Podcasts about CSI effect

In this episode, we break the cycle of societal pressures, mental health stigmas, and a woman's place with law enforcement with Crime Scene Technician/Investigator, Yalena Corton. She breaks down what the CSI Television shows get wrong and shares how she copes with the reality of collecting disturbing evidence from the scene of the crime. Get ready to tune in and figure out who has done it! Listen to Today's Episode to Learn About: -who the real Batman is -the CSI effect (how people approach Yalena) -the differences between the real thing and the TV show -our connection to CSI -Yalena's favorite part of her job -the hardest part of the job -coping mechanisms and mental health -learning on the job -what makes a crime scene a crime scene? -the reality of the job -how to take care of your mental health in such a heavy job -listener questions SYNC UP WITH YALENA: INSTAGRAM- @yalec3 WHO IS YALENA? Yalena has her Masters in Criminal Justice and 2 CSI certifications. She is currently in her 4th year as a full-time CSI with the city of Margate. YALENA'S WEB RECOMMENDATIONS: The CSI Network (A great resource for those interested in the field.)https://www.crime-scene-investigator.net/

Today my guest is Death Scene Investigator and Forensic Anthropologist Dr Janamarie Truesdell What we discuss with Dr Truesdell: The Critical Thinking in Death Scene Investigation course at the University of Wisconsin-Parkside How she teaches a method for investigating a scene How she got into death investigation and forensic anthropology Utilizing the Nutshell Studies of Unexplained Death in teaching How she developed a fascination for the Nutshells Her thoughts on the "CSI Effect." The upcoming summer course at UW-Parkside  Links for this episode: Health Podcast Network  LabVine Learning The ConfLab from LabVine Dress A Med scrubs   University of Wisconsin-Parkside Forensic Anthropology Workshop Critical Thinking in Death Scene Investigation Glessner House The History of the Nutshell Studies of Unexplained Death 18 Tiny Deaths by Bruce Goldfarb   People of Pathology Podcast: Twitter Instagram

This week, in Collinsville, Virginia, when a brother & sister pair decide to share a house, the whole family senses trouble, especially since one of them digs holes, in the middle of the night, while always keeping a large outdoor fire going. When one of them disappears, it becomes a huge mystery, with dogs sniffing all over the county. But when the murderer finally admits to doing it, they then make one of the craziest attempt at suicide, in history. This is followed by a process of finding the many pieces of the body, in some odd places, because the killer was obsessed with CSI! This one starts crazy, and just gets crazier!!Along the way, we find out that dragons aren't real, that antifreeze probably tastes disgusting, and that no matter how much CSI you watch, it's hard to commit the perfect murder!!Hosted by James Pietragallo and Jimmie WhismanNew episodes every Thursday!Donate at: patreon.com/crimeinsports or go to paypal.com and use our email: crimeinsports@gmail.comGo to shutupandgivememurder.com for all things Small Town Murder & Crime In Sports!Follow us on...twitter.com/@murdersmallfacebook.com/smalltownpodinstagram.com/smalltownmurderAlso, check out James & Jimmie's other show, Crime In Sports! On Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Music, Wondery, Wondery+, Stitcher, or wherever you listen to podcasts!See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In today's episode, we'll dive into the psychology, neuroscience, and philosophy of true crime. Find out what happens in your brain as you watch a thriller documentary, whether females really do enjoy true crime more than males, and how true crime mirrors the current status of our society.Adam Golub is professor of American Studies at California State University, Fullerton, where he teaches courses on popular culture, music, monsters, and creative work. He is co-editor of Monsters in the Classroom: Essays on Teaching What Scares Us (McFarland, 2017) and the author of numerous articles on topics including fandom, true crime, zombies, the blues, and cold war youth culture. Get started with Buzzsprout HERE!FIND DR. ADAM GOLUBWebsite: https://www.everydayfictions.com/MENTIONEDHonorable Donald E. Shelton, "The 'CSI Effect': Does It Really Exist?," March 16, 2008, nij.ojp.gov: https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/csi-effect-does-it-really-existVicary, A. M., & Fraley, R. C. (2010). Captured by true crime: Why are women drawn to tales of rape, murder, and serial killers? Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1(1), 81–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550609355486Kelli S. Boling & Kevin Hull (2018) Undisclosed Information—Serial Is My Favorite Murder: Examining Motivations in the True Crime Podcast Audience, Journal of Radio & Audio Media, 25:1, 92-108, DOI: 10.1080/19376529.2017.1370714https://ncadv.org/STATISTICShttps://www.mmiwg-ffada.ca/final-report/Zach Sommers, Missing White Woman Syndrome: An Empirical Analysis of Race and Gender Disparities in Online News Coverage of Missing Persons, 106 J. Crim. L. & Criminology (2016). https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc/vol106/iss2/4"Criminal Crossovers," Foreword to "American True Crime in the 21st Century Re-Examined: Critical Interventions in a National Obsession," special issue, Crime Fiction Studies 3:1 (2022): v-xiii.FIND MEWMT Instagram: @walkmethrough.jpg Website: https://walk-me-through.mailchimpsites.com/Support WMT: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/walkmethroughPersonal Instagram: @eugenia.jpgCREDITSTrack: Electric Ten — Broke in Summer [Audio Library Release]Music provided by Audio Library PlusWatch: https://youtu.be/qooMP-upphwFree Download / Stream: https://alplus.io/electric-tenSupport the show

Ever wonder what's real and what's fake when it comes to forensic television? What did Hollywood get right and what did they get really really wrong? Tune in to debunk some of the biggest myths perpetuated by TV that have led to the CSI Effect. 

