Podcasts about Kohlberg

William Cooper reflects on the surprise and division surrounding recent U.S. presidential elections and uses them to explore why people can hold such different views despite living in the same society. He introduces psychologist Lawrence Kohlberg's theory of six stages of moral development, which range from avoiding punishment and pursuing self-interest to following universal ethical principles. Cooper explains that people progress through these stages sequentially and can generally understand lower stages they have passed through, but struggle to comprehend perspectives more than one stage above their own. He argues that this framework helps reduce judgment of others, explains social and political disagreements, and sheds light on why people often dismiss those with different views using labels or stereotypes. Ultimately, he sees Kohlberg's model as a useful tool for fostering understanding, compassion, and clarity about human behavior, though not as a complete explanation of it. These podcasts are meant to supplement your personal path of awakening whatever that might be. They are a compilation of what I have found to be the most helpful over the last 50 years on my path of awakening. I feel these podcasts are most powerful when listened to in sequence from podcast one forward because each is built on the last.  Though they, also, all stand on their own.  Since we are each a bit different, if anything does not resonate, please disregard it and follow your heart. All my podcasts and website are free. Enjoy!Though I am a psychotherapist, and these podcasts are offered to be spiritually helpful, they are not psychotherapy.  If psychotherapy is ever needed, please reach out to a psychotherapist.www.williamecooper.wordpress.com for more support.  You may, especially, enjoy the short contemplations and the resource page which gives you some supportive material.

Patrick & Marco plaudern mal wieder über ihre ambivalente Beziehung zur Polizei:I. Präkonventionelle Ebene (Kindesalter)Moral wird durch externe Konsequenzen (Strafe/Belohnung) bestimmt. Stufe 1: Gehorsam und Bestrafung – Handlungen werden vermieden, um Strafe zu umgehen; Autoritäten haben absolute Macht.#Polizei #NRW

