Application of science to criminal and civil laws
POPULARITY
17 episodes with forensic scientist
6 episodes with forensic scientist
4 episodes with forensic scientist
4 episodes with forensic scientist
4 episodes with forensic scientist
2 episodes with forensic scientist
4 episodes with forensic scientist
2 episodes with forensic scientist
8 episodes with forensic scientist
Watch the full coverage of the live stream on The Emily D Baker YouTube channel: https://youtube.com/live/P_Lo2vXvHyMDay 17 of the Karen Read Retrial happened on May 16, 2025. The court addressed juror conduct issues, with a jurors making facial expressions and muttering. A stipulation was read regarding State Police troopers present at the autopsy, specifically noting Troopers Keefe and Watson were present, not Former Trooper Michael Proctor.Andre Porto, the Forensic Scientist, testimony revolved around DNA evidence found on a piece of glass and the tail light, with John O'Keefe's DNA and DNA from two unknown individuals being present. The defense strategy focused on questioning the thoroughness of the investigation and emphasizing that unknown DNA samples were not tested against other individuals of interest like Brian Higgins. Legal arguments arose regarding the chain of custody of evidence and delays in its submission. The judge ruled on objections and addressed issues related to rebuttal witnesses and ARCA expert testimony. There were discussions about new information and reports from experts causing potential time shifts and debates over whether this information was truly new or if it was previously disclosed.The day ended with testimony from Ash Vallier, a Forensic Scientist who pieced together the tail light, with discussions about which pieces fit and which did not. Some items from evidence bags were not fitting together mechanically and other items from different bags were fitting together. Defense Attorney, David Yannetti, crossed Vallier, highlighting potential issues with the chain of custody and who had access to evidence, particularly with Trooper Proctor. Trooper Michael Proctor was identified as submitting clothing evidence to the lab six weeks after the incident and the person who brought in the all of the pieces in the dash 7 series that fit together. Judge Cannone addressed concerns about new expert reports from Aperture, ruling that they were not grounds for undue surprise or prejudice but were ample ground for cross-examination by the defense. The Judge also addressed the ARCCA expert issue, allowing limited rebuttal testimony of Aperture only as to the new opinions by ARCCA from their May 7th report. The Judge stated the defense could recall witnesses under certain circumstances and addressed the long weekend break, stating it would give the defense the time they had requested. RESOURCESCalling a Witness Back? https://youtu.be/Wzt0SgXLa7k&t=564sFormer Trooper Proctor Did Not Attend The Autopsy - https://youtu.be/etzXdZ2T3D4&t=128s What You Need to Know About the Retrial - https://youtu.be/89Jpa8vz1RQ Karen Read Retrial Playlist - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKOJlfL__9F027hlETVU-vo Karen Read Trial - 2024 - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKUeCUzApgsEuQRXu5IXeTSThis podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis: Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacy
Saturday, October 12th, 2002. A warm night in Bali’s bustling Kuta Beach. Bars packed with tourists, music pumping. Then - devastation. Two massive explosions rip through popular Paddy’s Bar and the Sari Club across the road. 202 lives were lost, 88 of them Australians. In the wreckage, tiny clues told a story. Copper wires, fragments of tartan fabric, the surprising absence of a crater. Australian Federal Police Forensic chemist David Royds arrived at the scene just 48 hours later. Sifting through the devastation, he began working out what had happened and how it had happened —thereby uncovering essential information that would eventually lead to the arrest of the bombers. In this episode, he takes host Liz Porter inside the science of that investigation and reveals the lessons learned from it. This episode contains descriptions of a mass casualty event. If you or anyone you know needs assistance, contact Lifeline on 13 11 14. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
A Coloradan named Michael Clark walked free this week after spending 12 years in prison for a murder he says he did not commit. But Clark's story is just one of hundreds of cases potentially affected by the alleged mishandling of DNA at the hands of a star forensic scientist with the Colorado Bureau of Investigation who is now under investigation herself. Host Bree Davies sits down with Senior Investigative Reporter Jenny Deam of the Denver Gazette to get a grasp on Clark's case, understand the ramifications of the mounting DNA scandal, and dig into what it could mean for hundreds of victims and the accused in Colorado cases going back nearly 30 years. For even more news from around the city, subscribe to our morning newsletter Hey Denver at denver.citycast.fm. Follow us on Instagram: @citycastdenver Chat with other listeners on reddit: r/CityCastDenver Support City Cast Denver by becoming a member: membership.citycast.fm What do you think? Text or leave us a voicemail with your name and neighborhood, and you might hear it on the show: 720-500-5418 Learn more about the sponsors of this April 16th episode: The Delores Project Denver Health Energy Outreach PineMelon - Use code CITYCAST for 75% off! Prolonlife.com/city - Use this link for 15% off Looking to advertise on City Cast Denver? Check out our options for podcast and newsletter ads at citycast.fm/advertise Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Ted Kaczynski terrorised the US for almost 20 years. But, what was it like forensically analysing the letters of a twisted genius? Max Houck is one of the world's most respected and recognised forensic scientists. During his time at the FBI, he worked on some of the world's most infamous forensic investigations, including 9/11, D.B Cooper, and The Unabomber. Understand Max's career with host Kathryn Fox, as we dive into these cases and hear the incredible stories of their forensic investigations. If this content affected you, the number for lifeline is 13 11 14.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Today on The Indo Daily, Fionnán Sheahan is joined by Paul Williams, Special Correspondent with The Irish Independent, to look back at the life and career of his friend, Dr Jim Donovan, Former Forensic Science Director, and to learn how an infamous incident with The General Martin Cahill, had a dark impact on his life for nearly 40 years See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
PJ remembers the man who changed forensic science in Ireland and the UK and hailed from Cork's Northside, Dr James Donovan whose death was announced yesterday Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
DNA has become the gold standard in forensic investigation. As its use is increasing, so is our understanding of its limitations. Jae Gerhard is the principal forensic scientist at Independent Forensic Services. Starting out as a forensic scientist at the Australian Federal Police in 2002, Jae is an expert in body fluid detection, bloodstain pattern analysis, and DNA analysis and interpretation. In this episode of Crime Insiders Forensics, Kathryn Fox asks Jae to take us through the process of DNA collection. How accurate it is? How is it processed? And how useful is it for evidence? Jae also tells us about Stain 91, a blood stain pattern that played a part in helping to solve one of Australia's most renowned murder investigations - the Lin Family Murders. If you're interested in DNA and it's role in forensics, check out Secrets We Keep: Should I Spit?See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
This is the " The Year in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this year's most compelling headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that have dominated the news. This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events. Throughout the past year, we've followed and dissected cases such as P. Diddy, Karen Read, Scott Peterson, Ruby Franke and Jodi Hildebrand, the Delphi Murders, Kouri Richins, Bryan Kohberger, Rex Heuermann, Alex Murdaugh, Chad and Lori Daybell, and the Adelson family. Each episode navigates through these stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience. Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "The Year in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
This is the " The Year in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this year's most compelling headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that have dominated the news. This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events. Throughout the past year, we've followed and dissected cases such as P. Diddy, Karen Read, Scott Peterson, Ruby Franke and Jodi Hildebrand, the Delphi Murders, Kouri Richins, Bryan Kohberger, Rex Heuermann, Alex Murdaugh, Chad and Lori Daybell, and the Adelson family. Each episode navigates through these stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience. Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "The Year in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
This is the " The Year in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this year's most compelling headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that have dominated the news. This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events. Throughout the past year, we've followed and dissected cases such as P. Diddy, Karen Read, Scott Peterson, Ruby Franke and Jodi Hildebrand, the Delphi Murders, Kouri Richins, Bryan Kohberger, Rex Heuermann, Alex Murdaugh, Chad and Lori Daybell, and the Adelson family. Each episode navigates through these stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience. Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "The Year in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
This is the " The Year in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this year's most compelling headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that have dominated the news. This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events. Throughout the past year, we've followed and dissected cases such as P. Diddy, Karen Read, Scott Peterson, Ruby Franke and Jodi Hildebrand, the Delphi Murders, Kouri Richins, Bryan Kohberger, Rex Heuermann, Alex Murdaugh, Chad and Lori Daybell, and the Adelson family. Each episode navigates through these stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience. Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "The Year in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Chris Vance, a Criminalist with the San Diego Sheriff's Department, talks about the work of a Forensic Scientist and the types of jobs the Forensic Chemistry Unit handles; the collaboration with the Medical Examiner's Office; the discoveries of the Marijuana Enforcement Team; and the challenges of the ever-changing seized drug landscape in our region.
