Podcasts about Andrew Johnson

It's the “Scout's Honor” edition of the Bengals Booth Podcast as Dan Hoard visits with Bengals scout Andrew Johnson now entering his 10th season with the team. Then, it's “Five Questions” with third round draft pick Dylan Fairchild, followed by Dan's five observations after watching practice.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The Dedeaux Download Podcast returns with Shotgun Spratling and podcast co-host Kasey Kazliner breaking down USC baseball finishing the regular season with a series loss on the road at Washington, winning in the finale after dropping five of six games prior. Shotgun and Kasey take a look at the action, noting three positives, including an electric performance from Mason Edwards as well as a positive outing from fellow left-handed pitcher Caden Hunter and Ethan Hedges breaking through with a big hit in extra innings. They also look at the end-of-regular-season struggles for the Trojans and what USC has to do to right the ship at the opportune time. After a break, USC pitching coach Sean Allen joins the show to talk about what can be expected from the Big Ten Tournament since he's coached in it previously and how the unique pod system the Big Ten has gone to this season changes the dynamic, especially as the top seed in one of the four pods. Allen also discusses what they've done to try to get both Edwards and Hunter back locked in on the mound to give the Trojans more depth, especially with the emergence of freshman Andrew Johnson. USC's pitching coach also gives an assessment of the season to this point for a staff that has endured some significant injuries and states the Trojans' case for the NCAA selection committee. Shotgun and Kasey close out the show taking a look at where the Trojans' postseason hopes stand after back-to-back series losses but seeing their RPI climb in the last week. The podcast then previews USC's path in the Big Ten Tournament, including pitching matchups that could set up favorably for them. Please review, rate and subscribe to the Peristyle Podcast on ⁠⁠⁠⁠Apple Podcasts⁠⁠⁠⁠! Make sure you check out ⁠⁠⁠⁠USCFootball.com⁠⁠⁠⁠ for complete coverage of USC Trojans football, basketball, baseball and recruiting.  To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Visit the website and join our community by signing up on our email list. www.podpage.com/the-3-13-men-money-and-marriageCash App $a114johnsonSummaryIn this episode of the 313 Men, Money and Marriage podcast, host Andrew Johnson explores the concept of relationship mentorship for women. He discusses the urgency for women to seek guidance in navigating relationships, especially in light of declining marriage rates and changing family structures. Johnson emphasizes the importance of balancing career and relationships, addressing self-worth issues, and understanding the differing perspectives of men and women in relationships. He advocates for the role of a relationship mentor in providing emotional and instrumental support, helping women make informed decisions about their relationships. The episode concludes with a reflection on the podcast's future and the need for a break to improve the show's quality.TakeawaysWomen face increasing urgency in relationship decisions.Declining marriage rates impact family structures.A relationship mentor can guide women in partner selection.Balancing career and relationships is challenging but essential.Self-worth issues can affect dating success.Healthy communication is crucial in relationships.Men and women prioritize different qualities in partners.Not all women need a mentor, but some can benefit.Mentorship can provide valuable insights into relationships.The podcast will evolve to enhance listener experience.Do Women Need Relationship Mentors?Navigating Relationships: The Role of Mentorship"Do women need a relationship mentor?""Striking a balance is critical.""Some women need a relationship mentor."Chapters 00:00 Introduction to Relationship Mentorship01:51 The Urgency for Women in Relationships03:32 The Role of a Relationship Mentor06:34 Balancing Career and Relationships10:13 Self-Worth and Self-Esteem in Relationships12:38 Understanding Relationship Dynamics15:30 The Importance of Mentorship18:53 Navigating Relationship Advice20:17 Conclusion and Future of the Podcast

The Dirty Terps are on fire! Nathan and Jack recap the series sweep over Minnesota, and also chat with the three seniors that have spent their whole careers at Maryland in Andrew Johnson, Jacob Orr, and Ryan Van Buren.

Visit the website to join our email listwww.podpage.com/the-3-13-men-money-and-marriageIf you want to make a donation to the show Cash App $a114johnsonSummaryIn this episode of the 313 Men, Money, and Marriage podcast, host Andrew Johnson engages with domestic violence advocate Leslie Kline, who shares her personal journey as a survivor of domestic violence. The conversation delves into the definitions and types of domestic violence, the complexities of leaving abusive relationships, and the long-term effects on survivors. Leslie discusses her healing process, the importance of recognizing red flags in relationships, and the societal factors that contribute to domestic violence. The episode emphasizes the need for education and prevention strategies to break the cycle of abuse and promote healthy relationships.TakeawaysDomestic violence is a pattern of abusive behavior used to gain power and control.One in three women and one in four men experience physical violence by an intimate partner.Survivors often question how they ended up in abusive situations.Recognizing red flags is crucial in preventing future abuse.Manipulation and emotional ties can make leaving an abuser difficult.Long-term effects of abuse can include physical and mental health issues.Healing is a personal journey that requires time and effort.Choosing to abstain from relationships can be a part of the healing process.Education and awareness are key to breaking the cycle of domestic violence.Generational patterns of abuse can be addressed through proactive measures."How did I get here?""It was like a roller coaster.""I pray for those abusers.""It's not just women, it's men."Chapters00:00 Understanding Domestic Violence: Definitions and Types03:11 Leslie Kline's Survivor Story: A Journey Through Abuse05:54 Recognizing Red Flags: Lessons from Past Relationships09:03 The Complexity of Leaving: Manipulation and Guilt11:53 Long-Term Effects of Domestic Violence: Healing and Recovery15:09 Navigating New Relationships: Healing Before Moving On18:01 Societal Factors Contributing to Domestic Violence21:04 Breaking the Cycle: Education and Prevention Strategies

5/8: Lincoln's Peace: The Struggle to End the American Civil War Hardcover – Illustrated, March 18, 2025  by  Michael Vorenberg 1865 JOHNSON INAUGURATION  https://www.amazon.com/Lincolns-Peace-Struggle-American-Civil/dp/1524733172 We set out on the James River, March 25, 1865, aboard the paddle steamboat River Queen. President Lincoln is on his way to General Grant's headquarters at City Point, Virginia, and he's decided he won't return to Washington until he's witnessed, or perhaps even orchestrated, the end of the Civil War. Now, it turns out, more than a century and a half later, historians are still searching for that end. Was it April 9, at Appomattox, as conventional wisdom holds, where Lee surrendered to Grant in Wilmer McLean's parlor? Or was it ten weeks afterward, in Galveston, where a federal commander proclaimed Juneteenth the end of slavery? Or perhaps in August of 1866, when President Andrew Johnson simply declared “the insurrection is at an end”? That the answer was elusive was baffling even to a historian of the stature of Michael Vorenberg, whose work served as a key source of Steven Spielberg's Lincoln. Vorenberg was inspired to write this groundbreaking book, finding its title in the peace Lincoln hoped for but could not make before his assassination. A peace that required not one but many endings, as Vorenberg reveals in these pages, the most important of which came well more than a year after Lincoln's untimely death.  To say how a war ends is to suggest how it should be remembered, and Vorenberg's search is not just for the Civil War's endpoint but for its true nature and legacy, so essential to the American identity. It's also a quest, in our age of “forever wars,” to understand whether the United States's interminable conflicts of the current era have a precedent in the Civil War—and whether, in a sense, wars ever end at all, or merely wax and wane.

Join our community by subscribing to our email listwww.podpage.com/the-3-13-men-money-and-marriageIf you want to make a donation to the show Cash app $a114johnsonSummaryIn this episode of the 313 Men, Money, and Marriage podcast, host Andrew Johnson discusses the behaviors and characteristics that men look for in potential marriage partners. He emphasizes the importance of presentation, emotional stability, personal hygiene, and character traits over mere physical attraction. The conversation also touches on financial considerations and the evaluation process that men undergo when determining long-term compatibility with a partner. Johnson concludes by reiterating that men marry based on behavior and the overall impression a woman makes on them and their families.TakeawaysMen marry based on how women present themselves.Emotional stability is a key factor for men.Personal hygiene is crucial in relationships.Character traits often outweigh physical beauty.Men know within a year if a woman is marriage material.Financial stability and management are important to men.Men look for life goals and aspirations in partners.Trust and respect are foundational in relationships.Men want to feel valued and appreciated by their partners.Intense physical attraction does not guarantee marriage.SoundbitesMen's Marriage Preferences UnveiledThe Role of Behavior in Marriage"Men want emotional stability.""Beauty fades; character lasts.""Men will marry behavior."Chapters00:00 Introduction and Podcast Updates01:42 Understanding Men's Marriage Preferences06:06 The Importance of Presentation and Behavior10:20 Character Traits and Personal Qualities14:46 Financial Considerations in Relationships19:20 Evaluating Long-Term Compatibility23:30 The Role of Physical Attraction and Behavior

The Dedeaux Download Podcast returns with Shotgun Spratling and podcast co-host Kasey Kazliner breaking down USC baseball's 3-0 weekend in Minneapolis where the Trojans swept Minnesota with two dominant efforts to open the weekend and a ninth-inning come-from-behind effort in the series finale. Shotgun and Kasey take a look at all the action, pointing out the positives of the Trojans improving to 29-14 with 14-7 mark in Big Ten play and a third-place spot in the standings behind only UCLA and Iowa. They discuss the outstanding pitching outings of Andrew Johnson, Caden Aoki and Brodie Purcell as well as the offensive prowess of the Trojans' catchers. Shotgun and Kasey also look at how USC has been getting contributions from up and down the roster. The podcasters also try to find three negatives from the impressive weekend. They land on one conclusive one and stretch to find two others. After a break, USC junior college transfer Richard Tejeda joins the show to talk about his baseball journey going from the junior college ranks to being the primary backstop for a Big Ten-contending Trojan squad, including how he dealt with a big slump to start his Division I career and what adjustments he's made to be hitting .417 over his last nine games. Tejeda also discusses his connection with the pitching staff and starters Caden Hunter and Caden Aoki and what it was like catching Aoki as he came close to throwing a no-hitter Saturday. Shotgun and Kasey close out the show taking a look at where the Trojans stand after winning another Big Ten series, improving their RPI to No. 38. The podcast then previews USC's upcoming week of action with the Trojans taking on CSUN in midweek action before a huge rivalry series against UCLA down at Great Park next weekend. Please review, rate and subscribe to the Peristyle Podcast on ⁠Apple Podcasts⁠! Make sure you check out ⁠USCFootball.com⁠ for complete coverage of USC Trojans football, basketball, baseball and recruiting.  To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices

April 27, 2025 - The Second Sunday of Easter - Fr. Andrew Johnson by All Souls' Episcopal Church

The Dedeaux Download Podcast returns with Shotgun Spratling and podcast co-host Kasey Kazliner breaking down USC baseball's 3-1 week that featured a series win over Gonzaga and a dominant midweek win over Long Beach State. Shotgun and Kasey break down all the action, looking at the positives of the Trojans improving to 26-14 with an 11-7 mark in Big Ten play and a fourth-place spot in the standings behind only two ranked teams and Iowa. They discuss the play of Adrian Lopez powering the offense all weekend against the Zags as well as Ethan Hedges seeming to get back on track after a rough spell. Shotgun and Kasey also look at how the Trojans were able to bounce back after dropping the opener against Gonzaga with some uncharacteristically sloppy play thanks to the bullpen stepping up throughout the week. The podcasters also look at three negatives, including Kevin Takeuchi reinjuring his left shoulder during Tuesday's win at Long Beach and the RPI hit that one poor game can have as the Trojans start looking toward the postseason. After a break, USC head coach Andy Stankiewicz then joins the show to talk about how the Big Ten schedule, including the back-and-forth travel, has treated his team and how his players have handled and adjusted to the differences and challenges. He also discusses how the Trojans have tried to deal with a spate of injuries with multiple pitchers lost for the season as well as Takeuchi's shoulder issues. Stankiewicz then takes the listener through some strategic thought processes of how he tries to use late-inning opportunities in blowout games as well as how he handles his star players being in a funk, especially later in the season. The Trojan head man chats about Hedges, Lopez, Bryce Martin-Grudzielanek, Caden Hunter, Andrew Johnson, Jack Basseer and others. Shotgun and Kasey close out the show taking a look at where the Trojans stand after winning another series and taking a peek at where the Trojans could wind up in the postseason. The podcast then previews USC's upcoming week of action with the Trojans heading to Minneapolis to take on an injury-riddled Minnesota team that continues to battle despite 11 significant injuries, including five of the season-ending variety. Please review, rate and subscribe to the Peristyle Podcast on Apple Podcasts! Make sure you check out USCFootball.com for complete coverage of USC Trojans football, basketball, baseball and recruiting.  To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Disclaimer: The information on this show is for entertainment purposes, Do your own research into these topics, or seek advice from a financial services professional. SummaryIn this episode of the 313 Men, Money and Marriage podcast, host Andrew Johnson and Greg's Take discus strategies for investing during turbulent economic times. He emphasizes the importance of dollar cost averaging, staying informed without succumbing to anxiety, and the historical context of market fluctuations. Guest Greg shares insights from his banking experience during the 2008 financial crisis and offers advice on managing investments and expenses during downturns. The conversation highlights the need for a disciplined approach to investing, the value of personal finance education, and the importance of maintaining a long-term perspective.TakeawaysInvesting during turbulent times is crucial.One personal finance class has a lifetime benefit of $100,000.Dollar cost averaging can mitigate losses during downturns.Historical data shows that staying invested often leads to recovery.Dividend-paying stocks can provide stability during market fluctuations.Limiting exposure to mainstream news can reduce anxiety.Focus on long-term goals rather than short-term market movements.Real estate can be a tangible investment but requires caution.Reevaluating investment strategies is essential during market corrections.Sound Bites:Managing living expenses is critical in uncertain economic times.Investing Wisely in Uncertain TimesThe Importance of Dollar Cost Averaging"You can't control the stock market.""Stay busy and focus on your family.""Don't jump to the next hottest thing."Chapters 00:00Navigating Turbulent Times in Investing05:20 Market Insights and Historical Context10:09 Managing Anxiety During Market Downturns14:46 Real Estate vs. Stock Market Strategies20:12 Evaluating Investment Strategies24:15 Reflections on the 2008 Financial Crisis27:17 Strategies for Recent Retirees in a Downturn

Visit the website to get on the email listwww.podpage.com/the-3-13-men-money-and-marriageIf you want to make a donation to the show, Cash app $a114johnsonSummaryIn this episode of the 313 Men, Money, and Marriage podcast, host Andrew Johnson explores the downsides of dating one's type. He discusses how personal preferences can limit dating opportunities, the influence of family and social media on our expectations, and the importance of being flexible in relationships. Johnson emphasizes the need to recognize red flags and the potential for personal growth when dating outside of one's usual type. He concludes by addressing the dangers of having unrealistic expectations in relationships and the importance of self-awareness in the dating process.TakeawaysPhysical attraction is a major factor in dating decisions.Expectations can be shaped by family and past relationships.Being too rigid about your type can limit your dating pool.Flexibility in preferences can lead to better relationship outcomes.Ignoring red flags can lead to unhealthy relationships.Dating outside your type can foster personal growth.Unrealistic expectations can prevent finding a compatible partner.The dating landscape is influenced by social media.Self-awareness is crucial in the dating process.Father time affects physical appearance, so focus on deeper qualities.The Downsides of Dating Your TypeWhy Your Type Might Keep You Single"Our types sometimes will keep us single.""Don't ignore the red flags.""Father time is undefeated."Chapters 00:00 Understanding Your Type in Dating03:10 The Consequences of Having a Type08:14 The Impact of Expectations and Influences12:34 Red Flags and Personal Growth16:52 Unrealistic Expectations in Relationships

This Day in Legal History: President Lincoln DiesOn this day in legal history, April 15, 1865, President Abraham Lincoln died from a gunshot wound inflicted the night before by actor and Confederate sympathizer John Wilkes Booth. The assassination occurred at Ford's Theatre in Washington, D.C., where Lincoln was watching a play with his wife. He was shot in the back of the head and never regained consciousness, dying the next morning at 7:22 a.m. His death was the first assassination of a U.S. president and triggered a constitutional transition of power during a critical moment in American history. Vice President Andrew Johnson was sworn in the same day, inheriting the enormous task of leading the country through the fragile early stages of Reconstruction.Legally, Lincoln's assassination set several precedents. It led to the use of military tribunals to try civilians involved in Booth's conspiracy, a decision that remains controversial in constitutional law. The event also underscored the importance of presidential succession, later clarified by the 25th Amendment. In the immediate aftermath, martial law and curfews were imposed in the capital, and a massive manhunt ensued for Booth and his co-conspirators. The killing intensified public sentiment against the South and complicated efforts to reunify the nation. Johnson's approach to Reconstruction diverged sharply from Lincoln's more conciliatory plans, shaping decades of legal and political conflict over civil rights. The assassination deeply impacted how the federal government approached both national security and executive protection. The tragedy marked not just the loss of a president, but a shift in the legal and political structure of post-Civil War America.As Lincoln's funeral train retraced the route that had carried him from obscurity in Illinois to the presidency, it served as a symbolic farewell to both the man and the future he might have shaped. Each stop along the way—cities draped in mourning, crowds in silent grief—marked not only the end of his political journey but also the shunting off of a potential trajectory for his second term. Had Lincoln lived, his vision for a more lenient and reconciliatory Reconstruction might have softened the bitter divisions that would later deepen under Andrew Johnson's combative leadership. Perhaps civil rights protections would have been implemented sooner, with Lincoln using his political capital and moral authority to push for more lasting equality. The possibility remains that a different course could have been taken—one that prioritized unity without compromising justice, and that may have led to a more inclusive and less violent post-war America.Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a legally residing Salvadoran migrant in Maryland with a U.S. work permit, was wrongly deported to El Salvador in March, despite a judge's order blocking his removal. The Trump administration acknowledged the deportation was in error but has told a federal court it is not obligated to help him return from prison in El Salvador, interpreting a Supreme Court directive to "facilitate" his return as limited to removing domestic barriers—not assisting with his release abroad. A U.S. District Court judge had ordered the government to bring him back, a decision the Supreme Court upheld by rejecting the administration's appeal. However, a top immigration official has now argued the deportation order is moot, citing Abrego Garcia's alleged ties to MS-13, a group newly designated as a foreign terrorist organization. The State Department has confirmed that Abrego Garcia is "alive and secure" in a terrorism detention facility in El Salvador. Legal efforts continue, with Abrego Garcia's attorneys seeking more information from the government. The administration warns this could disrupt diplomatic talks, particularly with El Salvador's President Nayib Bukele visiting Washington. President Trump has said his administration would comply if ordered directly by the Supreme Court.Trump administration says it is not required to help wrongly deported man return to US | ReutersSandoz, a Swiss generic drugmaker, has filed a U.S. antitrust lawsuit against Amgen, accusing it of unlawfully maintaining a monopoly on its arthritis drug Enbrel. The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Norfolk, Virginia, alleges that Amgen created a "thicket of patents" to block the entry of biosimilar competitors like Sandoz's Erelzi, which has been approved by the FDA since 2016 but has not launched in the U.S. Sandoz claims this strategy has kept its lower-cost alternative off the market, depriving patients of affordable options and causing the company to lose millions in potential monthly sales. Amgen has not yet commented on the lawsuit. Enbrel generated $3.3 billion in U.S. revenue in 2024 alone and is used to treat inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis. Sandoz argues that Amgen's patent practices violate federal antitrust laws by suppressing competition and artificially extending its market dominance. The company is seeking an injunction to stop Amgen from using its patent portfolio in this way, as well as financial damages for lost sales.Sandoz files U.S. antitrust lawsuit against Amgen over arthritis drug | ReutersThe U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) has agreed to investigate recent changes at the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including those influenced by the White House and the Department of Government Efficiency (DGE), led by Elon Musk. This probe follows a request from Senators Elizabeth Warren and Mark Warner, who raised concerns about the SEC's ability to fulfill its regulatory duties amid sweeping restructuring efforts. Since President Trump's return to office and the Republican takeover of the agency, the SEC has reduced staff, ended leases, and reorganized operations. It has also scaled back enforcement efforts and seen a wave of resignations as part of a broader federal downsizing initiative. The GAO confirmed that the request for an investigation falls within its authority, with the review expected to begin in about three months. Lawmakers stress the importance of understanding how these changes may be undermining the SEC's mission. The agency's funding, while approved by Congress, is sourced from transaction fees rather than taxpayer dollars. These developments coincide with market instability triggered by Trump's recent tariff announcement.US congressional watchdog to probe changes at the SEC, letter says | Reuters This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

SummaryIn this episode of the Stoke It Up podcast, hosts Kenneth Priest and Alan Stoddard welcome Pastor Andrew Johnson of Faith Memorial Church in Houston, Texas. Andrew shares his journey of faith, his action hosting God's presence, and the revival of his congregation. The conversation emphasizes the significance of the call to reach all nations with the gospel.TakeawaysAndrew's early life was shaped by a challenging home environment.His father's transformation through faith inspired Andrew's ministry calling.Andrew's experience in a black church enriched his understanding of multi-ethnic ministry.Faith Memorial Church was predominantly Anglo when Andrew arrived.The community around the church has shifted to a more diverse demographic.Andrew emphasizes the importance of hosting God's presence in worship.The church is experiencing a revival through prayer and fasting.Creative problem-solving has been essential for church growth.Partnerships with other churches have provided vital support.The church aims to reach all nations and foster community engagement.Chapters00:00 Introduction to Pastor Andrew Johnson03:08 Andrew's Journey to Faith and Ministry06:01 Cultural Experience in a Black Church08:53 Transitioning Faith Memorial Church11:58 Pastoring in a Challenging Community15:02 Growth and Diversity at Faith Memorial18:10 Hosting the Presence of God22:00 Revival and Spiritual Growth24:05 Creative Solutions for Church Challenges27:48 The Importance of Partnerships in Ministry

"Preview: Author Michael Vorenberg, "Lincoln's Peace," introduces the moderate Republican voice in Congress, Lyman Trumbull of Illinois, who attempted and failed to find accommodation in the Civil Rights Act, 1866, for the increasingly  belligerent and rash President Andrew Johnson. More later in the new week." APRIL 15, 1865,  ANDREW JOHNSON INAUGURATED POTUS

This episode has some explicit language, be advisedVisit the website and join our community, subscribe to our email list. www.podpage.com/the-3-13-men-money-and-marriageTo Make a donation to the show Cash App $a114johnsonSummaryIn this episode of the 313 Men, Money, and Marriage podcast, host Andrew Johnson and guests John X, Robert Brooks, and Grant Lancaster delve into the complexities of child support and co-parenting. They share personal experiences, discuss the emotional and financial implications of child support, and explore the challenges of navigating the legal system. The conversation highlights the disparities in child support arrangements, the importance of maintaining relationships with children, and the often-overlooked emotional toll on parents. This conversation delves into the complexities of co-parenting, particularly focusing on the experiences of fathers navigating child support, emotional intelligence, and the challenges of being a primary caregiver. The speakers share personal stories that highlight the importance of time spent with children over financial contributions, the misconceptions surrounding the involvement of Black fathers, and the long-term effects of family dynamics on parenting. The discussion emphasizes the need for emotional intelligence in parenting and the ongoing challenges faced by parents even after children reach adulthood.TakeawaysCustodial mothers are more likely to have child support orders than fathers.Many custodial parents do not receive the full amount of child support.Child support can lead to significant emotional stress for parents.Court experiences can vary greatly depending on the judge and circumstances.Co-parenting without court involvement can be beneficial but challenging.The financial burden of child support can impact a parent's ability to provide for their children.Time spent with children is irreplaceable compared to financial support.Open communication between co-parents can prevent legal disputes.Judges may not consider informal support arrangements in court.The child support system can disproportionately affect fathers, especially in minority communities. Co-parenting requires a focus on the child's best interests.Time spent with children is more valuable than financial support.Black fathers are often more involved than stereotypes suggest.Family dynamics can complicate co-parenting relationships.Emotional intelligence is crucial in parenting, especially for fathers.Navigating different household rules can be challenging for children.The impact of parental relationships extends into adulthood.Maintaining a united front is important for effective co-parenting.It's essential to avoid speaking negatively about the other parent in front of children.Parenting is a lifelong commitment, regardless of living arrangements.Navigating the Child Support MazeReal Stories of Child Support StrugglesThe Emotional Impact of Child SupportCo-Parenting: Balancing Act Without CourtsSound Bites"I want to see my kids.""I never went to court.""You don't get back time.""I was very involved, dad.""You gotta be really strong.""It's not fair to the guy.""It's by design.""We don't give up, we don't stop."Chapters00:00 Introduction to Child Support Dynamics03:10 John X's Personal Child Support Journey09:22 Grant's Experience with Child Support12:52 Navigating Co-Parenting Challenges17:42 The Emotional Toll of Child Support20:07 Co-Parenting Without Court Involvement21:16 Navigating Co-Parenting Challenges23:06 The Importance of Time Over Money25:18 Misconceptions About Involvement of Black Fathers26:12 The Impact of Family Dynamics on Parenting29:18 Challenges of Being a Primary Caregiver32:06 Emotional Intelligence in Parenting38:01 Long-Term Effects of Co-Parenting Dynamics

We introduce listeners to Thaddeus Stevens, a significant yet often overlooked figure in American history. As an ardent opponent of slavery, Stevens played crucial roles in the passage of the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments, and led efforts to impeach President Andrew Johnson. Bruce Levine, author of Thaddeus Stevens: Civil War Revolutionary and Fighter for Racial Justice, joins the discussion to provide in-depth insights into Stevens' life, his relentless fight for abolition, equal rights, and free public education, and the powerful legacy he left behind. The episode delves into Steven's contributions, his complex relationship with Abraham Lincoln, and his radical yet unfulfilled vision for racial equality and land redistribution during the Reconstruction era.[00:00] Introduction to a Historical Figure[01:22] Meet the Hosts[02:01] Sponsor Message and Listener Engagement[03:32] Introducing the Guest: Bruce Levine[04:56] Thaddeus Stevens: Early Life and Influences[08:42] Stevens' Political Career and Ideals[18:57] Stevens' Role in the Anti-Slavery Movement[27:07] Sponsor Message and Historical Recording[30:07] Thaddeus Stevens and the Underground Railroad[32:30] Stevens' Political Career and Opposition[36:33] Stevens' Radical Ideas and Reconstruction[43:29] Stevens' Views on Tariffs and Capitalism[46:56] Legacy and Recognition of Thaddeus Stevens[49:13] Conclusion and Final ThoughtsTakeaways: Thaddeus Stevens was a pivotal figure against slavery, known for his radical ideas and determination. Stevens played a crucial role in the passage of the 13th and 14th amendments, pushing for racial equality. Despite his significant contributions, Stevens faced backlash and was often marginalized in historical accounts. His vision for land redistribution to freed slaves, known as '40 acres and a mule,' was ahead of its time but ultimately rejected. Stevens' fierce opposition to President Andrew Johnson's policies showcased his commitment to Reconstruction efforts. His legacy reminds us that true progress often requires bold action and unwavering conviction, even in the face of adversity. Bruce Levine Ph. D. | Department of History | IllinoisAmazon.com: Bruce C. Levine: books, biography, latest updateThaddeus Stevens & Lydia Hamilton Smith Center for History and DemocracyThaddeus Stevens Society Home PageThaddeus Stevens Society Facebook PageThis is Season 8! For more episodes, go to stlintune.com#thaddeusstevens #civilwar #reconstruction #gettysburg #14thamendment #waysandmeanscommittee #uscongress #40acresandamule

Professor Michael Vorenberg joins us to address one of the most perplexing questions in US history. Did the Civil War end on April 9, at Appomattox, as conventional wisdom holds, where Lee surrendered to Grant in Wilmer McLean's parlor? Or was it ten weeks afterward, in Galveston, where a federal commander proclaimed Juneteenth the end of slavery? Or perhaps in August of 1866, when President Andrew Johnson simply declared “the insurrection is at an end”? And we talk about the general question of when wars truly end. Fascinating! Episode 578.

One historian's journey to find the end of the Civil War—and, along the way, to expand our understanding of the nature of war itself and how societies struggle to draw the line between war and peace. We set out on the James River, March 25, 1865, aboard the paddle steamboat River Queen. President Lincoln is on his way to General Grant's headquarters at City Point, Virginia, and he's decided he won't return to Washington until he's witnessed, or perhaps even orchestrated, the end of the Civil War. Now, it turns out, more than a century and a half later, historians are still searching for that end. Was it April 9, at Appomattox, as conventional wisdom holds, where Lee surrendered to Grant in Wilmer McLean's parlor? Or was it ten weeks afterward, in Galveston, where a federal commander proclaimed Juneteenth the end of slavery? Or perhaps in August of 1866, when President Andrew Johnson simply declared “the insurrection is at an end”? That the answer was elusive was baffling even to a historian of the stature of Michael Vorenberg, whose work served as a key source of Steven Spielberg's Lincoln. Vorenberg was inspired to write this groundbreaking book, finding its title in the peace Lincoln hoped for but could not make before his assassination. A peace that required not one but many endings, as Vorenberg reveals in these pages, the most important of which came well more than a year after Lincoln's untimely death. To say how a war ends is to suggest how it should be remembered, and Vorenberg's search is not just for the Civil War's endpoint but for its true nature and legacy, so essential to the American identity. It's also a quest, in our age of “forever wars,” to understand whether the United States's interminable conflicts of the current era have a precedent in the Civil War—and whether, in a sense, wars ever end at all, or merely wax and wane. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/history

Visit the website for more show informationwww.podpage.com/the-3-13-men-money-and-marriageTo make a donation to the show Cash App $a114johnsonSummaryIn this episode of the 313 Men, Money, and Marriage podcast, host Andrew Johnson explores what men truly value in relationships and marriages. He discusses the complexity of men's needs, emphasizing that they are not one-dimensional and require respect, trust, appreciation, and open communication. The conversation delves into the importance of personal space, physical intimacy, reliability, mutual interests, and loyalty, providing insights into how men and women can better understand each other in romantic partnerships.TakeawaysMen have complex needs in relationships, not just physical attraction.Respect is fundamental for men; without it, relationships struggle.Trust is the foundation of any relationship and is easily broken.Men desire appreciation for their hard work and contributions.Open communication is essential for resolving conflicts in relationships.Men need personal space to recharge and maintain their well-being.Physical intimacy is important for creating a strong emotional bond.Reliability and consistency in partners are crucial for men.Mutual interests strengthen the bond between partners.Loyalty is essential for men, who value commitment in relationships.TitlesWhat Do Men Really Want in Relationships?Understanding Men's Complex Needs in Love"What do men truly want in a relationship?""Men need personal space to recharge.""Physical intimacy creates a strong bond."Chapters00:00 Introduction to Men's Values in Relationships03:06 Understanding Men's Communication Styles05:51 Key Values Men Seek in Relationships08:39 The Importance of Respect and Trust11:41 Appreciation and Communication in Relationships14:34 The Need for Personal Space17:33 Physical Intimacy and Consistency20:01 Mutual Interests and Intellectual Compatibility 23:13 Loyalty and Commitment in Relationships

This Day in Legal History: President Johnson Vetoes Civil Rights Act of 1866On March 27, 1866, President Andrew Johnson vetoed the Civil Rights Act of 1866, an extraordinary move that underscored his deep hostility to racial equality and his resistance to Reconstruction efforts. The bill, which Congress had passed in the wake of the Civil War, aimed to grant full citizenship to formerly enslaved people and guarantee their basic civil rights. Johnson, a Southern Democrat who remained loyal to the Union, used his veto power to block progress for freedmen, claiming the bill infringed on states' rights and unfairly favored Black Americans over whites. His justification was steeped in racism, couching white supremacy in the language of constitutional interpretation.Johnson's veto message argued that Black Americans were not yet qualified for citizenship and that extending such rights would “operate in favor of the colored and against the white race.” He blatantly ignored the atrocities of slavery and the urgent need for federal protections, given the widespread violence and oppression freedmen faced in the South. His opposition wasn't just a political miscalculation—it was a moral failure and a betrayal of the Union victory. Johnson actively emboldened white supremacist groups and Southern legislatures seeking to reassert control through Black Codes and racial terror.Fortunately, Congress overrode his veto—marking the first time in American history that a major piece of legislation was enacted over a presidential veto. This moment laid the groundwork for the 14th Amendment, which enshrined birthright citizenship and equal protection under the law. Johnson's veto, however, remains a stark example of how executive power can be wielded to delay justice and reinforce structural racism.The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) plans to revoke a controversial interpretive rule that applied certain credit card protections to “buy now, pay later” (BNPL) products. This move follows a lawsuit filed by the Financial Technology Association (FTA), which represents major BNPL providers like PayPal, Klarna, Block, and Zip. In a joint court filing, the CFPB and FTA asked a federal judge to pause litigation while the agency works on rolling back the rule.The rule, issued in May 2024, treated BNPL plans like credit cards under the Truth in Lending Act, requiring providers to offer billing statements, handle disputes, and process refunds. It officially took effect in July, but the CFPB allowed a grace period for compliance. The FTA argued the CFPB overstepped its authority by reclassifying pay-in-four products—short-term, no-interest loans—without formal rulemaking or understanding the distinct nature of BNPL.Despite some early industry cooperation and encouragement from the CFPB for other regulators to follow suit, fintech firms claimed the rule created regulatory confusion by misapplying standards meant for revolving credit. House Republicans tried to overturn the rule legislatively last year but failed.The case, Financial Technology Association v. CFPB, remains on hold while the CFPB prepares formal steps to rescind the rule.CFPB Plans to Revoke Buy Now, Pay Later Rule Fintechs Fought (1)A federal judge in Washington, Beryl Howell, denied the Justice Department's attempt to disqualify her from overseeing Perkins Coie v. U.S. Department of Justice, a case challenging a Trump executive order targeting the law firm. The DOJ accused Howell of bias, pointing to remarks she made in public settings that criticized Trump and referenced his ties to Fusion GPS. In their motion, DOJ officials claimed she showed “partiality” and “animus” toward the president, citing her characterization of Trump having a “bee in his bonnet” over past political investigations.Howell sharply rebuked the motion, calling it an “ad hominem” attack intended to undermine judicial integrity rather than engage with the legal merits. She emphasized that the parties would receive fair treatment and dismissed the disqualification effort as an attempt to preemptively discredit an unfavorable outcome.The case stems from a Trump executive order aimed at punishing law firms perceived as politically hostile, including Perkins Coie, by restricting their federal building access and terminating government contracts with their clients. Perkins Coie argued the order caused immediate and severe business harm, including the loss of a long-standing client. Trump has since issued similar orders against other firms, such as Jenner & Block.The DOJ's attempt to remove Howell reflects a broader pattern of politicized efforts to delegitimize judicial rulings unfavorable to Trump. Meanwhile, a prior ethics complaint against Howell, filed by Rep. Elise Stefanik over earlier comments she made about the erosion of truth in public discourse, is still pending.Judge Rejects Trump Bid to Oust Her From Perkins Coie Fight (2)A federal appeals court has refused to pause a lower court ruling requiring the Trump administration to reinstate over 17,000 federal workers fired during a mass purge of probationary employees across six government agencies. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 2-1 that the administration had not shown that the district judge erred in finding the firings were likely unlawful. At issue is the role of the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM), which Judge William Alsup said overstepped its authority by ordering the firings despite lacking the legal power to do so.The affected agencies include the Departments of Defense, Veterans Affairs, Agriculture, Energy, Interior, and Treasury. Some agencies claimed to have fired only a few hundred employees, while others—such as the Treasury and Agriculture Departments—terminated thousands. The fired employees were mostly probationary workers, often with less than two years in their roles, though some had longer federal service.The ruling doesn't prevent agencies from terminating probationary workers entirely, but it criticizes the centralized, OPM-directed method used. The Trump administration said it is working to reinstate the workers, placing them on paid leave for now, and has asked the Supreme Court to intervene.This case parallels another decision out of Maryland, where a judge ordered 25,000 similar reinstatements across 18 agencies, though on different legal grounds. That ruling has also been allowed to stand while under appeal.Appeals court won't pause ruling that forced US to reinstate federal workers | ReutersIn a piece I wrote for Forbes this week, Italy is attempting to tax the illusion of “free” on the internet—and I wrote about why that's a dangerous turn in VAT policy. In this piece, I walk through a recent move by Italian tax authorities to treat signing up for social media accounts as taxable barter transactions. The core claim is that when users hand over their personal data in exchange for access to a platform like Facebook or LinkedIn, a “supply for consideration” has occurred under EU VAT law. That would make the transaction taxable—even though no money changes hands.I argued that while user data undeniably has value, the theory stretches the purpose of VAT well beyond its policy design. VAT is supposed to be a consumption tax on goods and services, not a levy on intangible exchanges of attention or personal information. If this theory holds, Italy wouldn't just be taxing social media—it would be opening the door to taxing nearly every online interaction where data changes hands.I also pointed out that VAT requires a tax base, and valuing user data at the point of account creation is speculative at best. The market value of data depends on aggregation and use over time, not on the individual transaction. Plus, data isn't “consumed” in the way goods or traditional services are—it's copied, repurposed, and monetized indefinitely. That doesn't sit comfortably with the core logic of a consumption tax.Finally, I highlighted how this approach could ripple across the EU, creating regulatory chaos. If a cookie consent or an email sign-up becomes a taxable event, we risk converting the very architecture of the internet into a VAT trap. Italy's frustration with digital tax avoidance is understandable—but this isn't the right solution.​​Italy—Where Creating A Social Media Account May Be A Taxable Event This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

One historian's journey to find the end of the Civil War—and, along the way, to expand our understanding of the nature of war itself and how societies struggle to draw the line between war and peace. We set out on the James River, March 25, 1865, aboard the paddle steamboat River Queen. President Lincoln is on his way to General Grant's headquarters at City Point, Virginia, and he's decided he won't return to Washington until he's witnessed, or perhaps even orchestrated, the end of the Civil War. Now, it turns out, more than a century and a half later, historians are still searching for that end. Was it April 9, at Appomattox, as conventional wisdom holds, where Lee surrendered to Grant in Wilmer McLean's parlor? Or was it ten weeks afterward, in Galveston, where a federal commander proclaimed Juneteenth the end of slavery? Or perhaps in August of 1866, when President Andrew Johnson simply declared “the insurrection is at an end”? That the answer was elusive was baffling even to a historian of the stature of Michael Vorenberg, whose work served as a key source of Steven Spielberg's Lincoln. Vorenberg was inspired to write this groundbreaking book, finding its title in the peace Lincoln hoped for but could not make before his assassination. A peace that required not one but many endings, as Vorenberg reveals in these pages, the most important of which came well more than a year after Lincoln's untimely death. To say how a war ends is to suggest how it should be remembered, and Vorenberg's search is not just for the Civil War's endpoint but for its true nature and legacy, so essential to the American identity. It's also a quest, in our age of “forever wars,” to understand whether the United States's interminable conflicts of the current era have a precedent in the Civil War—and whether, in a sense, wars ever end at all, or merely wax and wane. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/american-studies

Website: www.podpage.com/the-3-13-men-money-and-marriageIf you want to make a donation to the show Cash App $a114johnsonWe had some technical difficulties recording this episode. My apologies in advance, however after a few hours of editing, this was the best that I could do.SummaryIn this episode of the 313 Men, Money, and Marriage podcast, host Andrew Johnson and guest Wayman Daniels explore the multifaceted concept of masculinity. They discuss the influences of family dynamics, societal expectations, and personal experiences on the development of a man. Wayman shares his transformative life story, emphasizing the importance of mentorship, vulnerability, and emotional intelligence in shaping a strong man. The conversation also addresses the evolution of masculinity over time and the need for men to challenge toxic masculinity in their lives.TakeawaysMasculinity is shaped by social conditions and family dynamics.Mentorship and role models are crucial for healthy masculinity.Vulnerability is a strength, not a weakness.Choosing the right partner is essential for family dynamics.Trauma can perpetuate cycles of negative behavior.Men must continue to learn and evolve throughout their lives.Emotional intelligence is key to personal development.Society often excludes men from positive narratives.Challenging toxic masculinity requires self-reflection and discipline.Building a man is a lifelong process of growth and learning. Soundbites:The Making of a Man: A Journey of GrowthMasculinity Unpacked: Insights from Wayman Daniels"The power of love is so powerful.""Trauma attracts trauma.""I must understand who I am."Chapters00:00 Introduction to Masculinity: Built Not Born02:00 Wayman Daniels: A Personal Journey04:38Family Dynamics and Masculinity06:55 The Evolution of Masculinity10:12 Defining a Built Man13:54 Challenging Toxic Masculinity17:16 Society's Role in Supporting Men19:21 Vulnerability as Strength21:48 Promoting Emotional Intelligence

One historian's journey to find the end of the Civil War—and, along the way, to expand our understanding of the nature of war itself and how societies struggle to draw the line between war and peace. We set out on the James River, March 25, 1865, aboard the paddle steamboat River Queen. President Lincoln is on his way to General Grant's headquarters at City Point, Virginia, and he's decided he won't return to Washington until he's witnessed, or perhaps even orchestrated, the end of the Civil War. Now, it turns out, more than a century and a half later, historians are still searching for that end. Was it April 9, at Appomattox, as conventional wisdom holds, where Lee surrendered to Grant in Wilmer McLean's parlor? Or was it ten weeks afterward, in Galveston, where a federal commander proclaimed Juneteenth the end of slavery? Or perhaps in August of 1866, when President Andrew Johnson simply declared “the insurrection is at an end”? That the answer was elusive was baffling even to a historian of the stature of Michael Vorenberg, whose work served as a key source of Steven Spielberg's Lincoln. Vorenberg was inspired to write this groundbreaking book, finding its title in the peace Lincoln hoped for but could not make before his assassination. A peace that required not one but many endings, as Vorenberg reveals in these pages, the most important of which came well more than a year after Lincoln's untimely death. To say how a war ends is to suggest how it should be remembered, and Vorenberg's search is not just for the Civil War's endpoint but for its true nature and legacy, so essential to the American identity. It's also a quest, in our age of “forever wars,” to understand whether the United States's interminable conflicts of the current era have a precedent in the Civil War—and whether, in a sense, wars ever end at all, or merely wax and wane. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

One historian's journey to find the end of the Civil War—and, along the way, to expand our understanding of the nature of war itself and how societies struggle to draw the line between war and peace. We set out on the James River, March 25, 1865, aboard the paddle steamboat River Queen. President Lincoln is on his way to General Grant's headquarters at City Point, Virginia, and he's decided he won't return to Washington until he's witnessed, or perhaps even orchestrated, the end of the Civil War. Now, it turns out, more than a century and a half later, historians are still searching for that end. Was it April 9, at Appomattox, as conventional wisdom holds, where Lee surrendered to Grant in Wilmer McLean's parlor? Or was it ten weeks afterward, in Galveston, where a federal commander proclaimed Juneteenth the end of slavery? Or perhaps in August of 1866, when President Andrew Johnson simply declared “the insurrection is at an end”? That the answer was elusive was baffling even to a historian of the stature of Michael Vorenberg, whose work served as a key source of Steven Spielberg's Lincoln. Vorenberg was inspired to write this groundbreaking book, finding its title in the peace Lincoln hoped for but could not make before his assassination. A peace that required not one but many endings, as Vorenberg reveals in these pages, the most important of which came well more than a year after Lincoln's untimely death. To say how a war ends is to suggest how it should be remembered, and Vorenberg's search is not just for the Civil War's endpoint but for its true nature and legacy, so essential to the American identity. It's also a quest, in our age of “forever wars,” to understand whether the United States's interminable conflicts of the current era have a precedent in the Civil War—and whether, in a sense, wars ever end at all, or merely wax and wane. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/military-history

One historian's journey to find the end of the Civil War—and, along the way, to expand our understanding of the nature of war itself and how societies struggle to draw the line between war and peace. We set out on the James River, March 25, 1865, aboard the paddle steamboat River Queen. President Lincoln is on his way to General Grant's headquarters at City Point, Virginia, and he's decided he won't return to Washington until he's witnessed, or perhaps even orchestrated, the end of the Civil War. Now, it turns out, more than a century and a half later, historians are still searching for that end. Was it April 9, at Appomattox, as conventional wisdom holds, where Lee surrendered to Grant in Wilmer McLean's parlor? Or was it ten weeks afterward, in Galveston, where a federal commander proclaimed Juneteenth the end of slavery? Or perhaps in August of 1866, when President Andrew Johnson simply declared “the insurrection is at an end”? That the answer was elusive was baffling even to a historian of the stature of Michael Vorenberg, whose work served as a key source of Steven Spielberg's Lincoln. Vorenberg was inspired to write this groundbreaking book, finding its title in the peace Lincoln hoped for but could not make before his assassination. A peace that required not one but many endings, as Vorenberg reveals in these pages, the most important of which came well more than a year after Lincoln's untimely death. To say how a war ends is to suggest how it should be remembered, and Vorenberg's search is not just for the Civil War's endpoint but for its true nature and legacy, so essential to the American identity. It's also a quest, in our age of “forever wars,” to understand whether the United States's interminable conflicts of the current era have a precedent in the Civil War—and whether, in a sense, wars ever end at all, or merely wax and wane. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/american-south

