Podcasts about mudde

Populisme is een begrip dat sinds 2016 volop werd gebruikt om de dreiging aan verschillende politieke fronten te duiden, maar het is een verrassend breed gebruikt begrip. De meeste definities verwijzen naar het onderzoek van Cas Mudde, die populisten duidts als: “Parties that endorse the set of ideas that society is ultimately separated into two homogeneous and antagonistic groups, “the pure people” versus “the corrupt elite”, and which argue that politics should be an expression of the volonté générale, or general will, of the people.” Mudde, 2004. Benjamin Moffitt, hoogleraar en schrijver van het boek Populism, noemt nadrukkelijk dat populisme geen ideologie is, maar een stijl van politiek bdrijven, “a way of speaking, acting, and presenting oneself.” Hierdoor zijn er veel verschillende groepen die onder deze noemer vallen, die op verschillende manieren worden beschuldigd van populisme. Populisme is niet hetzelfde als extreem-rechts of extreem-links gedachtegoed, maar die beide groepen gebruiken wel regelmatig populistische methodes. Populisme is niet hetzelfde als populariteit, hoewel er groepen zijn die populisme op die manier proberen te zuiveren van de negatieve bijklank. Populisme is ook niet hetzelfde als fascisme, hoewel populistische rhetoriek wel een kenmerk is van fascisme. De klassieke term die veel overlap vertoont met populisme is “demagogie”, waarbij een demagoog of “volksmenner” of “rabble-rouser” specifiek inspeelt op de driften en wensen van het volk door ze tegen de elite op te jagen. Dit valt samen met de definitie van populisme gebruikt door Catherine Fieschi, die stelt dat populisten niet alleen zeggen te spreken namen de moreel superieure stem van het volk, maar ook uniek in staat zijn om die stem te horen. Daarmee worden hun tegenstanders dus weggezet als vijanden van de waarheid en puurheid van het volk. Het nieuwere woord populisme komt uit de Verenigde Staten, waar in 1892 een partij genaamd de People's Party of ook de Populist Party in opstand kwam tegen de elite. Zij zagen zichzelf als gerechtvaardigd in het democratisch opstaan tegen de elite die hen onderdrukte. Sindsdien blijft de tweedeling tussen het volk en de elite een kenmerk van populistische retoriek, of er nou sprake is van een tweedeling tussen volk en elite, of niet. Vandaag onderzoeken wij de kenmerken van populisme in de hoop de term minder beladen en met meer precisie te kunnen gebruiken. Is populisme ooit “goed” of terecht? Is populisme een inherent onderdeel van bestuur door het volk? Is populisme altijd bron van polarisatie? Te gast is Sjoerd, net als in aflevering 4. Bronnen Intro Cas Mudde. “The Populist Zeitgeist.” Government and Opposition, 39:4, 2004, 541-563. Cas Mudde. “Populism in the Twenty-First Century: An Illiberal Democratic Response to Undemocratic Liberalism.” The Andrea Mitchell Center for the Study of Democracy. https://amc.sas.upenn.edu/cas-mudde-populism-twenty-first-century “Populism in the United States: A Timeline.” History.com. 7 december 2018. Gecorrigeerd: 14 december 2020. https://www.history.com/topics/us-government-and-politics/populism-united-states-timeline Yasmeen Serhan. “Populism Is Meaningless.” The Atlantic. 12 maart 2020. https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2020/03/what-is-populism/607600/ The PopuList. https://popu-list.org/ What is Populism? | History. 8 januari 2019. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_uA1GBzXzr4 Umberto Eco. “Ur-Fascism.” The New York Review of Books. 22 juni 1995. The Internet Archive. https://archive.org/details/umberto-eco-ur-fascism/umberto-eco-ur-fascism.lt/ The New Populism. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/series/the-new-populism Relevante artikelen zijn bijvoorbeeld: https://www.theguardian.com/world/ng-interactive/2019/mar/06/revealed-the-rise-and-rise-of-populist-rhetoric en https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/nov/20/measuring-populism-how-guardian-charted-rise-methodology

Last Sunday, Austria's Freedom Party (FPÖ) became the latest far-right political group to win a national election in Europe.The party now faces a familiar challenge encountered by many of its counterparts across the continent: will it form a coalition with the centre-right Austrian People's Party? Will Herbert Kickl become Austria's next Chancellor, or will he be sidelined?Political analyst Cas Mudde contends that while far-right prime ministers remain relatively rare, the traditional "cordon sanitaire" — the refusal to collaborate with extremist parties — has effectively been dismantled.Centre-right parties are increasingly willing to partner with the far right, not just to boost their own political power but also to secure more influential roles than they would in alliances with the centre-left.How long the far-right will continue to accept this arrangement? We'll let Mudde explain.Radio Schuman also gives you a quick overview of the Chinese electric vehicle tariff vote among EU member states. What is Germany's political role in this dispute? The result of today's vote could answer this question.Radio Schuman is hosted and produced by Maïa de la Baume, with journalist and production assistant Eleonora Vasques, audio editing by Zacharia Vigneron and music by Alexandre Jas. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Cas Mudde, one of the world's leading experts in the study of populism and far-right politics, joins us this week to discuss the tensions between populism and democracy, and why populism has increased around world in recent years.Mudde is the Stanley Wade Shelton UGAF Professor in the School of Public and International Affairs at the University of Georgia and a Professor II in the Center for Research on Extremism (C-REX) at the University of Oslo. His research agenda aims to address the question: how can liberal democracies defend themselves against political challenges without undermining their core values?  Mudde visited Penn State in October 2023 to give the keynote lecture at the Populism, Piety, and Patriotism conference organized by the McCourtney Institute for Democracy.

