Podcast appearances and mentions of laurie gilbertson

In 2021, former prosecutor Steve Wood told May the Record Reflect that to grow as a trial advocate, he had to accept that he is “insufferably boring.” What did he mean by that? And, how can it help you grow as an advocate as well? In this self-deprecating but entirely serious conversation, Steve and fellow former prosecutor Laurie Gilbertson talk about the neuroscience of boredom, multisensory engagement in the courtroom, telling a compelling story, and how it all adds up to self-confidence and stronger advocacy for your client.  Topics3:27 What it means to be “insufferably boring” in court5:55 Neuroscience behind boredom9:06 Why trials are boring15:11 Bored judges, bored jurors28:35 Resting postures for hands37:07 Role of storytelling42:42 When storytelling is most important49:36 Repeating yourself without being boring57:27 Confidence1:01:36 Preparation, notes, and delivery1:14:56 Great Hollywood courtroom performances1:21:00 Signoff questionsQuote“Our task as trial lawyers, as I see it, is to do three things. One, admit that we're boring — all of us, all the time. Two, with the aid of people like Laurie, do the things that we can do to be less boring. And then three, never fall prey to the conceit that at any given time a majority of the trier of fact is paying attention. Assume the opposite. But what we can do, most primarily, is introduce change into the courtroom environment. That's our mission.” Steve Wood“. . . what I found often is that jurors who have watched so much tv, who have watched so many movies, who have read legal thrillers, who have maybe listened to true-crime podcasts — some of them, if not many of them, expect to be entertained, and when you, as the attorney, are not kind of doing all these things that Steve is talking about in terms of interjecting that change and keeping them entertained, a lot of the jurors are surprised that court is actually that boring. They expect it to be a lot more interesting.” Laurie GilbertsonResources Steve Wood (bio)Laurie Gilbertson (bio)Top 10 Tips that Make a Difference, with Steve Wood (episode)Thinking with Your Hands: The Surprising Science Behind How Gestures Shape Our Thoughts (book)

In this statutory episode, Laurie Gilbertson, Founder and CEO of Tribeca Blue Consulting, shares her experiences in front of judges, juries, and live television audiences to help clients and their businesses maximize each speaking opportunity.You will discover:- Why communication is central to a founder's success in every industry- Three questions you need to ask before you communicate- How to get feedback on how you communicate
Laurie Gilbertson is a former New York City sex crimes and organized crime prosecutor, television legal analyst, educator, and entrepreneur. As the founder of Tribeca Blue Consulting, she coaches professionals on communicating with clarity, confidence, and creativity in their public speaking, presentations, trial work, and media appearances. Laurie works with clients to develop their personal and professional narratives, discover and hone their unique presentation styles, and craft and curate the stories that keep their audiences listening and wanting to learn more. 
Want to learn more about Laurie Gilbertson's work at Tribeca Blue Consulting? Check out her website at https://www.tribecablueconsulting.com/Mentioned in this episode:Take the Founder's Evolution Quiz TodayIf you're a Founder, business owner, or CEO who feels overworked by the business you lead and underwhelmed by the results, you're doing it wrong. Succeeding as a founder all comes down to doing the right one or two things right now. Take the quiz today at foundersquiz.com, and in just ten questions, you can figure out what stage you are in, so you can focus on what is going to work and say goodbye to everything else.Founder's Quiz

In the podcast "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," Laurie Gilbertson discusses the complexities surrounding the upcoming trial of Richard Allen, who is accused of multiple murders. A central issue is the role of Dr. Monica Walla, a therapist who treated Allen while he was detained. The defense argues that Walla's involvement and her social media activity about the case compromise her objectivity, although Gilbertson suggests this may not be a substantial issue unless her testimony directly impacts Allen's mental state. The conversation delves into Allen's multiple confessions—over 60—including those made under questionable conditions, like solitary confinement, which may affect their reliability. Gilbertson points out that while confessions are typically powerful evidence, their credibility can be challenged based on the defendant's mental state and the conditions under which they were made. The discussion also explores how solitary confinement could contribute to a defendant's instability, raising concerns about cruel and unusual punishment. Gilbertson emphasizes that the outcome will largely depend on how these confessions and related testimonies are presented in court and whether the defense can effectively argue that Allen's confessions were not made with a sound mind. - Richard Allen is on trial for multiple murders, with over 60 confessions made under questionable circumstances. - Dr. Monica Walla, a therapist involved in the case, is accused of compromising her objectivity due to personal interest and social media activity. - The defense may argue that Allen's confessions are unreliable, citing his mental state and conditions in solitary confinement. - Confessions are typically strong evidence, but their reliability is challenged if mental instability is proven. - Solitary confinement's potential psychological impact on Allen could be a significant factor in the defense's argument. - The case underscores the ethical and professional dilemmas involved in legal and psychological assessments. - The trial's outcome may hinge on the effectiveness of presenting and contesting the validity of Allen's confessions. #RichardAllen #MonicaWalla #ConfessionValidity #SolitaryConfinement #LegalDefense #MentalHealthInCourt #MurderTrial Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the podcast "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," Laurie Gilbertson discusses the complexities surrounding the upcoming trial of Richard Allen, who is accused of multiple murders. A central issue is the role of Dr. Monica Walla, a therapist who treated Allen while he was detained. The defense argues that Walla's involvement and her social media activity about the case compromise her objectivity, although Gilbertson suggests this may not be a substantial issue unless her testimony directly impacts Allen's mental state. The conversation delves into Allen's multiple confessions—over 60—including those made under questionable conditions, like solitary confinement, which may affect their reliability. Gilbertson points out that while confessions are typically powerful evidence, their credibility can be challenged based on the defendant's mental state and the conditions under which they were made. The discussion also explores how solitary confinement could contribute to a defendant's instability, raising concerns about cruel and unusual punishment. Gilbertson emphasizes that the outcome will largely depend on how these confessions and related testimonies are presented in court and whether the defense can effectively argue that Allen's confessions were not made with a sound mind. - Richard Allen is on trial for multiple murders, with over 60 confessions made under questionable circumstances. - Dr. Monica Walla, a therapist involved in the case, is accused of compromising her objectivity due to personal interest and social media activity. - The defense may argue that Allen's confessions are unreliable, citing his mental state and conditions in solitary confinement. - Confessions are typically strong evidence, but their reliability is challenged if mental instability is proven. - Solitary confinement's potential psychological impact on Allen could be a significant factor in the defense's argument. - The case underscores the ethical and professional dilemmas involved in legal and psychological assessments. - The trial's outcome may hinge on the effectiveness of presenting and contesting the validity of Allen's confessions. #RichardAllen #MonicaWalla #ConfessionValidity #SolitaryConfinement #LegalDefense #MentalHealthInCourt #MurderTrial Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the podcast "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," Laurie Gilbertson discusses the complexities surrounding the upcoming trial of Richard Allen, who is accused of multiple murders. A central issue is the role of Dr. Monica Walla, a therapist who treated Allen while he was detained. The defense argues that Walla's involvement and her social media activity about the case compromise her objectivity, although Gilbertson suggests this may not be a substantial issue unless her testimony directly impacts Allen's mental state. The conversation delves into Allen's multiple confessions—over 60—including those made under questionable conditions, like solitary confinement, which may affect their reliability. Gilbertson points out that while confessions are typically powerful evidence, their credibility can be challenged based on the defendant's mental state and the conditions under which they were made. The discussion also explores how solitary confinement could contribute to a defendant's instability, raising concerns about cruel and unusual punishment. Gilbertson emphasizes that the outcome will largely depend on how these confessions and related testimonies are presented in court and whether the defense can effectively argue that Allen's confessions were not made with a sound mind. - Richard Allen is on trial for multiple murders, with over 60 confessions made under questionable circumstances. - Dr. Monica Walla, a therapist involved in the case, is accused of compromising her objectivity due to personal interest and social media activity. - The defense may argue that Allen's confessions are unreliable, citing his mental state and conditions in solitary confinement. - Confessions are typically strong evidence, but their reliability is challenged if mental instability is proven. - Solitary confinement's potential psychological impact on Allen could be a significant factor in the defense's argument. - The case underscores the ethical and professional dilemmas involved in legal and psychological assessments. - The trial's outcome may hinge on the effectiveness of presenting and contesting the validity of Allen's confessions. #RichardAllen #MonicaWalla #ConfessionValidity #SolitaryConfinement #LegalDefense #MentalHealthInCourt #MurderTrial Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the podcast "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," Laurie Gilbertson analyzes the trial of Robert Telles, who was found guilty of murdering journalist Jeff German. The conversation focuses on Telles's bizarre defense strategy, which involved promoting a conspiracy theory that numerous entities, including law enforcement and the public administrator's office, were willing to kill a journalist to frame him. This strategy highlighted Telles's inflated sense of self-importance and narcissism, which was evident in his facial expressions and courtroom behavior. Despite the clear lack of evidence supporting his conspiracy claims, the jury took two days to reach a guilty verdict, reflecting the complexity of juror deliberations. The discussion also touches on the unpredictable nature of jury decisions and the psychological nuances involved, such as potential empathy towards defendants who take the stand. Telles's courtroom antics, including wearing a costume that resembled a Halloween outfit, seemed to have played a role in his relatively light sentence. Gilbertson reflects on the challenges faced by prosecutors in presenting a clear narrative to juries, particularly when the defendant's behavior complicates the perception of guilt. The podcast ends with a discussion about Telles's future in prison, suggesting that his personality traits may lead to further complications or even allow him to exploit his legal background. - Robert Telles was found guilty of murdering journalist Jeff German. - Telles's defense strategy included an unfounded conspiracy theory, revealing his narcissistic traits. - The jury's deliberation took two days despite the apparent lack of evidence supporting Telles's claims. - Telles's courtroom behavior and conspiracy theories highlighted his distorted sense of reality. - The discussion explores the complexity of jury dynamics and the unpredictable nature of their decisions. - Telles's eccentric behavior, such as wearing a costume, may have influenced his lighter sentence. - The podcast considers how Telles's personality and legal background might affect his life in prison. #RobertTelles #JeffGerman #ConspiracyTheory #CourtroomDrama #JuryDeliberation #LegalStrategy #MurderTrial Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Why Did The Robert Telles Jury Get Hung Up On A Wig? In the podcast "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," Laurie Gilbertson analyzes the trial of Robert Telles, who was found guilty of murdering journalist Jeff German. The conversation focuses on Telles's bizarre defense strategy, which involved promoting a conspiracy theory that numerous entities, including law enforcement and the public administrator's office, were willing to kill a journalist to frame him. This strategy highlighted Telles's inflated sense of self-importance and narcissism, which was evident in his facial expressions and courtroom behavior. Despite the clear lack of evidence supporting his conspiracy claims, the jury took two days to reach a guilty verdict, reflecting the complexity of juror deliberations. The discussion also touches on the unpredictable nature of jury decisions and the psychological nuances involved, such as potential empathy towards defendants who take the stand. Telles's courtroom antics, including wearing a costume that resembled a Halloween outfit, seemed to have played a role in his relatively light sentence. Gilbertson reflects on the challenges faced by prosecutors in presenting a clear narrative to juries, particularly when the defendant's behavior complicates the perception of guilt. The podcast ends with a discussion about Telles's future in prison, suggesting that his personality traits may lead to further complications or even allow him to exploit his legal background. - Robert Telles was found guilty of murdering journalist Jeff German. - Telles's defense strategy included an unfounded conspiracy theory, revealing his narcissistic traits. - The jury's deliberation took two days despite the apparent lack of evidence supporting Telles's claims. - Telles's courtroom behavior and conspiracy theories highlighted his distorted sense of reality. - The discussion explores the complexity of jury dynamics and the unpredictable nature of their decisions. - Telles's eccentric behavior, such as wearing a costume, may have influenced his lighter sentence. - The podcast considers how Telles's personality and legal background might affect his life in prison. #RobertTelles #JeffGerman #ConspiracyTheory #CourtroomDrama #JuryDeliberation #LegalStrategy #MurderTrial Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the podcast "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," Laurie Gilbertson discusses the unusual narrative testimony given by Robert Telles, who was found guilty of murdering journalist Jeff German. Telles, a former attorney himself, chose to present his story directly to the jury, a rare move in criminal trials. Gilbertson explains that narrative testimony allows a defendant to speak freely without their lawyer's guidance, often because the attorney may suspect or know the testimony could be false. Telles used his time on the stand to push a bizarre narrative involving professional assassins wearing conspicuous clothing, a claim that baffled the court. This strategy raised questions about his grasp on reality and his intention to portray himself as being framed. Gilbertson highlights how the prosecutor managed to counter Telles's claims effectively by focusing on factual inconsistencies and the absurdity of his story. The podcast underscores the challenges and frustrations faced by prosecutors in dealing with defendants who choose to create their own narratives in court, as well as the importance of maintaining control during cross-examination to ensure that only credible evidence is considered by the jury. - Robert Telles, found guilty of murdering Jeff German, gave a rare narrative testimony in court. - Narrative testimony allows defendants to tell their story directly, often without their attorney's active participation. - Telles, a former attorney, insisted on presenting his own version of events, claiming a conspiracy involving professional assassins. - His testimony was filled with bizarre claims, such as assassins drawing attention to themselves with bright clothing. - The prosecutor effectively countered Telles's narrative by highlighting its absurdity and factual inconsistencies. - The discussion highlights the prosecutor's need to manage courtroom dynamics and counter unfounded narratives. - Telles's choice of narrative testimony and his bizarre defense strategy raised doubts about his credibility and mental state. #JeffGerman #RobertTelles #NarrativeTestimony #CourtroomStrategy #LegalAnalysis #ProsecutionChallenges #MurderTrial Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the podcast "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," Laurie Gilbertson discusses the unusual narrative testimony given by Robert Telles, who was found guilty of murdering journalist Jeff German. Telles, a former attorney himself, chose to present his story directly to the jury, a rare move in criminal trials. Gilbertson explains that narrative testimony allows a defendant to speak freely without their lawyer's guidance, often because the attorney may suspect or know the testimony could be false. Telles used his time on the stand to push a bizarre narrative involving professional assassins wearing conspicuous clothing, a claim that baffled the court. This strategy raised questions about his grasp on reality and his intention to portray himself as being framed. Gilbertson highlights how the prosecutor managed to counter Telles's claims effectively by focusing on factual inconsistencies and the absurdity of his story. The podcast underscores the challenges and frustrations faced by prosecutors in dealing with defendants who choose to create their own narratives in court, as well as the importance of maintaining control during cross-examination to ensure that only credible evidence is considered by the jury. - Robert Telles, found guilty of murdering Jeff German, gave a rare narrative testimony in court. - Narrative testimony allows defendants to tell their story directly, often without their attorney's active participation. - Telles, a former attorney, insisted on presenting his own version of events, claiming a conspiracy involving professional assassins. - His testimony was filled with bizarre claims, such as assassins drawing attention to themselves with bright clothing. - The prosecutor effectively countered Telles's narrative by highlighting its absurdity and factual inconsistencies. - The discussion highlights the prosecutor's need to manage courtroom dynamics and counter unfounded narratives. - Telles's choice of narrative testimony and his bizarre defense strategy raised doubts about his credibility and mental state. #JeffGerman #RobertTelles #NarrativeTestimony #CourtroomStrategy #LegalAnalysis #ProsecutionChallenges #MurderTrial Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Laurie Gilbertson is a former New York City sex crimes and organized crime prosecutor, television legal analyst, educator, and entrepreneur. As the owner of Tribeca Blue Consulting, she helps professionals communicate with clarity and confidence in their public speaking, presentations, trial work, and media appearances. Laurie is passionate about helping people present their ideas in creative and persuasive ways that engage their audiences. As a former trial lawyer and television legal analyst, she shares insider's tips and tricks from her experiences in front of judges, juries, and live television audiences to help her clients get the most out of their presentations and public speaking. Laurie works with her clients through group training and one-on-one coaching to develop their personal and professional narratives, craft the hooks that draw their audiences in, and curate the stories that keep them listening and wanting to learn more. This leads to more clarity and confidence in their communications and more attention and success for them and their businesses. Laurie is a graduate of Cornell University and American University, Washington College of Law. She traded big city life for the beauty of Colorado when she and her family moved to Denver from New York several years ago. You can find her reading in her backyard, running (slowly but surely) in the park, hiking in the mountains, or watching a sporting event or dance competition involving her three awesome teenagers. You can learn more at https://www.tribecablueconsulting.com/about

