Part of speech
POPULARITY
Tyler Huckabee returns to the show and the late, great Hannibal Lecter makes his Substance debut!In 1991, Jonathan Demme shocked critics and audiences alike with his sleek, stylish, unsettling, and genuinely fantastic film The Silence of the Lambs. It went on to be the third film in cinematic history to win all 5 of the big awards come Oscar season. The film won Best Picture, Demme won Best Director, screenwriter Ted Tally won Best Screenplay, and Jodie Foster & Anthony Hopkins each won Best Actor/Actress. It was a true cultural phenomenon and in the last 30 years or so, it has lost none of its power or wonder. We had a great time welcoming Tyler back for this one, one of his self-proclaimed all-time Top 10 films. In this episode we cover:The technical mastery of TSotL just as a filmThe power of perspectiveClarice & Hannibal's unique relationshipHow the film's bold feminism is key to its strengthBuffalo Bill and his "deadly sin"And much more!We hope you enjoy and if you do, please consider rating/reviewing the show and sharing it with your friends!Substantive Cinema Episode ListShoutouts:Lonesome Dove by Larry McMurtryRaiders of the Lost ArkBlack BagO Pagador de PromessasWatchmenFollow Tyler:BlueSkyInstagramSojourners"Sin of Empathy" ReviewSubstackFollow Us:InstagramThreadsPhilip's LetterboxdBlueSkyShare Your Questions/Suggestions/Feedback With Us:Email: thesubstancepod@gmail.comDM on InstagramSupport Us: Support the show with an individual donation on CashApp to $TheSubstancePod or become a monthly Patreon supporter at patreon.com/TheSubstancePod
China and Japan have held a new round of talks in Beijing over the safety of Japanese aquatic products. According to China's top customs authority, the two sides achieved "substantive progress."
This lecture series explores the critical role of the Supreme Court in the American constitutional system, focusing on judicial review, interpretive methods, landmark cases, and the relationship between the judiciary and political branches. It discusses the origins, scope, and limits of judicial review, as well as major debates surrounding judicial activism and reform proposals.TakeawaysThe Supreme Court's role is central to the constitutional system.Judicial review allows courts to invalidate unconstitutional laws.The doctrine of standing limits who can bring cases to court.Interpretive methods include originalism, living constitutionalism, and textualism.Landmark cases illustrate the power of judicial review.The judiciary is an independent branch but interacts with political branches.Judicial activism and restraint are ongoing debates in constitutional law.Substantive due process protects rights not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution.The politicization of judicial appointments raises concerns about legitimacy.Reform proposals include term limits and changes to court jurisdiction.Supreme Court, Judicial Review, Constitutional Law, Interpretive Methods, Landmark Cases, Political Branches, Judicial Activism, Judicial Restraint, Legal Reform, Constitutional Interpretation
As Ryan Coogler and Michael B. Jordan's most recent collaboration, Sinners, is dominating the domestic and worldwide box office, we thought it would be a good time to look at their first project together, Fruitvale Station. Fruitvale is partially the telling of the tragic story of the killing of Oscar Grant in Oakland CA on New Year's Day 2009, but it's so much more. Beyond being a mere recreation of events and the conveying of the awful facts, the film is a beautiful portrait of a young man who is struggling against a system that is set against him and his own difficulties. In addition to being a star making vehicle for Michael B. Jordan, the film features incredible performances from Melonie Diaz, Octavia Spencer, and Ariana Neal. Coogler and co. received a lot of critical praise for the film which set him up to helm massive projects like Creed and the Black Panther movies for Marvel. Joining us for our look back is Chicago based film critic Zachary Lee who is a regular contributor to Roger Ebert, Letterboxd, Interview Magazine, Chicago Reader, Think Christian, and more. He's been someone we've wanted to have on the show for a while and he did not disappoint.Enjoy the show and share it with a friend!Substantive Cinema Episode ListZach Interviews Ryan CooglerFreaky Tales InterviewZach & Willem Dafoe on The Legend of OchiShoutouts:Queens of DramaThe Ballad of Wallis IslandOur Revolution by Bernie SandersMy Old AssFollow ZachInstagramEverything else!Follow UsInstagramPhilip's LetterboxdShare Your Questions/Suggestions/Feedback With Us:Email: thesubstancepod@gmail.comDM on InstagramSupport Us: Support the show with an individual donation on CashApp to $TheSubstancePod or become a monthly Patreon supporter at patreon.com/TheSubstancePod
(00:00) Jerry Jones says Cowboys working on 'pretty substantive trades'(08:02) Stephen Jones on Micah Parsons: "Right now there's a difference in what we feel like is the right number"(11:22) Micah Parsons indicates he won't do on-field work until he has a contract extension(19:15) Kirk Cousins reports to Falcons for first day of voluntary offseason work(26:20) Brock Purdy at 49ers' workouts, George Kittle is not(33:48) Anthony Richardson: “Looking to learn as much as I can” from Daniel Jones(38:13) PFT Live Draft: GM with most nerves heading into draft
Murph & Markus - Hour 1: Giants lose 11-3 to Brewers, John Lynch says there have been substantive talks on Purdy's contract extension, and Steve Kerr needs to manage Jimmy Butler's workloadSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Murph & Markus - The Big Hit: John Lynch says there have been substantive talks on Brock Purdy's contract extension and Christian McCaffrey likes being the underdogSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Murph & Markus - Hour 1: Giants lose 11-3 to Brewers, John Lynch says there have been substantive talks on Purdy's contract extension, and Steve Kerr needs to manage Jimmy Butler's workloadSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Murph & Markus - The Big Hit: John Lynch says there have been substantive talks on Brock Purdy's contract extension and Christian McCaffrey likes being the underdogSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
