Podcasts about dismissing

The Guardian recently featured my plan for how I'm raising my toddler to become a millionaire and it got me fired up about something I've been sitting on for a while. Today I'm calling out the financial patterns that Latino parents normalize that are actually keeping our community from building real wealth. I'm not talking about our elders who came here with nothing and survived on grit. I'm talking to us — the millennial parents with smartphones, podcasts, and investing apps at our fingertips — who still aren't doing enough differently. We'll talk about why spending $20K on a quince but skipping the 529 is a problem, why your child is NOT your retirement plan, and the five mindset shifts that need to happen so we can stop breaking generational cycles and start building generational wealth.This is a tough love episode, mi gente, but I think you're ready for it.WE GET INTO:00:24 The Guardian feature + Jannese's toddler wealth plan02:53 Who this episode IS (and isn't) for04:18 Problem #1: Spending on appearances, skipping financial foundations06:03 Problem #2: Treating your children like a retirement plan08:01 Problem #3: Preaching education without a financial plan for it10:30 College vs. retirement — why you must always choose retirement14:07 Problem #4: Shaming kids for wanting more16:12 Problem #5: Dismissing financial tools as "too much" for kids18:30 When it's not that there's no money — it's that there's no mission19:20 Action steps for Latino parents (talk about money earlier, stop saying you don't know)20:32 Action step: Open the accounts — 529, brokerage, Roth IRA20:44 Action step: Redirect family gifts to the college fund21:50 Action step: Plan for your own retirement + money tools resource23:45 The $4 trillion spending power problem — and what we need to build instead24:49 The vision: celebrate AND invest26:44 Closing + how to get The Guardian article27:23 Outro — Stay PoderosaKEY TAKEAWAYS:Spending on appearances while skipping financial foundations isn't tradition — it's a decisionYour child is not your 401k, your emergency fund, or your exit strategyPreaching education without a financial plan for it is setting your kids up to drown in student loan debtIf you have to choose between saving for college or retirement, choose retirement — every single timeWanting more does not make you ungrateful. Sometimes it's how you honor where you came fromSilence is the most expensive thing you can give your children when it comes to moneyThe most generous gift you can give your child is a financially free parentRead: A finance podcaster plans to make her daughter a millionaire by 18 – here's how TAKE THE NEXT STEP:Download the FREE Dinero GuideRead my book, Financially Lit!Book a Call with JanneseThis episode of Yo Quiero Dinero was produced by Heart Centered Podcasting. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Catch up on all the headlines in NBA, NFL, College Football, MLB, World Cup, Golf and NHL news with "What is Trending" for June 22, 2026.

Reform UK MP Richard Tice launches a fierce attack on Prime Minister Keir Starmer and senior policing figures over the growing debate surrounding "two-tier policing" in Britain. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Shark Tank's Kevin O'Leary has been making the media rounds defending the 40,000-acre data center project he's backing in northern Utah. Dismissing residents' concerns over the environmental impacts and water demands of the proposed project in the drought-stricken Great Salt Lake region, O'Leary has claimed protesters are “bused in,” “misinformed,” and alleged that China has had a hand in orchestrating the public push back.“The Stratos project in Utah is an example of data center largesse,” says Jim Walsh, the policy director of Food and Water Watch, an organization leading a campaign to stop the rapid development of data centers across the country. As proposed, the project would be more than double the size of Manhattan. Walsh adds, “It's important to recognize that the impacts of this data center go beyond the water and energy concerns that impact the residents of Salt Lake. They're going to be pulling gas from the Ruby Pipeline, and this project is going to perpetuate more fracking in the Western U.S., a practice for extracting natural gas that uses extreme amounts of water.”This week on The Intercept Briefing, host Jordan Uhl speaks to Walsh about the massive Utah project, the environmental and economic impact of data centers on communities especially where water is already scarce, and the Trump administration's push to cut regulations at the federal and local level to accelerate the build-out of data centers and AI infrastructure.In response to O'Leary claiming data center development is a national security priority to beat out China in the AI race, Walsh says, “National security isn't just about having technological and military superiority.” We're not safe if we don't have clean air and clean water to drink and breathe. We're not safe if our communities have massive data centers that are extracting our natural resources. Our entire economy functions on access to water.”For more, listen to the full conversation of The Intercept Briefing on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube or wherever you listen.Keep our investigations free and fearless at theintercept.com/join. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

A former Capitol Police Officer wins her defamation suit against Blaze Media for saying she was the DC Pipe Bomber. The justice department proudly removed the January 6th press releases from their website. Harry sues to dissolve the $1.8B slush fund, An appeals court allows Rep. Jamie Raskin to file an amicus brief against dismissing the seditious conspiracy charges against the Oath Keepers and the Proud Boys. Allison Gillhttps://muellershewrote.substack.com/https://bsky.app/profile/muellershewrote.comHarry DunnHarry Dunn | Substack@libradunn1.bsky.social on BlueskyWant to support this podcast and get it ad-free and early?Go to: https://www.patreon.com/aisle45podTell us about yourself and what you like about the show - http://survey.podtrac.com/start-survey.aspx?pubid=BffJOlI7qQcF&ver=short Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Click to Subscribe: https://bit.ly/Youtube-Subscribe-SoapDirt Young and the Restless spoilers reveal Patty Williams (Andrea Evans) comes to the rescue of Matt Clark (Roger Howarth), adding a new twist to the storyline. The move appears to be more than just an attempt to thwart Phyllis Summers' (Michelle Stafford) devious plans. It seems Patty is looking for a new love interest, given Jack Abbott's (Peter Bergman) continued obsession with Diane Jenkins (Susan Walters).  Y&R spoilers showcased an unhinged Phyllis, who assaulted Matt in a room at the GCAC. She took a photograph of the bound Matt, intending to use it as leverage with Nick Newman (Joshua Morrow) to get her criminal charges dropped. However, only Victor Newman (Eric Braeden), not Nick, has the power to make that happen. Spoilers for Young and the Restless divulge that while Phyllis was off scheming, Patty sought out Matt. She managed to convince a maid to let her into Matt's room, where she found him tied up. Dismissing the maid's shock by suggesting they were indulging in bedroom fantasies, Patty untied Matt and gave him a dose of reality. The episode ends with viewers on the edge of their seats, curious about Patty's next move and the future of this unexpected alliance. You are listening to Belynda from Soap Dirt. The most listened to soap opera podcaster. Visit our Young and the Restless section of Soap Dirt: https://soapdirt.com/category/young-and-the-restless/ Listen to our Podcasts: https://soapdirt.podbean.com/ And Check out our always up-to-date Young and the Restless Spoilers page at: https://soapdirt.com/young-and-the-restless-spoilers/ Check Out our Social Media... Twitter: https://twitter.com/SoapDirtTV Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/SoapDirt Pinterest: https://www.pinterest.com/soapdirt/ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@soapdirt Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/soapdirt/