Claude Cowork came out of an accident.Felix and the Anthropic team noticed something interesting with Claude Code: many users were using it primarily for all kinds of messy knowledge work instead of coding. Even technical builders would use it for lots of non-technical work.Even more shocking, Claude cowork wrote itself. With a team of humans simply orchestrating multiple claude code instances, the tool was ready after a brief week and a half.This isn't Felix's first rodeo with impactful and playful desktop apps. He's helped ship the Slack desktop app and is a core maintainer of Electron the open-source software framework used for building cross-platform desktop applications, even putting Windows 95 into an Electron app that runs on macOS, Windows, and Linux.In this episode, Felix joins us to unpack why execution has suddenly become cheap enough that teams can “just build all the candidates” and why the real frontier in AI products is no longer better chat, but trusted task execution.He also shares why Anthropic is betting on local-first agent workflows, why skills may matter more than most people realize, and how the hardest questions ahead are about autonomy, safety, portability, and the changing shape of knowledge work itself.We discuss* Felix's path: Slack desktop app, Electron, Windows 95 in JavaScript, and now building Claude Cowork at Anthropic* What Claude Cowork actually is: a more user-friendly, VM-based version of Claude Code designed to bring agentic workflows to non-terminal-native users* Why “user-friendly” does not mean “less powerful”: Cowork as a superset product, much like how VS Code initially looked simpler than Visual Studio but became more hackable and extensible* Anthropic's prototype-first culture: why Cowork was built in 10 days using many pre-existing internal pieces, and how internal prototypes shaped the final product* Why execution is getting cheap: the shift from long memos, specs, and debate toward rapidly building multiple candidates and choosing based on reality instead of theory* The local debate: why Felix thinks Silicon Valley is undervaluing the local computer, and why putting Claude “where you work” is often more powerful* Why Claude gets its own computer: the VM as both a safety boundary and a capability unlock, letting Claude install tools, run scripts, and work more independently without constant approval* Safety through sandboxing: why “approve every command” is not a real long-term UX, and how virtual machines create a middle ground between uselessly safe and dangerously autonomous* How Cowork differs from Claude Code: coding evals vs. knowledge-work evals, different system-prompt tradeoffs, longer planning horizons, and heavier use of planning and clarification tools* Why skills matter: simple markdown-based instructions as a lightweight abstraction layer for reusable workflows, personalized automation, and portable agent behavior* Skills vs. MCPs: why Felix is increasingly interested in file-based, text-native interfaces that tell the model what to do, rather than forcing everything through rigid tool schemas* The portability problem: why personal skills should move across agent products, and the unresolved tension between public reusable workflows and private user-specific context* Real use cases already happening today: uploading videos, organizing files, handling taxes, managing calendars, debugging internal crashes, analyzing finances, and automating repetitive browser workflows* Why AI products should work with your existing stack: Anthropic's bias toward integrating with Chrome, Office, and existing workflows instead of rebuilding every app from scratch* Computer use one year later: how much better it has gotten, why vision plus browser context is such a superpower, and why letting Claude see the thing it is working on changes everything* Why many “AI verticals” may get compressed: specialized wrappers may matter in the short term, but better general models and stronger primitives could absorb a lot of narrow use cases* The future of junior work: Felix's concerns about entry-level roles, labor-market disruption, and whether AI can compress early-career learning into denser simulated experience* Why Waterloo grads stand out: internships, shipping experience, and learning how real teams build products versus purely theoretical academic preparation* The agentic future of the desktop: what it means for Claude to have its own computer, whether AI should act on your machine or a remote one, and how intimacy with personal data changes the product design space* Why Electron still mattered: shipping Chromium as a controlled rendering stack, the limits of OS-native webviews, and why browser engines remain one of the great software abstractions* Anthropic's Labs mentality: wild internal experiments, half-broken future-looking prototypes, and the broader effort to move users from asking questions to delegating increasingly long and valuable tasks* Why the endgame is not just more capability, but more independence: teaching users to trust AI with bigger scopes of work, for longer durations, with fewer interventionsFelix Rieseberg* X: https://x.com/felixrieseberg* LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/felixrieseberg* Website: https://felixrieseberg.com/Anthropic* Website: http://anthropic.comFull Video PodTimestamps00:00 — Cheap execution and building all the candidates00:44 — Intro in the new Kernel studio02:47 — What Claude Cowork is04:18 — Why user-friendly can be more powerful05:33 — How Anthropic built Cowork07:09 — Prototype-first product development08:00 — Why local computers still matter09:20 — Skills, primitives, and platform leverage12:13 — Cowork's architecture: VM + Chrome + system prompt15:38 — Felix's own bug-fixing Cowork workflows17:38 — Local-first agents20:16 — Evals, planning, and knowledge-work optimization23:14 — What Anthropic means by evals24:21 — Scaffolding, tools, and why skills matter27:44 — Demo: YouTube uploads and self-generated skills31:03 — Calendar automation and cleaning your desktop34:47 — Browser context and why DOM access matters37:47 — Skills portability and plugins44:36 — Which AI categories survive?46:19 — Junior jobs, simulated work, and labor disruption52:00 — Gradual takeoff vs big-bang takeoff53:42 — Finance, taxes, and enterprise verticals56:24 — Vision and the improvement in computer use57:31 — Why Claude writes its own scripts58:06 — Should Claude have its own computer?1:01:26 — Windows 95 in JavaScript1:03:19 — VM tradeoffs and sandbox design1:07:23 — Approval fatigue and safe delegation1:11:18 — The future of Cowork1:12:27 — What comes next for agentic knowledge work1:15:13 — Electron, Chromium, and desktop software lessons1:22:16 — Multiplayer agents and coworker-to-coworker workflows1:26:05 — Anthropic Labs and closing thoughtsTranscriptAlessio: Hey everyone. Welcome to the Latent Space Podcast, our first one in the new studio. This is Alessio, founder of Kernel Labs, and I'm joined by swyx, editor of Latent Space.swyx: Yeah, so nice to be here. Thanks to, uh, TJ, Alessio, Allen helping to set everything up. It looks beautiful. We even have the logo outside.Yeah, kind.Felix: It's like really nice, right? When you walk in here as a guest, you're like, ah, this is a serious production. You're like, feel it immediately.swyx: Yeah. Felix, you've been, you're, you're currently a product manager of Cowork or,Felix: uh, really Technicswyx: Eng. Yeah. The, the identities are kind of vague member technical staff.Felix: I know member staff is like, the official title will carry around forever.swyx: Yeah. I basically kind of wanted, like we've been. Kinda obsessed. I, I've been using it a lot, even for managing latent space. Like, uh, cowork helps me upload videos and like title things and like edit and everything. It's, it's like really amazing.Alessio: Cool. He said multiple times Cowork has said gi in the group track.swyx: Yeah, yeah, yeah. So, so we have a second, uh, we have a second channel, uh, for latent space tv. Uh, and I, uh, and uh, we basically, this is our Discord meetup. Um, and I I, we have like Claude Coworks, it might be a GI, I don't know if we, we have, uh, uploaded it yet, but one of the sessions was like a, like a Claude cowork thing.Felix: I, you have to see, I would love to see it. Like, I'm so curious, like one of the most fun parts of my job is like constantly see the weird things people use Cowork for because it's obviously like very hard for us to actually design for specific use cases we do. But like every single person who's like most amazed is usually amazed about a thing that I didn't even expect cowork would be good at.Um, we have a new designer and it's one of the first small tasks. I was like, Hey, we need like a new emoji for cowork for our internal stock. It's like a pretty small thing. I like, can you please do it? And he drew an SVG and just gave it to coworker was like, can you animate this emoji? And now it has like this beautiful loopy animation.Um, and I mean, I think obviously this goes down to like, it turns out you can do more things with code than you expected, but it, it's like that kind of stuff that is really fun to me. So, long story short, I would love to see like, the kind of things you're doing.swyx: I'll pull it up. I'll pull it up.Felix: Yeah. Yeah.swyx: Uh, but before we get into it, I, I think always wanna start with like a top level. What is Claude Cowork for people who haven't heard of it? Haven't tried it out.Felix: Okay. Uh, real quick, Claude Cowork is a user friendly version of Claude Code. So the way it basically works is we have Claude Code and for us, fairly impressive agent harness that over December we noticed more and more people are using either, even though they're not technical, they, they're not at home in the terminal or they are at home in the terminal, but they started using Claude Code for non-coding workloads, right?Like managing expenses or like filling out receipts or organizing a knowledge base. Like there was a big obsidian moment that a lot of people liked and we wanted to capitalize on that, but also bring, bring this capability to people who are not terminal native and who might not know how to like brew and store something.So cowork is Claude Code running in original machine with a little bit of padding, a little bit more guardrails, making it a little safer and a little bit more convenient for people who don't wanna first open up the terminal when they go to work.swyx: It's interesting, uh, that is kind of. Pitch that way as a more user friendly thing because I always feel like it, it, to me, I I treat it as like why I'm familiar with Claude Code.Like we, we did a Claude Code episode Yeah. A year ago. But this one is like even more power user tools ‘cause it, uh, it kind of integrates much better with like clotting Chrome and, uh, in all the, all the other tooling. But like, maybe, maybe that's like a perception thing, right? LikeFelix: No, honestly, I don't think you're wrong.This is like a, a thing I've been thinking a lot about for like the last two weeks. So,swyx: but when they say user friendly, it's like, oh, it's the dumb down version. But no, actually this is the superset.Felix: Yeah. Like, I think a similar thing happened, A similar thing happened to me about 10 years ago, like maybe 12 years ago when I was at Microsoft and we started working on, on Electron and like browser-based technologies and cross-platform stuff.And one of the first use cases was Visual Studio Code, which used to be a website. And the initial narrative was, or Visual Studio Code is, is like a more user-friendly version of Visual Studio. But in a similar vein, I think there was some voices saying, oh, this is. For serious developers, like, we're not gonna use this.Right? For like anything. And I think in the end what happened is people have different stories about why Visual Studio Code became such a big thing. But my personal, my personal belief is that the Hackability and the extendability has like played a pretty big role, right? You can hook in Visual Studio Code that like almost any workload, it's so easy to hack on, so easy to put extensions for it.And I think cowork might be hitting a similar thing where it's very easy to extend and it's very easy to bring into your workflows. Uh, so the convenience I think is a bit of a, it's obviously the thing we strive for as developers, but I think the way people find value in it then is by probably mapping it onto whatever they actually have to do in their job.Alessio: So end of last year, you see the spike of like non-technical usage and clock code. What's the design process to say we should make clock code work? Because I mean, you built it in only 10 days. Um, I'm sure there was some discussion before on whether it's easier to use mean. You know, like making, making like a desktop GUI is obviously one way to do it, but like there's a lot of nuance in the product.Like maybe talk people through what was like the trigger of like, we should build a separate thing. We should not build like a different plot code thing. And then maybe some of the more interesting design decisions that maybe you didn't take.Felix: Yeah, I think philanthropic, we've been thinking about ways to move people who are comfortable with using Claude to answer questions and bring more of the power of like this thing to now like, execute tasks for you.I can like solve problems for you can like build things for you. How do we bring that capability to people who are currently mostly comfortable with like a like question answer paradigm within the chat. And we've had a lot of prototypes around that. Just going back as far as like easily a year and a half.Like we had a lot of people working on that. Um, and internally philanthropic is a very prototype demo, first culture. We have a lot of like internal prototypes that don't reach the public. What Cowork actually became is like we sort of picked the right pieces out of the many prototypes that we had.Right. And that's, that's maybe also like, I think an important qualifier whenever people mention this like 10 day number. I do think it's important to me to mention that within Double Scratch there was like a lot of stuff already happening, right? Like, and I think it's important for people to remember that when you build a website, you use React, you use like a bunch of other things.And this is like a similar scenario with like a lot of pieces we already had. Um, and in terms of decision path, I think we live in like an interesting new world where execution is actually quite cheap.swyx: Mm-hmm.Felix: So maybe, maybe what you would do That's so crazy. The year. I know it's wild.swyx: You should be, ideas are cheap.Execution is the hard part. IFelix: know. And like the, we, we used to live in this world maybe where you would take a product manager and the product manager would go to a number of potential customers and in this like very low bandwidth way, would try to. Try to like tease out what are the problems they're having, what are they willing to buy?Um, and then maybe what can you build to like drive out that need and then you go back and you like draft a spec and you think about it and then like you make a design and you execute it. We internally philanthropic app, not pretty much closer to the point where we're like, don't even write a memo, just like build, like let's build all the candidates very quickly.Let's just build all of them and then pick the best ones. I think the, the decision that is most impactful both for the product as well for the users right now is like the way we put value on your local computer. I think that's a big decision point a lot of people have thought about. Should this thing, whatever it is, should it ultimately run into computer or should it run in the cloud?‘cause they're big trade offs, right?Alessio: I guess like if we solve auth, it would be easy to do in the cloud. But I think like the fact that I can just download any file from anywhere and then put it and cowork there, it's like a big unlock. Um, I mean it's interesting you mentioned reusing certain pieces. I think this is something I've been thinking about even with Claude Code, right?The price of like writing code is going to zero, blah, blah, blah. But it actually seems like the value of having some sort of platform substrate is like increasing because as you build these new things, you can kind of plug them together.Felix: Yeah.Alessio: So I almost feel like when people are saying, oh, the value of a lot of software is gonna zero because you can recreate it, to me it's almost like the opposite.It's like having an existing platform to build on top of. It's like even more valuable because you can kind of bolt things on.Felix: Yeah.Alessio: You have obviously mcps, you have skills, you have like obviously the models, which is a big part. All these things kind of come together. Do you feel like that's a valid way to think about it, where people should invest even more in kind of like primitives.To rebuild on or are you like recreating a lot of it each time because like things change and it's easier to rewrite than reuse?Felix: You know, I think, I think you're right. I think you're right that the holistic platform is really useful. And this is maybe a whole like a somewhat contrarian view to a lot of people in ai.I actually don't think that the future is going to be hyper personalized software down to the point where everyone is running their own version. Like, I actually think it's going to be quite hard for all of us to have our own internal chat tool and like, if I wanna talk to you, likeswyx: howFelix: is that gonna work, right?In the, in the context of cowork and how we build it, I think it's a bit of a combination. Like what the, the execution that gets cheap is not necessarily rebuilding all the primitives. I think our priori, there's also not a lot of value in it. So for instance, my team did not think about rebuilding clock code.We're like very much started with the. The core thesis of this should be Claude Code.Mm-hmm.Felix: And then we'll like build things on top of it. The part of the execution that gets a little cheaper is like, how do you take all of these Lego pieces and put them together in a way that makes sense for users?It's like actually valuable. You have so many different approaches now in terms of what kind of, what kind of things do you actually elevate to a primitive, do you strongly believe that all your products should be built by just combining primitive that the public also has available? Do you keep some things internal?Um, and I think that's still evolving, but I think what's probably gonna go away is like, I'm not sure if it's gonna fully go away, but I'm gonna say, I think for me personally, I will probably no longer try to come up with a really good product without testing up with people. This is not a new concept, but wherever you used to have to make costly decisions around, do we pick technology A or technology B, or do we like, um, build it this way, build it the other way.I really strongly believe now you just build all of them and try them out with a small focus group and then whatever, whatever is better is what you go with. Right. And that, that is probably quite different even from how we maybe worked a year ago. Right. Like, I think, I think this happened very recently.Alessio: Yeah. I started building something in on Electron since you're here. Coincidence. Uh, but then Electron and like SQL Light are like, there's like some issues that like between development and like, uh, building anyway. And I was like, let's just rebuild the whole thing in Swift and just recreated the whole thing in Swift.And it's like, I. It's done.swyx: You know, I didn't take any effort. I, I, I don't even know Swift.Alessio: Yeah, exactly. I was like, I'm the, I'm not reviewing it anyway, whatever. You can write in whatever language you pick, but the important stuff that I did was not write the electron bindings. Yeah. It was like the logic of what happens in the app, you know, and then the model is like, yeah, I can just recreate the same thing as withswyx: Yeah.I, I think you still want, especially for people who are doing like high performance software or like very complex software, uh, you still want like, some view of the architecture. Uh, but you can use markdown for that,Felix: right? Yeah.swyx: Uh, you don't actually have to read the code again. I, I'm still like on a sort of like a definitional thing.Um, can we build a good mental model of Claude Cowork? Um, this is what I have, right? Like you you said it's like fundamentally cloud co. We don't wanna touch it. There's the cloud app, there's clouding Chrome. I think you guys do something different in planning, but, uh, I've been talking with Tariq who is on the cloud co team, and you guys are, he's like, no, we just exposed planning.Maybe we can clarify like, what are the major pieces. That people should be aware. It goes into cowork, like,Felix: okay, I think you basically have them. So really, um, you can, you can take planning more or less out. I think there's a few things that are really valuable in cowork. Um, the virtual machine is probably the most powerful thing.So we currently run like a, we currently run like a lightweight VM and we put clocked out into the vm and we do that for, for, um, a number of reasons. Safety and security is a big one, but even if you, even if you ignore for a second safety and security and you're just like, okay, Yolo, I want this thing to do whatever.It is quite powerful to give Claus on computer that is like generally a good idea. And in terms of architecture and UX and everything else that we've been working on, philanthropic, it often is quite useful for you to like anthropomorphize, um, clot aggressively and just be like, this is a person. What will you do if you give a, if you had a person, right?Yeah. And the analogy I've given my dad this morning who is still like quite insistent on using chat even for like coding things, is if you were a developer and your employer told you that you don't need a computer, they're just gonna like, send you emails with a code and you send emails with code back like that, maybe work for Patrick Miles in the back, but that it's not very effective.Um, so what we can do with the VM is because it's a, it's a Linux system, Claude Code has more or less free reign to install whatever needs to install. It can install Python, it can install no js. We do have strict network ingress and egress controls. So you can still, as, as a user in like plain human language, make it clear to, to the entire system what you're okay with and what you're not okay with.But at no point do we have to ask a real person, like a, like a person who might be in marketing or a lawyer. I'd have to go to a lawyer and be like, are you okay with me installing Homebrew?Alessio: Yeah, yeah.Felix: Right. Because the implications of the question and the answer are complex and nuanced and like, not, not easy to reason about.This gives us a lot of distraction that makes Cloud very powerful. Now then around it, we, we do probably have a number of things that also keeps growing almost every single week that you're probably noticing that make cowork maybe better for certain tasks than just cloud. Cloud on its own. Yeah. But most of those actually live in the system prompt.They're about like, what can we infer about the work that you do? What can we, what can we intru in the system prompt to make that more effective? It's of course the like very tight integration with Cloud and Chrome. You're noticing that a lot of people, especially as the models get better, a lot of people throw up their hands when it comes to MCP connectors in this area.I'm not gonna, I'm not gonna go through like 25 M CCP connectors, click off everywhere and then like half of them don't let me do the things anyway. So Cloud and Chrome is quite powerful because we can just talk to the cloud and Chrome sub agent and that will just do things for you.swyx: Yeah, so, so one example right in MCPI, honestly, I think that the state of MCP is kind of, kind of.Really hard to integrate. Um, I need to, I needed to add, uh, Figma MCP to the coding agent that I use.Felix: Yeah.swyx: Uh, and, but I didn't wanna read the docs, so I just had caught to it. And it's, it's great at reading docs and the same, same way I had to set up like a Google Cloud, um, account for some project I was working on and get some API keys somewhere.And Google Cloud is famously super hard to navigate, so I just didn't wanna deal with any of it. I just used Claude CoworkFelix: within the first week of developing on Core. This happened very, very quickly. Um, I caught myself by starting to use cowork for coding tasks, which is not ostensibly what we built it for, right?We don't need to. But I found myself, um, I found myself like on our internal, internal tool that we have for, to collect crashes and just like debugging information and I found myself sort like picking out the ones that I think we can easily fix versus the ones that might be like kernel corruption or something else on the operating system.And I found myself sort of picking these out and then just telling Clark, go fix this bug. I was like, what am I doing here? Go one level up, tell a cowork, I want you to go to all these crash tools. I want you to find all the bugs that you think are fixable and not like an operating system crash. And then I want you to tell another cloud to like fix all of that.Um, and that's, that's, that's sort of another cloud,swyx: just so it can spin up another instance or,Felix: uh, it, currently what I do is, um, and this is a bit of a hack, but I tell it to use clockwork remote to which website itself? Yeah, that's interesting. So you basically take, if you, if you imagine like a dashboard with like 20 bucks, you, this is remote control or clock or remote, or, sorry, I just wanted to confirm what, the way I'm using it is.I have cowork running and I'm telling cowork, here's where I normally go every morning to find the latest bugs. Go read the entire bug list, separate out which ones are fixable, which ones are, are fixable, and then for the fixable ones, four is this almost loop. For each bug, write a markdown file with a prompt.And then for each markdown v, that is a prompt. Start of a cloud set. So natively Claude Code hasswyx: this concept of subagents. Mm-hmm. And this is basically a subagent, but you're not using the subagent functionality.Felix: I'm not using the subagent functionality. And the reason I'm not is because I'm firing that off as a Claude Code remoteswyx: task.Felix: Yes. That's kind of nice. ‘cause then I can just fire it off. I can go to my next meeting and in Claude Code remote. Now the work is happening.swyx: Mm-hmm. Yeah. You, you see like you're already starting to use the cloud over your local machine. And I think this is one of those things where like. Shouldn't just everything just be cloud first, right?Felix: Ah, this is such a good group. I'm like solely bad about this. I have so many thoughts about that. Okay. So I generally believe that Silicon Valley overall is undervaluing the local computer. And my default argument for that is always how come we're all using MacBooks and not like an iPad or a Chromebook?Um, that there is like still value in, in having a local machine. And now when I think about Clot, it's this entity that is supposed to be very useful to you, like it tremendously useful to you. I think that entity needs to have access to all the same tools you have access to. Otherwise it's gonna be hamstrung in like all these complex ways.And there's, there's sort of two approaches we could take. We could say, okay, we're gonna like one by one chip away at everything that is at your computer and move it into the cloud. That's, that's one way to do it. Um, and I think other products have taken that path. I personally, this is a very personal opinion, but I personally, for the amount of tools that I use.Just don't have the patience to give another tool like permissions to every single thing and keep those permissions up to date. The second thing that I'm still grappling with, and I don't have a good answer for anyone just yet, but the second thing I'm still grappling with is what does it look like for someone to slurp up your entire work and put that in the cloud?Like if I, just as an example, like if you could click a button and it just clone your entire computer into the cloud, is that something that you would want? I'm not totally convinced yet that all everyone will. Mm-hmm. And that is sort of like upstream of all the technical issues we're gonna have. ‘cause like in general, I think the world is not ready for this kind of stuff.Like, I'll give you one quick example that would probably be very easy for us. So as a desktop app, we in theory with your permission, can do a lot of things on your computer, including reading your Chrome cookies. If we really want to do right, we could take your Chrome cookies, you would have to decrypt them for us.We could put those on the cloud if we really felt like it. Pretty easy solution. That would be super cool. We could just be like, oh, we can do all your tasks in the cloud now. Um, a lot of websites, thanks, include it. If, if they see the same authentication from like two different locations, we'll just lock down your account and now you have to go to the branch and be like, okay, I, I'm here with my passport.You actually know that. Wow. Yeah. As tired as well are of the term agent for the age agent future, I think there's a lot of stuff that sort of slowly needs to catch up and until that's the case, the way I, as someone's working on clock and make Cloud most effective is to like put it where you are working.swyx: Anything else? I thought with our mental model, so like, basically like, uh, part of me also just want, like the more I understand how it works, the more I can use it to its full potential. Right?Felix: Yeah.swyx: And so what I'm get hearing from you is you told me to delete the planning thing. You're not doing anything special on, on the, that's only exclusive to Qua cowork.Felix: We have some tricks for this sort of like change week over week. We eval cowork maybe against different use cases than he would evil clock code, right? If you think about it this way. Okay, so like clock code is our eval clock cowork. Yeah. So clock code is like quite optimized for coding tasks and we mostly value it whether or not we're getting better or worse depending on how good it is at like a typical suite job.And Clark Cowork on the other hand, we evaluate more against typical knowledge work, the kind of stuff he would find in finance or in like maybe a, like in like a legal office. Um, my personal use case is always like managing my things, like managing my personal mortgage or something like that, right? Or like wealth planning for me and my family.Those are the kinds of use cases we eval, clock cowork on. And what you might be picking up on is like the subtle changes we make to the system. Prompt what we put in the system, prompt how we steer, clot with the tools we give it. Um, like either it'd be better in one or the other direction and whether there's a trade off, try us exist a lot.CLO code will be better of a code and Claude Cowork will be better. For non-coding tasks, will those gaps still exist in the next three generations of models? It's like a little unclear to me though.swyx: Yeah,Felix: because right now these like hyper optimizations we make, I'm not sure for how long they're still be relevant.swyx: I think what I was referring to was also, it, it just, uh, it qualitatively felt different when I probably, it's just all prompting and I'm reading too much into it, but like the, the fact that it comes out with like a nine step plan, I can edit the plan and give feedback and, and, and see it execute the plan.Yeah. It felt more long range than in Claude Code, but maybe that already existed in Claude Code and you just build a nicer UI for it.Felix: It's kind of both. Um, like if the Clark Code people who build the planning functionalities would city, they probably say yes, we have all of those things in Clark code and they do.Um, I think people tend to give cowork. Tasks that are maybe of longer time horizon, I thought isswyx: so long. Yeah.Felix: That's like one thing, right? It's just like that the, the chunk of work tends to be maybe a little bigger. And then the second thing is that because the work, when it gets longer, it gets a little bit more ambiguous.We do tell co-work to make heavy use of the planning tool or to make heavy use of the ask user question tool, right? We do want it to come up with like. Different scenarios of, okay, tease out what the user actually wants. Don't go off to work for like four hours and then come back with the wrong thing.And you're probably picking up on that.swyx: Yeah.Felix: Um, I wish I could tell you I like built this magical thing and it's like, there's some secret sauce,swyx: but No, no, no. I mean, it's, it's just clarity is good that, you know, engineers just want to know. Yeah. They can, they can plan around it. And then I think also for me, um, I am realizing I have to switch to my, my other machine because this is a new machine that doesn't have my session.But, uh, yeah, the, the, the planning is really important for, for me to like approve or like to see whether it's like, it's right. The ask is, the question is so beautifully presented. I mean, it also, it also available in like cursor and, and in Claude Code. But like, I, I think like it's so nice to see that it, like it's kind of for me like to understand that it gets me, it gets what I want to do.Felix: Yeah.swyx: Yeah.Felix: It probably very hardswyx: just on the topical evals. Mm-hmm. When you say eval, I think people are very vague about what it means. Is it just like vibe testing or do you have like automated programmatic evals of Claude Cowork?Felix: When we say eval, uh, what we really mean is that we essentially take the entire transcript, including all the tools that clot has available ultimately to it, and we then measure what are the outputs, depending on what we tweak, right?So we do run that a lot. We use that in training. Um, we use that in, in like, if you sort of separate out post training from like the scaffolding around it. Cowork sort of exists in the scaffolding space, but obviously we also train on it a little bit. Um, so when we say eval, we mean given the certain transcript, what do the outputs look like?Including the file outputs as well as like the actual token outputs, like the ones that you see in the chat window.Alessio: I'm curious, um, how much of the failure modes are the model intelligence versus like the usage of the end tool to put the intelligence in? Like the well planning is like a good example, right?It's like one thing is to come up with a plan. The other thing is like make a nice spreadsheet. Yeah. That kind of runs you through the plan. Like how have you seen that? Well,Felix: the thing that I grapple with a lot is that whatever scaffolding you come up with, I think we still have a bit of sort of like model overhang where the model is dramatically more capable than right.Users end up using it for. And I think part of that is that we're just not getting the model all the tools to do all the things that's theory capable of, right? There's like one thing, um, however, whenever you do build the scaffolding, I'm sort of wondering at what point, at what point will that scaffolding go away and like how much you invest in figuring out what the right scaffolding is.It's kind of up to, it's a little bit of a bet. And one thing that I as an NJ quite enjoy is that like working in philanthropic and working at a frontier lab, I maybe have a little bit more insight into what's coming, coming down the chute in terms of like, what's the next model, what is the model capable of?What is good at, what is it bad at? And I'm, I'm increasingly wondering, is the right thing for us to like really invest too much in sort of these like scaffolding corrections where the model might otherwise not misbehave, but just not do the thing that you want?Alessio: Yeah.Felix: Or is it to just like give it as many capabilities as possible, try to make those safe so there's the worst case scenarios, likeno status might be otherwise.And then just simply wait a second for the next model drop. I'm personally, currently more leaning into the ladder. I think we're gonna see a lot of like applications and companies that do very impressive things with ai that in the short term might seem very effective ‘cause they're very specialized to individual use cases.But I think once models get better generalization and get better at like those specific use cases without being super guided on those, I'm not sure how long that's gonna stick around. And you can kind of, kind of already see this in like skills and NCP servers, right? Mm-hmm. We've, we've already seen sort of this like slow shift from MCP service to skills.And like, maybe a good example is Barry who made skills. He was initially hacking on something that honestly looked a lot, looked, looked a lot like what Cowork does today. It was sort of thinking about what if cowork, but for like people who don't wanna build code. Mm-hmm. And, um, he too did that as a prototype inside the desktop app.One of the first use cases we thought of were, okay, what, what are like coding like use cases that could really benefit from graphical interfaces and like from being a little separated from the actual underlying code. And everyone comes with the same answers. Data analysis,Alessio: right?Felix: Yeah. Or saying how many users do we have today?How many, like, it's always data analysis. And I think the thing that ultimately led to skills is that we wanted to connect this little prototype to our data warehouse and. The team very quickly discovered that like instead of building a custom tool for the thing to talk our data warehouse, they just like meet and embarked on follow like mm-hmm.Dear Claude, if you want to get data, here's the end point. Here's what the API looks like. You'll figure it out.swyx: Ah.Felix: And then it be hand over control. Yeah, yeah. Also just like maybe go one step up in the layer of abstractions, right. Just, yeah. Instead of, instead of telling the thing, here's ACL I, please call the CLI, or here's an MCP.Please call this ECT shape. Just like this is the end point. If you wanna know something, if you post here, maybe you can do post sql. It's gonna be okay. And that ended up being so effective that they started trying the same pattern of like just giving the model a markdown file that describes whatever it needs to do.That the whole thing eventually became skills and we're like. We should package this up. This is a good idea.swyx: Yeah. Um, we've had Barry Mahesh, uh, on, on our conference and uh, he's uh, definitely got a good idea there.Felix: Yeah.swyx: I wanted to show you the, how I've been using Claude Cowork.Felix: Uh, this is was my favorite part.swyx: This is this. So this is like me, uh, this is how we run the Discord. Uh, we literally, uh, at first I didn't trust Cloud Core. This was my very first usage.Felix: Okay.swyx: Right. So then I was like, okay, I will just try to manually download from Zoom all my recordings and upload it to YouTube. Yeah. Because this is a very laborious process.I got a click, click, click YouTube, um, isn't super user friendly. Uh, and it just did it. And then I was like, actually, you know, even the download from Zoom part, I should also. Put into Claude Cowork, and then I did it right. Here's a bunch of, and it starts compacting here, and it, and it, it starts to even be able to do things like look through the individual frames of the video to name the video so I can upload it auto automatically.Oh, that is, and this replaces my job as a YouTuber. We will forever appreciate your creative Yes. You know, and so that's great. Uh, but then by the way, it compacts and makes, makes like a new thing, right? So I, I don't, I don't have the initial, initial thing, but then I asked it to make its own skills so that it, so that something that's repetitive and one-off and human guided becomes more automated and I can use the skills independently and reuse them.Uh, and it obviously you can write skills and that goes into context and skills at the bottom here, which is, which is so nice. Um, so I have all these skills that, that I now sort of do on a weekly basis. Uh, I know you've released scheduled Coworks, which I haven't done yet, butFelix: course I should try them. I, I think this is like so wonderful and fun for me to see because.One thing that is very fun for me about skills in particular is that they're so easy to make. Like anyone can make a skill, like a text message, could be a skill, and they can be so hyper personalized to you. And this is like sort of the subtraction layer, right? Like, um, I, I'm just guessing, but I assume, heck, you are very good at your job.You're probably given this thing some guidance about how to do it, right? I,swyx: I just said, wrap everything up into, into a skill, right?Felix: Yeah.swyx: And then, uh, and then I was like, actually, sometimes I might need to break, uh, things apart because some parts fail or some parts might be needed in individually. So I told it to split one skill into three skills.So it's like a skill splitting thing, and then there's like a parent skill that just orchestrates all of them if I want to use that. You know, like, um, I think that's, that's like really good. Uh, and, and, uh, there's, there's one more part, which is the, uh, Google Chrome thing that I told you about.Felix: Yeah.swyx: Where I'm like, okay, you know, what's better than uploading, using Claude Coworks to YouTube?Like actually. Looking at the docs to like programmatically upload to YouTube and then putting that in a skill. And I've never done that before. I don't want to deal with Google Cloud. Yeah. So Claude Cowork does it for me.Felix: That is really cool.swyx: So, so I, I just, I don't care. I just, like, I do a thing. I don't, it doesn't really matter.Felix: That is really cool. And then you've, I assume paired the skill just with the script that it's built.swyx: Yeah, no, I just update, update the skills.Felix: Oh, that is beautiful. Yeah. That's wonderful.swyx: It's kind of like a skill, like, uh, uh, basically I think like the way that people ease into Claude Cowork is like take a knowledge work task that you would normally be clicking around for and then, uh, try to turn, turn that, and then you do the, okay, well what if you went further?Okay. And then when, if you went further, when, if you, and it sort of expand the scope of cowork as you gain trust with it and, and also teach it how to replace you.Felix: Yeah. It's like a little bit like playing factorial, but for your own life. Uh, like you say, you start really small.swyx: Yeah.Felix: You start automating something really tiny and like.Once it clicks, you keep adding onto this like automation empire. Just like make your life easier and easier. My favorite skill has been, um, every single morning Kohlberg starts looking at my calendar and make sure that there's conflicts because people tend to schedule a lot of meetings, sometimes last minute, sometimes miss it soft and painful.And a lot of products have existed like that A lot. I've written in the custom prompt there. I haven't made it a skill, um, honestly should.swyx: Yeah.Felix: But I've given it like pretty clear instructions about okay, here are some people, if they book over other meetings, I'm probably gonna go to their meeting. Like if Dario schedules a meeting.swyx: Right.Felix: Not try to reschedule down. Right. Um, and I think there's some other rules in there about like what kind of meetings I care more about what kind of meetings I care less about. What is okay to like, maybe pun like when I want to be, when I want to be working, when I don't want to be working. And it's those really small things that I can think kind of click with people.Right. When we launch co-work, I think one of the US races that went most viral on Twitter. X was clean up your desktop, which is stuff, because silly, that's such a smart thing, right? Like you don't need to model to clean up your desktop. Not really. Um,swyx: like this, like clean up my desktop.Felix: Yeah, exactly. Yeah.swyx: I need to, I need to choose my desktop, right? I guess give it access to my desktop.Felix: Yeah.swyx: Okay. Uh, okay. This is very scary. Oh, we'll do it.Alessio: I did, I did it with my downloads folder. It was like, you have so many term sheets and there's like eight copies of your rental lease for your office. I was like, all right.Like, don't yell at me.Felix: It's like, it's not such a small task. And then like, I, I would never go out there and normally otherwise and tell people I've pulled a product. It can organize your folder. Right. Um, because it feels small. But I think to your point like,swyx: oh, here's, here's the, here's the ask user questions.Felix: Yeah.swyx: Uh,Felix: beautiful. Right. Elite obvious junk. You probably shouldn't click that.Alessio: No.Felix: If he's not done right.swyx: As long as it's reversible, I don'tAlessio: make up blend to,swyx: yeah. Uh, yeah. No, I, I have a, I have a typical, everything is super messy folder. So, yes. I think this, this is super helpful. So this is a pretty simple task.Mm-hmm. But I've, okay, here it is. Right. Here's the progress. I don't see this in, that's why I'm like, this gotta be something different than, uh, than Claude Code, because I'm like, weFelix: do. Yeah. That's, we do system prompt that. We're like, all right. We want you to think about like, this task Yeah. Methodology.Yeah.swyx: And then I can, I can, I can do like little suggestions for, for, for these things. It's beautiful. Look at this. I, I can, I can like say like, oh, don't do that. Don't do this. It's amazing.Felix: I'm so happy. You like it. Um, I mean, the other way around, like we're part of the Clark core team, if you would like this in Clark COVID.swyx: Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Uh, so, so yeah, I mean, uh, this is really good. Obviously I, I'm like kind of raving about it. Uh, you know, I have other things like sign up for pg e so if you can do phone calls for me, that'd be great. Um, I, I do, peopleFelix: have done that. Obviously you can't do that natively, but people have done that with like, various other providers.swyx: Yeah. Uh, and then this is like signing up for the Figma MCP. Um, I, I really am trying to do like everything, um, data analysis as well. I do think, um, oh, design to code, uh, very, very good. Right? So like, here's a Figma file, take it. And then this is where like a lot of other tasks is like knowledge work, like replace my manual clicking, but this is no, I would normally use Claude Code or uh, Claude Code for this, but because I perceive that you have better Chrome integrationFelix: mm-hmm.swyx: I, I think you can actually do a better job of this. And I, this, this is one shot at my, uh, conference website.Felix: That's pretty cool. Like at some point I would love to like, hear how you feel about code. In the desktop apps, which is like I never use, which is the, the same team. Same team.swyx: So I use the call code in terminal, which I, I perceive to be the default way of cloud coding.Felix: So one thing this has,swyx: sorry, I'm just like, I'm notFelix: here, I'm not here. All products. Can I talk about other stuff? Like I, I'm not sure if people out there wanna like hear me advertise my stuff for like an hour. Please do that. Um, this thing is like a builtin browser, which is a thing a lot of products have said.Yeah, it's a builtin browser. And I think giving cloud eyes into like what you're actually working on makes it so much more effective. And that's probably what you've seen in cohort because it can see Chrome, it can like debug the dom, it can like see things. Um, that does make it more powerful.swyx: Yeah. So, so I think, uh, my mental model was kind broken.‘cause I only use this cowork because I thought it had a, a browser thing in it. But I understand that the Claude Code app. The app version of Claude Code does have a built-in browser. I've seen, I've seen this preview thing.Felix: Yeah.swyx: I just, I've never used it.Felix: But in the end, in the end, you sort of have it by hard.Yeah. You basically get the same thing. Right? Like the, the, the additional skill that you're describing is chart is better if we can see what it's working on. Right. That's, that's sort of like the summary here and like whether it's using your Chromeswyx: Yeah.Felix: Or it's just like making up its own little like browser.It doesn't really make a big difference because either way it's gonna see what it's working on and that just makes it much better. And then you don't have to run QA for your cloud.swyx: Why doesn't it pick up my existing Claude Code sessions? ‘cause I, I mean, obviously I've used Claude Code, but Excellent question.Um, don't have a good answer other than like, we're honest. Just haven't Yeah. This is what the Open AI team does. Okay. Uh, cool. I I I don't have other, like, I, I just, I, I do wanna expand people's minds and also maybe show people if they haven't really done it, but like, I, I think it's very interesting how I sometimes use this more than I use, I mean, I use dia, right?Yeah. Um, I, and I use, uh, I've used like all the other agentic browsers and philanthropic didn't have to build an agentic browser because you just had Claude Cowork and that's enough.Felix: Yeah. I also think like maybe integrating with number of excellent browsers out there, it's like currently on my personal priority list, a little higher than like trying to rebuild a browser from scratch.Yeah. You know, never say never, but I think going back to this idea of like, we wanna plug this into an entire existing workflow, I think our goal is actually to not replace any of the applications we have in your computer. But instead of like, work really well within a new workflow,Alessio: make the new one. Yeah.Are, it seems that nowadays, especially on the browser, most of the innovation is like user ergonomics. It's not really like the underlying browser engine. So I feel like to call it, it doesn't really matter if it's like the, uh, or Chrome or Alice, whatever.Felix: Yeah. We wanna, we wanna meet you wherever you are.Which is like, like obviously I would say that, but it's also just generally true because I don't wanna shrink my potential user base artificially by saying, okay, like, I'm gonna start building for the people who are willing to switch browsers.Alessio: Right.Felix: That's such a, like, you know, like many lawsuits have been filed over who gets to review the browser and like a lot of money has switched hands over the question of like, which browser is default and which search engine is default within the browser.Um, I just wanna build for, yeah, I wanna build for swyx essentially. Like, I wanna, I wanna, I wanna build for people who have a number of annoying tasks that they feel like. Maybe clock could do it. Could do it for them.Alessio: Yeah. What do you think about skills portability? I think there's been one thing, I use another thing called zo, which is kinda like a cloud computer plus agent.And I have a skill to add visitors to the office. Yeah. So whenever somebody has to come in after hours, they need to check in downstairs. Um, but I wanna like text the thing, so it doesn't really work in, in cowork, but now that skill is in the zone harness and it's not in my cowork thing. And then if I make a change, it's gotta, I gotta sync them.How do you see that going? Like I see memory as like. Cloud personal, kinda like, I don't necessarily want my memories to be cross thing.Felix: Yeah.Alessio: But I do want my skills to be cross agent that I use. I think with MTPs, people do the same thing. It's like, oh, Mt. P Gateway. Mt P registry. I don't really know if that's like a business.So I'm curious like if you've had any thoughts in the area.Felix: I think for me, this is sort of where I go back to the really basic primitives for our skills are file-based instead of like this complicated thing that exists inside a place somewhere that is like super proprietary. I'm really leaning into the idea of like, it's all just files and vultures, and that makes it very portable on its own.Right. We do have skills as part of this container format, which was just called plugins.Alessio: Mm-hmm.Felix: And plugins are available both for Claude Code and Claude Code work the same format, and you can install plugins. This works in cowork today. You can basically say, I'm gonna add a whole, like just a GitHub repo as a.Skills marketplace or like a plugin marketplace. And that's how we're doing portability. I think we have a lot of room left to grow in. How do we make it easy for people to know that they can write skills? How do we make it easy for them to just like, share a skill with you? Because obviously all the words I just said, right?Like I'm losing most of the knowledge worker base out there, right. And start by saying, oh, you can connect to GitHub repo. It's not exactly how most people will end up working in like a general knowledge worker space. Um, but I think there's something there. And another thing that's there that I think has not really been properly explored is the, the, the combination of which part of the skill is very portable and then which part of the skill is like very personal to you.Right. And I think that's something we haven't really solved as an industry. Hmm.swyx: It's like, which, how you wanna introduce more structure to the skill or have always have like. Public skill, private skill, you know, pair. Yeah, yeah. Kind of. I think there'sFelix: like a, like the easiest way to do this, which is we do like use string interpolation or something.Right, right. Yeah, yeah. Insert username here, insert like phone number, insert, like known folder, locations, that kind of stuff. Um, that's probably clunky. That's why we haven't built it. Um, but I do think someone is going to come up with like an interesting way to keep everything we like about skills. The portability is just a file, it's just marked down.It's just text, honestly. Right. Like a text file words. The complete lack of structure, which means you don't need any kind of tutorial to write a skill. Just like explain it to Claude the way he would explain it to me and Claude will probably get it before I work. Mm-hmm. Right? You're just like, for booking a flight, tell Claude how to book a flight the same way we tell him somewhere.I just started working here today. But combine that with a very like, personal thing. Um, maybe we'll stick with a booking a flight example. I don't actually think. AI should be booking flights. I think the tools we have is yes.swyx: Yeah. Finally, somebody says it. It's the default demo that everyone's making.Felix: I'mswyx: like, I even against like booking demos, it is not a good showcase.Felix: Yeah. I'm like, I just wanna book my flight myself. But, um, I think there's a lot of things that have a personal and a non-personal component and that's maybe why people reach for flight booking because some things are very universal. Yeah. Super flight is usually better, right? Like few people try to book the most expensive flight.And then some things are quite personal about like what times you prefer, which seat you prefer, which airports you prefer. Combining that and like a skill format that is actually portable, compatible, easy to understand for people. I think that would be very exciting. We just haven't figured it out yet.Alessio: Yeah, I think the text part every, I think everybody by now has some sort of like cloud file thing. Either Dropbox, Google Drive, whatever. So it feels like in a way it should basically like sim link. My skills into all my agent harnesses. Yeah. Just keep those ing like we have internally this like valuable tokens repo, which is like all the commands sub agents.It's good. Uh, and then I build like a TUI where you can start it and be like, you know, install this command and this three sub agents into this agent in this folder and just copy paste this. It doesn't do anything. It literally cp the file into that. But I feel like there should be something similar where like whenever I go into a new thing, it's like, hey, here's like the link to exactly the cloud folder and just bring down these skills into this.Yeah. Like today it doesn't quite work like that. Like if I install a new agent, I cannot, I have to like copy paste all the skills and I don't even know where they are.Felix: Yeah.Alessio: That's like the big problem. It's like where do I find them?Felix: Yeah.Alessio: Um, so I'm curious like in the future like that, that almost feels like my personal productivity thing will be my skills.Felix: Yeah.Alessio: Is not really the product that I use. Everybody has access to the same product. But today there's, that just looks like copy pasting ME files, IFelix: think so many things I, I really like thinking about agents and LLMs just as like another coworker. So many attempts have made to build documentation companies that are like, oh, we're gonna solve oil documentation problems.Um, I myself, like spend a little bit of time working in notion, right? I'm like deeply familiar with the concept of let's get everyone on the same page. Mm-hmm. Right? And what you're basically saying here is you want all your agents to be on the same page about your preferences, about the skills, about the way they ought to work and like how they ought to execute.And I'm not sure what the right thing is going to be if it's going to be some, some company that can say, all right, we're as an independent body, we're not trying to like, push into any particular product. It's our job to be like the skill authority, and we provide, I don't know, we're gonna be the Dropbox of skills and we can just sim link us into all the products we want to use.I'm not sure that's gonna be viable business, but as, as an idea, it would be cool.Alessio: Yeah. Yeah. I think so many things are just going away as businesses. It's like, how am I supposed to do it? I'm not even asking somebody to make a product about it. Like yeah. I wanna personally know. And there's things like you said, it's like you almost wanna skill and then interpolate it between personal and work.So if I'm booking a fly for work, it's different than I'm booking a flight personally.Felix: Yeah.Alessio: In some ways, yeah. But like a lot of the scaffolding is the same, you know? Cool.Felix: I mean, as an engineer I will tell you like, you know, technic a person to technic a person. I will just be like siblings.Alessio: Well that's what, that's what I do.We call that MD and agents that MD's just the same how sim length. And so it is like, that works, but it feels like, yeah, I don't know. MaybeFelix: you can always go one, you can always tell cowork problem and then cowork will solve it for you. Just make the siblings. That's like one way to do it.Alessio: That's true.That's true. All right. Everything is called cowork.Felix: Uh, potentially spicy. Question for both of you.swyx: Uh, which of these industries will go away?Alessio: Okay, so what Felix was saying before is interesting. There's busy like. The short term pressure of like, we need to turn these tokens into valuable things, which is I should build the last mile product that harness the model.And then there's the question of like, long term, which ones are gonna still be valuable? And I think you're kind of seeing this today with like, uh, you know, the coding space in a way is kind of like everybody's moving up and up in stack because you need more than just turning tokens into code. I think search, like enterprise search is kind of saying the same thing.Like with G Clean and like all these different companies is like, at the end of the day, if Cowork is the one doing all the work, the search itself is like such a small part that like, I don't know if I'm really gonna pay that much money just to do search. It's almost like everything is like a cowork vertical.So like how much can cowork first party support?swyx: Mm-hmm.Alessio: And how much can it not? I think for a lot of these things, the planning thing that you were showing do Which one? The planning. The planning.swyx: Okay. Yeah. Yeah.Alessio: That's one thing where like most of the value that these agents provide is like they're better at planning for specific tasks.Yeah. And have better tools for it.swyx: Yeah.Alessio: But I think the models are now moving in that direction and they have the right harnesses and they're on your computer. So for me it's almost like if for the end customer trusts your startup to be the provider of that task result, then I think that works. This is, uh, something that, this is a shortswyx: spike that we're, we're working on.Uh, yeah.Felix: I think, look, I'll, I'll, I'll tell you this, like I don't think I'm the best person to like actually estimate which industry is going to be hit the hardest. But I do think that at philanthropic as a group of people, we're deeply worried about the impact. That the tools are going to have on the labor market, especially for like junior employees that, because I think, I think it's only honest to say that when we talk about automating a lot away, a lot of the work that we personally find annoying that we maybe think's not the best use of our time.In a lot of industries, that kind of work would've been given to a junior entry level employee. Yeah. Right. And I think it's, it's only, it's only right to be really worried about that and like worry what that's going to do in particular to people like enter the shop market.Alessio: Mm-hmm. I have a solution for that.Which you make them, you create simulative jobs for them.Felix: Okay.Alessio: So this is, this is like half joke, half true. So if you think about software engineering, when you're like a junior engineer, you work like 1, 2, 3 years. And in those three years there's like maybe like a handful of moments where like you really learn something.And then a bunch of other days where like you're not really progressing.Felix: Yeah.Alessio: I think now we can use AI and these models to actually like shortcut these careers and almost like simulate the early years of your work and like just make them like super dense and like these learnings, it's like, hey, we're working on this feature, which is like a distributed system and you need to learn this thing that might take three months at a company.And so you take three months here, it's like we're just simulating the whole thing. It's actually not a real thing. And in one week we kind of speed run through the whole thing and you kind of learn your lesson from there. And we kind of repeat that in like one year. You basically get like three years worth of like projects and experience.Yeah. I think it's harder for like things like sales or for things like, you know, marketing because you don't really have a way to get the feedback loop. But I think a lot of it, it sounds kind of silly, it's like you're making the new effect job, but it's almost like you go to college, right? People pay to learn how to do it, and this might feel similar where it's like, hey, we have the.Jane Street Simulator is like, you wanna come work at Jane Street? We'll just put you in the simulator for like three months.Felix: Wow.Alessio: And you'll come out of it. It's like, you know, I'm ready.Felix: So there, there is an aspect here. I'm not an expert enough to like actually know what, what is going to happen to marketing or legal or finance, right?Like, I don't work in those jobs and I, I don't think I should talk about them, but I am an engineer and I think I have a pretty good idea of what engineering is like. And I think one thing we're sort of seeing is that as a company and also as, as the public, we're like deeply worried about entry level, but we're also seeing more senior engineers accelerate it.If like they're more productive. They, they actually increase the value they provide. And the thing that I'm thinking about a lot is the fact that even before all of this happened, um, I've always had a lot of respect for the University of Waterloo and the, the new grads that have joined my teams as from coming from the University of Waterloo always felt like.More ready than new grads will like literally spend their entire time at the university regardless of how good, but never actually had to work inside an environment where you have to ship things that eventually will be used by users. And I'm, I'm, I'm German. I like initially went to German University and I think the, the, the like information systems programs, there tend to be very theoretical, right?Like I often give people the example of like trying

