Podcasts about halloween october

As we end our “Month of Boo'“ on The Magic Word Podcast, we close it out on the 98th anniversary of the death of Harry Houdini who passed on Halloween (October 31st), 1926. It is fitting that we have a chat with the internationally noted expert on “all things Houdini,” John Cox. John is the blogger of “Wild About Houdini” which is a daily blog about the master of escapes. He always seems to find some interesting nugget about Houdini's life that has been long overlooked or “escaped” his attention. If you are more of a visual person, then you might enjoy watching our conversation that was recorded over Zoom. View fullsize View fullsize View fullsize View fullsize View fullsize View fullsize View fullsize View fullsize View fullsize View fullsize View fullsize This week, John Cox talks about the many variations of the “Houdini Seance” since the first one by Bess Houdini first held on the year following Harry's death. These modern day seances includes the current “Official” one hosted by Dorothy Dietrich and Dick Brookz and the “Original” one hosted by Tom Boldt and Bill Radner. John also tells us some details about Houdini's trial in Germany, plus he updates us on the books he is writing including the elucidation on Houdini's diary from his early years before he rose to his legendary status. Download this podcast in an MP3 file by Clicking Here and then right click to save the file. You can also subscribe to the RSS feed by Clicking Here. You can download or listen to the podcast through Pandora and SiriusXM (formerly Stitcher) by Clicking Here or through FeedPress by Clicking Here or through Tunein.com by Clicking Here or through iHeart Radio by Clicking Here. If you have a Spotify account, then you can also hear us through that app, too. You can also listen through your Amazon Alexa and Google Home devices. Remember, you can download it through the iTunes store, too. See the preview page by Clicking Here.

Jameson Williams facing a new suspension, Joe Biden's garbage comment, a rooftop penis mural, Martha on Netflix, a crazy rodeo accident, and Harry of The Rachel Cancer Scam Podcast tells us how he was tricked. The World Series continues as the New York Yankees take Game 4 over the LA Dodgers. Did you know Anthony Volpe is from New York? Freddie Freeman is a beast. These bozos stole the show and one is friends with Gronk. Detroit Lions WR Jameson Williams does whatever he wants. Seems everyone is #TeamJamo on this one. At least he picked the right Halloween costume. The Osbourne family is against the Menendez Bros getting out of prison. Lyle and Erik may get their ‘Christmas Special' after all. Hip Hop: Metro Boomin (Leland Wayne) has been accused of rape. Drake got a Brazilian Butt Lift. Megan Thee Stallion is sick of deep-fake porn of her. You may recognize his voice in our intros, but Harry has his own podcast: The Rachel Cancer Scam. Harry joins us to discuss the show. Gay-Per-View is catching on with women. A ‘Rooftop Dick Mural has some Colorado residents up in arms. Check this wild sport! Did his shoes come off? Politics: Joe Biden called Trump supporters “garbage”. Aubrey Plaza is none too pleased at Tony Hinchcliffe. MAGA hat plane brawl! Amber Rose vs Beyoncé. Arnold Schwarzenegger backs Kamala Harris. Carl Marlinga can't shake his terrible nickname. Republicans want to stop you from pounding off. Entertainment: Two influencers died after refusing to wear lifejackets. Snowboarder Shaun White is engaged. Jerry O'Connell's wife Rebecca Romijn wrecked his eyebrows. Channing Tatum and Zoe Kravitz have broken up. Sad. Scary Movie 6 is coming soon. After 26 years, Shawn Mendes still cannot figure out his sexuality. Sophie Turner and Joe Jonas have an intercontinental custody agreement. Martha Stewart has a new doc available on Netflix. More JaMo: Dan Campbell has Jameson Williams' back. Donald Trump rode in a garbage truck today. Visit our presenting sponsor Hall Financial – Michigan's highest rated mortgage company. If you'd like to help support the show… consider subscribing to our YouTube Channel, Facebook, Instagram and Twitter (The Drew Lane Show, Marc Fellhauer, Trudi Daniels, Jim Bentley and BranDon).

Every town has a legend, a secret that they want to keep hidden in the dark recesses. Christiansburg, VA has its legend with the Black Sisters, 3 sisters who dressed in black and only came out at night. Hear their sinister story of murder and intimidation.  Also, can a land be cursed? The folks that have experienced Lake Shawnee would swear to it! #BlackSisters #Christiansburg #LakeShawnee #hauntings #Halloween #October #ghoststories

We've made to the midway point of our spooky journey through the month of October. We hope you are having a good start to the new week... - Four 'Blind Rankings' - 3CT Jeopardy: Fall Edition Enjoy! Stay connected with all things 3CT related at https://linktr.ee/3countthursday Subscribe to the show on ALL podcast platforms & YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/@3CountThursday) You can get your 3CT merch on TeePublic at https://www.teepublic.com/user/3countthursday Creative Commons Music used in this show created by Jason Shaw on https://audionautix.com/

Title caught your attention!!!!  Gemma discusses her love of Halloween/ October & James Junior plays a game of Mouse Trap. Codswallops & a weird story of the week involving taxidermy. All this and much more laughs along the way.  TeePublic Store: https://www.teepublic.com/stores/talking-codswallop-podcast?ref_id=36335 Talking Codswallop can be found on ALL social media: @CodswallopPod and we are on YOUTUBE too!!! :)  

WELCOME TO THE VINTAGE HALLOWEEN CURDBOX As October nights grow longer and a subtle chill fills the air, Halloween takes on a timeless charm, where the past and present seem to dance together. Shadows cast by carved pumpkins sway gently across the scene, casting an atmosphere where the excitement of Halloween seamlessly intertwines with the quiet beauty of age and change. In this gradual shift, aged cheeses take on a mystical allure—their weathered textures and deep aromas embody the essence of autumn's transformation. The perfect blend of the vintage and the mysterious serves as a reminder of time's patient touch—and the magic of the season. Now, let's take a look at what we have patiently waiting for us in this month's box... Visit curdbox.com for more info.Please visit some of our cheese and pairing partners in this month's box:@jandbfarm, @fromagerielamuse, @hookscheeseco, @rusticbakery, @blanxartchocolates, and @eatdivina. 

Well... it's been a fantastic ride, but we're just about at the end. With the end of the series almost here, we'd like to give you one more chance to get answers to your burning questions. Have something you want to know about the show or its characters? Have a question for a character? Submit them via this form, between now and Halloween (October 31). We'll be putting together a little panel of cast and crew to answer your questions, for release on the show feed after the finale. Thanks for coming along with us as we explored the System, and we hope you enjoyed listening to these stories as much as we enjoyed making them. ** Welcome to the System Our Website Join the Law of Names Discord Follow us on Twitter Support us on Patreon Our theme music was composed & arranged by Michael Freitag written by Scott Paladin, and vocals by Jeremiah. Breathing Space is a Law of Names production. © This work is copyrighted by Law of Names Media, 2023 It may be freely adapted and remixed for non-commercial use with attribution to the original creators. The unaltered material may not be shared or distributed for any purpose without written permission from Law of Names Media. For adaptations and derivative works, please include the following: Created with permission from Law of Names Media. Based on original material from Breathing Space. All rights reserved.

Happy Halloween - October 31, 2023 - Be Safe Out There.

It's Halloween and the frights continue with The Cellar Two-Parter, We're Alive #34.2, Halloween the Hard Way, and Tales of Myster and Horror- The Father! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Check out The Jack & 'Chill Podcast here!http://atozenglishpodcast.com/episodeshttps://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-jack-chill-podcast/id1709902691https://redcircle.com/shows/the-jack-and-chill-podcastOn October 31st, several significant events happened in history. Here are a few notable occurrences on this date:1517: Martin Luther, a German monk, nailed his 95 Theses to the door of the Castle Church in Wittenberg. This event is considered the catalyst for the Protestant Reformation.1864: Nevada was admitted as the 36th state of the United States during the Civil War. It is known as the "Silver State" due to its significant silver mining industry.1926: Magician and escape artist Harry Houdini passed away in Detroit, Michigan. He was renowned for his daring escape acts and illusionist performances.1941: The famous Mount Rushmore National Memorial in South Dakota was completed after 14 years of carving the faces of U.S. Presidents George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Theodore Roosevelt, and Abraham Lincoln into the mountain.1984: Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi was assassinated by two of her bodyguards, leading to a period of political turmoil in India.1993: The United Nations Security Council passed Resolution 827, creating the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) to prosecute war crimes that occurred during the Yugoslav Wars.1999: EgyptAir Flight 990 crashed into the Atlantic Ocean off the coast of Nantucket, Massachusetts, killing all 217 people on board. The cause of the crash remains a subject of debate and investigation.2011: The global population was estimated to have reached 7 billion people on this day, according to the United Nations.Halloween: October 31st is widely celebrated as Halloween in many countries, a holiday with origins in ancient Celtic and Christian traditions. It is a day for costumes, candy, and various spooky and fun activities.These are just a few of the events that have occurred on October 31st throughout history. This date has a mix of historical, cultural, and political significance.Podcast Website:https://atozenglishpodcast.com/a-to-z-this-day-in-world-history-october-31st/Social Media:Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/671098974684413/Tik Tok:@atozenglish1Instagram:@atozenglish22Twitter:@atozenglish22A to Z Facebook Page:https://www.facebook.com/theatozenglishpodcastCheck out our You Tube Channel:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCds7JR-5dbarBfas4Ve4h8ADonate to the show: https://app.redcircle.com/shows/9472af5c-8580-45e1-b0dd-ff211db08a90/donationsRobin and Jack started a new You Tube channel called English Word Master. You can check it out here:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC2aXaXaMY4P2VhVaEre5w7ABecome a member of Podchaser and leave a positive review!https://www.podchaser.com/podcasts/the-a-to-z-english-podcast-4779670Join our Whatsapp group: https://forms.gle/zKCS8y1t9jwv2KTn7Intro/Outro Music: Daybird by Broke for Freehttps://freemusicarchive.org/music/Broke_For_Free/Directionless_EP/Broke_For_Free_-_Directionless_EP_-_03_Day_Bird/https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcodehttps://freemusicarchive.org/music/eaters/simian-samba/audrey-horne/Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/the-a-to-z-english-podcast/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