Webpage: www.podpage.com/the-3-13-men-money-and-marriageCash App $a114johnsonSummaryIn this episode of the 313 Men, Money and Marriage podcast, host Andrew Johnson discusses the evolving landscape of employment, particularly focusing on the importance of full-time work for men. He explores how historical shifts in the job market have affected family dynamics, the significance of financial stability, and the role of employment in shaping identity and community. The conversation also addresses the challenges men face in securing full-time employment and the broader economic implications of workforce participation.TakeawaysThe traditional role of men as breadwinners has evolved significantly.Full-time employment is crucial for financial stability and family support.Men's employment impacts their self-esteem and sense of purpose.Women now make up a significant portion of the workforce, changing family dynamics.Employment can reduce recidivism rates among former offenders.Social security benefits are directly tied to full-time employment history.Routine work helps maintain stability and reduces risky behaviors.Relationships formed in the workplace can lead to new opportunities.The overall economy benefits from higher employment rates.Challenges in finding full-time work can be daunting, especially in competitive markets.Beyond the Paycheck: The Importance of Full-Time EmploymentThe Changing Landscape of Men's Employment"Financial stability is very important for a man.""Fulfillment through employment is very critical.""Routine of work keeps men stable and at home."Chapters 00:00 Introduction to Modern Employment Dynamics01:39 Historical Context of Employment Changes03:38 The Shift to Service-Based Economy06:24 Importance of Full-Time Employment for Men11:17 Financial Stability and Long-Term Goals14:20 Social Security and Retirement Planning16:11 Identity and Fulfillment Through Work19:59 Community Impact of Full-Time Employment22:04 Challenges in Securing Full-Time Employment

Sermon preached by Andrew Johnson on March 16, 2025 at Arlington Baptist Church in Arlington, Virginia.

Website: www.podpage.com/the-3-13-men-money-and-marriageCash App $a114johnsonSummaryIn this episode of the 313 Men, Money and Marriage podcast, host Andrew Johnson and returning guest Greg discuss the phenomenon of 'pretend success' where individuals project an image of wealth and success while struggling financially. They explore the societal pressures that drive this behavior, the implications of living beyond one's means, and the impact of social media on perceptions of wealth. The conversation emphasizes the importance of authenticity, financial literacy, and the consequences of maintaining a facade of success.Takeaways60% of Americans cannot afford a $1,000 repair.Many people pretend to be successful while being broke.Financial security brings peace of mind.Consumer culture pressures individuals to keep up appearances.Social media often portrays an unrealistic image of wealth.Living beyond one's means can lead to financial ruin.The pressure to impress others can lead to illegal activities.Authenticity is more valuable than material possessions.Understanding the true cost of success is crucial.Learning from failures can lead to personal growth.The Illusion of Wealth: Pretend Success UnveiledBehind the Facade: The Truth About Financial Insecurity"60% cannot afford a $1,000 repair.""Money can be amazing when used with wisdom.""Living a lie upon a lie never ends well."Chapters0000:00 Introduction to Pretend Success02:52 Understanding Financial Insecurity05:56 The Pressure of Consumer Culture08:51 Social Media and the Illusion of Wealth11:47 The Consequences of Pretending Success14:54 Lessons Learned from Financial Failure

Episode 218 will be released in full,Pt1 Mint Sauce Chronicles & Pt2 with Andrew Johnson.There will be an edited version for YouTube but the full releases will be available here and at our Podomatic channel, link below, with downloads for members and none members.Andrew's website and contact details Check The Evidence – Knowledge, Not BeliefSheep Farm www.sheepfarm.co.ukhttps://www.youtube.com/@sheepfarmstudios2921/videoshttps://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/sheepfarmstudioshttps://rumble.com/user/SheepFarmStudiohttps://odysee.com/@sheepfarmstudios:fDom's Health Bunker Supplements www.shop.healthbunker.co.ukUse discount Codes HB-SF10OFF for NEW Liposomal Vitamin C & HB-SF25OFF for all HB other Products. But discount codes can be used at checkout.*Discount Codes only available on Health Bunker Products*Health Bunker Clinic www.healthbunker.co.ukChris's Gaping Gobs – Etsy UK

Website: www.podpage.com/the-3-13-men-money-and-marriageCash App: $a114johnsonSummaryIn this episode of the 313 Men, Money and Marriage podcast, host Andrew Johnson and guest Judy Winbush explore the dynamics of relationships where women are more successful than men. They discuss how societal expectations and personal insecurities can affect men's self-esteem and masculinity, and how couples can navigate these challenges through open communication and mutual support. The conversation emphasizes the importance of confidence, acceptance, and shared goals in fostering healthy relationships.Takeaways74 million women are currently in the workforce, making up 47% of it.Men may feel their masculinity is challenged by their partner's success.It's not about income disparity, but rather confidence in oneself.Social conditioning influences how men perceive success in relationships.Support and understanding are crucial for couples with differing income levels.Women should not downplay their success when dating.Relationships thrive on acceptance, regardless of who earns more.Communication about roles and expectations is vital before marriage.Discomfort regarding income often stems from deeper self-esteem issues.Celebrating each other's successes strengthens relationships.Are Men Intimidated by Successful Women?Navigating Gender Dynamics in Modern Relationships"Are men intimidated by successful women?""Men can experience a decrease in self-esteem.""Establish goals and support one another."Chapters00:00 Introduction to Gender Dynamics in Relationships03:06 Men's Self-Esteem and Success in Relationships06:05. Navigating Relationships with Successful Women08:43. The Role of Confidence in Relationships11:31 Social Conditioning and Relationship Dynamics14:23 Balancing Masculine and Feminine Traits17:14 Dating and Career Success20:31 Supporting Each Other's Success

Let me know your thoughts in the comments section down below...SPONSORED BY https://www.instagram.com/supremeoftheuk/?hl=enhttps://www.instagram.com/cfr_news/https://rumble.com/user/CFRNetworkhttps://twitter.com/CFRNetwork__https://www.youtube.com/c/checktheevidence/http://www.checktheevidence.com/

Webpage: www.podpage.com/the-3-13-men-money-and-marriageCash App $a114johnsonSummaryIn this episode of the 313 Men Money and Marriage podcast, host Andrew Johnson delves into the complexities of six figure dating, exploring the expectations women have for high-earning men, the statistics surrounding six figure earners, and the challenges faced in modern dating. The discussion covers where to meet these men, the importance of financial literacy, and the expectations that come with dating someone in a high income bracket. Johnson emphasizes the need for women to evaluate their own qualifications and compatibility with these men, highlighting that dating high earners is a different ballgame altogether.Takeaways Women often have unrealistic expectations about dating high earners. Only 16% of male workers in the U.S. earn six figures or more. Geographic location plays a significant role in meeting high earners. High earners often have busy schedules that can affect relationships. Financial literacy is crucial when dating high income men. Women need to evaluate their own strengths and accomplishments. Dating etiquette is important in high-income relationships. The competition for high earners is fierce due to their options. Women must be prepared for the challenges of dating high earners. It's essential to be in the right social circles to meet these men. Navigating the World of Six Figure Dating The Reality of High-Income Relationships "Are you financially literate?" "What do you qualify for?" "You have to be where they're at." "They're evaluating you."Chapters00:00 Introduction to Six Figure Dating 03:08 Understanding the Statistics of Six Figure Earners06:00 Where to Meet Six Figure Men08:50 Challenges of Dating High Earners12:12 Expectations and Etiquette in High-Income Dating15:07 Financial Compatibility and Literacy17:58 Evaluating Strengths and Accomplishments20:54 Conclusion and Wrap-Up

