Podcasts about attorney client privilege

The Art of Divorce Depositions: Strategy, Preparation, and SuccessIn this episode of the season-long "Your Divorce Case" series, Seth and Pete tackle one of the most crucial elements of divorce proceedings: depositions. As Seth notes, depositions are where cases can be won or lost, making this episode essential listening for anyone facing divorce proceedings.The discussion reveals the strategic chess game that unfolds during depositions, from how attorneys prepare their clients to the careful dance of questions and answers. Seth shares insights from his years of experience, explaining why depositions are his favorite part of legal proceedings and how proper preparation can make all the difference. The episode covers everything from the basic structure of a deposition to advanced techniques for handling difficult questions, all while emphasizing the importance of authenticity and honesty in your responses.Questions we answer in this episode:What rules should I follow when answering deposition questions?How do attorney objections work during a deposition?What rights do I have if questioning becomes hostile?Key Takeaways:Listen carefully and only answer exactly what's askedTake your time reviewing documentsStay authentic - don't try to outsmart the processThis episode provides invaluable insights for anyone facing a deposition, offering both practical guidance and strategic understanding. Seth's enthusiasm for the deposition process, combined with real-world examples, makes complex legal concepts accessible and actionable for listeners.Links & NotesTune in to our Deposition Prep episode!Schedule a consult with SethGot a question you want to ask on the show? Click here! (00:00) - Welcome to How to Split a Toaster (00:26) - Depositions (00:56) - What Is a Deposition? (02:41) - An Art, Not a Science (03:36) - Who Is Present? (04:02) - Questions and Answers and Objections (07:34) - Recorded vs. Live (09:10) - Strategy (13:39) - What You Can't Do (16:05) - Attorney Client Privilege (18:11) - Preparing the Client (20:33) - It's an Interview, Not a Conversation (23:00) - How Much Coaching Works (25:11) - Recording Types (27:27) - Understand the Theme of Your Case (30:33) - Ethical Considerations (32:44) - Take Your Time (35:33) - Making Mistakes (36:53) - Wrap Up

Steve Palmer unravels the complexities of attorney-client privilege. Discover how this crucial legal concept protects communication between lawyers and clients, ensuring confidentiality and trust. Learn about the ethical rules that guide lawyers, the difference between privilege and confidentiality, and the rare exceptions to this robust protection.Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2024 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law

[5:15] The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit has overturned a 30-year precedent, ruling that a violation of the right to confidential attorney-client calls arises only if a defendant shows that there was realistic potential for the prosecution to benefit from listening to communication. Leave voicemail: 747-227-4477 Email us: registrymatterscast@gmail.com Support us on...

- Joe Biden breaks his word and pardons Hunter Biden - Trump's tariffs on Mexico, Canada and China - Trump threatens 100% tariffs on all BRICS nations - This will set off a global trade war - The decline of US dollar dominance - The rise of AI and why that's accelerating depopulation agendas - Interview with Tracy Thurman, covering Roger Ver, aka "Bitcoin Jesus" - The weaponized IRS and DOJ try to throw Roger in prison for life - US government attacks client-attorney privilege - Why cryptocurrency can help promote decentralization and freedom - Will Trump consider pardoning Roger Ver? For more updates, visit: http://www.brighteon.com/channel/hrreport NaturalNews videos would not be possible without you, as always we remain passionately dedicated to our mission of educating people all over the world on the subject of natural healing remedies and personal liberty (food freedom, medical freedom, the freedom of speech, etc.). Together, we're helping create a better world, with more honest food labeling, reduced chemical contamination, the avoidance of toxic heavy metals and vastly increased scientific transparency. ▶️ Every dollar you spend at the Health Ranger Store goes toward helping us achieve important science and content goals for humanity: https://www.healthrangerstore.com/ ▶️ Sign Up For Our Newsletter: https://www.naturalnews.com/Readerregistration.html ▶️ Brighteon: https://www.brighteon.com/channels/hrreport ▶️ Join Our Social Network: https://brighteon.social/@HealthRanger ▶️ Check In Stock Products at: https://PrepWithMike.com

In this episode, Wade and Tain discuss waiver of attorney-client privilege. The written outline, with citations, can be found at goodjudgepod.com.

The role of the Vice President of the United States is an important one, but what actual power does it hold? Recently, vice president candidate JD Vance spoke publicly about the power of the vice presidency, the role of presiding over the electoral count as President of the Senate, and what he would have done if he was in former Vice President Mike Pence's shoes on January 6th 2021. In this episode, Craig is joined by Matthew Seligman, a fellow at the Stanford Constitutional Law Center, as they discuss the power of the vice presidency, the presiding role over the electoral count, and clarify the role of the vice presidency. Mentioned in This Episode: How to Steal a Presidential Election (co-authored with Harvard Law Professor Lawrence Lessig), Yale University Press (2024) "How JD Vance Disqualified Himself” by Matthew Seligman (The New York Times) The Ramifications of NSA Monitoring on Attorney-Client Privilege and the Bill of Rights featuring John Eastman & Erwin Chemerinsky (2014)

The role of the Vice President of the United States is an important one, but what actual power does it hold? Recently, vice president candidate JD Vance spoke publicly about the power of the vice presidency, the role of presiding over the electoral count as President of the Senate, and what he would have done if he was in former Vice President Mike Pence's shoes on January 6th 2021. In this episode, Craig is joined by Matthew Seligman, a fellow at the Stanford Constitutional Law Center, as they discuss the power of the vice presidency, the presiding role over the electoral count, and clarify the role of the vice presidency. Mentioned in This Episode: How to Steal a Presidential Election (co-authored with Harvard Law Professor Lawrence Lessig), Yale University Press (2024) "How JD Vance Disqualified Himself” by Matthew Seligman (The New York Times) The Ramifications of NSA Monitoring on Attorney-Client Privilege and the Bill of Rights featuring John Eastman & Erwin Chemerinsky (2014)

