POPULARITY
Choosing a Trustee: Why Naming Your Kid May Be a Mistake — Marguerite Lorenz Short answer: Naming your child as trustee, executor, or agent under your power of attorney is the default choice for most American families — and it is frequently the wrong one. In this episode of Wealth Actually, host Frazer Rice talks with California Licensed Professional Fiduciary and Master Certified Independent Trustee Marguerite Lorenz about why roughly two-thirds of American adults still have no estate plan, why the job of a trustee is far more intimate and technical than families expect, and how to decide between a family trustee, a bank or trust company, and an independent professional trustee. https://youtu.be/56bzuORe8YI Episode Overview: Who Will Actually Run Your Plan? Most estate planning conversations stop at the documents. Marguerite Lorenz argues the documents are the easy part. The hard part is staffing — deciding who steps in when you can no longer make new decisions, and whether that person can absorb the technical, financial, and emotional weight of the job. Lorenz has served as trustee, executor, agent under power of attorney for finance, and agent for health care for hundreds of families since 2003. She is the author of three books — Luck or Control? The Life-Improving Power of Estate Planning, How to Be a Successful 90-Year-Old, and the newly updated Ethics for Trustees 2.0 — and she is Vice-Chair of the Independent Trustee Alliance. Her framing line, and the one that should stick with every listener: “If you don’t get your estate plan done, you’re suing your family. You’re making them go to court. And who would want to make anyone else go to court?”— Marguerite Lorenz This is the second time Marguerite has joined the show. Her first appearance covered the mechanics of individual trusteeship: EP.75 — Individual Trusteeship with Marguerite Lorenz. Key Takeaways •Only about a third of American adults have any written estate plan — and Lorenz argues half of those plans would not actually function when needed. •Professionals are barely better than the public. When Lorenz polls rooms of attorneys, CPAs, and financial advisors, roughly one-third raise their hands for a complete, up-to-date, ready-to-go plan. •The trustee role is intimate, not administrative. A trustee sees your paperwork, your bills, your medications, and your bedroom. “Who is going to be the first person in your bedroom when you are no longer able to make new decisions?” •Incapacity, not death, is the long tail. Many people live for five or six years unable to make new decisions. The trustee’s job often runs during your lifetime, not just after it. •A professional trustee can be temporary. Lorenz recounts stepping in for a client during cancer treatment, providing a full accounting, and stepping back down when he recovered — then serving again after his death. Would your child step back down? •Estate planning is about preferences, not predictions. “Our power in estate planning is not prediction, it’s setting our preferences” — and preferences can only be set while you are competent. •Quality of life belongs in the plan. Not just tax, legal, and financial terms — but how you want to live, where you want to live, and what small things matter (for Lorenz, an international selection of dark chocolate). •Digital assets are now a core trustee problem. Phones, social accounts, and daily transactions all require someone with access and authority. •A will does nothing while you are alive. “The will doesn’t operate at all if you go to the hospital and you haven’t granted authority to anyone.” •Cost is usually overestimated. Both an estate plan and an independent professional trustee typically cost far less than probate court. •Revisit every five years. Calendar a five-year check-in with your attorney to review law changes, marriages, divorces, births, and deaths. Chapters and Timestamps •[00:00] Cold open: “If you don’t get your estate plan done, you’re suing your family.” •[00:32] Welcome back — introducing Marguerite Lorenz, California trustee and author •[01:14] Luck or Control? — why fear keeps families from finishing an estate plan •[02:22] What a full-time trustee actually sees: trustee, executor, agent for finance, agent for health care •[03:49] Why families default to naming a child — and where that breaks down •[05:00] The skill set nobody screens for: negotiation, calm, empathy, and grief •[05:40] Case study: serving as temporary trustee through a client’s cancer treatment — and stepping back down •[07:51] Why even attorneys need their own attorney: nobody is objective about their own circumstances •[09:09] The five-year estate plan check-in as a life milestone •[09:39] How to Be a Successful 90-Year-Old — living well to the very end •[10:20] The “black box” problem: privacy, dignity, and care in your own home •[11:54] Preferences over predictions — planning for your future vulnerable self •[13:40] Rewriting an advance health care directive after hundreds of hospital bedsides •[16:13] The statistics: only a third of adults — and only a third of professionals — are actually ready •[17:47] Frazer’s challenge to advisors: you can’t advise well if you aren’t practicing what you preach •[18:22] The first question in Luck or Control?: “Hey professional, do you have your estate plan done?” •[19:21] Ethics for Trustees 2.0 — what’s new in the updated audio and PDF edition •[20:27] Family trustee vs. bank trustee vs. independent professional trustee •[21:52] The looming crisis: the great wealth transfer, incapacity, and digital assets •[24:54] Documenting the “why” behind hard trustee decisions •[25:23] Probate courts overrun, bioethics committees, and next-of-kin defaults •[26:54] Where to find the books, the podcast, and the Independent Trustee Alliance directory About the Guest: Marguerite Lorenz, MCIT, CLPF Marguerite Lorenz is a California Licensed Professional Fiduciary (CLPF #319) and a Master Certified Independent Trustee (MCIT). She has served as Trustee, Executor, Agent for Finance, and Agent for Health Care for more than 200 families since 2003 as managing partner of Lorenz Private Trustees. Marguerite is Vice-Chair of the Board of the Independent Trustee Alliance, past Chair of the California Professional Fiduciaries Bureau Advisory Committee, and host of the Plan For This podcast. She is the author of Luck or Control? The Life-Improving Power of Estate Planning, How to Be a Successful 90-Year-Old, and Ethics for Trustees 2.0. About the Host: Frazer Rice Frazer Rice is the author of Wealth, Actually: Intelligent Decision-Making for the 1% and host of the Wealth Actually podcast, where he interviews experts, entrepreneurs, and commentators on preserving assets and enjoying wealth. Resources and Links Mentioned •PlanForThis.com — Marguerite’s books, the Plan For This podcast, and a free First Steps toolkit. Ethics for Trustees 2.0 is now exclusive to this site (audio + PDF bundled with purchase). •TrusteeAlliance.com — the Independent Trustee Alliance directory for locating certified independent trustees by state. •Marguerite Lorenz on LinkedIn •California Professional Fiduciaries Bureau — state licensing for professional fiduciaries •Related episode: EP.75 — Individual Trusteeship with Marguerite Lorenz •Related episode: What If You Are Named in a Will or Trust? Frequently Asked Questions Should I name my child as trustee? Not automatically. A child understands the family but may lack the technical skill to handle tax, legal, financial, and medical decisions — and may be grieving or in conflict with siblings at the exact moment judgment is required. Marguerite Lorenz notes that a trustee must be a good negotiator, stay calm under pressure, set aside personal feelings, and enforce rules the grantor set. She also raises a test most families never consider: if you recover, would your child voluntarily step back down and hand you a full accounting? What is the difference between a family trustee, a corporate trustee, and an independent trustee? A family trustee is a relative or friend serving in a personal capacity, usually unpaid and untrained. A corporate trustee is a bank or trust company with institutional infrastructure, minimum account sizes, and staff turnover. An independent professional trustee is a licensed or certified individual — like a California Licensed Professional Fiduciary — who serves full-time, carries a succession plan, and can often be engaged at a lower cost than families expect. The Independent Trustee Alliance maintains a national directory of independent trustees. What does a trustee actually do while I am still alive? A trustee acting during incapacity manages assets, accounts for every dollar, handles taxation, pays bills, coordinates care, and increasingly manages digital assets such as phone-based transactions and social media accounts. Lorenz emphasizes that many people live for five or six years unable to make new decisions, so the trustee’s lifetime role is often longer and more demanding than the post-death administration. How often should I update my estate plan? Roughly every five years, or sooner after a major life event such as marriage, divorce, birth, death, a liquidity event, or a change in tax law. Lorenz recommends putting a five-year reminder in your phone to call your attorney and ask what has changed in the law and in your life. What happens if I go to the hospital without an estate plan? The hospital and its bioethics committee will do the best they can and will look for next of kin to make decisions for you — potentially people with whom you have never discussed your personal wishes. A will does not help here, because a will only operates after death. Financial and health care powers of attorney are what grant someone authority while you are alive. Is an estate plan expensive? Usually less than people assume, and materially less than probate court. Lorenz makes the same point about professional trustees: “Independent individual professional trustees cost a lot less than you think also. And you need to ask, because this is your life we’re talking about.” Do financial professionals have their own estate plans? Often not. When Lorenz polls audiences of attorneys, CPAs, and financial advisors, only about a third report having a complete, up-to-date, ready-to-go plan — barely better than the general public. Her challenge to the profession is that clients will increasingly ask advisors directly: “Do you have your estate plan completed?” Pull Quotes “Our power in estate planning is not prediction, it’s really about setting our preferences.” “Who’s going to be the first person in your bedroom when you are no longer able to make new decisions?” “I’m not in charge. I’m a servant-manager.” “Once I get my estate plan done and updated, I don’t think about it anymore. My head space is so clear because everything I was worried about has been thought about, considered, allowed, and put down in writing.” Full Transcript Transcript lightly edited for clarity. Timestamps are approximate. [00:00] Marguerite Lorenz: You know, if you don’t get your estate plan done, you’re suing your family. You’re making them go to court, right? And who would want to make anyone else go to court? [00:08] Announcer: Welcome back to the Wealth Actually podcast, the show that features experts, entrepreneurs, and commentators that will give you the right knowledge, planning, and guidance so you can preserve your assets and enjoy your wealth. Learn more and subscribe today at wealthactually.com. This podcast is for educational and entertainment purposes. It is not investment, legal, nor tax advice and does not represent the opinion of the employers of the host or guests. [00:32] Frazer Rice: Welcome back. Friend of the podcast Marguerite Lorenz is on the podcast this week. She’s a California trustee and has a new book called Luck or Control? out. We’re going to talk a little bit about fiduciary matters and what it takes to have good staffing within your estate plan. Welcome back, Marguerite. [00:54] Marguerite Lorenz: Thank you, Frazer. [00:55] Frazer Rice: Since the last time you were on, you have a couple of books out and we’ve gotten to see each other a couple of times with the Independent Trustee Alliance. Let’s talk a little bit about the new book that you just published and what you’re trying to do with it. [01:14] Marguerite Lorenz: So that book is Luck or Control? The Life-Improving Power of Estate Planning. And I wrote it because I’ve seen hundreds and hundreds of families really struggle with how this is going to get done, and many people don’t get their estate plan done at all because they’re so afraid. They don’t know what to expect, they don’t want to talk about their mortality, they don’t want to have serious conversations with their loved ones. And if we don’t have those conversations, we really lose all control when we need it the most — when that medical crisis happens or when life changes in a big way. [01:52] Frazer Rice: No question about it. And I went through the book and it’s an important read, because for those people who really have to get their affairs in order and feel stuck for some reason, I think you do a good job of laying out why you need to get unstuck and then how to take a couple of steps to initiate those conversations and get the important things down so that you can then have the deeper conversations that help out later on as you’re structuring things. What part of your experience being a full-time trustee helped to inform all of this? [02:22] Marguerite Lorenz: Well, as a trustee professionally, I’ve met with lots of different families in lots of different circumstances. And for many of them they’ve named me, and so I’m serving in that role. It’s not just trustee; it’s trustee, executor, agent on the power of attorney for finance, and even as agent for health care. And so that’s a very intimate job. It’s a job where you end up seeing someone’s entire life, or as much as you can of another person — their paperwork, how they do things, how they pay their bills, how they live, what medications they take. It’s really very intimate. And I think a lot of us assume that our children know us and they’ll do what we want them to do. But the thing is that it’s very likely you haven’t lived with your children in the same household for decades. And now you’re asking them to come back, drop their life, and come in and be that person for you. Be the person who’s going to protect your privacy, be that person who’s going to protect the way you want to live. And they may disagree with the way you want to live. They may actually have issues with some of the choices that you’ve made or how you’ve proceeded. So now, in addition to having a medical challenge where you’re not able to make new decisions — maybe temporarily, maybe permanently — now you have someone who wants to run the show or actually be in charge. In my job as a professional trustee, I’m not in charge. I’m a servant-manager. I’m really taking the trustor’s wishes and how they’ve structured things and really looking at that to be sure that I can continue it as best I can with all the changes that have occurred. [03:49] Frazer Rice: One of the things we were talking about before we got on board, and something we’ve discussed generally through the Independent Trustee Alliance, is that people who are asked to serve in those roles usually are family members. And for people who are uninitiated in the field, that seems like an obvious choice, because they’re really trying to put somebody in there who understands the family. But as you and I know, they may not be necessarily qualified to deal with the technicalities of the different roles that we just discussed. But also, the idea of taking on the emotional toll of these new conditions can be something different and unapproachable for many people. [04:30] Marguerite Lorenz: Well, I think it helps to kind of look at some of those issues. So you might have more than one child. Even if you have an only child, these issues apply. And now you’ve been in the hospital and you’re expecting this person to deal with your tax, legal, financial, and medical decisions. This person has to be a good negotiator. This person has to be calm when there’s issues that arise, and they may have feelings — they may be grieving that things have changed for themselves and in their relationship with you. So I think to be really empathetic and to be really kind and compassionate, we have to get our own stuff in order so that we can really have a good experience for our last days. And again, some of these roles that I’ve served in have been temporary. Let me give you an example. I worked with a gentleman whose wife had passed away because of cancer. She had been gone about two years and he himself was diagnosed with cancer. So he already knew what that might be like, right? She had already had chemotherapy; he was right there with her through all of that experience. Well, now faced with it himself, he said, “In order for me to do this, I don’t have a partner. I need somebody who’s going to deal with the business of my life so that I can focus on my health.” He named me as his trustee. I became active. I reported to him because he was still able to receive those reports. He was certainly mentally able, but physically it was really hard. He was exhausted most of the time. And he was going to grief support for the loss of his wife and going to chemotherapy treatments. So you can imagine just how full his day was. So we’re into this two years. He met a woman at grief support. He was feeling better because the treatment worked, and he decided he wanted to travel the world before he died. And he married this woman, and they were very happy together. And he asked if he could be trustee again. So — I’m a professional trustee. It’s part of my duty to step back and step down when the trustor who wants to be trustee again wants that job back. So I gave him a full report, he had an accounting, he knew exactly what had happened during my term. He went on with his life, and then he passed away and I became trustee again. So I just wanted people to know that it could be temporary. It’s not necessarily a permanent job. Would your child step back down? [07:14] Frazer Rice: No question. Once in the role, sometimes it’s difficult to get out of it. But you did the right thing in terms of getting an accounting, making sure that your duties stopped when you were told to get off, and then when you were ready to come back on, that those sightlines are very clear. And that’s what comes with talking to a professional like you. You understand those parts so that you’re not having things bleed from one role into another and having liability issues or misunderstandings with the next generation. [07:51] Marguerite Lorenz: Right. And let’s talk about working with professionals from the beginning. We don’t know what we don’t know. And even attorneys need to go to an attorney to get their estate plan done. There may be attorneys who disagree with that, but none of us can be truly objective about our own circumstance. And we need someone who’s going to ask us some tough questions and really help us figure out: what is our intention? How do we feel about this? What’s important to us? So, getting my own estate plan done — I was a single mom in a new profession. I had just become a fiduciary and I had just learned about estate planning. I was learning so much at that time and realized, every time I drive on the freeway, I’m risking my children’s future. I’m their only parent. What can I do about that? So estate planning isn’t just about money, and it isn’t just about death. It’s also about taking an inventory. What do I have? What have I accomplished? Who do I love? What do I really care about? And once we get to have those kinds of conversations, our whole perspective on life improves. And I’ve used my own estate plan, every time I’ve gone to update it, as sort of a milestone check — where am I now? [09:09] Frazer Rice: Maybe the standard procedure is every five years to check in and make sure that life has not advanced as far as divorce, deaths, new kids, marriages, things like that, to make sure that the plan is in place. And it’s a great milestone to reflect on things. And then, as we move up the ladder wealth-wise, if there are changes in tax laws and things like that, it’s important to make sure that the plan understands that change and is able to accommodate what’s going on on that front. Let’s take that as a segue. You have another book that you came out with, How to Be a 90-Year-Old — or a well-functioning 90-year-old. [09:36] Marguerite Lorenz: How to Be a Successful 90-Year-Old. [09:39] Frazer Rice: More than well-functioning — actually successful. How to Be a Successful 90-Year-Old. I have not read that yet, so tell us a little bit about what’s going on there. [09:47] Marguerite Lorenz: Well, I want everyone to have that blue ribbon feeling at the end of their lives. And I picked 90 because I have had clients that have reached a grand old age of over 100. My last client passed at 105. So it is possible to live well until the very end. And I’ve been working with people for over 20 years that are much older than me, who have lots of wisdom and experience to share. Their stories are important. So for people that are serving as trustee — whether you’re a family member trustee or you’re a professional — this book might be helpful, because I actually talk about the relationships with those clients. And I also talk about some things we could do now so that life is simpler, better, and more comfortable when we might need some help. And that’s another barrier that a lot of us have. We have this barrier to having someone come into our home and help us. Our home is our sanctuary, it’s our private space. But I want everyone who’s listening right now to just think about it: who’s going to be the first person in your bedroom when you are no longer able to make new decisions? And do you want that person to see everything that might be in your bedroom? Many, many adults have what I call a black box. We have something that’s private that really, really we keep to ourselves. But everything gets exposed once you are not able to care for yourself. So then what? Well, many people want to stay in their home no matter what, as long as possible. So imagine, if you will — some of my clients have lived in the same home for 30, 40, 50 years. And now they have to get care. Can we arrange to have that care in their home? So this exploration is really about living well to the very end. There are some really great tips, things I’ve learned from my 90-plus-year-old clients that I’ve employed and deployed for myself. [11:23] Frazer Rice: Just as an example there — I’m a ripe old age of 53 shortly. The idea of getting things in place while you’re at the peak of your powers, and you don’t have the difficult decision of having the car keys taken from you, or being in a home that isn’t appropriate for you anymore, meaning you don’t have the necessary safeguards for showers and stairs and things like that. Do you get into that, as far as trying to look five years ahead to make sure that the things that you can do now in a more comfortable environment take place before maybe the emergency happens and then all of a sudden we say, “Oh my gosh, we’ve got to do a complete overhaul here”? [11:54] Marguerite Lorenz: Well, as you know, Frazer, our power in estate planning is not prediction, it’s really about setting our preferences. And if we don’t do that while we feel good, while we’re competent, while we’re thinking clearly, we don’t get a chance to express that or do that once we’ve lost our competence. So this is really important — that I’m thinking about my future vulnerable self. I’ll give you a small example for me personally: dark chocolate is part of my life. I like having an international selection of dark chocolate and I don’t want the same kind every day. I feel the nuances and the taste and the flavors; it’s important to me. For some people that might be wine, for other people it might be fine literature. It really depends on what you’re into. Well, our estate plan can be just about tax, legal, and financial stuff, but it really should be more. It should be about our quality of life. And that’s really what I’m instructing and what I’m talking about in a very warm, personal way in How to Be a Successful 90-Year-Old. And even in Luck or Control?, I want people to understand the function of the documents. So we talk about the documents and what they’re supposed to do to assist your person. But you have to have a person. And you might choose to have a trust company or a bank serve as your trustee, you might have a family member, you might have an individual like me — an independent trustee. You can find more independent trustees at the Independent Trustee Alliance. But the point is: how do I want to live? Who do I want to have help me? What does that help look like? Well, you might not know all the answers right now, but if you begin now, your eyes open to different possibilities. I’ll give you an example: I have visited lots of hospitals. I’ve been to people’s bedsides many, many times. I’ve learned that there are certain procedures I’m just not willing to go through. So in my mind I had to update my advance health care directive to basically say: this shell that I’m in, the case I walk around in, the machine that I live in, needs to be kept alive long enough so that my boys can say goodbye. And that’s not for me, that’s for them. But I don’t want it to go on interminably. [15:00] Marguerite Lorenz: So I’m pretty specific in my documents about what I want. So I’m hoping to help people have a little perspective — use that energy you have, use the power that you have right now to make decisions for yourself, and allow yourself the opportunity to update your estate planning documents from time to time, so that what you learn goes into your documents, and what you decide and what your intention is, is clear. [15:23] Frazer Rice: One of those points that you bring up that I think is important is that you can be a really good user of professional services with some forethought. To muse a little bit about what the end of life looks like is somewhat an unpleasant thought, if you feel like you’ve got less than your full faculties and that ends up being your future. But thinking about that and putting some planning around it, and real ideas about what you want others to take away from your end of life, in many ways I think is a great way to really get the documents put in place and reduce tension and questioning later, and any ambiguity that there might have been ahead of time. [16:13] Marguerite Lorenz: Well, that’s the thing too that we don’t necessarily consider when we avoid estate planning. And I’m talking to all the professionals who listen to you, Frazer. The percentage of professionals who have their estate plans completed might be just a little bit more than the average person, but only a third of American adults have any kind of written plan — and I would argue that half of them are not really going to work. And when I speak to professional groups — attorneys, CPAs, financial advisors and so on — I get that same raise of hands: only about a third of them have a complete, up-to-date, ready-to-go estate plan. Why do I need it ready to go? Because I don’t know what’s going to happen or when. So yes, it is hard to contemplate the end of our lives; it’s not something we want to think about. But how do you stop thinking about it? How do you stop worrying about it? You do everything you can about it right now, and then you set it aside. And our cell phones are so powerful that I can put in my calendar five years from now to call my attorney and ask if anything’s changed in the law, and to consider then if I need to think about anything that might have changed in my life that I want to update. So once I get my estate plan done and updated, I don’t think about it anymore. I’m so relieved. My head space is so clear, because everything I was worried about has been thought about, considered, allowed, and put down in writing. And now I don’t worry anymore. [17:47] Frazer Rice: I scolded a group of financial professionals I was giving a talk to. I asked probably a similar question, which was: how many of you have your estate plan documents up to date? And they all shot up, out of shame. I said, “How many of you have looked at them within the last two years?” And then that shot down to about a third, maybe less. I just said, “Shame on you.” People are looking to you for help on these things and you’re not leading by example. And so — point taken, and not just the trusts and estates lawyers, but for everybody else around the ecosystem. To not go through that exercise yourself — you can’t possibly advise correctly if you’re not practicing what you’re preaching. [18:22] Marguerite Lorenz: Well, here’s my challenge, and here’s my challenge to every professional in our mutual space: bank trust officers, administrators, paralegals, everybody. In Luck or Control? and on planforthis.com, which is where you can find my books and get a free First Steps toolkit, the first question is, “Hey professional, do you have your estate plan done?” It’s the first question. Why? Because I want to be sure I’m dealing with somebody who has some empathy for the emotional decisions I’m going to have to make. I want someone on my team that understands what this feels like — not just the wise, tax-smart decisions that they made. It’s a whole package. And so I’m putting it out there and I’m saying: I’m challenging everyone in our mutual space. Make sure you have your estate plan done, because more and more clients are going to be asking