Podcasts about inchoate

Inchoate offenses are "incomplete" crimes that involve steps taken toward committing another crime, even if the final harmful result never occurs. The three main types discussed are attempt, solicitation, and conspiracy.The two primary elements required for attempt are the intent to commit a specific crime and an overt act that constitutes a substantial step toward its commission. The mental state requires a specific intent to achieve the prohibited result.The proximity test for attempt requires the defendant's actions to be dangerously close to the completion of the intended crime, while the Model Penal Code's substantial step test is more expansive, focusing on conduct strongly corroborative of criminal purpose.Solicitation occurs when a person entices, encourages, commands, or requests another person to engage in criminal conduct, with the intent that the crime be committed. The crime of solicitation is complete the moment the request is made with the requisite intent, regardless of whether the other person acts on it.The actus reus of conspiracy is the agreement between two or more persons to commit an unlawful act, often requiring an overt act in furtherance of the agreement. The mens rea includes both the intent to agree and the intent that the object of the agreement be achieved.Malice aforethought for murder can be established through intent to kill (express malice), intent to cause serious bodily harm resulting in death, depraved heart murder (extreme recklessness), and felony murder (killing during the commission of an inherently dangerous felony).Voluntary manslaughter involves an intentional killing committed in the heat of passion resulting from adequate provocation, without a cooling-off period. Involuntary manslaughter, on the other hand, involves an unintentional killing resulting from criminal negligence or during the commission of a misdemeanor or non-dangerous felony.At common law, battery is the unlawful application of force to another person resulting in bodily injury or offensive touching. Assault can be either an attempted battery or the intentional creation of a reasonable apprehension in the victim of imminent bodily harm.Larceny is the trespassory taking and carrying away of the tangible personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of it. It differs from embezzlement, where the defendant initially possesses the property lawfully but then fraudulently converts it.Robbery is defined as the unlawful taking of personal property from the person or presence of another, by force or threat of immediate force, with the intent to permanently deprive. The use of violence or intimidation is the defining characteristic that elevates larceny to robbery.

This lecture on criminal law explores the crucial concepts of inchoate offenses, which are incomplete crimes like attempt, solicitation, and conspiracy. It then transitions to specific crimes against persons, such as varying degrees of homicide, assault, battery, kidnapping, and rape, detailing their distinct elements. Finally, the lecture examines various property crimes, including larceny, embezzlement, false pretenses, robbery, burglary, and arson, highlighting the legal differences between these offenses. The session aims to build upon foundational criminal law principles by applying them to these substantive and preparatory crimes.

This lecture provides an in-depth exploration of different categories of crimes recognized in criminal law. It defines a crime as any act or omission that violates a law and is punishable by the state, broadly categorized by the nature of harm, intent (mens rea), and severity of punishment.Crimes against the person involve harm to an individual's physical or psychological integrity and include homicide and assault and battery.Homicide is the killing of one person by another, with different types based on intent, planning, and circumstances.First-degree murder requires premeditation, deliberation, and malice aforethought. An example is meticulously planning a killing.Second-degree murder involves intent to kill without prior planning, often in the "heat of the moment".Voluntary manslaughter occurs in the heat of passion, such as killing a spouse upon discovering infidelity.Involuntary manslaughter is an unintentional death resulting from reckless or negligent behavior, like causing a fatal accident while texting and driving.Felony murder holds a perpetrator liable for murder if a death occurs during the commission of a dangerous felony, regardless of intent.Assault is an intentional act causing another person to reasonably fear imminent harmful or offensive contact [10]. Actual physical contact isn't required.Battery requires actual physical contact that is harmful or offensive. An example is punching someone in the face.Aggravated assault and battery occur when these crimes are committed with a deadly weapon or cause serious injury.Property crimes target another person's property and include robbery, burglary, larceny, arson, and vandalism.Robbery is the unlawful taking of property from another person through force, intimidation, or threats].Burglary involves unauthorized entry into a building with the intent to commit a crime, most commonly theft.Larceny, or theft, is the unlawful taking of property without force or intimidation.Arson is the intentional act of setting fire to property.Vandalism is the willful destruction or defacement of property].Inchoate crimes involve actions aimed at committing a crime, even if the intended crime is not completed, including attempt, solicitation, and conspiracy.Attempt occurs when an individual takes substantial steps toward committing a crime but does not complete it.Solicitation involves encouraging, requesting, or commanding another person to commit a crime.Conspiracy is an agreement between two or more individuals to commit a criminal act, with at least one conspirator taking an overt step toward carrying out the plan.White-collar crimes are non-violent offenses, typically committed for financial gain, and include fraud, embezzlement, and insider trading.Fraud involves deliberate deception to secure an unfair or unlawful gain.Embezzlement occurs when a person entrusted with managing property or funds diverts them for personal use.Insider trading is the use of non-public, material information to gain an unfair advantage in stock trading.Drug-related crimes involve the possession, distribution, manufacturing, or trafficking of controlled substances.Sex crimes encompass a range of offenses involving illegal or non-consensual sexual conduct.Rape is generally defined as non-consensual sexual intercourse committed through force, coercion, or when the victim is unable to give consent.Sexual assault is a broader term that includes any unwanted sexual contact without explicit consent.Prostitution-related offenses include solicitation, procurement, or operating a brothel.Cyber crimes are illegal activities committed through digital means and include identity theft, hacking, and online fraud.Identity theft involves the unauthorized acquisition and use of someone else's personal information to commit fraud.Hacking is the unauthorized access to computer systems, networks, or data.Online fraud includes scams, phishing schemes, and other fraudulent activities conduct

I. Elements of Crimes Actus Reus (The Guilty Act) A crime requires a voluntary act or an omission where a legal duty exists. Involuntary acts (e.g., seizures) do not qualify. Mens Rea (The Guilty Mind) Purpose: Defendant intends the criminal result. Knowledge: Defendant knows harm is almost certain. Recklessness: Conscious disregard of substantial risk. Negligence: Failure to recognize a substantial risk. Causation Actual Cause: But-for the defendant's actions, the harm would not have occurred. Proximate Cause: Harm must be a foreseeable result. Superseding Causes: Unforeseeable events can break liability. II. Crimes Against the Person Homicide Murder: Requires malice aforethought: intent to kill, intent to harm, extreme recklessness, or felony murder. Degrees of Murder: First-Degree: Premeditated or during a listed felony. Second-Degree: Unplanned but intentional, or reckless disregard for life. Manslaughter: Voluntary: Killing in the heat of passion due to provocation. Involuntary: Killing caused by criminal negligence or misdemeanor offense. Assault and Battery Battery: Unlawful application of force causing harm or offense. Assault: Attempted battery or act creating reasonable fear of harm. III. Crimes Against Property Larceny: Taking another's property with intent to permanently deprive. Embezzlement: Fraudulent conversion of property lawfully possessed. False Pretenses: Obtaining title through deception. Robbery: Larceny plus force or intimidation. Burglary: Unlawful entry into a structure with intent to commit a felony. Arson: Malicious burning of property. IV. Inchoate Offenses and Parties to Crime Attempt: Substantial step toward committing a crime with intent. Solicitation: Encouraging another to commit a crime. Conspiracy: Agreement plus overt act to commit a crime. Pinkerton Rule: Liability extends to foreseeable acts of co-conspirators. Accomplice Liability: Assisting or encouraging a crime with intent. Summary of Key Takeaways Crimes require actus reus (act), mens rea (intent), and causation. Crimes against persons involve direct harm, such as homicide and assault. Property crimes involve theft, destruction, or unlawful entry. Inchoate offenses address attempts and conspiracies. Accomplice liability extends punishment to those who assist crimes. This concludes Day 1 of Criminal Law & Procedure. Tomorrow, we will cover Defenses to Crimes and Criminal Procedure, focusing on constitutional protections and legal justifications.

This week on Mel & Floyd: Smarty Pants to Attend Coronation; US banks paying tribute to Mafia Don; And other random topics. The post The Inchoate Madness at the Center of the Universe appeared first on WORT-FM 89.9.

Merriam-Webster's Word of the Day for November 9, 2024 is: inchoate • in-KOH-ut • adjective Inchoate is a formal adjective that describes something that is not completely formed or developed yet. // In the podcast, the author described the process by which she took a series of inchoate vignettes and shaped them into her best-selling novel. See the entry > Examples: "Graffiti inserts itself like the blade of a knife between creation and destruction, between publicity and furtiveness, between word and image, cartoon, icon, and hieroglyph. … That its meaning is inchoate is part of the point. If you can explain it, you probably don't understand." — Jonathan Lethem, Cellophane Bricks: A Life in Visual Culture, 2024 Did you know? Inchoate is most often used to describe something that is not, or not yet, completely formed or developed. It's a formal word that's sure to add pizzazz to any conversation—but only if you start working on pronouncing it correctly. The first two letters of inchoate do what you'd expect—exactly what the word in does. However, the choate in inchoate does not share the first sound of chair, nor does it rhyme with oat. Instead, it shares the first sound of cat, and rhymes with poet. Inchoate came to English in the 16th century from the Latin adjective incohātus, meaning "only begun, unfinished, imperfect," which in turn comes from a form of the verb incohāre, meaning "to start work on."

Merriam-Webster's Word of the Day for November 9, 2024 is: inchoate • in-KOH-ut • adjective Inchoate is a formal adjective and synonym of vague that describes something that is not completely formed or developed yet. // In the podcast, the author described the process by which she took a series of inchoate vignettes and shaped them into her best-selling novel. See the entry > Examples: "Graffiti inserts itself like the blade of a knife between creation and destruction, between publicity and furtiveness, between word and image, cartoon, icon, and hieroglyph. … That its meaning is inchoate is part of the point. If you can explain it, you probably don't understand." — Jonathan Lethem, Cellophane Bricks: A Life in Visual Culture, 2024 Did you know? Inchoate is most often used to describe something that is not, or not yet, completely formed or developed. As a more formal word than its synonym, vague, it's sure to add pizzazz to any conversation—but only if you start working on pronouncing it correctly. The first two letters of inchoate do what you'd expect—exactly what the word in does. However, the choate in inchoate does not share the first sound of chair, nor does it rhyme with oat. Instead, it shares the first sound of cat, and rhymes with poet. Inchoate came to English in the 16th century from the Latin adjective incohātus, meaning "only begun, unfinished, imperfect," which in turn comes from a form of the verb incohāre, meaning "to start work on."

A single word dream, so perfectly on point.