A infodemia, segundo a Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde (2020), trata-se de um expressivo aumento no volume de informações associadas a um assunto, que podem se multiplicar exponencialmente em pouco tempo devido a um evento específico. O negacionismo é definido por Diethelm & McKee (2009) como o uso de argumentos para dar a aparência de uma debate onde não existe, a fim de minar o consenso científico. Exemplos do negacionismo são tanto o “tratamento precoce” na pandemia da Covid-19, quanto as mudanças climáticas. O populismo médico é um estilo político baseado em performances de crises de saúde pública que colocam "o povo" contra "o sistema". A Medicina de Família e Comunidade, por seus princípios e competências nucleares, apresenta-se como especialidade médica competente para o enfrentamento dessa problemática. Esse protagonismo da especialidade pode se dar no cotidiano do cuidado individual e comunitário, na produção de conhecimento e na comunicação social. Isso se dá porque a MFC é uma especialidade clinicamente qualificada, tem sua atuação influenciada pelo contexto, é um recurso da população e valoriza a relação comunicativa entre o profissional e a pessoa-comunidade-sociedade.Nesse episódio, gravado durante o 17º Congresso Brasileiro de Medicina de Família e Comunidade conversamos sobre O papel da medicina de família e comunidade no enfrentamento ao negacionismo. Conheça estratégias para lidar com negacionistas, como abordar no consultório e fora dele. Mediado pela Rafaela Pacheco, diretora de Comunicação da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina de Família e Comunidade, os convidados para a discussão foram Rubens Cavalcanti, médico de família e comunidade e professor na Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, e Mayara Floss, médica de família e comunidade em Florianópolis, doutoranda de patologia na Universidade de São Paulo. Apoio Técnico da gravação e captação de Áudio: equipe da organização do congresso Brasileiro de Medicina de Família e ComunidadeImagem da capa: criada com IA no aplicativo Canva. As vinhetas deste episódio foram produzidas por Rubens Cavalcanti e a edição ficou com o Brasil de Fato.Apoie o Brasil de Fato: https://apoia.se/brasildefatoSiga o Medicina em Debate nas redes sociais: Twitter, Instagram e Facebook.Referências do episódioRubensFLECK, L. Gênese e desenvolvimento de um fato científico: introdução à doutrina do estilo de pensamento e do coletivo de pensamento. Traducao Georg Otte; Mariana Camilo De Oliveira. Belo Horizonte: Fabrefactum Editora, 2010. DUNKER, C. Subjetividade em tempos de pós-verdade. Em: DUNKER, C. et al. (Ed.). Ética e Pós-Verdade. Porto Alegre: Editora Dublinense Ltda, 2017. p. 7–38. Discurso do Presidente da República, Jair Bolsonaro, na abertura da 76° Assembleia-Geral da ONU. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 9 maio. 2022. CASARÕES, G.; MAGALHÃES, D. The hydroxychloroquine alliance: how far-right leaders and alt-science preachers came together to promote a miracle drug. Revista de Administração Pública, v. 55, n. 1, p. 197–214, fev. 2021. SILVA, V. Médicos influenciadores cobram R$ 500 por atestado antivacina. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 9 maio. 2022. SANTOS, P. Bolsonaro mostra caixa de hidroxicloroquina para as emas do Alvorada. Correio Braziliense, 24 jul. 2020. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 27 mar. 2022.SANTOS, M. Reunião do “gabinete das sombras” foi solicitada por médicos pernambucanos. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 27 mar. 2022.PERES, A. C. Fake news são notícias fraudulentas. RADIS Comunicação e Saúde, 2018. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 27 mar. 2022.MUDDE, C.; ROVIRA KALTWASSER, C. Populism: a very short introduction. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2017. LASCO, G. Medical Populism and the COVID-19 Pandemic. Global Public Health, v. 15, n. 10, p. 1417–1429, 2 out. 2020.Diethelm, P., & McKee, M. (2009). Negação: o que é e como os cientistas devem responder? O Jornal Europeu de Saúde Pública, 19(1), 2–4.Mayara FLOSS, MAYARA; TOLOTTI, GABRIELLE ; ROSSETTO, ANDREI DOS SANTOS ; CAMARGO, TATIANA SOUZA DE ; SALDIVA, PAULO HILÁRIO NASCIMENTO . Linha do tempo do -tratamento precoce- para Covid-19 no Brasil: desinformação e comunicação do Ministério da Saúde. Interface (Botucatu. Online), v. 27, p. 1, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/interface.210693 FLOSS, MAYARA; ZANDAVALLI, RAFAELA BRUGALLI ; LEÃO, JÉSSICA RODRIGUES BORGES ; LIMA, CAMILA VESCOVI ; VIANNA, NELZAIR ; BARROS, ENRIQUE FALCETO ; SALDIVA, PAULO HILARIO NASCIMENTO . Poluição do ar. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE MEDICINA DA FAMÍLIA E COMUNIDADE, v. 17, p. 3038, 2022. https://rbmfc.org.br/rbmfc/article/view/3038 FLOSS, MAYARA; VIEIRA ILGENFRITZ, CARLOS AUGUSTO ; RODRIGUES, YLANA ELIAS ; CLÁUDIA DILDA, ANNA ; BORNGRÄBER CORRÊA, ANA PAULA ; AZEVEDO CONTE DE MELO, DIEGO ; FALCETO BARROS, ENRIQUE ; FAERRON GUZMÁN, CARLOS ALBERTO ; DEVLIN, ERIN ; SALDIVA, PAULO HILÁRIO NASCIMENTO ; KHOO, SU-MING ; GONÇALVES, MARCELO RODRIGUES . Development and Assessment of a Brazilian Pilot Massive Open Online Course in Planetary Health Education: An Innovative Model for Primary Care Professionals and Community Training. FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, v. 9, p. 1, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.663783 Floss M, Ilgenfritz CAV, Barbosa FP, Einloft FMS, Mendonça CS, Corrêa LD, Rossetto A dos S. A pandemia da COVID-19 e o Programa “Fica em Casa”: rádio, via WhatsApp, na Atenção Primária à Saúde. Rev Bras Med Fam Comunidade [Internet]. 8º de abril de 2023 [citado 13º de outubro de 2023];18(45):3129. Disponível em: https://rbmfc.org.br/rbmfc/article/view/3129

September 3 - Pastor Rob Mudde

Created by - Creative Benchers | Saade Aala Radio - A Creative Benchers PropertyWriters & Hosts - Harshdeep Singh, Sarabjeet Singh, Sandeep SinghD.o.P - Harjinder Singh | Sound by - Creative BenchersEdited by - Sandeep Singh | VFX - Harshdeep SinghManaged by - Creative Benchers (www.creativebenchers.com)Created by - Creative Benchers | Saade Aala Radio - A Creative Benchers PropertyWriters & Hosts - Harshdeep Singh, Sarabjeet Singh, Sandeep SinghD.o.P - Harjinder Singh | Sound by - Creative BenchersEdited by - Sandeep Singh | VFX - Harshdeep SinghManaged by - Creative Benchers (www.creativebenchers.com)YouTubeFacebookInstagramLinkedInTwitter HostsHarshdeep SinghSarabjeet SinghSandeep SinghSupport the showWant to promote your business?CREATIVE BENCHERS A Content Based Marketing AgencyContact - hello@creativebenchers.comSaade Aala Radio -  A Creative Benchers PropertySupport the showSupport the show

Weekly outlook by Miles R. Maftean and Adam Jasser: Yevgeny Prigozhin's rebellion and subsequent exile in Belarus spotlight Putin's weakening grip on power, amplified by Russia's war with Ukraine. The shift towards Belarus' President Lukashenka's role, who resolved the rebellion and now hosts Prigozhin, exhibits his growing significance in Putin's scheme. Amid this turmoil, Ukraine's struggle to quickly access international reconstruction funds, along with Slovak President Čaputová's decision not to seek re-election and Jarosław Kaczyński's reappointment as Poland's deputy prime minister, highlight the escalating political complexity in the region. Special guests – Marcin Krol Fellow Iván László Nagy sits down with political scientist Cat Mudde to discuss how Europe has incorporated populism rather than creating effective tools to mitigate its rise. Mudde highlights how the West's promotion of liberal democracy is rooted in strategy, not ideology.

Cas Mudde er en av verdens aller fremste forskere på høyrepopulisme. I denne episoden snakker vi med Mudde om høyrepopulismens stilling i verden etter Trump, hva som skal til for å lykkes i valg mot høyrepopulistiske partier og hvordan høyrepopulisme og ekstremisme henger sammen.