Laurie Gilbertson shares valuable insights on the power of storytelling and communication. Here's a summary of the key points discussed:The Importance of Storytelling: Stories are powerful tools that connect us emotionally and help us make sense of the world. They are everywhere in our daily lives, from casual conversations to TV shows and books.- Becoming a Good Storyteller: To become a good storyteller, start paying attention to the stories around you and the ones you tell frequently. Write down five favorite stories and analyze their core themes and emotions.- Unleashing Creativity: Storytelling allows for creativity and personal style to shine through, making each story unique. Embrace your creativity and authenticity to connect with your audience genuinely.- Empowering Others: Through storytelling, you can inspire and empower others without making them feel like they're being sold to. Connect with your audience on a personal level by sharing relatable stories tied back to your business's why and values. Key Takeaways:Stories are everywhere in our lives and can be powerful tools for communication.Start by being aware of the stories around you and analyzing their core themes and emotions.Embrace creativity and authenticity in your storytelling to connect with your audience genuinely.Use storytelling to inspire and empower others while staying true to your business's values and purpose. Connect with Laurie Gilbertson:https://www.linkedin.com/in/lauriegilbertson/  https://tribecablueconsulting.com Free Resources:Make Your FB Profile Profitable - https://shellyniehaus.ck.page/facebookThe Business Power Hour - https://shellyniehaus.ck.page/businesspowerhourEmail Quickstart Guide - https://shellyniehaus.ck.page/emailguideWeekly Women Entrepreneurs In Prayer Call - https://shellyniehaus.ck.page/prayercall Connect with Shelly Niehaus:Website: https://coaching.shellyniehaus.com/Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/educated.empowered.inspiredInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/shellyniehaus/LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/shelly-niehaus-7680652/Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@shellyniehauscoaching

How does a funeral home, a place of supposed respect and care for the deceased, transform into a site of a ghastly stack of 190 bodies? This question is at the heart of a recent episode of "Hidden Killers," where host Tony Brueski discusses the disturbing case of the 'Return to Nature' funeral home in Colorado with former prosecutor Laurie Gilbertson.    The episode begins with a shocking revelation: in a place named 'Return to Nature', 189 bodies were found haphazardly stacked near mundane objects like a Coke machine. Brueski and Gilbertson explore the logistics and psychology behind such a horrifying act, delving into the inadequacies in regulatory oversight in Colorado's funeral home industry.    Gilbertson, with her extensive legal background, points to a combination of greed and exploitation as key factors in this scandal. "It really starts with greed and grift and taking advantage of the grief of vulnerable people at a really terrible time in their lives," she says, highlighting the gross violation of trust involved in this case. The revelation that families were left with urns containing not the ashes of their loved ones but likely some inert substance like cement dust adds to the horrific nature of the deceit.    The discussion then turns to the practicalities of such an operation. The EPA's involvement in addressing the health hazards of the building indicates the severity of the situation. Gilbertson expresses bewilderment at how the funeral home's operators could conduct business in such an environment, suggesting the possibility of a toxic and deadly atmosphere inside the building.    As the conversation progresses, Brueski raises the possibility of a more sinister dimension to the case, involving the illegal trade in human body parts. Gilbertson acknowledges this dark industry, noting, "There's an industry for the body parts... people who actually want limbs and bones and skulls." This leads to speculation about whether the funeral home's actions were part of a larger, more nefarious operation.    Gilbertson emphasizes the exploitation of vulnerable individuals by such businesses. "It's absolutely heartbreaking that there are people out there who will target the most vulnerable at their most vulnerable time," she remarks. This point underscores the tragedy that extends beyond the immediate horror of the discovery to the emotional trauma inflicted on the families involved.    The conversation concludes with the acknowledgment that there is likely more to be uncovered in this case. Gilbertson suggests that if the funeral home was involved in selling body parts, it would add an even more gruesome layer to an already appalling situation. She asserts, "I think there's a lot more to this story," indicating that the investigation could reveal further shocking details.    This episode of "Hidden Killers" not only exposes a shocking case of neglect and deceit at a Colorado funeral home but also raises critical questions about the oversight and regulation of such facilities. How did such a flagrant disrespect for both the dead and the living go unnoticed for so long? And what other dark secrets might lie hidden within the 'Return to Nature' funeral home? The ongoing investigation into this case may yet reveal more about the extent of this disturbing scandal. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

How does a funeral home, a place of supposed respect and care for the deceased, transform into a site of a ghastly stack of 190 bodies? This question is at the heart of a recent episode of "Hidden Killers," where host Tony Brueski discusses the disturbing case of the 'Return to Nature' funeral home in Colorado with former prosecutor Laurie Gilbertson.    The episode begins with a shocking revelation: in a place named 'Return to Nature', 189 bodies were found haphazardly stacked near mundane objects like a Coke machine. Brueski and Gilbertson explore the logistics and psychology behind such a horrifying act, delving into the inadequacies in regulatory oversight in Colorado's funeral home industry.    Gilbertson, with her extensive legal background, points to a combination of greed and exploitation as key factors in this scandal. "It really starts with greed and grift and taking advantage of the grief of vulnerable people at a really terrible time in their lives," she says, highlighting the gross violation of trust involved in this case. The revelation that families were left with urns containing not the ashes of their loved ones but likely some inert substance like cement dust adds to the horrific nature of the deceit.    The discussion then turns to the practicalities of such an operation. The EPA's involvement in addressing the health hazards of the building indicates the severity of the situation. Gilbertson expresses bewilderment at how the funeral home's operators could conduct business in such an environment, suggesting the possibility of a toxic and deadly atmosphere inside the building.    As the conversation progresses, Brueski raises the possibility of a more sinister dimension to the case, involving the illegal trade in human body parts. Gilbertson acknowledges this dark industry, noting, "There's an industry for the body parts... people who actually want limbs and bones and skulls." This leads to speculation about whether the funeral home's actions were part of a larger, more nefarious operation.    Gilbertson emphasizes the exploitation of vulnerable individuals by such businesses. "It's absolutely heartbreaking that there are people out there who will target the most vulnerable at their most vulnerable time," she remarks. This point underscores the tragedy that extends beyond the immediate horror of the discovery to the emotional trauma inflicted on the families involved.    The conversation concludes with the acknowledgment that there is likely more to be uncovered in this case. Gilbertson suggests that if the funeral home was involved in selling body parts, it would add an even more gruesome layer to an already appalling situation. She asserts, "I think there's a lot more to this story," indicating that the investigation could reveal further shocking details.    This episode of "Hidden Killers" not only exposes a shocking case of neglect and deceit at a Colorado funeral home but also raises critical questions about the oversight and regulation of such facilities. How did such a flagrant disrespect for both the dead and the living go unnoticed for so long? And what other dark secrets might lie hidden within the 'Return to Nature' funeral home? The ongoing investigation into this case may yet reveal more about the extent of this disturbing scandal. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Is it possible for someone to be brainwashed into neglecting their parental responsibilities? This is the question Tony Brueski and former prosecutor Laurie Gilbertson ponder in their podcast "Hidden Killers," while discussing the complex case of Ruby and Kevin Franke and Jodi Hildebrandt.    Kevin Franke claims he was brainwashed by Ruby and Jodi, leading him to be oblivious to the abuse his children suffered. Gilbertson, however, is skeptical. "Brainwashing just doesn't seem to cut it for me," she remarks, indicating the moral lapse in Kevin's prolonged absence as a father. Gilbertson stresses that while moral responsibility is clear, the legal accountability might not be as straightforward.    The focus then shifts to the controversial role of 'life coaching,' a title used by Ruby Franke and Jodi Hildebrandt. Gilbertson and Brueski express concern about the unregulated nature of this industry and its potential for harm. "Anyone can put themselves out there as an expert," Gilbertson notes, highlighting the dangers of unqualified individuals presenting themselves as professional advisors.    This discussion sheds light on the broader issue of public perception and the responsibility of individuals in seeking out such services. Gilbertson urges the public to be vigilant, emphasizing the importance of researching the credentials and experiences of potential coaches or advisors.    One significant aspect of the conversation revolves around Kevin Franke's inaction. Despite the lack of a legal separation order, he chose not to check on his children, raising questions about his liability. Gilbertson points out the moral failing in his choice, despite his claims of being misled by Ruby and Jodi.    As the episode concludes, Brueski and Gilbertson delve into the potential legislative solutions to regulate the life coaching industry. However, Gilbertson is doubtful about the effectiveness of legislation, fearing that it might only lead to a change in terminology rather than a substantial shift in practices.    The Franke-Hildebrandt case, as dissected in "Hidden Killers," poses challenging questions about the boundaries of influence and manipulation in familial relationships, and the ethics of unregulated advisory roles. It highlights the importance of accountability, both moral and legal, in the protection of vulnerable individuals from predatory practices.    In a world where the line between guidance and manipulation is increasingly blurred, how can we ensure that individuals do not exploit the trust placed in them, particularly in the context of family and professional advice? This question remains open, inviting deeper reflection and discourse on the responsibilities inherent in such roles. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Is it possible for someone to be brainwashed into neglecting their parental responsibilities? This is the question Tony Brueski and former prosecutor Laurie Gilbertson ponder in their podcast "Hidden Killers," while discussing the complex case of Ruby and Kevin Franke and Jodi Hildebrandt.    Kevin Franke claims he was brainwashed by Ruby and Jodi, leading him to be oblivious to the abuse his children suffered. Gilbertson, however, is skeptical. "Brainwashing just doesn't seem to cut it for me," she remarks, indicating the moral lapse in Kevin's prolonged absence as a father. Gilbertson stresses that while moral responsibility is clear, the legal accountability might not be as straightforward.    The focus then shifts to the controversial role of 'life coaching,' a title used by Ruby Franke and Jodi Hildebrandt. Gilbertson and Brueski express concern about the unregulated nature of this industry and its potential for harm. "Anyone can put themselves out there as an expert," Gilbertson notes, highlighting the dangers of unqualified individuals presenting themselves as professional advisors.    This discussion sheds light on the broader issue of public perception and the responsibility of individuals in seeking out such services. Gilbertson urges the public to be vigilant, emphasizing the importance of researching the credentials and experiences of potential coaches or advisors.    One significant aspect of the conversation revolves around Kevin Franke's inaction. Despite the lack of a legal separation order, he chose not to check on his children, raising questions about his liability. Gilbertson points out the moral failing in his choice, despite his claims of being misled by Ruby and Jodi.    As the episode concludes, Brueski and Gilbertson delve into the potential legislative solutions to regulate the life coaching industry. However, Gilbertson is doubtful about the effectiveness of legislation, fearing that it might only lead to a change in terminology rather than a substantial shift in practices.    The Franke-Hildebrandt case, as dissected in "Hidden Killers," poses challenging questions about the boundaries of influence and manipulation in familial relationships, and the ethics of unregulated advisory roles. It highlights the importance of accountability, both moral and legal, in the protection of vulnerable individuals from predatory practices.    In a world where the line between guidance and manipulation is increasingly blurred, how can we ensure that individuals do not exploit the trust placed in them, particularly in the context of family and professional advice? This question remains open, inviting deeper reflection and discourse on the responsibilities inherent in such roles. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Is it possible for someone to be brainwashed into neglecting their parental responsibilities? This is the question Tony Brueski and former prosecutor Laurie Gilbertson ponder in their podcast "Hidden Killers," while discussing the complex case of Ruby and Kevin Franke and Jodi Hildebrandt.    Kevin Franke claims he was brainwashed by Ruby and Jodi, leading him to be oblivious to the abuse his children suffered. Gilbertson, however, is skeptical. "Brainwashing just doesn't seem to cut it for me," she remarks, indicating the moral lapse in Kevin's prolonged absence as a father. Gilbertson stresses that while moral responsibility is clear, the legal accountability might not be as straightforward.    The focus then shifts to the controversial role of 'life coaching,' a title used by Ruby Franke and Jodi Hildebrandt. Gilbertson and Brueski express concern about the unregulated nature of this industry and its potential for harm. "Anyone can put themselves out there as an expert," Gilbertson notes, highlighting the dangers of unqualified individuals presenting themselves as professional advisors.    This discussion sheds light on the broader issue of public perception and the responsibility of individuals in seeking out such services. Gilbertson urges the public to be vigilant, emphasizing the importance of researching the credentials and experiences of potential coaches or advisors.    One significant aspect of the conversation revolves around Kevin Franke's inaction. Despite the lack of a legal separation order, he chose not to check on his children, raising questions about his liability. Gilbertson points out the moral failing in his choice, despite his claims of being misled by Ruby and Jodi.    As the episode concludes, Brueski and Gilbertson delve into the potential legislative solutions to regulate the life coaching industry. However, Gilbertson is doubtful about the effectiveness of legislation, fearing that it might only lead to a change in terminology rather than a substantial shift in practices.    The Franke-Hildebrandt case, as dissected in "Hidden Killers," poses challenging questions about the boundaries of influence and manipulation in familial relationships, and the ethics of unregulated advisory roles. It highlights the importance of accountability, both moral and legal, in the protection of vulnerable individuals from predatory practices.    In a world where the line between guidance and manipulation is increasingly blurred, how can we ensure that individuals do not exploit the trust placed in them, particularly in the context of family and professional advice? This question remains open, inviting deeper reflection and discourse on the responsibilities inherent in such roles. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

As the legal proceedings against Bryan Kohberger continue to unfold, the introduction of Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG) evidence has become a focal point in the case. The recent handover of IGG evidence to Kohberger's defense team marks a crucial step in ensuring a fair trial. Former prosecutor Laurie Gilbertson joined Tony Brueski on the "Hidden Killers" podcast to dissect the significance of this evidence and its potential impact on the case.    IGG evidence, while not used to obtain warrants in the Kohberger case, has been instrumental in generating leads. Gilbertson emphasized the importance of transparency in such high-stakes trials, stating, "The prosecution turning over absolutely everything they have here... allows both sides to truly talk about what is there."    The discussion highlighted the dual aspects of DNA evidence scrutiny. The defense is likely to challenge both the methodology of obtaining the DNA and the evidence itself. "Even with the IGG... it's pretty straightforward," Gilbertson noted, acknowledging that the prosecution must ensure all procedural safeguards are met, including the appropriateness of search warrants.    Amidst the legal complexities, Gilbertson pointed out the overarching strength of the evidence against Kohberger, especially the damning nature of his digital footprint. "The Google searches, the Instagram messages... they show the thought process," she explained, underscoring the potentially pivotal role of digital evidence in painting a comprehensive picture of Kohberger's motives and actions.    Another critical element is the eyewitness account from a surviving housemate, who reported seeing a masked man resembling Kohberger. While Gilbertson recognized the potential flaws in memory, she suggested that, combined with other evidence, the eyewitness testimony could significantly impact the jury's perception.    Gilbertson also delved into how Kohberger's background in criminology could be perceived. While some might view it as a sign of altruistic intent, others could interpret it as a means to learn how to outmaneuver law enforcement. This duality adds another layer of intrigue to the case, leaving the jury to weigh the implications.    As for the defense strategy, Gilbertson advised a neutral presentation for Kohberger, focusing on minimizing any negative perceptions while challenging the evidence's validity. "He needs to present as almost this neutral blank slate," she said, highlighting the importance of a controlled demeanor and strategic interactions with his legal team.    Predicting the trial's timeline, Gilbertson suggested that late 2024 or early 2025 might be realistic, given the case's complexity and the need to meticulously examine every piece of evidence. However, she cautioned against placing bets on any specific date, given the unpredictable nature of such high-profile cases.    The conversation with Laurie Gilbertson provided a nuanced understanding of the legal intricacies in the Bryan Kohberger case. As the trial approaches, the world watches with bated breath, wondering how the myriad pieces of evidence, from IGG to digital footprints, will shape the final verdict. Will the jury find the evidence compelling enough to convict, or will the defense's counterarguments sway their decision? The answers to these questions remain shrouded in uncertainty as the legal labyrinth continues to unravel. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

When does influence cross the line into manipulation, and at what point does one lose sight of their moral and legal responsibilities as a parent? These are the central questions posed in a recent episode of "Hidden Killers," where host Tony Brueski and former prosecutor Laurie Gilbertson delve into the complex case of Ruby and Kevin Franke and Jodi Hildebrandt.    Kevin Franke claims he was brainwashed by the teachings of his wife, Ruby, and her accomplice, Jodi Hildebrandt, leading to his unawareness of the abuse his children suffered. Gilbertson, weighing in on this assertion, questions the validity of the brainwashing claim. "Brainwashing just doesn't seem to cut it for me," she states, highlighting the moral lapse in Kevin's absence as a father. The discussion probes the distinction between toxic codependency and deliberate neglect, with Gilbertson expressing disbelief at the extent of Kevin's alleged unawareness.    The conversation then shifts to the broader implications of Kevin's inaction. Gilbertson draws attention to the moral and potential legal ramifications of his choice to stay away from his children, despite there being no legal decree enforcing this separation. "Morally, 100% he needed to be taking responsibility," Gilbertson emphasizes, outlining the stark contrast between his claims of ignorance and the publicly available evidence of abuse on Ruby's YouTube channel.    The panelists also touch upon the role of public perception and community response in such cases. Neighbors and viewers of the YouTube channel were alarmed enough to alert authorities, yet Kevin remained ostensibly oblivious to the unfolding situation. This dissonance raises questions about his complicity and the degree of his moral failing.    Gilbertson delves into the legal aspects, explaining the potential for civil liability in cases where a parent fails to fulfill their duties, even in the absence of a formal separation agreement. She suggests that Kevin's voluntary choice to stay away from his children, despite being fully aware of Ruby's controversial parenting methods, could place him in a precarious legal position.    As the episode concludes, Brueski and Gilbertson reflect on the fine line between influence and manipulation in familial relationships. The Franke-Hildebrandt case emerges as a cautionary tale about the consequences of relinquishing parental responsibility and the dangers of blindly following a partner's lead, especially when it concerns the wellbeing of children.    In a world where the boundaries of influence are often blurred, how do we ensure that parents fulfill their moral and legal responsibilities to their children, particularly in the face of potential manipulation or coercion? This remains an open question, inviting further contemplation and discourse. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