The news of Texas covered today includes:Our Lone Star story of the day: It's not a finished deal yet but it is closer than ever before: School choice in Texas. I give a full review of the House finally passing school choice. If you read all the friendly to Democrat media, where you'd expect the strongest anti-school choice arguments from Dems to be featured, you will find that they had nothing of substance to offer. School choice plan clears historic hurdle with Texas House approval Texas House gives initial OK to $1 billion school voucher proposal In Historic First, Texas House Approves Private School Voucher Program How each Texas House member voted on school choice. (I see several opponents in the R-side voted for it – no doubt some trades with the Governor over key bills not being vetoed is involved – or they are just afraid of being targeted again in the primary election.)Our Lone Star story of the day is sponsored by Allied Compliance Services providing the best service in DOT, business and personal drug and alcohol testing since 1995.Responsible Texas House members knocked off the local and consent calendar today to scuttle an honorary memorial for the late Cecile Richards who is one of the loudest advocates of killing babies for the convenience of others. Way to go!Listen on the radio, or station stream, at 5pm Central. Click for our radio and streaming affiliates.www.PrattonTexas.com
Kogonada. Ever heard of him? The South Korean-born American filmmaker began to get attention for his video essays that analyzed themes and motifs from various films and television series before launching as a writer/director with the film we are covering this week, Columbus (2017).The movie follows two people who are at a place in their lives where they need to make important decisions related to their family and their future. Jin (John Cho), the son of a renowned architect, comes to Columbus to see his father when he falls ill but is unsure how long he wants to stay and look after him. When he arrives in Columbus (Indiana) he meets and befriends Casey (Haley Lu Richardson), a young woman who is passionate about architecture but hesitant to leave Columbus to pursue her next steps because she feels compelled to stay and be there for her mother who is dealing with addiction issues. It's a beautiful film about space and structures, passion, familial responsibility, and how the relationships we have push us to be the best version of ourselves we can be.Joining us this week are Kogonada enthusiasts and long time podcasters Jen & Sarah from the Movies & Us and TV & Us podcasts! And if you're listening on the week this drops, take a look at their feed and check out their episode this coming Wednesday with Philip where they cover Bong Joon Ho's Memories of Murder!Substantive Cinema Episode ListShoutouts:Supacell (Netflix)Caste by Isabel WilkersonSlow Horses (Apple TV)ProblemistaWitness in the CityThe Vince Staples Show (Netflix)Follow Jen & Sarah:Movies & Us podcastTV & Us podcastInstagramFollow UsInstagramPhilip's LetterboxdShare Your Questions/Suggestions/Feedback With Us:Email: thesubstancepod@gmail.comDM on InstagramSupport Us: Support the show with an individual donation on CashApp to $TheSubstancePod or become a monthly Patreon supporter at patreon.com/TheSubstancePod
Send us a textOn this week of Serious Privacy, Paul Breitbarth , Ralph O'Brien of Reinbo Consulting, and Dr. K Royal talk about the controversy with executive changes to the U.S. Federal Trade Commission #FTC, the UK #adequacy extension, and the Norwegian decision about Data Protection Officer #DPO conflicts of interest.Please subscribe in your favorite podcast app - sharing is caring! Powered by TrustArcSeamlessly manage your privacy program, assess risks, and stay up to date on laws across the globe.With TrustArc's Privacy Studio and Governance Suite, you can automate cookie compliance, streamline data subject rights, and centralize your privacy tasks—all while reducing compliance costs. Visit TrustArc.com/serious-privacy.If you have comments or questions, find us on LinkedIn and Instagram @seriousprivacy, and on BlueSky under @seriousprivacy.eu, @europaulb.seriousprivacy.eu, @heartofprivacy.bsky.app and @igrobrien.seriousprivacy.eu, and email podcast@seriousprivacy.eu. Rate and Review us! From Season 6, our episodes are edited by Fey O'Brien. Our intro and exit music is Channel Intro 24 by Sascha Ende, licensed under CC BY 4.0. with the voiceover by Tim Foley.
Speaker: Professor Ryan Abbott (University of Surrey)Session 2: AI Transforming IP Application / Registration Processes and Eligibility Tests On Saturday 29th March 2025, the Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law (CIPIL) held its Annual Spring Conference entitled 'Is AI Transforming IP?'For the last few years, lots of attention has been paid to AI and IP. The Supreme Court has already considered whether AI can be regarded as an inventor. There is also on-going litigation, in various jurisdictions, on whether training AI systems with copyright material infringes copyright, in what circumstances the outputs might infringe; as well as when, if at all, AI-generated content, designs or other outputs might be protected by intellectual property rights and, if so, for whose benefit.While these are important questions that involve the application of the existing understandings of the law to new factual scenarios, the conference moved beyond them to focus on: (i) what AI reveals about existing law; and (ii) how AI might be changing IP, altering the legal tests with which we have become familiar, as well as the assumptions that underlie them – and what the implications might be.For more information see:https://www.cipil.law.cam.ac.uk/seminars-and-events/cipil-spring-conference
Speaker: Professor Ryan Abbott (University of Surrey)Session 2: AI Transforming IP Application / Registration Processes and Eligibility Tests On Saturday 29th March 2025, the Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law (CIPIL) held its Annual Spring Conference entitled 'Is AI Transforming IP?'For the last few years, lots of attention has been paid to AI and IP. The Supreme Court has already considered whether AI can be regarded as an inventor. There is also on-going litigation, in various jurisdictions, on whether training AI systems with copyright material infringes copyright, in what circumstances the outputs might infringe; as well as when, if at all, AI-generated content, designs or other outputs might be protected by intellectual property rights and, if so, for whose benefit.While these are important questions that involve the application of the existing understandings of the law to new factual scenarios, the conference moved beyond them to focus on: (i) what AI reveals about existing law; and (ii) how AI might be changing IP, altering the legal tests with which we have become familiar, as well as the assumptions that underlie them – and what the implications might be.For more information see:https://www.cipil.law.cam.ac.uk/seminars-and-events/cipil-spring-conference