Summary of Chapter 3: Categories of Crimes. Chapter 3 provides an in-depth exploration of the various categories of crimes, emphasizing their legal definitions, elements, and consequences. Crimes are broadly classified into felonies and misdemeanors, with felonies being severe offenses punishable by more than a year of imprisonment or death, and misdemeanors being less severe, punishable by fines or less than a year of imprisonment. Felonies, such as murder and armed robbery, carry significant long-term consequences including civil rights impacts and employment restrictions. Misdemeanors, like petty theft and simple assault, result in penalties such as fines, probation, and community service, but still carry long-term implications such as criminal records. Inchoate offenses, which include attempt, solicitation, and conspiracy, address the actions aimed at committing crimes that are not completed. These offenses are significant as they enable intervention before a crime is fully realized, reflecting the danger posed by preparatory activities. Crimes against persons, such as homicide, assault, battery, and rape, involve direct harm to individuals and are considered severe due to their impact on victims' physical and psychological well-being. Homicide is classified into murder and manslaughter based on intent and premeditation, while assault and battery differentiate between threats of harm and actual physical contact. Crimes against property include theft, robbery, burglary, and arson. Theft involves unlawful taking of property with the intent to permanently deprive the owner, while robbery includes the use of force or intimidation. Burglary focuses on unauthorized entry with intent to commit a crime, and arson involves the willful burning of property. Crimes against public order and morality disrupt public peace and decency or violate societal norms. These include disorderly conduct, public intoxication, prostitution, and drug offenses. Each type of crime within this category has unique characteristics and legal consequences, aimed at maintaining social stability and public safety. Overall, Chapter 3 highlights the importance of understanding the distinctions and legal implications of different categories of crimes for effective navigation of the criminal justice system. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

1. Principal Actors: Principals and Accomplices. In criminal law, parties to a crime are classified based on their level of involvement in the commission of the crime. This classification is important because it determines the extent of each party's criminal liability. Principals. Definition and Role: A principal is the primary actor in the commission of a crime, the person who actually performs the act constituting the offense. Principals are often the most directly involved and are usually present at the scene of the crime. Types of Principals: Traditionally, principals are categorized into first and second degree. The first degree includes those who actually perform the criminal act, while the second degree encompasses those who aid, command, or encourage the principal and are present during the crime. Liability of Principals: Principals are fully liable for the crimes they commit. Their intent and actions are directly scrutinized in determining their guilt. Accomplices. Definition and Role: Accomplices are individuals who assist in the commission of a crime but are not the primary actors. They might provide help, encouragement, or support to the principal. Liability of Accomplices: Accomplices are usually liable to the same extent as the principal. This means they face the same charges and penalties as the person who actually commits the crime, as long as it can be proven that they had the intent to assist and did indeed assist in the crime. Mens Rea of Accomplices: An accomplice must have the requisite mens rea, or guilty mind, to be criminally liable. They must intentionally aid or encourage the principal in the commission of the crime. Actus Reus of Accomplices: The actus reus, or guilty act, for an accomplice, is their action in aiding, abetting, or facilitating the crime. This could include providing tools, planning the crime, or helping to hide evidence. 2. Accessory After the Fact. Definition and Role: An accessory after the fact is a person who assists the principal or an accomplice after the crime has been committed. Their assistance usually involves helping the principal or accomplice escape arrest, trial, or conviction. Liability of Accessory After the Fact: The liability of an accessory after the fact is generally less than that of the principal or accomplice. This is because their involvement does not directly contribute to the commission of the crime but rather assists after the fact. Elements of Being an Accessory After the Fact: The essential elements include knowledge that a crime has been committed and some act of assistance or support to the principal or accomplice with the intent to hinder or prevent their arrest, trial, or punishment. 3. Inchoate Offenses: Attempt, Conspiracy, and Solicitation. Inchoate offenses are crimes that involve taking steps toward committing a crime but not completing the crime itself. These are critical in criminal law as they aim to prevent crimes before they occur. Attempt. Definition and Elements: An attempt to commit a crime involves a person taking substantial steps towards committing a crime but failing to complete it. The key elements are intent to commit the crime and taking a direct, ineffectual act towards its completion. Legal Tests for Attempt: Courts use various tests to determine whether an individual's actions constitute an attempt. These include the proximity test (how close the person came to completing the crime), the unequivocality test (whether the person's actions unequivocally demonstrate the intent to commit the crime), and the substantial step test (whether the actions taken are substantial steps towards committing the crime). Conspiracy. Definition and Elements: Conspiracy involves an agreement between two or more persons to commit a crime. The essential elements are an agreement to commit the crime and an intent to enter into this agreement. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Jamison and Blake bitch about work without getting too specific as to not lose their jobs, then they talk about parenting sick kids and those who won't sleep and Blake's skype goes in and out on this recording so enjoy that. We then turn our attention to 2013's indie science fiction film Coherence where a group of friends come face to face with themselves from other dimensions and have to decide who is from what dimension. With multiverse theory is there any way for people to crossover or is this all just pop science bs? Listen to the episode and find out! Clip from Deep Impact. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/flybyfilms/message

Greetings, eager legal minds. Today, we delve into the fascinating world of inchoate crimes. These offenses involve criminal actions that fall short of the completed crime but still merit legal consequences. We'll be focusing on three key inchoate crimes: solicitation, conspiracy, and attempt. Solicitation: Encouraging Criminal Conduct. Solicitation occurs when one person tries to persuade, entice, or induce another person to commit a crime. Key elements include: - The intent to have the other person commit a specific crime. - An overt act or communication that encourages or requests the commission of the crime. It's important to note that solicitation can be punished even if the solicited crime is never actually committed. Conspiracy: Agreement to Commit a Crime. Conspiracy involves an agreement between two or more individuals to commit a crime. Key elements include: - An agreement between two or more people. - An intent to commit a specific crime. - An overt act taken in furtherance of the conspiracy. Unlike solicitation, conspiracy requires an agreement, and the crime need not be completed for charges to be filed. It's the agreement itself that is considered criminal. Attempt: Taking Substantial Steps Toward a Crime. Attempt occurs when an individual takes substantial steps toward committing a crime but does not complete it. Key elements include: - An intent to commit a specific crime. - Taking substantial steps toward the commission of that crime. - Failing to complete the crime. Attempt charges hinge on the defendant's actions, such as buying materials for a bomb or breaking into a building with the intent to steal, even if the ultimate crime is not achieved. Case Study: State v Rodriguez - Analyzing Conspiracy Charges. To understand how these concepts apply in practice, let's consider State v Rodriguez. In this case, three individuals are charged with conspiracy to commit bank robbery. They were overheard discussing their plans to rob a local bank and were subsequently arrested before they could carry out the crime. Here, we see the elements of conspiracy at play: an agreement to commit a specific crime (bank robbery) and overt acts (discussing their plans). It's important to note that the crime itself does not need to be completed for conspiracy charges to be filed. This case study highlights how conspiracy charges can be brought even before the underlying crime occurs. Now for question 1: Can someone be charged with both solicitation and attempt for the same crime? It's possible for someone to be charged with both solicitation and attempt for the same crime if the circumstances warrant it. For example, if an individual solicits another person to commit a crime and then takes substantial steps toward committing that crime themselves, they could potentially be charged with both solicitation and attempt. However, the specific charges and their success in court would depend on the facts of the case and the laws of the jurisdiction. Now for question 2: What distinguishes an overt act in conspiracy from mere preparation? The distinction between an overt act in conspiracy and mere preparation can be nuanced. An overt act is a step that demonstrates a firm commitment to carrying out the criminal plan and moves beyond mere preparation. It's an action that shows the conspiracy is not merely a theoretical agreement but has progressed to a point where criminal activity is imminent. Mere preparation, on the other hand, involves preliminary actions that fall short of an unequivocal step toward committing the crime. For example, discussing plans, gathering information, or acquiring tools without taking any decisive action to further the criminal goal might be considered mere preparation. The determination of whether an act is an overt act or mere preparation can vary by jurisdiction and the specific facts of the case. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Episode 74: An Inchoate OffenseGuest: Kayla LaVarier & Lanesha Beard This is the fourth week of the fall 2023 semester at Heartland Community College and Dewhitt's class is studying criminal law. A lot of people don't realize that there are crimes that don't actually need to be completed for a perpetrator to be in violation of the law. Bingham discusses with two of his students, Kayla and Lanesha, how a person can be considered a law violator even though they did not complete the crime.  The following is discussed:  Kayla and Lanesha's career pathWhy they are taking a criminal justice courseWhat high School they attendedTheir favorite due process rightConspiracySolicitationActus reusMens reaConcurrenceAttempted crimesLegalization of marijuanaThe impact of voting on the CJ systemBlack Lives MatterWhite SupremacyWhat they'd like to see the Biden administration accomplishYou can listen to the JFA Podcast Show wherever you get your podcast or by clicking on one of the links below.https://dlbspodcast.buzzsprout.com https://blog.feedspot.com/social_justice_podcasts/ https://peculiarbooks.org  Also if you are interested in exercise and being healthy check out the Top 20 Triathlon Podcasts.https://blog.feedspot.com/triathlon_podcasts/

For more from Doug, subscribe to Canon+: https://mycanonplus.com/

I saw all of these things as a kid: “Violent crime is crime that involves an act of violent aggression against another person.[49] Common examples of violent crime include homicide, assault, sexual assault, and robbery.[50][51] Some violent crimes, such as assault, may be committed with the intention of causing harm. Other violent crimes, such as robbery, may use violence to further another goal. Violent crime is distinct from noncriminal types of violence, such as self-defense, use of force, and acts of war. Acts of violence are most often perceived as deviant when they are committed as an overreaction or a disproportionate response to provocation.[49] Inchoate crime is crime that is carried out in anticipation of other illegal actions but does not cause direct harm. Examples of inchoate crimes include attempt and conspiracy. Inchoate crimes are defined by substantial action to facilitate a crime with the intention of the crime's occurrence. This is distinct from simple preparation for or consideration of criminal activity. They are unique in that renunciation of criminal intention is generally enough to absolve the perpetrator of criminal liability, as their actions are no longer facilitating a potential future crime.[65] Political crime is crime that directly challenges or threatens the state. Examples of political crimes include subversion, rebellion, treason, mutiny, espionage, sedition, terrorism, riot, and unlawful assembly. Political crimes are associated with the political agenda of a given state, and they are necessarily applied against political dissidents.[61] Due to their unique relation to the state, political crimes are often encouraged by one nation against another, and it is political alignment rather than the act itself that determines criminality.[62][63] State crime that is carried out by the state to repress law-abiding citizens may also be considered political crime.[64] Public order crime is crime that violates a society's norms about what constitutes socially acceptable behavior. Examples of public order crimes include gambling, drug-related crime, public intoxication, prostitution, loitering, breach of the peace, panhandling, vagrancy, street harassment, excessive noise, and littering.[56] Public order crime is associated with the broken windows theory, which posits that public order crimes increase the likelihood of other types of crime.[57] Some public order crimes are considered victimless crimes in which no specific victim an be identified.[58] Most nations in the Western world have moved toward decriminalization of victimless crimes in the modern era.[59] Common examples of property crime include burglary, theft, and vandalism.[52][53] Examples of financial crimes include counterfeiting, smuggling, tax evasion, and bribery. The scope of financial crimes has expanded significantly since the beginning of modern economics in the 17th century.[54] In occupational crime, the complexity and anonymity of computer systems may help criminal employees camouflage their operations. The victims of the most costly scams include banks, brokerage houses, insurance companies, and other large financial institutions.[55]” I saw all of these things as a kid in the church organized crime world: “Adultery, fornication, blasphemy, apostasy, and invoking the name of God are commonly recognized as crimes in theocratic societies or those heavily influenced by religion.[60]” --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/antonio-myers4/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/antonio-myers4/support

If you would like to discuss legal topics in person, join Law Schoolers Pro at https://lawschoolers.com/join/Disclaimers:1. Nearly all of our episodes are unedited. We want to give you raw footage which means that there will be bumps, dings, and some pops.2. The information contained in these episodes are for educational purposes only, not to be used as legal advice.3. If the information is used as legal advice, Law Schoolers is not liable for any legal outcomes.

