und eben jede Menge rund um Treber und Trester, sprich Bier, Wein und Spirituosen an. Am besten hört Ihr gleich die ganze Geschichte hier im BierTalk...

In dieser sechsten Folge sprechen wir im Anschluss an die letzte Theoriefolge darüber, wie der Marxismus Geschichte und Gesellschaft versteht. Dabei schlagen wir einen großen Bogen, sprechen über grundlegende Begriffe wie Produktionsweise, Produktivkräfte und Produktionsverhältnisse, Basis, Überbau und Gesellschaftsformation. Wir klären, welchen Entwicklungsbegriff der Marxismus besitzt, welche Geschichte hinter und und vor uns liegt, was es mit dem Klassenkampf auf sich hat und wie Evolution und Revolution zusammenspielen.Wir erheben keinen Anspruch auf Vollständigkeit. Wenn euch etwas fehlt, ihr Kritik, Anregungen oder auch Lob loswerden wollt, schreibt uns gerne unter linketheorie@gmx.de.Wir gehören keiner politischen Organisation an und erhalten auch keine Förderung, sondern arbeiten komplett unabhängig und ehrenamtlich neben Arbeit, Studium und unserem politischen Engagement. Deshalb freuen wir uns über jede kleine Unterstützung unter ko-fi.com/linketheorie. Danke!Hier findet ihr unsere Transkripte zu den einzelnen Folgen.Weiterlesen:Althusser, L.: Widerspruch und Überdetermination. Anmerkungen für eine Untersuchung.Engels, F.: Die Entwicklung des Sozialismus von der Utopie zur Wissenschaft.Engels, F.: Das Begräbnis von Karl Marx.Engels, F.: Herrn Eugen Dührings Umwälzung der Wissenschaft (Anti-Dühring).Engels, F.: Anteil der Arbeit an der Menschwerdung des Affen.Engels, F.: Der Ursprung der Familie, des Privateigentums und des Staats. Im Anschluß an Lewis H. Morgans Forschungen. (Genutzter Teil: Vorwort zur ersten Auflage, 1884)Engels, F.: Ludwig Feuerbach und der Ausgang der klassischen deutschen Philosophie.Engels, F.: Engels an Joseph Bloch in Königsberg vom 21. Sept. 1890.Fiedler, F./Friedrich, H./Richter, F./Ruhnow, M./Steußloff, H. (Hrsg.): Dialektischer und historischer Materialismus. Lehrbuch für das marxistisch-leninistische Grundlagenstudium.Krämer, R.: Kapitalismus verstehen.Lenin, W. I.: Was sind die “Volksfreunde” und wie kämpfen sie gegen die Sozialdemokraten? (Antwort auf die gegen die Marxisten gerichteten Artikel des “Russkoje Bogatstwo”).Lenin, W. I.: Über unsere Revolution.Lenin, W. I.: Der linke “Radikalismus”, die Kinderkrankheit des Kommunismus.Losurdo, D.: Klassenkampf oder die Wiederkehr des Verdrängten.Mandel: Einführung in den Marxismus.Lütten, J./Bernhold, C./Eckert, F.: Zur Kritik des Intersektionalismus. In: Zeitschrift Marxistische Erneuerung (126), S. 18-30.Mao, Z.: Über den Widerspruch.Marx, K.: Thesen über Feuerbach.Marx, K./Engels, F.: Die deutsche Ideologie.Marx, K.: Elend der Philosophie.Marx, K.: Lohnarbeit und Kapital.Marx, K.: Der achtzehnte Brumaire des Louis Bonaparte.Marx, K.: Zur Kritik der Politischen Ökonomie.Marx, K.: Brief an die Redaktion der „Otetschestwennyje Sapiski".Marx, K.: Das Kapital, Bd. 1.Marx, K.: Das Kapital, Bd. 3.Merleau-Ponty, M.: Humanismus und Terror.Rodney, W.: How Europe Underdeveloped Africa.Samaha, A.: How the West is Underdeveloping Itself. In: Peace, Land, & Bread (4), S. 18-46.Schleifstein, J.: Einführung in das Studium von Marx, Engels und Lenin. (Genutzter Teil: Kapitel 3: Die materialistische Geschichtsauffassung)Trotzki, L.: Ihre Moral und unsere (Genutzter Teil: Die dialektische Wechselbeziehung zwischen Ziel und Mittel)Trotzki, L.: Über dialektischen Materialismus. Auszüge aus Trotzkis Notizbüchern von 1933-35.

“Filzoflar dünyayı hep yorumlamakla uğraştı, oysa aslolan onu değiştirmektir” diye yazmıştı Karl Marx, Feuerbach Üzerine Tezler'inin 11. sinde. Bu sözün sol için hep özel ama bir o kadar da çelişik bir anlamı oldu. Dünyayı değiştirecek eylem çağrısına cevap verelim derken giriştikleri eylemler-devrimler dünyayı kendi teorileri açısından bile daha kabul edilemez ve katlanılamaz hale getirdi. Sosyalist hareketin tarihi o yüzden ütopya arayışlarının totaliter, otoriter ters-ütopyaya dönüşümünün tarihidir aynı zamanda. Öyle olunca dönüp yine yoruma sarılmanın daha sağlam bir yol olacağına inanmış olmalılar ki sonradan benimsedikleri yol biteviye söz, yorum, cedelden başka bir şey olmadı. Giderek tipik sol eylem tarzı lafla peynir gemilerini yürütme çabalarından ileri gidemedi. Dünyayı yorumlama işi aslında azımsanacak bir iş değil. Başkaları iş yapacak siz o işe bir ad koyacaksınız. O işin mahiyetinin ne olduğu sizin laflarınızla bir anlam kazanacak, gerçeğin üstünü sol laf- u güzafıyla istediğiniz şekilde örtebileceksiniz. Eylemin, pratiğin, gerçekliğin önüne teoriyle, lafla, sözle geçip onu örtbas etmenin, onu olduğundan başka bir şey olarak göstermenin adı İslami literatürde konulmuştur aslında. O adı zikretmeyelim şimdi.

El hombre conoce para transformar la naturaleza de acuerdo con necesidades humanas.