She's back! Kim Rhodes, best known as the mom on The Suite Life of Zack and Cody and Sheriff Jody on Supernatural, returns for a second conversation with Sarah and Jane, and this time things get even more interesting. Kim opens by confirming what a psychic once told her years ago: she has fae blood. A stranger at a recent convention walked up and informed her that her fairy wings were fluttering, and honestly, once you see her on camera, you can't argue with it. What unfolds from there is a wide-ranging, deeply real conversation about what it means to live outside the box. Kim shares her experience as an autistic woman diagnosed six years ago with both autism and ADHD, offering a nuanced, personal take on the Telepathy Tapes phenomenon and why blanket statements about neurodivergent people, even well-meaning ones, deserve a closer look. She makes a compelling case that autistic people may not be more psychic than anyone else, but they may be less likely to censor themselves when something pops in, and that distinction matters. The conversation winds into Kim's new theory about feminine archetypes: that the traditional maiden-mother-crone framework is missing a fourth stage, the Warrior, a phase she describes as a woman who has survived long enough to stop apologizing for taking up space and start using her gifts as weapons of love.  Kim also talks about her life since the pandemic: volunteering four days a week at an animal sanctuary where she has strong opinions about goats (she has a favorite, his name is Greg, and he's an a**hole), a miniature horse named Bob, and a chicken named Jeff. She shares her perspective on animal communication, why animals don't really need to talk the way humans do, and what it's like to be present with animals as they leave their bodies.  The whole episode has that quality Kim brings wherever she goes: real, warm, a little unfiltered, and remarkably wise. Key Takeaways: Autism may not confer special psychic ability, but it can lower the internal filter that stops people from expressing what they pick up. Kim suggests the gift isn't more perception, it's less self-censorship, and there's a meaningful difference. The maiden-mother-crone framework may be missing a fourth archetype: the Warrior.  The tools of the warrior don't have to look like traditional strength. Kim's weapons are love and presence, and she spent years feeling ashamed that wasn't more exciting before she accepted it as exactly enough. Trauma can hone intuitive gifts. Several voices in this conversation, and beyond it, have observed that learning to read a room for survival wires people for psychic sensitivity. The skill doesn't disappear when the danger does. Animals, for the most part, don't need to be heard the way humans do. Kim observes that animals aren't in a state of disconnect from source, which means the anxious need to be seen and validated just isn't part of their experience. They're already living it. Psychic experience doesn't require supernatural explanation. Kim points out that science already confirms the five senses don't capture everything: sounds we can't hear, light waves we can't see, magnetic fields fish can navigate. Dismissing intuitive information as impossible while accepting ultraviolet light is, she notes, a little inconsistent. Being seen, fully and without conditions, is what most people are actually hungry for. Kim has been called mom her whole life, resisted it, and finally stepped into it, and what she found inside it is one of the most powerful things a person can offer another human being. Direct Quotes: "I don't think autistic people are any more or less psychic than the rest of the population. I just think we might be less likely to judge ourselves for it and more likely to express it." "I'm not trying to glean identity or power from outside sources. I've recognized the ability to create it internally and with my creator." "It doesn't bother me that science has not caught up with my experience." Resources & Links: Kim Rhodes on Instagram: @kimrhodes4real Kim Rhodes on Cameo: cameo.com/kimrhodes Medium Curious Podcast Episode 6 (Kim's first appearance) Explore the Intuition & Mediumship Course: https://www.mediumcurious.com Book a reading with Jane Morgan https://www.janemorganmedium.com/ Book a reading with Sarah Rathke https://www.sarahrathke.com/ Jane's Substack: https://janemorgan.substack.com Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/mediumcuriouspod/

So many women are exhausted and calling it normal.   In this week's episode of Life Coaching for Mompreneurs, I'm joined by Dr. Nikia Smith for a deeply honest conversation about hustle culture, emotional exhaustion, boundaries, and how to stop living in survival mode.   We talk about: ✨ The subtle signs of burnout ✨ Why ambitious women struggle to rest ✨ How to start saying no without guilt ✨ The mindset shifts that change everything   If you've been overwhelmed, emotionally drained, irritable, exhausted, or secretly fantasizing about escaping your life just to rest, this conversation will help you feel seen and supported.   This is your permission to slow down and finally take care of yourself again. You are worthy of rest before your body forces you to stop.

Is Chris Hipkins missing a gene? Does he have a self-destructive predilection? Or is he just a pillock by nature? He rolls into Auckland to tell the nation's biggest city and engine room in election year that she's all good and everyone has moved on from the lockdowns. His lockdowns. The home handyman from the Hutt, telling Auckland what's what. What an arrogant twat. He was in Auckland to build rapport, to patch up the damage, to scope the joint and to see what sort of chance his party has come November. Love or hate Auckland, elections are won and lost in the city. No one gets to Government without a good day in Auckland. Even for a small country it is true to say there are countries within countries, or cultures and vibes within cultures and vibes. It took me a while to get a grip on Wellington before I moved there. It's different to Christchurch. It's different to Dunedin, and Auckland is different to each of the other urban centres. I think Chris Bishop has found that out by suggesting his two million home debacle. He's from Wellington too. If you are too entrenched in Wellington, you don't get Auckland. Hipkins suggested the only people who ever ask him about lockdown these days is Newstalk ZB. 1) That's not true and yesterday was an example given the person who asked wasn't from Newstalk ZB. 2) Newstalk ZB is the biggest game in Auckland and by a long way. Dismissing the biggest radio player in Auckland, and the country, is about as stupid as saying Aucklanders have moved on from lockdown. Ultimately, it's another example of why I have said all year that this election is over before it starts. Labour will not win. The pain, suffering and incompetence of 2020-23 is still too raw, real and recent to forgive and forget. Making it worse is the fact the very same people who did the damage are still there waiting for another crack. Judging by yesterday, they've learned nothing, want to learn nothing and are as arrogant as last time. Hipkins may well realise that, come election night when he loses and inevitably has to resign given he will have lost twice. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

A hot PPI came in well-above Wall Street expectations, testing the stock market's all-time high run. Joe Brusuelas believes it's a healthy wake up call. He outlines the good, bad, and ugly numbers the PPI print shows and compares it to the CPI to gauge inflation concerns. ======== Schwab Network ========Empowering every investor and trader, every market day.Options involve risks and are not suitable for all investors. Before trading, read the Options Disclosure Document. http://bit.ly/2v9tH6DSubscribe to the Market Minute newsletter - https://schwabnetwork.com/subscribeDownload the iOS app - https://apps.apple.com/us/app/schwab-network/id1460719185Download the Amazon Fire Tv App - https://www.amazon.com/TD-Ameritrade-Network/dp/B07KRD76C7Watch on Sling - https://watch.sling.com/1/asset/191928615bd8d47686f94682aefaa007/watchWatch on Vizio - https://www.vizio.com/en/watchfreeplus-exploreWatch on DistroTV - https://www.distro.tv/live/schwab-network/Follow us on X – https://twitter.com/schwabnetworkFollow us on Facebook – https://www.facebook.com/schwabnetworkFollow us on LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/company/schwab-network/About Schwab Network - https://schwabnetwork.com/about

Energy healing and chronic illness are more connected than most women have ever been told.And it has nothing to do with crystals or candles — it has everything to do with the emotional state your body is trying to heal from.In this episode, you'll discover:Why the emotional state you operate from every day is shaping your body's ability to heal in ways no protocol has ever addressedWhat energy healing actually is when you strip away the spiritual language — and why it matters for chronic illnessOne practical shift that begins to raise the energetic state your body is trying to heal fromThe practice in this episode will show you where your energy is being drained. My free ChatGPT prompt takes it one step further — connecting your specific physical symptoms to the emotional patterns underneath them in under 30 seconds. Right now it is completely free. That will not always be the case. CLICK HERE before that changes.For women navigating Chronic Illness, Autoimmune Disease, IBS, Digestive Disorders, Migraines, Chronic Fatigue, Fibromyalgia, Pain, PCOS, and Endometriosis.

Father Mitch Pacwa discusses the latest in the Middle-East on Cultural Connections. Dr. Monical Miller looks at the backlash that Shri Thanedar faces over dismissing the barbarity of abortion. Plus, T's Two Sense looks at how we overcome negativity and Fr. Tad Pacholczyk is our guest to talk surrogacy, IVF, and the long term effects it has on children.

Medical gaslighting is one of the most discussed topics in modern healthcare but what does it actually look like?In this powerful episode of the Unabridged MD podcast, Dr. Isabelle Amigues sits down with Dr. Uzma Khan, psychiatrist, obesity medicine specialist, and menopause expert, to discuss:• How gaslighting presents in medical settings• Why women are often told “it's just anxiety”• The weight bias problem in healthcare• Perimenopause and menopause symptoms being dismissed• How to advocate for yourself effectively• When it's time to change providers• The connection between trust, healing, and outcomesDr. Khan shares 4 practical strategies to help patients feel heard and respected in medical appointments, including how to present patterns instead of vague symptoms, how to challenge respectfully, and why being a “reliable historian” is more powerful than being a “Google reciter.”This conversation dives into obesity stigma, psychiatric medication weight gain, hormone imbalance, menopause symptoms, and the systemic dismissal of women's health concerns.If you've ever left a doctor's office feeling brushed off, minimized, or unheard — this episode is for you.You are the MVP of your healthcare team.

And that's the doorway into today's theme: dismissing distortions. Not just correcting them, not just debating them, but dragging them into the sunlight like a raccoon that's been living too comfortably in the attic of American politics.Because those 51 experts weren't an anomaly. They were a prototype. A beta test of how confidently wrong you can be if your job depends on staying wrong.Think about it. We were told elections are secure. Not “mostly secure,” not “pretty solid,” but Fort Knox with ballots. Meanwhile, more than half the country watched vote counts behave like they were powered by a Ouija board. Numbers going up, then down, then sideways like they were trying to escape the spreadsheet. You don't need a cybersecurity degree to know something's off when arithmetic starts acting like interpretive dance.Now layer this: pollsters. These folks operate like fortune tellers who only predict yesterday. “It's a tight race,” they say. Always tight. Always razor thin. You ever notice that? According to them, every election is decided by a butterfly landing on a ballot in Wisconsin. Yet somehow, they never predict the political equivalent of a thunderclap, like 2016, when the entire system blinked and suddenly realized it had been narrating a different movie.Donald Trump didn't just win that election. He detonated a narrative. The so-called cabal, the machine, whatever label you want to use, had been humming along for decades, and suddenly somebody unplugged it mid-sentence. And the reaction wasn't curiosity. It was panic dressed up as analysis.Here's a provocative thought: if the system was always honest, why did it react to 2016 like a casino discovering someone counted cards?See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Democrats like to put a number on their lies.Somewhere along the line, we were taught to stop asking whether these people actually knew anything, and instead just trusted the lanyard around their neck like it came with divine certification. Democrats love to put numbers with their lies…Fifty-one intelligence experts told us a laptop wasn't real. Not “we're not sure,” not “still investigating,” but full-throated, choir-level certainty. 130 climate scientists12 former generalsAnd that's the doorway into today's theme: dismissing distortions. Not just correcting them, not just debating them, but dragging them into the sunlight like a raccoon that's been living too comfortably in the attic of American politics.Because those 51 experts weren't an anomaly. They were a prototype. A beta test of how confidently wrong you can be if your job depends on staying wrong.Think about it. We were told elections are secure. Not “mostly secure,” not “pretty solid,” but Fort Knox with ballots. Meanwhile, more than half the country watched vote counts behave like they were powered by a Ouija board. Numbers going up, then down, then sideways like they were trying to escape the spreadsheet. You don't need a cybersecurity degree to know something's off when arithmetic starts acting like interpretive dance.Now layer this: pollsters. These folks operate like fortune tellers who only predict yesterday. “It's a tight race,” they say. Always tight. Always razor thin. You ever notice that? According to them, every election is decided by a butterfly landing on a ballot in Wisconsin. Yet somehow, they never predict the political equivalent of a thunderclap, like 2016, when the entire system blinked and suddenly realized it had been narrating a different movie.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In Hour 4, Willard and Dibs wonder why Steve Kerr would want out, chat with Monte Poole of NBC Sports Bay Area about Steve Kerr's future, and more.

Donald Trump said he would be open to congressional hearings related to Jeffrey Epstein as pressure mounts in Washington to revisit the case and potentially bring victims forward to testify. The remarks come at a time when lawmakers are signaling renewed interest in examining what information remains undisclosed and whether additional public scrutiny is warranted. Trump did not actively call for the hearings himself, but positioned himself as not standing in the way, while Congress continues to weigh how expansive such hearings might be and who would be brought in to testify.The problem with Trump's comments is the glaring inconsistency that undercuts their credibility. After repeatedly signaling that the Epstein story was overblown or something the public should move past, this sudden willingness to entertain hearings feels less like leadership and more like a reactive pivot to political pressure. It raises the question of whether this is a genuine attempt at transparency or a calculated move to avoid being on the wrong side of a story that refuses to go away. By shifting his tone without addressing prior dismissals, Trump contributes to the broader sense that the messaging around Epstein is being managed for optics rather than driven by any real commitment to uncovering the full truth.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Trump on public Epstein survivor hearings in Congress: 'I'm okay with that'

Donald Trump said he would be open to congressional hearings related to Jeffrey Epstein as pressure mounts in Washington to revisit the case and potentially bring victims forward to testify. The remarks come at a time when lawmakers are signaling renewed interest in examining what information remains undisclosed and whether additional public scrutiny is warranted. Trump did not actively call for the hearings himself, but positioned himself as not standing in the way, while Congress continues to weigh how expansive such hearings might be and who would be brought in to testify.The problem with Trump's comments is the glaring inconsistency that undercuts their credibility. After repeatedly signaling that the Epstein story was overblown or something the public should move past, this sudden willingness to entertain hearings feels less like leadership and more like a reactive pivot to political pressure. It raises the question of whether this is a genuine attempt at transparency or a calculated move to avoid being on the wrong side of a story that refuses to go away. By shifting his tone without addressing prior dismissals, Trump contributes to the broader sense that the messaging around Epstein is being managed for optics rather than driven by any real commitment to uncovering the full truth.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Trump on public Epstein survivor hearings in Congress: 'I'm okay with that'Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

If you're reading along, just know this has been slightly shortened to fit the space, so it might not match the audio word for word—but you're not missing anything important. He Is Series Jehovah Mekoddishkem (The Lord Who Sanctifies You) — When You Feel Unworthy, God Is Still Working in You Exodus 31:13 “You yourself are to speak to the Israelites: ‘You shall keep my sabbaths… that you may know that I, the Lord, sanctify you.'” Today, we are talking about Jehovah Mekoddishkem (The Lord Who Sanctifies You). To be sanctified means to be made holy. God is the one who makes us holy.  At a mission, a speaker asked who wanted to be holy; only a few hands went up. Then he asked who wanted to go to heaven—everyone raised their hand. He said, “You know the only way to get to heaven is to be holy, right?” Another speaker said something similar. Few wanted to be saints, but everyone wanted heaven. The truth is, we are all called to be saints—not necessarily Saints with a capital S like Mother Teresa or Saint Catherine of Siena—but we do need to be sanctified to enter heaven.  God is the one who sanctifies us through His grace, love, and mercy. He wants each of His children to be holy so we can spend eternity with Him. I think many of us hesitate to say we want to be holy for two reasons. First, we don't want to seem prideful. Second, we think it will require more than we can give. We assume it means doing everything perfectly or giving up everything we enjoy, so we avoid it. I looked up what sanctification means using the Truthly app—an AI tool that shares faith-based insights rooted in Catholic teaching. To be sanctified means: To be made holy — God transforms us from the inside out through grace. To be set apart — We are dedicated to God, no longer living just for ourselves. To be purified — God doesn't just cover sin; He cleanses it. The primary means of sanctification are: The Holy Spirit The Sacraments Prayer, fasting, and works of mercy Suffering united to the Cross The goal is full participation in God's life—what some call theosis—sharing in His divine life by grace. This is the purpose of the Christian life: not just to avoid hell, but to become truly holy. We cannot make ourselves holy, but we can cooperate with God—or resist Him. Before I continue, I want to say something important. I'm not sharing this so you feel like you have to do everything or that you're falling behind. This isn't a checklist. This is just a way to notice how God is already working in your life… and where He might be inviting you a little deeper. You don't have to do everything perfectly. Just listen and see if one thing stands out. Here are simple ways we can cooperate with God's grace: Prayer — Opens our hearts to God The Sacraments — Especially the Eucharist and Confession Scripture — Helps us hear His voice Fasting — Trains our hearts to depend on God Works of mercy — Loving others Offering suffering — Letting God transform it Devotion to Mary — Drawing closer to Jesus Spiritual guidance — Getting help from others Daily reflection — Noticing God's presence Virtue — Choosing patience, humility, and love This is not about doing all of these. Just ask: is there one step God is inviting me into? We can also unintentionally resist grace: Pride — Thinking we don't need God Serious sin — Though we can always return Neglecting prayer — Losing connection Small compromises — Slowly pulling away Tempting situations — Leading us to struggle Spiritual apathy — “It doesn't matter” Ignoring conscience — Dismissing that nudge Attachments — Loving things more than God Unforgiveness — Blocking grace Despair or presumption — Too far gone or no need to change Again, this is not to make you feel bad. Just ask gently: “Is anything blocking what God wants to do in me?” Grace is not earned—it is received. God is always giving. The question is whether our hearts are open. As Saint Augustine said, our hearts are restless until they rest in God—and every step toward Him brings us closer to that rest. I know this episode was more teaching than usual, but I felt called to share it. If you're listening, I believe you want heaven—and God wants that too. He is working in you every day. What is one way you can cooperate more with His grace? What might be resisting it? Dear Jehovah Mekoddishkem, bless all who are listening. Thank You for sanctifying us and wanting us with You forever. Show us anything blocking Your grace and help us cooperate with it. We want to be holy. We ask this in Jesus' name, Amen. Thank you for joining me on this journey to walk boldly with Jesus! Take a moment and ask the Holy Spirit, “Who needs to hear this?” If someone comes to mind, send it to them. I look forward to seeing you Monday. Remember, Jesus loves you just as you are—and so do I! Have a blessed weekend! Today's Word from the Lord was received in October 2025 by a member of my Catholic Charismatic Prayer Group. If you have questions, email CatholicCharismaticPrayerGroup@gmail.com. Today's Word from the Lord is:“When you find it difficult to be my voice, call upon the power of my name. My name will give you strength, help you overcome fear, and walk through every trial. My name is the power you need.”   www.findingtruenorthcoaching.comCLICK HERE TO DONATECLICK HERE to sign up for Mentoring CLICK HERE to sign up for Daily "Word from the Lord" emailsCLICK HERE to sign up for my newsletter & receive a free audio training about inviting Jesus into your daily lifeCLICK HERE to buy my book Total Trust in God's Safe Embrace

Hub Headlines features audio versions of the best commentaries and analysis published daily in The Hub. Enjoy listening to original and provocative takes on the issues that matter while you are on the go.0:24 - With a record-low 1.25 children per Canadian woman, stop dismissing falling fertility rates as a choice, by Mike Moffatt and Cara Stern8:18 - Why the Toronto-Quebec high-speed rail line is a bad idea, by Richard ShimookaThis program is narrated by automated voices. To get full-length editions of popular Hub podcasts and other great perks, subscribe to the Hub for only $2 a week: https://thehub.ca/join/hero/Subscribe to The Hub's podcast feed to get all our best content:https://tinyurl.com/3a7zpd7e (Apple)https://tinyurl.com/y8akmfn7 (Spotify)Watch The Hub on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@TheHubCanadaThe Hub on X: https://x.com/thehubcanada?lang=enCREDITS:Alisha Rao – Producer & Editor Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this really interesting episode, Doctors Lisa and Sara talk to Dr Rageshri Dhairyawan - Consultant in Sexual Health and HIV Medicine, and Dr Laura Tinner - Research Fellow in Centre for Public Health, at Bristol University. Rageshri talks about her lived experience of being dismissed in a medical situation, despite her professional background and how this led to her researching the topic in depth, and writing a book on the subject. Laura speaks to a piece of research she carried out around the views of young women accessing medical care and explains that we need to put more emphasis on listening in healthcare. They both talk to the system pressures and challenges that lead to patients feeling dismissed, but also share practical advice and tips for what healthcare professionals can do to help certain groups of people feel more heard in healthcare. You can use these podcasts as part of your CPD - we don't do certificates but they still count :) Resources: Unheard - The Medical Practice of Silencing by Dr Rageshri Dhairyawan: https://amzn.eu/d/03u4y1DX Animation about a young women's experience of healthcare accessible through the embedded link on this site: https://ayph.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/SHIFT-Improving-young-womens-care-resource-sheet.pdf The Association for Young People's Health: https://ayph.org.uk/ The Young Women's Movement: https://youngwomenscot.org/ Training session: Enquiries taken by Association for Young People's Health who have a 90-minute training course to healthcare professionals. It's co-delivered by young women who have been trained in facilitation skills and can be booked by groups of healthcare professionals who would benefit from training support related to delivering care to young women. The training uses the animation pillars to go through scenarios and exercises. Cost is dependent on whether delivered online or in person and whether any bespoke elements need to be included, but please get in touch to discuss what could work for you. Contact AYPH for more info: info@youngpeopleshealth.org.uk The Young Women's Movement:  EmBody to EmPower: https://youngwomenscot.org/resources/embody-to-empower/ Intersectional discrimination and mental health inequalities: a qualitative study of young women's experiences in Scotland: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12939-024-02133-3#citeas An exploration of discrimination in healthcare for young women in Scotland: An intersectional study: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321525000125 Fighting the “Bog Standard”: Intersectional experiences of gender and disability discrimination within healthcare among women in Scotland: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321526000119 Women's experiences of discrimination and the impact on health: https://www.gov.scot/publications/womens-experiences-discrimination-impact-health/ Reflect, collaborate, and listen: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(25)00251-X/abstract Listening is a tool for health equity, not just a soft skill: https://www.bmj.com/content/390/bmj.r1164.long Listening to the voices of the medically silenced: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0003761 Scotland's Women's Health Plan: Phase Two: https://www.gov.scot/publications/womens-health-plan-phase-two-2026-2029/ Dr Jonathon Tomlinson's blog : https://abetternhs.net/about/ ___ We really want to make these episodes relevant and helpful: if you have any questions or want any particular areas covered then contact us on Twitter @PCKBpodcast, or leave a comment on our quick anonymous survey here: https://pckb.org/feedback Email us at: primarycarepodcasts@gmail.com ___ Given that this episode was recorded with specific clinicians, the information discussed may not be applicable elsewhere and it is important to consult local guidelines before making any treatment decisions.  The information presented is the personal opinion of the healthcare professional interviewed and might not be representative to all clinicians. It is based on their interpretation of current best practice and guidelines when the episode was recorded. Guidelines can change; To the best of our knowledge the information in this episode is up to date as of it's release but it is the listeners responsibility to review the information and make sure it is still up to date when they listen. Dr Lisa Adams, Dr Sara MacDermott and their interviewees are not liable for any advice, investigations, course of treatment, diagnosis or any other information, services or products listeners might pursue as a result of listening to this podcast - it is the clinicians responsibility to appraise the information given and review local and national guidelines before making treatment decisions. Reliance on information provided in this podcast is solely at the listeners risk. The podcast is designed to be used by trained healthcare professionals for education only. We do not recommend these for patients or the general public and they are not to be used as a method of diagnosis, opinion, treatment or medical advice for the general public. Do not delay seeking medical advice based on the information contained in this podcast. If you have questions regarding your health or feel you may have a medical condition then promptly seek the opinion of a trained healthcare professional.

In today's episode, Claire is joined by Ruben Buhner to talkabout his book Negotiating Jewishness: Paul's Ethnicity Between Continuity and Discontinuity. The assertion that Paul remained a Jew throughout his liferequires little further justification. However, questions remain, including: How can his relationship with Judaism be positively articulated? How was that relationship influenced by Paul's belief in Jesus as the Messiah? A particular difficulty arises here: reconciling the sometimes contradictory statements in Paul's epistles concerning his connection to the Jewish people and their beliefs and behavior. A lively discussion surrounding the Jewishness of Paul in the last fifteen years has yielded the "radical new perspectiveon Paul," or "Paul Within Judaism" perspective. Dismissing older conceptions that contrast the Christ-believing Paul with a monolithic and negatively characterized ancient Judaism, new approaches focus on the extent to which we should depict Paul as "within Judaism" or still torah observant.With Negotiating Jewishness, Ruben Bühner addresses these issues and offers a different, more balanced approach byconsidering three key aspects: ancient ethnicity, neglected sources, and scholarly debates. Drawing from studies in cultural science and ethnology, Bühner shows that ancient Jewish identity can be characterized as "mesomorphic" as it integrated diverse—even divergent—parameters in ethnic construction. With a focus on passages from the Pauline Epistles crucial for understanding Paul's Jewishness, alongside a thorough excavation of the realities of Jewish life in the Greco-Roman diaspora, the book aims to bridge the gap between English-speaking and continental European scholarship, with a particular emphasis on underrepresented German perspectives.Paul navigated his Jewish identity within the myriad cultural landscapes of the first-century Mediterranean world and in constant dialogue with his missional calling and interactions with other Jews. Traces of this process emerge from his writings amidst their diverse historical, social, and rhetorical contexts. Negotiating Jewishness probes these scattered glimpses into Paul's self-understanding to demonstrate that Paul's relationship to Judaism can be best understood as a reflection of ancient Jewish ethnic negotiation. Bühner contributes to the scholarly conversation with a new definition of what it means to read Paul (or any New Testament text) "within Judaism."Dr. Ruben Bühner is a postdoctoral researcher for New Testament Studies at the University of Zurich and the University of Bonn.

Read OnlineSome of the inhabitants of Jerusalem said, “Is he not the one they are trying to kill? And look, he is speaking openly and they say nothing to him. Could the authorities have realized that he is the Christ? But we know where he is from. When the Christ comes, no one will know where he is from.” John 7:25–27Though Jesus was perfect, His sermons flawless, and His miracles astonishing, many remained hardened in their disbelief. People of the time had various expectations about the Messiah. Some were looking for a mysterious, heavenly figure; others, a political leader; still others envisioned the Messiah would suddenly appear without prior knowledge of His origins. These expectations were all based on an incomplete understanding of the prophets.The Messiah's arrival uprooted many of the preconceived ideas about who He would be. He arrived as a poor carpenter, raised in the unimpressive village of Nazareth, and without any ambitions to overthrow the Roman occupation of Israel. Yet, Jesus performed miracles. His sermons penetrated hearts, winning over many humble converts. His mere presence exuded confidence, purpose, and dignity. Could He really be the Messiah?Just like the people of Jesus' time, it is easy for us to develop preconceived ideas about Who God is and how our lives should change once we choose to follow Him. If you give your life to Christ, what do you expect from Him? Do you expect that God will bless you with great success in business? Your children will love and obey God? Your family and friends will be perfectly united? Material provisions will enable you to live a comfortable life? Or do you expect rejection, suffering, and death? We must always align our expectations with God's will, knowing that His ultimate plan is for our salvation.Some of the Jews rejected Jesus because He did not meet their expectations of Who the Messiah would be. The particular group in today's Gospel held the belief that the Messiah would arrive on the scene instantaneously, and no one would know where He came from. Their comment, “But we know where He is from,” reflects their disbelief, as they were expecting a more mysterious or sudden appearance. That misunderstanding of the prophets resulted in them rejecting Jesus, the true Messiah.Similarly, it is easy for us to have certain expectations about God that, when not fulfilled, lead to doubt or confusion. This is our fault for forming false expectations about what should happen once we choose to follow Christ. The remedy is simple—turn to the Gospel and believe what Jesus said.What did Jesus say? That He would suffer greatly at the hands of the scribes, Pharisees, and elders of the people. That He would be handed over, tortured, and crucified, but that He would also rise on the third day. And that is exactly what happened.When we choose to follow Christ, does Jesus promise that life will be easy, comfortable, and that we will be loved by all? Certainly not. He tells us that we will suffer the same fate He did, but if we persevere through the crosses of life, we will share in His ultimate victory.Reflect today on any false notions you might have about being a Christian. Embracing the Gospel—culminating in Christ's Passion—is difficult. The call to live sacrificially, to lay our lives down for others, to do penance, live selflessly, be generous, repent of every sin, pray continuously, and embrace Christ's Cross with unwavering determination is difficult at first. Doing so is only possible if we dismiss false expectations about being a Christian, so that the full Gospel and its demands will not shock us but inspire us to follow Christ down the path He has chosen for us.My Lord and Messiah, Your life and mission did not live up to the expectations that many people had of the Messiah. Similarly, I often have expectations of You that are contrary to Your will. Please open my mind and heart to see and embrace Your will so that I can lay down my life along with You, so as to share in Your Resurrection. Jesus, I trust in You.Image: See page for author, CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia CommonsSource: Free RSS feed from catholic-daily-reflections.com — Copyright © 2026 My Catholic Life! Inc. All rights reserved. This content is provided solely for personal, non-commercial use. Redistribution, republication, or commercial use — including use within apps with advertising — is strictly prohibited without written permission.

Brian Heywood and Let's Go Washington detail examples of lawmakers in Olympia ignoring historic levels of constituent engagement, enacting controversial tax increases, and expanding state power at the public's expense. https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/opinion/opinion-a-troubling-end-to-a-disruptive-session/ #Washington #Politics #Opinion #LetsGoWashington #BrianHeywood #Legislature #Olympia #PublicInput #TaxPolicy #Government

‘It does really matter': Joe pushes back on WH dismissing reports Russia is sharing intel with Iran To listen to this show and other MS podcasts without ads, sign up for MS NOW Premium on Apple Podcasts. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Good morning, Indiana School Leaders — As the General Assembly moves toward adjournment, the pace at the Statehouse has accelerated. Conference committees have dominated the week, and final votes may still be occurring as this message reaches you. In this week's Legislative Update Podcast, I focus on legislation that has officially crossed the finish line. At the time of recording, Governor Braun has signed four bills we've been following into law. Below you'll find direct links and a brief summary of each. ✅ HEA 1035 – Permissible Unsupervised Activity Author: Representative Teshka This new law defines "independent activity" and clarifies that a child is not considered a Child in Need of Services solely because a parent allows age-appropriate independence — including walking, biking, playing outdoors, remaining at home, or remaining briefly in a stationary vehicle. While not an education-specific bill, this legislation shapes the broader child welfare framework impacting our students and families. ✅ HEA 1195 – High School Equivalency Diplomas Author: Representative Davis This legislation extends pilot timelines through 2028 and requires students pursuing a High School Equivalency diploma to: Complete the Indiana Career Explorer program Complete a DOE-approved readiness assessment Effective upon passage. This reinforces structure and accountability within alternative diploma pathways. ✅ HEA 1325 – Special Education Author: Representative Pfaff HEA 1325 requires the Department of Education, in collaboration with the Indiana Department of Health, Department of Child Services, and the Office of the Secretary of Family and Social Services, to collect data and make recommendations regarding: Residential placements Developmental preschool Special education services With next year being a budget year, this data-driven approach positions Indiana for more informed conversations about special education funding and service alignment.     ✅ HEA 1036 – Children in Need of Services Author: Representative Wilburn This law requires the Department of Child Services to have in-person contact with an alleged victim before: Concluding an abuse or neglect assessment, and Dismissing or terminating a pending CHINS case. Given recent statewide discussion around DCS processes, this legislation strengthens procedural safeguards. School leaders — often mandatory reporters and partners in these cases — should be aware of this procedural shift. As session concludes, remember: IASP will continue monitoring conference outcomes and agency guidance and will provide additional updates as final language settles. Thank you for your leadership, your advocacy, and your steady presence for Indiana students.  

Boundaries are complex.They can feel uncomfortable.And they are deeply liberating.In this episode, I'm talking honestly about what boundaries actually are— and the biggest misunderstandings that keep us stuck.This isn't about scripts.It's not about controlling other people.And it's not about building walls.It's about truth.And here's the part we don't often talk about:If your boundaries are being “crossed,” it's you crossing them.And that's not about shame or fault.That's conditioning.We cross our own boundaries every day in subtle ways:*laughing at jokes we don't actually find funny.* Sharing food we don't actually want.*Deferring to other people's preferences while disconnected from our own.*Dismissing our needs to keep the peace.That's not weakness.That's conditioning.In this episode, I explore:*What boundaries actually are*What they are not*Why boundaries are relational skills*Why boundary work begins internally*How self-respect is the foundation of being respectedBoundary work is not about changing other people.It is about discovering what is true for you — and honoring it.This episode is real.It's grounded.It's honest.If you've felt confused, guilty, or conflicted about boundariesthis conversation will help you see them in a new way.Let's Connect:Instagram: @dianesorensen.bbFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/diane.sorensen.589Join the conversation — share your takeaways or questions from today's episode by sending me a message on Instagram or Facebook. I love hearing from you!Working Together:Diane Sorensen Coaching is where boundarywork becomes the bridge from chaos to connection.You'll learn to transform your triggers, lead with compassion, and create emotionally safe, connected relationships built on authenticity, not approval.Reclaim your CALM, speak your TRUTH, and live FREE→ Submit an inquiry or learn more: www.dianesorensen.net/contact→ Explore free guides and resources to support your growth: www.dianesorensen.net/→ Join the weekly newsletter for insights, tools, and support delivered straight to your inbox: www.dianesorensen.net/email-list

Send a textI had an experience recently where someone immediately dismissed a perspective I shared — not with disagreement, but with disregard. The conversation didn't end because we saw things differently. It ended because one side decided the other wasn't worth engaging.And it got me thinking.In a culture that encourages us to block, label, and move on, have we confused emotional comfort with emotional maturity?In this episode, we talk about:The difference between disagreement and disregardWhy shutting people down is often a sign of insecurity, not strengthHow social media and tribal thinking reward certainty over curiosityThe real grey areas — when disengagement may actually be wiseWhy emotional discipline is becoming one of the most important skills of our timeThis isn't about platforming harmful ideas or tolerating abuse. Boundaries matter. But there's a difference between protecting yourself and avoiding discomfort.If we automatically disregard everyone who challenges us, we don't just lose conversations — we lose the opportunity to sharpen our thinking, build resilience, and strengthen community.Understanding does not equal agreement.But understanding requires the willingness to stay in the room.This episode is an invitation — to choose curiosity over ego, discipline over impulse, and conversation over dismissal.If this episode resonates, consider sharing it with someone who values thoughtful conversation.Social Media:Insta/X: kyleTHEhortonYoutube: KyletalkssTiktok: KyleTalkssIntro: Head In The Clouds by Matthew MorelockOutro: Surfaces Type Beat - Jellyfish BeatsSupport the show

Mary Kissel analyzes the massive US naval deployment near Iran as a credible threat to force regime compliance, dismissing Iran's military drills in the Straits of Hormuz as feeble, suggesting the administration will use force if Tehran refuses dismantlement.1900 BRUSSELS

In this powerful episode of Raising Confident Girls, host Melissa Jones explores two moments that leave many parents feeling unsure: when their daughter compares herself to others—and when she comes home from school and completely falls apart.Melissa reframes comparison as something far more meaningful than a confidence problem. Rather than seeing it as insecurity or weakness, she explains that comparison is a normal developmental signal. It's how girls begin to understand where they fit socially, what matters to them, and how they see themselves in relation to others. Instead of dismissing comments like “She's prettier than me” or “I'm not as smart as her,” Melissa guides parents toward responding with empathy—acknowledging feelings first, then helping girls recognize their own unique strengths.She also unpacks the all-too-familiar “after-school unraveling.” If your daughter holds it together all day only to melt down the moment she gets home, Melissa offers a reassuring perspective: this emotional release is often a sign of safety and trust. Home is where she feels secure enough to let her guard down. Beneath the tears and frustration lies emotional effort, social pressure, and the hard work of self-regulation.Throughout the episode, Melissa shares practical and compassionate tools to help parents:Understand why comparison is developmentally normalRespond without minimizing or dismissing feelingsRecognize after-school meltdowns as signs of emotional safetyAvoid common reactions that unintentionally shut girls downCreate a home environment where feelings are welcomed, not fixedBuild connection, resilience, and lasting confidenceThis episode is a reassuring reminder that big emotions are not problems to solve—but opportunities to strengthen trust and deepen connection. When parents respond with empathy, steadiness, and understanding, they provide the stable foundation girls need to grow into confident, self-aware young women.Download the Quick Tips PDF of today's episode for future reference.If you know a parent who could benefit from this conversation, share this episode with them! Let's work together to raise the next generation of confident girls.Melissa's Links:• Website • Instagram • Facebook• TikTok• LinkedIn

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Hour one of Larry Conners USA: Guest: Briana Lyman RUMBLE: https://rumble.com/c/c-1568182 WEBSITE: https://www.larryconnersusa.com/ FACEBOOK: https://www.facebook.com/larryconnersusa NEWSTALK STL: https://newstalkstl.com/larry/ The post Nay Sayers Are Already Dismissing TrumpRX /6p 2.9.2026 appeared first on Larry Conners USA.

Subscribe to The Manila Times Channel - https://tmt.ph/YTSubscribe Visit our website at https://www.manilatimes.net Follow us: Facebook - https://tmt.ph/facebook Instagram - https://tmt.ph/instagram Twitter - https://tmt.ph/twitter DailyMotion - https://tmt.ph/dailymotion Subscribe to our Digital Edition - https://tmt.ph/digital Check out our Podcasts: Spotify - https://tmt.ph/spotify Apple Podcasts - https://tmt.ph/applepodcasts Amazon Music - https://tmt.ph/amazonmusic Deezer: https://tmt.ph/deezer Stitcher: https://tmt.ph/stitcherTune In: https://tmt.ph/tunein#TheManilaTimes Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

A memorandum in support of a request for dismissal of a complaint is a legal document submitted to a court that outlines the reasons why a complaint should be dismissed. This type of memorandum is typically prepared by the defendant or their legal counsel and presented to the court as part of the pre-trial proceedings.In this document, the defendant usually provides legal arguments and evidence to support their request for dismissal. This could include demonstrating that the complaint fails to state a valid legal claim, that there is a lack of jurisdiction, or that there are other legal grounds for dismissal.The memorandum serves as a persuasive tool for the court, aiming to convince the judge that the complaint does not have merit and should not proceed to trial. It is important for the memorandum to be well-researched, clearly written, and supported by relevant legal precedent.In this episode we begin our look at the UMG memorandum in support of dismissing the complaint filed against them by Rodney Jones.   to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.41.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)

A memorandum in support of a request for dismissal of a complaint is a legal document submitted to a court that outlines the reasons why a complaint should be dismissed. This type of memorandum is typically prepared by the defendant or their legal counsel and presented to the court as part of the pre-trial proceedings.In this document, the defendant usually provides legal arguments and evidence to support their request for dismissal. This could include demonstrating that the complaint fails to state a valid legal claim, that there is a lack of jurisdiction, or that there are other legal grounds for dismissal.The memorandum serves as a persuasive tool for the court, aiming to convince the judge that the complaint does not have merit and should not proceed to trial. It is important for the memorandum to be well-researched, clearly written, and supported by relevant legal precedent.In this episode we begin our look at the UMG memorandum in support of dismissing the complaint filed against them by Rodney Jones.   to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.41.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)

A memorandum in support of a request for dismissal of a complaint is a legal document submitted to a court that outlines the reasons why a complaint should be dismissed. This type of memorandum is typically prepared by the defendant or their legal counsel and presented to the court as part of the pre-trial proceedings.In this document, the defendant usually provides legal arguments and evidence to support their request for dismissal. This could include demonstrating that the complaint fails to state a valid legal claim, that there is a lack of jurisdiction, or that there are other legal grounds for dismissal.The memorandum serves as a persuasive tool for the court, aiming to convince the judge that the complaint does not have merit and should not proceed to trial. It is important for the memorandum to be well-researched, clearly written, and supported by relevant legal precedent.In this episode we begin our look at the UMG memorandum in support of dismissing the complaint filed against them by Rodney Jones.   to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.41.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)

A memorandum in support of a request for dismissal of a complaint is a legal document submitted to a court that outlines the reasons why a complaint should be dismissed. This type of memorandum is typically prepared by the defendant or their legal counsel and presented to the court as part of the pre-trial proceedings.In this document, the defendant usually provides legal arguments and evidence to support their request for dismissal. This could include demonstrating that the complaint fails to state a valid legal claim, that there is a lack of jurisdiction, or that there are other legal grounds for dismissal.The memorandum serves as a persuasive tool for the court, aiming to convince the judge that the complaint does not have merit and should not proceed to trial. It is important for the memorandum to be well-researched, clearly written, and supported by relevant legal precedent.In this episode we begin our look at the UMG memorandum in support of dismissing the complaint filed against them by Rodney Jones.   to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.41.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)

A memorandum in support of a request for dismissal of a complaint is a legal document submitted to a court that outlines the reasons why a complaint should be dismissed. This type of memorandum is typically prepared by the defendant or their legal counsel and presented to the court as part of the pre-trial proceedings.In this document, the defendant usually provides legal arguments and evidence to support their request for dismissal. This could include demonstrating that the complaint fails to state a valid legal claim, that there is a lack of jurisdiction, or that there are other legal grounds for dismissal.The memorandum serves as a persuasive tool for the court, aiming to convince the judge that the complaint does not have merit and should not proceed to trial. It is important for the memorandum to be well-researched, clearly written, and supported by relevant legal precedent.In this episode we begin our look at the UMG memorandum in support of dismissing the complaint filed against them by Rodney Jones.   to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.41.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)

Common Man Hour 1 --Wheel Of Topics --Cancelled Flight --Peek at the Purple --Dismissing Darnold

Common Man Hour 1 --Wheel Of Topics --Cancelled Flight --Peek at the Purple --Dismissing DarnoldSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Common Man Hour 1 --Wheel Of Topics --Cancelled Flight --Peek at the Purple --Dismissing DarnoldSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Professor Toby Wilkinson. After their defeat, Antony died in Cleopatra's arms. Cleopatra committed suicide to avoid Roman humiliation, ending the Ptolemaic dynasty. Octavian annexed Egypt, dismissing its religious traditions regarding the Apis Bull and exploiting the land solely as a grain source for the Roman Empire. 1900

THE REPUBLICAN FIELD AND THE SELECTION OF ALF LANDON Colleague David Pietrusza. The Republican Party sought a candidate to challenge Roosevelt, dismissing a return of Herbert Hoover and bypassing isolationist William Borah. They settled on Kansas Governor Alf Landon, known as the "Kansas Coolidge," a progressive Republican who had balanced his state's budget. Despite Landon being a lackluster speaker and a "dark horse," he secured the nomination because William Randolph Hearst threw his massive media support behind him. Hearst's papers published relentless positive coverage of Landon, making the nomination his to lose despite the candidate's lack of charisma and national profile. NUMBER 6

MEDIA COVER-UPS AND THE LADIES' ROOM DISCOVERY Colleague Craig Unger. Unger recounts how Newsweek and a Congressional investigation suppressed the story, dismissing the "October Surprise" as a myth. Despite warnings from Seymour Hersh, Unger and reporter Bob Parry persisted, eventually discovering a massive cache of discarded evidence hidden inside a House office building restroom, reigniting the investigation into the alleged treason. NUMBER 4

Gregory Copley. Gregory Copley discusses King Charles's recent video regarding his cancer, noting the King implied success with early detection and a reduction in future treatments. Dismissing social media panic, Copley explains the King remains in command and is more likely to die with the disease than of it.

In Matthew 7:16, Jesus said, “You will know them by their fruits” (NKJV). Some use this verse to argue against the Pentecostal belief that speaking in tongues is the initial evidence of the baptism of the Holy Spirit. In this episode of Apostolic Life in the 21st Century, Dr. David K. Bernard addresses that argument directly. He explores what “fruit” means in Scripture and clarifies how speaking in tongues functions biblically in relation to salvation and the Christian life. This podcast episode offers a thoughtful, Scripture-based response for anyone seeking to understand the biblical role of tongues.Visit PentecostalPublishing.com to shop Dr. Bernard's full catalog of published works. Enter promo code DKB10 at checkout to save 10 percent on your order.If you enjoy this podcast, leave a five-star rating and a review on iTunes or your preferred podcast platform. We also appreciate it when you share Apostolic Life in the 21st Century with family and friends.

Send us a textWhat if the very foundation of modern care—science alone—is the problem?You see the stats: mothers are drowning in postpartum depression, crippling anxiety, and mysterious autoimmune flare-ups. You're doing the screenings, you're following the standard protocols, but the lasting solutions are elusive. What if the very foundation of modern care—science alone—is the problem? Maranda dives into the six critical limitations of medical science that are actively harming mothers in the fourth trimester. This isn't anti-science; it's a call for a more honest, holistic postpartum health model. This episode exposes the six critical limitations of medical care actively harming the fourth trimester. We break down why relying on RCTs ignores millennia of successful traditional postpartum practices. Discover the Three Pillars of Knowledge for root-cause resolution in perinatal mental health and move beyond symptom managementCheck out the episode on the blog HERE: https://postpartumu.com/podcast/the-6-critical-blind-spots-of-science-that-are-harming-postpartum-moms-ep-242/Key time stamps: 04:15: Miranda's personal story: Dismissed with Zoloft, actually had thyroid dysfunction, gut infection, and severe nutrient deficiencies.09:05: The Three Pillars of Postpartum Knowledge: Science, Women's Stories, and Traditional Practices.11:47: Limitation #1: Science is money-driven and prioritizes patentable solutions over holistic postpartum practices.16:30: Limitation #3: Dismissing millennia of traditional care (like warm, cooked foods) as mere anecdotal evidence.21:20: Limitation #4: Doctors are taught pathology, not how the body actually heals, leading to a focus on pieces instead of the whole.26:38: Limitation #5: The male bias in research and leadership and why women were historically excluded from clinical trials.31:45: Limitation #6: Time lag in policy change—it takes 10-15 years for new evidence to become standard practice.34:23: Clinical Example: Client with "medication-resistant PPD" actually had Hashimoto's and severe B12/Ferritin deficiency.36:50: Call to Action: Believe your client, investigate beyond basic labs, and hold providers accountable for outdated care.40:17: Final thought: Science alone is not enough; we need all three pillars for comprehensive, root-cause postpartum support. NEXT STEPS:

Book Title: The Blazing World: A New History of Revolutionary England, 1603-1689 Author: Jonathan HealeyHeadline: Charles I's Personal Rule and the Scottish Revolt After dismissing Parliament in 1629, Charles I ruled personally, relying on figures like Archbishop William Laud and the Earl of Strafford. Their controversial religious policies and "arbitrary" actions, such as the Ship Money tax, generated significant opposition. The King's attempt to impose a new prayer book on Scotland in 1637 led to a revolt, ultimately collapsing his rule in England and leading to Laud and Strafford's arrests. 1661 OLIVER CROMWELL

Let's talk about Trump dismissing Epstein as a hoax (again)....