Por toda a Europa, o populismo soma vitórias. Portugal já não é, se é que algum dia foi, uma exceção. Estarão os portugueses a tornar-se populistas?Ana Sofia Martins arranca este episódio com uma tirada do ‘género populista'; e usa este arranque para que José Santana Pereira ajude a deslindar as questões que talvez preocupem muitos de nós. Em Portugal, quem adere ao populismo e porquê? Que diferenças existem entre o populismo de direita e de esquerda? O populismo é sempre mau para as democracias? Este fenómeno veio para ficar? Se quer saber as respostas a estas e outras perguntas, já sabe, é só carregar no play.   REFERÊNCIAS E LINKS ÚTEIS Eatwell, Roger, e Goodwin, Matthew (2019). Populismo: A Revolta Contra a Democracia Liberal. Porto Salvo: Desassossego. Judis, John B. (2017). A Explosão do Populismo. Lisboa: Editorial Presença. Mudde, Cas, e Cristóbal Rovira-Kaltwasser (2017). Populismo: Uma Brevíssima Introdução. Lisboa: Gradiva.Müller, Jan-Werner (2017). O Que é O Populismo? Lisboa: Texto Editores. Zúquete, José Pedro (2022). Populismo: Lá Fora e Cá Dentro. Lisboa: Fundação Francisco Manuel dos Santos. [IN] PERTINENTE - O que é o Populismo? BIOS ANA SOFIA MARTINS Apresentadora e atriz portuguesa. Foi descoberta por uma agência de modelos aos 14 anos e desde então até vingar na moda, foi um passo. Participou em inúmeras campanhas de publicidade e editoriais nacionais e internacionais. Na televisão, após a sua passagem pela MTV Portugal como apresentadora, estreou-se na representação, num dos projectos de maior sucesso da TVI. O seu currículo conta ainda com projectos de ficção internacionais, com destaque para Devils 2, entre outros ainda por estrear brevemente. A par da sua carreira profissional as causas sociais são uma das grandes preocupações da actriz. Exemplo disso é o apadrinhamento da Casa de Acolhimento “Casa Nova”. JOSÉ SANTANA PEREIRA José Santana Pereira (Nisa, 1982) é professor de Ciência Política no ISCTE, investigador e membro do consórcio Sondagens ICS-ISCTE. Doutorado em Ciências Políticas e Sociais pelo Instituto Universitário Europeu de Florença, tem, nos últimos 15 anos, desenvolvido investigação na área do comportamento eleitoral e da opinião pública, bem como sobre sistemas eleitorais, a relação entre política e entretenimento, ou os efeitos dos média e das campanhas. 

Big Idea: Followers of Jesus humble themselves and give everything to worship their King 1. Following Jesus is costly 2. Following Jesus is counter cultural 3. Following Jesus is life giving

Big Idea: Followers of Jesus humble themselves and give everything to worship their King 1. Following Jesus is costly 2. Following Jesus is counter cultural 3. Following Jesus is life giving

Hidden Figures, Part 3 - Rob Mudde>

Although “populism” is a term that has been rigorously discussed and theorized in political science and communication studies, the term has received special attention ever since the political rise and presidency of Donald Trump. But what does populism actually mean, and how can we trace the lineage of populist conservative discourses that prefigured the Trump presidency?To guide us through the rhetorical history of this fraught concept, we are joined on the show today by Dr. Paul Elliott Johnson, Assistant Professor of Communication at the University of Pittsburgh. His recently published book, I the People: The Rhetoric of Conservative Populism in the United States, tells a captivating story of how conservative politicians and rhetors from the mid-20th-century to the present have appealed to the values of “the people.” Johnson elucidates how the conservative variant of populism has reduced the category of “the American people” through its focus on a possessive individualism constantly under threat by new ways of being and modes of organization. This sense of “the people under siege” has been undergirded by a reactionary response to blackness, which is ultimately traceable to the US's foundation in settler-colonialism and chattel slavery. In our discussion, we talk through several of the rhetorical case studies in Johnson's book, including the political ascendency and presidency of Ronald Reagan, the 1994 midterm elections and the year of the “angry white male,” the astroturfed revanchist “Tea Party” surge during the Obama presidency, and the rise of Donald Trump and the contemporary right-wing. Finally, we discuss some alternative methods of articulating “the people” that might help to expand, rather than reduce, the meaning of US popular democracy.References:Beasley, V. B. (2011). You, the people: American national identity in presidential rhetoric (Vol. 10). Texas A&M University Press.Cooper, M. (2017). Family values: Between neoliberalism and the new social conservatism. MIT Press.Corrigan, L. M. (2020). Black feelings: Race and affect in the long sixties. Univ. Press of Mississippi.DiPiero, T. (2002). White men aren't. Duke University Press.Goldberg, J. (2009). Liberal fascism: The secret history of the American left, from Mussolini to the politics of change. Crown Forum.Harris, C. I. (1993). Whiteness as property. Harvard law review, 1707-1791.Hartman, S. V. (1997). Scenes of subjection: Terror, slavery, and self-making in nineteenth-century America. Oxford University Press on Demand.Honig, B. (2017). Public things: Democracy in disrepair. Fordham Univ Press.Kelsie, A. E. (2019). Blackened Debate at the End of the World. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 52(1), 63-70.King Watts, E. (2017). Postracial fantasies, blackness, and zombies. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 14(4), 317-333.Laclau, E. (2005). On populist reason. Verso.Lee, M. J. (2006). The populist chameleon: The people's party, Huey Long, George Wallace, and the populist argumentative frame. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 92(4), 355-378.Lee, M. J. (2014). Creating conservatism: Postwar words that made an American movement. MSU Press.Matheson, C. (2016). “What does Obama want of me?” Anxiety and Jade Helm 15. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 102(2), 133-149.Mbembe, A. (2019). Necropolitics. Duke University Press.Moffitt, B. (2020). Populism. John Wiley & Sons.Moten, F. (2013). Blackness and nothingness (mysticism in the flesh). South Atlantic Quarterly, 112(4), 737-780.Mudde, C. (2004). The populist zeitgeist. Government and opposition, 39(4), 541-563.Nash, G. H. (2014). The conservative intellectual movement in America since 1945. Open Road Media.Ore, E. J. (2019). Lynching: Violence, rhetoric, and American identity. Univ. Press of Mississippi.Spillers, H. J. (1987). Mama's baby, papa's maybe: An American grammar book. diacritics, 17(2), 65-81.Vats, A. (2014). Racechange is the new Black: Racial accessorizing and racial tourism in high fashion as constraints on rhetorical agency. Communication, Culture & Critique, 7(1), 112-135.White, K. C. (2018). The branding of right-wing activism: The news media and the Tea Party. Oxford University Press.Wright, M. M. (2015). Physics of blackness: Beyond the middle passage epistemology. U of Minnesota Press.

Spreker: Ds. MuddeLocatie: Hervormd IjsselmuidenDatum: 27 jan 2022Bron: https://kerkdienstgemist.nl/stations/1237/events/recording/164330820001237★ Support this podcast ★

We are familiar with practice as a method for getting better at something. But what if this idea was only one part of the importance of practice? What if a key aspect of practice was learning how to fail? Professors Anna Mudde and Robert Piercey (University of Regina) discuss what practices are and how they are essential in renewal and innovation, ideally preventing traditions and our own personal identities from stagnating and becoming rigid. Living Philosophy is brought to you by Philosophy2u.com.Host:Dr Todd MeiSponsors:Philosophy2u.comHillary Hutchinson, Career and Change Coach at Transitioning Your LifeMartin Bunzl, author of Thinking while WalkingHermeneutics in Real LifeGeoffrey Moore, author of The Infinite Staircase     Links Related to this Episode:Anna Mudde (website)Robert Piercey (website)Reading as Philosophical Practice (Amazon)colonialism (SEP)Canada and the Remains of Indigenous Children (NPR)practices and internal vs. external goods (IEP)Alasdair MacIntyre (Wikipedia)John Dewey and Pragmatism (SEP)Maria Lugones (Wikipedia)Charles Mills (Wikipedia)Music: Earth and the Moon, by KetsaLogo Art: Angela Silva, Dattura Studios

Featuring Margriet Mudde Success has no limit online -

Ultradestra, la ricerca di Cas Mudde oltre la democrazia liberale. Oggi Memos ha ospitato il politologo olandese Cas Mudde, 54 anni, che insegna ad Athens (Geogia, Stati Uniti) e a Oslo (Norvegia), per parlare del suo ultimo libro “Ultradestra” (Luiss, 2020). Mudde indaga l'ultradestra definita come “la destra antisistema, ostile alla democrazia liberale”. Questa destra, secondo il politologo olandese, si divide in due sottogruppi: l'estrema destra, che rifiuta l'essenza della democrazia, vale a dire la sovranità popolare e il principio di maggioranza. L'altro sottogruppo dell'ultradestra è la destra radicale che, invece, accetta l'essenza della democrazia, ma si oppone ad elementi fondamentali della democrazia liberale (diritti delle minoranze, stato di diritto, separazione dei poteri). Nell'intervista a Memos Cas Mudde dà un'interessante spiegazione del perché l'ultradestra è uscita dalla marginalità politica in Occidente. Secondo il politologo olandese, dopo l'11 settembre nella discussione politica c'è stato “il passaggio dai temi socio-economici ai temi socio-culturali. Da un lato l'11 settembre ha posto in primo piano questioni come l'identità, l'insicurezza; dall'altro, c'è stata la convergenza tra centrodestra e centrosinistra sulle questioni economiche. Quindi – conclude Cas Mudde - i partiti principali avendo meno da discutere delle questioni socio-economiche, hanno iniziato a discutere di più su questioni legate all'identità e alla sicurezza e queste sono le questioni che fanno guadagnare l'estrema destra”. L'intervista a Cas Mudde è preceduta da una breve introduzione della teorica della politica, Nadia Urbinati.