Nesse episódio, Hian Sousa (Filosofia - UFPA) e Gabriel Carvalho (Ciências Sociais - UNIVASF) recebem Eduardo Ferreira Chagas, graduado em filosofia pela Universidade Estadual do Ceará, mestre em filosofia pela Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, doutor em filosofia pela universidade de Kassel, na Alemanha, possuindo pós-doutorado em filosofia pela universidade de Munster na Alemanha, professor da graduação e pós-graduação em filosofia na Universidade Federal do Ceará, para falar sobre Ludwig Feuerbach, sua crítica da religião e do idealismo e sua filosofia da natureza.

La religión considera este objeto en relación con el hombre, apelando no a la razón sino al sentimiento, al instinto de felicidad, al temor y a la esperanza y a los efectos que esto pueda ejercer sobre él.

Situación estacionaria: pese a este tránsito de lo Absoluto a lo humano, y a esta limitación del ámbito de la abstracción, el hombre de Feuerbach sigue siendo —como le objetaran, primero, Stirner, y luego Marx y Engels— una abstracción.

Ludwig Feuerbach fue uno de los estudiantes más destacados de Hegel, a quien criticó asiduamente por perpetuar la formalidad teológica especulativa y abstracta en la filosofía alemana. En consecuencia, Feuerbach realiza un giro antropológico de la teología para declarar que el sujeto primero de cualquier meditación, estudio o premisa, no es Dios o el espíritu, sino el hombre.

Pues el ser personal, sólo como personal, sólo como persona, no ama, es sólo separador y repelente; la persona estrictamente considerada, no puede amar, sino solo odiar, separar, dividir, la persona para amar, debe prescindir de su estricto y excluyente ser-para-sí; pero no puede prescindir de él si no se da en ella, por así decirlo, un lugar, una situación, en la que no sea pura separación y acuciante diferencia, sino que sea lo Todo Uno y lo Uno Todo L. Feuerbach, Pensamientos sobre muerte e inmortalidad

Dios no existe: en sí y por sí, es decir, como sujeto, sino como un objeto que, en definitiva, es un predicado humano.

Einmal die Woche spielen Hamburgs Kunsthallen-Direktor Alexander Klar und Abendblatt-Chefredakteur Lars Haider „Ich sehe was, was du nicht siehst“ – und zwar mit einem Kunstwerk. Heute geht es um das Gemälde „Bianca Capello“ von Anselm Feuerbach aus dem Jahr 1864/68, wenn man so will ein „Fake-Porträt“: Denn es zeigt nicht die Frau Capello, sondern Anna Risi, die Muse des Malers. Was das soll, fragt Haider – und Klar hat natürlich eine Antwort…

Mit dieser Episode findet sich ein weiterer Teil der Reihe über die Themen des Religionabiturs. Werbung Bücher auf Amazon finden sich unter https://amzn.to/3gjEMvY --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/selbstorientiert/message

Satanic Verses by Salman RushdieSalman Rushdie is one of the great English language literary figures.  He has won the Brooker Prize for the best Novel in English and was a finalist twice. The focus of this talk is on the Rushdie novel, the Islamic traditions around the most controversial passages, comparisons with Christian traditions, and the reaction of Ayatollah Khomeini. But a core focus is upon how we interpret texts, especially religious texts.  Consider an incident in the gospels.  It is called The Woman at the Well.  Jesus is thirsty and asks a woman drawing water if he can have a drink.  She says yes and gives him a drink.  It turns out she is a “loose” woman, maybe even a prostitute.  But that aside there is a problem in translation.  In at least one African culture, when a woman gives a man food or drink from her hand, it is a prelude to sex.  In that particular translation of the Bible, there is a footnote explaining that Jesus is not hitting on this woman. Lesson 1:  Fidelity to the words as written can often be wrong rather than right.  Lesson 2: Our understanding can also be wrong, even if we have a clear understanding of the words. There is also a tension between the overarching goal of revelation (for those who are believers) and specific texts.  If the divine goal of revelation is to empower humans to achieve their full potential, then a focus upon a specific text intended to put a check on sin can be in contradiction with the higher goal if it is emphasized in a way that constrains human empowerment by overlooking  the higher divine purpose.   All believers want to know God's Will but God is often opaque in terms of our understanding.  (Go back to the podcast on Feuerbach is you missed that one).  I am reminded of what the great Catholic theologian Hans Kung said when he came to Dearborn in the 1980s and was challenged from the floor about how he had interpreted a specific passage. The person challenging him had absolute certainty about the meaning of a specific text regarding the future: Kung  said, “God does not act to satisfy human curiosity.”  Ouch!  Some of you will find this lecture provocative.  Good! I hope it is provocative in a way that makes you think.  This was a class lecture.  There is some interaction with students and some  references to readings.  Sorry about that.  I thought the lecture came out well and did not want to re-record it. Books by Salman Rushdie are Satanic Verses and  Joseph Anton.  Some terms and namesQureish, Hagar/Hajar, Ishmael, Abraham/Ibrahim,  Mecca, Medina, Gabriel/Jibril, circumambulate, Mahound, Salman the Scribe; Pantheon (a building in pre-Islamic Mecca where there were 360 gods); Taif; demiurge;  intersession; garaniq. Three female goddesses from Taif: Al-lat, al-Uzza, Manat.  Ayatollah Khomeini, fatwa.  Iran-Iraq War of 1980-1988.  Early biographers: Ibn Ishak, Tabari, Ibn Saad; Apostasy, blasphemy, heresy. One glitch:  A favorite translation of the Bible is The Jerusalem Bible, not The Jefferson Bible.  (There is a Jefferson Bible, consisting entirely of the words and teachings of Jesus, but it is not the one I mentioned). Thoughtful Comment:  Stocktonafterclass@gmail.com

