Podcasts about Criminal code

canada supreme court abuse scc criminal code

Play Episode Listen Later May 25, 2026 43:31

Joseph Neuberger and Diana Davison break down the Supreme Court of Canada's landmark decision in Ahluwalia v. Ahluwalia, 2026 SCC 16, which recognizes a new tort of intimate partner violence. They examine how coercive control, family law, tort law, and criminal law now intersect, why the dissent warns the ruling may create confusion for courts and litigants, and how this decision could affect future claims involving domestic abuse, financial control, psychological harm, family court litigation, and proposed Criminal Code changes.

Senate human rights committee hears residential school denialism should be made a hate crime

APTN News Brief

Play Episode Listen Later May 22, 2026 10:30

Our featured story: the Senate committee on human rights hears that Bill C-9's proposed amendments to the Criminal Code concerning hate crimes should include residential school denialism and ensure the protection of Indigenous cultural spaces.

senate indigenous hears hate crime bill c residential schools criminal code denialism human rights committee

Richard Leonard Walker v. His Majesty the King (Day 2/2) (41703)

Play Episode Listen Later May 21, 2026 139:41

During the course of an investigation under the Traffic Safety Act, a police officer attempted to effect a warrantless arrest of the appellant for obstruction under s. 129(a) of the Criminal Code. In a pre-trial application, the trial judge found that the police officer was not executing a lawful arrest, and therefore breached the appellant's s. 9 Charter right not to be arbitrarily detained by attempting the arrest. The trial judge acquitted the appellant of assault causing bodily harm. The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, and ordered a new trial. Argued Date 2026-05-20 Keywords Criminal law — Arrest — Accused assaulted police officer attempting to effect warrantless arrest for obstruction under s. 129(a) of Criminal Code — Trial judge holding that officer was not executing lawful arrest and breached accused's s. 9 rights — Trial judge further holding Crown failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that accused was not acting in self-defence — Accused acquitted of assaulting officer — Court of Appeal allowing appeal and ordering new trial — Whether a police officer can arrest an individual for obstruction under the Criminal Code during the course of a regulatory (or municipal) investigation where the regulatory (or municipal) statute provides for a lesser enforcement remedy — Whether the discretion referenced in Goodwin v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2015 SCC 46, allows police officers to engage the more serious Criminal Code provisions during the course of an investigation for less serious regulatory or municipal offences? Notes (Alberta) (Criminal) (By Leave) Language English Audio Disclaimers This podcast is created as a public service to promote public access and awareness of the workings of Canada's highest court. It is not affiliated with or endorsed by the Court. The original version of this hearing may be found on the Supreme Court of Canada's website. The above case summary was prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch).

canada office trial court supreme court crown appeal accused majesty charter goodwin registrar motor vehicles scc criminal code king day richard leonard

His Majesty the King v. Terrell Burke-Whittaker (41786)

canada black office toronto court supreme court crown highways appeal burke majesty whittaker registrar brampton criminal code north york

Play Episode Listen Later May 21, 2026 188:43

On June 9, 2020, Mr. Burke-Whittaker attended a funeral for Dimarjo Jenkins, who had been shot and killed on a street in downtown Toronto on May 26, 2020. The funeral took place at a restaurant in North York. The parking lot behind the restaurant backed onto Highway 401. Late on the evening of the viewing, a vehicle driving on Highway 401 pulled onto the shoulder of the westbound lanes behind the restaurant. Someone in the car started firing shots into the crowd that had gathered in the parking lot. Many people in the parking lot ran into the building, but others stayed in the parking lot and returned fire in the direction of passing traffic on Highway 401. Still others hid behind a dumpster that was close to the door of the building. Mr. Burke-Whittaker was in the parking lot when the shooting started. He took cover behind the dumpster. He took a firearm out of his satchel and, having struggled to cock it, he came out from behind the dumpster, fired a shot toward the vehicle, and fled into the building through the parking lot door. The incident was relatively brief and captured on video. No one was killed or injured.The police investigation identified Mr. Burke-Whittaker as one of the shooters. He turned himself in on June 22, 2021, just over one year after the shooting. His firearm was never recovered. He pled guilty to one count of possession of a loaded or prohibited or restricted firearm contrary to s. 95 of the Criminal Code. He was 24 years old at the time of the shooting and has no other criminal record. He was raised by his mother and grandmother in Brampton, as his father was in and out of jail during much of his childhood. He completed high school and began college, but did not finish that course of studies. He has one child born in 2018. At the time of sentencing, he had been accepted into the Toronto Fire Academy. While on bail, he started a vending machine business. Several positive character letters submitted to the sentencing judge indicated that, as a young Black male, he had experienced systemic racism. An Enhanced Pre-Sentence Report was not submitted.The sentencing judge sentenced the respondent to a conditional sentence of two years less a day to be followed by three years' probation. A majority of the Court of Appeal granted leave to appeal the sentence and dismissed the applicant's appeal of the sentence. The dissenting justice would have allowed the appeal, set aside the sentence imposed by the sentencing judge, and imposed a sentence of 38 months' incarceration less credit of 17 months. Argued Date 2026-05-19 Keywords Criminal law — Sentencing — Conditional sentencing orders — What principles should guide appellate courts' review of conditional sentencing orders for offences under Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46, 1, s. 95 — When, and based on what principles, appellate courts should reincarcerate offenders after otherwise successful Crown sentence appeal. Notes (Ontario) (Criminal) (By Leave) Language English Audio Disclaimers This podcast is created as a public service to promote public access and awareness of the workings of Canada's highest court. It is not affiliated with or endorsed by the Court. The original version of this hearing may be found on the Supreme Court of Canada's website. The above case summary was prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch).

4.43-The Dawn Patrol

The Oscar Project Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later May 19, 2026 21:18

Send us Fan MailToday's episode is my discussion of the 1930 film The Dawn Patrol. I don't have a guest today, but you can hear me discuss the comparisons between this and earlier WWI war films, the feud between Howard Hawks and Howard Hughes, and Hollywood's first nepo baby.You can watch The Dawn Patrol on YouTube, or Tubi or pick up a physical copy for your collection.Other films mentioned in this episode include:Hell's Angels directed by Howard HughesThe Air Circus directed by Howard Hawks (lost film)The Road to Glory directd by Howard Hawks (lost film)The Criminal Code directed by Howard HawksWings directed by William A. Wellman and Harry d'Abbadie d'ArrastThe Patent Leather Kid directed by Alfred SantellThe Noose directed by John Francis Dillon (lost film)Little Caesar directed by Mervyn LeroyBulldog Drummond directed by F. Richard JonesThe Dawn Patrol (1938) directed by Edmund GouldingThe Doorway to Hell directed by Archie MayoLaughter directed by Harry d'Abbadie d'ArrastOther referenced topics:Batman (series)The New Yorker reviewDanny Reid on pre-code.comSupport the show

hollywood hell batman angels wwi tubi little caesars howard hughes howard hawks criminal code dawn patrol william a wellman

