Podcasts about allegations

Statement of a fact in a pleading, that will be attempted to be proven

  • 4,964PODCASTS
  • 12,613EPISODES
  • 40mAVG DURATION
  • 2DAILY NEW EPISODES
  • Aug 14, 2025LATEST

POPULARITY

20172018201920202021202220232024

Categories



Best podcasts about allegations

Show all podcasts related to allegations

Latest podcast episodes about allegations

Mark Levin Podcast
8/12/25 - Adam Schiff's Allegations: Treason or Political Maneuvering?

Mark Levin Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 13, 2025 112:27


On Tuesday's Mark Levin Show, Sen Adam Schiff's in hot water—he's been accused of corruption and mortgage fraud. The FHFA says he listed both his Maryland and California homes as his “primary residence” to score better loan terms, which could violate federal laws. Now the Justice Department is looking into it, and Schiff says it's all political payback from President Trump, which is just his way of trying to brush off what he did.  Aside from all this, a Democratic whistleblower who worked on the House Intelligence Committee claimed to the FBI that Schiff authorized the leak of classified information in 2017 to undermine Trump during the Russia investigation. In addition, Democrats continue to reference the Epstein case, despite it no longer being a relevant topic of discussion. Their desperation to find anything to use against Trump is evident, but the truth will always triumph over hatred and ignorance. The left is now labeling Trump as a dictator who intends to deploy the National Guard to seize control of every city, which is a gross misrepresentation. In reality, Trump is utilizing the National Guard to combat the rising crime rates in Washington, D.C., a Federal city. Thus, the assertion that Trump can impose such measures on any city is incorrect, as is the public's concern regarding the Democrats' apparent indifference to the increasing crime rates in many urban areas. Lastly, Israel has rejected claims of widespread starvation in Gaza, saying Hamas is spreading misleading information to gain political leverage. A report by COGAT found that many deaths labeled as malnutrition-related were actually due to severe pre-existing medical conditions. The review also noted that Hamas failed to provide identifying details for the deceased, raising doubts about the credibility of their reports. One example cited was a child whose condition was attributed to hunger but was later found to suffer from a genetic disorder and had received treatment in Israel before the war. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Aaron Torres Sports Podcast
Oklahoma/John Mateer Gambling Allegations | Kentucky football disrespected? | A new twist with Shedeur Sanders in Cleveland

Aaron Torres Sports Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 13, 2025 63:54


On today's show Torres talks the WILD John Mateer/Oklahoma gambling story - what's fact? What's fiction and what's next. Plus, Alabama has its starting QB, did Kentucky football just get the ultimate disrespect and a new twist in the Shedeur Sanders saga in Cleveland! John Mateer/gambling story (2:00): Torres opens the show with the WILD story of Oklahoma starting QB John Mateer possibly, allegedly, maybe getting caught from old Venmo transactions. Torres reacts to Mateer's statement of denial - and can anyone prove he actually did it? If they do, what might be the consequences? College football camp notes (23:30): From there, Torres talks college football camp notes. Alabama has its starting QB. Also, did Kentucky football get the ultimate disrespect heading into the 2025 season - and can they use it as motivation? Shedeur Sanders' newest twist (45:00): Finally, Torres shares the newest twist following Shedeur Sanders debut - and why we got proof on Tuesday that Shedeur's impact was bigger than we realized. Fioboc is giving listeners of the Aaron Torres Pod 20% on their next purchase - for their FULL STORE of beautiful new clothes: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Check out their entire store here⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Also, thank you to ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Caulipuffs, the healthy, yet delicious snack⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ that is taking over your grocery isle! For more details - ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠visit CauliPuffs.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Dark Side of Wikipedia | True Crime & Dark History
Trump Pardon for Diddy? Inside the Dark Allegations That Won't Go Away

Dark Side of Wikipedia | True Crime & Dark History

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 13, 2025 19:15


Trump Pardon for Diddy? Inside the Dark Allegations That Won't Go Away Sean “Diddy” Combs built an empire on music, fashion, and fame — but behind the glamour, a far darker story has been unfolding for decades. From the explosive 2023 lawsuit filed by Cassie Ventura to the flood of allegations that followed, Diddy's name has been tied to accusations of coercion, S-A, trafficking, intimidation, and a disturbing pattern of exploitation. Raids on his properties revealed illegal weapons, surveillance setups, and evidence tied to his infamous “freak-off” parties — allegations that dozens of civil suits say were anything but consensual. In July 2025, Diddy was convicted on two federal Mann Act charges for transporting individuals for prostitution — though he was acquitted of the more severe trafficking and racketeering charges. He awaits sentencing in October. But now, an even more surreal twist: members of Diddy's camp have confirmed outreach to former President Donald Trump's team about a possible pardon. Trump himself has addressed the rumors, saying Diddy's past criticism makes it “more difficult,” but stopping short of ruling it out entirely. A presidential pardon could erase Diddy's federal convictions, but it wouldn't touch the massive wave of civil lawsuits still in motion. The very idea of clemency in a case like this raises serious questions — about justice, power, and whether fame and political access can still bend reality in America's legal system. In this episode, we break down the full timeline of accusations, the legal battle in court, and the unsettling conversation about whether a man accused of decades of abuse could walk free with one signature. Then, our co-hosts dive into the bigger picture: the victims' perspective, the role of public support, and whether a pardon for Diddy would be the ultimate example of a system that protects the powerful over the vulnerable. #Diddy #TrumpPardon #TrueCrime #JusticeSystem #CelebrityScandal #PoliticalPower #PresidentialPardon #CourtCase #HiddenKillers #SeanCombs diddy, sean combs, trump pardon, presidential pardon, cassie ventura, diddy trial, mann act, celebrity crime, true crime podcast, diddy allegations, diddy accusations, trump news, pardon rumors, celebrity justice, hidden killers podcast, music mogul scandal, diddy sentencing, cassie lawsuit, diddy civil suits, diddy raids, trump diddy, celebrity scandal, political influence, justice system flaws, diddy news Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
Trump Pardon for Diddy? Inside the Dark Allegations That Won't Go Away

Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 13, 2025 19:15


Trump Pardon for Diddy? Inside the Dark Allegations That Won't Go Away Sean “Diddy” Combs built an empire on music, fashion, and fame — but behind the glamour, a far darker story has been unfolding for decades. From the explosive 2023 lawsuit filed by Cassie Ventura to the flood of allegations that followed, Diddy's name has been tied to accusations of coercion, S-A, trafficking, intimidation, and a disturbing pattern of exploitation. Raids on his properties revealed illegal weapons, surveillance setups, and evidence tied to his infamous “freak-off” parties — allegations that dozens of civil suits say were anything but consensual. In July 2025, Diddy was convicted on two federal Mann Act charges for transporting individuals for prostitution — though he was acquitted of the more severe trafficking and racketeering charges. He awaits sentencing in October. But now, an even more surreal twist: members of Diddy's camp have confirmed outreach to former President Donald Trump's team about a possible pardon. Trump himself has addressed the rumors, saying Diddy's past criticism makes it “more difficult,” but stopping short of ruling it out entirely. A presidential pardon could erase Diddy's federal convictions, but it wouldn't touch the massive wave of civil lawsuits still in motion. The very idea of clemency in a case like this raises serious questions — about justice, power, and whether fame and political access can still bend reality in America's legal system. In this episode, we break down the full timeline of accusations, the legal battle in court, and the unsettling conversation about whether a man accused of decades of abuse could walk free with one signature. Then, our co-hosts dive into the bigger picture: the victims' perspective, the role of public support, and whether a pardon for Diddy would be the ultimate example of a system that protects the powerful over the vulnerable. #Diddy #TrumpPardon #TrueCrime #JusticeSystem #CelebrityScandal #PoliticalPower #PresidentialPardon #CourtCase #HiddenKillers #SeanCombs diddy, sean combs, trump pardon, presidential pardon, cassie ventura, diddy trial, mann act, celebrity crime, true crime podcast, diddy allegations, diddy accusations, trump news, pardon rumors, celebrity justice, hidden killers podcast, music mogul scandal, diddy sentencing, cassie lawsuit, diddy civil suits, diddy raids, trump diddy, celebrity scandal, political influence, justice system flaws, diddy news Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

My Crazy Family | A Podcast of Crazy Family Stories
Trump Pardon for Diddy? Inside the Dark Allegations That Won't Go Away

My Crazy Family | A Podcast of Crazy Family Stories

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 13, 2025 19:15


Trump Pardon for Diddy? Inside the Dark Allegations That Won't Go Away Sean “Diddy” Combs built an empire on music, fashion, and fame — but behind the glamour, a far darker story has been unfolding for decades. From the explosive 2023 lawsuit filed by Cassie Ventura to the flood of allegations that followed, Diddy's name has been tied to accusations of coercion, S-A, trafficking, intimidation, and a disturbing pattern of exploitation. Raids on his properties revealed illegal weapons, surveillance setups, and evidence tied to his infamous “freak-off” parties — allegations that dozens of civil suits say were anything but consensual. In July 2025, Diddy was convicted on two federal Mann Act charges for transporting individuals for prostitution — though he was acquitted of the more severe trafficking and racketeering charges. He awaits sentencing in October. But now, an even more surreal twist: members of Diddy's camp have confirmed outreach to former President Donald Trump's team about a possible pardon. Trump himself has addressed the rumors, saying Diddy's past criticism makes it “more difficult,” but stopping short of ruling it out entirely. A presidential pardon could erase Diddy's federal convictions, but it wouldn't touch the massive wave of civil lawsuits still in motion. The very idea of clemency in a case like this raises serious questions — about justice, power, and whether fame and political access can still bend reality in America's legal system. In this episode, we break down the full timeline of accusations, the legal battle in court, and the unsettling conversation about whether a man accused of decades of abuse could walk free with one signature. Then, our co-hosts dive into the bigger picture: the victims' perspective, the role of public support, and whether a pardon for Diddy would be the ultimate example of a system that protects the powerful over the vulnerable. #Diddy #TrumpPardon #TrueCrime #JusticeSystem #CelebrityScandal #PoliticalPower #PresidentialPardon #CourtCase #HiddenKillers #SeanCombs diddy, sean combs, trump pardon, presidential pardon, cassie ventura, diddy trial, mann act, celebrity crime, true crime podcast, diddy allegations, diddy accusations, trump news, pardon rumors, celebrity justice, hidden killers podcast, music mogul scandal, diddy sentencing, cassie lawsuit, diddy civil suits, diddy raids, trump diddy, celebrity scandal, political influence, justice system flaws, diddy news Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

The Middle of the Day Show Podcast - WWLS-FM
Mateer Speaks On Gambling Allegations. Jerry Jones Says What?!

