POPULARITY
Officer safety is real, but it cannot be used as a catch-all excuse to control people, skip professionalism, or erase constitutional rights. We lay out what “specific facts” should look like in the real world and why the biggest skill is knowing the difference between danger and discomfort.• officer safety as a legitimate concern without becoming a blank check• how vague “I felt unsafe” explanations damage public trust• articulation as the standard: behavior, context, and observable facts• the difference between safety decisions and control decisions• lawful carry during traffic stops and why honesty should not be punished• recording, questions, and refusal of consent as lawful behavior• professionalism under pressure: tactically aware without emotional reactivity• practical self-check questions before escalating an encounterSo I'm curious, what do you think? Where's the line? Where does officer safety justify extra caution? When does it become overreach? And for the cops watching this, what facts do you think should be required before pushing an encounter further? To civilians watching this, what officer safety concerns do you think are legitimate?Where do you draw the line between legitimate officer safety and overreach?#TheGrayArea #TwoCopsOneDonut #OfficerSafety #PoliceAccountability #LawEnforcementsend us a message! twocopsonedonut@yahoo.comSupport the showPlease see our Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/c/TwoCopsOneDonut Join our Discord!! https://discord.gg/BdjeTEAc *Send us a message! twocopsonedonut@yahoo.com
Is the new Iran deal a historic mistake, and is modern America repeating the fatal errors of Ancient Rome? Ben Domenech breaks down current foreign policy shifts with legendary historian Victor Davis Hanson. In this edition of The Big Ben Show, Ben unpacks his major reservations regarding the proposed Iran memorandum of understanding (MOU) and what it reveals about American strength. Joined by Victor Davis Hanson, senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, they dive deep into the administration's foreign policy strategy, the reality of regional military threats, and whether modern America is tracking the cultural, fiscal, and border-related collapse of the Western Roman Empire. Later in the episode, culinary icon Christopher Kimball joins the show to celebrate America's 250th anniversary through our unique food traditions. Kimball shares budget-friendly cooking strategies to combat inflation, grilling secrets for your summer celebrations, and explores how GLP-1 lifestyle shifts are fundamentally altering American palates. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Ryan, Dana, and Chris Trenkmann discuss an ongoing Tampa Police Department investigation into a use-of-force incident during an arrest in Ybor City that went viral on social media. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
The US ambassador to Denmark says US President Donald Trump has ruled out using military force to take control of Greenland, adding that the future of Greenland should be decided by the Greenlandic people themselves.
This week: Burnout & Use Of Force; Mindfulness; Sex Offender Treatment; Join the free Police Science Dr email list to have these emailed to you every Tuesday. You'll also get access to the password-protected 'Read' page which houses all video transcripts and all Police Science Snippets www.PoliceScienceDr.com
On this edition of The Newsroom, WHQR News Director Ben Schachtman talks to reporter Aaleah McConnell, who has been looking into the arrest of a Wilmington man who claims he was the victim of law enforcement violence — and the laws and policies that govern the use of force by cops and deputies.
KQED has obtained surveillance video of a mass use of force incident at the Central California Women's Facility. It's the first detailed look at the August 2024 incident that resulted in the largest disciplinary action from a single use of force event. Reporter: Madi Bolanos, The California Report Another woman has come forward to accuse former California Congressman Eric Swalwell of sexual assault. Reporter: David Wagner, LAist Governor Gavin Newsom is calling a special election to fill Eric Swalwell's congressional seat. Reporter: Laura Fitzgerald, CapRadio An independent privacy audit of Google, Meta and Microsoft web traffic in California found the firms may be violating state privacy laws, potentially exposing themselves to significant fines. Reporter: Rachael Myrow, KQED Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Criminologist Guy Lamb weighs in on rising police shootout deaths in KwaZulu-Natal, raising concerns about long-term crime prevention and accountability Presenter John Maytham is an actor and author-turned-talk radio veteran and seasoned journalist. His show serves a round-up of local and international news coupled with the latest in business, sport, traffic and weather. The host’s eclectic interests mean the program often surprises the audience with intriguing book reviews and inspiring interviews profiling artists. A daily highlight is Rapid Fire, just after 5:30pm. CapeTalk fans call in, to stump the presenter with their general knowledge questions. Another firm favourite is the humorous Thursday crossing with award-winning journalist Rebecca Davis, called “Plan B”. Thank you for listening to a podcast from Afternoon Drive with John Maytham Listen live on Primedia+ weekdays from 15:00 and 18:00 (SA Time) to Afternoon Drive with John Maytham broadcast on CapeTalk https://buff.ly/NnFM3Nk For more from the show go to https://buff.ly/BSFy4Cn or find all the catch-up podcasts here https://buff.ly/n8nWt4x Subscribe to the CapeTalk Daily and Weekly Newsletters https://buff.ly/sbvVZD5 Follow us on social media: CapeTalk on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CapeTalk CapeTalk on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@capetalk CapeTalk on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ CapeTalk on X: https://x.com/CapeTalk CapeTalk on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@CapeTalk567 