Ultradestra, la ricerca di Cas Mudde oltre la democrazia liberale. Oggi Memos ha ospitato il politologo olandese Cas Mudde, 54 anni, che insegna ad Athens (Geogia, Stati Uniti) e a Oslo (Norvegia), per parlare del suo ultimo libro “Ultradestra” (Luiss, 2020). Mudde indaga l’ultradestra definita come “la destra antisistema, ostile alla democrazia liberale”. Questa destra, secondo il politologo olandese, si divide in due sottogruppi: l’estrema destra, che rifiuta l’essenza della democrazia, vale a dire la sovranità popolare e il principio di maggioranza. L’altro sottogruppo dell’ultradestra è la destra radicale che, invece, accetta l’essenza della democrazia, ma si oppone ad elementi fondamentali della democrazia liberale (diritti delle minoranze, stato di diritto, separazione dei poteri). Nell’intervista a Memos Cas Mudde dà un’interessante spiegazione del perché l’ultradestra è uscita dalla marginalità politica in Occidente. Secondo il politologo olandese, dopo l’11 settembre nella discussione politica c’è stato “il passaggio dai temi socio-economici ai temi socio-culturali. Da un lato l'11 settembre ha posto in primo piano questioni come l'identità, l'insicurezza; dall'altro, c’è stata la convergenza tra centrodestra e centrosinistra sulle questioni economiche. Quindi – conclude Cas Mudde - i partiti principali avendo meno da discutere delle questioni socio-economiche, hanno iniziato a discutere di più su questioni legate all'identità e alla sicurezza e queste sono le questioni che fanno guadagnare l'estrema destra”. L’intervista a Cas Mudde è preceduta da una breve introduzione della teorica della politica, Nadia Urbinati.

What is the difference between Jean-Marie Le Pen’s National Front and Donald Trump’s election as U.S. president? Why should we understand Trump as part of a dangerous “fourth wave” of radical right politicians? Dr. Cas Mudde’s new book The Far Right Today (Polity, 2019) argues that politicians like Le Pen represented a 20th-century marginalized populist radical right party but Trump (and others across the globe) represent a fourth wave in which the 21st-century radical right parties are normalized and mainstreamed all over the world such that three of the world’s largest democracies (India, the United States, and Brazil) have or have had radical right leaders. It is this normalization that Mudde identifies as crucial to our understanding of the radical right around the globe – and any possible responses available from liberal democracies. Cas Mudde is the Stanley Wade Shelton UGAF Professor in the School of Public and International Affairs at the University of Georgia and a Professor II in the Center for Research on Extremism (C-REX) at the University of Oslo. Mudde has written numerous scholarly books published in 23 languages (many of which focus on extremism and populism) and regularly publishes in popular outlets such as The Guardian. He hosts Radikaal, a podcast about the radical aspects politics, music, and sports. Susan Liebell is an associate professor of political science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia. Why Diehard Originalists Aren’t Really Originalists recently appeared in the Washington Post’s Monkey Cage and “Retreat from the Rule of Law: Locke and the Perils of Stand Your Ground” was published in the Journal of Politics (July 2020). Email her comments at sliebell@sju.edu or tweet to @SusanLiebell. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/european-studies

What is the difference between Jean-Marie Le Pen’s National Front and Donald Trump’s election as U.S. president? Why should we understand Trump as part of a dangerous “fourth wave” of radical right politicians? Dr. Cas Mudde’s new book The Far Right Today (Polity, 2019) argues that politicians like Le Pen represented a 20th-century marginalized populist radical right party but Trump (and others across the globe) represent a fourth wave in which the 21st-century radical right parties are normalized and mainstreamed all over the world such that three of the world’s largest democracies (India, the United States, and Brazil) have or have had radical right leaders. It is this normalization that Mudde identifies as crucial to our understanding of the radical right around the globe – and any possible responses available from liberal democracies. Cas Mudde is the Stanley Wade Shelton UGAF Professor in the School of Public and International Affairs at the University of Georgia and a Professor II in the Center for Research on Extremism (C-REX) at the University of Oslo. Mudde has written numerous scholarly books published in 23 languages (many of which focus on extremism and populism) and regularly publishes in popular outlets such as The Guardian. He hosts Radikaal, a podcast about the radical aspects politics, music, and sports. Susan Liebell is an associate professor of political science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia. Why Diehard Originalists Aren’t Really Originalists recently appeared in the Washington Post’s Monkey Cage and “Retreat from the Rule of Law: Locke and the Perils of Stand Your Ground” was published in the Journal of Politics (July 2020). Email her comments at sliebell@sju.edu or tweet to @SusanLiebell. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science

What is the difference between Jean-Marie Le Pen’s National Front and Donald Trump’s election as U.S. president? Why should we understand Trump as part of a dangerous “fourth wave” of radical right politicians? Dr. Cas Mudde’s new book The Far Right Today (Polity, 2019) argues that politicians like Le Pen represented a 20th-century marginalized populist radical right party but Trump (and others across the globe) represent a fourth wave in which the 21st-century radical right parties are normalized and mainstreamed all over the world such that three of the world’s largest democracies (India, the United States, and Brazil) have or have had radical right leaders. It is this normalization that Mudde identifies as crucial to our understanding of the radical right around the globe – and any possible responses available from liberal democracies. Cas Mudde is the Stanley Wade Shelton UGAF Professor in the School of Public and International Affairs at the University of Georgia and a Professor II in the Center for Research on Extremism (C-REX) at the University of Oslo. Mudde has written numerous scholarly books published in 23 languages (many of which focus on extremism and populism) and regularly publishes in popular outlets such as The Guardian. He hosts Radikaal, a podcast about the radical aspects politics, music, and sports. Susan Liebell is an associate professor of political science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia. Why Diehard Originalists Aren’t Really Originalists recently appeared in the Washington Post’s Monkey Cage and “Retreat from the Rule of Law: Locke and the Perils of Stand Your Ground” was published in the Journal of Politics (July 2020). Email her comments at sliebell@sju.edu or tweet to @SusanLiebell. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/critical-theory