Inchoate crimes (specific intent crimes) p4 --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/fgoldbuster/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/fgoldbuster/support

Gary the Hate Camel presents a podcast with Tech, Kirk and Handy: Guests: cDub, boomslang, Tolstoy (45), Inchoate, DariusRex, DonaldTrump (34), PoorCoercion (60), GigaTime (20), vreddy (196) Topics Discussed: 0:00 - Wait, is this thing on? No intro, just straight into randomness! 1:43 - Just shut the fuck up. 2:04 - I knew it, I'm surrounded by Assholes! That's right, a Spaceballs reference two weeks in a row! 5:25 - If you have GERD or any other reflux issue, our apologies, skip this. 5:55 - CDub wants a D'vorce. 8:12 - Officer presets; too little, too late. No below decks makes it Charles Barkley "turrible". 11:08 - Treasury talk! *groan* 19:17 - That damn 1500 hostile cap, can't Scopely take it's damn medicine?!? Bipolar as fuck! 23:42 - Scopely COULD create a test server the community would use to find bugs, but don't. 26:52 - Scopely economics. 30:14 - We love it when we get more mining along with mining, right? Riiiight? 31:19 - Discord diplomacy. 41:29 - Remember that time you did that thing? Server 34 does, and they will keep the screenshots for eternity! (dee-da-dee, datur-dadur) 49:42 - Have to put the emotional masturbation in check... 57:46 - If Scopely releases a Server Move Prime Pack so anyone can move... S34 would be a ghost town, D'vor's at dawn! 1:01:38 - A 1997 AOL chatroom at 1am, but with ships! 1:05:49 - I can stop anytime I want! Also my phone is dying, hand me my tablet. 1:18:45 - Enjoy the game how YOU want, and give us all the leaderboards! 1:35:55 - Nintendo controllers! AKA Scopely doesn't add things when you get access to the resources ahead of time... 1:43:35 - And it's GigaTime. 1:46:48 - How do you grow an alliance? Well, I know they say it's a good fertilizer, but DEFINITELY don't shit on it. 1:50:17 - How is it Scopely never learns? 1:54:29 - For crying out loud, get Khan! 1:58:39 - The recording cuts out. :( 2:02:18 - No, no Boom did NOT have a fun time editing this. :P And remember...spread the hate! Follow us on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/trektalkpodcast/?hl=en Visit Trek Talk Discord: https://discord.gg/MKZZhK7CSA for more related Star Trek related content, and to interact with a greater Star Trek Fleet Command community. #STFC #StarTrek #StarTrekFleetCommand #TrekTalkwithTechandKirk

Welcome back to the Bar Exam Toolbox podcast! Today, we're focusing on Criminal Law, specifically inchoate offenses. This topic commonly appears on bar exam questions and includes attempt, solicitation, and conspiracy. In this episode, we discuss: How do inchoate offenses differ from other crimes? The rules for attempt, solicitation, and conspiracy to commit a crime The merger doctrine The Pinkerton liability rule Defenses to inchoate crimes How to structure an answer to an open-ended question on an exam Resources: “Listen and Learn” series (https://barexamtoolbox.com/bar-exam-toolbox-podcast-archive-by-topic/bar-exam-toolbox-podcast-explaining-individual-mee-and-california-bar-essay-questions/#listen-learn) Private Bar Exam Tutoring (https://barexamtoolbox.com/private-bar-exam-tutoring/) The Brainy Bar Bank: Streamlining Bar Study (https://barexamtoolbox.com/brainy-bar-bank/) California Bar Examination – Essay Questions and Selected Answers, October 2020 (https://www.calbar.ca.gov/Portals/0/documents/admissions/Examinations/October-2020-Essay-Selected-Answers.pdf) Podcast Episode 70: Tackling a California Bar Exam Essay: Criminal Law and Procedure (https://barexamtoolbox.com/podcast-episode-70-tackling-a-california-bar-exam-essay-criminal-law-and-procedure/) Podcast Episode 79: Tackling an MEE Criminal Law/Procedure and Evidence Essay (https://barexamtoolbox.com/podcast-episode-79-tackling-an-mee-criminal-law-procedure-and-evidence-essay/) Podcast Episode 87: Listen and Learn – Homicide (https://barexamtoolbox.com/podcast-episode-87-listen-and-learn-homicide/) Download the Transcript (https://barexamtoolbox.com/episode-175-listen-and-learn-inchoate-offenses-criminal-law/) If you enjoy the podcast, we'd love a nice review and/or rating on Apple Podcasts (https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/bar-exam-toolbox-podcast-pass-bar-exam-less-stress/id1370651486) or your favorite listening app. And feel free to reach out to us directly. You can always reach us via the contact form on the Bar Exam Toolbox website (https://barexamtoolbox.com/contact-us/). Finally, if you don't want to miss anything, you can sign up for podcast updates (https://barexamtoolbox.com/get-bar-exam-toolbox-podcast-updates/)! Thanks for listening! Alison & Lee

Gary the Hate Camel presents a podcast with Tech, Kirk and Handy: Guests: boomslang, Morgoth (45), MadameStarGazer (66), vreddy (196), Inchoate, Parzival, Smooth, DonaldTrump (34) Topics Discussed: 1:08 - Turns out, we're a bunch of nerds! 2:19 - Let's NOT talk about Server 34. 3:34 - Check in with Server 66. 6:00 - Picard talk BANNED (for now). 8:25 - The college experience with Frank. 9:34 - Talk about the new arc! ...which is now the old arc by the time this releases. Oops. 16:57 - VReddy walks uphill in the snow both ways. 25:01 - "Parzival" makes an appearance. 26:28 - 60 active players or less requires a server merger. 30:33 - Why did VReddy's original server die? 34:17 - https://stfc.2c.fyi/ gives unofficial server status, and there are questions. 42:27 - Lorca SMS, huzzah for VReddy! 43:12 - Pilum, it's a sexy beast. 47:09 - Back to server 66, because squirrel! 48:25 - There's a button that prevents being raided?!? WHAAAAAT??? 56:27 - Aaaaand we're back to in-game memorials. 1:02:35 - Morgoth? Yes, yes please! 1:05:53 - What happens when STFC is gone? 1:08:17 - Japanese gameshows! 1:14:15 - Psychopaths play STFC with the volume on. And remember...spread the hate! Follow us on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/trektalkpodcast/?hl=en Visit Trek Talk Discord: https://discord.gg/MKZZhK7CSA for more related Star Trek related content, and to interact with a greater Star Trek Fleet Command community. #STFC #StarTrek #StarTrekFleetCommand #TrekTalkwithTechandKirk

NHL playoffs started this week.  That's cool.  Other disorderly discussions include plastic surgery, my Spotify playlist, and some other things I forget.  Enjoy.  No guests this week.  Only me :)

Gary the Hate Camel presents a podcast with Tech, Kirk and Handy: Guests: ocmsrzr, boomslang, Tolstoy (45), Inchoate, Parzival (34) Topics Discussed: List notable things: 0:38 - Actual war, not game war (Ukraine). 16:58 - The impact of real world stress in game and vice versa. 31:22 - STFC needs a bar! 35:28 - The arc still sucks. 42:55 - StrangeKirk offers his services if you need to bend an ear. 46:37 - Some just want to fan the flames. 51:04 - How to deal with the worst of the worst. 1:00:06 - Remember to laugh! 1:05:54 - Talk about the new D'vor 1:15:09 - They say it's a PvP game, but, IS it? 1:18:32 - I see cloaked ships. 1:21:43 - Handy hates everybody, which gets us to the price of a BJ. 1:28:53 - Inch is a submissive. 1:29:30 - Handy even fat shames his dog! And remember...spread the hate! Follow us on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/trektalkpodcast/?hl=en Visit Trek Talk Discord: https://discord.gg/MKZZhK7CSA for more related Star Trek related content, and to interact with a greater Star Trek Fleet Command community. #STFC #StarTrek #StarTrekFleetCommand #TrekTalkwithTechandKirk

Gary the Hate Camel presents a podcast with Tech, Kirk and Handy: Guests: ocmsrzr, boomslang, Tolstoy (45), Inchoate (34), vreddy (196), GigaTime (20), KlingonQueen (49), Shimanzu (153/132), Gator (28) Topics Discussed: 1:30 - Gary is in full force as the hate flows across servers. 2:04 - NONA crashes a memorial held for an MBD player's wife? 8:24 - Server 34 is... Ugh. 12:11 - Current affairs of Server 28. 28:51 - Let S45 be the Mongol Horde!!! 32:07 - Apparently some people think we should care more about their wife than our dog? Seriously? In game memorials are stupid. 40:22 - Audio cuts out. BOO!!! Bad Craig, BAD! 40:23 - Techman is not very tech? 40:29 - Who is Craig? 40:47 - Stop, GIGA time! 48:39 - "How did this person sext your mom?" 52:54 - KlingonQueen from Server 49 1:06:38 - Top 5 alliance named "Free to Play" on S49. 1:08:14 - Ocmsrzr asks if he can take his gun out of his mouth, and we are all deeply saddened that he does. 1:09:47 - The more you call someone a tyrant, the more they will be one. 1:17:13 - When you said small, I was expecting to hear something small like 10 or 11 inches, but VReddy's server is tiny! 1:20:12 - Shimanzu joins to tell us about how things go on his EU server(s). 1:24:10 - Compartmentalizing the game and the real world. 1:31:35 - Goodbye, again. People who continually "leave" and have farewell parties every time. 1:36:52 - Decisions, decisions... 1:38:10 - D'Deridex talk. And remember...spread the hate! Follow us on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/trektalkpodcast/?hl=en Visit Trek Talk Discord: https://discord.gg/MKZZhK7CSA for more related Star Trek related content, and to interact with a greater Star Trek Fleet Command community. #STFC #StarTrek #StarTrekFleetCommand #TrekTalkwithTechandKirk