See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Most use-of-force problems don't start with bad intent; they start with bad preparation. We're talking with Joe Buice, a lifelong martial artist and retired sheriff's office lieutenant who has spent decades in corrections, led high-liability teams, and now serves as Pepperball's Director of Implementation. The result is a practical, no-theory conversation about what actually keeps officers safe in jails, prisons, and street encounters. We get specific about defensive tactics and why “just grab an arm” fails when stress hits. Joe breaks down the real gap he sees across agencies: perishable skills treated like check-the-box training. We discuss how hesitation shows up in body-worn video reviews, why fundamentals and repetition create fluidity, and how control tactics can reduce injuries for both staff and inmates while staying inside policy and lawful orders. We also connect the dots between training and leadership. Joe shares how strong teams are built by putting the right people in the right roles, leading from the front, and slowing down long enough to listen. Then we shift to safer options first, including Pepperball for distance, area saturation, buffer zones, and lowering the career-long toll of hands-on fights. If you care about corrections officer safety, law enforcement training, defensive tactics that work, and smarter use of force decisions, this one delivers. PepperBall - jbuice@pepperball.comLinkedIn - linkedin.com/in/joe-b-56116bb1 Surround yourself with professionals who take this work seriously. Join us Behind the Wall: https://patreon.com/ThePrisonOfficerSend us Fan Mail PepperBallFrom crowd control to cell extractions, the PepperBall system is the safe, non-lethal option.OMNIOMNI is cutting-edge software designed to track inmates and assets within your prison or jail. Command PresenceBringing prisons and jails the training they deserve!Disclaimer: This post contains affiliate links. If you make a purchase, I may receive a commission at no extra cost to you.Support the showAlso, check out Michael's newest book - POWER SKILLS: Emotional Intelligence and Soft Skills for Correctional Officers, First Responders, and Beyond https://amzn.to/4mBeog5See Michael's newest Children's Books here: www.CantrellWrites.comSupport the show=======================Support the mission and go deeper with The Prison Officer Podcast on Patreon. Behind the Wall, you will get exclusive content, behind-the-scenes insights, leadership discussions, and tools designed for correctional professionals who want to grow, lead, and perform at a higher level.
Last week, the US Supreme Court reversed the 2nd Circuit and dismissed a use of non-deadly force lawsuit regarding use of force against a protester. We examine that ruling today.
Trump calls out Joe Kent. Democrats continue to peddle dishonest arguments about the SAVE Act. // Big Local: The Tacoma News Tribune says use of force against people of color in Pierce County is too high. A suspect with 97 prior arrests was taken into custody in Thurston County. The Seattle Area Feline Rescue in Shoreline is throwing a ‘Kitten Shower.’ // You Pick the Topic: Young people and boomers are talking to each other to treat loneliness.
In this episode of NucleCast, Professor Dakota Rudesill, Esq. examines the legal boundaries that govern the use of military force, with a particular focus on the United States and Iran. Drawing on constitutional law, international law, and decades of historical precedent, Rudesill unpacks who truly holds the authority to take the nation to war—and under what conditions.The conversation explores the President's powers of self‑defense, Congress's constitutional role in declaring war, and how the War Powers Resolution of 1973 has shaped (and complicated) modern U.S. military action. From “operations less than war” to undeclared conflicts and contested legal justifications, Rudesill explains how legal gray areas have expanded over time—and why the rule of law remains essential to maintaining democratic accountability and global stability. This episode offers a clear, rigorous look at how law, power, and nuclear‑era decision‑making intersect in moments of crisis.Socials:Follow on Twitter at @NucleCastFollow on LinkedIn: https://linkedin.com/company/nuclecastpodcastSubscribe RSS Feed: https://rss.com/podcasts/nuclecast-podcast/Rate: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/nuclecast/id1644921278Email comments and topic/guest suggestions to NucleCast@anwadeter.org
Before reacting to a viral clip or choosing a political side, there's a more important question: what does the law say? Public debates about police use of force often begin with a short video, a headline, or a social media narrative, but the legal standards that govern these moments were defined decades ago by the Supreme Court and they're far more complex than most public discussions suggest. In this episode, Justin Yentes is joined by self-defense attorney Joey Hamby and former LEO Matt Browning to break down the constitutional framework behind use-of-force cases. They examine the landmark Supreme Court decisions that courts rely on when determining whether force was lawful and how those standards are applied in real-world situations where officers must make split-second decisions. Key Topics: The three main factors courts use when analyzing police use of force How courts evaluate split-second decisions made in dangerous situations Why police training, departmental policy, and institutional accountability matter How media incentives and public outrage can distort complex legal cases Why transparency and fairness are essential to public trust in the justice system This episode is for listeners who want to understand how the law evaluates use-of-force cases, rather than relying on viral clips or political commentary. It may challenge assumptions about how courts view police actions, how civil rights claims work, and why legal standards often look very different from the debates playing out online. Make sure that you follow the show and subscribe to the YouTube channel so you never miss an update! Follow Justin Yentes: @truthbefoundpodcast Link to Justin's agency, AIA: https://azprivateinvestigator.com/ Follow Matt: https://www.instagram.com/matsonbrowning/ Matt Browning's book: https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-hate-next-door-undercover-within-the-new-face-of-white-supremacy-matson-browning/964fba3e77e39704?affiliate=1713&ean=9781728276632&next=t&singleFormat=true Joey Hamby, Attorney: https://attorneysforfreedom.com/teammember/joey-hamby/ Graham v. Connor: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/490/386/ Tennessee v. Garner: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/471/1/ Statue 42 U.S.C. § 1983 — Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/1983 Fourteenth Amendment: https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-14/