you, “Do you have your estate plan completed?” [19:21] Frazer Rice: So then let’s talk about your third book, which is sort of an update — and we talked about it in the previous podcast that we did a while ago, and I’ll have that in there — which is Ethics for Trustees. What’s in the update? I know it’s now in an audio version, which I haven’t sampled yet but I’m sure it’s really good. What’s new now versus when it first came out? [19:54] Marguerite Lorenz: So I’ve simplified it a bit, because I recognize that each of us can look up the probate code for the state that we live in, and it was really much more of a California-specific book. Look, I’m a California Licensed Professional Fiduciary and I’m also a Master Certified Independent Trustee. So having the audiobook, and also having it in PDF form, I think is very helpful for people so they can make notes, take a certain page with them. And the book now is exclusively available at planforthis.com. And when you purchase it, you’re getting both the audio and the PDF version. [20:27] Frazer Rice: Cool. Well, we’ll make sure that’s in the show notes. Let’s take the last little bit of time we have here and talk about the decision to have an individual trustee — and by individual, I mean family trustee — versus a more professional trustee, whether it’s an individual or a bank trustee. You and I sort of nod our heads in agreement every time we talk on this topic, and I’ve done podcasts with others where I feel this looming crisis is coming, where people put all these documents together in trusts and then they staff them with people who may be initially qualified, barely, but then six months after the ink is dried, their interest wanes, their technical capability wanes, life intervenes, something different happens — and the problems just multiply at that point. I guess my big question is — and from the Independent Trustee Alliance, where there is a group of people who can operate as a trustee without having to go to a bank — how bad do you think this problem could get? We have this great wealth transfer and we have a lot of assets shifting, not just from the ultra-high-net-worth but regular people shifting to the next generation, with people at the wheel of these structures that I don’t think really understand what’s going on. How bad could this get? [21:52] Marguerite Lorenz: In my view, we’re not just dealing with a transfer of wealth — because that’s where a lot of people focus. Where’s the money going, right? It’s going from one generation who died and then the money’s going to the next generation. But in that interim — and by the way, many people live for years unable to make new decisions for themselves. So it’s during their lifetime that they might need their trustee to step in, not just after they die. And that’s really important to consider: that you might need someone for five or six years when you need someone to make decisions. What kind of decisions? You have digital assets, you have your social media accounts, you might be doing transactions on your phone all day every day — but someone else will need to get into your phone to actually do those things, maybe. Is that somebody you want from your family to do that for you? Maybe you still say yes. But that family member has to have the ability to enforce the rules that you’ve set in your trust. They need to communicate really well with other people. And they have to set aside their own feelings. They have to put you first. And that’s a big challenge. So when you think about the word fiduciary — and I know that the financial industry has used the word a lot — the technical aspect of that is that I’m putting my needs aside and putting that trustor, that person who created the trust, their needs first. Then I also have to consider their beneficiaries and the future of those beneficiaries. So I’m dealing with transactions and having to account for every single penny of where the funds are now and where they’re going, what the assets are, what the character of those assets are. I have to deal with all the taxation that goes with that. I have to manage those assets. So that’s one set of skills, right? But then there’s the softer skills about communicating with other people and understanding their doubts and their concerns, and not taking that personally, and putting things in writing. So this is a big job. It’s not the simple job that it might have been at one point, where someone just wrote a will on their cocktail napkin and said, “Okay, I’m leaving you all my money.” The will doesn’t operate at all if you go to the hospital and you haven’t granted authority to anyone to be that person for you, to go to your house, get you some clean underwear and socks and bring it to the hospital for you. So I think we have to look at our lives as more complex. It’s not just driving a car; it’s deciding where that car goes, and if the car is maintained, and is the car clean, and can we have other people in the car with you? There are just so many decisions that I’ve had to make for other people that I don’t take any of this lightly — and nor should anyone who’s writing their estate plan. You need that attorney to ask you those questions and walk you through your day-to-day, so you can keep your day-to-day as long as possible. [24:54] Frazer Rice: Well, the other part too is the people who assume those roles — and I’ve been in it too — when you are asked to make tough choices, sometimes you have to make tough choices that favor one person over another, and you may be called to account for that. And the idea of keeping diligent records and writing — in a sense putting down the reasoning behind what you’re doing and making sure that everyone, to the extent it’s possible, understands the why of what’s happening — I think that is going to help people really save themselves some issues going forward when those tough choices have to be made. [25:23] Marguerite Lorenz: You know, if you don’t get your estate plan done, you’re suing your family. [25:27] Frazer Rice: Ah — good way to put it. [25:29] Marguerite Lorenz: You’re making them go to court, right? And who would want to make anyone else go to court? I mean, it’s just such a sad thing. And by the way, our courts are overrun with people that did no planning. And none of it happens quickly. So if you end up hospitalized and you haven’t selected a person, then the hospital and their bioethics committee is going to do the best they can. They’re going to ask for next of kin to make decisions for you — people that you may never have discussed your personal life with now have to be making decisions for you. So I’m asking people to be a little more proactive. I know you’re busy. I know it costs money to get an estate plan — probably less than you think, and certainly less than probate court would cost. A lot less than probate court would cost. Independent individual professional trustees cost a lot less than you think also. And you need to ask, because this is your life we’re talking about. I’m good. I have my plan, I keep up to date with my successors. I have a succession plan that’s worked beautifully. I’ve tested it. I know. And that’s why I can be so calm and so confident everywhere I go in my life. I’m feeling so good and so happy. Well, I want that for everyone. I want everyone to have that calm, true confidence that comes with knowing you’ve done everything you possibly can for yourself and the people you love. [26:54] Frazer Rice: Terrific. Marguerite, how do people get the books? How do people find you and your podcast, the Independent Trustee Alliance, and any other points of contact? [27:04] Marguerite Lorenz: Great, thank you. So planforthis.com is where you can find the books, where you can find me. We do have a podcast that has some wonderful discussions, case studies, and other topics to help people better understand the choices that they have. The Independent Trustee Alliance has a wonderful directory to find all kinds of professionals, but especially independent trustees, and you can find that at trusteealliance.com. And I’m going to be out there — I’m on LinkedIn. Come find me, connect with me. And Frazer, once again, thank you so much for the opportunity to visit with you. [27:40] Frazer Rice: Oh, it’s always great to get your expertise. And you bring a great sense of empathy to what can be a very technical and dollar-driven process. And I think the empathy, when it gets avoided or missed, there’s something really lost. So I really value your perspective on it. Thank you so much. [28:00] Announcer: This podcast is for educational and entertainment purposes. It is not investment, legal, nor tax advice and does not represent the opinions of the employers of the host or guest. Subscribe to Wealth Actually on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Youtube or wherever you listen — and if this episode was useful, share it with the person you have named in your documents. https://www.amazon.com/Wealth-Actually-Intelligent-Decision-Making-1-ebook/dp/B07FPQJJQT/
So they have a Cartier bracelet, but no emergency fund. Or they own a home… but have a $5k monthly mortgage. What actually makes someone rich versus what makes them wealthy? This Deep Dive goes into some of Victoria and Bec’s earliest money memories to explore their first ideas of wealth and what it meant to be ‘rich’. They discuss clichéd wealth indicators from designer bags and luxury cars to who is allowed to be rich, whether there’s a difference to being wealthy and the realities of the upward comparison effect. This episode is less about ‘what the new rich looks like’ and more about the systemic beliefs we’re raised with versus realisations of what financial security and confidence actually feel like.Tune in for questions concerning acquired wealth, private school and boujee pencil cases. KNOW THYSELF: What’s your money mindset? Get acquainted with our quiz. MASTER YOUR MINDSET: A playlist to help you transform your relationship with money. HIT THE BLOG: Are they wealthy or are they just rich? We devoted a blog to this topic. New here? Follow us on Instagram (@shesonthemoneyaus) for Q&As, bite-sized advice, daily money inspo... and relatable money memes that just get you. Acknowledgement of Country By Nartarsha Bamblett (nartarshabamblett.com.au) The advice shared on She's On The Money is general in nature and does not consider your individual circumstances. She's On The Money exists purely for educational purposes and should not be relied upon to make an investment or financial decision. If you do choose to buy a financial product, read the PDS, TMD and obtain appropriate financial advice tailored towards your needs. Victoria Devine and She's On The Money are authorised representatives of Money Sherpa PTY LTD ABN - 321649 27708, AFSL - 4451289See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
“Reducing the Noise of AI Investing”: In this Wealth Actually episode, Frazer Rice speaks with KEVIN SHEA, Senior Equity Analyst at BNY Wealth, about AI Investing and how investors should think about artificial intelligence as an investment theme rather than just a headline-driven trend. They discuss the difference between hype and durable fundamentals, how to segment AI opportunities across infrastructure, software, and end-user adoption, and why free cash flow still matters when evaluating companies tied to AI. https://open.spotify.com/episode/1NGM8j2KqdiUFWSLguBMEH?si=YmB4s0OVSqyy6U3Mpg7OaA https://youtu.be/Wnlub-HoiUo The conversation also explores circular financing risk, the role of management vision in fast-moving markets, which industries may be disrupted or strengthened by AI, and how large institutions are using AI internally to improve productivity, analysis, and client service. Chapters 00:00 – Intro and episode setupFrazer Rice introduces the episode, frames AI as a dominant investment theme, and welcomes Kevin Shea to help unpack AI Investing for the audience. 01:00 – Hype versus disciplined investingKevin explains that disciplined investing is what allows investors to separate hype from durable opportunity, and argues that AI adoption, spending, and earnings revisions point to real underlying fundamentals. 03:00 – How to bucket AI investment themesThe discussion turns to how investors can organize AI exposure, including beneficiaries versus disrupted companies, technology bottlenecks such as GPUs and networking, and industry adoption themes across sectors. 05:30 – Valuation, momentum, and free cash flowKevin discusses why free cash flow per share growth remains one of the most important drivers of stock performance and why parts of the semiconductor ecosystem may deserve a valuation re-rating. 08:15 – Circular financing and risk in the AI ecosystemFraser asks about the growing concern that AI companies are financing one another, and Kevin outlines both the bullish “escape velocity” case and the downside risk if business models do not become independently profitable fast enough. 11:45 – Infrastructure buildout and competitive uncertaintyUsing analogies like railroads and golf courses, the conversation highlights the risk that early builders may not be the ultimate winners, especially in a market with heavy spending and rapid leapfrogging among competitors. 13:00 – AI Investing: Public versus private market exposureThey examine whether owning public companies such as Alphabet offers meaningful AI exposure, versus gaining more direct but harder-to-access exposure through private investment vehicles. 15:45 – What strong AI management teams look likeKevin emphasizes that in an environment with no clear historical playbook, vision, execution, and the ability to identify durable differentiation are critical traits in management teams. 19:15 – Adaptability and strategic pivotsFraser adds that thoughtful adaptation matters, and Kevin notes that sometimes acquisition activity can signal whether a company is innovating ahead of the curve or scrambling to catch up. 20:45 – Which industries are most exposed to disruptionThe conversation shifts to sectors under pressure, especially parts of software and IT services, while stressing that disruption does not necessarily mean extinction. 24:45 – Why law and accounting may evolve, not disappearFraser offers a contrarian view that AI may make strong legal and accounting professionals more valuable, and Kevin compares that to earlier fears that Excel would eliminate accountants. 26:15 – How Kevin uses AI in practiceKevin describes how AI has made his team materially more productive, especially in data aggregation, scenario analysis, industry research, and portfolio risk work, while also helping BNY operationally across onboarding, security, and client communication. 29:10 – Where to find Kevin and closing remarksThe episode closes with Kevin sharing where listeners can connect with him and Fraser noting how quickly the AI landscape continues to change. Links KEVIN SHEA on Linkedin RICK FERRI on BRING SIMPLICITY BACK TO INVESTING Transcript of AI INVESTING Frazer (00:01)Welcome aboard, Kevin. Kevin Shea (00:03)Yeah, thanks for having me. Appreciate it, Frazer. Frazer (00:06)We're going to tackle two words that have basically taken over the investment world for the last six months: artificial intelligence. Before we do that, whether it's AI or crypto or tulips or anything with a lot of hype or buzz around it, how do you think about delineating between investing based on hype and doing it within the confines of a disciplined approach? Kevin Shea (00:32)They really do go hand in hand. You need a disciplined approach in order to recognize whether it's hype or not. The reality is that it's pretty impressive, the adoption we're seeing with AI: the amount of spend, the companies that are participating in and benefiting from AI. There was some concern with the stock movements that many of these companies have seen about whether the market was getting ahead of itself. Yet we have seen significant estimate increases throughout the year. If you take a look at some of the networking companies, their earnings expectations for 2027 are up almost 50% versus where they were just six months ago. The same is true with memory, GPUs, and CPUs. Fundamentally, we're seeing a lot of these companies have expansion in revenue growth and earnings growth, which is quite supportive of a durable trend. What's also very important is that adoption of AI is increasing. You can look at enterprise adoption: nearly two‑thirds of enterprises pay for an AI service. You can look at token usage — that's how much companies are using AI — and that has been parabolic as well. Look at the revenue generation of these AI models. Right now, they are some of the largest, fastest‑growing companies that have ever existed. So we don't really see this as a tulip scenario, or even comparable to the internet bubble. We find it very different. We think there are fundamental drivers to this trade, and we're seeing that through earnings growth. Frazer (02:37)Cool. AI to me is a term that encompasses a lot of different things, and in some ways it's become like real estate or water — it's starting to touch a lot of different industries. It's not just a thing unto itself, but something that's becoming integrated into a lot of other types of things. How do you define and bucket the investment themes so that it's digestible for the investor, and it's not just, “I'm investing in Anthropic or Google,” but people can parse out where it fits within a portfolio? Kevin Shea (03:14)It's a great question and probably one of the most important ones. Part of our overarching thesis is that for AI to fulfill its promise, it has to be in every geography, in every industry, at every company, and at almost every employee layer. We're seeing that when you look at the business units that are adopting AI: customer service, product development, marketing — basically divisions that almost every single company in every geography has. You phrased it as water, how it touches everything, and we're seeing that. So how do you segment it? There are a number of different ways: First, you can break it into: who are the AI beneficiaries, and who are those that will be disrupted by AI? Second, you can break it down into different bottlenecks. That's a way I frequently use within the technology landscape: GPUs, CPUs, memory, networking, storage, data centers. Then you look at that framework and see which companies are most exposed to those bottlenecks. Third, you can ask: which industries will benefit from adoption? Is that biotech, transportation, warehousing? Which companies could be more negatively influenced — maybe that's software? That's how we try to create an AI Investing framework for where we should focus our investment efforts and determine the allocation that our clients can benefit from. Frazer (05:17)As we dive a little bit into how you've bucketed these themes across different areas, there's the concept of benefiting from momentum or valuation versus maybe the cash flow and fundamentals of these different investments. I could imagine that, with the hype and mania around the space, there's a lot of interest. How do you temper that valuation play versus analyzing what the cash flows look like? Kevin Shea (05:49)One of the most highly correlated metrics to stock outperformance is free cash flow per share growth. That's often the most important metric, and we watch that heavily. What's incredible — and we talked about this earlier with estimate revisions — is that many within the AI ecosystem are generating extremely healthy free cash flow growth and margins. A lot of that is in AI infrastructure. They're being paid to supply all the equipment and semiconductors. There's also this concept that valuation multiples shift to where there's value creation. I'll give an example: The SOX, the semiconductor index, used to trade at parity with the S&P. But there's been a paradigm shift. A lot of the intelligence that's being created through these models is powered by semiconductors, networking, packaging, and hardware. You've seen semiconductors go from trading at parity to trading at almost a 50% premium. At the same time, the market is intelligent; it's shifted its view of software. Software used to trade at a 70% premium, and we think the intelligence layer has moved just one layer above where software applications normally sit. As a result, you've seen valuation compression for the IGV, the software index, from that 70% premium down to about 20%. Some people might look at the semiconductor index and say it's more expensive than where it historically trades — maybe that's hype. But we actually view it as a shift in where the value creation is occurring. So we think it's a healthy, understandable move within the market. Frazer (08:16)One of the questions that pops up is that there's a lot of news around the circular flow of cash, where a lot of these companies are all investing in each other. You hear “five hundred billion is going from Google into Anthropic,” or different flavors of that, where it seems like the money is rotating. And there's a question as to whether it's rotating and expanding, given sales and so on. How do you think about that and make sure that we aren't wandering into more of the sort of things that are happening off balance sheet that we don't see, while still recognizing the investment that's taking place? Kevin Shea (08:57)At minimum, it raises the risk profile. There are many circumstances and scenarios where this has occurred in the past — the internet being the most commonly referenced — and that obviously did not work out. There are multiple scenarios that could happen, but for simplicity we'll break it down into two. The first scenario is that this is such a capital‑intensive expansion that companies are doing an “all‑hands‑on‑deck” effort. The faster you can get capital from well‑capitalized firms, the faster you can build your infrastructure and reach scale so that these large language models are profitable. If you can expand and take capital from everywhere, then you can provide enough compute for all enterprises and consumers to utilize your product and your model. You reach “escape velocity” in the sense that your scale allows you to lower costs and become more profitable faster. That's the glass‑half‑full environment. Glass‑half‑empty is that they do not reach escape velocity. The business models needed more time to bring the cost of delivering AI down enough to be profitable on their own; they didn't need this extra capital to reach an enormous amount of scale, and they're moving too fast. If that scenario plays out, and these companies are not able to be profitable on their own, and the financial markets become tighter, that creates more downside risk for everybody in the ecosystem. We don't see that right now because, at the moment compute is available, it's being taken right away. We still feel comfortable with the financing occurring right now, but it is one of the top risks that we monitor. It's not that it's systemic, but it provides less clarity and disclosure, and it creates a riskier profile as we go through this expansion. Frazer (11:43)In the back of your mind, you're probably saying, “We want to make sure, if there are winners and losers in AI Investing, that we avoid the railroad scenario,” where you build this whole infrastructure and companies have to go bankrupt twice before they actually reach profitability. Or the bromide that golf courses only become profitable, if they ever do, because the person who built it — a passion project — didn't make it work, then it goes bankrupt, then the bank is stuck with it and doesn't know how to run it, then they get rid of it, and then the third person has learned the lessons from the first two and is able to push forward. Kevin Shea (12:23)That's a good point. When we look at all these different models being created, right now you have an environment where everyone is spending and keeps leapfrogging each other at different times. It's still a very unknown outcome for all of these players. There's a lot of competitive intensity in the large language model space and the broader AI ecosystem. It's certainly a very dynamic environment right now. Frazer (12:59)As investors are trying to access this, there are the public companies. You can go on your Fidelity account or talk to your advisor at BNY Mellon or anybody else and say, “I've heard about Anthropic or Google or all of these things.” As far as a good proxy for exposure, how do you think about that? For example, if I looked at Google and understand that they have underlying investments in their portfolio — in addition to their regular businesses — into these different scenarios, is that a way to get shorthand exposure? As opposed to trying to access a venture fund where the entry points are difficult, the hurdles are high, you need to write big checks, and access is gated? Kevin Shea (13:53)It's a very astute point when you mention circular financing. That doesn't just happen with public companies; a lot of these vendors and companies in this ecosystem are investing in private companies as well. When those private companies go public, you find out that Company XYZ is a top owner, and one of their suppliers. There has been a growing awareness that, with certain public companies, you have exposure to a handful of private companies. For BNY, our Fujio funds do a lot of our private investments. That's usually the best way to gain direct exposure. Frazer (15:37)Sure. Not to be flippant, but you're getting paid to own it at that point via their dividend, as opposed to you paying — at the SPV or LP level — to gain access to it. But yes, it's definitely not a pure play. I wouldn't buy Google just to be in a venture fund. And just to reiterate for listeners, this is not investment advice. We're trying to learn and talk through different types of scenarios. As you're thinking about this and looking at these different companies, what does a good management team look like? You'd think: a bunch of PhDs, great at coding, lots of experience in the venture community, maybe hung out in Silicon Valley. But everything is so new and dynamic. When you're evaluating these businesses, what does a good management team look like as they're trying to scale at warp speed, while profitability may or may not be a thing? Frazer (17:49)I'd add that I think there's an interesting component to AI Investing: a track record of what I would call thoughtful adaptation. When your business plan gets punched in the face and you're able to pivot — meaningfully pivot — I'm not talking about a dog food company suddenly putting “.ai” at the end of its name, but someone who can shift and take advantage of opportunities as they come up, as you say, without being so rigid in their vision that they end up getting lapped. I think that's an interesting facet to focus on. Frazer (20:50)When I try to get my arms around this, I bucket things in terms of: Disruption: blowing up something traditional Optimization: taking something that's already good and turning it into great World‑building: taking a vision, starting from zero, and building something that didn't exist before On that first point, what industries do you think are under attack, and how do you invest around that so you're not left holding the bag — you're not a buggy‑whip company as Tesla releases their next issue? Frazer (24:48)As an example, I run into all sorts of law firms and accounting firms, and I hear the comment that law firms are going away. I have a contrarian view. First, I think law has a wonderful ability to metastasize, to find issues, and I think AI is going to be great at finding those and keeping lawyers busy. Second, for lawyers who are good, I think the ability for AI to make them more efficient and help them graduate to even more detailed and “higher‑value” discussions will only increase. So when people say, “Law is going to be dead,” I don't really agree. I think that ties into your point that AI will help some companies that can adapt and use it well to drive further value, probably even charge more. For others, they'll be left behind or become cottage industries. Frazer (26:11)And there will be more and more issues to solve. I don't underestimate that. I think AI is going to start poking holes in different things we didn't think about. Then it will take good brainpower, made more efficient by AI, to deal with these new issues as they pop up. In your day‑to‑day job, what are you using AI for? Maybe through Bank of New York, and maybe informally, when you're doing other research — to be smart not only about the company areas, but what you're doing personally to be more efficient, take advantage of AI, and learn about cool stuff. Frazer (29:11)Cool stuff. How do people find Kevin Shea, and any final thoughts? Kevin (29:20) KEVIN SHEA on AI Investing Frazer (29:29)Terrific. Thanks for being on, and we'll be sure to stay in touch, as I'm sure everything will be completely different in not just six months — probably six weeks. https://www.amazon.com/Wealth-Actually-Intelligent-Decision-Making-1-ebook/dp/B07FPQJJQT/ Keywords: AI Investing
LISTEN and SUBSCRIBE on:Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/watchdog-on-wall-street-with-chris-markowski/id570687608 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/2PtgPvJvqc2gkpGIkNMR5i WATCH and SUBSCRIBE on:https://www.youtube.com/@WatchdogOnWallstreet/featured Surrounded by headlines about money, power, and status, Chris reflects on a different definition of wealth. From family memories and life experiences to time spent with loved ones, he argues that true wealth isn't measured by yachts, luxury cars, or social media posts—it's measured by the moments and relationships that matter long after the money is gone.