A Kickboxing Tragedy And The Cat Ate My Ticket

Play Episode Listen Later May 7, 2026 20:37 Transcription Available

One decision can change a life, and another can quietly lock you into a guilty plea. We start with a heartbreaking civil claim tied to a mixed martial arts tournament and a kickboxing bout that leaves a 26-year-old UBC chemistry graduate in a permanent vegetative state. Because the event took place in space owned by Simon Fraser University, SFU ends up in the lawsuit and tries to shift responsibility to the province by pointing at the BC Athletics Commissioner, who approved kickboxing under the Criminal Code “prize fight” framework.We dig into what that approval power really means, and why the BC Court of Appeal says it still does not create the kind of proximity needed for negligence. Using the Anns/Cooper analysis, we unpack duty of care, remoteness, and the core idea that a statutory decision-maker acting for the public good is not automatically on the hook for private damages when something goes wrong. It's a clear look at the limits of government liability, even when a regulator could have said “no” and prevented the event from happening.Then we switch gears to a BC Supreme Court ruling with everyday stakes: a speeding and driving-without-due-care ticket, a missed 30-day deadline under the Offence Act, repeated attempts on an online dispute portal, and the explanation that a cat damaged or “ate” the ticket. We walk through the extension-of-time test, what “arguable defence” requires, and why missing even one required factor can sink your application.If you value practical legal takeaways and clear explanations of Canadian case law, subscribe, share the episode, and leave us a review. What part of these rulings do you think the courts got right or wrong?Follow this link for a transcript of the show and links to the cases discussed.

canadian tragedy ticket appeal kickboxing ubc simon fraser university sfu criminal code bc supreme court bc court

Driving Law Episode 450: DRE Testing, Warrantless Searches, and Confirmation Bias

Play Episode Listen Later May 1, 2026 31:26

This week on Driving Law, Kyla Lee and Paul Doroshenko break down what may be one of the most consequential Canadian decisions on drug recognition evaluations. The case examines what happens when police fail to follow the required 12-step DRE process, and why skipping even one step can make the entire investigation unlawful. They discuss how drug recognition evaluations function as warrantless searches, why police must stay within the exact authority granted by the Criminal Code, and how tunnel vision and confirmation bias can affect impaired driving investigations. The decision also raises serious questions about the structure of DRE forms and whether they push officers toward predetermined conclusions. Plus, the Ridiculous Driver of the Week involves two teenagers, a riding lawnmower, and a Target store. Check out the "Lawyer Told Me Not To Talk To You" T-shirts and hoodies at Lawyertoldme.com and "Sit Still Jackson" at sitstilljackson.com.

canadian testing target driving searches confirmation bias criminal code warrantless kyla lee paul doroshenko

Secret Informant, Secret Court

canada secret canadian zoom court crown british columbia appeal informants criminal code

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 16, 2026 21:48 Transcription Available

A court decision appears online with almost everything blacked out: no registry, no lawyers, no location, no hearing date, and even the judge's name is removed. All we're left with is a disturbing question at the heart of Canadian criminal law: can someone become a confidential police informant without ever being clearly told they are one, and if so, what does that do to open court principles and public trust?We walk through confidential informer privilege from the ground up, including why it is treated as near-absolute in Canada and why it can protect informants who are unreliable or acting for personal gain. Then we get into the moment that triggered the whole fight: after hours of a stalled interview, a detainee asks for a pen, writes “informal” on their hand, hides it from the camera, shows it to an officer who nods, and the recording suddenly goes off. The judge ultimately finds an implied promise of confidentiality on a balance of probabilities, despite the Crown's opposition, raising real-world issues about secrecy, disclosure, and how policing actually works.Then we shift to the Court of Appeal of British Columbia and a practical courtroom battle with huge stakes: when should a witness be allowed to testify by Zoom or Teams under the Criminal Code? In a referred murder conviction appeal after 17 years in prison, an officer who admitted recording key gunshot timings incorrectly wanted to testify remotely to avoid travel. The court said no, stressing the presumption of in-person evidence when credibility and fairness are on the line.Subscribe for more Canadian legal analysis, share this with someone who cares about open courts, and leave us a review. Where do you draw the line between necessary secrecy and the public's right to see justice done?Follow this link for a transcript of the show and links to the cases discussed.

British Columbia And Alberta Clash On How To Regulate Lawyers

canadian lawyers bc clash british columbia regulate law society criminal code

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 26, 2026 22:35 Transcription Available

Two neighbouring provinces are running a live experiment on professional regulation, and the results could shape how Canadians think about law societies, licensing bodies, and government power. We walk through British Columbia's Legal Professions Act changes, including the shift in what the Law Society is being asked to prioritize, and how that ties into disputes over mandatory cultural competency and sensitivity training for lawyers.Then we cross into Alberta, where Bill 13, the Regulated Professions Neutrality Act, lands like a hard reset. The law sets out a “neutrality” framework that rejects assigning privilege or disadvantage based on enumerated personal characteristics or beliefs, and it specifically blocks regulators from mandating training on topics like cultural competency, unconscious bias, diversity, equity, and inclusion. Put beside BC's approach, it's a stark policy split, and it raises a bigger question: what happens to independent regulation when politics starts writing the regulator's mission?We also shift to criminal law and a case with an ordinary trigger and an extraordinary outcome. A dispute over an e-bike, a shove, a fall, and a death days later led to a manslaughter conviction, with the key issue being defence of property under Criminal Code section 35, not self-defence. We unpack the “reasonable in the circumstances” standard, the modified objective test, and why appeals courts usually won't redo a trial judge's judgment call.If you care about legal rights, regulatory independence, Canadian criminal law, and where “reasonable force” really sits in practice, this one will stay with you. Subscribe, share the episode, and leave a review, then tell us: should governments ever steer professional regulators this directly?Follow this link for a transcript of the show and links to the cases discussed.

Dayton Kelly v. His Majesty the King (42050)

canada office court supreme court crown ontario appeal causing accused majesty constitutional charter registrar bdc criminal code

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 18, 2026 37:19

One evening in October 2021, the applicant was driving in rural southwestern Ontario. The sun had set and it was dark. The posted speed limit on the highway the applicant was using was 80km/h; he was travelling at least 116km/h. A horse-drawn buggy entered the roadway at an intersection. The applicant did not see the buggy in time to stop; his vehicle collided with it. Both occupants of the buggy died from injuries sustained in the collision. During the police investigation that night, the applicant admitted to being a chronic marijuana smoker and consented to providing two samples of his blood. Evidence established that the applicant's blood drug concentration (“BDC”) exceeded the prescribed limit at the time of the collision. The parties agreed at trial that there was no evidence of a causal nexus between the applicant's BDC and the collision. The applicant was charged with operating a conveyance with an excess BDC under s. 320.14(1)(c), two counts of committing an offence under s. 320.14(1)(c) causing death under s. 320.14(3), and two counts of dangerous operation of a conveyance causing death under s. 320.13(3).The trial judge held that it is insufficient that the applicant had a prohibited BDC and was operating a conveyance at the time he caused a death; a conviction for offences under s. 320.14(3) requires a causal nexus between an accused's BDC and the death of a victim. As the parties have agreed that there is no causal nexus between the applicant's BDC and the death of the victims, the applicant was acquitted on those counts.The Court of Appeal held that the trial judge erred in his interpretation of s. 320.14(3). A plain reading establishes that the elements are made out simply by operating a vehicle with excess BDC, and causing the death of a person. No causal nexus between the excess BDC and the cause of death is required. Accused persons retain the benefit of the basic legal causation standard: the Crown must prove that the applicant's actions were a significant contributing cause of death. Because of the trial judge's erroneous interpretation of s. 320.14(3), he did not make any finding as to whether the Crown had proven legal causation on this standard. The Court of Appeal therefore ordered a new trial on these counts. Argued Date 2026-03-17 Keywords Criminal law — Causing death while operating conveyance with excess blood drug concentration — Causation — Whether causal nexus required between blood drug concentration and death of victim — Constitutional law — Charter of Rights — Right to life, liberty and security of person — Whether s. 320.14(3) of the Criminal Code violates s. 7 of the Charter — Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46, s. 320.14(3) Notes (Ontario) (Criminal) (By Leave) Language English Audio Disclaimers This podcast is created as a public service to promote public access and awareness of the workings of Canada's highest court. It is not affiliated with or endorsed by the Court. The original version of this hearing may be found on the Supreme Court of Canada's website. The above case summary was prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch).