Judicial Limits and Political Checks on Presidential War-Making Power John Yu argues that elections, rather than courts or the War Powers Resolution, serve as the primary constitutional check on a president's use of force. (4)11865 Roger Taney
Today's Poll Question at Smerconish.com: "When should the use of force against Iran end? a) Now; b) When Iran's military and nukes are neutralized; c)When Iran's regime changes; or d) Both B and C." As new polling shows most Americans oppose military action against Iran, the White House and its allies argue the strike was preemptive and defensive—designed to prevent greater casualties if Israel were attacked. Michael breaks down fresh data, examines the administration's justification, and questions whether the U.S. faced a direct imminent threat or acted to shield Israel from one. Listen here and cast your vote to join the debate, and please rate, review, and share this podcast! Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See https://pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
The George Zimmerman trial about the death of Trayvon Martin reshaped national conversations on self-defense, race, and the legal system. Beyond the headlines, the case was far more complex. In this episode, Justin discusses it all with Dennis Root, a nationally recognized use-of-force expert and key witness in the Zimmerman trial. He breaks down the forensic evidence, media misconceptions, and what the public still gets wrong about high-profile cases like this. Key Points: Understand what constitutes “reasonable” use of force in self-defense situations. What it feels like to fear for your life and how biology and training take over. Why expert witnesses are crucial in helping juries and judges interpret evidence. Stand Your Ground vs. Self-Defense: Learn how these legal concepts apply. This episode cuts through the noise, offering a deeper understanding of use-of-force and self-defense, media distortion, and the complexities of cases that become national conversations. Listen now for a peek behind the curtain of this trial through the eyes of an expert witness. Follow Justin and the pod: @truthbefoundpodcast Link to Justin's agency, AIA: https://azprivateinvestigator.com/ Dennis's website with links to his training courses and podcast: Force Concepts Training & Consulting - myfctc.com
Text a Message to the ShowHow would a defensive tactics class in the police academy be different for a combat veteran than for someone without that experience? Today's guest Dennis Kleyh. Sgt Major Kleyh spent 30 years with the Marine Corps and is now a police captain, with over twenty years of teaching defensive tactics in both settings. Today we talk about how the combat mindset is different than policing and why some people have trouble regaining control when the things get real. We talk about how to train people who have never been in a fight before and why we all might benefit if some people were just punched in the face.Music is by National Sweetheart and by Chris HaugenHey Chaplain Podcast Episode 135Tags:Police, Calm, Defensive Tactics, Discipline, EID, Instructors, Leadership, Marines, Military Service, Self-Control, Training, USMC, Use of Force, Veterans, Missouri, Afghanistan, IraqSupport the showThanks for Listening! And, as always, pray for peace in our city.Subscribe/Follow here: Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/hey-chaplain/id1570155168 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/2CGK9A3BmbFEUEnx3fYZOY Email us at: heychaplain44@gmail.comYou can help keep the show ad-free by buying me a virtual coffee!https://www.buymeacoffee.com/heychaplain
China's ambassador to the United Nations has expressed concern over the situation in the Middle East. Permanent representative Fu Cong stressed that China opposes and condemns the use or threat of force in international relations.
Summary: In this conversation, Dr. Rick Parent discusses the complexities surrounding police use of force, the role of civilian oversight, and the importance of clear communication in maintaining public trust. He emphasizes the need for context and perspective in understanding police actions, the dangers faced by officers, and the significance of de-escalation techniques. The discussion also highlights the impact of mental health on policing and the necessity for a national approach to civilian oversight to improve accountability and public safety.Takeaways:• The most dangerous moment for a police officer is often routine calls.• Civilian oversight can either strengthen or undermine public trust.• There are several ways in which civilian oversight agencies need to improve their practices to help enhance public confidence.• Canadian police are reluctant users of deadly force compared to the U.S.• Clear communication is essential for public understanding of police actions.• Context is crucial in evaluating police use of force incidents.• The media often vilifies police without understanding the full story.• Timely responses from oversight agencies are critical for public trust.• Policing is an unpredictable and dangerous occupation.• De-escalation techniques are vital but should not compromise officer safety.• Mental health issues significantly impact police interactions with the public.