Gary the Hate Camel presents a podcast with Tech, Kirk and Handy: Guests: ocmsrzr, boomslang (45), Inchoate, Medic (34) Topics Discussed: 0:20 - Server 45 microphone issues in the house! 1:38 - Timezones! 5:02 - Kirk defends the mining arc. 10:28 - What else do we like about the new arc? 12:45 - Mining during war, and hunting miners, and how to win at war in general. 24:34 - Handy births the "Demote Ocm" movement! 25:11 - We're looking for anything we can talk about that is NOT this arc, it's that bad. 33:50 - Medic is invited up to give his perspective on how the war started. 41:21 - Inch comes on to give his perspective on how the war started. 52:52 - Kirk explains why NONA is upset with what MBD did. 57:18 - It boils down to NONA and MBD are at war because Inch is an a-hole. 59:50 - Ocmsrzr admits to being a 14 year old Filipino girl. 1:00:09 - How does territory work on S34, and how to wage war! 1:13:49 - There is, apparently, an arc going on? 1:17:16 - The what? The "Tygork"? Are you for real? 1:26:21 - Scopely wants people to pay! Follow us on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/trektalkpodcast/?hl=en Visit Trek Talk Discord: https://discord.gg/MKZZhK7CSA for more related Star Trek related content, and to interact with a greater Star Trek Fleet Command community. #STFC #StarTrek #StarTrekFleetCommand #TrekTalkwithTechandKirk

Gary the Hate Camel presents a podcast with Tech, Kirk and Handy: Guests: ocmsrzr (45), Inchoate, LurkingTiger, DariusRex (34), Gator (28), vreddy (196) Topics Discussed: 0:51 - Ocmsrzr is hemorrhoids. 1:39 - Trek Talk has a new home server!!! 2:49 - Mollywhopping and slobberknockers, the tease. 3:50 - Why the migration from Yaeger-Sector 34 Discord? 7:27 - Mollywhopping and slobberknockers, the main event (the lie has been told)! 13:26 - An internal outsiderish view on the conflict. 21:42 - Server 34 is bass ackwards with territory. 28:09 - Difficulties hiring employees. 35:08 - Gator from server 28. 46:27 - Wait...there are two Keenser's?!? 54:22 - The recording dies for a while, so...sorry about that. 56:19 - PC Emojis how-to! 56:54 - Handy shows his naivety, and refuses to embrace the hate. 1:01:05 - Rehabilitated? That's a b------t word. So, you just go on ahead and stamp that form there, sonny, and stop wasting my damn time. Truth is, I don't give a s--t. 1:08:39 - Handy should berate people cross server. 1:09:12 - Hopefulness about what new things we'll be able to scrap. Ahh, if only we knew then what disappointment awaited us... 1:12:12 - Cost of upgrading in the G5 economy. 1:16:59 - The constructive power of hate. 1:22:49 - Drama of why Trek Talk moved Discord's. 1:29:08 - Gary, f that guy. 1:31:41 - Family, or STFC? Follow us on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/trektalkpodcast/?hl=en Visit Trek Talk Discord: https://discord.gg/MKZZhK7CSA for more related Star Trek related content, and to interact with a greater Star Trek Fleet Command community. #STFC #StarTrek #StarTrekFleetCommand #TrekTalkwithTechandKirk

Process is the thing —Outcomes only the result —Some tweaking required* * *Matsuoka Roshi's expression that “You have to work your way through every bone in your body” implies a kind of thoroughgoing process of potentially hundreds of micro-adjustments to the posture of zazen. While this may seem daunting, and an unnecessarily complicated way of looking at meditation, it is meant to be encouraging. It reminds me of the old cowboy tune, “Home on the Range,” where “never is heard a discouraging word, and the skies are not cloudy all day.” Life on the range was not easy. Zen may promote a sunny view of reality, but it is one that is informed by the ever-present realities of aging, sickness and death, as were dependably present out there “where the deer and the antelope play.” And the cattle drive is endless.Allow me to get a couple of pet peeves off my chest before proceeding to deconstruct processes versus outcomes. Along with the aforementioned overuse of “methodology,” where a simple reference to “method” would suffice, another attempt at sounding more intelligent or professional is the mispronunciation of the plural for process, which is “processes.” More and more we hear self-styled experts in public media refer to “pro-cess-es,” long “o,” long “e.” This mildly irritating but contagious tic is probably a kind of backformation from Greek-derived terms such as “thesis,” the plural for which is “theses.” Its effect on English usage is akin to the grammarians' rule to not split an infinitive (which I just did), because it cannot be done in Latin.This compulsion appears to stem from a preference for older languages with haughtier pedigrees over the vernacular, such as Chinese once was for Japanese, or Greek and Latin, and even French, for English-speaking peoples. Such foreign lingos were esteemed as official language of court systems, diplomacy, and government in general. Its use supposedly reflected the refinement, education and sophistication of the speaker, as well as implying some disdain for the street language of the hoi polloi. Similarly, malaprop pronunciations suggest an underlying urge to lend more credence to our utterings. They may represent vestigial remains of class distinctions, a kind of compensation artifice.“Process” is also used as a kind of avoidance maneuver, a go-to default response to any challenge to due diligence, or demand for a report of progress, especially in the context of lagging behind schedule, or being over budget, for anticipated deliverables in any project, but again, notably predictable in military and government work. “We are in the process of…” say, “evaluating the situation…” is the kneejerk preamble to whatever excuses or real-world reasons may explain any delay or failure to meet expectations. This dodge is prevalent in political, military or policing operations in particular, in our highly fraught society. It is intended to make those who are called on the carpet at the moment to appear and sound competent, however egregious the complaint brought against them for dropping the ball. It amounts to a more professional, politesse circumlocution, meaning “it's not my fault,” basic CYA.With that aside, both Zen and Design emphasize process over outcomes, in getting to the heart of the matter, defining and hopefully solving problems du jour. A given outcome, such as a new software application, may be released for beta-testing in a less-than-perfect edition, with the understanding that users will help identify glitches to debug subsequent releases. A pre-digital-revolution example would be the “some assembly required” syndrome of the archetypal Christmas bicycle, or the inexpensive furniture from the discount store. Transferring the assembly part of the manufacturing process into the home and out of the factory, with more compact shipping thrown into the bargain, reduces cost to the customer. Whether this is a false economy depends upon the value the purchaser assigns to their time.Similarly in pursuing spirituality, if you have the means and can afford the outlay, you can enjoy a luxury resort type of experience in an exotic locale, all your needs catered to by retreat center staffing. Or, you can enjoy the “shabby-chic” experience of do-it-yourself approaches more characteristic of Zen centers, where work (J. samu) and cleaning (J. soji) are a part of the experience. In the latter case, you help staff the necessary tasks entailed in staging a retreat, such as feeding and housing guests, emptying trash, etc., as well as facilitating program presentations such as dharma talks, and meditation itself. This communal approach embraces the social dimension with a do-it-yourself mentality.If instead you practice Zen as a daily routine in your life, it does not exempt you from taking care of business, such as upkeep, maintenance and fulfillment of your personal needs as well as those of your family and friends, and your environment, as a householder. There is no escaping this practical demand. Thus, process is a feature of life, whether or not we are aware of it as such. Once we become aware of the process of living, whether in context of everyday life, or special circumstances such as the intentional community of a Zen center, or on an extended retreat, dependency on one or the other circumstance diminishes. Being in retreat in the mountains is not all that different from Zen at home.The process of meditation, in particular, is precisely the same in both cases, or should be. The main difference is that on traditional retreat, all aspects of daily life are subjugated, or should be, to the opportunity to delve deeply into meditation. While the refrigerator turning on and off at home may remind you that you need to defrost it soon. The pluses and minuses of each situation can be taken as a challenge to be overcome, or allowed to interfere with our positive attitude in approaching Zen practice. Your choice.Similarly, if we get over the hump in regard to the process of meditation and its relationship to external circumstances, we can do the same with expectations regarding outcomes. Each meditation session can be free of judgment as to its relative success or failure. In Design as well as in Zen, there is no success without failure. Somewhere Master Dogen makes the point that hitting the bullseye depends upon the hundreds of misses that preceded it. “Fall down seven times, get up eight” is apparently an old saying that Dogen co-opted. This is the attitude we inculcate in approaching zazen. The bigger the opponent, the harder the fall, as in the martial arts. Lowering our expectations favors the long view.In Design, a failure indicates its own correction. We actually design for failure, that is, to control the extent and impact of any anticipated glitches, so as to salvage the project. This fosters an attitude of losing the various battles along the way, in order to win the war. Progress defined as one long series of mistakes, while paying strict attention so as to avoid making them again, a process of elimination of unneeded secondary operations, as well as sequencing of steps in the most efficient order. Concept sketches, models, and prototypes to test proof-of-concept are examples of strategies to minimize risk and cost, while allowing for human error and material failure. End-user considerations come into play as well. User-friendly operation must be anticipated. If we apply such thinking to our zazen practice, we may see that we may be doing certain things backward, and open up our minds to experimenting with process, setting aside for the moment any specific definitions of outcomes.The expression often used in Design circles is, “What if?” What if we tried this a different way, for example doing an exercise program before sitting, rather than after, or before or after eating, or bathing, as has been our habit. What might be the outcome? Like any open-ended experiment, we don't know until we try. And the first test of a new approach may not be definitive, or determinative of the go-forward. We may want to try the new approach again and again, keeping the new sequence of workout first, zazen last; but tweaking the workout itself so that the cool-down exercises segue more gradually and naturally into the stillness of zazen. Or we may modify zazen to fit other demands on our time.What if we sat at a different time of day, in a different spot, and for a different length of time? What if we tried this over a period of weeks, or months, noting any differences, until we settle into a new zazen routine that we would never have imagined, without experimentation. What if we assume that all the ancestors of Zen had to go through some such winnowing process, in the evolution of the method over time, which resulted in certain notions about how to do zazen — and how not to do zazen — which were handed down as holy writ. What if specific instructions are revealed, through our experimentation, to have been embedded in the external circumstances of their day and time, and mostly irrelevant to ours? Or what if, instead, we find that we come to largely the same conclusions, and design decisions, that they did? Either way, we would never know, without trying. And our practice may not be as vital.Another common usage of process may derive from the jargon of psychology. We, or they, speak of “processing” events that once happened to us, or that we anticipate, such as traumatic transactions like injury, death, divorce, change of employment, moving our residency, et cetera. In fact, meditation has become one of the default recommendations to “process” our experience, along with talking it out with our partners, or a professional. I suppose that we could say that when we settle into zazen, we are processing all the incoming data in our lives. It does seem to function like a great clearing-house, sorting and reorganizing the various conflicting dimensions of our worldview, and its disjunctions with reality. This is probably why many practitioners choose to sit first thing in the morning and last thing at night.Zazen, like Design, is one of the most integrative processes available. Many or most of the methods we learn in the normal course of education tend to be analytical, divisive rather than combinatorial. Zen and Design both emphasize putting things together, or building back better, as our current POTUS would have it. Of course, in order to rebuild, we have to tear down. But the latter process need not be negative. Recognition of this fact is represented in Design solutions by such common practices as knockdown (KD) furniture, which enables a more flexible approach to staging our lives, quickly setting up and taking down everything from Shakespeare in the park and rock concerts to the humble sleeping pallets in a Japanese home or hotel (J. futon), or the over-engineered Western equivalent, the Murphy bed. Building practices pre-engineered in Japanese architecture allow for future deconstruction and rebuilding of whole edifices, whereas Western construction usually requires total demolition.If we imagine how this framework can be applied to zazen, we might contemplate how we can adapt to the inevitable onset of aging, if not sickness and death, in our future. How can we design our approach to simply sitting upright and comfortably so that physical and mental decline are mitigated to the degree possible? Most of the strategies that occur to me are pretty pedestrian and obvious, more a matter of attitude adjustments and regarding change not as compromise, but as innovation. The simplest adaptation may be just sitting in a chair. Ditch the crossed legs. Not essential.Others include more blue-sky invention, such as “Zen bondage.” Developing straps, harnesses, and hammock-like devices that reinforce the tensional net of musculature holding the compressional struts of the skeleton in the upright posture. Future clothing for meditation may follow the current trend of engineered spandex for elite competition in sports, where garments are designed to be ever-more custom fitted to the body, supporting the specific dynamics of the sport. Old-fashioned body armor was heavy and cumbersome, but the metal-smiths tried to approximate the needs of the warrior's body, like a human tin man. Future rigid costuming may include servo-motors and smart chips to reinforce aging joints. Inchoate inching toward this accomplishment is illustrated by today's primitive knee- and back-braces. As a designer, I look for what kind of minimal support system might distribute stress more evenly along the length of the spine, rather than creating undue pressure on our aging lower backs.Zen was an invention, and a process of discovery, from the very beginning. The ancestors manifested a willingness to challenge and change the received wisdom from prior generations, while not throwing the buddha-baby out with the used bathwater. They say that the difference between a good designer and a mediocre designer is that the former can still get excited. I am still excited about Zen, and look forward to reinventing it on the fly, in future. I encourage you to join us in this adventure.* * *Elliston Roshi is guiding teacher of the Atlanta Soto Zen Center and abbot of the Silent Thunder Order. He is also a gallery-represented fine artist expressing his Zen through visual poetry, or “music to the eyes.”UnMind is a production of the Atlanta Soto Zen Center in Atlanta, Georgia and the Silent Thunder Order. You can support these teachings by PayPal to donate@STorder.org. Gassho.Producer: Kyōsaku Jon Mitchell