Dispersing the Fog - E52 Parole for Former Spy Cameron Ortis, Deep Fakes Not "Intimate Images", 'Red Alert' Book Review, 'The Getaway', Rattlesnake Sentencing, Allan Legere Dies in Prison

The Rodgers Brief

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 15, 2026 66:39

This week, it is just Adam and Paul, discussing the week's news and released cases. There is breaking news this week, as the guys discuss former spy Cameron Ortis being granted early parole from his 14 year jail sentence. This story was national news when Mr. Ortis was tried and convicted, but his being granted parole has not been covered by any mainstream media outlet. Also this week, a judge in Nova Scotia has rendered a decision that 'deep fake' nude images created by AI are not captured by the Criminal Code, acquitting a man who used AI to make nude pictures of former classmates. Also discussed, the upcoming book on the RCMP, 'Red Alert', by Kent Roach, a sentencing decision from Alberta where the judge reduced the sentence by one year due to threats from the Edmonton Police to release more information on the case if they did not approve of the judge' sentence, and the death of New Brunswick serial killer, Allan Legere.

ai prison spies images intimate deepfakes nova scotia parole getaways new brunswick sentencing rattlesnakes rcmp red alert criminal code ortis dispersing allan legere cameron ortis

Episode 444: Right to Counsel Violations, Tracking Warrants & Impaired Driving Law Updates

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 13, 2026 22:41

This week on Driving Law, Kyla Lee flies solo while Paul recovers from illness and discusses her new British Columbia Impaired Driving Newsletter, which highlights important impaired driving cases and legal developments each week. Kyla breaks down a troubling impaired driving case where police delayed an Approved Screening Device demand to ask incriminating questions and then misled the accused about the availability of her lawyer of choice. The court ultimately excluded the breath samples due to serious Charter violations. She also examines proposed federal legislation that could expand police tracking warrants and lower the legal threshold for obtaining them, raising significant privacy concerns. Finally, Kyla discusses a sentencing appeal involving driving prohibitions and how changes to the Criminal Code mean time spent under bail conditions no longer counts toward a driving prohibition after conviction. Check out the "Lawyer Told Me Not To Talk To You" T-shirts and hoodies at Lawyertoldme.com and "Sit Still Jackson" at sitstilljackson.com.

tracking counsel charter warrants violations criminal code impaired driving kyla lee

Sentencing For Indiginty to Human Remains and Tribunal System Fix

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 12, 2026 20:29 Transcription Available

Someone dies, and the person beside them makes a choice that shocks everyone: no call for help, no report, just a body hidden away. We unpack a BC Provincial Court sentencing decision under Criminal Code section 182, the offence of offering an indignity to a dead body or human remains, and why the judge calls the conduct inherently serious even though there's no finding that the accused caused the death. Along the way, we break down aggravating versus mitigating factors, the role of remorse and an early guilty plea, and how Gladue principles shape the court's understanding of moral blameworthiness. We also talk about the realities that don't fit neatly into legal categories: addiction, fear, and the ripple effects on family and community when a person is treated as “missing” for weeks. The sentencing math matters too, including enhanced credit for time served because of brutal protective custody conditions that resemble solitary confinement, and why the court still concludes that a conditional sentence at home would not meet denunciation and deterrence. Then the conversation swings to administrative justice and the BC Court of Appeal: a Whole Foods probationary firing that turns into years of litigation through the Workers' Compensation system, judicial review, and parallel Human Rights Tribunal proceedings. We explain security for costs, why courts sometimes require it when an appeal is virtually without merit, and why overlapping tribunals can create expensive duplication. We close with a clear primer on habeas corpus under Charter section 10(c) and a key limit: when the Court of Appeal can, and cannot, appoint counsel. If you care about Canadian law, access to justice, and how courts balance principle with real life, subscribe, share the episode, and leave a review with the question you want us to tackle next.Follow this link for a transcript of the show and links to the cases discussed.

canadian system court workers appeal whole foods compensation tribunal charter sentencing human remains criminal code human rights tribunal bc court

EZ News 03/05/26

EZ News

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 5, 2026 5:53

Good afternoon, I'm _____ with today's episode of EZ News. Tai-Ex opening The Tai-Ex opened up 791-points this morning from yesterday's close, at 33,620 on turnover of 19.1-billion N-T. The market plunged over 1,400 points on Wednesday as escalating tensions in the Middle East spooked investors and triggered heavy selling across the board. Large-cap tech stocks bore the brunt of (首當其衝) the decline. However, all eight major industrial sectors finished lower, with plastics, electric machinery, cables and glass stocks posting steep losses. Prosecutors indict 62 individuals and 13 companies in Prince Holding Group Case The Taipei District Prosecutors' Office has indicted 62 individuals and 13 companies in connection with its money laundering investigation into the Cambodia-based Prince Holding Group. Prosecutors says the network laundered more than 10.7-billion N-T in Taiwan. The individual and companies have been charged with violating the Organized Crime Prevention Act, the Money Laundering Prevention Act, and the Criminal Code with intent to profit from gambling. Prosecutors are also seeking court approval to confiscate (沒收) the full 10.7-billion N-T in alleged criminal proceeds held in Taiwan. Authorities have so far seized more than 5.5-billion N-T in Prince Group assets (資產) during raids last year and they include 24 luxury properties, 35 high-end vehicles, 337 financial accounts, cash and designer goods. Dozens injured in raucous Lantern Festival events in Tainan and Taitung At least 47 people have been injured while attending Lantern Festival-related folk events in Tainan and Taitung. Both of the event saw participants forming processions and braving (勇敢面對（困難/危險）) barrages of bottle rockets or firecrackers. Officials in Tainan says 30 people suffered burns after being hit by dense barrages of bottle rockets, while six were injured stemming from falls at the Yanshui Beehive Fireworks Festival on Monday and Tuesday. While officials in Taitung say 11 people were taken to the city's MacKay Memorial Hospital on Tuesday after suffering injuries on the first day of the Bombing of Master Han Dan Festival. US submarine sinks Iranian warship At least 80 bodies have been recovered by Sri Lankan authorities after a torpedo fired by a US submarine sank an Iranian warship in the Indian Ocean. U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said it was the Islamic Republic's prize ship. And the first such strike since World War 2. Kate Fisher has more from Washington Africa Clean Energy Fund to Double Financing Africa's flagship clean energy fund says it plans to more than double its financing to $2.5 billion over the next two years, as momentum builds behind the continent's energy transition. The African Development Bank bank approved slightly fewer renewable energy projects last year but succeeded in increasing its funding. The lender's Sustainable Energy Fund for Africa has mobilized about $1 billion in commercial capital alongside its own commitments. Based on projects in the pipeline, that figure is expected to reach $2.5 billion within the next two years. The public-private finance facility supports utility-scale and decentralized projects, facilitating deals and supporting pan-African renewable energy investment platforms. That was the I.C.R.T. EZ News, I'm _____. －－－－以下為 SoundOn 動態廣告－－－－【遠雄樂元】台中北屯捷運X好市多雙首排 ➤早鳥首付55萬起旗艦級新地標21-39坪，台中北屯機捷總站20米，好市多60米，出站即到家。2147坪新世代遊園宅，全齡化公設✦ 早鳥輕入住 https://sofm.pse.is/8t6vjk --

EP#202 | The 7-Day Rule That Makes No Sense in Real Courtrooms

canada canadian record court supreme court crown courtroom no sense scc criminal code day rule