On Episode 51 of the Executive Perspective, special guest Retired Deputy Chief Mike Marino and Rob delve into the recent decision of Judge Guy Mitchell to find Sgt Erik Duran guilty of second degree manslaughter. Sentencing will be March 19th 2026 and we will discuss the possible decision by the same judge who found him guilty, as well as training within the NYPD and the implications of relying on instinct. The incident involved an on duty sergeant throwing a cooler at a fleeing perpetrator on a scooter causing the scooter and the male to crash. The male succumbed to his injuries. The discussion will also cover the NYPD's response to the recent water rescues in Jamaica Bay, including the resulting training for the members on patrol. Also discussed will be the impact of the recent reduction in overtime mandated by the city on the attrition rate that the NYPD is experiencing. Join the live chat for an engaging discussion ️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! https://streamyard.com/pal/d/5689366474915840 Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
Today is Tuesday, February 17. Here are the latest headlines from the Fargo, North Dakota area. InForum Minute is produced by Forum Communications and brought to you by reporters from The Forum of Fargo-Moorhead and WDAY TV. For more news from throughout the day, visit InForum.com.
The White House border czar Tom Homan announced that at least 1,000 federal officers have left Minnesota as their ICE surge operation in the state comes to a close. That's according to an interview with CBS News Sunday. Homan said several hundred more will leave today and tomorrow. In the weeks that ICE agents were here at peak numbers, hundreds of reports of civil rights violations from protestors, legal observers, and other Minnesotans piled up at the office of the ACLU of Minnesota. They are still busy collecting and sorting accounts, and this past Friday the organization added the stories of more than 80 Minnesotans in a lawsuit against the federal government. John Boehler is policy counsel at the ACLU of Minnesota and he joined Minnesota Now to talk about what's next.
020326 public forum Trump administrations' "violent attacks and disproportionate use of force." by The News with Paul DeRienzo
In a forum on federal agents' use of force in Trump's immigration crackdown, Democratic lawmakers heard from Americans who have been directly affected. No officials from the Department of Homeland Security appeared at Tuesday's forum on Capitol Hill. Amna Nawaz speaks with Janet Napolitano, who served as DHS secretary in the Obama administration, for more. PBS News is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy
Comprehensive coverage of the day's news with a focus on war and peace; social, environmental and economic justice. Democrats rally to call for impeachment of Homeland Security Secretary Noem over ICE use of force; Witnesses tell House committee of ICE terrorizing US citizens, leaving people injured and labelled “terrorists”; NY Attorney General to deploy legal observers to monitor federal immigration enforcement action in state; World Health Organization launches $1 Billion appeal to aid people in humanitarian crises; Trump demands Harvard pay $1 Billion, saying university “behaving very badly”; Hamburg Opera premieres “Monsters' Paradise” featuring president-king in gilded oval office, aides sing “nobody has such high numbers as you” The post Democrats call for impeachment of DHS Secretary Noem over ICE use of force; House committee witnesses describe ICE terrorizing citizens – February 3, 2026 appeared first on KPFA.
http://www.mofpodcast.com/http://www.pbnfamily.comhttps://www.facebook.com/matteroffactspodcast/https://www.facebook.com/groups/mofpodcastgroup/https://rumble.com/user/Mofpodcastwww.youtube.com/user/philrabhttps://www.instagram.com/mofpodcasthttps://twitter.com/themofpodcasthttps://www.cypresssurvivalist.org/Support the showMerch at: https://southerngalscrafts.myshopify.com/Shop at Amazon: http://amzn.to/2ora9riPatreon: https://www.patreon.com/mofpodcastPurchase American Insurgent by Phil Rabalais: https://amzn.to/2FvSLMLShop at MantisX: http://www.mantisx.com/ref?id=173*The views and opinions of guests do not reflect the opinions of Phil Rabalais, Andrew Bobo, Nic Emricson, or the Matter of Facts Podcast*America is on fire again with a raging debate around law enforcement use of force, what is reasonable, what is excessive, and where the responsibility lies when an officer uses lethal force. Trek from the Michigan Defensive Firearms Institute, well known for his expertise and candor around use of force, joins the MoF boys to debate what is happenning in Minneapolis.Matter of Facts is now live-streaming our podcast on our YouTube channel, Facebook page, and Rumble at 7:30 PM Central on Thursdays . See the links above, join in the live chat, and see the faces behind the voices. Intro and Outro Music by Phil Rabalais All rights reserved, no commercial or non-commercial use without permission of creator prepper, prep, preparedness, prepared, emergency, survival, survive, self defense, 2nd amendment, 2a, gun rights, constitution, individual rights, train like you fight, firearms training, medical training, matter of facts podcast, mof podcast, reloading, handloading, ammo, ammunition, bullets, magazines, ar-15, ak-47, cz 75, cz, cz scorpion, bugout, bugout bag, get home bag, military, tactical
