POPULARITY
8 episodes with open meetings
6 episodes with open meetings
3 episodes with open meetings
2 episodes with open meetings
2 episodes with open meetings
2 episodes with open meetings
2 episodes with open meetings
2 episodes with open meetings
2 episodes with open meetings
i. Constitution We Believe 1. We believe the First Amendment's Establishment Clause was intended to prevent a federal government-sponsored or preferred religion, not to separate God from our government or to remove religion from public life; therefore, we affirm our right under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution to exercise our freedom of speech including religious speech. 2. We believe the Second Amendment is an individual right of the citizens of the United States to keep and bear arms; therefore, we oppose any attempts, whether by law or regulation at any level of government, to restrict any citizen's right to keep and bear arms (open or concealed), to restrict access to ammunition, or to record the purchase thereof. 3. We believe the United States Constitution directs the judiciary to interpret law, not make law or create law through judicial activism. 4. We believe in the concept that Congress shall make no law that applies to citizens of the United States that does not apply to the Senators and Representatives. 5. We believe in the concept of nullification as a legitimate tool for adjudicating disputes between the states and the federal government when the federal government enacts a law clearly not in pursuance of the constitution and powers delegated in Art. I, Sec. 8. 6. We believe in the Tenth Amendment that provides "the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people," and we oppose any attempt by the federal government to intrude on state's rights. 7. We believe the Constitution provides for a clear and distinct separation of powers among the three branches of government. Any governmental action that tends to promote or allow one branch of government to practice the power or powers of the other branches of government is a violation of the limits placed on government by the people. 8. We believe in the duty and obligation of the federal government and the State of Oklahoma to adhere to and respect treaties between the federal government and the Indian tribes. We Support 1. We support the display of Judeo-Christian religious symbols, including the Ten Commandments in public places. 2. We support legislation that will protect gun and ammunition manufacturers or resellers from lawsuits attempting to hold the manufacturers or resellers liable for misuse of guns. 3. We support requiring that candidates for president present public proof of qualification in accordance with the Constitution at the time of filing, through the election board of each state. 4. We support a US Constitutional Amendment requiring a balanced budget. 18 5. We support a US Constitutional Amendment instituting term limits for all elected members of Congress. 6. We support a U.S. Constitutional Amendment defining marriage as the union of one man and one woman. 7. We support a requirement that each piece of legislation only address one issue. 8. We support the review and minimization of the Endangered Species Act. 9. We support the abolishment, or reduction and restructuring, of the Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Education, IRS, CIA, ATF, FBI, FEMA, NSA, DHS, CDC, and the Department of Labor and their powers and responsibilities distributed to state authority. 10. We support the protection of public and private sector whistleblowers who have firsthand information. 11. We support union's refunding dues used for partisan political activity. 12. We support the right of private associations to admit or deny membership based on what each association's conscience dictates. 13. We support an English Language Act, which would make English our official language in the United States. 14. We support the idea that when U.S. Conference Committees meet, they should consider only those terms submitted from the House and Senate, with no additional expenditures and items added. 15. We support the preservation of the National Day of Prayer. 16. We support legislation to limit the power of federal regulatory agencies. 17. We support the identification of persons as citizens or non-citizens in the census. We Oppose 1. We oppose any federal taxation on firearms, ammunition, or accessories and/or confiscation of firearms, ammunition, or accessories. 2. We oppose universal background checks and red flag laws for firearm purchases. 3. We oppose any legislation that would require the use of trigger or other locking devices on firearms. 4. We oppose any so-called "assault" weapons ban and any effort to register or restrict firearms, ammunition, or magazines. 5. We oppose legislation that would require gun owners to purchase insurance policies covering the misuse of their firearms. 6. We oppose the Patriot Act and the NDAA' s Sections 1021 and 1022, which allow American citizens, 19 except for enemy combatants, to be held indefinitely without due process, and call for its repeal. 7. We oppose court decisions based on any foreign law, such as Sharia Law, U.N. regulations and other international organizations, instead of U.S. law and Constitutional doctrine. 8. We oppose the creation of a new federal internal security force. 9. We oppose federal wage caps. 10. We oppose Statehood for the District of Columbia and allowing its representative a vote in Congress. 11. We oppose the appointment and funding of presidential "czars." 12. We oppose any attempts by the Federal Government to reinstitute the "Fairness Doctrine" or institute "Net Neutrality." 13. We oppose the construct of "Free Speech or Safe Zones." 14. We oppose national injunctions by federal district courts. 15. We oppose the use and sharing of data from Automated License Plate Readers as an infringement on our 4th amendment protected rights. ii. Criminal Justice We Believe 1. The rights of victims and their families must be protected in criminal proceedings, with notice and opportunity to attend all proceedings related to the crime(s) against them. 2. Restitution by the convicted criminal should be ordered to be made to the victim (or his estate) to compensate for losses and damages incurred as a result of the crime(s) committed. 3. The death penalty must be retained as an available punishment in appropriate cases. 4. Inmates who abuse the legal system by filing repeated frivolous claims should receive appropriate punishments for their misconduct. 5. Decisions on prison reform should be made by the Legislature after consultation with district attorneys, prison officials, and other interested parties, with the view towards stopping criminal behavior early, rather than adopting permissive treatment of low-level crimes which may deceive or encourage a young adult to continue on the wrong path under the mistaken assumption that there will be no consequences for criminal behavior. Consideration of incentives for first-time or youthful offenders who refrain from further misconduct may be a useful option to be considered in designing such reforms. 6. We believe in due process and that no one should be deprived of life, liberty, or property by the government or its agents without either being found guilty by a jury or pleading guilty of a crime. We therefore oppose the practice of civil asset forfeiture. 20 We Support 1. We support the repeal of The Oklahoma Uninsured Vehicle Enforcement Diversion Program as it is unconstitutional at the state and federal level. We Oppose 1. We oppose the monitoring, surveillance and tracking of United States citizens without a lawfully obtained warrant. iii. Federal & State Elections Preamble: The foundation of our representative-republic is honest elections. The Oklahoma Republican Party is committed to preserving every legally eligible Oklahoman's right to vote. We support only day of in-person voting as written in the Constitutions with limited exceptions to protect voting rights for the elderly, the disabled, military members, and all other eligible voters. We urge all elected officials around our state to take all necessary steps to ensure that voters may cast their ballots in a timely and secure manner. Security and transparency shall take precedence over convenience to ensure honest and fair, local, state, and federal elections. We Believe 1. We believe in fair and honest election procedures. 2. We believe equal suffrage for all United States citizens of voting age. 3. We believe in the constitutional authority of state legislatures to regulate voting. We Support 1. We support a bit-by-bit forensic audit of all electronic devices, including but not limited to servers, ballot machines, and paper ballots throughout the state immediately before and after each election. 2. We support vigorous enforcement of all our election laws as written and oppose any laws, lawsuits, and judicial decisions that make voter fraud difficult to deter, detect, or prosecute. 3. We support full enforcement of all voter ID laws currently enacted. 4. We support felony status for willful violations of the election code and increasing penalty for voter fraud from a misdemeanor back to a felony. 5. We support consolidating elections to primary, runoff, special, and general election. 6. We support sequentially numbered and signed ballots to deter counterfeiting. 7. We support expanding the Attorney General's staff for investigating election crimes and restoring the ability of the Attorney General to prosecute any election crimes. 8. We support the ability for civil lawsuits to be filed for election fraud or officials' failure to follow the Oklahoma Election Code. 21 9. We support allowing trained poll watchers from anywhere in Oklahoma with local party or candidate approval. 10. We support creating processes that will allow rapid adjudication of election law violations. 11. We support requiring voters to re-register if they have not voted in a five-year period. 12. We support requiring proof of residency, citizenship, and voter registration via photo ID for each voter. 13. We support retaining the 25-day registration deadline. 14. We support requiring a list of certified deaths be provided to the Secretary of State for the names of deceased voters to be removed from the list of registered voters, with checks every third year of the voter rolls to ensure all currently registered voters are eligible. 15. We support giving the Secretary of State enforcement authority to ensure county registrar compliance with Secretary of State directives. 16. We support protecting the integrity of the Republican Primary Election by requiring a closed primary system in Oklahoma. 17. We support drawing districts based on eligible voters, not pure population. Districts should be geographically compact when possible 18. We support hand counting of ballots. 19. We support recalls, audits, recounts, and irregularity and fraud investigations requested within 45 days of an election. 20. We support verification of United States citizenship for voting or registering to vote. 21. We support elections run by United States citizens. 22. We support counts to be posted on Precinct doors. We Oppose 1. We oppose internet voting, the use of tabulation machines and electronic voting machines of any kind for public office and any ballot measure. 2. We oppose all motor voter laws, automatic voter registration (AVR), and all forms of electronic databases, such as ERIC (Electronic Registration Information Center) and all third-party registration vendors. 3. We oppose all federal legislation, including but not limited to the Electoral Count Reform Act of 2022, which nullifies the 10th Amendment of the Bill of Rights. 22 4. We oppose unlawful voting, illegal assistance, or ineligible people voting in our national, state, and local elections. 5. We oppose ranked choice voting. 6. We oppose any identification of citizens by race, origin, creed, sexuality, or lifestyle choices and oppose the use of any such identification for the purposes of creating voting districts. We urge that the Voting Rights Act of 1965 be repealed. 7. We oppose any redistricting map that is unfair to conservative candidates in the Primary or the General Election. 8. We oppose the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact and any other scheme to abolish or distort the procedures of the Electoral College. 9. We oppose after-hours voting C. Natural Resources We Believe 1. We believe dependence on foreign energy sources is a national security issue. 2. We believe governments should ease restrictions in the search for energy and other natural resources. 3. We believe the federal agricultural appropriations should accurately show the percentage of money set aside for non-agricultural programs such as school lunch programs and food stamps. 