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 3, 2026 39:43

EP#202 | The 7-Day Rule That Makes No Sense in Real Courtrooms Sponsored by EasyDNS https://easydns.com/NotOnRecord A year after the Supreme Court of Canada's June 13, 2025 decision in **R. v. Kinamore (2025 SCC 19)**, the Not on Record crew checks the scoreboard: did Crown attorneys actually start bringing **voir dire** applications before leading **Crown-led sexual history evidence**, including **sexual inactivity**, **virginity**, and “lack of sexual interest” messaging? The Court said the screening process should *mirror* the **s. 276 Criminal Code** regime the defence is already forced to navigate, aiming for basic **parity** and fair notice so an accused can know the case to meet. In practice, the lawyers describe a system where the defence files applications months in advance, while the Crown often arrives late (or not at all), leaving defence counsel to “pre-bake” the Crown's Kinamore issues into their own materials just to keep trials from derailing. They also get into the messy realities this decision was trying to fix: disclosure that contains sexual history references, whether a complainant can “waive” the process (spoiler: the Court says the application still has to happen), how credibility fights get boxed into absurd technicalities (yes, even arguing about “flirting”), and why timeline rules like “seven days” can be fantasy-land in real criminal litigation. **Not legal advice.** This episode is practical commentary on Canadian criminal procedure, evidence, and what Kinamore is changing (and not changing) in courtrooms. Key case referenced: R. v. Kinamore, 2025 SCC 19 (released June 13, 2025).

“Sedition Laws: National Security or Government Censorship?”

THE ORACLE 19 PODCAST

Play Episode Listen Later Feb 26, 2026 31:28

Around the world, governments claim to support freedom of speech — but many still enforce sedition laws that can criminalize criticism, protest, or even online comments. From India and Singapore to Canada's own Criminal Code, these laws are designed to protect national security… but at what cost?In this episode of The Oracle 19 Podcast, we explore the history and modern use of sedition laws across multiple countries. Are these laws necessary to maintain order and stability, or are they being used as tools to silence dissent and control political narratives?We'll break down:What sedition laws actually areWhich countries still enforce themCanada's little-known sedition offences (ss.59–61)How social media is changing the definition of “incitement.”The fine line between public safety and censorshipIs this about protecting democracy — or protecting those in power?Podcast: Sunday, Monday, and ThursdayLINKS:⁠⁠⁠https://www.officialmoringamagic.com/#aff=enamul33 ⁠⁠⁠ moringa pillsMasonic Regalia and Jewelry Wholesale Prices | Bricks Masons https://bit.ly/4a2nn4DThe Encyclopedia of Power Foods- Latest2024! Ebooks https://bit.ly/49XfoWn⁠⁠⁠https://www.legalcontracts.com/?pid=p⁠⁠⁠Business sponsorship inquiries: evolutionoflondon@gmail.comShop now: www.evolutionoflondon.com(online shopping mall)www.evolutionoflondon.org(custom clothing accessories digital products)www.linktree.com/evolutionoflondon. www.patreon.com/evolutionoflondonDonate/PayPal:Evolutionoflondon@gmail.comMusic: cheap limousine channel on YouTubeGreatness19 channel on YouTubeMr. Evolution of London (health and wellness) on YouTubeWJA Accessories (fitness consultant)Email: healthfitnessconsultant1@gmail.comPodcast: Sunday, Monday, and ThursdayLINKS:⁠⁠⁠https://www.officialmoringamagic.com/#aff=enamul33 ⁠⁠⁠ moringa pillsMasonic Regalia and Jewelry Wholesale Prices | Bricks Masons https://bit.ly/4a2nn4DThe Encyclopedia of Power Foods- Latest2024! Ebooks https://bit.ly/49XfoWn⁠⁠⁠https://www.legalcontracts.com/?pid=p⁠⁠⁠Business sponsorship inquiries: evolutionoflondon@gmail.comShop now: www.evolutionoflondon.com(online shopping mall)www.evolutionoflondon.org(custom clothing accessories digital products)www.linktree.com/evolutionoflondon. www.patreon.com/evolutionoflondonDonate/PayPal:Evolutionoflondon@gmail.comMusic: cheap limousine channel on YouTubeGreatness19 channel on YouTubeMr. Evolution of London (health and wellness) on YouTubeWJA Accessories (fitness consultant)Email: healthfitnessconsultant1@gmail.com

canada business government evolution laws singapore ebooks oracle censorship freedom of speech national security commusic sedition criminal code from india

Megan Rae Korduner v. His Majesty the King (41737)

university master institute laws indonesia criminals human rights deputy director officials criminal justice new south wales indonesians amnesty international criminology criminal law criminal code kuhp

Play Episode Listen Later Feb 18, 2026 204:37

Ms. Korduner was a motor vehicle driver involved in a two-vehicle accident. A responding police officer questioned her at the scene for approximately three minutes, during which she stated that she should not have been driving because she was drunk. Ms. Korduner was arrested for impaired operation of a motor vehicle. She refused to provide a breath sample into an approved screening device and was charged for refusing to provide a breath sample. In voir dire proceedings to determine the admissibility of Ms. Korduner's statements, the trial judge held that Ms. Korduner's statements were compelled by the Traffic Safety Act, R.S.A. 2000, c. T-6, and were inadmissible pursuant to the use immunity principle; reliance on s. 320.31(9) of the Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46, as a basis for admitting the statements would breach Ms. Korduner's rights under s. 7 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms; and Crown counsel failed to prove the breach was justified pursuant to s. 1 of the Charter. The charges were dismissed. The Court of King's Bench of Alberta dismissed a summary conviction appeal. The majority of the Court of Appeal for Alberta allowed an appeal and ordered a new trial. Argued Date 2026-02-17 Keywords Charter of Rights and Freedoms — Principles of fundamental justice — Self-incrimination — Criminal law — Evidence — Use immunity — Remedies — Police officer responding to motor vehicle accident questioning driver involved in accident — Statements by driver causing officer to demand breath samples in order to administer approved roadside screening device — Trial judge declaring statements to officer compelled by Traffic Safety Act — Section 320.31(9) of Criminal Code setting out that a statement to a peace officer including statement compelled under provincial Act admissible in evidence for purpose of justifying demand to provide breath sample — Whether s. 320.31(9) infringes s. 7 of Charter — If so, whether limit reasonable and demonstrably justified pursuant to s. 1 of Charter — If not, appropriate remedy — Traffic Safety Act, R.S.A. 2000, c. T-6, ss. 69(1), 71(1) — Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46, s. 320.21(9). Notes (Alberta) (Criminal) (By Leave) Language English Audio Disclaimers This podcast is created as a public service to promote public access and awareness of the workings of Canada's highest court. It is not affiliated with or endorsed by the Court. The original version of this hearing may be found on the Supreme Court of Canada's website. The above case summary was prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch).

canada freedom office ms trial court supreme court rights act crown criminals appeal bench statements majesty charter registrar criminal code

Maidina Rahmawati - The New Criminal Code

Talking Indonesia

Play Episode Listen Later Feb 11, 2026 34:13

On January 2nd, 2026, Indonesia entered what officials are calling a "new era" of criminal justice. The country implemented a completely new Criminal code – KUHP - and a new Criminal Procedure Code—known as KUHAP—that changes what counts as a crime and how crimes are identified, investigated and punished. The government says this marks a shift toward "restorative justice" that prioritizes rehabilitation over punishment. Officials describe it as "more humane, modern, and just". But civil society groups are sounding the alarm. They're calling the new law "draconian and illiberal"—and potentially worse than the system it replaces. At the heart of the controversy: police can still arrest and detain people without a warrant and Amnesty International has identified 88 articles that could be used to silence critics and criminalize peaceful dissent. So which is it? A historic reform that modernises the Indonesian justice, or a step backward that gives authorities concerning new powers? In this episode, we're speaking with a legal expert who's been following this law since its drafting. Maidina Rahmawati has over 8 years of experience in criminal justice reform advocacy. She is a certified advocate/litigator and mediator, and currently serves as the Deputy Director of the Institute for Criminal Justice Reform (ICJR). Mai holds a Master of Laws from the University of New South Wales, specialising in Criminal Justice and Human Rights. She is newly appointed as a lecturer in Criminal Law and Human Rights at Atma Jaya University Jakarta and in Criminal Law in the undergraduate Criminology program at the University of Indonesia (UI).

