Podcasts about fuct

5 'Fuct' Friday 13th December - Watch the video here: https://youtube.com/live/ECHqH40_ZloBook a video call with me or join the movers Q&A club here: https://buymeacoffee.com/mhwc/extrasSteepest decline in job vacancies in 4 yearshttps://www.rec.uk.com/our-view/news/press-releases/report-jobs-steep-reduction-permanent-staff-placements-temp-market-decline-easesRayner's disastrous self-contradictory interview on housinghttps://x.com/SkyNews/status/18656833540891116025 yr mortgage rates jumphttps://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2024/12/09/five-year-mortgages-jump-most-year-rachel-reeves-budget/RICS November Surveyhttps://www.rics.org/content/dam/ricsglobal/documents/market-surveys/November_2024_RICS_UK_Residential_Market_Survey.pdfEconomy Contracts in Novemberhttps://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/grossdomesticproductgdp/bulletins/gdpmonthlyestimateuk/october2024Planning Reform Intentions Publishedhttps://www.gov.uk/government/publications/planning-reform-working-paper-planning-committeesSupport the showFollow me on X for daily updates: https://x.com/moving_charlie Talk to my hand picked conveyancing partners here: https://mhwc.co.uk/conveyancingCheck out our national property listings on bestagent.co.uk if you're looking for a new home or need an agent to sell or let your existing home. If you need a mortgage, talk to my hand picked, trusted mortgage team here: https://mhwc.co.uk/mortgageAll my other links: https://linktr.ee/movinghomewithcharlieFor my estate agency podcasts, visit https://linktr.ee/bestagentIf you're an estate agent, make sure you're getting your free telephone leads as well as viewing and vendor leads by joining https://bestagent.co.uk/agents

We spend a whole hour telling “Fuct or Fiction” stories Pup Tango, Pup Cylon, Coop Mythos, tell the naughtiest stories, cum along for story time!! This is a kink and fetish focused queer podcast for adults over 18 that expresses sexually explicit stories that could make many people uncomfortable so please listen with caution and care, not just another gay podcast. All our links -> thempups.com --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/them-pups/message

Pup Cylon and Pup Tango finish up their 3 part Fuct or Fiction story telling time - this is a NSFW 18 plus podcast that discusses explicit sexual situations through the lens of queerness with Kink and Fetish centered themes, not just for pups, also for Bears, Cubs, Jocks, Bros, Daddies, And those guys next door too!! Not just another gay podcast!! Listen if you dare. The podcast your friends are embarrassed to admit they listen to. All our links - > thempups.com --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/them-pups/message

Pup Cylon and Pup Tango really kick off the freshly named “Fuct or Fiction” segment, in this episode you get Cylon's Fuct or Fiction story. This is a sexually explicit podcast that is not safe for work, intended for adults 18 years of age or older, we are sex and body positive gender expansive queer adult content creators who share our stories and give our perspectives on all things kink, fetish, and queerness… come along for the ride! Not just another gay podcast. All our links -> thempups.com --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/them-pups/message

Episode 26: Gio & VIG wrap up all the A-League Men's action in Revolutionised Round-Up, dissect the first week of the A-League Women's Finals, and our famous FUCT or FICTION segment is back. Update on the BMW (Brendan "Machine" Wyatt) - Brendan finished his mammoth 160km (well 170km in the end) run for Lily in 17hrs 14mins, to absolutely smash his target of 19hrs. Brendan has raised over $16K, to help raise awareness around Cerebrovascular disease, in particular, Arteriovenous Malformation (AVM). All proceeds go directly to Brain Foundation Australia and any contribution is widely appreciated. Help get BMW to $20K - https://www.mycause.com.au/p/299799/1... Hope you enjoy the show!

Giant's interview with Alysha Nett. Recorded at Alysha's home near Kansas City, MO on August 18, 2022. Includes interjections by her partner Mike Fuentes. Topics discussed include: Growing up near Wichita, creepy basements, tornados, Varsity sports, drunk at school, country girl stuff, MTV, music videos, Britney Spears, MuchMusic, Real World San Francisco, Wichita State, Woodstock doc, New Metal, male-dominated family, cinematography, Hardcore, Napster, MySpace, fashion, thrifting, youth sizes, Paris style, Fast Fashion, changing perceptions of tattooed women, “Lower Back Tattoo”, encouraged by tattooed father, Sabina Kelley, full suits, perceptions of tattooed people, hiding tattoos when helpful, balance of a bust, negative space, symmetrical tattoo placement, Junkie Style, My Little Pony, Lauren Windsor, cosmetology school, working at a salon in Wichita, Model Mayhem, Flickr, Tumblr, traveling as a model, Chicago, 17 in New York City, internship at a brokerage firm, hustling to achieve a goal, incentives, Waldorf Astoria, trading up, changes in image search, modeling for skate/streetwear brands, Philadelphia, the Chinatown bus, Mutter Museum, summers in LA, Moose Limited, working as a buyer, Fuct ad, monetizing/influencing, being a boss, Seasonless Southern California, anxiety, The Hundreds warehouse, REBEL8, move to San Diego, hosting SoundDiego on NBC, bus touring, meeting Mike Fuentes (Pierce the Veil), The Law of Attraction, The California Struggle, detoxing from social media during pandemic, creating healthy boundaries, sensuality, consistency, “brand-safe”, losing sense of self, moving to suburban Kansas City, daily routine, Lightroom and Photoshop, iMovie, Reels, tattoo vs lifestyle feeds, trust your gut and The Block Button.

Sonny is back with a brand new Nitrous Radio! This week Sonny is running down the madness that takes place during episodes 2&3 of WCW Nitro from 1996!

So this episode really got away from us, we did so much to bring it back, having a lot of technical difficulties with the new equipment but while we did get to talk we got into Ron White and this dope gift hylton got from a close friend and the similarities between Action Bronson & Matty Matheson, we make our case to have Matty on the pod and what meal hylton would want to make for him! Sorry for all the problems but we still hope you enjoy! Follow us on Instagram:@somepeoplesuckpod@thisisthehomie@_hylty

This girl has layers! And we peel 'em back!