Most clients trust their wealth manager to make sound investment decisions on their behalf. Far fewer ever get to see exactly how those decisions are made. This episode is for the ones who want to know. In this special edition of Financial Commute, Executive Vice President Eric Selter sits down with Chief Investment Officer Meghan Pinchuk to pull back the curtain on Morton Wealth's full investment research process. From what triggers a new idea to how funds get vetted, how structures get scrutinized, and what it actually takes to earn conviction, this is the conversation most firms never have in public. Key TakeawaysThe investment process starts long before any money moves. From initial sourcing to final funding, a new investment can take 18 months or more. That is not a flaw in the process. It is the process. The structure around an investment matters as much as the investment itself. A great underlying asset in a poorly structured fund can leave you locked out, illiquid, or exposed to risks that have nothing to do with market performance. Good market conditions hide a lot. It is easy to look like a strong fund in a good market. The real test is how someone handles adversity. Morton Wealth actively looks for funds that have been tested and can clearly articulate what they learned. People are still the most important variable. AI can streamline data processing. It cannot assess character. Whether a fund will do the right thing when things are hard is a judgment call that requires real relationships and real time.
https://youtu.be/FU5IvtBbtCY JOHN SAMUELS from WELLWORTH ADVISORS discusses “HEALTH AS AN ASSET CLASS” and the nuances of personalized healthcare management for high-net-worth individuals. We contrast concierge medicine with comprehensive health advisory services. Learn about his book “WEALTHCARE” which lays out the frameworks of his practice. Finally, John goes into how expert navigation, team-based care, and strategic planning can significantly improve health outcomes and client relationships. Finally we hear a little bit about what his favorite medical shows are on TV! Key Topics Differences between concierge medicine and health advisory servicesTeam-based care and specialist involvementIntegrating healthcare with wealth managementDebunking myths about healthcare access and VIP treatmentStrategies for managing mental health and complex conditions Key Frameworks of Health as an Asset Class Team-based healthcare approachEvidence-based treatment decision-making Action Items Review your healthcare risk factors and create a plan.Organize your medical records and update legal documents.Engage a healthcare advisor to understand your coverage and treatment options. Chapters in “Health as an Asset Class” 00:00 Understanding Concierge Medicine vs. Health Advisory02:11 The Importance of Team-Based Care03:49 Collaborating with Client Advisors06:23 Navigating Complex Healthcare Needs08:07 Addressing Client Misinformation09:40 Challenges in Mental Health Treatment12:24 The Purpose Behind the Book14:26 Debunking Myths in Healthcare16:31 Preparing for Healthcare Interactions20:56 Managing Healthcare Risks23:05 Finding Resources and Support Resources Wellworth Advisors – https://wellworthadvisors.comJohn Samuels’ Book on Healthcare Management – https://www.amazon.com/Healthcare-Management-Advisor-Guide/dp/B09XYZ1234 More From John on “Wealth Actually”: https://frazerrice.com/ep-126-john-samuels/ Guest links Website – https://wellworthadvisors.comEmail – mailto:john@wellworthadvisors.com https://www.amazon.com/Wealth-Actually-Intelligent-Decision-Making-1-ebook/dp/B07FPQJJQT/ Keywords healthcare, concierge medicine, health advisory, high-net-worth individuals, patient navigation, mental health, healthcare risk, medical research, healthcare myths, health insurance Titles Beyond Concierge: The Future of Personalized Healthcare for Wealthy ClientsHow Expert Care Navigation Transforms High-Net-Worth Healthcare Sound Bites “We map out the cost of treatment for clients.”“We focus on evidence-based treatment options.”“VIP care often doesn’t mean better care.”
Welcome to another real-talk episode of the Building Your Money Machine Show! I'm cutting through the Instagram gloss to break down what every level of wealth ACTUALLY feels like—not what it looks like, but the true emotions, stress, and choices that come with rising up the wealth ladder.After 30+ years as a CPA, entrepreneur, and someone who's felt everything from survival-mode panic to the privilege (and pressure) of generational wealth, I'm laying out the raw stages of money mastery. I'll show you why getting richer doesn't always mean getting freer, how money messes with your mind at every stage, and why so many people try to fix the wrong problems on their way to financial freedom.If you want to know what it feels like, not just what it pays like, buckle up—this episode is for you. Let's get edgy, honest, and maybe a little uncomfortable…because that's where the real growth happens.IN TODAY'S EPISODE, I BREAK DOWN:Why making more money often turns UP the stress instead of down—and how to fix itThe key mindsets and systems you need at each stage, from survival to generational wealthThe hidden emotional toll and fears lurking at every financial level (and how to manage them)What ACTUALLY changes—and what doesn't—as you move from just surviving to true freedomWhy peace, control, and legacy matter so much more than just stacking dollarsRECOMMENDED EPISODES FOR YOUIf you liked this episode, click here to enjoy these and more:https://melabraham.com/show/When Does Investment Income Finally Beat Your Day JobI'm Politely Begging You To Get Good with MoneyEvery Financial Trap Middle Class People Fall Into ExplainedRich People Don't Buy Luxury...They Buy These 8 ThingsPsychology of Families Who Stay Rich For GenerationsRECOMMENDED VIDEOS FOR YOU If you liked this video, you'll love these ones:When Does Investment Income Finally Beat Your Day Job: https://youtu.be/bRyW3hxzRac I'm Politely Begging You To Get Good with Money: https://youtu.be/tEJ89xF2ZZ0 Every Financial Trap Middle Class People Fall Into Explained: https://youtu.be/kn5nCbd5FOU Rich People Don't Buy Luxury...They Buy These 8 Things: https://youtu.be/clc7oX7VJUQ Psychology of Families Who Stay Rich For Generations: https://youtu.be/phB_2VcYPbA ORDER MY NEW USA TODAY BESTSELLING BOOK:Building Your Money Machine: How to Get Your Money to Work Harder For You Than You Did For It!The key to building the life you desire and deserve is to build your Money Machine-a powerful system designed to generate income that's no longer tied to your work or efforts. This step-by-step guide goes beyond the general idea of personal finance and wealth creation and reveals the holistic approach to transforming your relationship with money to allow you to enjoy financial freedom and peace of mind.Part money philosophy, part money mindset, part strategy, and part tactical action, these powerful frameworks will show you how to build your money machine.When you do you'll also get over $1100 in wealth resources & bonuses for FREE! TAKE THE FINANCIAL FREEDOM QUIZ:Take this free quiz to see where you are on the path to financial freedom and what your next steps are to move you to a new financial destiny at http://www.YourFinancialFreedomQuiz.com
Frazer Rice and Bram Weinstein, the “Voice of the Washington Commanders,” discuss the shift in sports media for entrepreneurs. The current state of sports journalism is in flux, especially with the decline of the Washington Post’s sports section and its implications for local coverage. We explore the opportunities that come from this void. (Including the potential for new media ventures and the challenges of monetizing content in a fractured media landscape). The discussion also touches on the future of the Washington Commanders, the importance of audience engagement, and the evolving nature of podcasting and digital media. https://youtu.be/O0syDGcSkvU https://open.spotify.com/episode/3Ut9QRj7X9QD1pGEA6y6qt?si=39nLO2reQ8SK_nj0zenzDA Editing and post-production work for this episode was provided by The Podcast Consultant (https://thepodcastconsultant.com) Takeaways The Washington Post’s sports section closure is seen as a significant loss. There is a growing opportunity for new media companies to fill the coverage void. Monetizing media ventures requires innovative strategies and diverse revenue streams. Podcasters face challenges in gaining audience traction and monetization. The Commanders’ future depends on effective roster changes and health improvements. Engagement with the audience is crucial for media success. Digital platforms like YouTube provide exposure but limited revenue. The media landscape is rapidly changing, requiring adaptability. Local sports coverage is essential for community engagement. The importance of maintaining journalistic integrity in a changing media environment. SPORTS MEDIA FOR ENTREPRENEURS CHAPTERS 00:00 The State of Sports Journalism 02:59 Opportunities in Media 06:07 Monetizing Media Ventures 09:05 Navigating Podcasting Challenges 11:59 The Future of the Commanders 15:06 Engaging with the Audience DISCOVERING BRAM, THE COMMANDERS, AND AMPIRE MEDIA BRAM on SPOTIFY AMPIRE MEDIA ON YOUTUBE AMPIRE MEDIA WEBSITE Transcript of “SPORTS MEDIA FOR ENTREPRENEURS” Frazer Rice (00:00.686)Welcome aboard, Bram. Bram N Weinstein (00:02.551)Hey, Frazer, how are you? Frazer Rice (00:03.736)Doing great. The last time we spoke it was about three days before the Chicago Hail Mary, so I’m viewing that as good luck. That must have been something having to call that game. Bram N Weinstein (00:14.071)That was part of the most magical season I’ve ever been a part of. Not only first ever for the franchise, but 12 and five, NFC championship game, hadn’t done that in a generation. It was pretty incredible, yeah. Frazer Rice (00:28.652)No, as a skins fan, now commander’s fan, it’s been a long time, but it was a wild ride. One of the things that’s happened recently, which I know strikes near and dear to your heart, and frankly, for people who grew up sort of following it, has been, I guess, kind of the evisceration of the Washington Post sports section. And it’s got all sorts of impacts. But from your perspective, How do you make sense of that and what does it look like going forward for a city essentially that has all the major sports and the major paper not really covering it? Bram N Weinstein (01:09.719)I don’t make sense of it. I don’t understand it. I think at its core, The Washington Post is two things. It’s one of the most important publications in the world as the paper of record in the most powerful city in the world and the democratic center of the world. But it also is a local newspaper for one of the top 10 markets, top five markets in the country. And the idea that it would not cover its sports teams, or Metro desk, which, I know, you know, for our purposes, we focused a lot on the sports desk being shuttered. The Metro desk is too. So the Washington Post not covering the mayor’s office, city council meetings like in especially in these political times where, you know, the district budget is held by the federal government. To me, it doesn’t even it doesn’t compute that that wouldn’t exist. as far as like the sports section goes, which I think is like the lesser of the two real problems with this, but obviously is a real problem is, you I think for me, it feels like a death. I grew up reading the Washington Post. A lot of the reasons why I wanted to do what I wanted to do was through osmosis of reading Tony Kornheiser and Michael Wilbon and Tom Boswell and all of the great writers that came through the Washington Post. And I just don’t really understand how it’s not within the business model to be part of this. At the same time, you know, it does open opportunities for entrepreneurs like myself who have media companies and are always looking for new talent and always looking for openings. And I can tell you that void is going to get filled. But I do think it is sad that the Washington Post could not figure out a way to modernize itself to allow its coverage to continue for its loyal readership. This is a local paper that isn’t covering local news. That is astoundingly terrible in terms of a business practice to me. Frazer Rice (03:14.317)It’s weird because from my perch here in New York, I work across the street from the New York Times building and there’s a little bit of sort of guffawing that the New York Times has turned into a gaming company and sort of a media company second, which has helped to subsidize its continued commitment to long form journalism. But even then, I mean, it’s really focusing on arts and leisure and cookbooks and wordel and all sorts of things like that. And it’s a shame that the Washington Post either couldn’t pivot in that direction or otherwise make sense of things. Bram N Weinstein (03:48.727)Is the business model of media the same that was no. so there are a few things that play here to be fair. I’m not asking Jeff Bezos to lose money. You know, like, or just be the beneficiary to subsidize something, but you do bring up a point, which is. And I read this quote recently from, the old ownership group, the Graham family, who basically said. “You know, the newspaper is a grocery store. Like you are supposed to go in there and pick all the different things that you want. And hopefully there’s something for everybody or hopefully a number of things for everybody. And in modern times, the New York Times has done a very good job of putting together a new modern grocery store for people. So there’s a variety of different things that does subsidize the important work that it does. And in the end, like to me, the New York Times and the Washington Post and maybe the Wall Street Journal. Are the three most important newspaper entities, if you can call them that, in the United States of America. And for one of them to not understand their role in protecting democracy, in covering our world, in informing the readership, whether it’s locally or nationally, to me is an absconding responsibility. So I don’t know what the answer is. Again, I’m not like demanding Jeff Bezos just…money to keep things subsidized. Like it is a business and I understand that, but there must have been better ways to go about it or maybe, you know, sell it to someone who does have ideas because it’s important for its foundations to remain intact. And so I just, you know, for me, it’s, been hard to digest, honestly. And like to your original question of like, like, how do you make sense of it? I really don’t. I don’t make any sense of it. Frazer Rice (05:39.692)Well, you also now have a fledgling media company and I’m a devourer of yours and Kim’s and Standix podcasts and I learned something from it each time. I see an opportunity there if major component of the media establishment in the area is abdicating its role, not only to the major sports that aren’t getting covered as much. There’s an opportunity there. But even like the local hotbed sports like lacrosse, they’re completely ignored, I would imagine. And that might be a way to sort of get some grassroots component going. Bram N Weinstein (06:17.195)Yeah, we also here with my company Empire see the opportunity, unfortunately, but we do. And there’s a lot of talent that is available. There is a void in coverage. We know, you know, the size of our community, the appetite for sports. And so, you know, I don’t want to say too much, but we are actively seeking partners to expand in a pretty large way if possible. So Frazer Rice (06:24.045)Right. Bram N Weinstein (06:46.067)We’re working towards that and I’ve been working towards that and moving very fast in the hopes that we’re not the only ones thinking this like you. There’s a lot of people thinking there’s an opportunity here. I wish it wasn’t the opportunity that it is, but it has presented itself and it’s an opportunity that we intend to see through. So we are actively speaking to a number of different interested parties about funding a major expansion of what we’re doing. Frazer Rice (07:11.379)Really cool. Well, I’ll be sure to keep an eye on that as it develops. When you’re thinking about sort of the money making aspect of it, we don’t do things for free and it’d be lovely if we all had time and disposable income to do that without giving away the playbook because you’re raising money and you don’t want to give that up necessarily. But how do you think about that in terms of delivering value for sponsors or advertisers or the general audience? Have you made any…sort of commitment strategy-wise there. Bram N Weinstein (07:42.197)Yes, digital audio video forward. You know, I also believe in enterprise journalism. I also very much believe in long form journalism, but the audience appetite for it is limited. And so you do have to subsidize it. And that comes in the form of a number of different properties repurposed for different platforms in various ways, podcasts, video shows, YouTube. All offer opportunities to monetize the same content. I have been studying very closely the things the New York Times has done and thought about what kind of engagement tools would be necessary to be an added perk for those who would end up probably subscribing to a situation like this. So there are a lot of different types of financial models. One is subscriptions. in a variety of different ways, whether it’s premium content, newsletters, one of them is obviously advertising, which would come with YouTube or different streaming channel, streaming network, podcasts, obviously, sponsorship, which could go across the board for all of the different categories. And, lastly, live events. And this is something that we are very capable of doing as well. So there are a tremendous amount of different models to make money. None of them are easy. And because the audiences are so fractured, I think you have to find ways to make financial streams in the same content in various different forms. But we’re willing to do that. And we’ve already kind of done that with what I’ve done with Empire on a very limited role, which is why we think we’re ready to make this expansion and move. But we need an investor to buy in and to the investors, I would say to them, we intend to make you money and we intend to be something that could be purchased in a three to five to 10 year plan. So we understand the importance of making sure that the investment is paid off in the end as well. Frazer Rice (09:52.205)Cool. Are you thinking about expanding into other subject matter areas? you’re in DC, so politics, guess, would be a natural fit. Right. Bram N Weinstein (09:59.965)Not really. And I wouldn’t personally, like, I just don’t feel like that’s my expertise. So no, but like, could we be something like the ringer where you’re looking into culture, you’re looking into arts, music, dining, those types of things? Yeah, I think like that’s something I’m not sure that I would move fast into a realm like that. Like we see the void in sports coverage for this marketplace. We would like to fill that void. And whatever we do after that would be dabbling in those spaces to try to, again, find new ways to find new audiences. But we want to go with our core products first. And certainly for me personally, the politics world is completely above my pay grade. So I’m out of that. Yeah. Frazer Rice (10:46.028)It’s above everybody’s I think if anybody could figure it out It’s it’s one of those Rubik’s cubes that it’s not worth solving oftentimes So, you know one of the things I don’t know if I’d struggle with or I’m Would like to expand on my front is just getting my podcast out to more people and the concept of discover ability and one of the strengths that I think you have Is you know your current position in traditional media with the commanders? Keim has it a little bit with ESPN, Ben Stendig has it with his Substack, which isn’t traditional media, but there’s different outflows on that front. How do you view that competitive advantage in terms of getting the message out and almost having a bit of a head start over some of the other possibilities out there? Bram N Weinstein (11:30.175)Yeah, well, I think there was always like, you know, for the podcast world. Yes, anybody can do a show and you know, they could be good. The reality is, though, you know, the people who already have stakes in the marketplace, at least from name value, are always going to have a head start. It’s going to come down to how you market yourself and how you go about getting your show out there as much as possible. The reality is you need some level of a robust social presence to get to as many eyeballs or ears as possible. And if you don’t, then you typically have to kind of go down a paid route of making sure that it gets into algorithms. And so it’s a hard climb, like for sure. You know, like when podcasts and kind of open the gates for everybody, same thing with YouTube, like Frazer Rice (12:14.54)Mm. Bram N Weinstein (12:23.444)You know, there’s going to be a lot of success stories. There’s going to be a lot more people who are either doing it for love of the game, but not for money. And that’s just the reality of how much time any person has to give up to content. And secondarily, who can get to enough of an audience to make it worthwhile? As you probably know, you need thousands of downloads to really make any kind of real money at all on a podcast episode. Getting to thousands of downloads. doesn’t sound like a big, like if I said, you have to get to a thousand, like a thousand doesn’t sound like a lot for one episode, but it’s way harder to do. wager a guess that 90 % of podcasts do not reach 1000 downloads per episode. So it’s a very hard number to reach. And if you really want to make money, money on it, we’re talking about getting 10,000 an episode. Sure, anybody like myself that has various different platforms I can use to promote my own shows has a head start in that manner. And that would always have been for anybody in traditional media who had a following to start with, if they were willing to jump into the digital side quickly, they were always going to have a head start because they already had an audience that was built in. It was just converting them. Frazer Rice (13:39.572)You know, and for me, the conversion isn’t so much, you know, buying pillows or mattresses from the advertising that comes on the show. I don’t have any advertisers. The ROI for me is, in a client, one client, maybe listening to it and then calling up. And all of a sudden that pays for everything, in sort of my day job. Bram N Weinstein (13:52.992)Yes. Bram N Weinstein (13:57.813)Yeah, well, I think you’re actually looking at it the right way. Like, could your show end up having a big audience? Yeah, of course it could. But like, the reality is for most people who are doing podcasts for the other purpose, which is either marketing, client curation, branding, like those have extraordinary value to like my company’s done a lot of B2B type podcasts. And I explained this, you know, to them, and most of the people I work with aren’t looking, they don’t think they’re going to be Pat McAfee. But like, they understand that like, The value in doing this well is going to get paid back exponentially in client curation, marketing, entering new market spaces, expanding business opportunity, because it done well, it can really have that kind of benefit for you. Frazer Rice (14:43.563)How do you make sense of all the different platforms that are out there? You know, I converted to video because ignoring YouTube meant basically ignoring Google and I was like, well, that’s dumb. I know, Spotify’s out there. iTunes has just converted to video. And then you’ve got all the different podcasts, platforms, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. How do you, it just seems like it changes weekly in many ways as to what’s in favor, what’s not. When you’re making a bet on your company, how do you deal with that? Bram N Weinstein (15:06.996)Yeah. Yeah, think. Yeah, it’s hard. Things have changed a lot. Like, for the most part, we double up our podcasts now and they’re taped on video. So they’re disseminated with not a tremendous amount of production value behind them. And of course, you know, used as audio podcasts as well. So it’s a two in one situation. And we find that YouTube. The advertising dollars there are very small, but the exposure, not unlike when we were talking about kind of marketing yourself, the exposure of being there, if you can get thousands of views, often offers up a lot of different opportunities. Sponsors prefer to be visually seen than just audibly heard. So like in both of those cases, they can be beneficial. like we don’t frankly make a lot of like we have on YouTube. We only have two primary shows with Empire Media that are on YouTube on our channel. We have about 18,000 subscribers now and we get on an average month like 127,000 views between just the two shows, which is a lot, know, especially for like a niche thing where we’re really just talking about one thing, the commander. So we’re like, we’re not expanding out much more than that. So it’s a very niche thing and yet we’re getting a really, really sizable number. Frazer Rice (16:11.787)That’s good. Bram N Weinstein (16:25.15)If I told you how much money we get paid for that, you’d laugh like it’s it’s pennies on the dollar. But the exposure of having it and the amount of views and impressions that it generates gets us sponsorship opportunities because people want to be part of that. And that’s where the real opportunity comes with YouTube. As far as like using Facebook Live, IG, like TikTok, I suppose. Like. I don’t know, like I don’t think you can be everywhere. I think the idea is to try to be, I think you’re talking to different audiences on each of these things. So I don’t think it’s one size fits all. And it has to be worth it. For me, it has to be worthwhile. Like, is there a reason why we’re there other than we’re just trying to get people but if there’s no benefit of a carryover beyond it and it just happens to hit their feed, but we’re not getting any sponsorship money out of it or any activation out of it? Well, then what was the point? So I’m always looking for right places to be. But there has to be an incentive structure that makes sense, either true carryover audience growth or obvious sponsorship opportunity. Frazer Rice (17:32.076)The cost of coordination of all of that too starts to overwhelm. I know you’ve got a schedule to keep here. I would be silly not to ask about my commanders a little bit. Two new assistant coaches, offensive and defensive coordinator, lots of changes coming in terms of personnel and hopefully sort of a rethink of Jaden and hopefully a lot better health going into next year. But… Bram N Weinstein (17:36.17)Yes. Yeah. Frazer Rice (17:59.84)Potentially better division in many ways, how do you see things going forward? Bram N Weinstein (18:04.71)I don’t know what their team looks like yet. So this is like a hard question to answer because I think they’re going to be very aggressive in free agency and then obviously they have the seventh overall pick. I kind of need to see what their roster looks like before knowing. I you know, David Blough been here the last couple of years. He is one of these very young, very impressive people. I’m glad they kept him in the building. It’s a big ask to jump from where he was to go to offensive He at least is talking a big game like he’s ready for this and I hope he is, you know, like we’ll have to see. I think a lot of it will have to do with the quarterback stays healthy and that just didn’t happen a year ago and the whole team didn’t stay healthy. So they fell apart and you know, like I don’t think health was the only reason they had the record they had, but I think the health made it worse than it could have been like their record probably would have been a little more respectable if the health wasn’t as bad as it was. Hopefully Jayden stays healthy. He’s fine now. So hopefully he stays healthy and on defense Deonte Jones. This is his first opportunity doing this but he’s actually been in the league for 20 years and he’s worked with every almost every major defensive coordinator up until this point So he feels like someone that’s been overdue for an opportunity. I like the system He’s coming out of does he have the personnel to win with I don’t think right now and that’s why I’m like Let me see what they do in free agency. How much money do they spend at what positions? How are they looking to upgrade that side of the ball? And if they bring in what I think will be two, three, four new starters, whether it’s via the draft and free agency combined, then I think we could have a different conversation about what I think it’s gonna look like, because I kinda need to see what the roster looks like first. Frazer Rice (19:44.691)No, there’s so many holes in the free agency component. Not to pin you down on a record going into next year, because we don’t even know what the components are going to be. To that end, as you said, the injuries were a real problem. Everything that possibly could go right in 2024 didn’t in 2025. How does that work over the course of time in terms of regression to the mean? Is just every season completely different or is there something that carries over? Bram N Weinstein (20:19.542)So 2023 was nothing like 2024, which was nothing like 2025. So we’ve had a roller coaster for sure. Um I last year was a surprise like. If you had told me the beginning of the season look like the schedules too hard. They had too many injuries. They went 9889 didn’t make the playoffs. I would have believed you. You know, like it’s just things were just harder to try to replicate. I didn’t expect what ended up. So can they flip that back around and be more competitive again? I do believe so. I also agree with something you said, which was. Right now and again don’t know what the teams look like exactly yet, but I do think the division on the whole will be better. The Giants will be better coached for sure. They have a lot of defensive talent and we’ll see if Jaxson Dart takes another step. And if that’s the case, the Giants may be more formidable than they’ve been in 10 years. The Eagles are still going to have a very, good roster. No matter Frazer Rice (21:04.938)Mm-hmm. Bram N Weinstein (21:16.106)Whatever they do this off season, even if it includes moving off of a couple of primary people, they still have an extremely strong high level roster. And I like how the Cowboys pivoted from Micah Parsons. I know it hurt them last year, but I do like what they did in the return that they got since. So they play their cards right. They could be in line to really make a jump back this year. Like they’re the ones that feel kind of ready to me. If they play their cards right and if they don’t end up, which is the second part, which is never they avoid, they never avoid this. They turn themselves into a circus. So if they could ever stop turning themselves into a circus, I think it would serve them. You know, I think it would be a very positive outcome for them, but their owner doesn’t live in that world. He likes to be a ringmaster. And, you know, I think that that’s probably more than anything been the hindrance to them winning a Super Bowl over the last. Frazer Rice (21:55.004)You Bram N Weinstein (22:14.422)30 years, they’ve had good enough teams to do it. They just don’t and I think they get in their own way. But you know, maybe this year’s a little different for them. Frazer Rice (22:21.364)No question. Alright, how do people find Ampire and sample all the different media that you’re putting out there? Bram N Weinstein (22:31.766)YouTube is Empire Media AMPIRE. We have our YouTube page. You can find that there. My show is under my name, Bram Weisside Show. John Keim Report covers the commanders and Last Man Standing is Ben Standing’s show. And who knows, maybe in four to six months, we’ve got some new offerings. I’m hoping that’s gonna be the case pretty soon. Frazer Rice (22:51.466)Terrific. Thanks for coming on, Bram, and rootin’ for your success. Bram N Weinstein (22:55.414)Thanks a lot. Take care BRAM on “WEALTH ACTUALLY” three days before the JAYDEN HAIL MARY Keywords: sports journalism, Washington Post, media opportunities, podcasting, Commanders, monetization, audience engagement, digital media, sports coverage, media landscape Titles The Decline of Sports Journalism Seizing Media Opportunities https://www.amazon.com/Wealth-Actually-Intelligent-Decision-Making-1-ebook/dp/B07FPQJJQT/
In this episode, 10 Family Office Myths exposed (and debunked). https://youtu.be/j1cgcZZcRBM Welcome back and Happy New Year on the Wealth Actually podcast. I’m Frazer Rice. We have a fun show today where we talk about 10 myths in the family office space. Mark Tepsich, who runs the family office governance practice at UBS is here as we dish into the ideas and concepts that are misunderstood in the family office world. Summary This conversation delves into the complexities and myths surrounding family offices, exploring their structure, governance, and the unique challenges they face in wealth management. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the specific needs of families and the role of family offices in managing complexity and preserving wealth across generations. It also addresses common misconceptions about family offices, including their necessity, governance, and their relationship with institutional investors. Takeaways Family offices are established to manage complexity in wealth.Not all family offices are the same; each has unique needs.Governance frameworks are essential for effective family office management.Many family offices outsource functions rather than internalizing them.The myth that 85-90% of family offices shouldn’t exist is false.Shirt sleeves to shirt sleeves is a debated concept in wealth preservation.Family offices need to adapt to the evolving needs of families.Investment functions in family offices are often secondary to administrative roles.Family offices are driven by complexity rather than just size.The future of family offices may involve more direct investment opportunities. Chapters: Family Office Confidential 00:00 Understanding Family Offices: Myths and Realities02:02 The Complexity of Family Office Structures04:37 Debunking Common Myths About Family Offices06:17 The Role of Outsourcing in Family Offices07:54 Generational Wealth: The Shirt Sleeves Myth10:51 Flexibility vs. Permanence in Family Offices12:48 Governance and Decision-Making in Family Offices15:49 Investment Functions in Family Offices18:05 Size vs. Complexity in Family Offices20:09 Family Offices vs. Institutional Capital21:19 The Aspirational Nature of Family Offices23:30 The Relationship Between Family Offices and Institutions25:36 Technology in Family Offices: Current Trends29:03 Family Offices and Private Equity: A Comparative Analysis Myths 85-95% of FO’s should not exist vs. “there is no such thing as a family office’ Family office internalize everything A Family Office Anchored by an operating business is the same that is one funded solely by liquidity event Shirtsleeves to Shirtsleeves is myth Family offices are designed to be permanent’ Family Offices don’t need high end (almost SOX) like governance Family Offices are driven by net worth (no, by complexity) Family Offices are built on a robust investment function (no, it”s complexity management- often rooted in bookkeeping and accounting) Family Offices are like institutional Capital (no, many more motivations than pure returns- including whimsy and the knee-jerk ability to override the IPS) Family Offices are the right result for a career (they could be, but it is extremely unlikely- a lot of things have to be “just right” and there is little to know patience for development Family Offices make great wealth clients (very much depends on the function and the product- they can be difficult consumers) Family office tech is best – in – breed (No and it probably never will be) Family offices shun Large institutions (Surprisingly, no- needed for deals, expertise, and most importnatly financing and introductions) Keywords family offices, wealth management, governance, investment strategies, family dynamics, myths, financial planning, family wealth, complexity management, family governance Transcript: Family Office Myths Busted Frazer Rice (00:04.462): Welcome board, Mark. Mark Tepsich: Hey, Frazer, good to see you again. Appreciate the opportunity. Frazer Rice: Likewise. So let’s get started first. We’re going to go into some of the myths around family offices. But you really participate in kind of an interesting subset of that in terms of helping families design and govern them. What exactly does that mean on a day-to-day basis for you? Mark Tepsich: Yeah, good question. So, you know, it means a couple of things, right? So if you think about a family office, you have families that are at the inception point, right? Where things are getting too complex for them. They need to set up some sort of infrastructure. And it’s really like, what is a family office? What can it do for me? What are the pros, cons, and trade-offs? Where do I start? What’s the infrastructure, the systems? Who do I hire? How do I structure a compensation? So you’ve got families maybe coming at it. From post liquidity event, maybe coming at it from, we need to lift up, lift out this embedded family office out of the business to, hey, we’re an existing family office. We’ve got, you know, we’re evolving, right? The family’s growing, their enterprise is changing, the world around us is changing. People are leaving the family office, the next gen’s getting incorporated into the family office in some way. We’ve got some questions that could be, how do we engage the next generation through the family office? Mark Tepsich (01:21.614): How do we make decisions, communicate around our shared assets and resources, which could be a portfolio, maybe even a business, or hey, how do we come together and hire? What is this profile of this person look like? Who should we hire and not hire? What’s the structure of their compensation, carry co-investment, leverage co-investment? What’s the tech stack look like across accounting, consulting, reporting? Now, how do we insource and outsource? So it’s sort of. I like to call it organizational capabilities. So, you know, sometimes it’s soup to nuts, like starting from zero, other times it’s, we’ve been around for a long time, but we have a couple of questions. So that’s kind of my day to day. And, you know, I’ve been living this really since 2008 pre-global financial crisis. Frazer Rice So we’re going to go into, I think, some of the craziness of the family office ecosystem where we have people who wear many hats, people who wear masks, some people who are jokers and other people who are really good technicians and provide a lot of great insight. One of the things you were talking about is that the different types of mandate can be different. And I think maybe one of the first myths we should tackle is the The bromide that if you’ve seen one family office, you’ve seen one family office, which is thrown around at every family office conference and everybody chuckles for a minute and then it sort of washes away and no one cares anymore. What do you think about that statement? Mark Tespich (03:19.006): So I don’t necessarily think it’s true. And here’s what I mean. Let’s make an analogy to this, right? A business needs certain core infrastructure to just operate, right? And using accounting back office, you know the inflows, the outflows, you know, if you’re make a decision, these are the steps you have to go through. And so a family office, right? It needs to incorporate that, but it needs to incorporate it with the family and the family enterprise that is existing for that family, right? So, yeah, each family office is different because each family is different, but that’s like saying you’ve seen one business, you’ve seen one business, right? The strategy could be, the culture could be different, but, you still need some core operating infrastructure. And again, there’s accounting infrastructure, and that’s the basics, right? So there’s a curl of truth, but largely I think that it is false. Well, and at the same time, yes, families are different, but in general, families are trying to get to the same place, which is, know, they want to steward the wealth. They want to make sure it benefits the family and the other constituencies. And they want to make sure that it’s preserved over time. And those functions, you know, it’s very infrequent. You’d find the functions not there. And so how you get from A to B may be different, as you said, but there are a lot of universal truths to setting one of these things up. Frazer Rice So one of the other myths that we’ve come across is the idea that 80 to 90 percent of family offices shouldn’t exist. is, people and families set these up for, let’s call it the wrong reasons. Maybe it’s fear of missing out, maybe it’s great cocktail party chatter, maybe it’s an overdiagnosis of their needs. What do you think about that? Mark Tepsich Again, false. know, family offices are largely a function. They largely exist because there’s a market scale here. And what I mean by that is when you look under the hood at a family office, you’ve got basics of an accounting firm. You’ve got basics of an investment slash wealth management firm. You’ve got the basics of a legal slash tax firm. And then you’ve got essentially everything in between. And when you look at professional service firms out there, They can’t provide all of those under one roof, whether compliance or regulatory reasons. But the other reason is because no business model out there can really scale the complexity that each one of these families has. So yeah, you could outforce a lot of this stuff, but at the end of the day, family offices often exist because of a market failure. so, false, 85 to 90 % of family offices should exist. Frazer Rice (05:41.164) One of the other things, I’ve been around enough of these getting set up, is that the family office, if we get into sort of a technical structure, such that you set up a structure so that you’re able to deduct the expenses related to administering the wealth around that, that’s a valid reason to do things in addition to the organizational component. So I agree with you that there’s, to say that they shouldn’t exist is sort of belying the notion that these functions should take place internally. And I think you spoke to that. And I guess that gets to another myth, which is that family offices should internalize all of these functions. You just talked about it a little bit, that that’s not a great business model either. Mark Tepsich No, mean, yeah, so, you know, 85 to 90 % of family members out there, you just use that statistic, outsource a fair amount of things, right? And what that means is let’s just use tax counsel, for instance, right? This is something that these issues exist in every family office, they exist for every individual, but at the end of the day, should you have, you know, a tax counsel in-house in a family office that’s only doing, you know, income tax advisor work? Probably not. For 95 % of family offices because the frequency just isn’t there, right? So, you if you look at general councils alone, right? So they should have a broader mandate than income tax. should have well-transferred estate planning. Every family has those issues, but do they have the frequency to warrant bringing that individual, that professional and the rate, the cost? Probably not. a lot, you know, most family offices outsource a fair amount of whether it’s investment management, manager selection and due diligence. So false. Most fair amount offices do outsource a fair amount. Frazer Rice (07:31.374) One the things, this is one of my favorite controversial topics in the family office ecosystem of vendors that are out there is this notion that shirt sleeves to shirt sleeves is a myth. that the, and for those who don’t know what that means is, know, the first generation has generated the wealth, the second one enjoys it. And then the third one for a variety of reasons is ill-equipped to carry the wealth forward. And then everyone kind of goes back. It transcends culture. It’s lily pad to lily pad. You know, there’s a British version and a Russian version and whatever version. But the advice ecosystem around this is such that there’s a lot of debate about the statistics that have, quote unquote, proven that. And I can listen to that and say, yes, those may be very narrow. But there is a myth out there that shirt sleeves to shirt sleeves is a myth. Maybe you have some comments on that. Mark Tepsich Man, this is a tough one. I will say this will probably be the toughest one. So I think once a family becomes wealthy, right? And you can kind of define that as, the wealth, meaning the financial wealth will last a few generations with really out, with really nobody working, right? Let’s just define it that way. It’ll last a couple of generations if you make some not dumb decisions, we’ll call it. I think such as the financial markets today, right, as long as you’re diversified, you will stay wealthy. Does that mean you are going to have the same amount per capita over time? Maybe not, right? So if you look at it today, is a nuclear family of four, and you look at it 50 years from now, and the family is 30 people, right? I don’t know what the growth rate would have to be on those assets. So I think the family will remain wealthy whether they remain, you know, on a per capita basis, right? That’s a different story. I think what this is missing, however, I think the numbers kind of overshadow what this is getting at. I think when you look at it, when you take a step back, that first generation wealth creator, right? Will the family continue to be builders and entrepreneurs down the road? Frazer Rice (09:50.26) That I think that’s the question. Will they continue to kind of reach their full potential? I think that is that should be the focus. I’m going to punt on this one. I think it’s TBD and it’s there’s no set answer. I think the idea that the returns, To get back to your point is that as you go from generation to generation, the complexity increases, I’d say geometrically. Whereas the assets in many ways are going to be designed to increase linearly. And so at some point it may be 14 generations down the line when you’ve got 300 people that you have to take care of, are those assets gonna be in place to be able to support the level of living that people expected in generation one, two, and three? I think that’s the equation we’re all trying to fight. And so I’d say while Shirt Sleeves to Shirt Sleeves isn’t necessarily a prophecy, it’s definitely something that has to be addressed. So I’m gonna say that the fact that Shirt Sleeves to Shirt Sleeves is a myth, I think that’s the myth. Mark Tepsich So that’s where I draw my line in the sand there. think there’s an equation you constantly have to fight. Okay, so here’s another one. Family offices are designed to be permanent. I happen to think that they start out trying to be permanent, but in actuality, they really have to be more flexible and flex with the needs of the family, even at the first or second generation. Yeah, I would agree. Often they’re established for a good reason, right? That reason is complexity. Whether that complexity continues to exist for the family is a different story, right? You might have a business being sold. The family might just say, “hey, we don’t need to do all these direct investments, these alternate investments. Let’s just keep it simple, keep it passive.” I don’t think they’re designed to be permanent. I think families don’t really think about that too much. They want to exist for probably the existing generation that’s leveraging it and they wanna transition it, to your point, be flexible over time. But I don’t think anyone like a business, right? If you think about a business, the business generally speaking, it’s meant to exist in a perpetuity. That’s why you have a business, right? It’s not a sole proprietorship, but a family office, I think it’s TBD, right? So, you know. I don’t think anyone’s setting up a family that will say this is going to exist a thousand years from now. And I think if they came out and said that, think that it would add question and motivations. Frazer Rice Maybe we may be welcoming the Martians, we may be speaking Mandarin. There’s a thousand things that could happen in between here and then, that’s for sure. Here’s a myth that I think you and I are both going to agree is one, which is that family offices, for the ones that we think are going to try to persist, don’t demand necessarily Sarbanes-Oxley or high-end governance. Mark Tepsich I think as family offices mature, meaning as the family evolves, they do need some sort of decision-making framework. Especially if they’re going to really come together and act like somewhat of an institution. What I mean by that is, under the hood of a family office or under the hood of a family, let’s say there’s 10 family members. Let’s say there’s 20 to 25 trusts within that. You know, you could come together and pull your assets, right? And pull your resources. That’s part of the reason for having a family office. And so you just have a larger pool of capital. When you’re doing that, you do need governance. Okay? But if you’re gonna have, it’s just like, hey, we’re gonna have our separate portfolios. We’re not gonna come together and have pooled investment vehicles. You might not need an investment company, okay? And there might be good reasons to have an investment committee. In fact, many the investment committees I see, they’re not like college endowments where, we got eight people or nine people on here. We need to agree at least have five people to agree to allocate to this manager or change the allocation or change the IPS, depending on where that authority resides. I often see many investment committees for families, hey, we’re just collaborative in nature. We’ll get together. We’re going to have a meeting and talk about different strategies. Different advisors, things we should be doing. But if they’ve always had to agree at the family business level, they might not wanna have that same construct in the family office slash investment portfolio. If they’ve always struggled, know, come into agreement at the family business, now they’re gonna like, hey, we’re gonna recreate this dynamic. don’t have a binding construct. In fact, we ran a report, it’s coming out hopefully in the next couple of weeks. on family enterprise governance and a component obviously is the investment committee. 70 % of the investment committees out there are advisory in nature, meaning they don’t make binding decisions. They take it back to the trustees or whoever the authority is and they say, hey, here’s what we think, right? So individual family investors, whoever that is, co-trustees, it’s a, okay. So I do think governance is important, but it depends on what you mean by that, right? Should there be an IPS in place? I 100 % think that each family investor should have an IPS in place. The biggest mistake I see there is, hey, we’ve got this shared pool of capital. We’ve got 50 trusts. We’ve got one single IPS, right? I think that is a big mistake. don’t think that’s good governance. So it really depends on what you mean, but I think, yes, there should be some decision-making framework that you’re following. Otherwise, what exactly are you? Adhering to it, right? Like, what is your framework? What is your decision making tree? Frazer Rice (15:53.902) On top of that, possible myth. Family offices are built on a robust investment function. I mean, yes, there are some that are like that, right? You know, there’s a big names out there, MSD, Pritzker, so on and so forth. Those are the exceptions rather than the rule. Most family offices, 85 to 90 % are formed to manage the complexity, right? So again, otherwise you’re gonna have all these outsourced providers and that just doesn’t make sense when you’re trying to make a decision, because you need all the different parts to come together. They’re often built as administrative functions first, rather than, we’re gonna go start the next, you know, a private equity firm. that’s false. Frazer Rice The, as I like to say, probably to the boredom of a lot of people who talk to me a lot is that a lot of these really are built on a bookkeeping or an accounting spine. You’ve got to manage the inflows and outflows of everything and keep track of what you have or else you can have a great investment function, but things are going to spill all over the place. Mark Tepsich (17:30.872) I’ll never say, yeah. mean, and that actually goes back to good governance, right? So I always say, it’s not provocative. I’ll say, listen, this is not a provocative answer, but you need to create that first. And most of the people that are considering this rate are business owners. So they’ll intuitively get that. In fact, that function might exist somewhere at the business, but it’s really not organized. And without that function, like, it’s hard to make a decision, right? If you’re going to allocate 20 % of your portfolio, to private equity drawdown vehicles. got cap calls, capital commitments, distributions, like that needs to be budgeted and forecasting, right? So a lot of these families will have, one nuclear family can have three to four homes, 10 bank accounts, 20 entities. It’s not like a single piggy bank that you could take cash out of and move it every which way, right? Those are owned by different vehicles, different trusts, different assets and things like that, so. Frazer Rice Here’s a myth that I espouse which is Family offices and whether you have one or not is driven solely by size whether you have five billion or two hundred million or something like that that if you aren’t a certain size you shouldn’t have one and if you’re Of a certain size you must have one. Mark Tepsich That’s a myth. It’s driven by complexity first. I’ve seen, I’ve spoken to people that are worth two to $3 billion. It’s concentrated in a few stocks, meaning like they were early stage employees, right? They’re still in it. They’re getting a healthy dividend at this point. Guy talked to couple years ago. He had two homes, two cars, probably 95 % of his network was tied up into two separate securities that were probably traded. And he’s like, I don’t think I need a family office. You want to know what one was, what it could do from. And I’m like, listen, if you don’t have the complexity, it probably doesn’t make sense. Okay, if you can make a decision within whatever framework you have, whatever complex you have. Now, the other, you know, there is a cost factor to it, right? It gets easier to start a family office, meaning hire a couple of people, if you’ve got the… asset base for it to make sense on a cost perspective. So most of the time it’s driven by complexity, but cost does become a factor, right? If you’re worth a hundred million dollars, you’re to go hire 10 people. That probably doesn’t make sense. Frazer Rice (19:28.342) Right. Well, on top of that too, if you, and there’s a sort of the difference between a family office driven by a liquidity event and meeting that’s, that’s all you have versus a family office that’s tethered or sorry, a family business that’s tethered to it, that is also generating cash flows to help pay for things that that’s a big part of the decision. Because if you’re hiring people, you know, a CIO minimum, absolute minimum is probably $500,000. They’re going to need people, you know, you’re looking at at least 3 million. just to get the thing up and running before you start figuring out what you actually have to do. And so the concept that the size is going to dictate completely, it underscores sort of that cost component that you described there. Frazer Rice This is an interesting one and I like this concept to talk about. Family offices are like institutional capital as investors. Mark Tepsich Again, myth, there are some, again, there are some that are like institutions. They have the size and the sophistication. Oftentimes you see them, they’re former PE or hedge fund founders, right? That just aren’t doing any more of it. They made their wealth in the financial ecosystem, in the markets. And so they’re very sophisticated. But by and large, I mean, they’re sort of quasi-institutional, right? So I’ve seen multi-billion dollar family offices that Again, they’re more of the administrative hub rather than, we’re gonna be splashing around and playing in the markets and using a lot of leverage and doing a lot of control equity investments. So by and large, it’s the myth. 85 to 90 % are institutional-like. They are there to fill a need and that need is complexity management. Frazer Rice Here’s one on a different angle, which is family offices are the goal for people in the wealth management industry to work for, meaning family offices are a great aspiration for people who work in the industry and that that’s universal. Mark Tepsich (21:34.35) Myth, I think it’s an option. I think it’s interesting. I think it is a growing opportunity for folks that work in, you know, maybe wealth management or investment management or the financial ecosystem. But you didn’t, again, family has been around for a long time, but they’ve really only became, you know, kind of popular post global financial crisis with the rise of PE because of ZERP. You know, I’ll talk to a lot of people that are like in the hedge fund ecosystem looking for a change, right? And I say like, listen, like these opportunities for you are out there, but it depends on the family. It depends on their compensation philosophy as on the culture that you’re going to have to live within. There’s a lot of key man risk. Is it an opportunity? Yes. But again, it is, it is family office by family office. Frazer Rice I tell people too, it’s for people who are used to having lots of clients or lots of institutional support that is going to be a shift. It’s different to have one client. It’s different to have a scenario where the business of a family office, the business model of that particular family office can change on a dime. And if you don’t share the last name of the family you’re working for, you could be in a tough spot. Mark Tepsich Yeah, “we’re gonna build out a sustainability impact portfolio. We’re gonna build out, we’re gonna have a direct investment initiative. We’re gonna allocate whatever, a few hundred million dollars to it.” That person, that professional gets there and then a year or two or three years goes by and the strategy changes because a family member too had to change a heart. And then it becomes, okay, why am I here? Where am I gonna go now? So again, they could be great opportunities. I had a great experience.but it really just depends on the family. Frazer Rice (23:26.894) Here’s one, and you’ve got UBS over your shoulder there, so this is dramatic foreshadowing in some ways, but I think it bears talking about. It’s that family offices shun the large institutions, and that they want it bespoke, they want something peculiar all the time. What do you think about that? Mark Tepsich No, I mean, it goes back to the earlier myth that, you know, basically we’re saying family office should, family office do outsource a lot, right? So again, most family offices are five to eight people, right? I call it family office island, meaning you’re there on the island and you’re like, what is going on outside of the island or off of the island? You know your island really well, right? You know the family, know all the facts inside and out, but they are, I mean, there’s a reason why all these institutions, including UBS, has built out the resources to cater to family offices, right? I’m the perfect example. They brought me on to help our clients build family offices, right? They would not do that if it was gonna cannibalize their business. So they could be great clients and other times it’s like, hey, we’re very insular and we’re gonna keep everything close to the vest. Again, it’s family office to family office. But by and large, they’re great wealth clients. Frazer Rice No, and they also, you know, they need institutions to partner with of size, whether it’s at custody or lending or any number of other functions that are out there. Sometimes, you know, the RIA space is such that, you know, they try to be all things to all people and the appeal of being in, you know, the billionaire space. It takes a lot of people and a lot of effort and frankly a different business model to deal with that and to just sort of wander in and say we’re great and we can do these things. I think that’s a short road for a lot of institutions. Frazer Rice (25:17.602) Again, like we are brutally honest too. And I’ll, and here’s what I mean by that. Well, like we’re rated a lot of things, but I’ll say like, listen, there’s things that we can’t do for you. We can’t be your accounting back office, right? Like we just don’t offer that. We don’t have it. We’ve got a couple firms that would do that. They’re pure plays on it. So they’ve got to be good at it. but you know, use the various institutions for what they’re good for. They’re, know, again, that’s why you’ve got a family office. You can kind of pick or choose and be agnostic as to what you’re using them for. Frazer Rice If we wind down here a couple of last ones: The tech that family offices rely on is going to be best in breed. Mark Tepsich I, listen, I have this power station all the time with family office meeting, like what, what, you know, what tech providers should we be looking at? Listen, family office have grown in, right over the past 10, 15 years that there’s not a question. they’re historically, right. had to use in a family office, had to take basically institutional tools, try to repurpose them for the family office and they just, they’re just kind of clunky, right? The family office is still a cottage industry. If you’re trying to sell the family offices, you’re selling the two firms with five to eight employees, right? So the tools are going to continue to get better. But in my opinion, they’re always going to lag the institutional tools and kind of sophistication. But that’s also because institutional tools are very kind of narrow and deep, whereas the family office tech tools, you’ve got the accelerated reporting, but it needs to link to the accounting. That’s an issue. And so the family of standard day is left with like a bunch of disparate fragmented systems that have a challenge talking to each other. With that said, AI, I’ve been talking to a lot of these sort of mom and pop shops, I’ll call them. They’re firms that are trying to incorporate AI to break down these walls. So it’s not fragmented disparate systems. I use the analogy of it’s like jailbreaking an iPhone. I don’t know where this is gonna be in a couple of years, but I think the tools are going to continue to improve. But again, you’re probably not going to take a family office tech tool and deploy it at institutional scale. So if that answers your question, I guess it’s a measure. Frazer Rice First of all, I think it’s going to take a long time before something, quote unquote, replaces Excel, which is still a powerful tool that is flexible and does what it says it’s going to do. And people use it sometimes at their own peril to be the underpinning of everything. the one thing I would add is that the mom and pop software components, I think, have a lot of great ideas. The total market to sell into that, though, does not necessarily make for a great software business. As you say, to get those tools that are specific and required at the family office level to be profitable, you got to figure out a way to sell that into something bigger. I’m not sure there is anything bigger. Mark Tepsich (28:49.358) Yeah, I mean, you’d be better selling it to, you know, small businesses, right? So, I mean, the tools are going to get better, but there’s been a lot of interest recently in the past couple years. I don’t think, I think most of them are not going to survive. I don’t want to say there’s only going to be a couple winners, but on the Consolidated Reported Front, I really think there’s only going be a couple winners because you need scale. And again, family office, if you’re looking to make a decision, you’re like, well, okay, well, 5,000 users use Adapar and 50 use this other platform. So which one are you gonna choose? You don’t wanna onboard to the one that has 50 and then three years down the road, they’re out of business, or there’s fold or something like that. So with scale comes a little bit of security that at least you know that a lot of other people are using. You could point to that. Frazer Rice Last question. Family offices will rival PE firms in terms of influence in the investing market? 85 to 90 % will not rival PE firms. That’s not what they’re set up for. That’s not the goal of most family offices. Again, it’s complexity management. Will some rival PE firms? Yeah. But again, you… Listen, I’ve seen some family office go out there and raise their party capital. When they do that, they’re not a family office anymore. They might have a component in there, but they’re private equity firms. What you’re getting at is private equity firms are raising a fund every couple of years. Can a family office do that? No, because once they do that, they will be a private equity firm. So PE by and large has an infinite capital source, as long as they are good at what they do, right? So with that said, you know, there’s a lot of entrepreneurs that are are post liquidity events have played in the direct investment space, they really wanna do it. They’re still young, right? They’re billers, operators created. They wanna do it from a different vantage point. They’re coming to a realization: “that w”We need to start a fund.” I really love that story because again, they’re founders and operators. They didn’t come from the financial ecosystem first to do this. So I think they’re putting a different spin on PE. I think it’s great for the PE industry as a whole, by the way. And I think, if you’re a founder or a business owner, you might have an easier time taking an equity investment from somebody like that, who’s known in that specific industry that they made their money in, who’s had to make payroll. And they probably have a different timeline than normal PE that’s looking to flip every three to five years. So I think as an investor, I think that would be an interesting investment opportunity, right? And so it’s like, okay, well, part of my PE allocation, you know, This might look interesting. I hesitate to make, you know, I’m not an investment person, so. Frazer Rice Great stuff. Mark, how do people find you and reach out? Mark Tepsich I’m on LinkedIn. I would attempt to just spell my name with my email address at ubs.com, but it’s very lengthy. You just hit me up on LinkedIn. But, Frasier, I appreciate the time. This was great. Frazer Rice I’ll have that in the show notes and as a final parting, we sort of listen to people say, the family space is getting loud. I’m not sure it is. I think the vendors are more loud than the family offices are. I don’t know what your experience is there. Mark Tepsich 100%, the family members themselves are still quiet. You don’t see them out there on LinkedIn. It is the ecosystem to your point around them that is getting loud, right? It’s LinkedIn. It’s like, you know, every time I’m on there, it’s like somebody’s got something to say about families, which is good. Again, if you think about every boom in history, they attract people, right? You could say the same thing about AI, right? But again, it’s become loud, but that’s the industry. It’s not the family offices themselves. Frazer Rice Great stuff. Thanks, Mark. Mark Tepsich Thank you, Frazer. Appreciate it. FAMILY OFFICE DEFINED MORE ON FAMILY OFFICE DESIGN WITH ED MARSHALL https://www.amazon.com/Wealth-Actually-Intelligent-Decision-Making-1-ebook/dp/B07FPQJJQT/
Book your Corporate Breakup Call here: https://richwomanrevolution.com/corporate-breakup-call
https://youtu.be/xNeFuqsU7A4 Podcast Trailer Welcome to the "Wealth Actually" podcast trailer. I'm FRAZER RICE. After 170 episodes, I thought I'd check in to make sure that everyone understood what to expect from the show going forward, especially if you're new to it. For those newcomers, it was time for a quick podcast trailer. Ultimately, I'll be talking to a lot of different experts in their various fields. By day, I'm a chief operating officer / wealth strategist for large complicated families. This involves wealth management, tax, trustee issues, family dynamics, and the odd business succession story. I'm also a lawyer which means I'm interested in legal issues that surround these concepts. Finally, I enjoy politics and public policy. I grew up in it, and so I like to think about it and its interaction with my day job. Ultimately, this show is paired with a book called Wealth Actually, and the best way to reach me is via www.wealthactually.com. I hope this podcast trailer was helpful. I'm always looking to get it better. If you have guest ideas, topics to explore or or other ways to increase its reach, I'm happy to listen. Finally, if you have other shows that I think are worth experiencing, send them along. (For those repeat listeners, you will notice I changed the theme music too. It's a little more thunder, a lot less synthesizer. Let me know what you think of it.) Enjoy the show and be sure to like, subscribe, and share with your friends. More Episodes Find more episodes in the podcast section HERE Book To buy a copy of the book "Wealth, Actually", see the link below. (There is a great audiobook version that I just produced and is accessible on Amazon too) https://www.amazon.com/Wealth-Actually-Intelligent-Decision-Making-1-ebook/dp/B07FPQJJQT/ Social Media Linkedin Twitter IG BlueSky (NEW!) Podcast Trailer
This week, "Wealth Actually" meets "THE SOUL OF WEALTH" as I speak with DR. DANIEL CROSBY, Ph.D. about his new book. https://www.amazon.com/Soul-Wealth-reflections-money-meaning-ebook/dp/B0CP625K99 https://youtu.be/Y6dUcW_eQW4 Outline (Soul of Wealth) -Behavioral Finance-Issues with the "research"-Building consensus around money decisions-How our brains trick us into faulty wealth processes-Teaching people to stretch the time horizon of their planning Biography Educated at Brigham Young and Emory Universities, Dr. Daniel Crosby is a psychologist and behavioral finance expert who helps organizations understand the intersection of mind and markets. As a leading voice on the impact of behavioral finance, "The Soul of Wealth" isn't Daniel's only writing. Dr. Crosby's first book, Personal Benchmark: Integrating Behavioral Finance and Investment Management, was a New York Times bestseller. His second book, The Laws of Wealth, was named the best investment book of 2017 by the Axiom Business Book Awards and has been translated into Japanese, Chinese, Vietnamese and German. His latest work, The Behavioral Investor, is an in-depth look at how sociology, psychology and neurology all impact investment decision-making. Finally, Daniel publishes the highly respected Standard Deviations podcast- where you can find his personal thoughts on financial psychology and interviews with experts in the wealth management and psychology fields. Money - The Soul of Wealth Daniel's book presents 50 short essays which explore what wealth really is and provides practical suggestions for how to change your thinking and your actions in small, powerful ways, for a wealthier life. Soul of Wealth Topics: How you spend your money reveals your values. That money can buy happiness if spent well. What makes a good financial plan. Why willpower is overrated. How to master delayed gratification for the ultimate wealth hack. Why anything worth doing carries some risk. Contacts: @DANIELCROSBY TWITTER STANDARD DEVIATIONS PODCAST Behavioral Scientist, Brian Portnoy on the 100th Episode of "Wealth Actually" https://www.amazon.com/Wealth-Actually-Intelligent-Decision-Making-1-ebook/dp/B07FPQJJQT/
Author and investment expert, JARED DILLIAN, joins the podcast for the second time to discuss his new collection of short stories, NIGHT MOVES. We talk about his talent for moving across formats and between fiction and non fiction. We go into the need for story-telling and the importance of holding an audience. Finally, we look for crossovers in his writing from his personal history, his move to South Carolina and his experiences in the Coast Guard and Lehman Brothers. https://www.amazon.com/Night-Moves-stories-Jared-Dillian-ebook/dp/B0DDLB49X1/ "Night Moves" by Jared Dillian From his military experience and investment experience to his DJ'ing prowess and obvious for multi-faceted talent for writing, Jared is a creator and a Renaissance Man- and a terrific, no nonsense person to speak with about the ins and outs of publishing. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c7pratxa3EY Writing across formats and how that led to NIGHT MOVES? Non fiction Novel Short story - is the format a challenge or an opportunity? Newsletter - The daily grind of the Daily Dirtnap How to move between the daily pressure of writing a newsletter to the longer form content in non-fiction? Then, how do you move to the character development and world-building involved with fiction? Themes in NIGHT MOVES Sex, desperation, wistfullness Writing in a women's voice (how do you get into that headspace?) What does research consist of for short stories? Genre Favorites? Where you end the story determines whether it's a comedy or tragedy Do you start knowing where you want to end up? What does the format of a writing day look like? Ie do the newsletters get in the way or help with other projects? Do you get stuck? (Is there where it's convenient to have the newsletters) Music and Writing- The Crossover into NIGHT MOVES DJ'ing composing - what are the similarities in that process? Any crossover to investing? Where do we find the book and how else can people keep track of JARED? JARED'S SUBSTACK DAILY DIRTNAP Jared on "Wealth Actually" talking about his previous book, "NO WORRIES" https://www.amazon.com/Wealth-Actually-Intelligent-Decision-Making-1-ebook/dp/B07FPQJJQT/ "Wealth Actually" by Frazer Rice
"How to Retire" (by Christine Benz) deals with a concept full of fear, emotion, math and uncertainty: retirement. Even the wealthiest, who have a margin of safety, run into issues of purpose, time management and legacy. Layer onto that the risks of longevity, dementia, divorce, managing cash and investments in inflationary times, and navigating the byzantine health and elder care systems. No wonder "retirement" is a scary topic. Christine Benz' new book "How to Retire" is here to help get our arms around this topic. With 20 interviews with experts in the field, Christine has written a terrific reference for retirees to get their arms around this stage in life. Her book covers the numbers, the emotion and the structure for people entering the golden years. CHRISTINE BENZ is director of personal finance and retirement planning for Morningstar and senior columnist for Morningstar.com. In that role, she focuses on retirement and portfolio planning for individual investors. She also co-hosts a podcast for Morningstar, "The Long View", which features in-depth interviews with thought leaders in investing and personal finance. https://www.amazon.com/How-Retire-lessons-successful-retirement-ebook/dp/B0CP5X3TYK/ How to Retire How to Retire with Christine Benz The Numbers (Funding Retirement and Resilient Investing) The Transition to Retirement (AKA "The Countdown") With a plan in mind, what is the role a Dry Run with Retirement? The Buy-In: Getting consensus from spouses and family on what life will look like The First 2 years: The Importance of a Detailed Calendar How Are You Going to Use the Time? Having entered the role of caregiving, retirement may be more of a "job" than you think "End of Life": When Should you Give up the Keys and Long Term Care with CAROLYN MCCLANAHAN Estate Planning (with past "Wealth Actually" guest JENNY ROZELLE) With all of this frre time, how do spouses adjust to spending so much time together? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IN5C7Ko6XBY https://open.spotify.com/episode/50ZO3JLl4bAdf95b64UQIZ?si=XJEYU2h4ToG8rL_Qkou6eA https://www.amazon.com/Wealth-Actually-Intelligent-Decision-Making-1-ebook/dp/B07FPQJJQT/ Frazer Rice's "Wealth Actually"
The pace, scale and sophistication of RIA marketing has accelerated into hyperspace in the last 10 years. There are new business models in wealth management and, thus, new voices and sources of trust. The speed of content creation and publishing is increasing- especially with newer artificial intelligence tools. Social media has made the scope and reach of marketing efforts enormous -- and required firms to be data scientists as much as financial advisers. Finally, where once the firm drove the branding in the RIA space, there appears to be a move back to the star system - where recognizable names create the light that attracts clients. Enter RICHARD HEFT, President of EXT MARKETING - His firm focuses on marketing for RIA's, asset managers, and other financial institutions. The development and execution of marketing strategies are accelerating well past the leadership of the typical RIA. They have to prove to the market that their inorganic growth efforts are real and sustainable in a crowded (and often bland and undifferentiated) space. Richard tells us what he is seeing in the RIA Marketing space. Background- What does EXT do? Richard Heft EXT Marketing What was the opportunity you saw? What is "Marketing" vs Marketing for Financial Institutions? vs. RIA Marketing? Differences Regulation Other cultural issues Where does RIA Marketing stop and PR start as part of larger strategy? How do you combat the "sea of sameness" and "Lowest common denominator" factors in RIA Marketing? Boats, Piers, Forests Couples at the Beach New demographics, new ideas Measurement - What does marketing success look like from the agency perspective? Is there a difference in the clients' perspective? How do you bridge that gap and make sure there is agreement on metrics? Digital - After putting strategy, into action, what is the importance of data integrity and maintenance? Having established a visibility strategy, how does one convert eyeballs to dollars? How do we get around the "consulting class" fluff? Success stories The new sophistication of the referrer and the consumer / client. https://open.spotify.com/episode/79qDVNuUC0ixgHJIIhVAyD?si=33170e765cc44bdd The art of segmentation? B2B vs B2COI B2B vs B2C? How much can (or what should) be outsourced to an agency vs hiring someone internally? The necessity of 3rd party credibility and how to get it (and get credit for it) "RIA Marketing" Trends going forward? Artificial Intelligence and other tools Social Media (How an UHNW adviser uses podcasts) Will there be a move away from referrals to "legitimate" digital lead generation? Where does traditional media fit in? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XuhdR2xJ0bw "RIA Marketing" with Richard Heft Outro: https://www.amazon.com/Wealth-Actually-Intelligent-Decision-Making-1-ebook/dp/B07FPQJJQT/ "RIA Marketing" on Wealth Actually
PROPUBLICA has taken on the role abdicated by most mainstream news organizations. Its long form journalism, while controversial, takes on many special interests that escape public scrutiny. While I often don't agree with the slant that they take, ProPublica represents a new frontier for the fourth column. Traditional news outlets make less and less business sense. I wanted to find out more about how long form journalism is going to work going forward and how it will apply to financial regulation. So I spoke to JUSTIN ELLIOTT, an Investigative Reporter at ProPublica. Justin has won the Gerald Loeb Award for business journalism, the Selden Ring Award for a series on the American Red Cross and, with the “Trump, Inc.” podcast team, a duPont-Columbia Award. He co-wrote the story revealing tech mogul Peter Thiel's multibillion-dollar Roth IRA which we talk about here. Justin's Path to Reporting The Role of PROPUBLICA in Long Form Journalism What are its origins? What is its mandate? How is it funded? What is the Role of Journalism in (Re) Establishing Accountability in Society? What is Congress' (and the other branches of government) role in fixing the issues that journalism uncovers? Peter Thiel's $5 Billion Roth What happened? (How did Thiel get assets into a Roth IRA with a $2K cap?) How did this work? (Funding a Roth IRA with low value Founders' shares) The "Law", the Intent of the "Law" and the Variability around the "Law"? Is this a valuation issue as much as a legal issue? Is it wrong? How should we correct a distortion like this? What's next for Justin and ProPublica and how do we find him? 2024 Election Coverage Justin at ProPublica Justin at Twitter https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f1YOe9GV0MY https://youtu.be/Ao33oyZJuC8 https://www.amazon.com/Wealth-Actually-Intelligent-Decision-Making-1-ebook/dp/B07FPQJJQT Buy "Wealth Actually" Paperback, Kindle and Audio
The transition of wealth between generations has put the spotlight squarely on fiduciary roles. With the rapid changes in the financial services space, directed trustees and independent administrative trust companies have exploded in popularity. The Evolving World of Directed Trustees Most advisors, wealth management firms, and clients under-appreciate the responsibility and risks of proper trusteeship. They remember a culture and business model that existed decades ago. These days, individuals trustees usually can't handle the rigors of the job and law firms are leaving the space for liability reasons. Finally, in an environment where clients want more flexibility and control, the large bank-owned trust departments provide a cumbersome experience and high turnover, With this in mind, modern estate planning has unbundled traditional investment, administrative and distribution trustee roles. There is a huge appetite for jurisdictional planning and best-in-class providers. With all of this change, it is confusing for the advisor to know who is responsible for what and how much it should cost. The Problem for RIAs RIA's do not have the resources to advise or service clients with this complexity. The administration and oversight of these structures is a distraction. Building a trust company to solve this problem does not make business sense in a private equity-backed RIA aggregation environment. Moreover, using conflicted trust providers is out of the question for fear of putting client relationships at risk. An increasingly popular option for RIAs and wealthy families is the use of directed trustees and the independent administrative trust company. CHRISTOPHER HOLTBY is a co-founder of an independent trust company that works specifically with wealth advisors and directed trustees. Not only do we highlight the best practices for identifying and partnering with an administrative trustee, but we also discuss the typical workflow between an RIAs and directed trustees. Chris' Background with Directed Trustees How RIAs work with directed trustees and an independent trust company: 1/ What are the basic requirements of independent trust company? 2/ Accordingly, which "value adds" should RIA firms should look for? 3/ Are there key attributes to spot when deciding to work/partner with an independent trust company? 4/ Lastly, should you be aware of any "Gotchas" in the space? How Do We Stay in Touch with Chris? WEALTH ADVISORS TRUST COMPANY Video of the Podcast: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6YyqlULg1GA "Wealth Actually" is now on Video! https://www.amazon.com/Wealth-Actually-Intelligent-Decision-Making-1-ebook/dp/B07FPQJJQT
Episode 148: Aon's Latanya Simmons Aon's LaTanya Simmons on Florida and California Property Insurance The challenging Florida and California property insurance environment is a huge topic of conversation. Anyone looking to insure a property knows that this has become tricky business in the last five years. Floods, hurricanes, wildfires and mold have are major problems for successful families' homes. These and other conditions have driven up premiums if you can find insurance at all. Add into the mix the complexity around the liability and the long term viability of the insurers. It becomes obvious that you need an expert to help navigate these risks. LATANYA SIMMONS is an Atlanta native and 2nd generation risk management professional. As the National Sports Practice Director and Private Risk Advisor with AON Private Risk Management, LaTanya provides expert personal property and casualty insurance advice and advocacy for successful individuals. executives, entrepreneurs, athletes, entertainers and family offices nationwide count among the people that she serves. We discuss the Florida and California phenomenon and what she sees as the future of the property and casualty insurance market in the high net worth space. The Florida and California Property Insurance Challenge Tell us what is going on in the Florida and California property insurance markets? What is the impact on customers? Are Florida and California (and New York) just the beginning for the risk markets? What strategies should those and others contemplating moves or purchases in other states consider beforehand? How has the insurance market changed over the last 5 years (and specifically in the last 2)? Where do you see it going? Will states like Texas, Colorado and Georgia feel this? Where do you identify the biggest insurance risks for highly successful individuals? How often should insurance policies and programs be reviewed, including the health of their insurer? Many clients are high profile due to their or their family's success and involvement in the community. This puts them in the spotlight often – in the news, on social media, front page of their company website. What risks do higher profile people need to be thinking about? What other guidance you can share for successful individuals and families when it comes to managing the risk around their homes, autos, collections, and other property? Contact LaTanya LaTanya Simmons LINKEDIN AON Other "Wealth Actually" insurance discussions: https://frazerrice.com/ep-106-ahmet-bidav/ For More . . . https://www.amazon.com/Wealth-Actually-Intelligent-Decision-Making-1-ebook/dp/B07FPQJJQT/ The new audio version is out now!