As the legal proceedings against Bryan Kohberger continue to unfold, the introduction of Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG) evidence has become a focal point in the case. The recent handover of IGG evidence to Kohberger's defense team marks a crucial step in ensuring a fair trial. Former prosecutor Laurie Gilbertson joined Tony Brueski on the "Hidden Killers" podcast to dissect the significance of this evidence and its potential impact on the case.    IGG evidence, while not used to obtain warrants in the Kohberger case, has been instrumental in generating leads. Gilbertson emphasized the importance of transparency in such high-stakes trials, stating, "The prosecution turning over absolutely everything they have here... allows both sides to truly talk about what is there."    The discussion highlighted the dual aspects of DNA evidence scrutiny. The defense is likely to challenge both the methodology of obtaining the DNA and the evidence itself. "Even with the IGG... it's pretty straightforward," Gilbertson noted, acknowledging that the prosecution must ensure all procedural safeguards are met, including the appropriateness of search warrants.    Amidst the legal complexities, Gilbertson pointed out the overarching strength of the evidence against Kohberger, especially the damning nature of his digital footprint. "The Google searches, the Instagram messages... they show the thought process," she explained, underscoring the potentially pivotal role of digital evidence in painting a comprehensive picture of Kohberger's motives and actions.    Another critical element is the eyewitness account from a surviving housemate, who reported seeing a masked man resembling Kohberger. While Gilbertson recognized the potential flaws in memory, she suggested that, combined with other evidence, the eyewitness testimony could significantly impact the jury's perception.    Gilbertson also delved into how Kohberger's background in criminology could be perceived. While some might view it as a sign of altruistic intent, others could interpret it as a means to learn how to outmaneuver law enforcement. This duality adds another layer of intrigue to the case, leaving the jury to weigh the implications.    As for the defense strategy, Gilbertson advised a neutral presentation for Kohberger, focusing on minimizing any negative perceptions while challenging the evidence's validity. "He needs to present as almost this neutral blank slate," she said, highlighting the importance of a controlled demeanor and strategic interactions with his legal team.    Predicting the trial's timeline, Gilbertson suggested that late 2024 or early 2025 might be realistic, given the case's complexity and the need to meticulously examine every piece of evidence. However, she cautioned against placing bets on any specific date, given the unpredictable nature of such high-profile cases.    The conversation with Laurie Gilbertson provided a nuanced understanding of the legal intricacies in the Bryan Kohberger case. As the trial approaches, the world watches with bated breath, wondering how the myriad pieces of evidence, from IGG to digital footprints, will shape the final verdict. Will the jury find the evidence compelling enough to convict, or will the defense's counterarguments sway their decision? The answers to these questions remain shrouded in uncertainty as the legal labyrinth continues to unravel. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

When does influence cross the line into manipulation, and at what point does one lose sight of their moral and legal responsibilities as a parent? These are the central questions posed in a recent episode of "Hidden Killers," where host Tony Brueski and former prosecutor Laurie Gilbertson delve into the complex case of Ruby and Kevin Franke and Jodi Hildebrandt.    Kevin Franke claims he was brainwashed by the teachings of his wife, Ruby, and her accomplice, Jodi Hildebrandt, leading to his unawareness of the abuse his children suffered. Gilbertson, weighing in on this assertion, questions the validity of the brainwashing claim. "Brainwashing just doesn't seem to cut it for me," she states, highlighting the moral lapse in Kevin's absence as a father. The discussion probes the distinction between toxic codependency and deliberate neglect, with Gilbertson expressing disbelief at the extent of Kevin's alleged unawareness.    The conversation then shifts to the broader implications of Kevin's inaction. Gilbertson draws attention to the moral and potential legal ramifications of his choice to stay away from his children, despite there being no legal decree enforcing this separation. "Morally, 100% he needed to be taking responsibility," Gilbertson emphasizes, outlining the stark contrast between his claims of ignorance and the publicly available evidence of abuse on Ruby's YouTube channel.    The panelists also touch upon the role of public perception and community response in such cases. Neighbors and viewers of the YouTube channel were alarmed enough to alert authorities, yet Kevin remained ostensibly oblivious to the unfolding situation. This dissonance raises questions about his complicity and the degree of his moral failing.    Gilbertson delves into the legal aspects, explaining the potential for civil liability in cases where a parent fails to fulfill their duties, even in the absence of a formal separation agreement. She suggests that Kevin's voluntary choice to stay away from his children, despite being fully aware of Ruby's controversial parenting methods, could place him in a precarious legal position.    As the episode concludes, Brueski and Gilbertson reflect on the fine line between influence and manipulation in familial relationships. The Franke-Hildebrandt case emerges as a cautionary tale about the consequences of relinquishing parental responsibility and the dangers of blindly following a partner's lead, especially when it concerns the wellbeing of children.    In a world where the boundaries of influence are often blurred, how do we ensure that parents fulfill their moral and legal responsibilities to their children, particularly in the face of potential manipulation or coercion? This remains an open question, inviting further contemplation and discourse. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

As the legal proceedings against Bryan Kohberger continue to unfold, the introduction of Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG) evidence has become a focal point in the case. The recent handover of IGG evidence to Kohberger's defense team marks a crucial step in ensuring a fair trial. Former prosecutor Laurie Gilbertson joined Tony Brueski on the "Hidden Killers" podcast to dissect the significance of this evidence and its potential impact on the case.    IGG evidence, while not used to obtain warrants in the Kohberger case, has been instrumental in generating leads. Gilbertson emphasized the importance of transparency in such high-stakes trials, stating, "The prosecution turning over absolutely everything they have here... allows both sides to truly talk about what is there."    The discussion highlighted the dual aspects of DNA evidence scrutiny. The defense is likely to challenge both the methodology of obtaining the DNA and the evidence itself. "Even with the IGG... it's pretty straightforward," Gilbertson noted, acknowledging that the prosecution must ensure all procedural safeguards are met, including the appropriateness of search warrants.    Amidst the legal complexities, Gilbertson pointed out the overarching strength of the evidence against Kohberger, especially the damning nature of his digital footprint. "The Google searches, the Instagram messages... they show the thought process," she explained, underscoring the potentially pivotal role of digital evidence in painting a comprehensive picture of Kohberger's motives and actions.    Another critical element is the eyewitness account from a surviving housemate, who reported seeing a masked man resembling Kohberger. While Gilbertson recognized the potential flaws in memory, she suggested that, combined with other evidence, the eyewitness testimony could significantly impact the jury's perception.    Gilbertson also delved into how Kohberger's background in criminology could be perceived. While some might view it as a sign of altruistic intent, others could interpret it as a means to learn how to outmaneuver law enforcement. This duality adds another layer of intrigue to the case, leaving the jury to weigh the implications.    As for the defense strategy, Gilbertson advised a neutral presentation for Kohberger, focusing on minimizing any negative perceptions while challenging the evidence's validity. "He needs to present as almost this neutral blank slate," she said, highlighting the importance of a controlled demeanor and strategic interactions with his legal team.    Predicting the trial's timeline, Gilbertson suggested that late 2024 or early 2025 might be realistic, given the case's complexity and the need to meticulously examine every piece of evidence. However, she cautioned against placing bets on any specific date, given the unpredictable nature of such high-profile cases.    The conversation with Laurie Gilbertson provided a nuanced understanding of the legal intricacies in the Bryan Kohberger case. As the trial approaches, the world watches with bated breath, wondering how the myriad pieces of evidence, from IGG to digital footprints, will shape the final verdict. Will the jury find the evidence compelling enough to convict, or will the defense's counterarguments sway their decision? The answers to these questions remain shrouded in uncertainty as the legal labyrinth continues to unravel. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

When does influence cross the line into manipulation, and at what point does one lose sight of their moral and legal responsibilities as a parent? These are the central questions posed in a recent episode of "Hidden Killers," where host Tony Brueski and former prosecutor Laurie Gilbertson delve into the complex case of Ruby and Kevin Franke and Jodi Hildebrandt.    Kevin Franke claims he was brainwashed by the teachings of his wife, Ruby, and her accomplice, Jodi Hildebrandt, leading to his unawareness of the abuse his children suffered. Gilbertson, weighing in on this assertion, questions the validity of the brainwashing claim. "Brainwashing just doesn't seem to cut it for me," she states, highlighting the moral lapse in Kevin's absence as a father. The discussion probes the distinction between toxic codependency and deliberate neglect, with Gilbertson expressing disbelief at the extent of Kevin's alleged unawareness.    The conversation then shifts to the broader implications of Kevin's inaction. Gilbertson draws attention to the moral and potential legal ramifications of his choice to stay away from his children, despite there being no legal decree enforcing this separation. "Morally, 100% he needed to be taking responsibility," Gilbertson emphasizes, outlining the stark contrast between his claims of ignorance and the publicly available evidence of abuse on Ruby's YouTube channel.    The panelists also touch upon the role of public perception and community response in such cases. Neighbors and viewers of the YouTube channel were alarmed enough to alert authorities, yet Kevin remained ostensibly oblivious to the unfolding situation. This dissonance raises questions about his complicity and the degree of his moral failing.    Gilbertson delves into the legal aspects, explaining the potential for civil liability in cases where a parent fails to fulfill their duties, even in the absence of a formal separation agreement. She suggests that Kevin's voluntary choice to stay away from his children, despite being fully aware of Ruby's controversial parenting methods, could place him in a precarious legal position.    As the episode concludes, Brueski and Gilbertson reflect on the fine line between influence and manipulation in familial relationships. The Franke-Hildebrandt case emerges as a cautionary tale about the consequences of relinquishing parental responsibility and the dangers of blindly following a partner's lead, especially when it concerns the wellbeing of children.    In a world where the boundaries of influence are often blurred, how do we ensure that parents fulfill their moral and legal responsibilities to their children, particularly in the face of potential manipulation or coercion? This remains an open question, inviting further contemplation and discourse. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

What does it mean when parents seemingly overlook the disappearance of their son's fiancée, who lived with them, and choose a family camping trip instead? This perplexing behavior, seen in the case of Gabby Petito and Brian Laundrie, raises questions about the intersection of moral judgment and legal responsibility. Former prosecutor Laurie Gilbertson joined Tony Brueski on the "Hidden Killers" podcast to delve into these issues, particularly the new allegations that the Laundrie family was aware of Gabby's fate earlier than they let on.    The Laundries' actions, or lack thereof, in the wake of Gabby Petito's disappearance have left many shaking their heads in disbelief. Gilbertson, reflecting on the case, remarked, "It's just heartbreaking to think about," acknowledging the difficulty in understanding their decisions. She emphasized the significance of the allegation that the family knew Gabby was "gone," likely dead, and yet remained silent. This, according to Gilbertson, is not just a matter of failing to act but crosses a line into potential criminality, especially considering their subsequent actions.    The conversation shifted to the concept of "consciousness of guilt," a legal notion used in court to interpret actions indicative of knowing one has committed a crime. Gilbertson pointed out that the Laundries' behavior, such as hiring a lawyer, lying to the press, and not aiding in finding Gabby, could be seen as evidence of this. While there is a strong civil case, whether their actions rise to the level of criminality depends on further revelations about their actions and inactions.    Gilbertson also discussed the role of Steven Bertolino, the Laundries' attorney, in this complex saga. The moral and legal implications of Bertolino's actions, particularly his public statements when he allegedly knew of Gabby's demise, raise serious questions. "Certainly can cross some legal lines," Gilbertson stated, suggesting that Bertolino's conduct could lead to an inquiry into his professional standing, potentially affecting his law license.    The legal expert then clarified the delicate balance between moral and legal obligations in the justice system. A lawyer's ultimate allegiance, she explained, is to the court and the process of justice, not just to the client. This means they cannot lie to the court or support perjury. In Bertolino's case, going public with misleading statements could be seen as overstepping this boundary.    Gilbertson's insights shed light on the complexities of the Petito case, illustrating the fine line between legal duty and moral responsibility. The case is not just a tragic story of a young woman's untimely death but also a stark reminder of the challenges in navigating the legal system when emotions and personal relationships are deeply entwined.    As we await the unfolding of this case, one critical question remains: At what point does the desire to protect a loved one override the moral and legal obligation to seek justice, and what are the consequences of crossing that line? The Petito case, still unfolding, continues to challenge our understanding of justice, family bonds, and the limits of legal responsibility. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

What does it mean when parents seemingly overlook the disappearance of their son's fiancée, who lived with them, and choose a family camping trip instead? This perplexing behavior, seen in the case of Gabby Petito and Brian Laundrie, raises questions about the intersection of moral judgment and legal responsibility. Former prosecutor Laurie Gilbertson joined Tony Brueski on the "Hidden Killers" podcast to delve into these issues, particularly the new allegations that the Laundrie family was aware of Gabby's fate earlier than they let on.    The Laundries' actions, or lack thereof, in the wake of Gabby Petito's disappearance have left many shaking their heads in disbelief. Gilbertson, reflecting on the case, remarked, "It's just heartbreaking to think about," acknowledging the difficulty in understanding their decisions. She emphasized the significance of the allegation that the family knew Gabby was "gone," likely dead, and yet remained silent. This, according to Gilbertson, is not just a matter of failing to act but crosses a line into potential criminality, especially considering their subsequent actions.    The conversation shifted to the concept of "consciousness of guilt," a legal notion used in court to interpret actions indicative of knowing one has committed a crime. Gilbertson pointed out that the Laundries' behavior, such as hiring a lawyer, lying to the press, and not aiding in finding Gabby, could be seen as evidence of this. While there is a strong civil case, whether their actions rise to the level of criminality depends on further revelations about their actions and inactions.    Gilbertson also discussed the role of Steven Bertolino, the Laundries' attorney, in this complex saga. The moral and legal implications of Bertolino's actions, particularly his public statements when he allegedly knew of Gabby's demise, raise serious questions. "Certainly can cross some legal lines," Gilbertson stated, suggesting that Bertolino's conduct could lead to an inquiry into his professional standing, potentially affecting his law license.    The legal expert then clarified the delicate balance between moral and legal obligations in the justice system. A lawyer's ultimate allegiance, she explained, is to the court and the process of justice, not just to the client. This means they cannot lie to the court or support perjury. In Bertolino's case, going public with misleading statements could be seen as overstepping this boundary.    Gilbertson's insights shed light on the complexities of the Petito case, illustrating the fine line between legal duty and moral responsibility. The case is not just a tragic story of a young woman's untimely death but also a stark reminder of the challenges in navigating the legal system when emotions and personal relationships are deeply entwined.    As we await the unfolding of this case, one critical question remains: At what point does the desire to protect a loved one override the moral and legal obligation to seek justice, and what are the consequences of crossing that line? The Petito case, still unfolding, continues to challenge our understanding of justice, family bonds, and the limits of legal responsibility. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

How do you become persuasive and creative in your presentations?Meet Laurie Gilbertson!Laurie is a former prosecutor, television legal analyst and legal educator who formed Tribeca Blue Consulting to bring her unique skills and passion for teaching to help professionals communicate better.  She achieves this by combining her lawyer's attention to detail, the insider's tips and tricks she learned during a decade spent in New York City courtrooms and the expertise she gained while helping the nation's top attorneys and judges develop and present compelling material. She helps her individual and group clients with presentations, sales calls, pitch meetings…Laurie is a dynamic, passionate and poised communicator, whether in the courtroom, the classroom or on television. She brings her unique brand of enthusiasm, dedication and skill to teaching people how to use powerful and creative presentations, public speaking and on-camera appearances to connect with their clients and their audiences. She loves the intellectual challenge of persuasion, advocacy and education.Key Points:- how to develop persuasive and compelling narratives- the success that comes from being a better communicator- why crafting a story convinces the jury / your audience- how to set up your story framework- why it's good to be nervous just before speaking- why being yourself trumps everything- how to create curiosity in your audience- how to open and close strongly...and so much more!Connect with Laurie:Website: https://www.tribecablueconsulting.comLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/lauriegilbertson/Additional Resources:Daveed Diggs Tony Awards Acceptance Speech on YouTubeListen to the Podcast, subscribe, leave a rating and a review:Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/persuasive-storytelling-from-a-former-prosecutor-w/id1614151066?i=1000634919968Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/episode/6ItcZ4n1J91HCunXo3PS2CYouTube: https://youtu.be/llc5KYRHH-0Connect with me / FREE Consultation:Email: roberta4sk@gmail.comhttps://calendly.com/robertandlela/podcaster-beekonnected?month=2023-10Become a Compelling Speaker:Use the code ROBERTA to get 20% offhttps://www.compellingspeaker.com/a/2147634219/QLj9VdCb