It's Halloween and the frights continue with The Cellar Two-Parter, We're Alive #34.2, Halloween the Hard Way, and Tales of Myster and Horror- The Father! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

It's Halloween! October 31st, 8amAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

*Please note, this show is no longer in live production. Any live shows advertised within the episode have already concluded.   From Town Hall in Seattle, WA with host Richard Sher Stereo Left: Carolyn Faye Fox, Arnie Reisman, Paula Lyons Stereo Right: Tony Kahn, Francine Achbar, Murray Horwitz Music: Bulldog Brass Band   Rounds Played: Round 1: Halloween IQ Round 2: Bluff (guck) Round 3: Mixed Messages Spotlight Round: Lit Horror Round 4: Bluff (kis) Round 5: Melded Movies

Yess spooky October for Halloween

Guest Stephanie Kuhlman, founder of Home of the Brave, Organization of the year winner, Banquet Recap, Navy Birthday (October 13), Day of Deployed (October 26), Halloween (October 31), Film Review: Hacksaw Ridge Lauren Gedman Re/Max Preferred AssociatesForever in Bloom Artificial and solo wood florist for home decor, bridal bouquets, and special occasion needs.Disclaimer: This post contains affiliate links. If you make a purchase, I may receive a commission at no extra cost to you.Support the show

Guest Stephanie Kuhlman, founder of Home of the Brave, Organization of the year winner, Banquet Recap, Navy Birthday (October 13), Day of Deployed (October 26), Halloween (October 31), Film Review: Hacksaw Ridge Support the show

As an artist I must first be, Open to worlds they say cannot be, Then I must download and seek to create, What I am given before it's too late. ☉ As usual, there is more to say than I have time for in the video. I did not get to MARS in all this! The square to Mars is what makes it all crazy (and more challenging for some) and is the source of fear being brought onto the scene. Now, I have talked about this Mars squaring Neptune for the third time and how it requires us to manifest the dreams we've had since last May when they came into conjunction and, more specifically, since he squared him last Halloween (October 31). When it comes to Mars/Neptune, we need to understand the Chinese concept of wu-wei or non-action. When one is totally at one with Source or the universe, in the flow of the river, so to speak, it is not necessary to exert the ego-will force so much as steer, balance, and dance with the flow. However, when we are in the lower domain of Mars, our ego-will, we can assert ourselves to create dreams that are not “of Source,” but rather ego, and are thus illusions, distractions, or attachments not serving the soul evolution. Thus, this can be a time of “chasing windmills,” confusion about what we should do, or disillusionment when our best efforts don't materialize. In these cases, it is a lesson in discrimination and discernment where we need to look deeply into where, when, how, and most importantly, WHY we desired people, places, plans, things, or dreams that didn't happen. Hopefully, your dreams will come true, and if not, you don't give up but learn, grow, and continue to believe in yourself and love. Song for this week? Walk along the river with Blue Sky! https://youtu.be/6MG8vAZvmLg The Pentagon talks about aliens! https://www.foxnews.com/science/pentagon-officials-suggest-alien-mothership-solar-system-send-mini-probes-earth Come to Greece this May! Let's get together! Each moment is precious. Let's make the most of them. http://bit.ly/40d7LF9 So Much Love, Kaypacha https://newparadigmastrology.com/ Sign up for my weekly newsletter to receive my Astro reports and uncensored insights: http://bit.ly/npanewsletter