Private Wealth Manager | Podcast Host | Author Frazer Rice focuses on Family Office Infrastructure, Trusts and Estates, Private Company Board and Charity, Multi-Generational Wealth & Trustee Consulting for Next Capital. Frazer has written the book Wealth, Actually: Intelligent Decision-Making for the 1% and produces the successful “Wealth Actually” Podcast. He appears on a variety of media and industry panels to discuss wealth management practice, trusts and estates, family dynamics issues, and tax policy. He is on the Board of the New York City Estate Planning Council and is Co-Head of its Programming Committee. He received his B.A. in Political Science and History from Duke University and his J.D. from Emory University School of Law. Frazer lives in Manhattan and enjoys golf, travel, horror movies, media production, and writing. Today, we start with one of my favorite quotes from Frazer's book: “Very few of life's important answers are found in a pitch book or a slide deck.” – he further adds, “Unfortunately, the financial services industry makes its money, from the sale of products.” — He shares some advice how to navigate this fascinating, but challenging environment. We focus on the importance of anticipation when providing advice. We also tackle a big question: what it means to be rich? Frazer introduces the distinctions between current and legacy wealth, retirement planning vs. estate planning. We have a lively discussion about sudden windfalls, and Frazer proposes another way of looking at this life-changing event. Stay tuned until the end, when we talk about the real fear of losing it all. Links: www.frazerrice.com www.nextcapitalmgmt.com https://www.amazon.com/Wealth-Actually-Intelligent-Decision-Making-1-ebook/dp/B07FPQJJQT/ --- Crisis Investing: 100 Essays - My new book. To get regular updates and bonus content, please sign-up for my substack: https://bogumilbaranowski.substack.com/ Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/bogumil_nyc Learn more about Bogumil Baranowski Learn more about Sicart Associates, LLC. NEVER INVESTMENT ADVICE. IMPORTANT: As a reminder, the remarks in this interview represent the views, opinions, and experiences of the participants and are based upon information they believe to be reliable; however, Sicart Associates nor I have independently verified all such remarks. The content of this podcast is for general, informational purposes, and so are the opinions of members of Sicart Associates, a registered investment adviser, and guests of the show. This podcast does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any specific security or financial instruments or provide investment advice or service. Past performance is not indicative of future results. More information on Sicart Associates is available via its Form ADV disclosure documents available adviserinfo.sec.gov --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/talking-billions/message
In this episode with Frazer Rice, Author & Host of the Podcast "Wealth Actually", we talk: - All about the corporate transparency act coming in 2024 - What changes are coming in 2026 as tax laws sunset - How to plan for them based on what wealth level you are at - Why waiting till 2025 is a bad choice - Some charitable planning ideas for families to instill values in their children
Commander John Sharpe and the King Dude talk about economics.
When it comes to building the life of your dreams, hope is not a strategy. So, today we're kicking off a new series that will give you the tools you need to build a solid financial foundation from the ground up. In this episode, Allegra explains what wealth actually enables in our lives (hint: it's not just about being rich) and introduces the Factora Financial Framework—the basis for everything we teach in the Wealth Circle. Download our FREE financial framework workbook > Learn more about the Wealth Circle >
When it comes to building the life of your dreams, hope is not a strategy. So, today we're kicking off a new series that will give you the tools you need to build a solid financial foundation from the ground up. In this episode, Allegra explains what wealth actually enables in our lives (hint: it's not just about being rich) and introduces the Factora Financial Framework—the basis for everything we teach in the Wealth Circle. Download our free workbook.Apply to the Spring 2023 Wealth Circle.
Golf legend, JAY SIGEL joins us on this episode of "Wealth Actually." In United States Amateur Golf, there are three names: Bobby Jones, Tiger Woods and Jay Sigel. Jay is one of the most accomplished amateur golfers in American history. After growing in Pennsylvania, Jay played his college golf at Wake Forest. Afterwards, he embarked on a successful career in insurance and focused on the amateur side of the game-And focus on it he did . . . Jay won: The US Amateur twice (Including his win at the Country Club in Brookline in 1982)The US Mid AmateurThe British Amateurand he played in 9 Walker Cups (captaining two of them). Jay later turned professional at age 50 and played on the Senior tour where he won 10 times. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5weEssiMjgM While it's an amazing story of golf accomplishment, many of the lessons from Jay's life come from his insurance business, his lessons in mentorship from Arnold Palmer and Jack Nicklaus, his charity work and the importance of family. Jay's early golf and rise to prominence, -Junior Golf-The role of Wake Forest-His arm injury, the decision to forgo professional golf and the economics of the Tour "back then" The start and story of Jay's successful insurance business in Pennsylvania -The factors that went into his long-term success in business (and golf's role in business)-The role of family-The decision to compete on the Senior Tour (and the role of Jack Nicklaus)-Winning as a pro Jay's charitable endeavors and what is happening now? -THE JAY SIGEL INVITATIONALGolf questions -What made Jay a terrific player?-Was anything missing? -What is the difference between the top .01% and the top .0001%?-Mindset of Stroke vs Match Play -The match with Rick Fehr at Brookline and the aftermath-The great players and lessons learned in Jay's career The State of the Game -What he thinks of the state of the game after a whirlwind of news in the world of golf:-Impact of length and power on the game -How did Brookline hold up with the modern game? How Do We Stay In Touch? WWW.JAYSIGEL.COM THE 2022 JAY SIGEL INVITATIONAL Jay's Golf Resume https://www.jaysigel.com/new-page https://www.amateurgolf.com/golf-tournament-news/27871/Catching-up-with-Jay-Sigel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhLj8EMCok0 https://www.amazon.com/Wealth-Actually-Intelligent-Decision-Making-1-ebook/dp/B07FPQJJQT/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ViEKPjkjEWI JOHN FICHTHORN, now a two-time "Wealth Actually" interviewee, joins the podcast to discuss his new documentary, "Gaming Wall Street". Directed by Tobias Deml, the two-part documentary debuts on March 3rd on HBOMax. Gaming Wall Street chronicles the 2021 GameStop short squeeze that drew in the retail investor community and galvanized a movement against the traditional financial services industrial complex. It also underscores the complicated and often unfair nature of Wall Street. To add to the intrigue and character of the documentary, Succession star, Kieran Culkin, narrates the story. Outline You were last on when BETTING ON ZERO came out- your documentary on the Herbalife trade. Now you have the new documentary- what got you focused on Gamestop? -Take us through what happened here -Who were the players? -EP1 Wall Street Bets – Gabe Plotkin/Melvin -Robin Hood -EP2 Payment for order flow Citadel – Robin Hood - How can you have more short interest than outstanding shares? - Another Long Term Capital Management? -Who got outfoxed? -Gamestop and AMC and others? -Who made out like bandits and who got destoryed -Why was this different? -The middle finger to Wall Street? -What happened to “the market can remain rational longer than you can remain liquid?” -Pulling the plug on Robin Hood -The Effect of Margin -Bitcoin analogy -What are the lessons learned from Gamestop? -What is the fallout? -What is the media's obligation here? The SEC? -What's next? Any more documentaries? Where to find "Gaming Wall Street" https://collider.com/gaming-wall-street-trailer-kieran-culkin-documentary-hbo-max/ HBOMax https://www.amazon.com/Wealth-Actually-Intelligent-Decision-Making-1-ebook/dp/B07FPQJJQT/
Wealthy families have a lot of complexities to deal with. There is a seemingly endless amount to organize, direct, and plan ahead for across their assets, activities, relationships, and many other aspects of their lives, especially for families who want to develop a large and thriving family business that will last for generations. Frazer Rice, the Regional Director at Pendleton Square Trust, Author and Podcast Host of "Wealth Actually” discusses how the family office helps manage these complexities, the basic things you need to know, how to assess if you need a family office service and so much more! [00:01 - 10:57 ] Opening Segment Pendleton and its role in tax from a business, family, and private trust company perspective Pendleton trust services explained Private Trust versus Corporate Trust company [11:31 - 21:06 ] Family Office: Purpose, Benefits, and Services Zero Income Tax Capability & Asset Protection When do you need a family office Questions to ask yourself to assess your status Intergenerational wealth issue Types of taxes and how you could deal with them wisely Tax Avoidance versus Tax Evasion [25:48 - 39:59 ] Family Office Regulation Data Security How do you protect yourself from cyber-attacks? On new Asset Class (Cryptocurrency, NFT, etc.) The common characteristics to lead a successful multi-generation family [44:53 - 48:57] Wrapping Up! What makes Pendleton different from other trust companies Key Quotes “If you're paying estate taxes or have some sort of liability, that's a good time to be thinking about trust structure.” - Frazer C. Rice “Understand exactly what you own and what that means. Then understand how it is custody and how you access it, etc. If you don't understand how its custody, you just shouldn't be playing in the space… Because if you don't understand how this stuff works, then you really fall prey, you won't understand why value goes up or down.” - Frazer C. Rice ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Connect with Frazer: Website: frazerrice.com / pendletonsqquaretrust.com Linkedin, Instagram, and Twitter: @frazerrice Connect with me: https://www.linkedin.com/in/brian-c-adams/ (LinkedIn) LIKE, SUBSCRIBE, AND LEAVE US A REVIEW on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Google Podcasts, or whatever platform you listen on. Thank you for tuning in and Stay Tuned for the Next Episode COMING SOON!
Welcome back to the 99th episode of the "Wealth Actually" Podcast . . . (We're recording right before Christmas and I'd like give a special thanks to Matthew Passy who helps me sound good and make the trains run on time.) With the end of the year fast approaching, philanthropy is on the minds of many people. For charitable organizations, the mad rush to meet their goals underscores many challenges they face. Understaffed, under-resourced, and using old tools, non-profits face an uphill climb every year. By using marketing technology, Artificial Intelligence and data science tools, a new company is trying to help with this problem. ARJUNA SOLUTIONS applies the same marketing concepts and data science found at the top consumer companies in the world to the non-profit space. To take us through the idea of how technology and the non-profit space can intersect, I'm going to speak to COLIN STEWART. Colin leads Arjuna's groundbreaking philanthropic practice, which enables nonprofits to adopt new technologies and increase revenue more easily via philanthropic funding. We focus on how non-profit organizations can increase their revenue through more data-driven and targeted asks. Finally, we talk about how HNW donors and charities can deepen their relationships and multiply the impact of major gifts in measurable ways through technology. OUTLINE: Technology and the Importance of Philanthropy ARJUNA SOLUTIONS background- What does Arjuna solve? How do you optimize the right amount to ask for so that you get the most out of a donor (without scaring them off)? Arjuna's ExactAsk process-Where does the Artificial Intelligence fit in? What data are you using? How do you manage the data to get the right ask amount?Where does it integrate with the recipient organizations systems?For which organizations is this right? (Large Donor Bases where there is plenty of data to analyze and marketing systems to optimize).How can the AI process help the donor amplify a large gift to an organization?- When multiplying the impact, Is this really a case of a $1 gift generating $3?What does the gift process look look like?Besides potentially more donations, how does it it help the charitable organization?How do you measure success? How does the client measure success?What's next?How do we stay in touch? COLIN STEWART https://www.amazon.com/Wealth-Actually-Intelligent-Decision-Making-1-ebook/dp/B07FPQJJQT/
On today's episode of The Real Estate Nerds Podcast, our host and attorney Scott Smith is joined by Frazer Rice. The two attorney-investors dive right into a deep conversation about asset protection and management, learning financial responsibility, and the true meaning of wealth.Note that this is an episode in our “Live From FinCon 2018” Series. Don't forget to check out the Royal Legal YouTube channel for video extras and other great content. Back to the show...Tune in to Episode 41 of The Real Estate Nerds Podcast now to hear the full conversation.Listen To Episode 41 of The Real Estate Nerds Podcast NowFrazer Rice on Wealth Actually and Steps You Can Take To Keep More of Your Investing Income in Your HandFrazer Rice sits down with our host and asset protection attorney, Scott Smith. Together, they chat about Frasier's latest book,[0:45] Frazer is a wealth expert who helps other investors keep as much of their earnings in their own pockets. This includes asset protection, but also tax minimization work. He points out the many ways that the U.S. Government, via taxation, pockets taxpayer dollars through sheer ignorance on the part of the taxpayer.[2:00] Frazer recently authored Wealth Actually: Intelligent Decision-Making for the 1%. The book is full of wisdom for those changing asset classes or “moving up” in the real estate world.[2:30] Scott expresses his admiration for the book, relating his own experiences as an asset protection attorney.[3:15] Frazer points out the need for unique, customized plans: “You could be a doctor with a high litigation risk. You could own a construction company. You could have a high inheritance risk with a drug-addicted sibling. Everyone's situation is different.” Each of these circumstances requires a specific type of risk management, and that's where Frazer's latest work is useful[5:30] Scott asks what motivated Frazer's latest book. Frazer immediately points to taxes, and how to mitigate capital gains and minimize tax liability. He also speaks to how to form an adequate estate plan--advice he routinely gives his clients. Failure to form an estate plan can lead to lengthy litigation, forced sales, and plenty of avoidable fees.[Tweet "“You could be a doctor with a high litigation risk. You could own a construction company. You could have a high inheritance risk with a drug-addicted sibling. Everyone's situation is different.” - Frazer Rice, Real Estate Nerds Ep. 41"]Tools Even Children Can Use for Learning Fiscal ResponsibilityFrazer shares some of his practical tips for working with young people to set them up for a life of financial responsibility. Since financial literacy is generally overlooked in schools, Frazer has taken the initiative to fill this education gap.[7: 20] Frazer lists a couple of exercises for teaching children about investing, preparing them for a lifetime of responsibility. They learn early on about losing as well. Siblings present an ideal situation, as they can work together on exercises to determine their strengths and weaknesses[10:00] Scott inquires whether these concepts are for children only. Frazer replies that financial literacy is something investors can work on at any age. Scott asks how Frazer explains headier concepts like taxes, real estate investing, and problem-solving. Frasier replies that his financial literacy tools are modified for age-appropriateness.[14:00] Scott asks about whether it is worth the effort to train children in their real estate business for seamless transition. Frazer says yes, and that the lessons about wealth are fairly intuitive--and better off taught. He elaborates more on wealth management with some stories from his experiences with clients.[18:30] On the subject of wealth, Frazer points out that a broad definition can improve your life: “There's a currency of success that has nothing to do with dollars.” Scott agrees, and points out that people can use real estate for passive income to free up time to pursue the things they really enjoy.[21:00] Scott asks a bit more about how children learn from early investing options. Frazer believes if the power of compound interest were taught universally, Americans in general would be doing better.[Tweet "“There's a currency of success that has nothing to do with dollars.” - Frazer Rice, Episode 41 Real Estate Nerds Podcast"]The Takeaway: Your Approach Can Be What Makes The Deal WorkScott and Frazer wrap up with the take-aways points from their discussion. Both investors agree that a strong backing system and network is vital.[22:40] Scott points out that most investors take mis-steps because of their own blind spots.[23:00] Frazer confirms, and further elaborates that skill sets are diverse, and that's okay: “You don't need to know how to solve every problem..If you're okay at a couple of things, that's a good business model.” Some team members may be better with lenders, while others can crunch the numbers on properties and comps easily. Still others may be more equipped for managing contractors and the properties themselves.
Edward Marshall is joined by Frazer Rice, Regional Director of Pendleton Square. Frazer works with families and individuals in developing and implementing fiduciary structures to achieve family goals. Frazer is the author of Wealth Actually and hosts an affiliated podcast where he interviews experts in the wealth space. Frazer provides insight into valuable lessons learned, including properly communicating with professional services advisors, successful wealth planning around cryptocurrency, the impact of artificial intelligence, and the modified family office landscape in a post-pandemic world.
Frazer Rice (https://frazerrice.com/) is a Regional Director for Pendleton Square Trust Company (https://pendletonsquaretrust.com/). In that capacity, he focuses on trustee, fiduciary and family governance issues for wealthy families. He is the author and podcast host of "Wealth, Actually (https://www.amazon.com/Wealth-Actually-Intelligent-Decision-Making-1-ebook/dp/B07FPQJJQT)" which centers on decision-making for wealthy families The podcast interviews wealth experts and entrepreneurial families and individuals. Standout Quotes: * "Something that's happening industry-wide or at least in the US is the concept that being a corporate trustee is a different business than the asset management side of wealth management" - [Frazer] * "Most of the trust planning is articulating a move at the minimum from Gen 1 to Gen 2" - [Frazer] * "I view the Trust and the planning around the Trust to be an outgrowth, when done correctly, of a solid communication structure that has been developed within the family" - [Frazer] * "What the family bank approach is offering to families is a way for them to pass on their intellectual capital...to their human capital, the next generation by having them apply for the financial capital" - [Mike] * "If the kids see what's important to the other kids early, and attach a dollar manifestation around that, I think that you're building the context so you have fewer blow-ups later on" - [Frazer] * "I think the most important thing anyone can have in their lifestyle is the ability to be comfortable in their own skin" - [Frazer] Key Takeaways: * Frazer shares his background and experiences so far, from college to working in politics, after which he decided to study law and gained exposure while working in different firms. His career started down the path of wealth management when he worked with a Trust company. * He is also the author of the book "Wealth Actually" and the host of a podcast that discusses topics related to finance and wealth management even though that was not the initial plan for the podcast. * Pendleton Square Trust is an administrative Trust company that fulfills the function in a Trustee role aimed at helping families get access to good Tennessee jurisdiction. * 3 main Functions of a Trustee: First is the administrative function which includes safeguarding and reporting on assets, paying the taxes. The Second is the distribution of the asset to beneficiaries. The third function is the investment management of the asset which is excluded at Pendleton, Frazer believes most places don't do everything well. * A trustee does not have to be a corporation, it can be an individual acting as a trustee with the ability to perform all 3 key functions, however, it may be difficult to find one person who is great at all functions. * A lot of families would prefer to have more control, and a private trust company allows them to control the aspects they're comfortable with and outsource the rest. * There is a possible conflict where corporate trustees who also provide asset management services invariably provide their asset management services. * The most common customer for the company is a US family that is either actively transferring wealth from the first generation to the second generation or generally has a multi-generational approach. * For those families that have taken their hands off the wheel in terms of managing the wealth, the Trust company operates more like a family office but for those still actively engaged in the continuation of the business, that business becomes the real center of the family office. * One of the real destroyers of wealth is bad communication amongst the family, this leads to conflict, which leads to litigation and litigation is expensive * There's a lot of good work that needs to be done ahead of building the structures so that you're not only setting something up that takes care of the money for the family, you're also getting the family ready for the money. * Family or Shared Philanthropy is one of the tools that helps to work with families as it gets the family members to express their interests and helps them work together while considering the needs of each other. * The Vacation Fund Concept: This is another tool, and the idea is to have the kids make a joint decision around the investment of money by getting them to plan the vacation based on a particular amount available. It helps identify which kids have aptitude and interest, the aggressive or conservative ones, and other responses exhibited by the kids towards the task. Summarily the kids get involved in financial planning and learn critical points related to it. * The idea of a Family Bank is putting structure around the request of money for projects so that it forces preparedness in front of real people who have to make a decision. Learning that persuasion is important helps the next generation to deal with the real world. * It also provides an opportunity to combat the situation of assets growing linearly being overtaken by liabilities growing geometrically, as more opportunities explored can increase the growth of assets. * There's a big difference between Operational succession and Ownership Succession of a family business, the difference in roles may mean some people get paid more but this needs to be discussed earlier on before the transition period. * From Frazer to his kids: I think the most important thing anyone can have in their lifestyle is the ability to be comfortable in their skin. The concept of trying to please other people's sense of success is a difficult road because you're never going to please everyone all the time, more so you will be running from things that could be your path to success. o * Run your own race, be comfortable in your own skin. Episode Timeline: * [00:46] Introducing today's guest, Frazer Rice, Regional Director for Pendleton Square Trust Company. * [07:26] About Pendleton Square Trust Company and Wealth Management. * [08:46] The 3 main functions of a Trustee. * [11:21] In the US, do families have to appoint a company to act as Trustee in an administrative capacity. * [12:16] The concept of a Private Trust Company. * [18:54] Who would you say is your most common customer? * [28:02] Frazer shares tools used when working with families. * [32:51] The Vacation Fund Concept. * [38:40] Frazer's insight on a Family Bank. * [47:57] Frazer's letter to his kids For more episodes go to BusinessOfFamily.net (https://www.businessoffamily.net/) Sign up for The Business of Family Newsletter (https://www.businessoffamily.net/newsletter) Follow Mike on Twitter @MikeBoyd (https://twitter.com/MikeBoyd) If you feel it's appropriate, I'd so appreciate you taking 30 seconds to Leave a Review on iTunes (http://getpodcast.reviews/id/1525326745), I receive a notification of each review. Thank you! Special Guest: Frazer Rice.