First 25 minutes, full episode on patreon.com/contain Freeform conversation with the mimetic artist/designer and FUCT collaborator Been Shill. We discuss the time he sent a lewd paintings to Jerry Saltz, the Waco Siege, and the 1996 campaign finance controversy, haphazardly trying to draw parallels between two major events of the 1990's and the present. Al Gore being funded by drug brothels in Macaw? You bet! This is non-talking, soothing passive information on billionaire Indonesian families and David Koresh, modern day religious experiments, the Hsi Lai Temple funding scandal, and more. This is ADHD ASMR.

Recorded 2020-12-03 20:01:04 Tracklisting: * Spor - If You Cry * QO & Trilo - Push It To The Limit * Optiv & BTK - Malfunction (State of Mind Remix) * The Sect - Killa Humans * Raiden - Type 0 * LOOH - Kislota * Mindscape feat. Kryptomedic - One Sound (Rido Remix) * Current Value - Loner (Mindscape Remix) * Robyn Chaos & Fortitude - Broadmoor Blues (The Sect Remix) * Cooh & Fragz - Vitamin * Donny - The Climb * D Kay & Lee - Wax'd VIP (D Kay Remix) * Neonlight - Project Flare * Evol Intent - Red Soil (TBT Remaster) * Cooh - Melo Die (VIP) * Counterstrike - Stalker * Xenon - Bionic Love Affair * GOH - To The Core * QO & The Clamps - Krieg * Pythius & Black Sun Empire - Heresy * Phace & Spor - Dying of the Light * Black Sun Empire & State Of Mind - Bad * Counterstrike - Fear Division Destruction * Homeboy - Ghost Protocol * Current Value - Dark Rain (Remix) * SPL - Distance * DJ Trace - Template * Audio & Dylan - The Birth & The Death * GOH - Propagation * InsideInfo - Spychase * Rhaoul - Willow (Inhumanoid Remix) * SPL - Bristol Transmission * Dub Elements - Navegante * Counterstrike - Against the Grain * T.Z.A. - Fuct * The Panacea feat. Goldberg Variations & Untergang - Ryse & Shiiine (Cooh Remix) * Propaganda - Visionary * Current Value - Matchfit * Aeph & Maztek - Hypnotize * Counterstrike - Ready For The Pain * DJ Hidden - Mind Prison (Extended Version) * Donny & Katharsys - Cause & Effect * Diode - Psyche * Signs - Vermin (Jade Remix) * DJ Hidden - Scry 7734-5335 - 345 * Donny & Katharsys - God's Fucking Plan * Counterstrike - White Light * Limewax - Natural * Forbidden Society - Demons (DJ Hidden Remix) * Technical Itch - Death Jazz * Donny & Current Value - Nightmare Man * Terror[east] & TRN18 - The Last Day * DJ Hidden - Blind Universe * Fragz & Hallucinator - Bloodpath * Dolphin - Phonaesthetica * Rhaoul - Molten Core * DJ Hidden - Einstein * Dolphin - Hollow Ground * AK-Industry & NeverQuiet - Nekromongers (Forbidden Society Remix) * Sinister Souls - Let Me In * Switch Technique - Exo * Counterstrike & Cooh - Crowd Surfer (The Outside Agency Remix) * Meander - Khanivore * Dither - Alien Resistance (Sei2ure Remix) * DJIPE - The Daily Grind * The DJ Producer - Can't Describe It (Finally) * Art Of Fighters - Fuck You! (Detest "Walk With Me In Hell" Remix) * Deathmachine - Sonar * DJIPE - Combine 17 * Dolphin - Runnin' Out Of CREAM * Undead Roniin - Mutated Core * Dolphin - Outlier * The DJ Producer - Paradise Is Never (Paradise Found 2017 Refix) * Stantekk - Rabbi Jacob (Wan Bushi Rave Remix) * Amiga Shock Force - Junglism * Hellfish - Dogfish * Dolphin - Knuckle Dragger * Khaoz Engine - Amenz Inforzment Killer Download, Distribute, and Donate!

stephee and emilie cover season 1 episode 7 of the x-files, "ghost in the machine."  --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/stephee-emilie/support

In this episode about the third and final single from FUCT, we pick a relatively short line from the song (it happens to be Erin's favorite) and then try to pick apart what it does and does not imply. Listen in fascination as James KEEPS taking swings at it. (This is James typing) But by the end, it is an EXCELLENT analysis of an EXCELLENT song. Theme Song: "You Can't Fail" by Density & Time

オーディオブックの比較とファクトフルネスの感想 --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/edge7/message

This was one of the songs that we skipped on the acoustic EP, because we wanted to talk about it in the context of FUCT. And we get INTO it. Also included: basically a full rundown of the movie Dirty Dancing, a STARTLING REALIZATION about this song's true meaning, Patrick Swayze's butt. Theme music: "You Can't Fail" by Density & Time

We actually get to, and stick to, the point in this episode, which means it's a shorter one. We're talking about the second track on FUCT, a song that is a good transition from the first track to the third one. It's also an official Thnks Fr Th Lrcs Favored Track from this album (we all like it a lot.) Theme Music: "You Can't Fail" by Density & Time

My guest this week is Tull Price, co-founder of FEIT.Tull and I discuss starting a streetwear brand before he was 20, pioneering laceless sneakers at Royal Elastics, finding joy in life’s struggles, loving beginnings, and learning from the past to create a more sustainable future.NOTES(1:10) Royal Elastics(19:13) Offspring (store)(19:55) Richard Wharton(21:24) Goldie(22:05) K-Swiss(47:25) Visvim(47:59) Burton // Gravis (50:10) Chris Gibbs (Blamo! Interview)(55:20) Hiroshi Fujiwara(55:32) Stussy(55:59) XLarge(56:17) FUCT(56:24) Fresh Jive(57:09) No Fear(58:52) CCS Skate Catalogue(59:30) Supreme**This episode is brought to by 3sixteen**Want even more Blamo? Join the BlamFam on Patreon and get access to additional interviews, a community slack, special events, and more!