EP#197 | Why “Lenient Sentences” Aren't What You Think

canadian dna crown seo sentences criminal code lenient

Play Episode Listen Later Jan 26, 2026 49:44

Sponsored by EasyDNS https://easydns.com/NotOnRecord Tonight, the crew breaks down **what sentencing actually is** (and when it happens), and why what looks “lenient” to the public can be the result of a very structured legal framework. They walk through the sentencing process after a **guilty plea vs. after a trial**, explain what it means when the **“facts are read in”** (and why the judge's “are these facts substantially true?” question can derail a plea), and outline how Crown and defence approach sentencing with **aggravating vs. mitigating factors**, character reference letters, restitution, counselling, and case law. From there, they unpack **s.718 of the Criminal Code**: the purpose of sentencing, the six objectives (denunciation, deterrence, separation, rehabilitation, reparation, and restoration), and the **overriding principle of proportionality,** plus the additional principles like parity, totality, restraint/least restrictive sanctions, and individualized outcomes. The episode closes with a practical look at **ancillary orders** (DNA, weapons prohibitions, no-contact terms, victim fine surcharge) and why sentencing is never a simple “you did this, you get that” formula. ## **Short description** Why do “lenient” sentences happen? This episode explains the sentencing process, the goals in s.718, proportionality, aggravating/mitigating factors, joint submissions, and the extra orders judges can add. ## **SEO meta description (concise)** A practical breakdown of Canadian criminal sentencing: guilty plea vs trial, agreed facts, aggravating/mitigating factors, s.718 objectives, proportionality, parity/totality, joint submissions, and ancillary orders like DNA and prohibitions. ## **Hashtags** #CanadianLaw #CriminalLaw #Sentencing #CriminalCode #LegalPodcast #CourtProcess #Probation #Restitution #DefenceLawyer #CrownAttorney #JusticeSystem #LawAndOrder #TorontoLaw #NotOnRecord

Homeland: The new Indonesian Criminal Code has drawn criticism since its official enactment - Nusantara: KUHP Indonesia yang baru sejak secara resmi berlaku sudah menuai kritik

SBS Indonesian - SBS Bahasa Indonesia

Play Episode Listen Later Jan 19, 2026 15:55

Indonesia officially enacted its new Criminal Code on January 2, 2026, replacing the old one. The new Code is intended to create a national criminal law based on Pancasila. However, in the short time since its enactment, the new Code has drawn criticism. - Indonesia secara resmi memberlakukan KUHP barunya mulai tanggal 2 Januari 2026, menggantikan KUHP lama. KUHP baru ini dimaksudkan untuk menciptakan hukum pidana nasional yang berlandaskan Pancasila. Namun demikian dalam waktu yang singkat sejak pemberlakuaannya, KUHP baru itu telah menuai kritik.

code official indonesia criminals criticism kritik drawn indonesians homeland baru namun sudah secara sejak nusantara criminal code resmi enactment pancasila kuhp

EP#195 | Your Rights at Risk? A Lawyer's Warning on Bill C-16

COVID Era - THE NEXT NORMAL with Dave Trafford

Play Episode Listen Later Jan 12, 2026 59:53

Sponsored by EasyDNS https://easydns.com/NotOnRecord In Episode 195, the hosts examine Bill C-16, the federal government's latest omnibus criminal-law reform, and why it could significantly reshape Canada's justice system. The discussion focuses on the proposed criminalization of coercive or controlling conduct in intimate relationships, the introduction of the term femicide”into the Criminal Code, and the automatic elevation of certain intimate-partner killings to first-degree murder. The episode also explores changes to criminal harassment, testimonial aids, AI-generated intimate images, sentencing discretion, and delay analysis under Jordan, raising serious concerns about evidentiary standards, constitutional rights, and the risk of abuse in high-conflict cases. Throughout, the hosts argue that while some reforms are well-intentioned, others may undermine due process, complicate trials, and invite years of constitutional litigation.

canada ai risk rights lawyers bill c criminal code

Machinery of Suppression: Bill C9 and the Weaponization of Antisemitism

Blueprints of Disruption

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 31, 2025 64:53 Transcription Available

Activists from Jews Say NO to Genocide are working to challenge the coordinated narratives around the antisemitic violence at Bondi Beach in Australia - narratives that help pave the way for dangerous legislation like Canada's own Bill C9. Louise, also of Independent Jewish Voices, goes over Carney's pending Act to Amend the Criminal Code, and its possible ramifications. From the new intimidation offence, to the vague wording around restricted spaces and symbols, the case is made that this is another tool for the powerful to suppress opponents at will.Toronto based activist, Molly Kraft, also of SURJ Toronto, talks about how the prioritizing the feelings of some at the expense of the rights of others is all just part of the larger scheme to suppress dissent and benefit, not Jewish people, but white, Christian nationalists, Imperialism and ultimately, Capital.Gur Tsabar, of the Movement Media Hub and spokesperson for the group, says we need to be asking the hard questions in the immediate wake of events like Bondi Beach and October 7th. He insists its in those moments the machinery working against us goes into overdrive to lay the "moral foundation" for the horrors that come next.Hosted by: Jessa McLeanCall to Action: Say NO to Bill C-9 (Action Network Petition)Related Episodes: Jews Say NO to Genocide (Dec 2024) The organization's first appearance on Blueprints to talk about the Jewish identity crisis purposely being crafted by the Israeli lobby. Weaponizing Canadian Law for Israel (Jul 2024) Martin Lukacs on Toronto Police's Project Resolute and the secretive committee tasked with cracking down on Palestinian solidarity activism.More Resources: The Independent: UK Terror Arrests CBC: On Bloc's Proposed Changes to Bill C9Toronto Star: Calls for Antisemitism Task Force After Bondi BeachBill C-9 Threatens Freedom of Peaceful Assembly and Freedom of Expression in Canada – Canadian BDS Coalition & International BDS AlliesBill C9: Legislative InfoBe sure to check out our Substack for more content and resources for activists.All of our...

canada australia freedom toronto jewish capital act israelis substack palestinians expression genocide antisemitism activists carney suppression blueprints imperialism bondi beach weaponization machinery bill c amend proposed changes criminal code toronto police peaceful assembly independent jewish voices martin lukacs

Revising the Criminal Code and Wage Transparency, good or bad?