#STSNation, Welcome to another episode of Surviving The Survivor, the podcast that brings you the #BestGuests in all of True Crime… In a bombshell development, the trial of Donna Adelson, accused in the 2014 murder-for-hire killing of Dan Markel, went off the rails on the first day of jury selection after her lead attorney, Dan Rashbaum of Miami, withdrew over conflicts of interest. Rashbaum represented Adelson's son, Charlie Adelson, who was convicted last year on murder charges and sentenced to life in prison. Donna Adelson opted to hire Rashbaum represent her despite the fact that her legal needs may be at odds with those of her son, who has an appeal pending with the 1st District Court of Appeal. After Rashbaum's move Tuesday afternoon, Leon Circuit Judge Stephen Everett announced that the trial will be continued and that prospective jurors would be sent home. In light of this, tonight we look at the current state of attorney-client privilege. #BestGuests #JusticeForDanMarkel #TrueCrime #FSU #TrueCrimeCommunity #Podcast #Podcasting #Florida #CharlieAdelson #WendiAdelson #TrueCrime #DonnaAdelson #DanielRashBaumPatreon: Https://patreon.com/SurvivingTheSurvivorYouTube: Surviving The Survivor: #BestGuests in True Crime - YouTubeJoel's Book: Https://www.amazon.com/shop/surviving...Website: https://survivingthesurvivor.com/All Things STS

Former OnlyFans model Courtney Clenney's parents slammed prosecutors handling the jailed 27-year-old's murder case after a Miami judge ruled in her defense team's favor and decided to rule out a key piece of evidence.Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

What ever happened to attorney-client privilege? Biden pausing weapons to Israel is purely political. Trump electrifies voters with proposed tax cut. Biden denies RFK Jr. secret service protection.

With the backdrop of the Trump / Stormy Daniels hush money trial, Steve Palmer breaks down what the attorney-client privilege really means.This is taken from a recent episode of Common Sense Ohio.Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511, a production of 511 South High Media LLC.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Yavitch & Palmer Co., L.P.A. You can also find Lawyer Talk on these platforms:Rumble: LawyerTalkPodcastBrighteon: LawyerTalkPodcastGab: @LawyerTalkPodcastGETTR: @LawyerTalkGot a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511, a production of 511 South High Media LLC.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Yavitch & Palmer Co., L.P.A. You can also find Lawyer Talk on these platforms:Rumble: LawyerTalkPodcastBrighteon: LawyerTalkPodcastGab: @LawyerTalkPodcastGETTR: @LawyerTalkCopyright 2024 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law

 In an intriguing episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," Tony delves into the complex case of Shanna Gardner, whose legal team has filed a motion to dismiss the indictment against her, related to the death of her ex-husband. Tony is joined by Eric Faddis, a former prosecutor turned defense attorney, to shed light on the nuances of the situation, specifically the controversy surrounding the taint team's handling of evidence. Here's a summary of the conversation: Taint Team Process Explained: Faddis clarifies the role of the taint team in separating attorney-client privileged communications from relevant evidence in a case, especially in the digital age where entire devices are downloaded for evidence. Shanna Gardner's Case: The motion to dismiss the indictment against Gardner stems from allegations that the taint team failed to properly filter out privileged information, potentially breaching attorney-client confidentiality. Objective of the Motion: While the motion's likelihood of leading to dismissal is slim, the defense aims to have the current prosecutorial team recused, forcing a reset with a new prosecutorial team. This could introduce strategic advantages for the defense by injecting chaos into the prosecution's preparations. Strategic Legal Moves: Faddis discusses the strategic implications of such a motion, suggesting it's a chess move in criminal litigation aimed at gaining a tactical advantage, possibly through fresh plea negotiations or a more favorable prosecutorial approach. Impact on the Trial: The issue of the original prosecutor's potential invasion of attorney-client privilege is unlikely to be presented to the jury, as it does not directly pertain to Gardner's guilt or innocence but is rather a procedural concern affecting the trial's preparation. This episode highlights the strategic complexities and procedural intricacies within high-profile legal cases, offering listeners a deeper understanding of the defense's motivations and potential impacts on the trial process. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

In an intriguing episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," Tony delves into the complex case of Shanna Gardner, whose legal team has filed a motion to dismiss the indictment against her, related to the death of her ex-husband. Tony is joined by Eric Faddis, a former prosecutor turned defense attorney, to shed light on the nuances of the situation, specifically the controversy surrounding the taint team's handling of evidence. Here's a summary of the conversation: Taint Team Process Explained: Faddis clarifies the role of the taint team in separating attorney-client privileged communications from relevant evidence in a case, especially in the digital age where entire devices are downloaded for evidence. Shanna Gardner's Case: The motion to dismiss the indictment against Gardner stems from allegations that the taint team failed to properly filter out privileged information, potentially breaching attorney-client confidentiality. Objective of the Motion: While the motion's likelihood of leading to dismissal is slim, the defense aims to have the current prosecutorial team recused, forcing a reset with a new prosecutorial team. This could introduce strategic advantages for the defense by injecting chaos into the prosecution's preparations. Strategic Legal Moves: Faddis discusses the strategic implications of such a motion, suggesting it's a chess move in criminal litigation aimed at gaining a tactical advantage, possibly through fresh plea negotiations or a more favorable prosecutorial approach. Impact on the Trial: The issue of the original prosecutor's potential invasion of attorney-client privilege is unlikely to be presented to the jury, as it does not directly pertain to Gardner's guilt or innocence but is rather a procedural concern affecting the trial's preparation. This episode highlights the strategic complexities and procedural intricacies within high-profile legal cases, offering listeners a deeper understanding of the defense's motivations and potential impacts on the trial process. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In this episode of the Law With Mr. Lafayette, we explore the fundamental principle of attorney client privilege, it's significance and preserving confidentiality, and real world. Examples that illustrate its importance.