4. We believe the responsible use of natural resources is essential for the benefit of future generations. We Support 1. We support the creation and enactment of a national energy policy to reduce dependence on foreign sources. 2. We support the private expansion of oil and gas exploration and refining capacity. 3. We support the exportation of U.S. petroleum products. 4. We support labeling of all food and fiber with country-of-origin labeling. Further, only products born, raised, slaughtered, and processed or sprouted, harvested, grown, and processed in this country should receive a U.S. label. 5. We support energy policy based on private development, efficient use and expansion of current resources such as fossil fuels, clean coal, and nuclear energy; and exploration and efficient use of other resources such as biofuels, wind, solar and water energy. 6. We support ending all federal and state subsidies, including tax credits, for industrial renewable 23 energy, including but not limited to, wind and solar. 7. We support the rights of individuals and businesses to refuse the installation of smart meters without penalties. 8. We support the right of states to provide water for present and future use within their borders by state residents before they can be designated for use to other states. 9. We support environmental recommendations that are based on sound science, that respect and protect the rights of property owners, and that do not impose unreasonable burdens on Oklahoma citizens or businesses. 10. We support more use of coal and natural gas to be used in the production of electricity. 11. We support the use of modular nuclear, or small natural gas fired generation facilities to be built close to high demand facilities to greatly reduce the need for long and expensive transmission lines. 12. We support mandatory country-of-origin labeling of meat products and that a country-of-origin label that states in any way that it is a product of the USA must be of the following requirements: Born, raised, harvested, packaged & processed in the USA. 13. We support The Packers and Stockyards Act and the enforcement of anti-trust laws. 14. We support private property rights and call for appropriate legislation to prohibit the use of eminent domain by private companies. 15. We stand with Oklahoma and her property owners against the Green Agenda. We Oppose 1. We oppose government curbs, moratoriums, punitive taxes and fees on our domestic oil and gas industry. 2. We oppose states selling water rights to out-of-state buyers. 3. We oppose the use of eminent domain for any water sale. 4. We oppose human rights for animals. 5. We oppose livestock taxation. 6. We oppose legislation that restricts or regulates family farms or farmers' markets. 7. We oppose restrictive regulation of carbon and particulate matter emissions in agriculture. 8. We oppose the "Cap and Trade" system for carbon dioxide. 9. We oppose the UN's Agenda 21, aka UN 2030, as a coordinated effort to relinquish the sovereignty of the United States to foreign powers. 24 10. We oppose the purchase or ownership of land by a foreign government or entity. 11. We oppose the production, selling, and labeling of a product that is an alternative protein source claiming to be meat, otherwise known as or referred to as fake meat, and labeling such product as meat, beef, burger, steak, or any other name given to an actual meat protein source derived from the production and slaughter of livestock. 12. We oppose current regulations that allow foreign beef to enter the U.S. and be packaged, repackaged, or commingled with domestic product and then labeled a product of the USA. 13. We oppose the theory that cow flatulence, belching, or any process of enteric fermentation that is said to emit methane or a greenhouse gas that some link to the theory of global warming is some sort of detriment threat to the environment. 14. We oppose any form of carbon tracking solutions imposed on farmers and ranchers that will ultimately lead to more costly and burdensome regulations. 15. We oppose NACs (natural asset companies) or similar companies derived by investors, the SEC, or any other entity that wishes to monetize, trade natural outputs, or otherwise maximize ecological performance in such a way that any company can control the management of public or private lands quantifying outputs of natural resources such as air and water. 16. We oppose any effort of the federal government to have any role in animal care or husbandry. 17. We oppose mandates or restrictions on the use of antibiotics for farm or veterinary use. 18. We oppose mandatory Electronic Identification device (EID) tags on livestock, birds, and animals. D. National Issues i. Defense We Believe 1. We believe that a strong national defense should be fully funded, provide sufficient compensation, educational opportunities, quality training, and the best equipment for our armed forces. 2. We believe any educational institution that inhibits the normal operations of ROTC or military recruiters should be ineligible for government funding. 3. We believe foreign enemies who have committed or planned acts of aggression against the U.S. are unlawful enemy combatants and are not entitled to citizenship rights under the U.S. Constitution. We believe they should be held in detention facilities such as Guantanamo Bay, not the U.S. Prisons Systems, and their cases adjudicated by military tribunals, not by U.S. Criminal Courts. 4. We believe Congress and the President should refrain from weakening the military through changes to the Uniform Coe of Military Justice. The military should be allowed to maintain its high level of honesty, integrity, morality, and operational capabilities. 25 5. We believe in the complete accounting of all MIAs and POWs that were engaged in military actions by the United States. We Support 1. We support maintaining a strong national defense and advocate "peace through strength", with a combat ready and capable force. 2. We support the right of the military's internal determination of who is qualified to perform the various roles and functions of each branch of the uniformed armed services. 3. We support veterans' and survivors' benefits, and to receive top quality health care. We support the reform of the Veteran's Administration and the use of private facilities when appropriate. 4. We support helping our veterans to succeed in their return to civilian life in medical care, mental health care, education, housing, and employment assistance. 5. We support the freedom of military chaplains to provide religious services including freedom of worship according to their faith. 6. We support and encourage continued public and privately funded exploration of space. 7. We support returning to "Don't Ask Don't Tell" for the military of the United States. We Oppose 1. We oppose re-instituting the draft except in time of war as declared by Congress. 2. We oppose drafting females into U.S. military service. 3. We oppose the military use of U.S. troops under foreign command except joint operations. 4. We oppose the erosion of our military's readiness through "gender norming" for training and promotion. 5. We oppose the further reduction of benefits and entitlements to service members, former service members, and their families. 6. We oppose halting military pay during US government shutdowns. ii. Foreign Relations We Support 1. We support economic stability be it in the U.S. or Internationally 2. We support the dollar as the principal currency of the world. 3. We support equal access of U.S. products to global markets and the elimination of trade barriers. 26 4. We support withdrawing from treaties and agreements, such as the Kyoto Treaty, and the Paris Climate Accord, that hamper the U.S. economy and compromises freedoms We Oppose 1. We oppose the Chinese Communist Party and any other governments that are manipulators of the U.S. dollar and exchange rates at the expense of U.S. National Security as well as economic stability. 2. We oppose paying into UN programs that are against American principles and freedoms. 3. We oppose any doctrines that infringe upon U.S. Sovereignty and the Sovereignty of U.S. allies such as Israel, the Ukraine, and Taiwan. 4. We oppose terrorism and any nations that sponsor terroristic organizations and groups that are anti-U.S. such as Al-Qaeda and ISIS. 5. We oppose the sale of technology by U.S. Corporations to terrorist and enemy nations. 6. We oppose the transfer of U.S. taxpayer wealth to any foreign governments under the umbrella of foreign, humanitarian aid, scientific research, and military assistance for non-U.S. interests. 7. We oppose the principles of the World Economic Forum to devalue the U.S. dollar and do not accept them as a body of global governance. 8. We oppose the creation of the Transatlantic Common Market 9. We oppose any United Nations Programs that seek a "world order" over the Earth's population and U.N. policies that are forced over the world's nations. 10. We oppose the World Health Organization's policies over U.S. citizens and setting precedent for the U.S. medical community. 11. We oppose foreign control over any ports or bases within the jurisdiction of the United States. 12. We oppose any actions taken by previous administrations that relinquish U.S. sovereignty and control over U.S. data and private communications. iii. Immigration We Support 1. We support limited legal immigration and embrace legal immigrants who choose to assimilate to our American culture, language, and values. 2. We support securing our borders against illegal immigrants and potential enemies of the United States including building a wall or barrier on our southern border. 3. We support legal requirements for citizenship, excluding provisions for birthright citizenship to children of illegal residents. 27 4. We support a strictly regulated and enforced guest worker program. Legal guest workers should assume social costs, such as education and health care for themselves and their dependents. 5. We support the method for determining the number of immigrants and temporary visa holders allowed in the United States should be revised to prevent an adverse effect on our national security, wages, housing, environment, medical care, or schools. 6. We support that the U.S. government should vigorously enforce and demand that all local law enforcement agencies uphold and enforce all federal laws concerning illegal immigration. We particularly support the work of the men and women of Immigration and Custom Enforcement (ICE) and US Border Patrol and Protection. 7. We support the elimination of sanctuary cities for illegal aliens and the defunding of any government entity which declares itself a sanctuary city. 8. We support strong enforcement of state and federal laws dealing with illegal aliens. 9. We support substantial state fines for employers who knowingly hire illegal aliens. 10. We support issuing driver's license only to citizens and others who reside here legally, and not to illegal aliens. We Oppose 1. We oppose illegal aliens being given the same privileges as U.S. citizens or legal aliens, including entitlements such as Social Security, health care (excepting trauma care), education, and earned income tax credits. State government social programs should be available only to citizens and legal residents of the United States. 2. We oppose any form of blanket amnesty. 3. We oppose legal immigrants overstaying their visas. 4. We oppose a "path to citizenship" that would grant citizenship to illegal aliens faster than to immigrants who have come to the United States through legal means. E. State Issues i. State Legislature We Believe 1. We believe all bills should be limited to one issue. 2. We believe that it is the responsibility of individual legislators to read and to be knowledgeable of all pieces of legislation prior to voting. 3. We believe that all state-tribal compacts and agreements should require the approval of both houses of the legislature in addition to the ten-member Joint Committee on State-Tribal Relations. 28 4. We believe Oklahoma shall participate only in programs or plans that protect private property rights and encourage citizens to develop their property in a manner that does not harm others. 5. We believe Oklahoma should not participate in any global ID initiatives and should prohibit the introduction of a radio frequency identification device (RFID) in any state-issued identification card. 6. We believe the Oklahoma Lottery should be repealed. 7. We believe a fee shall be defined as funds collected for voluntary use of government service, be used exclusively for that service, and not to exceed the cost of that service. We Support 1. We support any legislation that protects our rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights. 2. We support an explanation of the specific Oklahoma and U.S. Constitutional authority when filing a bill. 3. We support full funding of all state retirement systems. 4. We support legislation rescinding Oklahoma's previous calls for a U.S. Constitutional Convention. 