Send us a textCondominiums and HOAs may dominate Florida's shared ownership landscape, but cooperative associations offer a fascinating alternative with their own distinct legal framework and operational quirks. This week, Board-certified community association attorney and Becker shareholder David Rogel joins Take It To The Board host Donna DiMaggio Berger to unravel the mysteries of this older form of shared ownership that continues to house Floridians in everything from high-rises to single-family homes. At its core, understanding cooperatives requires grasping their fundamental difference from condominiums: in co-ops, the association owns the entire property, while residents own shares in the corporation with exclusive use rights to their units. This structure creates unique dynamics in financing, governance, and property transactions that directly impact property values and owner rights. Donna and David navigate the evolution of cooperative law, explaining how these communities—many established in the 1950s and 1960s—operate under bylaws and articles of incorporation rather than declarations. They dispel common misconceptions, including the notion that Florida cooperative boards have unlimited discretion to reject potential buyers, a practice more commonly associated with New York City co-ops. For those curious about conversion options, Donna and David outline the process of transforming a cooperative into a condominium, a trend gaining momentum as owners seek to increase property values despite the potential for higher property taxes. They also address the unique challenges of cooperative terminations, which lack the statutory framework available to condominiums. Whether you're a cooperative resident wondering about your property rights, a board member navigating governance questions, or simply curious about alternative forms of community living, this episode provides valuable insights into a housing model that has served Floridians for generations and continues to evolve alongside its more prevalent condominium counterpart.Conversation Highlights Include:Typical governing documents for a cooperativeDifferent types of housing that can be used for a cooperative (e.g., vertical construction, mobile home, single-family homes)Legal implications of being a shareholder vs. unit ownerBiggest misconceptions about co-opsCooperatives and cash-only salesWhy developers stopped using the cooperative form of ownership in FloridaProcess of converting cooperatives to a condominium form of ownershipProcedural and Substantive differences in Chapter 718 and Chapter 719 of Florida StatutesRelated Links:Podcast: Contemplating Condo Terminations with John Cadden of the Condominium Advisory GroupArticle: Legislative Changes Opens the Door to New Options for Resolving ‘Disputes' In Condominium and Cooperative AssociationsOnline Class: Knowledge is Power: Navigating Florida Condo & HOA Laws
Last week we had a great time talking movies with our Canadian friend Marta Djordjevic, so we figured we'd keep it going and double down with another Canadian guest AND a Canadian film (and stay tuned in the post show to potentially hear Marta about this week's film)!I Like Movies is writer/director Chandler Levack's 2022 directorial debut and it's a complete delight. It's very funny, it's sweet, it's sad, it's cringey, and it beautifully captures a period of life that everyone can relate to whether or not they are a movie lover. It's currently streaming on Kanopy & Hoopla, available to rent on your digital retailer of choice, and is also probably on DVD at your local library. Go check it out!We are also honored to have had the film's star Romina D'Ugo join us for this conversation! In the film, Romins plays the manager of the store that the protagonist gets a job at while he's attempting to save up enough money to go film school. Over the course of the movie, they grow close and ultimately both help each other move into the next stages of life. We discuss what went into her preparation for the character, filming through Covid, taking it on the festival circuit, and more!Substantive Cinema Episode ListShoutouts:The Swearing JarThe Artist's WayStrategic Coach booksFollow RominaInstagramPortal to HellFollow UsInstagramPhilip's LetterboxdShare Your Questions/Suggestions/Feedback With Us:Email: thesubstancepod@gmail.comDM on InstagramSupport Us: Support the show with an individual donation on CashApp to $TheSubstancePod or become a monthly Patreon supporter at patreon.com/TheSubstancePod
For review"1. IDF Starts Ground Operations in Gaza. The IDF said Wednesday it had launched “pinpoint” ground operations in the central and southern Gaza Strip. The IDF said its operations were aimed at expanding the security zone near the border and creating a partial buffer between northern and southern Gaza. 2. Captured documents from Gaza show that in the years leading up to 07 October attack, Hamas developed a concrete plan to destroy the Jewish state, in full coordination with Hezbollah and Iran.3. President Trump and President Zelenskyy Phone Call. President Donald Trump has held what he described as a "very good" hour-long phone call with his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelensky. President Zelensky described his conversation with President Trump as "positive", "frank", and "very substantive". 4. Ukraine Receives Shipment of F-16 Warplanes. The Ukrainian President stated that several F-16s had arrived but did not reveal the exact number of jets delivered.5. The Ukrainian Commander of the Unmanned Systems Forces claims fielding of a laser (direct energy) anti-aircraft system. Known as the Triton (English), the system was first publicly mentioned in mid-December 2024- and in February 2025, the Commander confirmed that the weapon was operationally deployed.
Way back when the show relaunched in 2020, we had planned on covering Abbas Kiarostami's Palme d'Or winning Taste of Cherry but I was overruled by my then cohosts who, at the time, were not terribly taken with the film. Now almost five years later, I'm excited to return to it with an even greater appreciation of it. I'm also delighted to be joined on this episode by my internet friend, film historian, critic, and podcaster Marta Djordjevic. Her former podcast, McFly's Movie House, is a treasure trove of insights and appreciation for cinema and a great way to build your watchlist. She's also a huge Kiarostami fan, with Taste of Cherry being one of her favorite films. **In this episode we do cover the topic of suicide, if you didn't watch or look up the movie**We also talk about the three arguments against it that the film depicts: community, morality, and beauty, we look at Kiarostami's career arc and personal style, why sometimes stories with harsh or challenging content can become comfort viewing for some, and more!Tune in next week for a back to back Substantive Cinema with Canadian ladies in the film world when actress Romina D'Ugo joins us to talk about her recent film I Like Movies.Substantive Cinema Episode ListShoutoutsNTS RadioHaruFollow MartaWebsiteInstagramLetterboxdSubstackFollow UsInstagramPhilip's LetterboxdShare Your Questions/Suggestions/Feedback With Us:Email: thesubstancepod@gmail.comDM on InstagramSupport Us: Support the show with an individual donation on CashApp to $TheSubstancePod or become a monthly Patreon supporter at patreon.com/TheSubstancePod