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 24, 2025 37:59

Mark Towhey digs in with Gaving Tighe, Senior Partner with Gardiner Roberts LLP, into revising the Crominal Code to outlaw intimidation and harassment. And Candy Ho HR Expert, Chair of Canadian Education and Research Institute for Counselling and a faculty member at Kwantlen Polytechnic University breaks down the effects of the new wage transparency law that takes effect January 1, 2026.

criminals transparency good or bad wage counselling senior partner research institute revising criminal code kwantlen polytechnic university

A second MP has left the Cons

PolitiCoast

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 14, 2025 58:37

Who’s in/who’s out in the BC Conservative race. Eby promises to amend DRIPA as Conservatives call for a repeal. Federally, another MP crosses from the Liberals to the Conservatives, making Elizabeth May the kingmaker (for now). Yves Engler is rejected from the NDP leadership, Carney pitches ‘constitutional’ mandatory minimums as he snuck superpowered ministers into his budget bill. Links Rookie MP Aaron Gunn considers bid to lead BC Conservatives – The Globe and Mail Kerry-Lynne Findlay Christy Clark cryptic posts Former B.C. premier says Conservatives cannot be ‘kooky’ if they want to govern – Victoria Times Colonist Sturko hasn't ruled out B.C. Conservative return, bid for party leadership | Goldstream News Gazette Eby says DRIPA law could be amended after First Nations win appeal in mining case – Victoria Times Colonist B.C.’s Indigenous rights law is legally enforceable, rules court Eby accuses courts of jeopardizing B.C. economy, resource projects – The Globe and Mail Ontario MP Michael Ma crosses floor to Liberals, putting party one seat short of majority – The Globe and Mail NDP rejects Yves Engler as leadership candidate – The Globe and Mail Full correspondence via Yves EnglerCanada overhauls Criminal Code to protect victims and keep kids safe from predators What is in Bill C-16, Ottawa's legislation that seeks to toughen gender-based violence laws? – The Globe and Mail Opinion | Mark Carney is quietly giving sweeping new powers to his ministers Canada Post commits to free postage for people who are blind as legislation changes

left indigenous conservatives cons ottawa globe mp first nations liberals carney ndp bill c federally criminal code elizabeth may eby yves engler

New crime bill addresses violence against women and court delays

The Decibel

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 12, 2025 24:07

Mark Carney's federal government has introduced its second tough-on-crime bill this fall. The new bill, Bill C-16, focuses on violence against women and children, changes to mandatory minimum sentences and the growing problem of court delays.The Globe's justice reporter, David Ebner, explains the specific changes to the Criminal Code that this bill wants to make and what advocates and critics are saying about it.Questions? Comments? Ideas? Email us at thedecibel@globeandmail.com Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

ideas court globe delays addresses simplecast mark carney violence against women bill c crime bill criminal code

Ottawa urged to stop euthanasia expansion

The Daily Brief

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 8, 2025 13:08

Anti-euthanasia advocates are urging MPs to support a Conservative bill which would ban mental illness as the sole reason someone can access Medical Assistance in Dying. Alberta independence leaders are claiming a victory as Alberta passed a bill that separatists say would have allowed Elections Alberta to block or delay a referendum for independence. Canada's Catholic Bishops are urging Ottawa to reconsider planned amendments to Bill C-9, which would strip good-faith religious expression as a defence in the Criminal Code. Tune in to the Daily Brief with Isaac Lamoureux and Walid Tamtam! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

canada dying expansion conservatives ottawa mps euthanasia bill c catholic bishops medical assistance criminal code daily brief

The Texture of LGBT Progress

Rights & Wrongs

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 1, 2025 43:37

The rights of LGBT people are on the chopping block across the world, with new countries criminalizing same-sex practices and banning representation of queer relationships in 2025. However, the landscape for LGBT rights has also shifted tremendously towards progress over the past decades. What gives? This week, we explore the texture of progress for LGBT rights. As Indonesia prepares for a new Criminal Code that will outlaw same-sex relations, prominent local advocate Dédé Oetomo charts the trajectory of LGBT rights from cultural openness to increasing repression. Indonesia's path illustrates a pattern of both forward movement and backtracking on the rights of LGBT people across the globe. Dédé Oetomo: Scholar and activist Kyle Knight: Associate Director of the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Rights Program at Human Rights Watch Phillip Ayoub: Professor in the Department of Political Science and School of Public Policy at University College London

school progress lgbt indonesia political science public policy lesbians bisexual university college london texture criminal code

When A Guest Won't Leave

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 20, 2025 22:02 Transcription Available

A single sentence in the Criminal Code can decide whether you can legally remove someone from your home—or whether you're suddenly the one at risk of an assault charge. We break down a fresh BC Supreme Court ruling that reads purpose into Parliament's 2011 reforms on self-defence and defence of property, answering a practical question with big stakes: if you invite someone in and later revoke consent, can you use reasonable force to make them leave? Short answer: yes, if you give a reasonable time to go and the force is proportionate, because the law was never meant to grant squatters' rights to rowdy guests and stubborn salespeople.From there, we follow the thread of “reasonableness” into family law. British Columbia treats partners who live together in a marriage-like relationship for two continuous years as spouses for property division, but the crucial trigger is separation. The two-year limitation period starts when you separate, not when the romance finally fizzles. In the case we unpack, on‑again, off‑again reunions couldn't reset the clock. If you plan to claim division of property, mark the separation date, organise documents, and act before the window closes.We close with a cautionary tale about civil procedure and proportionality: a $9,000 used SUV, mechanical trouble, and a claim that ballooned to $250 million. The court ordered security for costs, balancing access to justice against the burden of defending an outsized, low‑merit case with little chance of recovering expenses. Together, these stories showcase how Canadian courts weigh text, purpose, and fairness—guarding property rights, enforcing clear timelines, and filtering litigation through practical safeguards.If you enjoyed the analysis, follow the show, share it with a friend who loves real‑world law, and leave a quick review to help others find us. Follow this link for a transcript of the show and links to the cases discussed.

canadian british columbia parliament suv criminal code bc supreme court

EP#189 | Why Mandatory Minimums Are Bad

Matt Cox Inside True Crime Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 10, 2025 42:59

Three piece suits, sock wars, and a serious legal deep-dive. In this episode, Joseph and Alper unpack the Supreme Court of Canada's Quebec (Attorney General) v. Senville, 2025 SCC 33 ruling, which struck down the one-year mandatory minimum for possession/accessing child pornography on indictment under Criminal Code s. 163.1(4)(a) and 163.1(4.1)(a). They explain Section 12 of the Charter (cruel and unusual punishment), why reasonable hypotheticals matter, and how judicial discretion prevents grossly disproportionate outcomes using real world scenarios (including an autistic 18-year-old and the youth sexting hypothetical) to illustrate nuance. They also set the record straight on R. v. Friesen (2020 SCC 9): courts remain firm on protecting children and imposing stiffer ranges where warranted; Senville doesn't weaken that. Plus: media framing vs. facts, trusting judges over politics, calls for principled sentencing, and yes whether festive socks ever belong with a three-piece suit. Website: http://www.NotOnRecordpodcast.com Sign up to our email list - http://eepurl.com/hw3g99 Social Media Links Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/NotonRecord Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/notonrecordpodcast/ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@notonrecordpodcast Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/notonrecord Telegram: https://t.me/NotOnRecord Minds: http://www.minds.com/notonrecord Audio Platforms Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/4F2ssnX7ktfGH8OzH4QsuX Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/not-on-record-podcast/id1565405753 SoundCloud: https://soundcloud.com/notonrecord Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-842207 For more information on criminal law issues go to Neuberger & Partners LLP http://www.nrlawyers.com. Produced by Possibly Correct Media www.PossiblyCorrect.com

tiktok canada supreme court soundcloud telegram rumble charter friesen scc alper criminal code neuberger mandatory minimums

Insane True Stories of Betrayal, Criminal Code, & Life In Prison

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 25, 2025 146:06

Christopher Willars shares his life story and how one bad decision changed his life forever.⁣ ⁣ ⁣ Chris's Links https://linktr.ee/christopher_life_willars⁣ ⁣ ⁣

tiktok raising real estate sharks credit fill criminals paypal betrayal insane true stories insanity checkout true crime podcasts stranger danger life in prison criminal code etsy store real estate course

Episode 425 – Bail Reform, Driving Prohibitions, and the Fire Truck Heist

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 24, 2025 22:03

This week on Driving Law, Kyla Lee and Paul Doroshenko break down Canada's new bail reform legislation and how it quietly changes the Criminal Code to bring back discretionary driving prohibitions in serious offences like criminal negligence and manslaughter. They explain what this means for drivers, defence lawyers, and why the timing of a plea could make a difference. Kyla also addresses controversy around ICBC's Indigenous driver support hotline — pushing back on racist commentary and reminding listeners that reconciliation and accessibility still matter in the justice system. Finally, the Ridiculous Drivers of the Week include a Lamborghini driver speeding through winter without proper tires, and a Halifax woman who stole a fire truck and somehow didn't crash it. Listen now for sharp legal analysis, real-world driving law insights, and a little humour along the way. Check out the 'Lawyer Told Me Not To Talk To You' T-shirts and hoodies at Lawyertoldme.com and 'Sit Still Jackson' at sitstilljackson.com

canada driving indigenous trucks heist halifax lamborghini bail reform firetruck criminal code prohibitions icbc kyla lee paul doroshenko

Episode 106: Yes, you could be JAILED for memes if C-9 passes. Plus, shocking letters to B.C. home owners.

