Podcasts about personality science

52 minutes. C'est le temps qu'on passerait chaque jour à faire des commérages, selon une étude du Social Psychological and Personality Science.. Ces 52 minutes révèlent aussi quelque chose d'important: les potins, aussi futiles qu'ils paraissent, ont en fait une vraie fonction sociale.  Les ragots ne sont pas toujours négatifs. Techniquement, c'est simplement le fait de parler de quelqu'un qui n'est pas là. Et ça peut être gentil, indifférent ou… un peu plus piquant. D'ailleurs, les chercheurs de cette même étude les ont classés de la même façon : les potins positifs, négatifs ou neutres. Résultat : ¾ des ragots sont neutres. Ce qu'on raconte le moins en revanche, ce sont les choses sympas. Les potins positifs sont deux fois moins fréquents que les négatifs !  Mais… c'est quoi l'intérêt des ragots ? Ça veut dire qu'on passe près d'une heure par jour à critiquer les autres ? Ecoutez la suite de cet épisode de "Maintenant vous savez" À écouter ensuite : Comment savoir si on est radin ? Éjaculation féminine : quelles sont les 3 choses à savoir ? Pourquoi cuisiner améliore-t-il notre santé mentale ? Retrouvez tous les épisodes de "Maintenant vous savez". Suivez Bababam sur Instagram. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Vous vous sentez parfois morose, passif, ou en manque d'énergie ? Dans cet épisode, on explore comment sortir de cet état et se sentir pleinement vivant, grâce aux apports de la psychologie positive et des sciences sociales. S'appuyant sur des études concrètes, cet épisode vous livre des clés pour comprendre pourquoi on peut se sentir éteint, et surtout, des astuces pratiques pour retrouver de l'enthousiasme !Sources scientifiques pour crédibiliser ton contenu :Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper & Row. Fredrickson, B. L. (2016). The Journal of Positive Psychology – Études sur la gratitude et le bien-être. Nature Neuroscience (2021) – Recherche sur la nouveauté et la dopamine. Psychological Bulletin (2019) – Méta-analyse sur les relations sociales et le bien-être. The Journal of Happiness Studies (2020) – Objectifs intrinsèques et sentiment de vitalité. Social Psychological and Personality Science (2017) – Contagion émotionnelle.

Lässt sich die Liebe durch Lust auf Sex steigern? 8 Impulse, mit denen das gelingen kann. Am Anfang der Liebe ist alles einfach. Man trägt die rosarote Brille, ist auf Wolke 7. Doch dann kommt die Gewohnheit, der Rausch lässt nach. Alltag, Stress, Kinder, Job, die Liebe hat es schwer und oft erleben Paare, dass es dann auch mit dem Sex nicht mehr läuft wie früher, was wiederum die Liebe in Gefahr bringen kann. Wir klären in dieser Folge, wie das anders geht Fühlt euch gut betreut Leon & Atze VVK Münster 2025: https://betreutes-fuehlen.ticket.io/ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/leonwindscheid/ https://www.instagram.com/atzeschroeder_offiziell/ Der Instagram Account für Betreutes Fühlen: https://www.instagram.com/betreutesfuehlen/ Mehr zu unseren Werbepartnern findet ihr hier: https://linktr.ee/betreutesfuehlen Tickets: Atze: https://www.atzeschroeder.de/#termine Leon: https://leonwindscheid.de/tour/ Quellen: Die Übersichtsarbeit: Birnbaum, G. E., & Muise, A. (2025). The interplay between sexual desire and relationship functioning. Nature Reviews Psychology. Die Studie zu Sexueller Zufriedenheit und Zufriedenheit mit der Beziehung über die Zeit: Quinn-Nilas, C. (2020). Relationship and sexual satisfaction: A developmental perspective on bidirectionality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 37(2), 624-646. Meta-Analyse zu Unterschieden im Sex Drive bei Männern und Frauen: Frankenbach, J., Weber, M., Loschelder, D. D., Kilger, H., & Friese, M. (2022). Sex drive: Theoretical conceptualization and meta-analytic review of gender differences. Psychological Bulletin. Die Studie zu “Das Verlangen muss vielleicht gar nicht gleich sein”: Kim, J. J., Muise, A., Barranti, M., Mark, K. P., Rosen, N. O., Harasymchuk, C., & Impett, E. (2021). Are couples more satisfied when they match in sexual desire? New insights from response surface analyses. Social Psychological and Personality Science. Wer beim Sex das Wohl des Partners UND sein eigenes im Blick hat, erlebt mehr Lust und Zufriedenheit in der Beziehung: Muise, A., Impett, E. A., & Desmarais, S. (2013). Getting it on versus getting it over with: Sexual motivation, desire, and satisfaction in intimate bonds. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. Mehr als 1x die Woche Sex: Was bringt es? Muise, A., Schimmack, U., & Impett, E. A. (2016). Sexual frequency predicts greater well-being, but more is not always better. Social Psychological and Personality Science. Doppelt so viel Sex nach Aufforderung durch Forschende: Loewenstein, G., Krishnamurti, T., Kopsic, J., & Mcdonald, D. (2015). Does increased sexual frequency enhance happiness?. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 116, 206-218. Und die Interviews zu dieser Studie: https://www.cmu.edu/news/stories/archives/2015/may/more-sex-does-not-lead-to-happiness.html Redaktion: Leon Windscheid Produktion: Murmel Productions

La fréquence des rapports sexuels au sein d'un couple est souvent perçue comme un indicateur de satisfaction et de bonheur. Une étude canadienne, publiée dans la revue Social Psychological and Personality Science, a cherché à comprendre dans quelle mesure le sexe influence le bien-être. Contrairement à l'idée reçue selon laquelle « plus c'est fréquent, mieux c'est », les résultats montrent qu'au-delà d'une fois par semaine, l'augmentation de la fréquence ne procure pas de bénéfice supplémentaire en termes de bonheur.L'étude et ses résultatsL'étude s'est appuyée sur l'analyse des données de plus de 30 000 Américains sur une période de 40 ans. Les chercheurs ont examiné le lien entre la fréquence des rapports sexuels et la satisfaction relationnelle. Il en ressort que :- Les couples ayant des rapports sexuels au moins une fois par semaine se disent plus heureux que ceux qui en ont moins.- Cependant, au-delà d'un rapport hebdomadaire, le niveau de bonheur ne s'améliore pas davantage.Ces résultats suggèrent que la relation entre fréquence sexuelle et bonheur suit une courbe ascendante jusqu'à un point de saturation, après lequel l'augmentation du nombre de rapports n'a plus d'impact significatif.Pourquoi une fois par semaine suffit ?L'explication repose sur plusieurs facteurs :1. Équilibre entre désir et routine- Avoir des relations sexuelles régulièrement permet de maintenir l'intimité et la connexion émotionnelle.- Une fréquence trop élevée pourrait transformer le sexe en une obligation plutôt qu'un plaisir spontané.2. Qualité vs quantité- Ce n'est pas tant la fréquence qui importe, mais plutôt la qualité des rapports et leur capacité à renforcer le lien entre partenaires.- Un couple qui a des relations sexuelles de qualité une fois par semaine peut être plus satisfait qu'un autre ayant des rapports plus fréquents mais moins épanouissants.3. Facteurs psychologiques et émotionnels- L'intimité ne repose pas uniquement sur le sexe mais aussi sur la communication, le respect et le partage.- Une connexion émotionnelle forte joue un rôle essentiel dans la satisfaction globale du couple.ConclusionFaire l'amour une fois par semaine semble être le juste équilibre entre maintenir une intimité forte et éviter la pression d'une fréquence trop élevée. Cependant, chaque couple est unique, et l'important reste d'être en phase avec les désirs et besoins de chacun. Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

.From: American Atheist.Org Atheism is one thing: A lack of belief in gods. Atheism is not an affirmative belief that there is no god nor does it answer any other question about what a person believes. It is simply a rejection of the assertion that there are gods. Atheism is too often defined incorrectly as a belief system. To be clear: Atheism is not a disbelief in gods or a denial of gods; it is a lack of belief in gods. Older dictionaries define atheism as “a belief that there is no God.” Clearly, theistic influence taints these definitions. The fact that dictionaries define Atheism as “there is no God” betrays the (mono)theistic influence. Without the (mono)theistic influence, the definition would at least read “there are no gods.” Atheism is not a belief system nor is it a religion. While there are some religions that are atheistic (certain sects of Buddhism, for example), that does not mean that atheism is a religion. To put it in a more humorous way: If atheism is a religion, then not collecting stamps is a hobby. Despite the fact that atheism is not a religion, atheism is protected by many of the same Constitutional rights that protect religion. That, however, does not mean that atheism is itself a religion, only that our sincerely held (lack of) beliefs are protected in the same way as the religious beliefs of others. Similarly, many “interfaith” groups will include atheists. This, again, does not mean that atheism is a religious belief. Some groups will use words like Agnostic, Humanist, Secular, Bright, Freethinker, or any number of other terms to self identify. Those words are perfectly fine as a self-identifier, but we strongly advocate using the word that people understand: Atheist. Don't use those other terms to disguise your atheism or to shy away from a word that some think has a negative connotation. We should be using the terminology that is most accurate and that answers the question that is actually being asked. We should use the term that binds all of us together. If you call yourself a humanist, a freethinker, a bright, or even a “cultural Catholic” and lack belief in a god, you are an atheist. Don't shy away from the term. Embrace it.  Agnostic isn't just a “weaker” version of being an atheist. It answers a different question. Atheism is about what you believe. Agnosticism is about what you know. Not all non-religious people are atheists, but… In recent surveys, the Pew Research Center has grouped atheists, agnostics, and the “unaffiliated” into one category. The so-called “Nones” are the fastest growing “religious” demographic in the United States. Pew separates out atheists from agnostics and the non-religious, but that is primarily a function of self-identification. Only about 5% of people call themselves atheists, but if you ask about belief in gods, 11% say they do not believe in gods. Those people are atheists, whether they choose to use the word or not. A recent survey from University of Kentucky psychologists Will Gervais and Maxine Najle found that as many as 26% of Americans may be atheists. This study was designed to overcome the stigma associated with atheism and the potential for closeted atheists to abstain from “outing” themselves even when speaking anonymously to pollsters. The full study is awaiting publication in Social Psychological and Personality Science journal but a pre-print version is available here. Even more people say that their definition of “god” is simply a unifying force between all people. Or that they aren't sure what they believe. If you lack an active belief in gods, you are an atheist.  Being an atheist doesn't mean you're sure about every theological question, have answers to the way the world was created, or how evolution works. It just means that the assertion that gods exist has left you unconvinced. Wishing that there was an afterlife, or a creator god, or a specific god doesn't mean you're not an atheist. Being an atheist is about what you believe and don't believe, not about what you wish to be true or would find comforting. All atheists are different The only common thread that ties all atheists together is a lack of belief in gods. Some of the best debates we have ever had have been with fellow atheists. This is because atheists do not have a common belief system, sacred scripture or atheist Pope. This means atheists often disagree on many issues and ideas. Atheists come in a variety of shapes, colors, beliefs, convictions, and backgrounds. We are as unique as our fingerprints. Atheists exist across the political spectrum. We are members of every race. We are members of the LGBTQ* community. There are atheists in urban, suburban, and rural communities and in every state of the nation.      