Few bear witness to human decomposition. We embalm and seal bodies in caskets, and bury them six feet underground. Decomposition happens out of sight and out of mind, or in the case of cremation, is skipped over entirely.But at human decomposition facilities, sometimes known as "body farms," students and researchers see rotting corpses every day. They watch as scavengers and bacteria feast on them. And when it's all over, they clean the skeletons, and file them away in a collection.In this episode, producer Felix Poon visits a human decomposition facility in North Carolina to  see what the people who work there have learned about death, find out how a human body decomposes, and why a person might choose to wind up there in the first place. Featuring: Nick Passalacqua, Rebecca George, Carter Unger, Maggie Klemm, Carlee Green, Victoria Deal, Kadri Greene, Mackenzie Gascon, Reagan Baechle, Leigh Irwin, and Lucinda Denton LINKSYou can watch Bill Bass tell the story of Colonel William Shy and the time since death estimation he got so wrong that led to him founding the first ever “Body Farm.”If you want to hear from pre-registered donors about their decision to donate their bodies, you can watch a WBIR-TV segment, The Body Farm: A donor explains why she's ready to hand off her corpse to the forensic center about Lucinda Denton, who we feature in this episode. And you can read Fawn Fitter's article, My Afterlife on the Body Farm (NY Times), about how she intends to help solve crimes as part of a world-renowned criminal justice program after she dies.If you're curious to read more about the “CSI Effect,” check this article out: ‘CSI effect' draws more women to forensics.And if you want to read up on how the field of forensics is talking about evolving their concepts of race and gender, you can read Decolonizing ancestry estimation in the United States, and Centering Transgender Individuals in Forensic Anthropology and Expanding Binary Sex Estimation in Casework and Research. SUPPORTOutside/In is made possible with listener support. Click here to become a sustaining member of Outside/In. Subscribe to our FREE newsletter.Follow Outside/In on Instagram or Twitter, or join our private discussion group on Facebook. CREDITSHost: Nate HegyiReported and produced by: Felix PoonEditing by Taylor Quimby, with help and feedback from Nate Hegyi, Rebecca Lavoie, Justine Paradis, and Jessica Hunt.Rebecca Lavoie is our Executive ProducerSpecial Thanks to: Fawn Fitter, Katie Zejdlik, Jimmy Holt, Carter Unger, Maggie Klemm, Carlee Green, Victoria Deal, Kadri Greene, Mackenzie Gascon, Reagan Baechle, and Leigh Irwin.Music for this episode by Blue Dot Sessions.Our theme music is by Breakmaster Cylinder.Outside/In is a production of New Hampshire Public Radio

In episode two of our Strengthening the Forensic Workforce season, Just Science sat down with Dr. Sarah Williams, a Research Associate Professor in Forensic Science at Virginia Commonwealth University and Dr. Keith Morris, a Ming Hsieh Distinguished Teaching Professor of Forensic & Investigative Science at West Virginia University to discuss undergraduate, master's, and doctorate programs in forensic science. This season, Just Science will explore a variety of forensic science programs and the growing need for more doctoral programs. Recent years have also presented unique challenges for hands-on research with the COVID-19 pandemic and misconstrued expectations stemming from the CSI effect, forcing universities and their students to adapt. Listen along as Dr. Morris and Dr. Williams discuss Ph.Ds. in forensic science and the role of NIJ and FEPAC in providing research and education opportunities for the next generation of forensic science professionals. This episode is funded by the National Institute of Justice's Forensic Technology Center of Excellence.

On this episode we sit down with David Moore (24') and talk about all things forensic science, including the CSI Effect, Lie detector test, North Carolina's "kit" crisis, DNA, and overcoming challenges within the field. This interview was conducted by David's cohort mate, Sharonda Daniels (24').