Artist, video director and internationally acclaimed streetwear designer AJ Falelavaki sits down at the loft for an honest conversation on mental health and thriving creatively after surviving a chaotic childhood. Although there is also plenty of room for laughter and talk about career milestones, like her part in the rise of Antwerp label A Cut Above, being invited by Erik Brunetti to help with the rebranding of FUCT, shooting in Marfa with Larry Clark and the imminent publication of her book ‘Grudges'. An-Josefien Falelavaki on Instagram @anjosefienfalelavaki The Most on Instagram @themostpodcast Mail us questions@wethemost.com More info on www.knotoryus.com  Please subscribe to The Most on Spotify or Apple Podcasts! 

Artist, video director and internationally acclaimed streetwear designer AJ Falelavaki sits down at the loft for an honest conversation on mental health and thriving creatively after surviving a chaotic childhood. Although there is also plenty of room for laughter and talk about career milestones, like her part in the rise of Antwerp label A Cut Above, being invited by Erik Brunetti to help with the rebranding of FUCT, shooting in Marfa with Larry Clark and the imminent publication of her book ‘Grudges'. An-Josefien Falelavaki on Instagram @anjosefienfalelavaki The Most on Instagram @themostpodcast Mail us questions@wethemost.com More info on www.knotoryus.com  Please subscribe to The Most on Spotify or Apple Podcasts! 

This week covers a cavalcade of naughty, immoral and scandalous participants who found a mixed bag of justice before the Supreme Court, including Iancu v. Brunetti (dirty-named clothing designers), Flowers v. Mississippi (racist prosecutors), and Gundy v. U.S. (the U.S. Attorney General's Office). The law starts at the beginning but it certainly doesn't stay that way.

On June 24, 2019, the Supreme Court decided Iancu v. Brunetti, a case considering whether a provision of the Lanham Act prohibiting the registration of “immoral or scandalous” trademarks infringes the First Amendment.Business owner Erik Brunetti applied to register his clothing brand’s trademark, “FUCT,” (pronounced as the individual letters F-U-C-T) but was refused by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) because the Lanham Act prohibits registration of marks that consist of or comprise “immoral or scandalous” matter. The PTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board deemed the mark vulgar and indicated that it carried “negative sexual connotations,” and in association with Brunetti’s website imagery and products conveyed misogyny, depravity, and violence. Brunetti then appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which held that the Lanham Act’s prohibition violated the First Amendment. The Supreme Court then granted certiorari to address the lower court’s invalidation of the federal statute.By a vote of 6-3, the Supreme Court upheld the judgment of the Federal Circuit. In an opinion delivered by Justice Kagan, the Court held that the Lanham Act prohibition on the registration of “immoral” or “scandalous” trademarks constitutes viewpoint discrimination that infringes the First Amendment. Justice Kagan’s majority opinion was joined by which Justices Thomas, Ginsburg, Alito, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh. Justice Alito filed a concurring opinion. Justice Breyer and Chief Justice Roberts filed opinions concurring in part and dissenting in part. Justice Sotomayor filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part, in which Justice Breyer joined.To discuss the case, we have Thomas Berry, Attorney at the Pacific Legal Foundation.

On June 24, 2019, the Supreme Court decided Iancu v. Brunetti, a case considering whether a provision of the Lanham Act prohibiting the registration of “immoral or scandalous” trademarks infringes the First Amendment.Business owner Erik Brunetti applied to register his clothing brand’s trademark, “FUCT,” (pronounced as the individual letters F-U-C-T) but was refused by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) because the Lanham Act prohibits registration of marks that consist of or comprise “immoral or scandalous” matter. The PTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board deemed the mark vulgar and indicated that it carried “negative sexual connotations,” and in association with Brunetti’s website imagery and products conveyed misogyny, depravity, and violence. Brunetti then appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which held that the Lanham Act’s prohibition violated the First Amendment. The Supreme Court then granted certiorari to address the lower court’s invalidation of the federal statute.By a vote of 6-3, the Supreme Court upheld the judgment of the Federal Circuit. In an opinion delivered by Justice Kagan, the Court held that the Lanham Act prohibition on the registration of “immoral” or “scandalous” trademarks constitutes viewpoint discrimination that infringes the First Amendment. Justice Kagan’s majority opinion was joined by which Justices Thomas, Ginsburg, Alito, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh. Justice Alito filed a concurring opinion. Justice Breyer and Chief Justice Roberts filed opinions concurring in part and dissenting in part. Justice Sotomayor filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part, in which Justice Breyer joined.To discuss the case, we have Thomas Berry, Attorney at the Pacific Legal Foundation.

Remember “The Slants,” the Asian-American rock band who were denied a trademark because the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) thought the band’s name was “disparaging”? In Matal v. Tam (2017), the Supreme Court unanimously struck down the Lanham Act’s anti-disparagement provision. (That also resolved the battle over the Washington Redskins’ trademarks.) Well, here we go again, this time with a related provision that prevents registration of “immoral” or “scandalous” marks. It doesn’t take much imagination to figure out what the clothing brand “Fuct” is going for, and the PTO decided it did not pass muster. The Federal Circuit struck down the relevant provision—as it had in Tam—and the Supreme Court again took the case. On June 24, the Supreme Court affirmed 6-3, holding that the Lanham Act prohibition on the registration of “immoral” or “scandalous” trademarks infringes the First Amendment. Thomas Berry, who contributed to an interesting and entertaining amicus brief submitted by the CATO Institute, will share his thoughts on the decision and its implications on free speech and intellectual property.Featuring: Thomas Berry, Attorney, Pacific Legal Foundation Teleforum calls are open to all dues paying members of the Federalist Society. To become a member, sign up on our website. As a member, you should receive email announcements of upcoming Teleforum calls which contain the conference call phone number. If you are not receiving those email announcements, please contact us at 202-822-8138.

Remember “The Slants,” the Asian-American rock band who were denied a trademark because the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) thought the band’s name was “disparaging”? In Matal v. Tam (2017), the Supreme Court unanimously struck down the Lanham Act’s anti-disparagement provision. (That also resolved the battle over the Washington Redskins’ trademarks.) Well, here we go again, this time with a related provision that prevents registration of “immoral” or “scandalous” marks. It doesn’t take much imagination to figure out what the clothing brand “Fuct” is going for, and the PTO decided it did not pass muster. The Federal Circuit struck down the relevant provision—as it had in Tam—and the Supreme Court again took the case. On June 24, the Supreme Court affirmed 6-3, holding that the Lanham Act prohibition on the registration of “immoral” or “scandalous” trademarks infringes the First Amendment. Thomas Berry, who contributed to an interesting and entertaining amicus brief submitted by the CATO Institute, will share his thoughts on the decision and its implications on free speech and intellectual property.Featuring: Thomas Berry, Attorney, Pacific Legal Foundation Teleforum calls are open to all dues paying members of the Federalist Society. To become a member, sign up on our website. As a member, you should receive email announcements of upcoming Teleforum calls which contain the conference call phone number. If you are not receiving those email announcements, please contact us at 202-822-8138.