Jessica Lisak of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP in Boston breaks down ethics, attorney-client privilege, and work product in this podcast, excerpted from MCLE's 6/28/23 live webcast: Dissecting Attorney-Client Privilege & the Work Product Doctrine. The full program is available as an on demand webcast or an MP3 here.  Get 24/7 instant access to hundreds of related eLectures like this one—and more—with a subscription to the MCLE OnlinePass. Learn more at www.mcle.org/onlinepass and start your free trial today! Connect with us on socials!Instagram: mcle.newenglandX (Formerly Twitter): MCLENewEnglandLinkedIn: Massachusetts Continuing Legal Education, Inc. (MCLE│New England)Facebook: MCLE New EngalndThreads: mcle.newnengland

Hunter Biden's former art gallerist Georges Bergès was deposed by the House Oversight Committee, where he revealed there was nothing in their agreement that precluded Hunter Biden from discovering who purchased his artwork. Joined by Garrett Ziegler of @MarcoPolo501c3.Hunter Biden's lawyer Kevin Morris was deposed by the House Oversight Committee, where he regularly invoked his "Attorney-Client Privilege" with Hunter to avoid answering questions. Joined by Garrett Ziegler of @MarcoPolo501c3.Joined by Garrett Ziegler of @MarcoPolo501c3.

It's one of the most bizarre murder cases you'll ever hear, and it only gets weirder by the day. We discuss the twists and turns in the Kouri Richins murder case.

As digital communications become more advanced and complicated, protecting confidential information and documents also becomes a more complex process to accomplish. In this in-house fundamentals episode, litigation partner Diana Feinstein of Gibson Dunn & Crutcher breaks down what you need to know to protect the attorney-client privilege in your in-house Legal Department. She shares concrete tips on setting up the stage for confidential communications, especially when outside counsel is directly involved.

In DC, we have updates on the limited gag order Judge Chutkan issued; and Trump's moves to stay the entire proceedings while awaiting a ruling on his motion to dismiss based on presidential immunity.In Florida, DoJ filed a notice to the court regarding Trump's attempts to delay other trials by playing one venue off the other. Brian Greer is here to go over CIPA filings and rulings in DC and Florida.A document comes up in the NYAG civil fraud trial that might be of interest to Jack Smith's team.John Eastman says that disbarment proceedings in California are strengthening his belief in the big lie.Plus, listener questions.Brian Greerhttps://twitter.com/secretsandlawsOn CIPAThe Quick Guide to CIPA (Classified Information Procedures Act)https://www.justsecurity.org/87134/the-quick-guide-to-cipa-classified-information-procedures-act/Motion from DoJ asking the court to require Trump to give notice of an advice-of-counsel defense:https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.258149/gov.uscourts.dcd.258149.98.0_1.pdfA couple of terms to remember:Brady Rule | US Law |Cornell Law School | Legal Information Institutehttps://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/brady_rule#:~:text=Brady%20material%2C%20or%20the%20evidence,infer%20against%20the%20defendant's%20guiltJencks Material | Thomson Reuters Practical Law Glossaryhttps://content.next.westlaw.com/Glossary/PracticalLaw/I87bcf994d05a11e598dc8b09b4f043e0?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)Statutes:18 U.S.C. § 241 | Conspiracy Against Rights18 U.S.C. § 371 | Conspiracy to Defraud the United States | JM | Department of Justice18 U.S.C.  § 1512 | Tampering With Victims, Witnesses, Or Informants Questions for the pod -Submit questions for the pod here https://formfacade.com/sm/PTk_BSogJCheck out other MSW Media podcastshttps://mswmedia.com/shows/Follow AG:Follow Mueller, She Wrote on Posthttps://twitter.com/allisongillhttps://twitter.com/MuellerSheWrotehttps://twitter.com/dailybeanspodAndrew McCabe isn't on social media, but you can buy his book The ThreatThe Threat: How the FBI Protects America in the Age of Terror and TrumpWe would like to know more about our listeners. Please participate in this brief surveyListener Survey and CommentsThis Show is Available Ad-Free And Early For Patreon and Supercast Supporters at the Justice Enforcers level and above:https://dailybeans.supercast.techOrhttps://patreon.com/thedailybeansOr when you subscribe on Apple Podcastshttps://apple.co/3YNpW3P