Nazis...I hate these guys.Seth Vargas of the Movie Friends podcast joins us to discuss Jeremy Saulnier's 2015 punk horror masterpiece, Green Room. When a down on their luck punk band takes a blind gig at a venue that ends up being a skinhead bar, things get gnarly. We talk Seth's background in the aughts punk scene, Patrick Stewart's terrifying performance, the struggle of the independent artist, how systems can be just as malicious and destructive as individuals, the late Anton Yelchin, and more!The movie may not be for everyone but we hope you enjoy the conversation!Follow UsInstagramTwitterPhilip's LetterboxdShare Your Questions/Suggestions/Feedback With Us:Email: thesubstancepod@gmail.comDM on InstagramSupport Us: Support the show with an individual donation on CashApp to $TheSubstancePod or become a monthly Patreon supporter at patreon.com/TheSubstancePod
In der heutigen Folge begrüßen wir die renommierten Gäste Prof. Dr. Esel und Dr. Teddy zur Diskussion über das faszinierende deutsche Wort "Zeug" und seine besondere Stellung in Sprache und Denken. Das Wort "Zeug" ist ein sprachliches Phänomen, das sowohl linguistisch als auch philosophisch bemerkenswerte Eigenschaften aufweist. Unsere Experten werden diese Besonderheiten aus ihren jeweiligen Fachperspektiven beleuchten. Das Wort "Zeug" nimmt eine besondere ontologische Stellung ein. Es charakterisiert Gegenstände primär durch ihre Funktionalität und Zweckhaftigkeit, nicht durch ihre bloße Existenz. Martin Heidegger hat diesen Aspekt in "Sein und Zeit" aufgegriffen und "Zeug" als fundamentale Kategorie des menschlichen In-der-Welt-Seins beschrieben. Für Heidegger existiert "Zeug" stets im Modus des "um-zu" – es steht in einem Verweisungszusammenhang und erhält seine Bedeutung durch seinen Gebrauch und seine Einbettung in menschliche Praktiken. In diesem Sinne repräsentiert "Zeug" nicht nur materielle Objekte, sondern offenbart auch unsere Art, die Welt zu erschließen und in ihr zu handeln. Aus linguistischer Perspektive besticht "Zeug" durch seine außergewöhnliche Wortbildungskraft. Als Grundwort in Komposita transformiert es das jeweilige Bestimmungswort in eine funktionale oder kollektive Kategorie. Die semantische Struktur folgt dabei verschiedenen Mustern: Es kann Substantive in Sammelbezeichnungen verwandeln, Verbstämme in tätigkeitsbezogene Kollektiva umformen oder in Verbindung mit Adjektiven wertende Kategorisierungen schaffen. Bemerkenswert ist die semantische Flexibilität des Wortes, die von der neutralen Sammelbedeutung bis zur starken Bedeutungsverengung in spezifischen Komposita reicht. Diese Wortbildungsdynamik macht "Zeug" zu einem linguistischen Sonderfall, der die besondere Fähigkeit der deutschen Sprache zur Kategorisierung widerspiegelt. Im Anschluss an die Einführung in dieser Episode diskutieren Prof. Dr. Esel und Dr. Teddy: Die etymologischen Wurzeln des Wortes "Zeug" Die verschiedenen Komposita-Kategorien und ihre Bedeutungsfelder Die philosophischen Implikationen für unser Verständnis von Alltagsgegenständen Kulturspezifische Aspekte des "Zeug"-Konzepts im Vergleich zu anderen Sprachen Inspiration: https://www.instagram.com/share/BAb3GwIFcJ
Be sure to visit https://dwtbpodcast.com for more information and add your name to start receiving their newsletter. If you'd like to support this show, rate, subscribe and leave a review on your podcast app.Connect with AJ & Mike:AJ Harper, website Write A Must-Read Free resourcesAJ's Socials:FacebookLinkedInMike Michalowicz, websiteAll books Mike's Socials: IGFBLinkedIn
Funez-Ortiz v. McHenry, No. 23-2290 (4th Cir. Feb. 4, 2025)CAT protection; BIA overturning IJ; under color of law; gangs wearing military uniform; acquiescence; presumption of regularity Matter of De Jesus-Platon, 29 I&N Dec. 7 (BIA 2025)Cal. Pen Code § 1473.7 vacated conviction; post-conviction relief; Cal. Pen. Code § 18.5; Matter of Velasquez-Rios; CIMT; Cal. Pen Code § 422; motion to remand; procedural or substantive defect; noncitizen's burdenBecerril-Sanchez v. Bondi, No. 23-3349 (8th Cir. Feb. 6, 2025)fear of cartels and police in Mexico; harm in utero as past persecution; insufficient threats and beating for past persecution; motion to reopen and women in Mexico United States v. Greenberg, No. 23-7168 (2d Cir. Feb. 3, 2025)criminal prosecution of immigration attorneys; 18 U.S.C. § 1546(a) ¶ 1; conspiracy to obtain documents through fraudSponsors and friends of the podcast!Kurzban Kurzban Tetzeli and Pratt P.A.Immigration, serious injury, and business lawyers serving clients in Florida, California, and all over the world for over 40 years.Cerenade"Leader in providing smart, secure, and intuitive cloud-based solutions"Click me!The Pen & Sword College (formerly The Clinic at Sharma-Crawford Attorneys at Law) Use Promo Code: ImmReview2025Link to firm: https://sharma-crawford.com/ Link to Nonprofit: https://thepen-and-swordkc.org/ Link to books: https://www.rekhasharmacrawford.com/ Immigration Lawyer's Toolboxhttps://immigrationlawyerstoolbox.com/immigration-reviewWant to become a patron?Click here to check out our Patreon Page!CONTACT INFORMATIONEmail: kgregg@kktplaw.comFacebook: @immigrationreviewInstagram: @immigrationreviewTwitter: @immreviewAbout your hostCase notesRecent criminal-immigration article (p.18)Featured in San Diego VoyagerAll praise to the pod's wonderful editors!Luana Lima SerraYasmin LimaDISCLAIMER & CREDITSSee Eps. 1-200Support the show
The lecture covers defenses to crimes and an introduction to criminal procedure, focusing on the Fourth Amendment. Defenses to Crimes: Capacity Defenses include insanity, infancy, and intoxication. Insanity involves not understanding actions or right from wrong, using tests like the M'Naghten Rule, Irresistible Impulse Test, Durham Rule, and Model Penal Code Test. Infancy recognizes that minors lack criminal intent, with different age classifications. Intoxication is generally not a defense, except for involuntary intoxication or for negating specific intent crimes. Justification/Excuse Defenses include self-defense, defense of others, duress, necessity, and entrapment. Self-defense involves using proportional force against imminent harm, sometimes with a duty to retreat. Defense of others is similar to self-defense, sometimes using the "alter ego rule" or "reasonable belief" standard. Duress involves committing a crime under immediate threat of harm, but is not a defense to murder. Necessity involves committing a crime to prevent greater harm when there is no other reasonable alternative. * Entrapment is when law enforcement induces a crime that a person would not otherwise commit. Criminal Procedure: The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures. Most searches require a warrant based on probable cause. Exceptions to the warrant requirement include search incident to arrest, exigent circumstances, consent searches, the automobile exception, plain view doctrine, and border & administrative searches. The Exclusionary Rule makes illegally obtained evidence inadmissible in court. The Fruit of the Poisonous Tree doctrine extends this to evidence derived from an illegal search, with some exceptions. The lecture serves as an introduction to defenses and the Fourth Amendment. The following lecture will discuss the Fifth and Sixth Amendment protections.