God's Will is Done (Audio) David Eells – 2/26/25 Do you know and understand that God is sovereign over the minds of all men? An angel recently told me that they could influence men's minds and they do. (Pro.21:1) The king's heart is in the hand of the Lord as the watercourses: He turneth it whithersoever he will. It is amazing to me how many Christians today can be so ignorant of the sovereignty of God when there is so much of it in the Word, though so many, even in the Old Testament, understood this truth. We would get a good argument if we said some of these things in almost any church, but we should be able to say anything that the Scripture says and feel good about it. When we quote the Scriptures and we do not feel easy about it, it is because we are wrong in our thinking. In this way, we can know if we have false doctrine and our mind needs to be renewed. There are many verses ignored by the modern church because they are uncomfortable to the carnal mind. Here is one of those verses. (Dan.4:17) The sentence is by the decree of the watchers, and the demand by the word of the holy ones; to the intent that the living may know that the Most High ruleth in the kingdom of men, and giveth it to whomsoever he will, and setteth up over it the lowest of men. Why is it that people do not understand this today? There are so many Christians today that are so politically-minded they think that they have the ability by banding together to put somebody in office that God does not want. Be careful about matching numbers with the wicked. According to the truth of the broad road, there is no moral majority. It is not by might and not by power. Throughout history, God has set up over the kingdoms of men the lowest of men not the highest who are disciples of Christ and born of the Word. God has a good reason for doing this. It was the reason that the lowest of men judged Jesus, and it is the same reason that we need the lowest of men to rule over us now. Good people will not nail you to a cross, but without the cross, there is no crown. Even though at this time our Cyrus is overthrowing Babylonish Deep State kingdom to bring in one more favorable to conservative Christians, apostacy and corruption has not been corrected in the Church. This will give us a time of relative peace for the Man-child reformers to get the true Word out. Then that Word will be tested in them. In Biblical times, when God's people fell into apostasy, He raised up a beast kingdom to crucify them into repentance. Six world-ruling kingdoms – Egypt, Assyria, Babylon, Media-Persia, Greece and Rome – were raised up to bring little Israel to their cross. Is it an accident that world kingdoms thought it important to subject the smallest of kingdoms? History and the Word of God are plain. (Ecc.1:9) That which hath been is that which shall be; and that which hath been done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun. To bring to repentance a worldwide apostate (meaning: fallen away) Church, now God is raising up a seventh and eighth worldwide beast kingdom, which will incorporate the seed of all the previous kingdoms (Rev.17:11). We read about Nebuchadnezzar, a man who was so proud of the great kingdom that he thought he had built. (Dan.4:30) The king spake and said, Is not this great Babylon, which I have built for the royal dwelling-place, by the might of my power and for the glory of my majesty? (31) While the word was in the king's mouth, there fell a voice from heaven, [saying], O king Nebuchadnezzar, to thee it is spoken: The kingdom is departed from thee: (32) and thou shalt be driven from men; and thy dwelling shall be with the beasts of the field; thou shalt be made to eat grass as oxen; and seven times shall pass over thee; until thou know that the Most High ruleth in the kingdom of men, and giveth it to whomsoever he will. This vessel of clay taking credit for God's work reminds me of the statement made by the Titanic's engineer, “We built a boat that God could not sink.” (Ecc.5:2) Be not rash with thy mouth, and let not thy heart be hasty to utter anything before God; for God is in heaven, and thou upon earth: therefore let thy words be few. This sovereignty of God instills respect. When King Nebuchadnezzar was walking in his palace bragging about his accomplishments, the Lord turned his mind over to the mind of a beast for seven times. This is a type of the last seven years of tribulation when God will turn the kingdoms of the world over to the dragon of Revelation 12 and then the beast of Revelation 13, giving them the mind of a beast in Revelation17. For seven seasons, that great boastful king ate the grass of the fields, symbolizing the flesh of men, until he came to the revelation in Dan.4:25 the Most High ruleth in the kingdom of men and giveth it to whomsoever He will. The first thing we should see here is that God made this arrogant man king and gave the rebellious people of God into his hand. God has repeated this habit throughout history. God through Daniel warned the king of his judgment ahead of time to make him responsible to repent. This is an example to us to fear God and not touch His glory. (Dan.4:35) And all the inhabitants of the earth are reputed as nothing; (It is not the world that is important in God's plan but those who are born from above.) and he doeth according to his will in the army of heaven, and among the inhabitants of the earth; and none can stay his hand, or say unto him, What doest thou? Nobody can push God's hand away and say, “What are you doing?” Nobody can stop Him from doing what God wants him to do. This should give us faith, rest, and the fear of God. Since God is doing exactly what He wants, why does He set up these evil men over the world? We thought God wanted to go the other way with the world. He, obviously, does not share the majority's opinion on that. God has no interest in saving the world through world politics; He has never done it before. This is the thinking of ignorant Christians who want to help God out. Their plan is to always put Christians at the head to make favorable laws and judgments for us so that we will never be under persecution, oppression, or on the cross. The problem with this is that deeply spiritual men have no desire to rule over men. They only desire to serve the kingdom in fulfilling the Great Commission. (Mar.10:42) And Jesus… saith unto them, Ye know that they who are accounted to rule over the Gentiles lord it over them; and their great ones exercise authority over them. (43) But it is not so among you: but whosoever would become great among you, shall be your minister (Greek: “servant”). Political Christians are left with those who desire power among men as their choice. These people and the world they rule over serve the larger plan of bringing sons to maturity. (2 Sam.7:14) I will be his father, and he shall be my son: if he commit iniquity, I will chasten him with the rod of men, and with the stripes of the children of men. Political Christians would love to take away God's rod. If so many Christians did not have a name that lives while they are dead (Rev.3:1), there would be no need for the rod of men. When it comes to politics, I am totally neutral because I want to be on God's side not man's side. God does not always want to put in the good man we think He wants to put in. He did not do it with Clinton or Obama did He? Most Christians would agree with me there. God wanted to put a wicked man in office, because a wicked man is the only kind that would bring this wicked country into the chastening it needed. (Rom.13:1) Let every soul be in subjection to the higher powers: for there is no power but of God; and the [powers] that be are ordained of God. God did not put these types in because they were our preference but because that was what we needed. No father prefers to chasten his child, but bless him. God put Bush in office because Christians asked Him to. Now, He can prove that we don't have discernment. He couldn't save nor keep us from chastening, either. You may ask, “Is it God's Will to use the true Christian vote to put in office someone like Clinton, Obama or Biden?” No, because if God uses a Christian, He wants to use a true Christian as a vessel of honor. Then would He have us not vote? When He desires to put someone like that in office, the answer is yes. When does He want us to vote? The short answer is when He tells us to. (Rom.8:14) For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, these are sons of God. He wants us to vote when He wants to do something very unusual, like put a better man in office. We know that God has ordained that Cyrus/Trump be in office at this time. God wants to always use us as vessels of honor. God will use those who refuse to be used as vessels of honor as vessels of dishonor. God will use the wicked to put in a wicked man if He wants the wicked in there. If you disagree with me on that, at least agree with me on this. “There is no power but of God; and the [powers] that be are ordained of God.” This was written in the time of the Herods, Caesars and the Neros, and after that it was true of Hitler and Stalin. Listen, we cannot argue with the Scripture if we want the truth. According to the Word, if wicked men are in a position of power, God put them there. This gives me peace. I do not have to worry. I saw so many Christians worried that Clinton was going to get into office. They were erroneously thinking that it was their responsibility to make sure the right man went in, instead of just obeying God. I did not have to worry about that because my God reigns. I told many before Clinton's first term that God was going to put him into office. I was told that God would not do that. Well, He overruled them. God rules in the kingdom of men, and He rules in the heavens, and He never falls off the throne. Many are deceived into thinking that God's plan is to rule the world by democracy. In such a case, the broad road gang wins. He already rules through theocracy. Romans 9:21 clearly states that He has vessels of honor and vessels of dishonor. God has a good purpose for His vessels of dishonor, as we shall see. Who was it that killed Jesus? The Jews who were recognized as the people of God were the voters who cried, “Crucify Him! Crucify Him!” Let me show you Who was behind the voters. Do you know what “Barabbas” means? “Barabbas” means “Son of the father.” Barabbas was the criminal who represented us. The voters set Barabbas free and demanded that Jesus be crucified. (Act.2:22) Ye men of Israel, hear these words: Jesus of Nazareth, a man approved of God unto you by mighty works and wonders and signs which God did by him in the midst of you, even as ye yourselves know; (23) him, being delivered up by the determinate counsel and foreknowledge of God, ye by the hand of lawless men did crucify and slay. God delivered up Jesus to lawless men including their religious leaders. God could not use men who would not slay the Lamb. God put the people in power that would carry out His “determinate counsel.” Who was it that delivered up and smote the shepherd? It was not just the voters of Judas, Caiaphas, Herod, Pilate, the Romans, and the Jews. We have to look behind all of them. (Mat.26:31) Then saith Jesus unto them, All ye shall be offended in me this night: for it is written, I will smite the shepherd, and the sheep of the flock shall be scattered abroad. Even though all these vessels of dishonor are guilty, these are only secondary wills. We have to look behind the secondary wills and see the sovereign Will of God. God said, “I will smite the shepherd.” Thank God His plan was not to stop there because there is a lot more crucifying necessary. (Zech.13:7) Awake, O sword, against my shepherd, and against the man that is my fellow, saith the Lord of hosts: smite the shepherd, and the sheep shall be scattered; and I will turn my hand upon the little ones. God is sovereign, and His plan is to crucify the sheep, the little ones. How else can we account for the persecution of Christians throughout history, throughout the world? Unless we take up our cross and follow Jesus, we cannot be His disciples. Of course, we would like to get rid of evil governments and be accepted by the world so that we could enjoy the good life, but all that would live godly in Christ Jesus shall suffer persecution (2 Tim.3:12). If we are disciples of Christ, we will be persecuted. Jesus said, “I am the way.” The way to what? The way to heaven. How do you go? The same way Jesus went. If God were going to turn His hand upon the little ones in the way of crucifixion, would you take away His tools? How is God going to bring His plan to pass without the wicked being in rule? Can you see the earth, the dirt, and the plant? The dirt kills the seed coat, and the plant brings forth fruit. Sometimes God permits childlike thinking. If we understood some of these things without a good foundation, we might be tempted to charge God with doing evil and, of course, God never does evil. For this reason, God permits baby Christians to have this “God is in a war with the devil” concept. But when they mature and study the Scriptures, they should come into the knowledge and understanding that God is sovereign and does not make mistakes. He is creating sons. He created and is using the wicked for the day of evil, and they are necessary to crucify the sons. Prosperity and freedom have caused us to lose sight of this fact. (Mat.16:24) Then said Jesus unto his disciples, If any man would come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me. (25) For whosoever would save his life shall lose it: and whosoever shall lose his life for my sake shall find it. We must lose our carnal life to have God's spiritual life. (Acts 4:27) For of a truth in this city against thy holy Servant Jesus, whom thou didst anoint, both Herod and Pontius Pilate, with the Gentiles and the peoples of Israel, were gathered together, (28) to do whatsoever thy hand and thy counsel foreordained to come to pass. God foreordained these wicked men to crucify Jesus for our salvation and His plan for us to be crucified as well. Not always physically, but absolutely the old man must die to self that the new man may live. God uses people around us to bring us to our cross. If you have ever thought, “I don't need this person in my life,” then you need this person in order to bear the fruit of Jesus. Difficult people are used to bring out the worst in us so that we may choose to walk in the light of the Word and be cleansed of this corruption (1Jn.1:7), or disobey the Word and not bear fruit. This is the whole reason for the most hated command in the Scriptures: non-resistance to evil. We are commanded to be as sheep in the midst of wolves (Mat.10:16), to resist not evil and turn the other cheek (Mat.5:39), to love our enemies (Mat.5:44), to bless those who persecute us (Rom.12:14), and to avenge not ourselves (Rom.12:19) to list a few. These are the natural actions of the one who obeys Jesus and forgives from the heart. God will turn all others over to the tormentors or demons. (Mat.18:34) And his lord was wroth, and delivered him to the tormentors, till he should pay all that was due. (35) So shall also my heavenly Father do unto you, if ye forgive not every one his brother from your hearts. When we are faced with the wicked and we obey these commands of non-resistance, we can feel the fiery trial burning up the wood, hay, and stubble of our old life. Every time our flesh rises up on the inside and we deny it, it dies, and we get more of the gold, silver, and precious stones of the valuable life of Christ. We are to consider flesh, self or the old man, to be dead because it was crucified with Christ. Rom 6:6  knowing this, that our old man was crucified with him, that the body of sin might be done away, that so we should no longer be in bondage to sin; …11  Even so reckon ye also yourselves to be dead unto sin, but alive unto God in Christ Jesus. 