Attorney-Client Privilege. Defining Attorney-Client Privilege and its Significance: The attorney-client privilege is a legal doctrine that protects confidential communications between an attorney and their client from disclosure in court proceedings. This privilege is grounded in the fundamental principle that clients should be able to speak openly and honestly with their attorneys without fear that their communications will be used against them in court. The attorney-client privilege is a critical aspect of the legal system, as it promotes trust and transparency between clients and their legal counsel. Recognizing that Communications Between Attorneys and Clients are Generally Protected from Disclosure in Court: Under the attorney-client privilege, certain communications made in confidence between an attorney and their client are shielded from disclosure, even if those communications would otherwise be relevant and admissible as evidence in a legal case. This protection extends to both oral and written communications and includes discussions of legal advice, strategy, and information provided by the client to facilitate legal representation. The significance of this privilege cannot be overstated. It encourages clients to seek legal advice promptly and fully disclose all relevant information to their attorneys, allowing attorneys to provide the most effective counsel possible. Without this privilege, clients might be hesitant to share sensitive information with their lawyers, which could hinder the legal process and compromise their defense or legal claims. The attorney-client privilege, however, is not absolute and can be subject to limitations and exceptions. For instance, if a client communicates with an attorney with the intent to commit a crime or to perpetrate fraud, the privilege may not apply. Doctor-Patient Privilege. Understanding Doctor-Patient Privilege and its Scope: Doctor-patient privilege, also known as physician-patient privilege, is a legal doctrine that protects the confidentiality of communications between healthcare providers and their patients. This privilege is rooted in the principle that patients should feel free to discuss their medical conditions and history openly and honestly with healthcare professionals without fear that these conversations will be disclosed in legal proceedings. The scope of doctor-patient privilege typically covers a wide range of communications, including discussions of medical history, symptoms, diagnoses, treatment plans, and other medical information. This privilege exists to ensure that patients receive appropriate medical care and that healthcare providers can make accurate diagnoses and treatment recommendations based on complete and accurate information. Privacy Protections for Medical Communications Between Healthcare Providers and Patients: Doctor-patient privilege applies to both oral and written communications between patients and healthcare providers, including doctors, nurses, therapists, and other medical professionals. This protection extends to medical records, test results, and any information shared during medical examinations or consultations. Healthcare providers have a legal and ethical obligation to safeguard patient confidentiality. Violating this privilege can result in serious consequences, including legal liability and professional sanctions. It's important to note that the scope and application of doctor-patient privilege can vary by jurisdiction, and some jurisdictions may have specific laws or regulations that further define the privilege's boundaries. Spousal Privilege. Exploring Spousal Privilege and its Variations: Spousal privilege is a legal doctrine that protects certain communications between spouses from disclosure in legal proceedings. There are two primary variations of spousal privilege: --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

One of America's best (and most quotable) judges, Learned Hand said, "Any one may so arrange his affairs that his taxes shall be as low as possible; he is not bound to choose that pattern which will best pay the Treasury; there is not even a patriotic duty to increase one's taxes." What happens when the IRS disagrees with the way you've arranged your affairs? What do you do when you receive “fan mail” from the IRS (or the State Taxing authority) KELLEY C. MILLER, ACTEC Fellow and Partner at Reed Smith in Washington DC. helps us understand the process of an IRS audit, good practices in dealing with an audit, and inside knowledge of how the process works at the agency. This episode is full of good information on an uncomfortable, but vital, topic for families that are pursuing complicated planning that may catch the attention of the taxman. Background and Good Conduct Rules of Thumb Be Honest Be Prompt Be Complete Be Clear/Organized Be Consistent and coordinated with other tax and gov't authorities Be Quick to Alert the IRS if issues come up What is the IRS / State looking for? In a word, UNDERPAYMENT . . . or "more revenue." Listed Transactions (ex. syndicated conservation easements) Unreported income Mischaracterization of gain vs income Filing status (ex. Domicile / Residence - esp. at state level) and Dependents Itemized deductions (Business vs Personal) Eligibility for credits / treatment Sources of “referrals”: Data (Demographics, Internal Data, HNW, UHNW patterns, Social Media, AI in the future?) News, Spouses, Other Agencies (Corporate Transparency Act Implications) Past conduct How is the IRS to deal with? Other states? They are professional and sophisticated but under-resourced Whom are they looking for? Improvements? Potential new staffing and technological investments Is not incorporating your advice team ever a good idea? Civil vs. Criminal vs Collections Departments Process 1) Open the Letter!  (Not a good time to stick your head in the sand) Is it an audit or a request for additional information? What person or entity is being audited? What is the focus of the audit? What documentation is being requested? What kind of audit? Correspondence Audit: The IRS requests additional information regarding a part of your tax return, such as receipts or canceled checks. Office Audit: The IRS requests that you bring specific documentation into your local IRS office- the audit happens there. Field Audit: An IRS agent shows up at your place of business to conduct a face-to-face audit. Taxpayer Compliance Measurement Program Audit: The mother of all audits- one that requires full documentation down to birth certificates to test the Agency's scoring systems. 2) Notify the team and decide on the response strategy Who is quarterbacking the response and the interaction? Accountant / Attorney / Wealth Manager / COO When should the tax preparer run things vs an attorney? Do you need other expertise? Should you have Attorney / Client Privilege? Very likely. Who is compiling the information? 3) Responding to the request You should respond to the IRS/State within 30 days of receipt How should that occur? Call / letter? Crafting the response letter Supplying the requested information 4) No Action or additional payment? If it's determined I owe more, what is the process of appeal? What if I don't have it? Payment plans? 5) Closing the file Documenting the outcome Post-mortem – What practices were audited? Should we do anything different in tax planning Any other storm clouds on the horizon? Lessons Learned- Updating documentation and administration process going forward How Do We Stay In Touch with Kelley? KELLEY MILLER at REED SMITH KELLEY MILLER on LINKEDIN https://www.amazon.

Andrew is back from his trip to Alaska, and boy did he miss a ton!  Trump gets indicted, then arraigned, and he and Jerry agree that just about EVERYONE commenting on the Trump indictment is wrong - Never Trumpers, Pro-Trumpers, libertarians, progressives, conservatives, NOBODY seems to be calling balls and strikes.  They break down the indictment, talk about what Trump's been accused of, and the various theories that have been posited regarding the law:  the Presidential Records Act, the Espionage Act, the Crime/Fraud Exception to Attorney-Client Privilege. What all this means for the 2024 Presidential elections--and how a 2024 Trump administration would be tremendously different than the 2016 Trump administration.