Catherine Connors went from Academia (Sessional Lecturer at University of Toronto) to Disney Executive (Head of Content and Editor In Chief of Disney Interactive). I have shivers as she shares her story. We talk about why myths and stories matter. Is the Disney Princess Good or Evil? This is a complex question for so many reasons, but all I can say is that she changed my mind. Catherine writes the Her Bad Mother blog (named one of TIME's Top 25 Blogs of 2012.) She co-authored The Feminine Revolution with Amy K. Stanton (who I interviewed a few episodes ago.) I could listen to Catherine talk All Day Long. Her Bad Mother has been featured in the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Globe and Mail, the Toronto Star, the American Prospect, the London Times, and sundry other publications, as well as on CNN, ABC, CBC and the BBC online. Catherine has made appearances on most major media outlets, including CNN, NPR, and Good Morning America, addressing all variety of topics related to motherhood, feminism, media, and femininity — sometimes all at once. Show Notes: Her Bad Mother Blog http://herbadmother.com/ The Feminine Revolution Buy here: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1580058124/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&tag=herbadmother-20&camp=1789&creative=9325&linkCode=as2&creativeASIN=1580058124&linkId=f02e3b38324282e3fc3f94721f48e0f6 The CSI Effect https://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=5593372&page=1 This Changes Everything (2019, On Netflix) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPGwJmSMoPs History of Cinderella https://www.vox.com/2015/3/15/8214405/cinderella-fairy-tale-history Follow Catherine at: https://www.instagram.com/herbadmother/ Follow Flipflops at: https://www.instagram.com/flipflops_podcast/

In this episode we will talk about the CSI effect and its implications on the scientific community and the perception of the general population. We will also talk about the crisis that exists in crime lab and discuss the repercussions and detrimental for forensic science.

Hi guys and welcome back to a bonus episode of Amare Moments! Today we'll be talking about the bbl and csi effect along with some other crazy forensics facts!

Learn about a key trait in group leaders; why DNA evidence is overrated; and a brainless slime mold that can “think.” The "babble hypothesis" of leadership says people who talk more are seen as leaders by Steffie Drucker Dolan, E. W. (2021, July 17). New study finds people who speak more are more likely to be viewed as leaders. PsyPost; PsyPost. https://www.psypost.org/2021/07/new-study-finds-people-who-speak-more-are-more-likely-to-be-viewed-as-leaders-61540  MacLaren, N. G., Yammarino, F. J., Dionne, S. D., Sayama, H., Mumford, M. D., Connelly, S., Martin, R. W., Mulhearn, T. J., Todd, E. M., Kulkarni, A., Cao, Y., & Ruark, G. A. (2020). Testing the babble hypothesis: Speaking time predicts leader emergence in small groups. The Leadership Quarterly, 31(5), 101409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101409  Contrary To Popular Belief, DNA Evidence Is Far From Perfect by Ashley Hamer  Shermer, M. (2015). Forensic Pseudoscience. Scientific American, 313(3), 95–95. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0915-95  Shaer, M. (2016, May 17). The Atlantic. The Atlantic; theatlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/06/a-reasonable-doubt/480747/  ‌Dolan, M. (2019, January 29). The danger of DNA: It isn't perfect. Chicagotribune.com; Chicago Tribune. https://www.chicagotribune.com/la-me-dna26-2008dec26-story.html  There's a brainless slime mold that can do things often associated with thinking by Cameron Duke Greenberg, A. (2020, September 21). Eight smart things slime molds can do without a brain. Pbs.org; Nova. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/article/slime-mold-smart-brainless-cognition/  Murugan, N. J., Kaltman, D. H., Jin, P. H., Chien, M., Martinez, R., Nguyen, C. Q., Kane, A., Novak, R., Ingber, D. E., & Levin, M. (2021). Mechanosensation Mediates Long‐Range Spatial Decision‐Making in an Aneural Organism. Advanced Materials, 2008161. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202008161  Thinking without a brain. (2021, July 15). EurekAlert! https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/762793  Follow Curiosity Daily on your favorite podcast app to learn something new every day withCody Gough andAshley Hamer. Still curious? Get exclusive science shows, nature documentaries, and more real-life entertainment on discovery+! Go to https://discoveryplus.com/curiosity to start your 7-day free trial. discovery+ is currently only available for US subscribers. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Children go missing, exploited, and trafficked everyday. It takes investigators, prosecutors, and private sector technology specialists to help them. Misinformation and TV portrayals can impact our resources that are directed to help. Today's guest is Kevin Metcalf. Kevin is a former federal agent turned prosecutor and the founder of The National Child Protection Task Force which brings together recognized experts in the field such as strategic legal applications, open source intelligence, cellular mapping analysis, dark web investigations, and cryptocurrency to help law enforcement agencies everywhere. He has undergone training provided by the National Computer Forensics Institute, the National White Collar Crime Center, and the FBI Cellular Analysis Survey Team, among others. Kevin developed a system for working with cell phone related data in criminal cases that developed into a mobile device foundational course that focuses on the integration of legally-derived information with open source information. Kevin has also published a series of instructional books available on Amazon. Show Notes: [1:26] - Kevin shares his background and how starting the National Child Protection Task Force was not something he initially thought he'd do. [2:20] - As a single parent, Kevin left his job in law enforcement, went back to school, and became a prosecutor. [3:58] - As he was led into working in social media and cell phones, Kevin realized how often he was working on cases that had to do with children. [5:11] - Kevin describes the case that got him national attention and how it led to him working with experts that wanted to come together to help more kids. [7:01] - Chris notes the gap between law enforcement and the technology that is available. Kevin is trying to bridge that gap. [8:00] - How does Kevin deal with the “CSI Effect”? [9:57] - There is a lot of misinformation regarding human trafficking.  [10:52] - It is very challenging to convict someone for human trafficking due to little information and the victim not being forthcoming with details out of fear. [12:19] - Most of the time they are able to convict for something else, like drugs or gun charges, which does at least get the person in jail without putting the victim through testifying again. [13:34] - There are a lot of psychological factors involved for victims even years afterwards. [14:55] - Kevin's organization works with missing, exploited, and trafficked children. He explains the difference between exploitation and trafficking. [16:49] - Children who are missing and runaways are at higher risk of being exploited and trafficked.  [17:51] - There is a huge problem with missing children investigation or lack thereof. Predators are aware of this and take advantage. [21:21] - There are so many problems with statistics that Kevin doesn't know what questions to ask. [23:18] - Kevin feels that there are two categories for children, missing or not. [24:04] - Kevin lists some of the things that put children at risk, including parents trying to control everything. [27:35] - During the grooming process, predators are looking for the weaknesses in a parent-child relationship. Mental health issues also add another level of vulnerability. [31:10] - The NCPTF is composed of active duty law enforcement. Kevin explains following the rules of the jurisdiction they're working in. [32:51] - Although there are some controversial tools used to investigate these cases, Kevin describes how to prevent breaches in privacy. [35:04] - “You have to understand the limitations of technology. If you don't, you're going to misuse it, screw up an investigation, and arrest the wrong person.” [36:19] - Kevin explains the algorithms used for facial recognition, especially using the face of a child. [38:43] - An investigator needs to follow up on every hit used with facial recognition. [39:59] - Kevin describes how the NCPTF hones their technology skills. [41:38] - Predators are using information willingly posted on social media to harm others. [42:51] - It is difficult to make politicians and policy makers understand how bad the situation is and what is needed to prosecute a predator. [45:00] - Newer privacy laws make it difficult to use technology to identify a human trafficker. [46:51] - Using these technological resources for minor infractions is a waste of time and money. They should be used for the major things. [49:27] - It is important to not tip predators off with what they are using to identify them. Sometimes photos and videos will allow investigators to determine their location. [51:14] - A lot of people don't realize how easy it is to find their information. Thanks for joining us on Easy Prey. Be sure to subscribe to our podcast on iTunes and leave a nice review.  Links and Resources: Podcast Web Page Facebook Page whatismyipaddress.com Easy Prey on Instagram Easy Prey on Twitter Easy Prey on LinkedIn Easy Prey on YouTube Easy Prey on Pinterest Erica Stanford on LinkedIn National Child Protection Task Force Kevin Metcalf NCPTF Twitter NCPTF Twitter NCPTF Facebook