The Middle of the Day Show Podcast - WWLS-FM

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 13, 2025 81:53


Mateer Speaks On Gambling Allegations. Jerry Jones Says What?! Should Shedeur Sanders Possibly Start? NBA Schedule Slowly Releasing! MUCH MORE!!!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The MeidasTouch Podcast
Trump Stalking Allegations Resurface as Cover-Up Fails

The MeidasTouch Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 12, 2025 18:50


MeidasTouch host Ben Meiselas reports on new research revealing how creeped out Princess Diana was by Donald Trump, how he refused to leave her alone, and how he made vile, lewd remarks about her both before and after her passing — comments that now carry even more profound context given Michael Wolff's exclusive reporting this past weekend. For free and unbiased Medicare help, dial 82-MEDICARE (826-334-2273) to speak with our trusted partner, Chapter, or go to https://askchapter.org/mtn Disclaimer: Chapter and its affiliates are not connected with or endorsed by any government entity or the federal Medicare program. Chapter Advisory, LLC represents Medicare Advantage HMO, PPO, and PFFS organizations and stand alone prescription drug plans that have a Medicare contract. Enrollment depends on the plan's contract renewal. While we have a database of every Medicare plan nationwide and can help you to search among all plans, we have contracts with many but not all plans. As a result, we do not offer every plan available in your area. Currently we represent 50 organizations which offer 18,160 products nationwide. We search and recommend all plans, even those we don't directly offer. You can contact a licensed Chapter agent to find out the number of products available in your specific area. Please contact Medicare.gov, 1-800-Medicare, or your local State Health Insurance Program (SHIP) to get information on all of your options. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Widow We Do Now?
Ep. 246 | From Widow to Suspect? The Allegations Against Kouri Richins

Widow We Do Now?

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 12, 2025 78:17


In this episode, Anita dives into the unfolding case of Kouri Richins, a Utah widow and author of a grief book for children, accused of murdering her husband, Eric. Drawing from court documents, news reports, and public statements, this epsiode unpacks the timeline, the key allegations, and the questions still surrounding the story. *Check our Patreon to submit tributes of your person to be read in an episode!*http://www.patreon.com/wwdnSponsored by:BetterHelp.com. Save 10% off the first month of online therapy done securely, online with our unique link: https://trybetterhelp.com/wwdnMint Mobile: Mobile phone plans with great service and coverage starting at $15/month https://trymintmobile.com/wwdnJoin our Patreon for ad-free episodes and more!http://www.patreon.com/wwdnNeed some Snarky Grief merch?http://shop.widowwedonow.comWanna buy us tacos?http://www.buymeacoffee.com/widowwedonow

3 Man Front
3 Man Front Hour 2: John Mateer gambling allegations, Robbie Weinstein & most overrated AP Poll teams

3 Man Front

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 12, 2025 45:21


Hour 2 of Tuesday's 3 Man Front included our breakdown of the John Mateer gambling allegations on social media, Robbie Weinstein talking expectations for Vanderbilt in 2025 & the most overrated AP Poll teams since 2014. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

World at Work
Dealing With External Allegations About An Employee

World at Work

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 12, 2025 16:47 Transcription Available


"If it has nothing to do with the workplace, it's not your place to address it as an employer."  Notable Moments 00:03:05 – How to handle allegations unrelated to the workplace 00:04:54 – Using proper legal channels for non-work issues 00:07:59 – When a code of conduct changes your responsibility 00:10:46 – Offering EAP support without enforcing consequences 00:13:44 – Why uniforms and name tags come off after hours Tim Dyck discusses how employers should handle allegations about an employee's behavior outside of work. He explains when such concerns warrant action, how a code of conduct can change the rules, and why offering support without enforcement can make a difference. From legal considerations to protecting workplace trust, Tim outlines a thoughtful, practical approach. Read the blog for more from this episode.  Connect with Tim and his team: Website: https://bestculturesolutions.ca/ LinkedIn: Best Culture Solutions, Inc Instagram: @best.culture.solutions   Email: tim@bestculturesolutions.ca  

The Tara Show
H2: From Classroom Memories to Economic Reality: Fed Moves, Housing Strains, and Political Shifts

The Tara Show

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 11, 2025 27:09


What starts as lighthearted back-to-school reflections quickly pivots into a sharp economic and political analysis. With Charles Payne weighing in, the discussion covers potential Federal Reserve rate cuts, the struggles facing small businesses and homebuyers, and the ripple effects of illegal immigration on housing demand. Allegations of census fraud raise questions about political power shifts, tying together the economic, social, and electoral stakes ahead.

Beyond The Horizon
Ghislaine Maxwell Was Still Rubbing Shoulders With The So Called Elite After Allegations

Beyond The Horizon

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 11, 2025 28:21 Transcription Available


Even after Jeffrey Epstein's 2008 conviction, Ghislaine Maxwell continued to receive invitations to dinners, galas, and gatherings among the same elite circles that claimed to be horrified by his crimes. This wasn't oversight—it was the quiet acknowledgment that her connections, influence, and social capital still outweighed the stain of her association. For many in high society, Maxwell wasn't a liability; she was a gatekeeper to an exclusive network, someone who could still open doors, raise funds, and make introductions. The whispered rationale was simple: as long as she hadn't been personally convicted, she remained “safe” to be seen with. It was a textbook example of how privilege allows reputations to be insulated far beyond the point where ordinary people would be cast out.Her continued presence in elite settings revealed that, in those circles, association with scandal is not a dealbreaker—it's a test of loyalty. Inviting Maxwell wasn't ignorance, it was defiance; a way for the powerful to signal that they don't bend to public outrage or moral pressure. To them, ostracizing her would have meant acknowledging that the accusations against Epstein and his network had real weight—and that the social class they all belonged to was implicated. Instead, Maxwell was treated as one of their own until it became politically untenable, proving once again that high society's first instinct is not to cleanse itself, but to protect and preserve its own.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2904115/Ghislaine-Maxwell-s-link-sex-scandal-court-papers-involving-Prince-Andrew-Jeffery-Epstein-don-t-stop-having-amazing-social-connections.html

Beyond The Horizon
Gerald Marie And The Allegations Against Him And Elite Modeling

Beyond The Horizon

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 11, 2025 13:57 Transcription Available


Gerald Marie was a big shot in the modeling game. With the power to help propel a career into the next level, he instead used that power according to allegations in many instances to abuse instead. In this episode, we hear from a whistleblower who spills the beans on the toxic culture around Gerald Marie and Elite Modeling.(commercial at 9:35)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9558771/Predator-bosses-Elite-modelling-agency-league-table-models-slept-with.html

The Current
Allegations of arson as wildfires rage across eastern Canada

The Current

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 11, 2025 18:48


Wildfires are burning across Newfoundland and Labrador, prompting the provincial government to significantly increase fines and prison time for people who violate a fire ban. We speak to Scott Chandler, who lost his home in Conception Bay North, and ask Premier John Hogan about investigations into allegations of arson — and the latest on the firefighting effort. Plus, we hear from Janet Barlow of Hike Nova Scotia about the province's sweeping ban on activities in wooded areas and the impact on outdoor recreation.