5. We support the state and any county, municipality, city, town, school or any other political subdivision to display, in its public buildings and on its grounds, replicas of United States historical documents including, but not limited to, the Ten Commandments, Magna Carta, Mayflower Compact, Declaration of Independence, United States Constitution, Bill of Rights, Oklahoma Constitution and other historically significant documents in the form of statues, monuments, memorials, tablets or any other display that respects the dignity and solemnity of such documents. Such documents shall be displayed in a manner consistent with the context of other documents contained in such display. 6. We support full protection of U.S. Second Amendment rights in Oklahoma by amending the Oklahoma Constitution to mirror the Second Amendment of the US Constitution. 7. We support maintaining the Constitutional Carry law in Oklahoma statute. 8. We support the ability of state law enforcement to restore the peace and protect Oklahoma citizens through the arrest and prosecution of any persons/agents attempting to inflict unconstitutional laws/mandates on its citizens. 9. We support the fundamental right to own and to enjoy our private property and we oppose restrictions or losses of that right. 10. We support fair, just, and timely compensation for property owners when governmental regulations limit property use. 11. We support driver's license photos of a lower resolution that is perfectly adequate for visual identification, but not for biometric tracking. 12. We support the repeal of mandatory fingerprinting or other traceable biometric information, and 29 we oppose the maintenance of a biometric database, in connection with an application for a driver's license or government ID. 13. We support lawsuit reform including but not limited to "loser pays". 14. We support amending the current Right to Farm law to explicitly allow for expansion, production, technological changes, and measures to protect these activities. 15. We support the Unmanned Surveillance Act which prohibits the use of a drone when no warrant has been issued. 16. We support a state constitutional amendment requiring judges to inform jurors of their duty to judge the law (nullification); and prohibiting judges and district attorneys from infringing on the rights of the defense to inform the jury of this duty. 17. We support amending the Oklahoma Constitution to remove the unelected Judicial Nominating Commission and adopt the federal model authorizing the Governor to appoint Oklahoma appellate judges with confirmation by the Oklahoma State Senate. 18. We support the oversight and regulation of the medical marijuana industry for medical purposes only. 19. We support the state and its citizens maintaining control of all transportation instead of selling or leasing control of that right to foreign entities, corporations, private/public partnerships, or other states. 20. We support efficient and necessary spending on our state, county, and local roads and bridges because they are essential for economic growth and development. 21. We support a moratorium on creation of additional turnpikes in Oklahoma until existing turnpikes in Oklahoma have generated enough toll revenue based upon an independent audit to repay their original costs, are conveyed to state ownership, and converted to toll-free roads. 22. We support the elimination of the Oklahoma Turnpike Authority and all tolls. We Oppose 1. We oppose the final passage of any legislation before the full text has been read. 2. We oppose the concept of claiming property as "blighted" as a reason for taking land. 3. We oppose allowing state agencies to hire lobbyists to lobby other state agencies or the legislature. 4. We oppose animal ID programs by the government, leaving it up to the free market. 5. We oppose the expansion of gambling in any form in Oklahoma. 30 ii. State Agencies, State, County, and Local Government We Believe 1. We believe in transparent and honest government in the Oklahoma Legislature, all legislative committees, and in state and county agencies. 2. We believe all state agencies should be made accountable for maintenance of their records and accurate enforcement of rules, policies, and regulations. 3. We believe all government officials, including judges, who act in violation of the U.S. or Oklahoma Constitution should be impeached and removed from office in a timely manner. 4. We believe the Attorney General should be removed from the District Attorney's Council so that locally elected officials have the proper degree of autonomy. 5. We believe that no governmental agency or private business should require from any citizen any information that is not essential to the direct performance of the agency's/ business's operation or mandate. We Support 1. We support reducing the size of state government to allow citizens to do those things that people can do best for themselves. 2. We support legislative efforts to repeal outdated and irrelevant statutes in keeping with the philosophy of smaller government and support the elimination or consolidation of redundant authorities, boards, commissions, and agencies. 3. We support providing an enforcement mechanism to ensure compliance with the Open Meetings and Records Act and with audit findings. 4. We support external annual performance and financial audits. The auditor shall not be selected by the audited agencies. 5. We support public disclosure of all financial records of public institutions including trusts, authorities, libraries, community foundations, all state retirement funds, and teacher retirement funds. 6. We support the Whistleblower Act which protects all public employees, including higher education employees. 7. We support all elected and appointed officials to aggressively uncover, remedy, and prosecute all waste, fraud, and abuse in government including the elimination of all unnecessary state agencies. 8. We support the repeal of Title 11, Section 22-104.1 of the OK Statutes, which enables a municipal corporation to engage in any business it is authorized to license. 9. We support mandatory random drug testing for all employees of the State of Oklahoma and recipients of public assistance with sanctions for positive test results. 31 10. We support and call on the Attorney General to vigorously enforce Article XXII, Section 1 of the Oklahoma Constitution which prohibits foreign governments from owning businesses or real estate in Oklahoma. 11. We support that the state of Oklahoma shall not exercise any eminent domain action until at least 90% of affected property holders/interests has been acquired without the threat of eminent domain. 12. We support enforcement of state and federal Anti-Trust laws regulating the mergers of domestic and foreign corporations that create monopolies resulting in a loss of competition, and detrimental to Oklahoma entities. We Oppose 1. We oppose any exemptions to the current Open Meetings and Open Records Act. 2. We oppose unfunded mandates by the State Legislature and state agencies. 3. We oppose the declaration of a United Nations Day in Oklahoma. 4. We oppose legislative actions that would alter current county government structures (i.e. Home Rule). 5. We oppose self-serving legislation and conflict of interest legislation. 32 2025 Oklahoma Republican Party Platform Committee Casey Wooley, Chair Lori Gracey , Vice-Chair Patricia Pope – Blaine Bryan Morris – Canadian Rachel Ruiz – Canadian John Spencer – Canadian LeRoss Apple – Cimarron Bruce Fleming – Cleveland Sherrie Hamilton – Haskell Gary Voelkers – Kay Julie Collier – McClain Leslie Mahan – Oklahoma Ruth Foote – Oklahoma Mark Harris – Oklahoma Robert Scott – Okmulgee Jason Shilling – Payne Mishela DeBoer – Rogers Patricia Lyle – Rogers John Doak – Tulsa April Dawn Brown – Garvin Amanda Bergerson – Logan Michelle Wax – Carter Jana Belcher – Grady
What really counts as a public record? Can a text message land your organization in legal trouble? And why should private employers care about the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and the Open Meetings Act (OMA)? In this episode, Miller Johnson employment attorney Sarah Willey sits down with Rich Cherry to break down two critical public transparency laws: FOIA and OMA. Whether you're in HR, work for a public body, or represent a private employer that interacts with the government, this episode will help you avoid common compliance mistakes and protect sensitive information. Tune in as we explore: What FOIA and OMA actually cover Why personal texts and emails can become public records How private employers can (and should) use FOIA Common legal mistakes by public sector employers What makes a meeting "public" under the law
This week, the City Manager reviews the Mayor's conference from last week, discusses Sunshine Laws and Open Meetings, plus the Youth Advisory Council and the Michigan Municipal League.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
CLOSED MEETINGS vs. OPEN MEETINGS. In this episode of Take 12 Recovery Radio Show, the hosts discuss the differences between closed and open meetings in recovery, sharing personal experiences and insights. They explore the importance of community support, the spiritual aspects of addiction, and the role of newcomers in meetings. The conversation also touches on the legacy of Ozzy Osbourne and the significance of gratitude in recovery. The hosts emphasize the need for compassion and understanding in the recovery process, advocating for a welcoming environment for all individuals seeking help. Closing Song: Closed Meetings by Michael Purington. Facebook The Monty man (@take12radio) | TikTok#recovery #alcoholic #twelvesteps #wedorecover #addiction
In this podcast episode, host Michelle Frechette welcomes Carrie Dils, Mika Epstein, and Ryan McCue to discuss their roles in the WordPress community and the new FAIR project. The group explores FAIR's mission to create a federated independent repository system for WordPress plugins and themes, focusing on decentralization, community-driven moderation, inclusive governance, and privacy. They address challenges like supporting premium plugins, reducing environmental impact, and fostering global participation. The episode highlights FAIR's collaborative, open-source approach and invites listeners to get involved through GitHub and community meetings, aiming to shape a more innovative and inclusive WordPress ecosystem.Top Takeaways:FAIR Is Reimagining Plugin Discovery and Trust for WordPress: FAIR is building a more open, decentralized ecosystem for WordPress plugin discovery—empowering both end users and developers. By enabling verified directories and authenticated plugin listings (via methods like DNS verification), FAIR provides an alternative to the limitations of the WordPress.org repo, while increasing transparency, user safety, and trust.Community Participation Is Central to FAIR's Success: The FAIR initiative is deeply community-driven. Contributors are encouraged to get involved through GitHub Discussions, introduce themselves, offer help, or join working groups. The leadership team is intentionally building these groups based on people's skills and availability, rather than predefined roles—making FAIR flexible, inclusive, and open to evolving needs.FAIR Encourages Innovation Outside Traditional WordPress Constraints: The project provides an alternative path for plugin creators who may not want to follow the traditional WordPress.org model (e.g., having to release a free version first). With FAIR, creators can request to be listed in aggregator directories that are more flexible, values-aligned, or niche-focused—fostering innovation and lowering barriers to entry.FAIR Is Still in Early Development—and Actively Growing: While the FAIR plugin and protocol are live (accessible via fair.pm), the ecosystem is in its formative stages. The team is prioritizing essential needs (the “MVP”) and building infrastructure to support future growth in documentation, marketing, design, development, and user testing. They welcome feedback on plugin issues, conflicts, and ideas, encouraging broad experimentation and iteration.Mentioned in the Show:FAIRLinkedIn LearningAwesome MotiveLez Watch TVHuman MadeAspire PressGravatarLinux Foundation ProjectBlueskyWPCCBlack PressMastodon DrupalCourtney RobertsonAutomatticMediaWikiMonster InsightsGravity FormsFastly
DC Ward 5 Councilmember Zachary Parker talks with Ward 3 Councilmember Matt Frumin about the Council's recent votes on ERAP (Emergency Rental Assistance Program) reform, and on emergency legislation to amend the Open Meetings Act. Both topics have been marked by controversy in public discussion. The Councilmembers distill the various viewpoints and explain their votes. Communications Director Melissa Littlepage shares highlights from the latest Ward 5 Weekly Newsletter. Read at ward5.us/news, and subscribe at ward5.us/newsletter.