In a quiet English town, 13-year-old Billie Jo Jenkins was brutally murdered on the porch of her foster home. Her foster father, Sion Jenkins, was convicted of the crime, but after two retrials, he was acquitted in 2006 - leaving one of the UK's most notorious murders unsolved. Despite his acquittal, the jury never delivered a ‘not guilty' verdict, making this case even more perplexing. Professor Adrian Linacre is a forensic blood spatter expert, who's worked on hundreds of cases across the world, including the Billie Jo Jenkins murder investigation. In this episode, uncover the twists and turns in this highly controversial case, go inside the courtroom drama, and unravel the delicate balance between forensic science and justice. If you or anyone you know needs help: Lifeline (Crisis support and suicide prevention) 13 11 14 1800 Respect (National sexual assault, family and domestic violence counselling line) 1800 737 732 Men's Referral Service (National counselling, information and referral service for men looking to change their behaviour) 1300 766 491 Full Stop Australia (National violence and abuse trauma counselling and recovery Service) 1800 385 578 See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Today's guest SallyAnn Harbison has been working in the field for over 30 years. She's the Director of Auckland Universities' Forensic science programme, and leads the forensic biology team at ESR. Have you ever wondered if it's really possible to use DNA to track bank notes? Or maybe your more interested in whether the mud on your shoe gives away your movements? Jesse puts that to SallyAnn and the listener questions.
ALSO: Sean 'Diddy' Combs denied bond, pleads not guilty... A defunct used car dealership accused of rolling back hundreds of odometers... PLUS... Butler announces new Assistant Men's Basketball coachSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
A forensic scientist has returned to the witness box as the second week of Philip Polkinghorne's murder trial gets underway at the High Court in Auckland. Fiona Matheson described the hours spent at the Polkinghorne home as a"full-on week" as she combed the scene for evidence, Finn Blackwell reports.
Professor Patricia Wiltshire is a forensic ecologist who specialises in palynology – the study of pollen. Her expertise has led her to work with every police force in Britain and helped solve some of the country's most notorious crimes including the Soham murder case in which two young girls were killed by school caretaker Ian Huntley.Patricia was born in Cefn Fforest, a mining village in the Sirhowy Valley, north of Cardiff. She studied botany at King's College London as a mature student and later worked as an environmental archaeologist, helping to reconstruct ancient environments by analysing the pollen and other remains in the soil.In 1994 Hertfordshire police asked her to help them with a murder case. A man had been found dead in a ditch and the police had tyre tracks and a vehicle and they needed to prove that the car in question had made the tracks. Patricia's analysis of the pollen and spores found in the car helped to convict the killers and started her career as a forensic ecologist. Patricia is married to Professor David Hawksworth, a renowned mycologist, and they sometimes work on criminal investigations together. DISC ONE: Nocturnes, Op. 27: No. 2 in D-Flat Major. Composed by Frédéric Chopin and performed by Arthur Rubinstein DISC TWO: My Foolish Heart - Billy Eckstine DISC THREE: Rock Around The Clock - Bill Haley and His Comets DISC FOUR: Brandenburg Concerto No. 4 (Allegro movement) Composed by Johann Sebastian Bach and performed by Orchestra Mozart, conducted by Claudio Abbado DISC FIVE: Myfanwy - The Treorchy Male Voice Choir DISC SIX: Piano Concerto No. 21 in C Major, K. 467 "Elvira Madigan": III. Allegro vivace assai. Composed by Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart and performed by Murray Perahia (piano / conductor) and English Chamber Orchestra DISC SEVEN: And I Love Her - The Beatles DISC EIGHT: Love Will Keep Us Together - Neil Sedaka BOOK CHOICE: Childrens Encyclopedia Volume Set by Arthur Mee LUXURY ITEM: A cooking pot CASTAWAY'S FAVOURITE: Nocturnes, Op. 27: No. 2 in D-Flat Major. Composed by Frédéric Chopin and performed by Arthur RubinsteinPresenter Lauren Laverne Producer Paula McGinley
The Colorado Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has released its internal affairs report on Yvonne “Missy” Woods, a former forensic scientist whose work has been pivotal in thousands of criminal cases over nearly three decades. The report reveals significant misconduct, raising concerns about the reliability of her testing and prompting a comprehensive review of her casework. Key Findings Anomalies in Woods' work were first detected in September 2023 during a management-initiated research project. This led to an extensive investigation, including third-party scrutiny by the Kansas Bureau of Investigation. The findings revealed that Woods deviated from standard testing protocols, omitted material facts in official records, and altered or omitted some test results from case files. However, the investigation found no evidence of Woods falsifying DNA matches. “Yvonne ‘Missy' Woods was able to manipulate the DNA testing system. Ultimately, CBI detected Woods' manipulation and removed her from her position,” the CBI stated in a news release on Wednesday. Woods was placed on administrative leave on October 3, 2023, and retired on November 6, 2023, before the investigation concluded. Impact and Costs So far, 654 cases Woods worked on have been questioned, with additional cases from 1994 to 2008 under review. Retesting these DNA samples will cost the state nearly $7.5 million. “Following the discovery of Woods' actions in manipulating DNA analysis data in 2023, CBI is meticulously reviewing all of its testing protocols,” said CBI Director Chris Schaefer. “Not only is Woods' caseload being reviewed, but we are auditing the results of all current and previous DNA scientists to ensure the integrity of the Lab.” Historical Concerns and Oversight Failures The report highlights that concerns about Woods' work date back to at least 2014, when a coworker questioned her testing of evidence and reported it to a technical leader. In 2018, Woods was accused of data manipulation and temporarily reassigned. Despite these concerns, the issues were not escalated to higher authorities, and Woods was reinstated. During her 29-year tenure with the CBI, Woods was involved in several high-profile cases in Colorado, including the investigation of basketball player Kobe Bryant on rape accusations and the murder of University of Colorado student Susannah Chase. “We deeply regret that one of our analysts violated CBI's code of conduct and failed to maintain our high standards,” Director Chris Schaefer said in the news release. “While the focus of the [Internal Affairs report] addressed Woods' misconduct, we acknowledge that it took too long to detect ongoing intentional manipulation of our Lab system.” In response to Woods' misconduct, the CBI has implemented policy changes to address the vulnerabilities exploited by Woods. An internal review of the results from current and former DNA scientists at CBI-accredited labs statewide is underway to ensure the accuracy and completeness of records. The CBI is also identifying an external vendor to conduct an organizational review to ensure adherence to high standards. The agency maintains that the internal affairs review did not find evidence of Woods falsifying DNA matches or fabricating DNA profiles, but her actions have significantly impacted the integrity of the lab's work. “While the internal affairs review addressed Woods' misconduct, we are in the process of identifying an external vendor to conduct an organizational review to ensure that our forensic services procedures and systems adhere to CBI's high standards,” said Schaefer. Ongoing Criminal Investigation A separate criminal investigation into Woods' actions is being conducted by the South Dakota Division of Criminal Investigation. The CBI has stated that to protect the integrity of this ongoing investigation, no further information can be released at this time. As the investigation and reviews continue, the CBI remains committed to restoring trust in its forensic services and ensuring that all testing protocols meet rigorous standards to prevent future misconduct. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
The Colorado Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has released its internal affairs report on Yvonne “Missy” Woods, a former forensic scientist whose work has been pivotal in thousands of criminal cases over nearly three decades. The report reveals significant misconduct, raising concerns about the reliability of her testing and prompting a comprehensive review of her casework. Key Findings Anomalies in Woods' work were first detected in September 2023 during a management-initiated research project. This led to an extensive investigation, including third-party scrutiny by the Kansas Bureau of Investigation. The findings revealed that Woods deviated from standard testing protocols, omitted material facts in official records, and altered or omitted some test results from case files. However, the investigation found no evidence of Woods falsifying DNA matches. “Yvonne ‘Missy' Woods was able to manipulate the DNA testing system. Ultimately, CBI detected Woods' manipulation and removed her from her position,” the CBI stated in a news release on Wednesday. Woods was placed on administrative leave on October 3, 2023, and retired on November 6, 2023, before the investigation concluded. Impact and Costs So far, 654 cases Woods worked on have been questioned, with additional cases from 1994 to 2008 under review. Retesting these DNA samples will cost the state nearly $7.5 million. “Following the discovery of Woods' actions in manipulating DNA analysis data in 2023, CBI is meticulously reviewing all of its testing protocols,” said CBI Director Chris Schaefer. “Not only is Woods' caseload being reviewed, but we are auditing the results of all current and previous DNA scientists to ensure the integrity of the Lab.” Historical Concerns and Oversight Failures The report highlights that concerns about Woods' work date back to at least 2014, when a coworker questioned her testing of evidence and reported it to a technical leader. In 2018, Woods was accused of data manipulation and temporarily reassigned. Despite these concerns, the issues were not escalated to higher authorities, and Woods was reinstated. During her 29-year tenure with the CBI, Woods was involved in several high-profile cases in Colorado, including the investigation of basketball player Kobe Bryant on rape accusations and the murder of University of Colorado student Susannah Chase. “We deeply regret that one of our analysts violated CBI's code of conduct and failed to maintain our high standards,” Director Chris Schaefer said in the news release. “While the focus of the [Internal Affairs report] addressed Woods' misconduct, we acknowledge that it took too long to detect ongoing intentional manipulation of our Lab system.” In response to Woods' misconduct, the CBI has implemented policy changes to address the vulnerabilities exploited by Woods. An internal review of the results from current and former DNA scientists at CBI-accredited labs statewide is underway to ensure the accuracy and completeness of records. The CBI is also identifying an external vendor to conduct an organizational review to ensure adherence to high standards. The agency maintains that the internal affairs review did not find evidence of Woods falsifying DNA matches or fabricating DNA profiles, but her actions have significantly impacted the integrity of the lab's work. “While the internal affairs review addressed Woods' misconduct, we are in the process of identifying an external vendor to conduct an organizational review to ensure that our forensic services procedures and systems adhere to CBI's high standards,” said Schaefer. Ongoing Criminal Investigation A separate criminal investigation into Woods' actions is being conducted by the South Dakota Division of Criminal Investigation. The CBI has stated that to protect the integrity of this ongoing investigation, no further information can be released at this time. As the investigation and reviews continue, the CBI remains committed to restoring trust in its forensic services and ensuring that all testing protocols meet rigorous standards to prevent future misconduct. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The Colorado Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has released its internal affairs report on Yvonne “Missy” Woods, a former forensic scientist whose work has been pivotal in thousands of criminal cases over nearly three decades. The report reveals significant misconduct, raising concerns about the reliability of her testing and prompting a comprehensive review of her casework. Key Findings Anomalies in Woods' work were first detected in September 2023 during a management-initiated research project. This led to an extensive investigation, including third-party scrutiny by the Kansas Bureau of Investigation. The findings revealed that Woods deviated from standard testing protocols, omitted material facts in official records, and altered or omitted some test results from case files. However, the investigation found no evidence of Woods falsifying DNA matches. “Yvonne ‘Missy' Woods was able to manipulate the DNA testing system. Ultimately, CBI detected Woods' manipulation and removed her from her position,” the CBI stated in a news release on Wednesday. Woods was placed on administrative leave on October 3, 2023, and retired on November 6, 2023, before the investigation concluded. Impact and Costs So far, 654 cases Woods worked on have been questioned, with additional cases from 1994 to 2008 under review. Retesting these DNA samples will cost the state nearly $7.5 million. “Following the discovery of Woods' actions in manipulating DNA analysis data in 2023, CBI is meticulously reviewing all of its testing protocols,” said CBI Director Chris Schaefer. “Not only is Woods' caseload being reviewed, but we are auditing the results of all current and previous DNA scientists to ensure the integrity of the Lab.” Historical Concerns and Oversight Failures The report highlights that concerns about Woods' work date back to at least 2014, when a coworker questioned her testing of evidence and reported it to a technical leader. In 2018, Woods was accused of data manipulation and temporarily reassigned. Despite these concerns, the issues were not escalated to higher authorities, and Woods was reinstated. During her 29-year tenure with the CBI, Woods was involved in several high-profile cases in Colorado, including the investigation of basketball player Kobe Bryant on rape accusations and the murder of University of Colorado student Susannah Chase. “We deeply regret that one of our analysts violated CBI's code of conduct and failed to maintain our high standards,” Director Chris Schaefer said in the news release. “While the focus of the [Internal Affairs report] addressed Woods' misconduct, we acknowledge that it took too long to detect ongoing intentional manipulation of our Lab system.” In response to Woods' misconduct, the CBI has implemented policy changes to address the vulnerabilities exploited by Woods. An internal review of the results from current and former DNA scientists at CBI-accredited labs statewide is underway to ensure the accuracy and completeness of records. The CBI is also identifying an external vendor to conduct an organizational review to ensure adherence to high standards. The agency maintains that the internal affairs review did not find evidence of Woods falsifying DNA matches or fabricating DNA profiles, but her actions have significantly impacted the integrity of the lab's work. “While the internal affairs review addressed Woods' misconduct, we are in the process of identifying an external vendor to conduct an organizational review to ensure that our forensic services procedures and systems adhere to CBI's high standards,” said Schaefer. Ongoing Criminal Investigation A separate criminal investigation into Woods' actions is being conducted by the South Dakota Division of Criminal Investigation. The CBI has stated that to protect the integrity of this ongoing investigation, no further information can be released at this time. As the investigation and reviews continue, the CBI remains committed to restoring trust in its forensic services and ensuring that all testing protocols meet rigorous standards to prevent future misconduct. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
It took 37 years, a failed murder trial, and an Australian mathematician to finally prosecute one of Scotland's most infamous serial killers. Professor David Balding is a pioneer in the field of mathematical computational genetics. Join host Kathryn Fox and hear how using things like probability, David can calculate the likelihood of DNA belonging to offenders, victims and crime scenes. If you or someone you know is experiencing, or at risk of experiencing, domestic, family or sexual violence, call 1800RESPECT on 1800 737 732, text 0458 737 732 or visit 1800RESPECT.org.au for online chat and video call services.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Wow! How interesting it was to Make Motivation with Forensic Scientist, Mandi Mohr! Mandi Mohr is a Montana native that transplanted to Pennsylvania in 2010 for graduate school. She holds a Masters Degree in Forensic Science from Arcadia University. Mandi is a board certified forensic toxicologist, and currently serves as a Director at the Center for Forensic Science Research and Education, which is a nonprofit organization dedicated to research, education and outreach in the forensic sciences. In her role at the CFSRE, she is responsible for the management and oversight of a portfolio of research projects and contracts. She is active in the forensic toxicology community and a member of several professional organizations. Her research interests include drug impaired driving and oral fluid drug testing. Mandi is the proud wife of an army vet and mom to 2 amazing kids. She enjoys traveling and doing all things that in involve physical activity.
The guys take a live call-in from a Forensic Scientist, deliver Relationship Advice to one the nicest guys ever and talk Brendan Dassey's rapping brother, Shannon Sharpe and Steven A. Smith, watching the NBA live, gifting their girls overpriced designer bags and much more. Get the full episode plus two extra episodes every month at https://patreon.com/thegoldenhourpodcast
Can the dust in a room hold the key to solving crimes? This captivating question opens the door to a groundbreaking discussion between Tony Brueski, host of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, and esteemed forensic scientist and professor Dan Krane. The topic of their recent episode delves into the innovative and rapidly evolving field of Dust DNA, a concept that is reshaping the landscape of forensic investigations. Dust DNA, as Krane explains, is an extension of environmental DNA (eDNA) testing, a technique that gained significant traction during the COVID-19 pandemic for tracking virus strains in communities. "It's an offshoot of an idea of environmental DNA testing or eDNA testing," Krane elucidates, highlighting how this method was instrumental in monitoring COVID variants. This approach, initially used to detect the presence or absence of specific biological entities, is now being adapted to forensic science, marking a pivotal evolution in the discipline. The concept of Dust DNA is deceptively simple yet profoundly impactful. As Brueski muses, "If dust can contain our DNA if we're just entering a room, or at a crime scene of some sort. That's an interesting fingerprint right there." This analogy to a fingerprint underscores the potential of Dust DNA in crime scene investigation, providing a new avenue to gather evidence. However, the application of Dust DNA in forensics is not without its complexities. Krane points out the challenges in using this technology for individual identification. "They're really very good for answering questions about presence or absence of something or other. They're not so good at answering questions about identification," he explains. This limitation stems from the difficulty in attaching a statistical significance to the DNA findings, a critical component in forensic evidence. Krane further elaborates on the dual challenges facing the forensic community: the push for heightened sensitivity in DNA testing and the necessity for statistical validation. "You know, look at smaller and smaller quantities of material, and those two usually don't mesh well together," he states. This dichotomy poses a significant hurdle in the practical application of Dust DNA in forensic investigations. The sensitivity of current DNA tests, as Krane notes, has reached its theoretical limits, able to detect DNA in minuscule quantities. Yet, this high sensitivity also brings into question the DNA's longevity and context within a given environment. Krane poses a thought-provoking scenario: "We may be able to say that there are human DNA in this room, and we may even be able to say that a certain number of individuals could be contributors, but we can't say how long their DNA has been there, what circumstances brought their DNA there." The discussion between Brueski and Krane not only illuminates the potential of Dust DNA in forensic science but also underscores the inherent challenges and ethical considerations. As forensic technology continues to advance, it beckons us to ponder the balance between scientific innovation and its application in the justice system. Does the future of forensic science lie in the dust around us, and if so, are we ready to interpret its silent testimony? This closing question leaves readers contemplating the profound implications of Dust DNA in both solving crimes and understanding the intricate relationship between humans and their environment. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
Can the dust in a room hold the key to solving crimes? This captivating question opens the door to a groundbreaking discussion between Tony Brueski, host of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, and esteemed forensic scientist and professor Dan Krane. The topic of their recent episode delves into the innovative and rapidly evolving field of Dust DNA, a concept that is reshaping the landscape of forensic investigations. Dust DNA, as Krane explains, is an extension of environmental DNA (eDNA) testing, a technique that gained significant traction during the COVID-19 pandemic for tracking virus strains in communities. "It's an offshoot of an idea of environmental DNA testing or eDNA testing," Krane elucidates, highlighting how this method was instrumental in monitoring COVID variants. This approach, initially used to detect the presence or absence of specific biological entities, is now being adapted to forensic science, marking a pivotal evolution in the discipline. The concept of Dust DNA is deceptively simple yet profoundly impactful. As Brueski muses, "If dust can contain our DNA if we're just entering a room, or at a crime scene of some sort. That's an interesting fingerprint right there." This analogy to a fingerprint underscores the potential of Dust DNA in crime scene investigation, providing a new avenue to gather evidence. However, the application of Dust DNA in forensics is not without its complexities. Krane points out the challenges in using this technology for individual identification. "They're really very good for answering questions about presence or absence of something or other. They're not so good at answering questions about identification," he explains. This limitation stems from the difficulty in attaching a statistical significance to the DNA findings, a critical component in forensic evidence. Krane further elaborates on the dual challenges facing the forensic community: the push for heightened sensitivity in DNA testing and the necessity for statistical validation. "You know, look at smaller and smaller quantities of material, and those two usually don't mesh well together," he states. This dichotomy poses a significant hurdle in the practical application of Dust DNA in forensic investigations. The sensitivity of current DNA tests, as Krane notes, has reached its theoretical limits, able to detect DNA in minuscule quantities. Yet, this high sensitivity also brings into question the DNA's longevity and context within a given environment. Krane poses a thought-provoking scenario: "We may be able to say that there are human DNA in this room, and we may even be able to say that a certain number of individuals could be contributors, but we can't say how long their DNA has been there, what circumstances brought their DNA there." The discussion between Brueski and Krane not only illuminates the potential of Dust DNA in forensic science but also underscores the inherent challenges and ethical considerations. As forensic technology continues to advance, it beckons us to ponder the balance between scientific innovation and its application in the justice system. Does the future of forensic science lie in the dust around us, and if so, are we ready to interpret its silent testimony? This closing question leaves readers contemplating the profound implications of Dust DNA in both solving crimes and understanding the intricate relationship between humans and their environment. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Alex Murdaugh's defense team continued making their case on Monday, offering up a different scenario than the one that has been pushed by the prosecution.Timothy Palmbach, a Connecticut based Forensic Scientist offered up detailed testimony, backing up that assertion.In this epsiode, we take a look at Mr. Palmbach's testimony and where things stand after it.(commercial at 7:45)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Witness in Alex Murdaugh trial explains 2-shooter theory (lawandcrime.com)This show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5003294/advertisement
Alex Murdaugh's defense team continued making their case on Monday, offering up a different scenario than the one that has been pushed by the prosecution.Timothy Palmbach, a Connecticut based Forensic Scientist offered up detailed testimony, backing up that assertion.In this epsiode, we take a look at Mr. Palmbach's testimony and where things stand after it.(commercial at 7:45)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Witness in Alex Murdaugh trial explains 2-shooter theory (lawandcrime.com)This show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5080327/advertisement
Have you ever been intrigued by crime scene investigations, DNA analysis, and the pursuit of justice? Whether you're a true-crime enthusiast or considering a future career in criminal justice or forensic science - then this episode is for you! In this episode, we're joined by Alexis Garloff, a forensic scientist working within a forensic biology unit in Baltimore. Her educational journey led her to Towson University, where she pursued both undergraduate and graduate studies. She holds a Bachelor of Science degree in forensic chemistry with a specialization in DNA analysis and is currently in the final stages of completing a Master of Science in forensic science, focusing on forensic biology. Listen in as we discuss her educational journey and what it's like in her field of work. Our website: www.YourAdvisorsWillSeeYouNow.com Follow us on Instagram Follow us on Facebook Send us an email: yawsynpodcast@gmail.com Support the podcast through Venmo: @YawsynPodcast
The National Offender database, which contains the DNA profiles of offenders, has more than 13 million profiles, almost double since 2009. However, there is growing concern about the accuracy of DNA matches and the potential for human error in the system. Forensic scientist and professor Dan Krane revealed alarming error rates in DNA test results on the "Hidden Killers" podcast with Tony Brueski. Krane, who has extensive experience working with DNA databases, expressed his excitement about the potential to identify error rates or determine errors in DNA test results. He cited his involvement in an investigation for the state of Victoria in Australia, where he had access to about 15,000 DNA profiles. "When you did all possible pairwise comparisons of those 15,000 people, what you found is that there were a fair number that matched perfectly at 14 out of 18," Krane explained. "There were fewer that matched at 15 out of 18, but still some, fewer that matched at 16 out of 18, but still some, and then a whole bunch that matched at 17 out of 18, more than matched at 14 out of 18, and then a whole bunch that matched at 18 out of 18." Krane explained that the only explanation for the ones that matched at 18 out of 18 was that these were people who were entered into the system twice, possibly under an alias. However, the ones that matched at 17 out of 18 indicated that there was a mistake in one of the two times their DNA got entered into the system. This translated into an error rate of one in 300. "And when you're talking about chances of a coincidental match in the quintillions or the bazillions, if you prefer, yet you make a mistake every 300th time that you try to generate a DNA profile, the bazillion number doesn't matter anymore. It gets swapped out by that chance of making a mistake," Krane said. This error rate is particularly concerning as it means that opportunities to generate useful investigative leads are missed. If a DNA sample is collected from a crime scene and there is no suspect, authorities search the CODIS database to find a match. However, every 300th time this is done, a lead is not generated, which Krane believes is an unacceptably high failure rate given the consequences of having a rapist or a murderer go without being apprehended. Krane suggested that one way to correct this could be by doing a pairwise comparison of the 13 million profiles in the federal database to determine if errors happen more frequently at one of the locations than others. "Maybe one of those loci just is more error-prone than others. Maybe the biology just doesn't work as well for that one locus. That one location. And when you do your database search, maybe you don't include that one, right? Or maybe you include it and this, but you factor in that you discount it because that one is just more prone to having a mistake," Krane suggested. Krane also expressed concern about the secrecy surrounding the CODIS database and suggested that more people in the correct positions should have access to it to identify more criminals and solve more cases. He also mentioned the development of probabilistic genotyping systems, expert systems used to interpret test results that human analysts find too complicated. These systems, while not openly shared due to stringent non-disclosure agreements, can distinguish between signal and noise, which is particularly useful when dealing with a small amount of DNA or a sample with many different contributors. While the expert systems may not explicitly use artificial intelligence (AI), they involve serious computer science undertakings with hundreds of thousands of lines of computer code. These systems may help reduce human error and improve the accuracy of DNA database searches, ultimately helping to catch more criminals and solve more cases. Krane's insights highlight the need for more transparency and improvement in the system to ensure that DNA databases are used to their fullest potential in solving crimes and catching criminals. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The National Offender database, which contains the DNA profiles of offenders, has more than 13 million profiles, almost double since 2009. However, there is growing concern about the accuracy of DNA matches and the potential for human error in the system. Forensic scientist and professor Dan Krane revealed alarming error rates in DNA test results on the "Hidden Killers" podcast with Tony Brueski. Krane, who has extensive experience working with DNA databases, expressed his excitement about the potential to identify error rates or determine errors in DNA test results. He cited his involvement in an investigation for the state of Victoria in Australia, where he had access to about 15,000 DNA profiles. "When you did all possible pairwise comparisons of those 15,000 people, what you found is that there were a fair number that matched perfectly at 14 out of 18," Krane explained. "There were fewer that matched at 15 out of 18, but still some, fewer that matched at 16 out of 18, but still some, and then a whole bunch that matched at 17 out of 18, more than matched at 14 out of 18, and then a whole bunch that matched at 18 out of 18." Krane explained that the only explanation for the ones that matched at 18 out of 18 was that these were people who were entered into the system twice, possibly under an alias. However, the ones that matched at 17 out of 18 indicated that there was a mistake in one of the two times their DNA got entered into the system. This translated into an error rate of one in 300. "And when you're talking about chances of a coincidental match in the quintillions or the bazillions, if you prefer, yet you make a mistake every 300th time that you try to generate a DNA profile, the bazillion number doesn't matter anymore. It gets swapped out by that chance of making a mistake," Krane said. This error rate is particularly concerning as it means that opportunities to generate useful investigative leads are missed. If a DNA sample is collected from a crime scene and there is no suspect, authorities search the CODIS database to find a match. However, every 300th time this is done, a lead is not generated, which Krane believes is an unacceptably high failure rate given the consequences of having a rapist or a murderer go without being apprehended. Krane suggested that one way to correct this could be by doing a pairwise comparison of the 13 million profiles in the federal database to determine if errors happen more frequently at one of the locations than others. "Maybe one of those loci just is more error-prone than others. Maybe the biology just doesn't work as well for that one locus. That one location. And when you do your database search, maybe you don't include that one, right? Or maybe you include it and this, but you factor in that you discount it because that one is just more prone to having a mistake," Krane suggested. Krane also expressed concern about the secrecy surrounding the CODIS database and suggested that more people in the correct positions should have access to it to identify more criminals and solve more cases. He also mentioned the development of probabilistic genotyping systems, expert systems used to interpret test results that human analysts find too complicated. These systems, while not openly shared due to stringent non-disclosure agreements, can distinguish between signal and noise, which is particularly useful when dealing with a small amount of DNA or a sample with many different contributors. While the expert systems may not explicitly use artificial intelligence (AI), they involve serious computer science undertakings with hundreds of thousands of lines of computer code. These systems may help reduce human error and improve the accuracy of DNA database searches, ultimately helping to catch more criminals and solve more cases. Krane's insights highlight the need for more transparency and improvement in the system to ensure that DNA databases are used to their fullest potential in solving crimes and catching criminals. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In a recent episode of the acclaimed podcast "Hidden Killers," Tony Brueski spoke with Joseph Scott Morgan, a Forensic Scientist and Distinguished Scholar of Applied Forensics at Jacksonville State University, about a chilling topic: a murder case where the key to solving it lay buried within a hoarder's home. The backdrop is grim. A house that once seemed to tell the tale of an obsessive collector, overflowing with a lifetime of trinkets and mementos, turned out to be a maze of potential evidence in an unsettling murder case. Brueski set the scene, recounting, "This very much looks like a hoarder house… The FBI had to rip through a hoarder house." He posed the immediate question, "What does that say to us about a personality like this and the likelihood of hoarding and if there's this proclivity to kill people?" Morgan's response, shaped by years in forensics, painted a daunting challenge for investigators. Sifting through decades of items, every piece could either be a mere trinket or a damning piece of evidence. "It is an overwhelming task," he admitted. "Out of all the stuff in here, what's going to have value and what is not going to have value?" Diving deeper into the psyche of a potential criminal, Morgan pondered on the strategic advantage a hoarder's home would offer. The consistent accumulation of objects could be the perfect hiding place for incriminating items. "If this guy is such a super criminal, did he look around these areas and say, well, I'm gonna hold some stuff back from these adventures that I'm going out on?" Morgan speculated. The home, it turns out, was more than just a repository of keepsakes. "One of the victims may have met their end in the house," said Brueski, emphasizing the gravity of their discoveries. But this isn't the only case in recent memory to have investigators scratching their heads. Morgan drew attention to another chilling incident – the discovery of a dismembered body found on Fire Island in 1996, with the skull found in a different location in 2010. "Is there any indication that perhaps that skull had been held back for a protracted period of time?" he queried, noting the potential significance of weathering and tool marks on the recovered bone. Morgan also highlighted the incredible strides in forensic technology over the years. "We did not have the capability in say, 2007 to do the things...we do now in order to put a really fine point on it and begin to try to understand origin," he said, emphasizing the role of DNA evidence in modern forensic investigations. This evolution of techniques has provided a more nuanced view of older evidence, allowing investigators to revisit cold cases with a fresh perspective. Looking ahead, Morgan foresees even more groundbreaking advancements, particularly in the field of DNA databases and artificial intelligence. He suggested, "There's no telling how far the technology could expand just from a crime-fighting standpoint." Given the rapid pace of technological change, he believes it's only a matter of time before forensic science can draw from an even richer pool of evidence. Closing on a light note, Brueski and Morgan mused the popular trend of at-home DNA kits, a seemingly innocent gift that could potentially uncover dark family secrets. "We thought Uncle Bernie was so nice. Turns out he killed seven hookers in Los Angeles," Brueski quipped. Their discussion is a stark reminder of the fascinating, sometimes horrifying intersection of forensics, psychology, and crime. As technology and techniques evolve, the tools at investigators' disposal only grow more powerful, enabling them to unearth long-hidden secrets and bring justice to the fore. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In a recent episode of the podcast Hidden Killers, Tony Brueski was joined by Joseph Scott Morgan, a Forensic Scientist and Distinguished Scholar of Applied Forensics at Jacksonville State University. The discussion delved into the intricate facets of forensic evidence related to an ongoing case involving a suspected serial killer. At the onset, Morgan detailed the challenges of investigating cases where the bodies have been in a state of decomposition for several years. "We don't have a lot of solid data relative... about causes of death," he shared, linking the gaps in information to the advanced decomposition of the remains. The forensic scientist also touched upon patterns typically exhibited by serial killers in their modus operandi, indicating that most do not deviate from their preferred methods of execution. He highlighted the case of one killer from New Orleans who derived perverse pleasure from using a garrot. Such killers revel in the physical pain they inflict, with the act of murdering becoming an intimate and personalized endeavor. This gruesome insight shed light on the psychology of serial killers and their attachment to certain methods of killing. One of the more perplexing aspects of the case at hand is the varying states of the bodies found - some intact and others dismembered. Morgan stated, "What's fascinating about her [Fire Island Jane Doe] case is that her... legs were found that fateful day out on Fire Island back in 96... there's still no torso with her." This begs the question: why would a killer leave some bodies intact and yet take the time to dismember others? Discussing this dichotomy further, Morgan posited a theory that the dismemberment could be a sign that the killer had more time with certain victims. "Is the dismemberment an indication that a subject may have had more time with someone they had targeted to kill?" Morgan mused. "It takes time to take a body apart... They would have done this, wrapped it and deposited it out there." On the contrary, other bodies might have been disposed of in haste, possibly wrapped in materials like burlap. Contrasting these behaviors, Morgan underlined the difference between treating a dead body with a semblance of respect versus mutilating it. These variations can be significant when trying to understand the psyche of a serial killer and can give insights into their evolving patterns. Yet, this very evolution is what baffles investigators. "To change how you're disposing of bodies is certainly an outlier in my experience," Morgan expressed. Brueski echoed the sentiment, pointing out that it's bizarre for one's methods to alter so drastically unless it's a sign of evolving behavior. Adding a layer of complexity, the location of these bodies was discussed. The secluded nature of Long Island was emphasized, with its isolation being a potential factor in why it was chosen for body deposition. A more unsettling aspect was the return of the suspected killer's family to their home, presumably a site of significant forensic evidence. The speed with which the house was released back to the family after investigations left both Brueski and Morgan shocked. The podcast episode served as a sobering reminder of the complexities of forensic investigations, especially with serial killers. Morgan's insights provided a deep dive into the often unfathomable minds of those who commit such heinous acts, leaving listeners with more questions than answers about the ongoing case. As the investigation unfolds, both the public and experts alike await to see how forensic science will unveil the truths hidden within the evidence. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In a riveting episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," Tony Brueski delved into the mysteries surrounding Kohberger's decision to study in Pullman, Washington, with Forensic Scientist and Distinguished Scholar of Applied Forensics at Jacksonville State University Joseph Scott Morgan. Their conversation began with Brueski's questioning the peculiar choice of Pullman for Kohberger's education. Morgan speculated that answers might soon surface from the forensic analysis of Kohberger's digital devices, revealing potential premeditated tracking or stalking of the victims. Morgan commented, "I think that it's going to be a treasure trove more than likely." He emphasized the importance of physical evidence in his work but showed equal enthusiasm for the discoveries digital forensics might offer. Brueski recalled media footage that highlighted the seizure of a tower computer from Kohberger's residence, wondering about Kohberger's activities during the late hours. The focus, Morgan noted, shouldn't be on message boards but rather on search histories. These could provide a comprehensive understanding of Kohberger's intentions and actions leading up to the alleged crime. Interestingly, Morgan made it clear that despite speculations, Kohberger was no "criminal mastermind from a forensic standpoint," essentially only as educated as one might be from watching YouTube videos. This statement perhaps sought to highlight the significant difference between actual forensic expertise and superficial knowledge from online sources. Brueski then shifted the conversation towards Kohberger's alibi, sarcastically noting its predictability: driving around at night. The major evidence against this alibi is the cell phone triangulation data, which placed Kohberger at the crime scene. Morgan elaborated on the accuracy of cell phone data, noting its terrifying precision, "everywhere we go, we are tracked." The data essentially serves as the "DNA of the phone," he mused, pointing out its undeniable reliability in linking individuals to specific locations. With Kohberger's defense arguing that he frequently drove that route as a night owl and PhD student looking to clear his mind, the prosecution faces the challenge of proving that on the particular night in question, something was different. This might be where the fact that Kohberger's cell phone is connected to the victim's Wi-Fi becomes pivotal. "If he is following this same route that ends up going by the house... Does that show more likely that he did this?" pondered Brueski. Morgan suggested that the "totality of circumstances" would be a central argument. The prosecution would need to combine various pieces of evidence to paint a convincing picture of Kohberger's guilt, while the defense would try to poke holes in their narrative. The podcast episode hinted at an intense legal battle ahead, especially concerning electronic evidence. Apart from the triangulation data, Kohberger's digital searches, social media interactions, and potential aliases would be under scrutiny. Morgan concluded with a profound thought on the complexity of the case, especially in the realm of electronics, suggesting it would be an area of contention. He stated, "There's so many different ways, Tony, that we can go in this particular circumstance, just in this one area of electronics, that it's a bit overwhelming." This gripping episode sheds light on the modern challenges and intricacies of forensic investigation, making it clear that in the digital age, our electronic footprints might speak louder than any other evidence. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In a riveting episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," Tony Brueski delved into the mysteries surrounding Kohberger's decision to study in Pullman, Washington, with Forensic Scientist and Distinguished Scholar of Applied Forensics at Jacksonville State University Joseph Scott Morgan. Their conversation began with Brueski's questioning the peculiar choice of Pullman for Kohberger's education. Morgan speculated that answers might soon surface from the forensic analysis of Kohberger's digital devices, revealing potential premeditated tracking or stalking of the victims. Morgan commented, "I think that it's going to be a treasure trove more than likely." He emphasized the importance of physical evidence in his work but showed equal enthusiasm for the discoveries digital forensics might offer. Brueski recalled media footage that highlighted the seizure of a tower computer from Kohberger's residence, wondering about Kohberger's activities during the late hours. The focus, Morgan noted, shouldn't be on message boards but rather on search histories. These could provide a comprehensive understanding of Kohberger's intentions and actions leading up to the alleged crime. Interestingly, Morgan made it clear that despite speculations, Kohberger was no "criminal mastermind from a forensic standpoint," essentially only as educated as one might be from watching YouTube videos. This statement perhaps sought to highlight the significant difference between actual forensic expertise and superficial knowledge from online sources. Brueski then shifted the conversation towards Kohberger's alibi, sarcastically noting its predictability: driving around at night. The major evidence against this alibi is the cell phone triangulation data, which placed Kohberger at the crime scene. Morgan elaborated on the accuracy of cell phone data, noting its terrifying precision, "everywhere we go, we are tracked." The data essentially serves as the "DNA of the phone," he mused, pointing out its undeniable reliability in linking individuals to specific locations. With Kohberger's defense arguing that he frequently drove that route as a night owl and PhD student looking to clear his mind, the prosecution faces the challenge of proving that on the particular night in question, something was different. This might be where the fact that Kohberger's cell phone is connected to the victim's Wi-Fi becomes pivotal. "If he is following this same route that ends up going by the house... Does that show more likely that he did this?" pondered Brueski. Morgan suggested that the "totality of circumstances" would be a central argument. The prosecution would need to combine various pieces of evidence to paint a convincing picture of Kohberger's guilt, while the defense would try to poke holes in their narrative. The podcast episode hinted at an intense legal battle ahead, especially concerning electronic evidence. Apart from the triangulation data, Kohberger's digital searches, social media interactions, and potential aliases would be under scrutiny. Morgan concluded with a profound thought on the complexity of the case, especially in the realm of electronics, suggesting it would be an area of contention. He stated, "There's so many different ways, Tony, that we can go in this particular circumstance, just in this one area of electronics, that it's a bit overwhelming." This gripping episode sheds light on the modern challenges and intricacies of forensic investigation, making it clear that in the digital age, our electronic footprints might speak louder than any other evidence. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In a recent episode of the popular podcast "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski sat down with Joseph Scott Morgan, a Forensic Scientist and Distinguished Scholar of Applied Forensics at Jacksonville State University, to delve into the genealogical DNA evidence linking Brian Kohberger to a recent crime. The conversation peeled back the layers on the reliability of this cutting-edge forensic tool, challenging common beliefs while addressing some of the most pressing questions. As Brueski puts it, the use of genealogical DNA in criminal investigations has many heralding it as "golden" evidence. "Some people say this is super solid. You can't really argue it," he noted. Yet, the actual value and validity of this technique is being contested, especially in legal arenas. As attorneys begin to challenge the method, the question arises: just how valuable is this type of evidence? Morgan, taking a scientific stance, was keen to distinguish between the reliability of the science itself and the procedures around collecting samples. "It's proven science," he asserted, "The science itself is pretty rock solid when compared to some other practices within forensic science." His emphasis lies in the belief that while questions may arise regarding the provenance of samples, the genealogical DNA science stands unassailable. The strength of genealogical DNA as evidence becomes even more evident when one considers its implications. As Morgan describes it, "it is almost as if distant cousins are pointing at you accusingly." The interconnectedness of lineage reveals relationships, hinting at culpability in ways that other forensic techniques can't. However, Morgan acknowledges the possibility of errors, but downplays their likelihood. He explained that even if there were another match, "it would have to be someone else within [Kohberger's] familial line." The astronomical odds stacked against finding a match outside the familial connection makes this type of evidence compelling in the eyes of the court. He went on to highlight that this isn't a fragile forensic practice like bite mark evidence, which has lost credibility over time. With genealogical DNA, the defense faces an uphill battle. The discussion then veered into a perplexing angle of Kohberger's case: his unexpected move from Pennsylvania to Washington State University (WSU) for his studies. Despite residing in a state boasting multiple prestigious Ph.D. programs in criminology, Kohberger chose WSU. Morgan, drawing from his academic background, explained that PhD aspirants typically select institutions based on specific faculty members whose interests align with their own. In Kohberger's case, it was Katherine Sland, a renowned scholar who penned a book on the BTK killer. Though Brueski hinted at a possible correlation between Kohberger's interests and Sland's expertise, Morgan veered the conversation back to the victims. He stressed the importance of understanding any potential connection between Kohberger and the individuals from the crime scene. Was it a chance encounter, or was there a deeper, possibly sinister reason behind Kohberger's choice of location and university? The podcast episode illuminated the intricate web of factors that investigators and prosecutors consider when building a case. It also underscored the increasing importance of genealogical DNA as a forensic tool. While questions remain in Kohberger's case, one thing is clear: as science advances, so does the criminal justice system's ability to unveil the truth. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In a recent episode of the popular podcast "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski sat down with Joseph Scott Morgan, a Forensic Scientist and Distinguished Scholar of Applied Forensics at Jacksonville State University, to delve into the genealogical DNA evidence linking Brian Kohberger to a recent crime. The conversation peeled back the layers on the reliability of this cutting-edge forensic tool, challenging common beliefs while addressing some of the most pressing questions. As Brueski puts it, the use of genealogical DNA in criminal investigations has many heralding it as "golden" evidence. "Some people say this is super solid. You can't really argue it," he noted. Yet, the actual value and validity of this technique is being contested, especially in legal arenas. As attorneys begin to challenge the method, the question arises: just how valuable is this type of evidence? Morgan, taking a scientific stance, was keen to distinguish between the reliability of the science itself and the procedures around collecting samples. "It's proven science," he asserted, "The science itself is pretty rock solid when compared to some other practices within forensic science." His emphasis lies in the belief that while questions may arise regarding the provenance of samples, the genealogical DNA science stands unassailable. The strength of genealogical DNA as evidence becomes even more evident when one considers its implications. As Morgan describes it, "it is almost as if distant cousins are pointing at you accusingly." The interconnectedness of lineage reveals relationships, hinting at culpability in ways that other forensic techniques can't. However, Morgan acknowledges the possibility of errors, but downplays their likelihood. He explained that even if there were another match, "it would have to be someone else within [Kohberger's] familial line." The astronomical odds stacked against finding a match outside the familial connection makes this type of evidence compelling in the eyes of the court. He went on to highlight that this isn't a fragile forensic practice like bite mark evidence, which has lost credibility over time. With genealogical DNA, the defense faces an uphill battle. The discussion then veered into a perplexing angle of Kohberger's case: his unexpected move from Pennsylvania to Washington State University (WSU) for his studies. Despite residing in a state boasting multiple prestigious Ph.D. programs in criminology, Kohberger chose WSU. Morgan, drawing from his academic background, explained that PhD aspirants typically select institutions based on specific faculty members whose interests align with their own. In Kohberger's case, it was Katherine Sland, a renowned scholar who penned a book on the BTK killer. Though Brueski hinted at a possible correlation between Kohberger's interests and Sland's expertise, Morgan veered the conversation back to the victims. He stressed the importance of understanding any potential connection between Kohberger and the individuals from the crime scene. Was it a chance encounter, or was there a deeper, possibly sinister reason behind Kohberger's choice of location and university? The podcast episode illuminated the intricate web of factors that investigators and prosecutors consider when building a case. It also underscored the increasing importance of genealogical DNA as a forensic tool. While questions remain in Kohberger's case, one thing is clear: as science advances, so does the criminal justice system's ability to unveil the truth. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Alex Murdaugh's defense team continued making their case on Monday, offering up a different scenario than the one that has been pushed by the prosecution.Timothy Palmbach, a Connecticut based Forensic Scientist offered up detailed testimony, backing up that assertion.In this epsiode, we take a look at Mr. Palmbach's testimony and where things stand after it.(commercial at 7:45)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Witness in Alex Murdaugh trial explains 2-shooter theory (lawandcrime.com)This show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5080327/advertisement
Alex Murdaugh's defense team continued making their case on Monday, offering up a different scenario than the one that has been pushed by the prosecution.Timothy Palmbach, a Connecticut based Forensic Scientist offered up detailed testimony, backing up that assertion.In this epsiode, we take a look at Mr. Palmbach's testimony and where things stand after it.(commercial at 7:45)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Witness in Alex Murdaugh trial explains 2-shooter theory (lawandcrime.com)This show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5003294/advertisement
In a recent episode of "Hidden Killers," a podcast hosted by Tony Brueski, a fascinating and complex discussion unfolded with Forensic Scientist and Professor Dan Krane. The focus of the conversation revolved around a quadruple homicide case and the implications of DNA evidence discovered on a knife sheath attributed to the suspect, Kohlberg. Krane succinctly summarized the predicament, stating, "The presence of a DNA profile doesn't tell us anything about how or when that DNA came to be associated with what you've been testing." This highlights the conundrum that DNA, while compelling evidence, cannot establish a timestamp for its deposition or offer context on how it came to be at the crime scene. Professor Krane stressed the inherent challenge in the prosecution's narrative that Kohlberg's DNA was left on the knife sheath during the crime. He outlined how the defense might argue that the knife was discarded by the defendant long before the crime or taken by someone else, emphasizing, "The DNA test results by themselves are absolutely silent in terms of which of those competing hypotheses might be more likely." The podcast hosts and Krane also delved into the technological future of forensic science, pondering the potential for establishing a 'timestamp' on DNA evidence. Although we are currently unable to determine the age of a DNA sample, Krane postulated that this might change within the next decade, possibly through an examination of associated proteins. The conversation expanded to the implications of the growing DNA databases resulting from widespread genetic testing. Krane acknowledged the transformative potential of this trend for law enforcement, stating, "The increasing availability of DNA test results is going to be a very powerful tool for law enforcement." However, he also highlighted the ensuing ethical dilemmas, including issues around informed consent and the potential for casting suspicion on family members unaware of their genetic information being utilized. Beyond DNA, Krane underscored that a crime scene offers a wealth of other potential evidence, such as blood spatter analysis, fingerprinting, fiber analysis, and computer investigations, among others. He labeled DNA as the 'gold standard' of forensic science but acknowledged that other techniques could provide crucial context and corroboration to DNA findings. In the context of the Kohlberg case, Brueski and Krane discussed the possibility of DNA evidence accidentally implicating an innocent person. The high sensitivity of DNA tests could potentially detect samples from years ago, creating an open-ended interpretation that might mislead an investigation. "There's nothing about the DNA test results in themselves that would tell you which of two alternatives were more likely," Krane added. Their compelling discussion concluded with the notion that DNA evidence, while an essential piece, is just one part of a complex puzzle in criminal investigations. "A great attorney said to me, I'm weaving together a symphony to entertain the jury with. I need you to deliver one note," recounted Krane, emphasizing the importance of integrating DNA evidence into a holistic investigative approach. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Renowned forensic scientist and professor Dan Krane recently joined host Tony Brueski on the popular podcast "Hidden Killers" to discuss the curious DNA evidence entwined in the case of Brian Koberger, the suspect of the Idaho Four murders. Krane, an expert in his field, provided a captivating analysis of the defense's arguments, particularly focusing on the concept of 'ascertainment bias.' Reports indicate that DNA from three men was discovered at the murder scene. Still, none matched Koberger, prompting defense attorney Jay Weston Logsden to express the need for detailed information on how genetic genealogy was used to identify Koberger as a person of interest. Krane acknowledged the legitimacy of Logsden's critique, pointing out that the CODIS database - a tool regularly used by prosecutors to generate investigative leads - was not used to identify the other two males. Krane explained that the defense's desire for alternative suspects is understandable, given that they cannot directly access the CODIS database. They would require a court order for the prosecution and law enforcement to search on their behalf. Furthermore, Krane argued with the state's argument that Koberger's direct DNA match from a buccal swab somehow negates the necessity for genetic genealogy. He labeled this as 'disingenuous,' invoking the concept of 'ascertainment bias.' Krane clarified this complex term by analogy: "Let's say that there's a one in a million chance that you would have a winning lottery ticket. Ascertainment bias comes into play if you tell me that you've got a winning lottery ticket after having purchased 10,000 tickets. I would be 10,000 fold less impressed that you got the winning lottery ticket than if you'd gotten the ticket from having purchased just one." In Koberger's case, the defense argues that the police did not randomly select him, but narrowed down potential suspects through a sizable DNA database before focusing on him. Thus, we should be less impressed by the DNA match because of how Koberger was identified. This methodology created the 'ascertainment bias' in this case. "The key here was how they first identified him. We need to know how big of a net was cast, how many people could have been included as a possible source of the DNA because that's how much we need to downgrade or adjust how impressed we are with the match," explained Krane. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Today on Change Agents, an IRONCLAD original, Andy Stumpf interviews Debra LaPrevotte about how law enforcement agents take down kleptocracies – corrupt government officials who steal billions from people in need. Debra is a retired FB Supervisory Special Agent on the International Corruption Unit at FBI Headquarters. She helped to start the FBI's Kleptocracy program and seized more than $1 billion from foreign corrupt officials. She is a Forensic Scientist and spent several years on the FBI's Evidence Response Team Unit at the FBI Lab. Prior to her FBI career, Debra worked for the Department of Defense. Today, her work is featured on the new podcast series “A Nation for Thieves”. Subscribe to the podcast: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/change-agents-with-andy-stumpf/id1677415740 Shop IRONCLAD Apparel: https://shop.thisisironclad.com/ Change Agents is an IRONCLAD original. Visit https://www.thisisironclad.com to learn more. Be sure to subscribe to @thisisironclad on YouTube and major social platforms. Follow us on Social - Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/thisisironclad Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/ThisIsIRONCLAD Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thisisironclad TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@thisisironclad Subscribe to our Newsletter: https://thisisironclad.com/newsletter Sponsors: HVMN – You can find Ketone-IQ at https://hvmn.com/. Visit hvmn.com and use promo code ANDY at checkout to save 20%.
Throughout the 1970s and 80s, an unidentified man terrorized families across California. Responsible for more than 100 burglaries, over 50 rapes, and at least 13 homicides, the suspect was dubbed the "Golden State Killer." For decades, law enforcement worked tirelessly to uncover the identity of the murderer. In 2018, justice was served when former police officer Joseph DeAngelo was finally arrested at 74 years old. Retired FBI Agent and lead profiler on the Golden State Killer case Julia Cowley shares how she was brought onto the case, the work that went into creating Joseph DeAngelo's profile, and how her work played a pivotal role in the investigation. Julia Cowley served as a Forensic Scientist and Special Agent with the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation. Upon joining the FBI, Julia was assigned to the Boston Division where she investigated various violent crime cases and later rose to become the leader of their Evidence Response Team. In 2010, she was promoted to FBI Headquarters, where she worked in their Behavioral Analysis Unit. Follow Emily on Instagram: @realemilycompagno Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
The trial of Lori Vallow Daybell takes a dramatic turn as expert witnesses, including police and FBI agents, reveal shocking new information about the case. The disturbing details of her actions and motives, previously shrouded in mystery, are now coming to light. Don't miss the chance to learn about the twisted mind of Lori Vallow Daybell, as this high-profile case continues to captivate the nation. Want to listen to ALL of our Podcasts Ad-Free? Subscribe through Apple Podcasts, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski (All Cases) - https://audioboom.com/channels/5040505-hidden-killers-with-tony-brueski-breaking-news-commentary Chad & Lori Daybell - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098105-demise-of-the-daybells-the-lori-chad-daybell-story The Murder of Ana Walshe - https://audioboom.com/channels/5093967-finding-ana-this-disappearance-of-ana-walshe Alex Murdaugh - https://audioboom.com/channels/5097527-the-trial-of-alex-murdaugh The Idaho Murders, The Case Against Bryan Kohberger - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098223-the-idaho-murders-the-case-against-bryan-kohberger Lucy Letby - https://audioboom.com/channels/5099406-nurse-of-death-the-lucy-letby-story Follow Tony Brueski On Twitter https://twitter.com/tonybpod Join our Facebook Discussion Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/834636321133
I welcome forensic scientist Robert (Bob) Green to the show in this interview episode.Bob worked for the Forensic Science Service (FSS) in research and service development before moving to the Home Office to become the head of science and technology in the Police and Crime Standards Directorate.He was at the forefront of ensuring the most effective use of forensic science to combat crime and develop knowledge around applying forensic science and policing tools to support the investigation of violent and acquisitive crimes.He is noted for developing and leading the national programme of cold case review – Operation Advance – and being a national and international speaker on developing DNA and other biometric databases.For his services to forensic science, Bob was awarded an OBE in the Queen's Birthday Honours list of 2008.Nowadays, Bob is a Reader in Forensic Science and Director of Student Engagement at the University of Kent for the School of Chemistry and Forensic Science. For all things British Murders, please visit my website:https://www.britishmurders.com/Intro music:David John Brady - 'Throw Down the Gauntlet'https://linktr.ee/davidjohnbradymusic Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Forensic scientist Dan Krane explains the rationale behind sending the knife sheath in the Idaho murder case to two separate labs for DNA testing. Krane, a recognized expert in the field, reveals that conducting dual DNA testing is an unusual but strategic move to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the results. This approach provides an added layer of confidence in the evidence, which may prove crucial in the trial's outcome. As the case unfolds, the forensic analysis of the knife sheath will likely play a significant role in determining the defendant's guilt or innocence. Want to listen to ALL of our Podcasts Ad-Free? Subscribe through Apple Podcasts, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski (All Cases) - https://audioboom.com/channels/5040505-hidden-killers-with-tony-brueski-breaking-news-commentary Chad & Lori Daybell - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098105-demise-of-the-daybells-the-lori-chad-daybell-story The Murder of Ana Walshe - https://audioboom.com/channels/5093967-finding-ana-this-disappearance-of-ana-walshe Alex Murdaugh - https://audioboom.com/channels/5097527-the-trial-of-alex-murdaugh The Idaho Murders, The Case Against Bryan Kohberger - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098223-the-idaho-murders-the-case-against-bryan-kohberger Lucy Letby - https://audioboom.com/channels/5099406-nurse-of-death-the-lucy-letby-story Follow Tony Brueski On Twitter https://twitter.com/tonybpod Join our Facebook Discussion Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/834636321133
Forensic scientist Dan Krane explains the potential impact of the knife sheath DNA evidence in the Kohberger murder investigation. This crucial piece of evidence could either support or undermine Kohberger's defense, depending on how it is presented and interpreted in court. Krane's expert analysis provides insight into the complexities of forensic evidence and the role it plays in shaping the outcome of a trial. As the case unfolds, the knife sheath DNA will likely be a key focus for both the prosecution and defense teams. Want to listen to ALL of our Podcasts Ad-Free? Subscribe through Apple Podcasts, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski (All Cases) - https://audioboom.com/channels/5040505-hidden-killers-with-tony-brueski-breaking-news-commentary Chad & Lori Daybell - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098105-demise-of-the-daybells-the-lori-chad-daybell-story The Murder of Ana Walshe - https://audioboom.com/channels/5093967-finding-ana-this-disappearance-of-ana-walshe Alex Murdaugh - https://audioboom.com/channels/5097527-the-trial-of-alex-murdaugh The Idaho Murders, The Case Against Bryan Kohberger - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098223-the-idaho-murders-the-case-against-bryan-kohberger Lucy Letby - https://audioboom.com/channels/5099406-nurse-of-death-the-lucy-letby-story Follow Tony Brueski On Twitter https://twitter.com/tonybpod Join our Facebook Discussion Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/834636321133
In today's episode of Tony, Dan Krane, a Forensic Scientist and Professor, joins the show to discuss the forensic evidence disaster that was at the murder scene of the Murdaugh case. Krane will analyze the handling of evidence at the scene and what went wrong in the process. This is a crucial aspect of the trial and Krane will provide expert insight into the state of forensic evidence in the case. The discussion will shed light on the controversial Murdaugh case and the importance of proper evidence handling at crime scenes. #ForensicEvidence #MurdaughMurder #ExpertAnalysis Want to listen to ALL of our Podcasts Ad-Free? Subscribe through Apple Podcasts, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski (All Cases) - https://availableon.com/universityofidahomurderspodcast4killedforwhat Chad & Lori Daybell - https://availableon.com/demiseofthedaybellsthelorichaddaybellstory The Murder of Ana Walshe - https://availableon.com/findinganathisdisappearanceofanawalshe Alex Murdaugh - https://availableon.com/thetrialofalexmurdaugh The Idaho Murders, The Case Against Bryan Kohberger - https://availableon.com/theidahomurdersthecaseagainstbryankohberger True Crime Today (All Cases & EXTRA Commentary) - https://availableon.com/truecrimetodayatruecrimepodcast Follow Tony Brueski On Twitter https://twitter.com/tonybpod Join our Facebook Discussion Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/834636321133
Tony talks with Dan Krane, a Forensic Scientist and Professor, about his thoughts on Alex Murdaugh's testimony in the murder trial. Krane offers a scientific perspective on the statements made by Murdaugh in court, examining the testimony under the microscope of forensic science. Krane's analysis provides insight into the testimony from an expert's point of view and highlights the importance of the intersection of science and law in complex legal cases. #Forensics #ExpertOpinion #ScienceMeetsLaw. Want to listen to ALL of our Podcasts Ad-Free? Subscribe through Apple Podcasts, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski (All Cases) - https://availableon.com/universityofidahomurderspodcast4killedforwhat Chad & Lori Daybell - https://availableon.com/demiseofthedaybellsthelorichaddaybellstory The Murder of Ana Walshe - https://availableon.com/findinganathisdisappearanceofanawalshe Alex Murdaugh - https://availableon.com/thetrialofalexmurdaugh The Idaho Murders, The Case Against Bryan Kohberger - https://availableon.com/theidahomurdersthecaseagainstbryankohberger True Crime Today (All Cases & EXTRA Commentary) - https://availableon.com/truecrimetodayatruecrimepodcast Follow Tony Brueski On Twitter https://twitter.com/tonybpod Join our Facebook Discussion Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/834636321133
Today, we delve into the intricacies of DNA matching with renowned Forensic Scientist and Professor, Dan Krane. Join us as we explore the potential for accuracy and error in this powerful tool and discover the crucial role it plays in determining the fate of individuals in criminal cases - from delivering justice to inciting injustice. Unlock a world of mystery and intrigue with our Ad-Free Podcasts. Subscribe now through Apple Podcasts and experience three days of unlimited, uninterrupted listening. https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Embark on a journey of discovery with our captivating cases: Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski (All Cases) - https://availableon.com/universityofidahomurderspodcast4changedforwhat The shocking true story of Chad & Lori Daybell - https://availableon.com/demiseofthedaybellsthelorichaddaybellstory The Murder of Ana Walshe - https://availableon.com/findinganathisdisappearanceofanawalshe The Trial of Alex Murdaugh - https://availableon.com/thetrialofalexmurdaugh The Idaho Murders, The Case Against Bryan Kohberger - https://availableon.com/theidahomurdersthecaseagainstbryankohberger True Crime Today (All Cases & EXTRA Commentary) - https://availableon.com/truecrimetodayatruecrimepodcast Join the conversation on Twitter with Tony Brueski - https://twitter.com/tonybpod And be a part of our Facebook Discussion Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/834636321133
Professor Angela Gallop is a forensic scientist who has helped solve some of the most notorious violent crimes in recent British history including the killings of Stephen Lawrence, Damilola Taylor and Rachel Nickell. After completing a degree in botany and a doctorate on the biochemistry of sea slugs, Angela joined the Home Office's Forensic Science Service in 1974, and four years later attended her first crime scene, where 18-year-old Helen Rytka was killed by Peter Sutcliffe, the Yorkshire Ripper. Over the years cold cases became her speciality and in 1992 she investigated the death of the Italian banker Roberto Calvi. He was found hanging from scaffolding under Blackfriars Bridge, London, in a suspected suicide ten years before. Angela's work established that suicide was unlikely and that, in all probability, he'd been murdered. His killers were never found. In 1999 Angela and her team investigated the murder of Lynette White who was killed in her flat in Cardiff in 1988. Five men had been tried for her death and three - known as the ‘the Cardiff Three' - were sent to prison although their convictions were quashed by the Court of Appeal two years later. Angela's investigation made history when the murderer was identified and convicted through his familial DNA. Angela first worked on the Stephen Lawrence case in 1995 – two years after his murder - and returned to it in 2006. The forensic evidence that was found during this investigation helped to convict his killers in 2012. Angela has written a book about her career in forensics and another which outlines the challenges the discipline faces today. Presenter Lauren Laverne Producer Paula McGinley
© 2020-2025 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