Gary the Hate Camel presents a podcast with Tech, Kirk and Handy: Guests: Jaehand (14), Inchoate (34), ocmsrzr, boomslang (45) Topics Discussed: 1:00 - How goes the new alliance with Dark? 6:28 - Jaehend from server 11 joins to talk about their server and server merger. 17:34 - More about the territory takeover event. 24:33 - Level 34 is now small. 28:07 - There's one on every server... 34:19 - We don't censor. 35:46 - Scopely is against female orgasms. Probably because they've never managed to give one. 39:20 - The right way to do aggressive ROE. 44:25 - You should use the Nova with M'Benga solo. 49:01 - Inch needs to work on his Klingon. 53:26 - Server 34 has a cult leader! 58:51 - Where is that 2nd scrapper? 1:01:59 - A prescient conversation about making raiding better. 1:14:30 - The generator kick in the dick. 1:24:30 - Pivot back to talk about aggressive ROE. 1:32:20 - Boom swings the other way? Then we talk hitting 0 nodes in territory. 1:36:38 - Pump fake the ending to talk about hitting MOST OPL. 1:40:39 - A thought on PvP participation in events. Follow us on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/trektalkpodcast/?hl=en Visit Trek Talk Discord: https://discord.gg/MKZZhK7CSA for more related Star Trek related content and interact with a greater Star Trek Fleet Command community. #STFC #StarTrek #StarTrekFleetCommand #TrekTalkwithTechandKirk

In criminal law, incitement is the encouragement of another person to commit a crime. Depending on the jurisdiction, some or all types of incitement may be illegal. Where illegal, it is known as an inchoate offense, where harm is intended but may or may not have actually occurred. International law. The Article 20 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights requires that any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law. That few journalists have been prosecuted for incitement to genocide and war crimes despite their recruitment by governments as propagandists is explained by the relatively privileged social status of journalists and privileged institutional position of news organizations in liberal societies, which assign a high value to a free press. Solicitation is the act of offering, or attempting to purchase, goods and/or services. Legal status may be specific to the time or place where it occurs. The crime of "solicitation to commit a crime" occurs when a person encourages, "solicits, requests, commands, importunes or otherwise attempts to cause" another person to attempt or commit a crime, with the purpose of thereby facilitating the attempt or commission of that crime. United States. In the United States, solicitation is the name of a crime, an inchoate offense that consists of a person offering money or inducing another to commit a crime with the specific intent that the person solicited commit the crime. For example, under federal law, for a solicitation conviction to occur the prosecution must prove both that defendant had the intent that another person engage in conduct constituting a felony crime of violence, and that the defendant commanded, induced, or otherwise endeavored to persuade the other person to commit the felony. Differences in laws. In the United States, the term "solicitation" implies some part of commercial element, consideration, or payment. In some other common law countries, the situation is different: where the substantive offense is not committed, the charges are drawn from incitement, conspiracy, and attempt; where the substantive offense is committed, the charges are drawn from conspiracy, counseling and procuring (see accessories), and the substantive offenses as joint principals (see common purpose). Differences from other crimes. Solicitation has in the U.S. these unique elements: 1. the encouragement of, bribing, requesting, or commanding a person. 2. to commit a substantive crime. 3. with the intent that the person solicited to commit the crime. --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/law-school/support

Tech, Kirk and Handy host another podcast: Guests: Mudd, Inchoate, DariusRex, TwistedEvil Topics Discussed: List notable things: 0:45 - Tech reveals Incho is a bot coder responsible for the 1500 hostile limit. Rage ensues. 4:44 - The accent of basement dwelling Chinese game farmer. 5:06 - Tech delves into the pain that is Discovery. 10:04 - GRAVITY CAUSES FIRES!!! 17:28 - Tech tees up his guest from MBD to talk about the cessation of the NONA / MBD war. 18:33 - Mudd from MBD offers to lean into being touched. 25:39 - A tree is murdered while Kirk is in MBD. 32:30 - Techman wants to know about sister alliances with NONA. 33:35 - Talks on sister alliances and consolidation. 40:18 - Mudd asks about territory moves. 50:54 - Mudd asks why it's ok to compare MBD and Bold territory, but not MBD and Most. 51:25 - MBD should take out Wolf? 54:08 - Techman breaks down the discussion on territory. 55:55 - Andy admits it makes sense for him to shut his mouth. 57:19 - Mudd asks about isogen hitting, and a lot of whining about being hit OPL ensues. 1:01:52 - Mudd points out STFC has a description, and it doesn't involve mining. 1:09:58 - Jogging is awful. 1:15:45 - TwistedEvil reminds us that nobody wants to mine, because nobody wants to mine! Also the ISO hit whining just continues and continues! Serve cheese with this episode. 1:22:46 - Kirk points out that the ISO whining is just arguing over which version of being lazy is correct or not. 1:25:54 - Twisted lets us know he doesn't find hunting OPC Isogen miners fun, and implies that you therefore should also not find it fun. I wonder what he has to say to stamp collectors? Or if I can hire him to tell me what in life I'm supposed to enjoy or not enjoy? Apparently I can't make that decision on my own. 1:33:29 - Kirk makes the point I just made in notes, who is anyone to tell someone else the way they enjoy the game is wrong? 1:41:51 - Handy reminds "whoever" sent Mudd "love letters" to not do so again. Twisted admits it was him, and everyone pretends they didn't hear it. 1:42:36 - Incho wants to know what the heck a guard ship does for a miner. 1:45:14 - Incho's secret is out! And... It's crack. A lot of crack. 1:49:24 - Kirk claims to have a real social life. 1:52:17 - Kirk reminds us he's not saying anything profound. 1:54:38 - Handy asks players to use their brain cells, which makes me wonder what game he's been playing. 2:00:07 - Twisted will always be twisted about Mudd. 2:06:41 - Kirk points out how Scopely keeps adding changes to help push PvP, for monies! Follow us on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/trektalkpodcast/?hl=en Visit Yaeger-Sector 34 Discord: https://discord.gg/7ZyRs5k for more related Star Trek related content and interact with a greater Star Trek Fleet Command community. #STFC #StarTrek #StarTrekFleetCommand #TrekTalkwithTechandKirk