0:03:10 - Ogden Downtown Alliance Annual Report0:24:24 - Zone Ogden - Update1:08:31 - Administrative Update1:19:14 - Council Business: Training - Ethics, Open Meetings, and Cyber Security
This week, we shared a story of the Georgia Supreme Court ruling against DA Deborah Gonzalez in a case related to Open Records. Find Open Records and Open Meetings laws here. Subscribe online at OconeeEnterprise.com
Host Scott Gerfen and OSBA Staff Attorney John Price join forces on this episode of "Leading the Way" to discuss the Open Meetings Act. They explore the common errors school districts make and the repercussions that can follow. Essential listening for school board members aiming to uphold the principles of open governance. Get more resources: https://www.ohioschoolboards.org/sunshine-law. Thanks to our sponsor: Pappas & Associates. Learn more at https://www.pappaskc.com.
Miami Real Estate Investment Strategies With Peter Zalewski Of Condo Vultures®
Please note: This is a preview of the report. Click on the “Read the report” button below for the entire article. Florida condo associations with at least 10 units are now required to hold quarterly board meetings and allow owners – who can purportedly be boisterous and confrontational – to ask questions about agenda items under a series of 2024 revisions to the state's condo law. As part of the changes adopted during the recent Florida legislative session, condo boards must now also provide advance notice to units owners when financial topics such as “regular or special assessments” and/or contracts for “goods and services” are scheduled to be discussed and/or voted upon. In an effort to bring increased transparency, copies of proposed contracts as well as the descriptions and estimated costs for items to be purchased must now be shared with unit owners – and made available for inspection – prior to all votes. Read the report: https://peterzalewski.substack.com/p/florida-condo-boards-must-now-hold
Did lawmakers at the Idaho legislature violate open meeting laws? That's the question swirling around the statehouse after an impromptu and unannounced meeting of some of the members of the powerful budget writing committee last Thursday, March 28.
A First Amendment and media attorney here in Salt Lake City says he's become increasingly concerned... about the number of bills our lawmakers are considering... that create exemptions for our public records and open meetings laws.
Arizona's open meetings law was recently violated.
Brad Young, KMOX Legal analyst and partner at Harris Dowell Fisher and Young joins Megan and Tom talking about Bob Menendez facing charges, Whip-It lawsuit and Wentzville schools.
Have you ever thought about your meeting as something that should be “designed?” Design implies purpose and intent, and meetings should have both. In this episode, Dr. Ray and JLC coaches Colleen Sullivan and Kathy Roide continue their discussion around the “Context, Purpose, Outcome” process in meetings. They'll show you how to use the method in reverse, so you can better design your meetings and establish focus around your meetings' agenda items. The Jorgensen Learning Center offers a variety of programs for individuals and organizations to enhance their communication and leadership skills… To find out more, visit our Events page at https://www.gojlc.com/inlearning-events
Secret meetings and encrypted conversations. Those claims are at the heart of a lawsuit filed by two Democratic state representatives against their own party. Then, Michael Hancock reflects on the accomplishments and challenges after three terms as Denver's mayor. And a new rule could change how more than 8 million acres of public land are managed in Colorado.
Secret meetings and encrypted conversations. Those claims are at the heart of a lawsuit filed by two Democratic state representatives against their own party. Then, Michael Hancock reflects on the accomplishments and challenges after three terms as Denver's mayor. And a new rule could change how more than 8 million acres of public land are managed in Colorado.
“Why do you start your meetings like that?” It's a question we get asked frequently by our clients, and it's the subject of our latest podcast episode. Join Dr. Ray and JLC coaches Colleen Sullivan and Kathy Roide for a discussion about using the “Context, Purpose, Outcome” protocol to open your meetings and define the intent and focus for that meeting. The team will also talk about why that process works, and why it's important. The Jorgensen Learning Center offers a variety of programs for individuals and organizations to enhance their communication and leadership skills… To find out more, visit our Events page at https://www.gojlc.com/inlearning-events
Full Spectrum's FCC Open Meeting Recaps feature a first take and analysis following the FCC's monthly Open Meetings, with an emphasis on the agenda items directly impacting our clients. On today's episode of Full Spectrum, Senior Associate Winafred Brantl discusses the Commission's proposed significant changes to the International Section 214 regime (1:11.515). Responding to growing concerns regarding undisclosed foreign ownership of international Section 214 carriers, the FCC will conduct a one-time data collection from all international Section 214 authorization holders and has proposed a requirement for periodic renewals or reviews of international Section 214 authorizations as well. At the same time, the FCC proposes to expand the scope of information required in any international Section 214 application and to implement recurring update filing requirements. In addition, Special Counsel Mike Dover discusses the Commission's proposals relating to expanded accessibility and transparency in the Wireless Emergency Alert program (15:36.614). Subscribe for ongoing coverage of these topics and future FCC Open Meetings.
This week on the podcast, the editors discuss New York State's Open Meetings Law, a sunshine law designed to ensure that all levels of government, from the State Senate down to local village boards, land-use boards and school boards, conduct the public's business out in the open, where citizens can observe the deliberations behind the decisions that affect their wallets and quality of life. The editors explain the narrow instances in which boards may meet privately, and they raise concerns about when the Open Meetings Law is subverted.
This week on Behind the Headlines, the panel discusses the Open Meetings Law; a whopping commercial real estate deal in East Hampton; the Riverhead IDA; a zero tolerance policy in Riverhead; and Lorraine Dusky's new book on adoption.Joseph P. Shaw, Executive Editor, The Express News GroupBill Sutton, Managing Editor, The Express News GroupDenise Civiletti, Editor/Publisher, Riverhead LocalChristopher Gangemi, Staff Writer, The East Hampton StarBeth Young, Editor/Publisher at East End Beacon
This week on Behind the Headlines, the panel discusses the Open Meetings Law; a whopping commercial real estate deal in East Hampton; the Riverhead IDA; a zero tolerance policy in Riverhead; and Lorraine Dusky's new book on adoption.Joseph P. Shaw, Executive Editor, The Express News GroupBill Sutton, Managing Editor, The Express News GroupDenise Civiletti, Editor/Publisher, Riverhead LocalChristopher Gangemi, Staff Writer, The East Hampton StarBeth Young, Editor/Publisher at East End Beacon
A recent Supreme Court of Ohio ruling provides important clarity to public bodies, including school boards, about the Open Meetings Act and executive sessions. What do you say before you go into executive session? How do you comply with the law while in executive session? What are the consequences of violating the law? OSBA's Senior Deputy Director of Legal Services Jennifer Hardin, our guest for this episode, answers those questions. Read more about the Supreme Court's opinion at https://www.ohioschoolboards.org/blogs/legal-ledger/multiple-civil-forfeitures-multiple-claims-same-conduct-rejected-open-meetings. This episode is brought to you by Sedgwick, an OSBA endorsed program. Get more details at https://www.ohioschoolboards.org/workers-compensation.
During our podcast coverage of the September 2022 Elgin Sustainability Commission meeting, Erik questioned whether commissioners had violated the Illinois Open Meetings Act. He made a promise to The Elgin Watchman's listening audience to roll up his sleeves and get to the bottom of things. In this podcast episode, Erik . . . Interviewed former Elgin Township Supervisor Franklin RamirezShares a few thoughts from a newspaper reporterConveys additional thoughts from a downstate attorneyAnd shares court cases provided by a good government nonprofit organization's internAfter hearing (and reading) all of the information put in front of him, Erik has no doubt that the Elgin Sustainability Commission violated the Illinois Open Meetings Act. Erik asks listeners to call/email city of Elgin General Counsel Bill Cogley. For more information, please visit our website, LIKE our Facebook page, and subscribe to our podcast using one of the many RSS Readers on our Buzzsprout podcast platform.Have you downloaded, read, and shared The Elgin Watchman Podcast's Single Use Bag Fee Ordinance Advocacy eGuide? If not, then please . . . Go to our Waste webpage at www.elginwatchman.com/wasteScroll a little bit down the page and you will see itExpand it to full screen, read, and click the buttons/links to learn moreConsider downloading or sharing the eGuide with likeminded friendsStart calling and emailing Mayor David Kaptain and all city council members using the information on the last page of the eGuide. Ask them to please adopt the Single Use Plastic Bag Fee ordinanceYou can make a difference. Get involved . . . get engaged . . . and always keep watch!
Full Spectrum's FCC Open Meeting Recaps feature a first take and analysis following the FCC's monthly Open Meetings, with an emphasis on the agenda items directly impacting our clients. This month, Special Counsel Mike Dover discusses the Commission's Report and Order modifying the clarity and accessibility of Emergency Alert System (EAS) messages to the public to make alerts more accessible to the public, including for persons who are deaf or hard of hearing. (1:00). Partner Chip Yorkgitis discusses the Commission's Second Report and Order addressing mitigation of orbital debris that adopts rules requiring low-Earth orbit space station operators planning disposal of their satellites after the end of mission through uncontrolled atmospheric re-entry, absent a waiver or applicable grandfathering, to complete disposal as soon as practicable and, in any event, within five years. (16:40) Subscribe for ongoing coverage of these topics and future FCC Open Meetings. The next FCC Open Meeting is slated for October 27, 2022.
Throughout September, we are revisiting some of our favorite podcast episodes from the past three years. This week: government secrecy and closed door conversations. You'll hear why the people you elected to represent you may be having secret conversations you can't hear and cutting deals you can't see. A recent FOX6 investigation uncovered the Wauwatosa School Board discussed public records in private. Why is that a big deal? In today's episode of Open Record, the FOX6 Investigators explain what you should expect from your government's public meetings. Bryan Polcyn and Amanda St. Hilaire walk listeners through a crash course in Open Meetings 101. Amanda breaks down a recent investigation involving the Wauwatosa School Board. Attorney Tom Kamenick, founder of Wisconsin Transparency Project, joins the episode. He's with a law firm dedicated to enforcing the state's open records and open meetings laws and explains how public meetings should go and what you should expect from your government.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Full Spectrum's FCC Open Meeting Recaps feature a first take and analysis following the FCC's monthly Open Meetings, with an emphasis on the agenda items directly impacting our clients. This month, Special Counsel Mike Dover discusses the establishment of the Affordable Connectivity Outreach Grant Program to provide eligible governmental and non-governmental entities funding to conduct outreach to increase awareness of and encourage participation in the Affordable Connectivity Program among eligible low-income households (0:47) and the consideration of a Third Report and Order which would establish the one-year Your Home, Your Internet Pilot Program with the goal of increasing awareness of the Affordable Connectivity Program among recipients of federal housing assistance and facilitating enrollment in the ACP by providing targeted assistance with the ACP application (10:50). Partner Chip Yorkgitis discusses several space-oriented items, including a report and order and further notice of proposed rulemaking concerning rules for the 17 GHz frequency band to support more intensive satellite use of the spectrum (18:18) and the adoption of a Notice of Inquiry that would examine opportunities and challenges of in-space servicing, assembly, and manufacturing – or “ISAM” – that can support sustained economic activity in space (29:31). Subscribe for ongoing coverage of these topics and future FCC Open Meetings. The next FCC Open Meeting is slated for September 29, 2022.
Harold Doucet recaps 07/19 council meeting. Discusses Texas Open Meetings Act and drainage issues. Harold Doucet talks about possible violation with the Texas Open Meetings Act to council. Mr. Doucet talks about possible violations with the sale of Pleasure Island, Dr. Thigpen being hired to do evaluations. Mr. Doucet also touches on drainage issues. Gulfway and Houston Ave becoming a retention pond and other topics. https://youtu.be/RuoZPv24ZQ8 --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/revolution409/support
Full Spectrum's FCC Open Meeting Recaps feature a first take and analysis following the FCC's monthly Open Meetings, with an emphasis on the agenda items directly impacting our clients. This month, Partners Tom Cohen and Hank Kelly and Special Counsel Mike Dover discuss key actions and topics from the July 14th meeting, including the Report and Order and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on an enhanced competition incentive program for wireless radio services, Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking updating the Intercarrier Compensation Regime to Eliminate Access Arbitrage (7:40), and the Notice of Inquiry on supporting survivors of domestic and sexual violence (16:50). Subscribe for ongoing coverage of these topics and future meetings.
In this episode, I share a LIVE discussion about the best ways to open a meeting. Given three scenarios, we walk through what to say in the first 90 seconds. --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/matt-warren8/message
*This is part one of a two-part episode* Full Spectrum's FCC Open Meeting Recaps feature a first take and analysis following the FCC's monthly Open Meetings, with an emphasis on the agenda items directly impacting our clients. This month, Partners Tom Cohen, Chip Yorkgitis, and Hank Kelly discuss key actions and topics from the June 8th meeting, including (1:45) a Notice of Inquiry related to facilitating access to spectrum for offshore uses, (6:23) a Public Notice aimed at improving wireless 911 call routing, and(18:40) a previously adopted Notice of Proposed Rulemaking seeking comment on Affordable Connectivity Program data collection. Subscribe for ongoing coverage of these topics and future meetings.
Today's episode is packed with updates. Updates on Jacobo Medoza's (Kovo) Disposition Hearing yesterday. The Estes Park School District R-3 Board of Education meeting and talk about new allegations that the School Board may have violated Colorado Open Record laws. We then end the episode by interviewing local Estes Park resident Patty Brown regarding the Big Kahuna memorial project and a quick update on the troubles at the post office. Here is a copy of the letter circulating through the Estes Park Community (written by the same group that had approximately 150 signatures voicing their opinions on the sudden separation between the district and former Superintendent Sheldon Rosenkrance.):The undersigned allege that the Estes Park School District Board of Education has violated the law in its recent executive session terminating the Superintendent's contract before public comment was received and by apparently discussing the action in private communications outside of open meetings requirements. The President of the Board of Education of the Estes Park School District has twice insisted that the recent termination / dismissal of Superintendent of Schools Sheldon Rosenkrance was “totally legal”. The response to inquiries and public comment shows a deliberate disregard for transparency, fairness/ethics, the law, and administrative process.The specific violations of the Colorado Open Meetings law were: ● Engaging in private communications between Board members on a matter that is only allowed at open meetings and after public announcement. ● Holding a meeting for a formal action and adopting it in an executive (closed) session.● Holding a meeting involving the dismissal, discipline, or compensation of an employee that was not open to the public. A special session, implying that the decision, voting to terminate Mr. Rosenkrance's contract, and adopting the “mutual separation” (termination) agreement asks us to accept that all of that was all done in about an hour. While discussing a legal position to take may be done in closed session, any actiontaken at a meeting that has not first had the opportunity for public input violates the Open Meetings law. Another provision, specifically addressing an employment discipline, invites public input unless the employee requests it be closed. The Board made a decision, had an agreement in closed session, voted on it, then had public input at the following regular board meeting. Private communications between Board members regarding a planned action is also illegal. As outlined below, it appears private emails and conversations took place prior to the special session. These must be made public.This is not how we expect a Board of Education to behave. Their abuse of power has violated trust in a significant part of the community. It will take more than just “technically being legal” to regain that trust.The remedy for the alleged violations, detailed below, as shown by a recent Colorado judicial opinion, is an injunction and/or the voiding or invalidation of the action. Or, given that the newly elected majority won the election by just a handful of votes, a recall would have a likelihood of success, particularly when it appears that the action was taken because of the personal opposition by some Board members to the Superintendent's administration. Dismissing him with weeks left in the school year is highly unusual and probably wasted close to $200,000 of District money that does not represent good stewardship of taxpayer funding.The legal violations under the quoted sections of the COLORADO REVISED STATUTES TITLE 24. GOVERNMENT - STATE ADMINISTRATION ARTICLE 6. COLORADO SUNSHINE LAW PART 4. OPEN MEETINGS LAW C.R.S. 24-6-401 (2012) appear to be as follows:“The following may NOT be done in an executive (closed) session:“no adoption of any proposed …. formal action…shall occur at any executive session that is not open to the public.” (emphasis added)Additionally, the law expressly adds:“All ..meetings held…to consider ….the dismissal, discipline, promotion, demotion, or compensation of, or the investigation of charges or complaints against ….[an] employee shall be open to the publicunless said applicant, official, or employee requests an executive session.” (emphasis added). [no evidence of his request has been provided, despite a request]And to be absolutely clear, the statute adds: “upon the announcement by the local public body [the School Board] to the public of the topic for discussion in the executive session……. after such announcement, may hold an executive session only at a regular or special meeting and for the sole purpose of considering any of [certain] …. matters; except that no adoption of any proposed policy, position, resolution, rule, regulation, or formal action. …shall occur at any executive session that is not open to the public.Mr. Rosenkrance agreed to the action, no doubt under some duress, and a legal action to void it would waste more district resources and perhaps his best interest. However, the Board of Education is now on notice that such actions will not be tolerated in the future.Admittedly, the Board of Education gave the minimum notice of a special meeting to consider the termination of Mr. Rosenkrance, and discussions with legal counsel and considerations of actions may be done in an executive session, including deciding the position to take in a termination action or settlement.But let's review the facts, confirmed by the video recording of the special meeting. After the closed session of about an hour, with the Board's attorney, the Board and Mr. Rosenkrance announced an agreement. Then, the Board voted and adopted the settlement. That is an ACTION. Yes, it was done in open session, but there is no evidence that Mr. Rosenkrance waived his rights to an open session, and public comment was taken AFTER the action. How was the agenda or the meeting scheduled, how did the attorney come to the meeting, and how were the terms so quickly agreed to, unless the Board members discussed the possible action in private meetings or communications among the Board members.The law is clear. No action may be taken at a special or general Board meeting WITHOUT BEING OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AND COMMENTS TAKEN. The minutes and video show it was a done deal without abiding by those requirements.A recent court case in Douglas County, also after a superintendent dismissal, held that one-on-one discussions between School Board meetings “at which public business is discussed and/or decisions reached is a violation of the purpose of the statute, not just its spirit”. This court said the action cannot be simply a “rubber stamp”, as to do so circumvents the legality of the Open Meetings Law. The Board discussions and decisions were not made openly, but in closed session. That is more than simply receiving confidential legal advice.Sure, at the next open general meeting, the Board heard public comments, but it did not take state the special session was just a proposal. It was a decision. No action or vote was taken after open discussions or public comment.All of this demonstrates a blatant disregard of transparency, respect of public participation, and apparently, the law. Similar decisions or actions may result in community action.Also, if you would like to plug into or support the Kahuna Memorial Project, you can find more information at the following links:Website: www.kahunamemorial.comGoFundMe: https://www.gofundme.com/f/KahunaMemorialFacebook: Kahuna the Elk of Rocky Mountain National Park https://www.facebook.com/groups/357613813065071Twitter: Kahuna Memorial @JohnCoo87405512 Today's podcast is sponsored by: Get full access to The Colorado Switchblade at www.coloradoswitchblade.com/subscribe
Full Spectrum's FCC Open Meeting Recaps feature a first take and analysis following the FCC's monthly Open Meetings, with an emphasis on the agenda items directly impacting our clients. This month, Partners Tom Cohen and Hank Kelly and Special Counsel Mike Dover discuss key actions and topics from the May 19th meeting, including (00:53) a number of actions addressing foreign-originated and other illegal robocalls, (15:00) a proposal by the A-CAM Broadband Coalition to expand broadband service, and (26:40) a possible update to rules providing priority provision and restoration of service for national security and emergency response users. Look out for ongoing coverage of these topics and future meetings.
A recent FOX6 investigation uncovered the Wauwatosa School Board discussed public records in private. Why is that a big deal? In today's episode of Open Record, the FOX6 Investigators explain what you should expect from your government's public meetings. Bryan Polcyn and Amanda St. Hilaire walk listeners through a crash course in Open Meetings 101. Amanda breaks down a recent investigation involving the Wauwatosa School Board. Attorney Tom Kamenick, founder of Wisconsin Transparency Project, joins the episode. He's with a law firm dedicated to enforcing the state's open records and open meetings laws and explains how public meetings should go and what you should expect from your government.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
May 9, 2022 - As the result of pandemic restrictions on in-person gatherings, New York got creative with its open meetings law requirements over the last two years, allowing for remote viewing and participation of public meetings. Reinvent Albany's Rachael Fauss explains how this experience shaped changes to the state's open meetings law that were adopted in the budget.
Full Spectrum's FCC Open Meeting Recaps feature instant reaction and analysis following the FCC's monthly Open Meetings, with an emphasis on the agenda items directly impacting our clients. This month, Partner Chip Yorkgitis and Associate Belen Crisp discuss key actions and topics from the April 21st meeting, including (1:00) a look at the role receiver performance policies or requirements might play in the FCC's spectrum management responsibilities, (11:05) strengthening Wireless Emergency Alerts, and (16:01) a proposed fine related to a common carrier's alleged failure to comply with foreign ownership-related requirements. Look out for ongoing coverage of these topics and future meetings.
Full Spectrum returns with our newest series, FCC Open Meeting Recaps. These episodes will feature instant reaction and analysis following the FCC's monthly Open Meetings, with an emphasis on the agenda items directly impacting our clients. This month, Partners Tom Cohen, Hank Kelly and Chip Yorkgitis discuss key actions and topics from the March 16th meeting, including digital discrimination, pole replacement disputes, and the Connected Care Pilot Program. Look out for ongoing coverage of these topics and future meetings on this feed and on our blog, www.commlawmonitor.com.
The settlement preserves the commission's final legislative and congressional district maps.
This week on Behind The Headlines, the panel discusses a number of topics, including the debate over masks in schools; the East Hampton Airport, the Open Meetings Law; and The Express News Group's new series on climate change, The Rising Tide.
This week on Behind The Headlines, the panel discusses a number of topics, including the debate over masks in schools; the East Hampton Airport, the Open Meetings Law; and The Express News Group's new series on climate change, The Rising Tide.
This week on Behind The Headlines, the panel discusses a number of topics, including the new Southold Town Board, revisions to the Open Meetings Law, property tax reassessments and the temporary closing of the East Hampton Airport. https://www.facebook.com/shaw11946 (Joseph P. Shaw,) Executive Editor, The Express News Group https://www.facebook.com/wpsutton (Bill Sutton,) Managing Editor, The Express News Group https://www.facebook.com/annette.hinkle (Annette Hinkle,) Arts and Living Editor, The Express News Group https://www.facebook.com/civiletti (Denise Civiletti,) Editor/Publisher, Riverhead Local https://www.facebook.com/steve.wick.359 (Steve Wick,) Executive Editor, Times-Review Media Group
This week on Behind The Headlines, the panel discusses a number of topics, including the new Southold Town Board, revisions to the Open Meetings Law, property tax reassessments and the temporary closing of the East Hampton Airport. https://www.facebook.com/shaw11946 (Joseph P. Shaw,) Executive Editor, The Express News Group https://www.facebook.com/wpsutton (Bill Sutton,) Managing Editor, The Express News Group https://www.facebook.com/annette.hinkle (Annette Hinkle,) Arts and Living Editor, The Express News Group https://www.facebook.com/civiletti (Denise Civiletti,) Editor/Publisher, Riverhead Local https://www.facebook.com/steve.wick.359 (Steve Wick,) Executive Editor, Times-Review Media Group
The Rhode Island Open Meetings Act is aimed at making sure that government is operating appropriately. It dictates how public entities can meet, how they cannot meet, what they can talk about, how the agendas need to be noticed and certain deadlines and time frames. Take a listen as we dive into more detail and give examples go the Rhode Island Open Meetings Act.
The Rhode Island Open Meetings Act is aimed at making sure that government is operating appropriately. It dictates how public entities can meet, how they cannot meet, what they can talk about, how the agendas need to be noticed and certain deadlines and time frames. Take a listen as we dive into more detail and give examples go the Rhode Island Open Meetings Act.
This week on Behind The Headlines, the panel discusses a number of topics, including proposed changes to the state's Open Meetings Law; efforts to bury the power lines at the Downtown Montauk gateway; proposed hotels in Southold and Cutchogue; the changing nature of the East End; and beach access concerns. https://www.facebook.com/shaw11946 (Joseph P. Shaw), Executive Editor, The Express News Group https://www.facebook.com/wpsutton (Bill Sutton), Managing Editor, The Express News Group https://www.facebook.com/carissa.katz.9 (Carissa Katz), Managing Editor, The East Hampton Star https://www.facebook.com/steve.wick.359 (Steve Wick), Executive Editor, Times-Review Media Group
This week on Behind The Headlines, the panel discusses a number of topics, including proposed changes to the state's Open Meetings Law; efforts to bury the power lines at the Downtown Montauk gateway; proposed hotels in Southold and Cutchogue; the changing nature of the East End; and beach access concerns. https://www.facebook.com/shaw11946 (Joseph P. Shaw), Executive Editor, The Express News Group https://www.facebook.com/wpsutton (Bill Sutton), Managing Editor, The Express News Group https://www.facebook.com/carissa.katz.9 (Carissa Katz), Managing Editor, The East Hampton Star https://www.facebook.com/steve.wick.359 (Steve Wick), Executive Editor, Times-Review Media Group
October 28, 2021 - Assembly Government Operations Committee Chair Ken Zebrowski, a Rockland County Democrat, recounts what he learned at his recent hearing examining compliance with the state's Open Meetings Law during the pandemic and considers the shape of the transparency measure for the future.
This week on Behind The Headlines, the panel discusses a number of topics, including final passage of the Community Housing Act and affordable housing in general on the East End; Open Meetings Law compliance; a disease killing deer on the East End;and efforts to rescue abandoned domestic rabbits. https://www.facebook.com/shaw11946 (Joseph P. Shaw), Executive Editor, The Express News Group https://www.facebook.com/wpsutton (Bill Sutton), Managing Editor, The Express News Group https://www.facebook.com/civiletti (Denise Civiletti), Editor/Publisher, Riverhead Local https://www.facebook.com/beth.young.777 (Beth Young), Editor/Publisher at East End Beacon https://www.facebook.com/BrendanJosephOReilly (Brendan J. O'Reilly,) Features Editor, The Express News Group
This week on Behind The Headlines, the panel discusses a number of topics, including final passage of the Community Housing Act and affordable housing in general on the East End; Open Meetings Law compliance; a disease killing deer on the East End;and efforts to rescue abandoned domestic rabbits. https://www.facebook.com/shaw11946 (Joseph P. Shaw), Executive Editor, The Express News Group https://www.facebook.com/wpsutton (Bill Sutton), Managing Editor, The Express News Group https://www.facebook.com/civiletti (Denise Civiletti), Editor/Publisher, Riverhead Local https://www.facebook.com/beth.young.777 (Beth Young), Editor/Publisher at East End Beacon https://www.facebook.com/BrendanJosephOReilly (Brendan J. O'Reilly,) Features Editor, The Express News Group
(00:00) Local News Chat: Historic School & EV Charging (17:00) Your Take on Gableman's Election Investigation (37:00) Sara Eskrich & Rep Ron Tusler on Final Five Voting (54:00) Tom Kamenick, WI Transparency Project (86:00) The Takeaway: Polluting The Public Infosphere
September 7, 2021 - A new law enabling government entities to meet remotely has good government activists, like Common Cause NY Executive Director Susan Lerner, calling foul, as the change to the state's open meetings law will limit other forms of civic engagement and media access.