Summary of Criminal Procedure – Day 2 Introduction Day 2 covers criminal defenses and an introduction to criminal procedure, focusing on legal justifications and constitutional protections under the Fourth Amendment. Key Topics: Defenses to Crimes: Insanity, infancy, intoxication, self-defense, duress, necessity, and entrapment. Fourth Amendment: Search & seizure rules, warrant requirements, and exceptions. Exclusionary Rule: Preventing use of illegally obtained evidence in court. I. Defenses to Crimes Criminal defenses fall into two categories: capacity defenses and justification/excuse defenses. A. Capacity Defenses Insanity: Defendant lacked mental capacity to understand wrongdoing. Tests: M'Naghten Rule, Irresistible Impulse Test, Durham Rule, MPC Standard. Infancy: Juveniles may not be held criminally responsible (common law: under age 7 presumed incapable). Intoxication: Voluntary intoxication: Not a defense unless it negates specific intent crimes. Involuntary intoxication: Can be a defense if it causes loss of control or awareness. B. Justification & Excuse Defenses Self-Defense: Use of force must be proportional and necessary. Deadly force allowed if defendant faces imminent threat of death or serious harm. Defense of Others & Property: Same rules as self-defense, but no deadly force to protect property. Duress: Defendant coerced into committing a crime under threat of death or serious harm. Not a defense for homicide. Necessity: Defendant committed a crime to prevent a greater harm (e.g., breaking into a cabin during a blizzard). Entrapment: Law enforcement induced crime that defendant was not predisposed to commit. II. Introduction to Criminal Procedure The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures by law enforcement. A. Probable Cause & Warrants Probable cause: Reasonable belief that a crime has been committed. Warrant requirements: Issued by a neutral judge, based on sworn affidavit, specifying place and items to be searched. Arrests require probable cause, but warrants are not always needed if arrest occurs in public. B. Warrant Exceptions Some searches do not require a warrant due to public safety concerns or exigent circumstances: Search Incident to Arrest – Limited search of arrestee and immediate surroundings. Exigent Circumstances – Immediate threat to safety or evidence destruction. Consent Searches – Voluntary consent waives Fourth Amendment rights. Automobile Exception – Cars have reduced privacy, allowing searches with probable cause. Plain View Doctrine – Officers can seize evidence in plain sight if lawfully present. Stop and Frisk (Terry Stop) – Officers may briefly detain and pat down suspects if there is reasonable suspicion of criminal activity. C. The Exclusionary Rule & Fruit of the Poisonous Tree Illegally obtained evidence is inadmissible in court (Mapp v. Ohio (1961)). Exceptions: Good Faith Exception: Police relied on a warrant later found invalid. Inevitable Discovery: Evidence would have been found legally. Independent Source: Evidence came from separate, legal investigation. Conclusion Day 2 covered criminal defenses and the Fourth Amendment's search and seizure protections. These legal principles help determine when a defendant is legally excused and when law enforcement actions violate constitutional rights. Next time we will continue with Fifth and Sixth Amendment protections and trial procedures.
This lecture covers the core principles of criminal law, focusing on the elements of a crime, crimes against persons and property, and inchoate offenses. Elements of a Crime: Actus Reus is the physical component of a crime, requiring a voluntary act or a legal duty to act. Involuntary acts do not satisfy actus reus. A failure to act can be criminal if there's a legal duty, such as by statute, contract, special relationship, voluntary assumption of care, or creation of peril. Mens Rea refers to the mental state of the defendant, categorized by the Model Penal Code as purpose (intent), knowledge, recklessness, and negligence. Purpose is a conscious objective to engage in prohibited conduct. Knowledge means awareness that conduct will cause a specific result. Recklessness is a conscious disregard of a substantial and unjustifiable risk. Negligence is the failure to be aware of a substantial and unjustifiable risk. Causation must be established for crimes that require a specific result. Actual cause is when the harm would not have occurred "but for" the defendant's actions, while proximate cause means the defendant is legally responsible for foreseeable consequences. Crimes Against the Person: Homicide is the unlawful killing of a human being. Common Law Murder requires malice aforethought, including intent to kill, intent to inflict serious bodily harm, depraved heart disregard for human life, or felony murder. First-degree murder involves premeditation, while second-degree murder includes intentional but unpremeditated killings or deaths caused by an extreme disregard for life. Manslaughter includes voluntary manslaughter, a killing mitigated by adequate provocation, and involuntary manslaughter, an unintentional killing resulting from criminal negligence or during a non-dangerous unlawful act. Crimes Against Property: Larceny is the trespassory taking and carrying away of another's tangible personal property with intent to permanently deprive. Robbery is larceny committed with force or threat of force. Burglary is the breaking and entering of a structure with the intent to commit a crime inside. Arson is the malicious burning of a building. Inchoate Offenses and Accomplice Liability: Attempt is taking a substantial step toward committing a crime with the intent to complete it. Solicitation is intentionally encouraging another to commit a crime with the intent that the crime be committed. Conspiracy is an agreement between two or more persons to commit a crime, plus an overt act in furtherance of the agreement. Accomplice liability extends criminal responsibility to those who aid or encourage the commission of a crime. This lecture serves as an introduction to substantive criminal law, which will be followed by a discussion of defenses to crimes and criminal procedure.