Laurie Gilbertson former New York City homicide, sex crimes, and organized crime prosecutor, On-air legal analyst for Court TV, educator, and entrepreneur. We get candid about how the justice system plays out from behind the counsel table.  Helpful tips for sexual assault survivors who are facing their attackers on the stand and the injustice we are dealing with when it comes to prison sentencing. As the founder and CEO of Tribeca Blue Consulting, Laurie helps professionals communicate with clarity and confidence in their public speaking, presentations, trial work, and media appearances.www.tribecablueconsulting.comhttps://www.linkedin.com/in/lauriegilbertson#Bryan Kohberger#jodiariasSupport the showhttps://www.crimeovercocktails.com/http://www.instagram.com/crimeovercocktailshttps://www.the-crime-connection.org/

The true nature of criminals and the workings of their mind have always been a topic of intrigue and concern. The podcast "Hidden Killers" with Tony Brueski and former prosecutor Laurie Gilbertson shed light on such heinous criminals, their behaviors, and the systems that deal with them. A recent episode discusses Rex Heuermann, who was meeting with a clergyman once a week while in jail. Gilbertson and Brueski debate whether this is a genuine act of seeking redemption or a strategy advised by an attorney to evoke pity. Gilbertson admits, “I have no idea what it means, and honestly, does it really matter? Maybe he needs someone to talk to. Maybe he has found God, maybe it is just a way of trying to get some sympathy.”    The podcast delves deeper into the mind of criminals like Heuermann, questioning how such individuals are created. Gilbertson recalls a case from her time in the Appeals Bureau, involving a psychopathic killer whose cruelty started with animals in his childhood. She draws a parallel with Heuermann, who targeted and tortured vulnerable individuals for his satisfaction. Gilbertson explains, “someone like Rex Heuermann took the weakest people that he could find and pretty much tortured them… obviously he got a lot out of it.” She further asserts that such tendencies do not suddenly develop in adulthood but are likely exhibited from childhood.    The conversation takes a darker turn as Brueski and Gilbertson discuss whether serial killers ever stop on their own or only halt due to external factors like death or incarceration. Gilbertson believes that being caught is the usual end for serial killers as the act of committing crimes and getting away with them is too enticing. She notes that Heuermann, despite being a successful architect with a family, continued his criminal activities because he was getting away with it every day. This constant pushing of boundaries and evasion of capture is a common pattern observed in serial killers. Gilbertson concludes, “It is rare that you see serial killers just decide to retire.”    This insightful discussion underscores the complexity of criminal minds and the challenges faced by the criminal justice system. It also highlights the need for a more comprehensive understanding of criminal behavior and its origins to develop effective prevention and intervention strategies. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Serial killer Dennis Rader, infamously known as BTK (Bind, Torture, Kill), is back in the headlines with connections to several cold cases. His daughter recently tweeted that there are about five unsolved missing person cases possibly attributed to her father. One case under close scrutiny involves Cynthia Kinney, a 16-year-old cheerleader from Oklahoma who disappeared in 1976. Despite serving life terms for his known crimes, there is still the possibility of justice for these victims, as former prosecutor Laurie Gilbertson discussed on the podcast "Hidden Killers" with host Tony Brueski.    In the podcast, Gilbertson and Brueski discussed the possibility of more murders committed by Rader than previously known. Rader, now 78, has been vocal since the release of a book about another serial killer, Berger. Gilbertson speculated that Rader does not want another serial killer getting more attention than him, and as a result, he might be willing to share more information about his past crimes. This is a double-edged sword, as it could lead to the closure of cold cases but also give Rader the attention he craves. Gilbertson stressed the importance of not letting Rader's desire for publicity reopen old wounds for the victims' families.    Brueski noted that despite being offered immunity, Rader has denied involvement in the newly investigated cases. However, he has previously recounted a fantasy that eerily matches the details of one of the crimes being investigated. Gilbertson pointed out that this could be part of a game Rader is playing with the investigators, or he may not want to admit to these crimes due to his frail condition and the attention a courtroom appearance would bring. While Rader admitted guilt in his first trial, he does not necessarily have to this time, and the prospect of courtroom attention might be enticing for him.    The podcast touched on the challenges of understanding the minds of serial killers like Rader, Coberg, and Erman. A common trait among them is attention-seeking behavior. Gilbertson highlighted that Rader's desire for attention might be a motivating factor for him to engage with investigators and the legal process. As the investigation progresses, forensic evidence, witness accounts, and Rader's confessional writings will be crucial in determining his involvement in the newly investigated cases.    In summary, the recent investigation into cold cases potentially linked to Dennis Rader brings hope for justice and closure for the victims' families. However, it also raises concerns about giving attention to a serial killer who craves the spotlight. As the investigation unfolds, it will be important to balance the need for justice with the need to avoid giving Rader undue publicity. Ultimately, the goal is to provide closure for the families of the victims and hold Rader accountable for any additional crimes he may have committed. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Serial killer Dennis Rader, infamously known as BTK (Bind, Torture, Kill), is back in the headlines with connections to several cold cases. His daughter recently tweeted that there are about five unsolved missing person cases possibly attributed to her father. One case under close scrutiny involves Cynthia Kinney, a 16-year-old cheerleader from Oklahoma who disappeared in 1976. Despite serving life terms for his known crimes, there is still the possibility of justice for these victims, as former prosecutor Laurie Gilbertson discussed on the podcast "Hidden Killers" with host Tony Brueski.    In the podcast, Gilbertson and Brueski discussed the possibility of more murders committed by Rader than previously known. Rader, now 78, has been vocal since the release of a book about another serial killer, Berger. Gilbertson speculated that Rader does not want another serial killer getting more attention than him, and as a result, he might be willing to share more information about his past crimes. This is a double-edged sword, as it could lead to the closure of cold cases but also give Rader the attention he craves. Gilbertson stressed the importance of not letting Rader's desire for publicity reopen old wounds for the victims' families.    Brueski noted that despite being offered immunity, Rader has denied involvement in the newly investigated cases. However, he has previously recounted a fantasy that eerily matches the details of one of the crimes being investigated. Gilbertson pointed out that this could be part of a game Rader is playing with the investigators, or he may not want to admit to these crimes due to his frail condition and the attention a courtroom appearance would bring. While Rader admitted guilt in his first trial, he does not necessarily have to this time, and the prospect of courtroom attention might be enticing for him.    The podcast touched on the challenges of understanding the minds of serial killers like Rader, Coberg, and Erman. A common trait among them is attention-seeking behavior. Gilbertson highlighted that Rader's desire for attention might be a motivating factor for him to engage with investigators and the legal process. As the investigation progresses, forensic evidence, witness accounts, and Rader's confessional writings will be crucial in determining his involvement in the newly investigated cases.    In summary, the recent investigation into cold cases potentially linked to Dennis Rader brings hope for justice and closure for the victims' families. However, it also raises concerns about giving attention to a serial killer who craves the spotlight. As the investigation unfolds, it will be important to balance the need for justice with the need to avoid giving Rader undue publicity. Ultimately, the goal is to provide closure for the families of the victims and hold Rader accountable for any additional crimes he may have committed. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The true nature of criminals and the workings of their mind have always been a topic of intrigue and concern. The podcast "Hidden Killers" with Tony Brueski and former prosecutor Laurie Gilbertson shed light on such heinous criminals, their behaviors, and the systems that deal with them. A recent episode discusses Rex Heuermann, who was meeting with a clergyman once a week while in jail. Gilbertson and Brueski debate whether this is a genuine act of seeking redemption or a strategy advised by an attorney to evoke pity. Gilbertson admits, “I have no idea what it means, and honestly, does it really matter? Maybe he needs someone to talk to. Maybe he has found God, maybe it is just a way of trying to get some sympathy.”    The podcast delves deeper into the mind of criminals like Heuermann, questioning how such individuals are created. Gilbertson recalls a case from her time in the Appeals Bureau, involving a psychopathic killer whose cruelty started with animals in his childhood. She draws a parallel with Heuermann, who targeted and tortured vulnerable individuals for his satisfaction. Gilbertson explains, “someone like Rex Heuermann took the weakest people that he could find and pretty much tortured them… obviously he got a lot out of it.” She further asserts that such tendencies do not suddenly develop in adulthood but are likely exhibited from childhood.    The conversation takes a darker turn as Brueski and Gilbertson discuss whether serial killers ever stop on their own or only halt due to external factors like death or incarceration. Gilbertson believes that being caught is the usual end for serial killers as the act of committing crimes and getting away with them is too enticing. She notes that Heuermann, despite being a successful architect with a family, continued his criminal activities because he was getting away with it every day. This constant pushing of boundaries and evasion of capture is a common pattern observed in serial killers. Gilbertson concludes, “It is rare that you see serial killers just decide to retire.”    This insightful discussion underscores the complexity of criminal minds and the challenges faced by the criminal justice system. It also highlights the need for a more comprehensive understanding of criminal behavior and its origins to develop effective prevention and intervention strategies. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a recent episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, host Tony Brueski and former prosecutor Laurie Gilbertson shed light on the daunting atmosphere created by former Suffolk County Police Chief James Burke that prevented sex workers from reporting crimes due to his own involvement in the industry. Gilbertson remarked, "People like this, like [Rex] Heuermann and sex workers and all that, they don't live in a bubble. This goes on all over the country."    The conversation delved into the terrifying reality that there might be numerous Rex Heuermanns lurking around the nation, creating an environment where the police dismiss crimes reported by sex workers. Gilbertson expressed her dismay, saying, "It's pretty disheartening. And horrifying and sad...there were people who had Heuerman's description down to a T and they gave it away 10 years ago, but nothing was done."    The situation is far from unusual, as many crime shows and real-life incidents underscore the reluctance of the police to believe and protect sex workers, who are not considered "victims" in the traditional sense. However, Gilbertson emphasized the need for a different mindset, starting from the ground up with education and training for law enforcement officers, to change this perception and ensure justice for all victims, regardless of their background or involvement in illegal activities.    Gilbertson shared her experience working in the Special Victims Bureau in New York, where victims of sex crimes were treated with the respect they deserved, regardless of their background. This approach made a significant difference in prosecuting crimes and encouraging victims to testify without fear of repercussions.    The discussion also touched on the alarming statistic that approximately 90% of people involved in sex work are not there by choice, but rather due to trafficking or coercion. Gilbertson pointed out that investigating deeper into the networks of pimps and traffickers could unearth the "queen bees" of trafficking rings, which would be instrumental in dismantling these criminal organizations.    Using the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act, originally intended for organized crime, to prosecute conspiracies among many people involved in trafficking could be one way to address the issue. Gilbertson emphasized the need to target the heads of these organizations, who carefully choose their victims based on their vulnerability and susceptibility to coercion.    Rex Heuermann, for instance, targeted women who he knew would mostly not be missed or attract much attention from law enforcement, thereby enabling him to evade capture for an extended period. Gilbertson stressed the importance of acknowledging the reasons individuals end up in sex work and treating them as victims rather than criminals.    The conversation underscored the need for a holistic approach to addressing the issue, as many victims are too frightened to cooperate with law enforcement due to their past experiences. Gilbertson shared her own experience of being robbed in New York City and the challenges she faced in navigating the legal process, despite working in the industry.    In conclusion, the episode of "Hidden Killers" highlighted the urgent need for a change in mindset and approach towards sex workers and victims of sex crimes. Treating all victims with respect, regardless of their background, and digging deeper into the networks of traffickers and pimps are crucial steps towards ensuring justice for all and dismantling the criminal organizations that perpetuate these crimes. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