In Part 53 of Inside the Robe, Judge Mader expresses concern about the influence of the so-called "CSI" effect and the demand for DNA evidence by jurors. She reflects on the intent behind three strikes sentencing, and she answers the classic question, "What do judges wear under their robes?"

Tori Berezowski lends her forensic expertise to explore the impacts of the CSI effect.

CSI Effect, magic maggots, true crime, forensics, oh my!

Today's podcast is a conversation with Peter Jankowski, President and Chief Operating Officer of Dick Wolf Enterprises, and Executive Producer of all of the iterations of the Law and Order franchise as well as Chicago Fire, Chicago PD and Chicago Med. The conversation was recorded as part of a series of classes that I taught at The University of Southern California's School of Cinematic Arts. Each week I would host an artist for a discussion that would help us better understand their values and aims as storytellers in the world of crime and justice. In this conversation, Peter and I discussed the people and forces that shaped his approach to storytelling, and we zeroed in on his experiences as the overseer of Dick Wolf's sprawling creative empire, with a particular focus on the original Law and Order series and Law and Order: SVU. One piece of context, before we begin. Prior to my interview with Peter, the students in the class screened the Pilot episode of the first Law & Order series entitled “Prescription for Death” which originally aired on September 13, 1990 as well as the episode of Law & Order: Special Victims Unit entitled “The Undiscovered Country” which aired in Season 19 as Episode 13 on February 7, 2018. That's right those episodes premiered 27 and a half years apart from one another.

On today's podcast, we present part 2 of my two-part interview with Carol Mendelsohn, the founding showrunner of the juggernaut CBS crime procedural, CSI: Crime Scene Investigation. In this part of the conversation, we discuss the show's characters, we take a deep dive into one of the iconic episodes of CSI which was directed by Quentin Tarantino, we look at the impact of the show on America's criminal justice system and Carol reflects on the enormous success of the show and it's spinoffs. One last podcast note, last Tuesday, October 6 marked the 20th Anniversary of the series' debut on CBS.

SPECIAL GUEST: Glenn Porter (UNE) The science of forensics has popularised by the success of TV crime shows, but the reality of how criminal investigations occur, and the science behind evidence gathering is often nowhere near as glamorous as these shows imply. While we may not be able to work the magic they show on TV, new technologies   are aiding forensic scientists in more effectively gathering and presenting evidence. With advances in imaging technology and the ubiquity of digital cameras in society, forensic imaging is a continuously growing field and faces new challenges surrounding the management and privacy of enormous amounts of image data. Support In Situ Science on Patreon Glenn Porter is the head of the Centre for Rural Criminology at the University of New England and specialises in how optics and photographic techniques can be used gather and present evidence in criminal investigations. Glenn began his career as a creative photographer and, after finding a job as a forensic photographer, found his career taking a new and exciting direction towards forensic science research. In this interview with In Situ Science we talk about how forensic science can play a role in the complex and collaborative field of crime detection, investigation and prevention.   Find out more about the Centre for Rural Criminology here.   Follow us on Twitter @insituscience Follow us on Instagram Like us on Facebook                                          Music: ‘Strange Stuff’ by Sonic Wallpaper - www.sonicwallpaper.bandcamp.com

Forensic Science is a field that has overtaken courtrooms and television screens alike. These two worlds, forensic science, and media, collided when a little show called CSI was created. CSI quickly become one of the most popular science fiction shows in the world, but it came with a price. Those who watch the show are exposed to the world of forensic science and are led to believe it's an easy world to understand. This is where we get into some trouble. Today, we take a look at a media effect called the CSI Effect and see whether or not this plays a hand in the courtroom. All the sources in this episode are listed below: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/most-watched-tv-show-in-the-world-csi_n_1597968 http://lsprg.asu.edu/archive/csieffect.pdf http://www.imprimus.net/forensic_classroom/PDF%20Files/Publications/NIJ%20Journal%20-%20CSI%20Effect.pdf https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/wicked-deeds/201605/the-guilty-pleasure-true-crime-tv

A unique and very special episode with a funny and entertaining interview with our favorite Dateline NBC reporter, Josh Mankiewicz! (@JoshMankiewicz) Coming to you from Smith & Wollensky in Columbus, Ohio, the One Hit Wonder is a nod to Dateline, Haddaway's “What is Love,” or “Baby Don't Hurt Me.” Sal and Bob are huge fans of Dateline, and Josh's reporting, so they ask questions they think other fans want to know the answers to. Josh talks about why Dateline is so compelling, quoting his colleague and fellow Dateline reporter Dennis Murphy, that “It's not about the murder. It's about the marriage.” Josh talks about the “CSI Effect,” which highlights how today's jurors are affected by crime science portrayed on television, saying that OJ would probably be convicted today. Bob asks if Josh has a favorite episode that resonated with him and gave him personal satisfaction. Josh shares one where a wrongfully convicted man was helped, in part, by Dateline's dramatization of the facts, and was ultimately cleared of wrongdoing and freed from prison. Sal and Josh talk about how there's an art to the interview process, and how families of murdered loved ones want to tell the story of the victim, and how Dateline helps them do that. Josh talks about the challenges in interviewing law enforcement officials. People have asked Josh if he's scared when he interviews murderers, and his response is that he is not. Partly because it's in a prison where the fight has gone out of the killer, and partly because the murderers want to tell their story, too. All the guys laugh about Bill Hader's impression of Josh, and Sal wonders how Dateline gets the “pensive” shots of the guilty drinking coffee by a window. Josh says one of the trickiest parts of the show is to keep the secret of someone's guilt or innocence until the right time in the story. They wrap things up by agreeing to meet for a steak dinner at The Golden Steer, The Met, Michael's Gourmet Room, Manny's Steakhouse, or somewhere else road warriors meet. What a fun, entertaining, and insightful episode with the very gracious and funny Josh Mankiewicz. Watch Dateline on NBC: FRI 10/9c SAT 8/7c, 9/8c Follow the show for more: Twitter: @SalandBobShow Facebook: facebook.com/SalAndBobShow

Mark welcomes Dr. Katherine Ramsland to the show. Dr. Katherine Ramsland teaches forensic psychology at DeSales University in Pennsylvania and has published more than 65 books, including The Criminal Mind, The Human Predator, The CSI Effect, The Forensic Science of CSI, A Voice for the Dead, and Ghost: Investigating the other Side. She writes regular features on forensics and serial murder for Court TV's Crime Library and is considered an international expert on serial killers. She combines an interest in the supernatural with intensive research on crime, and sometimes these topics join in some surprising ways. Dr. Katherine Ramsland 's website can be found here: katherineramsland.com You can find Dr. Katherine Ramsland 's amazing books here: The Devil's Dozen Inside the Minds of Serial Killers: Why They Kill Cemetery Stories: Creepy Graveyards, Embalming Secrets & the Life of a Corpse After Death Dean Koontz: A Writer's Biography Ghost: Investigating the Other Side Piercing the Darkness: Undercover With Vampires in America Today Prism of the Night: A Biography of Anne Rice The Vampire Companion: The Official Guide to Anne Rice's the Vampire Chronicles The Witches' Companion: The Official Guide to Anne Rice's Lives of the Mayfair Witches The Mind of a Murderer Confession of a Serial Killer

Mark welcomes Dr. Katherine Ramsland to the show. Dr. Katherine Ramsland teaches forensic psychology at DeSales University in Pennsylvania and has published more than 65 books, including The Criminal Mind, The Human Predator, The CSI Effect, The Forensic Science of CSI, A Voice for the Dead, and Ghost: Investigating the other Side. She writes regular features on forensics and serial murder for Court TV's Crime Library and is considered an international expert on serial killers. She combines an interest in the supernatural with intensive research on crime, and sometimes these topics join in some surprising ways. Dr. Katherine Ramsland 's website can be found here: katherineramsland.com You can find Dr. Katherine Ramsland 's amazing books here: The Devil's Dozen Inside the Minds of Serial Killers: Why They Kill Cemetery Stories: Creepy Graveyards, Embalming Secrets & the Life of a Corpse After Death Dean Koontz: A Writer's Biography Ghost: Investigating the Other Side Piercing the Darkness: Undercover With Vampires in America Today Prism of the Night: A Biography of Anne Rice The Vampire Companion: The Official Guide to Anne Rice's the Vampire Chronicles The Witches' Companion: The Official Guide to Anne Rice's Lives of the Mayfair Witches The Mind of a Murderer Confession of a Serial Killer

In this episode, Melanie Reid, Associate Dean of Faculty and Professor of Law at Lincoln Memorial University Duncan School of Law, discusses her paper "A CSI Story: The Past, Present, and Future of Crime Scene Collection and What Litigators Need to Know" which was published in the Wake Forest Journal of Law & Policy. Reid begins by discussing the role of crime scene investigators, and how contemporary perceptions of CSIs based upon movies and TV shows are much different than the realities in the field. She explores the advancement of forensic science through the lens of a 19th century murder trial in England and the 1994 OJ Simpson murder trial, noting the wide differences in forensic science techniques between the 19th century and the modern day. And she notes that a number of errors have been made by CSIs, and details what changes can be made to improve crime scene collection. She discusses the role of CSIs, prosecutors, and defense attorneys in criminal trials, and how each should interact with one another and the information provided by CSIs during trial. Reid concludes with what lawyers, judges, and investigative agencies should take away from her paper. Reid's scholarship is available on SSRN.This episode was hosted by Luce Nguyen, a college student and the co-founder of the Oberlin Policy Research Institute, an undergraduate public policy research organization based at Oberlin College. Nguyen is on Twitter at @NguyenLuce. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Do shows like CSI have a negative influence on peoples’ interpretation of the criminal justice system, and on forensic science practices? In this podcast, Mr I discusses what the latest research suggests is the case.

TV shows and movies about crime solving have exploded in popularity in recent years, but real-life forensic research is much more complicated, and much more diverse, than what we see on the screen. Is forensic science in the media actually affecting real-life court cases, and are criminals walking free because of junk science? Meet experts from Laurentian's Department of Forensic Science and hear some myths busted about forensics. Supported by NSERC. Panelists included: Dr. Scott FairgrieveFull Professor, Department of Forensic Science and Director, Forensic Osteology Laboratory, Laurentian University Dr. Gerard M. CourtinProfessor Emeritus, Adjunct Professor, Department of Forensic Science, Laurentian University Dr. James WattersonAssociate Professor and Chair, Department of Forensic Science, Laurentian University Moderator: Dana MurchisonStaff Scientist, Science North

TV shows and movies about crime solving have exploded in popularity in recent years, but real-life forensic research is much more complicated, and much more diverse, than what we see on the screen. Is forensic science in the media actually affecting re...

A unique and very special episode with a funny and entertaining interview with our favorite Dateline NBC reporter, Josh Mankiewicz! (@JoshMankiewicz) Coming to you from Smith & Wollensky in Columbus, Ohio, the One Hit Wonder is a nod to Dateline, Haddaway's “What is Love,” or “Baby Don't Hurt Me.” Sal and Bob are huge fans of Dateline, and Josh's reporting, so they ask questions they think other fans want to know the answers to. Josh talks about why Dateline is so compelling, quoting his colleague and fellow Dateline reporter Dennis Murphy, that “It's not about the murder. It's about the marriage.” Josh talks about the “CSI Effect,” which highlights how today's jurors are affected by crime science portrayed on television, saying that OJ would probably be convicted today. Bob asks if Josh has a favorite episode that resonated with him and gave him personal satisfaction. Josh shares one where a wrongfully convicted man was helped, in part, by Dateline's dramatization of the facts, and was ultimately cleared of wrongdoing and freed from prison. Sal and Josh talk about how there's an art to the interview process, and how families of murdered loved ones want to tell the story of the victim, and how Dateline helps them do that. Josh talks about the challenges in interviewing law enforcement officials. People have asked Josh if he's scared when he interviews murderers, and his response is that he is not. Partly because it's in a prison where the fight has gone out of the killer, and partly because the murderers want to tell their story, too. All the guys laugh about Bill Hader's impression of Josh, and Sal wonders how Dateline gets the “pensive” shots of the guilty drinking coffee by a window. Josh says one of the trickiest parts of the show is to keep the secret of someone's guilt or innocence until the right time in the story. They wrap things up by agreeing to meet for a steak dinner at The Golden Steer, The Met, Michael's Gourmet Room, Manny's Steakhouse, or somewhere else road warriors meet. What a fun, entertaining, and insightful episode with the very gracious and funny Josh Mankiewicz. Watch Dateline on NBC: FRI 10/9c SAT 8/7c, 9/8c Follow the show for more: Twitter: @SalandBobShow Facebook: facebook.com/SalAndBobShow

Cody Gough and Ashley Hamer discuss the following stories to help you get smarter and learn something new in just a few minutes: The Hidden Differences Between American and British English Crime Shows Might Influence Real Criminal Trials Via the CSI Effect For more on how forensics can fail, check out "Inside the Cell: The Dark Side of Forensic DNA" by Erin E. Murphy. Swedish Lemon Angels Are the Dessert You Should Never Try to Make  If you liked learning about Swedish Lemon Angels, then check out more from "Penn and Teller's How to Play with Your Food." You Shouldn't Rinse Your Dishes Before Putting Them in the Dishwasher Follow Curiosity Daily on your favorite podcast app to learn something new every day withCody Gough andAshley Hamer. Still curious? Get exclusive science shows, nature documentaries, and more real-life entertainment on discovery+! Go to https://discoveryplus.com/curiosity to start your 7-day free trial. discovery+ is currently only available for US subscribers. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Welcome to Season 2! Today we are joined by Hayley Cullen, a PhD candidate and research assistant in the forensic psychology lab at the University of Sydney. In this episode we look at the "CSI effect," and how popular understandings of forensic science evidence have the potential to influence juror decision making.You can find Hayley on Twitter and ResearchGate, or you can email her at hcul1365@uni.sydney.edu.au. You can find The Sydney Exoneration Project here.CW: Rape, suicide, murder.   You can support us on Patreon at https://www.patreon.com/tropewatchers. If you enjoy Game of Thrones or A Song of Ice and Fire, check out our sister podcast, A Clash of Critics, for deep critical analysis of every episode and every book of George R. R. Martin's epic series: aclashofcritics.com.

In a special episode of CSI: Reality Check we discuss the "CSI Effect". We talk about how shows like CSI have influenced jurors' expectations with regards to physical evidence.    *Listener Discretion Advised* While this episode mainly focuses on evidence presented in court, there is a discussion of sexual assault cases that may be upsetting to some listeners. 

Intro/outro music: “Gay Bar Videogame” by The Wildbunch http://freemusicarchive.org/music/The_Wildbunch/Gay_Bar/Gay_Bar_videogame 1:20 Numerologists – wrong for once (shocker) 2:45 Introducing this week’s show 3:40 Concept of the show 4:43 JS goes down Memory Lane 6:48 Impressions of our host 8:02 ‘Expert witnesses’ 8:55 Judge’s legalistic demeanor 10:08 More distant than Judge Toler 10:59 Mike hoped this would be more interesting/distinct 13:13 Ep 1 – foster family 14:33 Ep 2 – eviction dispute 15:41 Quite a bit of legal explanation 16:40 Tonal variation – much more realistic 17:23 Motif of ‘informal agreements’ 18:45 Claimants and social class 19:31 Case ruling 20:28 Difficult situation of claimants 21:43 Ep 3 – serious look at light-hearted matter 22:45 Crossover exposure 24:40 Economics of court TV and reputation 26:20 Laptop case from Ep 4 27:18 JS’s favorite case – Tinder scam artist 29:29 Plaintiff’s occupation and social class stood out 31:06 Brief aside on demographics 31:44 Legal merits of ruling 33:21 Difference b/w arbitration and regular court 34:20 Ep 7 – thefts and theatrics 35:12 How much was this choreographed? 36:40 Episode’s humorous tone 37:07 Possibly dubious ruling? 39:01 2nd half – possibly sponsored? 39:56 Wrinkle to the case 40:48 Ep 8 – accident claim dispute 41:33 Most interesting and realistic case 42:37 Discussing complexity of ruling 44:24 Ep 9 – tent revival in a courtroom 45:41 This seemed like a weird outlier 46:38 Did the actual case even matter? 47:30 Strong reflection of what target audience craves? 48:53 ID theft case in Ep 10 50:43 Problematic nature of ‘law as entertainment’ 51:58 Similar to ‘CSI Effect’? 53:03 Any potential redeeming value to courtroom reality TV? 54:51 Does show’s greater ‘realism’ give it more potential to mislead viewers? 55:30 Does inherent complexity of law subtly bias system against less educated? 58:32 JS argues legal system attempts to take this into account 1:00:35 Potential to alienate poor citizens who rely on ‘informal agreements’? Can law be made more ‘user-friendly’? 1:01:54 Law is often complex because society is complex 1:02:53 Brief aside on class issues and show’s ‘law-and-order’ perspective 1:04:53 JS wraps up with some reflection on how his barometer has changed 1:05:15 Introducing show for next episode 1:06:45 Announcements: email, rate/review, and subscribe

V dnešnom podcaste budeme hovoriť o záhade s gravitačnou konštantou, o takzvanom CSI efekte, ktorý môže spôsobiť odsúdenie nevinných a o čínskych vedcoch, ktorí modifikovali ľudské embryo. TémyZdroje Intro Záhada gravitačnej konštanty  Osobnosť CSI efekt Čínski vedci modifikovali ľudské embryo Fakt alebo fikcia Outro Blíží se záhada s gravitační konstantou k překvapivému rozuzlení? Otto Hahn Is The 'CSI Effect' Influencing Courtrooms? FBI admits flaws in hair analysis over decades The FBI, Forensic Science, and the CSI Effect Embryo editing sparks epic debate CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing in human tripronuclear zygotes Change in weight and body composition in obese subjects following a hypocaloric diet plus different training programs or physical activity recommendations Chilli peppers hold promise of preventing liver damage and progression Risks from excessive drinking: Social and psychological issues trump physical hazards

Speaking to Neural magazine, artist Paul Vanouse said "I think in the next couple years there will be lots more scientific research that undermines DNA determinism. For instance, theorist Hanna Landecker...describe[s] varied large-scale "Relational Biology" research projects that examine things such as epigenetics, stem-cell differentiation, bidirectional signaling, etc. - things that I think may dethrone the reductive idea that DNA is the dictator of all things and may loosen the metaphor of life as code." Paul Vanouse is visiting USU as a part of the ARTsySTEM project. Tuesday on Access Utah we'll discuss Race and DNA, the CSI Effect, the Human Genome Project, and related topics.

Topics Discussed: Overcoming Technological Malfunction, Watching People Humiliate Themselves for Money, Word of the Day, We Had a Good Burn, Chelsea Peretti, Brooklyn 99, A Valuable Lesson in Right Wing Politics, Liberal Propaganda, Retractions: Modern Buddhists Might Recruit, BeautifulPeople.com Cleans House, Hot or Not, St. Patrick’s Day, Dub’s Wedding Ring, Using Corporate Policy Against Itself, Coldest Motherfucker(s) Ever: The (Other) Baton Rouge Serial Killer, How DNA Dragnets Work, Getting Your Legacy Right, the CSI Effect, CODIS Database, Cops can Totally Lie to You, Moving and Remembering Dumb Details.

Thanks to modern technology most crimes these days can be neatly solved in under an hour. At least that's what fictional TV shows like CSI seem to suggest.  We wanted to address the so-called "CSI Effect," caused by the simplification of forensic science in popular culture. CSI and  likeminded TV shows–with their heroic investigators solving crimes in mere minutes–mislead viewers and affect real court cases. The reality of investigation is much slower and more complex, but no less fascinating. Hosts Michal Meyer and Robert Kenworthy speak with experts Anna Dhody, a physical and forensic anthropologist, and Lisa Rosner, a historian. They discuss the early days of solving crime and the on-going chemistry of the human body throughout life and death. SHOW CLOCK: 00:03 Introduction 02:03 Past and present: the "CSI Effect"   05:00 Forensic science: its beginnings 06:40 Burke and Hare: the not-quite body snatchers 09:34 Digging up the bodies: mass murder in Peru 11:11 The chemistry of bodies 12:44 Skulls, phrenology, and race CREDITS: Hosts: Michal Meyer and Robert Kenworthy Guests: Anna Dhody and Lisa Rosner Producer & Editor: Mariel Carr "Stabbings" by Moby, courtesy of Mobygratis.com   check out Distillations magazine at distillations.org, where you'll find articles, videos, and our podcast.  

The inaccuracy in popular crime drama TV franchises has been dubbed "the CSI Effect". From Crime Scene to Courtroom co-author and leading forensic pathologist Cyril Wecht, M.D., J.D. offers an insider's perspective on real-life forensic science and the crimes that have captivated America.