Discover all of the podcasts in our network, search for specific episodes, get the Optimal Living Daily workbook, and learn more at: OLDPodcast.com. Episode 2479: Sensitive parental care in early childhood lays the foundation for secure, trusting relationships in adulthood. Research by Dr. Samantha Joel highlights that children who receive warm, attentive care from their mothers at 18 months old develop more secure attachments in their romantic and social relationships later in life. This study reinforces the idea that the way we are nurtured as infants shapes our ability to connect deeply with others throughout our lives. Read along with the original article(s) here: https://www.luvze.com/sensitive-parental-care-in-childhood-predicts-better-relatio/ & https://www.luvze.com/mo-money-mo-problems-how-having-money-can-make-you-a-worse-p/ Quotes to ponder: "The quality of care a person receives during childhood influences their strategies for navigating close relationships in adulthood." "Individuals who received the most sensitive care from their mothers at 18 months old also reported the most secure attachment to friends and romantic partners in early adulthood." "Parents play a pivotal role in shaping our expectations and tendencies in close relationships, including our adult romantic relationships." Episode references: Social Psychological and Personality Science: https://journals.sagepub.com/home/spp Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Trigger Warning: diet culture, disordered eating, body image. Dating in a fat body is different than dating in a thin body, and is in some ways much more difficult. Our dating culture has internalized the thin preference that is deeply rooted in Western culture, and that preference leaves many people struggling to find someone who appreciates their body and sees them as an attractive potential partner. In this episode, Megan and Steven grapple with this difficult topic and provide data to illustrate the trends and, hopefully, to give hope to anyone who feels that their body is presenting challenges to connection. Links and References: Preferences for sexually dimorphic body characteristics revealed in a large sample of speed daters--Sidari, M. et al, Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2019: https://dspace.stir.ac.uk/retrieve/54c9b8dc-0155-4447-bae2-387dae00637e/SPPS_20Manuscript_20Final.pdf Secular differences in the association between caloric intake, macronutrient intake, and physical activity with obesity- Brown, Ruth E. et al, Obesity Research & Clinical Practice, 2016: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26383959/ "Size, By the Numbers," Hilary George Parkin, Racked, June 5, 2018. LANGUAGE ADVISORY: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26383959/ Health at Every Size: The Surprising Truth About Your Weight, Lindo Bacon, PhD. NOTE: This is a research-based book about dieting and its impact on health, written by a secular author who also identifies as non-binary. We understand that some may feel uncomfortable reading a book whose author does not affirm biological gender; however, the book is not about gender identity and its contents are important for anyone who has struggled with guilt, shame, or depression around their weight. Read with caution, but please consider reading. https://lindobacon.com/health-at-every-size-book/ Apostolic and Single? Take the "From Singles, to Shepherds" survey now! https://forms.gle/KTt8UZEMA8ipHreTA #Synchpin Registration: https://the-synchrony-project.mykajabi.com/synchpin-registration These pins are exclusively for Apostolic Singles to use to recognize other singles in public spaces and create better connections. Register and pay shipping and we will mail you your own pin! Synchrony Community Members: You don't have to pay for shipping! See the Community space to give us your address and we'll mail you one absolutely free. Want to understand and remove the dating barriers that prevent your connections? Check out the course here. (Synchrony Community Members, check the Community forum to access the course for free). https://the-synchrony-project.mykajab... Download the 10 Min Connection Guide Here: https://the-synchrony-project.mykajabi.com/opt-in-d5ca0b81-abe1-4190-88ec-cb038489ca6a Save 15% on your coffee order with our friends at Kaffe117 when you put the code "Synchrony" into the checkout, or use the following link: https://kaffe117.com/discount/Synchrony Contact: If you want to join the conversation about this topic and give your thoughts, reach out on Instagram, Facebook, YouTube, or at questions@synchronyproject.com.

(Fast) jede:r spricht mal negativ hinter dem Rücken anderer Personen. Doch die wenigsten mögen es, wenn über sie selber gesprochen wird. Auch Beziehungen können durch "hintenrum sprechen" belastet werden. In dieser Folge teile ich dir, wie wir gut in folgenden Situationen umgehen können: a) wenn wir Sorge haben, dass andere nicht gut über uns sprechen könnten b) wenn wir hinter dem Rücken anderer sprechen c) wenn wir Teil einer Gruppe sind, in der hintern dem Rücken von anderen geredet wird Hier zum Weiterlesen: - Robin Dunbar: Grooming, Gossip, and the Evolution of Language - Chris Boehm: Hierarchy in the Forest: The Evolution of Egalitarian Behavior - Artikel aus der SZ: https://www.sueddeutsche.de/wissen/laestereien-klatsch-trasch-1.4433223 Studie: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1948550619837000 (Robbins, M. L., & Karan, A. (2020). Who Gossips and How in Everyday Life? Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(2), 185-195.)

Ein Wochenende Urlaub- was macht das mit uns? Dieser Frage gehen Luise und Kai im Selbstexperiment nach. Während Luise in der Kontrollgruppe ein Wochenende schuftet, macht Kai ein Wochenende Urlaub. In dieser Folge erfahrt ihr, wie es uns damit geht und mit welchen Gefühlen wir am Montag wieder in die Arbeit starten. Zwischen im Moment leben und aus Routinen ausbrechen diskutieren Luise und Kai, was die Forschung dazu sagt. Stay positive! Musik: Stephan SchillerSchnitt und Post-Production: Helena Mehler und Luise HönigModeration und Production: Kai Krautter und Luise Hönig Quelle: West, C., Mogilner, C., & DeVoe, S. E. (2021). Happiness from treating the weekend like a vacation. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(3), 346-356.

Menschen fühlen eine Menge unterschiedliche Emotionen an nur einem einzigen Tag; positive oder negative, langanhaltender oder kurzfristig. Um mit unseren Emotionen umgehen zu können, müssen wir Emotionsregulationsstrategien erlernen. Diese Strategien helfen uns dabei zu regulieren, wie wir Emotionen empfinden oder wie wir darauf reagieren und handeln. Welche Strategien wir nutzten ist sehr individuell und situationsabhängig. Daher müssen wir auch flexibel in unserer Emotionsregulation sein. Luise stellt in dieser Folge ein Laborexperiment vor, in dem die Emotionsregulations-Flexibilität untersucht wird. Außerdem diskutieren Kai und Luise darüber, wie flexibel wir sein müssen, welche Strategien funktionaler sind als andere und wie wir das lernen können. Stay positive! Musik: Stephan SchillerSchnitt und Post-Production: Helena Mehler und Luise HönigModeration und Production: Kai Krautter und Luise Hönig Quelle: Specker, P., Sheppes, G., & Nickerson, A. (2023). Does Emotion Regulation Flexibility Work? Investigating the Effectiveness of Regulatory Selection Flexibility in Managing Negative Affect. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 19485506231189002. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506231189002

In this episode, Jaap Denissen, the new editor-in-chief of Personality Science, discusses the journal's recent relaunch with Rebekka Weidmann. Jaap shares insights into what the relaunch involved, the current initiatives and goals of the journal, and highlights a recently accepted special issue. Learn more about the exciting changes and future directions of this open-access journal.

Wie habt ihr romantische Partner:innen kennengelernt? In der Psychologie würde man eureantworten grob unterteilen in 1) „Wir waren zuerst Freund:innen“ und 2) „Wir haben uns gedatet“. In dieser Folge stellt Luise Kai ein Paper vor, was sich mit den beiden Kennenlernphasen beschäftigt. Die Forschung bisher konzentriert sich nämlich auf den zweiten Ansatz, es zeigt sich aber, dass viele Menschen präferieren zuerst befreundet zu sein. Wie wir das messen können und wie lange Menschen befreundet sind bevor sie romantische Beziehungen eingehen, erfahrt ihr in dieser Folge. Stay positive! Musik: Stephan SchillerSchnitt und Post-Production: Helena Mehler und Luise HönigModeration und Production: Kai Krautter und Luise Hönig Quelle: Stinson, D. A., Cameron, J. J., & Hoplock, L. B. (2022). The Friends-to-Lovers Pathway to Romance: Prevalent, Preferred, and Overlooked by Science. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(2), 562-571. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211026992

In this final episode of the three-part series on the Philosophical Psychology lectures by Paul Meehl, we discuss lectures 6-8, which cover the ten obfuscating factors in "soft areas" of psychology and a host of advice Meehl provides for researchers, reviewers, editors, and educators on how to improve practice.    Shownotes Krefeld-Schwalb, A., Sugerman, E. R., & Johnson, E. J. (2024). Exposing omitted moderators: Explaining why effect sizes differ in the social sciences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(12), e2306281121. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2306281121 Lakens, D., & Etz, A. J. (2017). Too True to be Bad: When Sets of Studies With Significant and Nonsignificant Findings Are Probably True. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(8), 875–881. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617693058  

Professor Steve Woods works at the leading edge of research into personality at work, including psychometric and personality trait assessment, and personality development and change. In conversation here with Rob Feltham, he discusses two recent and important peer reviewed articles in which he and co-researchers have critically examined and challenged current assumptions and practices in the fields of both personality assessment and of cognitive testing for selection into graduate and higher professional occupations. Steve highlights the need for personality assessment to focus more on the dynamic nature of traits, and for the assessment domain to more fully encompass prosocial behaviours at work, particularly in the context of leadership.  As regards cognitive testing and prestige occupations, Steve points to its potential to perpetuate societal inequality and social disadvantage, and he outlines potential alternative ways forward for employers. Steve also discusses his own personal career journey.  Steve is Professor of Work and Organisational Psychology at Surrey Business School, University of Surrey. He conducts research on personality and assessment at work, recruitment and selection in organisations, with special interests in how to ensure fair and effective assessment and digital selection procedures and analytics. His work is published in scientific and professional journals (e.g. Journal of Applied Psychology; Journal of Vocational Behaviour; Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology), scholarly books, and international conferences. He is co-author of the international text The Psychology of Work and Organizations with Prof Michael West.     Steve collaborates with industry to help put research into action, and to help develop solutions to real world challenges of management, as a practitioner work and organisational psychologist in the UK and with businesses and organisations globally, especially in the areas of HR assessment, recruitment, selection and development. Since gaining his PhD, he has held academic posts at University of Nottingham, Aston Business School, University of Liverpool, University of Surrey and University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus.Rob Feltham is Podcast Editor of the ABP. Reading list:For listeners who wish to look further into the two articles specifically referred to in the podcast, they are:Ritz, J., Woods, S. A., Wille, B., Woo, S. E., Nübold, A., Beckmann, N., Dalal R.S., Galic Z., Wiernik B., Tett, R.P., Pickett, J. & Christiansen, N. (2023). Personality at work. Personality Science, 4(1).Woods, S.A. & Patterson, F. (2024). A critical review of the use of cognitive ability testing for selection into graduate and higher professional occupations. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 97(1).