I. Elements of Crimes Actus Reus (The Guilty Act) A crime requires a voluntary act or an omission where a legal duty exists. Involuntary acts (e.g., seizures) do not qualify. Mens Rea (The Guilty Mind) Purpose: Defendant intends the criminal result. Knowledge: Defendant knows harm is almost certain. Recklessness: Conscious disregard of substantial risk. Negligence: Failure to recognize a substantial risk. Causation Actual Cause: But-for the defendant's actions, the harm would not have occurred. Proximate Cause: Harm must be a foreseeable result. Superseding Causes: Unforeseeable events can break liability. II. Crimes Against the Person Homicide Murder: Requires malice aforethought: intent to kill, intent to harm, extreme recklessness, or felony murder. Degrees of Murder: First-Degree: Premeditated or during a listed felony. Second-Degree: Unplanned but intentional, or reckless disregard for life. Manslaughter: Voluntary: Killing in the heat of passion due to provocation. Involuntary: Killing caused by criminal negligence or misdemeanor offense. Assault and Battery Battery: Unlawful application of force causing harm or offense. Assault: Attempted battery or act creating reasonable fear of harm. III. Crimes Against Property Larceny: Taking another's property with intent to permanently deprive. Embezzlement: Fraudulent conversion of property lawfully possessed. False Pretenses: Obtaining title through deception. Robbery: Larceny plus force or intimidation. Burglary: Unlawful entry into a structure with intent to commit a felony. Arson: Malicious burning of property. IV. Inchoate Offenses and Parties to Crime Attempt: Substantial step toward committing a crime with intent. Solicitation: Encouraging another to commit a crime. Conspiracy: Agreement plus overt act to commit a crime. Pinkerton Rule: Liability extends to foreseeable acts of co-conspirators. Accomplice Liability: Assisting or encouraging a crime with intent. Summary of Key Takeaways Crimes require actus reus (act), mens rea (intent), and causation. Crimes against persons involve direct harm, such as homicide and assault. Property crimes involve theft, destruction, or unlawful entry. Inchoate offenses address attempts and conspiracies. Accomplice liability extends punishment to those who assist crimes. This concludes Day 1 of Criminal Law & Procedure. Tomorrow, we will cover Defenses to Crimes and Criminal Procedure, focusing on constitutional protections and legal justifications.
Texas Republican Congressman Chip Roy joins Fox Across America With Jimmy Failla to shed light on the absurdity of the Left's opposition to the Trump administration's push to deport illegal immigrants who have committed crimes. Jimmy explains why so many Democratic Senators, and a few Republican ones, do not want to see Robert F. Kennedy Jr. leading the Department of Health and Human Services. PLUS, host of the “Kennedy Saves The World” podcast Kennedy drops by to talk about how President Trump is setting a new standard for the first 100 days of a presidential administration. [00:00:00] RFK Jr. grilled by Senators during confirmation hearing [00:38:45] Liberals continue to freak out over deportations [00:57:13] Rep. Chip Roy [01:15:35] Vance continues to school the media [01:34:07] Kennedy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Odds and ends, nonprofits, and law studentseffected nonprofits and law students: email me if you need anything at kgregg@kktplaw.com Aguilar-Quintanilla v. McHenry, No. 24-60142 (5th Cir. Jan. 24, 2024)CAT protection; removal does not moot CAT challenge; ICE facilitating return; suspected gang members in El Salvador; CAT even with adverse credibility; requirement to consider affidavits; requirement to actually consider evidence, rather than simply mention Villagomez v. McHenry, No. 23-3558 (9th Cir. Jan. 24, 2025)crime of violence; general intent crimes; battery resulting in substantial bodily harm under Nev. Rev. Stat. § 200.481(2)(b); mens rea; violent force; Johnson; Borden Martinez v. Clark, No. 21-35023 (9th Cir. Dec. 27, 2024) (remand)detention; dangerousness; jurisdiction; mixed question of law and fact; INA § 236 Doe v. Becerra, 732 F.Supp.3d 1071 (N.D. Cal. 2024)prolonged detention; mandatory detention; conditions of detention; habeas; punitive detention; alternatives to detention; substantive due processSponsors and friends of the podcast!Kurzban Kurzban Tetzeli and Pratt P.A.Immigration, serious injury, and business lawyers serving clients in Florida, California, and all over the world for over 40 years.Cerenade"Leader in providing smart, secure, and intuitive cloud-based solutions"Click me!Immigration Lawyer's Toolboxhttps://immigrationlawyerstoolbox.com/immigration-reviewWant to become a patron?Click here to check out our Patreon Page!CONTACT INFORMATIONEmail: kgregg@kktplaw.comFacebook: @immigrationreviewInstagram: @immigrationreviewTwitter: @immreviewAbout your hostCase notesRecent criminal-immigration article (p.18)Featured in San Diego VoyagerAll praise to the pod's wonderful editors!Luana Lima SerraDISCLAIMER & CREDITSSee Eps. 1-200Support the show
We are back and joined by crime fiction and television writer Megan Abbott with a Substantive Cinema show on one of Martin Scorsese and Paul Schrader's most underrated films, Bringing Out the Dead! Substantive Cinema Episode List Shoutouts: Between the Temples Virtue I Like Movies Follow Megan Instagram Twitter BlueSky Website Follow Us Instagram Twitter Philip's Letterboxd Share Your Questions/Suggestions/Feedback With Us: Email: thesubstancepod@gmail.com DM on Instagram Support Us: Support the show with an individual donation on CashApp to $TheSubstancePod or become a monthly Patreon supporter at patreon.com/TheSubstancePod
The host of the Bryce Eddy show appeared on Politics Done Right to discuss Trump and MAGA policies. He likely got more civil pushback than he expected. Subscribe to our Newsletter: https://politicsdoneright.com/newsletter Purchase our Books: As I See It: https://amzn.to/3XpvW5o How To Make America Utopia: https://amzn.to/3VKVFnG It's Worth It: https://amzn.to/3VFByXP Lose Weight And Be Fit Now: https://amzn.to/3xiQK3K Tribulations of an Afro-Latino Caribbean man: https://amzn.to/4c09rbE