Mike Hoa Nguyen, assistant professor of education, faculty affiliate at the Institute for Human Development and Social Change, and faculty affiliate at the Metropolitan Center for Research on Equity and the Transformation of Schools at New York University, leads the conversation on affirmative action. FASKIANOS: Thank you. Welcome to CFR's Higher Education Webinar. I'm Irina Faskianos, Vice President of the National Program and Outreach at CFR. Today's discussion is on the record, and the video and transcript will be available on our website, CFR.org/academic. As always, CFR takes no institutional positions on matters of policy. We are delighted to have Mike Hoa Nguyen with us to discuss affirmative action. Dr. Nguyen is assistant professor of education at New York University's Steinhardt School of Culture, Education, and Human Development. He's also a faculty affiliate at NYU's Metropolitan Center for Research on Equity and the Transformation of Schools and a faculty affiliate at NYU's Institute for Human Development and Social Change. Additionally, Dr. Nguyen is a principal investigator of the Minority Serving Institutions Data Project. And prior to coming to NYU he was at the University of Denver. He has extensive professional experience in the federal government and has managed multiple complex, long-term intergovernmental projects and initiatives, focusing on postsecondary education and the judiciary and has published his work widely, including in Educational Researcher, The Journal of Higher Education, and The Review of Higher Education. So Mike, thanks very much for being with us today to talk about affirmative action. Could you give us an overview of where we are, the history of affirmative action, where we are now, and examples of criteria that are used by different institutions? NGUYEN: Well, hello. And thank you so much, Irina. And also thank you to the Council on Foreign Relations for having me here today. It's a real honor. And thank you to many of you who are joining us today out of your busy schedules. I'm sure that many of you have been following the news for Harvard and UNC. And, of course, those cases were just heard at the Supreme Court about a month ago, on Halloween. And so today thank you for those questions. I'd love to be able to spend a little bit of time talking about the history of sort of what led us to this point. I also recognize that many joining us are also experts on this topic. So I really look forward to the conversation after my initial remarks. And so affirmative action, I think, as Philip Rubio has written, comes from centuries-old English legal concept of equity, right, or the administration of justice according to what is fair in a particular situation, as opposed to rigidly following a set of rules. It's defined by the U.S. Civil Rights Commission in 1977 as a term that is a broad—a term, in a broad sense, that encompasses any measure beyond a simple termination of discriminatory practice adopted to correct for past or present discrimination or to prevent discrimination from recurring in the future. Academics have defined affirmative action simply as something more than passive nondiscrimination, right. It means various organizations must act positively, affirmatively, and aggressively to remove all barriers, however informal or subtle, that prevent access by minorities and women to their rightful places in the employment and educational institutions of the United States. And certainly one of the earliest appearances of this term, affirmative action, in government documents came when President Kennedy, in his 1961 executive order, where he wrote that the mandate stated that government contractors, specifically those that were receiving federal dollars to, quote, take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed and employees are treated during employment without regard of their race, creed, color, or national origin. Certainly President Kennedy created a committee on equal employment opportunity to make recommendations for this. And then later on President Johnson later expressed—I'm sorry—expanded on President Kennedy's approach to take a sort of more active antiracist posture, which he signaled in a commencement speech at Howard University. In the decades following, of course, political-legal attacks have rolled back on how affirmative action can be implemented and for what purposes. So in admissions practices at U.S. colleges and universities today, really they can only consider race as one of many factors through a holistic process or holistic practices if so-called race-neutral approaches to admissions policies have fallen short in allowing for a campus to enroll a racially diverse class in order to achieve or reap the benefits of diversity, the educational benefits of diversity. Federal case law established by the courts have affirmed and reaffirmed that colleges may only consider race as one of many factors for the purposes of obtaining the educational benefits in diversity. So starting with the Bakke decision in the late 1970s, the Court limited the consideration of race in admissions and replaced the rationale for the use of race, specifically the rationale which was addressing historic and ongoing racism or systemic and racial oppression, instead in favor of the diversity rationale. So, in other words, if a college or university wishes to use race in their admissions, they can only do so with the intention of enhancing the educational benefits of all students. It may not legally use race as a part of their admissions process for the purpose of acknowledging historical or contemporary racism as barriers to equity in college access. If we fast-forward to something more recent, the two cases out of Michigan, the Grutter and Gratz case, what we saw there were really—significant part of the discussions of these two cases were really informed and conversations really about the educational benefits of diversity. That was really a key aspect of those cases. Lawsuits challenging the use of race in college admissions after those two cases now can sort of be traced to Edward Blum, a conservative activist, and his organization, Students for Fair Admission, or SFFA. So Blum has really dedicated his life to establishing what he calls a colorblind American society by filing lawsuits with the goal of dismantling laws and policies seeking to advance racial justice. This includes redistricting, voting rights, and, of course, affirmative action. So in 2000—in the 2000s, he recruited Abigail Fisher to challenge the University of Texas in their admissions program. The Court, the Supreme Court, ultimately ruled in favor of Texas in the second Fisher case—Fisher II, as we call it. And so that's actually where we saw Ed Blum alter his tactics. In this case he established SFFA, where he then purposefully recruited Asian Americans as plaintiffs in order to sue Harvard and UNC. So the cases now at Harvard—are now certainly at the Supreme Court. But one sort of less-known case that hasn't got a whole lot of attention, actually, was—that was sort of on the parallel track, actually originated from the U.S. Department of Justice more recently, during the Trump administration, which launched an investigation into Yale's admissions practices, which also focus on Asian Americans. And this was around 2018, so not too long ago. And certainly Asian Americans have been engaged in affirmative action debate since the 1970s. But these lawsuits have really placed them front and center in sort of our national debate. And so I think it's really important to also note that while empirical research demonstrates and shows that the majority of Asian Americans are actually in support of affirmative action, a very vocal minority of Asian Americans are certainly opposed to race-conscious admissions and are part of these lawsuit efforts. But interestingly enough, they've received a large and disproportionate share of media attention and sort of—I stress this only because I think popular press and media have done a not-so-great job at reporting on this. And their framing, I think, sometimes relies on old stereotypes, harmful stereotypes, about Asian Americans, and written in a way that starts with an assumption that all Asian Americans are opposed to affirmative action when, again, empirical research and national polls show that that's certainly not the case, right, and much more complex than that. But anyway, so back to what I was saying earlier, in sort of the waning months of the Trump administration the Department of Justice used those investigations into Yale to file a lawsuit charging that Yale in its admissions practices discriminates against Asian Americans. This lawsuit, the DOJ lawsuit, was dropped in February of 2021 when President Biden took office. So in response to that, SFFA submitted its own lawsuit to Yale based upon similar lines of reasoning. So I think what's—why bring this up? One, because it doesn't get a lot of attention. But two, I think it's a really interesting and curious example. So in the Yale case, as well as in the previous DOJ complaint, Ed Blum notes specifically that they exclude Cambodian Americans, Hmong Americans, Laotian Americans, and Vietnamese Americans from the lawsuit, and thus from his definition of what and who counts as Asian American. I think this intentional exclusion of specific Southeast Asian American groups in Yale, but including them in Harvard, is a really interesting and curious note. I've written in the past that, sort of at the practical level, it's a bit—it's not a bit—it's a lot misleading. It's manipulative and advances a bit of a false narrative about Asian Americans. And I think it engages in what we call sort of a racial project to overtly reclassify the Asian American racial category, relying again on old stereotypes about Asian American academic achievement. But it also sort of counters state-based racial and ethnic classifications used by the Census Bureau, used by the Department of Education, used by OMB, right. It does not consider how Southeast Asian Americans have been and are racialized, as well as how they've built pan-ethnic Asian American coalitions along within and with other Asian American subgroups. So the implications of this sort of intentional racialized action, I think, are threefold. First, this process, sort of trying to redefine who is Asian American and who isn't, demonstrates that SFFA cannot effectively argue that race-conscious admissions harms Asian Americans. They wouldn't be excluded if that was the case. Second, it illustrates that Ed Blum and his crusade for sort of race—not using race in college admissions is actually really not focused on advancing justice for Asian Americans, as he claims. And then finally, I think that this maneuver, if realized, will really disenfranchise educational access and opportunity for many Asian Americans, including Southeast Asian Americans and other communities of color. Of course, this case hasn't received a lot of attention, given that we just heard from Harvard and UNC at the Supreme Court about a month ago. But I think it provides some really important considerations regarding the upcoming Supreme Court decision. Nonetheless the decision for Harvard and UNC, we're all sort of on pins and needles until we hear about it in spring and summer. And I was there in Washington for it, and so what I'd actually like to do is actually share some interesting notes and items that sort of struck out to me during the oral arguments. So I think in both cases we heard the justices ask many questions regarding the twenty-five-year sunset of using race in college admissions, right, something that Justice O'Connor wrote in the Michigan case. I think the solicitor general, Solicitor General Prelogar's response at the conclusion of the case was really insightful. She said—and I'm sort of paraphrasing here about why we—in addressing some of the questions about that twenty-five-year sunset, she basically said that society hasn't made enough progress yet. The arc of progress is slower than what the Grutter court had imagined. And so we just suddenly don't hit 2028—that's twenty-five years from the decision—and then, snap, race is not used in college admissions anymore. There was also a lot of discussion regarding proxy approaches to so-called race-neutral admissions, right, yet still being able to maintain some or similar levels of racial diversity. I think what we know from a lot of empirical research out there is that there's really no good proxy variables for race. Certainly Texas has its 10 percent plan, which really only works to a certain extent and does not actually work well for, say, private schools that draw students from across all fifty states and the territories in the Caribbean and the Pacific. And again, as the solicitor general stated, it doesn't work well for the service academies either, for really similar reasons. I do think the line of questioning from the chief justice again related to what sounded like a carveout exemption for our U.S. military schools, our service academies. What's really interesting, and might be of actually specific interest for the CFR community, of course, our service academies practice affirmative action and are in support of it. And this was also argued in an amicus brief written by retired generals and admirals. And they argued that race-conscious admissions is necessary to build a diverse officer corps at both the service academies as well as ROTC programs at various universities across the country, which, in their words, they say builds a more cohesive, collaborative, and effective fighting unit, especially, quote, given recent international conflicts and humanitarian crises which require our military to perform civil functions and call for heightened cultural awareness and sensitivity in religious issues. And so, to a certain extent, I think that same line of logic can also be extended to, for example, our diplomatic corps, and certainly many corporations. We also saw briefs from the field of medicine, from science and research, have all written in support of race-conscious admissions, along the same sort of pipeline issues as their companies and organizations. And they argue that their work benefits from a highly educated, diverse workforce. But what was interesting, was that there wasn't much discussion about Asian Americans. It was only brought up sort of a handful of times, despite the fact that certainly that's sort of the origin story of the sets of lawsuits. And perhaps—to me perhaps this is simply an indication that the case was really never about Asian Americans from the beginning. And certainly the finding from the district court shows that Asian Americans are not discriminated in this process at Harvard. And so we will all sort of see how the Court rules next year, if they uphold precedent or not, and if they do not, how narrow or how broad they will go. Justice Barrett did have an interesting question in the UNC part of the case about affinity groups and affinity housing on campus. So, for example, my undergraduate alma mater, UC Berkeley, has this for several groups. They have affinity housing for Asian Americans, African Americans, Native Americans, women in STEM, the LGBTQ+ community, Latinx students, among many, many others, actually. So I think a possible area of concern is if they go broad, will we see a ban on these types of race-based practices on campus? Would that impact sort of thinking about recruitment efforts? So these so-called race-neutral approaches, sort of recruitment and outreach services for particular communities. Or would that impact something like HBCUs and tribal colleges, HSIs and AANAPISIs, or other MSIs? How does that all fit in, right? I think that line of questioning sort of sparked a bit of concern from folks and my colleagues. But I think, though, in conversation, we don't think the Court has really any appetite to go that far. And I'm certainly inclined to agree. But end of the day, that line of questioning was rather curious. And so, with that, I thank you for letting me share some of my thinking and about what's going on. And I would really love to be able to engage in conversation with all of you. FASKIANOS: Wonderful. Thank you so much. And we'd love to hear now from you all questions and comments, and if you could share how things are happening on your campuses. Please raise—click on the raised-hand icon on your screen to ask a question. If you're on an iPad or tablet, you can click the More button to access the raised-hand feature. I'll call on you, and then accept the unmute prompt, state your name and affiliation, followed by your question. You can also submit a written question in the Q&A box or vote for questions that have been written there. And if you do write your question, it would be great if you could write who you are. I'm going to go first to a raised hand, Morton Holbrook. And there you go. Q: I'm there, yeah. Morton Holbrook from Kentucky Wesleyan College in Kentucky. Thanks, Professor Nguyen. Sort of a two-part question here. One is, how do you reconcile apparent public support for affirmative action with the number of states, I think ten or twelve states, that have banned affirmative action? Are their legislators just out of touch with their people, or what? And the second part is, a recent article in the Washington Post about UC Berkeley's experience, where the number of African American students simply plummeted down to about 3 percent, and at the same time that campus is still very diverse in other respects. Have you made a study of all the states that have banned affirmative action? Have they all had that same result with regard to African Americans? Or where does that stand? Thank you. NGUYEN: Thank you. Thank you for the really excellent question. I