Welcome to this explosive, comprehensive episode of Light ‘Em Up.As we come to air with this episode, another person has been shot and killed in Minneapolis, MN, this time by Border Patrol agents. The tension and the stakes in the streets couldn't be any higher.Tonight, we shine the antiseptic light of the truth and examine in-depth the killing of Renee Good, 37, mother of 3, by an Immigration & Customs Enforcement Officer during a large immigration enforcement operation in Minneapolis on January 7th.As Minnesota state officials demand an end to the Trump administration's divisive, brutal “immigration crackdown” in Minnesota:Renee Good should still be alive today. This episode confronts the deadly consequences of deploying federal officers into U.S. cities as a political ploy rather than a public‑safety necessity. When federal power is used as a stage prop, communities become collateral damage, and human lives become expendable.In this episode:— We'll examine what the landmark Supreme Court decision Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (1989) is and what is says, as it will certainly be applied to this case. — We'll introduce the legal concept of “officer induced jeopardy” which argues that police officers should be held liable—criminally or civilly—when their own, unjustifiable, or reckless tactical choices create a dangerous situation that forces them to use deadly force. It posits that police cannot intentionally escalate a situation to a point of fatal risk and then justify shooting as self-defense.We dig deeper into the Supreme Court-crafted “qualified immunity” concept.As we examine the authority of the police to use force -- as it represents one of the most misunderstood powers granted to representatives of law enforcement by the public at large -- we will ferret out just what is meant in this process by being “objectively reasonable”, again, which very few people outside of legal scholars truly understand.— And we'll analyze and break down frame by frame the fateful shooting.The Feds have failed to cooperate with Minnesota officials as countless details remain in dispute. President Trump, just moments after the shooting, already put his thumb on the scales of justice by saying that the “agents had acted in self-defense”.This comes from a man who has lied on and vehemently demonized innocent immigrants who were in this country legally and in a legal and protected status in Springfield, Ohio, saying that they were “eating the dogs and the cats” there. Through careful reporting, historical context, and a clear-eyed look at the federal government's expanding use of force, this episode asks a fundamental question: What happens when political theater is backed by a gun and a badge?There is an epidemic of moral cowardice in this country. No one is safe from ICE.Many people probably believed that even in “Trump's America”, citizens would still have inviolable liberties to stand up to the jack-booted, masked agents who have swarmed upon the communities where they call home.This is what happens when the Federal government sends troops into our cities.Did anyone learn anything from the tragic events at Kent State University on May 4th, 1970?All of our “rights” have been eroded. How does that sit with you? Is this what you voted for?We've got “on the scene audio” as it was happening.We've got boots on the ground in Minneapolis. Tune in to our sponsors Newsly & Feedspot! We want to hear from you! We want to hear from you!Support the show
Sarah, Evan, Paul, and Ken look extensively at the dramatic events with ICE and Border Patrol in Minnesota asking questions about the right use of force, the legitimacy of deportations, and whether the two deaths there were justified or preventable. We also look at a suggestion for a national divorce and a breaking story in the Charismatic world involving the downfall of at least one big name.
FREDDIE MERC'S GUN WERCS WILL PARKER TRT: 26:42 GUN RIGHTS/CONCEAL CARRY LAW/LEGAL USE OF FORCE/POLICE INTERACTION
A real-time legal breakdown of the Minneapolis Border Patrol shooting that left a man dead—what happened in the video, what officers are allowed to do under the law, and why “intent” isn't the deciding factor when deadly force is used.You'll hear attorney Andrew Branca (Law of Self Defense / The Branca Show) walk you through the key moments: interference with officers, resisting arrest, the role of “reasonable perception,” how fast multi-officer shootings unfold, and why comparisons to other high-profile cases don't always fit.#minneapolis #ice #borderpatrol #useofforce #alexpretti #breakingnews #policebodycamera #civilunrest #insurrectionact
In this episode, we break down the fatal Minneapolis ICE-related shooting that left 37-year-old ICU nurse Alex Pretti dead during a federal immigration enforcement operation. Federal officials say Pretti was armed and that agents acted in self-defense, but multiple witness videos and eyewitness accounts appear to contradict key parts of the official narrative. We walk through the timeline of what happened, what the Department of Homeland Security claims, and what the footage seems to show, including moments where Pretti appears to be filming and attempting to help others during the encounter. With two federal agents firing shots and national attention now focused on the case, we examine whether this was a justified use of force or another example of federal agents escalating a situation that turned deadly. As investigations continue and political pressure mounts, this case has become a flashpoint in the national debate over immigration enforcement, civil liberties, and the use of deadly force. Tonight, we separate fact from spin and ask the question many Americans are asking, was the killing of Alex Pretti justified?Visit our merch store
