POPULARITY
6 episodes with Kohlberg
6 episodes with Kohlberg
3 episodes with Kohlberg
2 episodes with Kohlberg
2 episodes with Kohlberg
2 episodes with Kohlberg
2 episodes with Kohlberg
6 episodes with Kohlberg
2 episodes with Kohlberg
Alan Bray was born in Waterville, Maine, and grew up in Monson, a small slate-quarrying town set in the northern reaches of the Appalachians. Bray attended the Art Institute of Boston before graduating from the University of Southern Maine; he received his MFA in painting from the Villa Schifanoia in Florence, Italy. It was during this formative time in Florence that he was exposed to casein tempera on panel. Bray's work has been the subject of no less than 25 solo exhibitions and is included in the public collections of the Portland Museum of Art, ME; DeCordova Museum and Sculpture Park, MA; the Farnsworth Museum of Art, ME; Arnot Art Museum, Elmira, NY; Zillman Art Museum, ME; Leigh Yawkey Woodson Art Museum, WI; Lyman Allyn Museum of Arts, New London, CT; Maine Savings Bank Collection, Memphis Cancer Center, Kohlberg, Kravis, Roberts, Menlo Park, CA; among others. The artist lives and works in Sangerville, Maine. As both a naturalist and a painter, Bray is drawn to what often goes unnoticed. “I paint what is right around me,” he says. “Occasionally it's a big subject, but more often it's a bird's nest or a farm pond.” Like the subtle geometry of his compositions, Bray's preference for modest, unassuming subjects—backwater meanders over mountaintop vistas—is deliberate and quietly profound. He has become an expert observer of bogs and shorelines, rock slides and fallow fields, daybreaks and dusks, the shifting edges of seasons. In the overlooked landscapes of his native Maine, Bray uncovers a deep sense of spirituality that gives his work its quiet power—transformative in its presence, not merely descriptive. Bray paints in casein, a milk-based tempera that has virtually no drying time. Necessarily, his paintings are technically complex because they consist of thousands of tiny brush strokes, built up in layers, out of which the images – the vision – advance from the foundation of a mirror-smooth, absolute void of white ground. It is a method of painting that follows directly from his method of exploring his subjects. Alan Bray, Neighbors, 2025 Casein on panel, 11 x 14 in. Alan Bray A Whisper Breaks the Silence, 2024 Casein on panel, 15 x 20 in. Alan Bray Refuge, 2024 Casein on panel, 16 x 20 in
Once again, Dr. Raffa and Catarina dive into another well-known name in the development of psychology, Lawrence Kohlberg. After looking at his theory of moral development, our hosts review how his contributions might still be relevant today.Welcome to Talk Therapy CBT | Conversation about Educating, Connecting, Helping Individuals to the World of Psychology.We would like to thanks our sponsor : Dr. Alba Raphaela, you can buy her book about : Breaking the Mirror : A Story & Guide on how to recognize and deal with a narcissist. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B09HFRNWYC/ref=cm_sw_r_apan_3NW8EE01F8A6G4KGNW56This podcast is sponsored by (https://www.innerbalancepsychology.com/) - Inner Balance Psychology Center, Psychological Treatment and Evaluations for Children, Adolescents and AdultsAs solution-focused therapists, our goal is to help you uncover your true potential and lead a life that is worth celebrating. While we can't change difficult situations of the past, we can work together to better understand and resolve challenges in your life. By applying complementary therapy approaches and techniques, we will unearth long-standing behavior patterns or negative perceptions that may be holding you back from experiencing a more fulfilling and meaningful life.Follow Us on Social Media:Blog : (https://www.innerbalancepsychology.com/blog/ )FAQs : ( https://www.innerbalancepsychology.com/faqs/ )Facebook : (https://www.facebook.com/ibpcllc)Instagram : (https://www.Instagram.com/innerbalancepsychology) Check out our website for more information : (https://www.innerbalancepsychology.com/) or email Dr. Raffa : (dawnraffa@innerbalancepsychology.com)This podcast is hosted by and produced by (https://www.innerbalancepsychology.com/) Please consider subscribing and sharing this episode if you found it entertaining or informative. If you want to go the extra mile, you can leave us a rating or review which helps the show with rankings and algorithms on certain platforms. you can leave us a review on Podchaser or Apple Podcasts Make sure you're subscribed to the podcast so you get the latest episodes. Our Podcast Page : (https://www.innerbalancepsychology.com/)(Subscribe with Apple Podcast)(Follow on Spotify)(Subscribe with Stitcher)(Subscribe on IHeartRadio )(Listen on other streaming platforms) DISCLAIMEROpinions expressed are solely the hosts and guest(s) and do not represent or express the views or opinions of Inner Balance Psychology
In this hilarious episode with Pop Culture Moms podcasters and real life BFFs Andie Mitchell and Sabrina Kohlberg, the ladies discuss the highs and lows of their birth experiences, the role formula played in their family's feeding journeys, strategies for establishing a healthy division of labor with one's partner, modeling healthy eating and body positivity for kids without over-stressing, which pop culture moms the gal pals love, and more!Please note that this episode may contain paid endorsements and advertisements for products and services. Individuals on the show may have a direct or indirect financial interest in products or services referred to in this episode.Produced by Dear Media.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
In this class series, Rabbi Shmuly will explore the Torah of the mind. Examining thinkers like Freud, Piaget, Maslow, Frankl, and so many others over 50 interactive sessions, we will explore how Jewish thought intersects with modern psychological studies and theories. Looking at consciousness, moral reasoning, ego, love, learning, and evil, how can we better understand why humans act as they do? Considering our relationships, traumas, memories, conflicts, and self-esteem, how can reflecting on the deep complexity of our minds help us live more meaningful lives? Further, how might Jewish ethics and Jewish philosophy help us ask not just “how do we live” but “how might we live?” Join us for a deep dive into the collective, individual, and the Jewish mind.Attended these classes live over Zoom by becoming a member for just $18 per month: https://www.valleybeitmidrash.org/become-a-member.------------------Stay Connected with Valley Beit Midrash:• Website: https://www.valleybeitmidrash.org• Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ValleyBeitMidrash ★ Support this podcast ★
In today's episode, Liz chats with best friends Andie Mitchell and Sabrina Kohlberg, hosts of the Good Morning America and ABC podcast Pop Culture Moms. Together, they explore the evolving portrayal of motherhood in entertainment, share their insights from their podcasting journey, and talk about their own personal TV mom heroes. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Welcome back to THE IAS COMPANION. Follow us on YouTube: www.youtube.com/@IASCompanion. In today's lecture, we will explore Values in Psychology, a crucial aspect of human behavior that influences our decisions, attitudes, and interactions. Values are fundamental beliefs or standards that guide our actions and reflect what we find important in life. They are not merely preferences but deeply rooted principles that shape our behavior and worldview. We will examine various definitions of values, including those by Milton Rokeach and Gordon Allport, and discuss their key characteristics such as stability, cultural influences, and their role in guiding actions. Additionally, we will look into different value classifications, measurement tools like Kohlberg's Moral Judgment Scale and the Rokeach Value Survey, and distinguish values from attitudes. Understanding these elements helps psychologists gain deeper insights into the motivations behind human behavior. #UPSC #IASprep #civilserviceexam #IASexamination #IASaspirants #UPSCjourney #IASexam #civilservice #IASgoals #UPSC2024 #IAS2024 #civilservant #IAScoaching #aUPSCmotivation #IASmotivation #UPSCpreparation #IASpreparation #UPSCguide #IASguide #UPSCtips #IAS #UPSCbooks #IASbooks #UPSCexamstrategy #IASexamstrategy #UPSCmentorship #IASmentorship #UPSCcommunity #IAScommunity #UPSCpreparation #IASpreparation #UPSCguide #IASguide #UPSCtips #IAStips #UPSCbooks #IASbooks #UPSCexamstrategy #IASexamstrategy #UPSCmentorship #IASmentorship #UPSCcommunity #IAScommunity
Blusky Restoration, a prominent restoration and renovation company, was acquired by Partners Group and Kohlberg & Company in 2018. Over the first three years, BluSky Restoration experienced more than a fourfold growth.RKON's Managing Director, Jeff Laurinaitis, sat down with BluSky Restoration's CIO, Aaron Rich, to discuss private equity's IT approach vs. traditional companies, IT recruiting strategies in a tight labor market and outsourcing/insourcing in the service of scalability. Tune in to learn more about BluSky Restoration and their partnership with RKON.
Welcome to "Empowering the Ethics of Person-Centered Care through Practice." In this two-part podcast, we explore the fundamental principles and practical applications of person-centered care within the realm of healthcare ethics. Objectives: Listeners will gain a comprehensive understanding of the ethical principles and practical methodologies underpinning person-centered care within healthcare contexts. They will learn actionable strategies to implement person-centered practices, aiming to enhance patient experiences, uphold dignity, and promote positive outcomes in healthcare delivery.Guests: Jessa Roisen, PhD, SAU Philosophy and MPH ProfessorDoug Johnson, System Patient Experience Officer, Northshore Edward-Elmhurst Hospital Planetree Gold CertifiedDr. Roisen has more than 18 years in higher education regularly teaching Ethics, Applied Ethics, and Conflict Analysis for the Philosophy Department at St. Ambrose University. She chairs the Bioethics and Humanities Initiative and is a certified mediator and Health Care Ethics Consultant with over 10 years of experience. Dr. Roisen also trains community mediators and mediates regularly for the Davenport Civil Rights Commission and the Rock Island County Circuit Court.Doug Johnson is the Patient Experience Officer at North Shore Edward Elmhurst Health, a Planetree Gold Certified campus. He has worked across disciplines, including healthcare, the marketing industry, retail, and within professional baseball with the Chicago Cubs! References: Berwick DM. The Moral Determinants of Health. JAMA. Published online June 12, 2020. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.11129Ekman, I. (2022). Practicing the ethics of person-centred care balancing ethical conviction and moral obligations. Nursing Philosophy, 23, e12382. doi.org/10.1111/nup.12382Entwistle, V. A., & Watt, I. S. (2013). Treating Patients as Persons: A Capabilities Approach to Support Delivery of Person-Centered Care. The American Journal of Bioethics, 13(8), 29–39. doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2013.802060Harris, E. (2020, May) Person-Centered Care: Why it means everything & how to provide it? www.crisisprevention.com/Blog/Person-…orram-Manesh, A., Gray, L., Goniewicz, K., Cocco, A., Ranse, J., Phattharapornjaroen, P., Achour, N., Sørensen, J., Peyravi, M., Hertelendy, A.J., Kupietz, K., Bergholtz, J., &Carlström, E., (2024). Care in emergencies and disasters: Can it be person-centered?, Patient Education and Counseling, doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2023.108046.Marmot M. The Health Gap: The Challenge of an Unequal World. Bloomsbury; 2015.Planetree International www.planetree.org/Santana MJ, Manalili K, Jolley RJ, Zelinsky S, Quan H, Lu M. (2018) How to practice person-centred care: A conceptual framework. Health Expect. 21(2):429-440. doi:10.1111/hex.12640Sprouts. (2019, November 29). Kohlberg's 6 stages of moral development [Video]. www.youtube.com/watch?v=bounwXLkme4Tomaselli G., Buttigieg S.C., Rosano A., Cassar M., Grima G. (2020) Person-Centered Care From a Relational Ethics Perspective for the Delivery of High Quality and Safe Healthcare: A Scoping Review. Front Public Health. 8:44 doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00044.This podcast is CEU Accredited.