What is the difference between Jean-Marie Le Pen’s National Front and Donald Trump’s election as U.S. president? Why should we understand Trump as part of a dangerous “fourth wave” of radical right politicians? Dr. Cas Mudde’s new book The Far Right Today (Polity, 2019) argues that politicians like Le Pen represented a 20th-century marginalized populist radical right party but Trump (and others across the globe) represent a fourth wave in which the 21st-century radical right parties are normalized and mainstreamed all over the world such that three of the world’s largest democracies (India, the United States, and Brazil) have or have had radical right leaders. It is this normalization that Mudde identifies as crucial to our understanding of the radical right around the globe – and any possible responses available from liberal democracies. Cas Mudde is the Stanley Wade Shelton UGAF Professor in the School of Public and International Affairs at the University of Georgia and a Professor II in the Center for Research on Extremism (C-REX) at the University of Oslo. Mudde has written numerous scholarly books published in 23 languages (many of which focus on extremism and populism) and regularly publishes in popular outlets such as The Guardian. He hosts Radikaal, a podcast about the radical aspects politics, music, and sports. Susan Liebell is an associate professor of political science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia. Why Diehard Originalists Aren’t Really Originalists recently appeared in the Washington Post’s Monkey Cage and “Retreat from the Rule of Law: Locke and the Perils of Stand Your Ground” was published in the Journal of Politics (July 2020). Email her comments at sliebell@sju.edu or tweet to @SusanLiebell. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/south-asian-studies

What is the difference between Jean-Marie Le Pen’s National Front and Donald Trump’s election as U.S. president? Why should we understand Trump as part of a dangerous “fourth wave” of radical right politicians? Dr. Cas Mudde’s new book The Far Right Today (Polity, 2019) argues that politicians like Le Pen represented a 20th-century marginalized populist radical right party but Trump (and others across the globe) represent a fourth wave in which the 21st-century radical right parties are normalized and mainstreamed all over the world such that three of the world’s largest democracies (India, the United States, and Brazil) have or have had radical right leaders. It is this normalization that Mudde identifies as crucial to our understanding of the radical right around the globe – and any possible responses available from liberal democracies. Cas Mudde is the Stanley Wade Shelton UGAF Professor in the School of Public and International Affairs at the University of Georgia and a Professor II in the Center for Research on Extremism (C-REX) at the University of Oslo. Mudde has written numerous scholarly books published in 23 languages (many of which focus on extremism and populism) and regularly publishes in popular outlets such as The Guardian. He hosts Radikaal, a podcast about the radical aspects politics, music, and sports. Susan Liebell is an associate professor of political science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia. Why Diehard Originalists Aren’t Really Originalists recently appeared in the Washington Post’s Monkey Cage and “Retreat from the Rule of Law: Locke and the Perils of Stand Your Ground” was published in the Journal of Politics (July 2020). Email her comments at sliebell@sju.edu or tweet to @SusanLiebell. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/politics-and-polemics

What is the difference between Jean-Marie Le Pen’s National Front and Donald Trump’s election as U.S. president? Why should we understand Trump as part of a dangerous “fourth wave” of radical right politicians? Dr. Cas Mudde’s new book The Far Right Today (Polity, 2019) argues that politicians like Le Pen represented a 20th-century marginalized populist radical right party but Trump (and others across the globe) represent a fourth wave in which the 21st-century radical right parties are normalized and mainstreamed all over the world such that three of the world’s largest democracies (India, the United States, and Brazil) have or have had radical right leaders. It is this normalization that Mudde identifies as crucial to our understanding of the radical right around the globe – and any possible responses available from liberal democracies. Cas Mudde is the Stanley Wade Shelton UGAF Professor in the School of Public and International Affairs at the University of Georgia and a Professor II in the Center for Research on Extremism (C-REX) at the University of Oslo. Mudde has written numerous scholarly books published in 23 languages (many of which focus on extremism and populism) and regularly publishes in popular outlets such as The Guardian. He hosts Radikaal, a podcast about the radical aspects politics, music, and sports. Susan Liebell is an associate professor of political science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia. Why Diehard Originalists Aren’t Really Originalists recently appeared in the Washington Post’s Monkey Cage and “Retreat from the Rule of Law: Locke and the Perils of Stand Your Ground” was published in the Journal of Politics (July 2020). Email her comments at sliebell@sju.edu or tweet to @SusanLiebell. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/world-affairs

What is the difference between Jean-Marie Le Pen’s National Front and Donald Trump’s election as U.S. president? Why should we understand Trump as part of a dangerous “fourth wave” of radical right politicians? Dr. Cas Mudde’s new book The Far Right Today (Polity, 2019) argues that politicians like Le Pen represented a 20th-century marginalized populist radical right party but Trump (and others across the globe) represent a fourth wave in which the 21st-century radical right parties are normalized and mainstreamed all over the world such that three of the world’s largest democracies (India, the United States, and Brazil) have or have had radical right leaders. It is this normalization that Mudde identifies as crucial to our understanding of the radical right around the globe – and any possible responses available from liberal democracies. Cas Mudde is the Stanley Wade Shelton UGAF Professor in the School of Public and International Affairs at the University of Georgia and a Professor II in the Center for Research on Extremism (C-REX) at the University of Oslo. Mudde has written numerous scholarly books published in 23 languages (many of which focus on extremism and populism) and regularly publishes in popular outlets such as The Guardian. He hosts Radikaal, a podcast about the radical aspects politics, music, and sports. Susan Liebell is an associate professor of political science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia. Why Diehard Originalists Aren’t Really Originalists recently appeared in the Washington Post’s Monkey Cage and “Retreat from the Rule of Law: Locke and the Perils of Stand Your Ground” was published in the Journal of Politics (July 2020). Email her comments at sliebell@sju.edu or tweet to @SusanLiebell. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/latin-american-studies

What is the difference between Jean-Marie Le Pen’s National Front and Donald Trump’s election as U.S. president? Why should we understand Trump as part of a dangerous “fourth wave” of radical right politicians? Dr. Cas Mudde’s new book The Far Right Today (Polity, 2019) argues that politicians like Le Pen represented a 20th-century marginalized populist radical right party but Trump (and others across the globe) represent a fourth wave in which the 21st-century radical right parties are normalized and mainstreamed all over the world such that three of the world’s largest democracies (India, the United States, and Brazil) have or have had radical right leaders. It is this normalization that Mudde identifies as crucial to our understanding of the radical right around the globe – and any possible responses available from liberal democracies. Cas Mudde is the Stanley Wade Shelton UGAF Professor in the School of Public and International Affairs at the University of Georgia and a Professor II in the Center for Research on Extremism (C-REX) at the University of Oslo. Mudde has written numerous scholarly books published in 23 languages (many of which focus on extremism and populism) and regularly publishes in popular outlets such as The Guardian. He hosts Radikaal, a podcast about the radical aspects politics, music, and sports. Susan Liebell is an associate professor of political science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia. Why Diehard Originalists Aren’t Really Originalists recently appeared in the Washington Post’s Monkey Cage and “Retreat from the Rule of Law: Locke and the Perils of Stand Your Ground” was published in the Journal of Politics (July 2020). Email her comments at sliebell@sju.edu or tweet to @SusanLiebell. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/american-studies

What is the difference between Jean-Marie Le Pen’s National Front and Donald Trump’s election as U.S. president? Why should we understand Trump as part of a dangerous “fourth wave” of radical right politicians? Dr. Cas Mudde’s new book The Far Right Today (Polity, 2019) argues that politicians like Le Pen represented a 20th-century marginalized populist radical right party but Trump (and others across the globe) represent a fourth wave in which the 21st-century radical right parties are normalized and mainstreamed all over the world such that three of the world’s largest democracies (India, the United States, and Brazil) have or have had radical right leaders. It is this normalization that Mudde identifies as crucial to our understanding of the radical right around the globe – and any possible responses available from liberal democracies. Cas Mudde is the Stanley Wade Shelton UGAF Professor in the School of Public and International Affairs at the University of Georgia and a Professor II in the Center for Research on Extremism (C-REX) at the University of Oslo. Mudde has written numerous scholarly books published in 23 languages (many of which focus on extremism and populism) and regularly publishes in popular outlets such as The Guardian. He hosts Radikaal, a podcast about the radical aspects politics, music, and sports. Susan Liebell is an associate professor of political science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia. Why Diehard Originalists Aren’t Really Originalists recently appeared in the Washington Post’s Monkey Cage and “Retreat from the Rule of Law: Locke and the Perils of Stand Your Ground” was published in the Journal of Politics (July 2020). Email her comments at sliebell@sju.edu or tweet to @SusanLiebell. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