Legal legend Alan Dershowitz says a Special Counsel is legal targeting but Trump's Executive Privilege and Attorney Client Privilege were violated as a result. To what extent has targeting been permissible and the results of targeting justifiable to bring a prosecution. That's the moral issue of the case. You have to ask whether any American could survive the kind of scrutiny that Trump has undergone if the government went after them? It raises very troubling problems about the American justice system.Liberals now want to preserve and strengthen the FBI, expand the Espionage Act and Conservatives have become the civil libertarians. Liberals don't care about the Constitution, it's get Trump, get Trump. Dershowitz says Trump's arraignment, trial and appeal should be televised. The public has a right to see how their criminal justice system operates, particularly in a political case like this. It shouldn't be filtered through MSNBC, CNN or the New York Times where they'll get a distorted view. GUEST: ALAN DERSHOWITZ, LEGAL LEGEND AND AUTHOR OF “GET TRUMP”See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

4Patriots https://4patriots.com Protect your family with Food kits, solar generators and more at 4Patriots. Use code TODD for 10% off your first purchase. Alan's Soaps https://alanssoaps.com/TODD Use coupon code ‘TODD' to save an additional 10% off the bundle price. BiOptimizers https://magbreakthrough.com/todd Use promo code TODD for 10% off your order. Bonefrog https://bonefrog.us Enter promo code TODD at checkout to receive 10% off your subscription. Bulwark Capital http://KnowYourRiskRadio.com Find out how Bulwark Capital Actively Manages risk. Call 866-779-RISK or vist KnowYourRiskRadio.com Healthycell http://healthycell.com/todd Protect your heart with Healthycell! Use promo code TODD for 20% off your first order. My Pillow https://mypillow.com Use code TODD for BOGO on the new MyPillow 2.0 Patriot Mobile https://patriotmobile.com/herman Get free activation today with offer code HERMAN. Visit or call 878-PATRIOT. RuffGreens https://ruffgreens.com/todd Get your FREE Jumpstart Trial Bag of Ruff Greens, simply cover shipping. Visit or call 877-MYDOG-64. SOTA Weight Loss https://sotaweightloss.com SOTA Weight Loss is, say it with me now, STATE OF THE ART! GreenHaven Interactive https://greenhaveninteractive.com Digital Marketing including search engine optimization and website design.This show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5674544/advertisement

DOJ cancels Attorney-Client Privilege and Equal Protection, because: TrumpWhen the DOJ steals Equal Protection of one man, they have stolen it from all of us. When the DOJ gets a judge to steal Attorney-Client Privilege for one man, they have stolen it from all of us. Using the remarkably corrupt techniques and others, like the unconstitutional J6 committee, Garland's DOJ will seek pretrial detention for Trump. Probably not in MAL case but definitely for Jan 6 indictment in DC, and an FBI agent who House Republicans said was a whistleblower has been suspended. Meanwhile, Marjorie Taylor Greene posted a video: “I just read the FBI's FD-1023 form implicating Joe Biden in a political bribery pay-to-play scheme. Here's what the American people deserve to know” and a reporter actually asked FigureHead Biden about that: Reporter: "Bribery allegations. Congresswoman Nancy Mace says there's damning evidence in an FBI file that you sold out the country. Do you have a response?" BIDEN: "Where's the money? I'm joking. It's a bunch of malarkey."Seeking to get a federal court seat, a corrupt lawyer blue-screened under questioning by Senator Josh Hawley: "The lawyer who helped DC shut down churches during Covid wants a promotion to the federal court. NO."What does God's Word say? Deuteronomy 27:25 “‘Cursed be anyone who takes a bribe to shed innocent blood.' And all the people shall say, ‘Amen.'”I encourage everyone to spend time reading about what happened when humans made their own kinds, as the FBI/DOG/CDC/FDA have become for so many Americans.1 Samuel 8-15Episode 886 Links:And here is one of DOJs most reliable mouthpieces confirming what I've warned about for months. Garland's DOJ will seek pretrial detention for Trump. Probably not in MAL case but definitely for Jan 6 indictment in DC. Be prepared.Reporter: "Bribery allegations. Congresswoman Nancy Mace says there's damning evidence in an FBI file that you sold out the country. Do you have a response?" BIDEN: "Where's the money? I'm joking. It's a bunch of malarkey."I just read the FBI's FD-1023 form implicating Joe Biden in a political bribery pay-to-play scheme. Here's what the American people deserve to knowSo it was Burisma all along and we don't have to take @repMTG's word for it. We have the evidence.On Nov 2, 2015, the director of Burisma's board wrote Hunter demanding "deliverables", specifically to get "high-ranking US officials" to "close down" the cases against Burisma.An FBI agent who House Republicans said was a whistleblower has been suspended by the bureau because internal investigators concluded that he leaked classified information to Project Veritas, a bureau official says - NBC NEWSBiden: "I have never once, not one single time, suggested what the DOJ should or should not do relative to bringing a charge or not bringing a charge. I'm honest."If you're wondering why DOJ then Jack Smith investigated this in DC then switched to FLA last minute, here's why. DOJ didn't want to risk dealing with Judge Cannon—so they got DC chief judge Beryl Howell to rubber stamp their dirty work. Like piercing atty-client privilege.Hunter Biden Could Face Jail for Contempt of Court, Judge SaysTrump-Russia conspiracy theorist @Maddow says "you have to wonder" if the DOJ would drop Trump's case in exchange for him never "running for office again." @Lawrencereminds her that this is exactly what Trump accuses the DOJ of trying to achieve:President Trump didn't need to give them access so quickly, but he didJulie Kelly: “For those who think the boxes pictured in indictment were FILLED with classified docs, this is from DOJ: 184 docs in boxes Trump gave to NARA, 38 docs produced in response to subpoena, 102 docs in 9-hour FBI raid including 76 from storage room BRATT AND FBI INSPECTEDSenator @HawleyMO: "Do you think it's wrong to discriminate on the basis of religious faith?". Biden's district judge nominee for D.C Loren AliKhan: "Absolutely.Senator Hawley: "Then why did you argue that religious services and religious people pose a greater risk of infection than people gathered to argue for defunding the police? Josh Hawley: "The lawyer who helped DC shut down churches during Covid wants a promotion to the federal court. NO."4Patriots https://4patriots.com Protect your family with Food kits, solar generators and more at 4Patriots. Use code TODD for 10% off your first purchase. Alan's Soaps https://alanssoaps.com/TODD Use coupon code ‘TODD' to save an additional 10% off the bundle price. BiOptimizers https://magbreakthrough.com/todd Use promo code TODD for 10% off your order. Bonefrog https://bonefrog.us Enter promo code TODD at checkout to receive 10% off your subscription. Bulwark Capital http://KnowYourRiskRadio.com Find out how Bulwark Capital Actively Manages risk. Call 866-779-RISK or vist KnowYourRiskRadio.com Healthycell http://healthycell.com/todd Protect your heart with Healthycell! Use promo code TODD for 20% off your first order. My Pillow https://mypillow.com Use code TODD for BOGO on the new MyPillow 2.0 Patriot Mobile https://patriotmobile.com/herman Get free activation today with offer code HERMAN. Visit or call 878-PATRIOT. RuffGreens https://ruffgreens.com/todd Get your FREE Jumpstart Trial Bag of Ruff Greens, simply cover shipping. Visit or call 877-MYDOG-64. SOTA Weight Loss https://sotaweightloss.com SOTA Weight Loss is, say it with me now, STATE OF THE ART! GreenHaven Interactive https://greenhaveninteractive.com Digital Marketing including search engine optimization and website design.This show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5674544/advertisement