The tragic death of Renee Good following a confrontation with ICE Agents has raised many questions about the use of force, immunity for federal agents, and what comes next. We discuss the legal framework that will be applied in this controversial case.Check out our new True Crime Substack the True Crime Times Get Prosecutors Podcast Merch Join the Gallery on Facebook Follow us on TwitterFollow us on Instagram Check out our website for case resources: Hang out with us on TikTokSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
OneLegUpAlex Update- Belli Bombs Are Back, Trump Rules Out Use of Force in Greenland , Happy Birthday to PAPA 1-21-26
This true crime breaking news story centers on the fatal ICE operation in Minnesota that has ignited national controversy, political division, and intense media scrutiny following the death of Renee Good. As videos of the encounter spread rapidly across social media, major outlets including the New York Times and Washington Post amplified public reaction before investigators had the opportunity to complete a full use-of-force review. At the heart of this case is the legal standard known as Graham v. Connor, a Supreme Court ruling that governs how law enforcement actions are evaluated during rapidly unfolding and dangerous situations. The standard does not rely on hindsight or emotional reaction but instead examines whether an officer's actions were objectively reasonable based on the threat perceived in the moment.Federal authorities have confirmed that the FBI is leading the shooting investigation, supported by specialized teams composed of tactical operators, firearms instructors, and former SWAT personnel with extensive experience analyzing officer-involved shootings. Their role is to reconstruct the event second by second, analyzing body camera footage, civilian video, angles of fire, and timing between shots. This process is designed to determine whether the agents believed they or others were facing imminent death or serious bodily harm and whether their response met constitutional standards.The case has also reignited debate over ICE enforcement, masked agents, and immigration arrests. Law enforcement experts note that federal agents increasingly conceal their identities due to documented threats, doxxing incidents, and harassment targeting officers and their families. Officials emphasize that ICE agents do not create immigration law but are tasked with enforcing it, often targeting individuals linked to violent crimes, gang activity, trafficking operations, and drug distribution networks.As the investigation unfolds, multiple agencies including DHS and state authorities are expected to issue independent findings, with a grand jury review likely. For now, the Renee Good case stands as a stark reminder of the complexity surrounding police use of force, the speed at which public narratives form, and the legal frameworks that ultimately determine accountability. This developing true crime story continues to raise urgent questions about enforcement, perception, and justice in America.#ReneeGood #ICEShooting #MinnesotaNews #FBIInvestigation #GrahamVsConnor #TrueCrimeNews #BreakingNews #LawEnforcement #UseOfForce #Justice
On this episode of New York's Finest : Retired & Unfiltered Podcast John, Eric & Marlon analyze the videos of the ICE shooting in Minnesota that cost Renee Nicole Good her life. They discuss whether or not the shooting is Justified in their usual unfiltered straight to the point manner. ️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! https://streamyard.com/pal/d/5689366474915840 Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
On this new episode of THE POLITICRAT daily podcast Omar Moore takes Jim Acosta to task on a couple of racist statements. Also: A fulsome analysis of the Department Of Homeland Security policy on use of force, last updated in 2023. ICE executioner Jonathan Ross violated at least two provisions of it. Plus: News and an important analysis by the New York Times on the last seconds of Renee Nicole Good's life.WARNING: This episode contains foul language, racist epithets, sounds of gunshots and screaming. Listener discretion is advised.Recorded January 10, 2026.MUST-READ: The 2023 Dept. Of Homeland Security Use Of Force Policy - violated by Jonathan Rosshttps://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/2023-02/23_0206_s1_use-of-force-policy-update.pdfJim Acosta's January 9, 2026 show in full: https://jimacosta.substack.com/p/breaking-news-new-video-in-ice-killing?publication_id=3775894&post_id=184065268&r=275tyr&triedRedirect=trueSUBSCRIBE: https://mooreo.substack.comSUBSCRIBE: https://youtube.com/@thepoliticratpodSUBSCRIBE: https://politicrat.substack.comBUY MERCH FROM THE POLITICRAT STORE: https://the-politicrat.myshopify.comBUY BLACK!Patronize Black-owned businesses on Roland Martin's Black Star Network: https://shopblackstarnetwork.comBLACK-OWNED MEDIA MATTERS: (Watch Roland Martin Unfiltered daily M-F 6-8pm Eastern)https://youtube.com/rolandsmartin
The American Radicals Podcast provides a primer on law enforcement deadly force policy and applies the "use of force" continuum to the DOJ's Epstein transparency failure, National Guard troops in big cities, and rogue federal judges. https://archive.ph/9oFmF https://archive.ph/ZOXmr https://nypost.com/2025/12/31/us-news/trump-removing-national-guard-from-chicago-portland-and-los-angeles-warns-we-will-come-back-stronger/?utm_campaign=129541854-The%20LOOP&utm_medium=email&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-_-gEN5swgerMnnzLPljCjTLZXLtBd2q760vHGbey2can11FDur1CqA9H-3YInTTDLMlikKsUf0DxlnBXy17bT45SrhJQ&_hsmi=20438755&utm_content=20438755&utm_source=hs_email
Jason talks with attorney Joe Tamburino about today's shooting of a protester by an ICE agent, and how investigators will go about determining if it was an appropriate use of force.