Afke en Ella vertellen in deze aflevering over hun werk voor de online expositie RE-FRAME. Het werk is te zien op de website: www.re-frame.site

Thema: Alleen als je schuilt bij Jezus sta je gegraveerd in Zijn hart. 1. Davids gebed om bewaring (vers 1) 2. Davids belijdenis (vers 2)

When hundreds of far-right activists gathered in Berlin earlier this month, banners and T-shirts bearing US President Donald Trump’s face could be clearly seen among the crowd. Many waved the American flag. The demonstrators, who later tried to storm the German parliament, had assembled to protest against the German government’s COVID-19 restrictions.Related: Is there a ‘Nazi emergency’ in the German city of Dresden?The US president is a popular figure among far-right groups in Europe. Patrik Hermansson went undercover with far-right groups in the US for one year. Credit: Courtesy of Patrik Hermansson  Patrik Hermansson, a researcher with Hope Not Hate, a British advocacy group that campaigns against racism and fascism, says far-right activists see Trump as an anti-establishment figure, someone who rallies against the elites. Swedish-born Hermansson spent a year undercover in 2017 as a member of alt-right movements in Europe and the US. Trump’s time in office “put the wind in the sails of far-right groups and populist parties in Europe,” he said.Just hours after TV networks announced that Trump had won the 2016 US election, French far-right leader Marine Le Pen took to the stage of her party headquarters in Paris and celebrated the result. “Americans have voted, they’ve rejected the status quo. What happened last night was not the end of the world, it was the end of a world,” Le Pen said. She wasn’t alone in her jubilation. In neighboring Germany, the then-leader of the far-right Alternative for Deutschland (AfD) party, Frauke Petry, tweeted "this night changes the USA, Europe and the world!"And in Britain, Nigel Farage, former leader of the populist UK Independence Party, compared Trump’s win to the passing of Brexit a few months earlier, saying 2016 was a year of “political revolutions.”Supporting an American president is highly unusual for far-right politicians in Europe.Related: Artists in Germany fear backlash after far-right party wins big A portrait of Sylvia Taschka Credit: Courtesy of Sylvia Taschka Sylvia Taschka, who teaches history at Wayne State University in Detroit, says US presidents usually represent everything European far-right parties oppose: “Unrestrained capitalism. In other words, you know, a globalized free-market economy and an interventionist, some would say imperialist foreign policy," she said. Trump challenged both of those stereotypes, Taschka says, and upended their long-held tradition of anti-Americanism. Taschka, who was born in Nuremberg, Germany, has witnessed the rise of the far-right in Germany with dismay. As a young child growing up in a city famed for its enormous Nazi party rallies in the 1920s and '30s and later the Nazi war trials, she was well aware that support for far-right views still existed. But those views were never openly celebrated."I was not blind when I lived in Germany.  Germany always had a far-right element — even when I grew up — but they were kept more under the lid.”In the last decade, Taschka says that has changed dramatically. But she doesn’t attribute the growing strength of the far-right AfD party to Trump. A changing political landscape and the refugee crisis in 2015 were key driving factors, she says.Related: With far-right topping Dutch polls, EU elections could see Eurosceptics take the leadDutch political scientist Cas Mudde agrees. Mudde, who’s a professor in the School of Public and International Affairs at the University of Georgia, says far-right parties like the National Front in France or the Freedom Party of Austria don’t need to look to Trump for ideological motivation. “They have a much more developed ideological frame than Trump will ever have,” he said.Mudde says President Trump takes little notice of Europe’s populist politicians — but that’s not the case for some of his diplomats. The US ambassadors to Germany and the Netherlands have both been guilty of normalizing Europe’s far-right parties, he says.“One can think of Richard Grenell, in Germany, who was criticized for normalizing the AFD and in the Netherlands, it's even stronger with US Ambassador Pete Hoekstra," Mudde said. It’s alleged that far-right Dutch party leaders met with Hoekstra at the US Embassy to discuss their plans for the future, Mudde says.Former Trump strategist Steve Bannon has also been holding court with far-right parties in Europe over the last couple of years. Bannon plans to convert a monastery outside of Rome into a political academy for ultraconservatives and future populist leaders, a move that has met fierce resistance from Italy’s Culture Ministry. The former White House aide also helped establish a foundation in Brussels aimed at supporting Europe’s far-right parties. But so far, it has received little attention from the parties themselves.French political analyst Jean-Yves Camus, a specialist on the French and European radical right, says parties like the National Front in France have little interest in taking advice from an American. They were doing just fine before Bannon came on the scene, he says.“When Steve Bannon tried to present himself as the man who could unite the extreme right in Europe, he forgot a very important thing: The National Front was a very strong party well before Steve Bannon became known in Washington, DC. So, basically, they did not need him.”The policy of "America first" that Trump promotes has been a mantra of the far-right movement in France since the 1970s. Slogans like “France for the French” or “French first” have been around for some decades, Camus says.     While the rise of populist parties in Europe might seem like an anti-establishment vote, Hermansson says it’s important to recognize that many grassroots supporters believe violence is the only way to achieve their goals. In his first few months undercover with far-right groups, Hermansson was shocked at how openly they condoned the use of violence.“I think in the beginning, I was quite surprised over how openly supportive of violence they were, or at least how implicitly they gave credence to even mass shootings," Hermansson said. Hermansson was in Charlottesville the day of the Unite the Right white supremacist rally in August 2017. He was standing just yards away from Heather Heyer when she was killed by James Alex Fields Jr., an alt-right supporter who plowed his car into a crowd of counterprotesters, injuring 19 people and killing Heyer. Screenshot of video footage of a white power rally in Chartlottesville, Virginia, taken by Patrik Hermansson, who went undercover with far-right groups in the US for one year.  Credit: Courtesy of Patrik Hermansson Hermansson says the incident was hugely traumatic and although he never expected someone would get killed that day, he had become increasingly concerned that things would turn violent. After Hermansson revealed his cover, he received threats from far-right groups for months afterward. Today, he says he feels relatively safe. The alt-right supporters Hermansson met in Europe would most definitely support a second Trump term, he says. In the last year, populist politicians in Europe have also been tweeting their support for another Trump win in November. Political scientist Mudde says their support hinges on the fact that they share a number of common enemies with the US president. They don’t believe a Trump victory will boost their standing in the polls, he says, but it’s better than seeing Biden get into office.Biden is no friend of the far-right, Mudde says. 