You're done with your divorce. That means you're done with lawyers, right? Not necessarily! In today's episode, Seth and Pete talk about a few cases in which you may need to talk to a lawyer again – if you want to appeal your divorce, and for post-divorce estate planning. It's a rare thing for judges to make mistakes when it comes to divorce cases, but it does happen. That's when you'd want to appeal your divorce. Seth and Pete talk about other situations that may require going this route, and who you'd talk to for it. We also talk about the difference between appealing your case and a ‘motion to modify.'While appealing divorces isn't as common, everyone going through a divorce should immediately do post-divorce estate planning. You've just gone through a divorce. All of your financial paperwork is already in your lawyer's hands. It's the perfect time to talk to an estate planning attorney. Plus, you want to make sure your ex is no longer included in your will or listed as beneficiary, right? They're very important topics in today's episode. Plus, we have three listener questions. The first is a follow-up to our recent conversation about vocation evaluations, particularly for those also dealing with mental health issues. The second asks about client confidentiality. The third is how to approach your lawyer if you feel their paralegals are making mistakes in your case. Great questions! Tune in!Links & NotesSchedule a consult with SethGot a question you want to ask on the show? Click here! (00:00) - Welcome to How to Split a Toaster (00:26) - Post-Divorce Estate Planning & the Divorce Appeal (02:15) - Divorce Appeals (12:28) - Motion to Modify (14:02) - Suggestions if Appealed (16:04) - Sponsor: Soberlink (18:40) - Estate Planning Lawyer (23:22) - Listener Questions (23:41) - Follow-Up on Vocational Evaluations (28:41) - Attorney-Client Privilege (31:29) - When Paralegals Make Mistakes (34:45) - Wrap-Up

Using the recent Supreme Court matter of In re Grand Jury as an introduction, this program will explore the tricky terrain of the attorney-client privilege's application to dual-purpose communications. (5/11/2023) Questions? Inquiries about program materials? Contact Alan I. Johnson at ajohnson@bostonbar.org

Elise Maizel, acting assistant professor of lawyering at New York University, joins the Business Scholarship Podcast to discuss her article The Case for Downsizing the Corporate Attorney-Client Privilege. In this article, Maizel offers a comparative and historical analysis of the corporate attorney-client privilege versus the more familiar privilege enjoyed by individual clients. She finds the contemporary practice of corporate attorney-client privilege to be unworkable and socially costly and proposes reforms around channeling corporations' attorney-client communications through board-level privileged-communications committees. This episode is hosted by Andrew Jennings, assistant professor at Brooklyn Law School.

Welcome to the award-winning FCPA Compliance Report, the longest running podcast in compliance. Looking for a podcast that will give you insights into the Department of Justice's corporate enforcement policy and the implications for corporations facing investigations? Look no further than FCPA Compliance Report! In this episode, Tom Fox sits down with Ryan Patrick, a former US district attorney for the southern district of Texas. They discuss the importance of staying up-to-date with DOJ memos and speeches, the difficulty for corporations in deciding whether or not to self-disclose, and the implications of outside counsel being deputized. Ryan emphasizes the importance for companies to work with lawyers who know judges and have pre-existing relationships with local prosecutors, including US attorneys and line prosecutors. They discuss the Southern District of Texas and its role in border-related issues, as well as the Patrick's time as a US Attorney for the Southern District of Texas. This podcast is a must-listen for anyone looking to gain a better understanding of corporate enforcement and compliance policies. Don't miss out on the conversation between Tom Fox and Ryan Patrick!  Key Highlights ·      Discussing U.S District Attorney's work challenges  ·      Evolution of Corporate Enforcement Policy by DOJ ·      Challenges in Communication with Corporations for Attorneys ·      Challenges of Self-Disclosure for Businesses ·      Navigating Legal Issues with Local Counsel ·      Challenges to Attorney-Client Privilege in Corporate Cases ·      Border Security and Cryptography Cases in Texas ·      US Attorney General Advisory Committee in Presidential Administration ·      Role of Southern District of Texas in law enforcement and corporate enforcement ·      Inside a Federal Prosecutor's Role  Notable Quotes  ·      "It seems to me that this broaden beyond simply anti-corruption in FCPA and whether it be fraud, whether it be antitrust, whether it be environmental, whether it be a wide variety of other types of issues that an AUSA and a local district attorney US district attorney's office would prosecute.” ·      “Asking the US attorney's offices now to step into this space where really thinking from the idea of self-disclosure and from monitoring or audio auditing, so to speak, someone's compliance program.” ·      “One of the not perhaps most difficult, but hardest conversations a corporation has is whether or not to self-disclose under the FCPA.” ·      “Bring it to me. I will consider it because it's not 1 size fits all. Resources Ryan Patrick on LinkedIn Ryan Patrick on Haynes and Boone Tom  Instagram Facebook YouTube Twitter LinkedIn Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

It's a big day for the Department of Justice. Donald Trump's lawyer Evan Corcoran will be testifying today. It's a rare thing given Attorney Client Privilege but not when there is an ongoing crime. There is an ongoing crime and Corcoran is testifying. Let's get into it. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/rational-boomer/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/rational-boomer/support

In this episode, Elise Bernlohr Maizel, Acting Assistant Professor of Lawyering at NYU Law School, discusses her article "The Case for Downsizing the Corporate Attorney-Client Privilege." Maizel begins by describing the attorney-client privilege and work product doctrine. She explains why the attorney-client privilege doctrine has always been a poor fit for corporate clients. And she proposes a new model for the attorney-client privilege in the corporate context that is both more conceptually coherent and practically desirable. Maizel is on Twitter at @eliseconstance.This episode was hosted by Brian L. Frye, Spears-Gilbert Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at @brianlfrye. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

AP correspondent Jackie Quinn reports on Trump Classified Documents.

At long last, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its first two decisions of the Supreme Court this week, but one of them was a curious one-line dismissal of a case argued just weeks ago. Law360's The Term examines the possible reasons the justices decide to punt in a closely-watched case about the scope of attorney-client privilege.  

On today's docket, we will discuss a case that just had oral arguments at the Supreme Court of the United States. The name of the case is In Re Grand Jury. It is quite unusual for a case to make it to the Supreme Court and the petitioner remain anonymous. The case is about attorney-client privilege and what communication(such as documents) should remain confidential and what is discoverable and needs to be released to the opposing side in a lawsuit. The crux of the argument is to replace the 'primary purpose test' with the 'significant purpose test'. We will also discuss the oral argument process at the Supreme Court.For the show notes for this episode, go here. Comment below the show notes if you have any questions about this episode.For more about this podcast, go here. For ways to improve your Legal English, go here.For the Intro To Legal English Course, go here. This is a free course!Interested in improving your Email writing? Go here to learn how.---Check out our NEW website: 4 Business-EnglishImprove Your Communication SkillsIn the modern business world, communication is key to success. Often, communication is conducted in English. Whether you are dealing with native-English speakers, or English as a Second Language speakers, you need to communicate effectively in the lingua franca of the 21st Century: English. There are many common business terms that you need to understand, and some you need to master. Often, academic English courses do not teach these business phrases or lexicon. That is where 4 Business English can help.This site is designed with business professionals in mind. People who need to improve their professional English skills - reading, writing, conversational, or even public speaking and giving formal presentations. ---To read more about or to purchase Criminal Law Lexicon, go to the Amazon page here.The author is Timothy Barrett, the host of this podcast. This book is designed for non-native English speakers who want to improve their understanding of the proper Legal English terms concerning the field of Criminal Law. This book introduces this lexicon and gives examples of using these words. 

The scope of attorney client privilege headlines a lower-profile first sitting of the new year for the Supreme Court, which returns to the bench for arguments Jan. 9. But things won't stay quiet for long. The February argument calendar features a fast-tracked GOP-led challenge to Biden administration attempts to end pandemic-era immigration restrictions. Supreme Court correspondents Kimberly Robinson and Greg Stohr break down the roster of cases and other happenings at the court in 2023's first episode of Cases and Controversies. Do you have feedback on this episode of Cases & Controversies? Give us a call and leave a voicemail at 703-341-3690.

David Seide serves as Senior Counsel at Government Accountability Project (GAP), a non-profit supporting government whistleblowers, where he specializes in immigration issues. David began his career in 1983 after earning a JD from NYU Law in the federal court system as a clerk to Hon. Morris E. Lasker. David soon rose to the position of Assistant US Attorney, serving as a White Collar and Securities Fraud Prosecutor. Before joining GAP, David worked as Special Counsel to U.S. Senator Jeff Merkley and served as Partner at multiple private practices through the years. David also holds experience as Lead of High-Profile Internal Investigations for the U.S. Department of State. David has authored multiple books on internal and governmental investigations, including Warning the Witness: A Guide to Internal Investigations and the Attorney-Client Privilege and Navigating Multiple Government Investigations: Critical Issues and Guiding Principles.   Warning the Witness: A Guide to Internal Investigations and the Attorney-Client Privilege - https://www.amazon.com/Warning-Witness-Investigations-Attorney-Client-Privelege/dp/160442916X    Navigating Multiple Government Investigations: Critical Issues and Guiding Principles - https://www.americanbar.org/products/ecd/ebk/217821/    David Seide Social Media LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/in/david-z-seide-a648965/ Twitter - https://twitter.com/davidseide    Government Accountability Project Social Media LinkedIn – https://www.linkedin.com/company/government-accountability-project/  Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/GovernmentAccountabilityProject  Twitter - https://twitter.com/GovAcctProj  Homepage - https://whistleblower.org/   Remember to subscribe and follow us on social media…   LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/mass-tort-news Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/masstortnewsorg Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/masstortnews.org

Donald Trump's former "fixer" Michael Cohen tells Joe Madison exactly how dangerous Donald Trump can be with the secret documents he brought to Mar-a-Lago, including using them to blackmail the United States.