Hoy hablamos de: 1. Los niveles humanos pueden interpretarse a través de las teorías de Abraham Maslow, Clayton Alderfer, David Hawkins y Lawrence Kohlberg. 2. Alderfer plantea tres niveles simultáneos: existencia, relación y crecimiento. 3. El nivel más bajo está dominado por la supervivencia, el miedo y el orgullo. 4. El miedo acompaña todos los niveles, pero en su forma exagerada limita al ser humano. 5. Históricamente, la humanidad ha permanecido mayormente en el nivel de supervivencia. 6. El nivel relacional introduce amor y alegría como experiencias humanas más elevadas. 7. Muchas acciones humanas siguen motivadas por miedo al castigo o necesidad de aceptación (Kohlberg). 8. El nivel más alto implica actuar por convicción ética y principios universales, no por miedo. 9. La “gran paradoja”: el miedo y el orgullo que nos frenan son en gran parte construcciones mentales. 10. La evolución humana consiste en pasar del miedo y el ego a la conciencia, el corazón y la ética. Música: 1. soundcloud.com/nhamer-garcia/hamer-metamorphosis 2. Valkiria. Nhamer García. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwSu1nKgAo Si quieres invitarme a algo, puedes hacerlo aquí: 1. https://www.ivoox.com/support/36379 2. Paypal: contacto@buscadoresdesentido.es 3. Transferencia a nombre de Álvaro Gómez Contreras en la cuenta: ES98 1491 0001 2930 0007 5447 Si quieres contactarme puedes hacerlo en : contacto@buscadoresdesentido.es