In criminal law, a conspiracy is an agreement between two or more persons to commit a crime at some time in the future. Criminal law in some countries or for some conspiracies may require that at least one overt act be undertaken in furtherance of that agreement, to constitute an offense. There is no limit on the number participating in the conspiracy and, in most countries, no requirement that any steps have been taken to put the plan into effect (compare attempts which require proximity to the full offense). For the purposes of concurrence, the actus reus is a continuing one and parties may join the plot later and incur joint liability and conspiracy can be charged where the co-conspirators have been acquitted or cannot be traced. Finally, repentance by one or more parties does not affect liability (unless, in some cases, it occurs before the parties have committed overt acts) but may reduce their sentence. An unindicted co-conspirator, or unindicted conspirator, is a person or entity that is alleged in an indictment to have engaged in conspiracy, but who is not charged in the same indictment. Prosecutors choose to name persons as unindicted co-conspirators for a variety of reasons including grants of immunity, pragmatic considerations, and evidentiary concerns. United States. Conspiracy has been defined in the United States as an agreement of two or more people to commit a crime, or to accomplish a legal end through illegal actions. A conspiracy does not need to have been planned in secret to meet the definition of the crime. Conspiracy law usually does not require proof of specific intent by the defendants to injure any specific person to establish an illegal agreement. Instead, usually the law requires only that the conspirators have agreed to engage in a certain illegal act. In most U.S. jurisdictions, for a person to be convicted of conspiracy, not only must he or she agree to commit a crime, but at least one of the conspirators must commit an overt act (the actus reus) in furtherance of the crime. However, in United States v Shabani the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that this "overt act" element is not required under the federal drug conspiracy statute, 21 U.S.C. section 846. The conspirators can be guilty even if they do not know the identity of the other members of the conspiracy. --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/law-school/support

Tech, Kirk and Handy host another podcast: Guests: EpiTheUnderBoss, Inchoate, WarWizard, Medic, Smooth Topics Discussed: - (0:15) Introductions and where in the world is Kirk Sandiego? - (0:57) Star Trek Discovery - As terrible as ever. - (2:38) Pew Pew pixels blowing up, NONA-MBD war over territory moves and ISO hunting. - (2:53) Incho is fine, while everything is on fire. - (3:06) Epi provides the grander scale server issue - the server has a problem. - (9:04) Incho gives his side of what kicked off the festivities, and people blame each other how things started. - (31:20) Kirk blames all mid-level players for stirring shit up. - (40:10) Smooth didn't start it? I guess gentlemens clubs work well. - (52:48) Kirk gets cut-off and gets very perturbed. - (54:14) Parzival the war hawk. - (1:09:28) AMG biology lesson - (1:15:30) Wife swap between MBD and NONA? - (1:21:15) Incho gives solid advice about what not to force. Follow us on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/trektalkpodcast/?hl=en Visit Yaeger-Sector 34 Discord: https://discord.gg/7ZyRs5k for more related Star Trek related content and interact with a greater Star Trek Fleet Command community. #STFC #StarTrek #StarTrekFleetCommand #TrekTalkwithTechandKirk

An attempt to commit a crime occurs if a criminal has an intent to commit a crime and takes a substantial step toward completing the crime, but for reasons not intended by the criminal, the final resulting crime does not occur. Attempt to commit a particular crime is a crime, usually considered to be of the same or lesser gravity as the particular crime attempted. Attempt is a type of inchoate crime, a crime that is not fully developed. The crime of attempt has two elements, intent and some conduct toward completion of the crime. One group of theories in criminal law is that an attempt to commit an act occurs when a person comes dangerously close to carrying out a criminal act, and intends to commit the act, but does not commit it. The person may have carried out all the necessary steps (or thought they had) but still failed, or the attempt may have been abandoned or prevented at a late stage. The attempt must have gone beyond mere planning or preparation, and is distinct from other inchoate offenses such as conspiracy to commit a crime or solicitation of a crime. There are many specific crimes of attempt, such as attempted murder, which may vary by jurisdiction. Punishment is often less severe than would be the case if the attempted crime had been carried out. Abandonment of the attempt may constitute a not guilty defense, depending partly on the extent to which the attempt was abandoned freely and voluntarily. Early common law did not punish attempts; the law of attempt was not recognized by common law until the case of b. Rex v Scofield in 1784. The essence of the crime of attempt in legal terms is that the defendant has failed to commit the actus reus (the Latin term for the "guilty act") of the full offense, but has the direct and specific intent to commit that full offense. The normal rule for establishing criminal liability is to prove an actus reus accompanied by a mens rea ("guilty mind") at the relevant time (see concurrence and strict liability offenses as the exception to the rule). The actus reus (guilty act) of attempted crime. Whether the actus reus of an attempt has occurred is a question of fact for the jury to decide after having heard the judge's instructions regarding the law. The common law precedent is used to distinguish between acts that were merely preparatory and those sufficiently proximate or connected to the crime. However, sometimes it is hard to draw the line between those acts which were merely preparatory, and those that went and executed a plan, will always go through a series of steps to arrive at the intended conclusion. Some aspects of the execution of the act will be too remote or removed from the full offense. Examples are watching the intended victim over a period of time to establish the routines and traveling to a store to buy necessary tools and equipment. But the closer to the reality of committing the offense the potential wrongdoer moves, the greater the social danger they become. This is a critical issue for the police who need to know when they can intervene to avert the threatened harm by arresting the person. This is a difficult policy area. On the one hand, the state wishes to be able to protect its citizens from harm. This requires an arrest at the earliest possible time. But, most states recognize a principle of individual liberty that only those people who actually choose to break the law should be arrested. Since the potential wrongdoer could change their mind at any point before the crime is committed, the state should wait until the last possible minute to ensure that the intention is going to be realized. --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/law-school/support

An inchoate offense, preliminary crime, inchoate crime or incomplete crime is a crime of preparing for or seeking to commit another crime. The most common example of an inchoate offense is "attempt". "Inchoate offense" has been defined as the following: "Conduct deemed criminal without actual harm being done, provided that the harm that would have occurred is one the law tries to prevent." Intent. Every inchoate crime or offense must have the mens rea of intent or of recklessness, typically intent. Absent a specific law, an inchoate offense requires that the defendant have the specific intent to commit the underlying crime. For example, for a defendant to be guilty of the inchoate crime of solicitation of murder, he or she must have intended for a person to die. Attempt, conspiracy, and solicitation all require mens rea. On the other hand, committing an offense under the US Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act merely requires "knowing", that is, recklessness. Facilitation also requires "believing", yet another way of saying reckless. Intent may be distinguished from recklessness and criminal negligence as a higher mens rea. Proof of intent. Specific intent may be inferred from circumstances. It may be proven by the doctrine of "dangerous proximity", while the Model Penal Code requires a "substantial step in a course of conduct". Merger doctrine. The doctrine of merger has been abandoned in many jurisdictions in cases involving a conspiracy, allowing an accused to be convicted of both conspiracy and the principal offense. However, an accused cannot be convicted of either attempt or solicitation and the principal offense. --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/law-school/support

On Cock and Bull today Cyrus, Amit and Silverie (Antariksh) talk about why the BMC has shut down parks in Mumbai, whether COVID is really a hoax, what the words 'Ersatz' and 'inchoate' mean, and much more (Cyrus is shocked at how Amit know what 'Inchoate' actually means since these words aren't exactly common.) Further in the show, they talk about actor Siddharth tweeting 'subtle cock champion of the world' criticising Saina Nehwal's comments on the 'PM Modi Security Breach' incident, The Wire's investigative report on the secret 'Tek Fog' app, and tons more. They also try to decipher the meanings of some Hindi words, talk about Jawed Habib's spitting on a 'customer', and more. Tune in for this and much more. Subscribe to our new YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCmY4iMGgEa49b7-NH94p1BQ Also, subscribe to Cyrus' YouTube channel: https://youtube.com/channel/UCHAb9jLYk0TwkWsCxom4q8A You can follow Amit on Instagram & Twitter @DoshiAmit: https://twitter.com/doshiamit and https://instagram.com/doshiamit You can follow Antariksh on Instagram @antariksht: https://instagram.com/antariksht Do send in AMA questions for Cyrus by tweeting them to @cyrussaysin or e-mailing them at whatcyrussays@gmail.com Don't forget to follow Cyrus Broacha on Instagram @BoredBroacha (https://www.instagram.com/boredbroacha) In case you're late to the party and want to catch up on previous episodes of Cyrus Says you can do so at: www.ivmpodcasts.com/cyrussays You can listen to this show and other awesome shows on the new and improved IVM Podcasts App on Android: https://ivm.today/android or iOS: https://ivm.today/ios

Tech, Kirk and Handy host another podcast: Guests: Cook, Inchoate, ShadowGray, RobertApril (34), ocmsrzr (45) Topics Discussed: - (0:00) Introductions and Binge Watching Lower Decks - (4:39) Star Trek Prodigy discussion - (12:10) Shadow totally clueless about Star Trek talk - (13:31) Server 34 Drama: MIL-DEAD, DARK-WOLF, BOLD-QT - (28:17) Tech's funny NONA story - (32:26) The ShadowGray Interview - (40:20) Shadow's revelations about Tech's alliance: if you're in it, you're a Trekkie - (40:35) Shadow reveals how his mother actually worked on Star Trek Discovery - (48:03) Server 45: the ocmrzr story - (1:20:15) Inchoate arrives and starts talking about life in the 50s, the 4.4B rep problem and more. - (2:07:27) RobertApril joins and talks about the Wolf-Dark War - And more... Follow us on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/trektalkpodcast/?hl=en Visit Yaeger-Sector 34 Discord: https://discord.gg/7ZyRs5k for more related Star Trek related content and interact with a greater Star Trek Fleet Command community. #STFC #StarTrek #StarTrekFleetCommand #TrekTalkwithTechandKirk

StrangeKirk and Handy (again without Tech) host another podcast: Guests: Inchoate (34), PemaG (34), DonaldTrump (34), Valhalla (34), CaptainMarkRedAngel (20), LateToTheParty (50) Topics Discussed: - New Levels: 51-60 - Kirk's shameful spending - The horrible reasons for Inchoate's and Handy's names - G5 Mining - New Ship costs - Star Trek Discovery season 4 preview - And more... Follow us on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/trektalkpodcast/?hl=en Visit Yaeger-Sector 34 Discord: https://discord.gg/7ZyRs5k for more related Star Trek related content and interact with a greater Star Trek Fleet Command community. #STFC #StarTrek #StarTrekFleetCommand #TrekTalkwithTechandKirk

Merriam-Webster's Word of the Day for September 22, 2021 is: inchoate • in-KOH-ut • adjective Inchoate means "imperfectly formed or formulated." // In the podcast, the author described the process by which she took a series of inchoate vignettes and shaped them into her best-selling novel. See the entry > Examples: "Petrifying sights and sounds haunt her nights and inchoate shadows hover around her." — Jeannette Catsoulis, The New York Times, 19 Aug. 2021 Did you know? Inchoate comes from inchoare, which means "to start work on" in Latin but translates literally as "to hitch up" (inchoare combines the prefix in- with the Latin noun cohum, which refers to the strap that secures a plow beam to a draft animal's yoke). The concept of this initial step toward the larger task of plowing a field explains how inchoate came to describe something (as a plan or idea) in its early, not fully formed, stages of development.

Tech and Kirk speak with NONA's Inchoate and Handy as well as MOST's Graziplay about various topics regarding server 34, such as territory capture and the recent war between MOST and DARK. Topics covered: - Formation of teams now known as the Dominion and the Federation - Who started and who won the Territory Capture battles between MOST and NONA - What were some of the strategies associated with Territory Capture - The reasons behind the DARK and MOST war - And more... Visit Yaeger-Sector 34: https://discord.gg/7ZyRs5k for more related Star Trek related content and interact with a greater Star Trek Fleet Command community.

Inchoate smash! On this episode of Trek Talk with Techman16 (Discord: Techman16#8350) and StrangeKirk (Discord: StrangeKirk#1863) we speak with Inchoate, just an ordinary, average, run-of-the-mill level 50 player and also the most powerful person on Server 34. We talk about RoE from his alliance's perspective and how overly complicated it has gotten, and we get a sneak peak into what is life like hanging out in Beta Sector, the furthest most point in the game. Visit Yaeger-Sector 34 Discord: https://discord.gg/7ZyRs5k for more related Star Trek related content and interact with a greater Star Trek Fleet Command community.

In criminal law, a conspiracy is an agreement between two or more persons to commit a crime at some time in the future. Criminal law in some countries or for some conspiracies may require that at least one overt act be undertaken in furtherance of that agreement, to constitute an offense. There is no limit on the number participating in the conspiracy and, in most countries, no requirement that any steps have been taken to put the plan into effect (compare attempts which require proximity to the full offense). For the purposes of concurrence, the actus reus is a continuing one and parties may join the plot later and incur joint liability and conspiracy can be charged where the co-conspirators have been acquitted or cannot be traced. Finally, repentance by one or more parties does not affect liability (unless, in some cases, it occurs before the parties have committed overt acts) but may reduce their sentence. An unindicted co-conspirator, or unindicted conspirator, is a person or entity that is alleged in an indictment to have engaged in conspiracy, but who is not charged in the same indictment. Prosecutors choose to name persons as unindicted co-conspirators for a variety of reasons including grants of immunity, pragmatic considerations, and evidentiary concerns. --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/law-school/support

An attempt to commit a crime occurs if a criminal has an intent to commit a crime and takes a substantial step toward completing the crime, but for reasons not intended by the criminal, the final resulting crime does not occur. Attempt to commit a particular crime is a crime, usually considered to be of the same or lesser gravity as the particular crime attempted. Attempt is a type of inchoate crime, a crime that is not fully developed. The crime of attempt has two elements, intent, and some conduct toward completion of the crime. One group of theories in criminal law is that attempt to commit an act occurs when a person comes dangerously close to carrying out a criminal act, and intends to commit the act, but does not commit it. The person may have carried out all the necessary steps (or thought they had) but still failed, or the attempt may have been abandoned or prevented at a late stage. The attempt must have gone beyond mere planning or preparation and is distinct from other inchoate offenses such as conspiracy to commit a crime or solicitation of a crime. There are many specific crimes of attempt, such as attempted murder, which may vary by jurisdiction. Punishment is often less severe than would be the case if the attempted crime had been carried out. Abandonment of the attempt may constitute a not guilty defense, depending partly on the extent to which the attempt was abandoned freely and voluntarily. Early common law did not punish attempts; the law of attempt was not recognized by common law until the case of b. Rex v Scofield in 1784. The essence of the crime of attempt in legal terms is that the defendant has failed to commit the actus reus (the Latin term for the "guilty act") of the full offense, but has the direct and specific intent to commit that full offense. The normal rule for establishing criminal liability is to prove an actus reus accompanied by a mens rea ("guilty mind") at the relevant time (see concurrence and strict liability offenses as the exception to the rule). The actus reus (guilty act) of attempted crime. Whether the actus reus of an attempt has occurred is a question of fact for the jury to decide after having heard the judge's instructions regarding the law. The common law precedent is used to distinguish between acts that were merely preparatory and those sufficiently proximate or connected to the crime. However, sometimes it is hard to draw the line between those acts which were merely preparatory, and those that went and executed a plan, will always go through a series of steps to arrive at the intended conclusion. Some aspects of the execution of the act will be too remote or removed from the full offense. Examples are watching the intended victim over a period of time to establish the routines and traveling to a store to buy necessary tools and equipment. But the closer to the reality of committing the offense the potential wrongdoer moves, the greater the social danger they become. This is a critical issue for the police who need to know when they can intervene to avert the threatened harm by arresting the person. This is a difficult policy area. On the one hand, the state wishes to be able to protect its citizens from harm. This requires an arrest at the earliest possible time. But, most states recognize a principle of individual liberty that only those people who actually choose to break the law should be arrested. Since the potential wrongdoer could change their mind at any point before the crime is committed, the state should wait until the last possible minute to ensure that the intention is going to be realized. --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/law-school/support

Attempted murder is a crime of attempt in various jurisdictions. Canada. Section 239 of the Criminal Code makes attempted murder punishable by a maximum of life imprisonment. If a gun is used, the minimum sentence is four, five or seven years, dependent on prior convictions and relation to organized crime. United Kingdom. England and Wales. In English criminal law, attempted murder is the crime of simultaneously preparing to commit an unlawful killing and having a specific intention to cause the death of a human being under the Queen's Peace. The phrase "more than merely preparatory" is specified by the Criminal Attempts Act 1981 to denote the fact that preparation for a crime by itself does not constitute an "attempted crime". In England and Wales, as an "attempt", attempted murder is an offence under section 1(1) of the Criminal Attempts Act 1981 and is an indictable offence which carries a maximum penalty of life imprisonment (the same as the mandatory sentence for murder). The corresponding legislation for Northern Ireland is section 3(1) of the Criminal Attempts and Conspiracy (Northern Ireland) Order 1983. The mens rea (Latin for the "guilty mind") for murder includes an intention to kill or cause grievous bodily harm where there is virtual certainty of death resulting, whereas attempted murder depends on an intention to kill and an overt act towards committing homicide. Attempted murder is only the planning of a murder and acts taken towards it, not the actual killing, which is the murder. This makes the offence very difficult to prove and it is more common for a lesser charge to be preferred under the Offences against the Person Act 1861. However, in R v Morrison, the Court of Appeal considered the issue of alternative verdicts on an indictment with a single count of attempted murder. Morrison had gone into a shop with two other men on a robbery with a firearm. They demanded money and one of the men shot at the shopkeeper who suffered only minor injury. The prosecution had many opportunities to add other counts before the trial but failed to act. Having heard the case, the judge expressed his view that the jury could consider an attempted grievous bodily harm (GBH) under section 18 of the 1861 Act and Morrison was duly convicted of attempting to cause grievous bodily harm. The Court of Appeal confirmed that attempting to cause grievous bodily harm is a valid alternative to attempted murder because there can be no intention to kill someone without the intention also to cause grievous bodily harm. This is a practical decision to ensure that the criminal justice system did not allow a guilty person to walk away because only one charge had been preferred. But it is not necessarily a good general principle[ because, in euthanasia for example, a person assisting intends to cause death, but with no suffering. That attempting to cause grievous bodily harm must be an alternative verdict should the intended victim not die would be a strange outcome because there is no intention to cause any long-lasting and serious injury: the two attempted offences have different mens rea requirements so that proof of intent to murder would not necessarily meet the requirement for section 18 of the 1861 Act. First, acting deliberately and intentionally or recklessly with extreme disregard for human life, the person attempted to kill someone; and the person did something that was a substantial step toward committing the crime. --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/law-school/support

An inchoate offense, preliminary crime, inchoate crime or incomplete crime is a crime of preparing for or seeking to commit another crime. The most common example of an inchoate offense is "attempt". "Inchoate offense" has been defined as the following: "Conduct deemed criminal without actual harm being done, provided that the harm that would have occurred is one the law tries to prevent." --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/law-school/support

In this podcast, we read you 10 key questions & answers that give you important background knowledge of Criminal Law: Inchoate Crimes, which is critical to the more detailed questions that might arise on the Bar Exam.For example:0:35 -- What is the mens rea for attempt?1:14 -- Can you be charged with attempt for strict liability crimes or crimes that have a mens rea of recklessness or negligence?2:51 -- Under the MPC, what is the substantial step test?3:13 -- Does mere preparation qualify as a substantial step?These podcasts are perfect for "passive studying" while you're exercising, cooking, cleaning, commuting, or otherwise unable to focus on the Brainscape app itself.Of course, the most effective way to study is to use Brainscape's adaptive web & mobile flashcards app, which covers comprehensive background knowledge pulled from all the top bar exam prep courses. Remember that you can learn more about it at http://bit.ly/brainscapeMBE . Best of luck on your studies!

We'll be taking a short hiatus from The Wednesday Conversation while Bob is out on sabbatical. But before we say farewell for now, we spend an episode talking about what we're reading, what cultural trends we're watching, and where we're feeling inchoate angst.