In late June, the Supreme Court struck down the part of federal trademark law that prohibited the registration of “immoral or scandalous” trademarks. The case was called Iancu v. Brunetti, and it was a follow-up to the court's Matal v. Tam ruling two years ago. In Tam, the justices unanimously ruled that the Lanham Act's ban on disparaging trademarks was a violation of free speech rights under the First Amendment. In Brunetti, the justices used the First Amendment to strike down another ban: the one on “immoral or scandalous” trademarks. Mr. Erik Brunetti sought to register the word mark "FUCT," in connection with clothing. The examining attorney at the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO") refused registration under Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act, on the basis that the mark was vulgar, and therefore "immoral" or "scandalous."  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board ("TTAB") upheld the examining attorney's decision on appeal.  Mr. Brunetti then appealed the TTAB's decision to the Federal Circuit.  The Federal Circuit requested additional briefing from the parties following the Supreme Court's decision in Matal v. Tam, 137 S.Ct. 1744 (2017), which held that Section 2(a)'s prohibition on registering "disparaging" trademarks is unconstitutional under the First Amendment. In December 2017, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a unanimous ruling declaring unconstitutional Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1052(a), which prohibits the registration of "immoral" or "scandalous" trademarks.   The issue came down to a key part of First Amendment law: is the regulation in question viewpoint-neutral? The First Amendment protects speech despite the viewpoint it expresses, so the government (in this case, the USPTO) cannot pick winners and losers because it likes some views better than others. Writing for a 6-3 majority, Justice Elena Kagan concluded that is exactly what the USPTO had been doing in applying the “immoral or scandalous” ban codified in the Lanham Act. Kagan examined the USPTO's treatment of trademarks related to drugs: trademark examiners rejected “YOU CAN'T SPELL HEALTHCARE WITHOUT THC,” “MARIJUANA COLA,” and “KO KANE.” But they approved “D.A.R.E. TO RESIST DRUGS AND VIOLENCE” and “SAY NO TO DRUGS—REALITY IS THE BEST TRIP IN LIFE.” According to the Court, those decisions are clearly viewpoint-based and, therefore, unconstitutional, even if they are “understandable” because of the trademarks' potential to offend. Justice Sotomayor in her dissenting opinion—anticipate a rush to register trademarks containing arguably vulgar, profane, or obscene words and images, with the PTO now powerless to say no. She's right! This ruling means that trademark registrations are open to any type of language. It's the Wild West in the dusty, old town of TrademarkVille. What do you want to say about your product? Does your product's branding have a viewpoint? Registrations at the USPTO now must be open to all, even those marks that will offend. Intellectual Property law seemed to be one area that was stuck in the past, even as technology keeps changing at a rapid pace. Not anymore. Bring on all the words that you may need to cover your ears to hear. They're registrable. Here is a lightly-edited transcript of the video blog: Trademark law generally does not change. In the last two years, however, trademark law has had a couple of really big changes, thanks to the Supreme Court. Several 6-3 decisions have basically allowed, well, some bolder language to come in and well, maybe some trademarks that don't actually treat people very well to be registered. How did this happen? A couple of years ago, a band called The Slants wanted to register the band name as trademark. It was rejected. Why? Because "The Slants" was deemed to be words that disparaged people. Specifically, it was deemed to be an ethnic slur and a trademark under the

In this episode, host, Peter J. Lamont talks about the Supreme Court's recent decision concerning the trademark application filed by the clothing brand FUCT. This is an important ruling because it opens the door to new trademark applications. This case is also a victory for proponents of freedom of speech and the First Amendment.  ----more---- Don't miss this episode of Understanding the Law Radio (UTLRadio)! Want to listen to an episode that you missed?  No problem, all episodes are available on iTunes and on our website, www.utlradio.com  Make sure that you subscribe to the podcast on iTunes so you know when new episodes are available.   If you want even more business or legal information, subscribe to our YouTube channel!   UTLRadio: http://www.UTLRadio.com   Legal: http://www.pjlesq.com   Twitter: @pjllaw   Please subscribe to the Podcast and visit us at www.UTLRadio.com for free business and legal information. UTLRadio is a service of the Law Offices of Peter J. Lamont. The Law Offices of Peter J. Lamont is a premier, New Jersey real estate, business, contract, and litigation law firm with offices in New Jersey and New York. The firm services businesses of all sizes throughout the entire state of New Jersey, including Bergen County, Passaic County, Hudson County, and Essex County, and throughout the five boroughs of New York City. The firm's main office is conveniently located in Wyckoff, New Jersey   Please note: This podcast is for informational purposes only. The statements and opinions contained in this podcast do not constitute legal advice. Additionally, listening to this podcast does not create an attorney/client relationship. If you have a legal issue or concern, you should consult with an attorney in your state.

In Episode 71, we discuss Chris Carr’s call for student loan dismissals, religious groups hitting hurdles with Bibles on POW remembrance tables, SCTOUS empowering a business owner to use the name ‘FUCT,’ and Trump’s support of the ban on flag burning.

We start this episode with a quick review of the Afghan American Conference that Diz and Ali attended. We then talk about the Supreme Court decision regarding the branding of “FUCT.” We discuss the nature and limits of free speech the controversy over obscenity, and the consequences for the public sphere. We link this to...