 I heard you wanted to get creative, so here is my *almost painfully*detailed breakdown of that process. If you'd like my resume when it comes to creative thinking, Google my name.  (Before appearing too self-righteous to prospective listeners, we will be discussing the fundamental use of first person and first person possessive pronouns when it comes to creativity.) This is part one to my new mini-series on how to be more creative where we're exploring the fields of neuroscience, linguistics, metalinguistics, musculature, childhood development and much more! It's time to brace yourself because the communal Schauer this week is loosening some pretty big knots. Resources: What We Value: The Neuroscience of Choice and Change - Emily Falk A neurocomputational model of creative process https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149763422001452 The Seven Functional Movement Patterns + Video Demonstrations https://www.opexfit.com/blog/seven-functional-movement-patterns Advertising: how it influences children and teenagers https://raisingchildren.net.au/toddlers/play-learning/screen-time-media/advertising-children#:~:text=At%207%2D11%20years%2C%20children,overstate%20how%20good%20products%20are. Describing Skeletal Muscles: A Review of Muscle Attachments and Actions https://www.visiblebody.com/learn/muscular/muscle-movements#:~:text=3.,muscles%20play%20in%20each%20movement.&text=The%20prime%20mover%2C%20sometimes%20called,are%20keeping%20your%20posture%20sturdy Behavioral energetics in human locomotion: how energy use influences how we move https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11993254/ “I” versus “the author”: The power of first-person voice when writing about science https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11145200/#:~:text=Writing%20in%20the%20first%20person,that's%20something%20most%20scientists%20want.  Using “I”: The First Person in Academic Writing https://www.brandeis.edu/writing-program/resources/faculty/handouts/first-person.html Please everyone read this to understand how to apply “I” statements in academic writing OR AT LEAST when studying and trying to retain the information - there is clearly a benefit to using 3rd person, but using first person *strategically and with nuanced understanding* will make knowledge more relative and rewarding to self, as well as make concepts easier to apply. Why Metalinguistic Awareness Matters https://www.gemmlearning.com/blog/learning-issues/why-are-metalinguistic-skills-important/#:~:text=Metalinguistic%20awareness%20is%20the%20ability%20to:%20*,your%20understanding%20as%20you%20listen%20and%20read  Epithelium  https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/articles/22062-epithelium  Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development https://www.verywellmind.com/kohlbergs-theory-of-moral-development-2795071 For sources from a previous podcast episode, please visit that episode for the full source list in the caption! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Text at 617-750-9411

In today's episode, Integrity Square Founder Pete Moore dives into the roots and current landscape of private equity (PE) — and why it matters to literally

Alan Bray was born in Waterville, Maine, and grew up in Monson, a small slate-quarrying town set in the northern reaches of the Appalachians. Bray attended the Art Institute of Boston before graduating from the University of Southern Maine; he received his MFA in painting from the Villa Schifanoia in Florence, Italy. It was during this formative time in Florence that he was exposed to casein tempera on panel. Bray's work has been the subject of no less than 25 solo exhibitions and is included in the public collections of the Portland Museum of Art, ME; DeCordova Museum and Sculpture Park, MA; the Farnsworth Museum of Art, ME; Arnot Art Museum, Elmira, NY; Zillman Art Museum, ME; Leigh Yawkey Woodson Art Museum, WI; Lyman Allyn Museum of Arts, New London, CT;  Maine Savings Bank Collection, Memphis Cancer Center, Kohlberg, Kravis, Roberts, Menlo Park, CA; among others. The artist lives and works in Sangerville, Maine. As both a naturalist and a painter, Bray is drawn to what often goes unnoticed. “I paint what is right around me,” he says. “Occasionally it's a big subject, but more often it's a bird's nest or a farm pond.” Like the subtle geometry of his compositions, Bray's preference for modest, unassuming subjects—backwater meanders over mountaintop vistas—is deliberate and quietly profound. He has become an expert observer of bogs and shorelines, rock slides and fallow fields, daybreaks and dusks, the shifting edges of seasons. In the overlooked landscapes of his native Maine, Bray uncovers a deep sense of spirituality that gives his work its quiet power—transformative in its presence, not merely descriptive. Bray paints in casein, a milk-based tempera that has virtually no drying time. Necessarily, his paintings are technically complex because they consist of thousands of tiny brush strokes, built up in layers, out of which the images – the vision – advance from the foundation of a mirror-smooth, absolute void of white ground. It is a method of painting that follows directly from his method of exploring his subjects. Alan Bray, Neighbors, 2025 Casein on panel, 11 x 14 in. Alan Bray A Whisper Breaks the Silence, 2024 Casein on panel, 15 x 20 in. Alan Bray Refuge, 2024 Casein on panel, 16 x 20 in

Once again, Dr. Raffa and Catarina dive into another well-known name in the development of psychology, Lawrence Kohlberg. After looking at his theory of moral development, our hosts review how his contributions might still be relevant today.Welcome to Talk Therapy CBT | Conversation about Educating, Connecting, Helping Individuals to the World of Psychology.We would like to thanks our sponsor : Dr. Alba Raphaela, you can buy her book about : Breaking the Mirror : A Story & Guide on how to recognize and deal with a narcissist. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B09HFRNWYC/ref=cm_sw_r_apan_3NW8EE01F8A6G4KGNW56This podcast is sponsored by (https://www.innerbalancepsychology.com/) -  Inner Balance Psychology Center, Psychological Treatment and Evaluations for Children, Adolescents and AdultsAs solution-focused therapists, our goal is to help you uncover your true potential and lead a life that is worth celebrating. While we can't change difficult situations of the past, we can work together to better understand and resolve challenges in your life. By applying complementary therapy approaches and techniques, we will unearth long-standing behavior patterns or negative perceptions that may be holding you back from experiencing a more fulfilling and meaningful life.Follow Us on Social Media:Blog : (https://www.innerbalancepsychology.com/blog/ )FAQs : ( https://www.innerbalancepsychology.com/faqs/ )Facebook : (https://www.facebook.com/ibpcllc)Instagram : (https://www.Instagram.com/innerbalancepsychology) Check out our website for more information :  (https://www.innerbalancepsychology.com/) or email Dr. Raffa : (dawnraffa@innerbalancepsychology.com)This podcast is hosted by  and produced by (https://www.innerbalancepsychology.com/) Please consider subscribing and sharing this episode if you found it entertaining or informative. If you want to go the extra mile, you can leave us a rating or review which helps the show with rankings and algorithms on certain platforms. you can leave us a review on Podchaser or Apple Podcasts Make sure you're subscribed to the podcast so you get the latest episodes. Our Podcast Page : (https://www.innerbalancepsychology.com/)(Subscribe with Apple Podcast)(Follow on Spotify)(Subscribe with Stitcher)(Subscribe on IHeartRadio )(Listen on other streaming platforms) DISCLAIMEROpinions expressed are solely the hosts and guest(s) and do not represent or express the views or opinions of Inner Balance Psychology

In this hilarious episode with Pop Culture Moms podcasters and real life BFFs Andie Mitchell and Sabrina Kohlberg, the ladies discuss the highs and lows of their birth experiences, the role formula played in their family's feeding journeys, strategies for establishing a healthy division of labor with one's partner, modeling healthy eating and body positivity for kids without over-stressing, which pop culture moms the gal pals love, and more!Please note that this episode may contain paid endorsements and advertisements for products and services. Individuals on the show may have a direct or indirect financial interest in products or services referred to in this episode.Produced by Dear Media.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In today's episode, Liz chats with best friends Andie Mitchell and Sabrina Kohlberg, hosts of the Good Morning America and ABC podcast Pop Culture Moms. Together, they explore the evolving portrayal of motherhood in entertainment, share their insights from their podcasting journey, and talk about their own personal TV mom heroes. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Blusky Restoration, a prominent restoration and renovation company, was acquired by Partners Group and Kohlberg & Company in 2018. Over the first three years, BluSky Restoration experienced more than a fourfold growth.RKON's Managing Director, Jeff Laurinaitis, sat down with BluSky Restoration's CIO, Aaron Rich, to discuss private equity's IT approach vs. traditional companies, IT recruiting strategies in a tight labor market and  outsourcing/insourcing in the service of scalability. Tune in to learn more about BluSky Restoration and their partnership with RKON.

Welcome to "Empowering the Ethics of Person-Centered Care through Practice." In this two-part podcast, we explore the fundamental principles and practical applications of person-centered care within the realm of healthcare ethics. Objectives: Listeners will gain a comprehensive understanding of the ethical principles and practical methodologies underpinning person-centered care within healthcare contexts. They will learn actionable strategies to implement person-centered practices, aiming to enhance patient experiences, uphold dignity, and promote positive outcomes in healthcare delivery.Guests: Jessa Roisen, PhD, SAU Philosophy and MPH ProfessorDoug Johnson, System Patient Experience Officer, Northshore Edward-Elmhurst Hospital Planetree Gold CertifiedDr. Roisen has more than 18 years in higher education regularly teaching Ethics, Applied Ethics, and Conflict Analysis for the Philosophy Department at St. Ambrose University. She chairs the Bioethics and Humanities Initiative and is a certified mediator and Health Care Ethics Consultant with over 10 years of experience. Dr. Roisen also trains community mediators and mediates regularly for the Davenport Civil Rights Commission and the Rock Island County Circuit Court.Doug Johnson is the Patient Experience Officer at North Shore Edward Elmhurst Health, a Planetree Gold Certified campus. He has worked across disciplines, including healthcare, the marketing industry, retail, and within professional baseball with the Chicago Cubs! References: Berwick DM. The Moral Determinants of Health. JAMA. Published online June 12, 2020. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.11129Ekman, I. (2022). Practicing the ethics of person-centred care balancing ethical conviction and moral obligations. Nursing Philosophy, 23, e12382. doi.org/10.1111/nup.12382Entwistle, V. A., & Watt, I. S. (2013). Treating Patients as Persons: A Capabilities Approach to Support Delivery of Person-Centered Care. The American Journal of Bioethics, 13(8), 29–39. doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2013.802060Harris, E. (2020, May) Person-Centered Care: Why it means everything & how to provide it? www.crisisprevention.com/Blog/Person-…orram-Manesh, A., Gray, L., Goniewicz, K., Cocco, A., Ranse, J., Phattharapornjaroen, P., Achour, N., Sørensen, J., Peyravi, M., Hertelendy, A.J., Kupietz, K., Bergholtz, J., &Carlström, E., (2024). Care in emergencies and disasters: Can it be person-centered?, Patient Education and Counseling, doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2023.108046.Marmot M. The Health Gap: The Challenge of an Unequal World. Bloomsbury; 2015.Planetree International www.planetree.org/Santana MJ, Manalili K, Jolley RJ, Zelinsky S, Quan H, Lu M. (2018) How to practice person-centred care: A conceptual framework. Health Expect. 21(2):429-440. doi:10.1111/hex.12640Sprouts. (2019, November 29). Kohlberg's 6 stages of moral development [Video]. www.youtube.com/watch?v=bounwXLkme4Tomaselli G., Buttigieg S.C., Rosano A., Cassar M., Grima G. (2020) Person-Centered Care From a Relational Ethics Perspective for the Delivery of High Quality and Safe Healthcare: A Scoping Review. Front Public Health. 8:44 doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00044.This podcast is CEU Accredited.

