Podcasts about brights

Schick and Nick discuss Nebrasketball missing the B1G Tournament. Nick quoted Jay Bilas. What happened to the Huskers?  Fred Hoiberg's future.  Ohhh, Kevin Keatts !  Celebrities at the Nebrasketball game. Champ Week is upon us. Schick's High Point pun. Potential America East puns.  Brights are at its lightest. Say Stayfe. Recapping the polls. Connect with us! SchickandNick.com Facebook, Twitter, or email  We would hate it if you missed an episode! So PLEASE subscribe, rate the pod, and throw us a review. It helps us out so much! We'd likey that.  This is another Hurrdat Media Production. Hurrdat Media is a podcast network and digital media production company based in Omaha, NE. Find more podcasts on the Hurrdat Media Network by going to HurrdatMedia.com or Hurrdat Media YouTube channel! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this episode of the Mixing Music Podcast, Dee Kei and Lu answer some questions from the audience!SUBSCRIBE TO OUR PATREON FOR EXCLUSIVE CONTENT!⁠SUBSCRIBE TO YOUTUBE⁠Join the ‘Mixing Music Podcast' Discord!HIRE DEE KEIHIRE LUFind Dee Kei and Lu on Social Media:Instagram: @DeeKeiMixes @MasteredbyLuTwitter: @DeeKeiMixes @MasteredbyLuThe Mixing Music Podcast is sponsored by ⁠Izotope⁠, ⁠Antares (Auto Tune)⁠, Sweetwater, ⁠Plugin Boutique⁠, ⁠Lauten Audio⁠, ⁠Filepass⁠, & ⁠Canva⁠The Mixing Music Podcast is a video and audio series on the art of music production and post-production. Dee Kei, Lu, and James are professionals in the Los Angeles music industry having worked with names like Odetari, 6arelyhuman, Trey Songz, Keyshia Cole, Benny the Butcher, carolesdaughter, Crying City, Daphne Loves Derby, Natalie Jane, charlieonnafriday, bludnymph, Lay Bankz, Rico Nasty, Ayesha Erotica, ATEEZ, Dizzy Wright, Kanye West, Blackway, The Game, Dylan Espeseth, Tara Yummy, Asteria, Kets4eki, Shaquille O'Neal, Republic Records, Interscope Records, Arista Records, Position Music, Capital Records, Mercury Records, Universal Music Group, apg, Hive Music, Sony Music, and many others.This podcast is meant to be used for educational purposes only. This show is filmed and recorded at Dee Kei's Private studio in North Hollywood, California. If you would like to sponsor the show, please email us at ⁠deekeimixes@gmail.com⁠.Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mixing-music-music-production-audio-engineering-and-music/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

We Welcome our mate Lee's latest Instalment To our podcast !Shadeemus DamnBopperson & Bikbaye Wellness Is A Practice (Frankson Remix)Aboubakar Traoré & Balima - DjarabiWater Suite (Thirst) (Kassa Overall Remix) Trinka - Dois No IlêBlue Tataouine - Al-Qasar, Nadah Mahmoud - Uncovered Happy Mondays - Loose Fit (Greg Wilson and Ché Wilson Remix)  Chantal Curtis Get Another LoveFirst Choice Let No Man Put Asunder [ Frankie Knuckles Mix ]Guto D'Harculete - Intro (ft Azagaia)Guto D'Harculete - GutaNuovi Fratelli with Nimbus Sextet [Featuring Russell Stewart and lissappear] Searching (Full Length Version)Mae Defays High Tide [ instrumental ]Mae Defays High TideMaya Blandy Loving In My LifeBlend Mishkin & Soul Sugar I Miss Those Days Mr Bird Hidden GoldStacey Cohen War On LoveJoanna Law Love Let Me LoveIrini Arabatzi This Fight (for A&A.)Arnau Obiols & KAYYAK Faith Franck Biyong Jela Kubwa [ Aint4perfect Remix ]Drama On The Corner The LightEx-Friendly Yellow Room