Case or no case: Dangerous Scooter Compromised Volvo Judge appoints a Special prosecutor in Jussie Smollett's case . Clothing line "FUCT" trademark allowed, wins free speech case

Episode 91 [03:30] - FUCT vs. The Government [17:00] - NEW YORK! [20:00] - YouTuber vs. Podcaster [30:00] - Vetement's "Don't Shoot" Shirt [43:19] - Talking PRIDE Week [50:00] - ALYX and Blockchain ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Follow us here. No Chance Radio Instagram: www.instagram.com/nochanceradio Twitter: twitter.com/nochanceradio

  Welcome to this special episode of Entertainment Law Update SHOW NOTES The mark, as the decision lays out, is supposed to be pronounced as four letters, one after the other, as in “F-U-C-T” (Phonetically “eff-eww-see-tee” and not as one … Read the rest The post Special Episode: Iancu v. Brunetti (USSC deals with FUCT trademark) appeared first on Entertainment Law Update.

Marchesa's co-founder is leaving, the Supreme Court made a decision about FUCT, and Zara's Indian partner has big plans for a cheaper fashion chain. British lawmakers said "nah" to a sustainability proposal, Prada is introducing recycled Nylon, and Amazon is opening a store just for professional beauty artists. Vetements had a runway show at a McDonalds! Plus, we've got another diamond crime. Come hang out! Pop Fashion Links Instagram: @popfashionpodcast Twitter: @JustPopFashion Lisa’s Twitter: @lisatella Kaarin’s Twitter: @truetostyle

Discussed on this week's 5in5: IANCU v. Brunetti Game and Technology Co., Ltd. v. Activision Blizzard, Inc. Beers v. Attorney General of the US Jones v. Davis Cavin v. Michigan Department of Corrections Relevant Articles FUCT Up? Supreme Court Allows Immoral, Scandalous Trademarks Patents: Make Sure Your Idea is Useful, Novel, and Non-Obvious Gun Laws Fifth Amendment Miranda Rights Wiccans Can Pursue Challenge to CA Prisons’ Five Faiths Policy  Legal Limerick of the Week: When the government decides what's profane; Their decisions give me a migraine. The policing of thought; Of what's nice and what's not; Is not logic, it's legerdemain.   Please subscribe, rate, and review our show if you enjoyed the content we provided and learn more at FindLaw.com. Contact us at podcasts@thomsonreuters.com. For more multimedia content on legal matters check out the FindLaw Consumers Youtube Channel.

Suprema Corte americana libera palavrões em marcas e patentes Agência de marcas e patentes havia se recusado a registrar marca com um nome que lembra uma flexão verbal de uma palavra de baixo calão em inglês. A Suprema Corte dos Estados Unidos derrubou, nesta segunda (24), uma antiga regra que proibia que marcas que tivessem palavras e símbolos imorais ou escandalosos. Os juízes tiveram que tomar uma decisão relativa a uma empresa de roupas que tinha um nome controverso. O dono da marca alegou que a proibição violava o direito ao discurso, que é uma garantia constitucional nos EUA. O governo de Donald Trump, favorável à proibição da marca, argumentou que a lei que restringia palavrões em marcas existia desde 1905. O caso em questão é da marca FUCT, da cidade de Los Angeles. O designer Erik Brunetti protocolou o registro do nome comercial, mas a agência de marcas e patentes recusou. A palavra FUCT não existe em inglês, mas tem uma sonoridade próxima de um termo inapropriado. A Suprema Corte manteve uma decisão de uma instância inferior de Justiça, de 2017, que considerava que a proibição era uma violação à garantia constitucional de liberdade de expressão nos Estados Unidos. Na prática, a agência de marcas e patentes não vai mais impedir registros de marcas por profanidade ou imagens gráficas de cunho sexual. A administração de Trump havia avisado que invalidar a lei abriria as portas para um fluxo de palavras extremas e imagens sexualmente gráficas no mercado. Em 2011, quando o protocolo da FUCT foi rejeitado, a agência concluiu que, além da sonoridade da palavra, os produtos tinham imagens explícitas, misóginas e violentas. Brunetti tentou registrar a marca porque seria mais fácil protegê-la de falsificações. O nome é uma saída inteligente, ele afirma, por causa da sua associação a um palavrão, mas também é uma sigla para “amigos em quem não se pode confiar”. Uma instância de Justiça deu razão a ele em 2017. Banda de rock ganhou processo semelhante A decisão desta segunda (24), a Suprema Corte seguiu a mesma lógica de uma decisão de 2017 quando derrubou uma lei que proibia marcas ofensivas. Naquela ocasião, era uma banda de rock dançante que se chama The Slants. Esse é um termo que, originalmente, se refere a algo inclinado, mas que é empregado de maneira pejorativa para descrever pessoas de origem asiática. O conjunto The Slants é formado por músicos de ascendência asiática. A agência de marcas e registros considerou que eles não poderiam ter esse nome, eles entraram com um processo na Justiça e venceram. Cuidados com a pronúncia Na argumentação, no dia 15 de abril, os juízes e advogados tiveram o cuidado de não pronunciarem o palavrão do qual deriva o nome da marca de roupa. Um advogado descreveu a palavra como “o equivalente à flexão verbal no particípio passado de uma profanidade paradigmática de uma palavra profana na nossa cultura”. O juiz Stephen Breyer a chamou de “a palavra em questão”. Os produtos da marca de Brunetti incluem um pulôver com a inscrição “The World is fuct” (o mundo está fuct), calças com os dizeres “We are fuct” (nós estamos fuct) e uma camiseta com a frase “Fuct is free speech, free speech is fuct” (Fuct é a liberdade de expressão, a liberdade de expressão está fuct). Ainda que algumas pessoas fiquem ofendidas por certas palavras, limitar o direito de se expressar é uma medida perigosa, afirmou Brunetti, em uma entrevista em abril. O governo dos EUA argumentou que banir termos vulgares e imagens indecentes não é uma discriminação contra um ponto de vista, e que o governo não deveria ser forçado, pelo sistema de proteção de marcas, a promover palavras e imagens que podem chocar o público. Source: G1 --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/learnportugueseonline/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/learnportugueseonline/support

On this week's post-Porcfest Electric Libertyland Brian starts off giving both cheers and jeers on Donald Trump's decision not to bomb Iran, however with many, MANY caveats. Then Brian gets into a new rape accuser for The Donald in the form of columnist E. Jean Carroll, the Supreme Court's FUCT decision, and Justin Amash's FISA bill getting shot down. Finally Brian looks at a Wayfair walkout and the youngest generation turning against LGBTQ tolerance per latest polling data. Show notes: www.lionsofliberty.com/ell130   Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