I want to see what this financial advice podcast is all about. Show Link: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/wealth-actually/id1066626018?ls=1&mt=2
The 75th "Wealth Actually" Podcast . . . Wow . . . it seems like I just started this project a few months ago. It has been 4 and a half years since the first one . . . it's alarming how fast time flies. Hopefully, I have improved over time! This 75th recording is an industry specific interview, but it has wide ramifications. In getting up to speed on a different project, I stumbled across the book "Ethics for Trustees 2.0" by MARGUERITE LORENZ. Based in California, Marguerite is a Master Trustee and the Managing Partner of LORENZ PRIVATE TRUSTEES. https://www.amazon.com/Ethics-Trustees-2-0-Guide-Trustee/dp/172837278X/ Ethic for Trustees 2.0 is a quick and extremely informative read on the roles and responsibilities of a trustee and the establishment of good practices around decision-making that involves judgment and discretion. It also went into some detail about the California licensing component of individual trustees- something I knew little about. So in typical "me" fashion, I called up Marguerite to find out more about the book and her firm's unique practice. That led to her gracious appearance on the latest "Wealth, Actually" podcast. We covered: -Her unique background and the formation of her private trustee business. (It has its own unique succession story too!) -Marguerite's rationale and experience in writing the book -The Definitions of a Trust, their uses and some of the nomenclature -The Duties of a Trustee/Fiduciary- (many of which trustees aren't aware of)! -What makes a good trustee? How does one deal with arguing beneficiaries? Tricky assets? -The Origin of CALIFORNIA LICENSING FOR PROFESSIONAL TRUSTEES (and why it may be important for normally exempted attorneys and CPAs to get licensed. -When does advice graduate from being to transactional to ongoing and how does it relate to administration of structures and discretionary decision-making? -Traps for the unwary trustee -What functions or areas of trustee responsibility are good to ask for help? When do you bring in outside experts? -Useful Resources and Groups: INDEPENDENT TRUSTEE ALLIANCE ESTATE PLANNING GROUP NETWORK -How do we stay in touch? MARGUERITE LORENZ LINKEDIN LORENZ PRIVATE TRUSTEES (WEBSITE) MARGUERITE LORENZ TWITTER https://www.amazon.com/Wealth-Actually-Intelligent-Decision-Making-1-ebook/dp/B07FPQJJQT/
Here is the first video foray for the "Wealth Actually" podcast (a bit by accident! We had to switch formats midstream . . . so I decided to experiment with the video format). I interviewed Christopher Ott on #Cybersecurity for the Ultra High Net Worth, High Net Worth and Family Office space. We talk about how one should view their own digital risks, how to protect yourself, and what to do when you have been compromised. We kept it to 40 minutes and probably could have discussed issues for more than three hours. Chris is a partner at Rothwell Figg, the litigation firm based in Washington, D.C. Successfully litigating complex data security matters, conducting hundreds of investigations, and winning dozens of appeals, Prior to entering private practice, Mr. Ott held various influential positions at DOJ including Supervisory Cyber Counsel to the National Security Division of the DOJ, In these roles, he investigated and charged the largest known computer hacking and securities fraud scheme and the hack of Yahoo by Russian intelligence operatives, the largest data breach in history, https://youtu.be/XzYwkjA1qiA BASICS Cybersecurity- the main concerns are around the ability to control access and use of information. Everybody has at least three types of information PREDICTIVE DATA This is data that will help predict what you are going to do. This is especially useful for hackers and other criminals as they figure out how to access your data. CONTROLLING DATA This is data that regulates the access to a client's information. This can include: Passwords (and the need for two factor control, Phones (with automatic password access that can be migrated), and "Deep Fake" video and voice that can trick the gatekeepers into relinquishing access INFLUENCE This can include social, political, or economic influence. THREE TYPES OF ADVERSARIES Criminals Spies Hybrid hackers -Russian Type -Chinese Type SPECIAL CONCERNS FOR HNW INDIVIDUALS More data More control Much more influence · Direct socio-political · Indirect socio-political WHAT IS IMPORTANT? § Control · Analog passwords · Never take shortcuts · Device security § Two Factor INFORMATIONAL AUDITS (DATA MAPPING) § What do I have? § How do I control it? § Who else has access to it? CONVENIENCE VS. SECURITY § BEC § Sim Jacking § Deep fake audio and video WHAT TO DO WHEN YOU HAVE BEEN COMPROMISED Understand What You Have and What Your Risks Are Have Advisors In Place Don't Panic- Assess the Situation Implement Action Plan Some Quick Ideas to Protect Yourself and Your Business . . . Establish an action plan in case of a breach or other compromise. Emphasize personal relationships with all business transactions. Make sure that you have personal relationships with your advisors and transactors so that there is layer of common sense behind communications. Audit what you and your family put out in the world of social media both from a cybersecurity AND from a PERSONAL security standpoint. Consider having a policy- even if informal- to prevent predators having access to physical information. Use multi-factor authentication procedure to confirm and verify instructions (ESPECIALLY for wire transfers or money transactions). Encrypt emails that include private information such as bank details, credit card numbers, Social Security numbers, etc. Back up all data off-site on a regular basis. Regularly change passwords and use different passwords for platforms so that one breach doesn't turn into a cascading data breach on other systems. Perform regular cyber audits to make sure confidential information is secure and that accessible information to the public is properly scrutinized. Avoid clicking on links and being suspicious of attachments.
In this episode of "Wealth Actually", I speak with George Hubbard. George is the Managing Partner and Chief Investment Officer of Algonquin Advisors, a Registered Investment Adviser that focusses on large families, foundations, endowments and other pools of money. He and his firm bring a unique approach to family investment management that uses tried and true institutional principles. Pay special attention to our discussion around alternative assets and the role of the asset class for family investments. George also talks about bringing "trustee" principles to investment implementation. And in honor of the U.S. Open at Winged Foot, we talk about what his dream foursome would be and where it would be played. Introduction Algonquin Advisors T21 Trustees What are the differences between institutional investment thinking and HNW thinking? Taxation Issues Time horizons Liquidity needs (Yale model) Return expectations Access/Deal Flow Position sizing "Real" Due Diligence (how much time/resources should one expect to expend in researching a manager/deal?) The power of concentration to build wealth Where alternatives fit in asset allocation Function of Alternatives Diversification Other types of risk the traditional investor is missing? The ultimate importance of having the private equity portion of a portfolio fund future vintages out of current private equity distributions. (While this is obvious in the institutional world, this kind of thinking is largely absent from most advice to investors who are "sold" private equity!). What can be borrowed from institutional processes to help Individuals make fewer rookie mistakes? Starting at the Beginning: The Investment Policy Statement and The Asset Allocation The Importance of a "Forensic Review" What comprises a "Forensic Review"? The Importance of "Intentional" Investment Decisions How should a trustee think about these things in a true "fiduciary" capacity? Importance of cash management, lock-ups, multiple time horizons, multiple beneficiaries, multiple interests What are the Alternative Asset Classes that investors are focussing on now? -Private Equity (LBO, Venture) -Private Credit -Hedge Funds / derivatives -Managed Futures -Commodities -Real Estate -Infrastructure -Collectibles -Insurance T21 and the Importance of Getting the Right People into Fiduciary Roles for Families George's Golf Dream Foursome How do we keep track of George and the firms? ALGONQUIN ADVISORS GHUBBARD@ALGADV.COM T21 TRUSTEES GHUBBARD@T21TRUSTEES.COM https://www.amazon.com/Wealth-Actually-Intelligent-Decision-Making-1-ebook/dp/B07FPQJJQT/
Part of the fun of the Wealth Actually podcast is to delve into topics around wealth management and better ways to help families understand the intersection between wealth and the fulfillment of goals and ideals. I also get to speak to people as they describe their entrepreneurial journeys- which in itself provides many lessons on the path to success. Occasionally, you get both in one conversation. Enter Betsy Brown. In this episode, we talk about: Betsy's background at larger institutions and the entrepreneur "bug" The changing Wealth Management Industry The desperate need for independence and customization for clients The appeal of Tennessee as a legal jurisdiction, a growing business haven, and a nexus for diversified businesses How this led her to the formation of Pendleton Square Trust Company. The development of her support system and the importance of having a community of entrepreneurs to lean on and share ideas (and opportunities!). The importance of story-telling in communicating, not just to the families she speaks with, but the market at large The influencers in her life that provide her "north star". This is a particularly fun I get to see this up close as I work with Pendleton Square Trust Company to bring the message of benefits of Tennessee law to the advisors for family offices, foundations and fiduciaries in the Northeast and beyond. More information about the firm and Betsy can be found on the links below: LINKEDIN: BETSY BROWN Transcript Tell us about the origin of the firm and what makes it special: We chartered Pendleton Square Trust Company in October of 2015- so we are about to celebrate our 5 year anniversary! Happy Birthday, Pendleton Square! We are a chartered trust company regulated by the TN Department of Financial Institutions. The opportunity came about from listening to families frustrated with the traditional corporate trustee options. We also studied and implemented accounting and administration technology platforms to build our dream independent trust company. I always use the term “we” because it took a team. My partner Derek Church is a genius- he is an attorney and oversees regulatory, compliance and operation side of the business- our board and investors believed in us and supported our plans to build a best in class independent trust company. Our trust officers and team members are serving our families and building efficient processes. I want to stress that we are an independent trust company- our definition of independent is that we are not affiliated with other banks or financial institutions- we focus on trust administration and we do not manage the liquid assets. As a fiduciary we are held by law to the highest standard of responsibility. Our model is designed to avoid conflicts of interest and provide a natural system of checks and balances, we are not managing assets or drafting estate planning documents. In addition- our fee structure is simple and transparent. I also want to share how the concept of INTERdependence is extremely important for our model. We are interdependent on the network of advisors surrounding the family- the financial advisors, estate planning attorneys, family CPAs, insurance specialists. There is constant communication and collaboration with our partners as we serve the family. In many cases, the financial advisor is the quarterback of the relationship- we are there to assist and provide the backbone of trust and estate services. How did you get into the trust business? I cannot believe that I am approaching 25 years in the financial services industry. I grew up in the traditional big bank environment- and I am so thankful for my strong credit and analysis background. I spent 10 years in Debt Capital Markets- a true transaction business- but my mentor always told me I should be in the long-term relationship business. I transitioned to private wealth and trust business for the next 10.
Trusts aren't just for rich people! If you want to protect your assets, tune in. If you want to leave a legacy, tune in. If you are the executor of anyone's estate, you'll want to tune in. Frazer Rice, author of Wealth Actually, joins us to discuss estate planning strategies. Questions? Email me: Mpolicar@hightoweradvisors.com
In the latest episode of the Wealth Actually podcast, we get to sit down with Scott Johnston the author of Campusland. This is Scott's second appearance on WA, but the first where Scott discusses his book. It made it to #15 on the New York Times best seller list and #1 in the humorous books section. In the first part of the podcast, we talked about the incident at his alma mater that got him to write his newest book. We also dove into the business of being an author and the typical hurdles that new authors face. Finally, we spent some time reviewing the typical timetable and scheduling that goes into the production and launch of a book. In the second part, we probed some ground around Campusland's subject matter: the new environment of the college campus and what that means today. A description of the problem Scott saw on campuses and why it was great material to write about.The effect of wealth in the collegiate process both at the endowment and the student level.What are the numbers and the data behind the college environment?How did the admissions numbers game get so lopsided?When did the college campus environment change from the goals of inclusion and diversity of thought to other agendas?What is the impact on the politics of this country?Do alumni have any other options than to divorce themselves and their checkbook from their schools?Was the recent admissions bribery scandal to be expected?What is the impact of online learning? Coronavirus absences?The coming financial difficulties for smaller collegesCan a major university close down? Should it close down?What is the way forward? Are repurposed college campuses an interesting solution for our seniors?How do we keep track of you and Campusland? Scott is on Twitter (@SJohnston60) and CAMPUSLAND can be found here: https://www.amazon.com/Campusland-Novel-Scott-Johnston-ebook/dp/B07MYX3GXM/ WEALTH, ACTUALLY can be found below . . . https://www.amazon.com/Wealth-Actually-Intelligent-Decision-Making-1-ebook/dp/B07FPQJJQT
In the latest episode of the Wealth Actually podcast, we get to sit down with Scott Johnston the author of Campusland. This is Scott's second appearance on WA, but the first where Scott discusses his book. It made it to #15 on the New York Times best seller list and #1 in the humorous books section. In the first part of the podcast, we talked about the incident at his alma mater that got him to write his newest book. We also dove into the business of being an author and the typical hurdles that new authors face. Finally, we spent some time reviewing the typical timetable and scheduling that goes into the production and launch of a book. In the second part, we probed some ground around Campusland's subject matter: the new environment of the college campus and what that means today. A description of the problem Scott saw on campuses and why it was great material to write about.The effect of wealth in the collegiate process both at the endowment and the student level.What are the numbers and the data behind the college environment?How did the admissions numbers game get so lopsided?When did the college campus environment change from the goals of inclusion and diversity of thought to other agendas?What is the impact on the politics of this country?Do alumni have any other options than to divorce themselves and their checkbook from their schools?Was the recent admissions bribery scandal to be expected?What is the impact of online learning? Coronavirus absences?The coming financial difficulties for smaller collegesCan a major university close down? Should it close down?What is the way forward? Are repurposed college campuses an interesting solution for our seniors?How do we keep track of you and Campusland? Scott is on Twitter (@SJohnston60) and CAMPUSLAND can be found here: https://www.amazon.com/Campusland-Novel-Scott-Johnston-ebook/dp/B07MYX3GXM/ WEALTH, ACTUALLY can be found below . . . https://www.amazon.com/Wealth-Actually-Intelligent-Decision-Making-1-ebook/dp/B07FPQJJQT
Another reminder that the "Wealth, Actually" podcasts come out on Thursday morning before the EST commute. You can subscribe on most major podcast platforms . . . and now on with the show! Remember Todd Marinovich? He was on the cover of Sports Illustrated as the archetype for early specialization and "guaranteed success" in sports . . . his story started out nicely, but ended in a horrible flame out. Here is a recent update on his progress from Rick Telander . . . https://chicago.suntimes.com/2019/1/15/18386050/todd-marinovich-story-is-a-cautionary-tale-for-parents In this Episode, Haven and I engage our society's thirst for sports success, the pressure it puts on early sports specialization and the damage it can cause. We tackle: The role of sports in social mobilityHow colleges and the admissions process have played a role in sports machineThe benefits of team activities in overall developmentThe lottery-like odds of successThe nature of injuries and the risk of specializationThe benefits of specialization and the risk of being left behind Let us know what you think! https://www.amazon.com/Wealth-Actually-Intelligent-Decision-Making-1-ebook/dp/B07FPQJJQT
Another reminder that the "Wealth, Actually" podcasts come out on Thursday morning before the EST commute. You can subscribe on most major podcast platforms . . . and now on with the show! Remember Todd Marinovich? He was on the cover of Sports Illustrated as the archetype for early specialization and "guaranteed success" in sports . . . his story started out nicely, but ended in a horrible flame out. Here is a recent update on his progress from Rick Telander . . . https://chicago.suntimes.com/2019/1/15/18386050/todd-marinovich-story-is-a-cautionary-tale-for-parents In this Episode, Haven and I engage our society's thirst for sports success, the pressure it puts on early sports specialization and the damage it can cause. We tackle: The role of sports in social mobilityHow colleges and the admissions process have played a role in sports machineThe benefits of team activities in overall developmentThe lottery-like odds of successThe nature of injuries and the risk of specializationThe benefits of specialization and the risk of being left behind Let us know what you think! https://www.amazon.com/Wealth-Actually-Intelligent-Decision-Making-1-ebook/dp/B07FPQJJQT
HOUSEKEEPING: Podcasts are scheduled to post every Thursday morning just before the EST commute . . . and now for this week's podcast. Occasionally, you get to look at someone's vision for the future and it fires one's intellectual synapses. In this case, we came across a post at the beginning of the year that fit the bill. It comes from New York venture capitalist, FRED WILSON. In this podcast, we take each of his prognostications in turn . . . his list of ten themes and the full (and interesting) post is linked below. Enjoy and let us which themes we should all be thinking about. https://avc.com/2020/01/what-will-happen-in-the-2020s/ Fred Wilson: What Will Happen In The 2020s 1/ The looming climate crisis will be to this century what the two world wars were to the previous one. 2/ Automation will continue to take costs out of operating many of the services and systems that we rely on to live and be productive. 3/ China will emerge as the world’s dominant global superpower leveraging its technical prowess and ability to adapt quickly to changing priorities. Conversely the US becomes increasingly internally focused and isolationist in its world view. 4/ Countries will create and promote digital/crypto versions of their fiat currencies, led by China who moves first and benefits the most from this move. 5/ A decentralized internet will emerge, led initially by decentralized infrastructure services like storage, bandwidth, compute, etc. 6/ Plant based diets will dominate the world by the end of the decade. Eating meat will become a delicacy, much like eating caviar is today. Much of the world’s food production will move from farms to laboratories. 7/ The exploration and commercialization of space will be dominated by private companies as governments increasingly step back from these investments. 8/ Mass surveillance by governments and corporations will become normal and expected this decade and people will increasingly turn to new products and services to protect themselves from surveillance. 9/ We will finally move on from the Baby Boomers dominating the conversation in the US and around the world and Millennials and Gen-Z will be running many institutions by the end of the decade. 10/ Continued advancements in genetics will produce massive wins this decade as cancer and other terminal illnesses become well understood and treatable. " SUBSCRIBE AND TELL A FRIEND ABOUT THE PODCAST . . . https://www.amazon.com/Wealth-Actually-Intelligent-Decision-Making-1-ebook/dp/B07FPQJJQT
HOUSEKEEPING: Podcasts are scheduled to post every Thursday morning just before the EST commute . . . and now for this week's podcast. Occasionally, you get to look at someone's vision for the future and it fires one's intellectual synapses. In this case, we came across a post at the beginning of the year that fit the bill. It comes from New York venture capitalist, FRED WILSON. In this podcast, we take each of his prognostications in turn . . . his list of ten themes and the full (and interesting) post is linked below. Enjoy and let us which themes we should all be thinking about. https://avc.com/2020/01/what-will-happen-in-the-2020s/ Fred Wilson: What Will Happen In The 2020s 1/ The looming climate crisis will be to this century what the two world wars were to the previous one. 2/ Automation will continue to take costs out of operating many of the services and systems that we rely on to live and be productive. 3/ China will emerge as the world’s dominant global superpower leveraging its technical prowess and ability to adapt quickly to changing priorities. Conversely the US becomes increasingly internally focused and isolationist in its world view. 4/ Countries will create and promote digital/crypto versions of their fiat currencies, led by China who moves first and benefits the most from this move. 5/ A decentralized internet will emerge, led initially by decentralized infrastructure services like storage, bandwidth, compute, etc. 6/ Plant based diets will dominate the world by the end of the decade. Eating meat will become a delicacy, much like eating caviar is today. Much of the world’s food production will move from farms to laboratories. 7/ The exploration and commercialization of space will be dominated by private companies as governments increasingly step back from these investments. 8/ Mass surveillance by governments and corporations will become normal and expected this decade and people will increasingly turn to new products and services to protect themselves from surveillance. 9/ We will finally move on from the Baby Boomers dominating the conversation in the US and around the world and Millennials and Gen-Z will be running many institutions by the end of the decade. 10/ Continued advancements in genetics will produce massive wins this decade as cancer and other terminal illnesses become well understood and treatable. " SUBSCRIBE AND TELL A FRIEND ABOUT THE PODCAST . . . https://www.amazon.com/Wealth-Actually-Intelligent-Decision-Making-1-ebook/dp/B07FPQJJQT
It didn't take long for Haven and I to reach back across the pond for a topic to chew on . . . and this week we wrangle over the mess of the potential "departure" of Prince Harry and his wife Meghan (and son, Archie) from the official royal duties of the British Monarchy. NY TIMES: The Crisis . . . . after the Crisis https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/15/world/europe/harry-meghan-megxit-brexit.html Page Six opines! https://pagesix.com/2020/01/13/meghan-markle-reportedly-pushed-for-megxit-prince-harry-heartbroken Canada Shrugs: https://www.wsj.com/articles/megxit-causes-global-uproar-canada-shrugs-11579136511 We take some time to go over The implications of this kind of move to the families, the institution of the monarchy and Britain in general.The risks of a "Sussex Royal" brandThe poor Queen Mum having to deal with this . . . Some of the potential motivations behind it,And the likely chaos that could be coming in it's wake . . . We also put on our family governance hats and mused as to what we would do if we were dropped into the family situation and could advise the Royals on a course of action. Hopefully it would produce some short term successes, lay the groundwork for future harmony and, finally, restore some stability and long-term planning and structure for the Crown and its relationship to the country. Enjoy! And if you like the podcast, like, subscribe, comment and refer it to friends. https://www.amazon.com/Wealth-Actually-Intelligent-Decision-Making-1-ebook/dp/B07FPQJJQT
It didn't take long for Haven and I to reach back across the pond for a topic to chew on . . . and this week we wrangle over the mess of the potential "departure" of Prince Harry and his wife Meghan (and son, Archie) from the official royal duties of the British Monarchy. NY TIMES: The Crisis . . . . after the Crisis https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/15/world/europe/harry-meghan-megxit-brexit.html Page Six opines! https://pagesix.com/2020/01/13/meghan-markle-reportedly-pushed-for-megxit-prince-harry-heartbroken Canada Shrugs: https://www.wsj.com/articles/megxit-causes-global-uproar-canada-shrugs-11579136511 We take some time to go over The implications of this kind of move to the families, the institution of the monarchy and Britain in general.The risks of a "Sussex Royal" brandThe poor Queen Mum having to deal with this . . . Some of the potential motivations behind it,And the likely chaos that could be coming in it's wake . . . We also put on our family governance hats and mused as to what we would do if we were dropped into the family situation and could advise the Royals on a course of action. Hopefully it would produce some short term successes, lay the groundwork for future harmony and, finally, restore some stability and long-term planning and structure for the Crown and its relationship to the country. Enjoy! And if you like the podcast, like, subscribe, comment and refer it to friends. https://www.amazon.com/Wealth-Actually-Intelligent-Decision-Making-1-ebook/dp/B07FPQJJQT