Twenty years ago on Christmas Day, Wes Anderson released his fourth feature film into the world. The star-studded Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou was not as an immediate hit as some of Anderson's other films but it's one that has aged incredibly well. Bill Murray leads a cast of phenomenal actors such as Owen Wilson, Cate Blanchett, Willem Dafoe, Jeff Goldblum, Anjelica Huston, and many others as the titular Steve Zissou on a quest for both revenge against the rare (and possibly fictional) shark that killed his partner and best friend, and his long lost dignity and relevance as an oceanographer and documentarian. As funny as it is, the movie also is about a man struggling against his mortality and seeking to repair his legacy. It's charming, exciting, funny, and deeply heartfelt. Whether you revisit this as an old favorite or are coming to it for the first time, we hope you enjoy! We are also thrilled to welcome Dan McCoy (The Flop House podcast, The Daily Show with Jon Stewart) to discuss the film with us. Dan is a veteran writer, comedian, podcaster, and movie watcher and it was a wonderful time having him on to talk about one of his favorite films. Follow/Listen to The Flop House Substantive Cinema Episode List If you're newer to the show be sure to check out our library of 150+ episodes with folks like Filmspotting's Josh Larsen, artist Stephanie Stalvey, Jemar Tisby, New York Times film critic Alissa Wilkinson, Propaganda, actor/director John Carroll Lynch, Kaitlyn Schiess (The Holy Post), and our old pal Slim (Letterboxd & 70mm Podcast). Shoutouts: The Burial Continental Drifter by Kathy MacLeod The Last Stop in Yuma County Hundreds of Beavers Dan: Letterboxd BlueSky Website Follow Us Instagram Twitter Philip's Letterboxd Share Your Questions/Suggestions/Feedback With Us: Email: thesubstancepod@gmail.com DM on Instagram Support Us: Support the show with an individual donation on CashApp to $TheSubstancePod or become a monthly Patreon supporter at patreon.com/TheSubstancePod --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thesubstancepod/support
The host of the Bryce Eddy show appeared on Politics Done Right to discuss Trump and MAGA policies. He likely got more civil pushback than he expected. Subscribe to our Newsletter: https://politicsdoneright.com/newsletter Purchase our Books: As I See It: https://amzn.to/3XpvW5o How To Make America Utopia: https://amzn.to/3VKVFnG It's Worth It: https://amzn.to/3VFByXP Lose Weight And Be Fit Now: https://amzn.to/3xiQK3K Tribulations of an Afro-Latino Caribbean man: https://amzn.to/4c09rbE
On this week's episode, the crew is joined by crypto enthusiast Doug Collins to talk about Bitcoin cresting $100k/coin
Four weeks in a row, can you believe it?! This week we are back with a Substantive Cinema pick that we've been excited for for quite some time, Walter Hill's underrated masterpiece Southern Comfort. The movie follows a squad of National Guardsmen doing exercises in the Louisiana swamps. After some painfully avoidable events, the men become hunted and are on the run for their lives against an enemy of their own making in a place that, while actually being part of their own homeland, they find entirely foreign. On the one hand, the film is a perfectly thrilling and taut entertainment. However, it's also a substantive look at White male entitlement, American exceptionalism, militarism, race relations, and more. If you enjoyed the film or our discussion we'd love for you to send us an email or voice note. And if you have any suggestions of movies, topics, or guests for future shows, please send those our way as well! Listen to Mitchell's previous Substantive Cinema appearance Mitchell's Walter Hill Interview WH Filmography Ranked Mitchell on Letterboxd Purchase the Vinegar Syndrome 4K Streaming options for Southern Comfort List of Substantive Cinema movies If you're newer to the show be sure to check out our library of 150+ episodes with folks like Filmspotting's Josh Larsen, artist Stephanie Stalvey, Jemar Tisby, New York Times film critic Alissa Wilkinson, Propaganda, actor/director John Carroll Lynch, and our old pal Slim (Letterboxd & 70mm Podcast). Shoutouts: Witness in the City (Radiance Films) Troy article (Paste) Ethan & Maya Hawke interview Follow Us Instagram Twitter Philip's Letterboxd Share Your Questions/Suggestions/Feedback With Us: Email: thesubstancepod@gmail.com DM on Instagram Support Us: Support the show with an individual donation on CashApp to $TheSubstancePod or become a monthly Patreon supporter at patreon.com/TheSubstancePod --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thesubstancepod/support
Let's break down the main points of this law school lecture on constitutional protections and rights. 1. Core Protections: The US Constitution has your back, protecting your freedoms from the government stepping over the line. Due process ensures you get a fair shake in legal proceedings and stops the government from acting without reason. Equal protection means no discrimination allowed – everyone gets treated equally under the law. Freedom of speech, religion, press, assembly, and petition are protected under the First Amendment, essential for a functioning democracy. 2. Due Process: Procedural vs. Substantive Procedural due process ensures you get a fair process if the government decides to take away your life, liberty, or property. Substantive due process puts limits on what the government can do to you, no matter how fair the process. 3. Equal Protection: Levels of Scrutiny Courts use different levels of scrutiny to decide if a law violates equal protection. Strict scrutiny is for laws affecting certain groups of people or fundamental rights. The government has to have a really good reason and tailor the law carefully. Intermediate scrutiny is for laws affecting other groups of people. The government has to prove they have a good reason and that the law is related to that reason. Rational basis review is for all other laws. The government just has to show that the law is rationally related to a legitimate government interest. 4. First Amendment: Freedoms and Limitations Freedom of speech includes the right to speak up and the right to keep your mouth shut. The government can make some rules about time, place, and manner, but they can't single out certain topics. Freedom of religion includes the right to practice your religion and the government's promise not to pick favorites. 5. Adapting to Modern Challenges Constitutional protections are always being tested by new technology, changing social norms, and public health concerns. Courts have to balance individual rights with public health needs, especially during tough times like the COVID-19 pandemic. 6. Evolution and Expansion of Protections Constitutional protections evolve over time as society changes and judges interpret the law differently. Recent cases have expanded the scope of substantive due process and equal protection, recognizing same-sex marriage as a constitutional right and striking down laws that discriminate against LGBTQ+ people. 7. Practical Implications for Legal Practice Lawyers need to have a solid understanding of constitutional protections to do their jobs well. They use these protections to protect their clients' rights in criminal cases, challenge discrimination in civil rights cases, and defend civil liberties, especially First Amendment rights. Summary Constitutional protections are the foundation of American law, ensuring our individual freedoms and ensuring fairness. They're not set in stone but evolve over time to reflect changing societal values and legal interpretations. Lawyers need to be well-versed in these principles to be effective advocates for their clients and uphold the core values of our democratic society. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support