"Cosmic Creating Show” Current Affairs with Jan Shaw SHOW PHOTO The Success Alchemist: Success Coach | Business & Marketing Strategist (970) 852 4450 / (512) 487 2980. https://www.TheSuccessAlchemist.net Twitter @CoachJanShaw Telegram - https://t.me/usukpatriot/56 Jan's Podcast Station: https://pod.co/cosmic-creating-with-jan-shaw "Cosmic Creating" is seen 5-6 pm EST every Saturday http://www.cosmicreality.com/radio.html Jan is also seen on every second Saturday 6-8 pm EST on the “Say What Radio Show” at http://www.cosmicreality.com/radio.html PODCASTS https://pod.co/cosmic-reality-radio Archives: https://www.cosmicreality.com/archives.html LINKS: Biden's Hateful Rhetoric Against Americans Presents GOP With A Sterling Opportunity FBI Seized Over 11,000 documents Confirmed: FBI Seized Documents Protected by Attorney-Client Privilege from Trump's Home FBI's Mar-A-Lago Raid Backlash Continues To Build Will the Biden DOJ indict Trump?

In our news wrap Monday, some documents seized from former President Trump's home may be protected by attorney-client privilege, a judge in Georgia ordered Republican Governor Brian Kemp to testify before a grand jury on alleged attempts by Trump to alter election results there and the path to restoring the Iran nuclear deal grew more uncertain as President Ebrahim Raisi issued a new warning. PBS NewsHour is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders

In our news wrap Monday, some documents seized from former President Trump's home may be protected by attorney-client privilege, a judge in Georgia ordered Republican Governor Brian Kemp to testify before a grand jury on alleged attempts by Trump to alter election results there and the path to restoring the Iran nuclear deal grew more uncertain as President Ebrahim Raisi issued a new warning. PBS NewsHour is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders

In our news wrap Monday, some documents seized from former President Trump's home may be protected by attorney-client privilege, a judge in Georgia ordered Republican Governor Brian Kemp to testify before a grand jury on alleged attempts by Trump to alter election results there and the path to restoring the Iran nuclear deal grew more uncertain as President Ebrahim Raisi issued a new warning. PBS NewsHour is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders

In our news wrap Monday, some documents seized from former President Trump's home may be protected by attorney-client privilege, a judge in Georgia ordered Republican Governor Brian Kemp to testify before a grand jury on alleged attempts by Trump to alter election results there and the path to restoring the Iran nuclear deal grew more uncertain as President Ebrahim Raisi issued a new warning. PBS NewsHour is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders

CBS News Congressional Correspondent Scott MacFarlane has the details.

Report claims FBI seized privileged Trump records during raid, Senate Republicans PROMISE Investigation of the unprecedented raid, The FBI Search Warrant Contains a ‘Chilling' Passage That Reveals What the Trump Raid Was REALLY All About— Did the FBI raid completely BACKFIRE on the Regime?

Trump Lawyers Request FBI Return Any Files Covered by Attorney-Client Privilege. Five U.S. Lawmakers Visit Taiwan, Just 12 Days After Pelosi Visits. Inflation Bill Funds Abortion, Violating Hyde Amendment.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Top 5 News Headlines and Commentary for Monday, August 15th, 2022. 1. Democrat Inflation Bill Funds Abortion, Violating Hyde Amendment. 2. Arizona Begins Constructing Wall on US-Mexico Border Without Biden's Permission. 3. Trump Lawyers Request FBI Return Any Files Covered by Attorney-Client Privilege. 4. White House Sought to Silence Critic on Twitter. 5. WHO Moves to Change Name of Monkeypox to Avoid Being Racist.

Welcome to The Conservatude Podcast! This IS the home of freedom and the voice of truth. We won't kowtow to the Radical Left and we won't give up the fight! We're here to equip you to take the fight to the Woke mob! We believe America is STILL worth fighting for!! Enjoy the show!! Episode Guide: John Durham slaps down Hillary for America's Claim to Attorney-Client Privilege. Democratic Senator Joe Manchin Saves our Kibbles and Bits AGAIN!  And Finally,  Secretary of Homeland Security Gets Fricasseed by House Republicans over the Border!!  It Got UGLY!! I discuss it all on today's The Conservatude Podcast with Mark Kremer.  Join me on the patriotic journey that IS the Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave!!  Follow Me on Social Media: http://www.tiktoc.com/@theconservatude (TikTok) http://www.instagram.com/theconservatude (Instagram) http://www.gettr.com/user/theconservatude (Gettr) http://www.twitter.com/theconservatude (Twitter) http://www.facebook.com/theconservatude (Facebook)

On this episode of Kelley Drye's Legal Download, senior associate Molly Rao speaks with Jaimie Nawaday, the chair of the firm's White Collar, Investigations and Compliance practice group, and Kristi Wolff, the chair of the firm's Food and Drug Law and Cannabis Law practices. They provide answers to frequently asked questions surrounding attorney-client privilege and investigations, including how to protect privilege and how to keep third-party communications protected. For more information, contact: Jaimie Nawaday Partner jnawaday@kelleydrye.com (212) 808-7695 Bio - www.kelleydrye.com/Our-People/Jaimie-Nawaday Kristi Wolff Partner kwolff@kelleydrye.com (202) 342-8805 Bio - www.kelleydrye.com/Our-People/Kristi-L-Wolff Malavika (Molly) Rao Senior Associate mrao@kelleydrye.com (212) 808-5129 Bio: www.kelleydrye.com/Our-People/Malavika-A-Rao

Edward Marshall, Global Head of Dentons' Family Office practice, is joined by Deborah Little and Sam Braver, colleagues in the Firm's Litigation and Dispute Resolution group, as they share their insights on a recent Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision, concerning the fiduciary exception and its effect on attorney-client and work-product privileges, including the impact of this decision on clients in Pennsylvania, Florida an beyond.