On this week's post-Porcfest Electric Libertyland Brian starts off giving both cheers and jeers on Donald Trump's decision not to bomb Iran, however with many, MANY caveats. Then Brian gets into a new rape accuser for The Donald in the form of columnist E. Jean Carroll, the Supreme Court's FUCT decision, and Justin Amash's FISA bill getting shot down. Finally Brian looks at a Wayfair walkout and the youngest generation turning against LGBTQ tolerance per latest polling data. Show notes: www.lionsofliberty.com/ell130  

Follow-up: AL - you heard right, He's baack! @3:49 AL - Church police @10:47 Williamson backs off...a bit @16:18 Evolution - from Terry @25:17 FUCT @33:46 Sandy Hook Law suit @34:36 AJones @36:40 Trump Updates: E Jean Carroll @39:28 SCOTUS Bladensburg cross @47:18 National News: Kids growing horns @48:53 It's Bunk Alternative Medicine: MI bil @58:17 Young Blood @59:29 Dorsey's tent @1:02:11 Halotherapy @1:07:59 State News: OR - senators walk out @1:11:29 Final story: PA Pastor brings Harry Potter to church https://www.foxnews.com/faith-values/harry-potter-jesus-series-pastor-philadelphia-pennsylvania

Pelosi says she told Trump: "You're scaring the children" as President delays immigration raids in ten U.S. cities; Iran warns it's capable of downing more U.S. drones; Two House Committees considering Mueller subpoena; 79 House Dems now support an impeachment inquiry as House Intel member Jim Himes comes out in favor; Magazine columnist accuses Trump of sexual assault; North Korea: Trump letter to Kim Jong Un is "excellent"To learn more about how CNN protects listener privacy, visit cnn.com/privacy

(0:00) Local News Chat: Crosswalks & Blood Drives (19:33) Your Take on Airborne Speed Enforcement (41:56) How Do Refugees Differ From Asylum-Seekers? (1:00:26) Jerry Bader on Supreme Court Decisions (1:31:26) The Takeaway: Politics are Now Personal

TOPICS: Cam Newton offers passenger $1500 for a better seat in coach on an airplane and gets shut down. Will the Democratic Presidential Primary debates be a boom or bust this year? Lil Nas X and Gucci Mane drop new projects. What did you think of each? Supreme Court rules in favor of “FUCT”, says indecent speech can be trademarked. Oregon GOP State Senators continue to refuse to show up to a vote on climate change, blocking it due to their absence. | SEGMENTS | Is it right for a coworker in the cubicle beside you to chomp down on food like pretzels and chips loudly? Why We Have Hope in the World Today: Gary Woodland and Amy Bockerstette, Foulgate + Marcus Stroman.

The House could vote on border money on Tuesday, but the situation is fluid; The Supreme Court okays FUCT.

PTO can not refuse trademarks on grounds that they are ”immoral or scandalous”.

Supreme Court rules that a clothing line called "FUCT" can trademark their name. Is this going to open the doors for more risque names to be trademarked? Does this prove that the Supreme Court is non-partisan. Another officer have been killed 9 miles outside of Saint Louis, responding to a person trying to cash a bad check.

AIPLA Podcast Network's Mike Cushman is joined by Ted Davis, partner at Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, to discuss the Iancu v. Brunetti case. The US Supreme Court, on April 15, heard arguments over whether it should permit the registration of “scandalous” or profane trademarks, a move which critics say would be unconstitutional. The case is an appeal from the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit which in 2017 overturned a decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) and approved registration for the ‘Fuct’ mark.The USPTO refused registration for the mark on the grounds that it was immoral or scandalous under section 2(a) of the Lanham Act. This provision, also known as the disparagement clause, prohibits registration of trademarks covering “immoral, deceptive, or scandalous matter”. The Supreme Court will now rule on whether this clause is in breach of the First Amendment, which guarantees free speech.Support the show (http://www.aipla.org)

ICYMI: The Mo'Kelly Show Presents – Details on the Synagogue shooting in Poway, Joe Biden announcing his candidacy for president, a Nerd-O-Rama review of “Avengers: Endgame AND Washington law making way for human composting on KFI AM 640 – More Stimulating Talk!

Game of Thrones Argument @1:39 - @8:58 Follow-up: Gallop data - 70% to 50% since 1999 @10:45 Measles update: Current number: 626 @11:53 WA state senate passes bill @13:17 New measles rule in NY @13:32 We start with Sri Lanka @14:10 Trump Updates: Full report annotated by WP @18:22 McGahn alone should be cause for impeachment @21:23 Trump sues @21:33 Barr lies @25:49 Sanders lied @29:25 Dems divided @34:18 National News: Dems on Climate Change @51:47 SCOTUS to rule on FUCT clothes line @52:45 State News: Rewire update on blitz laws @56:16 TN - Constitutional amendment to reference almighty god @57:21 WA - The Genesis II Church of Health and Healing @1:02:11 World News: Taiwan presidential hopeful running because Mazu said he should @1:04:30 Final story: BrainEx @1:06:50 NY S'quatch callers @1:10:38

In Episode 83, the crew breaks down the Iancu v. Brunetti trademarking case. If neither of the names ring a bell - Erik Brunetti created popular 90s street/skate brand FUCT and well Iancu is a part of the group fighting against fully allowing Brunetti to make FUCT a legitimate trademarked brand name. The larger conversation turns into that of - what constitutes as offensive in streetwear? Raciness and avant garde attitude is essential to the DIY mentality of where streetwear comes from, but with hyper-sensitive culture focusing in on streetwear's now mainstream appeal where is the line drawn in the sand? We also cover topics like trademarking, legal use acts, and the differences between parodies and bootlegging. Tune in! ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Want to continue the conversation? Follow us on our socials! No Chance Radio Instagram: www.instagram.com/nochanceradio Twitter: twitter.com/nochancepodcast Ryan Corpuz Instagram: www.instagram.com/swanouthere/ Twitter: twitter.com/swanouthere Nathan Lumanlan Instagram: www.instagram.com/natesince95/ Twitter: twitter.com/NateSince95 Melanie Chu Instagram: www.instagram.com/wassupmel Twitter: twitter.com/wassupmel_

Kim Kardashian West is (sort of) following in her father's legal footsteps by becoming a lawyer. A law student is suing his school over his grades. The beef between 50 Cent and Teairra Mari has taken a petty turn. SCOTUS is flirting with the f/word.