In this episode, Matt and Jenn discuss the resurging popularity of sleeping in separate bedrooms. We'll consider the  reasons why a couple might choose this option and whether it might be wise for your marriage. In addition, we'll discuss some of the consequences of spouses who have separate bedtimes.Every step we take away from our spouses, especially physically, has inevitable negative long-term consequences for the relationship. The decision to sleep apart should be weighed carefully and be constantly reevaluated. As much as is within your power, eliminate the barriers to sleeping together so that you can get be in bed with each other as often as possible.Likewise, separate bedtimes also promote emotional and physical drift away from each other, allowing opportunity for selfishness and betrayal.As promised, here are the sources for the data that we referenced in this episode: Elsey, Taylor et al. “The role of couple sleep concordance in sleep quality: Attachment as a moderator of associations.” Journal of sleep research vol. 28,5 (2019): e12825. Drews HJ, Drews A. Couple Relationships Are Associated With Increased REM Sleep-A Proof-of-Concept Analysis of a Large Dataset Using Ambulatory Polysomnography. Front Psychiatry. 2021 May 10;12:641102.Richter, K., Adam, S., Geiss, L., Peter, L., & Niklewski, G. (2016). Two in a bed: The influence of couple sleeping and chronotypes on relationship and sleep. An overview. Chronobiology International, 33(10), 1464–1472. Troxel WM; Buysse DJ; Matthews KA; Kravitz HM; Bromberger JT; Sowers M; Hall MH. Marital/cohabitation status and history in relation to sleep in midlife women. SLEEP 2010;33(7):973-981.Chiao, Chi et al. “Loneliness in older parents: marital transitions, family and social connections, and separate bedrooms for sleep.” BMC geriatrics vol. 21,1 590. 22 Oct. 2021Larson JH, Crane DR, Smith CW. (1991). Morning and night couples: The effect of wake and sleep patterns on marital adjustment. J Marital Fam Ther. 17:53–65.Ulfberg J, Carter N, Talback M, Edling C. (2000). Adverse health effects among women living with heavy snorers. Health Care Women Int. 21:81–90.Gordon, A. M., & Chen, S. (2014). The Role of Sleep in Interpersonal Conflict: Do Sleepless Nights Mean Worse Fights? Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(2), 168-175.Cartwright, R D, and S Knight. “Silent partners: the wives of sleep apneic patients.” Sleep vol. 10,3 (1987): 244-8. Cascais Costa C, Afreixo V, Cravo J. Impact of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Treatment on Marital Relationships: Sleeping Together Again? Cureus. 2023 Oct 5;15(10):e46513.Please support these companies that support Intimate Covenant:Married Dance — https://marrieddance.com/?aff=29  Shop from this link and part of your purchase will support Intimate Covenant.  Coconu — http://www.coconu.com  Your purchase helps support Intimate Covenant AND you get 15% OFF. Coupon Code: intimateconvenantTo send your comments, questions and suggestions, go to our website: www.intimatecovenant.com/podcast and click on the button: “Contact the Podcast” for an ANONYMOUS submission form. Or, send an email: podcast@intimatecovenant.com   Thanks for sharing, rating, reviewing and subscribing!   Cherishing,  Matt & Jenn www.intimatecovenant.com Intimate Covenant | Matt & Jenn Schmidt

René Mõttus talks to Bill Revelle and Bob Hogan who are well respected personality researchers in the field. They argue that the main use of personality research is to predict what real people do in the real world. Yet, much of academic psychology has not taken this seriously, focusing on abstract ideas and models with little real-world relevance. They discuss why useful personality assessment is not about complex statistics or even measuring traits, but simply adding up questions that best predict important outcomes. They also discuss why we should stop believing in Easter Bunnies, how to reassess your work after forty years, and how to build a successful global company. And many other things.

Happy 2024 Psychology Podcast listeners. It's a new year and it's time to finally change your personality. Forget the fluff-- Scott is here to bring you some science-backed tips to actually become a new you. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Enjoying our content and want to support us directly? Join our premium subscription for access to our podcasts, bonus content, merch discounts and more! Visit: www.psych2go.supercast.com Want someone to notice you? What are some things you can be doing to show them what a great person you are so they fall for you in no time? Well, if you look to psychology, the obvious and not so obvious tips, here are a few psychological tricks that can make anyone fall for you. Want more dating advice? We made another video on the secrets on how to make someone pursue you: https://youtu.be/-m9K5kO0-3E Writer: Michal Mitchell Script Editor: Rida Batool Script Manager: Kelly Soong VO: Amanda Silvera Animator: Grace Cárdenas Cano YouTube Manager: Cindy Cheong References Aronson, E., Willerman, B., & Floyd, J. (1966). The effect of a pratfall on increasing interpersonal attractiveness. Psychonomic Science, 4(6), 227–228. www.https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03342263 Gunaydin, G., Selcuk, E., & Zayas, V. (2017). Impressions Based on a Portrait Predict, 1-Month Later, Impressions Following a Live Interaction. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(1), 36–44. www.doi.org/10.1177/1948550616662123 Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1993). Emotional Contagion. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2(3), 96–100. www.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10770953 Kayser, Daniela Niesta, et al. “Red and Romantic Behavior in Men Viewing Women.” Wiley Online Library, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 29 July 2010, www.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ejsp.757. Zajonc, R. B. (2001). Mere Exposure: A Gateway to the Subliminal. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(6), 224–228. www.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00154 Zajonc, R. B. (2001). Mere Exposure: A Gateway to the Subliminal. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(6), 224–228. www.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00154 Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: the perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of personality and social psychology, 76(6), 893–910. www.doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.76.6.893 Psych2go aims to make psychology and mental health content accessible for everyone around the world free of charge. Sponsors like Endel helps make this possible because we get to reinvest the funds to create more amazing content for everyone, while at the same time sharing companies that are working towards a similar mission.

Die Themen in den Wissensnachrichten: +++ Warnsignale für Gewalt in Partnerschaften +++ Superschlaue Hunde bringen sich selbst Wörter bei +++ Wohl kein Schmetterlingseffekt in lebenden Zellen +++ **********Weiterführende Quellen zu dieser Folge:The Predictive Validity of Intimate Partner Violence Warning Signs, Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11.12.2023A citizen science model turns anecdotes into evidence by revealing similar characteristics among Gifted Word Learner dogs, Scientific Reports, 14.12.2023Models of Cell Processes are Far from the Edge of Chaos, PRX Live, Dezember 2023Correlated x-ray fluorescence and ptychographic nano-tomography on Rembrandt's The Night Watch reveals unknown lead “layer”, Science Advances, 15.12.2023Erster britischer Weltraumbahnhof hat Genehmigung für Raketenstarts, Britische LuftfahrtbehördeOn Bringing Robots Home, arXiv**********Ihr könnt uns auch auf diesen Kanälen folgen: Tiktok und Instagram.

Welcome to the Social-Engineer Podcast: The Doctor Is In Series – where we will discuss understandings and developments in the field of psychology.   In today's episode, Dr. Abbie is being joined by Erin Gray. Erin is an internationally known actress, 70's super model and now founder of 'Heroes for Hire', a company representing celebrities for personal appearances worldwide. Erin went from being one of the original Sports Illustrated models, Breck Girls, Maxi Girl and the Bloomingdales spokesperson for ten years to being the lead actress in the feature film and TV series ‘Buck Rogers in the 25th Century', quickly followed by NBC's ‘Silver Spoons' for 5 years. In addition, Erin has over 50 TV credits beginning at 17 with ‘Malibu U', a musical variety show starring Ricky Nelson, to ‘Magnum PI', ‘Law and Order', ‘Hunter', ‘Baywatch', ‘Profiler', etc. plus two dozen feature films such as ‘Six Pack' with Kenny Rogers, ‘Friday the 13th: Jason Goes to Hell' and ‘Dreams Awake'.   Erin is the recipient of eleven community service awards, including The Leadership Award by the County of LA, the 2002 Woman of the Year Award presented by the Los Angeles Commission for Women, and most recently two Lifetime Achievement Awards and best actress in a feature film at the Monaco Film Festival for her performance in ‘Dreams Awake' and best actress in The 2020 Golden State Film Festival in ‘The Piano Teacher”. Erin is currently on the Board of Directors for the Innocent Lives Foundation, protecting women and children from human traffickers and pedophiles and bringing them to justice. [Nov 6, 2023]   00:00 - Intro 00:40 - Intro Links -          Social-Engineer.com - http://www.social-engineer.com/ -          Managed Voice Phishing - https://www.social-engineer.com/services/vishing-service/ -          Managed Email Phishing - https://www.social-engineer.com/services/se-phishing-service/ -          Adversarial Simulations - https://www.social-engineer.com/services/social-engineering-penetration-test/ -          Social-Engineer channel on SLACK - https://social-engineering-hq.slack.com/ssb -          CLUTCH - http://www.pro-rock.com/ -          innocentlivesfoundation.org - http://www.innocentlivesfoundation.org/ 03:26 - Erin Gray Intro 05:32 - The Topic of the Day: Mind-Body-Connect 08:42 - Smile Within 12:19 - It's All in the Mind 14:36 - Out of the Woods 18:37 - Standing Like a Model 20:01 - Emotional Contagion 21:43 - Finding Balance 25:41 - Maintaining Flexibility 29:34 - Seeing is Believing 31:17 - Self Trust 34:32 - The Gift of Integrity 37:46 - Integrity is Hard! 44:23 - More Than a Memory 46:24 - Where It Comes From 49:17 - Wrap Up & Outro -          www.social-engineer.com -          www.innocentlivesfoundation.org   Find us online: -          Twitter: https://twitter.com/abbiejmarono -          LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/dr-abbie-maroño-phd-35ab2611a -          Twitter: https://twitter.com/humanhacker -          LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/christopherhadnagy   References: Neal, D. T., & Chartrand, T. L. (2011). Embodied emotion perception: Amplifying and dampening facial feedback modulates emotion perception accuracy. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(6), 673-678.   Strack, F., Martin, L. L., & Stepper, S. (1988). Inhibiting and facilitating conditions of the human smile: a nonobtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis. Journal of personality and social psychology, 54(5), 768.   Davis, J. I., Senghas, A., & Ochsner, K. N. (2009). How does facial feedback modulate emotional experience?. Journal of research in personality, 43(5), 822-829.   Buck, R. (1980). Nonverbal behavior and the theory of emotion: the facial feedback hypothesis. Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 38(5), 811.   McIntosh, D. N. (1996). Facial feedback hypotheses: Evidence, implications, and directions. Motivation and emotion, 20, 121-147.   Coles, N. A., Larsen, J. T., & Lench, H. C. (2019). A meta-analysis of the facial feedback literature: Effects of facial feedback on emotional experience are small and variable. Psychological bulletin, 145(6), 610.   Kee, Y. H., Chatzisarantis, N. N., Kong, P. W., Chow, J. Y., & Chen, L. H. (2012). Mindfulness, movement control, and attentional focus strategies: effects of mindfulness on a postural balance task. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 34(5), 561-579.   Samuel, G. (2015). The contemporary mindfulness movement and the question of nonself. Transcultural psychiatry, 52(4), 485-500.   Nisbet, M. (2017). The mindfulness movement: How a Buddhist practice evolved into a scientific approach to life. Skeptical Inquirer, 41(3), 24-26.   Kinser, P., Braun, S., Deeb, G., Carrico, C., & Dow, A. (2016). “Awareness is the first step”: an interprofessional course on mindfulness & mindful-movement for healthcare professionals and students. Complementary therapies in clinical practice, 25, 18-25.   Hicks, G. (2010). Confidence building with body language. In 101 Coaching Strategies and Techniques (pp. 103-105). Routledge.   Gonçalves, M. (2020, April). Review of Body Language Posture, and an Exercise Called “Power Posing Challenge” to Improve One's Confidence. In 5th International Conference on Social Sciences and Economic Development (ICSSED 2020) (pp. 147-149). Atlantis Press.

Enjoying our content and want to support us directly? Join our premium subscription for access to our podcasts, bonus content, merch discounts and more! Visit: www.psych2go.supercast.com Do you hope your crush notices your great qualities? Do you have a hard time showing them to others right away? What if the person you admire can't quite notice the great things that make you, you? Well, you could hope they will eventually notice, or you can use a few psychology tricks to point them in the right direction. Today, I'm gonna let you in on a little secret… Well… multiple secrets. Psychological secrets. Want more tips? We made a video talking about a few powerful ways to attract your crush WITHOUT saying anything: https://youtu.be/ThulgaOVaJM Writer: Michal Mitchell Script Editor & Manager: Kelly Soong VO: Amanda Silvera Animator: Tris Canimo YouTube Manager: Cindy Cheong References: Polman, E., & Maglio, S. J. (2017). Mere Gifting: Liking a Gift More Because It Is Shared. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(11), 1582–1594. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217718525 Mitchell, Michal. “6 Psychological Tricks That Can Make Anyone Fall For You.” Psych2Go, 2020, psych2go.net/6-psychological-tricks-that-can-make-anyone-fall-for-you/. McRaney, David. “The Benjamin Franklin Effect.” You Are Not So Smart, 20 July 2015, youarenotsosmart.com/2011/10/05/the-benjamin-franklin-effect/. Gunaydin, G., Selcuk, E., & Zayas, V. (2017). Impressions Based on a Portrait Predict, 1-Month Later, Impressions Following a Live Interaction. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(1), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616662123 Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1993). Emotional Contagion. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2(3), 96–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10770953 Kayser, Daniela Niesta, et al. “Red and Romantic Behavior in Men Viewing Women.” Wiley Online Library, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 29 July 2010, onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ejsp.757. “8 Nifty Psychological Tricks That Can Make You Irresistible.” BrightSide, 6 Sept. 2019, brightside.me/inspiration-psychology/8-nifty-psychological-tricks-that-can-make-you-irresistible-794120/. Alleva, Jessica M. “Blue Is For Boys and Girls.” Psychology Today, 2018, www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/mind-your-body/201809/blue-is-boys-and-girls. “How to Use the Triangle Technique for Engaging Eye Contact.” CMA, 26 Oct. 2016, www.cmaconsult.com/how-to-use-the-triangle-technique-for-engaging-eye-contact/.

In this episode, we discuss the replication crisis in psychology which has been an important topic of discussion for the last decade. We revisit some key events from the start of the replication crisis, such as the publication of Daryl Bem's studies on precognition, the paper False Positive Psychology, and the Reproducibility Project and share personal anecdotes about how it was to live through the replication crisis.   Shownotes:  Bem, D. J. (2011). Feeling the future: Experimental evidence for anomalous retroactive influences on cognition and affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(3), 407–425. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021524 Ritchie, S. J., Wiseman, R., & French, C. C. (2012). Failing the Future: Three Unsuccessful Attempts to Replicate Bem's ‘Retroactive Facilitation of Recall' Effect. PLOS ONE, 7(3), Article e33423. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0033423 Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632 John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953 Fiedler, K., & Schwarz, N. (2016). Questionable Research Practices Revisited. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615612150 NOTE: Daniel says in the podcast the paper below is by Fiedler and Strack - but it is by Fiedler and Schwarz. Ebersole, C. R., Mathur, M. B., Baranski, E., Bart-Plange, D.-J., Buttrick, N. R., Chartier, C. R., Corker, K. S., Corley, M., Hartshorne, J. K., IJzerman, H., Lazarević, L. B., Rabagliati, H., Ropovik, I., Aczel, B., Aeschbach, L. F., Andrighetto, L., Arnal, J. D., Arrow, H., Babincak, P., … Nosek, B. A. (2020). Many Labs 5: Testing Pre-Data-Collection Peer Review as an Intervention to Increase Replicability. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920958687 Luttrell, A., Petty, R. E., & Xu, M. (2017). Replicating and fixing failed replications: The case of need for cognition and argument quality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 69, 178–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.09.006 Simons, D. J., Shoda, Y., & Lindsay, D. S. (2017). Constraints on Generality (COG): A Proposed Addition to All Empirical Papers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 1123–1128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617708630 Simonsohn, U. (2015). Small Telescopes Detectability and the Evaluation of Replication Results. Psychological Science, 26(5), 559–569. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614567341  

Et prik i panden, der giver færre rynker. Det kan lyde fristende, men flere hjemmesider og artikler på nettet postulerer, at botox også lammer din empati.  Er der virkelig noget om snakken? Kan det gøre os mindre empatiske, hvis vi får botox? Og i så fald hvorfor? Det undersøger podcast-værterne Nana Elving Hansen og Anne Sophie Thingsted i denne uges episode af Brainstorm. Her dykker de ned i evidensen i forskellige studier, der har undersøgt sammenhængen mellem botox og hjerneaktivitet. Brainstorm er støttet af Lundbeckfonden. Medvirkende: Ro Julia Robotham Tenure track adjunkt på Institut for Psykologi ved Københavns Universitet Videnskabelige studier: 'Modulation of amygdala activity for emotional faces due to botulinum toxin type A injections that prevent frowning', Scientific Reports 2023 'Botulinum toxin-induced facial muscle paralysis affects amygdala responses to the perception of emotional expressions: preliminary findings from an A-B-A design', Biology of Mood & Anxiety Disorders, 2014 'Embodied Emotion Perception: Amplifying and Dampening Facial Feedback Modulates Emotion Perception Accuracy', Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2011 'The Link between Facial Feedback and Neural Activity within Central Circuitries of Emotion—New Insights from Botulinum Toxin–Induced Denervation of Frown Muscles', Cerebral cortex, 2008 'Cosmetic use of botulinum toxin-A affects processing of emotional language', National Library of Medicine, 2011 Følg Brainstorm på Instagram.

Avant la saison 7 de Neurosapiens, je vous propose de (re)découvrir des épisodes! Ce mois-ci focus sur l'amour et le plaisir! Découvrez le livre NEUROSAPIENS, sorti le 26 janvier aux éditions Les Arènes ! Pour apprendre à créer rapidement et à moindre coût son podcast, c'est par ici ! Dans le monde entier et de tout temps, les gens aiment. Les mythes et légendes portent sur l'amour et son contraire. Les anthropologues ont découvert que l'amour romantique existait dans plus de 170 sociétés humaines ! L'amour semble être la pierre angulaire de notre espèce mais aussi de bien des espèces animales. Dans cet épisode, nous répondrons aux questions suivantes :  Que se passe-t-il dans le cerveau quand on tombe amoureux ?  L'amour dure-t-il réellement 3 ans ? Et pourquoi tombe-t-on amoureux d'une personne plutôt qu'une autre ? ____________ Si vous souhaitez avoir un éclairage neuro sur un sujet en particulier de la vie quotidienne, de notre fonctionnement, écrivez-moi à neurosapiens.podcast@gmail.com Production, animation, réalisation et illustration : Anaïs Roux Le podcast en version blog : www.neurosapiens.fr A bientôt pour un nouvel épisode ! ____________ SOURCES Bartels A, Zeki S. The neural basis of romantic love. Neuroreport. 2000 Nov 27;11(17):3829-34. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200011270-00046. PMID: 11117499. Acevedo BP, Aron A, Fisher HE, Brown LL. Neural correlates of long-term intense romantic love. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2012 Feb;7(2):145-59. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsq092. Epub 2011 Jan 5. PMID: 21208991; PMCID: PMC3277362. Insel TR, Winslow JT, Wang Z, Young LJ. Oxytocin, vasopressin, and the neuroendocrine basis of pair bond formation. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1998;449:215-24. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-4871-3_28. PMID: 10026808. Cormier, Z. Gene switches make prairie voles fall in love. Nature (2013). S. Stroope et al., Marital characteristics and the sexual relationships of U.S. older adults: an analysis of national social life, health, and aging project data, in Arch. Sex. Behav., vol. 44, pp. 233-247, 2015. B. P. Acevedo et al., Neural correlates of long-term intense romantic love, in Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, vol. 7, pp. 145-159, 2012. K. D. O'Leary et al., Is long-term love more than a rare phenomenon ? If so, what are its correlates ? in Social Psychology and Personality Science, vol. 3, pp. 241-249, 2012. Insel, T. R., and Hulihan, T. (1995). A gender-specific mechanism forpair bonding: Oxytocin and partner preference formation in mo-nogamous voles. Behav. Neurosci. 109, 782–789. Insel, T. R., and Shapiro, L. E. (1992). Oxytocin receptor distributionreflects social organization in monogamous and polygamousvoles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 5981–5985 Helen Fisher, Why We Love : The Nature and Chemistry of Romantic Love, Henry Holt, 2004 Helen Fisher, Why Him? Why Her? : Finding Real Love By Understanding Your Personality Type, Oneworld Publications UK-Commonwealth, 2009.  Musique d'intro KEEP ON GOING Musique proposée par La Musique Libre Joakim Karud - Keep On Going :https://youtu.be/lOfg0jRqaA8 Joakim Karud : https://soundcloud.com/joakimkarud

This episode of the Live Better Sell Better Podcast features William Ballance, CEO at Lavender. The Herrmann Brain Dominance Instrument (HBDI) divides people into four quadrants: Action, Vision, People, and Data. Each quadrant represents a different aspect of decision-making.You can structure your messaging to target all four quadrants or use personality assessments like DISC or OCEAN to determine an individual's decision-making pattern. Depending on an individual's personality, they may focus on different quadrants, which can lead to different decision-making patterns, and therefore a different messaging.HIGHLIGHT QUOTESAppeal your messaging to a prospect's personality type - William: "If you're going after someone who's action-oriented, you want to drive them into that decision and remove any sort of friction in that decision. For someone who is more vision-oriented, they are the big-picture thinkers, they're very high on openness. You want to inspire them in that decision-making. You can see this a lot with Nike commercials, Just do it. Like you look at those commercials and you're like, I can do anything."You can find out more about William in the links below:LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/wmb1/Website: https://www.lavender.ai/Connect with KD in the links below:LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kddorsey3/Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/insidesalesexcellenceLive Better. Sell Better. is sponsored by our proud partner:Rocket Reach | rocketreach.com

We gaan in deze aflevering opnieuw een aantal van jullie toffe vragen behandelen. Want dat waren er weer een hele hoop! Dit keer hebben we geen overkoepeld thema, dus is het een willekeur aan thema's en mooie onderwerpen. Van ouderschap tot het zijn van een ochtend of avondmens, van alcohol tot polyamorie. Wij nemen jullie graag mee!Ook leuk: je kunt ons ook volgen op Instagram of TikTok!Lees, kijk en luistertips

Die Themen in den Wissensnachrichten: +++ Pille für den Mann könnte mit Abschalten eines bestimmten Gens Wirklichkeit werden +++ Corona-Impfstoffe haben laut WHO in der Region Europa mehr als eine Million Leben gerettet +++ Weniger Eis in der Antarktis führt zu weniger Robbenrufen +++**********Weiterführende Quellen zu dieser Folge:ARRDC5 expression is conserved in mammalian testes and required for normal sperm morphogenesis, Nature Communications, 17.04.2023Estimated number of deaths directly averted as a result of COVID- 19 vaccination, ECCMID, 17.04.2023A new semi-slug of the genus Microparmarion from Brunei, discovered, described and DNA-barcoded on citizen-science 'taxon expeditions' (Gastropoda, Stylommatophora, Ariophantidae), Biodiversity Data Journal, 10.04.2023Having less than others is physically painful: Income rank and pain around the world, Social Psychological and Personality Science, 17.04.2023Sea-ice anomalies affect the acoustic presence of Antarctic pinnipeds in breeding areas, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 09 April 2023DribbleBot: Dynamic Legged Manipulation in the Wild, Cornell University, 03.04.2023**********Ihr könnt uns auch auf diesen Kanälen folgen: Tiktok und Instagram.**********Weitere Wissensnachrichten zum Nachlesen: https://www.deutschlandfunknova.de/nachrichten

New research which shows relationship vollatility may affect your body. Lead study author, Dr Brian Don from the University of Auckland says the quality of our primary relationship can predict how stressed we feel and can result in physiological symptoms such as blood pressure and heart rate. The research - The Good, the Bad, and the Variable: Examining Stress and Blood Pressure Responses to Close Relationships ran from 2019 to 2021 and it has just been published in the journal, Social Psychological and Personality Science. The 4,000 participants of the study usually took part for three week blocks, during which they had changes in their heart rates and blood pressure recorded via smartphone sensor. Dr Don says they were from a range of countries including the US, UK, Australia and New Zealand and shared reflections on their closest relationships, documenting positive and negative experiences.

We vergeten het nog weleens, maar het is voor ons hoofd behoorlijk belastend om een keuze te maken! En bovendien gaan we als mensen ook allemaal anders om met het maken van keuzes. Daarom hebben we het in deze aflevering over manieren en beweegredenen bij het 'kiezen' en lichten we: de 'maximizers' en de 'satisficers' uit.Voor meer persoonlijkheidsfeitjes volg ons op Instagram of TikTok!Lees, kijk en luistertips

In today's episode, we'll dive into the psychology, neuroscience, and philosophy of true crime. Find out what happens in your brain as you watch a thriller documentary, whether females really do enjoy true crime more than males, and how true crime mirrors the current status of our society.Adam Golub is professor of American Studies at California State University, Fullerton, where he teaches courses on popular culture, music, monsters, and creative work. He is co-editor of Monsters in the Classroom: Essays on Teaching What Scares Us (McFarland, 2017) and the author of numerous articles on topics including fandom, true crime, zombies, the blues, and cold war youth culture. Get started with Buzzsprout HERE!FIND DR. ADAM GOLUBWebsite: https://www.everydayfictions.com/MENTIONEDHonorable Donald E. Shelton, "The 'CSI Effect': Does It Really Exist?," March 16, 2008, nij.ojp.gov: https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/csi-effect-does-it-really-existVicary, A. M., & Fraley, R. C. (2010). Captured by true crime: Why are women drawn to tales of rape, murder, and serial killers? Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1(1), 81–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550609355486Kelli S. Boling & Kevin Hull (2018) Undisclosed Information—Serial Is My Favorite Murder: Examining Motivations in the True Crime Podcast Audience, Journal of Radio & Audio Media, 25:1, 92-108, DOI: 10.1080/19376529.2017.1370714https://ncadv.org/STATISTICShttps://www.mmiwg-ffada.ca/final-report/Zach Sommers, Missing White Woman Syndrome: An Empirical Analysis of Race and Gender Disparities in Online News Coverage of Missing Persons, 106 J. Crim. L. & Criminology (2016). https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc/vol106/iss2/4"Criminal Crossovers," Foreword to "American True Crime in the 21st Century Re-Examined: Critical Interventions in a National Obsession," special issue, Crime Fiction Studies 3:1 (2022): v-xiii.FIND MEWMT Instagram: @walkmethrough.jpg Website: https://walk-me-through.mailchimpsites.com/Support WMT: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/walkmethroughPersonal Instagram: @eugenia.jpgCREDITSTrack: Electric Ten — Broke in Summer [Audio Library Release]Music provided by Audio Library PlusWatch: https://youtu.be/qooMP-upphwFree Download / Stream: https://alplus.io/electric-tenSupport the show

Moet je je eigen persoonlijkheid simpelweg accepteren en er niet naar omkijken, of zijn er manieren om het toch te veranderen? In de laatste aflevering van dit seizoen hebben we het over of je jezelf kunt veranderen. En zo ja: hoe dan!?Voor meer persoonlijkheidsfeitjes volg ons op Instagram of TikTok!Lees, kijk en luistertips

Gratitude has altered the way Nancy Boyne sees the world and herself. Nancy's lifework included learning consulting and corporate telecommunications. She now is a super-active retiree with a practice of recognizing and acknowledging the goodness in her life. Listen in as she takes you through her travels, her successes, her obstacles, and her challenges. I highlight some of the many benefits of gratitude practices and offer some advice on how to cultivate and express a state of thankfulness. Host: Chris Singleheart Dewall, Nathan & Lambert, Nathaniel & Pond, Jr, Richard & Kashdan, Todd & Fincham, Frank. (2012). A grateful heart is a nonviolent heart: Cross-sectional, experience sampling, longitudinal, and experimental evidence. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 3. 232-240. 10.1177/1948550611416675. Fox, G. R., Kaplan, J., Damasio, H., & Damasio, A. (2015). Neural correlates of gratitude. Frontiers in psychology, 6, 1491. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01491 Seligman, M., Steen, T.A., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005). Positive psychology progress: Empirical validation of interventions. The American psychologist, 60 5, 410-21.

"Positive Psychologie" setzt sich damit auseinander, wie wir glücklicher und zufriedener werden können. Dafür sollten wir uns gewisse Fragen stellen. Welche das sind, erklären Main Huong und Diane in dieser Ausgabe "Achtsam". **********Quellen aus der Folge:Lindsay, E. K., Chin, B., Greco, C. M., Young, S., Brown, K. W., Wright, A. G. & Creswell, J. D. (2018). How mindfulness training promotes positive emotions: Dismantling acceptance skills training in two randomized controlled trials. Journal of personality and social psychology, 115(6), 944. Kiken, L. G., & Shook, N. J. (2011). Looking up: Mindfulness increases positive judgments and reduces negativity bias. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(4), 425-431.   **********Dianes und Main Huongs Empfehlungen:"Glücklich sein: Warum Sie es in der Hand haben, zufrieden zu leben" von Sonja Lyubomirsky, Campus Verlag."Das Happiness Prinzip" von Shawn Achor, Unimedica."Dankbarkeit, Wertschätzung und Glück: Auf dem Weg zu einem neuen Lebensstil" von Liv Larsson, Junfermann Verlag."The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Positive Psychological Interventions" von Acacia C. Parks und Stephen Schueller, John Wiley & Sons (wissenschaftliche Literatur). **********Mehr zum Thema bei Deutschlandfunk Nova:An Krisen wachsen: Strategien für mehr ResilienzPsyche: Good vibes setzen uns mental unter DruckOptimistisch bleiben - Wenn uns die Weltlage verunsichert**********Den Artikel zum Stück findet ihr hier.**********Ihr könnt uns auch auf diesen Kanälen folgen: Tiktok und Instagram.**********Ihr habt Anregungen, Ideen, Themenwünsche? Dann schreibt uns gern unter achtsam@deutschlandfunknova.de

Welcome to the Social-Engineer Podcast: The Doctor Is In Series – where we will discuss understandings and developments in the field of psychology.     This is Episode 181 and hosted by Chris Hadnagy, CEO of Social-Engineer LLC, and The Innocent Lives Foundation, as well as Social-Engineer.Org and The Institute for Social Engineering.    Joining Chris is co-host Dr. Abbie Maroño. Abbie is Director of education at Social-Engineer, LLC, and a perception management coach. She has a PhD in Behaviour analysis and specializes in nonverbal communication, trust, and cooperation.    Today's conversation will be on the topic of Can You Fake It Till You Make It. [Oct 03, 2022]    00:00 – Intro  00:21 – Dr. Abbie Maroño Intro  01:16 – Intro Links  Social-Engineer.com Managed Voice Phishing  Managed Email Phishing Adversarial Simulations  Social-Engineer channel on SLACK  CLUTCH  innocentlivesfoundation.org  03:45 – The topic of the day: Can you fake it till you make it?  05:15 – The Power of the Mind  06:53 – The Placebo Milkshake  12:07 – The difference with disorders  14:09 – “I'm gonna be happy!”  15:55 – Facial Feedback Hypothesis  21:00 – The power of expression  22:18 – Botox for happiness?  30:27 – Power Posing  37:39 – V is for Victory!  39:07 – The basis of non-verbals  41:34 – Self Talk  44:34 – All or Nothing  47:37 – Public Speaking or Firing Squad?  49:34 – Book Recommendations  You, Only Better – Nicholas Bate - https://amzn.to/3LTGkul  Don't Sweat the Small Stuff – Richard Carlson - https://amzn.to/3C0eg3I  50:26 – Wrap Up   50:58 – Find us online  Twitter: https://twitter.com/abbiejmarono  LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/dr-abbie-maroño-phd-35ab2611a  Twitter: https://twitter.com/humanhacker  LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/christopherhadnagy  51:48 – Outro  www.social-engineer.com  www.innocentlivesfoundation.org    Select research:    Carney, D. R., Cuddy, A. J., & Yap, A. J. (2010). Power posing: Brief nonverbal displays affect neuroendocrine levels and risk tolerance. Psychological science, 21(10), 1363-1368.     Coles, N. A., Larsen, J. T., & Lench, H. C. (2019). A meta-analysis of the facial feedback literature: Effects of facial feedback on emotional experience are small and variable. Psychological bulletin, 145(6), 610.     Crum, A. J., Corbin, W. R., Brownell, K. D., & Salovey, P. (2011). Mind over milkshakes: mindsets, not just nutrients, determine ghrelin response. Health Psychology, 30(4), 424.     Fischer, J., Fischer, P., Englich, B., Aydin, N., & Frey, D. (2011). Empower my decisions: The effects of power gestures on confirmatory information processing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(6), 1146-1154.     Garrison, K. E., Tang, D., & Schmeichel, B. J. (2016). Embodying power: A preregistered replication and extension of the power pose effect. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(7), 623-630.     Gronau, Q. F., Van Erp, S., Heck, D. W., Cesario, J., Jonas, K. J., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2017). A Bayesian model-averaged meta-analysis of the power pose effect with informed and default priors: The case of felt power. Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology, 2(1), 123-138.     Hardy, J., Gammage, K., & Hall, C. (2001). A descriptive study of athlete self-talk. The sport psychologist, 15(3), 306-318.     Kross, E., Bruehlman-Senecal, E., Park, J., Burson, A., Dougherty, A., Shablack, H., ... & Ayduk, O. (2014). Self-talk as a regulatory mechanism: how you do it matters. Journal of personality and social psychology, 106(2), 304.     McIntosh, D. N. (1996). Facial feedback hypotheses: Evidence, implications, and directions. Motivation and emotion, 20(2), 121-147.     Neal, D. T., & Chartrand, T. L. (2011). Embodied emotion perception: amplifying and dampening facial feedback modulates emotion perception accuracy. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(6), 673-678.     Neary, N. M., Small, C. J., & Bloom, S. R. (2003). Gut and mind. Gut, 52(7), 918-921.     Shackell, E. M., & Standing, L. G. (2007). Mind Over Matter: Mental Training Increases Physical Strength. North American Journal of Psychology, 9(1).    Zamanian, A., Jolfaei, A. G., Mehran, G., & Azizian, Z. (2017). Efficacy of botox versus placebo for treatment of patients with major depression. Iranian journal of public health, 46(7), 982.     Khademi, M., Roohaninasab, M., Goodarzi, A., Seirafianpour, F., Dodangeh, M., & Khademi, A. (2021). The healing effects of facial BOTOX injection on symptoms of depression alongside its effects on beauty preservation. Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 20(5), 1411-1415.     Carter, Bradin T., "Is Botox A Safe And Effective Treatment To Reduce Symptoms Of Depression?" (2017). PCOM Physician Assistant Studies Student Scholarship. 404. https://digitalcommons.pcom.edu/pa_systematic_reviews/404   

IN SICKNESS AND HEALTH Common condition ‘makes you notice your partner's annoying habits MORE', scientists warn According to a new study published in Social Psychological and Personality Science, how married couples see each other can be affected by their stress levels and the strains going on in their day-to-day lives. Be sure to check out Kenya Nunez as she uncovers how stress can screw up your marriage. Don't forget to SUBSCRIBE and SUPPORT the show right on your phone. Just click "Support." [◉"]whoislimos --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/thebarbershopgroup/support

In this episode, I had the pleasure of speaking with Dr. Nanette Nuessle - a frontline pediatrician with over 30  years experience, who has developed a coaching company named Beat Down Burnout, which is allowing healthcare organizations to improve their staff retention, increasing patient safety, and reducing risks for staff & patients. By using Personality Science, Dr. Nan has discovered a very simple tool that can be implemented IMMEDIATELY by anyone to reduce workplace conflict, improve constructive conversation, and build teams that work together with high levels of professional integrity and efficiency. We all know that majority of the issues that lead to workplace frustration is lack of communication, but with this very simple strategy - communication can improve significantly, just by knowing the personality types of others! You don't want to miss this episode!

Welcome to the Social-Engineer Podcast: The Doctor Is In Series – where we will discuss understandings and developments in the field of psychology.     This is Episode 177 and hosted by Chris Hadnagy, CEO of Social-Engineer LLC, and The Innocent Lives Foundation, as well as Social-Engineer.Org and The Institute for Social Engineering.    Joining Chris is co-host Dr. Abbie Maroño. Abbie is Director of education at Social-Engineer, LLC, and a perception management coach. She has a PhD in Behaviour analysis and specializes in nonverbal communication, trust, and cooperation.    Today's conversation will be on the topic of Subliminal Persuasion. [Sep 05, 2022]    00:00 – Intro  00:27 – Dr. Abbie Maroño Intro  01:07 – Intro Links  Social-Engineer.com Managed Voice Phishing Managed Email Phishing Adversarial Simulations  Social-Engineer channel on SLACK CLUTCH innocentlivesfoundation.org  03:26 – Why this podcast?  04:28 – The topic of the day: Subliminal Persuasion  05:46 – What is Subliminal Persuasion?  07:03 – The Coca-Cola & popcorn myth  09:08 – Judas Priest Lawsuit  10:32 – Sex on ice, does it work?  15:00 – Getting warmer...  16:08 – ...and colder  18:49 – The importance of being attentive  21:28 – Does it pass the smell test?  22:59 – Can Prime lead to Persuasion?  24:34 – The necessity of Motivation  27:05 – Does Belief play a role?  28:17 – The Smell of Fear  32:52 – Applying the Subliminal  38:58 – The limitations of application  41:26 – Subtle Psychology  44:33 – Book Recommendations  Subliminal: How Your Unconscious Mind Rules Your Behavior – Leonard Mlodinow  45:42 – Find Dr. Abbie Maroño on the web  Twitter: https://twitter.com/abbiejmarono  LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/dr-abbie-maroño-phd-35ab2611a  Website: https://www.abbiemarono.com/  46:26 – Find Chris on the web  Twitter: https://twitter.com/humanhacker  LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/christopherhadnagy  46:41 – Wrap Up   47:59 – Outro  www.social-engineer.com  www.innocentlivesfoundation.org    Select research:  Chen, Z., Tan, Y., Zhang, Z., & Li, M. (2021). Research on subliminal visual messages based on EEG signal and convolutional neural network. In MATEC Web of Conferences (Vol. 336, p. 05014). EDP Sciences.    Damaskinidis, G., & Kostopoulou, L. (2021). Intersemiotic Translation of Subliminal Messages in Brand Logos: A Qualitative Experimental Research. International Journal of Semiotics and Visual Rhetoric (IJSVR), 5(1), 1-14.    Dijksterhuis, A., Aarts, H., & Smith, P. K. (2005). The power of the subliminal: On subliminal persuasion and other potential applications. The new unconscious, 1, 77-106.    Epley, N., Savitsky, K., & Kachelski, R. A. (1999). What every skeptic should know about subliminal persuasion. Skeptical Inquirer, 23(5), 40-45.    Hsu, L., & Chen, Y. J. (2020). Neuromarketing, subliminal advertising, and hotel selection: An EEG study. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 28(4), 200-208.    Li, N., Juan, L., Xin, W., & Xiang-hong, S. (2011, March). Effect of sustained subliminal auditory stimulus on human emotion. In International Conference on Information Science and Technology (pp. 381-384). IEEE.    Loersch, C., Durso, G. R., & Petty, R. E. (2013). Vicissitudes of desire: A matching mechanism for subliminal persuasion. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(5), 624-631.    Riener, A. (2012). Subliminal persuasion and its potential for driver behavior adaptation. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 13(1), 71-80.    Smarandescu, L., & Shimp, T. A. (2015). Drink coca-cola, eat popcorn, and choose powerade: testing the limits of subliminal persuasion. Marketing Letters, 26(4), 715-726.    Strahan, E. J., Spencer, S. J., & Zanna, M. P. (2002). Subliminal priming and persuasion: Striking while the iron is hot. Journal of experimental social psychology, 38(6), 556-568.    Zacharia, A. B., Hamelin, N., Harcar, T., & Rodgers, P. (2020). A Neuro Analysis of Static Subliminal Advertising in Packaging. EDITORIAL 77, 29, 81-104. 

Nicholas Epley is the John Templeton Keller Distinguished Service Professor of Behavioral Science, and Director of the Center for Decision Research, at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business. He studies social cognition—how thinking people think about other thinking people—to understand why smart people so routinely misunderstand each other. He teaches an ethics and happiness course to MBA students called Designing a Good Life. His research has appeared in more than two dozen empirical journals, been featured by the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, CNN, Wired, and National Public Radio, among many others, and has been funded by the National Science Foundation and the Templeton Foundation. He has been awarded the 2008 Theoretical Innovation Award from the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, the 2011 Distinguished Scientific Award for Early Career Contribution to Psychology from the American Psychological Association, the 2015 Book Prize for the Promotion of Social and Personality Science, and the 2018 Career Trajectory Award from the Society for Experimental Social Psychology. Epley was named a “professor to watch” by the Financial Times, one of the “World's Best 40 under 40 Business School Professors” by Poets and Quants, and one of the 100 Most Influential in Business Ethics in 2015 by Ethisphere. He is the author of Mindwise: How We Understand What Others Think, Believe, Feel, and Want.Support the show

Summary We explore the impact of good people doing bad things upon our assessment of others.   Transcript Welcome to episode 150 of the Leadership Today podcast where each week we bring research to life in your leadership. That's right - episode 150. Thanks to everyone for your support on the podcast over the past four years - it is much appreciated. This week we look at the impact of good people doing bad things upon our assessment of others. Have you ever been let down by someone? Perhaps you thought they were a “good” person, but found out they did something surprisingly bad. What impact did that have on your perception of the person? Research demonstrates that when we evaluate someone as “good” but they then do something unexpectedly “bad”, it understandably shakes our faith in the person. However, it also makes us question our ability to judge character generally. If we were wrong about them, maybe we're wrong about everyone else? There are plenty of famous examples  of seemingly good people doing bad things than we could cover here, whether it's in government, the entertainment industry or in corporations. The research suggest that the immoral act of a “good” person makes the world feel more confusing. In fact, the researchers found that the larger the difference between our initial impression of the individual and their bad act, the greater the impact on our ability to make sense out of the world.  So what do we do about this?  We need to have realistic standards of others. No one is perfect and we are all going to let people down from time to time. We need to recognise that one person's bad behaviour doesn't make everyone else slightly worse. We shouldn't let it shake our faith in humanity. When people do slip up, it's helpful to demonstrate empathy. Listen to the person and understand their experience. We don't need to endorse or agree with what they've done, but we also don't need to write people off over one act. We need to set up work environments where people can speak up and be honest. Maybe someone was tempted to take financial advantage of a customer, or to cut corners on a project. As their leader, I'd rather have that open dialogue early so I can coach someone away from an even worse outcome. If you found this episode helpful, I would love it if you could take a minute to provide a rating and review. This really helps others to find the podcast. Have a great week.   Reference Guan KW, Heine SJ. When Good People Break Bad: Moral Impression Violations in Everyday Life. Social Psychological and Personality Science. February 2022. doi:10.1177/19485506221076685

Can genuine friends truly transition into longterm romantic and sexual partners? Is it more ideal to gradually walk into love WITH someone who's already your best friend OR fall in love and then become best friends? According to a 2021 study published in Social Psychological and Personality Science finds that two thirds of romantic couples started out in a platonic relationship. Yes, 68% reported that their current romantic relationship began as a friendship! And the rate of friends to lovers was even higher among 20 somethings and within the LGBTQ+ communities with 85% reported that their relationship began as a friendship. And more interestingly I think, only 30% said they were sexually attracted to the partner from the very beginning.  You might be like, why is this so shocking to you and it's because in essence our generation might be rewriting the traditionally understood blueprint for forming romantic bonds. This is what we discuss with guests Ezee and Natalie, two comedic-content creators turned collaborators turned best friends turned lovers, who have shared every part of their journey online and thus have sparked a lot of conversations about whether plutonic friends really shift to romantic lovers in a way that is both equal and sustainable? And with Hotline Bling producer plus half of DVSN's Nineteen85 aka Paul Jefferies.  Follow Shan on Instagram: www.instagram.com/shanboodyCall in to the show to leave a voice note ‪(323) 375-4797loversfriendspodcast@gmail.com   Follow the guests on this episode   Ezee  https://www.instagram.com/ezee https://www.youtube.com/c/youngezee https://www.youtube.com/c/ezeexnatalie  Nataliehttps://www.instagram.com/natalie.odell/ https://www.youtube.com/c/NatalieOdellXo https://www.youtube.com/c/ezeexnatalie  Nineteen85 https://www.instagram.com/nineteen85_ https://www.instagram.com/dvsn https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC9xq-hVeC-OJHvWOxGydo9g  

The COVID-19 pandemic brought lots of surprises, including the political and religious conflicts connected to it. In this podcast we explore one facet of this as Emily Kubin and Frank J. Kachanoff discuss their research published in the paper "Threat Rejection Fuels Political Dehumanization" published in the journal Social Psychological and Personality Science. Part of their abstract for the paper reads, "Americans disagree about many things, including what threats are most pressing. We suggest people morally condemn and dehumanize opponents when they are perceived as rejecting the existence or severity of important perceived threats." Although not a part of their research project, this dynamic may play a part in conservative Christian reactions to those who take a different stance on COVID-19 vaccines. "Threat Rejection Fuels Dehumanization": https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/19485506211068922 Learn more about our work at https://www.multifaithmatters.org. Support this work: One-time donation: https://multifaithmatters.org/donate Become my patron: https://patron.podbean.com/johnwmorehead #socialpsychology #dehumanization #COVID

This episode of the Live Better Seller Better Podcast features William Ballance, CEO of Lavender. How do you get personality science into the framework of decision-making to convert more sales? William shares the ins and outs of predicting personality using online data to help write more effective emails.William explains the Hermann Brain Dominance Instrument (HBDI) and how people think through decisions based on action, vision, people, and data. William walks through each of these and how they are identified. He then discusses how you can approach each dominant personality to create more personalized emails and increase response rate and overall conversion. HIGHLIGHTSThe quadrants of HBDI explained and how they affect decision-makingIdentifying each personality type and applying it in the sales processAdditional resources for communication psychology in marketing QUOTESWilliam: "It's important that you have someone in your team that's going to be that vision-focused person, that action-oriented driver, some that think about the people involved, and some to research the data. It's normally used to structure leadership teams but we started applying that same framework on how people make their buying decisions both in marketing and sales."William: "So part of your messaging would target the action involved or the vision, the big picture or the aspirational side of the sale, the people that it's going to impact, and the data behind it. And that can all be in one pitch or it could be in different steps."William: "It's always interesting in demos. Sometimes I'll do the analytics and coaching dashboard last. And every now and then someone's like 'Man, I wish we could've started with that' and I never hear that. But every now and then, you get someone who just wants to dive really deep into the analytics." You can find out more about William in the links below:LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/wmb1/Website: https://www.lavender.ai/ Live Better. Sell Better. is sponsored by our proud partners:Vidyard |vidyard.comDooly |dooly.aiChili Piper |chilipiper.com

每日英語跟讀 Ep.K361: Farm animals and humans should be treated the same, children say   Children think farm animals deserve to be treated as well as human beings but lose this belief in adolescence, a groundbreaking study has found. 一項開創性的研究發現，孩子們認為農場動物應該像人類一樣受到對待，但在青春期就失去了這種信念。 Researchers from the universities of Exeter and Oxford asked a group of British children aged nine to 11, young adults aged 18 to 21 and older men and women about their attitudes to different sorts of animals. 來自埃克塞特大學和牛津大學的研究人員詢問了一組9至11歲的英國兒童，18至21歲的年輕人以及年齡較大的男性和女性，以了解他們對不同種類動物的態度。 In general, the children said farm animals and human beings should be treated the same and found eating animals less morally acceptable than both sets of adults. The findings suggest that “speciesism” — a moral hierarchy that gives different value to different animals — is learned during adolescence, according to the study. 普遍來說，孩子們說農場動物和人類應該得到同樣的對待，並且發現吃動物在道德上不如兩組成年人。研究結果表明，「物種主義」——一種賦予不同動物不同價值的道德等級制度——是在青春期學習的。 “Humans' relationship with animals is full of ethical double standards,” said the lead author, Luke McGuire, a lecturer at the University of Exeter who specializes in social and moral development. “Some animals are beloved household companions, while others are kept in factory farms for economic benefit. Judgments seem to largely depend on the species of the animal in question: dogs are our friends, pigs are food.” “人類與動物的關係充滿了道德雙重標準，”主要作者，埃克塞特大學（University of Exeter）專門研究社會和道德發展的講師盧克·麥奎爾（Luke McGuire）說。“有些動物是心愛的家庭伴侶，而另一些則為了經濟利益而被飼養在工廠化農場。判斷似乎在很大程度上取決於所討論動物的種類：狗是我們的朋友，豬是食物。 The report says an important aspect of the human mind is “moral acrobatics”: people can hold ethical values that contradict each other and employ moral double standards. But the origins of moral acrobatics relating to animals is poorly understood and the researchers say this new study provides some of the first evidence examining the differences in how children and adults think about animal treatment. 報告說，人類思維的一個重要方面是“道德雜技”：人們可以持有相互矛盾的道德價值觀，並採用道德雙重標準。但是，與動物有關的道德雜技的起源知之甚少，研究人員表示，這項新研究提供了一些初步證據，檢查了兒童和成人如何看待動物治療的差異。 Among other tasks, participants in the study were presented with pictures including a farm animal and companion animals and asked to categorize them as “food”, “pet” or “object”. They were asked how animals were treated, and how they should be treated. 除其他任務外，該研究的參與者還獲得了包括農場動物和伴侶動物在內的圖片，並被要求將它們歸類為“食物”，“寵物”或“物體”。他們被問及如何對待動物，以及應該如何對待它們。 Children did not judge all animals to be equal. They concluded, in fact, that dogs ought to be treated better than pigs — but also that pigs ought not to be treated differently from humans. The two sets of adult groups said pigs ought to be treated less well than dogs, while humans and dogs ought to be treated the same. 孩子們並沒有判斷所有的動物都是平等的。事實上，他們得出的結論是，狗應該比豬受到更好的對待，但也不應該對豬的待遇與人類不同。這兩組成年群體表示，豬應該比狗受到的待遇要差，而人類和狗應該受到同樣的對待。 McGuire said the study suggests that while children think farm animals and humans ought to be treated equally well, by adulthood people believe that companion animals and humans ought to be treated better. He said children rated eating animals as significantly less permissible than young adults and adults did. McGuire說，這項研究表明，雖然孩子們認為農場動物和人類應該得到同等的對待，但到了成年人，人們認為伴侶動物和人類應該得到更好的對待。他說，兒童認為吃動物比年輕人和成年人的允許性要低得多。 The paper, published in the journal Social Psychological and Personality Science, is titled “The development of speciesism: age-related differences in the moral view of animals.” 這篇論文發表在《社會心理與人格科學》（Social Psychological and Personality Science）雜誌上，題目是“物種主義的發展：動物道德觀中與年齡相關的差異”。Source article: https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/lang/archives/2022/04/19/2003776807

In this modern world of endless social media scrolling and heightened divisions, have you ever found yourself intentionally looking for something to be angry about? This episode is for you if you've ever wondered why.Disclaimer: This podcast is for educational and informational purposes only and does not substitute individual professional psychological advice.REFERENCESBrown-Iannuzzi, J. L., Lundberg, K. B., Kay, A. C., & Payne, B. K. (2020). A Privileged Point of View: Effects of Subjective Socioeconomic Status on Naïve Realism and Political Division. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(2), 241–256.Chien, Y., Wegener, D., Petty, R., & Hsiao, C. (2014). The Flexible Correction Model: Bias Correction Guided by Naïve Theories of Bias. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(6), 275-286. Esses, V. M., Veenvliet, S., Hodson, G., & Mihic, L. (2008). Justice, morality, and the dehumanization of refugees. Social Justice Research, 21, 4–25. Gilbert, D. T., Lieberman, M. D., Morewedge, C. K. & Wilson, T. D. (2004). The peculiar longevity of things not so bad. Psychological Science, 15(1), 14–19.Hawkins, D. R. (2002). Power vs. force: The hidden determinants of human behavior. Carlsbad, Calif: Hay House.Ito, T. A., Larsen, J. T., Smith, N. K., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1998). Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: The negativity bias in evaluative categorizations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(4), 887–900. Lisitsa, E. (2012, December 3). The Positive Perspective: Dr. Gottman's Magic Ratio! [blog post]. Retrieved from http://www.gottmanblog.com/2012/12/the-positive-perspective-dr-gottmans.htmlLópez-Rodriguez, L., Halperin, E., Vázquez, A., Cuadrado, I., Navas, M., & Gómez, A. (2021). Awareness of the Psychological Bias of Naïve Realism Can Increase Acceptance of Cultural Differences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. Martin, R. C., Coyier, K. R., VanSistine, L. M., & Schroeder, K. L. (2013). Anger on the Internet: The Perceived Value of Rant-Sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(2), 119–122. Merritt, A., Effron, D., & Monin, B. (2010). Moral Self‐Licensing: When Being Good Frees Us to Be Bad. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(5)Pronin, E., Gilovich, T., & Ross, L. (2004). Objectivity in the eye of the beholder: Divergent perceptions of bias in self versus others. Psychological Review, 111, 781–799.Puryear, C. (2020). The threat to virality: Digital outrage combats the spread of opposing ideas.Rathje, S., Van Bavel, J. J. & van der Linden, S. (2021). Out-group animosity drives engagement on social media. The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(26).Ross, L., & Ward, A. (1995). Psychological barriers to dispute resolution. Advances in experimental social psychology, 27, 255–304. Rothschild, Z. K. & Keefer, L. A. (2017). A cleansing fire: moral outrage alleviates guilt and buffers threats to one's moral identity. Motivation and Emotion, 41(2), 209–229.Sapolsky, R. M. (2017). Behave: The Biology of Humans at Our Best and Worst. Penguin Books.Singer, M. A. (2007). The Untethered Soul. New Harbinger Publications.Tong, E., & Yang, Z. (2011). Moral Hypocrisy. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(2), 159-165.Your Brain on Drama

Body proportions matter a surprising amount in the context of dating but much of it is only able to be understood in a realistic field study. In today's episode, we go over a unique speed-dating study with a large sample size to confirm that physical features such as shoulder-width ratio and waist-hip ratio matter in making someone appear more physically attractive and how this relates to appearances of social dominance contrasting with femininity (i.e. sexual dimorphism).Sidari, Morgan J.; Lee, Anthony J.; Murphy, Sean C.; Sherlock, James M.; Dixson, Barnaby J. W.; Zietsch, Brendan P. (2020). Preferences for Sexually Dimorphic Body Characteristics Revealed in a Large Sample of Speed Daters. Social Psychological and Personality Science, (), 194855061988292

Patrick Hill has studied many topics, including purpose in life, gratitude, health, and personality change. In this episode, Patrick spoke with René Mõttus about the influence of personality on life outcomes, interventions to change personality traits, and several other topics.

Sarah speaks with Dr. Tila Pronk, an assistant professor in social psychology at Tilburg University, who specializes in love and relationships. Dr. Pronk guides us through her research on executive functioning (a set of processes that have to do with managing oneself and one's resources in order to achieve a goal), forgiveness, and how to minimize online dating burnout. This episode  discusses questions like - Why some people are better able to protect and maintain a relationship than others. What does it take to forgive? And what are some of the potential psychological drawbacks of uninhibited online dating? Resources: The Stroop Test: https://faculty.washington.edu/chudler/java/ready.html Dr. Tila Pronk's Research: https://www.tilburguniversity.edu/staff/t-pronk Instagram: @tila.pronk; Twitter: @tilapronk The articles discussed in this episode are below:  A rejection mind-set: Choice overload in online dating  Pronk, T. & Denissen, J., 2020, In: Social Psychological and Personality Science. 11, 3, p. 388-396 Marriage as a training ground: Examining change in self-control and forgiveness over the first 4 years of marriage  Pronk, T. M., Buyukcan-Tetik, A., Iliás, M. & Finkenauer, C., 2019, In: Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 36, 1, p. 109-130 What it takes to forgive: When and why executive functioning facilitates forgiveness. Pronk, T. M., Karremans, J. C., Overbeek, G., Vermulst, A. A. & Wigboldus, D. H. J., 2010, In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 98, 1, p. 119-131 How can you resist? Executive control helps romantically involved individuals to stay faithful. Pronk, T. M., Karremans, J. C. & Wigboldus, D. H. J., 2011, In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 100, 5, p. 827-837 Sarah Kelleher Instagram: @psychandthecitybk Twitter: @psychndthecity Website: sarah-kelleher.com

Popular discourse tends to depict women as less likely than men to take risks. Christine LaGarde, Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund, famously implied that women make less risky financial decisions when she stated that the financial crisis of 2008 would not have occurred “if it had been Lehman Sisters rather than Lehman Brothers”. But are women really more risk-averse than men? Research has in fact shown that men and women are more similar in their risk preferences than commonly believed. We bust this myth with leading experts to show that women may act more risk- averse only because of gender norms that place expectations on them to do so. Featured Guests: Dr. Thekla Morgenroth, previously of University of Exeter and now at Purdue University  Dr. Julie Nelson, University of Massachusetts Boston Research Mentioned: Booth, A.L. and Nelson, P. (2012). Gender Differences in Risk Behaviour: Does Nurture Matter? The Economic Journal 122(558), F56-F78. Botelho, T. and Abraham, M. (2017). Pursuing Quality: How Search Costs and Uncertainty Magnify Gender-based Double Standards in a Multistage Evaluation Process. Administrative Science Quarterly 62(4), 698-730. Kaplan, S. and Walley, N. (2016). The Risky Rhetoric of Female Risk Aversion. Stanford Social Innovation Review. https://ssir.org/articles/entry/the_risky_rhetoric_of_female_risk_aversion Liu, E.M. and Zuo, S.X. (2019). Measuring the impact of interaction between children of a matrilineal and a patriarchal culture on gender differences in risk aversion. PNAS 116(14), 6713- 6719. Morgenroth, T., Fine, C., Ryan, M.K. and Genat, A.E. (2017). Sex, Drugs, and Reckless Driving: Are Measures Biased Toward Identifying Risk-Taking in Men? Social Psychological and Personality Science 9(6), 744-753. Nelson, J.A. (2015). Are Women Really More Risk-Averse Than Men? A Reanalysis of the Literature Using Expanded Methods. Journal of Economic Surveys 29(3), 566-585. For more research and resources (https://www.gendereconomy.org) or click here . For transcript + show notes please visit out website (www.gendereconomy.org/Busted) or click here. This podcast is a GATE Audio production from the University of Toronto's Institute for Gender and the Economy: www.gendereconomy.org

References: Films Media Group. (2002). Sex life: Couple. Films On Demand. https://fod.infobase.com/PortalPlaylists.aspx?wID=18949&xtid=185615. Grøntvedt, T. V., Kennair, L. E. O., & Bendixen, M. (2020). How intercourse frequency is affected by relationship length, relationship quality, and sexual strategies using couple data. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 14(2), 147–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/ebs0000173 Kim, J.J., Muise, A., Barranti, M., Mark, K., Rosen, N., Harasymchuk, C., & Impett, E. (2020). Are Couples More Satisfied When They Match in Sexual Desire?: New Insights From Response Surface Analyses:. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 194855062092677.

Communication is everything in any relationship. During this episode we talk about what emotional intelligence is, why it's crucial in cultivating healthy relationships and what it means to decode our children's personalities.…………..Guest Resources: Angel Baney, is a Certified Coach in Personality Science, the B.A.N.K methodology system. In March 2020, when her 7 year old daughter started School remotely she encountered days of screaming, fighting, and meltdowns. She decided that the stress between her and her daughter could no longer continue.She found the answer in an easy, scientifically proven method that helps parents communicate effectively with their children. Arguments and meltdowns disappeared peace and joy reigned in their household.Angel resides in Pittsburgh, PA with her husband, daughter and three Cats.Website: https://www.hearmyvoicenow.comInstagram https://www.instagram.com/angelmbaney/Linkedin https://www.linkedin.com/in/angel-baney-a0169b5/Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/groups/momanddaughtersconnectFree personality report: https://crackmycode.com/angela.baney …………..Vision Driven Mom ResourcesShare: #visiondrivenmompodcastWebsite: http://www.visiondrivenmom.com Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/visiondrivenmomsInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/visiondrivenmom/Pinterest: https://www.pinterest.com/visiondrivenmom/Email: visiondrivenmompodcast@gmail.comRaise Your Vibe Toolkit: A Mom's Guide to Taking Yoga Off The Mat And Into Life http://www.highvibetoolkit.com