In dit interview ga ik in gesprek met Merle Mudde, multi-passionate ondernemer. Merle noemt zich een multi-passionate ondernemer, omdat zij over meerdere dingen gepassioneerd is en hiermee ook ondernemingen heeft opgezet. Vanuit een achtergrond in het vastgoed ontstond haar eerste bedrijf; Holland Homestay. In meerdere steden in Nederland verhuurt Holland Homestay studentenkamers bij mensen thuis. Door het snelle en grote succes van Holland Homestay kwam Merle in contact met andere ondernemers die van haar wilden leren. Zo onstond haar onderneming in business coaching. Ze ontdekte het projectmanagement systeem Trello, waar ze helemaal weg van is en waarmee ze overzicht houdt. Door dit tijdens haar business coaching te gebruiken ontstond het idee om een online programma te maken, waarin ondernemers leren om d.m.v. Trello overzicht en rust te creeëren. Verder gelooft Merle in ondernemen vanuit jouw verhaal. Haar verhaal was zij door een ernstigere vorm van PMS elke maand in haar bed lag. Dit zorgde ervoor dat ze alles hieromtrent is gaan uitzoeken waardoor ze nu ook andere vrouwen empowert om te ondernemen vanuit hun cyclus en zo is business nummer 3 ontstaan. Voor het geval je denkt dat ze bijna overspannen raakt van de vele verschillende dingen waar ze mee bezig is; dit is totaal niet het geval! Merle is namelijk vorig jaar moeder geworden van een zoontje en vindt het heel belangrijk veel bij hem te zijn. Daardoor werkt ze ook maar 2 dagen per week. Hoe ze dit allemaal doet? Door multi-focus! En daarover vertelt ze in dit interview! Ben je nieuwsgierig? Luister dan snel! Wil je meer over Merle en haar bedrijven weten? Neem een kijkje op haar websites en volg haar op social media: https://merlemudde.com/ https://hollandhomestay.com/ https://womenfundamentals.nl/ https://www.instagram.com/merlemudde/ https://www.instagram.com/tribe_of_multipassionates/ https://www.linkedin.com/in/merlemudde/ https://www.facebook.com/businesscoachmerle/ https://www.facebook.com/hollandhomestay/

The global rise of radical right nativist parties seemed to skip Ireland. But the last 18 months have seen efforts to introduce anti-immigration politics to Ireland in a way not seen before, amid a backlash against the legalisation of abortion. We hear how a conspiracy theory elevated by US pundit Alex Jones has ended up on the streets of Cork, as protesters ambush an event by ruling party Fine Gael a week out from the election. Naomi O'Leary speaks to Dutch political scientist Cas Mudde about what Ireland can learn from the experience of countries that have already seen similar trends. Mudde breaks down the evolution of the far right, new tactics at play, and the dubious role played by the media in the United States and the Netherlands. This is an episode of Halfpints, the bonus content we make specially to thank our Patreon supporters. You can find a whole archive of extra content over at https://www.patreon.com/theirishpassport. Share this episode and tag @PassportIrish to be in with a chance to win a copy of Cas Mudde's new book, 'The Far Right Today'. Support this podcast

भोजपुरी फिल्मो की खूबसूरत अदाकारा आम्रपाली दुबे ने अपने इंटरव्यू में दीपिका पादुकोण की फिल्म 'छपाक'के बारे में क्या कहा,देखिये वीडियो.

Podcast co-host Tim Schlittner and guest host and AFL-CIO International Director Cathy Feingold talk with Professor Cas Mudde, a political scientist from the University of Georgia. Mudde has a new book, "The Far Right Today," which takes a look at the resurgence of right-wing politicians and activists across the globe, much of it cloaked in populist, worker-friendly rhetoric.

भोजपुरी फिल्मो के सुपरस्टार पर गोरखपुर के सांसद रवि किशन हाल ही में भोजपुरी फिल्म विवाह' के ट्रेलर लांच पर पहुंचे,देखिये इंटरव्यू में क्या कहा,रवि किशन ने.

Senior Researcher Joe Mulhall interviews long term friend of HOPE not hate, and prominent scholar of the far right, Cas Mudde about his new book The Far Right Today. Mudde argues that we have entered a new 'wave' of far right development that can be seen across the world in the increased presence of far right ideas and parties in the mainstream of democratic countries.Joe and Cas discuss the developments in the far right today, what drives them, and what can be done to address them. Mudde makes the explicit call to the mainstream right that they need to consider the limits of what and who they are willing to work with.

Počkat počkat .. proč, a kdo, a kde, a jak? Populismu je dnes ve veřejném prostoru plno, je tak snadné zapochybovat, zda vaše babička opravdu mluví o tom stejném jako rozhlasová hlasatelka nebo ten poslanec ze včerejška. Trocha definic a kontextu je tak rozhodně na místě! Dojde i na morálku, běžný lid nebo rodný list Baracka Obamy. Zamíříme také na Apeninský poloostrov, abychom se blíže podívali na italské populisty (dívat se ale budeme pouze, pokud mají na sobě aspoň tričko). K poslechu podcastu i následném žvanění o něm doporučujeme chlebíčky. Zdroje a odkazy: Müller, Jan-Werner. What is Populism? University of Pennsylvania Press Philadelphia (2016). Mudde, Cas. YouTube přednáška o populismu. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6lO6SCVJCFk. D’Alimonte, R. (2019). How the Populists won in Italy. Journal of Democracy, 30(1), 114–127.doi:10.1353/jod.2019.0009 Guardian série The new populism: https://www.theguardian.com/world/series/the-new-populism Populistické strany v Evropě: https://populistorg.files.wordpress.com/2019/02/populist-version-1-20190211.pdf Kvíz - máte sklony k populismu?: https://www.theguardian.com/world/ng-interactive/2018/nov/21/how-populist-are-you-quiz Rozhovor s Ivanem Krastevem: https://www.respekt.cz/tydenik/2019/23/souperit-budou-zachranci-zivota-se-zachranci-zivotniho-stylu Cas Mudde o populismu: https://icds.ee/mudde-populism-is-based-on-morals/ Mudde rozhovor v češtině: https://www.irozhlas.cz/zpravy-svet/nizozemsky-politolog-cas-mudde-populismus-krajni-pravice-evropska-unie-donald_1905291321_cha Wired článek o Hnutí 5 hvězd: https://www.wired.com/story/italy-five-star-movement-techno-utopians/?verso=true Audio zdroje: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjKsK_pi7VY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BjxgY0_8Zh8&t=20s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7pzPDBlkt7Q https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mIEeypPp3og https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AUZYXbW-z6k https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J0G9MOcb8_w Co se nám nevešlo: O populistické rétorice: https://medium.com/carrot-stick/the-rhetoric-of-a-populist-e54570b29e51

इंटरव्यू के दौरान जब राम मंदिर निर्माण पर ख़ेसारी लाल यादव से सवाल किया गया तब देखिये क्या था उनका रिएक्शन |

Dr. Cas Mudde, Stanley Wade Shelton UGAF Professor of International Affairs at the University of Georgia, joins Andrea Kendall-Taylor and Rachel Rizzo to discuss contemporary populism. Right- and left-wing populist movements have grown around the world in the last decade, but right- and left-wing populists feature remarkable differences. Dr. Mudde underlines that populism is a fundamental challenge to liberal democracies everywhere.