12  Let not sin therefore reign in your mortal body, that ye should obey the lusts thereof.  This is faith and the key to arriving at death to self. You can slap, insult, or rob a dead man and he will ignore you. Stop feeding the flesh and see how quickly it dies. We should see the crucifiers as God's gift to us, even if they are being used as vessels of dishonor. All these wicked people are gathered together to do whatsoever God's hand and God's counsel has foreordained to come to pass. In other words, God does not have any trouble out of any of them. They all do exactly what they are supposed to do. All these rebellious people fulfill the Will of God perfectly. Just as God works in us to will and do of His good pleasure, He also does in them. (Pro.16:9) A man's heart deviseth his way; But the Lord directeth his steps. Decide what you want to be, but no matter what you are, God will use you. Pity, forgive, and have mercy on those who are being used of God, through the devil, as vessels of dishonor. Some of them will repent through your prayers and faith and love. (Psa.75:5) Lift not up your horn on high (I.e. Let not your might, power, or voice be heard.); Speak not with a stiff neck. (6) For neither from the east, nor from the west, Nor yet from the south, [cometh] lifting up. (7) But God is the judge: He putteth down one, and liftest up another. Much has been said recently about the hidden powers that are manipulating the duped masses to get their man into office, and there is truth to this, but God is sovereignly behind it all to work His Will. Fleshly power, wisdom, manipulation, or money lifts up no one. The men of means do not rule this world by their own design; it only appears that way for God's purpose. Just as God sovereignly puts into office, He takes out of office. He also gives us signs of this control along the way. The president in office on every twentieth year died in office until Reagan. 1840: William Henry Harrison (Died in office) 1860: Abraham Lincoln (Assassinated) 1880: James A. Garfield (Assassinated) 1900: William McKinley (Assassinated) 1920: Warren G. Harding (Died in office) 1940: Franklin D. Roosevelt (Died in office) 1960: John F. Kennedy (Assassinated) 1980: Ronald Reagan (Survived assassination attempt). Why did this obvious pattern stop with Reagan and is he the last? God knows. I believe God used the faith and prayers of many Christians who knew about this cycle to bring it to an end. The millennial Sabbath or the actual year 6000 A.M. (September 2001 - 2002) may be the beginning of a new dealing with the sins of God's people. Spiritually, according to type, judgment comes on those who do not cease from their own works on the Sabbath. Two of the most famous of these Presidents who were 100 years apart had obviously God-ordained parallels. • Abraham Lincoln was elected to Congress in 1846. John F. Kennedy was elected to Congress in 1946. • Abraham Lincoln was elected President in 1860. John F. Kennedy was elected President in 1960. • Both were concerned with civil rights. Both their wives lost children while living in the White House. • Both Presidents were shot on a Friday. Both Presidents were shot in the head. • Kennedy's secretary was named Lincoln. • Both were succeeded by Southerners named Johnson. • Andrew Johnson, who succeeded Lincoln, was born in 1808. Lyndon Johnson, who succeeded Kennedy, was born in 1908. • Both assassins were known by their three names. • Both names are composed of 15 letters. • Lincoln was shot at the theater named “Ford.” Kennedy was shot in a car called “Lincoln” made by Ford. • Booth and Oswald were killed before their trials. Coincidence? It takes less faith to believe in a sovereign God! These signs are to show us the sovereignty of God. (Psa.75:7) But God is the judge: He putteth down one, and liftest up another. You cannot always judge by looking at the circumstances whether one is being lifted up or put down. For instance, look at Job. Job's friends certainly thought that God was putting him down, but God was lifting him up to sanctify him and to double what he had before (Job 42:10). Joseph is another good example of this. He was sold into bondage by his brothers, falsely accused by his master's wife, and thrown into prison, all as a type of Jesus. Through all Joseph's tribulations, God was actually promoting him over all. Pharaoh then promoted him, making him second only to himself. Joseph confirmed that all of the evil his brothers had done against him was for his good. (Gen.50:20) And as for you, ye meant evil against me; but God meant it for good, to bring to pass, as it is this day, to save much people alive. When God is through manifesting His sons, they will be promoted, and the usefulness of the vessels of wrath will come to an end. (Isa.10:24) Therefore thus saith the Lord, God of hosts, O my people that dwellest in Zion, be not afraid of the Assyrian, though he smite thee with the rod, and lift up his staff against thee, after the manner of Egypt. (25) For yet a very little while, and the indignation [against thee] shall be accomplished, and mine anger [shall be directed] to his destruction. Then God's elect will rule by Him. (Psa.75:10) All the horns (power) of the wicked also will I cut off; But the horns of the righteous shall be lifted up. Someone recently made the following comment to me: “So raising all these millions of dollars to promote a candidate is not necessary.” God is behind that also, even to put the one He wants into office. Those who do not love God need a natural reason for why things happen. Have you ever watched an ant colony behind glass? They carry on through instinct their own purposes, not realizing that they are being watched, and in our case tried. As long as only the natural is seen, God's purpose of a trial environment is established. It is God's purpose that both He and the devil stay hidden until the end. God is looking for those who will overcome walking by sight and will mature to a higher order of living by faith. After the candidate gets into office, it makes no difference. You may think that if you vote for a good conservative, he will be God's servant. He will always make decisions and choices we can trust because he is “God's man.” Has not God shown us the fallacy of that? G.W. Bush has taken away more civil rights because of terrorism than Clinton ever did. We know of a Christian, voted into office by Christians because they believed he would further the Christian cause. He made some of the most ignorant mistakes and foolish decisions, accomplishing nearly nothing. God teaches us lessons, not by the might of the Republican Party, nor by power of the ballot. We are not to trust in men like Israel who ran to Egypt for help against Babylon But we are to walk and speak faith so God can use a monkey. The issue is not about God's Will being done, because whoever gets elected, what he does will be God's Will. It will not, however, always be His wish. Let me explain. (2Pe.3:9) The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some count slackness; but is longsuffering to you-ward, not wishing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance. “Wishing” in this verse has been incorrectly translated “willing” in some versions. If God was not willing that any should perish, believe me, none would perish since He worketh all things after the counsel of His will (Eph.1:11). Every good parent does things they do not wish to do, but they will to do, in order to train children. In like manner, these world rulers will do the Will of God but not necessarily His wish. The real issue is who we put our faith and trust in. If we believe that we can blindly follow the good conservative we helped to elect instead of God, we will trip and fall on our misplaced trust. And this, too, is God's Will. (Pro.21:1) The king's heart is in the hand of the Lord as the watercourses: He turneth it whithersoever he will. Just as a channel turns the water, the Lord turns the king's heart. If He rules the head, He rules the tail. If He rules the king, He rules the people. God does what He wants by turning hearts. Either He turns their hearts as vessels of dishonor for our sake or He turns their hearts to righteousness. He has given us a method by which we can be His vessels to do this. If we forsake His way for the world's ways, the country will crumble. If we think we are going to turn our country around through politics, we are deceived. We cannot politically force evil people to be good. Only the Gospel has the power to change the hearts of the wicked. It is the power of God to save the one that believes it (Rom.1:16). Therefore we should be focused on obeying the Lord and preaching the Gospel to change this nation. Jesus and the apostles are our examples. They focused on the spiritual war and were not deceived into wrestling with flesh and blood. If our country is turned around, it is because people repent; when people repent, God gives them a good government. Since God's people rarely repent without chastening, our nation will hate us. (Mat.24:9)… Ye shall be hated of all the nations for my name's sake. We must never fear the will or conspiracies of men or governments. They are all working for His Name's sake. God predestines and does according to His Will. (Psa.103:19) The Lord hath established his throne in the heavens; And his kingdom ruleth over all. (20) Bless the Lord, ye his angels, That are mighty in strength, that fulfil his word, Hearkening unto the voice of his word, (Angels fight for us and are unlimited when we agree with God's Word, as it was with the Prophets. For instance: We cannot kill but they can.)(21) Bless the Lord, all ye his hosts, Ye ministers of his, that do his pleasure. (22) Bless the Lord, all ye his works, In all places of his dominion: Bless the Lord, O my soul. God is doing everything that is being done. Through many vessels, He is bringing to pass His eternal creation through the last Adam, Jesus Christ. We need to differentiate between the kingdoms of the world and the kingdom of God. The devil offered Jesus authority over all the kingdoms of the world (even your country!) as a temptation, but He turned the position down (Luk.4:5). Some Christians are not turning the devil down. They are being deceived into working in and for the wrong kingdom. Politics is the world's method for ruling the world. The Gospel is God's only method for building His kingdom. Jesus said, My kingdom is not of this world (Joh.18:36). Although God has people everywhere, in order for them to obey the Great Commission, they are forbidden to entangle themselves with the affairs of this life (2 Tim.2:4). Jesus said, The kingdom of God cometh not with observation: neither shall they say, Lo, here! or, There! for lo, the kingdom of God is within you (Luk.17:20-21). In other words, the kingdom of God is not to be seen or physical. It is within you; it is the spiritual or born-again man, the one who submits to Jesus as King. Many Christians are building a physical kingdom thinking it to be God's kingdom. Many are worshiping God and country, thinking their country to be God's kingdom. We are here to seek first the kingdom of God, but many are seeking and serving the world and the flesh, which are passing away. Have you ever noticed how the church usually aligns itself in any dispute according to its patriotic nationalism? For instance, during WWII the church in Germany for the most part aligned itself with Hitler while the church in the United States aligned itself patriotically with this country. Christians went out to kill Christians, members of their own kingdom! (1Pe.2:9) But ye are an elect race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people for [God's] own possession, that ye may show forth the excellencies of him who called you out of darkness into his marvellous light. Our kingdom is one race in the midst of all races and one nation in the midst of all nations. Our brothers and sisters do not have national bounds or ethnic divisions as the world does. We are a spiritual race and nation sent to the fleshly races and nations to “show forth the excellencies of him.” Shall we show the world how to kill in the name of Christ? The lost, who are killed, will never have another opportunity to have eternal life. The following excerpts from God's Word should answer that question: “All they that take the sword shall perish with the sword”; “Love your enemies”; “Resist not him that is evil”; “I send you forth as sheep in the midst of wolves”; “Bless them that persecute you; bless, and curse not”; “Render to no man evil for evil”; “Avenge not yourselves”; “If thine enemy hunger, feed him; if he thirst, give him to drink”; and “Overcome evil with good.” God's people are confused into being members of the wrong kingdom. If we align ourselves with the world, we are God's enemies! (Jas.4:1) Whence [come] wars and whence [come] fightings among you? [come they] not hence, [even] of your pleasures that war in your members? (2)… ye fight and war; ye have not, because ye ask not. (4) Ye adulteresses, know ye not that the friendship of the world is enmity with God? Whosoever therefore would be a friend of the world maketh himself an enemy of God. Religion or patriotism is the cause of most wars, sending multitudes to hell. We are forbidden to fight with people and only allowed to fight with evil spirits. (Eph.6:12) For our wrestling is not against flesh and blood, but against the principalities, against the powers, against the world-rulers of this darkness, against the spiritual [hosts] of wickedness in the heavenly [places]. In the days ahead, God will open our eyes to this adultery with the world. The whole world, including apostate (fallen away) Christianity, will unite against God's people. When this happens it will cause true Christians to unite behind Christ. (Mat.24:9) Then shall they deliver you up unto tribulation, and shall kill you: and ye shall be hated of all the nations for my name's sake. The whole world will follow the beast to make war on the saints (Rev.13:7-8). To those same saints, God says, If any man [is] for captivity, into captivity he goeth: if any man shall kill with the sword, with the sword must he be killed. Here is the patience and the faith of the saints (Rev.13:10). Many will disagree with me on the grounds of their own reasoning instead of God's Word. I have been asked, “If we do not fight for our country, who will?” Those who are on the broad road, who are not disciples, will, and God will use them as well if He wants to save their country that way. We can and should fight for our country God's way. (2Co.10:4) For the weapons of our warfare are not of the flesh, but mighty before God to the casting down of strongholds.

Part One- Jeffrey Boutwell, author of "Boutwell: Radical Republican and Champion of Democracy." The author's distant ancestor George Boutwell was an important force for racial equality in the 19th century. He helped secure the Republican presidential nomination for Abraham Lincoln- assisted in the crafting of the 13th and 15th amendments- was a fierce defender of Reconstruction- led the charge for the impeachment of Andrew Johnson- and was a crucial advisor for President Ulysses S. Grant. Part Two: (from 2009) Howard Dotson, author of "Becoming American: The African-American Journey."

Website www.podpage.com/the-3-13-men-money-and-marriageCash App $a114johnsonSummaryIn this episode of the 313 Men, Money and Marriage podcast, host Andrew Johnson delves into the concept of transactional dating, exploring its definition, statistics, types, risks, and emotional impacts. He discusses how economic factors influence these relationships and the challenges individuals face when transitioning back to traditional dating. The conversation also touches on societal norms and the potential long-term implications of normalizing transactional dating behaviors.Takeaways Transactional dating is defined by an exchange of benefits. 70% of individuals engage in transactional dating for basic needs. Emotional connections are often lacking in transactional relationships. There are various types of transactional dating, including sugar dating. Long-term engagement in transactional dating can affect mental health. Economic instability drives people towards transactional dating. Transitioning from transactional to emotional relationships is challenging. Societal norms are shifting towards accepting transactional dating. Women may become dependent on transactional relationships for financial support. The normalization of transactional dating poses risks for future generations. Understanding Transactional Dating The Rise of Transactional Relationships "70% of people do it for basic needs." "It's emotionally taxing in the long-term." "This behavior is becoming normalized."Chapters 00:00 Introduction to Transactional Dating01:15 Defining Transactional Dating02:49 Statistics and Trends in Transactional Dating04:15 Types and Risks of Transactional Dating08:13 Emotional Impacts of Transactional Relationships11:54 Financial Stability and Dating Choices15:06 Navigating Emotional Connections19:02 Societal Norms and Future Implications

Support the show

February 15, 2025 - The Sixth Sunday after the Epiphany - Fr. Andrew Johnson by All Souls' Episcopal Church

Biographical Bytes from Bala: Laurel Hill West Stories #041 John W. Forney was a publisher, a politician, a railroad agent, and the only person to serve as both Clerk of the US House and Secretary of the US Senate. Abraham Lincoln befriended the man, but political enemies called Forney "Lincoln's dog." Andrew Johnson drank to excess at Forney's Stag party the night before he was sworn in as Vice President and the two men later became bitter enemies. John W. Forney, political gadfly, chameleon, and provocateur is interred in the River Section of Laurel Hill West along with several members of his fascinating family. You will hear about all of them in the February 2025 episode of Biographical Bytes from Bala: Laurel Hill West Stories.

Website:www.podpage.com/the-3-13-men-money-and-marriageCash App $a114johnsonSummaryIn this episode of the 313 Men Money and Marriage podcast, host Andrew Johnson and guest Min. Bernard Marrow discuss the declining presence of men in church, exploring the reasons behind this trend and the changing perceptions of church among men. They emphasize the importance of community outreach, the role of masculinity in spirituality, and the need for sermons to be relevant to modern men. The conversation highlights strategies for engaging more men in church and fostering a sense of belonging within the community.Takeaways61% of churchgoers are women, highlighting a gender gap.Men often feel unnecessary in church without leadership roles.Personal relationships with God are crucial for men in church.Community outreach can help connect with men outside the church.Men need safe spaces to discuss their feelings and experiences.Sermons should be relevant to the challenges faced by modern men.Tradition can limit spiritual growth; innovation is needed.Both men and women should have their spiritual needs addressed.Men can serve as mentors and role models in the church.Engaging men requires understanding their unique needs and perspectives.Where Are the Men in Church?The Changing Face of Church Attendance"Where are the men in church?""God wants a relationship, not religion.""We need men to lead as well."Chapters00:00 Introduction to the Church Attendance Crisis03:04 Changing Perceptions of Church Among Men05:39 Aligning Traditional Practices with Modern Generations08:35 Personal Experiences and the Importance of Male Presence11:40 Community Outreach and Its Role in Church Engagement14:23 Masculinity and Spirituality in the Church17:02 Balancing Focus Between Men and Women in Church19:56 Relevance of Sermons for Today's Men22:32 Strategies to Increase Male Involvement in Church

Frances Harper was an abolitionist, author, and activist who spent her life in the pursuit of a better nation. Risking her safety to tour on the anti-slavery lecture circuit before the war, Harper became one of the loudest critics of Andrew Johnson during Reconstruction. Tune in this week as I dive into her life, motivations, and legacy. 

Donald Trump er ekki fyrsti forseti Bandaríkjanna sem viðrar hugmyndir um kaup á Grænlandi. Harry Truman vildi kaupa Grænland í upphafi kalda stríðsins og Andrew Johnson skoðaði hugmyndina sömuleiðis á nítjándu öld. En er þá ekki hægt að ekki hægt að líta á hugmyndir Trumps um kaup á Grænlandi með tilvísun í söguna og forvera hans sem höfðu sambærilegan áhuga á þessu nágrannalandi? Guðmundur Hálfdánarson, prófessor í sagnfræði og blaðamaðurinn Árni Snævarr ræða við Birtu Björnsdóttur um sögulegan áhuga Bandaríkjamanna á Grænlandi og hið flókna samband Danmerkur og Grænlands. Undir lok síðasta árs bárust fregnir af því að Rússum hefði borist liðsauki í stríðinu gegn Úkraínu. Norðurkóreskar hersveitir voru mættar á vígvöllinn. Eins og flest allt sem viðkemur einræðisríkinu Norður-Kóreu eru hlutverk og þátttaka þessara hersveita sveipuð leynd. Ólöf Ragnarsdóttir rýndi í það sem hefur þó komið fram og ræddi við Jón Björgvinsson, sem hefur margoft farið á vígvöllinn í Úkraínu.

Webpage: www.podpage.com/the-3-13-men-money-and-marriage Cash app $a114johnson Summary In this episode of the 313 Men Money and Marriage podcast, host Andrew Johnson discusses the importance of understanding relationship options and the dynamics of dating. He emphasizes the significance of self-awareness, communication, and the impact of social media on dating choices. The conversation explores the challenges of dating outside one's zone, the types of relationships people engage in, and the emotional complexities of jealousy and envy. Johnson concludes by highlighting the benefits of dating within one's zone for a more fulfilling and less stressful relationship experience. Takeaways Understanding your relationship options is crucial. Self-awareness is key for relationship success. Dating outside your zone can lead to failure. Communicate your intentions early in relationships. Social media can cloud judgment in dating. Jealousy indicates feelings of inadequacy. Avoid comparing your relationship to others. Dating within your zone leads to greater fulfillment. Less stress is associated with dating in your zone. Know where you belong in relationships. Navigating Relationship Options: A Guide Understanding Your Dating Zone "Know your relationship options." "Communicate what you want early on." "Know where you belong in relationships." Chapters 00:00 Introduction to Relationship Options 01:45 Understanding Your Dating Zone 08:15 Types of Relationships and Their Dynamics 12:16 The Importance of Communication in Relationships 15:14 The Impact of Social Media on Dating 19:34 Jealousy, Envy, and Relationship Comparisons 21:07 Benefits of Dating Within Your Zone

Few Presidents had as many lives as Andrew Johnson, 17th President of the United States, serving in every elected position possible from Tennessee, treated as loyal hero and hated traitor, our first impeached President, and our only to return to the Senate after his term! Learn about Johnson's post-Presidency, his death, burial, and legacy!Check out the website at VisitingthePresidents.com for visual aids, links, past episodes, recommended reading, and other information!Episode Page: https://visitingthepresidents.com/2025/02/04/season-3-episode-17-andrew-johnsons-tomb/Season 1's Andrew Johnson Episode: "Andrew Johnson and Raleigh" on his birthplace!Season 2's Andrew Johnson Episode: "Andrew Johnson and Greeneville" on his home!Support the showSupport the showCheck out "Visiting the Presidents" on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram!

Join me this week as I dive into the life of Eliza McCardle Johnson. In this episode I dive into McCardle's early years, her relationship with Andrew Johnson, and how she chose to run the house as First Lady. 

Website: www.podpage.com/the-3-13-men-money-and-marriage Cash App $a114johnson Summary In this episode of the 313 Men, Money and Marriage podcast, host Andrew Johnson and guest Greg Take discuss the importance of investing for everyone, not just the wealthy. They share inspiring stories of ordinary individuals who built significant wealth through smart investing practices. The conversation covers essential topics such as getting started with investing, the significance of asset allocation, the power of compound interest, and the lack of financial education in communities. They emphasize the importance of discipline, goal setting, and the long-term nature of wealth building. Takeaways Investing is accessible to everyone, not just the wealthy. Real-life stories show that ordinary people can build wealth. Starting early and consistently investing is crucial. Asset allocation helps mitigate risk in investments. Compound interest can significantly grow your wealth over time. Financial education is lacking in many communities. Discipline and consistency are key to successful investing. Dollar cost averaging is a smart investment strategy. Understanding inflation is essential for financial planning. Setting clear goals can guide your investment journey. Investing for Everyone: Breaking the Wealth Barrier Real Stories of Wealth: Ordinary Investors "You can learn how to invest." "It's about time in the market." "Investing is not sexy." Chapters 0:00 Introduction to Investing for Everyone 05:15 Real-Life Stories of Ordinary Investors 11:34 Getting Started with Investing 14:30 The Importance of Asset Allocation 16:57 Understanding Compound Interest 21:57 The Lack of Financial Education 26:07 Goal Setting in Your Investment Journey

After four years and 210 episodes, Sammie and Michelle have decided to close out the Build A Wealthy Spirit podcast. In this episode, they reflect on the past four years, sharing their favorite memories and the deep gratitude they feel for all of you and everyone who has supported the podcast along the way. It's the end of an era in a beautiful way. Thank you to all of you who have listened to the podcast and joined us for different parts of this journey! Show Notes:Thank you to our podcast mentors! Joe Saul Sehy & Jordan “Doc G” GrumetInterviews mentioned: Areeb, Andrew Johnson, Oz Chen, Nick Gray, Paul Millerd (and Michelle on Paul's podcast!), Jess, Harris, Rychelle, Debt Free Guys, Doc G#18: FOMO, YOLO and Other Bad Reasons To InvestTop Five Episodes:2: How to Make New Friends as an Adult111. The Great Debate: Sabbatical vs FIRE (Financial Independence Retire Early)112. Deprogramming from a Corporate Mindset105. The Pathless Path with Paul Millerd122. The Art of Planning A SabbaticalBonus - 1: What is Status Post Adulting? Rethink the Status QuoFavorite Personality Tests:The Four TendenciesSparketype AssessmentPersonal ValuesThe Five Love LanguagesMichelle's Writing CoachingFind more show notes and interact with the Build A Wealthy Spirit community at buildawealthyspirit.com!

En el programa de hoy se analiza el asesinato de Abraham Lincoln el 14 de abril de 1865, poco después del fin de la Guerra Civil, con un enfoque en los detalles del evento, incluyendo la falta de medidas de seguridad, la conspiración liderada por John Wilkes Booth y las consecuencias políticas y sociales. Se discute el impacto de su muerte en la reconstrucción de los Estados Unidos, las políticas del sucesor Andrew Johnson y la prolongada segregación racial. Además, se comenta sobre la vida y logros de Lincoln, destacando su liderazgo, inteligencia y carácter magnánimo, y se recomiendan libros que profundizan en estos temas. Para acceder al programa sin interrupción de comerciales, suscríbete a Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/elvillegas Temas principales y sus minutos 00:00:06 - Asesinato de Lincoln: Contexto y detalles. Se relatan los hechos del asesinato, el escenario en el Teatro Ford y las acciones de John Wilkes Booth, junto con la reacción inmediata. 00:06:25 - Muerte de Lincoln: Consecuencias inmediatas. Se describe cómo Lincoln fue tratado médicamente, su muerte y la frase icónica "Now he belongs to the times", junto con las repercusiones inmediatas de su pérdida. 00:12:22 - Reconstrucción fallida tras la Guerra Civil. Se exploran las políticas de Lincoln versus las de Andrew Johnson, y cómo la falta de medidas más estrictas permitió la persistencia del racismo y la segregación. 00:17:29 - Vida y liderazgo de Abraham Lincoln. Un recorrido por la trayectoria de Lincoln, desde su infancia rural hasta su liderazgo político, destacando su manejo de la Guerra Civil y su visión estratégica. 00:23:15 - Legado de Lincoln y recomendaciones de lectura. Se abordan las consecuencias duraderas de su asesinato y se recomiendan libros que detallan su vida, su asesinato y su contexto político.

Join me this week as I wrap up my coverage of the life and presidency of 17th President Andrew Johnson. In this episode, I dive into Johnson's meeting with Black abolitionists and his impeachment - the first in United States history.