Today's episode features two moms I can relate to - we're media moms of multiples! Andie and Sabrina met 20 years ago as college freshmen and have been inseparable ever since. With four kids between them, they spend a lot of time chatting about the joys and hardships of parenting; the pressures of juggling family and work; and, of course, the latest pop News. Andie Mitchell: Andie Mitchell is a New York Times bestselling author and the founder of the food and lifestyle blog, AndieMitchell.com. Her memoir, It Was Me All Along, was chosen as one of Amazon's Top 100 Best Books of 2015 and People Magazine's Book of the Week. Her cookbook, Eating in the Middle: A Mostly Wholesome Cookbook, was featured in the New York Times book review and selected as O Magazine's Cookbook of the Month. She lives in Massachusetts with her husband, Daniel; and their two sons, James (5) and Levi (3). Sabrina Kohlberg: Sabrina Peduto is an Emmy Award-winning producer for Good Morning America with a passion for producing stories about pop culture and parenting. If she's not on a red carpet at an award show, she can be found writing a story about current events or parenting advice. She lives in New Jersey with her husband, Steve; and their children, Violet (4) and Cooper (2). Meet My Guest: INSTAGRAM: @skohlberg INSTAGRAM: @andiemmitchell X: @SabrinaPeduto X: @andiemmitchell Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Andie Mitchell (It Was Me All Along, Eating in the Middle) and Sabrina Kohlberg (Good Morning America) of Pop Culture Moms join the show to talk about meeting in college, relationships, parenthood, whether there is a central Jersey, Barbie, recipe testing and so much more. We also did a round of Just Me or Everyone and Podcast Pals Product Picks. Get yourself some new ARIYNBF merch here: https://alison-rosen-shop.fourthwall.com/ Subscribe to my newsletter: http://alisonrosen.substack.com Products I Use/Recommend/Love: http://amazon.com/shop/alisonrosen Check us out on Patreon: http://patreon.com/alisonrosen   This episode is brought to you by: BETTER HELP:  http://BetterHelp.com/BESTFRIEND (use code BESTFRIEND for 10% off),  Alison Rosen Is Your New Best Friend is sponsored by Better Help Buy Alison's Fifth Anniversary Edition Book (with new material): Tropical Attire Encouraged (and Other Phrases That Scare Me) https://amzn.to/2JuOqcd You probably need to buy the HGFY ringtone! https://www.alisonrosen.com/store/ Try Amazon Prime Free 30 Day Trial

They're heeeere. Pop Culture Moms Andie Mitchell and Sabrina Kohlberg emerge from the television set to talk about anxious first trips to Disneyland, the perfect mothering of Chilli Heeler, and how they learned empathy from watching TV.Listen to Pop Culture Moms, Andie and Sabrina's new podcast from ABC Audio, wherever fine pods are cast.Thank you to all our listeners who support the show as monthly members of MaximumFun.org. Go to MaximumFun.org/join to become a member!Share a personal or commercial message on the show! Details at MaximumFun.org/Jumbotron.Visit our Linktree for our website, merch, and more! https://linktr.ee/onebadmotherYou can suggest a topic or a guest for an upcoming show by sending an email to onebadmother@maximumfun.org.Show MusicSummon the Rawk, Kevin MacLeod (www.incompetech.com)Ones and Zeros, Awesome, Beehive SessionsMom Song, Adira Amram, Hot Jams For TeensTelephone, Awesome, Beehive SessionsMama Blues, Cornbread Ted and the ButterbeansMental Health Resources:Therapy for Black Girls – Therapyforblackgirls.comDr. Jessica Clemmens – https://www.askdrjess.comBLH Foundation – borislhensonfoundation.orgThe Postpartum Support International Warmline – 1-800-944-4773 (1-800-944-4PPD)The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) Helpline – 1-800-662-4357 (1-800-662-HELP)Suicide Prevention Hotline: Call or chat. They are here to help anyone in crisis. Dial 988 for https://suicidepreventionlifeline.org and there is a chat option on the website.Crisis Text Line: Text from anywhere in the USA (also Canada and the UK) to text with a trained counselor. A real human being.USA text 741741Canada text 686868UK text 85258Website: https://www.crisistextline.orgNational Sexual Assault: Call 800.656.HOPE (4673) to be connected with a trained staff member from a sexual assault service provider in your area.https://www.rainn.orgNational Domestic Violence Hotline:https://www.thehotline.org/help/Our advocates are available 24/7 at 1-800-799-SAFE (7233) in more than 200 languages. All calls are free and confidential.They suggest that if you are a victim and cannot seek help, ask a friend or family member to call for you.Teletherapy Search: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/therapists/online-counseling

Breaking down Kohlberg's Stages of Moral Development helps Matt and Toni make sense of some of the strong emotions going on inside of her when she comes up against rules-based Christians, why some people are so afraid of the Way of Love and how often our motives (even Toni's) are really about avoiding pain.

On today's episode, we are turning our attention to the complex and often misunderstood industry of restoration and remediation. Joining our host Gavin McGrath is Jonathan Ward, Operating Partner of Kohlberg, and Paul Bromfield, Partner at L.E.K. Consulting and expert in building and site services. Together, they will explore the inner workings of this multibillion-dollar industry, debunking misconceptions and shedding light on the true essence of restoration and remediation. From recurring events like burst pipes to the impact of extreme weather and insurance relationships, our guests will provide valuable insights and guidance on navigating this dynamic sector.Key points/topics covered: Revenue stability in the restoration and remediation industry The impact of extreme weather and catastrophic events The influence of insurance relationships on the industry Connect with our experts on LinkedIn:Paul Bromfield, Managing Director and Partner, L.E.K. Consulting: https://www.linkedin.com/in/paulbromfield/Gavin McGrath, Managing Director and Partner, L.E.K. Consulting: https://www.linkedin.com/in/gavinmcgrath/Jonathan Ward, Operating Partner, Kohlberg: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jonathan-ward-0667a57b/  Visit L.E.K. Consulting at https://www.lek.com/

The ongoing Bryan Kohlberger case has recently entered a new phase, with an increasing number of motions being filed by both sides. One particular issue that has come under scrutiny is the presence of cameras in the court, with some of the filings specifically mentioning inappropriate focus on Kohberger's crotch. Defense Attorney Bob Motta, host of the podcast Defense Diaries, recently shared his thoughts on this and other aspects of the case on the "Hidden Killers" podcast with Tony Brueski. Motta explained that with the removal of the speedy trial demand, both the state and defense have been under less pressure, allowing them to fully engage in traditional motion work. This involves going through all discovery materials and deciding whether to file motions such as motions to suppress or quash. However, Motta pointed out that the recent motion work is just a fraction of what is expected in a death penalty case like this one. On the camera issue, Motta predicted that the judge might limit pretrial coverage to avoid tainting the jury pool, a known problem in high-profile cases. Some lawyers in the area believe that the trial should not be moved to a different venue, and Motta agreed, noting that in Idaho, changing the venue would not involve changing the prosecutor or judge, only the location. He also mentioned that importing a jury might be a more cost-efficient and logistically feasible option given the massive undertaking of transporting evidence. While discussing the trial proceedings, Motta emphasized the importance of getting it right the first time to avoid putting the victims' families through the ordeal again. This involves both sides agreeing to a fair trial, which could involve importing a jury from a different county. As for the recent scheduling hearing, two motions to dismiss the indictment were scheduled for September 22nd. The first motion alleges a biased grand jury, inadmissible evidence, lack of sufficient evidence to prosecute, and prosecutorial misconduct. Although this motion will be sealed, Motta predicted that both motions would ultimately be denied. The second motion, which will be open to the public, involves a legal argument regarding the Idaho Constitution's language on the standard required to bind someone over for trial. The defense argues that the constitution requires a "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard, while the Supreme Court of Idaho's criminal rules specify a "probable cause" standard. Motta shared his belief that the defense attorney had been waiting for an opportunity to litigate this constitutional argument, which could have far-reaching implications if successful. However, he clarified that even if the motions were granted, Kohlberg would not be released; the prosecution would likely simply re-indict him. Overall, the Kohberger case continues to evolve with various legal intricacies and challenges that will likely have a significant impact on the final outcome. As both sides prepare for the upcoming hearings, it remains to be seen how the court will address these complex issues and move forward towards a resolution that ensures justice for all parties involved. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The ongoing Bryan Kohlberger case has recently entered a new phase, with an increasing number of motions being filed by both sides. One particular issue that has come under scrutiny is the presence of cameras in the court, with some of the filings specifically mentioning inappropriate focus on Kohberger's crotch. Defense Attorney Bob Motta, host of the podcast Defense Diaries, recently shared his thoughts on this and other aspects of the case on the "Hidden Killers" podcast with Tony Brueski. Motta explained that with the removal of the speedy trial demand, both the state and defense have been under less pressure, allowing them to fully engage in traditional motion work. This involves going through all discovery materials and deciding whether to file motions such as motions to suppress or quash. However, Motta pointed out that the recent motion work is just a fraction of what is expected in a death penalty case like this one. On the camera issue, Motta predicted that the judge might limit pretrial coverage to avoid tainting the jury pool, a known problem in high-profile cases. Some lawyers in the area believe that the trial should not be moved to a different venue, and Motta agreed, noting that in Idaho, changing the venue would not involve changing the prosecutor or judge, only the location. He also mentioned that importing a jury might be a more cost-efficient and logistically feasible option given the massive undertaking of transporting evidence. While discussing the trial proceedings, Motta emphasized the importance of getting it right the first time to avoid putting the victims' families through the ordeal again. This involves both sides agreeing to a fair trial, which could involve importing a jury from a different county. As for the recent scheduling hearing, two motions to dismiss the indictment were scheduled for September 22nd. The first motion alleges a biased grand jury, inadmissible evidence, lack of sufficient evidence to prosecute, and prosecutorial misconduct. Although this motion will be sealed, Motta predicted that both motions would ultimately be denied. The second motion, which will be open to the public, involves a legal argument regarding the Idaho Constitution's language on the standard required to bind someone over for trial. The defense argues that the constitution requires a "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard, while the Supreme Court of Idaho's criminal rules specify a "probable cause" standard. Motta shared his belief that the defense attorney had been waiting for an opportunity to litigate this constitutional argument, which could have far-reaching implications if successful. However, he clarified that even if the motions were granted, Kohlberg would not be released; the prosecution would likely simply re-indict him. Overall, the Kohberger case continues to evolve with various legal intricacies and challenges that will likely have a significant impact on the final outcome. As both sides prepare for the upcoming hearings, it remains to be seen how the court will address these complex issues and move forward towards a resolution that ensures justice for all parties involved. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The upcoming case against Bryan Kohberger, the legal stage is set for some intricate courtroom maneuvers. According to a recent discussion on the podcast "Hidden Killers" with Tony Brueski, Defense Attorney and host of "Defense Diaries," Bob Motta, addressed the pending motion to dismiss the charges against Kohberger. The motion, raised by defense attorney Ann Taylor, is scheduled for the end of this week.    While the speedy trial has already been waived, removing the October 2nd trial date from the table, Taylor is reportedly still going to argue for a dismissal. Motta, elaborating on the intricacies of this maneuver, stated, “I think that Ann Taylor has been...waiting for an indictment by grand jury because they're very unusual in Idaho. They typically go by preliminary hearing.” It's important to note that while grand juries are standard practice in many states, Idaho often relies on preliminary hearings to decide whether to charge a defendant.    To the surprise of many, including Motta, who predicted this change in course earlier this year, the state opted for a grand jury in the Kohberger case. He hypothesized that this move might have been driven by a desire to mitigate potential media interference, saying, "As much as some people don't want to acknowledge the fact that a jury pool can be tainted by constant negative press about a defendant, the fact of the matter is that it can."    Central to Taylor's argument for dismissal is a challenge to the constitutionality of Idaho's grand jury indictments. Motta explained, “She's basically saying that the Idaho constitution... has set the standard for a grand jury indictment that it essentially has to be beyond a reasonable doubt.” The crux of the issue is a potential discrepancy between the Idaho constitution and the Idaho Criminal Rules (ICR). While the ICR states that a grand jury only needs probable cause to indict, Taylor argues that the Idaho constitution requires a higher standard—namely, the same "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard used in trials.    Motta found this legal contention particularly fascinating, pointing out that if Taylor's interpretation is correct, the grand jury was misinformed of the burden they had to meet. He elaborated, “You have these two competing things and they're very different burdens. She's basically arguing, look, they went in and they went to the grand jury and they gave them the wrong burden.”    The implications of Taylor's argument are far-reaching. If she prevails, it doesn't mean that Kohberger will be freed, but rather that the legal process might have to start over. When Brueski pressed Motta on this, asking about the path forward should Taylor succeed, Motta clarified, “If she did succeed and he dismissed that grand jury indictment, that doesn't mean that Kohlberg's walking. That means, yeah, they'd have to do the process all over again.”    While Motta expressed skepticism about the likelihood of Taylor's motion succeeding, he admitted, “For legal nerds, it's going to be a very interesting conversation and argument. I am chomping at the bit to hear it.”    The Kohberger case thus presents not just the story of the crime itself but also a deep dive into the nuances and intricacies of the legal system. As defense attorneys, prosecutors, and legal enthusiasts alike await the courtroom debate, many are eager to see how these arguments play out in shaping the course of Idaho's criminal justice process. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The upcoming case against Bryan Kohberger, the legal stage is set for some intricate courtroom maneuvers. According to a recent discussion on the podcast "Hidden Killers" with Tony Brueski, Defense Attorney and host of "Defense Diaries," Bob Motta, addressed the pending motion to dismiss the charges against Kohberger. The motion, raised by defense attorney Ann Taylor, is scheduled for the end of this week.    While the speedy trial has already been waived, removing the October 2nd trial date from the table, Taylor is reportedly still going to argue for a dismissal. Motta, elaborating on the intricacies of this maneuver, stated, “I think that Ann Taylor has been...waiting for an indictment by grand jury because they're very unusual in Idaho. They typically go by preliminary hearing.” It's important to note that while grand juries are standard practice in many states, Idaho often relies on preliminary hearings to decide whether to charge a defendant.    To the surprise of many, including Motta, who predicted this change in course earlier this year, the state opted for a grand jury in the Kohberger case. He hypothesized that this move might have been driven by a desire to mitigate potential media interference, saying, "As much as some people don't want to acknowledge the fact that a jury pool can be tainted by constant negative press about a defendant, the fact of the matter is that it can."    Central to Taylor's argument for dismissal is a challenge to the constitutionality of Idaho's grand jury indictments. Motta explained, “She's basically saying that the Idaho constitution... has set the standard for a grand jury indictment that it essentially has to be beyond a reasonable doubt.” The crux of the issue is a potential discrepancy between the Idaho constitution and the Idaho Criminal Rules (ICR). While the ICR states that a grand jury only needs probable cause to indict, Taylor argues that the Idaho constitution requires a higher standard—namely, the same "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard used in trials.    Motta found this legal contention particularly fascinating, pointing out that if Taylor's interpretation is correct, the grand jury was misinformed of the burden they had to meet. He elaborated, “You have these two competing things and they're very different burdens. She's basically arguing, look, they went in and they went to the grand jury and they gave them the wrong burden.”    The implications of Taylor's argument are far-reaching. If she prevails, it doesn't mean that Kohberger will be freed, but rather that the legal process might have to start over. When Brueski pressed Motta on this, asking about the path forward should Taylor succeed, Motta clarified, “If she did succeed and he dismissed that grand jury indictment, that doesn't mean that Kohlberg's walking. That means, yeah, they'd have to do the process all over again.”    While Motta expressed skepticism about the likelihood of Taylor's motion succeeding, he admitted, “For legal nerds, it's going to be a very interesting conversation and argument. I am chomping at the bit to hear it.”    The Kohberger case thus presents not just the story of the crime itself but also a deep dive into the nuances and intricacies of the legal system. As defense attorneys, prosecutors, and legal enthusiasts alike await the courtroom debate, many are eager to see how these arguments play out in shaping the course of Idaho's criminal justice process. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The Brian Kohberger trial has seen a new twist in its tale, as the defense prepares to challenge the DNA evidence that may incriminate Kohberger. In the latest episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers", Tony Brueski spoke with former Felony Prosecutor and attorney, Eric Faddis, shedding light on the defense's strategy and the risks it presents. Brueski started the episode discussing a new motion, an attempt to "compel the defense to persuade prosecutors to share various evidence," specifically surrounding DNA testing. Faddis pointed out that, at this juncture, the DNA evidence "could be terribly problematic for Kohlberg." He mentioned a potential reconsideration by the prosecution on using some of the genetic genealogy evidence. "All of this is gonna come down on Friday. We're gonna know a lot more then." The podcast discussed the key idea of "false positives" in DNA evidence. To the general public, the term can be misleading. "If there is anything that, like you said, any errors, any faultiness, but when it comes down to a false positive with DNA...the odds of that are slim to almost nothing whatsoever with the type of DNA they're testing," Brueski stated. He continued with an analogy, explaining that even if a key (representing DNA) is mishandled or gets dirty, it still opens the right door, indicating the DNA remains unchanged despite potential mishandling. Faddis brought a new perspective, suggesting that Kohberger's defense might attempt to claim the DNA was planted, an accusation that would dramatically alter the course of the trial. If the defense could highlight any faults in the testing, it could strengthen their argument against the evidence's reliability. "If they're gonna try to use all of the... alleged faultiness in the testing to support a larger theory that this DNA evidence was planted," Faddis hypothesized. Taking the stance that the evidence was planted is significantly risky for the defense. Faddis clarified that such an argument is a double-edged sword. "That's a super risky argument to take," he said, "If you're gonna put that in front of a jury as a defense attorney, you better be able to back it up." Arguing that evidence was planted inherently suggests that the DNA was, in fact, from the client, thus removing the argument about testing reliability. Brueski pondered on the implications, "How risky is it to go down that road? ...to go down that road, is there a lot of risk involved to make such a claim?" Faddis responded with a resounding, "Oh heck yes." Arguing the DNA was planted implies not just that the evidence was mishandled but that there was a deliberate attempt to frame Kohberger. "It's a pretty tall accusation to make if you can't back it up," Faddis said, "and also that accusation... divests you of one additional argument." He emphasized the gravity of such a claim and the need for a competent attorney to carry it forward. The debate surrounding the DNA evidence, whether it's about its validity or potential mishandling, has added another layer of complexity to the Brian Kohberger case. As the motion to compel unfolds, all eyes will be on the courtroom to see how the defense navigates these treacherous waters and the direction the trial takes in the coming weeks. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The Brian Kohberger trial has seen a new twist in its tale, as the defense prepares to challenge the DNA evidence that may incriminate Kohberger. In the latest episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers", Tony Brueski spoke with former Felony Prosecutor and attorney, Eric Faddis, shedding light on the defense's strategy and the risks it presents. Brueski started the episode discussing a new motion, an attempt to "compel the defense to persuade prosecutors to share various evidence," specifically surrounding DNA testing. Faddis pointed out that, at this juncture, the DNA evidence "could be terribly problematic for Kohlberg." He mentioned a potential reconsideration by the prosecution on using some of the genetic genealogy evidence. "All of this is gonna come down on Friday. We're gonna know a lot more then." The podcast discussed the key idea of "false positives" in DNA evidence. To the general public, the term can be misleading. "If there is anything that, like you said, any errors, any faultiness, but when it comes down to a false positive with DNA...the odds of that are slim to almost nothing whatsoever with the type of DNA they're testing," Brueski stated. He continued with an analogy, explaining that even if a key (representing DNA) is mishandled or gets dirty, it still opens the right door, indicating the DNA remains unchanged despite potential mishandling. Faddis brought a new perspective, suggesting that Kohberger's defense might attempt to claim the DNA was planted, an accusation that would dramatically alter the course of the trial. If the defense could highlight any faults in the testing, it could strengthen their argument against the evidence's reliability. "If they're gonna try to use all of the... alleged faultiness in the testing to support a larger theory that this DNA evidence was planted," Faddis hypothesized. Taking the stance that the evidence was planted is significantly risky for the defense. Faddis clarified that such an argument is a double-edged sword. "That's a super risky argument to take," he said, "If you're gonna put that in front of a jury as a defense attorney, you better be able to back it up." Arguing that evidence was planted inherently suggests that the DNA was, in fact, from the client, thus removing the argument about testing reliability. Brueski pondered on the implications, "How risky is it to go down that road? ...to go down that road, is there a lot of risk involved to make such a claim?" Faddis responded with a resounding, "Oh heck yes." Arguing the DNA was planted implies not just that the evidence was mishandled but that there was a deliberate attempt to frame Kohberger. "It's a pretty tall accusation to make if you can't back it up," Faddis said, "and also that accusation... divests you of one additional argument." He emphasized the gravity of such a claim and the need for a competent attorney to carry it forward. The debate surrounding the DNA evidence, whether it's about its validity or potential mishandling, has added another layer of complexity to the Brian Kohberger case. As the motion to compel unfolds, all eyes will be on the courtroom to see how the defense navigates these treacherous waters and the direction the trial takes in the coming weeks. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The Brian Kohberger trial has seen a new twist in its tale, as the defense prepares to challenge the DNA evidence that may incriminate Kohberger. In the latest episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers", Tony Brueski spoke with former Felony Prosecutor and attorney, Eric Faddis, shedding light on the defense's strategy and the risks it presents. Brueski started the episode discussing a new motion, an attempt to "compel the defense to persuade prosecutors to share various evidence," specifically surrounding DNA testing. Faddis pointed out that, at this juncture, the DNA evidence "could be terribly problematic for Kohlberg." He mentioned a potential reconsideration by the prosecution on using some of the genetic genealogy evidence. "All of this is gonna come down on Friday. We're gonna know a lot more then." The podcast discussed the key idea of "false positives" in DNA evidence. To the general public, the term can be misleading. "If there is anything that, like you said, any errors, any faultiness, but when it comes down to a false positive with DNA...the odds of that are slim to almost nothing whatsoever with the type of DNA they're testing," Brueski stated. He continued with an analogy, explaining that even if a key (representing DNA) is mishandled or gets dirty, it still opens the right door, indicating the DNA remains unchanged despite potential mishandling. Faddis brought a new perspective, suggesting that Kohberger's defense might attempt to claim the DNA was planted, an accusation that would dramatically alter the course of the trial. If the defense could highlight any faults in the testing, it could strengthen their argument against the evidence's reliability. "If they're gonna try to use all of the... alleged faultiness in the testing to support a larger theory that this DNA evidence was planted," Faddis hypothesized. Taking the stance that the evidence was planted is significantly risky for the defense. Faddis clarified that such an argument is a double-edged sword. "That's a super risky argument to take," he said, "If you're gonna put that in front of a jury as a defense attorney, you better be able to back it up." Arguing that evidence was planted inherently suggests that the DNA was, in fact, from the client, thus removing the argument about testing reliability. Brueski pondered on the implications, "How risky is it to go down that road? ...to go down that road, is there a lot of risk involved to make such a claim?" Faddis responded with a resounding, "Oh heck yes." Arguing the DNA was planted implies not just that the evidence was mishandled but that there was a deliberate attempt to frame Kohberger. "It's a pretty tall accusation to make if you can't back it up," Faddis said, "and also that accusation... divests you of one additional argument." He emphasized the gravity of such a claim and the need for a competent attorney to carry it forward. The debate surrounding the DNA evidence, whether it's about its validity or potential mishandling, has added another layer of complexity to the Brian Kohberger case. As the motion to compel unfolds, all eyes will be on the courtroom to see how the defense navigates these treacherous waters and the direction the trial takes in the coming weeks. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski joined forces with psychotherapist and author Shavaun Scott to delve into the perplexing case of Bryan Kohberger. The conversation sought to unravel the psyche of Kohberger amidst a cloud of allegations and questionable actions.   Brueski kicked off the dialogue, highlighting the contradictions in Kohberger's behavior. "Initially, their team [said], we're looking forward to being exonerated. Then it just kept going. Then he has an alibi," Brueski said, expressing skepticism about the strength of Kohberger's alibi which consisted of him just driving around.   Brueski further mused about the influence Kohberger seems to be exerting over his attorney, Ann Taylor. The defense strategy seemed "very odd," and not "in the control" of the attorney. He speculated, "I feel like he's calling some of the shots here and I feel like Ann Taylor is almost being held hostage."   Shavaun Scott proposed that it might be a calculated legal strategy, though it certainly seemed "passive." She suggested that the lawyers might be doing the best they can with the evidence they have.   A significant point of discussion was Kohberger's decision to return to the alleged crime scene, a behavior identified through phone pings the day after the incident. Scott explained, "Part of the fascination with serial killers returning to the crime scene, is that going back... gives them, again, a sense of control, a sense of power, and a sense of pleasure." She further highlighted the habitual nature of offenders to revisit the scene, either physically or through memorabilia and news articles, to relive their "pleasure."   Brueski raised an intriguing point about the geographical proximity of the crime to Kohberger's residence. "Was that something that is intentional because then he gets to soak up all of the attention?" he asked.   Scott confirmed that there's a trend of revisiting, and that it made sense Kohberger would choose a location close to his home, yet not directly on his own turf. "And it wasn't as if he killed someone on his own campus... he really fixated on these young women," she remarked.   However, the most pressing question on Brueski's mind was how Kohlberg's interactions with his defense, especially his statement about looking forward to being exonerated, reflected on his psychological state. In response, Scott suggested, "My guess is that's all legal maneuvering."   She emphasized that Kohberger isn't delusional in the traditional sense. "He knows he did it," she claimed, hinting at the existing evidence and weak alibi. In her professional opinion, Scott concluded that Kohberger isn't suffering from multiple personalities or any classic signs of delusions. "He's not crazy. So, I think it's just, you know, what does a guilty person do very often the first thing they say is, I didn't do it."   As the episode wrapped, listeners were left with a clearer, albeit still enigmatic, understanding of Bryan Kohberger's psychology. Both Brueski and Scott presented compelling insights into the behavior of alleged criminals, emphasizing that while understanding may be reached, full comprehension remains elusive. Kohberger has pled not guilty to all charges.  Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski joined forces with psychotherapist and author Shavaun Scott to delve into the perplexing case of Bryan Kohberger. The conversation sought to unravel the psyche of Kohberger amidst a cloud of allegations and questionable actions.   Brueski kicked off the dialogue, highlighting the contradictions in Kohberger's behavior. "Initially, their team [said], we're looking forward to being exonerated. Then it just kept going. Then he has an alibi," Brueski said, expressing skepticism about the strength of Kohberger's alibi which consisted of him just driving around.   Brueski further mused about the influence Kohberger seems to be exerting over his attorney, Ann Taylor. The defense strategy seemed "very odd," and not "in the control" of the attorney. He speculated, "I feel like he's calling some of the shots here and I feel like Ann Taylor is almost being held hostage."   Shavaun Scott proposed that it might be a calculated legal strategy, though it certainly seemed "passive." She suggested that the lawyers might be doing the best they can with the evidence they have.   A significant point of discussion was Kohberger's decision to return to the alleged crime scene, a behavior identified through phone pings the day after the incident. Scott explained, "Part of the fascination with serial killers returning to the crime scene, is that going back... gives them, again, a sense of control, a sense of power, and a sense of pleasure." She further highlighted the habitual nature of offenders to revisit the scene, either physically or through memorabilia and news articles, to relive their "pleasure."   Brueski raised an intriguing point about the geographical proximity of the crime to Kohberger's residence. "Was that something that is intentional because then he gets to soak up all of the attention?" he asked.   Scott confirmed that there's a trend of revisiting, and that it made sense Kohberger would choose a location close to his home, yet not directly on his own turf. "And it wasn't as if he killed someone on his own campus... he really fixated on these young women," she remarked.   However, the most pressing question on Brueski's mind was how Kohlberg's interactions with his defense, especially his statement about looking forward to being exonerated, reflected on his psychological state. In response, Scott suggested, "My guess is that's all legal maneuvering."   She emphasized that Kohberger isn't delusional in the traditional sense. "He knows he did it," she claimed, hinting at the existing evidence and weak alibi. In her professional opinion, Scott concluded that Kohberger isn't suffering from multiple personalities or any classic signs of delusions. "He's not crazy. So, I think it's just, you know, what does a guilty person do very often the first thing they say is, I didn't do it."   As the episode wrapped, listeners were left with a clearer, albeit still enigmatic, understanding of Bryan Kohberger's psychology. Both Brueski and Scott presented compelling insights into the behavior of alleged criminals, emphasizing that while understanding may be reached, full comprehension remains elusive. Kohberger has pled not guilty to all charges.  Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski joined forces with psychotherapist and author Shavaun Scott to delve into the perplexing case of Bryan Kohberger. The conversation sought to unravel the psyche of Kohberger amidst a cloud of allegations and questionable actions.   Brueski kicked off the dialogue, highlighting the contradictions in Kohberger's behavior. "Initially, their team [said], we're looking forward to being exonerated. Then it just kept going. Then he has an alibi," Brueski said, expressing skepticism about the strength of Kohberger's alibi which consisted of him just driving around.   Brueski further mused about the influence Kohberger seems to be exerting over his attorney, Ann Taylor. The defense strategy seemed "very odd," and not "in the control" of the attorney. He speculated, "I feel like he's calling some of the shots here and I feel like Ann Taylor is almost being held hostage."   Shavaun Scott proposed that it might be a calculated legal strategy, though it certainly seemed "passive." She suggested that the lawyers might be doing the best they can with the evidence they have.   A significant point of discussion was Kohberger's decision to return to the alleged crime scene, a behavior identified through phone pings the day after the incident. Scott explained, "Part of the fascination with serial killers returning to the crime scene, is that going back... gives them, again, a sense of control, a sense of power, and a sense of pleasure." She further highlighted the habitual nature of offenders to revisit the scene, either physically or through memorabilia and news articles, to relive their "pleasure."   Brueski raised an intriguing point about the geographical proximity of the crime to Kohberger's residence. "Was that something that is intentional because then he gets to soak up all of the attention?" he asked.   Scott confirmed that there's a trend of revisiting, and that it made sense Kohberger would choose a location close to his home, yet not directly on his own turf. "And it wasn't as if he killed someone on his own campus... he really fixated on these young women," she remarked.   However, the most pressing question on Brueski's mind was how Kohlberg's interactions with his defense, especially his statement about looking forward to being exonerated, reflected on his psychological state. In response, Scott suggested, "My guess is that's all legal maneuvering."   She emphasized that Kohberger isn't delusional in the traditional sense. "He knows he did it," she claimed, hinting at the existing evidence and weak alibi. In her professional opinion, Scott concluded that Kohberger isn't suffering from multiple personalities or any classic signs of delusions. "He's not crazy. So, I think it's just, you know, what does a guilty person do very often the first thing they say is, I didn't do it."   As the episode wrapped, listeners were left with a clearer, albeit still enigmatic, understanding of Bryan Kohberger's psychology. Both Brueski and Scott presented compelling insights into the behavior of alleged criminals, emphasizing that while understanding may be reached, full comprehension remains elusive. Kohberger has pled not guilty to all charges.  Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a recent episode of "Hidden Killers," a podcast hosted by Tony Brueski, a fascinating and complex discussion unfolded with Forensic Scientist and Professor Dan Krane. The focus of the conversation revolved around a quadruple homicide case and the implications of DNA evidence discovered on a knife sheath attributed to the suspect, Kohlberg.   Krane succinctly summarized the predicament, stating, "The presence of a DNA profile doesn't tell us anything about how or when that DNA came to be associated with what you've been testing." This highlights the conundrum that DNA, while compelling evidence, cannot establish a timestamp for its deposition or offer context on how it came to be at the crime scene.   Professor Krane stressed the inherent challenge in the prosecution's narrative that Kohlberg's DNA was left on the knife sheath during the crime. He outlined how the defense might argue that the knife was discarded by the defendant long before the crime or taken by someone else, emphasizing, "The DNA test results by themselves are absolutely silent in terms of which of those competing hypotheses might be more likely."   The podcast hosts and Krane also delved into the technological future of forensic science, pondering the potential for establishing a 'timestamp' on DNA evidence. Although we are currently unable to determine the age of a DNA sample, Krane postulated that this might change within the next decade, possibly through an examination of associated proteins.   The conversation expanded to the implications of the growing DNA databases resulting from widespread genetic testing. Krane acknowledged the transformative potential of this trend for law enforcement, stating, "The increasing availability of DNA test results is going to be a very powerful tool for law enforcement." However, he also highlighted the ensuing ethical dilemmas, including issues around informed consent and the potential for casting suspicion on family members unaware of their genetic information being utilized.   Beyond DNA, Krane underscored that a crime scene offers a wealth of other potential evidence, such as blood spatter analysis, fingerprinting, fiber analysis, and computer investigations, among others. He labeled DNA as the 'gold standard' of forensic science but acknowledged that other techniques could provide crucial context and corroboration to DNA findings.   In the context of the Kohlberg case, Brueski and Krane discussed the possibility of DNA evidence accidentally implicating an innocent person. The high sensitivity of DNA tests could potentially detect samples from years ago, creating an open-ended interpretation that might mislead an investigation. "There's nothing about the DNA test results in themselves that would tell you which of two alternatives were more likely," Krane added.   Their compelling discussion concluded with the notion that DNA evidence, while an essential piece, is just one part of a complex puzzle in criminal investigations. "A great attorney said to me, I'm weaving together a symphony to entertain the jury with. I need you to deliver one note," recounted Krane, emphasizing the importance of integrating DNA evidence into a holistic investigative approach. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a recent episode of "Hidden Killers," a podcast hosted by Tony Brueski, a fascinating and complex discussion unfolded with Forensic Scientist and Professor Dan Krane. The focus of the conversation revolved around a quadruple homicide case and the implications of DNA evidence discovered on a knife sheath attributed to the suspect, Kohlberg.   Krane succinctly summarized the predicament, stating, "The presence of a DNA profile doesn't tell us anything about how or when that DNA came to be associated with what you've been testing." This highlights the conundrum that DNA, while compelling evidence, cannot establish a timestamp for its deposition or offer context on how it came to be at the crime scene.   Professor Krane stressed the inherent challenge in the prosecution's narrative that Kohlberg's DNA was left on the knife sheath during the crime. He outlined how the defense might argue that the knife was discarded by the defendant long before the crime or taken by someone else, emphasizing, "The DNA test results by themselves are absolutely silent in terms of which of those competing hypotheses might be more likely."   The podcast hosts and Krane also delved into the technological future of forensic science, pondering the potential for establishing a 'timestamp' on DNA evidence. Although we are currently unable to determine the age of a DNA sample, Krane postulated that this might change within the next decade, possibly through an examination of associated proteins.   The conversation expanded to the implications of the growing DNA databases resulting from widespread genetic testing. Krane acknowledged the transformative potential of this trend for law enforcement, stating, "The increasing availability of DNA test results is going to be a very powerful tool for law enforcement." However, he also highlighted the ensuing ethical dilemmas, including issues around informed consent and the potential for casting suspicion on family members unaware of their genetic information being utilized.   Beyond DNA, Krane underscored that a crime scene offers a wealth of other potential evidence, such as blood spatter analysis, fingerprinting, fiber analysis, and computer investigations, among others. He labeled DNA as the 'gold standard' of forensic science but acknowledged that other techniques could provide crucial context and corroboration to DNA findings.   In the context of the Kohlberg case, Brueski and Krane discussed the possibility of DNA evidence accidentally implicating an innocent person. The high sensitivity of DNA tests could potentially detect samples from years ago, creating an open-ended interpretation that might mislead an investigation. "There's nothing about the DNA test results in themselves that would tell you which of two alternatives were more likely," Krane added.   Their compelling discussion concluded with the notion that DNA evidence, while an essential piece, is just one part of a complex puzzle in criminal investigations. "A great attorney said to me, I'm weaving together a symphony to entertain the jury with. I need you to deliver one note," recounted Krane, emphasizing the importance of integrating DNA evidence into a holistic investigative approach. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

NationalCounselingExam.comLawrence Kohlberg, a psychologist who built on Jean Piaget's work, developed a six-stage model of moral development in the mid-20th century. His theory asserts that moral development, like cognitive development, follows a series of stages that people progress through as they mature.Kohlberg's theory has been highly influential in fields like psychology, education, and ethics. It provides a framework for understanding how moral reasoning changes over time, though it's important to note it focuses on moral thinking rather than action.If preparing for your National Counseling Exam visit NationalCounselingExam and try our samplers completely free of charge! It's a fantastic way to identify any areas you might want to review. and brush up on.This podcast is not associated with the National Board of Certified Counselors (NBCC) or any state or governmental agency responsible for licensure.

Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.     This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.     Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience. Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.     This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.     Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience. Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In this episode Cat, David, Bill and Jeff talk about Maturity. The conversation starts by talking about law and order - level 4. The discussion transitions to love for others - level 5. The conversation flows in principle-based living - level 6. Together we work  through some examples of the model applying appropriate levels of maturity. For materials referenced during this episode, please goto our blog site; https://fellowshipcast07.wixsite.com/standinginfaith

We discuss what dictatorship is through the lens of counseling. We use Kohlberg's moral development to bridge the gap between democracy and dictatorship. Email us – healthyperspectives@protonmail.com Podcast home page - www.healthy-perspectives.com/podcast Sponsor/Support – https://healthy-perspectives.com/sponsor Rumble - https://rumble.com/c/c-2235930 YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCEXZdWuBoM6KXof4YcP9nkQ Extra documents - www.healthy-perspectives.com/podcast-documents LinkIn page - www.linkedin.com/in/jeremiah-guidos-915b3426  Twitter - https://twitter.com/hphonestviews Facebook page - https://www.facebook.com/healthyperspectivesinc

In this episode Cat, David, Bill and Jeff talk about Maturity. The conversation starts by exploring the ideation of the model were presenting. The discussion moves to articulating the levels of the Kohlberg model in terms of maturity. We explain and provide examples for levels 1-3 in this episode. This episode includes some interesting insight into retributive justice and unforgiveness. For materials referenced during this episode, please go to our blog site; https://fellowshipcast07.wixsite.com/standinginfaith

In this exciting new episode, we're diving into the world of Solidcore, the renowned fitness franchise that has taken the fitness industry by storm. Solidcore offers a unique 50-minute, full-body, strength-training workout that utilizes slow, controlled movements to break down slow-twitch muscle fibers, resulting in stronger and leaner bodies. In a recent announcement on April 18, 2023, Anne Mahlum, the founder of Solidcore, revealed that she has sold all of her shares in the company to Kohlberg & Company for an undisclosed amount. Join us as we delve into the world of Solidcore and explore if this franchise is worth it. Want to know more about this franchise? https://www.vettedbiz.com/listing/solidcore/ Need help finding the right franchise? Click here: https://www.vettedbiz.com/franchise-search/ #SolidCoreFranchise #SolidCoreFounder #FranchiseFindings If you are looking for more information, you can connect with us through our networks:  https://www.vettedbiz.com/  https://www.linkedin.com/company/vettedbiz/  https://www.facebook.com/vettedbiz  https://www.tiktok.com/@businessandfranchiseinus  We partner with Fund My Franchise to give you the best “one-stop source” for all your funding needs. Knowing which option is best suited for you and your business is their specialty. Whether you use our Self-Directed 401(k), allowing an entrepreneur to use qualifying retirement monies to capitalize a business, and/or traditional Debt Funding, utilizing Unsecured Lines of Credit (ULOC) or Small Business Administration (SBA) Loans, they are here to help you realize your entrepreneurial dream. Don't let bad credit stand in your way. They can help with credit repair. Click the link in the show notes to apply for a no-obligation, no-charge consultation with one of their Senior Consultants: https://share.hsforms.com/1hkqew4n2S7ap6o8z1OqBIQ4e0xw

Aujourd'hui, s'il n'y a plus forcément de pages dédiées aux filles et d'autres dédiées aux garçons dans les catalogues de jouets, le sexisme se ressent toujours. Cette division des jouets et des jeux selon le genre entraîne un apprentissage différencié : les filles jouent essentiellement à des jeux d'imitation et développent leur attention aux autres et leurs capacités linguistiques, tandis que les garçons jouent à des jeux physiques et développent leur motricité. Comment faire alors pour que nos enfants s'épanouissent au maximum par le jeu ? Intervenant·e·s : Pascale Ezan, professeure en sciences de gestion Christia Spears Brown, professeuse en psychologie du développement Manuela Spinelli, sociologue et autrice Bienvenu·e Bébé : journal de bord d'une éducation non-genrée est la quatrième série du podcast "Le Journal " produit par Paradiso Media. Le Journal raconte les histoires intimes de celles et ceux qui tentent de se construire hors des cadres établis. Si vous aimez ce podcast, abonnez-vous et laissez nous un maximum d'⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐! Et pour le partager, c'est simple : https://lnk.to/BandeAnnonceBienvenueBebe Retrouvez tous nos podcasts ici et nos actualités sur Instagram | Twitter | Linkedin Crédits : Écrit et raconté par : Aline Laurent-Mayard Productrice : Suzanne Colin Producteurs délégués : Lorenzo Benedetti, Louis Daboussy, Benoit Dunaigre Réalisateur, Monteur son, sound designer et mixeur : Théo Albaric Avec la voix d'Alix Du Plessis D'Argentré Directeur.ice de production : Oriane Bettoni Chargée de production : Lucine Dorso Responsable marketing : Carla Bertone Assistante marketing : Cyrile Pocreau Assistante chargée de développement : Marie-Soizic Fraboulet Stagiaire édito : Joséphine Caro Attachée de presse : Gaëlle Job Juridique : Ludye Nysol et Alix du Plessis d'Argentré Musique Originale : D.L.i.d Graphiste : SuperFeat Photographe : Salomé Oyallon Archives : Extraits du reportage “Tours : manifestation Marre du Rose !, association Osez le féminisme”, 19 20 Edition Central Val de Loire, INA, 17 décembre 2016 Extraits du journal de 20h, France 2, INA, 20 décembre 2004 Ressources : Rapport sur l'égalité entre les filles et les garçons dans les modes d'accueil de la petite enfance Campagne Marre du rose ! Lancée en 2015 Étude Longitudinale Française depuis l'Enfance (Elfe), Ined, Inserm, 2023 Renée Greusard, Choisir d'être mère : Tout ce qu'on ne vous a pas dit sur la parentalité, JC Lattès, 2022 Ezan, Pascale, et Isabelle Ulrich. « Bouleverser les codes dans les catalogues de jouets : réactions des enfants et légitimité de la démarche », Décisions Marketing, vol. 82, no. 2, 2016, pp. 53-72. Christia Spears Brown, Parenting Beyond Pink & Blue : How to Raise Your Kids Free of Gender Stereotypes, Ten Speed Press, 2014 Spinelli, M. et Hancewicz, A., Eduquer sans préjugés : Pour une éducation non-sexiste des filles et des garçons, JC Lattès, 2021 L. Kohlberg, Essays on Moral Development. Vol. I: The Philosophy of Moral Development: Moral Stages and the Idea of Justice, New York, Harper and Row, 1981, p. 98.

Lawrence Kohlberg, a psychologist who built on Jean Piaget's work, developed a six-stage model of moral development in the mid-20th century. His theory asserts that moral development, like cognitive development, follows a series of stages that people progress through as they mature.The first two stages, known as the "Pre-conventional Level," are typically found in young children. The most basic stage, 'Obedience and Punishment,' is where morality is driven by a direct response to punishments and rewards. For example, a child may perceive a behavior as right if it helps avoid punishment. The second stage, 'Individualism and Exchange,' involves recognizing that there isn't just one right view imposed by authorities. People in this stage can differentiate their own interests and needs from those of authorities.The "Conventional Level" includes the third and fourth stages. 'Interpersonal Relationships,' or the "good boy/good girl" stage, is when social approval and maintaining relationships become more important. Behaviors are evaluated based on their ability to please others and maintain social harmony. The fourth stage, 'Maintaining Social Order,' entails recognizing the importance of law and order for society. Individuals in this stage respect authority and rules to maintain societal structure and cooperation.Finally, the "Post-conventional Level" encompasses the final two stages. The fifth stage, 'Social Contract and Individual Rights,' sees laws as changeable structures that exist for the good of the society. Individuals may disobey rules if they find them unjust, favoring democratically agreed upon laws. The sixth stage, 'Universal Ethical Principles,' is not reached by most adults. It's characterized by adherence to self-chosen ethical principles that are universal, such as justice, dignity, and equality. At this stage, laws are validated by these principles, and if laws are in conflict with them, these principles take precedence.Kohlberg's theory has been highly influential in fields like psychology, education, and ethics. It provides a framework for understanding how moral reasoning changes over time, though it's important to note it focuses on moral thinking rather than action. Critics argue that it may be culturally biased, overly focused on justice, and doesn't adequately address gender differences in moral reasoning.Despite these criticisms, Kohlberg's stages of moral development still form an integral part of our understanding of moral evolution in individuals. It pushes the debate beyond whether an action is right or wrong and into the realm of why people believe an action to be right or wrong and how these beliefs evolve over time.If you need to study for your NCMHCE narrative exam, try the free samplers at: CounselingExam.comThis podcast is not associated with the National Board of Certified Counselors (NBCC) or any state or governmental agency responsible for licensure.

Nick and Sabrina Kohlberg were told at their 20-week anatomy scan that their daughter Collins had anencephaly. This condition is not compatible with life. They were given a couple weeks to decide whether to terminate the pregnancy or continue with the expectation that she could pass at any time. They were told if she made it to delivery, she could live a few minutes or a few hours. Sabrina said, " I could not make the decision to terminate her life, so we put it in God's hands, and we hoped to get some time with our daughter alive. Nick & Sabrina Shared about: ·      The next 4 months of pregnancy ·      Strangers asked if it was a boy or girl? ·      Co-workers that would just sit and cry with Sabrina. ·      The high-risk doctors support. ·      The amazing 11 hours that Collins lived and the 2 days they were able to spend with her. ·      Creating memories, mementos and ways to honor Collins life. “Don't worry about making others uncomfortable when talking about your child. This is your life, and your child deserves to be talked about. Don't be scared to mention your baby.” ~~ Nick “I learned that grief could look very different even with spouses. We both lost Collins and the path we went through was very different.” ~~ Sabrina Connect with Teresa: EMAIL teresa.womenconnect2019@gmail.com or teresa.livingaftergrief.com Facebook ⁠https://www.facebook.com/.womenconnectsupport/⁠. and ⁠https://www.facebook.com/.livingaftergrief/⁠. Instagram: @womenconnectandsupport or @livingaftergrief Website: ⁠www.livingaftergrief.com⁠ click and schedule a time to talk: ⁠https://calendly.com/teresa-reiniger/podcast-discovery-call

0:00 -- Intro.1:50 -- Start of interview.4:09 -- His take on the state of capital markets. From the highs of 2021 to the lows of 2022: the impact of interest rates in asset valuations.6:59 -- On tech layoffs. "The effects on the labor market are not as large as the numbers suggest."8:34 --  The impact of downturn on public and private investors.10:07 -- On AI, ChatGPT and the emergence of this new technology.12:45 -- On the crypto industry and its regulation challenges. "There is going to be more carnage, more blood on the streets." "The number of people in this industry that are willing to show you their code but refuse to show their financials should make your head spin."20:01 -- On the SEC's proposed climate change regulation, and his take that "The SEC Is Heading Toward a Climate Train Wreck." "I am profoundly concerned." "Investors need these climate disclosures but I'm extraordinary skeptical that the courts as currently constituted will uphold the rules that the SEC will adopt. In other words, the rules will get adopted, but they will get staid, vacated and we are going to get nothing (and I don't think that's the best result for investors, that's just wrong)."24:36 -- Joe's climate change proposal. Instead of the SEC requiring its own climate change rules, it should require investors to disclose the data that is already in the public domain.28:04 -- On the ESG / anti-ESG trend and the politicization of corporation governance. "I think it is simultaneously disastrous and hilarious." "The important thing to recognize is that it is all political."30:52 -- On institutional Investors passing-through voting power to beneficial owners. "It's politically a very smart thing to do from some of these intermediaries."32:37-- On the impact of the new SEC universal proxy rules for director elections on shareholder activism. "It will have a meaningful effect, but it will take some time to manifest itself" "It shifts power to the investor community."33:30 -- The best corporate governance trend of 2022: boardroom diversity.34:13 -- The worst corporate governance trend of 2022: the political whiplash.34:54 -- The biggest corporate governance trend to watch out for in 2023 and going forward: "a combination of universal proxy and the politicization of the boardroom."36:57 -- His take on how to deal with the politicization of the boardroom: "The short answer is that you can't generalize. Every corporation's situation is unique."38:58 - The biggest winner in business in 2022: Prince Harry (monetizing family dysfunction!)40:34 - The biggest looser in business in 2022: Elon Musk. "If it wasn't perfectly obvious that of all the people in the world that should not be running Twitter, he shouldn't be running it." He gives it a 43.96% chance of being in bankruptcy by this time next year. Joseph A. Grundfest is an expert on capital markets, corporate governance, and securities litigation. Professor Grundfest founded the Stanford Securities Class Action Clearinghouse, which provides detailed, online information about the prosecution, defense, and settlement of federal class action securities fraud litigation. He launched Stanford Law School's executive education programs and continues to co-direct Directors' College, the nation's leading venue for the continuing professional education of directors of publicly traded corporations. He is also a senior faculty member with the Arthur and Toni Rembe Rock Center for Corporate Governance. Additionally, he is co-founder and director of Financial Engines and a director of Kohlberg, Kravis, Roberts & Co. Before joining the Stanford Law School faculty in 1990, Professor Grundfest was a commissioner of the Securities and Exchange Commission, served on the staff of the President's Council of Economic Advisors as counsel and senior economist for legal and regulatory matters, and was an associate at Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering. Early in his career he was a research associate at the Brookings Institution and an economist and consultant with the RAND Corporation.If you like this show, please consider subscribing, leaving a review or sharing this podcast on social media. __ You can follow Evan on social media at:Twitter: @evanepsteinLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/epsteinevan/ Substack: https://evanepstein.substack.com/__Music/Soundtrack (found via Free Music Archive): Seeing The Future by Dexter Britain is licensed under a Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License