Beyond The Horizon
In Their Own Words: Jane Doe 101 And The Allegations Made Against Epstein In 2009 (Part 2) (8/10/25)

Beyond The Horizon

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 10, 2025 19:50 Transcription Available


The 2009 federal lawsuit Jane Doe No. 101 v. Jeffrey Epstein, filed in the Southern District of Florida, accuses Epstein of sexually abusing and trafficking the plaintiff when she was a minor in Palm Beach County. Filed under a pseudonym to protect her identity, the complaint outlines a pattern of predatory conduct consistent with other allegations against Epstein during the same period. It asserts federal jurisdiction, establishes venue in Florida, and demands a jury trial. Early filings also sought a no-contact order and measures to preserve evidence, signaling the seriousness of the claims and the plaintiff's intent to prevent witness intimidation or evidence tampering.The case emerged alongside a wave of similar “Jane Doe” suits that were being coordinated in federal court, reflecting the widening legal fallout for Epstein at the time. The complaint fits within the broader narrative of civil actions that sought to hold Epstein accountable after his controversial 2008 plea deal allowed him to avoid federal prosecution. By placing this new plaintiff's claims into the public record, the suit added further pressure on Epstein's legal defenses and contributed to the mounting body of litigation alleging he operated a long-running sex trafficking network targeting underage girls.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.flsd.334533.1.0.pdf

Beyond The Horizon
In Their Own Words: Jane Doe 101 And The Allegations Made Against Epstein In 2009 (Part 1) (8/10/25)

Beyond The Horizon

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 10, 2025 14:36 Transcription Available


The 2009 federal lawsuit Jane Doe No. 101 v. Jeffrey Epstein, filed in the Southern District of Florida, accuses Epstein of sexually abusing and trafficking the plaintiff when she was a minor in Palm Beach County. Filed under a pseudonym to protect her identity, the complaint outlines a pattern of predatory conduct consistent with other allegations against Epstein during the same period. It asserts federal jurisdiction, establishes venue in Florida, and demands a jury trial. Early filings also sought a no-contact order and measures to preserve evidence, signaling the seriousness of the claims and the plaintiff's intent to prevent witness intimidation or evidence tampering.The case emerged alongside a wave of similar “Jane Doe” suits that were being coordinated in federal court, reflecting the widening legal fallout for Epstein at the time. The complaint fits within the broader narrative of civil actions that sought to hold Epstein accountable after his controversial 2008 plea deal allowed him to avoid federal prosecution. By placing this new plaintiff's claims into the public record, the suit added further pressure on Epstein's legal defenses and contributed to the mounting body of litigation alleging he operated a long-running sex trafficking network targeting underage girls.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.flsd.334533.1.0.pdf

The Moscow Murders and More
In Their Own Words: Jane Doe 101 And The Allegations Made Against Epstein In 2009 (Part 1) (8/10/25)

The Moscow Murders and More

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 10, 2025 14:36 Transcription Available


The 2009 federal lawsuit Jane Doe No. 101 v. Jeffrey Epstein, filed in the Southern District of Florida, accuses Epstein of sexually abusing and trafficking the plaintiff when she was a minor in Palm Beach County. Filed under a pseudonym to protect her identity, the complaint outlines a pattern of predatory conduct consistent with other allegations against Epstein during the same period. It asserts federal jurisdiction, establishes venue in Florida, and demands a jury trial. Early filings also sought a no-contact order and measures to preserve evidence, signaling the seriousness of the claims and the plaintiff's intent to prevent witness intimidation or evidence tampering.The case emerged alongside a wave of similar “Jane Doe” suits that were being coordinated in federal court, reflecting the widening legal fallout for Epstein at the time. The complaint fits within the broader narrative of civil actions that sought to hold Epstein accountable after his controversial 2008 plea deal allowed him to avoid federal prosecution. By placing this new plaintiff's claims into the public record, the suit added further pressure on Epstein's legal defenses and contributed to the mounting body of litigation alleging he operated a long-running sex trafficking network targeting underage girls.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.flsd.334533.1.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The Moscow Murders and More
In Their Own Words: Jane Doe 101 And The Allegations Made Against Epstein In 2009 (Part 2) (8/10/25)

The Moscow Murders and More

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 10, 2025 19:50 Transcription Available


The 2009 federal lawsuit Jane Doe No. 101 v. Jeffrey Epstein, filed in the Southern District of Florida, accuses Epstein of sexually abusing and trafficking the plaintiff when she was a minor in Palm Beach County. Filed under a pseudonym to protect her identity, the complaint outlines a pattern of predatory conduct consistent with other allegations against Epstein during the same period. It asserts federal jurisdiction, establishes venue in Florida, and demands a jury trial. Early filings also sought a no-contact order and measures to preserve evidence, signaling the seriousness of the claims and the plaintiff's intent to prevent witness intimidation or evidence tampering.The case emerged alongside a wave of similar “Jane Doe” suits that were being coordinated in federal court, reflecting the widening legal fallout for Epstein at the time. The complaint fits within the broader narrative of civil actions that sought to hold Epstein accountable after his controversial 2008 plea deal allowed him to avoid federal prosecution. By placing this new plaintiff's claims into the public record, the suit added further pressure on Epstein's legal defenses and contributed to the mounting body of litigation alleging he operated a long-running sex trafficking network targeting underage girls.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.flsd.334533.1.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Shadow Warrior by Rajeev Srinivasan
Ep 173: Trump tariff wars: Seeing them in context for India