 In a recent episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, host Tony Brueski and former prosecutor Laurie Gilbertson shed light on the daunting atmosphere created by former Suffolk County Police Chief James Burke that prevented sex workers from reporting crimes due to his own involvement in the industry. Gilbertson remarked, "People like this, like [Rex] Heuermann and sex workers and all that, they don't live in a bubble. This goes on all over the country."    The conversation delved into the terrifying reality that there might be numerous Rex Heuermanns lurking around the nation, creating an environment where the police dismiss crimes reported by sex workers. Gilbertson expressed her dismay, saying, "It's pretty disheartening. And horrifying and sad...there were people who had Heuerman's description down to a T and they gave it away 10 years ago, but nothing was done."    The situation is far from unusual, as many crime shows and real-life incidents underscore the reluctance of the police to believe and protect sex workers, who are not considered "victims" in the traditional sense. However, Gilbertson emphasized the need for a different mindset, starting from the ground up with education and training for law enforcement officers, to change this perception and ensure justice for all victims, regardless of their background or involvement in illegal activities.    Gilbertson shared her experience working in the Special Victims Bureau in New York, where victims of sex crimes were treated with the respect they deserved, regardless of their background. This approach made a significant difference in prosecuting crimes and encouraging victims to testify without fear of repercussions.    The discussion also touched on the alarming statistic that approximately 90% of people involved in sex work are not there by choice, but rather due to trafficking or coercion. Gilbertson pointed out that investigating deeper into the networks of pimps and traffickers could unearth the "queen bees" of trafficking rings, which would be instrumental in dismantling these criminal organizations.    Using the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act, originally intended for organized crime, to prosecute conspiracies among many people involved in trafficking could be one way to address the issue. Gilbertson emphasized the need to target the heads of these organizations, who carefully choose their victims based on their vulnerability and susceptibility to coercion.    Rex Heuermann, for instance, targeted women who he knew would mostly not be missed or attract much attention from law enforcement, thereby enabling him to evade capture for an extended period. Gilbertson stressed the importance of acknowledging the reasons individuals end up in sex work and treating them as victims rather than criminals.    The conversation underscored the need for a holistic approach to addressing the issue, as many victims are too frightened to cooperate with law enforcement due to their past experiences. Gilbertson shared her own experience of being robbed in New York City and the challenges she faced in navigating the legal process, despite working in the industry.    In conclusion, the episode of "Hidden Killers" highlighted the urgent need for a change in mindset and approach towards sex workers and victims of sex crimes. Treating all victims with respect, regardless of their background, and digging deeper into the networks of traffickers and pimps are crucial steps towards ensuring justice for all and dismantling the criminal organizations that perpetuate these crimes. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The defense team for Bryan Kohberger has raised concerns about the possibility of a tainted jury, due to the amount of information already in the public domain. According to the podcast "Hidden Killers" with Tony Brueski and former prosecutor Laurie Gilbertson, the defense is worried that potential jurors have already heard and know too much about Kohberger. The defense has made many comments and complaints about the situation, and they were the side that requested a gag order to prevent any further information from coming out from either side or even the victim's families.    “It's interesting here because the defense… asked for there not to be anything coming out from either side or even the victim's families. So that would really lead to not at all tainting the jury pool,” said Gilbertson. Despite the concerns, Gilbertson believes that the court has taken appropriate precautions, including the gag order, to ensure the jury pool is not tainted. “I don't think that concerns from the defense regarding a tainted jury pool are really that valid here,” she added.    Another point of discussion on the podcast was the use of expert witnesses, especially those whose expertise could be questionable. For example, the case involved a self-taught genealogist, Gabriela Vargas, who began working on cases just in 2018. Despite being relatively new to the field and running a carpentry business as a side hustle, she was called upon as an expert witness. Brueski raised questions about the validity of such experts, saying, “Should there be stricter rules on who's getting up on the stand and claiming to be an expert?”    Gilbertson explained that the process of qualifying an expert involves going through their work experience, education, publications, peer-reviewed papers, teaching experience, and the specificity and backing of their expertise. After this, the opposing side has an opportunity to cross-examine, and then the judge makes a determination on whether the person can be deemed an expert. “This person, I will deem them an expert… they are able to offer an opinion to the jury that the jury can then consider that will be relevant, that will be credible, and that is based on all of their knowledge and experience,” she explained.    However, Gilbertson also noted that while legally an expert opinion holds no greater weight than a layperson's, the public perception may differ. “Calling someone an expert in lay terms tends to kind of give the public that idea. So, yeah. Can that taint the jury pool? In my opinion, it doesn't taint it too well for the person calling her as an expert,” she remarked.    In the end, regardless of what is heard outside the courtroom, the jury will be instructed about all these matters by the judge, who will clarify what it means if someone is called or denied being called an expert. This, Gilbertson believes, will ensure that the jury makes decisions based on clear and accurate information.    As the trial for Bryan Kohberger continues, concerns about a tainted jury and the qualifications of expert witnesses remain key issues that the court must navigate carefully to ensure a fair trial. Whether or not the defense's concerns are well-founded, it is clear that the court is taking precautions to address these issues and ensure a fair and just process for all parties involved. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The defense team for Bryan Kohberger has raised concerns about the possibility of a tainted jury, due to the amount of information already in the public domain. According to the podcast "Hidden Killers" with Tony Brueski and former prosecutor Laurie Gilbertson, the defense is worried that potential jurors have already heard and know too much about Kohberger. The defense has made many comments and complaints about the situation, and they were the side that requested a gag order to prevent any further information from coming out from either side or even the victim's families.    “It's interesting here because the defense… asked for there not to be anything coming out from either side or even the victim's families. So that would really lead to not at all tainting the jury pool,” said Gilbertson. Despite the concerns, Gilbertson believes that the court has taken appropriate precautions, including the gag order, to ensure the jury pool is not tainted. “I don't think that concerns from the defense regarding a tainted jury pool are really that valid here,” she added.    Another point of discussion on the podcast was the use of expert witnesses, especially those whose expertise could be questionable. For example, the case involved a self-taught genealogist, Gabriela Vargas, who began working on cases just in 2018. Despite being relatively new to the field and running a carpentry business as a side hustle, she was called upon as an expert witness. Brueski raised questions about the validity of such experts, saying, “Should there be stricter rules on who's getting up on the stand and claiming to be an expert?”    Gilbertson explained that the process of qualifying an expert involves going through their work experience, education, publications, peer-reviewed papers, teaching experience, and the specificity and backing of their expertise. After this, the opposing side has an opportunity to cross-examine, and then the judge makes a determination on whether the person can be deemed an expert. “This person, I will deem them an expert… they are able to offer an opinion to the jury that the jury can then consider that will be relevant, that will be credible, and that is based on all of their knowledge and experience,” she explained.    However, Gilbertson also noted that while legally an expert opinion holds no greater weight than a layperson's, the public perception may differ. “Calling someone an expert in lay terms tends to kind of give the public that idea. So, yeah. Can that taint the jury pool? In my opinion, it doesn't taint it too well for the person calling her as an expert,” she remarked.    In the end, regardless of what is heard outside the courtroom, the jury will be instructed about all these matters by the judge, who will clarify what it means if someone is called or denied being called an expert. This, Gilbertson believes, will ensure that the jury makes decisions based on clear and accurate information.    As the trial for Bryan Kohberger continues, concerns about a tainted jury and the qualifications of expert witnesses remain key issues that the court must navigate carefully to ensure a fair trial. Whether or not the defense's concerns are well-founded, it is clear that the court is taking precautions to address these issues and ensure a fair and just process for all parties involved. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the latest episode of the popular true-crime podcast "Hidden Killers," hosted by Tony Brueski, an insightful discussion was held with former Prosecutor and attorney Laurie Gilbertson concerning the recent legal tactics employed by Ann Taylor, the defense attorney for the infamous Kohberger case.   Recently, Taylor filed a motion seeking to have Kohberger's indictment dismissed on the grounds that the grand jury was erroneously instructed on the standard of proof required for the indictment. Taylor argued that the jury should have been informed that the proof required would be "beyond a reasonable doubt," not the standard for presentment, which she claims was the standard used.   According to Gilbertson, however, Taylor's move is flawed. Gilbertson accused Taylor of damaging her credibility before the court by making this filing. "She knows what the standard is and what the correct standard is and the correct way to instruct a grand jury. These are formalities and she knows it," Gilbertson emphasized.   Moreover, Gilbertson highlighted the absurdity of Taylor admitting in the motion that "all of modern jurisprudence" is against her client. "If you gotta put a sentence like that in, you know that you're making some crazy claim," Gilbertson remarked. She argued that this desperate strategy only highlights the lack of a solid defense for Kohberger.   The podcast hosts also criticized Taylor for what they described as 'throwing random elements' into the case. They noted how Taylor suggested that evidence such as DNA and the sheath could have been planted, drawing parallels with tactics used during the O.J. Simpson case. Furthermore, Taylor's late filing of an alibi defense, without providing adequate information to the prosecution, was highlighted as a questionable strategy.   Gilbertson was equally critical of these tactics, describing the alibi defense as a desperate attempt to create doubt without substance. "In order for there to be a fair trial, you forfeit the right to use an alibi if you do not provide the information about it to the prosecution within the statutory time," Gilbertson stated.   The former Prosecutor also criticized Taylor's alleged disregard of a gag order, which prevents attorneys from discussing case details outside the court. The hosts and Gilbertson observed that Taylor seems to bypass this order by using court filings to make public insinuations. They suggested this might be an attempt to influence potential jurors, a tactic reminiscent of a political campaign.   "What it seems to me here over everything she's filed over the past, I guess, week or so, is playing games a bit with the system," Gilbertson opined. Despite all these maneuvers, the hosts and Gilbertson remain skeptical of their ultimate effectiveness.   In conclusion, the "Hidden Killers" episode offered a critical perspective on Taylor's handling of the Kohberger case. Gilbertson's expert legal insight revealed questionable tactics, potentially damaging Taylor's credibility. However, whether these tactics will sway the course of the case remains to be seen. As Brueski concluded, "We'll see." Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the latest episode of the popular true-crime podcast "Hidden Killers," hosted by Tony Brueski, an insightful discussion was held with former Prosecutor and attorney Laurie Gilbertson concerning the recent legal tactics employed by Ann Taylor, the defense attorney for the infamous Kohberger case.   Recently, Taylor filed a motion seeking to have Kohberger's indictment dismissed on the grounds that the grand jury was erroneously instructed on the standard of proof required for the indictment. Taylor argued that the jury should have been informed that the proof required would be "beyond a reasonable doubt," not the standard for presentment, which she claims was the standard used.   According to Gilbertson, however, Taylor's move is flawed. Gilbertson accused Taylor of damaging her credibility before the court by making this filing. "She knows what the standard is and what the correct standard is and the correct way to instruct a grand jury. These are formalities and she knows it," Gilbertson emphasized.   Moreover, Gilbertson highlighted the absurdity of Taylor admitting in the motion that "all of modern jurisprudence" is against her client. "If you gotta put a sentence like that in, you know that you're making some crazy claim," Gilbertson remarked. She argued that this desperate strategy only highlights the lack of a solid defense for Kohberger.   The podcast hosts also criticized Taylor for what they described as 'throwing random elements' into the case. They noted how Taylor suggested that evidence such as DNA and the sheath could have been planted, drawing parallels with tactics used during the O.J. Simpson case. Furthermore, Taylor's late filing of an alibi defense, without providing adequate information to the prosecution, was highlighted as a questionable strategy.   Gilbertson was equally critical of these tactics, describing the alibi defense as a desperate attempt to create doubt without substance. "In order for there to be a fair trial, you forfeit the right to use an alibi if you do not provide the information about it to the prosecution within the statutory time," Gilbertson stated.   The former Prosecutor also criticized Taylor's alleged disregard of a gag order, which prevents attorneys from discussing case details outside the court. The hosts and Gilbertson observed that Taylor seems to bypass this order by using court filings to make public insinuations. They suggested this might be an attempt to influence potential jurors, a tactic reminiscent of a political campaign.   "What it seems to me here over everything she's filed over the past, I guess, week or so, is playing games a bit with the system," Gilbertson opined. Despite all these maneuvers, the hosts and Gilbertson remain skeptical of their ultimate effectiveness.   In conclusion, the "Hidden Killers" episode offered a critical perspective on Taylor's handling of the Kohberger case. Gilbertson's expert legal insight revealed questionable tactics, potentially damaging Taylor's credibility. However, whether these tactics will sway the course of the case remains to be seen. As Brueski concluded, "We'll see." Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the recent episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, host Tony Brueski and former prosecutor and attorney Laurie Gilbertson delved into the complexities of the ongoing Gilgo Beach Murderer investigation. The suspect, often referred to as the Long Island serial killer, is at the center of a 13-year investigation that has been fraught with an extensive amount of evidence, from cell phone records and emails to DNA samples and surveillance footage.   Gilbertson noted, "The prosecution is doing exactly what they are legally obligated to do, which is to start turning it all over." The defense, facing a colossal quantity of information, will inevitably require more time to go through everything. Gilbertson expects the defense to keep asking for more time, but she also warned that this could be a "delay tactic."   Given the intricacies and voluminous evidence of the case, Gilbertson anticipates that it could take at least a year if not longer, to prepare for trial. "In a case like this, I think going to trial even in a year, for a serial murder like this with three victims, where no doubt the defense will make a motion to sever those trials to maybe have him tried separately for each of those... a year would be the absolute minimum for this to start a trial, probably a bit longer than that," she explained.   The discussion then transitioned to the potential implications of breaking up the case into individual trials for each murder. Gilbertson hypothesized that the prosecution would likely aim to demonstrate patterns across the killings to validate their serial killer claim. However, if the defense were able to prove that combining the trials would be "more prejudicial than probative," separate trials could become a possibility. "Obviously, if you're being tried for one murder in front of a jury, it looks a little different than if you're being tried for three," Gilbertson added.   When asked about the family of the suspect, Gilbertson acknowledged the trauma they must have undergone, especially given the disruptive search operations conducted by the authorities. Brueski speculated that the household might have been a "hoarder house," with evidence of extreme clutter and accumulation of objects. The suspect, known as Rex, was found to have possessed over 200 guns, which Brueski pointed out as significant.   Reflecting on the family's reaction, Gilbertson remarked, "We're going to learn more about this family, about what the conditions were, about how he was with his family." The podcast hosts were struck by the family's displacement of their trauma and anger onto the investigators rather than Rex. Gilbertson surmised that the family might have had a vague awareness of Rex's transgressions all along but chose to stay in a state of "willful blindness."   The case of the Long Island serial killer is a disturbing and intricate one. As the legal teams delve further into the vast array of evidence, the public awaits the unfolding of this tragic and complex story. As the proceedings continue, the victims and their families hope for justice, and the case serves as a chilling reminder of the sometimes hidden realities of our society. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the recent episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, host Tony Brueski and former prosecutor and attorney Laurie Gilbertson delved into the complexities of the ongoing Gilgo Beach Murderer investigation. The suspect, often referred to as the Long Island serial killer, is at the center of a 13-year investigation that has been fraught with an extensive amount of evidence, from cell phone records and emails to DNA samples and surveillance footage.   Gilbertson noted, "The prosecution is doing exactly what they are legally obligated to do, which is to start turning it all over." The defense, facing a colossal quantity of information, will inevitably require more time to go through everything. Gilbertson expects the defense to keep asking for more time, but she also warned that this could be a "delay tactic."   Given the intricacies and voluminous evidence of the case, Gilbertson anticipates that it could take at least a year if not longer, to prepare for trial. "In a case like this, I think going to trial even in a year, for a serial murder like this with three victims, where no doubt the defense will make a motion to sever those trials to maybe have him tried separately for each of those... a year would be the absolute minimum for this to start a trial, probably a bit longer than that," she explained.   The discussion then transitioned to the potential implications of breaking up the case into individual trials for each murder. Gilbertson hypothesized that the prosecution would likely aim to demonstrate patterns across the killings to validate their serial killer claim. However, if the defense were able to prove that combining the trials would be "more prejudicial than probative," separate trials could become a possibility. "Obviously, if you're being tried for one murder in front of a jury, it looks a little different than if you're being tried for three," Gilbertson added.   When asked about the family of the suspect, Gilbertson acknowledged the trauma they must have undergone, especially given the disruptive search operations conducted by the authorities. Brueski speculated that the household might have been a "hoarder house," with evidence of extreme clutter and accumulation of objects. The suspect, known as Rex, was found to have possessed over 200 guns, which Brueski pointed out as significant.   Reflecting on the family's reaction, Gilbertson remarked, "We're going to learn more about this family, about what the conditions were, about how he was with his family." The podcast hosts were struck by the family's displacement of their trauma and anger onto the investigators rather than Rex. Gilbertson surmised that the family might have had a vague awareness of Rex's transgressions all along but chose to stay in a state of "willful blindness."   The case of the Long Island serial killer is a disturbing and intricate one. As the legal teams delve further into the vast array of evidence, the public awaits the unfolding of this tragic and complex story. As the proceedings continue, the victims and their families hope for justice, and the case serves as a chilling reminder of the sometimes hidden realities of our society. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a recent episode of the renowned podcast "Hidden Killers," former prosecutor Laurie Gilbertson joined host Tony Brueski for a penetrating discussion on the Lori Vallow DeBell sentencing. The case, under the national spotlight, has raised eyebrows and spurred many questions, particularly about Vallow DeBell's strange behavior and statements during the sentencing.   "Clearly delusional and completely off base from the reality that everyone else in the room had gone through," is how Gilbertson described the eight-minute rant from Vallow DeBell during her sentencing. She proceeded to speculate that Vallow DeBell likely overruled her attorney's advice against making a statement. Gilbertson noted that it's uncommon for defense attorneys to encourage their clients to speak, as it typically doesn't benefit their cause.   "Lori wanted to share with everybody all of the delusional things that were in her head," Gilbertson said. She suggested that Vallow DeBell's decision to make a statement demonstrated her desire for attention and a disregard for its effect on the families involved, as well as the implications it could have on her own sentencing.   Gilbertson also addressed the surprisingly affectionate tone of the defense attorney's statement, describing it as an almost "love letter nature." She further noted, "It went above and beyond vigorously defending his client."   Gilbertson speculated that the defense attorney's sentiments, which she referred to as "bizarre," might have resulted from prolonged exposure to Vallow DeBell during the trial. She also suggested that the attorney's statement lacked an understanding of how his words would be perceived and the damage they could do to his client's case.   The former prosecutor also shared insights on what's next for Vallow DeBell. "She'll be extradited to Arizona eventually here by the end of the year to face the charges in the death of Charles Vallow," Gilbertson revealed.   However, the question of whether Vallow DeBell is mentally competent to stand trial in Arizona has arisen. Gilbertson shared that Vallow DeBell's mental health had prompted her to investigate how Arizona handles such cases, especially given Idaho's lack of an insanity defense.   Gilbertson raised the issue of the feasibility of another trial for Vallow DeBell, given the resources it would require, the toll it would take on the victims' families, and the fact that she had already been sentenced to life terms. However, Gilbertson also acknowledged the importance of justice for the other victim, Charles Vallow.   Regarding Vallow DeBell's future representation, Gilbertson said, "Maybe she will have an attorney more grounded in reality, who will choose to handle this in a more pragmatic way than spouting craziness."   The Lori Vallow DeBell case has stirred a national conversation about legal defense strategies and mental health's role in criminal cases. This insightful dialogue between Tony Brueski and Laurie Gilbertson offers a deeper understanding of the complex issues. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a recent episode of the renowned podcast "Hidden Killers," former prosecutor Laurie Gilbertson joined host Tony Brueski for a penetrating discussion on the Lori Vallow DeBell sentencing. The case, under the national spotlight, has raised eyebrows and spurred many questions, particularly about Vallow DeBell's strange behavior and statements during the sentencing.   "Clearly delusional and completely off base from the reality that everyone else in the room had gone through," is how Gilbertson described the eight-minute rant from Vallow DeBell during her sentencing. She proceeded to speculate that Vallow DeBell likely overruled her attorney's advice against making a statement. Gilbertson noted that it's uncommon for defense attorneys to encourage their clients to speak, as it typically doesn't benefit their cause.   "Lori wanted to share with everybody all of the delusional things that were in her head," Gilbertson said. She suggested that Vallow DeBell's decision to make a statement demonstrated her desire for attention and a disregard for its effect on the families involved, as well as the implications it could have on her own sentencing.   Gilbertson also addressed the surprisingly affectionate tone of the defense attorney's statement, describing it as an almost "love letter nature." She further noted, "It went above and beyond vigorously defending his client."   Gilbertson speculated that the defense attorney's sentiments, which she referred to as "bizarre," might have resulted from prolonged exposure to Vallow DeBell during the trial. She also suggested that the attorney's statement lacked an understanding of how his words would be perceived and the damage they could do to his client's case.   The former prosecutor also shared insights on what's next for Vallow DeBell. "She'll be extradited to Arizona eventually here by the end of the year to face the charges in the death of Charles Vallow," Gilbertson revealed.   However, the question of whether Vallow DeBell is mentally competent to stand trial in Arizona has arisen. Gilbertson shared that Vallow DeBell's mental health had prompted her to investigate how Arizona handles such cases, especially given Idaho's lack of an insanity defense.   Gilbertson raised the issue of the feasibility of another trial for Vallow DeBell, given the resources it would require, the toll it would take on the victims' families, and the fact that she had already been sentenced to life terms. However, Gilbertson also acknowledged the importance of justice for the other victim, Charles Vallow.   Regarding Vallow DeBell's future representation, Gilbertson said, "Maybe she will have an attorney more grounded in reality, who will choose to handle this in a more pragmatic way than spouting craziness."   The Lori Vallow DeBell case has stirred a national conversation about legal defense strategies and mental health's role in criminal cases. This insightful dialogue between Tony Brueski and Laurie Gilbertson offers a deeper understanding of the complex issues. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In this captivating episode, Tony welcomes former prosecutor Laurie Gilbertson for an in-depth discussion on the likelihood of the Menendez brothers receiving another trial. Leveraging her expertise, Gilbertson unravels the complex layers of the legal system to explore the factors that could lead to a retrial for these notorious siblings. They delve into issues such as new evidence, procedural errors, and the current legal landscape. Don't miss out on their insightful conversation that explores one of the most infamous cases in American legal history. Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts Ad-Free? Subscribe through Apple Podcasts, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj  Follow Our Other Cases:    Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski (All Cases) -https://audioboom.com/channels/5040505-hidden-killers-with-tony-brueski-breaking-news-commentary Chad & Lori Daybell - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098105-demise-of-the-daybells-the-lori-chad-daybell-story The Murder of Ana Walshe - https://audioboom.com/channels/5093967-finding-ana-this-disappearance-of-ana-walshe Alex Murdaugh - https://audioboom.com/channels/5097527-the-trial-of-alex-murdaugh The Idaho Murders, The Case Against Bryan Kohberger - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098223-the-idaho-murders-the-case-against-bryan-kohberger Lucy Letby - https://audioboom.com/channels/5099406-nurse-of-death-the-lucy-letby-story