Not Reserving Judgment

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 22, 2025 52:46

On Episode 106, we explain why the proposed hate speech law C-9 really could lead to jail for your memes, we discuss whether the Liberals' proposed tough-on-crime legislation will be constitutional, and we talk about some shocking letters handed out to B.C. property owners. Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode:Bill C-9, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (hate propaganda, hate crime and access to religious or cultural places)B.C. politicians hopeful after Ottawa promise of bail-reform bill (CBC News)Carney will introduce legislation next month to tighten bail system (Globe and Mail)Woman jailed for race hate post says she was political prisoner (BBC)Man jailed over racially aggravated posts (BBC)Maryport man jailed over racist online post (BBC)Police make 30 arrests a day for offensive online messages (The Times)Richmond property owners worried after First Nations land claim (Global News)Court Issues First-Ever Jail Sentence in Canada for Holocaust Denial (FSWC)Not Reserving Judgment is a podcast about Canadian constitutional law hosted by Josh Dehaas, Joanna Baron, and Christine Van Geyn. The show is brought to you by the Canadian Constitution Foundation, a non-partisan legal charity dedicated to defending rights and freedoms. To support our work, visit theccf.ca/donate.

canada stories canadian act letters memes shocking ottawa globe first nations homeowners liberals jailed bill c criminal code joanna baron

Episode 424: “Given, Not Shown”: Breath-Test Rules, Tough-on-Crime Talk, and a Skeleton Passenger

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 18, 2025 22:32

Kyla and Paul open with Ontario's R v. Klemp, where a breath-test certificate of a qualified technician was excluded because it was only shown to the accused, not given as the Criminal Code requires—a reminder that if the Crown wants hearsay shortcuts, it must strictly comply. They kick around the disclosure wrinkle of implied-undertaking “ownership” versus the court's notion of permanent transfer, and how defence counsel might demand an express waiver. Then they unpack Ottawa's latest “tough on crime” talk: expanded reverse-onus for bail, rhetoric about consecutive sentences, and curbing conditional sentences—why most of this won't move the needle, except perhaps encouraging more consecutive terms in serious driving cases, while undermining proven, rehabilitative CSOs. Ridiculous Driver of the Week caps it off with timely spooky season flair: an Ontario learner caught using a model skeleton as the required supervising driver Check out the 'Lawyer Told Me Not To Talk To You' T-shirts and hoodies at Lawyertoldme.com and 'Sit Still Jackson' at sitstilljackson.com

tough crown breath ontario ottawa passenger skeleton shown criminal code csos klemp crime talk

Canadian legislation to combat hate crimes a threat to civil liberties

Redeye

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 12, 2025 17:17

The federal government's Bill C-9 would amend the Criminal Code to address hate propaganda, hate crime and access to religious or cultural places. But a human rights coalition says it threatens the Charter rights and civil liberties of all people in Canada, including those communities that the government wishes to protect. We speak with Tim McSorley of the International Civil Liberties Monitoring Group.

Episode 423 — Road Rage, “Xavier's Law,” and Why Due Process Still Matters

law fresh ontario bc winnipeg road rage due process north vancouver criminal code

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 10, 2025 37:51

Fresh off a sleepless night thanks to an elderly, opinionated dog, Kyla and Paul dive into a tough week on BC roads and in BC politics. With the public-sector strike still at an impasse, they pivot to a spate of high-profile road-rage cases in North Vancouver, Winnipeg, and Ontario. Kyla explains why we don't need a new “road-rage law” when the Criminal Code already covers assaults, threats, dangerous driving, and leaving the scene, and offers practical advice: protect your own safety first and keep your cool. They then unpack “Xavier's Law,” a proposal to yank licences indefinitely after any fatal crash until charges are declined or a trial ends, and lay out the legal problems: undefined timelines, no clear trigger when prosecutors quietly decline charges, constitutional issues akin to Alberta's struck-down indefinite suspensions, perverse effects on plea discussions, and the fact that BC already has high-risk administrative prohibitions if police believe someone is unsafe. The Ridiculous Driver of the Week crosses the border to Florida, where a habitual violator on a driving prohibition left an idling car by a school and then allegedly punched and bit officers when told to shut it down—an object lesson in how quickly minor misconduct can become major charges. Check out the 'Lawyer Told Me Not To Talk To You' T-shirts and hoodies at Lawyertoldme.com and 'Sit Still Jackson' at sitstilljackson.com

EZ News 10/07/25

EZ News

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 7, 2025 6:02

Good afternoon, I'm _____ with today's episode of EZ News. Tai-Ex opening The Tai-Ex opened up 268-points this morning from last Friday's close, at 27,029 on turnover of 17-billion N-T The market smashed recent records during Friday's session - ending at a high of 26,761 - after Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing hit a fresh closing high on the back of enthusiasm toward artificial intelligence development. Influencer Holger Chen under investigation for alleged Lai comments The Criminal Investigation Bureau says it's investigating internet personality Holger Chen after he called for the decapitation of President Lai Ching-te during a recent livestream. According to the bureau, the investigation is focusing on whether Chen's comments may constitute incitement (煽動) to commit a crime and threatening bodily harm under the Criminal Code. The bureau says it has been collecting evidence related to the comments and has asked the New Taipei District Prosecutors' Office to summon Chen for questioning. Chen made the alleged comments during a portion of his livestream on Sunday focusing on politics and cross-strait issues. Survey team reaches Matai'an Creek barrier lake site: Forestry agency One of two teams deployed by the Forestry and Nature Conservation Agency to survey potential routes to the Ma-Tai-An Creek barrier lake are reporting widespread devastation. The agency's Hualien branch deployed a task force consisting of two teams to visit the site on September 30. The teams were tasked with surveying the remnants of the lake and looking for prospective (預期的，盼望中的，未來的) routes for construction equipment to enter the area to rebuild. Officials say data collected by the teams will be used to help ensure safety during future efforts to rebuild the area and set up disaster prevention and detection infrastructure. US Supreme Court begins new term The US Supreme Court began its new nine-month term today - and it promises to be consequential (有影響力的，重要的) — with major cases focused on how much power the constitution gives the President. Charlotte North reports from Washington Iraq Prisoners Released Under Amnesty Iraq has released over 35,000 people from prisons under an amnesty law passed earlier this year. The law, aimed at reducing prison overcrowding, makes nearly 144,000 more people eligible for relief. The country's Supreme Judicial Council said courts recovered over $34 million in restitution (賠償) from those convicted of theft and corruption. The amnesty covers crimes like corruption, theft and some terrorism-related offenses, though not those involving killings. Sunni lawmakers pushed for the law, arguing their community faced unfair terrorism charges. The law also allows retrials for some terrorism convictions and halts executions. SAmerican Trade Bloc Rules Peru Failing to Curb Illegal Mining A South American trade bloc has ruled that Peru is failing to curb illegal gold mining and mercury (汞) trafficking. The Andean Community, which includes Peru, Colombia, Ecuador, and Bolivia, made the decision on Monday. They have ordered Peru to reform its laws and seize illegal mining equipment. Indigenous groups say mercury from mining is poisoning rivers and food in the Amazon. Peru has 20 working days to comply or face potential (潛在的) trade sanctions. The case could set a precedent for other countries. Peru has made some efforts to crack down on illegal mercury, but enforcement remains inconsistent. That was the I.C.R.T. EZ News, I'm _____. －－－－以下為 SoundOn 動態廣告－－－－在這個人人都想賺錢的時代，我們聊的不只是「怎麼賺」，更是「為什麼要這樣賺」。《賺錢這檔事》由冒牌生、致淮、驚驚共同主持，帶你從個人品牌、自媒體經營、創業心法，到自由工作者的真實掙扎，一起拆解「賺錢的底層邏輯」。每週四更新｜陪你一起成長、一起賺。 Apple / Spotify / Youtube 搜尋《賺錢這檔事》，或點擊下方連結，讓耳朵開始替你賺錢。 ↓↓↓點擊下方連結，手機隨時收聽