Shadow Warrior by Rajeev Srinivasan

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 10, 2025 27:23


A version of this essay has been published by firstpost.com at https://www.firstpost.com/opinion/shadow-warrior-from-crisis-to-advantage-how-india-can-outplay-the-trump-tariff-gambit-13923031.htmlA simple summary of the recent brouhaha about President Trump's imposition of 25% tariffs on India as well as his comment on India's ‘dead economy' is the following from Shakespeare's Macbeth: “full of sound and fury, signifying nothing”. Trump further imposed punitive tariffs totalling 50% on August 6th allegedly for India funding Russia's war machine via buying oil.As any negotiator knows, a good opening gambit is intended to set the stage for further parleys, so that you could arrive at a negotiated settlement that is acceptable to both parties. The opening gambit could well be a maximalist statement, or one's ‘dream outcome', the opposite of which is ‘the walkway point' beyond which you are simply not willing to make concessions. The usual outcome is somewhere in between these two positions or postures.Trump is both a tough negotiator, and prone to making broad statements from which he has no problem retreating later. It's down-and-dirty boardroom tactics that he's bringing to international trade. Therefore I think Indians don't need to get rattled. It's not the end of the world, and there will be climbdowns and adjustments. Think hard about the long term.I was on a panel discussion on this topic on TV just hours after Trump made his initial 25% announcement, and I mentioned an interplay between geo-politics and geo-economics. Trump is annoyed that his Ukraine-Russia play is not making much headway, and also that BRICS is making progress towards de-dollarization. India is caught in this crossfire (‘collateral damage') but the geo-economic facts on the ground are not favorable to Trump.I am in general agreement with Trump on his objectives of bringing manufacturing and investment back to the US, but I am not sure that he will succeed, and anyway his strong-arm tactics may backfire. I consider below what India should be prepared to do to turn adversity into opportunity.The anti-Thucydides Trap and the baleful influence of Whitehall on Deep StateWhat is remarkable, though, is that Trump 2.0 seems to be indistinguishable from the Deep State: I wondered last month if the Deep State had ‘turned' Trump. The main reason many people supported Trump in the first place was the damage the Deep State was wreaking on the US under the Obama-Biden regime. But it appears that the resourceful Deep State has now co-opted Trump for its agenda, and I can only speculate how.The net result is that there is the anti-Thucydides Trap: here is the incumbent power, the US, actively supporting the insurgent power, China, instead of suppressing it, as Graham Allison suggested as the historical pattern. It, in all fairness, did not start with Trump, but with Nixon in China in 1971. In 1985, the US trade deficit with China was $6 million. In 1986, $1.78 billion. In 1995, $35 billion.But it ballooned after China entered the WTO in 2001. $202 billion in 2005; $386 billion in 2022.In 2025, after threatening China with 150% tariffs, Trump retreated by postponing them; besides he has caved in to Chinese demands for Nvidia chips and for exemptions from Iran oil sanctions if I am not mistaken.All this can be explained by one word: leverage. China lured the US with the siren-song of the cost-leader ‘China price', tempting CEOs and Wall Street, who sleepwalked into surrender to the heft of the Chinese supply chain.Now China has cornered Trump via its monopoly over various things, the most obvious of which is rare earths. Trump really has no option but to give in to Chinese blackmail. That must make him furious: in addition to his inability to get Putin to listen to him, Xi is also ignoring him. Therefore, he will take out his frustrations on others, such as India, the EU, Japan, etc. Never mind that he's burning bridges with them.There's a Malayalam proverb that's relevant here: “angadiyil thottathinu ammayodu”. Meaning, you were humiliated in the marketplace, so you come home and take it out on your mother. This is quite likely what Trump is doing, because he believes India et al will not retaliate. In fact Japan and the EU did not retaliate, but gave in, also promising to invest large sums in the US. India could consider a different path: not active conflict, but not giving in either, because its equations with the US are different from those of the EU or Japan.Even the normally docile Japanese are beginning to notice.Beyond that, I suggested a couple of years ago that Deep State has a plan to enter into a condominium agreement with China, so that China gets Asia, and the US gets the Americas and the Pacific/Atlantic. This is exactly like the Vatican-brokered medieval division of the world between Spain and Portugal, and it probably will be equally bad for everyone else. And incidentally it makes the Quad infructuous, and deepens distrust of American motives.The Chinese are sure that they have achieved the condominium, or rather forced the Americans into it. Here is a headline from the Financial Express about their reaction to the tariffs: they are delighted that the principal obstacle in their quest for hegemony, a US-India military and economic alliance, is being blown up by Trump, and they lose no opportunity to deride India as not quite up to the mark, whereas they and the US have achieved a G2 detente.Two birds with one stone: gloat about the breakdown in the US-India relationship, and exhibit their racist disdain for India yet again.They laugh, but I bet India can do an end-run around them. As noted above, the G2 is a lot like the division of the world into Spanish and Portuguese spheres of influence in 1494. Well, that didn't end too well for either of them. They had their empires, which they looted for gold and slaves, but it made them fat, dumb and happy. The Dutch, English, and French capitalized on more dynamic economies, flexible colonial systems, and aggressive competition, overtaking the Iberian powers in global influence by the 17th century. This is a salutary historical parallel.I have long suspected that the US Deep State is being led by the nose by the malign Whitehall (the British Deep State): I call it the ‘master-blaster' syndrome. On August 6th, there was indirect confirmation of this in ex-British PM Boris Johnson's tweet about India. Let us remember he single-handedly ruined the chances of a peaceful resolution of the Ukraine War in 2022. Whitehall's mischief and meddling all over, if you read between the lines.Did I mention the British Special Force's views? Ah, Whitehall is getting a bit sloppy in its propaganda.Wait, so is India important (according to Whitehall) or unimportant (according to Trump)?Since I am very pro-American, I have a word of warning to Trump: you trust perfidious Albion at your peril. Their country is ruined, and they will not rest until they ruin yours too.I also wonder if there are British paw-prints in a recent and sudden spate of racist attacks on Indians in Ireland. A 6-year old girl was assaulted and kicked in the private parts. A nurse was gang-raped by a bunch of teenagers. Ireland has never been so racist against Indians (yes, I do remember the sad case of Savita Halappanavar, but that was religious bigotry more than racism). And I remember sudden spikes in anti-Indian attacks in Australia and Canada, both British vassals.There is no point in Indians whining about how the EU and America itself are buying more oil, palladium, rare earths, uranium etc. from Russia than India is. I am sorry to say this, but Western nations are known for hypocrisy. For example, exactly 80 years ago they dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan, but not on Germany or Italy. Why? The answer is uncomfortable. Lovely post-facto rationalization, isn't it?Remember the late lamented British East India Company that raped and pillaged India?Applying the three winning strategies to geo-economicsAs a professor of business strategy and innovation, I emphasize to my students that there are three broad ways of gaining an advantage over others: 1. Be the cost leader, 2. Be the most customer-intimate player, 3. Innovate. The US as a nation is patently not playing the cost leader; it does have some customer intimacy, but it is shrinking; its strength is in innovation.If you look at comparative advantage, the US at one time had strengths in all three of the above. Because it had the scale of a large market (and its most obvious competitors in Europe were decimated by world wars) America did enjoy an ability to be cost-competitive, especially as the dollar is the global default reserve currency. It demonstrated this by pushing through the Plaza Accords, forcing the Japanese yen to appreciate, destroying their cost advantage.In terms of customer intimacy, the US is losing its edge. Take cars for example: Americans practically invented them, and dominated the business, but they are in headlong retreat now because they simply don't make cars that people want outside the US: Japanese, Koreans, Germans and now Chinese do. Why were Ford and GM forced to leave the India market? Their “world cars” are no good in value-conscious India and other emerging markets.Innovation, yes, has been an American strength. Iconic Americans like Thomas Edison, Henry Ford, and Steve Jobs led the way in product and process innovation. US universities have produced idea after idea, and startups have ignited Silicon Valley. In fact Big Tech and aerospace/armaments are the biggest areas where the US leads these days.The armaments and aerospace tradeThat is pertinent because of two reasons: one is Trump's peevishness at India's purchase of weapons from Russia (even though that has come down from 70+% of imports to 36% according to SIPRI); two is the fact that there are significant services and intangible imports by India from the US, of for instance Big Tech services, even some routed through third countries like Ireland.Armaments and aerospace purchases from the US by India have gone up a lot: for example the Apache helicopters that arrived recently, the GE 404 engines ordered for India's indigenous fighter aircraft, Predator drones and P8-i Poseidon maritime surveillance aircraft. I suspect Trump is intent on pushing India to buy F-35s, the $110-million dollar 5th generation fighters.Unfortunately, the F-35 has a spotty track record. There were two crashes recently, one in Albuquerque in May, and the other on July 31 in Fresno, and that's $220 million dollars gone. Besides, the spectacle of a hapless British-owned F-35B sitting, forlorn, in the rain, in Trivandrum airport for weeks, lent itself to trolls, who made it the butt of jokes. I suspect India has firmly rebuffed Trump on this front, which has led to his focus on Russian arms.There might be other pushbacks too. Personally, I think India does need more P-8i submarine hunter-killer aircraft to patrol the Bay of Bengal, but India is exerting its buyer power. There are rumors of pauses in orders for Javelin and Stryker missiles as well.On the civilian aerospace front, I am astonished that all the media stories about Air India 171 and the suspicion that Boeing and/or General Electric are at fault have disappeared without a trace. Why? There had been the big narrative push to blame the poor pilots, and now that there is more than reasonable doubt that these US MNCs are to blame, there is a media blackout?Allegations about poor manufacturing practices by Boeing in North Charleston, South Carolina by whistleblowers have been damaging for the company's brand: this is where the 787 Dreamliners are put together. It would not be surprising if there is a slew of cancellations of orders for Boeing aircraft, with customers moving to Airbus. Let us note Air India and Indigo have placed some very large, multi-billion dollar orders with Boeing that may be in jeopardy.India as a consuming economy, and the services trade is hugely in the US' favorMany observers have pointed out the obvious fact that India is not an export-oriented economy, unlike, say, Japan or China. It is more of a consuming economy with a large, growing and increasingly less frugal population, and therefore it is a target for exporters rather than a competitor for exporting countries. As such, the impact of these US tariffs on India will be somewhat muted, and there are alternative destinations for India's exports, if need be.While Trump has focused on merchandise trade and India's modest surplus there, it is likely that there is a massive services trade, which is in the US' favor. All those Big Tech firms, such as Microsoft, Meta, Google and so on run a surplus in the US' favor, which may not be immediately evident because they route their sales through third countries, e.g. Ireland.These are the figures from the US Trade Representative, and quite frankly I don't believe them: there are a lot of invisible services being sold to India, and the value of Indian data is ignored.In addition to the financial implications, there are national security concerns. Take the case of Microsoft's cloud offering, Azure, which arbitrarily turned off services to Indian oil retailer Nayara on the flimsy grounds that the latter had substantial investment from Russia's Rosneft. This is an example of jurisdictional over-reach by US companies, which has dire consequences. India has been lax about controlling Big Tech, and this has to change.India is Meta's largest customer base. Whatsapp is used for practically everything. Which means that Meta has access to enormous amounts of Indian customer data, for which India is not even enforcing local storage. This is true of all other Big Tech (see OpenAI's Sam Altman below): they are playing fast and loose with Indian data, which is not in India's interest at all.Data is the new oil, says The Economist magazine. So how much should Meta, OpenAI et al be paying for Indian data? Meta is worth trillions of dollars, OpenAI half a trillion. How much of that can be attributed to Indian data?There is at least one example of how India too can play the digital game: UPI. Despite ham-handed efforts to now handicap UPI with a fee (thank you, brilliant government bureaucrats, yes, go ahead and kill the goose that lays the golden eggs), it has become a contender in a field that has long been dominated by the American duopoly of Visa and Mastercard. In other words, India can scale up and compete.It is unfortunate that India has not built up its own Big Tech behind a firewall as has been done behind the Great Firewall of China. But it is not too late. Is it possible for India-based cloud service providers to replace US Big Tech like Amazon Web Services and Microsoft Azure? Yes, there is at least one player in that market: Zoho.Second, what are the tariffs on Big Tech exports to India these days? What if India were to decide to impose a 50% tax on revenue generated in India through advertisement or through sales of services, mirroring the US's punitive taxes on Indian goods exports? Let me hasten to add that I am not suggesting this, it is merely a hypothetical argument.There could also be non-tariff barriers as China has implemented, but not India: data locality laws, forced use of local partners, data privacy laws like the EU's GDPR, anti-monopoly laws like the EU's Digital Markets Act, strict application of IPR laws like 3(k) that absolutely prohibits the patenting of software, and so on. India too can play legalistic games. This is a reason US agri-products do not pass muster: genetically modified seeds, and milk from cows fed with cattle feed from blood, offal and ground-up body parts.Similarly, in the ‘information' industry, India is likely to become the largest English-reading country in the world. I keep getting come-hither emails from the New York Times offering me $1 a month deals on their product: they want Indian customers. There are all these American media companies present in India, untrammelled by content controls or taxes. What if India were to give a choice to Bloomberg, Reuters, NYTimes, WaPo, NPR et al: 50% tax, or exit?This attack on peddlers of fake information and manufacturing consent I do suggest, and I have been suggesting for years. It would make no difference whatsoever to India if these media outlets were ejected, and they surely could cover India (well, basically what they do is to demean India) just as well from abroad. Out with them: good riddance to bad rubbish.What India needs to doI believe India needs to play the long game. It has to use its shatrubodha to realize that the US is not its enemy: in Chanakyan terms, the US is the Far Emperor. The enemy is China, or more precisely the Chinese Empire. Han China is just a rump on their south-eastern coast, but it is their conquered (and restive) colonies such as Tibet, Xinjiang, Manchuria and Inner Mongolia, that give them their current heft.But the historical trends are against China. It has in the past had stable governments for long periods, based on strong (and brutal) imperial power. Then comes the inevitable collapse, when the center falls apart, and there is absolute chaos. It is quite possible, given various trends, including demographic changes, that this may happen to China by 2050.On the other hand, (mostly thanks, I acknowledge, to China's manufacturing growth), the center of gravity of the world economy has been steadily shifting towards Asia. The momentum might swing towards India if China stumbles, but in any case the era of Atlantic dominance is probably gone for good. That was, of course, only a historical anomaly. Asia has always dominated: see Angus Maddison's magisterial history of the world economy, referred to below as well.I am reminded of the old story of the king berating his court poet for calling him “the new moon” and the emperor “the full moon”. The poet escaped being punished by pointing out that the new moon is waxing and the full moon is waning.This is the long game India has to keep in mind. Things are coming together for India to a great extent: in particular the demographic dividend, improved infrastructure, fiscal prudence, and the increasing centrality of the Indian Ocean as the locus of trade and commerce.India can attempt to gain competitive advantage in all three ways outlined above:* Cost-leadership. With a large market (assuming companies are willing to invest at scale), a low-cost labor force, and with a proven track-record of frugal innovation, India could well aim to be a cost-leader in selected areas of manufacturing. But this requires government intervention in loosening monetary policy and in reducing barriers to ease of doing business* Customer-intimacy. What works in highly value-conscious India could well work in other developing countries. For instance, the economic environment in ASEAN is largely similar to India's, and so Indian products should appeal to their residents; similarly with East Africa. Thus the Indian Ocean Rim with its huge (and in Africa's case, rapidly growing) population should be a natural fit for Indian products* Innovation. This is the hardest part, and it requires a new mindset in education and industry, to take risks and work at the bleeding edge of technology. In general, Indians have been content to replicate others' innovations at lower cost or do jugaad (which cannot scale up). To do real, disruptive innovation, first of all the services mindset should transition to a product mindset (sorry, Raghuram Rajan). Second, the quality of human capital must be improved. Third, there should be patient risk capital. Fourth, there should be entrepreneurs willing to try risky things. All of these are difficult, but doable.And what is the end point of this game? Leverage. The ability to compel others to buy from you.China has demonstrated this through its skill at being a cost-leader in industry after industry, often hollowing out entire nations through means both fair and foul. These means include far-sighted industrial policy including the acquisition of skills, technology, and raw materials, as well as hidden subsidies that support massive scaling, which ends up driving competing firms elsewhere out of business. India can learn a few lessons from them. One possible lesson is building capabilities, as David Teece of UC Berkeley suggested in 1997, that can span multiple products, sectors and even industries: the classic example is that of Nikon, whose optics strength helps it span industries such as photography, printing, and photolithography for chip manufacturing. Here is an interesting snapshot of China's capabilities today.2025 is, in a sense, a point of inflection for India just as the crisis in 1991 was. India had been content to plod along at the Nehruvian Rate of Growth of 2-3%, believing this was all it could achieve, as a ‘wounded civilization'. From that to a 6-7% growth rate is a leap, but it is not enough, nor is it testing the boundaries of what India can accomplish.1991 was the crisis that turned into an opportunity by accident. 2025 is a crisis that can be carefully and thoughtfully turned into an opportunity.The Idi Amin syndrome and the 1000 Talents program with AIThere is a key area where an American error may well be a windfall for India. This is based on the currently fashionable H1-B bashing which is really a race-bashing of Indians, and which has been taken up with gusto by certain MAGA folks. Once again, I suspect the baleful influence of Whitehall behind it, but whatever the reason, it looks like Indians are going to have a hard time settling down in the US.There are over a million Indians on H1-Bs, a large number of them software engineers, let us assume for convenience there are 250,000 of them. Given country caps of exactly 9800 a year, they have no realistic chance of getting a Green Card in the near future, and given the increasingly fraught nature of life there for brown people, they may leave the US, and possibly return to India..I call this the Idi Amin syndrome. In 1972, the dictator of Uganda went on a rampage against Indian-origin people in his country, and forcibly expelled 80,000 of them, because they were dominating the economy. There were unintended consequences: those who were ejected mostly went to the US and UK, and they have in many cases done well. But Uganda's economy virtually collapsed.That's a salutary experience. I am by no means saying that the US economy would collapse, but am pointing to the resilience of the Indians who were expelled. If, similarly, Trump forces a large number of Indians to return to India, that might well be a case of short-term pain and long-term gain: urvashi-shapam upakaram, as in the Malayalam phrase.Their return would be akin to what happened in China and Taiwan with their successful effort to attract their diaspora back. The Chinese program was called 1000 Talents, and they scoured the globe for academics and researchers of Chinese origin, and brought them back with attractive incentives and large budgets. They had a major role in energizing the Chinese economy.Similarly, Taiwan with Hsinchu University attracted high-quality talent, among which was the founder of TSMC, the globally dominant chip giant.And here is Trump offering to India on a platter at least 100,000 software engineers, especially at a time when generativeAI is decimating low-end jobs everywhere. They can work on some very compelling projects that could revolutionize Indian education, up-skilling and so on, and I am not at liberty to discuss them. Suffice to say that these could turbo-charge the Indian software industry and get it away from mundane, routine body-shopping type jobs.ConclusionThe Trump tariff tantrum is definitely a short-term problem for India, but it can be turned around, and turned into an opportunity, if only the country plays its cards right and focuses on building long-term comparative advantages and accepting the gift of a mis-step by Trump in geo-economics.In geo-politics, India and the US need each other to contain China, and so that part, being so obvious, will be taken care of more or less by default.Thus, overall, the old SWOT analysis: strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. On balance, I am of the opinion that the threats contain in them the germs of opportunities. It is up to Indians to figure out how to take advantage of them. This is your game to win or lose, India!4150 words, 9 Aug 2025 This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit rajeevsrinivasan.substack.com/subscribe

Tucker Carlson - Audio Biography
Tucker Carlson's Digital Empire Expands: Fox's Tubi Acquisition Boosts His Reach

Tucker Carlson - Audio Biography

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 10, 2025 4:10 Transcription Available


Tucker Carlson remains a central figure in conservative media and continues to generate headlines with his evolving media ventures and provocative public appearances. Most recently, his media company has become a primary focus of commentary and investment discussions within the conservative ecosystem. Fox Corporation has announced the acquisition of Red Seat Ventures, a digital media company that helps independent creators, including Carlson, Megyn Kelly, and Bill O'Reilly, expand their digital reach. This move signals Fox's intent to bolster content offerings on its free streaming service, Tubi, and possibly create new synergy for figures like Carlson as they operate outside traditional linear television. Red Seat Ventures will continue to operate as a standalone unit but now falls under the Tubi Media Group umbrella, giving Carlson's digital projects potentially greater access to mainstream distribution and higher visibility within the Fox content ecosystem.In digital metrics, The Tucker Carlson Show saw a significant jump in Podtrac's July podcast rankings, climbing six spots to claim the 18th position for U.S. unique monthly audience. This surge reflects his ability to mobilize a large, dedicated listener base even as he operates independently from his old broadcast home. His move to platforms like X (formerly Twitter) and collaborations or discussions with Elon Musk further underscore his approach of distributing content directly to audiences, bypassing traditional networks.Carlson's public appearances continue to stoke reactions across the political landscape. One of the most talked-about events was his recent live interview alongside former President Donald Trump in Phoenix, Arizona, where Trump reiterated stances on immigration, the 2020 election, and ongoing political battles, all with Carlson prompting headline-grabbing statements. The interview drew extensive commentary from both supporters and critics, reflecting the continuing polarization around Carlson's editorial approach and Trump's rhetoric.The legal and contractual friction between Carlson and Fox News remains unresolved and in the spotlight. His legal team is still negotiating terms with Fox as his previous contract, technically still binding, does not expire until January 2025. Allegations from Carlson's side include claims of contractual breach, deception, and mishandling of his private communications, while Fox strongly denies these accusations. These disputes serve as potent reminders of the shifting sands in media employment relations, especially as high-profile personalities attempt to chart their own course outside of legacy platforms.His influence on broader political and media discourse continues to spark debate. Critics and advocacy groups regularly respond to his positions on immigration, social justice, and American identity, prompting advertiser boycotts, grassroots movements, and public protests. His interview with Russian President Vladimir Putin drew significant attention and controversy, amassing hundreds of millions of views, and sparked another round of discussions about the responsibilities and risks of platforming figures central to global political tension.Within the podcast community and among figures in journalism and media studies, the debates around Carlson's style have sharpened. Media commentators have analyzed his ability to directly shape conservative discourse, often framing him as both a disruptor and a polarizer—a person whose reach and technique continue to influence the agenda for right-leaning politics, both in the U.S. and abroad.Thank you for listening to the Tucker Carlson news tracker podcast. Please subscribe for more updates on his ongoing activities and their wider implications. This has been a Quiet Please production, for more check out quiet please dot ai.For more http://www.quietplease.aiGet the best deals https://amzn.to/3ODvOta

The Epstein Chronicles
In Their Own Words: Jane Doe 101 And The Allegations Made Against Epstein In 2009 (Part 2) (8/9/25)

The Epstein Chronicles

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 9, 2025 14:36 Transcription Available


The 2009 federal lawsuit Jane Doe No. 101 v. Jeffrey Epstein, filed in the Southern District of Florida, accuses Epstein of sexually abusing and trafficking the plaintiff when she was a minor in Palm Beach County. Filed under a pseudonym to protect her identity, the complaint outlines a pattern of predatory conduct consistent with other allegations against Epstein during the same period. It asserts federal jurisdiction, establishes venue in Florida, and demands a jury trial. Early filings also sought a no-contact order and measures to preserve evidence, signaling the seriousness of the claims and the plaintiff's intent to prevent witness intimidation or evidence tampering.The case emerged alongside a wave of similar “Jane Doe” suits that were being coordinated in federal court, reflecting the widening legal fallout for Epstein at the time. The complaint fits within the broader narrative of civil actions that sought to hold Epstein accountable after his controversial 2008 plea deal allowed him to avoid federal prosecution. By placing this new plaintiff's claims into the public record, the suit added further pressure on Epstein's legal defenses and contributed to the mounting body of litigation alleging he operated a long-running sex trafficking network targeting underage girls.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.flsd.334533.1.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The Epstein Chronicles
In Their Own Words: Jane Doe 101 And The Allegations Made Against Epstein In 2009 (Part 1) (8/9/25)

The Epstein Chronicles

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 9, 2025 19:50 Transcription Available


The 2009 federal lawsuit Jane Doe No. 101 v. Jeffrey Epstein, filed in the Southern District of Florida, accuses Epstein of sexually abusing and trafficking the plaintiff when she was a minor in Palm Beach County. Filed under a pseudonym to protect her identity, the complaint outlines a pattern of predatory conduct consistent with other allegations against Epstein during the same period. It asserts federal jurisdiction, establishes venue in Florida, and demands a jury trial. Early filings also sought a no-contact order and measures to preserve evidence, signaling the seriousness of the claims and the plaintiff's intent to prevent witness intimidation or evidence tampering.The case emerged alongside a wave of similar “Jane Doe” suits that were being coordinated in federal court, reflecting the widening legal fallout for Epstein at the time. The complaint fits within the broader narrative of civil actions that sought to hold Epstein accountable after his controversial 2008 plea deal allowed him to avoid federal prosecution. By placing this new plaintiff's claims into the public record, the suit added further pressure on Epstein's legal defenses and contributed to the mounting body of litigation alleging he operated a long-running sex trafficking network targeting underage girls.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.flsd.334533.1.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The Moscow Murders and More
In Their Own Words: Virginia Roberts And The Prince Andrew Allegations (8/9/25)

The Moscow Murders and More

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 9, 2025 24:45 Transcription Available


The civil complaint filed by Virginia Roberts Giuffre against Prince Andrew in 2021 alleged that he sexually abused her on multiple occasions when she was 17 years old, a victim of Jeffrey Epstein's trafficking network. The lawsuit, filed in New York under the Child Victims Act, claimed that Prince Andrew knowingly engaged in sexual acts with Giuffre despite being aware that she was being trafficked by Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Giuffre alleged that the abuse occurred in Epstein's New York townhouse, in London at Ghislaine Maxwell's residence, and in the Virgin Islands. The complaint painted a damning picture of a royal using his status and connections to exploit a vulnerable girl, shielded by a global web of power and silence.Prince Andrew publicly denied the allegations, claiming he had no recollection of meeting Giuffre—even though a widely circulated photo shows them together with Maxwell in the background. Rather than face a public trial and legal discovery, Andrew reached an out-of-court settlement with Giuffre in early 2022, reportedly for several million dollars, without admitting guilt. The settlement effectively ended the case but left critical questions unanswered, including whether others in Epstein's orbit facilitated or knew of the abuse. The lawsuit against Prince Andrew marked a rare instance where someone of global stature and diplomatic immunity faced direct legal consequences tied to Epstein's trafficking ring, though many critics saw the quiet settlement as another example of privilege avoiding accountability.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Final Giuffre v. Prince Andrew Complaint v.13.pdf (courthousenews.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Hammer + Nigel Show Podcast
Breaking Down Allegations Towards Lt. Gov. Office

Hammer + Nigel Show Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 8, 2025 8:29 Transcription Available


This story about the A.I Porn and the Lt Gov Office isn’t going away, here's what to know. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The Epstein Chronicles
In Their Own Words: Virginia Roberts And The Prince Andrew Allegations (8/8/25)

The Epstein Chronicles

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 8, 2025 24:45 Transcription Available


The civil complaint filed by Virginia Roberts Giuffre against Prince Andrew in 2021 alleged that he sexually abused her on multiple occasions when she was 17 years old, a victim of Jeffrey Epstein's trafficking network. The lawsuit, filed in New York under the Child Victims Act, claimed that Prince Andrew knowingly engaged in sexual acts with Giuffre despite being aware that she was being trafficked by Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Giuffre alleged that the abuse occurred in Epstein's New York townhouse, in London at Ghislaine Maxwell's residence, and in the Virgin Islands. The complaint painted a damning picture of a royal using his status and connections to exploit a vulnerable girl, shielded by a global web of power and silence.Prince Andrew publicly denied the allegations, claiming he had no recollection of meeting Giuffre—even though a widely circulated photo shows them together with Maxwell in the background. Rather than face a public trial and legal discovery, Andrew reached an out-of-court settlement with Giuffre in early 2022, reportedly for several million dollars, without admitting guilt. The settlement effectively ended the case but left critical questions unanswered, including whether others in Epstein's orbit facilitated or knew of the abuse. The lawsuit against Prince Andrew marked a rare instance where someone of global stature and diplomatic immunity faced direct legal consequences tied to Epstein's trafficking ring, though many critics saw the quiet settlement as another example of privilege avoiding accountability.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Final Giuffre v. Prince Andrew Complaint v.13.pdf (courthousenews.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Gamers Week Podcast
Episode 177 - Visa And Mastercard Deny Censorship Allegations Over Adult Video Games

Gamers Week Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 8, 2025 73:58


Send us a textIn this episode...--> Visa and Mastercard are refuting censorship allegations after forcing storefronts to remove adult video games. Valve says otherwise.--> The BioShock remake has been cancelled as BioShock 4 has reportedly failed to meet review standards.--> A short-lived Nintendo fan survey asked for your opinions on buying digital games instead of boxed copies, and offered a chance for you to provide feedback on the Switch 2's Game-Key Cards.--> According to Larian Studios, it turns out that 250,000 Baldur's Gate 3 players like their Withers with Big Naturals.--> Also: Top 3 New Releases, Gamers Week DebatesWe love our sponsors! Please help us support those who support us!- Check out the Retro Game Club Podcast at linktr.ee/retrogameclub- Connect with CafeBTW at linktr.ee/cafebtw- Get creative with Pixel Pond production company at pixelpondllc.com- Visit Absolutely the Best Podcast: A Work in Progress at linktr.ee/absolutelythebest**Use this link to get a $20 credit when you upgrade to a paid podcast hosting plan on Buzzsprout! buzzsprout.com/?referrer_id=1884378Hosts: wrytersview, donniegretro, retrogamebrewsOpening theme: "Gamers Week Theme" by Akseli TakanenPatron theme: "Chiptune Boss" by donniegretroClosing theme: "Gamers Week Full-Length Theme" by Akseli TakanenSupport the show

NEVER AGAIN IS NOW Podcast
US – The ‘genocide' allegation – Ep. 193

NEVER AGAIN IS NOW Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 8, 2025 56:46


Thane Rosenbaum, law professor and Distinguished University Professor at Touro University, and CBS News Radio's legal analyst, describes the legal definition of ‘genocide' and argues that Israel's actions in Gaza donot meet the criteria. His new book is titled “Beyond Proportionality: Israel's Just War in Gaza.”

Valuetainment
"Nick Fuentes Brings Receipts" - Nick Fuentes RIPS Tucker Carlson Over CIA ALLEGATIONS

Valuetainment

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 7, 2025 23:17


Tucker Carlson claims he only discovered his father was CIA after his death, but past interviews say otherwise. PBD and the crew unpack the contradictions, Nick Fuentes' callout, Candace Owens' flip on Israel, and why this strange alliance may be heading for a massive breakup.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams
Episode 2920 CWSA 08/07/25

Real Coffee with Scott Adams

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 7, 2025 76:41


God's Debris: The Complete Works, Amazon https://tinyurl.com/GodsDebrisCompleteWorksFind my "extra" content on Locals: https://ScottAdams.Locals.comContent:Politics, AI Voice Cloning, DEI, CRT, Apple US Investment Plan, Tim Cook, Trump Compliments Tim Cook, Countrywide Redistricting, Race-Based Redistricting, Ghislaine Maxwell, 2 Movies 1 Screen, Russiagate, Climate Change, Ukraine Enlisting Elderly, India's Russian Oil, Trump Putin Meeting, J6 Insurrection Hoax, UFO Technology, Anti-RFK Jr. Psyops, 2020 Election Denial Punishment, Tulsi Gabbard, James Clapper Iraq WMD Hoax, General Flynn, October 7 Allegations, 911 Narrative, Covid Vax Allegations, Jake Tapper, Turbo-Charged Weaponization, Project Veritas Bill Barr Allegations, Anti-Trump Debanking, Intel CEO China Ties, Trump Census Reform, Israel Gaza, Expert Consensus Pressure, MN Housing Program Fraud, Simulation Theory, Scott Adams~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.

The Opperman Report
Rick Lovett Responds to John S Captain Allegations

The Opperman Report

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 7, 2025 60:05 Transcription Available


Shaun Attwood's True Crime Podcast
THE EVIL ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE CLINTONS - EPSTEIN, HATI, MISSING CHILDREN? - CRIME THEORY

Shaun Attwood's True Crime Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 7, 2025 114:29


Support My Shows Here - https://linktr.ee/projectrooq LIVE STREAM TTS DONATIONS - https://streamlabs.com/projectrooq/tip Project ROOQ Website MORE CONTENT - https://www.projectrooq.com/ My Patreon - patreon.com/projectrooq Instagram - www.instagram.com/projectrooq/ #PODCAST #YOUTUBE #CLINTONS

Beyond The Horizon
In Their Own Words: Jane Doe 43 And Her Allegations Against Jeffrey Epstein And The Core 4 (Part 1) (8/7/25)

Beyond The Horizon

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 7, 2025 11:18 Transcription Available


In this lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, Jane Doe 43 accuses Jeffrey Epstein and several of his closest associates—Ghislaine Maxwell, Sarah Kellen, Lesley Groff, and Natalya Malyshev—of participating in and facilitating Epstein's long-running sex trafficking operation. The complaint, brought through her legal counsel, alleges that the defendants were not only aware of the abuse but were active participants in grooming, recruiting, and coercing underage girls to engage in sexual acts with Epstein and his powerful associates. Jane Doe 43 claims she was one of the many young victims ensnared in this network, suffering serious emotional and physical harm as a result.The lawsuit paints a picture of an organized, high-functioning operation where each defendant played a specific role in maintaining Epstein's trafficking enterprise. Maxwell is described as the primary enabler who helped lure and manipulate girls, while Kellen, Groff, and Malyshev are portrayed as essential logistical coordinators who scheduled encounters, managed Epstein's properties, and ensured a steady supply of victims. By demanding a jury trial, Jane Doe 43 is seeking accountability not only from Epstein's estate but also from the living co-conspirators who, she alleges, helped facilitate the abuse and enabled his crimes to continue for years without interruption.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - RansomeComplaint - Final for Filing

Beyond The Horizon
In Their Own Words: Jane Doe 43 And Her Allegations Against Jeffrey Epstein And The Core 4 (Part 2) (8/7/25)

Beyond The Horizon

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 7, 2025 16:55 Transcription Available


In this lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, Jane Doe 43 accuses Jeffrey Epstein and several of his closest associates—Ghislaine Maxwell, Sarah Kellen, Lesley Groff, and Natalya Malyshev—of participating in and facilitating Epstein's long-running sex trafficking operation. The complaint, brought through her legal counsel, alleges that the defendants were not only aware of the abuse but were active participants in grooming, recruiting, and coercing underage girls to engage in sexual acts with Epstein and his powerful associates. Jane Doe 43 claims she was one of the many young victims ensnared in this network, suffering serious emotional and physical harm as a result.The lawsuit paints a picture of an organized, high-functioning operation where each defendant played a specific role in maintaining Epstein's trafficking enterprise. Maxwell is described as the primary enabler who helped lure and manipulate girls, while Kellen, Groff, and Malyshev are portrayed as essential logistical coordinators who scheduled encounters, managed Epstein's properties, and ensured a steady supply of victims. By demanding a jury trial, Jane Doe 43 is seeking accountability not only from Epstein's estate but also from the living co-conspirators who, she alleges, helped facilitate the abuse and enabled his crimes to continue for years without interruption.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - RansomeComplaint - Final for Filing

Vetted: The UFO Sleuth
Shocking Allegations Against Steven Greer

Vetted: The UFO Sleuth

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 7, 2025 12:42


Patrick discusses shocking allegations against Steven Greer.

RNZ: Checkpoint
Allegations of over-crowding, soiled beds in respite care

RNZ: Checkpoint

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 7, 2025 6:59


A woman who has moved her elderly parents out of multiple rehab and respite facilites because of serious concerns, including over-crowding, mistakes with medication and unchanged soiled bedding, said sweeping reform is needed in aged care. The woman, we're calling Sandy for privacy reasons, said earlier this year her father, who has dementia, was discharged from a hosptial in the middle of the night in his pyjamas because there was no longer a bed for him. Sandy spoke to Lisa Owen.

The Brian Kilmeade Show Free Podcast
Alan Wilson responds to Nancy Mace's allegation: Categorical lie

The Brian Kilmeade Show Free Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 6, 2025 15:02


Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Kendall And Casey Podcast
State Rep Craig Haggard joins to discuss AI deepfake allegations

Kendall And Casey Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 6, 2025 10:36 Transcription Available


Indiana State Rep. Craig Haggard, whose wife is allegedly the victim of an AI topless deepfake video, joins Kendall and Casey to discuss the controversy.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Kendall And Casey Podcast
Statehouse Happenings: AI Porn Allegations Rock Statehouse

Kendall And Casey Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 6, 2025 29:50 Transcription Available


Allegations that employees in the Lt. Governor's Office were sharing artificial intelligence pornography of a state lawmaker's wife has turned the statehouse upside down. Veteran journalist Tom Lobianco has reported State Representative Craig Haggard's wife was the victim. Lt. Governor Micah Beckwith has denied the allegations and claimed he investigated and cleared the individuals. With law enforcement apparently now involved, Rob Kendall, Jim Merritt and Abdul-Hakim Shabazz explore one of the most bizarre stories to ever hit Indiana politics and government. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The Epstein Chronicles
In Their Own Words: Jane Doe 43 And Her Allegations Against Jeffrey Epstein And The Core 4 (Part 1) (8/6/25)

The Epstein Chronicles

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 6, 2025 11:18


In this lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, Jane Doe 43 accuses Jeffrey Epstein and several of his closest associates—Ghislaine Maxwell, Sarah Kellen, Lesley Groff, and Natalya Malyshev—of participating in and facilitating Epstein's long-running sex trafficking operation. The complaint, brought through her legal counsel, alleges that the defendants were not only aware of the abuse but were active participants in grooming, recruiting, and coercing underage girls to engage in sexual acts with Epstein and his powerful associates. Jane Doe 43 claims she was one of the many young victims ensnared in this network, suffering serious emotional and physical harm as a result.The lawsuit paints a picture of an organized, high-functioning operation where each defendant played a specific role in maintaining Epstein's trafficking enterprise. Maxwell is described as the primary enabler who helped lure and manipulate girls, while Kellen, Groff, and Malyshev are portrayed as essential logistical coordinators who scheduled encounters, managed Epstein's properties, and ensured a steady supply of victims. By demanding a jury trial, Jane Doe 43 is seeking accountability not only from Epstein's estate but also from the living co-conspirators who, she alleges, helped facilitate the abuse and enabled his crimes to continue for years without interruption.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - RansomeComplaint - Final for FilingBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The Epstein Chronicles
In Their Own Words: Jane Doe 43 And Her Allegations Against Jeffrey Epstein And The Core 4 (Part 2) (8/6/25)

The Epstein Chronicles

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 6, 2025 16:55


In this lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, Jane Doe 43 accuses Jeffrey Epstein and several of his closest associates—Ghislaine Maxwell, Sarah Kellen, Lesley Groff, and Natalya Malyshev—of participating in and facilitating Epstein's long-running sex trafficking operation. The complaint, brought through her legal counsel, alleges that the defendants were not only aware of the abuse but were active participants in grooming, recruiting, and coercing underage girls to engage in sexual acts with Epstein and his powerful associates. Jane Doe 43 claims she was one of the many young victims ensnared in this network, suffering serious emotional and physical harm as a result.The lawsuit paints a picture of an organized, high-functioning operation where each defendant played a specific role in maintaining Epstein's trafficking enterprise. Maxwell is described as the primary enabler who helped lure and manipulate girls, while Kellen, Groff, and Malyshev are portrayed as essential logistical coordinators who scheduled encounters, managed Epstein's properties, and ensured a steady supply of victims. By demanding a jury trial, Jane Doe 43 is seeking accountability not only from Epstein's estate but also from the living co-conspirators who, she alleges, helped facilitate the abuse and enabled his crimes to continue for years without interruption.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - RansomeComplaint - Final for FilingBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Positively Uncensored
The Ultimatum S3 Mariah & Caleb's Breakup: Allegations of Ab**e

Positively Uncensored

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 5, 2025 14:35


I've waited to formally record on Mariah and Caleb's breakup as he began posting his version of events early July, and I was waiting to hear Mariah address his claims and share her experience of the relationship. After watching Caleb's videos and taking Mariah's experience into context, I truly feel he was trying to 'get ahead' of her sharing her truth and try to dismantle her character and credibility. Watch my full TikTok here (with the screenshots from Mariah's post): https://www.tiktok.com/@positivelyuncensored/video/7534489195247619342?is_from_webapp=1&sender_device=pc&web_id=7366740793853904415Follow me on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@positivelyuncensored?is_from_webapp=1&sender_device=pcSubscribe to the podcast on Spotify and leave a 5-star review if you enjoyed this episode!

Zolak & Bertrand
Sign Stealing Allegations Against the Red Sox Clear the Benches // Should We Be Worried About Drake Maye's Turnover Habits? // Key Players For Patriots This Year- 8/4 (Hour 1)

Zolak & Bertrand

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 4, 2025 44:25


(00:00) Beetle, McKone and Dondero start today's show LIVE from Patriot’s training camp down in Foxborough as the team prepares for another padded practice; We touch on the Red Sox and how they’re looking after an uneventful trade deadline. (15:30) The crew discusses the cheating allegations that cleared the benches this weekend between the Red Sox and Astros. (23:48) We talk about the Patriots in stadium practice Friday night and reports that Drake Maye struggled in his performance. (33:11) The guys finish the hour discussing the key players for the Patriots this year; We take calls and reactions from the past hour. This episode of Zolak & Bertrand is brought to you in part by Profluent. https://go.happinessexperiment.com/begin-aff-o1-page2-107890-365938?am_id=podcast2025&utm_source=podcast&utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=michael

Beyond The Horizon
In Their Own Words: Jane Doe 1 And Jane Doe 2 And Their Allegations Against Jeffrey Epstein (8/4/25)

Beyond The Horizon

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 4, 2025 15:01


In this civil complaint filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, plaintiffs Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 allege that they were sexually abused and trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein and his associates while they were minors. The complaint is brought against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and a group of unidentified defendants labeled as “Sue Roe” and “Roes 2–10,” believed to have played roles in facilitating, enabling, or directly participating in the abuse. The plaintiffs claim that Epstein used his wealth, power, and network of co-conspirators to lure them into environments where they were manipulated and coerced into sexual acts, often under false pretenses such as employment or mentorship opportunities.The complaint outlines how Epstein's trafficking scheme functioned through a coordinated network that exploited young and vulnerable girls, with the plaintiffs seeking damages for the severe psychological, emotional, and physical harm they endured. It alleges that Epstein's associates—including unnamed individuals still unknown to the plaintiffs—helped maintain this system and continued to shield his conduct even after his 2008 conviction. The lawsuit demands a jury trial and aims to hold not only Epstein's estate accountable but also the living enablers who allegedly perpetuated or benefited from the abuse.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.521195.1.0.pdf

Beyond The Horizon
In Their Own Words: Jane Doe 1 And Jane Doe 2 And Their Allegations Against Jeffrey Epstein (8/4/25)

Beyond The Horizon

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 4, 2025 15:01


In this civil complaint filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, plaintiffs Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 allege that they were sexually abused and trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein and his associates while they were minors. The complaint is brought against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and a group of unidentified defendants labeled as “Sue Roe” and “Roes 2–10,” believed to have played roles in facilitating, enabling, or directly participating in the abuse. The plaintiffs claim that Epstein used his wealth, power, and network of co-conspirators to lure them into environments where they were manipulated and coerced into sexual acts, often under false pretenses such as employment or mentorship opportunities.The complaint outlines how Epstein's trafficking scheme functioned through a coordinated network that exploited young and vulnerable girls, with the plaintiffs seeking damages for the severe psychological, emotional, and physical harm they endured. It alleges that Epstein's associates—including unnamed individuals still unknown to the plaintiffs—helped maintain this system and continued to shield his conduct even after his 2008 conviction. The lawsuit demands a jury trial and aims to hold not only Epstein's estate accountable but also the living enablers who allegedly perpetuated or benefited from the abuse.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.521195.1.0.pdf

Morning Wire
Clinton Russiagate Allegations & Trump's Tariff Deadline | 8.1.25

Morning Wire

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 1, 2025 17:04


New evidence in the Russia collusion hoax leads back to Hilary Clinton, Trump's long-awaited deadline to make a deal or face tariffs arrives, and a Massachusetts police training identifies Moms for Liberty as a hate group. Get the facts first with Morning Wire. - - - Wake up with new Morning Wire merch: https://bit.ly/4lIubt3 - - - Today's Sponsors: EarnIn - Type in Morning Wire under PODCAST when you sign up for EarnIn today by downloading in the Google Play or Apple App Store. ZocDoc - Find and instantly book a top-rated doctor today. Visit https://Zocdoc.com/WIRE #sponsored - - - Privacy Policy: https://www.dailywire.com/privacy morning wire,morning wire podcast,the morning wire podcast,Georgia Howe,John Bickley,daily wire podcast,podcast,news podcast Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Verdict with Ted Cruz
BONUS POD: Pelosi Under Fire as Trump Slams ‘Disgraceful' Stock Gains

Verdict with Ted Cruz

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 31, 2025 11:02 Transcription Available


Allegations by Donald Trump: Former President Donald Trump is quoted calling for an investigation into Nancy Pelosi, accusing her of using insider information to amass wealth through stock trading. He claims Pelosi has achieved returns “practically in the history of Wall Street” and suggests this is due to her access to non-public information. Financial Discrepancies Highlighted: Pelosi’s government salary is cited as $174,000/year, yet her net worth is reported to have grown from $114.7 million in 2018 to potentially $413 million by 2024. The file references sources like OpenSecrets, Investopedia, and The Times to support these figures. Paul Pelosi reportedly earned between $7.8 million and $42.5 million in 2024 from stock trades. Stock Performance: The Pelosi portfolio allegedly returned 54% in 2024, outperforming the S&P 500’s 25% gain. Notable trades included early investments in Nvidia and Palo Alto Networks, and timely sales of Microsoft and Visa. Pelosi’s Response: In a CNN interview with Jake Tapper, Pelosi deflects the insider trading question, emphasizing her focus on the 60th anniversary of Medicaid. She denies wrongdoing, stating: “I’m not into it. My husband is,” and accuses Trump of “projecting.” Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. Thanks for Listening #seanhannity #hannity #marklevin #levin #charliekirk #megynkelly #tucker #tuckercarlson #glennbeck #benshapiro #shapiro #trump #sexton #bucksexton#rushlimbaugh #limbaugh #whitehouse #senate #congress #thehouse #democrats#republicans #conservative #senator #congressman #congressmen #congresswoman #capitol #president #vicepresident #POTUS #presidentoftheunitedstatesofamerica#SCOTUS #Supremecourt #DonaldTrump #PresidentDonaldTrump #DT #TedCruz #Benferguson #Verdict #maga #presidenttrump #47 #the47morningupdate #donaldtrump #trump #news #trumpnews #Benferguson #breaking #breakingnews #morningupdateYouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruzSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis
Government Corruption Exposed, John Solomon Breaks Down the Russia Collusion Allegations, Ghislaine Maxwell's Immunity Bid & The View's Liberal Bias

Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 31, 2025 42:16


Tonight's rundown: Hey BillOReilly.com Premium and Concierge Members, welcome to the No Spin News for Wednesday July 30, 2025. Stand Up for Your Country.  Talking Points Memo: Bill argues that people believe what they want, citing the right's view that the Russia collusion story was a corrupt, government-led effort ignored by the left. John Solomon, CEO and Editor-in-Chief of Just the News, joins the No Spin News to weigh in on the unraveling Russia collusion claims and what is known about the involvement of Democrats like Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton in the story. Will Ghislaine Maxwell be able to seek a deal in exchange for her congressional testimony? A new report states that one-third of American adults had a mental illness or substance use disorder in 2024. In 2025, The View has hosted 102 liberal guests without featuring a single conservative. Final Thought: Kamala Harris' announcement, plus the top movies this summer. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

No Jumper
The NJ Show #363: 4xtra Disses No Jumper, Crazy No Jumper Allegations, Free Gilbert Arenas

No Jumper

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 31, 2025 143:15


Shout out to all our members who make this content possible, sign up for only $5 a month    / @nojumper   Check out e420 app for deals Apple: https://spn.so/g6gbid5j Google: https://spn.so/104g2yp6 use code NOJUMPER for $$ off New episode of the No Jumper Show! Follow Adam22:   / adam22    / adam22    / adam22   adam22bro on Snapchat ----- Get the latest news & videos http://nojumper.com CHECK OUT OUR ONLINE STORE!!! https://shop.nojumper.com/ NO JUMPER PATREON   / nojumper   CHECK OUT OUR NEW SPOTIFY PLAYLIST https://open.spotify.com/playlist/5te... Follow us on SNAPCHAT   / 4874336901   Follow us on SPOTIFY: https://open.spotify.com/show/4z4yCTj... iTunes: https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/n... Follow us on Social Media:   / 4874336901    / nojumper    / nojumper    / nojumper    / nojumper   JOIN THE DISCORD:   / discord   Follow Adam22:   / adam22    / adam22    / adam22   adam22bro on Snapchat Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Verdict with Ted Cruz
BONUS POD: Worst of the Worst: ICE Targets Convicted Child Predators in Houston Sweep

Verdict with Ted Cruz

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 29, 2025 15:40 Transcription Available


1. ICE Arrests in Houston U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) arrested 214 illegal aliens in the Houston, Texas area over a six-month period. All individuals were charged or convicted of sex offenses involving minors. This number exceeds the total arrests for similar offenses in the entire previous fiscal year (211 arrests). The arrests are attributed to a multi-agency targeting initiative launched under the Trump administration, aimed at removing “the worst of the worst” criminal aliens. Notable Arrests Highlighted Jesus Coutirez (67, Mexico): Convicted of aggravated sexual assault of a child; deported. George Zebra (48, Mexico): Convicted of multiple child sex offenses; deported. Manuel Antonio Castro (37, El Salvador): Convicted of sexual assault of a minor; in custody pending deportation. Jose Mesa (40, Mexico): Convicted of theft and sexual assault of a child; deported. Sergio Rolando (45, Mexico): Convicted of DWI and aggravated sexual assault of a child; deported. Agencies Involved ICE collaborated with multiple federal and local agencies including: FBI ATF DEA U.S. Customs and Border Protection U.S. Marshals Diplomatic Security Services 2. Criticism of Government Programs The latter part of the document shifts to a political critique of past Democratic administrations, particularly: The “Obama phone” program (Lifeline), which provided subsidized phones to low-income individuals. Allegations of fraud and abuse in the program, including a case where a Florida CEO was sentenced to prison and fined $128 million for defrauding the government. The piece connects this to broader claims of government waste and corruption, especially under President Obama. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. Thanks for Listening #seanhannity #hannity #marklevin #levin #charliekirk #megynkelly #tucker #tuckercarlson #glennbeck #benshapiro #shapiro #trump #sexton #bucksexton#rushlimbaugh #limbaugh #whitehouse #senate #congress #thehouse #democrats#republicans #conservative #senator #congressman #congressmen #congresswoman #capitol #president #vicepresident #POTUS #presidentoftheunitedstatesofamerica#SCOTUS #Supremecourt #DonaldTrump #PresidentDonaldTrump #DT #TedCruz #Benferguson #Verdict #maga #presidenttrump #47 #the47morningupdate #donaldtrump #trump #news #trumpnews #Benferguson #breaking #breakingnews #morningupdateYouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruzSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.