In een reeks Q&A-afleveringen beantwoorden we luisteraarsvragen die we binnenkrijgen, voordat we in februari verder gaan met seizoen 2! In deze aflevering gaan we in op de vraag: hoe komt het dat er veel verschillen zitten in het beschikken van een moreel kompas bij verschillende personen? En bespreken daarmee onder andere het verschil tussen empathie, geweten en moraliteit. Voor meer persoonlijkheidsfeitjes volg ons op Instagram en TikTok!Wil je weten hoe jij scoort op de Big Five?Ga dan naar Understandmyself.com Wij verdienen hier niets aan, maar het is wel een van de betere en betrouwbare tests.Wetenschappelijke verantwoording:- Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. Vintage.- Over de morele fundamenten: https://moralfoundations.org/ - Kohlberg morele ontwikkeling stadia: https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_Kohlberg- Stuk over de Dark Triad: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_triadZie het privacybeleid op https://art19.com/privacy en de privacyverklaring van Californië op https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Marty Fischer grew up in southeast Georgia near Savannah and is a 1974 graduate of Georgia Southern College with a BS Degree in Speech-Public Relations.  Marty got his start in the hunting and shooting industry when he served as the Vice President and General Manager of Cherokee Rose Shooting Resort in Griffin, Georgia from April 1990 through December 1992.  In January 1993 Marty founded SportShooting Consultants, Ltd, a company that specializes in gun club design, event target setting and management as well as business consulting for the hunting and clay target industries.  To date Fischer has designed and/or set competition targets on more than 175 sporting courses throughout North America. He has done design work for the likes of the Ted Turner family (Kinloch Plantation on the Santee River in SC), Henry Kravis, (7 Lakes Lodge in Meeker, CO, now owned by golfer Greg Norman) managing partner of Kohlberg, Kravis and Roberts in New York, Los Angeles Dodgers owner Mark Walters, noted hotelier Richard Kessler and his Kessler Canyon Ranch in DeBeque, CO.  He recently did an initial private design and clay target installation for Gaylon Lawrence, Jr. in Wilson, Arkansas.  Additional public facility phases are being planned and priced at this time.     Recent courses of note include a redesign of the Brays Island Sporting Clays course in South Carolina and two 15 station championship layouts for the Clark County Shooting Park in Las Vegas, Nevada; sporting clays, 5-Stand, shooting school venues for The Orvis Shooting Grounds at Pursell Farms in Alabama; two 14 station layouts for the Garland Mountain Sporting Clays facility in north metro Atlanta, GA and a 5-Stand, Wobble Trap, 10 station corporate courses at The Kiawah Sporting Club in SC and at historic Millpond Plantation in Thomasville, GA as well as two 15 station sporting clays courses for Dead Zero Shooting Park in Spencer, TN.   He recently finished a project called The Clays at Lone Oaks Farm, a $2.3 million clay target project for the University of Tennessee.  His next full-service design for completion is a sporting clays facility in Weirton, WV.  At any given time, he has three to five different design jobs underway.  Fischer became one of the first National Sporting Clays Association (NSCA) Level III Shooting Instructors.  This level of coaching expertise represents the highest instructor level awarded by the NSCA.  Marty is also the Head Coach of the Georgia Southern University Clay Target Team, which competes for Regional and National Collegiate Clay Target Championships.  Under his guidance, Georgia Southern won back-to-back ACUI divisional national championships in 2021 and 2022.

Agradece a este podcast tantas horas de entretenimiento y disfruta de episodios exclusivos como éste. ¡Apóyale en iVoox! Este es mi primer audiolibro completo, titulado "Vivir de corazón". Índice 1. A quién le escribo 2. Nuestro futuro será diferente 3. Vivir en un sueño 4. El lagarto en el laboratorio 5. El secreto de mi vida 6. Activa tu sistema inercial 7. La intuición 8. Sobre el miedo 9. Vivo dos tipos de miedo 10. La paradoja 11. El cerebro no está para pensar 12. Cuando perdí la referencia interna 13. El adulto que vive según la referencia externa 14. La muerte del miedo 15. El miedo a ser diferente 16. RAS 17. Acercaos al borde 18. Qué es saltar 19. Es imposible cometer un error 20. Como viviría si 21. El hombre de conocimiento 22. Hay algo en mí que tengo que entregarle al mundo 23. Mi misión en cuatro pasos 24. Espontáneo Vs impulsivo 25. Si una persona decide ser ella misma 26. La tercera ley de la moral de Kohlberg 27. La vida dando vueltas 28. Suicídate sin matarte 29. Tendencia innata 30. El hombre de negocios y el pescador que vivía de corazón 31. Qué listo eres 32. La jaula de los leones 33. Si volviera a vivir 34. La muerte 35. Bienvenidos al planeta tierra 36. Las excusas del pájaro para no volar 37. No llores, no te quejes, comprende 38. La feliz vida en cautividad 39. El secreto a voces 40. Agárrate a aquello que te haga bien 41. ¿Somos el culmen de la civilización? 42. Historias de expertos en el arte de la ilusión 43. La seguridad 44. La oportunidad 45. Nación medicada 46. Tratado personal de nutrición 47. En busca de un estado mental 48. Nada que perder 49. Me da igual 50. Éxito 51. Seguir la llamada interna 52. ¡Quítate! 53. Si te mueves te juzgarán 54. Varios capítulos en uno 55. Lo que estará de moda 56. Patrones de conducta humana 57. Las etapas de la vida 58. El dinero 59. No hacer nada por dinero 60. La revolución humana 61. El ser antisocial 62. El ser social 63. La aceptación 64. Vivir de corazón 65. El cerebro se suicida 66. Sensibles al dolor ajeno 67. Psicópatas cotidianos 68. La prisa 69. Evitando 70. El equilibrio interior 71. Si sólo tuviera 72. El Cómo 73. Date cinco años 74. Es difícil 75. Lo que verdaderamente importa Escucha el episodio completo en la app de iVoox, o descubre todo el catálogo de iVoox Originals

Nick and Sabrina Kohlberg were told at their 20-week anatomy scan that their daughter Collins had anencephaly. This condition is not compatible with life. They were given a couple weeks to decide whether to terminate the pregnancy or continue with the expectation that she could pass at any time. They were told if she made it to delivery, she could live a few minutes or a few hours. Sabrina said, " I could not make the decision to terminate her life, so we put it in God's hands, and we hoped to get some time with our daughter alive. During the episode they shared about the next 4 months of pregnancy. Times when complete strangers asked if it was a boy or girl? Co-workers that would just sit and cry with Sabrina. The support from the high-risk doctor that Sabrina said was amazing as well as all the people he connected them too. The guidance and support for them through the rest of the pregnancy, delivery and funeral services was so helpful. Nick and Sabrina talked about the amazing 11 hours that Collins lived and the 2 days they were able to spend with her. They shared about creating memories, mementos and ways they are honoring Collins life. Advice and Encouragement from Nick and Sabrina: Nick: First, talk about the child you lost. Don't worry about making others uncomfortable when talking about your child. This is your life, and your child deserves to be talked about. Don't be scared to mention your baby. Second, yes it sucks. Just hold on, it might take a year, it might take 6 months or multiple years. There can be good that comes out of a bad situation. Honor your baby, which is good and keep hope alive. The loss community is not one that we would choose to be part of but it is a community that takes care of each other. Sabrina: Facebook support groups can be amazing, search for a group specific to your situation. I will caution you though that it can be overwhelming, and you may need to step back. I learned that grief could look very different even with spouses. We both lost Collins and the path we went through was very different. For women the trauma is different for you because your body is going through a lot of change. Connect with Teresa: EMAIL teresa.womenconnect2019@gmail.com or teresa.livingaftergrief.com Facebook https://www.facebook.com/.womenconnectsupport/. and https://www.facebook.com/.livingaftergrief/. Instagram: @womenconnectandsupport or @livingaftergrief Website: www.livingaftergrief.com click and schedule a time to talk: https://calendly.com/teresa-reiniger/podcast-discovery-call

Would you break the law if you thought it would save the life of your spouse? Would you break the law if you thought it would save the life of a stranger? What does the Bible say about dealing with people at different stages of moral development? Episode 22 – Leadership Ethics Since I am the leader, I can do anything I want, right?  Have you had a leader like that or knew anyone that thought like that? Php 2:3–5 Do nothing from selfish ambition or conceit, but in humility count others more significant than yourselves.  Let each of you look not only to his own interests, but also to the interests of others.  Have this mind among yourselves, which is yours in Christ Jesus, Verses: Ga 5:16–26 But I say, walk by the Spirit, and you will not gratify the desires of the flesh.  For the desires of the flesh are against the Spirit, and the desires of the Spirit are against the flesh, for these are opposed to each other, to keep you from doing the things… 1 Pe 1:15–16 but as he who called you is holy, you also be holy in all your conduct, since it is written, “You shall be holy, for I am holy.” Ethics  Definition and Theory ·         Is a derivative of the Greek word ethos, meaning customs, conduct, or character ·         Is concerned with the kinds of values and morals an individual or society ascribes as  desirable or appropriate ·         Focuses on the virtuousness of individuals and their motives Kohlberg's Stages of Moral Development In 1958 Lawrence Kohlberg had the idea that moral reasoning was linked to cognitive development.  Kohlberg studied this by posing questions about morality to children aged 10 – 16 years and what he found was there were three levels of moral development and each level was split into two stages.  Kohlberg also noted that people progressed through these in a fixed order. One of the best known of Kohlberg's (1958) stories concerns a man called Heinz who lived somewhere in Europe. Heinz's wife was dying from a particular type of cancer.  Doctors said a new drug might save her.  The drug had been discovered by a local chemist, and Heinz tried desperately to buy some, but the chemist was charging ten times the money it cost to make the drug, and this was much more than the Heinz could afford. Heinz could only raise half the money, even after help from family and friends.  He explained to the chemist that his wife was dying and asked if he could have the drug cheaper or pay the rest of the money later. The chemist refused, saying that he had discovered the drug and was going to make money from it.  The husband was desperate to save his wife, so later that night he broke into the chemist's and stole the drug. Kohlberg asked a series of questions such as: 1.      Should Heinz have stolen the drug? 2.      Would it change anything if Heinz did not love his wife? 3.      What if the person dying was a stranger? Would it make any difference? 4.      Should the police arrest the chemist for murder if the woman died? Stages of Moral Development ·         Level 1.  Pre-conventional morality - Preconventional morality is the initial stage of moral development, lasting approximately until the age of nine.  Children do not have a personal moral code at the preconventional level; instead, moral decisions are shaped by adult standards and the consequences of following or breaking their rules.  For example, if an action leads to punishment is must be bad, and if it leads to a reward is must be good.  Authority is outside the individual and children

Dear Life Warriors, Meet Tamara Zachery, President of WHTWRKS. WHTWRKS is a full-service marketing strategy, communications, and creative services agency.Tamara shares her story from making a final decision to what seems to be the perfect marriage to finding her true love again. I am honored she chose me to tell her story. I do not take these opportunities lightly. For anyone struggling in their marriage or struggling after divorce, this a story you don't want to miss.About TamaraTamara has a long-standing career in marketing, communications, and business development in various sectors including entertainment, fashion, healthcare, and technology. Tamara's career is steeped in launching new ideas, brands, and products. She has a voracious appetite for testing and evaluating new ideas, and believes in the power of connecting people to brands through developing compelling and authentic narratives. Tamara has an innate curiosity to understand the way things work, the way people think, and subsequently what drives people to connect to brands. Her focus is to drive growth and revenue using her passion for content creation and innovation.Tamara began her career in the music and fashion industries where she was instrumental in the success of some of the most celebrated musicians and fashion brands. Starting at New York City's infamous Hit Factory, Tamara managed studios, engineers, and recording sessions for some of the world's most famous musicians and bands, including Mariah Carey, Michael Jackson, and Aerosmith. While at RCA Records, she oversaw projects for recording artists such Tyrese, SWV, and Christina Aguilera. Her time in fashion saw her bring to life new brands such as Sean John and J Lo's line for Kohl's at MAGIC Las Vegas, the largest retail apparel trade show held biannually.Next, Tamara made an intentional pivot to make a direct impact on people's lives. She began work in the healthcare sector supporting and developing physicians' private practice brands, and working for a company opening inpatient residential and outpatient addiction treatment facilities nationwide. The company became known as Sunspire Health and as the sole marketing and comms exec supported its sale to Kohlberg & Co. for $100M. She then developed and led the strategic marketing plan to re-articulate, re-name, and relaunch Student Leadership Network - the organization formerly known as Young Women's Leadership Network - the 22-year old education non-profit started and led by Ann and Andrew Tisch. There, Tamara reorganized the development team and led them to a historic $10M+ in revenue in less than one year and produced two of their annual benefits, raising close to $2M in total.After two years with WHTWRKS, Tamara serves as President of the full-service marketing strategy, communications, and creative services agency. In addition to overseeing the vision and planning for the company, Tamara leads all client services which since her tenure among others has grown to include clients such as Nike, Disney, LinkedIn, Moët Hennessy, and Nielsen. WHTWRKS' continues to service ViacomCBS BET where they have worked on developing custom content for some of the globe's biggest brands including Doritos, Curls, Seagrams, Home Depot, US Army, Vaseline, Mountain Dew, and Burger King. Tamara is responsible for ideating, pitching, selling, producing, and fully bringing to life linear, digital and social content for the networks' advertisers.#dearlifewarriors #pursuitofbasichappiness #lifecoachingtips #tamarazachery  #whtwrks

Why is it that different people might not agree on the "right" thing to do? Is it ever moral to break the law? Phil and Azaii talk about Kohlberg's stages of morality and also how we see ourselves. Phil Hawkins and Azaii Calderon Muniz from Jack Westin discuss anecdotes, advice, and ramblings on the premed years, the MCAT, and life both inside and outside of medicine. Have new episodes and MCAT Strategies delivered to you by subscribing. https://anchor.fm/jack-westin-mcat-podcast Jack Westin - Free MCAT Practice https://jackwestin.com/

Join Rev. Emily E. Ewing (they) and Rev. Kay Rohloff (she) and special guests Pace Warfield-May (they) and Joe Ramelo (he) from the new, spin-off podcast, Horror Nerds At Church to explore new and nerdy connections to the scripture for the 3rd Sunday of Easter, which falls on April 18th this year, including our deep dive into the chances Jesus was a zombie, ghost, or vampire! The scripture we refer to for this episode can be found here. We talked about queer potlucks (in our Patreon episode!), which you can explore more here. We also talk about Kohlberg's stages of moral development, which is explained more here. Pace mentioned that they are queerying the Gospel during Easter with Emily at Queerying.org CN: we talk about antisemitism when discussing the first reading. Check us out on Facebook & Twitter at @NerdsAtChurch to connect! --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/nerdsatchurch/message

The focus of today's session is critical thinking, problem solving, and discernment. The doctors discuss the similarities and difference between the 3 and how uncommon it is for people to use these skills. Be sure to listen to the end when the doctors deep dive into discernment. Kohlberg's Moral Development Theory https://youtu.be/bounwXLkme4 Intro music by Music by Gozz Outro music by Volume Kontrol