amazon president office colombia peru indigenous survey ecuador hosting creek chen bolivia officials us supreme court forestry sunni lai soundon criminal code lai ching hualien matai charlotte north taiwan semiconductor manufacturing

Episode 103: Is Carney stoking Alberta separatism? Plus hate symbols plan raises speech concerns.

Not Reserving Judgment

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 24, 2025 56:06

On Episode 103, we tell you why the Carney government's surprise notwithstanding clause argument could stoke separatism, we explain our concerns with the government's proposal for new hate crimes, and we discuss whether Canada's recognition of Palestine really matters. Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode: Liberals ‘confident' Canadians will 'voluntarily' obey gun confiscation scheme (Juno)Bill C-9, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (parl.ca)Ottawa's end run around the Constitution (The Globe and Mail)Josh Dehaas: Carney's move to limit notwithstanding clause is a threat to national unity (National Post)Canada recognizes a version of Palestine that only exists in Geneva's dreams (Globe and Mail)Liberal hate crimes bill raises free speech concerns (TheCCF.ca)Not Reserving Judgment is a podcast about Canadian constitutional law hosted by Josh Dehaas, Joanna Baron, and Christine Van Geyn. The show is brought to you by the Canadian Constitution Foundation, a non-partisan legal charity dedicated to defending rights and freedoms. To support our work, visit theccf.ca/donate.

canada canadian speech act concerns palestine ottawa globe raises symbols carney stoking criminal code separatism joanna baron

Canada officially recognizes the State of Palestine. Plus: Should schools bring back “O Canada?”

The Big Five Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 22, 2025 31:50

Elias Makos begins the week with Dan Delmar, Co-founder of the content marketing firm TNKR Media and co-host of the podcast Inspiring Entrepreneurs Canada, and Paul Gott, Lead singer and guitarist for Montreal Punk Rock band the Ripcordz and a journalism professor at Concordia. Canada has officially recognized the State of Palestine. The Irish hip-hop group Kneecap has been banned from entering Canada. The federal government is bringing forward new legislation to add a hate crime offence to the Criminal Code. Journal de Montreal took a look at the new modular homes the city is putting up to house the homeless and found it costs the city about 2600$ per unit a month…

canada state news radio irish journal schools montreal palestine quebec bring back newstalk big5 kneecap recognizes o canada mtl criminal code cjad ripcordz dan delmar elias makos tnkr media

Ottawa's new hate crime laws ‘a step in the right direction', Jewish leaders say

The CJN Daily

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 22, 2025 26:39

On Sept. 19, Prime Minister Mark Carney's government unveiled a series of planned changes to Canada's criminal code. They, in part, crack down on the explosion of hate crimes across the country over the past two years since Oct. 7, mostly against Jewish people. The new bill is called the “Combatting Hate Act” and still has a way to go before it is passed and takes effect. Ottawa intends to make it a crime when hateful protesters try to scare and intimidate minorities, including Jews, from accessing their community buildings, including synagogues, Jewish Community Centres, Jewish seniors homes, Hebrew schools and even cemeteries. The new law would also, for the first time, outlaw the public display of the Nazi swastika and the SS symbol in Canada, as well as other terrorism signs, if the people waving them are wilfully urging hatred against an identifiable group. Many Jewish leaders are applauding the gesture as a strong signal that the Carney administration is keeping an election promise while putting a strong emphasis on fighting domestic antisemitism–that even while Canada announced on Sept. 21 it has formally recognized the Palestinian State, the government does not want to drag Middle Eastern politics onto Canadian soil. So what's in the new bill? Will it make it safer for Jews today, as the High Holidays begin? The short answer is: no. On today's episode of The CJN's _North Star _podcast, hate crimes legal expert Mark Sandler—founding chair of the Alliance of Canadians Combatting Antisemitism—joins host Ellin Bessner to break down the proposed reforms. Also joining is Ezra Shanken, CEO of the Jewish Federation of Greater Vancouver, who personally met with the prime minister in Ottawa just days before the announcement. Related links Read more reaction to the proposed changes to the Criminal Code to outlaw terror symbols and the Swastika, and better define hate and intimidation outside Jewish buildings, in The CJN. Learn more about why Canada banned the Irish band Kneecap from performing next month, in The CJN. Why B'nai Brith Canada lobbied Whitby, Ont. to agree to ban the Swastika, on The CJN Daily (now “North Star”) podcast. Credits Host and writer: Ellin Bessner (@ebessner) Production team: Zachary Kauffman (senior producer), Andrea Varsany (producer), Michael Fraiman (executive producer) Music: Bret Higgins Support our show Subscribe to The CJN newsletter Donate to The CJN (+ get a charitable tax receipt) Subscribe to North Star (Not sure how? Click here)

Self-Defense Rights in Your Home

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 19, 2025 20:35 Transcription Available

What happens when the line between victim and perpetrator blurs in the eyes of the law? When a homeowner confronts a crossbow-wielding intruder or store employees stop a car theft, should they face criminal charges or civil lawsuits for defending themselves and their property?Barrister Michael Mulligan unpacks the controversial legal landscape of self-defense in Canada, explaining how the 2012 amendments to the Criminal Code created a complex "reasonableness" requirement for those protecting themselves or others. This means that even when facing deadly threats in your own home, the law expects you to consider factors like the relative size, age, and gender of your attacker before responding. As Mulligan notes, "When you're fighting for your life or to save your children, you don't need to worry about weighing up how old this person is and what their gender is."The discussion extends beyond criminal liability to civil lawsuits, highlighting a case where a self-described "career criminal" is suing grocery store employees who prevented him from stealing a car, claiming they damaged his self-esteem. This mirrors Alberta's experience, where a rancher faced legal action from a thief after firing a warning shot. The provincial response—legislation preventing "criminal trespassers" from suing unless force was "grossly disproportionate"—offers a potential model for other provinces.The episode also examines a revealing case about Uber's wheelchair accessibility requirements in BC. Instead of mandating accessible vehicles, the government collects a 90-cent fee per non-accessible trip—money that disappears into general revenue while wheelchair users remain unable to use the service. When one wheelchair user won a $35,000 human rights award, the BC Supreme Court overturned it, revealing the tension between regulation and actual solutions.These cases raise fundamental questions about our legal priorities: Should we better protect those defending themselves and their property? And when regulations like Uber's accessibility fee don't solve the actual problem, what's their real purpose? Listen for an eye-opening look at where our laws might be failing those they're meant to protect.Follow this link for a transcript of the show and links to the cases discussed.

canada uber rights bc self defense criminal code bc supreme court

EP#181 | Self Defence Laws: Canada vs. The United States