#Bhaisaab #fasaad #master #gurujee #school #college #publictransport #privatecar #sarkari #hospital #nursinghome #radar #musclepower #tubelight #khopdi #teacher #doctor #vakeel #gurukul #adalat #license #treatment #google #operation #youtube #publicproperty #Narak #Yamdoot #bodymassage #police #kasam #NRShospital 

Estonia, a tiny Baltic state, was hit by a giant shockwave in March when a political party promoting white supremacist views won nearly 18 percent of the vote in a general election. A second shockwave hit when Jüri Ratas, the leader of the liberal-left Centre Party, invited the party, called EKRE, to form a coalition government. The powerful interior and finance ministries went to two EKRE leaders, Mart Helme and son Martin Helme; the family double act excels in racism, sexism and homophobia, and their followers spread the alt-right conspiracy theory that immigrant invaders are replacing so-called true Europeans. Last month, fascism defender Jaak Madison became the first EKRE representative to win a seat at the European Parliament. EKRE now has a strong role representing Estonia on the international stage where it threatens the country's carefully nurtured image as an advanced and open society that teems with startups and digital services. With a rather different Estonia emerging — an Estonia where the kind of accommodation that allowed EKRE into government has echoes with the rise of fascism in the 1930s — we travel to the capital Tallinn to hear from people who have taken a stand. Ahto Lobjakas is a former Brussels correspondent whose outspoken commentary at home frequently made him a government opponent. He is now more like an enemy of the state amid creeping censorship and threats to his personal safety. A former president of the country, Toomas Hendrik Ilves, is among those who have come to Lobjakas’ defence. We also talk to two leaders of anti-EKRE protest movements. Kristi Roost helped start the online campaign Kõigi Eesti this year with the goal of preserving Estonia as a respectful and inclusive country. A core group, including Silver Tambur, the co-founder of online magazine Estonian World, has grown to 27,000 members. Click here for Kõigi Eesti's video. Maris Hellrand, a civil society activist and journalist, takes a more direct approach by leading street protests outside Estonia’s seat of government, Stenbock House. She also has helped turn the tables on EKRE by promoting a lapel pin displaying “pink spittle,” which is one of EKRE’s epithets for their opponents. Neither movement was able to stop EKRE from joining the government or the European Parliament. But they are run by determined and imaginative campaigners. To start the show, we check in with Cas Mudde, a Dutch political scientist renowned for his work on populism and the radical right. Mudde offers some general thoughts on EKRE and on whether Moscow may have had a role in its rise, as was the case for some other far-right movements in Europe. Visit our website for episode art and more on EU Scream. “Beethoven Symphony No. 9 in D minor, Op. 125” by Papalin is licensed under CC by 3.0. “Airside No. 9” is played by Lara Natale.Support the show (https://euscream.com/donate/)

Europas Populisten vereinen sich, um gemeinsam ins EU-Parlament einzuziehen. Aber in ihren Reihen tickt eine milliardenschwere Zeitbombe. Hier findest du den Artikel auf perspective-daily.de. Autor und Sprecher: David Ehl  

#Kalyug #selfproclaimed #moralpolice #methane #gas #babool #Madhyayug #timemachine #21stcentury #mahila #shaadi #divorce #minimum #maximum #fix #TV #channel #Purush #vivaah #dimaag #BGrade #Hindi #picture #DVDs #autoplay #jokes #memes #pioneer #keetanu #antibacterial #solution #tikona #padosi #school #fungus #GeneralElection2019 #vote

Tim Mudde serves as Student Ministries Pastor at Grandview Baptist Church

#gun  #khan #knowledge #khazana #kitabein #speaker #listener #quality #toothpaste #wisdom #dhoommachaledhoom #button #annoying #irritating  #flaunt #BayofBengal #bakhanoo #baba #complex #jargon #big #words #obscure #references #conversation #ghanta

At the start of Populism: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford University Press, 2017), five different, and competing, approaches to populism. It has been used to describe those on the left and the right, those in power and those seeking out power. Into this confusion, Cas Mudde and Cristobal Rovira Kaltwasser... Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

At the start of Populism: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford University Press, 2017), five different, and competing, approaches to populism. It has been used to describe those on the left and the right, those in power and those seeking out power. Into this confusion, Cas Mudde and Cristobal Rovira Kaltwasser offer clarity and brevity to the challenge of figuring out what populism is exactly. Mudde is associate professor of international affairs at the University of Georgia; Kaltwasser is associate professor of political science at the Diego Portales University in Santiago, Chile. Mudde and Kaltwasser suggest that an ideational approach to populism offers needed clarification. They argue that populism is centered on specific ideas about The People, The Elite, and The General Will. Whether populism emerges in the form of a social movement, like Occupy Wall Street, or political parties, such as the populism parties spread across Europe, or even populist leaders, these ideas distinguish populists. But they also suggest that the thin-centeredness of populism means it often is connected to other ideologies, such as socialism or authoritarianism. Populism then can manifest in a specific political context as a left-wing movement or a charismatic strongman. Gender, too, matters, as masculinity and definitions of the role of women, feature prominently in populism. This podcast was hosted by Heath Brown, Assistant Professor of Public Policy, John Jay College and the Graduate Center at the City University of New York. You can follow him on Twitter @heathbrown. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

At the start of Populism: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford University Press, 2017), five different, and competing, approaches to populism. It has been used to describe those on the left and the right, those in power and those seeking out power. Into this confusion, Cas Mudde and Cristobal Rovira Kaltwasser offer clarity and brevity to the challenge of figuring out what populism is exactly. Mudde is associate professor of international affairs at the University of Georgia; Kaltwasser is associate professor of political science at the Diego Portales University in Santiago, Chile. Mudde and Kaltwasser suggest that an ideational approach to populism offers needed clarification. They argue that populism is centered on specific ideas about The People, The Elite, and The General Will. Whether populism emerges in the form of a social movement, like Occupy Wall Street, or political parties, such as the populism parties spread across Europe, or even populist leaders, these ideas distinguish populists. But they also suggest that the thin-centeredness of populism means it often is connected to other ideologies, such as socialism or authoritarianism. Populism then can manifest in a specific political context as a left-wing movement or a charismatic strongman. Gender, too, matters, as masculinity and definitions of the role of women, feature prominently in populism. This podcast was hosted by Heath Brown, Assistant Professor of Public Policy, John Jay College and the Graduate Center at the City University of New York. You can follow him on Twitter @heathbrown.

At the start of Populism: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford University Press, 2017), five different, and competing, approaches to populism. It has been used to describe those on the left and the right, those in power and those seeking out power. Into this confusion, Cas Mudde and Cristobal Rovira Kaltwasser offer clarity and brevity to the challenge of figuring out what populism is exactly. Mudde is associate professor of international affairs at the University of Georgia; Kaltwasser is associate professor of political science at the Diego Portales University in Santiago, Chile. Mudde and Kaltwasser suggest that an ideational approach to populism offers needed clarification. They argue that populism is centered on specific ideas about The People, The Elite, and The General Will. Whether populism emerges in the form of a social movement, like Occupy Wall Street, or political parties, such as the populism parties spread across Europe, or even populist leaders, these ideas distinguish populists. But they also suggest that the thin-centeredness of populism means it often is connected to other ideologies, such as socialism or authoritarianism. Populism then can manifest in a specific political context as a left-wing movement or a charismatic strongman. Gender, too, matters, as masculinity and definitions of the role of women, feature prominently in populism. This podcast was hosted by Heath Brown, Assistant Professor of Public Policy, John Jay College and the Graduate Center at the City University of New York. You can follow him on Twitter @heathbrown. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

At the start of Populism: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford University Press, 2017), five different, and competing, approaches to populism. It has been used to describe those on the left and the right, those in power and those seeking out power. Into this confusion, Cas Mudde and Cristobal Rovira Kaltwasser offer clarity and brevity to the challenge of figuring out what populism is exactly. Mudde is associate professor of international affairs at the University of Georgia; Kaltwasser is associate professor of political science at the Diego Portales University in Santiago, Chile. Mudde and Kaltwasser suggest that an ideational approach to populism offers needed clarification. They argue that populism is centered on specific ideas about The People, The Elite, and The General Will. Whether populism emerges in the form of a social movement, like Occupy Wall Street, or political parties, such as the populism parties spread across Europe, or even populist leaders, these ideas distinguish populists. But they also suggest that the thin-centeredness of populism means it often is connected to other ideologies, such as socialism or authoritarianism. Populism then can manifest in a specific political context as a left-wing movement or a charismatic strongman. Gender, too, matters, as masculinity and definitions of the role of women, feature prominently in populism. This podcast was hosted by Heath Brown, Assistant Professor of Public Policy, John Jay College and the Graduate Center at the City University of New York. You can follow him on Twitter @heathbrown. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices