Podcasts about social psychological

52 minutes. C'est le temps qu'on passerait chaque jour à faire des commérages, selon une étude du Social Psychological and Personality Science.. Ces 52 minutes révèlent aussi quelque chose d'important: les potins, aussi futiles qu'ils paraissent, ont en fait une vraie fonction sociale.  Les ragots ne sont pas toujours négatifs. Techniquement, c'est simplement le fait de parler de quelqu'un qui n'est pas là. Et ça peut être gentil, indifférent ou… un peu plus piquant. D'ailleurs, les chercheurs de cette même étude les ont classés de la même façon : les potins positifs, négatifs ou neutres. Résultat : ¾ des ragots sont neutres. Ce qu'on raconte le moins en revanche, ce sont les choses sympas. Les potins positifs sont deux fois moins fréquents que les négatifs !  Mais… c'est quoi l'intérêt des ragots ? Ça veut dire qu'on passe près d'une heure par jour à critiquer les autres ? Ecoutez la suite de cet épisode de "Maintenant vous savez" À écouter ensuite : Comment savoir si on est radin ? Éjaculation féminine : quelles sont les 3 choses à savoir ? Pourquoi cuisiner améliore-t-il notre santé mentale ? Retrouvez tous les épisodes de "Maintenant vous savez". Suivez Bababam sur Instagram. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Lässt sich die Liebe durch Lust auf Sex steigern? 8 Impulse, mit denen das gelingen kann. Am Anfang der Liebe ist alles einfach. Man trägt die rosarote Brille, ist auf Wolke 7. Doch dann kommt die Gewohnheit, der Rausch lässt nach. Alltag, Stress, Kinder, Job, die Liebe hat es schwer und oft erleben Paare, dass es dann auch mit dem Sex nicht mehr läuft wie früher, was wiederum die Liebe in Gefahr bringen kann. Wir klären in dieser Folge, wie das anders geht Fühlt euch gut betreut Leon & Atze VVK Münster 2025: https://betreutes-fuehlen.ticket.io/ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/leonwindscheid/ https://www.instagram.com/atzeschroeder_offiziell/ Der Instagram Account für Betreutes Fühlen: https://www.instagram.com/betreutesfuehlen/ Mehr zu unseren Werbepartnern findet ihr hier: https://linktr.ee/betreutesfuehlen Tickets: Atze: https://www.atzeschroeder.de/#termine Leon: https://leonwindscheid.de/tour/ Quellen: Die Übersichtsarbeit: Birnbaum, G. E., & Muise, A. (2025). The interplay between sexual desire and relationship functioning. Nature Reviews Psychology. Die Studie zu Sexueller Zufriedenheit und Zufriedenheit mit der Beziehung über die Zeit: Quinn-Nilas, C. (2020). Relationship and sexual satisfaction: A developmental perspective on bidirectionality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 37(2), 624-646. Meta-Analyse zu Unterschieden im Sex Drive bei Männern und Frauen: Frankenbach, J., Weber, M., Loschelder, D. D., Kilger, H., & Friese, M. (2022). Sex drive: Theoretical conceptualization and meta-analytic review of gender differences. Psychological Bulletin. Die Studie zu “Das Verlangen muss vielleicht gar nicht gleich sein”: Kim, J. J., Muise, A., Barranti, M., Mark, K. P., Rosen, N. O., Harasymchuk, C., & Impett, E. (2021). Are couples more satisfied when they match in sexual desire? New insights from response surface analyses. Social Psychological and Personality Science. Wer beim Sex das Wohl des Partners UND sein eigenes im Blick hat, erlebt mehr Lust und Zufriedenheit in der Beziehung: Muise, A., Impett, E. A., & Desmarais, S. (2013). Getting it on versus getting it over with: Sexual motivation, desire, and satisfaction in intimate bonds. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. Mehr als 1x die Woche Sex: Was bringt es? Muise, A., Schimmack, U., & Impett, E. A. (2016). Sexual frequency predicts greater well-being, but more is not always better. Social Psychological and Personality Science. Doppelt so viel Sex nach Aufforderung durch Forschende: Loewenstein, G., Krishnamurti, T., Kopsic, J., & Mcdonald, D. (2015). Does increased sexual frequency enhance happiness?. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 116, 206-218. Und die Interviews zu dieser Studie: https://www.cmu.edu/news/stories/archives/2015/may/more-sex-does-not-lead-to-happiness.html Redaktion: Leon Windscheid Produktion: Murmel Productions

por Yaiza Santos La estupidez de los políticos puede llegar a soportarla en los debates, donde se exhiben sin pudor sus básicos conocimientos, pero no cuando interviene sobre la evidencia. Así la acometida de Ayuso contra las pantallas. Justo en este momento, cuando los cambios inminentes en el conocimiento —¡y no digamos en la salud!— se prevén disruptivos. La pantalla distrae, claro que distrae, clamó: ¡la vida distrae! Hay que actuar contra las consecuencias del mal uso, no con una prohibición preventiva. Retomó el asunto pandémico, esta vez para hacer constar que no solo no hay Gobierno que haga un balance cabal de lo que pasó hace cinco años, sino tampoco oposición. Tuvo después que tomar aire para leer con sobriedad —a diferencia de cuando escribe, habla mejor sin enfadarse– el vergonzoso artículo 2 a) de la ley de amnistía, enmienda obligada por Junts, que establece que esta no se aplica a «los actos dolosos contra las personas que hubieran producido la pérdida o inutilidad de un órgano o miembro», y que por lo tanto expone a los policías que actuaron conforme a la legalidad hasta a doce años de cárcel. Cuando llama «Lily» a El País lo hace muy seriamente, aclaró, antes de comentar, esto sí a risotadas, la chochez más reciente. Lamentó las amenazas contra Anagrama y Luisgé Martín por publicar un libro sobre José Bretón, pues nada de lo que esté en él, argumentó, podrá superar lo publicado por los periódicos en su día, como dejó constancia. Pero qué alegría, por lo demás, tener corresponsales como Soto Ivars, que asegura que sus conversaciones con Santos parecen las de un exmatrimonio bien avenido. ¡Quia! Porque no leyó el último paper candente, que muestra cómo, más que quedarles París, las exparejas se encuentran como el tango que cantó: como dos extraños. Y fue así que Espada yiró. Bibliografía Alberto Flores, «Los caramelos de Granada con sabor a jamón, queso y vino: “La gente alucina”», Ideal Jia Y. Chong y R. Chris Fraley, «La estabilidad a largo plazo de los vínculos afectivos tras una separación sentimental: ¿desaparecen simplemente los apegos?», Social Psychological and Personality Science Banda sonoraSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

La fréquence des rapports sexuels au sein d'un couple est souvent perçue comme un indicateur de satisfaction et de bonheur. Une étude canadienne, publiée dans la revue Social Psychological and Personality Science, a cherché à comprendre dans quelle mesure le sexe influence le bien-être. Contrairement à l'idée reçue selon laquelle « plus c'est fréquent, mieux c'est », les résultats montrent qu'au-delà d'une fois par semaine, l'augmentation de la fréquence ne procure pas de bénéfice supplémentaire en termes de bonheur.L'étude et ses résultatsL'étude s'est appuyée sur l'analyse des données de plus de 30 000 Américains sur une période de 40 ans. Les chercheurs ont examiné le lien entre la fréquence des rapports sexuels et la satisfaction relationnelle. Il en ressort que :- Les couples ayant des rapports sexuels au moins une fois par semaine se disent plus heureux que ceux qui en ont moins.- Cependant, au-delà d'un rapport hebdomadaire, le niveau de bonheur ne s'améliore pas davantage.Ces résultats suggèrent que la relation entre fréquence sexuelle et bonheur suit une courbe ascendante jusqu'à un point de saturation, après lequel l'augmentation du nombre de rapports n'a plus d'impact significatif.Pourquoi une fois par semaine suffit ?L'explication repose sur plusieurs facteurs :1. Équilibre entre désir et routine- Avoir des relations sexuelles régulièrement permet de maintenir l'intimité et la connexion émotionnelle.- Une fréquence trop élevée pourrait transformer le sexe en une obligation plutôt qu'un plaisir spontané.2. Qualité vs quantité- Ce n'est pas tant la fréquence qui importe, mais plutôt la qualité des rapports et leur capacité à renforcer le lien entre partenaires.- Un couple qui a des relations sexuelles de qualité une fois par semaine peut être plus satisfait qu'un autre ayant des rapports plus fréquents mais moins épanouissants.3. Facteurs psychologiques et émotionnels- L'intimité ne repose pas uniquement sur le sexe mais aussi sur la communication, le respect et le partage.- Une connexion émotionnelle forte joue un rôle essentiel dans la satisfaction globale du couple.ConclusionFaire l'amour une fois par semaine semble être le juste équilibre entre maintenir une intimité forte et éviter la pression d'une fréquence trop élevée. Cependant, chaque couple est unique, et l'important reste d'être en phase avec les désirs et besoins de chacun. Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

.From: American Atheist.Org Atheism is one thing: A lack of belief in gods. Atheism is not an affirmative belief that there is no god nor does it answer any other question about what a person believes. It is simply a rejection of the assertion that there are gods. Atheism is too often defined incorrectly as a belief system. To be clear: Atheism is not a disbelief in gods or a denial of gods; it is a lack of belief in gods. Older dictionaries define atheism as “a belief that there is no God.” Clearly, theistic influence taints these definitions. The fact that dictionaries define Atheism as “there is no God” betrays the (mono)theistic influence. Without the (mono)theistic influence, the definition would at least read “there are no gods.” Atheism is not a belief system nor is it a religion. While there are some religions that are atheistic (certain sects of Buddhism, for example), that does not mean that atheism is a religion. To put it in a more humorous way: If atheism is a religion, then not collecting stamps is a hobby. Despite the fact that atheism is not a religion, atheism is protected by many of the same Constitutional rights that protect religion. That, however, does not mean that atheism is itself a religion, only that our sincerely held (lack of) beliefs are protected in the same way as the religious beliefs of others. Similarly, many “interfaith” groups will include atheists. This, again, does not mean that atheism is a religious belief. Some groups will use words like Agnostic, Humanist, Secular, Bright, Freethinker, or any number of other terms to self identify. Those words are perfectly fine as a self-identifier, but we strongly advocate using the word that people understand: Atheist. Don't use those other terms to disguise your atheism or to shy away from a word that some think has a negative connotation. We should be using the terminology that is most accurate and that answers the question that is actually being asked. We should use the term that binds all of us together. If you call yourself a humanist, a freethinker, a bright, or even a “cultural Catholic” and lack belief in a god, you are an atheist. Don't shy away from the term. Embrace it.  Agnostic isn't just a “weaker” version of being an atheist. It answers a different question. Atheism is about what you believe. Agnosticism is about what you know. Not all non-religious people are atheists, but… In recent surveys, the Pew Research Center has grouped atheists, agnostics, and the “unaffiliated” into one category. The so-called “Nones” are the fastest growing “religious” demographic in the United States. Pew separates out atheists from agnostics and the non-religious, but that is primarily a function of self-identification. Only about 5% of people call themselves atheists, but if you ask about belief in gods, 11% say they do not believe in gods. Those people are atheists, whether they choose to use the word or not. A recent survey from University of Kentucky psychologists Will Gervais and Maxine Najle found that as many as 26% of Americans may be atheists. This study was designed to overcome the stigma associated with atheism and the potential for closeted atheists to abstain from “outing” themselves even when speaking anonymously to pollsters. The full study is awaiting publication in Social Psychological and Personality Science journal but a pre-print version is available here. Even more people say that their definition of “god” is simply a unifying force between all people. Or that they aren't sure what they believe. If you lack an active belief in gods, you are an atheist.  Being an atheist doesn't mean you're sure about every theological question, have answers to the way the world was created, or how evolution works. It just means that the assertion that gods exist has left you unconvinced. Wishing that there was an afterlife, or a creator god, or a specific god doesn't mean you're not an atheist. Being an atheist is about what you believe and don't believe, not about what you wish to be true or would find comforting. All atheists are different The only common thread that ties all atheists together is a lack of belief in gods. Some of the best debates we have ever had have been with fellow atheists. This is because atheists do not have a common belief system, sacred scripture or atheist Pope. This means atheists often disagree on many issues and ideas. Atheists come in a variety of shapes, colors, beliefs, convictions, and backgrounds. We are as unique as our fingerprints. Atheists exist across the political spectrum. We are members of every race. We are members of the LGBTQ* community. There are atheists in urban, suburban, and rural communities and in every state of the nation.      

Discover all of the podcasts in our network, search for specific episodes, get the Optimal Living Daily workbook, and learn more at: OLDPodcast.com. Episode 2479: Sensitive parental care in early childhood lays the foundation for secure, trusting relationships in adulthood. Research by Dr. Samantha Joel highlights that children who receive warm, attentive care from their mothers at 18 months old develop more secure attachments in their romantic and social relationships later in life. This study reinforces the idea that the way we are nurtured as infants shapes our ability to connect deeply with others throughout our lives. Read along with the original article(s) here: https://www.luvze.com/sensitive-parental-care-in-childhood-predicts-better-relatio/ & https://www.luvze.com/mo-money-mo-problems-how-having-money-can-make-you-a-worse-p/ Quotes to ponder: "The quality of care a person receives during childhood influences their strategies for navigating close relationships in adulthood." "Individuals who received the most sensitive care from their mothers at 18 months old also reported the most secure attachment to friends and romantic partners in early adulthood." "Parents play a pivotal role in shaping our expectations and tendencies in close relationships, including our adult romantic relationships." Episode references: Social Psychological and Personality Science: https://journals.sagepub.com/home/spp Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Trigger Warning: diet culture, disordered eating, body image. Dating in a fat body is different than dating in a thin body, and is in some ways much more difficult. Our dating culture has internalized the thin preference that is deeply rooted in Western culture, and that preference leaves many people struggling to find someone who appreciates their body and sees them as an attractive potential partner. In this episode, Megan and Steven grapple with this difficult topic and provide data to illustrate the trends and, hopefully, to give hope to anyone who feels that their body is presenting challenges to connection. Links and References: Preferences for sexually dimorphic body characteristics revealed in a large sample of speed daters--Sidari, M. et al, Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2019: https://dspace.stir.ac.uk/retrieve/54c9b8dc-0155-4447-bae2-387dae00637e/SPPS_20Manuscript_20Final.pdf Secular differences in the association between caloric intake, macronutrient intake, and physical activity with obesity- Brown, Ruth E. et al, Obesity Research & Clinical Practice, 2016: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26383959/ "Size, By the Numbers," Hilary George Parkin, Racked, June 5, 2018. LANGUAGE ADVISORY: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26383959/ Health at Every Size: The Surprising Truth About Your Weight, Lindo Bacon, PhD. NOTE: This is a research-based book about dieting and its impact on health, written by a secular author who also identifies as non-binary. We understand that some may feel uncomfortable reading a book whose author does not affirm biological gender; however, the book is not about gender identity and its contents are important for anyone who has struggled with guilt, shame, or depression around their weight. Read with caution, but please consider reading. https://lindobacon.com/health-at-every-size-book/ Apostolic and Single? Take the "From Singles, to Shepherds" survey now! https://forms.gle/KTt8UZEMA8ipHreTA #Synchpin Registration: https://the-synchrony-project.mykajabi.com/synchpin-registration These pins are exclusively for Apostolic Singles to use to recognize other singles in public spaces and create better connections. Register and pay shipping and we will mail you your own pin! Synchrony Community Members: You don't have to pay for shipping! See the Community space to give us your address and we'll mail you one absolutely free. Want to understand and remove the dating barriers that prevent your connections? Check out the course here. (Synchrony Community Members, check the Community forum to access the course for free). https://the-synchrony-project.mykajab... Download the 10 Min Connection Guide Here: https://the-synchrony-project.mykajabi.com/opt-in-d5ca0b81-abe1-4190-88ec-cb038489ca6a Save 15% on your coffee order with our friends at Kaffe117 when you put the code "Synchrony" into the checkout, or use the following link: https://kaffe117.com/discount/Synchrony Contact: If you want to join the conversation about this topic and give your thoughts, reach out on Instagram, Facebook, YouTube, or at questions@synchronyproject.com.

Working in conjuction with the National Counselling Service this project focuses on the long-term impact of Mother and Baby institutions. As part of the study, both mothers & adult adoptees will be surveyed about their experiences. To tell us more Professor Orla Muldoon of the University of Limerick, who is leading this project.