Today's episode features two moms I can relate to - we're media moms of multiples! Andie and Sabrina met 20 years ago as college freshmen and have been inseparable ever since. With four kids between them, they spend a lot of time chatting about the joys and hardships of parenting; the pressures of juggling family and work; and, of course, the latest pop News. Andie Mitchell: Andie Mitchell is a New York Times bestselling author and the founder of the food and lifestyle blog, AndieMitchell.com. Her memoir, It Was Me All Along, was chosen as one of Amazon's Top 100 Best Books of 2015 and People Magazine's Book of the Week. Her cookbook, Eating in the Middle: A Mostly Wholesome Cookbook, was featured in the New York Times book review and selected as O Magazine's Cookbook of the Month. She lives in Massachusetts with her husband, Daniel; and their two sons, James (5) and Levi (3). Sabrina Kohlberg: Sabrina Peduto is an Emmy Award-winning producer for Good Morning America with a passion for producing stories about pop culture and parenting. If she's not on a red carpet at an award show, she can be found writing a story about current events or parenting advice. She lives in New Jersey with her husband, Steve; and their children, Violet (4) and Cooper (2). Meet My Guest: INSTAGRAM: @skohlberg INSTAGRAM: @andiemmitchell X: @SabrinaPeduto X: @andiemmitchell Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Kohlberg's research was conducted on white male students at elite colleges in the 1950s. Gilligan conducted a study with more diverse test subjects and found some interesting differences. Check out this week's Business Law 101 for more! Thanks for joining me for this episode! I'm a Houston- based attorney, run an HR Consulting company called Claremont Management Group, and am a tenured professor at the University of St. Thomas. I've also written several non-fiction political commentary books: Bad Deal for America (2022) explores the Vegas-style corruption running rampant in Washington DC, while The Decline of America: 100 Years of Leadership Failures (2018) analyzes – and grades – the leadership qualities of the past 100 years of U.S. presidents. You can find my books on Amazon, and me on social media (Twitter @DSchein1, LinkedIn @DavidSchein, and Facebook, Instagram, & YouTube @AuthorDavidSchein). I'd love to hear from you! As always, the opinions expressed in this podcast are mine and my guests' and not the opinions of my university, my company, or the businesses with which I am connected.
Kohlberg outlined 6 major stages of moral development – which line up reasonably well with Mazlow's much more famous hierarchy of needs. Learn more this week on Business Law 101! Thanks for joining me for this episode! I'm a Houston- based attorney, run an HR Consulting company called Claremont Management Group, and am a tenured professor at the University of St. Thomas. I've also written several non-fiction political commentary books: Bad Deal for America (2022) explores the Vegas-style corruption running rampant in Washington DC, while The Decline of America: 100 Years of Leadership Failures (2018) analyzes – and grades – the leadership qualities of the past 100 years of U.S. presidents. You can find my books on Amazon, and me on social media (Twitter @DSchein1, LinkedIn @DavidSchein, and Facebook, Instagram, & YouTube @AuthorDavidSchein). I'd love to hear from you! As always, the opinions expressed in this podcast are mine and my guests' and not the opinions of my university, my company, or the businesses with which I am connected.
Andie Mitchell (It Was Me All Along, Eating in the Middle) and Sabrina Kohlberg (Good Morning America) of Pop Culture Moms join the show to talk about meeting in college, relationships, parenthood, whether there is a central Jersey, Barbie, recipe testing and so much more. We also did a round of Just Me or Everyone and Podcast Pals Product Picks. Get yourself some new ARIYNBF merch here: https://alison-rosen-shop.fourthwall.com/ Subscribe to my newsletter: http://alisonrosen.substack.com Products I Use/Recommend/Love: http://amazon.com/shop/alisonrosen Check us out on Patreon: http://patreon.com/alisonrosen This episode is brought to you by: BETTER HELP: http://BetterHelp.com/BESTFRIEND (use code BESTFRIEND for 10% off), Alison Rosen Is Your New Best Friend is sponsored by Better Help Buy Alison's Fifth Anniversary Edition Book (with new material): Tropical Attire Encouraged (and Other Phrases That Scare Me) https://amzn.to/2JuOqcd You probably need to buy the HGFY ringtone! https://www.alisonrosen.com/store/ Try Amazon Prime Free 30 Day Trial
They're heeeere. Pop Culture Moms Andie Mitchell and Sabrina Kohlberg emerge from the television set to talk about anxious first trips to Disneyland, the perfect mothering of Chilli Heeler, and how they learned empathy from watching TV.Listen to Pop Culture Moms, Andie and Sabrina's new podcast from ABC Audio, wherever fine pods are cast.Thank you to all our listeners who support the show as monthly members of MaximumFun.org. Go to MaximumFun.org/join to become a member!Share a personal or commercial message on the show! Details at MaximumFun.org/Jumbotron.Visit our Linktree for our website, merch, and more! https://linktr.ee/onebadmotherYou can suggest a topic or a guest for an upcoming show by sending an email to onebadmother@maximumfun.org.Show MusicSummon the Rawk, Kevin MacLeod (www.incompetech.com)Ones and Zeros, Awesome, Beehive SessionsMom Song, Adira Amram, Hot Jams For TeensTelephone, Awesome, Beehive SessionsMama Blues, Cornbread Ted and the ButterbeansMental Health Resources:Therapy for Black Girls – Therapyforblackgirls.comDr. Jessica Clemmens – https://www.askdrjess.comBLH Foundation – borislhensonfoundation.orgThe Postpartum Support International Warmline – 1-800-944-4773 (1-800-944-4PPD)The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) Helpline – 1-800-662-4357 (1-800-662-HELP)Suicide Prevention Hotline: Call or chat. They are here to help anyone in crisis. Dial 988 for https://suicidepreventionlifeline.org and there is a chat option on the website.Crisis Text Line: Text from anywhere in the USA (also Canada and the UK) to text with a trained counselor. A real human being.USA text 741741Canada text 686868UK text 85258Website: https://www.crisistextline.orgNational Sexual Assault: Call 800.656.HOPE (4673) to be connected with a trained staff member from a sexual assault service provider in your area.https://www.rainn.orgNational Domestic Violence Hotline:https://www.thehotline.org/help/Our advocates are available 24/7 at 1-800-799-SAFE (7233) in more than 200 languages. All calls are free and confidential.They suggest that if you are a victim and cannot seek help, ask a friend or family member to call for you.Teletherapy Search: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/therapists/online-counseling
Breaking down Kohlberg's Stages of Moral Development helps Matt and Toni make sense of some of the strong emotions going on inside of her when she comes up against rules-based Christians, why some people are so afraid of the Way of Love and how often our motives (even Toni's) are really about avoiding pain.
On today's episode, we are turning our attention to the complex and often misunderstood industry of restoration and remediation. Joining our host Gavin McGrath is Jonathan Ward, Operating Partner of Kohlberg, and Paul Bromfield, Partner at L.E.K. Consulting and expert in building and site services. Together, they will explore the inner workings of this multibillion-dollar industry, debunking misconceptions and shedding light on the true essence of restoration and remediation. From recurring events like burst pipes to the impact of extreme weather and insurance relationships, our guests will provide valuable insights and guidance on navigating this dynamic sector.Key points/topics covered: Revenue stability in the restoration and remediation industry The impact of extreme weather and catastrophic events The influence of insurance relationships on the industry Connect with our experts on LinkedIn:Paul Bromfield, Managing Director and Partner, L.E.K. Consulting: https://www.linkedin.com/in/paulbromfield/Gavin McGrath, Managing Director and Partner, L.E.K. Consulting: https://www.linkedin.com/in/gavinmcgrath/Jonathan Ward, Operating Partner, Kohlberg: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jonathan-ward-0667a57b/ Visit L.E.K. Consulting at https://www.lek.com/
The ongoing Bryan Kohlberger case has recently entered a new phase, with an increasing number of motions being filed by both sides. One particular issue that has come under scrutiny is the presence of cameras in the court, with some of the filings specifically mentioning inappropriate focus on Kohberger's crotch. Defense Attorney Bob Motta, host of the podcast Defense Diaries, recently shared his thoughts on this and other aspects of the case on the "Hidden Killers" podcast with Tony Brueski. Motta explained that with the removal of the speedy trial demand, both the state and defense have been under less pressure, allowing them to fully engage in traditional motion work. This involves going through all discovery materials and deciding whether to file motions such as motions to suppress or quash. However, Motta pointed out that the recent motion work is just a fraction of what is expected in a death penalty case like this one. On the camera issue, Motta predicted that the judge might limit pretrial coverage to avoid tainting the jury pool, a known problem in high-profile cases. Some lawyers in the area believe that the trial should not be moved to a different venue, and Motta agreed, noting that in Idaho, changing the venue would not involve changing the prosecutor or judge, only the location. He also mentioned that importing a jury might be a more cost-efficient and logistically feasible option given the massive undertaking of transporting evidence. While discussing the trial proceedings, Motta emphasized the importance of getting it right the first time to avoid putting the victims' families through the ordeal again. This involves both sides agreeing to a fair trial, which could involve importing a jury from a different county. As for the recent scheduling hearing, two motions to dismiss the indictment were scheduled for September 22nd. The first motion alleges a biased grand jury, inadmissible evidence, lack of sufficient evidence to prosecute, and prosecutorial misconduct. Although this motion will be sealed, Motta predicted that both motions would ultimately be denied. The second motion, which will be open to the public, involves a legal argument regarding the Idaho Constitution's language on the standard required to bind someone over for trial. The defense argues that the constitution requires a "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard, while the Supreme Court of Idaho's criminal rules specify a "probable cause" standard. Motta shared his belief that the defense attorney had been waiting for an opportunity to litigate this constitutional argument, which could have far-reaching implications if successful. However, he clarified that even if the motions were granted, Kohlberg would not be released; the prosecution would likely simply re-indict him. Overall, the Kohberger case continues to evolve with various legal intricacies and challenges that will likely have a significant impact on the final outcome. As both sides prepare for the upcoming hearings, it remains to be seen how the court will address these complex issues and move forward towards a resolution that ensures justice for all parties involved. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The ongoing Bryan Kohlberger case has recently entered a new phase, with an increasing number of motions being filed by both sides. One particular issue that has come under scrutiny is the presence of cameras in the court, with some of the filings specifically mentioning inappropriate focus on Kohberger's crotch. Defense Attorney Bob Motta, host of the podcast Defense Diaries, recently shared his thoughts on this and other aspects of the case on the "Hidden Killers" podcast with Tony Brueski. Motta explained that with the removal of the speedy trial demand, both the state and defense have been under less pressure, allowing them to fully engage in traditional motion work. This involves going through all discovery materials and deciding whether to file motions such as motions to suppress or quash. However, Motta pointed out that the recent motion work is just a fraction of what is expected in a death penalty case like this one. On the camera issue, Motta predicted that the judge might limit pretrial coverage to avoid tainting the jury pool, a known problem in high-profile cases. Some lawyers in the area believe that the trial should not be moved to a different venue, and Motta agreed, noting that in Idaho, changing the venue would not involve changing the prosecutor or judge, only the location. He also mentioned that importing a jury might be a more cost-efficient and logistically feasible option given the massive undertaking of transporting evidence. While discussing the trial proceedings, Motta emphasized the importance of getting it right the first time to avoid putting the victims' families through the ordeal again. This involves both sides agreeing to a fair trial, which could involve importing a jury from a different county. As for the recent scheduling hearing, two motions to dismiss the indictment were scheduled for September 22nd. The first motion alleges a biased grand jury, inadmissible evidence, lack of sufficient evidence to prosecute, and prosecutorial misconduct. Although this motion will be sealed, Motta predicted that both motions would ultimately be denied. The second motion, which will be open to the public, involves a legal argument regarding the Idaho Constitution's language on the standard required to bind someone over for trial. The defense argues that the constitution requires a "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard, while the Supreme Court of Idaho's criminal rules specify a "probable cause" standard. Motta shared his belief that the defense attorney had been waiting for an opportunity to litigate this constitutional argument, which could have far-reaching implications if successful. However, he clarified that even if the motions were granted, Kohlberg would not be released; the prosecution would likely simply re-indict him. Overall, the Kohberger case continues to evolve with various legal intricacies and challenges that will likely have a significant impact on the final outcome. As both sides prepare for the upcoming hearings, it remains to be seen how the court will address these complex issues and move forward towards a resolution that ensures justice for all parties involved. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The upcoming case against Bryan Kohberger, the legal stage is set for some intricate courtroom maneuvers. According to a recent discussion on the podcast "Hidden Killers" with Tony Brueski, Defense Attorney and host of "Defense Diaries," Bob Motta, addressed the pending motion to dismiss the charges against Kohberger. The motion, raised by defense attorney Ann Taylor, is scheduled for the end of this week. While the speedy trial has already been waived, removing the October 2nd trial date from the table, Taylor is reportedly still going to argue for a dismissal. Motta, elaborating on the intricacies of this maneuver, stated, “I think that Ann Taylor has been...waiting for an indictment by grand jury because they're very unusual in Idaho. They typically go by preliminary hearing.” It's important to note that while grand juries are standard practice in many states, Idaho often relies on preliminary hearings to decide whether to charge a defendant. To the surprise of many, including Motta, who predicted this change in course earlier this year, the state opted for a grand jury in the Kohberger case. He hypothesized that this move might have been driven by a desire to mitigate potential media interference, saying, "As much as some people don't want to acknowledge the fact that a jury pool can be tainted by constant negative press about a defendant, the fact of the matter is that it can." Central to Taylor's argument for dismissal is a challenge to the constitutionality of Idaho's grand jury indictments. Motta explained, “She's basically saying that the Idaho constitution... has set the standard for a grand jury indictment that it essentially has to be beyond a reasonable doubt.” The crux of the issue is a potential discrepancy between the Idaho constitution and the Idaho Criminal Rules (ICR). While the ICR states that a grand jury only needs probable cause to indict, Taylor argues that the Idaho constitution requires a higher standard—namely, the same "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard used in trials. Motta found this legal contention particularly fascinating, pointing out that if Taylor's interpretation is correct, the grand jury was misinformed of the burden they had to meet. He elaborated, “You have these two competing things and they're very different burdens. She's basically arguing, look, they went in and they went to the grand jury and they gave them the wrong burden.” The implications of Taylor's argument are far-reaching. If she prevails, it doesn't mean that Kohberger will be freed, but rather that the legal process might have to start over. When Brueski pressed Motta on this, asking about the path forward should Taylor succeed, Motta clarified, “If she did succeed and he dismissed that grand jury indictment, that doesn't mean that Kohlberg's walking. That means, yeah, they'd have to do the process all over again.” While Motta expressed skepticism about the likelihood of Taylor's motion succeeding, he admitted, “For legal nerds, it's going to be a very interesting conversation and argument. I am chomping at the bit to hear it.” The Kohberger case thus presents not just the story of the crime itself but also a deep dive into the nuances and intricacies of the legal system. As defense attorneys, prosecutors, and legal enthusiasts alike await the courtroom debate, many are eager to see how these arguments play out in shaping the course of Idaho's criminal justice process. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The upcoming case against Bryan Kohberger, the legal stage is set for some intricate courtroom maneuvers. According to a recent discussion on the podcast "Hidden Killers" with Tony Brueski, Defense Attorney and host of "Defense Diaries," Bob Motta, addressed the pending motion to dismiss the charges against Kohberger. The motion, raised by defense attorney Ann Taylor, is scheduled for the end of this week. While the speedy trial has already been waived, removing the October 2nd trial date from the table, Taylor is reportedly still going to argue for a dismissal. Motta, elaborating on the intricacies of this maneuver, stated, “I think that Ann Taylor has been...waiting for an indictment by grand jury because they're very unusual in Idaho. They typically go by preliminary hearing.” It's important to note that while grand juries are standard practice in many states, Idaho often relies on preliminary hearings to decide whether to charge a defendant. To the surprise of many, including Motta, who predicted this change in course earlier this year, the state opted for a grand jury in the Kohberger case. He hypothesized that this move might have been driven by a desire to mitigate potential media interference, saying, "As much as some people don't want to acknowledge the fact that a jury pool can be tainted by constant negative press about a defendant, the fact of the matter is that it can." Central to Taylor's argument for dismissal is a challenge to the constitutionality of Idaho's grand jury indictments. Motta explained, “She's basically saying that the Idaho constitution... has set the standard for a grand jury indictment that it essentially has to be beyond a reasonable doubt.” The crux of the issue is a potential discrepancy between the Idaho constitution and the Idaho Criminal Rules (ICR). While the ICR states that a grand jury only needs probable cause to indict, Taylor argues that the Idaho constitution requires a higher standard—namely, the same "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard used in trials. Motta found this legal contention particularly fascinating, pointing out that if Taylor's interpretation is correct, the grand jury was misinformed of the burden they had to meet. He elaborated, “You have these two competing things and they're very different burdens. She's basically arguing, look, they went in and they went to the grand jury and they gave them the wrong burden.” The implications of Taylor's argument are far-reaching. If she prevails, it doesn't mean that Kohberger will be freed, but rather that the legal process might have to start over. When Brueski pressed Motta on this, asking about the path forward should Taylor succeed, Motta clarified, “If she did succeed and he dismissed that grand jury indictment, that doesn't mean that Kohlberg's walking. That means, yeah, they'd have to do the process all over again.” While Motta expressed skepticism about the likelihood of Taylor's motion succeeding, he admitted, “For legal nerds, it's going to be a very interesting conversation and argument. I am chomping at the bit to hear it.” The Kohberger case thus presents not just the story of the crime itself but also a deep dive into the nuances and intricacies of the legal system. As defense attorneys, prosecutors, and legal enthusiasts alike await the courtroom debate, many are eager to see how these arguments play out in shaping the course of Idaho's criminal justice process. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The Brian Kohberger trial has seen a new twist in its tale, as the defense prepares to challenge the DNA evidence that may incriminate Kohberger. In the latest episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers", Tony Brueski spoke with former Felony Prosecutor and attorney, Eric Faddis, shedding light on the defense's strategy and the risks it presents. Brueski started the episode discussing a new motion, an attempt to "compel the defense to persuade prosecutors to share various evidence," specifically surrounding DNA testing. Faddis pointed out that, at this juncture, the DNA evidence "could be terribly problematic for Kohlberg." He mentioned a potential reconsideration by the prosecution on using some of the genetic genealogy evidence. "All of this is gonna come down on Friday. We're gonna know a lot more then." The podcast discussed the key idea of "false positives" in DNA evidence. To the general public, the term can be misleading. "If there is anything that, like you said, any errors, any faultiness, but when it comes down to a false positive with DNA...the odds of that are slim to almost nothing whatsoever with the type of DNA they're testing," Brueski stated. He continued with an analogy, explaining that even if a key (representing DNA) is mishandled or gets dirty, it still opens the right door, indicating the DNA remains unchanged despite potential mishandling. Faddis brought a new perspective, suggesting that Kohberger's defense might attempt to claim the DNA was planted, an accusation that would dramatically alter the course of the trial. If the defense could highlight any faults in the testing, it could strengthen their argument against the evidence's reliability. "If they're gonna try to use all of the... alleged faultiness in the testing to support a larger theory that this DNA evidence was planted," Faddis hypothesized. Taking the stance that the evidence was planted is significantly risky for the defense. Faddis clarified that such an argument is a double-edged sword. "That's a super risky argument to take," he said, "If you're gonna put that in front of a jury as a defense attorney, you better be able to back it up." Arguing that evidence was planted inherently suggests that the DNA was, in fact, from the client, thus removing the argument about testing reliability. Brueski pondered on the implications, "How risky is it to go down that road? ...to go down that road, is there a lot of risk involved to make such a claim?" Faddis responded with a resounding, "Oh heck yes." Arguing the DNA was planted implies not just that the evidence was mishandled but that there was a deliberate attempt to frame Kohberger. "It's a pretty tall accusation to make if you can't back it up," Faddis said, "and also that accusation... divests you of one additional argument." He emphasized the gravity of such a claim and the need for a competent attorney to carry it forward. The debate surrounding the DNA evidence, whether it's about its validity or potential mishandling, has added another layer of complexity to the Brian Kohberger case. As the motion to compel unfolds, all eyes will be on the courtroom to see how the defense navigates these treacherous waters and the direction the trial takes in the coming weeks. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The Brian Kohberger trial has seen a new twist in its tale, as the defense prepares to challenge the DNA evidence that may incriminate Kohberger. In the latest episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers", Tony Brueski spoke with former Felony Prosecutor and attorney, Eric Faddis, shedding light on the defense's strategy and the risks it presents. Brueski started the episode discussing a new motion, an attempt to "compel the defense to persuade prosecutors to share various evidence," specifically surrounding DNA testing. Faddis pointed out that, at this juncture, the DNA evidence "could be terribly problematic for Kohlberg." He mentioned a potential reconsideration by the prosecution on using some of the genetic genealogy evidence. "All of this is gonna come down on Friday. We're gonna know a lot more then." The podcast discussed the key idea of "false positives" in DNA evidence. To the general public, the term can be misleading. "If there is anything that, like you said, any errors, any faultiness, but when it comes down to a false positive with DNA...the odds of that are slim to almost nothing whatsoever with the type of DNA they're testing," Brueski stated. He continued with an analogy, explaining that even if a key (representing DNA) is mishandled or gets dirty, it still opens the right door, indicating the DNA remains unchanged despite potential mishandling. Faddis brought a new perspective, suggesting that Kohberger's defense might attempt to claim the DNA was planted, an accusation that would dramatically alter the course of the trial. If the defense could highlight any faults in the testing, it could strengthen their argument against the evidence's reliability. "If they're gonna try to use all of the... alleged faultiness in the testing to support a larger theory that this DNA evidence was planted," Faddis hypothesized. Taking the stance that the evidence was planted is significantly risky for the defense. Faddis clarified that such an argument is a double-edged sword. "That's a super risky argument to take," he said, "If you're gonna put that in front of a jury as a defense attorney, you better be able to back it up." Arguing that evidence was planted inherently suggests that the DNA was, in fact, from the client, thus removing the argument about testing reliability. Brueski pondered on the implications, "How risky is it to go down that road? ...to go down that road, is there a lot of risk involved to make such a claim?" Faddis responded with a resounding, "Oh heck yes." Arguing the DNA was planted implies not just that the evidence was mishandled but that there was a deliberate attempt to frame Kohberger. "It's a pretty tall accusation to make if you can't back it up," Faddis said, "and also that accusation... divests you of one additional argument." He emphasized the gravity of such a claim and the need for a competent attorney to carry it forward. The debate surrounding the DNA evidence, whether it's about its validity or potential mishandling, has added another layer of complexity to the Brian Kohberger case. As the motion to compel unfolds, all eyes will be on the courtroom to see how the defense navigates these treacherous waters and the direction the trial takes in the coming weeks. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The Brian Kohberger trial has seen a new twist in its tale, as the defense prepares to challenge the DNA evidence that may incriminate Kohberger. In the latest episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers", Tony Brueski spoke with former Felony Prosecutor and attorney, Eric Faddis, shedding light on the defense's strategy and the risks it presents. Brueski started the episode discussing a new motion, an attempt to "compel the defense to persuade prosecutors to share various evidence," specifically surrounding DNA testing. Faddis pointed out that, at this juncture, the DNA evidence "could be terribly problematic for Kohlberg." He mentioned a potential reconsideration by the prosecution on using some of the genetic genealogy evidence. "All of this is gonna come down on Friday. We're gonna know a lot more then." The podcast discussed the key idea of "false positives" in DNA evidence. To the general public, the term can be misleading. "If there is anything that, like you said, any errors, any faultiness, but when it comes down to a false positive with DNA...the odds of that are slim to almost nothing whatsoever with the type of DNA they're testing," Brueski stated. He continued with an analogy, explaining that even if a key (representing DNA) is mishandled or gets dirty, it still opens the right door, indicating the DNA remains unchanged despite potential mishandling. Faddis brought a new perspective, suggesting that Kohberger's defense might attempt to claim the DNA was planted, an accusation that would dramatically alter the course of the trial. If the defense could highlight any faults in the testing, it could strengthen their argument against the evidence's reliability. "If they're gonna try to use all of the... alleged faultiness in the testing to support a larger theory that this DNA evidence was planted," Faddis hypothesized. Taking the stance that the evidence was planted is significantly risky for the defense. Faddis clarified that such an argument is a double-edged sword. "That's a super risky argument to take," he said, "If you're gonna put that in front of a jury as a defense attorney, you better be able to back it up." Arguing that evidence was planted inherently suggests that the DNA was, in fact, from the client, thus removing the argument about testing reliability. Brueski pondered on the implications, "How risky is it to go down that road? ...to go down that road, is there a lot of risk involved to make such a claim?" Faddis responded with a resounding, "Oh heck yes." Arguing the DNA was planted implies not just that the evidence was mishandled but that there was a deliberate attempt to frame Kohberger. "It's a pretty tall accusation to make if you can't back it up," Faddis said, "and also that accusation... divests you of one additional argument." He emphasized the gravity of such a claim and the need for a competent attorney to carry it forward. The debate surrounding the DNA evidence, whether it's about its validity or potential mishandling, has added another layer of complexity to the Brian Kohberger case. As the motion to compel unfolds, all eyes will be on the courtroom to see how the defense navigates these treacherous waters and the direction the trial takes in the coming weeks. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski joined forces with psychotherapist and author Shavaun Scott to delve into the perplexing case of Bryan Kohberger. The conversation sought to unravel the psyche of Kohberger amidst a cloud of allegations and questionable actions. Brueski kicked off the dialogue, highlighting the contradictions in Kohberger's behavior. "Initially, their team [said], we're looking forward to being exonerated. Then it just kept going. Then he has an alibi," Brueski said, expressing skepticism about the strength of Kohberger's alibi which consisted of him just driving around. Brueski further mused about the influence Kohberger seems to be exerting over his attorney, Ann Taylor. The defense strategy seemed "very odd," and not "in the control" of the attorney. He speculated, "I feel like he's calling some of the shots here and I feel like Ann Taylor is almost being held hostage." Shavaun Scott proposed that it might be a calculated legal strategy, though it certainly seemed "passive." She suggested that the lawyers might be doing the best they can with the evidence they have. A significant point of discussion was Kohberger's decision to return to the alleged crime scene, a behavior identified through phone pings the day after the incident. Scott explained, "Part of the fascination with serial killers returning to the crime scene, is that going back... gives them, again, a sense of control, a sense of power, and a sense of pleasure." She further highlighted the habitual nature of offenders to revisit the scene, either physically or through memorabilia and news articles, to relive their "pleasure." Brueski raised an intriguing point about the geographical proximity of the crime to Kohberger's residence. "Was that something that is intentional because then he gets to soak up all of the attention?" he asked. Scott confirmed that there's a trend of revisiting, and that it made sense Kohberger would choose a location close to his home, yet not directly on his own turf. "And it wasn't as if he killed someone on his own campus... he really fixated on these young women," she remarked. However, the most pressing question on Brueski's mind was how Kohlberg's interactions with his defense, especially his statement about looking forward to being exonerated, reflected on his psychological state. In response, Scott suggested, "My guess is that's all legal maneuvering." She emphasized that Kohberger isn't delusional in the traditional sense. "He knows he did it," she claimed, hinting at the existing evidence and weak alibi. In her professional opinion, Scott concluded that Kohberger isn't suffering from multiple personalities or any classic signs of delusions. "He's not crazy. So, I think it's just, you know, what does a guilty person do very often the first thing they say is, I didn't do it." As the episode wrapped, listeners were left with a clearer, albeit still enigmatic, understanding of Bryan Kohberger's psychology. Both Brueski and Scott presented compelling insights into the behavior of alleged criminals, emphasizing that while understanding may be reached, full comprehension remains elusive. Kohberger has pled not guilty to all charges. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski joined forces with psychotherapist and author Shavaun Scott to delve into the perplexing case of Bryan Kohberger. The conversation sought to unravel the psyche of Kohberger amidst a cloud of allegations and questionable actions. Brueski kicked off the dialogue, highlighting the contradictions in Kohberger's behavior. "Initially, their team [said], we're looking forward to being exonerated. Then it just kept going. Then he has an alibi," Brueski said, expressing skepticism about the strength of Kohberger's alibi which consisted of him just driving around. Brueski further mused about the influence Kohberger seems to be exerting over his attorney, Ann Taylor. The defense strategy seemed "very odd," and not "in the control" of the attorney. He speculated, "I feel like he's calling some of the shots here and I feel like Ann Taylor is almost being held hostage." Shavaun Scott proposed that it might be a calculated legal strategy, though it certainly seemed "passive." She suggested that the lawyers might be doing the best they can with the evidence they have. A significant point of discussion was Kohberger's decision to return to the alleged crime scene, a behavior identified through phone pings the day after the incident. Scott explained, "Part of the fascination with serial killers returning to the crime scene, is that going back... gives them, again, a sense of control, a sense of power, and a sense of pleasure." She further highlighted the habitual nature of offenders to revisit the scene, either physically or through memorabilia and news articles, to relive their "pleasure." Brueski raised an intriguing point about the geographical proximity of the crime to Kohberger's residence. "Was that something that is intentional because then he gets to soak up all of the attention?" he asked. Scott confirmed that there's a trend of revisiting, and that it made sense Kohberger would choose a location close to his home, yet not directly on his own turf. "And it wasn't as if he killed someone on his own campus... he really fixated on these young women," she remarked. However, the most pressing question on Brueski's mind was how Kohlberg's interactions with his defense, especially his statement about looking forward to being exonerated, reflected on his psychological state. In response, Scott suggested, "My guess is that's all legal maneuvering." She emphasized that Kohberger isn't delusional in the traditional sense. "He knows he did it," she claimed, hinting at the existing evidence and weak alibi. In her professional opinion, Scott concluded that Kohberger isn't suffering from multiple personalities or any classic signs of delusions. "He's not crazy. So, I think it's just, you know, what does a guilty person do very often the first thing they say is, I didn't do it." As the episode wrapped, listeners were left with a clearer, albeit still enigmatic, understanding of Bryan Kohberger's psychology. Both Brueski and Scott presented compelling insights into the behavior of alleged criminals, emphasizing that while understanding may be reached, full comprehension remains elusive. Kohberger has pled not guilty to all charges. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski joined forces with psychotherapist and author Shavaun Scott to delve into the perplexing case of Bryan Kohberger. The conversation sought to unravel the psyche of Kohberger amidst a cloud of allegations and questionable actions. Brueski kicked off the dialogue, highlighting the contradictions in Kohberger's behavior. "Initially, their team [said], we're looking forward to being exonerated. Then it just kept going. Then he has an alibi," Brueski said, expressing skepticism about the strength of Kohberger's alibi which consisted of him just driving around. Brueski further mused about the influence Kohberger seems to be exerting over his attorney, Ann Taylor. The defense strategy seemed "very odd," and not "in the control" of the attorney. He speculated, "I feel like he's calling some of the shots here and I feel like Ann Taylor is almost being held hostage." Shavaun Scott proposed that it might be a calculated legal strategy, though it certainly seemed "passive." She suggested that the lawyers might be doing the best they can with the evidence they have. A significant point of discussion was Kohberger's decision to return to the alleged crime scene, a behavior identified through phone pings the day after the incident. Scott explained, "Part of the fascination with serial killers returning to the crime scene, is that going back... gives them, again, a sense of control, a sense of power, and a sense of pleasure." She further highlighted the habitual nature of offenders to revisit the scene, either physically or through memorabilia and news articles, to relive their "pleasure." Brueski raised an intriguing point about the geographical proximity of the crime to Kohberger's residence. "Was that something that is intentional because then he gets to soak up all of the attention?" he asked. Scott confirmed that there's a trend of revisiting, and that it made sense Kohberger would choose a location close to his home, yet not directly on his own turf. "And it wasn't as if he killed someone on his own campus... he really fixated on these young women," she remarked. However, the most pressing question on Brueski's mind was how Kohlberg's interactions with his defense, especially his statement about looking forward to being exonerated, reflected on his psychological state. In response, Scott suggested, "My guess is that's all legal maneuvering." She emphasized that Kohberger isn't delusional in the traditional sense. "He knows he did it," she claimed, hinting at the existing evidence and weak alibi. In her professional opinion, Scott concluded that Kohberger isn't suffering from multiple personalities or any classic signs of delusions. "He's not crazy. So, I think it's just, you know, what does a guilty person do very often the first thing they say is, I didn't do it." As the episode wrapped, listeners were left with a clearer, albeit still enigmatic, understanding of Bryan Kohberger's psychology. Both Brueski and Scott presented compelling insights into the behavior of alleged criminals, emphasizing that while understanding may be reached, full comprehension remains elusive. Kohberger has pled not guilty to all charges. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In a recent episode of "Hidden Killers," a podcast hosted by Tony Brueski, a fascinating and complex discussion unfolded with Forensic Scientist and Professor Dan Krane. The focus of the conversation revolved around a quadruple homicide case and the implications of DNA evidence discovered on a knife sheath attributed to the suspect, Kohlberg. Krane succinctly summarized the predicament, stating, "The presence of a DNA profile doesn't tell us anything about how or when that DNA came to be associated with what you've been testing." This highlights the conundrum that DNA, while compelling evidence, cannot establish a timestamp for its deposition or offer context on how it came to be at the crime scene. Professor Krane stressed the inherent challenge in the prosecution's narrative that Kohlberg's DNA was left on the knife sheath during the crime. He outlined how the defense might argue that the knife was discarded by the defendant long before the crime or taken by someone else, emphasizing, "The DNA test results by themselves are absolutely silent in terms of which of those competing hypotheses might be more likely." The podcast hosts and Krane also delved into the technological future of forensic science, pondering the potential for establishing a 'timestamp' on DNA evidence. Although we are currently unable to determine the age of a DNA sample, Krane postulated that this might change within the next decade, possibly through an examination of associated proteins. The conversation expanded to the implications of the growing DNA databases resulting from widespread genetic testing. Krane acknowledged the transformative potential of this trend for law enforcement, stating, "The increasing availability of DNA test results is going to be a very powerful tool for law enforcement." However, he also highlighted the ensuing ethical dilemmas, including issues around informed consent and the potential for casting suspicion on family members unaware of their genetic information being utilized. Beyond DNA, Krane underscored that a crime scene offers a wealth of other potential evidence, such as blood spatter analysis, fingerprinting, fiber analysis, and computer investigations, among others. He labeled DNA as the 'gold standard' of forensic science but acknowledged that other techniques could provide crucial context and corroboration to DNA findings. In the context of the Kohlberg case, Brueski and Krane discussed the possibility of DNA evidence accidentally implicating an innocent person. The high sensitivity of DNA tests could potentially detect samples from years ago, creating an open-ended interpretation that might mislead an investigation. "There's nothing about the DNA test results in themselves that would tell you which of two alternatives were more likely," Krane added. Their compelling discussion concluded with the notion that DNA evidence, while an essential piece, is just one part of a complex puzzle in criminal investigations. "A great attorney said to me, I'm weaving together a symphony to entertain the jury with. I need you to deliver one note," recounted Krane, emphasizing the importance of integrating DNA evidence into a holistic investigative approach. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In a recent episode of "Hidden Killers," a podcast hosted by Tony Brueski, a fascinating and complex discussion unfolded with Forensic Scientist and Professor Dan Krane. The focus of the conversation revolved around a quadruple homicide case and the implications of DNA evidence discovered on a knife sheath attributed to the suspect, Kohlberg. Krane succinctly summarized the predicament, stating, "The presence of a DNA profile doesn't tell us anything about how or when that DNA came to be associated with what you've been testing." This highlights the conundrum that DNA, while compelling evidence, cannot establish a timestamp for its deposition or offer context on how it came to be at the crime scene. Professor Krane stressed the inherent challenge in the prosecution's narrative that Kohlberg's DNA was left on the knife sheath during the crime. He outlined how the defense might argue that the knife was discarded by the defendant long before the crime or taken by someone else, emphasizing, "The DNA test results by themselves are absolutely silent in terms of which of those competing hypotheses might be more likely." The podcast hosts and Krane also delved into the technological future of forensic science, pondering the potential for establishing a 'timestamp' on DNA evidence. Although we are currently unable to determine the age of a DNA sample, Krane postulated that this might change within the next decade, possibly through an examination of associated proteins. The conversation expanded to the implications of the growing DNA databases resulting from widespread genetic testing. Krane acknowledged the transformative potential of this trend for law enforcement, stating, "The increasing availability of DNA test results is going to be a very powerful tool for law enforcement." However, he also highlighted the ensuing ethical dilemmas, including issues around informed consent and the potential for casting suspicion on family members unaware of their genetic information being utilized. Beyond DNA, Krane underscored that a crime scene offers a wealth of other potential evidence, such as blood spatter analysis, fingerprinting, fiber analysis, and computer investigations, among others. He labeled DNA as the 'gold standard' of forensic science but acknowledged that other techniques could provide crucial context and corroboration to DNA findings. In the context of the Kohlberg case, Brueski and Krane discussed the possibility of DNA evidence accidentally implicating an innocent person. The high sensitivity of DNA tests could potentially detect samples from years ago, creating an open-ended interpretation that might mislead an investigation. "There's nothing about the DNA test results in themselves that would tell you which of two alternatives were more likely," Krane added. Their compelling discussion concluded with the notion that DNA evidence, while an essential piece, is just one part of a complex puzzle in criminal investigations. "A great attorney said to me, I'm weaving together a symphony to entertain the jury with. I need you to deliver one note," recounted Krane, emphasizing the importance of integrating DNA evidence into a holistic investigative approach. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
NationalCounselingExam.comLawrence Kohlberg, a psychologist who built on Jean Piaget's work, developed a six-stage model of moral development in the mid-20th century. His theory asserts that moral development, like cognitive development, follows a series of stages that people progress through as they mature.Kohlberg's theory has been highly influential in fields like psychology, education, and ethics. It provides a framework for understanding how moral reasoning changes over time, though it's important to note it focuses on moral thinking rather than action.If preparing for your National Counseling Exam visit NationalCounselingExam and try our samplers completely free of charge! It's a fantastic way to identify any areas you might want to review. and brush up on.This podcast is not associated with the National Board of Certified Counselors (NBCC) or any state or governmental agency responsible for licensure.
Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news. This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events. Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience. Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news. This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events. Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience. Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In this episode Cat, David, Bill and Jeff talk about Maturity. The conversation starts by talking about law and order - level 4. The discussion transitions to love for others - level 5. The conversation flows in principle-based living - level 6. Together we work through some examples of the model applying appropriate levels of maturity. For materials referenced during this episode, please goto our blog site; https://fellowshipcast07.wixsite.com/standinginfaith
We discuss what dictatorship is through the lens of counseling. We use Kohlberg's moral development to bridge the gap between democracy and dictatorship. Email us – healthyperspectives@protonmail.com Podcast home page - www.healthy-perspectives.com/podcast Sponsor/Support – https://healthy-perspectives.com/sponsor Rumble - https://rumble.com/c/c-2235930 YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCEXZdWuBoM6KXof4YcP9nkQ Extra documents - www.healthy-perspectives.com/podcast-documents LinkIn page - www.linkedin.com/in/jeremiah-guidos-915b3426 Twitter - https://twitter.com/hphonestviews Facebook page - https://www.facebook.com/healthyperspectivesinc
In this episode Cat, David, Bill and Jeff talk about Maturity. The conversation starts by exploring the ideation of the model were presenting. The discussion moves to articulating the levels of the Kohlberg model in terms of maturity. We explain and provide examples for levels 1-3 in this episode. This episode includes some interesting insight into retributive justice and unforgiveness. For materials referenced during this episode, please go to our blog site; https://fellowshipcast07.wixsite.com/standinginfaith
In this exciting new episode, we're diving into the world of Solidcore, the renowned fitness franchise that has taken the fitness industry by storm. Solidcore offers a unique 50-minute, full-body, strength-training workout that utilizes slow, controlled movements to break down slow-twitch muscle fibers, resulting in stronger and leaner bodies. In a recent announcement on April 18, 2023, Anne Mahlum, the founder of Solidcore, revealed that she has sold all of her shares in the company to Kohlberg & Company for an undisclosed amount. Join us as we delve into the world of Solidcore and explore if this franchise is worth it. Want to know more about this franchise? https://www.vettedbiz.com/listing/solidcore/ Need help finding the right franchise? Click here: https://www.vettedbiz.com/franchise-search/ #SolidCoreFranchise #SolidCoreFounder #FranchiseFindings If you are looking for more information, you can connect with us through our networks: https://www.vettedbiz.com/ https://www.linkedin.com/company/vettedbiz/ https://www.facebook.com/vettedbiz https://www.tiktok.com/@businessandfranchiseinus We partner with Fund My Franchise to give you the best “one-stop source” for all your funding needs. Knowing which option is best suited for you and your business is their specialty. Whether you use our Self-Directed 401(k), allowing an entrepreneur to use qualifying retirement monies to capitalize a business, and/or traditional Debt Funding, utilizing Unsecured Lines of Credit (ULOC) or Small Business Administration (SBA) Loans, they are here to help you realize your entrepreneurial dream. Don't let bad credit stand in your way. They can help with credit repair. Click the link in the show notes to apply for a no-obligation, no-charge consultation with one of their Senior Consultants: https://share.hsforms.com/1hkqew4n2S7ap6o8z1OqBIQ4e0xw
Aujourd'hui, s'il n'y a plus forcément de pages dédiées aux filles et d'autres dédiées aux garçons dans les catalogues de jouets, le sexisme se ressent toujours. Cette division des jouets et des jeux selon le genre entraîne un apprentissage différencié : les filles jouent essentiellement à des jeux d'imitation et développent leur attention aux autres et leurs capacités linguistiques, tandis que les garçons jouent à des jeux physiques et développent leur motricité. Comment faire alors pour que nos enfants s'épanouissent au maximum par le jeu ? Intervenant·e·s : Pascale Ezan, professeure en sciences de gestion Christia Spears Brown, professeuse en psychologie du développement Manuela Spinelli, sociologue et autrice Bienvenu·e Bébé : journal de bord d'une éducation non-genrée est la quatrième série du podcast "Le Journal " produit par Paradiso Media. Le Journal raconte les histoires intimes de celles et ceux qui tentent de se construire hors des cadres établis. Si vous aimez ce podcast, abonnez-vous et laissez nous un maximum d'⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐! Et pour le partager, c'est simple : https://lnk.to/BandeAnnonceBienvenueBebe Retrouvez tous nos podcasts ici et nos actualités sur Instagram | Twitter | Linkedin Crédits : Écrit et raconté par : Aline Laurent-Mayard Productrice : Suzanne Colin Producteurs délégués : Lorenzo Benedetti, Louis Daboussy, Benoit Dunaigre Réalisateur, Monteur son, sound designer et mixeur : Théo Albaric Avec la voix d'Alix Du Plessis D'Argentré Directeur.ice de production : Oriane Bettoni Chargée de production : Lucine Dorso Responsable marketing : Carla Bertone Assistante marketing : Cyrile Pocreau Assistante chargée de développement : Marie-Soizic Fraboulet Stagiaire édito : Joséphine Caro Attachée de presse : Gaëlle Job Juridique : Ludye Nysol et Alix du Plessis d'Argentré Musique Originale : D.L.i.d Graphiste : SuperFeat Photographe : Salomé Oyallon Archives : Extraits du reportage “Tours : manifestation Marre du Rose !, association Osez le féminisme”, 19 20 Edition Central Val de Loire, INA, 17 décembre 2016 Extraits du journal de 20h, France 2, INA, 20 décembre 2004 Ressources : Rapport sur l'égalité entre les filles et les garçons dans les modes d'accueil de la petite enfance Campagne Marre du rose ! Lancée en 2015 Étude Longitudinale Française depuis l'Enfance (Elfe), Ined, Inserm, 2023 Renée Greusard, Choisir d'être mère : Tout ce qu'on ne vous a pas dit sur la parentalité, JC Lattès, 2022 Ezan, Pascale, et Isabelle Ulrich. « Bouleverser les codes dans les catalogues de jouets : réactions des enfants et légitimité de la démarche », Décisions Marketing, vol. 82, no. 2, 2016, pp. 53-72. Christia Spears Brown, Parenting Beyond Pink & Blue : How to Raise Your Kids Free of Gender Stereotypes, Ten Speed Press, 2014 Spinelli, M. et Hancewicz, A., Eduquer sans préjugés : Pour une éducation non-sexiste des filles et des garçons, JC Lattès, 2021 L. Kohlberg, Essays on Moral Development. Vol. I: The Philosophy of Moral Development: Moral Stages and the Idea of Justice, New York, Harper and Row, 1981, p. 98.
Lawrence Kohlberg, a psychologist who built on Jean Piaget's work, developed a six-stage model of moral development in the mid-20th century. His theory asserts that moral development, like cognitive development, follows a series of stages that people progress through as they mature.The first two stages, known as the "Pre-conventional Level," are typically found in young children. The most basic stage, 'Obedience and Punishment,' is where morality is driven by a direct response to punishments and rewards. For example, a child may perceive a behavior as right if it helps avoid punishment. The second stage, 'Individualism and Exchange,' involves recognizing that there isn't just one right view imposed by authorities. People in this stage can differentiate their own interests and needs from those of authorities.The "Conventional Level" includes the third and fourth stages. 'Interpersonal Relationships,' or the "good boy/good girl" stage, is when social approval and maintaining relationships become more important. Behaviors are evaluated based on their ability to please others and maintain social harmony. The fourth stage, 'Maintaining Social Order,' entails recognizing the importance of law and order for society. Individuals in this stage respect authority and rules to maintain societal structure and cooperation.Finally, the "Post-conventional Level" encompasses the final two stages. The fifth stage, 'Social Contract and Individual Rights,' sees laws as changeable structures that exist for the good of the society. Individuals may disobey rules if they find them unjust, favoring democratically agreed upon laws. The sixth stage, 'Universal Ethical Principles,' is not reached by most adults. It's characterized by adherence to self-chosen ethical principles that are universal, such as justice, dignity, and equality. At this stage, laws are validated by these principles, and if laws are in conflict with them, these principles take precedence.Kohlberg's theory has been highly influential in fields like psychology, education, and ethics. It provides a framework for understanding how moral reasoning changes over time, though it's important to note it focuses on moral thinking rather than action. Critics argue that it may be culturally biased, overly focused on justice, and doesn't adequately address gender differences in moral reasoning.Despite these criticisms, Kohlberg's stages of moral development still form an integral part of our understanding of moral evolution in individuals. It pushes the debate beyond whether an action is right or wrong and into the realm of why people believe an action to be right or wrong and how these beliefs evolve over time.If you need to study for your NCMHCE narrative exam, try the free samplers at: CounselingExam.comThis podcast is not associated with the National Board of Certified Counselors (NBCC) or any state or governmental agency responsible for licensure.
Labor Pains: Dealing with infertility and loss during pregnancy or infancy.
Nick and Sabrina Kohlberg were told at their 20-week anatomy scan that their daughter Collins had anencephaly. This condition is not compatible with life. They were given a couple weeks to decide whether to terminate the pregnancy or continue with the expectation that she could pass at any time. They were told if she made it to delivery, she could live a few minutes or a few hours. Sabrina said, " I could not make the decision to terminate her life, so we put it in God's hands, and we hoped to get some time with our daughter alive. Nick & Sabrina Shared about: · The next 4 months of pregnancy · Strangers asked if it was a boy or girl? · Co-workers that would just sit and cry with Sabrina. · The high-risk doctors support. · The amazing 11 hours that Collins lived and the 2 days they were able to spend with her. · Creating memories, mementos and ways to honor Collins life. “Don't worry about making others uncomfortable when talking about your child. This is your life, and your child deserves to be talked about. Don't be scared to mention your baby.” ~~ Nick “I learned that grief could look very different even with spouses. We both lost Collins and the path we went through was very different.” ~~ Sabrina Connect with Teresa: EMAIL teresa.womenconnect2019@gmail.com or teresa.livingaftergrief.com Facebook https://www.facebook.com/.womenconnectsupport/. and https://www.facebook.com/.livingaftergrief/. Instagram: @womenconnectandsupport or @livingaftergrief Website: www.livingaftergrief.com click and schedule a time to talk: https://calendly.com/teresa-reiniger/podcast-discovery-call
0:00 -- Intro.1:50 -- Start of interview.4:09 -- His take on the state of capital markets. From the highs of 2021 to the lows of 2022: the impact of interest rates in asset valuations.6:59 -- On tech layoffs. "The effects on the labor market are not as large as the numbers suggest."8:34 -- The impact of downturn on public and private investors.10:07 -- On AI, ChatGPT and the emergence of this new technology.12:45 -- On the crypto industry and its regulation challenges. "There is going to be more carnage, more blood on the streets." "The number of people in this industry that are willing to show you their code but refuse to show their financials should make your head spin."20:01 -- On the SEC's proposed climate change regulation, and his take that "The SEC Is Heading Toward a Climate Train Wreck." "I am profoundly concerned." "Investors need these climate disclosures but I'm extraordinary skeptical that the courts as currently constituted will uphold the rules that the SEC will adopt. In other words, the rules will get adopted, but they will get staid, vacated and we are going to get nothing (and I don't think that's the best result for investors, that's just wrong)."24:36 -- Joe's climate change proposal. Instead of the SEC requiring its own climate change rules, it should require investors to disclose the data that is already in the public domain.28:04 -- On the ESG / anti-ESG trend and the politicization of corporation governance. "I think it is simultaneously disastrous and hilarious." "The important thing to recognize is that it is all political."30:52 -- On institutional Investors passing-through voting power to beneficial owners. "It's politically a very smart thing to do from some of these intermediaries."32:37-- On the impact of the new SEC universal proxy rules for director elections on shareholder activism. "It will have a meaningful effect, but it will take some time to manifest itself" "It shifts power to the investor community."33:30 -- The best corporate governance trend of 2022: boardroom diversity.34:13 -- The worst corporate governance trend of 2022: the political whiplash.34:54 -- The biggest corporate governance trend to watch out for in 2023 and going forward: "a combination of universal proxy and the politicization of the boardroom."36:57 -- His take on how to deal with the politicization of the boardroom: "The short answer is that you can't generalize. Every corporation's situation is unique."38:58 - The biggest winner in business in 2022: Prince Harry (monetizing family dysfunction!)40:34 - The biggest looser in business in 2022: Elon Musk. "If it wasn't perfectly obvious that of all the people in the world that should not be running Twitter, he shouldn't be running it." He gives it a 43.96% chance of being in bankruptcy by this time next year. Joseph A. Grundfest is an expert on capital markets, corporate governance, and securities litigation. Professor Grundfest founded the Stanford Securities Class Action Clearinghouse, which provides detailed, online information about the prosecution, defense, and settlement of federal class action securities fraud litigation. He launched Stanford Law School's executive education programs and continues to co-direct Directors' College, the nation's leading venue for the continuing professional education of directors of publicly traded corporations. He is also a senior faculty member with the Arthur and Toni Rembe Rock Center for Corporate Governance. Additionally, he is co-founder and director of Financial Engines and a director of Kohlberg, Kravis, Roberts & Co. Before joining the Stanford Law School faculty in 1990, Professor Grundfest was a commissioner of the Securities and Exchange Commission, served on the staff of the President's Council of Economic Advisors as counsel and senior economist for legal and regulatory matters, and was an associate at Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering. Early in his career he was a research associate at the Brookings Institution and an economist and consultant with the RAND Corporation.If you like this show, please consider subscribing, leaving a review or sharing this podcast on social media. __ You can follow Evan on social media at:Twitter: @evanepsteinLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/epsteinevan/ Substack: https://evanepstein.substack.com/__Music/Soundtrack (found via Free Music Archive): Seeing The Future by Dexter Britain is licensed under a Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License
In een reeks Q&A-afleveringen beantwoorden we luisteraarsvragen die we binnenkrijgen, voordat we in februari verder gaan met seizoen 2! In deze aflevering gaan we in op de vraag: hoe komt het dat er veel verschillen zitten in het beschikken van een moreel kompas bij verschillende personen? En bespreken daarmee onder andere het verschil tussen empathie, geweten en moraliteit. Voor meer persoonlijkheidsfeitjes volg ons op Instagram en TikTok!Wil je weten hoe jij scoort op de Big Five?Ga dan naar Understandmyself.com Wij verdienen hier niets aan, maar het is wel een van de betere en betrouwbare tests.Wetenschappelijke verantwoording:- Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. Vintage.- Over de morele fundamenten: https://moralfoundations.org/ - Kohlberg morele ontwikkeling stadia: https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_Kohlberg- Stuk over de Dark Triad: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_triadZie het privacybeleid op https://art19.com/privacy en de privacyverklaring van Californië op https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Marty Fischer grew up in southeast Georgia near Savannah and is a 1974 graduate of Georgia Southern College with a BS Degree in Speech-Public Relations. Marty got his start in the hunting and shooting industry when he served as the Vice President and General Manager of Cherokee Rose Shooting Resort in Griffin, Georgia from April 1990 through December 1992. In January 1993 Marty founded SportShooting Consultants, Ltd, a company that specializes in gun club design, event target setting and management as well as business consulting for the hunting and clay target industries. To date Fischer has designed and/or set competition targets on more than 175 sporting courses throughout North America. He has done design work for the likes of the Ted Turner family (Kinloch Plantation on the Santee River in SC), Henry Kravis, (7 Lakes Lodge in Meeker, CO, now owned by golfer Greg Norman) managing partner of Kohlberg, Kravis and Roberts in New York, Los Angeles Dodgers owner Mark Walters, noted hotelier Richard Kessler and his Kessler Canyon Ranch in DeBeque, CO. He recently did an initial private design and clay target installation for Gaylon Lawrence, Jr. in Wilson, Arkansas. Additional public facility phases are being planned and priced at this time. Recent courses of note include a redesign of the Brays Island Sporting Clays course in South Carolina and two 15 station championship layouts for the Clark County Shooting Park in Las Vegas, Nevada; sporting clays, 5-Stand, shooting school venues for The Orvis Shooting Grounds at Pursell Farms in Alabama; two 14 station layouts for the Garland Mountain Sporting Clays facility in north metro Atlanta, GA and a 5-Stand, Wobble Trap, 10 station corporate courses at The Kiawah Sporting Club in SC and at historic Millpond Plantation in Thomasville, GA as well as two 15 station sporting clays courses for Dead Zero Shooting Park in Spencer, TN. He recently finished a project called The Clays at Lone Oaks Farm, a $2.3 million clay target project for the University of Tennessee. His next full-service design for completion is a sporting clays facility in Weirton, WV. At any given time, he has three to five different design jobs underway. Fischer became one of the first National Sporting Clays Association (NSCA) Level III Shooting Instructors. This level of coaching expertise represents the highest instructor level awarded by the NSCA. Marty is also the Head Coach of the Georgia Southern University Clay Target Team, which competes for Regional and National Collegiate Clay Target Championships. Under his guidance, Georgia Southern won back-to-back ACUI divisional national championships in 2021 and 2022.
Agradece a este podcast tantas horas de entretenimiento y disfruta de episodios exclusivos como éste. ¡Apóyale en iVoox! Este es mi primer audiolibro completo, titulado "Vivir de corazón". Índice 1. A quién le escribo 2. Nuestro futuro será diferente 3. Vivir en un sueño 4. El lagarto en el laboratorio 5. El secreto de mi vida 6. Activa tu sistema inercial 7. La intuición 8. Sobre el miedo 9. Vivo dos tipos de miedo 10. La paradoja 11. El cerebro no está para pensar 12. Cuando perdí la referencia interna 13. El adulto que vive según la referencia externa 14. La muerte del miedo 15. El miedo a ser diferente 16. RAS 17. Acercaos al borde 18. Qué es saltar 19. Es imposible cometer un error 20. Como viviría si 21. El hombre de conocimiento 22. Hay algo en mí que tengo que entregarle al mundo 23. Mi misión en cuatro pasos 24. Espontáneo Vs impulsivo 25. Si una persona decide ser ella misma 26. La tercera ley de la moral de Kohlberg 27. La vida dando vueltas 28. Suicídate sin matarte 29. Tendencia innata 30. El hombre de negocios y el pescador que vivía de corazón 31. Qué listo eres 32. La jaula de los leones 33. Si volviera a vivir 34. La muerte 35. Bienvenidos al planeta tierra 36. Las excusas del pájaro para no volar 37. No llores, no te quejes, comprende 38. La feliz vida en cautividad 39. El secreto a voces 40. Agárrate a aquello que te haga bien 41. ¿Somos el culmen de la civilización? 42. Historias de expertos en el arte de la ilusión 43. La seguridad 44. La oportunidad 45. Nación medicada 46. Tratado personal de nutrición 47. En busca de un estado mental 48. Nada que perder 49. Me da igual 50. Éxito 51. Seguir la llamada interna 52. ¡Quítate! 53. Si te mueves te juzgarán 54. Varios capítulos en uno 55. Lo que estará de moda 56. Patrones de conducta humana 57. Las etapas de la vida 58. El dinero 59. No hacer nada por dinero 60. La revolución humana 61. El ser antisocial 62. El ser social 63. La aceptación 64. Vivir de corazón 65. El cerebro se suicida 66. Sensibles al dolor ajeno 67. Psicópatas cotidianos 68. La prisa 69. Evitando 70. El equilibrio interior 71. Si sólo tuviera 72. El Cómo 73. Date cinco años 74. Es difícil 75. Lo que verdaderamente importa Escucha el episodio completo en la app de iVoox, o descubre todo el catálogo de iVoox Originals
Labor Pains: Dealing with infertility and loss during pregnancy or infancy.
Nick and Sabrina Kohlberg were told at their 20-week anatomy scan that their daughter Collins had anencephaly. This condition is not compatible with life. They were given a couple weeks to decide whether to terminate the pregnancy or continue with the expectation that she could pass at any time. They were told if she made it to delivery, she could live a few minutes or a few hours. Sabrina said, " I could not make the decision to terminate her life, so we put it in God's hands, and we hoped to get some time with our daughter alive. During the episode they shared about the next 4 months of pregnancy. Times when complete strangers asked if it was a boy or girl? Co-workers that would just sit and cry with Sabrina. The support from the high-risk doctor that Sabrina said was amazing as well as all the people he connected them too. The guidance and support for them through the rest of the pregnancy, delivery and funeral services was so helpful. Nick and Sabrina talked about the amazing 11 hours that Collins lived and the 2 days they were able to spend with her. They shared about creating memories, mementos and ways they are honoring Collins life. Advice and Encouragement from Nick and Sabrina: Nick: First, talk about the child you lost. Don't worry about making others uncomfortable when talking about your child. This is your life, and your child deserves to be talked about. Don't be scared to mention your baby. Second, yes it sucks. Just hold on, it might take a year, it might take 6 months or multiple years. There can be good that comes out of a bad situation. Honor your baby, which is good and keep hope alive. The loss community is not one that we would choose to be part of but it is a community that takes care of each other. Sabrina: Facebook support groups can be amazing, search for a group specific to your situation. I will caution you though that it can be overwhelming, and you may need to step back. I learned that grief could look very different even with spouses. We both lost Collins and the path we went through was very different. For women the trauma is different for you because your body is going through a lot of change. Connect with Teresa: EMAIL teresa.womenconnect2019@gmail.com or teresa.livingaftergrief.com Facebook https://www.facebook.com/.womenconnectsupport/. and https://www.facebook.com/.livingaftergrief/. Instagram: @womenconnectandsupport or @livingaftergrief Website: www.livingaftergrief.com click and schedule a time to talk: https://calendly.com/teresa-reiniger/podcast-discovery-call
Folge 263: "A Watschn geben" aus philosophischer Sicht (mit Merlin) Am letzten Wochenende fanden zwei Ohrfeigen statt. Eine an Olliver Pocher und eine an Chris Rock. Merlin und ich bedienen sich an Kohlberg und Kant und analysieren was das über die Moral der Täter aussagt. Macht es eine Entschuldigung besser? Spielt es eine Rolle, ob man das Opfer sympathisch findet? Wie hätte man anders reagieren können? Wie ist es um die Moral der öffentlichen Meinungen bestellt? Hörermeinungen zu den Fällen gibt es auch noch. Viel Spaß! Alle Inhalte und Empfehlungen auf http://www.bensprichtpodcast.de Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2QgN7R9 Exklusive Inhalte: https://www.patreon.com/bensprichtpodcast Schick mir ein Danke via Paypal an: https://www.paypal.me/bensprichtpodcast Geschenkliste: https://amzn.to/36Z7JpM