Put relationships on the agenda Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com
Welcome to the latest edition of The Express News Group's podcast, 27Speaks. The Express News Group editors Kathryn Menu, Annette Hinkle, Joseph P. Shaw, Brendan O'Reilly, and Bill Sutton discuss the week's news on the South Fork of Long Island. In this week's edition of 27Speaks, the editors are joined by New York State Assemblyman Fred W. Thiele for a discussion on work he's doing to reform the state's Open Meetings law to include language that could require local municipalities to utilize video conferencing to provide greater access and remote participation in board meetings.
Senate Ethics Hearing Delayed Due To Open Meetings Law Concerns by WSKG News
NY Senate Ethics Hearing Delayed Due To Open Meetings Law Concerns by WSKG News
You're listening to the Westerly Sun's podcast, where we talk about the best local events, new job postings, obituaries, and more. First, a bit of Rhode Island trivia. Today's trivia is brought to you by Perennial. Perennial's new plant-based drink “Daily Gut & Brain” is a blend of easily digestible nutrients crafted for gut and brain health. A convenient mini-meal, Daily Gut & Brain” is available now at the CVS Pharmacy in Wakefield. Now for some trivia. Did you know that Rhode Island native, Everett “Busy” Arnold was a publisher and an early comic book entrepreneur whose company, Quality Comics, wrote thousands of stories during the 1930s and 1940s. He was instrumental in helping set up the comics sections of many newspapers and was responsible for creating many important early comic magazines and books. Now for our feature story: Patrick Falcone Jr. is not sure what he should or will do when the Town Council meets again next month. As town sergeant, a position he has held since 2014, Falcone is expected to attend council meetings to keep order and provide security. The assistant town sergeant provides the same services during School Committee meetings. Falcone says he was caught off guard during the council's last meeting, on June 14, when councilors discussed having a police officer provide security coverage at council meetings. Officials said a police officer would be there along with the town sergeant, a position that is created and required by the Town Charter. After hearing from Chief of Police Shawn Lacey and speaking among themselves, the council decided, by discussion rather than a formal vote, to stick with the current and historic approach of relying only on the town sergeant. During a recent interview, Falcone noted that the councilors were actually split evenly on the question, with three councilors saying they favored adding a police officer for security at their meetings and three saying they preferred to stick solely with the town sergeant. Had the seventh councilor, who was absent, attended, the decision could have gone the other way. As a decades-long constable and former longtime captain of the Westerly Police Reserves organization, and from his time as an employee of the Water Department and his current job at McQuade's Marketplace, Falcone is well known in the town. He was not informed his position would be discussed until he arrived to provide coverage at the June 14 meeting and saw the agenda. "I sat there and I didn't know what to do. I was thinking, do I get up and leave? At no time did any of them ask me a question," Falcone said. The closest thing to interaction, Falcone said, was when an official looked over at him and moved his hand up and down. "Maybe to shut my mouth or not say anything," Falcone said. Despite the discomfort, Falcone stuck it out and stayed at the meeting until the council adjourned its public meeting and went into executive session. Several of his friends and acquaintances called him in the days following the meeting. "I'm still trying to figure out what actually happened. There are a lot of people who think I shouldn't go back," Falcone said. Town Council President Sharon Ahern said she put the discussion of potentially adding more security to Town Council meetings on the agenda in light of recent unrest in the country, including violent episodes and shootings. "I'm concerned if you get someone who is an active shooter and they come in here, you would have a trained professional who can react in real time," Ahern said during the meeting. On Friday, Ahern emphasized, as she did during the meeting, that she did not raise the issue of additional security as a slight against Falcone. She did not inform Falcone of the upcoming discussion because she wanted it to take place in public session, she said. In some cases, under the state Open Meetings law, certain individuals whose job performance is to be discussed are given a choice of having the discussion in public or in a private executive session. "I didn't want to have a personnel discussion because this is nothing against Pat Falcone. It's about changes that are coming our way and probably indicate that we need to go a different way with security at Town Hall," Ahern said. With society returning to normal following the closures imposed due to the COVID-19 pandemic, Ahern noted, Town Hall and council meetings are again meeting in person and the public is allowed to attend. Ahern said: "This is not, in my mind, just a question of trying to protect elected officials or appointed officials or staff. The public is now welcomed back in the council chambers, and it's not just staff and officials that I think need to have enhanced security,". For more about the coronavirus pandemic and the latest on all things in and around Westerly, head over to westerlysun.com. There are a lot of businesses in our community that are hiring right now, so we're excited to tell you about some new job listings. Today's Job posting comes from Sea Bags in Watch Hill. They're looking for a part-time retail sales associate ideally with 2 years of retail experience and customer service. Pay depends on experience.. If you'd like to learn more or apply, you can do so at the link in our episode description: https://www.indeed.com/l-Westerly,-RI-jobs.html?vjk=2742aded61e027db&advn=8743562717035863 Today we're remembering the life of Eleanor Mary Begnoche who was born on April 20, 1924 in North Adams, Massachusetts. An inquisitive child and voracious reader (who was also known to have roller-skated around the inside of her father's barbershop), Eleanor knew from an early age that she wanted to be a teacher. After attending Drury High School, she completed a BS in Education at North Adams State College, a MS in Education at Boston University, as well as a MA in Italian and DML studies at Middlebury College. She taught English and Italian at the middle and high school levels for over thirty years. A friend introduced her to an electrical engineer named Donald Begnoche, the love of her life, and the two were married in 1961, living first in North Adams, and later moving to Mystic, Connecticut. They had two sons whom they continually encouraged in their studies and eventual musical careers. As a couple, Eleanor and Don were actively involved in their home parish, St. Michael's, where they were dedicated to the RCIA program. Eleanor was very proud of her Italian heritage; in addition to her professional teaching, she volunteer taught Italian at her parish's elementary school for many years, and she received the Person of the Year Award from the Dante Society of Westerly in 1996. Eleanor was famous among her circle not only for her cooking, needlework, and memory for birthdays, but for the generous spirit that led her to cook meals for friends and those in need, to crochet blankets for every new baby or to send care packages as the Spirit moved her. She loved animals, musicals and laughter. Thank you for taking a moment today to remember and celebrate Eleanor's life. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
In this episode, we revisit Idaho's laws dealing with open meetings and public records. Chief Deputy Brian Kane addresses frequently asked questions of these two important laws meant to increase Idahoans' access to local and state government. Who enforces the law? How does new technology affect the law? What changes may be on the horizon?
Host: Matt Bach, Asst. Director, Strategic Communications, Michigan Municipal League We fielded some excellent questions from our members on today's Live with the League conversation. League CEO and Executive Director Dan Gilmartin joined us to talk about the American Rescue Plan (ARP) Act, Open Meetings Act, and more.
TopicsLive With Lou, No Shoes No Shirts No Mask No Service, Open Meetings, Thank You Rush, Bay Area Gym Million Dollar Fines, Open / Conceal Carry ConstitutionalWebsitesInstituteontheConstitution.comTheamericanview.comKrisannehall.comHillsdale.eduThe RecallGavin2020.comYuba Co Facebook for recall https://www.facebook.com/groups/794213030997889/Sutter County Facebook for recall https://www.facebook.com/groups/522574925168973/?ref=shareSponsorsGreenetzconstruction.comEliteuniversalsecurity.complumbingdoctor.com/locations/yuba-city-ca ArticlesConcealed Carry Permission UnconstitutionalSutter GJ Says Code Enforcement Collapse
The panelists discuss the state of COVID-19 in local schools, including developments in districts returning to high risk sports; pending legislation that would help local governments better control sand minds, including often targeted mines in Noyac and Calverton; and legislation proposed by Assemblyman Fred W. Thiele Jr. that would impose fines on agency and government officials who violate the state's Freedom of Information and Open Meetings laws. https://www.facebook.com/shaw11946 (Joseph P. Shaw,) Executive Editor, The Express News Group https://www.facebook.com/wpsutton (Bill Sutton), Managing Editor, The Express News Group https://www.facebook.com/civiletti (Denise Civiletti), Publisher at Riverhead Local https://www.facebook.com/beth.young.777 (Beth Young), Editor/Publisher at East End Beacon https://www.facebook.com/chrissysampson (Chrissy Sampson), Deputy Managing Editor at East Hampton Star
The panelists discuss the state of COVID-19 in local schools, including developments in districts returning to high risk sports; pending legislation that would help local governments better control sand minds, including often targeted mines in Noyac and Calverton; and legislation proposed by Assemblyman Fred W. Thiele Jr. that would impose fines on agency and government officials who violate the state's Freedom of Information and Open Meetings laws. https://www.facebook.com/shaw11946 (Joseph P. Shaw,) Executive Editor, The Express News Group https://www.facebook.com/wpsutton (Bill Sutton), Managing Editor, The Express News Group https://www.facebook.com/civiletti (Denise Civiletti), Publisher at Riverhead Local https://www.facebook.com/beth.young.777 (Beth Young), Editor/Publisher at East End Beacon https://www.facebook.com/chrissysampson (Chrissy Sampson), Deputy Managing Editor at East Hampton Star
TopicsRecall Newsom, Open Meetings, Wear Two Masks?, Star Spangled Banner Botched, Ruining Aunt Jemima, Sheriff to Arrest Fed Agents.WebsitesInstituteontheConstitution.comTheamericanview.comKrisannehall.comHillsdale.eduThe RecallGavin2020.comYuba Co Facebook for recall https://www.facebook.com/groups/794213030997889/Sutter County Facebook for recall https://www.facebook.com/groups/522574925168973/?ref=share SponsorsGreenetzconstruction.comEliteuniversalsecurity.complumbingdoctor.com/locations/yuba-city-ca
On this week's episode, Suzanne Downing and John Quick sit down with Frank McQueary, Chairman of Alaskans for Open Meetings, to discuss the ongoing legal battle against the Anchorage Assembly. Also, Suzanne and John talk about the 'Day of Reckoning' as Anchorage shopkeepers, cafes plan to open fully in the act of civil disobedience. Plus, Kenai Peninsula parents call for families to strike until the schools open. All that and more on the MRAK podcast!