think it's about—I think you're right—around nine, ten or so states that have banned affirmative action. You know, I'll be completely honest with you. I'm really just familiar with the bans that were instituted both in California and in Michigan, and those were through state referendums, right, and not necessarily legislature. So in this case, this is the people voting for it. And so I think that's a really tough nut to crack about how do you reconcile these bans at the state level versus sort of what we see at the national level. And so I think this is sort of the big challenge that advocates for racial equity are facing in places like California. They actually tried to repeal this in California recently, in the last decade. And again, that failed. And so I think part of the issue here is there's a whole lot of misinformation out there. I think that's one key issue. I sort of said in my opening remarks there that, at least in some of the popular media pieces today about these cases, the way Asian Americans are sort of understood and written about is really not aligned with a lot of the rich empirical research out there that shows quite the contrary, as well as sort of historical research that shows quite the contrary. And so I think there's a lot of public opinion being formulated as well as, again, just sort of misinformation about the topic that might be leading folks to think one way or another. To your second question about UC Berkeley, my alma mater, you're right. After that Prop 209 ban, you saw a huge decline in undergraduate enrollment, specifically of African American students. And so Berkeley has been trying every which way to figure out a race—a so-called race-neutral approach in order to increase those numbers. And I think they are trying to—they are really trying to figure it out. And I think that's why UC Berkeley, UCLA, other institutions submitted amicus briefs in support of Harvard, in support of UNC, because they know that there are not a lot—when you can't use race, that's a result that you end up with. And that's because there are just not good proxy variables for race. SES or economic status is often talked about a lot. That again isn't a good variable. Geography can—to a certain extent can be used. All these can sort of certainly be used in some combination. But again, they do not serve well as proxy variables. And I think that's why we see those numbers at Berkeley. And I think that's why Berkeley was so invested in this case and why all those campus leaders submitted amicus briefs in support of Harvard and UNC. FASKIANOS: Thank you. I'm going to take the next written question or first written question from Darko Spasevski, who's at the University of Skopje, North Macedonia: Do you think that in order to have successful affirmative actions in the higher education this process should be followed by affirmative actions in the workplace? Are the benefits—if the affirmative actions are only promoted at the level of higher education but are not at the same time continuing at the workplace? I guess it would be the opposite. Is it—you know, basically, should affirmative action be promoted in the workplace as well— NGUYEN: Yeah, I think— FASKIANOS: —once you get past the higher education? NGUYEN: Got it. Yeah, I think I understand that question. Actually, this was something that came up during this recent Supreme Court case. Again, the solicitor general was talking about specifically the briefs from the retired generals and admirals, as well as from various executives and corporations, talking about how affirmative action is so important at the university level because then it helps build a pipeline to recruit folks to work at those organizations or serve in the military, as well as that it trains all students, right, and lets them access and achieve the benefits of diversity and use that in their future employment, which research from areas of management show that that increases work productivity. It increases their bottom line, et cetera, et cetera. And so actually, in that argument, the—I think it was Justice Alito that asked, are you now arguing for this in the private sector, in corporations? And the solicitor general quickly said no, no. The context of this lawsuit is specifically or the position of the United States is specifically just focused here on higher education. And I think that certainly is relevant for this conversation today, as well as sort of my own area of expertise. But I think my colleagues in the areas of management and a lot of that work shows, I think, similar types of results that, when you have diverse workforces, when you have folks who can reap the benefits of diversity interactions, interracial interactions, then there are certainly a lot of benefits that come from that, in addition to creativity, work efficiency, so many things. And so, again, I'm not here to sort of put a position down regarding affirmative action in professional settings, only because that's not my area of expertise. But certainly other areas of research have pointed in similar directions as what's sort of shown in the higher-education literature. FASKIANOS: (Off mic) Renteln? And let's see if you can unmute yourself. If you click on the unmute prompt, you should be able to ask your question. Not working? Maybe not. OK, so I will read it. So— Q: Is it working now? FASKIANOS: It is, Alison. Go ahead. Q: Thank you. I'm sorry. It's just usually it shows me when I'm teaching. Thank you for a really interesting, incisive analysis; really enjoyed it. I wanted to ask about whether it's realistic to be able to implement policies that are, quote, race-neutral, unquote, given that people's surnames convey sometimes identities, ethnic and religious identities, and also activities that people participated in in professional associations. And when people have references or letters of recommendation, information about background comes out. So I'm wondering if you think that this debate really reflects a kind of polarization, a kind of symbolitics, and whether, while some worry about the consequences of the Supreme Court's decisions, this is really something that's more symbolic than something that could actually be implemented if the universities continue to be committed to affirmative action. NGUYEN: Really great question. Thank you so much for asking it. This was actually a big chunk of the conversation during oral arguments for both at UNC and both at Harvard, right. The justices were asking, so how do you—if you don't—and this was sort of the whole part about when they were talking about checking the box, checking sort of your racial category during the application process. And so they asked, if you get rid of that, what happens when students write about their experiences in their personal statements or, as you said, recommenders in their letters in about that? And so this was where it got really, really—I think the lawyers had a really hard time disentangling it, because for people of color, certainly a lot of their experiences, their racialized experiences, are inextricably linked to their race and their identity. And so removing that is, at an operationalized level, pretty hard to do and pretty impossible, right. So they actually had some interesting examples, like one—and so they're asking hypotheticals. Both lawyers—both the justices on all the various spectrum of the Court were asking sort of pointed questions. Where I think one justice asked, so can you talk about—can you talk about your family's experiences, particularly if your ancestors were slaves in the United States? And so the lawyers—this is the lawyer for SFFA saying that would not—we cannot use that. They cannot be used in admissions, because that is linked to their race. But can you—so another justice asked, can you talk about if, you know, your family immigrated to the United States? Can you—how do you talk about that? Can you talk about that? And the lawyers said, well, that would be permissible then, because that doesn't necessarily have to be tied to a racial group or a racial category. So again, it's very—I think what they were trying to tease out was how do you—what do you actually—what would actually be the way to restrict that, right? And so I guess, depending on how the justices decide this case, my assumption is or my hope is, depending on whatever way they go, they're going to—they will, one way or another, define or sort of place limits if they do end up removing the use of race. But I completely agree with you. Operationally, that's not an easy thing to do, right? And when do you decide what fits and what doesn't fit? And that will be the—that will be a big, big struggle I think universities will face if the courts ban the use of race in college admissions. FASKIANOS: Let me just add that Alison Dundes Renteln is a professor of political science at the University of Southern California. So I'm going to go to the next written question, from Clemente Abrokwaa at Penn State University: Do you think affirmative action should be redefined to reflect current social-demographic groups and needs? NGUYEN: Oh, that's such a fun question, and particularly for someone who studies race and racial formation in the United States. And so I—you know, this is—this is an interesting one. I think—I think sort of the way we think about—at least folks in my profession think about race versus sort of the way—the way it's currently accounted for in—by state-based classifications/definitions, those tend to be a little bit behind, right? That's normal and natural. But I think what we've seen in the United States over time is race has—or, racial classifications and categories have changed over time and continue to evolve, right? The Census—the Census Bureau has an advisory group to help them think through this when they collect this data. And so—and so I'll be honest with you, I don't have a good answer for you, actually. But I think—I think that certainly, given the fact that racial categories do shift and change over time and the meaning ascribed to them, we certainly need to take a—if we continue using approaches for—race- or ethnic-based approaches in college admissions, that's something that absolutely needs to be considered, right? But at the same time, it also means, as we think about sort of the future and what does that look like—and maybe, for example, here we're talking about folks who are—who identify as mixed race. But at the same time, we need to look historically, too, right? So we don't want to—the historical definitions and the way people would self-identify historically. And so I think—I think, certainly, the answer, then, would be—would be both, right? But what a fun question. Thanks for that question. FASKIANOS: I'm going to take the moderator prerogative here and ask you about: How does affirmative action in higher education in the United States relate to, you know, relations abroad? NGUYEN: Yeah. Well— FASKIANOS: Have you looked at that connection? NGUYEN: Sure. I think—I think that—I think that's really, really interesting. So something that we wrote in our amicus brief particularly regarding—it was sort of in response to SFFA's brief and their claim, which was about sort of why Asian Americans here were so exceptional in their—in their academic achievements. I think that's a—tends to be a big stereotype, model minority stereotype. That is how Asian Americans are racialized. So one thing that we sort of wrote in our brief was this actually is really connected to a certain extent, right—for some Asian American groups in the United States, that's linked to U.S. foreign policy and U.S. immigration policy about who from Asia is allowed to immigrate to the United States, what their sort of educational background and requirements are. And so I think when we think about the arguments being made in this lawsuit and the way Asian Americans are discussed, certainly one key aspect there is certainly connected to historic U.S. foreign policy, particularly around—as well as immigration policy, particularly around the 1965 Immigration Act. So certainly they are connected and they're linked. And something that we—that I wish more people could—more people would read our brief, I guess, and get a good understanding of, sort of to add to the complexity of this lawsuit. FASKIANOS: Great. I'm going to go back to Morton Holbrook. Q: Yes. Still here at Kentucky Wesleyan College. Speaking of amicus briefs, what do you think of the Catholic college brief from Georgetown University? Here we have a Court that's been very partial towards religious beliefs, and they're arguing that their religious beliefs requires them to seek diversity in college admissions. How do you think they'll fare in that argument? NGUYEN: Yeah. This was also brought up in—during oral arguments. I can't remember if it was during the UNC part or the Harvard part. And I'll be completely honest with you, I haven't read that brief yet. There's just so many and I wasn't able to read them all. But this was a really interesting—really interesting point that was sort of raised in the courts. And I don't—I don't—I don't have a good answer for you, to be completely honest. I'm not sure how they're going to, particularly given that these—that this Court seems to be very much in favor of religious liberty, right, how they would account for that amicus brief from the Catholic institutions. And so that will be an interesting one to watch and to see—to see how it's framed, and certainly it would be interesting if they played an outsized role in the justices' decision-making here. But great question. Great point to raise and something I'll add to my reading list for this weekend. FASKIANOS: So Alison Renteln came back with a question following on mine: Why are numerical quotas acceptable in other countries like India but not in the United States? NGUYEN: Yeah. Great, great question there. You know, also in other places like in Brazil. And so we, in fact, used to use numerical quotas before the Bakke decision. It was the Bakke decision, University of California v. Bakke, that eliminated the use of racial quotas, also eliminated the use of what I said earlier about sort of the rationales for why we can practice race-conscious admissions, which was it cannot be used to address historic racism or ongoing racism. In fact, the only rationale for why we can use affirmative action today as a—as a factor of many factors, is in order to—for universities to build campus environments—diverse campus environments of which there are benefits to diversity, the educational benefits of diversity that flows for all students. And so, yeah, it was the—it was the Supreme Court in the late 1970s that restricted the use of quotas among many other—many other rationales for the practice of race-conscious admissions. Thank you for that question. FASKIANOS: Great. And I'm going to go to next to raised hand from Emily Drew. Q: Great. Thank you. I'm listening in from Oregon, where I'm a sociologist. Thank you for all of these smart comments. My question is a little bit thinking out loud. What do you think about—it feels like there are some perils and dangers, but I'm hoping you'll reframe that for me, of some racialized groups like indigenous people saying, well, we're not a race anyway—we're tribes, we're nations—so that they're not subject to the ban on race-conscious practices, which, it's true, they're a tribe. They're also a racialized group. And so I'm struggling with groups kind of finding a political way around the ban or the potential ban that's coming, but then where does that leave us in terms of, you know, each group, like, take care of your own kind of thing? Can you just react a little bit to that? NGUYEN: Yeah. Thanks for that really wonderful question. Fascinating point about, yeah, the way to say: We're not a racial group. We're sovereign nations or sovereign tribes. I think what we're going to see, depending on how the courts go, are folks trying—schools potentially trying a whole host of different approaches to increase diversity on their campuses if they're not allowed to use some of these racial categories like they've been doing already, in a holistic approach. And so, yeah, that might be a fascinating way for indigenous communities to advance forward. I will say, though, there was one point, again, in the—during oral arguments where they started talking about sort of generational connections to racial categories. And so they're saying if it's my grandparents' grandparents' grandparents, right, so sort of talking almost about, like—at least the way I interpreted it, as sort of thinking about connecting one to a race via blood quantum. And so when does that—when does that expire, right? And so is it—is it—if you're one-sixteenth Native American, is that—does that count? So there was a short line of questioning about that, and I think the—I think the lawyer tried to draw a line in the sand about, like, at what point do you not go—what point does it count and when does it not count. And I think that's actually a bit of a misstep, primarily because that should be determined by the sovereign nation, by the tribe, about who gets to identify as that—as a member of that nation or that tribe and how they—I think—you know, I think, talking to indigenous scholars, they would say it's about how you engage in and how you live in it, rather than—rather than if it's just a percentage. So, again, those will be the tensions, I think, that will—that already exist, I should say, regardless of the Court decision. But a fascinating point about states sort of exercising indigenous law there to see if that would be a way to counter that. Certainly, I should—I should have said at the top of this I'm not trained as a lawyer. And so I have no idea how that would be sort of litigated out, but certainly I imagine all different entities will find ways to move through this without—in various legal fashions. And I was talking to a colleague earlier today about this and he said something about at the end of the day this might be something that, if Congress decided to take up, they may—this would be an opportunity for Congress to take up, to maybe develop a narrow path for institutions. But certainly it's—the courts seem to be the favored way for us to talk about affirmative action. FASKIANOS: There's a written question from John Francis, who is a research professor of political science at the University of Utah: If the Court were to strike down affirmative action, would state universities give much more attention to geographic recruitment within their respective states and encourage private foundations to raise scholarship funds to support students of color who live in those areas? NGUYEN: Great, great question there. And I think that would be one of many things that universities are doing. We're seeing schools where the states have banned affirmative action do things like this, in Michigan and certainly in California. But to a certain extent, it actually doesn't work—I guess in California's context—that well. I think, if I'm not mistaken, the head of admissions for UC Berkeley said in one of many panels—he's wonderful, by the way—on one of many panels, like, that doesn't work very well in the California context because only so many schools have sort of that large concentration of African American students and for them to sort of go there and recruit out of that. So it's not a—the sort of geographic distribution is not so easy and clean cut as—I think as one would normally perceive. And so it actually develops a big, big challenge for state institutions, particularly state flagship institutions, in particular geographic contexts. Now, I don't know if that's the case, say, in other parts of the country. But certainly within the UC system, that seems to be a prevailing argument. And I think more than ever now, everyone has been looking to the UC system for insight on what they—on how to approach this if the courts decide next year to ban the use of race. I should also admit that—or, not admit, but proudly declare that I'm a product of the UC system. All of my postsecondary education is from those schools. And so I know that this has been a constant and ongoing conversation within the UC system, and I imagine that will be the case for schools both public and private across the country. But I think part of that calculation then requires institutions to think about not just from private donors, but really from state legislatures as well as the institutions themselves have to really think about how they want to dedicate resources to achieving diversity if they don't—if they're unable to use race. I think a tremendous amount of resources. So, to a certain extent, it's going to make institutions put their money where their mouth is. And so we'll see if that—this will all be interesting areas to investigate, depending on how the courts decide come next year. FASKIANOS: There's a raised hand or there was a raised hand from Jeff Goldsmith. I don't know if you still have a question. Q: Yeah. So I've been trying to figure out exactly how I might want to pose this question, but I was struck by—sorry, this is Jeff Goldsmith from Columbia University. I was struck by the line of questioning that you mentioned from Justice Barrett about affinity housing and your thoughts about how narrow or far-reaching a decision striking down affirmative action might be. And I guess it seems like there is the potential for at least some gray area. And you know, we run things like summer research programs that are intended to bolster diversity. There are in some cases—you just sort of mentioned the scholarship opportunities focused on increasing the number of students from underrepresented backgrounds. And I guess I'm just sort of curious if you have any speculation about how narrow or far-reaching a decision might be. NGUYEN: Thanks for that question. Yeah. So I think this was—we—prior to the—to oral arguments, people had sort of talked about this a little bit. Would this be consequential? And I—in fact, the day before—the day before oral arguments, I was on a different panel and I sort of brought this up. And actually, a federal judge in the audience came up to me afterwards and said, you know, I don't think the Court's got a lot of appetite for that. And I said, hey, I completely agree with you, but certainly, you know, we've—in recent times we've seen the Court do more interesting things, I guess, if you'll—if I can use a euphemism. And so—and so, it almost feels like everything's on the table, right? But I think, generally speaking, I'm inclined to agree that if the courts strike down race-conscious admissions, they will do it in a very narrow and highly-tailored way. That was my feeling going in. That was my feeling on October 30, right? Then, on Halloween—October 31—while listening to the—to the oral arguments, you had that very short exchange between Justice Barrett, specifically during the UNC case, ask about affinity groups and affinity housing, and it felt like it sort of came out of left field. And not—and so I think that raised some curiosity for all of us about what—about why that was a line of questioning. But nonetheless, I think at least my—I've never been a gambling person, but if I were I would say that if they do strike it down that I think the justices wholesale don't—I don't think they would have a large appetite to do something so broad and sweeping like that. At least that's my hope, if that's the direction we're moving in. But I guess that's why I said earlier that we're sort of all on pins and needles about that. And if that is struck down, then I think that's got a lot of consequences for scholarships, recruitment programs, summer bridge programs, potentially minority-serving institutions, and all of the above. So, yeah, I—again, it seems like that's a big reshaping of postsecondary education, not just in admissions but sort of the way they operate overall. And I don't know if that would happen so quickly overnight like that. But that, at least, is my hope. FASKIANOS: (Off mic.) There you go. Q: (Laughs.) Thank you so much for your talk. Clemente Abrokwaa from Penn State University. And my question is, right now there is a push for diversity, equity, and inclusion in many areas. How is that different from affirmative action? NGUYEN: Well, great question. And actually, that's a really difficult one for me to answer only because I think if we were to go and ask ten people on the street what did we mean by diversity, equity, and inclusion, everyone would give you sort of a very different and potentially narrow or a very broad definition of what it means, right? But I think with respect to affirmative action, particularly in a higher-education context, it is specifically about college admissions, specifically about admissions and how do you review college admissions. And in this case here, there is a very narrow way in which it can—it can be used for race—in this case for race, that it's got to be narrowly tailored, that it can only be a factor among a factor in a broad holistic approach, that you can't use quotas, that it can't be based on rectifying previous or historical racism, and that the only utility for it is that it is used to create learning environments where there are educational benefits that flow from diversity and the interactions of diversity. Versus, I think, broader conversations about DEI, while of course centered on admissions, right, which is sort of one of many dimensions in which you achieve DEI, right? We like to think that—and I'm going to be sort of citing a scholar, Sylvia Hurtado, out of UCLA, who argues that, admissions help contribute to one dimension, which is the composition of a university, the sort of just overall demographics and numbers of that university. But there are many other dimensions that are important in order to create learning environments in which we can achieve DEI-related issues. That means that we have to look at the institution and the way it's acted historically and contemporarily. We have to look at behavioral interactions between people on a university. There are psychological dimensions, among many others. And so that's how I think about it. I think that's how at least my area of scholarship and in our academic discipline we think about it and for folks who study education think about it. And so hopefully that answers your question. And, yeah, hopefully that answers your question. FASKIANOS: I'm going to take the next question from Alison Renteln: What policies appear to be the best practices to increase diversity at universities, including disability? And what are the best practices from other countries? NGUYEN: Oh, wow, that's a really good question. So we—you know, I think—I think a lot of other countries use quotas. Brazil might be sort of the example that most folks think about when they think about the way affirmative action's practiced abroad. And certainly that's not something that we can do here in the United States. So that's—that—really, really important consideration. Sort of other practices that I think that are—that are not sort of the ones that are narrowly tailored by the courts are what I said earlier about sort of what the UC system has to really do and has to really grapple with, right, are using every sort of—everything that they can think of under the sun to go out and try to do outreach and recruit and build those pipelines throughout the entire education system. There's been some work by some wonderful folks in our field—Dominique Baker, Mike Bastedo—who looked at even sort of just a random sampling, if you were able to do a lottery system, and that has actually found that that doesn't actually increase diversity either, and so—racial diversity either. And so I think that's—so, again, this all points to how crucial affirmative action is in being able to use race in order to achieve compositional diversity on a college campus, and that other proxy variables just don't even come close to being able to help estimate that. And so, yeah, that's—I should also note that really, we're only talking about a dozen or so schools. Oh, I'm sorry, more than a dozen, but a handful of schools that this is really a big issue for. Most schools in the United States don't necessarily—are not at this level of selectivity where it becomes a big issue of concern for the national public. Nearly half of all of our college-going students are at community college, which tend to be open-access institutions. And so something also to keep in mind when we talk about affirmative action. FASKIANOS: Thanks. We only have a few minutes left. Can you talk a little bit more about the work of NYU's Metropolitan Center for Research on Equity and the Transformation of Schools? NGUYEN: Yeah. So I'm a faculty affiliate there, and maybe I'll preface by saying I'm new to NYU. I just came here from the University of Denver, and so I'm still learning about every wonderful thing that Metro Center is doing. It's led by a wonderful faculty member here named Fabienne Doucet and really focused on sort of a handful of pillars—certainly research on education, but also a real big tie for communities. So real direct engagement with schools, school systems in order to advance justice in those schools. And so they have a lot of contracts with school districts and public entities, as well as nonprofit groups that come in and work as an incubator there on a host of issues. And so I think the work there is really exciting and really interesting. It tends to be—and I should say also very expansive. So the whole sort of K-12 system, as well as postsecondary. And I think that's the role that I'm looking to play there, is to help contribute to and expand their work in the postsecondary education space. FASKIANOS: Great. And maybe a few words about your other—you have many, many hats. NGUYEN: Oh. (Laughs.) FASKIANOS: NYU's Institute for Human Development and Social Change. NGUYEN: Yeah. They do some really wonderful, interesting work. And it's really, actually, a center and a space for faculty to come in and run a lot of their research projects, including my own, which is the MSI Data Project, where we are looking at all the various different types of minority-serving institutions in the United States, how they change over time, and how the federal government thinks about them and accounts for them, as well as how do the schools themselves think about them, all with the goal here in order to work with students of colors and give them access and opportunity. I should say, depending on how you count them, MSIs enroll a huge and significant proportion of all students of color, almost half, in the country, despite making up such a small percentage, about 20 percent, of all college and universities. And so this is—certainly when we talk about affirmative action, we—I think a lot of folks center it around racial justice or social justice. I think sort of the other side of the same coin here are schools like minority-serving institutions which enroll and provide access to and graduate a really significant proportion and number of students of color and certainly an area that we need to bring a lot more attention to when we talk about issues of race and education. FASKIANOS: OK, I'm going to take one—try to sneak in one last question from John Francis, who's raised his hand. You get the last one, John. Q: OK, can you hear me? FASKIANOS: We can. Q: Oh, that's great. So my question is—has a certain irony to it, but there's been a great deal of discussion of late that men are not succeeding in college, but that women are, and that certainly should be encouraged, but also there should be ways to find perhaps even changing when people start out in elementary school how that may be shifted to help men later on. And in this discussion, when we're looking at that issue and it's gaining some latitude, some strength, should we think about that as a possible consideration that universities should have greater latitude in making decisions to reflect the current set of demographic issues, be it race or gender or others? Has this argument come to play any kind of role? NGUYEN: Great question and a good last one, and if I can be completely honest, not an area that I'm—gender-based issues are not an area that I've done a whole lot of work in, if really any work, but I will attempt to answer your question as best as I can here, which is, I think—and sort of connected to sort of the larger conversation and question that we had that someone posed earlier about sort of the complexity and changing nature of racial and ethnic categories and what does that mean, and how do universities address that? And I think this is again where it requires universities to have some flexibility and nimbleness and autonomy to be able to address a lot of these issues, including what you're talking about, John, depending on the context and the times in which we are in. You know, certainly one big area also connected to—for men in postsecondary education is sort of the huge gap we see for men of color from particular groups, and really we see foundations, we see the Obama administration really play—invest in this work. So, John, from what it sounds like, it sounds like I agree with you here about—that universities need flexibility and autonomy to be able to address these issues. Now, that may—at the same time, we don't want to dismiss the fact that the experiences of women in postsecondary education—while certainly we see numbers increasing in enrollment in a lot of aspects, in certain disciplines we see a sharp decline; we see—in STEM and engineering fields, in the way those disciplines may be organized to sort of push out women. And so I think, again, this is why it requires some nimbleness and some autonomy from the universities to be able to design approaches to support students of different types of diversity on their campuses, in particular areas, disciplines, and majors. And so I think that's the—I think that's the challenge, is that we need to be a lot more intentional and think more precisely and run our analyses in ways that make sense for particular intersectional groups on campus and in the areas of which they're studying. So yeah, I think that's the—one of the big challenges that universities are facing today and certainly depending on how the courts rule, we'll see if that ends up restricting autonomy and removing tools or allowing those tools to remain for various types of targeted interventions for various minoritized groups. FASKIANOS: Wonderful. Well, Mike Nguyen, thank you very much for this terrific hour and to all of you for your questions and comments. This is really insightful and we appreciate it. Welcome to New York, Mike, your first New York—holidays in New York. So we will be resuming the series in January and we will be sending out also the lineup for our winter/spring semester of the Academic Webinar series, which is really designed for students, later this month. We do wish you all luck with administering finals this week and grading them and all those papers; I don't envy you all. We have different deadlines under—at the Council that we're working on right now, so it will be a busy month, but we hope that everybody enjoys the holidays. We will resume in January, in the new year, and I encourage you all to follow us at @CFR_Academic on Twitter. Visit CFR.org, ForeignAffairs.com, and ThinkGlobalHealth.org for research and analysis on global issues. Again, thanks, Mike, for this, and to all of you. NGUYEN: Thank you so much for having me. Really an honor. FASKIANOS: Wonderful. Take care, everybody. (END)

Frankie Jonas Trolls Joe Jonas & His Ex Taylor Swift for HalloweenOctober 30, 2022

Frankie Jonas and Girlfriend Troll as Brother Joe Jonas and Ex Taylor Swift for HalloweenOctober 30, 2022

Happy Halloween y'all! In this week's episode we are Shooting the S**t Halloween style! We follow up last week's episode with a little more discussion about the queer characters in "House of the Dragon." We hope y'all had a safe and fun Halloween/October. Podcast IG: instagram.com/onethingqueer Kelsey's IG: instagram.com/spexrayx Jenny's IG: instagram.com/jennylynnbouton

The Locked On Cougars Podcast for Monday, October 31, 2022 The BYU Cougars and the Big 12 Conference celebrated Halloween with a big tasty treat in the form of a new six-year media rights deal that could net each program in the conference a number around $50 million annually, far more money than BYU football has ever seen Jake Hatch then took some time on a Film Review Monday to look back on the East Carolina loss for the BYU football program and said he was overall pleased with the effort level from the Cougars and shared why there should be optimism despite another loss Finally, Jake recapped the weekend for BYU women's volleyball and women's soccer as well as where the BYU golf programs are in action Support Us By Supporting Our Locked On Podcast Network Sponsors! LinkedIn - LinkedIn jobs helps you find the candidates you want to talk to, faster. Post your job for free at Linkedin.com/LockedOnCollege. Terms and conditions applyBuilt Bar - Built Bar is a protein bar that tastes like a candy bar. Go to BuiltBar.com and use promo code “LOCKEDON15,” and you'll get 15% off your next orderUpside - Today's episode is brought to you by Upside. Download the FREE Upside App and use promo code Locked to get $5 or more cash back on your first purchase of $10 or moreUnderdog - Today's episode is brought to you by Underdog. Sign up on underdogfantasy.com with the promo code LOCKED ON and get your first deposit doubled up to $100!SimpliSafe - Today's episode of Locked On Cougars is sponsored by SimpliSafe Home Security. With Fast Protect™️ Technology, exclusively from SimpliSafe, 24/7 monitoring agents capture evidence to accurately verify a threat for faster police response. There's No Safe Like SimpliSafe. Visit SimpliSafe dot com slash LockedOnCollege to learn more.Follow the Locked On Cougars podcast on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter to stay up-to-date with the latest with regards to the podcast and BYU sports news. Please remember to subscribe, rate and review the show. Also, please consider subscribing to the Yawk Talk Newsletter that Jake writes and is delivered directly to your email inbox.If you are interested in advertising with Locked On Cougars or the Locked On Podcast Network, please email us at LockedOnBYU@gmail.com or contact us here. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

On this day in 1974, Ronald Clark O'Bryan gave cyanide disguised as candy to five trick-or-treaters, including his own children. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The Locked On Cougars Podcast for Monday, October 31, 2022 The BYU Cougars and the Big 12 Conference celebrated Halloween with a big tasty treat in the form of a new six-year media rights deal that could net each program in the conference a number around $50 million annually, far more money than BYU football has ever seen Jake Hatch then took some time on a Film Review Monday to look back on the East Carolina loss for the BYU football program and said he was overall pleased with the effort level from the Cougars and shared why there should be optimism despite another loss Finally, Jake recapped the weekend for BYU women's volleyball and women's soccer as well as where the BYU golf programs are in action Support Us By Supporting Our Locked On Podcast Network Sponsors!  LinkedIn - LinkedIn jobs helps you find the candidates you want to talk to, faster. Post your job for free at Linkedin.com/LockedOnCollege. Terms and conditions apply Built Bar - Built Bar is a protein bar that tastes like a candy bar. Go to BuiltBar.com and use promo code “LOCKEDON15,” and you'll get 15% off your next order Upside - Today's episode is brought to you by Upside. Download the FREE Upside App and use promo code Locked to get $5 or more cash back on your first purchase of $10 or more Underdog - Today's episode is brought to you by Underdog. Sign up on underdogfantasy.com with the promo code LOCKED ON and get your first deposit doubled up to $100! SimpliSafe - Today's episode of Locked On Cougars is sponsored by SimpliSafe Home Security. With Fast Protect™️ Technology, exclusively from SimpliSafe, 24/7 monitoring agents capture evidence to accurately verify a threat for faster police response. There's No Safe Like SimpliSafe. Visit SimpliSafe dot com slash LockedOnCollege to learn more. Follow the Locked On Cougars podcast on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter to stay up-to-date with the latest with regards to the podcast and BYU sports news. Please remember to subscribe, rate and review the show. Also, please consider subscribing to the Yawk Talk Newsletter that Jake writes and is delivered directly to your email inbox. If you are interested in advertising with Locked On Cougars or the Locked On Podcast Network, please email us at LockedOnBYU@gmail.com or contact us here. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Auburn fires Bryan Harsin & lines up next coaching victim, 1st place Falcons win long exciting slog of a game, Pete Poll vs AP Poll, Gators kick star player off team, Lee Corso in Athens? time to get a Gofundme to help Michigan fix their tunnel problem, high school tweets get Vols reporter fired, World Series cheating? Mets scout says you have to cheat to win, Rogers Hornsby loved cheating, NBA player going as Lance Rentzel for Hallowe'en, All Hallow's Eve stuff, and the greatest Hallowe'en sports death story EVER. Pete's Tweets, This Day in Sports History. Come for how Falcons won, stay for coaching rumors & how a Red Sox GM avoided the media by donning a Hallowe'en costume. petedavis.buzzsprout.com 

Happy Halloween! The BvB is back to talk about the holiday and all the big games from this weekend. Can TN win it all? How about Hooker for Heisman? MNF is Browns vs. Bengals - lots of Orange tonight! 

Hello and welcome to episode 296 of The Stress factor Drum and Bass Podcast. We have DJ Tribo back for his Halloween October 2022 studio mix. Neil has mixed up 22 tracks into a wicked 82 minute mix for you. Loads of great new tunes on here from these artists and labels GLXY, Shogun Audio, Kings Of The Rollers, Lydia Plain, Hospital Records, True Tactix, Dub Shotta, Ruzer, Epic Sounds, Power Druid, Figure, DOOM Music, T Shirts and Sweats, Rambutan, P Money, Whiney, Example, DJ Hybrid, Mrs Magoo, Rider Shafique, Deep In The Jungle Records, Enei, Critical Music, Alix Perez, Bou, Trigga, 1985 Music, Objectiv, Dispatch Recordings, Dub Elements, Quite Hype, DEM Recordings, Focality, STRLGHT. Have a Happy and Safe Halloween! Tracklist 01. GLXY - Anatomy [Shogun Audio] 02. Kings Of The Rollers feat Lydia Plain - Somebody Else [Hospital Records] 03. True Tactix - Chat About [Dub Shotta] 04. Ruzer - 242 MPH [Epic Sounds] 05. Ruzer - Blood Moon Presence [Epic Sounds] 06. Power Druid - Catrine [Epic Sounds] 07. Ruzer - Tacet Mortem [Epic Sounds] 08. Ruzer - PWR [Epic Sounds] 09. Figure - Suffering and Pain [DOOM Music] 10. T Shirts and Sweats - Nightmare Fuel [Epic Sounds] 11. T Shirts and Sweats - Adrenaline Junkie [Epic Sounds] 12. Rambutan - Start [Epic Sounds] 13. STRLGHT - Siege [Epic Sounds] 14. T Shirts and Sweats - Wrenched [Epic Sounds] 15. P Money, Whiney, Example - Dead In The Eye [Hospital Records] 16. DJ Hybrid, Mrs Magoo, Rider Shafique - Back To 96 (Vocal VIP) [Deep In The Jungle Records] 17. Enei - No Man [Critical Music] 18. Alix Perez, Bou, Trigga - Back to Basics [1985 Music] 19. Objectiv - Ice White [Dispatch Recordings] 20. Dub Elements, Quite Hype - Piledriver [DEM Recordings] 21. Focality - London Hacks [Epic Sounds] 22. STRLGHT - Looked Away [Epic Sounds] Please SHARE, LIKE FOLLOW AND REPOST! Also subscribe on your favorite Podcast Platform. Download full 320k MP3 from Soundcloud. Full quality 320k MP3 can be download here under the "more" button. SHARE, COMMENT, LIKE and FOLLOW THIS MIX!!! Please subscribe on your preferred podcast platform, we are just about everywhere!

Halloween October 31 how to summon a ghost for the first time!!!

On this week's live show we discussed: ON THIS DAY October 27th in pro wrestling history 3CT WRESTLER OF THE WEEK PART DEUX Week 28 Results 3CT QOTW Since the switch to 'new' NXT... Have you been watching the program more, less, or the same amount as NXT 2.0? BEST OF THE SCARIEST Ranking the best 'creepy' characters in wrestling history Make sure you visit our website https://3countthursday.com/ Become a #Patreon supporter of #3CT & get exclusive audio content, social media shout-outs and more – visit https://www.patreon.com/3CountThursday for more info! Follow the 3Count team on twitter: @3CountThursday Jim (@BigJimSports on Twitter) Ryan (@ryneagle on Twitter) Matt (@3CTaPhilly8 on Twitter) ‬‬‬‬‬ Intern Mark (@3CountIntern on Twitter) Tim (@NotTheToolMan on Twitter) Don't forget to SUBSCRIBE to our show on ALL podcast platforms including Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Google Play & more. We are now on Amazon Music so you can follow our show there as well! Creative Commons Music used in this show created by Jason Shaw on https://audionautix.com/

Is student debt haunting your nonprofit career? Is the specter of student loans looming over people in your organization, or your colleagues elsewhere? Are you an HR person helping nonprofit workers navigate the harrowing nature of debt? Luckily, you don't need an exorcist to get rid of that debt! It can be wiped away through the federal government's Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) Progam. Now through Halloween (October 31, 2022), they're making the process (and likelihood of forgiveness) much easier by waiving unhelpful rules and bureaucracy that have dogged the program for years. In this time-sensitive bonus episode, you'll learn exactly what you or your colleagues need to do before the end of this month to wipe out your student debt. Rusty sits down with Aoife Delargy Lowe, an expert on the topic who provides staff leadership for the PSLF Coalition, an alliance of nonprofits that has been advocating for improvements to the program since 2017. In addition to three specific steps you can take and specific websites you can use, you'll also learn about the history of the coalition and what the future may hold for the PSLF program beyond this month. Listen today and share this episode with your networks! All resources & links mentioned in the show can be found on our show notes page from the episode or at fundthepeople.org/ftp_podcast. Find all the episodes of our podcast and other resources on our website, fundthepeople.org.

Let's chat about Michaelmas Septemner 29th Halloween October 31st All Hallows Day November 1st Martinmas November 11th Melisa shares her person family and co op practices for each Waldorf Fall Festival. We would love to know which festivals you celebrate and how you make them special for your family. Have the homeschool and peaceful foundation of your dreams. https://www.waldorfessentials.com Ask questions here or connect on social media. Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/waldorf_ess... Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/WaldorfEssen... Pinterest: https://www.pinterest.com/waldorfesse...

I am a sucker for a Q&A episode, especially when it's Halloween themed! Take a dive into the SPOOKY side while we answer some fun questions and play this or that Halloween/October edition. It's our favorite time of the year and I could talk all day about SPOOKY season! Instagram: horror_hideout91 Tik Tok: horror_hideout91 Email: horrorhideoutpod@hotmail.com

Season 9: Gothic Horror Keyword StackingEpisode 5: Queen Consort Carmiller The ThrillerJoin us for the scariest and most thrilling Sexy Nurse Costume Haunted House Scary Halloween Makeup Tutorial of 2022!On this spooky Halloween October special full of Blood, Gore, Sex, Wolves, and Murder, we present Chapter 15 from Carmilla by Joseph Sheridan Le Fanu, published in 1872.It's the Pumpkin Carving Horror Movie fun Halloween Pranks Ouija Board Nightmare of all Halloween Costume Ideas. This is the best Gothic Horror Halloween Candy not on Friday The 13th, and you definitely won't learn How To Toilet Paper a house or make a Horror Movies!This DIY Halloween Decor is filled with the best Halloween Pranks, Halloween Lights, Halloween Pick Up Lines, and Halloween Candy since the Dos and Don'ts of Halloween Contact Lenses.EmailWebsiteJust Gonna Read This is a Model Home 146 Production, in association with The National Foolscap Museum and the Masters of Podcasting Program at Artsy Collage.EmailWebsiteFacebook Instagram

Season 9: Gothic Horror Keyword StackingEpisode 4: Sexy Halloween Costume (or, Dorian Gray is an A-Hole)Join us for the scariest and most thrilling Sexy Nurse Costume Haunted House Scary Halloween Makeup Tutorial of 2022!On this spooky Halloween October special full of Blood, Gore, Sex, Wolves, and Murder, we present a selection from Chapter 11 of The Picture of Dorian Gray by Oscar Wilde.It's the Pumpkin Carving Horror Movie fun  Halloween Pranks Ouija Board Nightmare of all Halloween Costume Ideas. This is the best Gothic Horror Halloween Candy not on Friday The 13th, and you definitely won't learn How To Toilet Paper a house or make a Horror Movies!This DIY Halloween Decor is filled with the best Halloween Pranks, Halloween Lights, Halloween Pick Up Lines, and Halloween Candy since the Dos and Don'ts of Halloween Contact Lenses.EmailWebsite