Bloomberg News Supreme Court reporter, Greg Stohr, discusses a free speech challenge by the owner of a clothing line known as "FUCT," over the federal government’s rejection of his trademark application. He speaks to Bloomberg’s June Grasso.

Bloomberg News Supreme Court reporter, Greg Stohr, discusses a free speech challenge by the owner of a clothing line known as "FUCT," over the federal government's rejection of his trademark application. He speaks to Bloomberg's June Grasso. Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

It's that time of the week..another PBnJ people! This ended up being a slightly shorter/faster paced show thanks to the final season premiere of Game of Thrones! But you still get the regular helpings this week as always, covering a lot of ground. We got everything from denim panties; smile drinking; cheating in animal competitions; big ass mooseses; and much more. Please don't forget to like/comment/share; email us at PBnJPodcast@gmail.com; visit us on Facebook; view the live stream of this very episode on YouTube; and of course, check out the high quality audio version anywhere you get your podcasts from! We hope you enjoy, and we will see you all next week. iTunes:https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/id1223843538 Google Play Music:https://play.google.com/music/m/Ilz7kgridais42ldnzjkskz5u5u?t=PBnJ_Podcast RSS:https://pbnjpodcast.podbean.com/feed/

Remember “The Slants,” the Asian-American rock band who were denied a trademark because the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) thought the band’s name was “disparaging”? In Matal v. Tam (2017), the Supreme Court unanimously struck down the Lanham Act’s anti-disparagement provision. (That also resolved the battle over the Washington Redskins’ trademarks.) Well, here we go again, this time with a related provision that prevents registration of “immoral” or “scandalous” marks. It doesn’t take much imagination to figure out what the clothing brand “Fuct” is going for, and the PTO decided it did not pass muster. The Federal Circuit struck down the relevant provision—as it had in Tam—and the Supreme Court again took the case. The government argues that it isn’t stopping Fuct from using its name, only declining to register it as a trademark. Under the First Amendment, should federal officials be making calls about what’s “scandalous” or “disparaging.” Ilya Shapiro, lead counsel of an amicus brief for the Cato Institute, P.J. O’Rourke, and other individuals and groups, is attending the April 15 argument and will share his thoughts afterwards. Featuring:Mr. Ilya Shapiro, Director, Robert A. Levy Center for Constitutional Studies, Cato Institute Teleforum calls are open to all dues paying members of the Federalist Society. To become a member, sign up on our website. As a member, you should receive email announcements of upcoming Teleforum calls which contain the conference call phone number. If you are not receiving those email announcements, please contact us at 202-822-8138.

The Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris went up in flames today -- we’ll tell you what we know so far. In the US: 2020 presidential candidates are showing us their donation receipts. We’ll explain why the dollar signs are not all that matters. Also on today’s episode: SCOTUS hears a case about the brand that must not be named, and taxpayers are experiencing Instagram vs. reality: Tax Day edition.  

Remember “The Slants,” the Asian-American rock band who were denied a trademark because the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) thought the band’s name was “disparaging”? In Matal v. Tam (2017), the Supreme Court unanimously struck down the Lanham Act’s anti-disparagement provision. (That also resolved the battle over the Washington Redskins’ trademarks.) Well, here we go again, this time with a related provision that prevents registration of “immoral” or “scandalous” marks. It doesn’t take much imagination to figure out what the clothing brand “Fuct” is going for, and the PTO decided it did not pass muster. The Federal Circuit struck down the relevant provision—as it had in Tam—and the Supreme Court again took the case. The government argues that it isn’t stopping Fuct from using its name, only declining to register it as a trademark. Under the First Amendment, should federal officials be making calls about what’s “scandalous” or “disparaging.” Ilya Shapiro, lead counsel of an amicus brief for the Cato Institute, P.J. O’Rourke, and other individuals and groups, is attending the April 15 argument and will share his thoughts afterwards. Featuring:Mr. Ilya Shapiro, Director, Robert A. Levy Center for Constitutional Studies, Cato Institute Teleforum calls are open to all dues paying members of the Federalist Society. To become a member, sign up on our website. As a member, you should receive email announcements of upcoming Teleforum calls which contain the conference call phone number. If you are not receiving those email announcements, please contact us at 202-822-8138.

Hold on to your butts gang, cuz Brett and Nazim are talking THE WALL!  By way of background, Brett is sick with Kathleen Turner voice and Nazim has one foot on the door with busy weekend plans, so this episode is general coverage about whatever the hell is going on with the government these days, and then a quick and dirty look at Iancu v. Brunetti, which covers free speech and the trademark office.....again.  (Law starts at 04:45).