Haven (https://pundificator.com/) and I (frazerrice.com) took on 2019/2020- here is a quick summary Spring Forward, Look Back . . . FRAZER'S WINNERS: Amazon- the category 5 hurricane in American Consumerism- AMZN continues to charge forward. Kylie Jenner- She sold 51% of her company for $600mm to Coty- this could be the apex of influencer branding. FRAZER'S LOSERS The Federal Reserve- With the patina presidential intervention (and long term low rates), the independence of the institution is up for debate. Online Privacy – Facebook, Google, Alexa Financial Institutions have called into question the public’s trust and opened the door to gov’t regulation. (Extra Credit- I'm convinced that there will be a "Deepfake" incident that takes down a major public figure. When it turns out to be debunked (a la the movie "Rising Sun"), there will be a fundamental shift in the way people view the social media and the "trustworthiness" of video. FRAZER'S PREDICTIONS Nuclear Power will have a renewed place in the climate change debate The Tokyo 2020 Olympics will shine a glaring light on the China/Hong Kong tensions Marvel/Star Wars will take a big breather after a big and "climactic" 2019. . . . And the Knicks will continue to break my heart. . . HAVEN'S WINNERS And Washington Sports in general The Stock Market +29% HAVEN'S LOSERS Populism both Right and Left Political Industrial Complex and their new challenges HAVEN'S PREDICTIONS Political Industry Makes a ton of money in 2020 Longer from Journalism may start to come back . . . Rumsfeld- Knowing about the unknown unknowns will be even more important AND, FINALLY, MY POOR KNICKS . . . https://www.theringer.com/nba/2019/12/9/21002375/an-11-point-plan-to-save-new-york-knicks-david-fizdale-fired My Poor Knicks https://www.amazon.com/Wealth-Actually-Intelligent-Decision-Making-1-ebook/dp/B07FPQJJQT
Haven (https://pundificator.com/) and I (frazerrice.com) took on 2019/2020- here is a quick summary Spring Forward, Look Back . . . FRAZER'S WINNERS: Amazon- the category 5 hurricane in American Consumerism- AMZN continues to charge forward. Kylie Jenner- She sold 51% of her company for $600mm to Coty- this could be the apex of influencer branding. FRAZER'S LOSERS The Federal Reserve- With the patina presidential intervention (and long term low rates), the independence of the institution is up for debate. Online Privacy – Facebook, Google, Alexa Financial Institutions have called into question the public’s trust and opened the door to gov’t regulation. (Extra Credit- I'm convinced that there will be a "Deepfake" incident that takes down a major public figure. When it turns out to be debunked (a la the movie "Rising Sun"), there will be a fundamental shift in the way people view the social media and the "trustworthiness" of video. FRAZER'S PREDICTIONS Nuclear Power will have a renewed place in the climate change debate The Tokyo 2020 Olympics will shine a glaring light on the China/Hong Kong tensions Marvel/Star Wars will take a big breather after a big and "climactic" 2019. . . . And the Knicks will continue to break my heart. . . HAVEN'S WINNERS And Washington Sports in general The Stock Market +29% HAVEN'S LOSERS Populism both Right and Left Political Industrial Complex and their new challenges HAVEN'S PREDICTIONS Political Industry Makes a ton of money in 2020 Longer from Journalism may start to come back . . . Rumsfeld- Knowing about the unknown unknowns will be even more important AND, FINALLY, MY POOR KNICKS . . . https://www.theringer.com/nba/2019/12/9/21002375/an-11-point-plan-to-save-new-york-knicks-david-fizdale-fired My Poor Knicks https://www.amazon.com/Wealth-Actually-Intelligent-Decision-Making-1-ebook/dp/B07FPQJJQT
Welcome back to the "Wealth, Actually" podcast and Happy New Year! As we start 2020, Haven ("The Pundificator") and I are taking on "Impeachment". With Nancy Pelosi's withholding of the Articles of Impeachment from the Senate and the resultant delay in the Senate trial, Americans have had a couple of weeks to focus on the holiday season and away from this segment of political theater. Can Donald Trump withstand the latest attacks on his presidency? Will Nancy Pelosi and/or Mitch McConnell's constituencies pay a price for this political gamesmanship? Here's the chance to review what is happening before the media cycle revs back up. First, here are some quick links on . . . THE IMPEACHMENT PROCESS: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/us/politics/what-is-impeachment-process.html THE ELECTION CLIMATE: https://www.politico.com/news/2019/12/16/trump-2020-reelection-086033 WE'LL TRY TO MAKE SENSE OF: Where we stand right now in the processWere there other options?The probability of President Trump being removedWhat does removal mean? The strategy and tactics for the Democrats, Republicans and the President around this processPotential ramifications in the 2020 electionPotential ramifications for the use of impeachment in the future We hope you enjoy it! And a reminder to subscribe- the podcast is on major platforms. PS- I got the chance to be a part of Meb Faber's "Best Investment Writing, Volume 3. I created an audio version of Chapter 3 of "Wealth, Actually". The link is below. I hope you like it. https://mebfaber.com/2019/12/30/the-best-investment-writing-volume-3-frazer-rice-preparing-for-the-hurricane-of-wealth/ https://www.amazon.com/Wealth-Actually-Intelligent-Decision-Making-1-ebook/dp/B07FPQJJQT
Welcome back to the "Wealth, Actually" podcast and Happy New Year! As we start 2020, Haven ("The Pundificator") and I are taking on "Impeachment". With Nancy Pelosi's withholding of the Articles of Impeachment from the Senate and the resultant delay in the Senate trial, Americans have had a couple of weeks to focus on the holiday season and away from this segment of political theater. Can Donald Trump withstand the latest attacks on his presidency? Will Nancy Pelosi and/or Mitch McConnell's constituencies pay a price for this political gamesmanship? Here's the chance to review what is happening before the media cycle revs back up. First, here are some quick links on . . . THE IMPEACHMENT PROCESS: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/us/politics/what-is-impeachment-process.html THE ELECTION CLIMATE: https://www.politico.com/news/2019/12/16/trump-2020-reelection-086033 WE'LL TRY TO MAKE SENSE OF: Where we stand right now in the processWere there other options?The probability of President Trump being removedWhat does removal mean? The strategy and tactics for the Democrats, Republicans and the President around this processPotential ramifications in the 2020 electionPotential ramifications for the use of impeachment in the future We hope you enjoy it! And a reminder to subscribe- the podcast is on major platforms. PS- I got the chance to be a part of Meb Faber's "Best Investment Writing, Volume 3. I created an audio version of Chapter 3 of "Wealth, Actually". The link is below. I hope you like it. https://mebfaber.com/2019/12/30/the-best-investment-writing-volume-3-frazer-rice-preparing-for-the-hurricane-of-wealth/ https://www.amazon.com/Wealth-Actually-Intelligent-Decision-Making-1-ebook/dp/B07FPQJJQT
Haven and Frazer discuss Brexit and its Implications First, some quick housekeeping: "Wealth, Actually" is setting the schedule to post content every Thursday. Interviews with entrepreneurs, experts, and tastemakers AND Haven Pell and I will take on noteworthy and timely topics. SUBSCRIBE today on most major podcast venues. Tell friends, leave comments and get in touch! Second, HAVEN PELL and I are discussing Brexit. We take on . . . . England's Political Process (and how we got here)Some of the Personalities Behind the Election (Boris et al . . . )Labour vs. Tories (and others)5 Years of Labour?Ramifications for the UK and the EUPotential Implications for the US (and the big decisions coming up in our electoral process) Here are a couple of articles that are useful in understanding what just took place: BRITISH ENDGAME: BRITISH VOTERS BACK BORIS AND BREXIT https://pundificator.com/the-u-k-election-wont-solve-brexit/ Find Frazer's book here: https://www.amazon.com/Wealth-Actually-Intelligent-Decision-Making-1-ebook/dp/B07FPQJJQT
Haven and Frazer discuss Brexit and its Implications First, some quick housekeeping: "Wealth, Actually" is setting the schedule to post content every Thursday. Interviews with entrepreneurs, experts, and tastemakers AND Haven Pell and I will take on noteworthy and timely topics. SUBSCRIBE today on most major podcast venues. Tell friends, leave comments and get in touch! Second, HAVEN PELL and I are discussing Brexit. We take on . . . . England's Political Process (and how we got here)Some of the Personalities Behind the Election (Boris et al . . . )Labour vs. Tories (and others)5 Years of Labour?Ramifications for the UK and the EUPotential Implications for the US (and the big decisions coming up in our electoral process) Here are a couple of articles that are useful in understanding what just took place: BRITISH ENDGAME: BRITISH VOTERS BACK BORIS AND BREXIT https://pundificator.com/the-u-k-election-wont-solve-brexit/ Find Frazer's book here: https://www.amazon.com/Wealth-Actually-Intelligent-Decision-Making-1-ebook/dp/B07FPQJJQT
In a new regular feature on the "Wealth, Actually" Podcast, Haven Pell and I will take on a topic. (For our first one, we discuss the concept of "College" in modern American Society) With some fun questioning and debate, we'll try to make some sense of a subject that has some controversy, broad policy implications and a little bit of hypocrisy to unwind. Hopefully, it's weighty and important. We hope to tackle things that are both evergreen and timely. MEET HAVEN HERE: https://pundificator.com/haven-pell/ In this first segment, we take on "College". A broad, wide-ranging topic? You bet. We address: The cost The pressure (on applicants and graduates) The Insider vs the Outsider Viewpoint STEM vs Liberal Arts The Impact on Culture A Year of Service A Venue for People over 60? Sports and University Life Broader Ramifications on the Future of the U.S. Look forward to WEALTH ACTUALLY and the PUNDIFICATOR as regular feature . . . as we take on current events and and some of the big concepts and issues facing society today. SUBSCRIBE, TELL YOUR FRIENDS AND LEAVE COMMENTS. https://www.amazon.com/Wealth-Actually-Intelligent-Decision-Making-1-ebook/dp/B07FPQJJQT
In a new regular feature on the "Wealth, Actually" Podcast, Haven Pell and I will take on a topic. (For our first one, we discuss the concept of "College" in modern American Society) With some fun questioning and debate, we'll try to make some sense of a subject that has some controversy, broad policy implications and a little bit of hypocrisy to unwind. Hopefully, it's weighty and important. We hope to tackle things that are both evergreen and timely. MEET HAVEN HERE: https://pundificator.com/haven-pell/ In this first segment, we take on "College". A broad, wide-ranging topic? You bet. We address: The cost The pressure (on applicants and graduates) The Insider vs the Outsider Viewpoint STEM vs Liberal Arts The Impact on Culture A Year of Service A Venue for People over 60? Sports and University Life Broader Ramifications on the Future of the U.S. Look forward to WEALTH ACTUALLY and the PUNDIFICATOR as regular feature . . . as we take on current events and and some of the big concepts and issues facing society today. SUBSCRIBE, TELL YOUR FRIENDS AND LEAVE COMMENTS. https://www.amazon.com/Wealth-Actually-Intelligent-Decision-Making-1-ebook/dp/B07FPQJJQT
Today’s episode of The Real Estate Nerds Podcast features a conversation between our host and attorney Scott Smith and fellow attorney, investor, and wealth manager Frazer Rice. Frazer shares some of the wealth management strategies from his recent book, Wealth Actually. His ultimate goal in writing the book and teaching about financial literacy generally is […]
In today's interview with Frazer Rice, Frazer and I talk with you about impacting the world. Frazer shares with you what he's learned about how the wealthy view money. Frazer also shares some of his top tips on making an impact in the world and what he hopes his personal legacy looks like. Frazer also shares some of his upcoming focus and projects. Show Notes and Resources.
In today's interview with Frazer Rice, Frazer and I talk with you about developing your influence. Frazer shares his personal definition of leadership. Frazer also shares with you some tips on how to develop your story so you can develop your influence and how you can change your relationship with money by understanding your money story. Frazer also gives his top tips on public speaking and using story there. Show Notes and Resources.
In today's interview with Frazer Rice, Frazer and I talk with you about investing in others. Frazer shares with you how the types of advisers you need around you changes throughout your life. Frazer also shares how you can make more of an impact with giving not just on the recipients of the gift but also on your family. I also ask Frazer to share his top tips on how to communicate effectively with your family about wealth and money. Show Notes and Resources.
In today's interview with Frazer Rice, Frazer and I talk with you about investing in yourself. Frazer shares with you what he's discovered about how wealthy people handle their finances. He also shares some tips and techniques to get clarity on your definition of success and wealth and some resources and techniques you can use to invest in yourself. Show Notes and Resources.
This is a special "Wealth Actually" podcast. I spoke with an author and educator that has had a major impact on financial literacy and wealth management. He is also a terrific guy to boot! Over the course of our discussion, While I felt like I was nodding my head in agreement a lot (that's the whoosh near the microphone), My guest's nuanced views on wealth and his consistent and deep writing taught me a lot about the importance of great advice, clear thinking and long-term planning. Jonathan Clements is the founder and editor of HUMBLEDOLLAR.COM. He’s also the author of eight personal finance books, including his latest, “From Here to Financial Happiness.” Born in England and educated at Cambridge University, Jonathan spent almost two decades at The Wall Street Journal in New York, where he was the newspaper’s personal finance columnist. He also worked for six years at Citigroup as Director of Financial Education for the U.S. wealth management business. You can find him on on Twitter (@ClementsMoney) and Facebook (https://www.facebook.com/ClementsMoney) FROM HERE TO FINANCIAL HAPPINESS Background: Tell us a little bit about your background How did your career evolve? How did writing become a part of it? "From Here to Financial Happiness . . . in 77 Days" Where did the need for this book come from? "Just because it's not complicated doesn't mean it's easy!" The Power of Compounding- why it's vital. I'm impressed with the structure of the book and breaking down self-improvement steps in a series of days. How did you decide on that? Enjoyed the saving for retirement section. It has to happen first even though it's a liability that is farthest away. What works and what doesn't when trying to teach financial discipline to people whose After tax, After fee, After Inflation (spending); why is it so hard for wealth managers to frame things in these terms? Estate planning - necessary for everyone Friendly debate . . . whole life insurance as a way to save for LTC (instead of LTC insurance); The emergence of HSA's . . . Where should you expect an advisor to add value? Robo-advice, tax advice, sounding board, investment performance State of the wealth management industry . . . fee compression, business models, the role of the advisor, consolidation, service standards Humble Dollar- terrific blog on investing and general financial literacy- what can we do as a country to help make people make better decisions? Contact How can we get a hold of "From Here to Financial Happiness." How do we find out more about your other writings? How do we keep track of your whereabouts? To find my book, "Wealth, Actually", click below! https://www.amazon.com/Wealth-Actually-Intelligent-Decision-Making-1/dp/1619618605/ref=sr_1_2?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1539574775&sr=1-2&keywords=wealth+actually
This is a special "Wealth Actually" podcast. I spoke with an author and educator that has had a major impact on financial literacy and wealth management. He is also a terrific guy to boot! Over the course of our discussion, While I felt like I was nodding my head in agreement a lot (that's the whoosh near the microphone), My guest's nuanced views on wealth and his consistent and deep writing taught me a lot about the importance of great advice, clear thinking and long-term planning. Jonathan Clements is the founder and editor of HUMBLEDOLLAR.COM. He’s also the author of eight personal finance books, including his latest, “From Here to Financial Happiness.” Born in England and educated at Cambridge University, Jonathan spent almost two decades at The Wall Street Journal in New York, where he was the newspaper’s personal finance columnist. He also worked for six years at Citigroup as Director of Financial Education for the U.S. wealth management business. You can find him on on Twitter (@ClementsMoney) and Facebook (https://www.facebook.com/ClementsMoney) FROM HERE TO FINANCIAL HAPPINESS Background: Tell us a little bit about your background How did your career evolve? How did writing become a part of it? "From Here to Financial Happiness . . . in 77 Days" Where did the need for this book come from? "Just because it's not complicated doesn't mean it's easy!" The Power of Compounding- why it's vital. I'm impressed with the structure of the book and breaking down self-improvement steps in a series of days. How did you decide on that? Enjoyed the saving for retirement section. It has to happen first even though it's a liability that is farthest away. What works and what doesn't when trying to teach financial discipline to people whose After tax, After fee, After Inflation (spending); why is it so hard for wealth managers to frame things in these terms? Estate planning - necessary for everyone Friendly debate . . . whole life insurance as a way to save for LTC (instead of LTC insurance); The emergence of HSA's . . . Where should you expect an advisor to add value? Robo-advice, tax advice, sounding board, investment performance State of the wealth management industry . . . fee compression, business models, the role of the advisor, consolidation, service standards Humble Dollar- terrific blog on investing and general financial literacy- what can we do as a country to help make people make better decisions? Contact How can we get a hold of "From Here to Financial Happiness." How do we find out more about your other writings? How do we keep track of your whereabouts? To find my book, "Wealth, Actually", click below! https://www.amazon.com/Wealth-Actually-Intelligent-Decision-Making-1/dp/1619618605/ref=sr_1_2?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1539574775&sr=1-2&keywords=wealth+actually
Frazer Rice wanted a career pivot, but before he ditched his day job, he had to figure out exactly how much he cost. For more information, visit the show notes at https://www.bobbirebell.com/podcast/frazerrice
What is Wealth? While we all may have our own definitions, one thing is certain: getting to your definition will require sound decision-making and discernment. In this episode, Frazer Rice joins us to explain how to make intelligent decisions with money and his new book, Wealth Actually. You are #YoungMoney. Enjoy!
Entrepreneurs prepare for the future by setting up private wealth management and surrounding themselves with financial experts. On today’s episode, Steve introduces Frazer Rice. Frazer is a leading private wealth manager with 15 years of experience. He is also the author of the new book Wealth Actually and has been featured in the The New York Times, Daily Telegraph and The Journal news. Here are more gold nuggets on today’s episode: A short background about the book Wealth Actually and why it is a must read for entrepreneurs. The two-pronged approach to finding good advisers. Why working with experts make a whole world of difference. And the future of cryptocurrencies and Blockchain technology and more! Stay tuned to learn more valuable financial advice and find out how you too can manage your assets like a true Awesomer. Welcome to the Awesomers.com podcast. If you love to learn and if you're motivated to expand your mind and heck if you desire to break through those traditional paradigms and find your own version of success, you are in the right place. Awesomers around the world are on a journey to improve their lives and the lives of those around them. We believe in paying it forward and we fundamentally try to live up to the great Zig Ziglar quote where he said, "You can have everything in your life you want if you help enough other people get what they want." It doesn't matter where you came from. It only matters where you're going. My name is Steve Simonson and I hope that you will join me on this Awesomer journey. SPONSOR ADVERTISEMENT If you're launching a new product manufactured in China, you will need professional high-resolution Amazon-ready photographs. Because Symo Global has a team of professionals in China, you will oftentimes receive your listing photographs before your product even leaves the country. This streamlined process will save you the time money and energy needed to concentrate on marketing and other creative content strategies before your item is in stock and ready for sale. Visit SymoGlobal.com to learn more. Because a picture should be worth one thousand keywords. You're listening to the Awesomers podcast. 1:15 (Steve introduces today’s guest, Frazer Rice.) Steve: The Awesomers.com podcast series rolls onward everybody. You're listening to Episode number 40. Can you believe that word episode 40 already, just 40 days in, 40 episodes that's a drop a day for those keeping score at home. Now today I'm joined by special guest Frazer Rice and Frazer is a leading private wealth manager with over 15 years of experience advising millionaire and even billionaire families on financing including fiduciary and estate matters. Now, his clients have included business owners, hedge fund managers, real estate developers, corporate executive foundations and even so-called established families. Many very wealthy families have what's called family offices and he's been deeply involved in that over time. He's also the author of a new book Wealth Actually and has been featured in The New York Times, Daily Telegraph and The Journal News. He also hosts a podcast and blog related to politics, business trends and an entrepreneurship at frazerrice.com. I'm excited to have Frazer join us because as someone who's been directly responsible for managing not just millions, but even into the billions of dollars of people's cumulative wealth that's a responsibility and such a level of experience and expertise that all of us hard-charging entrepreneurs at any level whether you have a dollar or $10 or even a billion dollars we all need to have better education and better understanding on how do we deal with wealth as we're successful. Too often we run and we hard-charged towards this goal and then we're surprised when it actually pays off and we don't know what to do and there are so many unintended consequences I've seen for people, their families and other kind of unexpected tax hits that they
https://frazerrice.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Frazer-Rice-FB-Live.mp4 Thanks to David Grasso, Scott Richmond and the team at Bookstr for having me on their Facebook Live channel. It's always a pleasure to discuss "Wealth, Actually." A link to the book is here and don't forget to leave comments on the Amazon site. https://www.amazon.com/Wealth-Actually-Intelligent-Decision-Making-1-ebook/dp/B07FPQJJQT
http://www.frazerrice.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Frazer-Rice-FB-Live.mp4 Thanks to David Grasso, Scott Richmond and the team at Bookstr for having me on their Facebook Live channel. It's always a pleasure to discuss "Wealth, Actually." A link to the book is here and don't forget to leave comments on the Amazon site. https://www.amazon.com/Wealth-Actually-Intelligent-Decision-Making-1-ebook/dp/B07FPQJJQT
Here is something that is a little bit new! I was interviewed on my new book "Wealth, Actually by Josh Jalinksi on his Financial Quarterback show on 710 WOR ad on #iheartradio. We discussed estate planning, family dynamics, investing and a host of tools that could helpful in making good decisions about wealth. Thanks again, Josh! To buy "WEALTH, ACTUALLY" on AMAZON, click BELOW . . . Feel free to leave Amazon Reviews (hopefully good ones!). They help the algorithm. https://www.amazon.com/Wealth-Actually-Intelligent-Decision-Making-1-ebook/dp/B07FPQJJQT
Here is something that is a little bit new! I was interviewed on my new book "Wealth, Actually by Josh Jalinksi on his Financial Quarterback show on 710 WOR ad on #iheartradio. We discussed estate planning, family dynamics, investing and a host of tools that could helpful in making good decisions about wealth. Thanks again, Josh! To buy "WEALTH, ACTUALLY" on AMAZON, click BELOW . . . Feel free to leave Amazon Reviews (hopefully good ones!). They help the algorithm. https://www.amazon.com/Wealth-Actually-Intelligent-Decision-Making-1-ebook/dp/B07FPQJJQT
Frazer Rice is the President of Wealth Actually LLC. Wealth Actually is a financial services and legal media company. Today's reality is that advice companies need to be media companies as well. WA will help businesses and individuals recognize this reality and use it to amplify their presence and increase their business. On August 7th, 2018, Frazer released his first book “Wealth, Actually” through Lioncrest Press. In Wealth, Actually, Frazer shares his approach to wealth management. Through a combination of philosophical discussion, practical advice, humor, and anecdotes, he shows how prosperous individuals can determine what they want their wealth to do; communicate with loved ones about their fortune; avoid overspending; handle wealth threats; evaluate, grow, and protect investments; and choose the best advisors. It can be purchased at WWW.WEALTHACTUALLY.COM.
They say a fool and his money are soon parted, and for the 1%, this is especially true. The more wealth you have, the more risks there are to your financial security. But ... The post Wealth Actually: Frazer Rice appeared first on Author Hour.
In this episode we looked at Branding, Politics, Law and Money with Frazer Rice. Frazer Rice is a leading private wealth manager, with fifteen years’ experience advising millionaire and billionaire families on finances, including fiduciary and estate matters. His clients include business owners, hedge fund managers, real estate developers, corporate executives, foundations, and established families. Frazer has been featured in the New York Times, the Daily Telegraph, and the Journal News, and he has appeared on cable television news networks. In addition to his financial expertise, Frazer is a member of the New York State Bar and a graduate of Duke University and Emory University Law School. He hosts a podcast and blog on politics, business trends, and entrepreneurship at FrazerRice.com. Listen, Lean and Share Recommended Resources: FrazerRice.com Wealth Actually by Frazer Rice on Amazon Business Networking Made Easy Rebrand: The Ultimate Guide to Personal Branding Books by Bernard Kelvin Clive
Take 5 minutes from your busy business day and listen to expert business advice to grow and improve your business with Howard Lewinter. In today's 5 Minute Business Strategy Howard talks about: Where Is Business Wealth Actually Created? CEOs, presidents, founders, business owners across America trust Howard Lewinter's business advice to solve business problems, increase business profits and live their entrepreneurial dreams of running a successful business with less stress. For more business tips, follow Howard on Twitter: @HowardLewinter - or connect with Howard on LinkedIn.