Un saludo amigos y mecenas. Continuamos estudiando a Marx y su labor de demoler la Europa cristiana. Hoy con lo que llama alienación filosófica no hace otra cosa que destruir toda la tradición filosófica europea. Lo hace en bloque con los sistemas abstractos, metafísicos e idealistas llamándolos ideologías y con los viejos y nuevos materialismos tachándolos de estáticos. Es decir, estáticos porque no están consiguiendo desplazar el poder tradicional. No solo hay que borrar las monarquías católicas y democracias liberales para implantar un proyecto utópico y fantasioso; no solo hay que borrar toda religión para que el hombre sea dueño absoluto de toda su realidad, sino que hay que acabar con el acervo filosófico que ha configurado Europa: las nuevas generaciones serán educadas estrictamente en la ciencia del materialismo ateo. Como podréis ver Marx puede ser muchas cosas pero nunca dialogante. No trata de dialogar con ningún sistema filosófico y al único que aprecia es a Feuerbach. Opera un segundo giro copernicano donde todo está condicionado por la economía y el poder político. ÍNDICE: 0️⃣ INTRODUCCIÓN. 1️⃣ CRÍTICA DE HEGEL Y LA IZQUIERDA HEGELIANA. 2️⃣ LA IDEOLOGÍA Y SU GÉNESIS. 3️⃣ LAS TESIS SOBRE FEUERBACH Y LA PRAXIS. **** Música: Mussorsky al comienzo. Música soviética durante el desarrollo del audio. ***** Pulsen un Me Gusta y colaboren a partir de 2,99 €/mes si se lo pueden permitir para asegurar la permanencia del programa e incluso poder abrir otros en paralelo (recientemente ya lo he hecho con un Curso de Historia de la Iglesia Católica). ¡Muchas gracias a todos!

Mucho oímos hablar hoy en día de Marx y el concepto del marxismo cultural, pero ¿de dónde vienen estas ideas? Si algo hemos buscado transmitir en este Podcast es que las ideas tienen consecuencias, y que es muy fácil dejarse poseer por el espíritu de un filósofo muerto si no sabemos nada sobre el origen de esas ideas. Es muy fácil dejarse llevar por el río de la cultura y de la influencia de los demás. Pero conviene detenernos y preguntarnos sí realmente creemos esas cosas. Puede que en una búsqueda de cosas evidentemente buenas, como la justicia terminemos apoyando movimientos que se oponen fundamentalmente a lo que estimamos por valioso, y este proceso tiene mucho que ver con como las semillas de una idea de un filósofo muerto se desarrollan en el obrar de la gente, hasta que tiene consecuencias catastróficas a una escala social. Algo así ha pasado con las ideas de Marx, que ciertamente han cambiado el mundo. Antes de llamarse marxista, cualquiera debería saber de donde vienen esas ideas, no sea que en nombre de la justicia y la igualdad, termine esposando ideas que fundamentalmente estén en oposición a lo que uno estime por más valioso y sagrado. En este episodio empezamos analizando algunas ideas de Kant, que fueron desarrolladas por los idealistas alemanes y luego por Hegel, pasando por Feuerbach hasta llegar a Marx y el marxismo cultural moderno. Es una empresa ciertamente audaz el pretender cubrir tanto terreno en 40min, por tanto mucho va a quedar sin ser dicho. Cualquier feedback que tengan lo agradecemos. Si quisieras ponernos un tema o hacernos una pregunta y salir en un episodio puedes enviar un mensaje de voz aquí: https://anchor.fm/de-veritate/message Instagram: @de.veritate Music: Behind the Sword by Alexander Nakarada (www.serpentsoundstudios.com) Licensed under Creative Commons BY Attribution 4.0 License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Heute gibt es eine neue Folge unseres Podcasts für Themen des Abiturs. Werbung Bücher auf Amazon finden sich unter https://amzn.to/3hDXWwY --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/selbstorientiert/message

Heute geht's um Flöhe im Waschsalon, den bacchantischen Taumel des materialistischen Naturbegriffs, die feurige Liebe des Karl Marx, ADHS, studentische Solitude, die Rechte der salzigen Sohlen und bunte Kringel am Stadion. Es treten auf: Ludwig Feuerbach, Karl Marx, Herbert Marcuse, Alfred Schmidt, Sigmund Freud, Friedrich Nietzsche, Hans Joas, und der Heilige Hein. Folge abspielen

Aquí os dejamos el programa que grabamos en directo (segundo turno) en La Enredadera el pasado 5 de junio. Gracias a las más de 70 personas que acudisteis a la charla. Algunas reflexiones en torno a las Tesis sobre Feuerbach.***Para echarnos un cable con los gastos del podcast: https://ko-fi.com/cafemarx ***

Abraham Lincoln delivered two speeches that are considered among the greatest ever delivered.  One was the Gettysburg Address and one was the Second Inaugural.  Most Americans consider the Gettysburg Address to be his greatest, but Lincoln believed his Second Inaugural was his best. I agree.  It changed the way Americans thought about their country.  This is a talk I delivered to a class in the fall of 2020.  They had in front of them the speech itself.  You should print out the speech before you listen to this so you can follow along.  Lincoln had read and admired Feuerbach on how we humans generate our religious thinking.  If you have not listened to the talk on Feuerbach, and are interested, you might do that.  The last minute of the talk gets cut off. Sorry about that.  I was talking about Barack Obama's minister, Reverend Jeremiah Wright.  Reverend Wright was an amazing minister.  His congregation, which is situated in south Chicago, a very poor neighborhood, had wonderful programs.  He had educational tutoring, scholarships, jobs programs, food programs, health programs.  You name it, they did it.  I admire him in many ways.  But he had a style of preaching that was common in the Black community but not well understood outside of that tradition.  I grew up with that style.  The preacher will renounce the congregation for their sins. In my case I remember the minister saying, “You are damned and doomed to a devil's hell.”  But the renunciation was really a reassurance that you can overcome your sin and be a better person.  In one sermon Reverend Wright spoke of the tendency of people to say “God Bless America.”  The Reverend thought they were claiming a status in the eyes of God that they did not deserve.  He said, “NO!  Not God Bless America.  God Damn America!”  It may be hard to believe but that was actually an expression of patriotism, an affirmation that America could be what God meant it to be.  God is in the whirlwind and we can emerge a better nation, a nation truly under God.  But this emerged during a presidential campaign and one of the candidates was a Black man who had attended that church.  This phrase was distorted and misrepresented until candidate Obama had to renounce it.   Lincoln would have agreed with Reverend Wright.   Lincoln DID agree with Reverend Wright, as you can tell.  God is giving us a terrible punishment that we could never have imagined.  “I tremble for my country when I consider that God is just,” as Jefferson said.  Lincoln was even more graphic:  a Black drop of blood will be repaid by a dead white person.  We have to wonder how an American president would fare today if he delivered such a speech.  It was American Exceptionalism, Lincoln style. Two last points.  Reporters were keeping close track of cheering.  Most of the enthusiasm during the talk came from the Black members of the audience.  Many white people were silent.  The white members of the audience were Lincoln's base, his strongest supporters.  And every single one of them had lost someone they knew and loved in that war.  Finally, the comment by Frederick Douglass demands an acknowledgement.  Lincoln and Douglass had become personal friends.  This  unlikely friendship is  analyzed in the wonderful book Giants by John Stauffer. Douglass came by the White House that evening.  The place was packed but Lincoln singled out Douglass and asked what he thought.  Douglass demurred but Lincoln insisted.  “Mr. Lincoln.  That was a sacred effort.”  And so it was.  For those overseas, be aware that I am taking you deep into an American way of thinking.  

Erfahre mehr über unseren Ansatz: https://www.limpala.de Anna Sophia Feuerbach ist Biochemikerin und kommt aus einem Leistungsbereiten und Leistungsstarken Umfeld. Seit sie 15 Jahre alt setzt sie sich mit psychischen Erkrankungen auseinander, hält es allerdings unter Verschluss, weil sie Angst um ihre Karriere hat. 2016 trifft sie eine Entscheidung: Schluss mit Selbststigmatisierung und Verschluss. Seit 2018 arbeitet sie hauptberuflich im Bereich der Prävention, Aufklärung, und Antistigma-Arbeit psychischer Erkrankungen in Schulen, Universitäten und Unternehmen. In dieser Folge spreche ich mit Anna über ihre persönliche Erfahrungen, das Hilfesystem in Deutschland und was wir ganz konkret auch am Arbeitsplatz als Arbeitgeber, aber auch als Führungskraft oder Betroffener selbst tun können. Wenn Du mehr über Anna erfahren möchtest: LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/anna-sophia-feuerbach/ Website: https://www.annafeuerbach.de/ Im Get Leadership done! Podcast geht es um die Themen Personalentwicklung, Führung und Persönlichkeitsentwicklung. Für weitere Impulse, schau auf unseren anderen Kanälen vorbei: Blog: https://www.limpala.de/blog LinkedIn Micha: https://www.linkedin.com/in/michael-braun-367057160/ LinkedIn Malina: https://bit.ly/2UrQiJa Wenn Du Fragen, Feedback oder Anregungen hast, schreibe uns gerne eine E-Mail an support@limpala.de. Wir freuen uns auf Deine Nachricht!

Patricia und Sebastian reden mit einem der erfolgreichsten deutschen Fantasy Autoren, Sam Feuerbach über seine (Hör)-Bücher und wie wichig der Hörbuch-Sprecher Robert Frank für Sams Erfolg gewesen ist. Sam erzählt von seinem Interaktiven Hörbuch und seiner Begegnung mit George R.R. Martin. Wir lösen endlich die Entstehungsgeschichte der Weltenbauer auf, bei der eine Krankenschwester eine nicht unerhebliche Rolle gespielt hat. Und es gibt News zu einem noch geheimen Projekt von Sam und einer Anthologie über Met, zu der Sam eine Kurzgeschichte schreibt. Top Five Records: Bösewichte Shownotes https://www.samfeuerbach.de/ https://www.facebook.com/krosann/ https://www.instagram.com/sam_feuerbach/ https://www.metwabe.de/de/ Happe Kerkelings “Hurz“ https://www.dailymotion.com/video/xar2qj Twist-Tales : https://www.amazon.de/Ear-Reality-Twist-Tales/dp/B091DFGTJT Coverdesignerin von Sam Feuerbach : https://www.magicalcover.de/

Hot diggity dog! Here we go, investigating the obscure Marxist theory beloved of academics that has gone viral in the past year... in both senses of the word. In this episode you'll get an effective innoculation, for the good health of your own mind as well as the polis at large. Support us on Patreon! Notes: 1. Hedges, "Cancel Culture: Where Liberalism Goes to Die" 2. Marx, “Theses on Feuerbach,” in Karl Marx on Religion 3. Adorno and Horkheimer, Dialectic of Enlightenment 4. Tillich, The Socialist Decision 5. Simpson, Critical Social Theory 6. Marcuse, Eros and Civilization 7. Derrida, The Gift of Death 8. Brown, Undoing the Demos 9. Foucault, The History of Sexuality 10. Orwell, 1984 11. Carter, Race 12. Mitchell, American Awakening 13. Other episodes you might like related to this one: The Martyrdom of Perpetua and Felicitas, What Is a Person?, Two Kingdoms: Sixteenth Century Edition, and Two Kingdoms: Twentieth and Twenty-First Century Edition. 14. For my further reflections on Marxism and its impact, see these blog posts on The Bitter Price of Making the World a Better Place and Three Memoirs of Slovak Communism, as well as my book I Am a Brave Bridge (the January and February chapters in particular). 15. Dad on these topics: “Luther and Heidegger,” Lutheran Quarterly (Spring 2008); “The Spirit of Christ amid the Spirits of the Post-Modern World” Lutheran Quarterly (Winter 2000); “Sin, Death, and Derrida,” Lutheran Forum (Summer 2010). More about us at sarahhinlickywilson.com and paulhinlicky.com!

"Der Feuerbach ist das Purgatorium der Gegenwart“. Dieses Zitat stammt aus einer anonym verfassten, kleinen Verteidigungsschrift zur Verteidigung Feuerbachs „Wesen des Christentums“. Erstaunlicherweise wird dieses Schreiben in den Marx-Engels-Werken Karl Marx zugeschrieben. Im selben Zeitraum der Verteidigungsschrift schrieb Karl Marx seinem Verleger Arnold Ruge einen Brief, in welchem er seinen Unmut über die derzeitigen religionsphilosophischen Debatten, in welche Feuerbach zu verorten ist, beschrieb. Grund für Özgün und dem heutigen Gast Wassilis Tzallas, nach einer ausführlichen Auskunft Wassilis' zur Biographie Feuerbachs, in unteranderem Marx‘ Thesen über Feuerbach zu schauen, um über Feuerbachs und Marx‘ philosophisches Verhältnis zu sprechen und über Umstände sowie Missverständnisse aufzuklären. Literatur: Ludwig Feuerbach: Das Wesen des Christentums. "Kein Berliner"/Anonym: Luther als Schiedsrichter zwischen Strauß und Feuerbach. Karl Marx: Zur Kritik der Hegelschen Rechtsphilosophie. Einleitung. Karl Marx: Thesen über Feuerbach. Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels: Die Deutsche Ideologie. Hans-Martin Sass: Feuerbach statt Marx. Johannes Wallman: Ludwig Feuerbach und die theologische Tradition. Michael Heinrich: Karl Marx und die Geburt der modernen Gesellschaft. Wer mag, kann uns weiterhin mit einmaligen Beiträgen unterstützen auf: https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/keinemeinung

Un saludo amigos y fans. Comenzamos con este audio a tratar el bloque de los socialismos y marxismo en el siglo XIX. Hay quien piensa que Saint-Simon o Marx no son filósofos porque en realidad su pensamiento corrió únicamente dentro de los límites de la economía y la política. Puede ser verdad, y así lo afirma el prof. Verneaux aunque personalmente creo que sería injusto no calificarlos de pensadores al menos en dicho ámbito. Y la realidad es que todas las historias de la filosofía los incluyen (al menos a Marx). Hoy trataremos de los iniciadores del socialismo moderno incluidos en lo que se ha venido en llamar el Socialismo estatal (frente al socialismo libertario de los anarquistas). Nota: Para algunos Proudhon es anarquista, para otros no, habría dado importancia al Estado como instrumento de implementación del socialismo. El problema es que no disponemos de un sistema coherente de Pedro y muchas de sus ideas van surgiendo sobre la marcha aquí y allá en sus escritos. ÍNDICE 1. INTRODUCCIÓN GENERAL. Las raíces del socialismo están directamente hundidas en la Ilustración francesa, la cual le aportó los ingredientes de positivismo mecanicista, rechazo de la Iglesia católica e internacionalismo. En términos generales la lucha se establece entre dos grandes bloques: por un lado, el socialismo ilustrado, el positivismo y la izquierda hegeliana y, por el otro, los Tradicionalistas, espiritualistas y neotomistas impulsados por los papas. Hegel recibió ataques tanto de unos como de otros a pesar de que el Idealismo fue un dique de contención para los ideales revolucionarios. A unos u otros se sumaron las ideologías ya existentes, como liberales, ilustrados o católicos conservadores. En realidad el detonante para que apareciese el socialismo moderno fueron las graves injusticias que en la sociedad industrial del XIX surgieron por la aplicación del capitalismo liberal. RASGOS GENERALES DEL SOCIALISMO ILUSTRADO, UTÓPICO o PREMARXISTA: 1. La nueva moral es positivista y material. Rechazo de la Iglesia. 2. Establecimiento de una justicia igualitaria en términos técnicos y económicos. Abolición de la propiedad privada. 3. Existe un progreso ilimitado siempre que se realice bajo el diseño socialista. Rechazo de la democracia liberal. 2. CLAUDIO-ENRIQUE DE SAINT-SIMON. Nació en París en 1760 y falleció en 1825. Fue un economista y teórico socialista. Es considerado como el padre del socialismo moderno. Propugnó un gobierno de tipo tecnócrata y la disposición de los medios de producción y sus beneficios al servicio de los obreros. Influyó en Fourier y Proudhon. Concebía el mundo y los seres vivos como máquinas, concepción heredada de los Ilustrados, por lo que su planificación positiva de la sociedad la veía al modo de una gran máquina. Promovió una especie de secta de tipo masónico llamada iglesia sansimoniana. Arruinado y viendo que sus ideas no eran extensamente aceptadas, intentó suicidarse de un pistoletazo, pero falló el tiro y perdió un ojo. 3. CARLOS FOURIER. Nació en 1772 y falleció en París en 1837. Fue uno de los máximos representantes del socialismo utópico y padre del cooperativismo. Tras recibir su parte de la herencia se dedicó a viajar o escribir, pero una vez caído en la pobreza tuvo contacto con la dureza del trabajo de los obreros, situación que fue un revulsivo para sus concepciones políticas y sociales. Criticó no solo las estructuras económicas del capitalismo liberal, sino la moral entera de la sociedad en que vivió. Promovió unas cooperativas (falansterios) donde se combinaba el trabajo con el ocio, el trabajador iba alternando entre diferentes ocupaciones, las relaciones sexuales eran comunitarias y los niños eran criados en común. 4. PEDRO JOSÉ PROUDHON. Nació en 1809 y falleció en Passy en 1865. Fue uno de los socialistas ilustrados más conocidos. Influyó sobre los anarquistas rusos que provenían de la izquierda hegeliana. https://go.ivoox.com/rf/61192382 Su obra "¿Qué es la propiedad?" de 1840 le hizo repentinamente famoso en París y a partir de aquí muchos se interesaron en sus teorías. Afirma que la propiedad privada es antisocial y hay que abolirla, porque en definitiva es un robo al obrero. El comunismo no es la solución, sino un sistema intermedio entre liberalismo y comunismo. Los medios de producción y el capital deben estar en manos de los obreros para que reciban íntegramente las ganancias fruto de su esfuerzo. Propugna la aplicación de la justicia como método de implantar el socialismo y no mediante una revolución sangrienta con lucha de clases. Ni liberalismo, ni comunismo sino autogestión obrera. También te recomiendo escuchar: Feuerbach y la Izquierda hegeliana. https://go.ivoox.com/rf/61041397 La Ilustración Francesa. L'Encyclopèdie. https://go.ivoox.com/rf/35811381

In this episode, Craig, Adam, Matt, and Will examine an early writing of Friedrich Engels entitled "Outlines of a Critique of Political Economy". How can we interpret the evidently moralistic language in Engels' work in light of the anti-moralism which characterizes his later writings with Marx, namely within "The German Ideology". In "Outlines", Engels offers a succinct but brilliant rendering of how the division of capital and labor precipitate other kinds of contradictions under the capitalist system.  Also, the cast identifies potentially problematic formulations within the text seem to fall outside Engels' intended methodology.  Other figures mentioned include Spinoza, Hegel, Feuerbach, Stirner, Smith, Ricardo, Malthus, Foucault, Deleuze and Guattari. Radical Reprints: https://radicalreprints.neocities.org/History and Class Consciousness by Georg Lukács:https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/2229555618/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o00_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1Contribute to Acid Horizon: https://www.patreon.com/acidhorizonpodcastSubscribe to us on Apple Podcasts: https://tinyurl.com/169wvvhi Happy Hour at Hippel's (Adam’s blog): https://happyhourathippels.wordpress.comNew Revolts (Matt’s Blog): https://newrevolts.com/​Revolting Bodies (Will's Blog): https://revoltingbodies.com​Split Infinities (Craig’s Substack): https://splitinfinities.substack.com/​Music: https://sereptie.bandcamp.com/​Merch Store: http://www.crit-drip.com

TESTO DELL'ARTICOLO ➜http://www.bastabugie.it/it/articoli.php?id=6512LA VERA STORIA DEL PARTITO COMUNISTA ITALIANOLa fondazione 100 anni fa a Livorno, poi il compromesso storico con la DC, poi il finto scioglimento per cambiare il nome più volte, fino all'attuale presenza al governodi Roberto de MatteiIl Partito Comunista d'Italia nacque a Livorno il 21 gennaio 1921 da una scissione del Partito Socialista. I suoi principali fondatori furono Antonio Gramsci (1891-1937), Palmiro Togliatti (1893-1964) e Amedeo Bordiga (1889-1970), poi espulso e sottoposto a damnatio memoriae, secondo la dialettica interna tipica di ogni partito comunista.Nel 1917 il partito bolscevico aveva conquistato il potere in Russia, sotto la guida di Vladimir Lenin e Lev Trotzski. Il PCI fu la sezione italiana del Komintern, l'organizzazione internazionale fondata a Mosca nel 1919, con lo scopo di diffondere la rivoluzione comunista nel mondo. Nella storia del comunismo, la Rivoluzione russa è un evento più importante della pubblicazione del Manifesto del Partito Comunista con cui Karl Marx e Friederich Engels, nel febbraio del 1848, lanciarono un appello ai proletari di tutto il mondo per abbattere la borghesia e realizzare la «società senza classi».Nella «undicesima tesi» del suo commento alla filosofia di Feuerbach, Marx sostiene che il compito dei filosofi non è di interpretare il mondo, ma di «trasformarlo». Questa affermazione sembrò realizzarsi nel 1917 a Mosca, dove, per la prima volta nella storia, il comunismo prese il potere e iniziò a diffondersi nel mondo. A Lenin, morto nel 1924, successe Stalin, eliminando la dissidenza di Trotzski, che lo accusava di "tradire" la Rivoluzione. In Italia, mentre Gramsci, imprigionato dal fascismo, elaborava, nei Quaderni dal carcere, la sua «filosofia della prassi», Palmiro Togliatti, il più fedele tra gli stalinisti, guidò il Partito Comunista nella clandestinità e poi nel dopoguerra. Con l'aiuto, anche finanziario, dell'Unione Sovietica, il Partito Comunista divenne il secondo partito italiano dopo la Democrazia Cristiana.OSTPOLITIKIl 7 marzo 1963 Giovanni XXIII ricevette in Vaticano Alexis Adjubei, genero di Krusciov e direttore dell'agenzia Izvestija. Pochi giorni dopo Togliatti, in piena campagna elettorale, propose ufficialmente una collaborazione tra cattolici e comunisti (Rinascita, 30 marzo 1963). Nelle elezioni del 29 aprile, il PCI aumentò di un milione di voti, provenienti soprattutto da ambienti cattolici. Togliatti morì a Yalta nel 1964, mentre la Democrazia Cristiana, con la benedizione del nuovo Pontefice, Paolo VI, formava i primi governi di "centro-sinistra". Il Concilio Vaticano II si chiuse l'8 dicembre 1965 senza aver pronunciato una sola parola sul comunismo, sebbene quasi 500 Padri conciliari ne avessero chiesto un'ufficiale condanna.Nel 1973, dopo l'ascesa e la caduta del governo socialcomunista di Salvador Allende, in Cile, il nuovo segretario del PCI Enrico Berlinguer (1922-1984) pubblicò sulla rivista del partito Rinascita, una serie di Riflessioni sull'Italia dopo i fatti del Cile, in cui avanzava la proposta di un «compromesso storico», che portasse i comunisti al governo in maniera indolore, con l'appoggio della Democrazia Cristiana. L'interlocutore privilegiato di Berlinguer era Aldo Moro, che godeva della piena fiducia di Paolo VI e che iniziò a tessere la trama di un governo con i comunisti.IL COMPROMESSO STORICOGli anni fra il 1974 ed il 1976 furono quelli del maggior successo elettorale del PCI, che nelle elezioni del 21 giugno 1976 raggiunse il 34,4% dei voti espressi. Nel 1978, tuttavia, la morte tragica di Aldo Moro, a cui seguì, pochi mesi dopo, quella di Paolo VI, rallentò la realizzazione del "compromesso storico", mentre in Unione Sovietica, colpita da una colossale crisi economica, nasceva la perestrojika di Mikail Gorbaciov. Nel 1989 crollò il Muro di Berlino e l'Unione Sovietica iniziò la sua auto-dissoluzione. «La decomposizione dell'Unione Sovietica e di conseguenza del suo impero per il modo in cui è avvenuta resta misteriosa», scrive François Furet nel suo studio su Il passato di un'illusione (Mondadori, Milano 1995, p. 354). Senza spargimenti di sangue, tra il 1989 e il 1991, la nomenklatura sovietica sciolse la vecchia azienda e si mise alla testa della nuova. Il comunismo si liberò del suo apparato burocratico, in Russia e nel mondo, lasciando che l'idea comunista potesse esprimersi in nuove forme e modalità di azione.Il 3 febbraio 1991 anche il Partito Comunista Italiano deliberò il proprio scioglimento, promuovendo la costituzione del Partito Democratico della Sinistra (PDS). Il 14 febbraio 1998 il PDS, al termine degli Stati Generali della Sinistra, cambiò ulteriormente nome in Democratici di Sinistra (DS), una compagine che fu a sua volta soggetto fondatore dell'Ulivo, sorto per iniziativa di Romano Prodi, che finalmente, nel 1996 portò i comunisti al governo in Italia. L'Ulivo confluì poi nel Partito Democratico (PD), fondato nel 2007 e oggi al governo.Nota di BastaBugie: in Italia c'è stato il più grosso Partito Comunista d'occidente, ma sembra che in Italia nessuno sia stato comunista. Si può approfondire il tema leggendo il seguente articolo.IL PCI COMPIE CENTO ANNI ED E' AL POTERE IN ITALIA (SOTTO ALTRO NOME)I dirigenti del Partito Comunista si sono autoassolti senza chiedere scusa, hanno accantonato la bandiera marxista, ma non l'arroganza ideologica, la pretesa superiorità morale e la demonizzazione degli avversaridi Antonio Soccihttp://www.bastabugie.it/it/articoli.php?id=6322 Titolo originale: La genealogia del PCIFonte: Radici Cristiane, 12 Marzo 2021Pubblicato su BastaBugie n. 708

Wenn du als Autor oder Autorin nachhaltig erfolgreich sein willst, musst du gute Bücher schreiben. Es gibt viele Wege die Qualität deiner Bücher zu verbessern. Ein Korrektorat, das möglichst viele Fehler ausmerzt, sollte selbstverständlich sein. Ob du ein Lektorat brauchst, oder nicht, das ist eine heiß diskutierte Frage. Manche Autorinnen und Autoren haben sich für das Schreiben ihrer Bücher ein Team von Testlesern oder Betaleserinnen aufgebaut. Das sind Menschen, die dein Buch vor der Veröffentlichung lesen - teils vor, teils nach, teils statt dem Lektorat - und dir helfen es besser zu machen. In der Miniserie „Zusammenarbeit mit Testlesern und Testleserinnen“ spreche ich mit erfolgreichen Autorinnen und Autoren aus unterschiedlichen Genres darüber, wie sie mit ihren Betaleserinnen und Betalesern zusammenarbeiten. Diese Woche habe ich wieder einmal einen der Weltenbauer bei mir zu Gast und spreche mit Sam Feuerbach darüber, wie er die Zusammenarbeit mit seinen Testlesern und Testleserinnen gestaltet. In dieser Podcast-Folge sprechen wir unter anderem folgende Aspekte an: Welche Rolle spielen Testleserinnen und Testleser bei der Entstehung von Sam Feuerbachs Büchern? Wie hat Sam die Betaleser*innen gefunden, die zu ihm passen? Wann und an welcher Stelle im Schreibprozess bindest er die Testleser*innen ein? Wie viel Vorlaufzeit plant Sam Feuerbach für den Betaleseprozess ein? In welchem Rhythmus veröffentlicht Ralph seine Bücher? Wie lange dauert der Entstehungsprozess eines Buchs im Durchschnitt? Wie klappt die Kommunikation mit deinen Testleser*innen am besten? Was ist der Unterschied zwischen Testlesen und Lektorat? Wie viele Testleser*innen verträgt der Schreibprozess? Welche Aufgaben und Fragen solltest du deinem Testleseteam stellen? Wie kann sich ein Testleseteam im Laufe deiner Karriere entwickeln Warum es so wichtig ist dein Testlesen nach deinem Geschmack zu entwickeln. Hier die Links, die wir im Podcast ansprechen, und weiterführende Informationen, Tipps und Erfahrungsberichte rund um Bücher, eBooks und deinen Erfolg: Hier kommst du zu Sam Feuerbachs Autorenseite: https://www.samfeuerbach.de/   Hier findest du Sam Feuerbachs Bücher auf Amazon: https://amzn.to/2PypuYR Hier spreche ich mit Sam über seinen Alltag als Bestsellerautor: https://mission-bestseller.com/von-bestsellerautoren-lernen-sam-feuerbach-folge-207 Kennst du schon den Mission Bestseller Club, die Erfolgsgemeinschaft für Selfpublishing-Autorinnen und Autoren? Einige der Links auf dieser Seite sind Affiliate-Links und ich erhalte eine Provision, wenn du über sie kaufst, die sich nicht auf deinen Kaufpreis auswirkt.

When I would start my class on Religion and Politics, my first lecture would always be on Feuerbach.  He would give students a new way to think.  We could focus on the God Idea-  which we humans generate.  This had nothing to do with God but rather with human thinking.  We could analyze "outside of the circle" of believers as I would call it.  This is a bit of an intellectual discussion, but I have tried to make it accessible. If you think this might upset you, then skip it.  If you want your thinking challenged, then Carry On (as the British would say).  The students liked it. Happy studenting.  

Konjunkturforscher Stefan Kooths fordert mehr Tests und mehr Unterstützung für Betriebe ++ IG-Metall-Protesttag in Untertürkheim und Feuerbach

We continue our series on the Pivotal Players of the Enlightenment. Father Larry Swink and Father Jack Berard join Bill Wannall to discuss the German philosophers Immanuel Kant and Ludwig Feuerbach. --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/william-wannall/support

Presentazione del pensiero di Feuerbach. Bisogna considerare l'uomo dalla testa al calcagno. L'alienazione religiosa.

Una chiacchierata su "di tutto un po'" nell'introdurre la destra e la sinistra hegeliana. Si parla di molte cose: della teoresi come caratteristica della filosofia, della Shoah, di consigli su alcuni film da visionare, etc.Sono presenti anche alcuni cenni su Feuerbach e Marx.

Passend zu unserem 20-jährigen Jubiläum in Feuerbach hat unser Pastor Peter Wenz eine großartige Predigt über die Wichtigkeit des Hauses Gottes für die Welt vorbereitet.

Artículos de Wikipedia al azar.

En esta conversación con el profe Sebastián Hernández tocamos varios temas relacionados con el papel del conocimiento teológico en la vida cristiana. Él es un teólogo, con estudios de maestría y doctorado en teología y filosofía, profesor e investigador bíblico, y me compartió su visión de algunas de las falencias a la hora de abordar la espiritualidad, tanto en los que estamos de un lado o del otro del mundo de la academia. Hablamos, entre otras, de la muerte de Maradona, de la concepción de la belleza, la moralidad y la utilidad, de las comunidades de fe como estructuras empresariales y de lo que significa la colectividad en la vivencia de la fe cristiana. ¡Sé que les va a encantar! Notas del episodio: Artículos de Sebas en Teocotidiana: http://teocotidiana.com/author/sebastian-hernandez/ Tesis sobre Feuerbach: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tesis_sobre_Feuerbach Sobre la frase de San Anselmo de Canterbury, "creo para entender": https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Credo_ut_intelligam Juan Scoto y la defensa de la doctrina de la inmaculada concepción de María: http://www.fratefrancesco.org/esp/maria/escoto The Bible Project en YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCVfwlh9XpX2Y_tQfjeln9QA BITE en YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSkfXhOqioLNNuN6JPY6yXQ Colección Biblia de Editorial Verbo Divino: https://www.centrobiblicoquito.org/coleccion-biblia/ Temas del episodio: 00:00 - Introducción 03:11 - La muerte de Maradona, el dilema moral de separar la obra del artista, el fútbol como religión 08:30 - Presentación de Sebastián y su decisión de estudiar teología gracias a su experiencia de fe 18:15 - Cómo funciona el mundo de la investigación académica en el ámbito teológico 23:55 - El papel del teólogo en la labor de divulgación teológica para acercar a las comunidades al conocimiento bíblico 32:52 - Sobre la concepción de lo bello, lo bueno y lo útil 38:35 - Cómo reconciliar la vida de fe y el amor por el conocimiento 50:25 - Las dinámicas de las comunidades de la fe como estructuras empresariales 58:12 - El afán del protestantismo por "volver a las sendas antiguas" y el valor de la tradición 1:07:25 - El verdadero valor de los dogmas y doctrinas dentro de la espiritualidad 1:14:51 - Individualidad y colectividad en la vivencia de la fe cristiana 1:23:51 - Recomendaciones de recursos de divulgación teológica para profundizar 1:30:25 - Salutaciones y comentarios finales Tema musical: Midnight Special - E's Jammy Jams.

This is Episode 1 of Sociological Theory: Podcast Edition. In this episode we will tackle the reading from Week 1: Theses on Feuerbach, The Manifesto of the Communist Party, and The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. There are 3 parts to the episode: Part 1 covers the Theses on Feuerbach and sets the stage for the Manifesto Part 2 covers the Manifesto of the Communist Party Part 3 covers The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte You will find a PowerPoint to accompany this episode on your Learn page!

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Romans+8%3A31-39&version=NASB (Romans 8:31-39) L'amour de Dieu est folie! This French phrase translates, “The love of God is folly.” Brennan Manning in his book “The Ragamuffin Gospel” says that on Easter morning in France you'll see this phrase posted on the side of buildings, busses, and houses, and graffitied on sidewalks. The French sing it in their churches in worship and use it as a greeting when they wave to the neighbors. The love of God is folly. God's love is extravagant. In the season of Easter, we are remembering the profound truth that Jesus Christ, who was crucified and buried in a sealed tomb with Roman guards outside, is now risen from the dead never to die again. Death could not hold Him. Is God's initiative to send His Son into the world in love to save us and invite us to trust Him, a fool's mission? It does sound a little crazy that an all-powerful God would be born taking on the limits of humanity. He then would live a perfect life, reveal Himself in signs and wonders and miracles, teach about the kingdom of God, then face false charges, be arrested and crucified, though He was perfect. It seems illogical to take on the sins of all humanity and then be raised from the dead in victory to proclaim the forgiveness of sins to all who believe and the invitation to reconciliation in the love of God. Some say the love of God is folly. It is a fool's mission because it's illogical, irrational, and ill-advised. Perhaps even a wasted effort. The psalmist says, “The fool says in his heart there is no God” (Psalm 14:1). Contemporary philosophers might say it this way: The value of God is dead. It's as if some have concluded God is irrelevant. Could it be the German philosopher Feuerbach, who lived in the 19th century, was correct when he said God is the projection of human fears? That God didn't create us, but men created God in order to placate our own fears because of our weaknesses and limits? Is God just a figment of imagination to comfort our terrorized souls? Is Jesus alive from the dead? The truth of Easter's message is the heartbeat of God's revelation to the world. Paul said, “If Jesus Christ has not been raised, than your faith is worthless and you're still in your sins” (I Cor. 15:17). Ken Davis tells the story of a woman who saw her German Shepherd shaking the life out of a neighbor's pet rabbit. Her family didn't get along well with the neighbors, and she knew this would be a disaster. So she grabbed her broom and pummeled the dog until it finally dropped the dead rabbit from its mouth. Seeing the dead rabbit, she panicked. She grabbed the rabbit, took it inside, gave it a bath, blow dried its hair to its original fluffiness, combed its fur until it looked alive again, and then snuck into the neighbor's yard and propped it up so it looked alive. An hour later, she heard screams from next door. She went outside and asked what was going on. The neighbor woman said, Our rabbit! Our rabbit! He died two weeks ago, and we buried him. Now he's back! This is a funny and absurd story. Everybody knows dead rabbits don't come back to life. From a human logic standpoint, we'd also assert that when human beings breathe their last, they also don't come back to life. But the truth of the message of Easter says, Jesus Christ, who was crucified on the cross for the sins of the world – for my sins – was raised from the dead never to die again. In the message of Easter in Luke 24, the women went to the tomb to anoint Jesus' body. They found the stone rolled away and the tomb empty. Two angels told them, “Why do you seek the living among the dead? Jesus isn't here. He is risen, just as he said.” The disciples, when the women told them what they experienced and what the angel said, believed their words to be nonsense, foolishness. Luke, the physician actually uses a medical term for nonsense. It could be translated, the babbling...