A split‑second decision lives in a world your camera can't fully see. That's where we spend this episode, with Force Science's Von Kliem guiding us through how the brain actually works under threat and what that means for accountability, policy, and courtroom truth.We start with the mission: honest accountability grounded in human performance. Von breaks down why perception, cognition, and environment shape both police and civilian choices, and how de‑escalation succeeds only when conditions allow it. From there, we dig into why bodycams aren't eyes. Surveillance systems drop frames, bodycams distort angles and time, and a missing 0.56 seconds can erase a punch or a pre‑attack cue. You'll hear a Montana case where video “proved” no swing, until a frame‑level analysis changed everything. We unpack the gap between deciding to fire and the moment a shot breaks, why warnings are “when feasible” and often not, and how asking for movement can invite danger.In court, opposing experts increasingly invoke “generally accepted practices” that aren't real standards. We examine how that reframes the rules mid‑trial, how prosecutors should handle reasonable doubt ethically, and why juries deserve better than freeze‑frames and hindsight. We also walk through a real‑time bodycam review: a wrong‑way pursuit, a fleeing suspect waving a gun at drivers, and the principles that govern immediate threats. Along the way, you'll learn why “don't move” is the smarter command, how imputed knowledge from air support and dispatch matters, and why audio often tells more truth than video.If you carry a firearm, this conversation is a blueprint: invest in decision making, not just draw speed. Know the law of self‑defense, get insurance that stands by you before the facts look tidy, and train for recognition, avoidance, and control of your own attention. If you lead, legislate, or report, build processes that respect science: scrutinize video provenance, understand frame construction, and resist narratives that travel faster than facts. Subscribsend us a message! twocopsonedonut@yahoo.comPeregrine.io: Turn your worst detectives into Sherlock Holmes, head to Peregrine.io tell them Two Cops One Donut sent you or direct message me and I'll get you directly connected and skip the salesmen.Support the showPlease see our Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/c/TwoCopsOneDonut Join our Discord!! https://discord.gg/BdjeTEAc *Send us a message! twocopsonedonut@yahoo.com
LAPD has blown past state deadlines to report use of force during protests. L.A. County is bringing back a suicide hotline for LGBTQ youth. Plus, a NASA astronaut from LA returns to Earth. Support The L.A. Report by donating at LAist.com/join and by visiting https://laist.com Visit www.preppi.com/LAist to receive a FREE Preppi Emergency Kit (with any purchase over $100) and be prepared for the next wildfire, earthquake or emergency!Support the show: https://laist.com
A federal appeals court has halted a sweeping order from a lower-court judge who found that federal immigration officers used tactics that “shocked the conscience” during a Trump-era crackdown in Chicago. While the appeals court blocked the restrictions for now, it also left open the possibility of a narrower injunction as the case moves forward. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
A federal appeals court has halted a sweeping order from a lower-court judge who found that federal immigration officers used tactics that “shocked the conscience” during a Trump-era crackdown in Chicago. While the appeals court blocked the restrictions for now, it also left open the possibility of a narrower injunction as the case moves forward. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
Today on the Breakdown, ICE wants to offer cash bounties to inform on immigrants as the government moves toward invoking the insurrection act, DHS is caught red-handed fabricating propaganda, and police confess to a coverup of feds shooting at an unarmed Black man in DC. Check out the video version:Trump Shock BOUNTY SCHEME is BLOWN WIDE OPEN Our Donation LinksNational Security Counselors - DonateMSW Media, Blue Wave California Victory Fund | ActBlueWhistleblowerAid.org/beansFederal workers - feel free to email AG at fedoath@pm.me and let me know what you're going to do, or just vent. I'm always here to listen. Find Upcoming Actions 50501 Movement, No Kings.org, Indivisible.orgDr. Allison Gill - Substack, BlueSky , TikTok, IG, TwitterDana Goldberg - BlueSky, Twitter, IG, facebook, danagoldberg.comCheck out more from MSW Media - Shows - MSW Media, Cleanup On Aisle 45 pod, The Breakdown | SubstackShare your Good News or Good TroubleMSW Good News and Good TroubleHave some good news; a confession; or a correction to share?Good News & Confessions - The Daily Beanshttps://www.dailybeanspod.com/confessional/ Listener Survey:http://survey.podtrac.com/start-survey.aspx?pubid=BffJOlI7qQcF&ver=shortFollow the Podcast on Apple:The Daily Beans on Apple PodcastsWant to support the show and get it ad-free and early?The Daily Beans | SupercastThe Daily Beans & Mueller, She Wrote | PatreonThe Daily Beans | Apple Podcasts Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