Would you break the law if you thought it would save the life of your spouse? Would you break the law if you thought it would save the life of a stranger? What does the Bible say about dealing with people at different stages of moral development? Episode 22 – Leadership Ethics Since I am the leader, I can do anything I want, right? Have you had a leader like that or knew anyone that thought like that? Php 2:3–5 Do nothing from selfish ambition or conceit, but in humility count others more significant than yourselves. Let each of you look not only to his own interests, but also to the interests of others. Have this mind among yourselves, which is yours in Christ Jesus, Verses: Ga 5:16–26 But I say, walk by the Spirit, and you will not gratify the desires of the flesh. For the desires of the flesh are against the Spirit, and the desires of the Spirit are against the flesh, for these are opposed to each other, to keep you from doing the things… 1 Pe 1:15–16 but as he who called you is holy, you also be holy in all your conduct, since it is written, “You shall be holy, for I am holy.” Ethics Definition and Theory · Is a derivative of the Greek word ethos, meaning customs, conduct, or character · Is concerned with the kinds of values and morals an individual or society ascribes as desirable or appropriate · Focuses on the virtuousness of individuals and their motives Kohlberg's Stages of Moral Development In 1958 Lawrence Kohlberg had the idea that moral reasoning was linked to cognitive development. Kohlberg studied this by posing questions about morality to children aged 10 – 16 years and what he found was there were three levels of moral development and each level was split into two stages. Kohlberg also noted that people progressed through these in a fixed order. One of the best known of Kohlberg's (1958) stories concerns a man called Heinz who lived somewhere in Europe. Heinz's wife was dying from a particular type of cancer. Doctors said a new drug might save her. The drug had been discovered by a local chemist, and Heinz tried desperately to buy some, but the chemist was charging ten times the money it cost to make the drug, and this was much more than the Heinz could afford. Heinz could only raise half the money, even after help from family and friends. He explained to the chemist that his wife was dying and asked if he could have the drug cheaper or pay the rest of the money later. The chemist refused, saying that he had discovered the drug and was going to make money from it. The husband was desperate to save his wife, so later that night he broke into the chemist's and stole the drug. Kohlberg asked a series of questions such as: 1. Should Heinz have stolen the drug? 2. Would it change anything if Heinz did not love his wife? 3. What if the person dying was a stranger? Would it make any difference? 4. Should the police arrest the chemist for murder if the woman died? Stages of Moral Development · Level 1. Pre-conventional morality - Preconventional morality is the initial stage of moral development, lasting approximately until the age of nine. Children do not have a personal moral code at the preconventional level; instead, moral decisions are shaped by adult standards and the consequences of following or breaking their rules. For example, if an action leads to punishment is must be bad, and if it leads to a reward is must be good. Authority is outside the individual and children
Dear Life Warriors, Meet Tamara Zachery, President of WHTWRKS. WHTWRKS is a full-service marketing strategy, communications, and creative services agency.Tamara shares her story from making a final decision to what seems to be the perfect marriage to finding her true love again. I am honored she chose me to tell her story. I do not take these opportunities lightly. For anyone struggling in their marriage or struggling after divorce, this a story you don't want to miss.About TamaraTamara has a long-standing career in marketing, communications, and business development in various sectors including entertainment, fashion, healthcare, and technology. Tamara's career is steeped in launching new ideas, brands, and products. She has a voracious appetite for testing and evaluating new ideas, and believes in the power of connecting people to brands through developing compelling and authentic narratives. Tamara has an innate curiosity to understand the way things work, the way people think, and subsequently what drives people to connect to brands. Her focus is to drive growth and revenue using her passion for content creation and innovation.Tamara began her career in the music and fashion industries where she was instrumental in the success of some of the most celebrated musicians and fashion brands. Starting at New York City's infamous Hit Factory, Tamara managed studios, engineers, and recording sessions for some of the world's most famous musicians and bands, including Mariah Carey, Michael Jackson, and Aerosmith. While at RCA Records, she oversaw projects for recording artists such Tyrese, SWV, and Christina Aguilera. Her time in fashion saw her bring to life new brands such as Sean John and J Lo's line for Kohl's at MAGIC Las Vegas, the largest retail apparel trade show held biannually.Next, Tamara made an intentional pivot to make a direct impact on people's lives. She began work in the healthcare sector supporting and developing physicians' private practice brands, and working for a company opening inpatient residential and outpatient addiction treatment facilities nationwide. The company became known as Sunspire Health and as the sole marketing and comms exec supported its sale to Kohlberg & Co. for $100M. She then developed and led the strategic marketing plan to re-articulate, re-name, and relaunch Student Leadership Network - the organization formerly known as Young Women's Leadership Network - the 22-year old education non-profit started and led by Ann and Andrew Tisch. There, Tamara reorganized the development team and led them to a historic $10M+ in revenue in less than one year and produced two of their annual benefits, raising close to $2M in total.After two years with WHTWRKS, Tamara serves as President of the full-service marketing strategy, communications, and creative services agency. In addition to overseeing the vision and planning for the company, Tamara leads all client services which since her tenure among others has grown to include clients such as Nike, Disney, LinkedIn, Moët Hennessy, and Nielsen. WHTWRKS' continues to service ViacomCBS BET where they have worked on developing custom content for some of the globe's biggest brands including Doritos, Curls, Seagrams, Home Depot, US Army, Vaseline, Mountain Dew, and Burger King. Tamara is responsible for ideating, pitching, selling, producing, and fully bringing to life linear, digital and social content for the networks' advertisers.#dearlifewarriors #pursuitofbasichappiness #lifecoachingtips #tamarazachery #whtwrks
Why is it that different people might not agree on the "right" thing to do? Is it ever moral to break the law? Phil and Azaii talk about Kohlberg's stages of morality and also how we see ourselves. Phil Hawkins and Azaii Calderon Muniz from Jack Westin discuss anecdotes, advice, and ramblings on the premed years, the MCAT, and life both inside and outside of medicine. Have new episodes and MCAT Strategies delivered to you by subscribing. https://anchor.fm/jack-westin-mcat-podcast Jack Westin - Free MCAT Practice https://jackwestin.com/
This episode begins with Doctor Juni outlining his work withpsychiatric criminal populations and his efforts exploring their personal perspective about theirbehavior. By in large ,most of these people realized that they were acting in a harmfulmanner that would yield negative consequences. Juni relates this to actions and decisions of world leaders,including the last two US presidents. To properly grasp why this phenomena persists ,Dr. Junipoints to two ingrained dynamics which originate in early child developmentduring a period where the child has little understanding of reality testing.The first is a tendency to feel omnipotent and being convinced that one isunable to do wrong. The second, in contrast, is a mode of self-flagellationwhich entails a conviction that one is “bad”– –a perspective which engenders aself a sense of futility and helplessness. Juni stresses that the latter isalways accompanied by a conviction that one “deserves” punishment, and thatthis holds true even in adults who are overtly atheist or do not subscribe toany particular system of right and wrong. The doctor stresses that it isimportant here to understand that the ego administers a number of ambivalentmotives which are contradictory to each other Taking a more behavioral stance, Rabbi Kivelevitz suggeststhat people may be motivated by the “comfortable old shoe“ phenomenon wherethey revert to behavior they are used to simply because they are familiar withit -- even if they know it is harmful. When pushed to formulate a strategy of what someone can doto counter such nonfunctional behavior patterns. Juni suggests that by simplyunderstanding that one has a number of beneficial and harmful contradictory dynamicswhich exist side-by-side -- – – that alone can give some people some masteryover unacceptable impulses. Kivelevitz presents a prospective espoused by my Maimonideswhich is consistent with Aristotelian philosophy, Franz Rosenzweig's approachto personality, and the teachings of Rabbi Eliyahu Dessler. The approachentails being aware of harmful instincts and coming up with strategies tooppose them consciously. Dr. Juni ventures to present his own personal perspective(not at all related to his professional perspective) that there is a specificmoral component (as posited by Kohlberg) which may well include inborntendencies towards good and evil ,possibly along the lines of Yetzer Tov andYetzer Harah (good and evil inclinations). Juni stresses that despite hisabsolute conviction about the truth of traditional Psychoanalytic Gospel ofunconscious repressed formative dynamics as the major determinants of adultbehavior, one need not rule out inborn moral components. Expanding on this ideain light of the approaching high holidays, Kivelevitz elaborates theunderstanding of the transcendental aspect of the soul which, according toJewish tradition, is accessible by human beings who seek to better themselves. Doctor Samuel Juni is one of the foremost research psychologists in the world today. He has published groundbreaking original research in seventy different peer reviewed journals, and is cited continuously with respect by colleagues and experts in the field who have built on his theories and observations. Samuel Juni studied in Yeshivas Chaim Berlin under Rav Yitzchack Hutner, and in Yeshiva University as a Talmid of Rav Joseph Dov Soloveitchick. Professor Juni is a prominent member of the Association of Orthodox Jewish Scientists, and has regularly presented addresses to captivated audiences. Associated with NYU since 1979, Juni has served as Director of MA and PhD programs, all the while heading teams engaged in important research. Professor Juni's scholarship on aberrant behavior across the cultural, ethnic, and religious spectrum is founded on psychometric methodology and based on a psycho-dynamic psychopathology perspective. He is arguably the preeminent expert in Differential Diagnostics, with each of his myriad studies entailing parallel efforts in theory construction and empirical data collection from normative and clinical populations. Professor Juni created and directed NYU's Graduate Program in Tel Aviv titled Cross-Cultural Group Dynamics in Stressful Environments. Based in Yerushalayim, he collaborates with Israeli academic and mental health specialists in the study of dissonant factors and tensions in the Arab-Israeli conflict and those within the Orthodox Jewish community, while exploring personality challenges of second-generation Holocaust survivors. Below is a partial list of the journals to which Professor Juni has contributed over 120 articles. Many are available on line Journal of Forensic Psychology Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment, and Trauma. International Review of Victimology The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease International Forum of Psychoanalysis Journal of Personality Assessment Journal of Abnormal Psychology Journal of Psychoanalytic Anthropology Psychophysiology Psychology and Human Development Journal of Sex Research Journal of Psychology and Judaism Contemporary Family Therapy American Journal on Addictions Journal of Criminal Psychology Mental Health, Religion & Culture As Rosh Beis Medrash, Rabbi Avraham Kivelevitz serves as Rav and Posek for the morning minyan at IDT. Hundreds of listeners around the globe look forward to his weekly Shiur in Tshuvos and Poskim. Rav Kivelevitz is a Maggid Shiur for Dirshu International in Talmud and Halacha as well as a Dayan with the Beth Din of America. Please leave us a review or email us at ravkiv@gmail.com This podcast is powered by JewishPodcasts.org. Start your own podcast today and share your content with the world. Click jewishpodcasts.fm/signup to get started.
Join Rev. Emily E. Ewing (they) and Rev. Kay Rohloff (she) and special guests Pace Warfield-May (they) and Joe Ramelo (he) from the new, spin-off podcast, Horror Nerds At Church to explore new and nerdy connections to the scripture for the 3rd Sunday of Easter, which falls on April 18th this year, including our deep dive into the chances Jesus was a zombie, ghost, or vampire! The scripture we refer to for this episode can be found here. We talked about queer potlucks (in our Patreon episode!), which you can explore more here. We also talk about Kohlberg's stages of moral development, which is explained more here. Pace mentioned that they are queerying the Gospel during Easter with Emily at Queerying.org CN: we talk about antisemitism when discussing the first reading. Check us out on Facebook & Twitter at @NerdsAtChurch to connect! --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/nerdsatchurch/message
The focus of today's session is critical thinking, problem solving, and discernment. The doctors discuss the similarities and difference between the 3 and how uncommon it is for people to use these skills. Be sure to listen to the end when the doctors deep dive into discernment. Kohlberg's Moral Development Theory https://youtu.be/bounwXLkme4 Intro music by Music by Gozz Outro music by Volume Kontrol
Yaakov's Great Moral Dilemma-In this episode, I hope to reveal what made Yaakov distressed about the long anticipated encounter with Eisav. Truly fascinating!
© 2020-2025 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