In this engaging episode, Tony is joined by former prosecutor Laurie Gilbertson, as they probe into the possible postponement of Bryan Kohberger's trial. Gilbertson brings her prosecutorial expertise to explain the legal and procedural elements that could potentially push the trial date beyond October. They analyze the reasons for such a delay, including defense strategy, court schedules, and witness availability. Tune in as they provide a comprehensive overview of the legal landscape surrounding this high-profile murder trial. Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts Ad-Free? Subscribe through Apple Podcasts, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj  Follow Our Other Cases:    Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski (All Cases) -https://audioboom.com/channels/5040505-hidden-killers-with-tony-brueski-breaking-news-commentary Chad & Lori Daybell - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098105-demise-of-the-daybells-the-lori-chad-daybell-story The Murder of Ana Walshe - https://audioboom.com/channels/5093967-finding-ana-this-disappearance-of-ana-walshe Alex Murdaugh - https://audioboom.com/channels/5097527-the-trial-of-alex-murdaugh The Idaho Murders, The Case Against Bryan Kohberger - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098223-the-idaho-murders-the-case-against-bryan-kohberger Lucy Letby - https://audioboom.com/channels/5099406-nurse-of-death-the-lucy-letby-story

In this engaging episode, Tony is joined by former prosecutor Laurie Gilbertson, as they probe into the possible postponement of Bryan Kohberger's trial. Gilbertson brings her prosecutorial expertise to explain the legal and procedural elements that could potentially push the trial date beyond October. They analyze the reasons for such a delay, including defense strategy, court schedules, and witness availability. Tune in as they provide a comprehensive overview of the legal landscape surrounding this high-profile murder trial. Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts Ad-Free? Subscribe through Apple Podcasts, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj  Follow Our Other Cases:    Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski (All Cases) -https://audioboom.com/channels/5040505-hidden-killers-with-tony-brueski-breaking-news-commentary Chad & Lori Daybell - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098105-demise-of-the-daybells-the-lori-chad-daybell-story The Murder of Ana Walshe - https://audioboom.com/channels/5093967-finding-ana-this-disappearance-of-ana-walshe Alex Murdaugh - https://audioboom.com/channels/5097527-the-trial-of-alex-murdaugh The Idaho Murders, The Case Against Bryan Kohberger - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098223-the-idaho-murders-the-case-against-bryan-kohberger Lucy Letby - https://audioboom.com/channels/5099406-nurse-of-death-the-lucy-letby-story

In this enlightening episode, former prosecutor Laurie Gilbertson and host Tony delve into the intriguing silence of Bryan Kohberger during his plea hearing. Gilbertson employs her legal expertise to illuminate the possible strategies and implications behind Kohberger's choice to stand silent on the charges in the Idaho quadruple homicide case. Together, they discuss how this move might impact his defense and the upcoming trial proceedings. Join us as we navigate the complexities of the criminal justice system in this riveting analysis. Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts Ad-Free? Subscribe through Apple Podcasts, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj  Follow Our Other Cases:    Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski (All Cases) -https://audioboom.com/channels/5040505-hidden-killers-with-tony-brueski-breaking-news-commentary Chad & Lori Daybell - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098105-demise-of-the-daybells-the-lori-chad-daybell-story The Murder of Ana Walshe - https://audioboom.com/channels/5093967-finding-ana-this-disappearance-of-ana-walshe Alex Murdaugh - https://audioboom.com/channels/5097527-the-trial-of-alex-murdaugh The Idaho Murders, The Case Against Bryan Kohberger - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098223-the-idaho-murders-the-case-against-bryan-kohberger Lucy Letby - https://audioboom.com/channels/5099406-nurse-of-death-the-lucy-letby-story

In this enlightening episode, former prosecutor Laurie Gilbertson and host Tony delve into the intriguing silence of Bryan Kohberger during his plea hearing. Gilbertson employs her legal expertise to illuminate the possible strategies and implications behind Kohberger's choice to stand silent on the charges in the Idaho quadruple homicide case. Together, they discuss how this move might impact his defense and the upcoming trial proceedings. Join us as we navigate the complexities of the criminal justice system in this riveting analysis. Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts Ad-Free? Subscribe through Apple Podcasts, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj  Follow Our Other Cases:    Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski (All Cases) -https://audioboom.com/channels/5040505-hidden-killers-with-tony-brueski-breaking-news-commentary Chad & Lori Daybell - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098105-demise-of-the-daybells-the-lori-chad-daybell-story The Murder of Ana Walshe - https://audioboom.com/channels/5093967-finding-ana-this-disappearance-of-ana-walshe Alex Murdaugh - https://audioboom.com/channels/5097527-the-trial-of-alex-murdaugh The Idaho Murders, The Case Against Bryan Kohberger - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098223-the-idaho-murders-the-case-against-bryan-kohberger Lucy Letby - https://audioboom.com/channels/5099406-nurse-of-death-the-lucy-letby-story

In this gripping episode, former prosecutor Laurie Gilbertson and host Tony delve into the controversy surrounding Roberta Laundrie's letter to her son, Brian Laundrie. They analyze the underlying implications of her words and how they may shed light on her alleged role in covering up a murder. Laurie applies her prosecutorial expertise to provide unique insights into the dynamics of the Laundrie family, particularly focusing on the relationship between Roberta and Brian. Tune in to explore the potential legal and psychological ramifications of this chilling narrative.

In this episode, we delve into the perplexing case of Bryan Kohberger, exploring how he was allegedly able to hide traces of his presence at the murder scene. Former prosecutor Laurie Gilbertson weighs in, providing insights on forensic evidence and criminal behavior. We discuss the techniques that may have been employed to evade detection and the challenges investigators face in such cases. Join us for an intriguing look into the world of forensic science and its role in solving high-stakes criminal cases. Want to listen to ALL of our Podcasts Ad-Free? Subscribe through Apple Podcasts, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj  Follow Our Other Cases:    Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski (All Cases) - https://audioboom.com/channels/5040505-hidden-killers-with-tony-brueski-breaking-news-commentary Chad & Lori Daybell - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098105-demise-of-the-daybells-the-lori-chad-daybell-story The Murder of Ana Walshe - https://audioboom.com/channels/5093967-finding-ana-this-disappearance-of-ana-walshe Alex Murdaugh - https://audioboom.com/channels/5097527-the-trial-of-alex-murdaugh The Idaho Murders, The Case Against Bryan Kohberger - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098223-the-idaho-murders-the-case-against-bryan-kohberger Lucy Letby - https://audioboom.com/channels/5099406-nurse-of-death-the-lucy-letby-story

In this episode, we delve into the perplexing case of Bryan Kohberger, exploring how he was allegedly able to hide traces of his presence at the murder scene. Former prosecutor Laurie Gilbertson weighs in, providing insights on forensic evidence and criminal behavior. We discuss the techniques that may have been employed to evade detection and the challenges investigators face in such cases. Join us for an intriguing look into the world of forensic science and its role in solving high-stakes criminal cases. Want to listen to ALL of our Podcasts Ad-Free? Subscribe through Apple Podcasts, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj  Follow Our Other Cases:    Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski (All Cases) - https://audioboom.com/channels/5040505-hidden-killers-with-tony-brueski-breaking-news-commentary Chad & Lori Daybell - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098105-demise-of-the-daybells-the-lori-chad-daybell-story The Murder of Ana Walshe - https://audioboom.com/channels/5093967-finding-ana-this-disappearance-of-ana-walshe Alex Murdaugh - https://audioboom.com/channels/5097527-the-trial-of-alex-murdaugh The Idaho Murders, The Case Against Bryan Kohberger - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098223-the-idaho-murders-the-case-against-bryan-kohberger Lucy Letby - https://audioboom.com/channels/5099406-nurse-of-death-the-lucy-letby-story

In this episode, former prosecutor Laurie Gilbertson joins Tony to discuss the overwhelming evidence against Lori Vallow Daybell. They delve into the question of whether there can ever be "too much" evidence in a case like this. Together, they explore the implications of such a vast amount of evidence on the trial process and the defense strategy. Don't miss this insightful conversation on the complexities of the Lori Vallow Daybell case. Want to listen to ALL of our Podcasts Ad-Free? Subscribe through Apple Podcasts, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj  Follow Our Other Cases:    Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski (All Cases) - https://audioboom.com/channels/5040505-hidden-killers-with-tony-brueski-breaking-news-commentary Chad & Lori Daybell - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098105-demise-of-the-daybells-the-lori-chad-daybell-story The Murder of Ana Walshe - https://audioboom.com/channels/5093967-finding-ana-this-disappearance-of-ana-walshe Alex Murdaugh - https://audioboom.com/channels/5097527-the-trial-of-alex-murdaugh The Idaho Murders, The Case Against Bryan Kohberger - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098223-the-idaho-murders-the-case-against-bryan-kohberger Lucy Letby - https://audioboom.com/channels/5099406-nurse-of-death-the-lucy-letby-story

In this episode, former prosecutor Laurie Gilbertson joins Tony to discuss the overwhelming evidence against Lori Vallow Daybell. They delve into the question of whether there can ever be "too much" evidence in a case like this. Together, they explore the implications of such a vast amount of evidence on the trial process and the defense strategy. Don't miss this insightful conversation on the complexities of the Lori Vallow Daybell case. Want to listen to ALL of our Podcasts Ad-Free? Subscribe through Apple Podcasts, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj  Follow Our Other Cases:    Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski (All Cases) - https://audioboom.com/channels/5040505-hidden-killers-with-tony-brueski-breaking-news-commentary Chad & Lori Daybell - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098105-demise-of-the-daybells-the-lori-chad-daybell-story The Murder of Ana Walshe - https://audioboom.com/channels/5093967-finding-ana-this-disappearance-of-ana-walshe Alex Murdaugh - https://audioboom.com/channels/5097527-the-trial-of-alex-murdaugh The Idaho Murders, The Case Against Bryan Kohberger - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098223-the-idaho-murders-the-case-against-bryan-kohberger Lucy Letby - https://audioboom.com/channels/5099406-nurse-of-death-the-lucy-letby-story

In this episode of Legally Bliss Conversations, I sat down with Laurie Gilbertson, a former New York City sex crimes and organized crime prosecutor, television legal analyst, and arts entrepreneur. As the owner of Tribeca Blue Consulting, Laurie helps professionals communicate with clarity and competence in their public speaking, presentations, trial work, and media appearances. She shares her journey from pursuing law school to becoming a prosecutor and the challenges she faced along the way.Laurie discusses her passion for advocacy, her experiences in the criminal justice system, and how her background in law and acting contribute to her work as a public speaking coach. Tune in for an engaging conversation with Lori Gilbert, a woman who has made a significant impact in the legal world and beyond.Connect with Laurie Here:http://www.tribecablueconsulting.comhttps://www.linkedin.com/in/lauriegilbertson/Join our the Legally Blissed Community: https://www.LegallyBlissed.comThis episode of Legally Blissed Conversations has been sponsored by Advogence™️ / Advocacy Empowered by Artificial Intelligence ⚖️

Former prosecutor Laurie Gilbertson joins Tony to discuss the upcoming trials of Lori Daybell and Chad Daybell, and the potential advantage Lori might have by being tried first. Gilbertson will delve into the strategic implications of the trial order and how it could impact the outcomes for both defendants. Tune in for a captivating conversation that explores the complexities and nuances of the Daybell case and the legal tactics at play. Want to listen to ALL of our Podcasts Ad-Free? Subscribe through Apple Podcasts, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases:   Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski (All Cases) - https://audioboom.com/channels/5040505-hidden-killers-with-tony-brueski-breaking-news-commentary Chad & Lori Daybell - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098105-demise-of-the-daybells-the-lori-chad-daybell-story The Murder of Ana Walshe - https://audioboom.com/channels/5093967-finding-ana-this-disappearance-of-ana-walshe Alex Murdaugh - https://audioboom.com/channels/5097527-the-trial-of-alex-murdaugh The Idaho Murders, The Case Against Bryan Kohberger - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098223-the-idaho-murders-the-case-against-bryan-kohberger Lucy Letby - https://audioboom.com/channels/5099406-nurse-of-death-the-lucy-letby-story Follow Tony Brueski On Twitter https://twitter.com/tonybpod Join our Facebook Discussion Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/834636321133

Former prosecutor Laurie Gilbertson joins Tony to discuss the upcoming trials of Lori Daybell and Chad Daybell, and the potential advantage Lori might have by being tried first. Gilbertson will delve into the strategic implications of the trial order and how it could impact the outcomes for both defendants. Tune in for a captivating conversation that explores the complexities and nuances of the Daybell case and the legal tactics at play. Want to listen to ALL of our Podcasts Ad-Free? Subscribe through Apple Podcasts, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases:   Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski (All Cases) - https://audioboom.com/channels/5040505-hidden-killers-with-tony-brueski-breaking-news-commentary Chad & Lori Daybell - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098105-demise-of-the-daybells-the-lori-chad-daybell-story The Murder of Ana Walshe - https://audioboom.com/channels/5093967-finding-ana-this-disappearance-of-ana-walshe Alex Murdaugh - https://audioboom.com/channels/5097527-the-trial-of-alex-murdaugh The Idaho Murders, The Case Against Bryan Kohberger - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098223-the-idaho-murders-the-case-against-bryan-kohberger Lucy Letby - https://audioboom.com/channels/5099406-nurse-of-death-the-lucy-letby-story Follow Tony Brueski On Twitter https://twitter.com/tonybpod Join our Facebook Discussion Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/834636321133

Former prosecutor Laurie Gilbertson joins Tony to discuss the case against Bryan Kohberger, shedding light on the unexpected and seemingly "curveball" pieces of evidence that have recently emerged. Gilbertson will provide her expert analysis on the potential impact of these new findings on the trial and how they may change the outcome. Tune in to gain a deeper understanding of the complexities surrounding the Kohberger case and the fascinating twists it has taken. Want to listen to ALL of our Podcasts Ad-Free? Subscribe through Apple Podcasts, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases:   Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski (All Cases) - https://audioboom.com/channels/5040505-hidden-killers-with-tony-brueski-breaking-news-commentary Chad & Lori Daybell - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098105-demise-of-the-daybells-the-lori-chad-daybell-story The Murder of Ana Walshe - https://audioboom.com/channels/5093967-finding-ana-this-disappearance-of-ana-walshe Alex Murdaugh - https://audioboom.com/channels/5097527-the-trial-of-alex-murdaugh The Idaho Murders, The Case Against Bryan Kohberger - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098223-the-idaho-murders-the-case-against-bryan-kohberger Lucy Letby - https://audioboom.com/channels/5099406-nurse-of-death-the-lucy-letby-story Follow Tony Brueski On Twitter https://twitter.com/tonybpod Join our Facebook Discussion Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/834636321133

Former prosecutor Laurie Gilbertson joins Tony to discuss the case against Bryan Kohberger, shedding light on the unexpected and seemingly "curveball" pieces of evidence that have recently emerged. Gilbertson will provide her expert analysis on the potential impact of these new findings on the trial and how they may change the outcome. Tune in to gain a deeper understanding of the complexities surrounding the Kohberger case and the fascinating twists it has taken. Want to listen to ALL of our Podcasts Ad-Free? Subscribe through Apple Podcasts, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases:   Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski (All Cases) - https://audioboom.com/channels/5040505-hidden-killers-with-tony-brueski-breaking-news-commentary Chad & Lori Daybell - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098105-demise-of-the-daybells-the-lori-chad-daybell-story The Murder of Ana Walshe - https://audioboom.com/channels/5093967-finding-ana-this-disappearance-of-ana-walshe Alex Murdaugh - https://audioboom.com/channels/5097527-the-trial-of-alex-murdaugh The Idaho Murders, The Case Against Bryan Kohberger - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098223-the-idaho-murders-the-case-against-bryan-kohberger Lucy Letby - https://audioboom.com/channels/5099406-nurse-of-death-the-lucy-letby-story Follow Tony Brueski On Twitter https://twitter.com/tonybpod Join our Facebook Discussion Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/834636321133

Laurie Gilbertson, former prosecutor and head of Tribeca Blue Consulting about the conflict of interest allegations that are being made against Bryan Kohberger's public defender, Anne Taylor . If you like THIS PODCAST - and want AD FREE episodes, Be sure to sub to our premium channel on APPLE PODCASTS! http://shorturl.at/uLTWX Get access to: -Ad Free EXCLUSIVE BONUS Series from True Crime Today. -Advance Episodes -Ad Free Episodes 

Laurie Gilbertson, a former prosecutor, and head of Tribeca Blue Consulting, about the conflict of interest allegations that are being made against Bryan Kohberger's public defender, Anne Taylor. If you like THIS PODCAST - and want AD FREE episodes, Be sure to sub to our premium channel on APPLE PODCASTS! http://shorturl.at/uLTWX Get access to: -Ad Free EXCLUSIVE BONUS Series from True Crime Today. -Advance Episodes -Ad Free Episodes Update Description