Deputy Attorney General Brian Kane joins Scott Graf to discuss how the COVID-19 pandemic has affected state government, the authority various government entities have to protect public health, and where Idaho's Open Meeting Law currently stands. Recorded Nov. 3, 2020.
Host: Matt Bach, Assistant Director of Strategic Communications, Michigan Municipal League Guests:Michigan Senator Lana Theis, 22nd DistrictChris Johnson, General Counsel, Michigan Municipal LeagueJennifer Rigterink, Legislative Associate, Michigan Municipal League On Oct. 16, Governor Whitmer signed legislation that will allow local governments to continue to meet virtually during this pandemic. In this podcast, we discuss these changes and what they mean for communities.
Host: Matt Bach, Director of Communications, Michigan Municipal League Guests: Jeffrey Aronoff, Principal, Miller Canfield Chris Hackbarth. Director of State & Federal Affairs, Michigan Municipal League Jennifer Rigterink, Legislative Associate, Michigan Municipal league We're excited to announce that Senate Bill 1108 - which amends the Opening Meetings Act - has been passed by the Senate and is on its way to the governor for signature! This is great news for Michigan communities. Some of the bill's provisions include: Retroactive application to March 18, 2020 to cover virtual meetings that have taken place since then Continuation of virtual meetings for any circumstances through Dec. 31, 2020 On this week's Monday Morning Live, our team discussed SB 1108 before it was amended and passed. We also covered a variety of other current topics, including the upcoming lame duck session, gravel mining, and CARES Act funding.
When you accept who you are and how you feel, healing is possible. In this episode, we discuss the benefit of looking deeply at your pain and your trauma and doing the work to accept it. The other side is power. The other side is renewed innocence in a world where many of us are reliving our old traumas and hurts on a daily basis...in situations that are completely unrelated to the original pain.It's time to awaken to a new way of being.------------Work with us or reach out to us with inquiries, questions....and complaints (which we will likely ignore with love):Email: theshekings@gmail.comAli: http://iamaliduncan.com, FB:/aliduncanbeseen, IG: @aliduncanbeseenErica: http://ericadanielle.com, FB:/ericadanielleovershares, IG @ericadanielleoversharesJoin Erica's Open Meetings in Presence Peace and Power: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/presence-peace-and-power-open-meetings-tickets-113083622158.Support the show (https://www.patreon.com/join/shekings)
Sometimes there are energy shifts in our world that can be explained by any number of phenomena...but when they hit our bodies they feel like stress, anxiety, and sadness.When this happens we immediately want to find the problem and fix it so that we can feel better. But the truth is that sometimes there's nothing to find.Or, perhaps there is something to find, but it's already working itself out so there's no need to take a deep dive into figuring it all out. And when you do try to go into elaborate self-study, you feel more stuck rather than the relief you were looking for.In this episode, Ali and Erica explore these energetic shifts and offer some simple suggestions for getting through them peacefully.------------Work with us or reach out to us with inquiries, questions....and complaints (which we will likely ignore with love):Email: theshekings@gmail.comAli: http://iamaliduncan.com, FB:/aliduncanbeseen, IG: @aliduncanbeseenErica: http://ericadanielle.com, FB:/ericadanielleovershares, IG @ericadanielleoversharesJoin Erica's Open Meetings in Presence Peace and Power: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/presence-peace-and-power-open-meetings-tickets-113083622158.Support the show (https://www.patreon.com/join/shekings)
Public comment during a school board meeting is important and there are ways to accommodate your community voice. Learn best practices for public comment, conflict of interest, the Colorado Open Records Act, social media and email do’s and don’ts, and much more. Interview with Jennifer Mueller, Former CASB Chief General Counsel Host: Leslie Bogar, CASB Director of Professional Learning Music: Sine de Cobre by Cholate
The State of Texas is proud of the fact that almost all governmental meetings are subject to the Open Meetings Act, and our ability to listen to and address our governmental officials. However, with the COVID-19 outbreak and rules regarding social distancing, Governor Abbott made some temporary modifications to the act. Jackson Walker associate Alyca Riley Garrison walks us through some of the changes and what government officials need to consider when holding a meeting. For more information and additional JW Fast Take podcasts and webinars, visit JW.com/Fast. Follow Jackson Walker LLP on LinkedIn, Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram. The music is by Eve Searls. This podcast is made available by Jackson Walker for informational purposes only, does not constitute legal advice, and is not a substitute for legal advice from qualified counsel. Your use of this podcast does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Jackson Walker. The facts and results of each case will vary, and no particular result can be guaranteed.
Put relationships on the agenda Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com
This Week in Oklahoma Politics, KOSU's Michael Cross talks with Republican Political Consultant Neva Hill and ACLU Oklahoma Executive Director Ryan Kiesel about Senate Bill 661 to temporarily alter the state's Open Meetings laws allowing public bodies to teleconference into meetings during the COVID-19 crisis and state lawmakers worry about the budget with oil prices declining as well as businesses and casinos closing to stem the spread of the corona virus. The trio also discusses news of the state's public schools closing through at least April 6th and Oklahoma City and Tulsa ordering restrictions on restaurants, bars and entertainment venues in an attempt to flatten the curve on contagion. Support this podcast
We are speaking with Jennifer White, Director of Policy and Staff Attorney at TSBA, about open meetings and what board members need to know to comply with state law. We will discuss exceptions and misconceptions of the law, and why it's important to be mindful of discussing topics outside of the board meeting.
Whether you're a new board member or one that's been serving for a while, you're sure to gain valuable information from this episode on the Colorado Open Meetings Law. Topics covered are the eight reasons executive session can be called, the difference between discussion and strategy, the two reasons executive sessions don't have to be electronically recorded, and much more. Use your 2019 CASB Leadership Workbook, check out CASB's website in the A-Z resource center, download the podcast discussion guide, and make sure you catch Part II on public comment. Interview with Jennifer Mueller, CASB Chief Legal Counsel and General Counsel Host: Leslie Bogar, CASB Director of Professional Learning Music: You're a Punk, I'm a Punk
Our 10th podcast examines an issue near and dear to Attorney General Lawrence Wasden: government transparency. Journalist Betsy Russell joins A.G. Wasden and Deputy Attorney General Brian Kane to discuss the state's open meeting and public records laws, as well as the annual seminars the office conducts to educate reporters, citizens and government officials on transparency.
Times-Union reporter Christopher Hong talks with Page One Podcast host Mark Woods about the conclusion of a probe into potential Sunshine Law violations.
Times-Union reporter Nate Monroe talks with Page One Podcast host Mark Woods about how JEA's national search for a CEO led right back to interim CEO Aaron Zahn.
We are speaking with Jennifer White, Director of Policy and Staff Attorney at TSBA, about open meetings and what board members need to know to comply with state law. We will discuss exceptions and misconceptions of the law, and why it's important to be mindful of discussing topics outside of the board meeting.
This show will cover three distinct topics: economics, the Kansas Open Meetings Act, and elections to be held this new year, 2017, in Kansas and Missouri. Your host for this episode […] The post Economy, Kansas Open Meetings Act, and 2017 Kansas and Missouri elections. appeared first on KKFI.
This show will cover three distinct topics: economics, the Kansas Open Meetings Act, and elections to be held this new year, 2017, in Kansas and Missouri. Your host for this episode […] The post Economy, Kansas Open Meetings Act, and 2017 Kansas and Missouri elections. appeared first on KKFI.
Join us as we welcome author Joyce Strand and her new book, "The Judge's Story." About Author Joyce Strand: Mystery author Joyce T. Strand, much like her fictional character, Jillian Hillcrest, served as head of corporate communications at several biotech and high-tech companies in Silicon Valley for more than 25 years. Unlike Jillian, however, she did not encounter murder. Rather, she focused on publicizing her companies and their products. She is the author of the Jillian Hillcrest mysteries ON MESSAGE, OPEN MEETINGS, and FAIR DISCLOSURE and the Brynn Bancroft mystery HILLTOP SUNSET. Strand received her Ph.D. from The George Washington University, Washington, D.C. and her B.A. from Dickinson College, Carlisle, PA. She currently lives in Southern California with her two cats, a collection of cow statuary and art, and her muse, the roadrunner. About the Judge's Story: A Superior Court Judge with a passion for social justice as well as the law strives to discover the truth behind the mystery of a robbery-murder in a small California town in 1939. When the Judge hears testimony against a 14-year-old teenager, he realizes that the boy participated in a robbery-murder. However, the accused did not actually pull the trigger. But unless the boy identifies his partner, the Judge must sentence him as a murderer, which would result in prolonged jail time. The Judge’s investigator, along with the precocious 16-year-old girl who identified the boy as one of the thieves, explore different approaches to uncover the murderer. In the backdrop of escalating war in Europe, the financial scarcities of the Great Depression, and the Judge’s caseload, their attempts to find justice for the accused boy and unmask the killer lure the Judge and his friends into sordid criminal activities. Stay tuned and keep it locked.
Cover City Committee members training session.
© 2020-2026 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