Season 9: Gothic Horror Keyword StackingEpisode 2: Halloween Makeup Tutorial (or, Frank N. Stein: Attorney At Lore)Join us for the scariest and most thrilling Sexy Nurse Costume Haunted House Scary Halloween Makeup Tutorial of 2022!On this spooky Halloween October special full of Blood, Gore, Sex, Wolves, and Sanderson Sisters, we dive into Chapter 11 of Frankenstein; Or, The Modern Prometheus by Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley. It's the pumpkin carving horror movie fun  Halloween Pranks Ouija Board Nightmare of all Halloween Costume Ideas. This is the best Gothic Horror Halloween Candy and you definitely won't learn How To Toilet Paper a house or make a Horror Movies! (seriously, you won't).This Top Halloween Costumes of 2022 is filled with the best Halloween Pranks, Halloween Pick Up Lines, and Halloween Candy since the McDonald's Halloween Pail Hocus Pocus 2!1 of 2 new episodes because it's Jaime's Birthday AND our Anniversary! Happy Birthday and Happy Anniversary, Jaime!EmailWebsite

Season 9: Gothic Horror Keyword StackingEpisode 3: Is Halloween Satanic? (or, Melmoth The Sloth Doth Wander)Join us for the scariest and most thrilling Sexy Nurse Costume Haunted House Scary Halloween Makeup Tutorial of 2022!On this spooky Halloween October special full of Blood, Gore, Sex, Wolves, and a Werewolf Bar Mitzvah, we present a selection from Chapter 1 of Melmoth The Wanderer by Charles Robert Marturin.It's the pumpkin carving horror movie fun  Halloween Pranks Ouija Board Nightmare of all Halloween Costume Ideas. This is the best Gothic Horror Halloween Candy and you definitely won't learn How To Toilet Paper a house or make a Horror Movies! (seriously, you won't).This Top Halloween Costumes of 2022 is filled with the best Halloween Pranks, Halloween Pick Up Lines, and Halloween Candy since the McDonald's Halloween Pail Haunted Mansion!2 of 2 new episodes because it's Jaime's Birthday AND our Anniversary! Happy Birthday and Happy Anniversary, Jaime!EmailWebsite

Season 9: Gothic Horror Keyword StackingEpisode 1: Razor Blade in Candy (or, Dr. Acula is Accepting New Patients)Join us for the scariest and most Thrilling Sexy Nurse Costume Haunted House Scary Makeup Tutorial of 2022! On this spooky Halloween October special full of Blood, Gore, Sex, Wolves, and Freddy Krueger,  we dive into a selection from Chapter 3 of Dracula by Bram Stoker. It's the Pumpkin Carving Horror Movie fun Halloween Pranks Ouija Board Nightmare of all Halloween Costume Ideas. This is the best Halloween Candy and you definitely won't learn How to Toilet Paper a House or how to write a classic Gothic Horror Novel! (seriously, you won't).This Wednesday Addams Costume is Unique Halloween Treats filled with the best Halloween Pranks, Pick Up Lines, and Halloween Candy since the McDonald's Halloween Pail Laurie Strode The Lost Boys Exorcist Halloween Party Games!EmailWebsite

All through October 2022 it's Just Gonna Read This Season 9: Gothic Horror Keyword StackingJoin us for the scariest and most thrilling Sexy Nurse Costume Haunted House Scary Halloween Makeup Tutorial of 2022!On this spooky Halloween October special full of Blood, Gore, Sex, Wolves, and Sanderson Sisters, we dive into Chapter 11 of Frankenstein; Or, The Modern Prometheus by Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley.It's the pumpkin carving horror movie fun  Halloween Pranks Ouija Board Nightmare of all Halloween Costume Ideas. This is the best Gothic Horror Halloween Candy and you definitely won't learn How To Toilet Paper a house or make a Horror Movies! (seriously, you won't).This Top Halloween Costumes of 2022 is filled with the best Halloween Pranks, Halloween Pick Up Lines, and Halloween Candy since the McDonald's Halloween Pail Hocus Pocus 2!

Welcome to the Woo-Woo room!PODCAST: In this Podcast, we chat about all things magical, mystical, mysterious, supernatural and paranormal, which IS the new "Normal". Join me as we explore how to set up SEANCES,  Learn all about REMOTE VIEWING, or How to Hone into your psychic abilities, learn how to read tarot cards through magical insights not just a card description. Hear what fellow woohoo experts are saying about this magical craft, delve into   Supernatural stories of the unknown, unexplained & never told before... Until Now! Join me through this magical journey of exciting, funny, spooky and everything WOOWOO...                                              First Air Date: Is Monday, Halloween October 31st, “National Magic Day” in honor of Harry Houdini. You'll hear an excerpt from “Houdini Beyond the Veil" a Houdini Story never told before, How Harry Houdini really died, from this family members point of view, it will surprise you beyond belief...Tune in to the WooWooRoom.com Podcast and subscribe!From that point on all airdates will be on Tuesdays... New episodes every Tuesday!  Starting November 8th!

Halloween is now a celebrated holiday around the world. The American tradition of the season continues to raise the bar with its numerous haunted attractions, scary movies, and ghost tours. What is the history of Halloween, and where is that history headed in the future? Don't miss this episode.

“Halloween” (October 30, 1996) Considering that every other major Must See TV sitcom did at least one gay episode, it's surprising that NewsRadio didn't — especially when you consider the fact that its lead actor, Dave Foley, jumped straight to NBC from Kids in the Hall, which experimented with gender and sexuality a lot more freely. This episode was as close as we could find to a real gay episode. And while it does feature Dave Foley donning drag once again, there's a lot more weird stuff going on, including Phil Hartman's character getting a premonition of his own death — about a year and a half before he'd die in real life. All this plus Andy Dick and Joe Rogan! Yeah, this is a weird episode! Read: Uproxx's oral history of NewsRadio The interview where the NewsRadio creator compares Must See TV Thursdays to a “shit sandwich” Watch: Dave Foley in Anne of Avonlea Listen: American Hysteria, the podcast all about moral panics, urban legends and  conspiracy theories — and how they shape culture. The Science Versus episode on Joe Rogan The Astonishing Legends episode on the alien autopsy video Go shop at our TeePublic store!   Follow: GEE on Facebook • GEE's Facebook Group • GEE on Twitter • GEE on Instagram • Drew on Twitter • Glen on Twitter   Listen: Apple Podcasts • Spotify • Stitcher •  Google Podcasts • Himalaya • TuneIn   And yes, we do have an official website! We even have episode transcripts courtesy of Sarah Neal. Our logo was designed by Rob Wilson. This episode's art was designed by Ian O'Phelan. This is a TableCakes podcast.

Evan Sidery goes over his latest picks for a five-game slate in the NBA on Halloween.

#119 - Closing out our Halloween/October month of shows with Chase Andersen, who runs the day-to-day operations of the Texas Chain Saw Massacre brand! Somewhat of a dream job for a horror fan. We discuss the iconic 1974 film, Chase's collection of screen used & other TCSM memorabilia, partying with multiple Leatherface's & why we love horror. He also came bearing gifts & Dan freaks out. Want to support our show? Patreon.com/RareFormRadio for extra content, bonus episodes & goodies! --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/rareformradio/support

Check out all of the upcoming events for Saint Cloud, Florida in the month of October 2021. Lots of great events going on from the Fall Festival, Trail of Terror, Dive-in-Boovie, and so much more fun for all ages.

Our favorite Long Island travel blogger Amy from Amy's Adventures on Instagram is back this week for a Travel Tuesday to tell us all about the fun, Halloween/October themed things going on for you & the family!

Join us as we get into the Halloween spirit and get all dressed up for the occasion. With no MNSSHP this year we will be doing our own Trick or Treat and of course we will 'Waffle On' about all things spooky. We'd love to know what your plans our for celebrating Halloween during the pandemic.  Happy Halloween & Enjoy the Wafflers Assemble: Live!  Don't forget to hit subscribe and allow notifications as it really does help our channel If you are listening to The Great British Mickey Waffle for the first time or if you want to get in touch as a regular listener – you can email us at themickeywaffle@gmail.com or get in touch via Facebook, Instagram, YouTube or Twitter - @GBMickeyWaffle You will also find more at our newly updated website -  www.themickeywaffle.com Waffle on!!

Welcome back to another My Little Rant! In this episode I talk about: -Halloween and why I'm not the biggest fan of it -My dislike of horror and gore -My second quarter at my new school -What it was like going back to my old school for the first time since I left -Processing emotions -How growth isn't always linear -Consistency and procrastination - & my goals for November I hope you all enjoy this episode and have a magical day

In closing of the last day and last Saturday of the month of October, on this Halloween (October 31, 2020) I end domestic violence awareness month with a discussion with my mom, Karen R. Lewis, Founder of our non-profit The Angel House located in Wayne county Michigan, about her experiences with domestic violence and what she gained and lost during those abusive times in her life. Hear her story of abuse, survival, and growth! Follow her on Instagram: @karen5229_ Twitter: @theangelhouse and Facebook: The Angel House You can also be sure to follow me on Instagram: @rynyree --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/therapwithry/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/therapwithry/support

EPISODE #191-- On today's episode we drag the horror film Hellraiser IV into that octagonal square that is the SPOOKTAGON. It's a bad movie, but it makes for a good episode! We also talk Lady Snowblood, Nosferatu, and The Duelists. Follow James on Twitter @kislingtwits and on Instagram @kislingwhatsit. You can watch Cruz and show favorite Alexis Simpson on You Tube in "They Live Together." Thanks to our artists Julius Tanag (http://www.juliustanag.com) and Sef Joosten (http://spexdoodles.tumblr.com). The theme music is "Eine Kleine Sheissemusik" by Drew Alexander. #horror #horrormovie #Halloween #October #spooktagon #spooktober #spooktacular #horrorpodcast #Hellraiser #Pinhead #TheStrangers #badsequels #90sFilm