Today we talk with Laurie Gilbertson, a former prosecutor and head of Tribeca Blue Consulting, about the Alex Murdaugh Trial. We discuss what it's like to prosecute a “dynasty” family like the Murdaughs. We also talk about the physical reactions we've seen from Alex Murdaugh in court and during his police interrogation. If you like TRUE CRIME TODAY - and want AD FREE episodes, Be sure to sub to our premium channel on APPLE PODCASTS! http://shorturl.at/uLTWX  Get access to: -Ad Free EXCLUSIVE BONUS Series from True Crime Today. -Advance Episodes -Ad Free Episodes  

In today's edition, we discuss the following: - New footage that surfaced over the weekend, with audio. - An update from the Moscow PD - Interview with Laurie Gilbertson, a former prosecutor, legal analyst, and legal educator who formed Tribeca Blue Consulting. 4 Killed For What is a production of True Crime Today; listen & sub to True Crime Today Here: https://availableon.com/truecrimetodayatruecrimepodcast Join Tony Brueski @tonybpod on twitter and our Facebook Discussion Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/834636321133023 If you have information about the Moscow, Idaho murders: Tip Line: 208-883-7180 Email: tipline@ci.moscow.id.us Digital Media: http://fbi.gov/moscowidaho Update Description

Getting on the right stage, large or small, can open many doors for us. But most of the time, the thought of public speaking gives us sweaty palms or anxiety. We think we must be this master of the stage, like Steve Jobs, Elizabeth Gilbert, or Brene Brown. You don't. But you do need to take what's unique about YOU and your story and share it in a way that's compelling. So, how can you get over your stage fright and learn powerfully deliver your story? Laurie Gilbertson is a former New York City sex crime, organized crime, and homicide prosecutor, television legal analyst, educator, and entrepreneur. As the owner of Tribeca Blue Consulting, she helps professionals communicate with clarity, confidence, and creativity in their public speaking, presentations, trial work, and media appearances. On this episode of Wickedly Smart Women, Laurie joins Anjel to share how her love of story helped her find success in the courtroom. She'll walk us through why she left the courtroom, her journey's transition, and how that opened the door for her to help others harness the power and potential of their own stories. Listen in as Laurie shares how she uses the techniques she learned as a prosecutor and a television legal analyst to help her clients lean into the power and potential of their unique stories to share compelling narratives that impact their listeners. What You Will Learn Laurie shares her journey to becoming a prosecutor in the sex crimes unit How the one fundamental secret of creating compelling arguments in the courtroom translates to public speaking The mindset-changing experience that opened a new world of possibilities for Laurie Why Laurie is driven to help others tell their stories How to leverage the skills prosecutors and legal analysts use to grab the listener's attention How one of Laurie's clients packaged his story to breakthrough to success The secret essential component of telling an impactful story Connect with Laurie Gilbertson Tribeca Blue Consulting Laurie on LinkedIn Resources The Wealthy Life Readiness Quiz Connect with Anjel B. Hartwell Wickedly Smart Women Wickedly Smart Women Facebook Community Wickedly Smart Women on TeePublic Wickedly Smart Women on Clubhouse The Wealthy Life Mentor The Wealthy Life Mentor on Facebook Anjel on Twitter Anjel on Instagram Email listeners@wickedlysmartwomen.com  Leave Us A Message On Our listener line:   540-402-0043 x4343

Laurie Gilbertson was a criminal prosecutor in New York for 10 years and then made the jump to consulting, sharing all that she had learned with other lawyers and entrepreneurs. She shares her experiences being a female in another male-dominated industry, and some tips and tricks for putting your best self forward for a sales pitch or any communications in the business world.Tribeca Blue ConsultingWant to become a better communicator, or just boost your confidence when talking about your business? Get in touch with them today! Tribeca Blue Consulting will help you develop the skills to connect with your audience creatively, effectively and successfully. We provide group and individual training for public speaking, small and large group presentations, interviews, media appearances and any other situation that calls for compelling communication. Visit them online or reach out to Laurie directly at laurieg@tribecablueconsulting.com. You can also visit her on LinkedIn! Thank you to Tony Stuck for the awesome intro/outro music and to Mary Ann King for the amazing pod art that you see for every episode. If you've enjoyed this episode, please subscribe, rate, and review to help out this podcast! 5 stars goes a long long way and I so appreciate your support. I know it says write a review and that can be daunting but apparently Apple isn't asking for a novel. A simple Hey! What's up? Would be more than fine!And for more information about me and this podcast visit us online at othercwords.com or follow us @othercwords. Talk to you soon! And thanks for joining me today!

Laurie Gilbertson is a former New York City sex crimes and organized crime prosecutor, television legal analyst, educator, and entrepreneur. As the owner of Tribeca Blue Consulting, she helps professionals communicate with clarity and confidence in their public speaking, presentations, trial work, and media appearances. Laurie is passionate about helping people present their ideas in creative and persuasive ways that engage their audiences. As a former trial lawyer and television legal analyst, she shares insider's tips and tricks from her experiences in front of judges, juries, and live television audiences to help her clients get the most out of their presentations and public speaking. Laurie works with her clients through group training and one on one coaching to develop their personal and professional narratives, craft the hooks that draw their audiences in, and curate the stories that keep them listening and wanting to learn more. This means more attention and success to them and their businesses and more clarity and confidence in their communications. Laurie is a graduate of Cornell University and American University, Washington College of Law. She traded big city life for the beauty of Colorado when she and her family moved to Denver from New York several years ago. You can find her reading in her backyard, running (slowly but surely) in the park, hiking in the mountains, or watching a sporting event or dance competition involving her three awesome teenagers. This show is sponsored by Leopard Solutions Legal Intelligence Suite of products, Firmscape, and Leopard BI. Push ahead of the pack with the power of Leopard. For a free demo, visit this link: https://www.leopardsolutions.com/index.php/request-a-demo/ Links: www.tribecablueconsulting.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/lauriegilbertson/ laurieg@tribecablueconsulting.com   Conference Links: https://www.naps360.org/page/ConferenceOverview The National Association of Personnel Services; Conference dates: Oct 2 – 4, 2022; Alexandria, VA  www.sanfordrose.com

This week on Gin and Justice, Justine and Amanda chat with Laurie Gilbertson. Laurie is a former sex crimes prosecutor, television legal analyst and legal educator who formed Tribeca Blue Consulting to bring her unique skills and passion for teaching to help professionals communicate better.  Delving into the  stories that stuck with Laurie as a prosecutor, she talks about finding her true purpose not only as a prosecutor and pursuer of justice, but also her love of helping others.  Today, Laurie uses that exact combination in helping others to learn how to communicate effectively and clearly, finding purpose in each project, whether that's helping CEOs communicate to their board, or lawyers presenting their trial. For more info on Tribeca Blue Consulting:https://www.tribecablueconsulting.com/For more about Laurie: https://www.linkedin.com/in/lauriegilbertson

Communication expert Laurie Gilbertson shares strategies for consultants to become exceptional communicators and public speakers--both critical ways of getting more consulting business.

1:04- behind the scenes: podcast stats - number of countries, downloads and fan favourite episodes.  6:11 - We're putting the podcast on hold indefinitely.  9:54 - Mark's favourite episode: Chris Marhefka.  14:38 - Adrian Spear episode: distance between stimulus and response.  15:39 - Grant  Herbert episode: be yourself.16:13 - funniest moments: Lisa Linke, Christian Fleck, Daisy Simonis.  19:32 - most inspiring guests: Dr Everett Worthington, Ashley Kesner, Ricardo Gonzalez, Greg van Borssum.  24:29 - most surprising moments: grief (Jillian Rosoff and David Richman) and erotic empathy (Amanda Luterman), backburners (Dr Michelle Drouin).30:45 - the counter-intuitive Danish way of parenting: Jessica Joelle Alexander.  34:07 - most informative: Dr Timothy Levine.  38:43 - episodes on trust: Marie-Clarie Ross and Melanie Marshall.  39:00 - presenting and storytelling: Laurie Gilbertson.  40:26 - story telling: Francisco Mahfuz, Gabrielle Dolan.  44:07 - quick recap of topics covered in the podcast.  45:17 - leadership episodes: David Neal and Ryan Hartley.  48:02 - topics that we would have liked to do?  50:26 - benefits of doing the podcast: meeting people.  51:14 - empathy: Dr Ashok Bhattacharya and Daniel Murray.  53:11 - relationships are at the heart of life: Dr Michelle Drouin, Craig Bulmer and Ashley Fico.  54:48 - knowing better does not mean doing better: Divan's communication mistake.  59:32 - feedback: Jason Rosoff and Paul Farina.  1:01:09 - Tina Robinson: "all behaviour is communication".  1:01:40 - Mark's recommendations: Chris Marhefka, Dr Michelle Drouin, Amanda Luterman, Jessica Joelle Alexander.  1:02:45 - Divan's recommendations: Jessica Joelle Alexander, Francisco Mahfuz, David Neal, Dr Ashok Bhattacharya, Jason Rosoff, Dr Timothy Levine.1:05:15 - practice is as important as knowledge.  1:05:50 - wrapping up the podcast.  1:09:52 - connect with Divan and Mark.  1:10:28 - final words.  You can find more detailed show notes with links to references at: https://candourpodcast.com/the-finale/

Public speaking is a vulnerable position because of the fear of judgment and rejection. But there is a way to conquer your anxiety and become a better speaker in public. Eric Anderton presents Laurie Gilbertson, the founder and CEO of Tribeca Blue Consulting. Laurie talks about how practice and preparation are huge factors in feeling comfortable on stage. Allow yourself to rehearse and figure out which words sound natural when you speak. Afterward, it's easier to turn your attention away from yourself and towards the audience during your presentation. If you want more practical tips on becoming a better speaker in public, this episode's for you.  

2:10 - Alexander Hamilton.  5:02 - what drew Laurie into criminal law?  10:26 - the most important lessons Laurie's father taught her was about communication.  11:55 - importance of credibility when making your case.  14:18 - logic vs emotion in arguing a case.  17:32 - the importance of primacy: making the most of an opening statement.  23:53 - knowing your audience when the audience is very diverse.  27:37 - dealing with difficult people in the audience.  30:25 - we can easily misread our audience.  31:57 - the stories we tell ourselves can hinder communication.  33:16 - how to prepare for presentations.  38:16 - can you prepare too much?  43:23 - making a closing argument.  46:36 - communication lessons from interrogating witnesses.  48:58 - if you want honest feedback, ask kids.  52:01 - let your witness be the star of the show.  55:32 - arguing cases you don't believe in.  1:02:27 - adapting your presentation style for television.  1:04:26 - biggest barrier to good presentations: being yourself.  1:06:24 - do people struggle more with content or delivery?  1:09:56 - be like a child when speaking on stage.  1:12:13 - connect with Laurie Gilbertson. You can find more detailed show notes with links to references at: https://candourpodcast.com/laurie-gilbertson

Communication skills are key to leaders being effective. Not in just speaking but listening, strategizing and being able to make your point.  Who better than a former NYC prosecutor to share what works. Having the ability to ask the right question, to guide the discussion and then convince a body of people to decide the case can be useful for everyone who listens. Enjoy this great discussion filled with tactical tips.  Don't forget to subscribe!! About Laurie Laurie Gilbertson is a former New York City sex crimes, organized crime, and homicide prosecutor, television legal analyst, educator, and entrepreneur. As the owner of Tribeca Blue Consulting, she helps professionals communicate with clarity, confidence, and creativity in their public speaking, presentations, trial work, and media appearances. In 2019, she became a member of the Board of Directors and helped launch the Legal Entrepreneurs for Justice, an incubator program for attorneys starting solo firms to help provide access to justice to Coloradans. She currently serves as an advisory board member. Laurie began her legal career with a federal clerkship in Washington D.C, after which she joined the Queens County District Attorney's Office, where she prosecuted homicides, organized crime, sexual assaults and violent felony cases during her ten-year tenure. She translated her extensive trial experience into creative and comprehensive on-air legal analysis for local and national TV and other media outlets, which she continued when she transitioned to a role in the non-profit sector. Laurie graduated from Cornell University with a B.A. in Government and received her law degree cum laude from the Washington College of Law at American University. She is licensed to practice before the U.S. Supreme Court and the bars of the States of Colorado and New York.   Website: www.tribecablueconsulting.com LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/lauriegilbertson/ About Glenn Pasch: "Everyone finds themselves in charge at some point in their lives. Yet many of us lack the skills to generate consistent results. My goal is to help you learn the skills to adapt and grow in your personal and business life.” Glenn Pasch is CEO of PCG Digital, a full service digital marketing agency that specializes in helping businesses create and deliver customers raving, recommending & returning for more. He is author of 2 books including "The Power of Connected Marketing" and has spoken and educated audiences throughout the US and internationally. Let's Connect: Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/glennpasch/​ Personal Website http://glennpasch.com/​ Company website: https://pcgdigital.com/

Storytelling will help you sell to clients, persuade colleagues, engage employees, develop your brand narrative, gain a competitive advantage, and even win a trial in court. Learn how you can use it effectively to make presentations more memorable for your audience and make your product more charismatic to the end-user: https://blog.talaera.com/business-storytellingLaurie Gilbertson is a former New York City homicide, sex crimes, and organized crime prosecutor. She's also a television legal analyst, educator, and entrepreneur. She is the founder and CEO of Tribeca Blue Consulting, where she helps professionals communicate with clarity and confidence in their public speaking, presentations, trial work, and media appearances.Visit our free webinar calendar: https://bit.ly/3BSySZBLearn more about Talaera: http://talaera.com/

Brian speaks with Laurie Gilbertson, a former New York City sex crimes, organized crime, and homicide prosecutor, television analyst, educator, and entrepreneur.

How do you make it in media? Preparation is key when it comes to delivering memorable media interviews. However, Laurie Gilbert, notes that the ability to work collaboratively rather than competing, as well as asking for help whenever necessary, can be really helpful in propelling people to succeed. Laurie Gilbertson is a dynamic, passionate and poised communicator, whether in the courtroom, the classroom or on television. After a successful legal career encompassing criminal prosecution, government service, media appearances and non-profit work, Laurie formed Tribeca Blue Consulting to bring her unique brand of enthusiasm, dedication and skill to teaching people how to use powerful and creative presentations, public speaking and on-camera appearances to connect with their clients and their audiences. Laurie studied Government and English at Cornell University, where she wrote features for the Cornell Daily Sun and honed her public speaking by delivering hourly news updates on the campus radio station. She is licensed to practice before the U.S. Supreme Court and the bars of the States of New York, Colorado and Maryland. In this snippet from her full-length interview, Laurie talks about how she transitioned from being the district attorney to being an on-camera legal analyst. She also talks about the importance of embracing a collaborative attitude. Listen in! Social Media Handles https://www.tribecablueconsulting.com/ https://www.linkedin.com/in/lauriegilbertson/ ………………………………………………… Do you want to be a go to expert that news reporters, anchors and media producers turn to? Are you a media professional looking for credible, reliable and timely guests? Shock Your Media Potential is here for you. Shock Your Media Potential is a one of a kind platform that connects vetted experts with news professionals around the globe. As part of the launch of the platform, CEO Michael Sherlock, along with co-host Eddie Luisi, stage manager for Good Morning America, have interviewed 25 media personalities and professionals to ask them the questions you need to know the answers to in order to become more newsworthy, pitch your story better, and get invited back again and again, and much more. Some of their guests are household names, with exceptional on-camera careers. Others are award-winning directors, producers, camera operators, audio engineers, celebrity hair and makeup professionals, and so much more. As a part of our launch celebration, you can participate for free in our Shock Your Media Potential virtual conference, running March 28th through April 1st. To learn more about our platform and our conference today, go to https://www.shockyourmediapotential.com.

Laurie Gilbertson is a former New York City sex crimes, organized crime, and homicide prosecutor, television legal analyst, educator, and entrepreneur. As the owner of Tribeca Blue Consulting, she helps professionals communicate with clarity, confidence, and creativity in their public speaking, presentations, trial work, and media appearances. What you will learn in this episode: Laurie Gilbertson's background and how she went from an NYC prosecutor to a business owner and communication consultant How Laurie's skills from the courtroom directly translate to essential skills needed in the boardroom Laurie's process for taking on new clients and how she sets them up for success The importance of storytelling and tips from Laurie on how to be an excellent storyteller Laurie's three most important skills she learned as a prosecutor and how you can use them to be an effective communicator Resources: Website: www.tribecablueconsulting.com LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/lauriegilbertson/  

Laurie Gilbertson is a speaker, coach, entrepreneur, trial lawyer and the founder of Tribeca Blue ConsultingLaurie helps professionals communicate with clarity, confidence and creativity when public speaking, presenting, making media appearances or being involved in trial work.In this episode Laurie shares tips and advice for those looking to deliver their first presentation as well as for experienced presenters and business leaders who want and potentially need to ensure that they understand the benefits of preparation and practice.As Laurie says on her website ‘public speaking should be an opportunity to excel, not an obligation to dread'. Laurie shares lots of tips and advice around the area that probably holds back most presenters and that is a lack of confidence and the worry about simply being too nervous to speak.Laurie advises that presenters and speakers talk through their presentation as a way of practising to ensure it works and to never be too prepared – sound advice given the fact that a lot of business presenters and speakers very often for various reasons fail to prepare well and do little or no practiceLaurie's top three tips to transform your presentation and speaking skills are:Be yourselfCreate an introduction which demonstrates you thought about your audience – this could be in the form of a question, a story that or a propDeliver a conclusion in a similar format so that you are generating engagement energy at the beginning and the end of your presentationYou can find Laurie at Tribeca Blue Consulting And here on Linked In This is episode 203 of the Better Presentations More Sales podcast -  the previous 202 episodes are available on your usual podcast app or you can listen and download them via this link.  To find out how more about how I can help you with your sales challenges in 2022 please follow this link. For presentation coaching programmes, including helping you deliver that key presentation please follow this linkIf you or your company are keen to get better at sales and presentations in 2022 and you think you might need some help to make that happen let's have a 15-20 minute informal no obligation no charge chat on Zoom. Simply click on this link to make that happen.To find out more and potentially purchase my book please click here: 12 Business Lessons from Running and UltraMarathon. Thanks for listening. If you like the show please do leave a review via your podcast app. or comment in Linked in or share with others. Any / all of those actions would be much appreciated.

I am excited to bring this guest on to talk about one of the topics that I've been working on for myself and my clients.   Get practical tips and advice on how you can develop the skills to speak with comfort, ease and authenticity. Laurie Gilbertson is here to share how she helps her clients communicate effectively.   Here's what we cover:   Why sharing your story is important.   How to bring yourself in a confident way.   Understanding how to calm your nerves when it's time to take the stage.   We have all been on the receiving end of a great presentation. I encourage my clients to create their signature talk, and the number one question they ask is how can I do it in a way that will really connect?   Laurie has an incredible story. She was a prosecutor who learned how to speak in court rooms! She's a great example of how we can hone our skills no matter what our background.   Public speaking isn't about being on a BIG stage, unless that's part of your personal goals. It's about communicating. In all sorts of situations. Learning to communicate well pays off in all parts of your business and life.   Laurie shares 3 key strategies for getting comfortable speaking. These will help anyone become better communicators.   Connection:   One of the best ways to gain confidence is to remember it's about your audience. It's not about you. Think about how you can connect with them.   Communicate: How can you get your communication across effectively? Laurie shares 2 great tips to help you jump in with energy.   Conquer: Tell your story with comfort and ease and emotion. It's the “so what” part of your presentation. Why should your audience care? What do you want them to do when you complete your presentation? Hear how you can use your story to make this easy.   Tips to help you get started.   Focus on making a good first impression.  How can you turn a weakness into a strength?   Tell a story. Laurie shares a great way to frame your story – so helpful!  The power of the pause.   Use a prop to help you make a point.  Final messages matter too.   Have some fun with it if your content allows for that. It's a great way to show your personality and the audience picks up on the energy as well.   When is the time to invest in help to become a better presenter?   It's never to early to learn. Laurie shares that communication isn't always valued until it's time for a big interview or presentation. She encourages all of us to realize the impact of being a good communicator.     Resources:   Episode 91  Tribeca Blue Consulting   Start with Why TED Talk  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Laurie Gilbertson is a former New York City sex crimes, organized crime, and homicide prosecutor. As the owner of Tribeca Blue Consulting, Laurie helps entrepreneurs, executives, and trial attorneys craft and present engaging and persuasive narratives clearly and confidently in the courtroom, the boardroom, and the media.We hear about some of Laurie's most gripping cases, learn how to get inside the mind of a jury, and explore potential reasons behind the recent uptick in violence in America. =======================0:00 Intro 1:21 Why do we pay so much attention to true crime drama?3:27 The most gripping case Laurie prosecuted as a D.A. in Queens County, NY9:40 How do you get inside the mind of a jury?14:52 What makes a fair juror?19:45 How to control your nerves when the stakes are high like they are in a courtroom25:01 What do we know about the uptick in violence in the U.S.?31:15 Criminal Justice in a world where fewer laws are being enforced36:38 The reform taking place that provides more people access to justice38:57 What is legal entrepreneurship?42:54 “Doing well by doing good”44:30 The ripple effect of democratized legal aid46:04 Why you should make ‘learning how to communicate better' a priority53:41 Tips to help improve how you communicate today 55:59 “One Final Question”=======================LinkTree to support us and leave an Apple Podcast review (thank you!)Let's get in touch!Join the discussion in the episode comments on our YouTube channel or social media pages...InstagramTwitter

I had a delightful conversation with Laurie, she is insightful, light and engaging. We talked about her childhood dinner conversations where she learned to advocate for herself, quotes that moved her, her transition from a  New York City prosecutor to a legal commenter on news channels into her leap to becoming a communications coach in a whole different state. Laurie shares how she found the focus to chase her a new vision of her future  and she grew both personally and professional as she found her way. Laurie shared all this, including the important role her family has always played with warmth and humour.Laurie Gilbertson is a former New York City sex crimes, organized crime, and homicide prosecutor, television legal analyst, educator, and entrepreneur. As the owner of Tribeca Blue Consulting, she helps professionals communicate with clarity, confidence, and creativity in their public speaking, presentations, trial work, and media appearances. Links:www.tribecablueconsulting.comhttps://www.linkedin.com/in/lauriegilbertson/About Mark Laurie - Host.Mark has been transforming how women see themselves, enlarging their sense of sexy, expanding their confidence in an exciting adventure that is transformational photography. His photo studio is inner Spirit Photography.  http://innerspiritphotography.comhttps://www.instagram.com/innerspiritphotography/Sound Production by:Lee Ellis  - myofficemedia@gmail.com

Owner of Tribeca Blue Consulting, Laurie Gilbertson, joins us on the She Built It™ Experience today. Laurie is a former New York City sex crimes, organized crime, and homicide prosecutor, television legal analyst, educator, and entrepreneur. She shares her thoughts on why communication is a crucial leadership tool, and how elevating your communication can lead to taking advantage of every opportunity that's out there. Visit this episode's blog post here: https://www.shebuiltit.com/podcast-blog/60-laurie-gilbertson

Laurie Gilbertson is a former New York City sex crimes, organized crime, and homicide prosecutor, television legal analyst, educator, and entrepreneur. As the owner of Tribeca Blue Consulting, she helps professionals communicate with clarity, confidence, and creativity in their public speaking, presentations, trial work, and media appearances. On this week's show Laurie and I talk...

Ethical, transparent and accessible. Is that what comes to mind when you think of private law practice? Me either. But the work my guest today is doing, is trying to change all that.Laurie Gilbert left her work as a Prosecutor in New York City, where she tried everything from fraud to murder cases. In fact her last case was highly unique in that it took three times to get the defendant an attempted murder conviction despite the plethora of evidence and solid witnesses. This was the trial of Christopher Prince in Queens, New York.She now sits on the board of Legal Entrepreneurs for Justice - a legal incubator, designed to operate in a totally new way. I loved learning about this and was thrilled when Laurie shared that these are cropping up across the Unites States, with about 70- 80 in existence. You can check and see if your state has a "legal incubator" here:https://www.americanbar.org/groups/delivery_legal_services/initiatives_awards/program_main/Listen as Laurie shares the many ways these new models of practicing law are helping level the playing field. We round out the conversation with some good ol' Elizabeth Holmes commentary, and Laurie leaves us with her personal thoughts on justice. You can learn more about Legal Entrepreneurs for Justice and Laurie's consulting work via the links below:https://www.tribecablueconsulting.com/https://www.lejco.org/https://www.linkedin.com/in/lauriegilbertson/You heard two podcast trailers in today's episode:Ghost Town: listen now! https://www.ghosttownpod.com/Reel Crimes: listen now! https://www.reelcrimespod.com/Thank you to PAIR for sponsoring today's episode!If you need a website, check out PAIR!www.pair.com/freePromo code is QUICKSTARTSUPPORT:Do you love DIE-ALOGUE? Please tell a friend, share on your social media, and consider becoming a DIE-HARD on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/creator-homeFOLLOW! We are @diealoguepod across all platformsWATCH! You can WATCH this episode on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCTCrzoZanSNXQJtpC2Vq8-gRATE: Please rate and review DIE-ALOGUE if you haven't already?! Then share the show with your friends, family, foes, + true crime communities.Rate on apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/die-alogue-a-true-crime-conversation/id1470890320Rate on Spotify:https://open.spotify.com/show/64IHCryN2jFaswrVIzMV8wCONTACT:Thank you so much for joining me in these conversations. You can always reach out to me via my website: https://www.rebekahsebastian.com/discover/#contactor by email: rebekah@yellowtapetruecrime.comDIE-ALOGUE is part of the Crawlspace Network, and is hosted and edited by Rebekah Sebastian. Audio engineering by Jason Usry.

“My biggest lesson so far from entrepreneurship is that if you can't find it, make it for yourself.” Laurie Gilbertson Communication is an essential component of life both professionally and personal. Good communication skills allows for accurate and quicker understanding of information. This is according to our guest today Laurie Gilbertson, who further says that it is about preparing and mastering the confidence to pass and receive information. Laurie Gilbertson is a former New York City sex crimes, organized crime, and homicide prosecutor, television legal analyst, educator, and entrepreneur. As the owner of Tribeca Blue Consulting, she helps professionals communicate with clarity, confidence, and creativity in their public speaking, presentations, trial work, and media appearances. In todays episode, Laurie talks about her passion for entrepreneurship and how she is helping people use communication tools to get better outcomes. Listen in! Social Media Links: https://www.linkedin.com/in/lauriegilbertson/ https://www.tribecablueconsulting.com/ I am the founder of Tribeca Blue Consulting where I work with executives, entrepreneurs and trial lawyers to develop and hone their communications and public speaking skills. [2:17] Good communication is an essential leadership skill, and the great thing is that it can be learned. [2:31] There are so many easy and practical ways to make communication clear, engaging, and persuasive and that's exactly what I help my clients with. [2:48] People need to be prepared to get not just their message across, but really who they are and who their company is. [3:30] The bottom line is it leads to more profits for businesses and happier clients. [3:44] I do it with group trainings and interactive workshops, both online and one-on-one coaching as well. [4:23] The idea of presenting something in that succinct think and coherent way is that you are thinking not of all the things you can say but of how you can make it easy for your audience. [9:30] The second part of that is listening which is a huge part of communication. [9:54] By just asking questions and listening, you learn so much, and it helps so much for when you are going to open your mouth and talk. [11:02] Commercial break. [11:20] I never expected to be an entrepreneur so I call myself the reluctant entrepreneur. [14:38] Probably my biggest lesson so far from entrepreneurship is that if you can't find it, make it for yourself. [16:20] There are so many opportunities that people have to really do work that is important to them, that provides value to people. [16:29] If people need a big change, just start thinking about what changes you can make in your mindset. [21:00] My first rule for everyone is that it is about being yourself and not about fitting into some mold. [22:34] I do tell clients, to be really proud of themselves for taking them that step to know that they are stepping out of a comfort zone in some way. [25:14] Like with all great communication, it's not about you but the value that you are bringing that no one else is. [25:56] One of my favorite quotes from Howard Thurman, says “don't ask yourself what the world needs. Ask yourself, What makes you come alive, then go do that, because what the world needs is people who have come alive.” [27:51] ………………………………………………… Thank you to our January Sponsor: www.businessmiracles.com or Heather Dominick Are you a highly sensitive individual? You can learn to be in charge of yourself physically, spiritually and financially in a way that honors your highly sensitive self. Heather Dominic is the founder of Business miracles.com. and she's been training highly sensitive entrepreneurs and leaders since 2010. Whether you've been in business for years, or just starting out, learn how to be comfortable in your highly sensitive skin, to create your work and life to match who you truly are, so you can work less while making more impact and income. You are welcome to take the HSE quiz by clicking the link: https://energyrich.isrefer.com/go/quiz/SYP/ Learn more: https://energyrich.isrefer.com/go/HSCC/SYP/

Starting your own practice isn't something they teach in law school. Join me as I sit down with legal professionals to hear firsthand accounts of just how they did it.   Today, my guest is Laurie Gilbertson. Laurie has a very interesting career. She started off as a district attorney in the Queens County, New York office. From there she transitioned to being a fixture on Court TV along with other New York media outlets commenting on cases in the news and developing her communication skills and honing that skill set to the point where she was able to provide counseling and training to help attorneys develop those skills. Now she's started her own practice, called Tribeca Blue Consulting, that provides training and education to attorneys and other professional services on the nuances and importance of communication, particularly as a form of leadership.   In this episode, Neil and Laurie discuss: The theater of communication.  Honing your public speaking and other communication skills.  Refining your skill sets in places other than the courtroom.  Communication in building your solo firm.    Key Takeaways: Preparation and self awareness is what really makes communication shine. Lawyers, overall, are often resistant to change. We need to open ourselves up to learn. Learning is a mindset change. The best lawyers are those who are open to it.  When giving any presentation, you've got to know what's going to come out of your mouth in the first 30 seconds. Be more interested than interesting.   "Communication is really all about connection. It's about getting out of your own head and getting into the perspective of your audience, whether it's your client, a colleague, a jury, judge, television audience, or a podcast audience, it's all about that." —  Laurie Gilbertson Get in touch with Laurie: Website: https://www.tribecablueconsulting.com/ (https://www.tribecablueconsulting.com/)  LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/lauriegilbertson/ (https://www.linkedin.com/in/lauriegilbertson/)    Thank you to our sponsor! http://callruby.com/lawentrepreneur (Ruby Receptionist) - Virtual receptionist & live call services that will help you grow your office (and save money), one call at a time - to learn more, go to http://callruby.com/lawentrepreneur (callruby.com/lawentrepreneur) or call 844.895.7829 Get in touch with Neil: Website: https://thelawentrepreneur.com/ (https://thelawentrepreneur.com/) Twitter: https://twitter.com/lawentrepreneur (https://twitter.com/lawentrepreneur) Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thelawentrepreneur/?ref=hl (https://www.facebook.com/thelawentrepreneur/?ref=hl) LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/tyralawfirm/ (https://www.linkedin.com/in/tyralawfirm/) If you've enjoyed the podcast, http://getpodcast.reviews/id/1086406592 (please head to Apple Podcasts and leave a rating & review for the show)! It only takes a moment, and really helps me to reach new listeners. You can also http://www.thelawentrepreneur.com/ (head to the website at TheLawEntrepreneur.com) for more information on the podcast and my legal services.    Show notes by Podcastologist Chelsea Taylor-Sturkie   Audio production byhttps://www.turnkeypodcast.com/ ( Turnkey Podcast Productions.) You're the expert. Your podcast will prove it. 

Laurie and Jason talk about how the best part of New York City is the night, her journey from law to running her own speaking firm and the secret (that's not a secret anymore) that she lives in Colorado, yet doesn't like the outdoors. "Don't ask yourself what the world needs. Ask yourself, What makes you come alive, and go and do that? Because what the world needs is more people who have come alive."Laurie Gilbertson is a dynamic, passionate and poised communicator, whether in the courtroom, the classroom or on television. After a successful legal career encompassing criminal prosecution, government service, media appearances and non-profit work, Laurie formed Tribeca Blue Consulting to bring her unique brand of enthusiasm, dedication and skill to teaching people how to use powerful and creative presentations, public speaking and on-camera appearances to connect with their clients and their audiences.Laurie loves the intellectual challenge of persuasion, advocacy and education. She is a former prosecutor who relished the courtroom experience and the opportunity to do justice for victims and their families when prosecuting homicides, organized crime, sexual assaults and violent felony cases during her ten years in the District Attorney's Office in New York City. She translated that extensive trial experience into creative and comprehensive on-air TV legal analysis for national and local media outlets. After some time spent litigating white collar and financial crimes, Laurie transitioned into the non-profit sector, where she created, produced and presented litigation courses with the Practicing Law Institute, the top legal education organization in the country.Laurie studied Government and English at Cornell University, where she wrote features for the Cornell Daily Sun and honed her public speaking by delivering hourly news updates on the campus radio station. After graduating cum laude from the Washington College of Law at American University, where she handled full criminal case dockets as a student attorney, Laurie clerked for two federal judges in Washington, D.C. She is licensed to practice before the U.S. Supreme Court and the bars of the States of New York, Colorado and Maryland.Laurie is a transplanted New Yorker currently living in Denver with her family, where she enjoys the adventure of raising three energetic children.https://www.tribecablueconsulting.com/ www.linkedin.com/in/lauriegilbertson/ https://www.instagram.com/lauriebethg/Enjoying the podcast? Please tell your friends, give us a shoutout and a follow on social media, and take a moment to leave us a review at https://lovethepodcast.com/talkingtocoolpeople.Find the show at all of the cool spots below.WebsiteFacebookInstagramIf something from this or any episode has sparked your interest and you'd like to connect about it, please email us at podcast@jasonfrazell.com. We love hearing from our listeners!If you are interested in being a guest on the show, please visit jasonfrazell.com/podcast.