Note:  The "C" segment of this episode (and the show notes) contain hilarious explicit language in order to discuss a recent development in trademark law.  You've been warned! In the preshow, we tamp down on some unwarranted liberal freakout regarding a recent White House Executive Order regarding the last few fraying strands of our social safety net. After that, we revisit three cases we told you we'd be keeping an eye on.  First, we look at the aftermath of Jane Doe v. Wright, which we first discussed in Episodes 117 and 133.  Back then, we told you about the fate of a single young woman in state custody who was denied her right to an abortion; today, we tell you about the nationwide class action that was just certified in Garza v. Hargan. Next, we revisit Kolbe v. Hogan, which we called a "landmark" case way back in Episode 47.  Find out how a federal district court judge in Massachusetts just applied Kolbe in upholding the Massachusetts ban on assault weapons and large capacity magazines. For our third revisit, we take a look at another trademark case in light of the Slants case (Matal v. Tam) that we first discussed with Simon Tam way back in Episode 33 and reported on Tam's victory before the Supreme Court in Episode 80.  The Slants's victory paved the way for disparaging and offensive trademarks, but what about garden-variety "immoral or scandalous" ones, like FUCT clothing or "Big Dick Nick" towels?  Listen and find out! Finally, we end with the answer to the fiendishly hard Thomas Takes the Bar Exam Question #71 about whether a state can discriminate against out-of-state competitors.  Don't forget to follow our Twitter feed (@Openargs) and like our Facebook Page so that you too can play along with #TTTBE! Recent Appearances None!  If you'd like to have either of us as a guest on your show, drop us an email at openarguments@gmail.com. Show Notes & Links This is Alphr's list of the "15 Best Podcasts of 2018" -- and wow, we're in some good company! You can click here to read the White House Executive Order on "Reducing Poverty in America;" we quoted from Section 5 at the end. We first discussed Jane Doe v. Wright in Episodes 117 and 133. We first told you about Kolbe v. Hogan in Episode 47; now, you can read the Massachusetts decision in Worman v. Healey.  Also, if you like briefs, you can read the petition for certiorari, the State of Maryland's opposition, and the petitioners' reply. We told you about the Slants's case back in our Episode 33 interview with Simon Tam and reported on Tam's Supreme Court win in Episode 80; today, we discuss In re Brunetti, which applies the Matal v. Tam holding to the rest of 15 U.S.C. § 1052(a). Finally, the link you've been waiting for: the Deadspin article about "Big Dick Nick." Support us on Patreon at:  patreon.com/law Follow us on Twitter:  @Openargs Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/openargs/ Don't forget the OA Facebook Community! And email us at openarguments@gmail.com  

Bigger Show welcomes Graham Skipper!

This week’s episode is another installment in our ARTWORK REBELS series in partnership with Guerilla One. Check out the others at www.rebelradio.net. If you don’t know OG Slick, you don’t know LA graffiti. My dude has been famous since the 80s. More precisely, since the Slick x Hex battle at the Levitz furniture factory, which ended up as an early reality show on local TV. He’s gone on to become one of the most noted artists on the West Coast, if not the world, and a creative force behind early streetwear brands Fuct and Third Rail, and is now the proprietor of Big Dick’s Hardware, a graffiti lifestyle brand and store in Gardena, CA. He’s also the designer of the iconic album cover for The Pharcyde’s A Bizarre Ride II the Pharcyde. What you know about that? Slick stops by the studio with Guerilla One’s Eddie Donaldson to talk about his own bizarre ride from Hawaii to the streets of LA to underground superstardom. So many good stories about the golden age. Plus some good lessons for the rest of us: - Choose your friends wisely. And don’t do business with strangers. - Trust your partners (for Slick, that’s his wife). And learn how to separate business from personal. Get it all in right here. *EDM.com Track of the Week: https://soundcloud.com/your_secret/saski-faking-bright

This episode was recorded in part 3 of a Fast and Furious marathon to raise Vin Diesel awareness. Me and The Employee of the Month (Shea) learned how to drift. Join us!

Ammunition Recordings Podcast 016 Download / Subscribe @ SoundCloud Download / Subscribe @ iTunesWho really reads the write ups here when listening to the podcast? I know the only reason I look to the descriptions most of the time is for links. So yeah, find some links here.Other than that, hope you all enjoy the wompy goodness! Apologies for the lack of update in the last few months, been insane busy with Ammunition Recs, Caliber Music, and real life!BIGUP Yanntek for the Exclusive Guest Mix for this installment of the Ammo Podcast!Hope you all enjoy!FIND YANNTEK: - http://www.Soundcloud.com/Yanntek- http://www.Facebook.com/YanntekMusicFIND COFFEY: - http://www.Facebook.com/Coffeystep - http://www.Soundcloud.com/CoffeystepFIND AMMO: - http://www.AmmunitionRecs.com- http://www.Facebook.com/AmmunitionRecordings- http://www.Facebook.com/AmmunitionRecsFIND CALIBER: - http://www.CaliberMusic.com- http://www.Facebook.com/CaliberMusic - http://www.Soundcloud.com/CaliberMusicAmmunition Recordings Podcast 016- Written Tracklist -Coffey Mix00. Emperor - Tonight [Caliber Music Dub] "The Warm Up"01. Rusty K ft Lee-Mon - Devil's Show [Ammunition Dub] 02. Mefjus - Genetic Drift [Rise Audio Dub] 03. Ble3k - Exile [Ammunition Dub] 04. BrainfuzZ - Method Lean [Dub] 05. Isee & Thoran - Urgent Measures [Ammunition] 06. Billain - Batbots [Bad Taste] 07. Christ - Hidden Depth [Ammunition Dub] 08. Soul Intent - Hurt Me [Project 51] 09. Pink Tape - Dissonance Invader [Ammunition] 10. Wreckage Machinery & Mefjus - Zodiac [TrustInMusic Dub] 11. Damage Inc - The Science of Spying [Ammunition Dub] 12. Kung - Brainsmoke [Citrus Dub] 13. Furman - Genesi [Ammunition Dub] 14. Agressor Bunx & Bes - Red Core [TamRecs Dub] 15. Kantyze - Quick Look [State Of Mind Dub] 16. Ford - Magnum [Dub] 17. Marvel - Vendetta [Ammunition Dub]- Yanntek Mix -01. Bowsar & Yanntek - Space Opera [Dub] 02. xKore - Need You 03. Xilent - Memetics 04. Yanntek - Audiosurf [Ammunition] 05. Yanntek - Night Flight [Ammunition] 06. Receptor & Engage - Bio [Black Seeds] 07. Donny - Search & Destroy (Lucio De Rimanez Remix) 08. Coffey Vs. Soulstorm - Synner [Ammunition] 09. Isee & Thoran - Evolution Progress [Ammunition] 10. Xilent - Clear Your Mind 11. Emperor - The Sovereign 12. Kung - Black Lion [Ammunition] 13. Kosheen - Suicide (Receptor Remix) 14. Bcee - Chameleon 15. Yanntek - Wings [Ammunition] 16. T.Z.A. - Fuct 17. Isee & Thoran - Urgent Measures [Ammunition] 18. Yanntek - Ancients Of Future [Ammunition] 19. Xilent - TwiceReleased by: Ammunition Recordings Release/catalogue number: Ammo Podcast 016

This week, Ben and Chris are joined by special guest Josh Tonra to discuss everything from a landmark Supreme Court case that you probably didn’t hear about to plans for another Martix movie.