Once again, we recorded this episode a while back (a number of months ago, in this case) but due to the lamentable state of many things in the US, our episode this week feels eerily timely. For our first Noirvember Substantive Cinema epsiode of 2024, we are looking at one of Samuel Fuller's most celebrated and highly regarded films, Shock Corridor. In the movie, Johnny Barrett, a journalist in pursuit of fame and acclaim, poses as a lunatic in order to infiltrate a mental institution where a murder has taken place. Can he keep his sanity long enough to solve the case and what will be left of him if he can? In our discussion we cover: how Sam Fuller bluntly portrays America's various psychoses (nationalism, racial hatred, and the worship of violent power) in the three eyewitnesses that Johnny needs to interrogate, the legacy of Fuller's work in filmmakers like Martin Scorsese, David Lynch, Spike Lee, and Jim Jarmusch, the role of journalism in a free society, and more! Watch Shock Corridor on the Internet Archive Listen to Mike, Spencer, and I talk about The Naked Kiss, Fuller's follow up to Shock Corridor which also stars Constance Towers. My discussion of Fuller's war films on The Stacks Forty Guns episode of The Criterion Connection Follow Mike's work at Weirding Way Shoutouts Spencer: When the Clock Broke by John Ganz The Surrealism of Friday the 13th Mike: The Good Fairy The Strawberry Blonde Philip: The Snake Girl and the Silver-Haired Witch If you're newer to the show be sure to check out our library of 150+ episodes with folks like Karen Swallow Prior, Jemar Tisby, Tyler Huckabee, Kaitlyn Schiess, Propaganda, Josh Larsen, Stephanie Stalvey, and John Carroll Lynch. Share Your Questions/Suggestions/Feedback With Us: Email: thesubstancepod@gmail.com DM on Instagram Support Us: Support the show with an individual donation on CashApp to $TheSubstancePod or become a monthly Patreon supporter at patreon.com/TheSubstancePod --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thesubstancepod/support
The Greek and Turkish foreign ministers are set to meet on November 8th in Athens to explore whether there is genuine room for substantive discussions on Greek-Turkish differences, particularly issues in the Aegean Sea. In the lead up to this meeting, neither Greece nor Turkey have deviated from their core positions, something diplomats say is expected. Vassilis Nedos, Kathimerini's diplomatic and defense editor, joins Thanos Davelis as we look ahead at this crucial meeting, breaking down what to expect from Athens and Ankara, how the US elections could impact this process, and what role the EU can play. You can read the articles we discuss on our podcast here:Greece and Turkey hold firm on positions ahead of pivotal Nov 8 meetingAnnouncement by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs on the attacks on the Greek Member of the European Parliament Fredi Beleri (29.10.2024)Beleri pelted with yogurt and eggs in TiranaFirst A-level credit rating for Cyprus
New month, new TWIP! And I bet you're wondering... are there more international chart numbers in here? Honestly it's insulting you even have to ask. But we've ALSO got exclusive preview clips of "The Kingery" episode 13x02, The Pendant Shakespeare's "Henry VI, part 2" chapter 2, and "Genesis Avalon: Patriot" episode 19! And because that's not enough goodness for you, Jordan and Jack Calk discuss best friends, the opposite of clown, and rubber voices! Substantive content? We have it! --Please leave us a rating on Apple Podcasts!-- Website: pendantaudio.com Twitter: @pendantweb Facebook: facebook.com/pendantaudio Tumblr: pendantaudio.tumblr.com YouTube: youtube.com/pendantproductions
How pervasive is witchcraft in the entertainment industry? Join my live if you're not a brainlet. Substantive claims will be made in the first 30 minutes or you can scroll on with your life.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/jay-sanalysis--1423846/support.
Faith: Superficial vs. Substantive Confession: Canons of Dort V, Rejection of the Errors VII-IX Scripture: Luke 8:4-15 Preacher: Rev. David Inks Sermon Outline: Introduction It’s All in the Soil Not Free Will Christ’s Prayer Secures Substantive Faith Conclusion Sermon Video: https://youtu.be/QIjPIhJyJQ8 Canons of Dort: The Fifth Main Point of Doctrine The Perseverance […] The post Faith: Superficial vs. Substantive appeared first on Covenant United Reformed Church.
Mark Clifton and Mark Hallock discuss some tips from Thom Rainer on church revitalization. Substantive changes in a church typically don't hold until has been at a church at least 4-5 years. The most common way to face reality in a church is to look at a 10-year attendance pattern. Revitalization is not something that happens with the snap of a finger. You don't revitalize a church in your power. You do it through God's power. There are a lot of pastors and church leaders who just don't want to ask for help. If there were no risk in church revitalization, every church would be revitalized. Don't get into revitalization if you're afraid to lead by faith. Resources related to this podcast: No Silver Bullets by Daniel Im Pathways to Partnership by Bob Bickford and Mark Hallock
In part one of our gender equality episode with Pam Hrick, we discuss how section 28 of the Charter (regarding substantive gender equality rights) would apply to Quebec's controversial Bill 21. ✨ Read the full episode transcript HERE ✨ Learn more about the topics/cases on the Lawyered website✨ Help to declutter the law on the Lawyered crowdfunding page
Joe Biden's speech at the DNC was masterful and substantive. Here is a condensed version with the highlights you can watch in one sitting. Subscribe to our Newsletter: https://politicsdoneright.com/newsletter Purchase our Books: As I See It: https://amzn.to/3XpvW5o How To Make America Utopia: https://amzn.to/3VKVFnG It's Worth It: https://amzn.to/3VFByXP Lose Weight And Be Fit Now: https://amzn.to/3xiQK3K Tribulations of an Afro-Latino Caribbean man: https://amzn.to/4c09rbE
In this episode of The Shaun Tabatt Show, Shaun sits down with Brian Zahnd to discuss his book Water to Wine: Some of My Story. Find out More: BrianZahnd.com
Vice President Kamala Harris did not pull any punches in her substantive speech in Atlanta, Georgia. She took it all to Donald Trump, challenging him on immigration and future policies and making it clear that he is a convicted criminal running for the presidency. Subscribe to our Newsletter: https://politicsdoneright.com/newsletter Purchase our Books: As I See It: https://amzn.to/3XpvW5o How To Make America Utopia: https://amzn.to/3VKVFnG It's Worth It: https://amzn.to/3VFByXP Lose Weight And Be Fit Now: https://amzn.to/3xiQK3K Tribulations of an Afro-Latino Caribbean man: https://amzn.to/4c09rbE
PREVIEW: #NPR: Conversation with colleague Victor Davis Hanson re PR and memories of once upon a time (perhaps the 20the Century) polite, well-prepared and modestly left of center presenters who conducted substantive and often lengthy exchanges with guests absent partisan presumption or blame. Details tonight. 1936 Radio Row NYC