Christians in many countries are not only persecuted, but openly hunted. In the Middle Belt of Nigeria, for example, asystematic campaign of Islamist violence, kidnapping and genocide are savaging Christian communities at an industrial scale. Secular elites largely shrug off or falsely explain away the atrocities. Those that do notice the bloodshed often feel powerless to offer more than prayers and perhaps some humanitarian support.Prayers and humanitarian support are indeed desperatelyneeded. But there is another massive need that most never mention, though it is the proverbial elephant in the room: physical security. Persecuted Christians in northern and central Nigeria need to be physically safeguarded from theirheavily armed assailants. So do Christians in Syria, Burma and those living in many other lands.But physical security cannot be provided them by fellow Christians. At least that's the conclusion of many Christians today. Guided by pacifism and pietistic impulses, many Christians – including Christian leaders – regard such considerations as taboo. Physical security would requirethe use of power and force, which are themselves verboten themes. But is the silence and inaction surrounding the physical safety of persecuted Christians truly biblical? Bob of SpeakersCorner joins Andy on the Christian Emergency Podcast to delve into these important topics. Bob is no stranger to wading into contentious issues to try and draw out clarity from confusion. Armed with his insights, Christians canbegin to think more clearly about what is appropriate on this important topic. If you find this episode helpful, please give us a positive rating and review wherever you listen to your favorite podcasts.Also share this episode with a friend so they too can be blessed by these insights. To learn more about resources mentioned in this episode, see the following:Bob of Speakers Corner (YouTube Channel): https://www.youtube.com/@btbsoco Bob of Speakers Corner (Twitter / X): https://x.com/btbsoco Christian Emergency Alliance (Website): https://www.christianemergency.com/ Christian Emergency Alliance (Twitter / X): https://x.com/ChristianEmerg1 Christian Emergency Alliance (Facebook): https://www.facebook.com/christianemergency Christian Emergency Alliance (Instagram): https://www.instagram.com/christianemergencyalliance/The Christian Emergency Podcast is a production of the Christian Emergency Alliance.Soli Deo Gloria
How do you stop a car that doesn't want to stop? If you see a rabbit should you chase the rabbit? We talk about safety and statistics, what factors to weigh the risk versus reward, how policies play into decision making, what the Brits mean when they say “Red Mist,” and alternatives to vehicle pursuits including the role of Air Support, PIT, The Grappler, road spikes, surveillance, and intelligence gathering. Find us on social media (Facebook/Twitter/Instagram/YouTube) @TacTangents. You can join the conversation in our Facebook Discussion Group. Find all of our episodes, articles, some reading list ideas, and more on our website www.tacticaltangents.com Like what we're doing? Head over to Patreon and give us a buck for each new episode. You can also make a one-time contribution at GoFundMe. Intro music credit Bensound.com
Episode 247 : Intro: Welcome to the next episode of Pi Perspectives. We are back and bringing you new guests and new content. Today we feature Don Redl from Apex Intelligence group. Don is an expert on use of force litigation and has some great insight on the subject. This is just a great episode. Let's jump right in. Please welcome Don Redl and your host, NY Private Investigator, Matt Spaier Links: Matt's email: MatthewS@Satellitepi.com Linkedin: Matthew Spaier www.investigators-toolbox.com Don on Linkedin: Don Redl Email: don@apexintell.com PI-Perspectives Youtube link: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCYB3MaUg8k5w3k7UuvT6s0g Sponsors: https://piinstitute.com/ https://www.skopenow.com https://researchfpr.com/ https://www.trackops.com FBI Tip Line https://tips.fbi.gov/home https://www.fbi.gov/contact-us/field-offices/newyork/about - (212) 384-1000
Preview: Andrew McCarthy examines the president's order to shoot three alleged Venezuelan drug boats in international waters, killing 17 people. This use of force is questioned because drug importation is usually treated as a crime, not an act of war. 1945 VENEZUELA COUP
Join bestselling author Eric Tansey as he sits down with Eli Donker, a former U.S. Army Captain and Indiana State Heavyweight MMA Champion, to unpack the realities of police use of force. Eli shares insights from his time training soldiers in hand-to-hand combat and how those same principles now help law enforcement officers (LEOs) safely control violent encounters. In this episode, we break down real-world cases, examine when officers are legally justified in using force, and discuss how proper training saves lives—both for officers and the public. Whether you're a police officer, martial artist, or true crime fan interested in police tactics, this is a must-watch. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Lawfare Legal Fellow Mykhailo Soldatenko sits down with Oona Hathaway, Yale Law Professor and President-elect of the American Society of International Law, to discuss how the current world events are harming the norm prohibiting the use of force in international relations, why that's troubling, and what to do about it. They chat about the current U.S. administration's policies, recent strikes on Iran, and the implications for the norm from a potential negotiated settlement in the Russia-Ukraine war. You may want to look at the following pieces relevant to the discussion: “Might Unmakes Right: The Catastrophic Collapse of Norms Against the Use of Force,” by Oona A. Hathaway and Scott J. Shapiro“There's Still No Reason to Think the Kellogg-Briand Pact Accomplished Anything,” by Stephen M. Walt“Trump's Strikes on Iran Were Unlawful. Here's Why That Matters,” by Oona A. HathawayTo receive ad-free podcasts, become a Lawfare Material Supporter at www.patreon.com/lawfare. You can also support Lawfare by making a one-time donation at https://givebutter.com/lawfare-institute.Support this show http://supporter.acast.com/lawfare. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.