Ein Wochenende Urlaub- was macht das mit uns? Dieser Frage gehen Luise und Kai im Selbstexperiment nach. Während Luise in der Kontrollgruppe ein Wochenende schuftet, macht Kai ein Wochenende Urlaub. In dieser Folge erfahrt ihr, wie es uns damit geht und mit welchen Gefühlen wir am Montag wieder in die Arbeit starten. Zwischen im Moment leben und aus Routinen ausbrechen diskutieren Luise und Kai, was die Forschung dazu sagt. Stay positive! Musik: Stephan SchillerSchnitt und Post-Production: Helena Mehler und Luise HönigModeration und Production: Kai Krautter und Luise Hönig Quelle: West, C., Mogilner, C., & DeVoe, S. E. (2021). Happiness from treating the weekend like a vacation. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(3), 346-356.

Menschen fühlen eine Menge unterschiedliche Emotionen an nur einem einzigen Tag; positive oder negative, langanhaltender oder kurzfristig. Um mit unseren Emotionen umgehen zu können, müssen wir Emotionsregulationsstrategien erlernen. Diese Strategien helfen uns dabei zu regulieren, wie wir Emotionen empfinden oder wie wir darauf reagieren und handeln. Welche Strategien wir nutzten ist sehr individuell und situationsabhängig. Daher müssen wir auch flexibel in unserer Emotionsregulation sein. Luise stellt in dieser Folge ein Laborexperiment vor, in dem die Emotionsregulations-Flexibilität untersucht wird. Außerdem diskutieren Kai und Luise darüber, wie flexibel wir sein müssen, welche Strategien funktionaler sind als andere und wie wir das lernen können. Stay positive! Musik: Stephan SchillerSchnitt und Post-Production: Helena Mehler und Luise HönigModeration und Production: Kai Krautter und Luise Hönig Quelle: Specker, P., Sheppes, G., & Nickerson, A. (2023). Does Emotion Regulation Flexibility Work? Investigating the Effectiveness of Regulatory Selection Flexibility in Managing Negative Affect. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 19485506231189002. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506231189002

Wie habt ihr romantische Partner:innen kennengelernt? In der Psychologie würde man eureantworten grob unterteilen in 1) „Wir waren zuerst Freund:innen“ und 2) „Wir haben uns gedatet“. In dieser Folge stellt Luise Kai ein Paper vor, was sich mit den beiden Kennenlernphasen beschäftigt. Die Forschung bisher konzentriert sich nämlich auf den zweiten Ansatz, es zeigt sich aber, dass viele Menschen präferieren zuerst befreundet zu sein. Wie wir das messen können und wie lange Menschen befreundet sind bevor sie romantische Beziehungen eingehen, erfahrt ihr in dieser Folge. Stay positive! Musik: Stephan SchillerSchnitt und Post-Production: Helena Mehler und Luise HönigModeration und Production: Kai Krautter und Luise Hönig Quelle: Stinson, D. A., Cameron, J. J., & Hoplock, L. B. (2022). The Friends-to-Lovers Pathway to Romance: Prevalent, Preferred, and Overlooked by Science. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(2), 562-571. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211026992

In this final episode of the three-part series on the Philosophical Psychology lectures by Paul Meehl, we discuss lectures 6-8, which cover the ten obfuscating factors in "soft areas" of psychology and a host of advice Meehl provides for researchers, reviewers, editors, and educators on how to improve practice.    Shownotes Krefeld-Schwalb, A., Sugerman, E. R., & Johnson, E. J. (2024). Exposing omitted moderators: Explaining why effect sizes differ in the social sciences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(12), e2306281121. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2306281121 Lakens, D., & Etz, A. J. (2017). Too True to be Bad: When Sets of Studies With Significant and Nonsignificant Findings Are Probably True. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(8), 875–881. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617693058  

In this episode, Matt and Jenn discuss the resurging popularity of sleeping in separate bedrooms. We'll consider the  reasons why a couple might choose this option and whether it might be wise for your marriage. In addition, we'll discuss some of the consequences of spouses who have separate bedtimes.Every step we take away from our spouses, especially physically, has inevitable negative long-term consequences for the relationship. The decision to sleep apart should be weighed carefully and be constantly reevaluated. As much as is within your power, eliminate the barriers to sleeping together so that you can get be in bed with each other as often as possible.Likewise, separate bedtimes also promote emotional and physical drift away from each other, allowing opportunity for selfishness and betrayal.As promised, here are the sources for the data that we referenced in this episode: Elsey, Taylor et al. “The role of couple sleep concordance in sleep quality: Attachment as a moderator of associations.” Journal of sleep research vol. 28,5 (2019): e12825. Drews HJ, Drews A. Couple Relationships Are Associated With Increased REM Sleep-A Proof-of-Concept Analysis of a Large Dataset Using Ambulatory Polysomnography. Front Psychiatry. 2021 May 10;12:641102.Richter, K., Adam, S., Geiss, L., Peter, L., & Niklewski, G. (2016). Two in a bed: The influence of couple sleeping and chronotypes on relationship and sleep. An overview. Chronobiology International, 33(10), 1464–1472. Troxel WM; Buysse DJ; Matthews KA; Kravitz HM; Bromberger JT; Sowers M; Hall MH. Marital/cohabitation status and history in relation to sleep in midlife women. SLEEP 2010;33(7):973-981.Chiao, Chi et al. “Loneliness in older parents: marital transitions, family and social connections, and separate bedrooms for sleep.” BMC geriatrics vol. 21,1 590. 22 Oct. 2021Larson JH, Crane DR, Smith CW. (1991). Morning and night couples: The effect of wake and sleep patterns on marital adjustment. J Marital Fam Ther. 17:53–65.Ulfberg J, Carter N, Talback M, Edling C. (2000). Adverse health effects among women living with heavy snorers. Health Care Women Int. 21:81–90.Gordon, A. M., & Chen, S. (2014). The Role of Sleep in Interpersonal Conflict: Do Sleepless Nights Mean Worse Fights? Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(2), 168-175.Cartwright, R D, and S Knight. “Silent partners: the wives of sleep apneic patients.” Sleep vol. 10,3 (1987): 244-8. Cascais Costa C, Afreixo V, Cravo J. Impact of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Treatment on Marital Relationships: Sleeping Together Again? Cureus. 2023 Oct 5;15(10):e46513.Please support these companies that support Intimate Covenant:Married Dance — https://marrieddance.com/?aff=29  Shop from this link and part of your purchase will support Intimate Covenant.  Coconu — http://www.coconu.com  Your purchase helps support Intimate Covenant AND you get 15% OFF. Coupon Code: intimateconvenantTo send your comments, questions and suggestions, go to our website: www.intimatecovenant.com/podcast and click on the button: “Contact the Podcast” for an ANONYMOUS submission form. Or, send an email: podcast@intimatecovenant.com   Thanks for sharing, rating, reviewing and subscribing!   Cherishing,  Matt & Jenn www.intimatecovenant.com Intimate Covenant | Matt & Jenn Schmidt

Enjoying our content and want to support us directly? Join our premium subscription for access to our podcasts, bonus content, merch discounts and more! Visit: www.psych2go.supercast.com Want someone to notice you? What are some things you can be doing to show them what a great person you are so they fall for you in no time? Well, if you look to psychology, the obvious and not so obvious tips, here are a few psychological tricks that can make anyone fall for you. Want more dating advice? We made another video on the secrets on how to make someone pursue you: https://youtu.be/-m9K5kO0-3E Writer: Michal Mitchell Script Editor: Rida Batool Script Manager: Kelly Soong VO: Amanda Silvera Animator: Grace Cárdenas Cano YouTube Manager: Cindy Cheong References Aronson, E., Willerman, B., & Floyd, J. (1966). The effect of a pratfall on increasing interpersonal attractiveness. Psychonomic Science, 4(6), 227–228. www.https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03342263 Gunaydin, G., Selcuk, E., & Zayas, V. (2017). Impressions Based on a Portrait Predict, 1-Month Later, Impressions Following a Live Interaction. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(1), 36–44. www.doi.org/10.1177/1948550616662123 Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1993). Emotional Contagion. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2(3), 96–100. www.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10770953 Kayser, Daniela Niesta, et al. “Red and Romantic Behavior in Men Viewing Women.” Wiley Online Library, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 29 July 2010, www.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ejsp.757. Zajonc, R. B. (2001). Mere Exposure: A Gateway to the Subliminal. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(6), 224–228. www.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00154 Zajonc, R. B. (2001). Mere Exposure: A Gateway to the Subliminal. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(6), 224–228. www.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00154 Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: the perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of personality and social psychology, 76(6), 893–910. www.doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.76.6.893 Psych2go aims to make psychology and mental health content accessible for everyone around the world free of charge. Sponsors like Endel helps make this possible because we get to reinvest the funds to create more amazing content for everyone, while at the same time sharing companies that are working towards a similar mission.

Elisabeth Bik is a science integrity consultant. In this conversation, we talk about her work on reporting scientific errors and misconduct, how one becomes a full-time scientific integrity consultant, her postdoc work on the microbiome of dolphins, reactions to her work (both positive and negative), how to deal with online abuse, the arms race between fraudsters and fraud detectors, and much more.BJKS Podcast is a podcast about neuroscience, psychology, and anything vaguely related, hosted by Benjamin James Kuper-Smith.Support the show: https://geni.us/bjks-patreonTimestamps0:00:00: How Elisabeth became a full-time science integrity consultant0:04:45: The microbiome of dolphins0:12:02: What should I do if I find errors or fraud in a paper?0:28:58: Reactions to Elisabeth's work: awards, online abuse, and lots of silence from journals0:52:23: Should you report misconduct if you're in a vulnerable position?0:58:19: What problems are worth reporting?1:05:51: How does one become a (full-time) research integrity consultant?1:13:21: The arms race between people commiting fraud and people detecting fraud1:22:49: A book or paper more people should read1:25:26: Something Elisabeth wishes she'd learnt sooner1:29:09: Advice for PhD students/postdocsPodcast linksWebsite: https://geni.us/bjks-podTwitter: https://geni.us/bjks-pod-twtElisabeth's linksWebsite: https://geni.us/bik-webGoogle Scholar: https://geni.us/bik-scholarTwitter: https://geni.us/bik-twtBen's linksWebsite: https://geni.us/bjks-webGoogle Scholar: https://geni.us/bjks-scholarTwitter: https://geni.us/bjks-twtReferences & linksPubPeer: https://pubpeer.com/COPE: https://publicationethics.org/John Maddox Prize: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Maddox_PrizeEpisode w/ Joe Hilgard: https://geni.us/bjks-hilgardBik, Casadevall  & Fang (2016). The prevalence of inappropriate image duplication in biomedical research publications. MBio.Bik, Costello, Switzer, Callahan, Holmes, Wells, ... & Relman (2016). Marine mammals harbor unique microbiotas shaped by and yet distinct from the sea. Nature Communications.Brown & Heathers (2017). The GRIM test: A simple technique detects numerous anomalies in the reporting of results in psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science.Reich (2009): Plastic fantastic: How the Biggest Fraud in Physics Shook the Scientific

Die Themen in den Wissensnachrichten: +++ Warnsignale für Gewalt in Partnerschaften +++ Superschlaue Hunde bringen sich selbst Wörter bei +++ Wohl kein Schmetterlingseffekt in lebenden Zellen +++ **********Weiterführende Quellen zu dieser Folge:The Predictive Validity of Intimate Partner Violence Warning Signs, Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11.12.2023A citizen science model turns anecdotes into evidence by revealing similar characteristics among Gifted Word Learner dogs, Scientific Reports, 14.12.2023Models of Cell Processes are Far from the Edge of Chaos, PRX Live, Dezember 2023Correlated x-ray fluorescence and ptychographic nano-tomography on Rembrandt's The Night Watch reveals unknown lead “layer”, Science Advances, 15.12.2023Erster britischer Weltraumbahnhof hat Genehmigung für Raketenstarts, Britische LuftfahrtbehördeOn Bringing Robots Home, arXiv**********Ihr könnt uns auch auf diesen Kanälen folgen: Tiktok und Instagram.

Welcome to the Social-Engineer Podcast: The Doctor Is In Series – where we will discuss understandings and developments in the field of psychology.   In today's episode, Dr. Abbie is being joined by Erin Gray. Erin is an internationally known actress, 70's super model and now founder of 'Heroes for Hire', a company representing celebrities for personal appearances worldwide. Erin went from being one of the original Sports Illustrated models, Breck Girls, Maxi Girl and the Bloomingdales spokesperson for ten years to being the lead actress in the feature film and TV series ‘Buck Rogers in the 25th Century', quickly followed by NBC's ‘Silver Spoons' for 5 years. In addition, Erin has over 50 TV credits beginning at 17 with ‘Malibu U', a musical variety show starring Ricky Nelson, to ‘Magnum PI', ‘Law and Order', ‘Hunter', ‘Baywatch', ‘Profiler', etc. plus two dozen feature films such as ‘Six Pack' with Kenny Rogers, ‘Friday the 13th: Jason Goes to Hell' and ‘Dreams Awake'.   Erin is the recipient of eleven community service awards, including The Leadership Award by the County of LA, the 2002 Woman of the Year Award presented by the Los Angeles Commission for Women, and most recently two Lifetime Achievement Awards and best actress in a feature film at the Monaco Film Festival for her performance in ‘Dreams Awake' and best actress in The 2020 Golden State Film Festival in ‘The Piano Teacher”. Erin is currently on the Board of Directors for the Innocent Lives Foundation, protecting women and children from human traffickers and pedophiles and bringing them to justice. [Nov 6, 2023]   00:00 - Intro 00:40 - Intro Links -          Social-Engineer.com - http://www.social-engineer.com/ -          Managed Voice Phishing - https://www.social-engineer.com/services/vishing-service/ -          Managed Email Phishing - https://www.social-engineer.com/services/se-phishing-service/ -          Adversarial Simulations - https://www.social-engineer.com/services/social-engineering-penetration-test/ -          Social-Engineer channel on SLACK - https://social-engineering-hq.slack.com/ssb -          CLUTCH - http://www.pro-rock.com/ -          innocentlivesfoundation.org - http://www.innocentlivesfoundation.org/ 03:26 - Erin Gray Intro 05:32 - The Topic of the Day: Mind-Body-Connect 08:42 - Smile Within 12:19 - It's All in the Mind 14:36 - Out of the Woods 18:37 - Standing Like a Model 20:01 - Emotional Contagion 21:43 - Finding Balance 25:41 - Maintaining Flexibility 29:34 - Seeing is Believing 31:17 - Self Trust 34:32 - The Gift of Integrity 37:46 - Integrity is Hard! 44:23 - More Than a Memory 46:24 - Where It Comes From 49:17 - Wrap Up & Outro -          www.social-engineer.com -          www.innocentlivesfoundation.org   Find us online: -          Twitter: https://twitter.com/abbiejmarono -          LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/dr-abbie-maroño-phd-35ab2611a -          Twitter: https://twitter.com/humanhacker -          LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/christopherhadnagy   References: Neal, D. T., & Chartrand, T. L. (2011). Embodied emotion perception: Amplifying and dampening facial feedback modulates emotion perception accuracy. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(6), 673-678.   Strack, F., Martin, L. L., & Stepper, S. (1988). Inhibiting and facilitating conditions of the human smile: a nonobtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis. Journal of personality and social psychology, 54(5), 768.   Davis, J. I., Senghas, A., & Ochsner, K. N. (2009). How does facial feedback modulate emotional experience?. Journal of research in personality, 43(5), 822-829.   Buck, R. (1980). Nonverbal behavior and the theory of emotion: the facial feedback hypothesis. Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 38(5), 811.   McIntosh, D. N. (1996). Facial feedback hypotheses: Evidence, implications, and directions. Motivation and emotion, 20, 121-147.   Coles, N. A., Larsen, J. T., & Lench, H. C. (2019). A meta-analysis of the facial feedback literature: Effects of facial feedback on emotional experience are small and variable. Psychological bulletin, 145(6), 610.   Kee, Y. H., Chatzisarantis, N. N., Kong, P. W., Chow, J. Y., & Chen, L. H. (2012). Mindfulness, movement control, and attentional focus strategies: effects of mindfulness on a postural balance task. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 34(5), 561-579.   Samuel, G. (2015). The contemporary mindfulness movement and the question of nonself. Transcultural psychiatry, 52(4), 485-500.   Nisbet, M. (2017). The mindfulness movement: How a Buddhist practice evolved into a scientific approach to life. Skeptical Inquirer, 41(3), 24-26.   Kinser, P., Braun, S., Deeb, G., Carrico, C., & Dow, A. (2016). “Awareness is the first step”: an interprofessional course on mindfulness & mindful-movement for healthcare professionals and students. Complementary therapies in clinical practice, 25, 18-25.   Hicks, G. (2010). Confidence building with body language. In 101 Coaching Strategies and Techniques (pp. 103-105). Routledge.   Gonçalves, M. (2020, April). Review of Body Language Posture, and an Exercise Called “Power Posing Challenge” to Improve One's Confidence. In 5th International Conference on Social Sciences and Economic Development (ICSSED 2020) (pp. 147-149). Atlantis Press.

Raab, Michael (2019): Care in konsensuell-nichtmonogamen Beziehungsnetzwerken. Sorgende Netze jenseits der Norm. Toronto. (S. 18-34) Schroedter, T./Vetter, C. (2010): Polyamory. Eine Erinnerung. Stuttgart. Winston, D. (2017): The Smart Girl's Guide to Polyamory. Everything You Need to Know About Open Relationships, Non-Monogamy and Alternative Love. New York. (S. 35-51) Murphy, A. P., Joel, S., & Muise, A. (2021). A prospective investigation of the decision to open up a romantic relationship. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(2), 194-201. Wosick-Correa, K. (2010). Agreements, rules and agentic fidelity in polyamorous relationships. Psychology & Sexuality, 1(1), 44-61. Ossmann, S. (2020): Schöner leben mit Polyamory? Von selbstbestimmten beziehungsweise fremdbestimmten Beziehungen. In: Raab, M/Schadler, C.: Polyfantastisch? Nichtmonogamie als emanzipatorische Praxis. Münster, S. 65-83. https://martin-krzywinski.pixels.com/

Enjoying our content and want to support us directly? Join our premium subscription for access to our podcasts, bonus content, merch discounts and more! Visit: www.psych2go.supercast.com Do you hope your crush notices your great qualities? Do you have a hard time showing them to others right away? What if the person you admire can't quite notice the great things that make you, you? Well, you could hope they will eventually notice, or you can use a few psychology tricks to point them in the right direction. Today, I'm gonna let you in on a little secret… Well… multiple secrets. Psychological secrets. Want more tips? We made a video talking about a few powerful ways to attract your crush WITHOUT saying anything: https://youtu.be/ThulgaOVaJM Writer: Michal Mitchell Script Editor & Manager: Kelly Soong VO: Amanda Silvera Animator: Tris Canimo YouTube Manager: Cindy Cheong References: Polman, E., & Maglio, S. J. (2017). Mere Gifting: Liking a Gift More Because It Is Shared. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(11), 1582–1594. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217718525 Mitchell, Michal. “6 Psychological Tricks That Can Make Anyone Fall For You.” Psych2Go, 2020, psych2go.net/6-psychological-tricks-that-can-make-anyone-fall-for-you/. McRaney, David. “The Benjamin Franklin Effect.” You Are Not So Smart, 20 July 2015, youarenotsosmart.com/2011/10/05/the-benjamin-franklin-effect/. Gunaydin, G., Selcuk, E., & Zayas, V. (2017). Impressions Based on a Portrait Predict, 1-Month Later, Impressions Following a Live Interaction. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(1), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616662123 Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1993). Emotional Contagion. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2(3), 96–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10770953 Kayser, Daniela Niesta, et al. “Red and Romantic Behavior in Men Viewing Women.” Wiley Online Library, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 29 July 2010, onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ejsp.757. “8 Nifty Psychological Tricks That Can Make You Irresistible.” BrightSide, 6 Sept. 2019, brightside.me/inspiration-psychology/8-nifty-psychological-tricks-that-can-make-you-irresistible-794120/. Alleva, Jessica M. “Blue Is For Boys and Girls.” Psychology Today, 2018, www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/mind-your-body/201809/blue-is-boys-and-girls. “How to Use the Triangle Technique for Engaging Eye Contact.” CMA, 26 Oct. 2016, www.cmaconsult.com/how-to-use-the-triangle-technique-for-engaging-eye-contact/.

In this episode, we discuss the replication crisis in psychology which has been an important topic of discussion for the last decade. We revisit some key events from the start of the replication crisis, such as the publication of Daryl Bem's studies on precognition, the paper False Positive Psychology, and the Reproducibility Project and share personal anecdotes about how it was to live through the replication crisis.   Shownotes:  Bem, D. J. (2011). Feeling the future: Experimental evidence for anomalous retroactive influences on cognition and affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(3), 407–425. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021524 Ritchie, S. J., Wiseman, R., & French, C. C. (2012). Failing the Future: Three Unsuccessful Attempts to Replicate Bem's ‘Retroactive Facilitation of Recall' Effect. PLOS ONE, 7(3), Article e33423. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0033423 Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632 John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953 Fiedler, K., & Schwarz, N. (2016). Questionable Research Practices Revisited. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615612150 NOTE: Daniel says in the podcast the paper below is by Fiedler and Strack - but it is by Fiedler and Schwarz. Ebersole, C. R., Mathur, M. B., Baranski, E., Bart-Plange, D.-J., Buttrick, N. R., Chartier, C. R., Corker, K. S., Corley, M., Hartshorne, J. K., IJzerman, H., Lazarević, L. B., Rabagliati, H., Ropovik, I., Aczel, B., Aeschbach, L. F., Andrighetto, L., Arnal, J. D., Arrow, H., Babincak, P., … Nosek, B. A. (2020). Many Labs 5: Testing Pre-Data-Collection Peer Review as an Intervention to Increase Replicability. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920958687 Luttrell, A., Petty, R. E., & Xu, M. (2017). Replicating and fixing failed replications: The case of need for cognition and argument quality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 69, 178–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.09.006 Simons, D. J., Shoda, Y., & Lindsay, D. S. (2017). Constraints on Generality (COG): A Proposed Addition to All Empirical Papers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 1123–1128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617708630 Simonsohn, U. (2015). Small Telescopes Detectability and the Evaluation of Replication Results. Psychological Science, 26(5), 559–569. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614567341  

Et prik i panden, der giver færre rynker. Det kan lyde fristende, men flere hjemmesider og artikler på nettet postulerer, at botox også lammer din empati.  Er der virkelig noget om snakken? Kan det gøre os mindre empatiske, hvis vi får botox? Og i så fald hvorfor? Det undersøger podcast-værterne Nana Elving Hansen og Anne Sophie Thingsted i denne uges episode af Brainstorm. Her dykker de ned i evidensen i forskellige studier, der har undersøgt sammenhængen mellem botox og hjerneaktivitet. Brainstorm er støttet af Lundbeckfonden. Medvirkende: Ro Julia Robotham Tenure track adjunkt på Institut for Psykologi ved Københavns Universitet Videnskabelige studier: 'Modulation of amygdala activity for emotional faces due to botulinum toxin type A injections that prevent frowning', Scientific Reports 2023 'Botulinum toxin-induced facial muscle paralysis affects amygdala responses to the perception of emotional expressions: preliminary findings from an A-B-A design', Biology of Mood & Anxiety Disorders, 2014 'Embodied Emotion Perception: Amplifying and Dampening Facial Feedback Modulates Emotion Perception Accuracy', Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2011 'The Link between Facial Feedback and Neural Activity within Central Circuitries of Emotion—New Insights from Botulinum Toxin–Induced Denervation of Frown Muscles', Cerebral cortex, 2008 'Cosmetic use of botulinum toxin-A affects processing of emotional language', National Library of Medicine, 2011 Følg Brainstorm på Instagram.

Huomaatko usein, että haaveilu on sinulle vaikeaa? Et uskalla nykyisen realismin rajoissa tavoitella kuuta taivaalta, vaan tyydyt siihen minkä uskot olevan itsellesi mahdollista juuri NYT. Pahimmillaan elät siis elämää, jonka kuski et ole sinä itse ja joka ei koskaan pääse starttaamaan paikasta A paikkaan B. Vuonna 2015 julkaistu tutkimus "Social Psychological and Personality Science" -lehdessä osoitti, että korkeita tavoitteita asettavat henkilöt kokevat vähemmän stressiä ja parempaa terveyttä verrattuna matalampia tavoitteita asettaviin henkilöihin. Nurinkurista? Ei todellakaan.      Miksi meillä sitten on vaikeuksia ajatella suuria? Onko kyseessä opittu tapa, pelko vai yksinkertaisesti kokematon mieli? Tässä jaksossa sukellamme David J. Schwartzin kirjaan " The Magic of thinking big " -kirjan maailmaan vuodelta 1959. Sen ydinviesti on vakuuttava: uskosi itseesi ja unelmiisi muodostavat perustan niiden saavuttamiselle. Jos pystyt ajattelemaan suuria ja uskomaan omiin kykyihisi, on huomattavasti todennäköisempää, että menestyt. Aloittaa voit ottamalla vastuun elämästäsi. Mikään menestys ei synny syyttelemällä olosuhteita tai muita ihmisiä epäonnistumisista, vaan omista teoista ja päätöksistä vastuun kantamisesta. Sitä paitsi, aivomme rakastavat haasteita!Jo pelkästään ison tavoitteen sanoittaminen aloittaa aivoissa prosessin, jossa aivot alkavat etsiä väyliä tavoitteen saavuttamiseen- vaikket olisi koskaan ennen tehnyt tai yrittänyt moista! Isosti ajatteleva ihminen voi tutkimusten mukaan myös paremmin ja on onnellisempi. Tästä syystä jengimme heitti haasteeksi tienata yhdessä 20 000€ 20:ssä päivässä. Miten tuohon sitten pääsemme? Seuraa haastetta instassa!   @naistakomo @syo. nuku.saasta @romsronja @erjarossi @annapietelin   Onko syksyn tavoitteet vielä saavuttamatta? Mitä jos tämä on se vuosi, kun saavutat tavoitteesi ja enemmänkin? Sinulla on vielä mahdollisuus hypätä mukaan Tulevaisuuden minä -valmennukseen jonka startti on 6.9. Sinäkin voit muuttaa elämäsi. Tänä vuonna voit vielä :

Dans cette deuxième partie de l'entretien consacré à l'intégrité scientifique, Cyril Forestier détaille les principales formes d'inconduites scientifiques, les moyens qu'il utilise pour les détecter ainsi que de nombreux outils en ligne pour améliorer la qualité des travaux de recherche et exercer notre esprit critique en tant que lecteur. Références : Brown, Nick & Heathers, James. (2016). The GRIM Test: A Simple Technique Detects Numerous Anomalies in the Reporting of Results in Psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science. O'Connell, Neil & Moore, Andrew & Stewart, Gavin & Fisher, Emma & Hearn, Leslie & Eccleston, Christopher & Williams, Amanda. (2022). Investigating the veracity of a sample of divergent published trial data in spinal pain. Pain. Publish Ahead of Print. Ferraro, Michael & Moore, Andrew & Williams, Amanda & Fisher, Emma & Stewart, Gavin & Ferguson, McKenzie & Eccleston, Christopher & O'Connell, Neil. (2023). Characteristics of retracted publications related to pain research: a systematic review. Pain. Publish Ahead of Print. Dr James Heathers | Tomf***ery, A Redux: Academic distortions beyond regular bad science. Vidéoconférence disponible sur la chaîne Youtube de RIOT Science Club Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M. & Tice, D. M. Ego Depletion: Is the Active Self a Limited Resource? J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 74, 1252–1265 (1998) Daniël Lakens. Improving Your Statistical Inferences | Website.  Musique : Epic Rock. Alex Grohl. Envato Elements

Y es que hacer una foto captando una escena y hacer una autofoto tendrían distintos significados. Es posible que dentro de tu círculo de amigos o incluso de tu familia haya alguien que adora hacerse selfies. También es posible que pienses que lo hace por pura vanidad. Sin embargo, un nuevo estudio ha descubierto la razón por la cual a las personas nos gusta hacernos autofotos (a unas más que a otras) y no es por lo que crees. El estudio se acaba de publicar en Social Psychological and Personality Science y ha analizado dos maneras de hacer fotografías: la que consiste en captar la escena sin más y las autofotos o selfies.Suscríbete a MUY HISTORIA con un descuento del 50% usando el código especial para podcast - PODCAST1936https://bit.ly/3Mz0ImVComparte nuestro podcast en tus redes sociales, puedes realizar una valoración de 5 estrellas en Apple Podcast o Spotify.Dirección, locución y producción: Iván Patxi Gómez GallegoContacto de publicidad en podcast: podcast@zinetmedia.esSuscríbete a Muy Interesante https://suscripciones.zinetmedia.es/mz/¿Quieres anunciarte en este podcast? Hazlo con advoices.com/podcast/ivoox/1389230

Y es que hacer una foto captando una escena y hacer una autofoto tendrían distintos significados. Es posible que dentro de tu círculo de amigos o incluso de tu familia haya alguien que adora hacerse selfies. También es posible que pienses que lo hace por pura vanidad. Sin embargo, un nuevo estudio ha descubierto la razón por la cual a las personas nos gusta hacernos autofotos (a unas más que a otras) y no es por lo que crees. El estudio se acaba de publicar en Social Psychological and Personality Science y ha analizado dos maneras de hacer fotografías: la que consiste en captar la escena sin más y las autofotos o selfies. Suscríbete a MUY HISTORIA con un descuento del 50% usando el código especial para podcast - PODCAST1936 https://bit.ly/3Mz0ImV Comparte nuestro podcast en tus redes sociales, puedes realizar una valoración de 5 estrellas en Apple Podcast o Spotify. Dirección, locución y producción: Iván Patxi Gómez Gallego Contacto de publicidad en podcast: podcast@zinetmedia.es Suscríbete a Muy Interesante https://suscripciones.zinetmedia.es/mz/ ¿Quieres anunciarte en este podcast? Hazlo con advoices.com/podcast/ivoox/1389230

Conversing with people can be a difficult task, especially when you're trying to make a good first impression. With the introduction of a new AI-based dating tool, users on platforms such as Hinge and Bumble can now rely on artificial intelligence to do the talking for them. Developed by four college students who experienced difficulty in 'conversing with people', this AI writing tool uses natural language processing and machine learning algorithms to create conversations for its users. The tool promises to save time, eliminate stress, and increase success rates when it comes to finding love online.Figuring out how to make a good impression on a first date can be tricky. To make it easier, a recent study published in the journal Social Psychological and Personality Science looked into the biggest turn-ons and turn-offs for potential partners during first dates. The study surveyed nearly 5,000 participants from around the world to get their opinion on what they felt were the three biggest turn-ons and three biggest turn-offs when it comes to first dates. KOP takes a look at those results and exploring why certain behaviors might be seen as attractive or unattractive by potential partners.Being busy is often mistaken for productivity, leading to the common problem of having a long to-do list with almost nothing getting done. This phenomenon, known as the “Myth of Being Busy” has been increasingly visible in today's fast paced living. Fortunately, there are now tools that can help people become more productive and make better use of their time.KOP explores three tools that can help combat the “Myth of Being Busy” and increase productivity. These tools will help manage tasks more effectively, prioritize tasks and projects, and optimize efficiency by helping users focus on what really matters. With these tools in hand, it is possible to be busy doing something without sacrificing the quality or importance of what is being accomplished.Check out all of the KOP Radio Network's talk and music offerings plus contact KOP for professional podcast production, imaging, and web design services at http://www.kingofpodcasts.comFollow KOP on Twitter, Instagram, TikTok or Facebook @kingofpodcastsSend a question, comment or topic to KOP to kingofpodcasts@yahoo.com and he will talk about it on a future segment of Depraved and Debaucherous.This show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5267208/advertisement

We gaan in deze aflevering opnieuw een aantal van jullie toffe vragen behandelen. Want dat waren er weer een hele hoop! Dit keer hebben we geen overkoepeld thema, dus is het een willekeur aan thema's en mooie onderwerpen. Van ouderschap tot het zijn van een ochtend of avondmens, van alcohol tot polyamorie. Wij nemen jullie graag mee!Ook leuk: je kunt ons ook volgen op Instagram of TikTok!Lees, kijk en luistertips

Die Themen in den Wissensnachrichten: +++ Pille für den Mann könnte mit Abschalten eines bestimmten Gens Wirklichkeit werden +++ Corona-Impfstoffe haben laut WHO in der Region Europa mehr als eine Million Leben gerettet +++ Weniger Eis in der Antarktis führt zu weniger Robbenrufen +++**********Weiterführende Quellen zu dieser Folge:ARRDC5 expression is conserved in mammalian testes and required for normal sperm morphogenesis, Nature Communications, 17.04.2023Estimated number of deaths directly averted as a result of COVID- 19 vaccination, ECCMID, 17.04.2023A new semi-slug of the genus Microparmarion from Brunei, discovered, described and DNA-barcoded on citizen-science 'taxon expeditions' (Gastropoda, Stylommatophora, Ariophantidae), Biodiversity Data Journal, 10.04.2023Having less than others is physically painful: Income rank and pain around the world, Social Psychological and Personality Science, 17.04.2023Sea-ice anomalies affect the acoustic presence of Antarctic pinnipeds in breeding areas, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 09 April 2023DribbleBot: Dynamic Legged Manipulation in the Wild, Cornell University, 03.04.2023**********Ihr könnt uns auch auf diesen Kanälen folgen: Tiktok und Instagram.**********Weitere Wissensnachrichten zum Nachlesen: https://www.deutschlandfunknova.de/nachrichten

New research which shows relationship vollatility may affect your body. Lead study author, Dr Brian Don from the University of Auckland says the quality of our primary relationship can predict how stressed we feel and can result in physiological symptoms such as blood pressure and heart rate. The research - The Good, the Bad, and the Variable: Examining Stress and Blood Pressure Responses to Close Relationships ran from 2019 to 2021 and it has just been published in the journal, Social Psychological and Personality Science. The 4,000 participants of the study usually took part for three week blocks, during which they had changes in their heart rates and blood pressure recorded via smartphone sensor. Dr Don says they were from a range of countries including the US, UK, Australia and New Zealand and shared reflections on their closest relationships, documenting positive and negative experiences.

We vergeten het nog weleens, maar het is voor ons hoofd behoorlijk belastend om een keuze te maken! En bovendien gaan we als mensen ook allemaal anders om met het maken van keuzes. Daarom hebben we het in deze aflevering over manieren en beweegredenen bij het 'kiezen' en lichten we: de 'maximizers' en de 'satisficers' uit.Voor meer persoonlijkheidsfeitjes volg ons op Instagram of TikTok!Lees, kijk en luistertips

Anastasia 45 Spontan, lustvoll, trans*, offene Beziehung und auf der Suche nach Sex. All genders welcome.” Mit diesem Dating-Profil soll die Bundeswehroffizierin Anastasia Biefang gegen die sogenannte außerdienstliche Wohlverhaltenspflicht der Bundeswehr verstoßen haben. Woher kommen solche Vorstellungen über Sexualmoral? Und was macht problematisches Sexualverhalten wirklich aus? Die Antworten gibt's im Podcast.. Passend dazu? Unsere YouTube-Folge “Wegen Dating-App vor Gericht | Der Fall Anastasia Biefang”: https://youtu.be/jD4iZqWURMA _______________ Weitere Links und Infos aus der Folge: Der Fall auf YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@DerFall Y-Kollektiv “Homosexualität im Glauben: Wie steht die evangelische Kirche dazu?”: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_xuCjikFrg Zitierte Studien: Murphy, A. P., Joel, S., & Muise, A. (2021). A prospective investigation of the decision to open up a romantic relationship. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(2), 194-201. _______________ Hosts: Lydia Benecke, Sarah Koldehoff Autorin: Sarah Koldehoff Schnitt: Riley Dedio Grafik: Pauline Branke Redaktion funk/ZDF: Lilly Amankwah, Vivien Hartmann, Franziska Kues Eine Produktion von LOOKS Media GmbH für funk. In Zusammenarbeit mit frontal.

In today's episode, we'll dive into the psychology, neuroscience, and philosophy of true crime. Find out what happens in your brain as you watch a thriller documentary, whether females really do enjoy true crime more than males, and how true crime mirrors the current status of our society.Adam Golub is professor of American Studies at California State University, Fullerton, where he teaches courses on popular culture, music, monsters, and creative work. He is co-editor of Monsters in the Classroom: Essays on Teaching What Scares Us (McFarland, 2017) and the author of numerous articles on topics including fandom, true crime, zombies, the blues, and cold war youth culture. Get started with Buzzsprout HERE!FIND DR. ADAM GOLUBWebsite: https://www.everydayfictions.com/MENTIONEDHonorable Donald E. Shelton, "The 'CSI Effect': Does It Really Exist?," March 16, 2008, nij.ojp.gov: https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/csi-effect-does-it-really-existVicary, A. M., & Fraley, R. C. (2010). Captured by true crime: Why are women drawn to tales of rape, murder, and serial killers? Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1(1), 81–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550609355486Kelli S. Boling & Kevin Hull (2018) Undisclosed Information—Serial Is My Favorite Murder: Examining Motivations in the True Crime Podcast Audience, Journal of Radio & Audio Media, 25:1, 92-108, DOI: 10.1080/19376529.2017.1370714https://ncadv.org/STATISTICShttps://www.mmiwg-ffada.ca/final-report/Zach Sommers, Missing White Woman Syndrome: An Empirical Analysis of Race and Gender Disparities in Online News Coverage of Missing Persons, 106 J. Crim. L. & Criminology (2016). https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc/vol106/iss2/4"Criminal Crossovers," Foreword to "American True Crime in the 21st Century Re-Examined: Critical Interventions in a National Obsession," special issue, Crime Fiction Studies 3:1 (2022): v-xiii.FIND MEWMT Instagram: @walkmethrough.jpg Website: https://walk-me-through.mailchimpsites.com/Support WMT: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/walkmethroughPersonal Instagram: @eugenia.jpgCREDITSTrack: Electric Ten — Broke in Summer [Audio Library Release]Music provided by Audio Library PlusWatch: https://youtu.be/qooMP-upphwFree Download / Stream: https://alplus.io/electric-tenSupport the show

Moet je je eigen persoonlijkheid simpelweg accepteren en er niet naar omkijken, of zijn er manieren om het toch te veranderen? In de laatste aflevering van dit seizoen hebben we het over of je jezelf kunt veranderen. En zo ja: hoe dan!?Voor meer persoonlijkheidsfeitjes volg ons op Instagram of TikTok!Lees, kijk en luistertips

Gratitude has altered the way Nancy Boyne sees the world and herself. Nancy's lifework included learning consulting and corporate telecommunications. She now is a super-active retiree with a practice of recognizing and acknowledging the goodness in her life. Listen in as she takes you through her travels, her successes, her obstacles, and her challenges. I highlight some of the many benefits of gratitude practices and offer some advice on how to cultivate and express a state of thankfulness. Host: Chris Singleheart Dewall, Nathan & Lambert, Nathaniel & Pond, Jr, Richard & Kashdan, Todd & Fincham, Frank. (2012). A grateful heart is a nonviolent heart: Cross-sectional, experience sampling, longitudinal, and experimental evidence. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 3. 232-240. 10.1177/1948550611416675. Fox, G. R., Kaplan, J., Damasio, H., & Damasio, A. (2015). Neural correlates of gratitude. Frontiers in psychology, 6, 1491. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01491 Seligman, M., Steen, T.A., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005). Positive psychology progress: Empirical validation of interventions. The American psychologist, 60 5, 410-21.

El estudio The Friends-to-Lovers Pathway to Romance: Prevalent, Preferred, and Overlooked by Science (El camino de amigos a amantes hacia el romance: prevalente, preferido y pasado por alto) publicado en Social Psychological and Personality Science (SAGE Journals: Your gateway to world-class journal research) el año pasado, explica que aunque popularmente esperamos o creemos que el amor surge de la relación con alguien desconocido, la verdad es muy distinta pues según esta investigación, una gran parte de las parejas románticas comienzan como amigos, y de manera idealizada, esperamos que lo que inicia como una amistad, termine convirtiéndose en una relación amorosa. Los resultados mostraron que la mayoría de las parejas románticas comenzaron como amigos, según sus cifras, varían del 40% al 73% estas relaciones suelen ser más duraderas y con más comunicación debido a la confianza, complicidad y compatibilidad que se construye y quizá es el elemento primordial que nos lleva a construir un amor maduro.

"Positive Psychologie" setzt sich damit auseinander, wie wir glücklicher und zufriedener werden können. Dafür sollten wir uns gewisse Fragen stellen. Welche das sind, erklären Main Huong und Diane in dieser Ausgabe "Achtsam". **********Quellen aus der Folge:Lindsay, E. K., Chin, B., Greco, C. M., Young, S., Brown, K. W., Wright, A. G. & Creswell, J. D. (2018). How mindfulness training promotes positive emotions: Dismantling acceptance skills training in two randomized controlled trials. Journal of personality and social psychology, 115(6), 944. Kiken, L. G., & Shook, N. J. (2011). Looking up: Mindfulness increases positive judgments and reduces negativity bias. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(4), 425-431.   **********Dianes und Main Huongs Empfehlungen:"Glücklich sein: Warum Sie es in der Hand haben, zufrieden zu leben" von Sonja Lyubomirsky, Campus Verlag."Das Happiness Prinzip" von Shawn Achor, Unimedica."Dankbarkeit, Wertschätzung und Glück: Auf dem Weg zu einem neuen Lebensstil" von Liv Larsson, Junfermann Verlag."The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Positive Psychological Interventions" von Acacia C. Parks und Stephen Schueller, John Wiley & Sons (wissenschaftliche Literatur). **********Mehr zum Thema bei Deutschlandfunk Nova:An Krisen wachsen: Strategien für mehr ResilienzPsyche: Good vibes setzen uns mental unter DruckOptimistisch bleiben - Wenn uns die Weltlage verunsichert**********Den Artikel zum Stück findet ihr hier.**********Ihr könnt uns auch auf diesen Kanälen folgen: Tiktok und Instagram.**********Ihr habt Anregungen, Ideen, Themenwünsche? Dann schreibt uns gern unter achtsam@deutschlandfunknova.de

Welcome to the Social-Engineer Podcast: The Doctor Is In Series – where we will discuss understandings and developments in the field of psychology.     This is Episode 181 and hosted by Chris Hadnagy, CEO of Social-Engineer LLC, and The Innocent Lives Foundation, as well as Social-Engineer.Org and The Institute for Social Engineering.    Joining Chris is co-host Dr. Abbie Maroño. Abbie is Director of education at Social-Engineer, LLC, and a perception management coach. She has a PhD in Behaviour analysis and specializes in nonverbal communication, trust, and cooperation.    Today's conversation will be on the topic of Can You Fake It Till You Make It. [Oct 03, 2022]    00:00 – Intro  00:21 – Dr. Abbie Maroño Intro  01:16 – Intro Links  Social-Engineer.com Managed Voice Phishing  Managed Email Phishing Adversarial Simulations  Social-Engineer channel on SLACK  CLUTCH  innocentlivesfoundation.org  03:45 – The topic of the day: Can you fake it till you make it?  05:15 – The Power of the Mind  06:53 – The Placebo Milkshake  12:07 – The difference with disorders  14:09 – “I'm gonna be happy!”  15:55 – Facial Feedback Hypothesis  21:00 – The power of expression  22:18 – Botox for happiness?  30:27 – Power Posing  37:39 – V is for Victory!  39:07 – The basis of non-verbals  41:34 – Self Talk  44:34 – All or Nothing  47:37 – Public Speaking or Firing Squad?  49:34 – Book Recommendations  You, Only Better – Nicholas Bate - https://amzn.to/3LTGkul  Don't Sweat the Small Stuff – Richard Carlson - https://amzn.to/3C0eg3I  50:26 – Wrap Up   50:58 – Find us online  Twitter: https://twitter.com/abbiejmarono  LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/dr-abbie-maroño-phd-35ab2611a  Twitter: https://twitter.com/humanhacker  LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/christopherhadnagy  51:48 – Outro  www.social-engineer.com  www.innocentlivesfoundation.org    Select research:    Carney, D. R., Cuddy, A. J., & Yap, A. J. (2010). Power posing: Brief nonverbal displays affect neuroendocrine levels and risk tolerance. Psychological science, 21(10), 1363-1368.     Coles, N. A., Larsen, J. T., & Lench, H. C. (2019). A meta-analysis of the facial feedback literature: Effects of facial feedback on emotional experience are small and variable. Psychological bulletin, 145(6), 610.     Crum, A. J., Corbin, W. R., Brownell, K. D., & Salovey, P. (2011). Mind over milkshakes: mindsets, not just nutrients, determine ghrelin response. Health Psychology, 30(4), 424.     Fischer, J., Fischer, P., Englich, B., Aydin, N., & Frey, D. (2011). Empower my decisions: The effects of power gestures on confirmatory information processing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(6), 1146-1154.     Garrison, K. E., Tang, D., & Schmeichel, B. J. (2016). Embodying power: A preregistered replication and extension of the power pose effect. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(7), 623-630.     Gronau, Q. F., Van Erp, S., Heck, D. W., Cesario, J., Jonas, K. J., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2017). A Bayesian model-averaged meta-analysis of the power pose effect with informed and default priors: The case of felt power. Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology, 2(1), 123-138.     Hardy, J., Gammage, K., & Hall, C. (2001). A descriptive study of athlete self-talk. The sport psychologist, 15(3), 306-318.     Kross, E., Bruehlman-Senecal, E., Park, J., Burson, A., Dougherty, A., Shablack, H., ... & Ayduk, O. (2014). Self-talk as a regulatory mechanism: how you do it matters. Journal of personality and social psychology, 106(2), 304.     McIntosh, D. N. (1996). Facial feedback hypotheses: Evidence, implications, and directions. Motivation and emotion, 20(2), 121-147.     Neal, D. T., & Chartrand, T. L. (2011). Embodied emotion perception: amplifying and dampening facial feedback modulates emotion perception accuracy. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(6), 673-678.     Neary, N. M., Small, C. J., & Bloom, S. R. (2003). Gut and mind. Gut, 52(7), 918-921.     Shackell, E. M., & Standing, L. G. (2007). Mind Over Matter: Mental Training Increases Physical Strength. North American Journal of Psychology, 9(1).    Zamanian, A., Jolfaei, A. G., Mehran, G., & Azizian, Z. (2017). Efficacy of botox versus placebo for treatment of patients with major depression. Iranian journal of public health, 46(7), 982.     Khademi, M., Roohaninasab, M., Goodarzi, A., Seirafianpour, F., Dodangeh, M., & Khademi, A. (2021). The healing effects of facial BOTOX injection on symptoms of depression alongside its effects on beauty preservation. Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 20(5), 1411-1415.     Carter, Bradin T., "Is Botox A Safe And Effective Treatment To Reduce Symptoms Of Depression?" (2017). PCOM Physician Assistant Studies Student Scholarship. 404. https://digitalcommons.pcom.edu/pa_systematic_reviews/404   

IN SICKNESS AND HEALTH Common condition ‘makes you notice your partner's annoying habits MORE', scientists warn According to a new study published in Social Psychological and Personality Science, how married couples see each other can be affected by their stress levels and the strains going on in their day-to-day lives. Be sure to check out Kenya Nunez as she uncovers how stress can screw up your marriage. Don't forget to SUBSCRIBE and SUPPORT the show right on your phone. Just click "Support." [◉"]whoislimos --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/thebarbershopgroup/support

Welcome to the Social-Engineer Podcast: The Doctor Is In Series – where we will discuss understandings and developments in the field of psychology.     This is Episode 177 and hosted by Chris Hadnagy, CEO of Social-Engineer LLC, and The Innocent Lives Foundation, as well as Social-Engineer.Org and The Institute for Social Engineering.    Joining Chris is co-host Dr. Abbie Maroño. Abbie is Director of education at Social-Engineer, LLC, and a perception management coach. She has a PhD in Behaviour analysis and specializes in nonverbal communication, trust, and cooperation.    Today's conversation will be on the topic of Subliminal Persuasion. [Sep 05, 2022]    00:00 – Intro  00:27 – Dr. Abbie Maroño Intro  01:07 – Intro Links  Social-Engineer.com Managed Voice Phishing Managed Email Phishing Adversarial Simulations  Social-Engineer channel on SLACK CLUTCH innocentlivesfoundation.org  03:26 – Why this podcast?  04:28 – The topic of the day: Subliminal Persuasion  05:46 – What is Subliminal Persuasion?  07:03 – The Coca-Cola & popcorn myth  09:08 – Judas Priest Lawsuit  10:32 – Sex on ice, does it work?  15:00 – Getting warmer...  16:08 – ...and colder  18:49 – The importance of being attentive  21:28 – Does it pass the smell test?  22:59 – Can Prime lead to Persuasion?  24:34 – The necessity of Motivation  27:05 – Does Belief play a role?  28:17 – The Smell of Fear  32:52 – Applying the Subliminal  38:58 – The limitations of application  41:26 – Subtle Psychology  44:33 – Book Recommendations  Subliminal: How Your Unconscious Mind Rules Your Behavior – Leonard Mlodinow  45:42 – Find Dr. Abbie Maroño on the web  Twitter: https://twitter.com/abbiejmarono  LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/dr-abbie-maroño-phd-35ab2611a  Website: https://www.abbiemarono.com/  46:26 – Find Chris on the web  Twitter: https://twitter.com/humanhacker  LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/christopherhadnagy  46:41 – Wrap Up   47:59 – Outro  www.social-engineer.com  www.innocentlivesfoundation.org    Select research:  Chen, Z., Tan, Y., Zhang, Z., & Li, M. (2021). Research on subliminal visual messages based on EEG signal and convolutional neural network. In MATEC Web of Conferences (Vol. 336, p. 05014). EDP Sciences.    Damaskinidis, G., & Kostopoulou, L. (2021). Intersemiotic Translation of Subliminal Messages in Brand Logos: A Qualitative Experimental Research. International Journal of Semiotics and Visual Rhetoric (IJSVR), 5(1), 1-14.    Dijksterhuis, A., Aarts, H., & Smith, P. K. (2005). The power of the subliminal: On subliminal persuasion and other potential applications. The new unconscious, 1, 77-106.    Epley, N., Savitsky, K., & Kachelski, R. A. (1999). What every skeptic should know about subliminal persuasion. Skeptical Inquirer, 23(5), 40-45.    Hsu, L., & Chen, Y. J. (2020). Neuromarketing, subliminal advertising, and hotel selection: An EEG study. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 28(4), 200-208.    Li, N., Juan, L., Xin, W., & Xiang-hong, S. (2011, March). Effect of sustained subliminal auditory stimulus on human emotion. In International Conference on Information Science and Technology (pp. 381-384). IEEE.    Loersch, C., Durso, G. R., & Petty, R. E. (2013). Vicissitudes of desire: A matching mechanism for subliminal persuasion. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(5), 624-631.    Riener, A. (2012). Subliminal persuasion and its potential for driver behavior adaptation. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 13(1), 71-80.    Smarandescu, L., & Shimp, T. A. (2015). Drink coca-cola, eat popcorn, and choose powerade: testing the limits of subliminal persuasion. Marketing Letters, 26(4), 715-726.    Strahan, E. J., Spencer, S. J., & Zanna, M. P. (2002). Subliminal priming and persuasion: Striking while the iron is hot. Journal of experimental social psychology, 38(6), 556-568.    Zacharia, A. B., Hamelin, N., Harcar, T., & Rodgers, P. (2020). A Neuro Analysis of Static Subliminal Advertising in Packaging. EDITORIAL 77, 29, 81-104. 

Can genuine friends truly transition into longterm romantic and sexual partners? Is it more ideal to gradually walk into love WITH someone who's already your best friend OR fall in love and then become best friends? According to a 2021 study published in Social Psychological and Personality Science finds that two thirds of romantic couples started out in a platonic relationship. Yes, 68% reported that their current romantic relationship began as a friendship! And the rate of friends to lovers was even higher among 20 somethings and within the LGBTQ+ communities with 85% reported that their relationship began as a friendship. And more interestingly I think, only 30% said they were sexually attracted to the partner from the very beginning.  You might be like, why is this so shocking to you and it's because in essence our generation might be rewriting the traditionally understood blueprint for forming romantic bonds. This is what we discuss with guests Ezee and Natalie, two comedic-content creators turned collaborators turned best friends turned lovers, who have shared every part of their journey online and thus have sparked a lot of conversations about whether plutonic friends really shift to romantic lovers in a way that is both equal and sustainable? And with Hotline Bling producer plus half of DVSN's Nineteen85 aka Paul Jefferies.  Follow Shan on Instagram: www.instagram.com/shanboodyCall in to the show to leave a voice note ‪(323) 375-4797loversfriendspodcast@gmail.com   Follow the guests on this episode   Ezee  https://www.instagram.com/ezee https://www.youtube.com/c/youngezee https://www.youtube.com/c/ezeexnatalie  Nataliehttps://www.instagram.com/natalie.odell/ https://www.youtube.com/c/NatalieOdellXo https://www.youtube.com/c/ezeexnatalie  Nineteen85 https://www.instagram.com/nineteen85_ https://www.instagram.com/dvsn https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC9xq-hVeC-OJHvWOxGydo9g  

The COVID-19 pandemic brought lots of surprises, including the political and religious conflicts connected to it. In this podcast we explore one facet of this as Emily Kubin and Frank J. Kachanoff discuss their research published in the paper "Threat Rejection Fuels Political Dehumanization" published in the journal Social Psychological and Personality Science. Part of their abstract for the paper reads, "Americans disagree about many things, including what threats are most pressing. We suggest people morally condemn and dehumanize opponents when they are perceived as rejecting the existence or severity of important perceived threats." Although not a part of their research project, this dynamic may play a part in conservative Christian reactions to those who take a different stance on COVID-19 vaccines. "Threat Rejection Fuels Dehumanization": https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/19485506211068922 Learn more about our work at https://www.multifaithmatters.org. Support this work: One-time donation: https://multifaithmatters.org/donate Become my patron: https://patron.podbean.com/johnwmorehead #socialpsychology #dehumanization #COVID

每日英語跟讀 Ep.K361: Farm animals and humans should be treated the same, children say   Children think farm animals deserve to be treated as well as human beings but lose this belief in adolescence, a groundbreaking study has found. 一項開創性的研究發現，孩子們認為農場動物應該像人類一樣受到對待，但在青春期就失去了這種信念。 Researchers from the universities of Exeter and Oxford asked a group of British children aged nine to 11, young adults aged 18 to 21 and older men and women about their attitudes to different sorts of animals. 來自埃克塞特大學和牛津大學的研究人員詢問了一組9至11歲的英國兒童，18至21歲的年輕人以及年齡較大的男性和女性，以了解他們對不同種類動物的態度。 In general, the children said farm animals and human beings should be treated the same and found eating animals less morally acceptable than both sets of adults. The findings suggest that “speciesism” — a moral hierarchy that gives different value to different animals — is learned during adolescence, according to the study. 普遍來說，孩子們說農場動物和人類應該得到同樣的對待，並且發現吃動物在道德上不如兩組成年人。研究結果表明，「物種主義」——一種賦予不同動物不同價值的道德等級制度——是在青春期學習的。 “Humans' relationship with animals is full of ethical double standards,” said the lead author, Luke McGuire, a lecturer at the University of Exeter who specializes in social and moral development. “Some animals are beloved household companions, while others are kept in factory farms for economic benefit. Judgments seem to largely depend on the species of the animal in question: dogs are our friends, pigs are food.” “人類與動物的關係充滿了道德雙重標準，”主要作者，埃克塞特大學（University of Exeter）專門研究社會和道德發展的講師盧克·麥奎爾（Luke McGuire）說。“有些動物是心愛的家庭伴侶，而另一些則為了經濟利益而被飼養在工廠化農場。判斷似乎在很大程度上取決於所討論動物的種類：狗是我們的朋友，豬是食物。 The report says an important aspect of the human mind is “moral acrobatics”: people can hold ethical values that contradict each other and employ moral double standards. But the origins of moral acrobatics relating to animals is poorly understood and the researchers say this new study provides some of the first evidence examining the differences in how children and adults think about animal treatment. 報告說，人類思維的一個重要方面是“道德雜技”：人們可以持有相互矛盾的道德價值觀，並採用道德雙重標準。但是，與動物有關的道德雜技的起源知之甚少，研究人員表示，這項新研究提供了一些初步證據，檢查了兒童和成人如何看待動物治療的差異。 Among other tasks, participants in the study were presented with pictures including a farm animal and companion animals and asked to categorize them as “food”, “pet” or “object”. They were asked how animals were treated, and how they should be treated. 除其他任務外，該研究的參與者還獲得了包括農場動物和伴侶動物在內的圖片，並被要求將它們歸類為“食物”，“寵物”或“物體”。他們被問及如何對待動物，以及應該如何對待它們。 Children did not judge all animals to be equal. They concluded, in fact, that dogs ought to be treated better than pigs — but also that pigs ought not to be treated differently from humans. The two sets of adult groups said pigs ought to be treated less well than dogs, while humans and dogs ought to be treated the same. 孩子們並沒有判斷所有的動物都是平等的。事實上，他們得出的結論是，狗應該比豬受到更好的對待，但也不應該對豬的待遇與人類不同。這兩組成年群體表示，豬應該比狗受到的待遇要差，而人類和狗應該受到同樣的對待。 McGuire said the study suggests that while children think farm animals and humans ought to be treated equally well, by adulthood people believe that companion animals and humans ought to be treated better. He said children rated eating animals as significantly less permissible than young adults and adults did. McGuire說，這項研究表明，雖然孩子們認為農場動物和人類應該得到同等的對待，但到了成年人，人們認為伴侶動物和人類應該得到更好的對待。他說，兒童認為吃動物比年輕人和成年人的允許性要低得多。 The paper, published in the journal Social Psychological and Personality Science, is titled “The development of speciesism: age-related differences in the moral view of animals.” 這篇論文發表在《社會心理與人格科學》（Social Psychological and Personality Science）雜誌上，題目是“物種主義的發展：動物道德觀中與年齡相關的差異”。Source article: https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/lang/archives/2022/04/19/2003776807

In this modern world of endless social media scrolling and heightened divisions, have you ever found yourself intentionally looking for something to be angry about? This episode is for you if you've ever wondered why.Disclaimer: This podcast is for educational and informational purposes only and does not substitute individual professional psychological advice.REFERENCESBrown-Iannuzzi, J. L., Lundberg, K. B., Kay, A. C., & Payne, B. K. (2020). A Privileged Point of View: Effects of Subjective Socioeconomic Status on Naïve Realism and Political Division. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(2), 241–256.Chien, Y., Wegener, D., Petty, R., & Hsiao, C. (2014). The Flexible Correction Model: Bias Correction Guided by Naïve Theories of Bias. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(6), 275-286. Esses, V. M., Veenvliet, S., Hodson, G., & Mihic, L. (2008). Justice, morality, and the dehumanization of refugees. Social Justice Research, 21, 4–25. Gilbert, D. T., Lieberman, M. D., Morewedge, C. K. & Wilson, T. D. (2004). The peculiar longevity of things not so bad. Psychological Science, 15(1), 14–19.Hawkins, D. R. (2002). Power vs. force: The hidden determinants of human behavior. Carlsbad, Calif: Hay House.Ito, T. A., Larsen, J. T., Smith, N. K., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1998). Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: The negativity bias in evaluative categorizations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(4), 887–900. Lisitsa, E. (2012, December 3). The Positive Perspective: Dr. Gottman's Magic Ratio! [blog post]. Retrieved from http://www.gottmanblog.com/2012/12/the-positive-perspective-dr-gottmans.htmlLópez-Rodriguez, L., Halperin, E., Vázquez, A., Cuadrado, I., Navas, M., & Gómez, A. (2021). Awareness of the Psychological Bias of Naïve Realism Can Increase Acceptance of Cultural Differences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. Martin, R. C., Coyier, K. R., VanSistine, L. M., & Schroeder, K. L. (2013). Anger on the Internet: The Perceived Value of Rant-Sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(2), 119–122. Merritt, A., Effron, D., & Monin, B. (2010). Moral Self‐Licensing: When Being Good Frees Us to Be Bad. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(5)Pronin, E., Gilovich, T., & Ross, L. (2004). Objectivity in the eye of the beholder: Divergent perceptions of bias in self versus others. Psychological Review, 111, 781–799.Puryear, C. (2020). The threat to virality: Digital outrage combats the spread of opposing ideas.Rathje, S., Van Bavel, J. J. & van der Linden, S. (2021). Out-group animosity drives engagement on social media. The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(26).Ross, L., & Ward, A. (1995). Psychological barriers to dispute resolution. Advances in experimental social psychology, 27, 255–304. Rothschild, Z. K. & Keefer, L. A. (2017). A cleansing fire: moral outrage alleviates guilt and buffers threats to one's moral identity. Motivation and Emotion, 41(2), 209–229.Sapolsky, R. M. (2017). Behave: The Biology of Humans at Our Best and Worst. Penguin Books.Singer, M. A. (2007). The Untethered Soul. New Harbinger Publications.Tong, E., & Yang, Z. (2011). Moral Hypocrisy. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(2), 159-165.Your Brain on Drama

What are some of the commonly-believed myths about meditation? What are the benefits and risks? Join me as I discuss meditation: the good, the bad, and the ugly. Check out the Youtube Channel for a few meditation resources (will be expanding!): https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCO5n25rkQY4iSPBysUo0N2w/featured References Afonso, R. F., Kraft, I., Aratanha, M. A., & Kozasa, E. H. (2020). Neural correlates of meditation: a review of structural and functional MRI studies. Frontiers in Bioscience (Scholars Edition), 12, 92-115. Anderson, T., Suresh, M., & Farb, N. A. (2019). Meditation benefits and drawbacks: empirical codebook and implications for teaching. Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, 3(2), 207-220. Baer, R. A., Lykins, E. L., & Peters, J. R. (2012). Mindfulness and self-compassion as predictors of psychological wellbeing in long-term meditators and matched nonmeditators. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 7(3), 230-238. Farias, M., Maraldi, E., Wallenkampf, K. C., & Lucchetti, G. (2020). Adverse events in meditation practices and meditation‐based therapies: A systematic review. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 142(5), 374-393. Galante, J., Galante, I., Bekkers, M. J., & Gallacher, J. (2014). Effect of kindness-based meditation on health and well-being: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 82(6), 1101. Goldberg, S. B., Tucker, R. P., Greene, P. A., Davidson, R. J., Wampold, B. E., Kearney, D. J., & Simpson, T. L. (2018). Mindfulness-based interventions for psychiatric disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 59, 52-60. Hilton, L., Hempel, S., Ewing, B. A., Apaydin, E., Xenakis, L., Newberry, S., ... & Maglione, M. A. (2017). Mindfulness meditation for chronic pain: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 51(2), 199-213. Kiken, L. G., & Shook, N. J. (2011). Looking up: Mindfulness increases positive judgments and reduces negativity bias. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(4), 425-431. Koncz, A., Demetrovics, Z., & Takacs, Z. K. (2021). Meditation interventions efficiently reduce cortisol levels of at-risk samples: A meta-analysis. Health psychology review, 15(1), 56-84. Luberto, C. M., Shinday, N., Song, R., Philpotts, L. L., Park, E. R., Fricchione, G. L., & Yeh, G. Y. (2018). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of meditation on empathy, compassion, and prosocial behaviors. Mindfulness, 9(3), 708-724. Rusch, H. L., Rosario, M., Levison, L. M., Olivera, A., Livingston, W. S., Wu, T., & Gill, J. M. (2019). The effect of mindfulness meditation on sleep quality: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1445(1), 5-16. Shi, L., Zhang, D., Wang, L., Zhuang, J., Cook, R., & Chen, L. (2017). Meditation and blood pressure: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Journal of hypertension, 35(4), 696-706.

Jessica Flake is Assistant Professor for quantitative psychology and modeling at McGill University, where she studies measurement. In this conversation, we talk about her recent paper 'Measurement Schmeasurement:  Questionable measurement practices and how to avoid them' (with former guest of the podcast Eiko Fried), how she makes stats lectures interesting, and her work on the Psychological Science Accellarator.BJKS Podcast is a podcast about neuroscience, psychology, and anything vaguely related, hosted by Benjamin James Kuper-Smith. In 2022, episodes will appear irregularly, roughly twice per month. You can find the podcast on all podcasting platforms (e.g., Spotify, Apple/Google Podcasts, etc.). Timestamps0:00:04: Eiko Fried is maybe not that good at p-hacking0:02:03: How Jessica got into researching measurement0:10:42: The title of 'Measurement Schmeasurement'0:16:15: So what is Schmeasurement?0:24:47: How does Jessica ('literally the best prof ever') make statistics engaging?0:43:02: Is transparency the solution to schmeasurement?0:49:56: Was I measuring or schmeasuring in my recent paper?1:03:39: The next generation of the open science movement1:15:15: What's it like working on large collaborative projects like The Psychological Science Accelerator?Podcast linksWebsite: https://geni.us/bjks-podTwitter: https://geni.us/bjks-pod-twtJessica's linksWebsite: https://geni.us/flake-webGoogle Scholar: https://geni.us/flake-scholarTwitter: https://geni.us/flake-twtBen's linksWebsite: https://geni.us/bjks-webGoogle Scholar: https://geni.us/bjks-scholarTwitter:  https://geni.us/bjks-twtReferencesMy episode with Eiko Fried: https://geni.us/bjks-friedThe Twitter thread that started schmeasurement: https://twitter.com/JkayFlake/status/917514276893536257Axelrod (1980). Effective choice in the prisoner's dilemma. Journal of conflict resolution.Flake & Fried (2020). Measurement schmeasurement: Questionable measurement practices and how to avoid them. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science.Flake, Pek, & Hehman (2017). Construct validation in social and personality research: Current practice and recommendations. Social Psychological and Personality Science.Flake, Davidson, Wong, & Pek (2022). Construct validity and the validity of replication studies: A systematic review.Kuper-Smith, Doppelhofer, Oganian, Rosenblau, & Korn (2021). Risk perception and optimism during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. Royal Society open science.Moshontz, ... & Chartier, C. R. (2018). The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science.Nosek, Beck, Campbell, Flake, Hardwicke, Mellor, ... & Vazire (2019). Preregistration is hard, and worthwhile. Trends in cognitive sciences.Simmons, Nelson, & Simonsohn (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological science.

On part 1 of this episode of Heterodox Out Loud, we'll listen to Jonathan Haidt's edited summary of a seminal academic paper that helped lead to the founding of Heterodox Academy. The original paper, “Political Diversity Will Improve Social Psychological Science,” was published in Behavioral and Brain Sciences in 2015, and was written by Jonathan Haidt, Lee Jussim, Jose Duarte, Jarret Crawford, Phil Tetlock, and Charlotta Stern. Make sure to listen to listen to part 2 where we speak with co-author Lee Jussim, Social Psychologist and Distinguished Professor at Rutgers University, about how political bias in academia can solidify into orthodoxies that undermine truth-seeking and critical inquiry. Let us know what you think! For comments and questions email communications@heterodoxacademy.org.This episode was hosted by Zach Rausch, and produced by Davies Content. Heterodox Out Loud is an ongoing series of selected pieces from heterodox: the blog in audio form with exclusive interviews. 

On part 2 of this episode of Heterodox Out Loud, we continue exploring how political bias in academia can solidify into orthodoxies that undermine truth-seeking and critical inquiry.We speak with co-author of Political Diversity Will Improve Social Psychological Science, Lee Jussim, Social Psychologist and Distinguished Professor at Rutgers University. Lee has published numerous articles and edited several books on social perception, accuracy, self-fulfilling prophecies, and stereotypes. For more from Lee, check out his Psychology Today blog called Rabble Rouser. Let us know what you think! For comments and questions email communications@heterodoxacademy.org.This episode was hosted by Zach Rausch, and produced by Davies Content. Heterodox Out Loud is an ongoing series of selected pieces from heterodox: the blog in audio form with exclusive interviews. 

Luftangriffe, Atomwaffen, die in Alarmbereitschaft versetzt werden, Tote, Verletzte, Bomben, geflüchtete Menschen – gerade wird die Welt wieder mit Hiobsbotschaften geflutet. In dieser Folge von Achtsam klären wir unter anderem den Unterschied zwischen Mitgefühl und Mitleiden. Wie uns Achtsamkeit durch die aktuelle Zeit hilft: und zwar nicht, um sich von der Welt abzuschotten, sondern gerade, um helfen zu können, ohne den Verstand zu verlieren. **********Quellen aus der Folge:Bendau et al., 2021 in European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience (Medienkonsum von Corona-Nachrichten & psych. Belastungen) Curry, Alexander and Hammonds, Keith H. (2014, June). Solutions journalism. Center for Media (Journalismus & Selbstwirksamkeit der Leser*innen) Nila, Holt, Ditzen, Aguilar-Raab (2016), Mental Health & Prevention (Achtsamkeit und gesteigerte Stresstoleranz) Kiken & Shook, 2011 in Social Psychological and Personality Science (Achtsamkeit reduziert den Negativitäts-Bias und hilft auch positive Informationen wahrzunehmen) **********Den Artikel zum Stück findet ihr hier.**********Ihr könnt uns auch auf diesen Kanälen folgen: Instagram und YouTube.**********Ihr habt Anregungen, Ideen, Themenwünsche? Dann schreibt uns gern unter achtsam@deutschlandfunknova.de

Body proportions matter a surprising amount in the context of dating but much of it is only able to be understood in a realistic field study. In today's episode, we go over a unique speed-dating study with a large sample size to confirm that physical features such as shoulder-width ratio and waist-hip ratio matter in making someone appear more physically attractive and how this relates to appearances of social dominance contrasting with femininity (i.e. sexual dimorphism).Sidari, Morgan J.; Lee, Anthony J.; Murphy, Sean C.; Sherlock, James M.; Dixson, Barnaby J. W.; Zietsch, Brendan P. (2020). Preferences for Sexually Dimorphic Body Characteristics Revealed in a Large Sample of Speed Daters. Social Psychological and Personality Science, (), 194855061988292

Learn about how socializing too much can be bad for your health; rogue planets without a home star; and ancient bâdgirs.  Socializing too much can be bad for your health by Steffie Drucker  Research Shows Too Much Socializing Can Harm You. (2021). Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/finding-new-home/202110/research-shows-too-much-socializing-can-harm-you  Stavrova, O., & Ren, D. (2020). Is More Always Better? Examining the Nonlinear Association of Social Contact Frequency With Physical Health and Longevity. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 194855062096158. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620961589  Rogue Planets Wander The Galaxy Without A Star To Call Home by Ashley Hamer  Drake, N. (2014, March 13). A Guide to Lonely Planets in the Galaxy. Science; National Geographic. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/a-guide-to-lonely-planets-in-the-galaxy?loggedin=true  ‌Gough, E. (2021, October). Rogue Planets Could be Habitable - Universe Today. Universe Today. https://www.universetoday.com/152785/rogue-planets-could-be-habitable/  Schulze-Makuch, D. (2021, August 24). The Astrobiological Potential of Rogue Planets. Air & Space Magazine; Air & Space Magazine. https://www.airspacemag.com/daily-planet/astrobiological-potential-rogue-planets-180978507/  Ancient Persian "wind catchers" could help us beat the heat better than air conditioning by Grant Currin  Kimiya Shokoohi. (2021). The ancient Persian way to keep cool. Bbc.com. https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20210810-the-ancient-persian-way-to-keep-cool  ‌Carey, T. (2021, September 22). Is ancient technology better than modern air conditioning? Freethink; Freethink Media. https://www.freethink.com/environment/wind-catchers  ‌Cooling Stadiums at the 2022 FIFA World Cup - Free Running Buildings. (2021, July). Free Running Buildings. https://freerunningbuildings.com/cooling-stadiums-at-the-2022-fifa-world-cup/  Follow Curiosity Daily on your favorite podcast app to learn something new every day withCody Gough andAshley Hamer. Still curious? Get exclusive science shows, nature documentaries, and more real-life entertainment on discovery+! Go to https://discoveryplus.com/curiosity to start your 7-day free trial. discovery+ is currently only available for US subscribers. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Learn about psychedelics research in the 1950s; cold shower benefits; and an inaccurate stereotype about the only child. Thousands of patients were treated with psychedelics in the 1950s by Cameron Duke Fuentes, J. J., Fonseca, F., Elices, M., Farré, M., & Torrens, M. (2020). Therapeutic Use of LSD in Psychiatry: A Systematic Review of Randomized-Controlled Clinical Trials. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00943  Lattin, D. (2017, January 3). How the War on Drugs Halted Research Into the Potential Benefits of Psychedelics. Slate Magazine; Slate. https://slate.com/technology/2017/01/the-war-on-drugs-halted-research-into-the-potential-benefits-of-psychedelics.html  Rick, D. (2011). Dr. Leary's Concord Prison Experiment: A 34-Year Follow-up Study. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02791072.1998.10399715  The '60s Are Gone, But Psychedelic Research Trip Continues. (2014, March 9). NPR.org. https://www.npr.org/2014/03/09/288285764/the-60s-are-gone-but-psychedelic-research-trip-continues  Yensen, R., & Dryer, D. A. (1992, September 24). Thirty Years of Psychedelic Research: The Spring Grove Experiment and Its Sequels. ResearchGate; unknown. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309477954_Thirty_Years_of_Psychedelic_Research_The_Spring_Grove_Experiment_and_Its_Sequels  Johns Hopkins Medicine Receives First Federal Grant for Psychedelic Treatment Research in 50 years. (2021, October 18). Johns Hopkins Medicine Newsroom. https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/news/newsroom/news-releases/johns-hopkins-medicine-receives-first-federal-grant-for-psychedelic-treatment-research-in-50-years  Are cold showers actually worth it? by Cameron Duke Bottoms, L. (2021, September 28). Cold showers are said to be good for you – here's what the evidence shows. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/cold-showers-are-said-to-be-good-for-you-heres-what-the-evidence-shows-167822   Buijze, G. A., Sierevelt, I. N., van der Heijden, B. C. J. M., Dijkgraaf, M. G., & Frings-Dresen, M. H. W. (2016). The Effect of Cold Showering on Health and Work: A Randomized Controlled Trial. PLOS ONE, 11(9), e0161749. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161749  Janský, L., Pospíšilová, D., Honzová, S., Uličný, B., Šrámek, P., Zeman, V., & Kamínková, J. (1996). Immune system of cold-exposed and cold-adapted humans. European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology, 72-72(5-6), 445–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00242274  Only children aren't more selfish than kids with siblings by Steffie Drucker Only Children Are No More Selfish Than Those With Siblings. (2021, October 7). Research Digest. https://digest.bps.org.uk/2021/10/07/only-children-are-no-more-selfish-than-those-with-siblings/   Zheng, X., Su, Q., Jing, C., & Zhang, Y.-Y. (2021). They Are Not Little Emperors: Only Children Are Just as Altruistic as Non-Only Children. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 194855062110381. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211038190   Higuera, V. (2019, October 23). Only Child Syndrome: Proven Reality or Long-Standing Myth? Healthline; Healthline Media. https://www.healthline.com/health/parenting/only-child-syndrome   one-child policy | Definition, Start Date, Effects, & Facts | Britannica. (2021). In Encyclopædia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/one-child-policy  Fifield, A. (2019, May 3). Beijing's one-child policy is gone. But many Chinese are still reluctant to have more. Washington Post; The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/beijings-one-child-policy-is-gone-but-many-chinese-are-still-reluctant-to-have-more/2019/05/02/c722e568-604f-11e9-bf24-db4b9fb62aa2_story.html   Gallagher, J. (2020, July 14). Fertility rate: “Jaw-dropping” global crash in children being born. BBC News; BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/health-53409521   BBC News. (2021, May 31). China allows three children in major policy shift. BBC News; BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-57303592  Follow Curiosity Daily on your favorite podcast app to learn something new every day withCody Gough andAshley Hamer. Still curious? Get exclusive science shows, nature documentaries, and more real-life entertainment on discovery+! Go to https://discoveryplus.com/curiosity to start your 7-day free trial. discovery+ is currently only available for US subscribers. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Dan Quintana is a senior researcher at the University of Olso, where his research focuses on oxytocin, autism,  and meta-analyses. In this conversation, we talk about Dan's primer on synthetic datasets, science comunication, Everything Hertz, and podcasting in general.BJKS Podcast is a podcast about neuroscience, psychology, and anything vaguely related, hosted by Benjamin James Kuper-Smith. New conversations every other Friday, available on all podcasting platforms (e.g., Spotify, Apple/Google Podcasts, etc.).Timestamps0:00:04: From Australia to Norway0:09:37: Synthetic datasets0:41:15: Software tools in science (for writing and analysing data)0:58:41: Dan's multifaceted online presence / science communication on social media1:06:32: How to grow on Twitter with no followers1:15:45: The sound of your own voice1:22:30: Some of Dan's favourite podcasts1:25:53: How Everything Hertz grew over time1:33:04: Finances of podcasts1:41:45: Podcast editingPodcast linksWebsite: https://geni.us/bjks-podTwitter: https://geni.us/bjks-pod-twtDan's linksWebsite: https://geni.us/quintana-webGoogle Scholar: https://geni.us/quintana-scholarTwitter: https://geni.us/quintana-twtBen's linksWebsite: https://geni.us/bjks-webGoogle Scholar: https://geni.us/bjks-scholarTwitter:  https://geni.us/bjks-twtReferencesBrown, N. J., & Heathers, J. A. (2017). The GRIM test: A simple technique detects numerous anomalies in the reporting of results in psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science.Heathers, J. A., Anaya, J., van der Zee, T., & Brown, N. J. (2018). Recovering data from summary statistics: Sample parameter reconstruction via iterative techniques (SPRITE). PeerJ Preprints.Kuper-Smith, B. J., & Korn, C. (2021, Oct). Decomposed 2*2 games - a conceptual review. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/5jxrfQuintana, D. S. (2020). A synthetic dataset primer for the biobehavioural sciences to promote reproducibility and hypothesis generation. Elife, 9.LinksThe psychpathy measure used in my study with prison inmates: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychopathy_ChecklistMost standard statistical tests are linear models blog post: https://lindeloev.github.io/tests-as-linear/Dan's presentation on synthetic datasets for RIOT Science Club: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0fAR_oro1NYSimul for writing collaborations: https://www.simuldocs.com/Melon for live streaming: https://melonapp.com/featuresSome podcasts Dan listens to:Quantitude: https://quantitudepod.org/Very bad wizards: https://www.verybadwizards.com/Ologies: https://www.alieward.com/ologiesEzra Klein: https://www.nytimes.com/column/ezra-klein-podcastHarcore History: https://www.dancarlin.com/hardcore-history-series/

Popular discourse tends to depict women as less likely than men to take risks. Christine LaGarde, Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund, famously implied that women make less risky financial decisions when she stated that the financial crisis of 2008 would not have occurred “if it had been Lehman Sisters rather than Lehman Brothers”. But are women really more risk-averse than men? Research has in fact shown that men and women are more similar in their risk preferences than commonly believed. We bust this myth with leading experts to show that women may act more risk- averse only because of gender norms that place expectations on them to do so. Featured Guests: Dr. Thekla Morgenroth, previously of University of Exeter and now at Purdue University  Dr. Julie Nelson, University of Massachusetts Boston Research Mentioned: Booth, A.L. and Nelson, P. (2012). Gender Differences in Risk Behaviour: Does Nurture Matter? The Economic Journal 122(558), F56-F78. Botelho, T. and Abraham, M. (2017). Pursuing Quality: How Search Costs and Uncertainty Magnify Gender-based Double Standards in a Multistage Evaluation Process. Administrative Science Quarterly 62(4), 698-730. Kaplan, S. and Walley, N. (2016). The Risky Rhetoric of Female Risk Aversion. Stanford Social Innovation Review. https://ssir.org/articles/entry/the_risky_rhetoric_of_female_risk_aversion Liu, E.M. and Zuo, S.X. (2019). Measuring the impact of interaction between children of a matrilineal and a patriarchal culture on gender differences in risk aversion. PNAS 116(14), 6713- 6719. Morgenroth, T., Fine, C., Ryan, M.K. and Genat, A.E. (2017). Sex, Drugs, and Reckless Driving: Are Measures Biased Toward Identifying Risk-Taking in Men? Social Psychological and Personality Science 9(6), 744-753. Nelson, J.A. (2015). Are Women Really More Risk-Averse Than Men? A Reanalysis of the Literature Using Expanded Methods. Journal of Economic Surveys 29(3), 566-585. For more research and resources (https://www.gendereconomy.org) or click here . For transcript + show notes please visit out website (www.gendereconomy.org/Busted) or click here. This podcast is a GATE Audio production from the University of Toronto's Institute for Gender and the Economy: www.gendereconomy.org

References: Films Media Group. (2002). Sex life: Couple. Films On Demand. https://fod.infobase.com/PortalPlaylists.aspx?wID=18949&xtid=185615. Grøntvedt, T. V., Kennair, L. E. O., & Bendixen, M. (2020). How intercourse frequency is affected by relationship length, relationship quality, and sexual strategies using couple data. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 14(2), 147–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/ebs0000173 Kim, J.J., Muise, A., Barranti, M., Mark, K., Rosen, N., Harasymchuk, C., & Impett, E. (2020). Are Couples More Satisfied When They Match in Sexual Desire?: New Insights From Response Surface Analyses:. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 194855062092677.

In this episode Nathan dips his toes into the field of psychology, speaking with Professor Ron Fischer about evolutionary psychology, parasite stress theory and how cultural norms and attitudes influence health behaviours, specifically with regards to the COVID-19 pandemic. Professor Ron's research interests include value and personality processes, with a specific focus on evolutionary dynamics across time and cultures as well as how values and personal traits influence our health and well-being. This fascinating conversation provides insight into potential influences of COVID-19 related health behaviour; tune in for a deeper understanding into what motivates our choice to social distance, wear masks and receive a vaccination. Highlights * Introduction to evolutionary psychology (6:00) * The Schwartz Model (12:00) * Parasite stress theory (20:00) * COVID-19 related health behaviours (33:30) * Insights into COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy (45:40) * Behavioural intentions regarding COVID-19 (59:30) Useful Links and Resources About Professor Ronald Fischer: https://people.wgtn.ac.nz/Ronald.Fischer/grants Research: Fischer R, Bortolini T, Pilati R, Porto J, Moll J. Values and COVID-19 worries: The importance of emotional stability traits. Personality and Individual Differences. 2021 Jun 22:111079. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886921004566?via%3Dihub Fischer R, Karl JA. Predicting Behavioral Intentions to Prevent or Mitigate COVID-19: A Cross-Cultural Meta-Analysis of Attitudes, Norms, and Perceived Behavioral Control Effects. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 2020 Nov 17:19485506211019844. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/19485506211019844 Edwards B, Biddle N, Gray M, Sollis K. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and resistance: Correlates in a nationally representative longitudinal survey of the Australian population. PLoS One. 2021 Mar 24;16(3):e0248892. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248892. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0248892 Thornhill R, Fincher CL. The parasite-stress theory of sociality, the behavioral immune system, and human social and cognitive uniqueness. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences. 2014 Oct;8(4):257. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2014-41070-006 You Tube Videos: Parasite stress & human behavioral immune system https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RFqaAokX5Ao Has COVID-19 changed who we are? The case of human values https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OhtLQmUHD_I&t=849s

With the mass uptake of internet dating through apps like Tinder, Bumble and Hinge you would think that lots of successful relationships were being formed thanks to technology. But the data seems to imply the opposite.New research published in the journal Social Psychological and Personality Science found that two thirds of successful couples started out as friends and maintained a platonic relationship for long periods before sparking a romance.On average, the “friends first” initiators were friends for nearly 22 months before the relationship turned romantic and almost half of the total sample thought that friends-first initiation was the best way to start a new romantic relationship, versus the other options presented such as meeting at a party or online.Nanogirl Michelle Dickinson joined Francesca Rudkin to discuss the findings.LISTEN ABOVE

Joe Hilgard is Assistant Professor of Social Psychology at Illinois State University. In this conversation, we discuss his work on detecting and reporting scientific fraud. BJKS Podcast is a podcast about neuroscience, psychology, and anything vaguely related, hosted by Benjamin James Kuper-Smith. New conversations every other Friday. You can find the podcast on all podcasting platforms (e.g., Spotify, Apple/Google Podcasts, etc.).Timestamps0:00:05: Are we only catching the dumb fraudsters?0:08:45: Why does Joe always sign his peer reviews?0:11:51: Detecting errors during peer review0:17:44: Retractions motivated by Joe's work0:22:19: The whole Zhang affair0:49:19: Ben found errors in a paper. Joe advises what to do next1:04:06: How to separate negligible errors from serious errors that require action1:11:37: When effects are too big to be truePodcast linksWebsite: https://bjks.buzzsprout.com/Twitter: https://twitter.com/BjksPodcastJoe's linksWebsite: http://crystalprisonzone.blogspot.com/Google Scholar: https://scholar.google.de/citations?user=FPOHtgQAAAAJTwitter: https://twitter.com/JoeHilgardBen's linksWebsite: www.bjks.blog/Google Scholar: https://scholar.google.co.uk/citations?user=-nWNfvcAAAAJReferencesBrown, N. J., & Heathers, J. A. (2017). The GRIM test: A simple technique detects numerous anomalies in the reporting of results in psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science.Callaway, E. (2011). Report finds massive fraud at Dutch universities. Nature News.Friston, K. (2012). Ten ironic rules for non-statistical reviewers. Neuroimage.Heathers, J. A., Anaya, J., van der Zee, T., & Brown, N. J. (2018). Recovering data from summary statistics: Sample parameter reconstruction via iterative techniques (SPRITE) . PeerJ Preprints.Hilgard, Joe's blog post about the Zhang affair: http://crystalprisonzone.blogspot.com/2021/01/i-tried-to-report-scientific-misconduct.htmlHilgard, J. (2021). Maximal positive controls: A method for estimating the largest plausible effect size. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.Hilgard, J. (2019). Comment on Yoon and Vargas (2014): An implausibly large effect from implausibly invariant data. Psychological Science.Lakens, Daniel: blog post on hungry judges: http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2017/07/impossibly-hungry-judges.htmlMorey, R. D., Chambers, C. D., ... & Zwaan, R. A. (2016). The Peer Reviewers' Openness Initiative. Royal Society Open Science.O'Grady: Write up in Science Magazine about the Zhang affair: https://science.sciencemag.org/content/371/6531/767Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2013). Life after p-hacking. In Meeting of the society for personality and social psychology, New Orleans, LA.Simmons, J. What do true findings look like: Presentation slides available at https://osf.io/93fkq/Stapel's autobiography freely available in English: http://nick.brown.free.fr/stapelYong, E. (2012). The data detective. Nature News.

Noile cercetări de psihologie indică faptul că recunoștința îi motivează pe oameni să răspundă nevoilor sexuale ale partenerilor lor romantici. Studiul, publicat în Social Psychological and Personality Science, sugerează că cei care se simt apreciați de partener și apreciativi față de partener au tendința de a avea o legătură sexuală mai puternică. Pe parcursul unei relații romantice, oamenii vor experimenta momente în care nu se simt mulțumiți sexual, iar acest lucru poate fi dăunător satisfacției relației lor generale. „Descoperirile recente sugerează că a avea motivația de a satisface nevoile sexuale ale unui partener poate ajuta cuplurile romantice de a tempera aceste scăderi normative ale satisfacției sexuale; " „Recunoștința, o emoție care apare ca răspuns la recunoașterea că o altă persoană a fost benefică sau valoroasă pentru noi, este un factor care prezice o mai mare forță sexuală. Astfel, pur și simplu să simți recunoștință sau să primești recunoștință de la un partener romantic îți poate spori motivația pentru a satisface nevoile sexuale ale partenerului tău și poate ajuta la menținerea acestei motivații în timp. " Noul studiu extinde cercetările anterioare, care au descoperit că un sentiment de mulțumire și recunoștință a fost asociat cu angajamentul relației și receptivitatea. Însă studiul - ca toate cercetările - include câteva avertismente. „Deși rezultatele noastre sugerează că recunoștința este asociată în mod pozitiv cu motivația de a satisface nevoile sexuale ale unui partener în timp, este posibil ca persoanele să poată fi desensibilizate la beneficiile recunoștinței dacă se confruntă frecvent sau primesc recunoștință pentru aceleași motive din nou și din nou. De exemplu, s-ar putea să vă simțiți deosebit de recunoscători pentru un partener romantic după prima dată când vă face cina, dar aceste sentimente recunoscătoare pot să nu fie la fel de puternice după ce partenerul dvs. romantic pregătește cina în fiecare seară de mai mulți ani ”, a explicat Ashlyn Brady, autoare a studiului. Nu uita, dragostea și recunoștința pot desparte mări, muta munți și crea miracole.

Ashley Whillans Bio: I received my PhD in Social Psychology from the University of British Columbia in November 2017 and started working as an Assistant Professor at the Harvard Business School in July 2017. During my PhD, I was a member of UBC's Public Scholar Initiative and was funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. My PhD Dissertation won the CAGS Distinguished Thesis Award for being the best dissertation across the fine arts, social sciences, and humanities in Canada in 2017. In 2015 and 2018, I was named a Rising Star of Behavioral Science by the International Behavioral Exchange & Behavioral Science and Policy Association. In 2016, I co-founded the Department of Behavioral Science in the Policy, Innovation, and Engagement Division of the British Columbia Public Service Agency. I am part of the , and advise on the well-being strategy of numerous non-profit and for-profit partners. I am a member of the  at Harvard Business School, a member of the  at Harvard Chan School of Public Health, and a member of Harvard Kennedy School of Public Policy's . I am also a  at Harvard University, where my ongoing research examines the welfare benefits of alleviating time poverty among working poor women living in developing markets. ​​More broadly, my research focuses on understanding how the daily and long-term decisions people make about time and money (in their personal lives, relationships, and at work) impact well-being. My research has been published in numerous academic outlets, including the Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Social Psychological and Personality Science, Health Psychology, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, Nature Human Behavior, Science Advances, and Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.

Learn about whether it’s better to be a big fish in a small pond or a small fish in a big pond, a mysterious, ancient city called Cahokia that’s, weirdly, just outside St. Louis, and how AI might be able to catch heart disease with a selfie. Curiosity Daily is a finalist in the 2020 Discover Pods Awards, and we need your vote to win! Please vote for Curiosity Daily for Best Technology & Science Podcast via the link below. It's free and only takes a minute. Thanks so much! https://awards.discoverpods.com/vote/ Is It Better to Be a Big Fish in a Small Pond or a Small Fish in a Big Pond? By Kelsey Donk Even When You’re A Member Of An Elite Group, It Can Be Demoralising To Rank Lower Than Your Peers. (2020, September 24). Research Digest; Research Digest. https://digest.bps.org.uk/2020/09/24/even-when-youre-a-member-of-an-elite-group-it-can-be-demoralising-to-rank-lower-than-your-peers/#more-40380  Zell, E., & Lesick, T. L. (2020). Taking Social Comparison to the Extremes: The Huge-Fish-Tiny-Pond Effect in Self-Evaluations. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 194855062095653. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620956535  Cahokia Was the Mysterious, Massive Ancient City in ... St. Louis? By Reuben Westmaas Newitz, A. (2016, December 13). Finding North America’s lost medieval city. Ars Technica; Ars Technica. https://arstechnica.com/science/2016/12/theres-a-1000-year-old-lost-city-beneath-the-st-louis-suburbs/  Mound 38 – Monks Mound – Cahokia Mounds. (2015, October 23). Cahokiamounds.Org. https://cahokiamounds.org/mound/mound-38-monks-mound/  Woodhenge - Cahokia Mounds, Illinois. (2020). Scienceviews.Com. https://scienceviews.com/indian/woodhenge.html  AI Might Be Able to Catch Heart Disease with a Selfie by Kelsey Donk “Selfies” could be used to detect heart disease. (2020). EurekAlert! https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2020-08/esoc-cb082120.php  Christoffersen, M., Frikke-Schmidt, R., Schnohr, P., Jensen, G. B., Nordestgaard, B. G., & Tybjærg-Hansen, A. (2014). Visible Age-Related Signs and Risk of Ischemic Heart Disease in the General Population. Circulation, 129(9), 990–998. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.113.001696  Lin, S., Li, Z., Fu, B., Chen, S., Li, X., Wang, Y., Wang, X., Lv, B., Xu, B., Song, X., Zhang, Y.-J., Cheng, X., Huang, W., Pu, J., Zhang, Q., Xia, Y., Du, B., Ji, X., & Zheng, Z. (2020). Feasibility of using deep learning to detect coronary artery disease based on facial photo. European Heart Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa640  Schnohr, P., Lange, P., Nyboe, J., Appleyard, M., & Jensen, G. (1995). Gray hair, baldness, and wrinkles in relation to myocardial infarction: The Copenhagen City Heart Study. American Heart Journal, 130(5), 1003–1010. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-8703(95)90201-5  Subscribe to Curiosity Daily to learn something new every day with Ashley Hamer and Natalia Reagan (filling in for Cody Gough). You can also listen to our podcast as part of your Alexa Flash Briefing; Amazon smart speakers users, click/tap “enable” here: https://www.amazon.com/Curiosity-com-Curiosity-Daily-from/dp/B07CP17DJY See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Part 2...*Be a better Sender:** Use BCC for large lists of addressees to avoid the dreaded mega-thread, and to protect users’ addresses from being known by others* Summarize your request or communication in a few sentences at the top instead of making people read through the entire mega-thread* Three Sentences (https://web.archive.org/web/20120120052313/http://three.sentenc.es/) - from 2012* Maximum two apologies for taking up someone’s time* It’s 2020. Stop asking, “Did you get my email?” Start asking, “May I get a response from you within 48 or 72 hours?” * Email is really an asynchronous tool; so when trying to get a response to NOT use it to get something you need with a quick turn around...because the person on the other end might be tied up with other things. “I need this by tomorrow”....and you send it at 3pm- you shall be burned at the stake in my book* Re-evaluate your signature and just how much information you are blasting to people. With. Every. Sent. Email.* Three rounds of email tennis? Time for a voice/video chat with your recipient.* _Thou shalt not_ use URGENT; if it ain’t. And avoid “immediately;” unless what you're asking has to be done so. *The $1 Million question(s)*Does your personal or work email need to be on your mobile phone when it already is on your other tech devices?What emails were so urgent to respond to that warranted your email app being present on your mobile device?*The Business Emoji Battle Royal** (2019) Adobe emoji study reveals that about 61% of emoji users admit to resorting to them at work * TL;DR. AJ’s baseball approach to Emoji in email * When are you casual, when you friendly, and when and what point are you trying to make * Covid communication and the loss of nonverbal cues (https://www.business.com/articles/put-an-emoji-on-it-should-you-use-emojis-in-business-communication/) * Know your audience * Social Psychological and Personality Science (http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1948550617720269?journalCode=sppa&), emojis make workers appear less competent “The Dark Side of a Smiley: Effects of Smiling Emoticons on Virtual First Impressions” * However, in come communication it brings a higher rate of percevied friendliness (https://www.hrfuture.net/talent-management/culture/emoji-in-work-related-email-communication-2020-study/) or honesty * That little icon...may have a mixed meaning; They aren't universal.*Business chat/messaging** Set quiet hours/sign off WHEN YOU ARE OFF. Gett your inner French on; “Right to Disconnect” (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_disconnect)* In this Covid era remember you know you don’t have to have your video on for every call you make. #EndZoomFatigue * Chris’ security/privacy tinfoil hat: What you’re sending can be sent to others via screenshot. Communicate wisely.* Don’t want “The Man” to be spying on your communiques? Check out Signal (https://www.signal.org/) and Wire (https://www.signal.org/).Project: Hygge - Preventing Burnout *AJ** Coffee & quiet after waking up without the sound of an alarm * Current playlist: https://chillhop.com/releases/sleepy-fish-everything-fades-to-blue/ * Practicing ‘turning off’ * Can’t look forward to something big; so find small projects that make you happy to look forward to. Quality AssuranceAudio/Video:*Chris: ** The Daily Stoic podcast (https://dailystoic.com/Podcast/) by Ryan Holiday - Quick hit of rationalization to start your day.*AJ: ** A chef’s secret to organizing your life. https://pca.st/episode/5c745efc-c61b-4cb8-998b-dfadc197f2f2 * “We begin with the importance of squaring your checklists with your calendar and the one organizing process Dan most recommends: something called the *30-minute "meeze."* We then discuss how to arrange your physical working space for greater efficiency and the importance of working clean. From there, Dan explains what he thinks *Stephen Covey's famous idea of putting first things first* doesn't take into consideration, and why it's important to understand the difference between what Dan calls *"process time"* and *"immersive time."*

Join psychologists David Sherman and Leaf Van Boven (CCL's Sept 2018 monthly speakers) as they review the main findings and framework for their recent research. Deepen your understanding of how to utilize the strategies of affirmation, norms, immediacy and legacy in your own climate advocacy and citizen lobbying. Dr. Van Boven is a professor of psychology and neuroscience at the University of Colorado, Boulder, and Dr. Sherman is a professor of psychology and brain sciences at the University of California, Santa Barbara.   Skip ahead to the following section(s): Theoretical Background (4:19) Framework For Overcoming Barriers (27:10) Data & Findings (42:07) Implications for Advocacy & Training (52:49)   Presentation Slides: http://cclusa.org/social-psychological-slides Recent Sherman, Shteyn, Han & Van Boven research article: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/behavioural-public-policy/article/exchange-between-citizens-and-elected-officials-a-social-psychological-framework-for-citizen-climate-activists/0220FD5EE016383DB2B9D46C10C751D0 Behavior Climate Policy Conference: https://sites.google.com/colorado.edu/bcp2020/home (online, UC-Boulder, Friday, October 23)  

Charles Cassidy is the Director of the Evidence-Based Wisdom project. The site translates academic research regarding the science and psychology of wisdom into understandable and helpful resources for the wider public. Charles studied Physics at the University of Manchester in the UK. Following the development of educational research projects with The British Council across South America and Asia, Charles taught Mathematics and Science in London for 15 years. Since the start of the project, he has conducted interviews with many leaders in the field of wisdom research, compiled and translated many of the key papers from the field and created many public-facing resources, including video animations, info-graphics, articles and podcasts. He has also written about wisdom research for publications including Psychology Today and The Huffington Post, as well as appearing on talk radio across the United States. Igor Grossmann is a social-cognitive scientist and world traveller. Born during the downfall of the Soviet Union on a day of October revolution, and growing up in Ukraine and Germany, ever since childhood he has been wondering about how people make sense of complex social challenges. He is the Director of the Wisdom and Culture Lab at the University of Waterloo, Canada. He is currently an Associate Professor of Psychology at the University of Waterloo, Canada. His work has been published in such outlets as PNAS, Proceedings of the Royal Academy: B, Perspectives on Psychological Science, Psychological Science, Journal of Experimental Psychology, and Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. His contributions have been recognized through numerous awards (e.g., SAGE Young Scholar award from the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Rising Star Award from the Association for Psychological Science, APA Dissertation Award, USERN Prize for Social Sciences). Igor is an Associate Editor of the journal Social Psychological and Personality Science and co-hosts the On Wisdom Podcast, disseminating scientific insights from psychology, philosophy and cognitive sciences to the general public. Social Links Email: Charles - charles@evidencebasedwisdom.com; Igor - igrossma@uwaterloo.ca Twitter: Charles - @EBasedwisdom; Igor - @psywisdom; On Wisdom podcast - @onwisdompodcast LinkedIn: @CharlesCassidy; @IgorGrossmann Facebook: Igor - @iGorAG

The ladies explore whether it's acceptable to engage with the work of someone who has committed a serious crime and if you can ever separate the art from the artist, their reactions to Cardi B and Megan Thee Stallion's new single WAP and whether the song is an anthem for female sexual liberation or simply perpetuates the oversexualisation of Black women, their personal hair journeys and thoughts on new research revealing that Black women with natural hairstyles are perceived as “less professional”, and why some men seem to be threatened by ambitious women following the appointment of Kamala Harris as Joe Biden's running mate.--------------------------------------- FOLLOW THE CONVERSATION #EthnicallySpeakingInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/unitedmelanincoFacebook: https://facebook.com/unitedmelanincoTwitter: https://instagram.com/unitedmelanincoLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/unitedmelaninco/YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/UnitedMelaninGroupGet in touch with us: ethnicallyspeaking@unitedmelaningroup.com---------------------------------------- LINKS MENTIONED IN THIS EPISODE https://unitedmelaningroup.com/es010(Website – Show notes)https://youtu.be/hsm4poTWjMs(Video – WAP [Official Music Video] – Cardi B feat. Megan Thee Stallion)https://faroutmagazine.co.uk/ceelo-green-interview-gnarls-barkley-music-today/(Article – Far Out Meets: CeeLo Green, offering up lessons from the past for the kids of the future – Mike Milenko for Far Out)https://youtu.be/U9FM49Tzhn4(Video – Ben Shapiro Reacts to "WAP" by Cardi B! – Ben Shapiro YouTube Channel)https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1948550620937937(Abstract/Research Paper – The Natural Hair Bias in Job Recruitment – Christy Zhou Koval, Ashleigh Shelby Rosette in Social Psychological and Personality Science journal)https://www.vogue.com/article/kamala-harris-ambition-joe-biden-running-mate(Article – The Veep Watch: Some People Seem to Have a Problem With Kamala Harris's ‘Ambition.' I Wonder Why. – Michelle Ruiz for Vogue)----------------------------------------Each week join Anissa, Linda E, Luanda Yasmin and Sophie Hannah, four smart, curious and opinionated highly-melanated women, as they discuss everything from current affairs to pop culture, and everything in between. No subject is off limits for these ladies, especially when it comes to issues affecting British communities of colour. Get ready to laugh, learn and liberate your mind, because if there's one thing you can guarantee, it's that the Ethnically Speaking ladies will be giving it to you straight!----------------------------------------Music by GC

Social Psychological break down. A mixture of reading the academic literature and improvised moments:

Social media is always awash in pet videos and images, but since the COVID lockdowns it seems as though there is even more pet content to be found online as cats invade video conferences and dogs beg for even more walks. There are sometimes even calls in spaces such as Twitter for people to share pet images when someone’s having a bad day. The connection between pets and wellness is one of the focuses of this episode of Stats and Stories, with guest Allen McConnell. Allen McConnell is University Distinguished Professor and Chair of the Department of Psychology at Miami University. His research examines how relationships with family and pets affect health and well-being, how people decode others’ nonverbal displays, and how self-nature representations influence pro-environmental action with this work supported over the years by National Institutes of Health (NICHD and NIMH) and National Science Foundation grants. His research has been featured in a variety of popular press outlets such as ESPN, CBC, CNN, BBC, New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, USA Today, Atlantic Monthly, and Cosmopolitan. He has served as Editor in Chief of Social Psychological and Personality Science, Associate Editor of Journal of Personality and Social Psychology and Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, and President of the Midwestern Psychological Association and of the Society of Experimental Social Psychology. His Social Self blog at Psychology Today receives more than 10K unique views per post. How did you start studying pets? (1:25) Ways pets improve health (3:20) How do you do control groups when studying pet ownership? (5:40) What about the pets that cause stress? (8:15) Pets relationship with media (9:50) How does this fit into social/positive psychology? (12:12) How do you feel about the reporting around your work? (13:40) Divisions in pet ownership and how people view pets (16:10) Is there data like this around the world? (19:47) Nature’s impact on mental health (21:20)

To watch this as a video Download it and play it from the Downloads section in the Castbox app on your device.Two studies conducted by Social Psychological and Personality Science found that watching television reruns actually restores willpower, whereas watching a brand new episode (or a nightly news program) depletes will power.Study http://www.buffalo.edu/news/releases/2012/09/13646.html#Lifehacking Self Control Playlist https://www.brighteon.com/watch?playlistId=ac6e1fca-6b41-4c14-9b95-b7e1d88bfb92&index=123 Biohacks and Uncommon Mindsets for Superhuman Will Power https://www.limitlessmindset.com/limitless-lifestyle/77-biohacks-and-mindsets-for-will-powerDownload the Caballo Protocol https://www.LimitlessCaballo.comConfused?If you invest at least $100 in your Biohacking via LimitlessMindset.com, I will include a 30-minute free Biohacking consulting call with you. See my recommended Nootropics sources and Biohacking products here:https://www.limitlessmindset.com/blog/25-limitless-mindset-secret-societyForward a receipt of at least $100 to Consultations@LimitlessMindset.comJoin the Limitless Mindset email newsletterhttps://www.limitlessmindset.com/membership/community-membershipSupport My WorkMy BookHow to Be Cross Eyed: Thriving Despite Your Physical ImperfectionDonateBitcoin: 37ftt2np8YxGedZu87eGmbiE9RxyCNs1VNConnect with Jonathanon Facebookhttps://www.facebook.com/limitlessmindseton Twitterhttp://twitter.com/jroselandon Instagramhttps://www.instagram.com/roselandjonathan/on Gabhttps://gab.ai/jroselandon Mindshttps://www.minds.com/jroselandon LBRYhttps://lbry.tv/@jroseland:fon Telegramhttps://t.me/limitlessjrI'm not a doctor, medical professional or trained therapist. I'm a researcher and pragmatic biohacking practitioner exercising free speech to share evidence as I find it. I make no claims. Please practice skepticism and rational critical thinking. You should consult a professional about any serious decisions that you might make about your health.

Learn about where your emotions come from and how you can hack them, with help from psychology researcher and neuroscientist Lisa Feldman Barrett. Plus: learn why tarantula venom could be an alternative to opioids. Maybe tarantula venom could be an alternative to opioids by Cameron Duke Agwa, A. J., Tran, P., Mueller, A., Tran, H. N. T., Deuis, J. R., Israel, M. R., McMahon, K. L., Craik, D. J., Vetter, I., & Schroeder, C. I. (2020). Manipulation of a spider peptide toxin alters its affinity for lipid bilayers and potency and selectivity for voltage-gated sodium channel subtype 1.7. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 295(15), 5067–5080. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.ra119.012281 Spider venom key to pain relief without side-effects. (2020). EurekAlert! https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2020-04/uoq-svk041320.php  ‌Viviane Richter. (2016, February 29). The tarantula’s bite that could stop pain. Cosmosmagazine.com; Cosmos Magazine. https://cosmosmagazine.com/biology/tarantulas-bite-could-stop-pain  Understanding the Epidemic. (2019). CDC.gov; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/epidemic/index.html Additional resources from Lisa Feldman Barrett:  Watch our full, uncut interview with Lisa Feldman Barrett from the American Association for the Advancement of Science Annual Meeting (#AAASmtg) on YouTube https://youtu.be/MY0ZqmBzd4g  Pick up “How Emotions Are Made: The Secret Life of the Brain” on Amazon https://amzn.to/3cpMyzl Official website https://lisafeldmanbarrett.com/ You aren’t at the mercy of your emotions (TED Talk) https://www.ted.com/talks/lisa_feldman_barrett_you_aren_t_at_the_mercy_of_your_emotions_your_brain_creates_them Follow @LFeldmanBarrett on Twitter https://twitter.com/LFeldmanBarrett Other publications by Lisa Feldman Barrett https://amzn.to/2WLC8U7  Citation for test anxiety study: Jamieson, J. P., Peters, B. J., Greenwood, E. J., & Altose, A. J. (2016). Reappraising Stress Arousal Improves Performance and Reduces Evaluation Anxiety in Classroom Exam Situations. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(6), 579–587. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616644656  Subscribe to Curiosity Daily to learn something new every day with Cody Gough and Ashley Hamer. You can also listen to our podcast as part of your Alexa Flash Briefing; Amazon smart speakers users, click/tap “enable” here: https://www.amazon.com/Curiosity-com-Curiosity-Daily-from/dp/B07CP17DJY 

Hershfield et al. (2016). People who choose time over money are happier. Social Psychological and Personality Science,7(7), 697-706.Epley & Schroeder (2014). Mistakenly seeking solitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(5), 1980.

Learn about why signaling your status makes it harder to make new friends; the evolutionary reason why humans have so much back pain; and how pretending to understand babies can make them smarter. Signaling your status makes it harder to make new friends by Steffie Drucker Forget the bling: High status-signaling deters new friendships. (2018, August). EurekAlert! https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2018-08/sfpa-ftb081518.php  Garcia, S. M., Weaver, K., & Chen, P. (2018). The Status Signals Paradox. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(5), 690–696. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618783712  Pinsker, J. (2018, September 27). The Misconceptions People Have About Luxury Purchases. The Atlantic; The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/family/archive/2018/09/buying-luxury-goods-value/571525/  Why do humans have so much back pain? Thank evolution by Grant Currin Human Evolution: Gain Came With Pain. (2013, February 16). Human Evolution: Gain Came With Pain. Science | AAAS. https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2013/02/human-evolution-gain-came-pain#  Your back pain may be due to evolution and spine shape. (2020). EurekAlert! https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2020-03/sfu-ybp030420.php  Plomp, K. A., Viðarsdóttir, U. S., Weston, D. A., Dobney, K., & Collard, M. (2015). The ancestral shape hypothesis: an evolutionary explanation for the occurrence of intervertebral disc herniation in humans. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-015-0336-y  Plomp, K. A., Dobney, K., Weston, D. A., Strand Viðarsdóttir, U., & Collard, M. (2019). 3D shape analyses of extant primate and fossil hominin vertebrae support the ancestral shape hypothesis for intervertebral disc herniation. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-019-1550-9  Plomp, K. A., Dobney, K., & Collard, M. (2020). Spondylolysis and spinal adaptations for bipedalism. Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health, 2020(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/emph/eoaa003  Spondylolysis. (2020). https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/spondylolysis  Keep Pretending To Understand Babies—It Makes Them Smarter by Anna Todd https://curiosity.com/topics/keep-pretending-to-understand-babiesit-makes-them-smarter-curiosity Subscribe to Curiosity Daily to learn something new every day with Cody Gough and Ashley Hamer. You can also listen to our podcast as part of your Alexa Flash Briefing; Amazon smart speakers users, click/tap “enable” here: https://curiosity.im/podcast-flash-briefing

This is a film review/analysis of "Dark Waters." March, 2020 Narrative Film Genre Structure Analysis: Psychological Realism: Character/Thought Genre

Learn about how to choose the best music for your workout playlist; why learning more about a new disease like coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) won’t comfort you; and how to clean your phone. For the best workout playlist, go for deep bass and fast tempos by Mae Rice Tunes for training: High-tempo music may make exercise easier and more beneficial. (2020). EurekAlert! https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2020-02/f-tft012920.php   MacMillan, A. (2014, August 19). What Type of Music Should I Listen To Before and During a Workout? Outside Online; Outside Magazine. https://www.outsideonline.com/1785571/what-type-music-should-i-listen-and-during-workout    Hsu, D. Y., Huang, L., Nordgren, L. F., Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2014). The Music of Power. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(1), 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550614542345    Patania, V. M., Padulo, J., Iuliano, E., Ardigò, L. P., Čular, D., Miletić, A., & De Giorgio, A. (2020). The Psychophysiological Effects of Different Tempo Music on Endurance Versus High-Intensity Performances. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00074   More info about a disease won’t comfort you by Steffie Drucker  Knowing more about a virus threat may not satisfy you. (2020). EurekAlert! https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2020-03/osu-kma030920.php  Hubner, A. Y., & Hovick, S. R. (2020). Understanding Risk Information Seeking and Processing during an Infectious Disease Outbreak: The Case of Zika Virus. Risk Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13456  World Health Organization: WHO. (2018, July 20). Zika virus. Who.Int; World Health Organization: WHO. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/zika-virus  Keaten, J. (2016, February). WHO declares global emergency over Zika virus spread. AP News; Associated Press. https://apnews.com/af581b94ff5542ffa24cd45bed28e404  Robinson, B. (2020, March 13). The Psychology Of Uncertainty: How To Cope With COVID-19 Anxiety. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/bryanrobinson/2020/03/12/the-psychology-of-uncertainty-how-to-cope-with-covid-19-anxiety/#569310f6394a  Markman, A. (2016, August 22). A Guide To Uncertainty For People Who Hate Not Knowing. Fast Company; Fast Company. https://www.fastcompany.com/3062984/a-guide-to-uncertainty-for-people-who-hate-not-knowing  How to clean your phone by Ashley Hamer (Listener question from Linda) Meadow, J. F., Altrichter, A. E., & Green, J. L. (2014). Mobile phones carry the personal microbiome of their owners. PeerJ, 2, e447. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.447   This Is How to Clean Your Smartphone Without Destroying It. (2018). Curiosity.com. https://curiosity.com/topics/this-is-how-to-clean-your-smartphone-without-destroying-it-curiosity  ‌Kiedrowski, L. M., Perisetti, A., Loock, M. H., Khaitsa, M. L., & Guerrero, D. M. (2013). Disinfection of iPad to reduce contamination with Clostridium difficile and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. American Journal of Infection Control, 41(11), 1136–1137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2013.01.030   Apple. (2020, March 9). How to clean your Apple products. Apple Support. https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT204172?mod=article_inline   Clean your Pixel phone’s back & sides - Pixel Phone Help. (2020). Google.Com. https://support.google.com/pixelphone/answer/7533987?hl=en   Gallegos, C., McDuffee, V., Hong-Engelhard, C., & Boeck, C. (2018). Hold the phone. Nursing, 48(10), 68–70. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.nurse.0000541405.87543.65   Subscribe to Curiosity Daily to learn something new every day with Cody Gough and Ashley Hamer. You can also listen to our podcast as part of your Alexa Flash Briefing; Amazon smart speakers users, click/tap “enable” here: https://curiosity.im/podcast-flash-briefing