In this episode of Is The Mic Still On, we discuss the Super Bowl halftime performers, impeachment, Malik Yoba, and the Joker movie. If you are a new listener to Is The Mic Still On, we would love to hear from you.  Please visit our Reddit and let us know your thoughts on this week’s topics or the show! In this episode, we discuss:Super Bowl Halftime ShowImpeachmentMalik YobaCandace OwensA3C/2 ChainzJoker Movie Controversy Follow our Podcast:Apple Podcast & Google Podcasts: http://bit.ly/IsTheMicStillOnSpotify: http://bit.ly/IsTheMicStillOnSpotifyFollow our Host:Sophie: http://twitter.com/sayitaintsophMyke: http://twitter.com/mykectownRod: http://twitter.com/iammodestmediaBeezy: http://twitter.com/beezy430Feefo: http://twitter.com/feefo247Ken: http://twitter.com/kennithbinge Join the Conversation Our favorite part of recording a live podcast each week is participating in the great conversations that happen on our live chat, on social media, and in our comments section.  This weeks word of the day is: Inchoate - https://www.wordgenius.com/all-words/inchoate Explore these Resources In this episode, we mentioned the following resources:Jennifer Lopez & Shakira: https://www.billboard.com/articles/news/super-bowl/8531496/super-bowl-halftime-show-2020-dream-playlist-jlo-shakiraT.I. mad at New Birth: https://www.instagram.com/p/B2fn40whbb6/ https://www.instagram.com/p/B2ob1V-l0BD/ImpeachmentThe DailyThe Impeachment Inquiry begins: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/25/podcasts/the-daily/impeachment-trump.htmlI Would Like You to Do Us A Favor: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/26/podcasts/the-daily/trump-ukraine-impeachment.htmlThe Whistle Blower’s Complaint: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/27/podcasts/the-daily/whistleblower-complaint-trump-maguire.htmlHow the Whistle Blower Complain Almost Didn’t Happen: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/30/podcasts/the-daily/whistleblower-complaint-cia.htmlThe Impeachment Dilemma for Republicans: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/01/podcasts/the-daily/impeachment-republicans-trump-nixon-clinton.htmlCandace Owens: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0cUQqPxw3hcMalik Yoba’s Root Interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4YOlbfvsYyI2 Chainz becomes co-owner of A3C: https://www.blackenterprise.com/2-chainz-purchases-a-stake-in-the-a3c-festival-and-conference/Joker: https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/movies/2019/09/24/aurora-mass-shooting-victims-families-concerned-about-joke-movie/2428777001/ Follow ITMSO https://linktr.ee/isthemicstillon Check Out More Dead End Podcast Network Programming Dead End Sports: https://deadendpodcasts.com/show/dead-end-sports/Dead End Gaming: https://deadendpodcasts.com/show/dead-end-gaming/Frames Per Second: https://deadendpodcasts.com/show/frames-per-second/ NoDissRespect: https://deadendpodcasts.com/show/nodissrespect/ Lowmid: https://deadendpodcasts.com/show/dead-end-hip-hop/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

We go over those 5 words and talk a little bit about sports and politics. Super chill broh. --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/grevocab/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/grevocab/support

Inchoate fears about public transit—and the people who use it—have a long history, both in New York and other US cities.

Inchoate finale! The Rifts reach the end of their investigation, perhaps having missed some key clues along the way. Choices are made and non-traditional meals are consumed before the veil is lifted and the curtain falls on our latest foray into the unknown. Learn how the City of Mist shrouds the Hub. Donate to support the BC Children's Hospital Foundation here: bit.ly/Whycalibur2018 Roger Cande is played by Michael Blood. You can find them on Twitter @GoodSirBlood. Veronica Sterling is played by OG Brown Sugar. You can find her on Twitter @OGBrownSugar. Maria Cosco is played by Keekers. You can find her on Twitter @BeASpaceCat. Mark William Calloway is played by Jason. You can find him on Twitter @SingingChemist. I want to acknowledge that this podcast is produced on the unceded territory of the Katzie, Kwikwetlem, Stó:lō, Kwantlen, Stz'uminus, and Musqueam people, and the treaty land of the Tsawwassen First Nation. I'm your friendly guide, Matt. You can find me on Twitter @Whycalibur.  Follow our show @BrokenSunRPG, tweet about it using the #brokensunrpg hashtag, and read up on the lore of the land at splintersofabrokensun.tumblr.com Learn more about City of Mist or buy your copy here: https://www.cityofmist.co/ "Secret of Tiki Island" Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0 Licensehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/    

Enjoy this early release in celebration of Extra Life 2018! Donate to support the BC Children's Hospital Foundation here: bit.ly/Whycalibur2018 See the schedule here: bit.ly/Whycalibur2018Schedule Watch here: twitch.tv/Whycalibur The Rifts continue their investigation, heading for both the mysterious tower and the third murder scene. They find some hard evidence at last, but are quickly sucked into a trap of their own making.  Roger Cande is played by Michael Blood. You can find them on Twitter @GoodSirBlood. Veronica Sterling is played by OG Brown Sugar. You can find her on Twitter @OGBrownSugar. Maria Cosco is played by Keekers. You can find her on Twitter @BeASpaceCat. Mark William Calloway is played by Jason. You can find him on Twitter @SingingChemist. I'm your friendly guide, Matt. You can find me on Twitter @Whycalibur.  Follow our show @BrokenSunRPG, tweet about it using the #brokensunrpg hashtag, and read up on the lore of the land at splintersofabrokensun.tumblr.com Learn more about City of Mist or buy your copy here: https://www.cityofmist.co/ "Secret of Tiki Island" Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0 Licensehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ I want to acknowledge that this podcast is produced on the unceded territory of the Katzie, Kwikwetlem, Stó:lō, Kwantlen, Stz'uminus, and Musqueam people, and the treaty land of the Tsawwassen First Nation.

Extra Life 2018 is coming! Support my fundraiser for the BC Children's Hospital here. Our intrepid investigators follow the killer's trail through City City, snooping through two murder scenes and narrowly escaping arrest. They find what seems to be a vital clue connecting two of the victims.  Roger Cande is played by Michael Blood. You can find them on Twitter @GoodSirBlood. Veronica Sterling is played by OG Brown Sugar. You can find her on Twitter @OGBrownSugar. Maria Cosco is played by Keekers. You can find her on Twitter @BeASpaceCat. Mark William Calloway is played by Jason. You can find him on Twitter @SingingChemist. I'm your friendly guide, Matt. You can find me on Twitter @Whycalibur.  Follow our show @BrokenSunRPG, tweet about it using the #brokensunrpg hashtag, and read up on the lore of the land at splintersofabrokensun.tumblr.com Learn more about City of Mist or buy your copy here: https://www.cityofmist.co/ "Secret of Tiki Island" Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0 Licensehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ I want to acknowledge that this podcast is produced on the unceded territory of the Katzie, Kwikwetlem, Stó:lō, Kwantlen, Stz'uminus, and Musqueam people, and the treaty land of the Tsawwassen First Nation.

An invisible tower. Mysterious murders. Serial killers. Eggs. Late one night, four ordinary people with extraordinary powers meet in a rundown pizzeria, and their lives are changed forever. Roger Cande is played by Michael Blood. You can find them on Twitter @GoodSirBlood. Veronica Sterling is played by OG Brown Sugar. You can find her on Twitter @OGBrownSugar. Maria Cosco is played by Keekers. You can find her on Twitter @BeASpaceCat. Mark William Calloway is played by Jason. You can find him on Twitter @SingingChemist. I'm your friendly guide, Matt. You can find me on Twitter @Whycalibur.  Follow our show @BrokenSunRPG, tweet about it using the #brokensunrpg hashtag, and read up on the lore of the land at splintersofabrokensun.tumblr.com Learn more about City of Mist or buy your copy here: https://www.cityofmist.co/ "Secret of Tiki Island" Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0 Licensehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ I want to acknowledge that this podcast is produced on the unceded territory of the Katzie, Kwikwetlem, Stó:lō, Kwantlen, Stz'uminus, and Musqueam people, and the treaty land of the Tsawwassen First Nation.

Welcome to the City. The City of Mist. In this Session Zero, we learn about the characters who will be taking on this mystery, and work out some details of the world, setting, and concept. Inchoate is a limited-run series that does, in fact, tie in to the main Splinters of a Broken Sun campaign.  Join us, won't you? We've got a few spare tickets to the next City Caucasians game with your name on 'em.  Roger Cande is played by Michael Blood. You can find them on Twitter @GoodSirBlood. Veronica Sterling is played by OG Brown Sugar. You can find her on Twitter @OGBrownSugar. Maria Cosco is played by Keekers. You can find her on Twitter @BeASpaceCat. Mark William Calloway is played by Jason. You can find him on Twitter @SingingChemist. I'm your friendly guide, Matt. You can find me on Twitter @Whycalibur.  Follow our show @BrokenSunRPG, tweet about it using the #brokensunrpg hashtag, and read up on the lore of the land at splintersofabrokensun.tumblr.com Learn more about City of Mist or buy your copy here: https://www.cityofmist.co/ "Secret of Tiki Island" Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0 Licensehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ I want to acknowledge that this podcast is produced on the unceded territory of the Katzie, Kwikwetlem, Stó:lō, Kwantlen, Stz'uminus, and Musqueam people, and the treaty land of the Tsawwassen First Nation.

Uk summer draws to a close, and so to another reflective mix. Today, mixed in with the normal ambient journey, we feature exclusive tracks from an up and coming ambient artist Jacob Ware, who goes by the name of Rapt, (formerly known as Inchoate) https://energostatic.bandcamp.com/album/if-it-were-quiet https://rapt.bandcamp.com/album/rapt Outstanding fluid ambient of which, easily stands shoulder to shoulder with all the big well established names. Inspired by music concrete/insomnia/thought loops. “’Rapt' is the product of a search for mental headspace and the desire for a world to get lost in.” Available on Bandcamp as per link, Go show some support.

--- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/nick-nordstrom/support

81: Belfry, Abeyance. Substantiate, Eschew. 82: Welter, Calumny, Flag, Noisome 83: Tortuous, Surfeit, Anachronism, Leery 84: Abjure, Cartography, Mirth, Divine 85: Maudlin, Deride, Malinger, Gestation 86: Connoisseur, Droll, Inchoate, Refractory 87: Terrestrial, Canard, Warranted, Amulet 88: Spectrum, Rejoinder, Panoply, Verbose 89: Exigency, Variegated, Diffidence, Nascent 90: Inquest, Arrogate, Kudos, Martinet

The words for today are: Connoisseur, Droll, Inchoate, Refractory. Today's quote is from Being and Time by Martin Heidegger VictorPrep's vocab podcast is for improving for English vocabulary skills while helping you prepare for your standardized tests! This podcast isn't only intended for those studying for the GRE or SAT, but also for people who enjoy learning, and especially those who want to improve their English skills. I run the podcast for fun and because I want to help people out there studying for tests or simply learning English. The podcast covers a variety of words and sometimes additionally covers word roots. Using a podcast to prep for the verbal test lets you study while on the go, or even while working out!  If you have comments or questions and suggestions, please contact me at @SamFold or send me an email at sam@victorprep.com Check out the podcast website at VictorPrep.com or the Facebookpage at Facebook.com/victorpreplearning

Valaska delivers their indie rock from the windy city of Chicago. Mellow, sad, and infinitely beautiful, the four band members share about their new and stellar release, "Inchoate".

Valaska delivers their indie rock from the windy city of Chicago. Mellow, sad, and infinitely beautiful, the four band members share about their new and stellar release, “Inchoate”.

This week's episode about the criminal elements needed to convict someone is the converse to last week's episode about Constitutional elements that protect criminal defendants.  In addition to talking about how criminal law works at a fundamental level, Brett and Nazim also cover inchoate crimes, why learning about criminal law is boring, why How to Get Away With Murder on ABC sucks, Ocasio v. U.S., how Madden gets harder as you get older, Lockhart v. US, and habitual offender statutes.