When The White Ship hit a rock near Barfleur on 25th November, 1120, she sank, killing all 300 noblemen on-board. Among the dead was Henry I's one legitimate son, William Adelin, plunging the English throne into a dynastic crisis. Like the Titanic, the vessel was considered the epitome of safety and prestige for its time, Captained by Thomas FitzSteven, whose father had piloted the boat that brought William the Conqueror to England. But, despite this pedigree, the crew and passengers' decision to a) get drunk and b) race the King home sealed their doom. In this episode, Arion, Rebecca and Olly uncover the plotting that unseated the next in line to the throne (because she was a GIRL); explain how a humble butcher was the sole survivor of the shipwreck; and consider why contemporaries thought it was all God's work…  Further Reading: • ‘900 years since the White Ship disaster' (British Library, 2020): https://blogs.bl.uk/digitisedmanuscripts/2020/11/white-ship.html • 'Earl Spencer - The White Ship, the worst ever royal disaster' (The Oldie, 2020): https://theoldie.co.uk/blog/the-900th-anniversary-of-the-worst-ever-royal-disaster • ‘The White Ship by Charles Spencer' (Brights of Nettlebed, 2020): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yVKDHDgyTXY #Medieval #Royals #Mistakes #Rowing #France Love the show? Support us!  Join 

Join Janice and her handsome co-host Danny for an inspiring conversation with Richard & Sheri Bright! Richard and Sheri Bright are transparent about their real-life marriages and fearlessly discuss the ups and downs of marital bliss and the challenges of blending a family. They are speakers, podcasters, authors, and XO Marriage Mediators. They both love marriage and delight in helping other couples bring joy and fun back into their relationships. This husband and wife comedy duo combines tag-team humor, proven relationship tools, and their passion for strong marriages and share their story with church date night events, cruises, seminars, and conferences across the U.S. Connect with the Brights: www.brightermarriage.com linktr.ee/BrighterMarriagewww.facebook.com/therealbrights Connect with Janice: www.journeywithjanice.com @thejourneywithjanice on social media #MarriageMatters #RelationshipGoals #CouplesPodcast #MarriageCoaching #BlendedFamilyJourney #XOMarriage #StrongMarriage #MarriageHumor #BrighterMarriage #ChristianMarriage --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/journeywithjanicepodcast/support

WGSN has been tracking a rise in appetite for outdoor adventures including glamping and nighttime activities. In this episode, we discuss this expanding demand and detail key trends shaping the future of sports and outdoors. Senior Insight Strategist Cassandra Napoli hosts this chat with our Sports & Outdoor experts – Content Strategist, Caitlin Folgner, and CMF Senior Strategist, Jennifer Birch. From soft adventure to easily accessing health and wellness benefits of the outdoors for new participants, get on board the opportunities and design directions this movement presents.We've been forecasting the rise of rugged luxury bringing modern convenience and rich comfort to camping, where travellers can enjoy the outdoors leisurely without having to invest in new luxury gear amid a cost of living crisis. Listen in on how brands can strategise around colour, materials, and product development trends for hardware and apparel across industries.

When You Think Someone Has Their Brights On 06/25/24

Today's unusual science fiction story is by Hugo-Award winning writer Mark Clifton, and deals with children who are a step beyond the genius IQ. They are "Brights," and they have figured out how to manipulate the space-time continuum, making the inter-dimensional cosmos their playground. This creates a thorny problem for their parents, the "Tweens" and "Stupids" to figure out. Visit our website: https://goodolddaysofradio.com/ Subscribe to our Facebook Group for news, discussions, and the latest podcast: https://www.facebook.com/groups/881779245938297 Our theme music is "Why Am I So Romantic?" from Animal Crackers: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01KHJKAKS/ref=cm_sw_em_r_mt_dp_MK8MVCY4DVBAM8ZK39WD

Sermon by Pastor Corky Calhoun

The story of Bill Bright, founder of Campus Crusade for Christ, is a remarkable story. He and his wife were newly married but found themselves increasingly frustrated and disappointed with the course of their lives. In the midst of that time, Bill sensed God calling him to surrender his life totally and completely to Him. Bill and his wife obeyed. They made a list of all their dreams, plans and goals and signed them over to God. Apart from salvation, it was the greatest decision of their lives. It began what Bill would refer to as the “Great Adventure.” This adventure would come with a cost. Bill sold his company and left his courses at Fuller Seminary. There was great uncertainty, many risks and various trials, but God was always there to protect, provide and guide. As they laid down their dreams, they found that their dreams paled in comparison to God’s dreams. In our passage this weekend, we find David in the midst of his adventure of following God. His adventure, like the Brights, had many ups and downs, difficulties and dangers. However, God was always there bringing him into a brighter day in the fulfillment of a plan that was bigger than what he could ever have imagined. I pray you will join us for worship this weekend as we consider the grand adventure of following Christ! — Pastor Chad

The story of Bill Bright, founder of Campus Crusade for Christ, is a remarkable story. He and his wife were newly married but found themselves increasingly frustrated and disappointed with the course of their lives. In the midst of that time, Bill sensed God calling him to surrender his life totally and completely to Him. Bill and his wife obeyed. They made a list of all their dreams, plans and goals and signed them over to God. Apart from salvation, it was the greatest decision of their lives. It began what Bill would refer to as the “Great Adventure.” This adventure would come with a cost. Bill sold his company and left his courses at Fuller Seminary. There was great uncertainty, many risks and various trials, but God was always there to protect, provide and guide. As they laid down their dreams, they found that their dreams paled in comparison to God’s dreams. In our passage this weekend, we find David in the midst of his adventure of following God. His adventure, like the Brights, had many ups and downs, difficulties and dangers. However, God was always there bringing him into a brighter day in the fulfillment of a plan that was bigger than what he could ever have imagined. I pray you will join us for worship this weekend as we consider the grand adventure of following Christ! — Pastor Chad

If your Oodie or Hug n Snug is crawling to the washing machine because you've spent all winter hibernating in it, we've got the perfect replacement. Because, drum roll, please…TechPixies has launched its own stylish swag!!!

The crew continues to battle against the bright walker, but things aren't looking so good. With their senses under assault, can the party prevail against this descriptive danger? You can visit us on ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠twitter⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ and ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠facebook⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ and even chat with us on ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠discord⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠! Also, check us out on ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠twitch⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ and ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠youtube⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠! If you'd like to help us out, and maybe give a Hero Point to a character, buy us a ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠coffee⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠! In the market for some new dice? (who isn't?)  Use code SHOTS15 at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Easy Roller Dice⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ for 15% off your order!

In today's episode we talk about, Night On The Town, STRUTS LIVE, Films & Tv, Coppers N' Brights, and MORE! --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/okaythatsweird/support

Welcome Back to season 10 home audience! To Celebrate a decade of exploring medicine in every way possible, Dr's J and Santhosh will be going back to being basic, but extra in this episode on high blood pressure, aka hypertension! Along the way, they cover soft and hard pulses, ancient egypt, diagnostic poetry, Brights disease, french dietary studies, salt nephritis, the ultimate micromanager, FDR and giraffe blood pressure similarities, normal blood pressure ranges, stages of hypertension, nightly dipping, lie detectors and emotional response, dart gun medication and more! So sit back, stay calm and relax as we get salty about hypertension!Further ReadingMacGregor GA, de Wardener HE. Salt, Diet and Health: Neptune's Poisoned Chalice: The Origins of High Blood Pressure. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1998. [Google Scholar]https://academic.oup.com/ajh/article/10/S1/2S/194309https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31641769/Support Us spiritually, emotionally or financially here! or on ACAST+travelmedicinepodcast.comX/Twitter: @doctorjcomedy @toshyfroGmail: travelmedicinepodcast@gmail.comSpotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/28uQe3cYGrTLhP6X0zyEhTFacebook: facebook.com/travelmedicinepodcastPatreon: https://www.patreon.com/travelmedicinepodcast Supporting us monthly has all sorts of perks! You get ad free episodes, bonus musical parody, behind the scenes conversations not available to regular folks and more!! Your support helps us to pay for more guest interviews, better equipment, and behind the scenes people who know what they are doing! https://plus.acast.com/s/travelmedicinepodcast. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Singapore may attract top artists from Jacky Cheung, Coldplay and Taylor Swift to play multiple nights of concerts but does this city state offer the best investment ideas? We speak to Adrian Loh, the Head of Research of UOB Singapore to find out.Image by: Shutterstock

5 - 24 - 23 REVERSE FLASH AND MASSHOLE BRIGHTS by Maine's Coast 93.1

In this episode, we're talking about women who are in the Bright Color Palette category. Maybe that's you, or someone you know!  We'll explain what constitutes a Bright, and how to bring out one's natural bright coloring with makeup and clothing.  Dressing harmoniously with your natural coloring helps you to tap into who you really are, and show up! Mentioned In This Episode:  Candlelight Radiance Powder Emerald, Teal, Plum, Navy and Sterling Mineral Eyeliners Pink Sorbet Mineral Rich Lipstick Bliss Mineral Eyeshadow Satin Sheen Highlight Watch our Intros On YouTube On Simple Beauty Minerals Linda's True Colors Channel ➡️Contest Entry - Give us a written review on Apple, screenshot the review and send it over to one of us via Instagram or Facebook. We will choose one winner per month to receive a 15% Gift Code from both Simple Beauty Minerals & Linda's Style Programs and services. **DISCLOSURE: Hey beautiful! We may be affiliates for some of the products that we recommend on the Podcast. When you purchase those items through our links, we will earn a small commission. You will NEVER pay more when buying a product through our links. Plus, It helps support the Podcast, so we can continue to offer you lots of great free information. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/living-visibly-over-50/message

I det här avsnittet pratar Hanna med Fredrik Bardon, VD på utbildningsföretaget Brights om hur kunskap kan hjälpa er att rusta er inför morgondagens arbetsmarknad. Han delar bland annat med sig om hur du bäst skapar förutsättningar för utveckling, utvärdera kunskapsmål och koppla spjutspetsmål till utbildning för att kunna ställa om för framtiden.HRnytt-poddens programledare är Hanna Bergfäldt, konsult på FEM HR. I podden intervjuar Hanna aktuella personer, ledare, HR chefer och andra som kan ge oss insikt, kunskap, inspiration inom HR området.https://www.femhr.se/ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

There is a small amount of advice and self-help. This portion is more like an audio journal, as i said is part of this podcast. ~ Changing live through changing the job, my transparency of story is intended to help. Job report, I love my new job as a leasing agent in a different company. I have so much time alone and its great. This job is great for thinking for the use of adding to this podcast continually. What's neat is i have been where all my leads and prospects have been, first apt, had a family, been a solo resident, all that. Compared to my previous dispatching trailers to all over Toyota job where all talking with males were working all at once. A job is so important to your contentment happiness. I do realize sometimes a family is depending on you and you just do the job where it pays the most. The family needs are the most critical. But if a family is ok and you can survive on a less income, and personal satisfaction can be found at a lesser paying job then, that might be a quality of life good personal decision to go with. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/yolanda254/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/yolanda254/support

Nikita Obraztsov is a master of religious studies at St Petersburg University and a popularizer of the science of religion. His main interest is the study of contemporary religious processes, and his master's thesis is on the Brights movement. He went into religious studies from jurisprudence, because it is more important to live interestingly than to live richly :). He is convinced that it is possible and necessary to speak about religion in a scientific language, contrary to the postmodernist narratives that are widespread today, denying such a possibility. Interested in Buddhism, Shinto and Taoism. Author of popular science courses on the religions of the world, explaining complex concepts in simple language. FIND NIKITA ON SOCIAL MEDIA YouTube | VKontakte | Dzen | Telegram ================================ SUPPORT & CONNECT: Support on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/denofrich Twitter: https://twitter.com/denofrich Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/mark.develman/ YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/denofrich Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/den_of_rich/ Hashtag: #denofrich © Copyright 2023 Den of Rich. All rights reserved.

Nick Fay recaps the Nets' loss to the Knicks and jumps into some questions pertaining to this team. - Another terrible performance  - The defense was BAD - Cam Johnson and Mikal Bridges  - Twitter questions  - Jacque Vaughn  - Brights spots for the rest of the year?  - Who's to blame?  - Backup center?  - What's next?  - AND MORE Let Nick (@Nick_Fay_) and Jac (@JacManuell) know what you think of the episode on Twitter! FOLLOW THE BUZZ ON INSTAGRAM https://www.instagram.com/brooklynbuzzpod/ @brooklynbuzzpod Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

For the record, I don't care about Han Solo or whether he shot first in the cantina scene in Star Wars. I care about Matthew. Don't get me wrong, I'm all for Mark, too, and Luke, and John. It's just that Mark didn't shoot first. Mark shot second. Like Mark Antony's speech at Caesar's funeral, it started with a line such as, “I've come to bury Matthew, not to praise him!” This scholarship to remove Matthew as the first Gospel writer started in anti-Catholic Protestant universities in Europe, using biased textual criticism that ignored all historical testimony in writing and Sacred Tradition. But why would they do that? Why would anyone do that? Who benefits? Let me beat this topic a bit longer…First and foremost, knocking down Matthew to second or third very clearly elevates the Protestant argument against Peter as the first Pope and apostolic succession. This cannot be understated. If there is one position to attack on the Catholic Church, it's to get the Papacy in check-mate, and when the direct assault of the Protestants didn't work, a long “march through the culture” happened in the universities. Today we can observe the atheists like Bart Ehrman in lockstep with the Marxists. It makes for strange bedfellows. Since the workers of the world did not unite to overthrow capitalism and religion, a long atheist “march through the culture” is happening. (Spoiler alert: at the end these marches, guess who will still be there? Yes, the answer is the Catholic Church. This is not the first rodeo for the Church. There have been large, violent, and lengthy attacks before in the forms of the Arians, Nestorians, Albigensians, Islam, and a hundred others.) As we watch the fragmentation of Protestantism, and the latest ascendency of what is becoming known as wokeness, we can observe a process of atomization unfolding. A scattering is happening. We can read about the annual splintering of the Baptists at their conventions. Even this week as I write this, the United Methodist Church will soon be no longer United but “Wedged” instead. On the other side, the unbelievers form factions that come and go, like the Masons, the humanists, the deconstructionists, the freethinkers, the “Brights” (the hilarious, brief attempt at a religion started by Richard Dawkins, which I was quite enamored with when I was fallen away and thought Dawkins was deep instead of ridiculous). These fads come and go, because none of them are from God. We are in the last days of the Masons because they were always just a reaction and a copycat. The humanists can't get along, or even form a coherent set of ideas, because they worship the human, and that makes for seven billion gods. The woke are already destroying one another, as the head is now eating the tail. One thing that always plays out is the breakdown of unity among unbelievers. It's ugly. It's not beautiful. It's ugly…because it's not from God.The tragedy, however, in doing this teardown of Matthew, is that these well-intentioned Pope-haters (which is considered a virtue in some Protestant circles) managed to undermine all of sacred scripture, not just the parts that affect the Catholic Church. A nice summary of this long tragedy is in a book by Scott Hahn and Benjamin Wiker called The Decline and Fall of Sacred Scripture. The obsession with scholarly insight into scripture did not elevate the word of God, it devalued it and ripped out the supernatural altogether. Yet the supernatural is still in there, despite decades of academic wrestling over.Why does this research undermine the Gospel? Because if Matthew is written after the fall of the Temple in Jerusalem, when the Romans laid waste to all things Jewish, Jesus' prediction about the temple being disassembled becomes really, really weak. If Matthew wrote this after 70 A.D., which all “modern” biased scholarship suggests, then it makes no sense. As Jesus came out of the temple and was going away, his disciples came to point out to him the buildings of the temple. Then he asked them, “You see all these, do you not? Truly I tell you, not one stone will be left here upon another; all will be thrown down.” (Matthew 24:1-2)Now, faithful scholarship believes Matthew was written between 42 and 68 A.D., which makes sense with this statement (and everything else above). However, scholars who lack faith place Matthew as being written after 70 A.D. and only that Matthew drew from “earlier sources,” but the problem is that the suspicion is already branded on the text and when scholars refer to “earlier sources” they are not referring to the Hebrew version of Matthew that tradition speaks about. And here are the suspicions: 1.) That the prediction of the temple destruction was added after the fact to make Jesus look prophetic. 2.) That the pro-Catholic verses about Peter and the Sacraments were added later to shore up the case for Catholic authority. 3.) That all of the Gospel is dubious at best because so much time passed that an eyewitness account is impossible. What I can never fully get my head around is this. The main argument for Mark being first is that…: Mark is shorter. The second reason is that Mark is…: Mark is a weaker writer. Both of these arguments can be turned around and argued against to say that Matthew was first because Matthew is longer and Matthew is a better writer. These arguments for “Mark shot first” are inventions and bear no weight whatsoever on facts, and you can argue it until you are blue in the face without it getting anywhere, and scholars have done just that. But somehow these arguments have great staying power because scholarship has anointed these two ideas with the ink of published papers. Never mind that the journals are biased toward “Mark shot first” to begin with. Never mind that you probably can't get a job teaching Biblical studies if you objected to these arguments (read this fascinating article about 19th century German hiring and firing of those who didn't toe the party line). The following may come as a shock to the modern person who likes to “follow the science” and assumes that science and experts would never lie: scholars and scientists are every bit as prone to simping, scapegoating, and “dry-labbing” facts as are religious and business people, and correcting an error in scholarship or science is like turning a super-tanker around in the ocean; it takes a long time, and a lot of energy, and a lot of convincing, because usually no one wants to admit things are going in the wrong direction. There's too much money, time, and sunk costs to change direction. The Titanic didn't sink because an iceberg hit it. The Titanic sunk because it ran into an iceberg. The problem of pride in the mind and assumed perfection preceded the collision. The iceberg just happened to be the reality that smashed a false idea. In praise of science, it usually will self-correct over time because sooner or later someone calls out the lie. The researcher who produces false results will be outed, even if it takes a century. However, Biblical scholarship is not biology or physics, so there is much more room for bias, just like in sociology or history or literary criticism, and the will of whoever is in power, whether it's a king or department chair, can skew the results dramatically toward the desired outcome through wordsmithing. Even in hiring, the bias for the desired outcome of future research is accomplished, because if an academic researcher would like a job but shows inclinations against the status quo, then their application will be passed over. This is no different than the Church, where an atheist cannot become a priest. But the faith is laid out in full display in the Church, where the preachers and teachers must profess the faith. In academia, this is hidden. Under the guise of “free speech” there is anything but such a thing, and therein lies the problem: the lies. Thus is a bias and motive protected, fenced off, in the walled gardens of academia, and there is no place more fenced off in the modern world than the university. They are the modern Levites, the experts who hand down the truth. As we try to downplay Moses and religious ways, our modern academic experts act more like Moses on Sinai than Moses himself, even wearing lab coats in their TV interviews, or being interviewed in rooms with walls bearing diplomas for the lay people, or giving TED talks from on high to the plebes watching at home on YouTube. So, back to the absurd argument of “It's shorter.” If I want to argue that “Mark shot first” because “it's shorter,” if I stare long and hard enough at Mark, I will find a case and enough evidence for the outcome I'm seeking. This is the beauty of textual criticism - it's an interpretive dance based solely on internal evidence, and therefore a fantasy. On the flip side, if I want to argue that Matthew is first because “it's longer,” I can do that, too. After all, you can spin a text into whatever you like, if you just use internal evidence of the text itself.The difference, however, is that a scholar most likely cannot publish the findings for an argument that “Matthew is longer, therefore first.” In secular academics, to get a job teaching such things, or to get accepted in a graduate program, is unlikely. This is the problem with modern academia; it is as rigid as the Pharisees in what you are allowed to say or believe. The book 1984 was written in an era of totalitarian governments, but today it applies very well to American universities and public schools, and this is exactly why so many teachers are leaving the profession. No one enjoys living a lie. As a former English major, I will say this pointing at myself: This spin problem is why you never want English majors being the navigators for your nation. They can spin gold into straw very easily, but they cannot spin straw into gold. They can only spin. They spin and toil and undo things, but by and large they do not create anything. A career is made of unpacking and teasing out meaning, calling out prejudices, pointing out oppression - but never producing or making anything. Lit-crit and Biblical-crit at the modern university is full of morality, guilt, and finger-pointing, to the point that three modern academics were able to publish several hoax papers on grievance studies that were accepted mainly because of their use on ridiculous postmodern jargon. “The trio set out with the intent to expose problems in what they called ‘grievance studies', referring to academic areas where they claim ‘a culture has developed in which only certain conclusions are allowed… and put social grievances ahead of objective truth'.”Now, with the humanities in free-fall, the jig is up on modern scholarship, since it's reaching the tipping point, the last phase, where the head becomes too heavy for the body to carry it any longer. Now we reach the point in a society where the workers of the world unite, but not the way that intellectuals like Marx think. The workers unite because they are tired of pulling the cart and being told they are the evil ones. So for the most part, I try not to worry about this long attack on Matthew. Jesus warned us not to worry. One thing is for sure: even if Matthew hadn't written at all, and we were still simply rolling by oral tradition, the message of Christ would still be growing, because it is from God, and nothing on this earth, nothing in this world, can halt what is from God. Jesus warned us about spinning and toiling, using clothing as an example, and clothing is even a metaphor in the Garden to hide our nakedness. Our reputations and opinions are kind of like clothing, where we fashion these elaborate fig leaves to cover ourselves. Jesus warns us to knock it off, and quit worrying: “Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow; they neither toil nor spin.” He warns us about men of little faith: “But seek first his kingdom and his righteousness, and all these things shall be yours as well.”So I should really just stop bothering about the fact that “Matthew shot first,” because I know that tradition tells us his Gospel was first, and having faith means trusting in Sacred Scripture, Sacred Tradition, and the Magisterium of the Church. I know that. And yet, sometimes I let it bother me, because the real reason behind all of this is not a search for the truth, but the search for an outcome. The obvious aim of this kind of scholarship from the start has been to undermine the Church, and it remains so to this day. Whether it comes from the cynicism of unbelievers or the broadsides of Protestants, the desired outcome is the capitulation of the bishop of Rome, a.k.a. the Pope, who is on the chair of Peter, on the rock of the Church that Christ founded. And clearly scholars will not destroy the church, because Jesus promised that the “gates of hell will not prevail against” his Church. So they can certainly try to undermine it, but ultimately will fail, and they are failing now. It will play out exactly as every other attempt to destroy the Church, in that it will be messy, but the Church will remain when the dust settles, just as it has outlasted every other heresy and empire. This campaign has produced thousands of papers and articles on the Synoptic Problem, which was not a problem at all until modern scholarship made it into one, in the same universities that brought us the sad philosophy and ideas that conjured 20th century Germany, China, and the Soviet Union, and all of the horrors. These things are not unrelated. The stoking of the “will-to-power” didn't just happen in political nationalism and social Darwinism and Marxist revolutions. It happened most definitely in Biblical scholarship as well. Now, they meant it for bad, but as always, God will in the end, use it for good. This is how God deals with folks like Julius Wellhausen and Gottlieb Storr. He will do so with modern doubters too, like Bart Ehrman and his atheist disciples. The funny thing about scholarship's search for “truth” that wants to debunk Christianity is that they often end up organizing and collating information better so that new insights to Sacred Scripture and Sacred Tradition can be found. In other words, the unbelievers and anti-Catholics help faithful writers write better books on the truth of Christ. The anti-Catholics are like Joseph's eleven brothers in Genesis that throw him down the well and sell him into slavery, only to find out later that Joseph ended up thriving while they starved. In short, there was great incentive to crush Catholicism in Lutheran Germany from the time old Gottlieb Storr first whispered the idea of “Mark shot first” in 1786. For any philosophy aficionados, this connection will be interesting: one of Gottlieb Storr's students was none other than Hegel, who was the muse of Karl Marx. You have to marvel at it really, how these connections lead down the path of unbelief. The mess we are in today is the product of a lot of cross-pollination and rebellion (I wanted to say inbreeding but that would be uncharitable). What's interesting to me is these Hatfields and McCoys are actually all in the same family, as Protestant Storr begat unbelieving Hegel, and Hegel begat atheist Marx, and Marx begat Nietzsche, and Nietzsche begat Sartre, and Sartre begat Derrida, and Derrida begat Foucault, and Foucault begat the many-headed monster of wokeism. These are the names. This is how we've come to live in the book of Judges again in 2023 because “in those days there was no king in Israel; all the people did what was right in their own eyes.” (Judges 21:25) The path of denying that sin exists starts small, but balloons into the denial of God. In hindsight, this all should have been as predictable as a stock market bubble, but the prophets of doom, those annoying gnats, are never heard until afterward.When Bismarck and company were consolidating power in Germany, this little snowball of Biblical criticism rolled, and rolled, and rolled, and the re-shaping of the Bible into a secular book has been so successful that when I attended a Catholic University for a year (from which I want my money back), I learned about “Marcan Priority,” which is a fancy way of saying that “Mark shot first.” I was also told that “We don't know who wrote the Gospels.” Both of these statements are false. If only that were the worst of it. The “Mark shot first” theory is not only taught in Catholic colleges. No, no, no. “Mark shot first” is taught in the American bishops' official Bible footnotes, in the “New American Bible,” the NAB. The Bible translation itself is fine. It's the footnotes that destroy faith. I am not alone in this feeling. Many others, like Jimmy Akin and Trent Horn to name just two of them, do not like the footnotes, or even the translation very much. You cannot read a page of Matthew in the New American Bible without the writer of the footnotes mentioning the hypothetical “Q” source (a document that doesn't exist and was probably Matthew in Aramaic or Hebrew if it did exist). Further, the footnote author mentions Marcan priority, and Mark as the source. So the footnotes of the New American Bible disagree with 1800 years of Tradition. How interesting. Someday I hope to learn who the author was of these footnotes. The root problem here is a lack of a supernatural view of the Bible, of which I may do a whole additional series on, because it's so important, but I can't dive deeply on it here without getting way off track, as I tend to do. This Bible, this New American Bible, with these heretical and faithless footnotes, is given to Confirmation students across America. It is everywhere. They are given out like a medal, a right of passage at Confirmation. I've discarded mine. So should you. Get a Word on Fire Bible or Ignatius Study Bible instead, or if you don't want a Catholic study Bible, get an ESV Study Bible that has faithful footnotes. I guess I can breathe a sigh of relief here because most Catholics don't actually read the Bible. (Score one for the Protestants. See - I don't always pick on the protestors. Some of the Protestant study Bibles have better footnotes, far more faithful ones than the New American Bible). Worst of all, the USCCB, the United States Catholic Bishops' website, uses these same footnotes. I weep. Here I weep. This is a travesty that must be uprooted and ripped out of the Church. I wrote a letter to the USCCB requesting that the footnotes be taken down, or better, printed off and used for kindling. (“But that's book burning, you Nazi!”) Fine, let's just delete them and use the Ignatius Study Bible footnotes instead. Now there is a Catholic study Bible that is faithful to the Scripture and the Tradition. Again, the New American Bible is fine, but the footnotes must have been written by my liberal arts professors who hadn't been to Mass in a long time - probably ever since they received their New American Bible with the footnotes about Marcan priority! Matthew shot first. As I've mentioned before, in the Bible, in the Commandments, and in the story of Creation, order matters, and the order of which the four evangelists wrote also matters greatly. The ordering of them in the form of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John doesn't just roll off the tongue. It's also the order in which they came to be on paper. And even if Matthew was translated from Hebrew into Greek, he was first, has always been first, and the early Church had no reason to pretend this was the case, unlike the scholars who tried to upend history by twisting words. One thing that should be an immediate head scratcher for you is this: if Christianity started in Jerusalem, where Christ was crucified, effectively on Pentecost, and most of the initial arguments were with Jews and Christ's followers, then why would Mark, written in Greek, be the first? Warning: if you attend a university, almost any university, you will never hear these arguments. This is all hidden from you, as the modern Biblical scholars have buried these. In 1995, I was taught only Marcan Priority…at a Catholic college, of all places. The great thing about truth, however, is that it cannot be buried forever. My hope is that someday, just as the Dead Sea Scrolls were found by some kids throwing rocks in caves, that another jar will turn up in Israel, and inside it will be Aramaic Matthew, and all of this false scholarship, and I mean all of it, will turn to dust. Matthew shot first.The following is from a biblical site where people argue about these things, copied in full. (From https://hermeneutics.stackexchange.com). What are the arguments in favor of Matthean Priority?External Evidence* Matthew is almost unanimously testified as the oldest gospel by the church fathers. Clement of Alexandria even supported both Matthew and Luke as before Mark. This is significant because Mark is said to have founded the Coptic branch of Christianity in Alexandria, Egypt. If any place were to argue for Markan priority, Egypt would be the most likely. A sampling of the church fathers' testimony follows:* Papias “Matthew wrote in Hebrew and others translated.” (HE 3.39.16)* Origen said the first gospel was written by Matthew in Hebrew. (HE 6.25.4)* Irenaeus (grandson in the faith of John by Polycarp of Smyrna) said the first gospel was written written by Matthew in land of Hebrews in their own language. (Against Heresies. 3.1.1)* Eusebius — Matthew had first preached to Hebrews and wrote in their own language (HE 3.24.6)* Jerome “Matthew was the first to compose in Hebrew and his text is still available in [library near Bethlehem].” He even challenged his critics to go see it if they doubted. (Lives of Illustrious Men ch. 3)As the church rose out of the mission to the gentiles, it is interesting that the church fathers supported the Judaic gospel of Matthew instead of Mark. Also consider that they testify that Mark was the companion of the Apostle Peter in Rome which became one of the five sees of the early church (Rome, Constantinople, Antioch, Jerusalem, and Alexandria, Egypt). Unless the tradition of Matthean priority were very early, it is unlikely that they would all arrive at it independently. In fact, the slight differences in their testimonies provide evidence that they came from different sources.* Even though one of the main arguments for Markan priority is that Mark is shorter and "later authors would be more likely to expand than contract," such is not always the case (see, for example, the Reader's Digest Condensed Library). Summarizing a longer work is well known and has been for a long time. There are even ancient works which name their sources and state, "this work will be a shorter, more understandable account of the events than X."* The Didache clearly relies on Matthew. While the date of this document is debated between AD 50 and AD 150, the earlier it is, the earlier Matthew has to be.* When you examine second-century Christian writings, Matthew is quoted far more frequently than Mark. So is Luke. If Mark enjoyed a period when it was the only written gospel, it seems that it should have been more popular. Likewise, Matthew's Gospel enjoys a more central place in the second century liturgy than any other gospel or even Paul's epistles. (see, for example, Massaux's extensive treatment of the subject here)Internal EvidenceI am separating textual evidence from internal evidence. The difference is that internal evidence will be themes or concepts while textual evidence deals with specific words and phrases.* The fall of Jerusalem is completely missing from Matthew. This event rocked the Jewish world. Matthew, who so often points out when a prophecy is fulfilled, does not add an editorial comment to Jesus' prophecy that Jerusalem would be overthrown. Not a single "and this prophecy was fulfilled" about the fall.Some have pointed to Matthew 22:7 as referring to the fall of Jerusalem as an event happening in the past. In fact, this verse is almost universally accepted as such. However, sending in troops and burning a city with fire were quite common ways of dealing with troublesome cities in the past. In fact, it is so common in Near Eastern, Old Testament, and Rabbinic writings that its occurrence here should not be thought to refer to a single event.Moreover, for an after-the-fact prophecy, Matt 22:7 is very inexact. While the walls of Jerusalem fell, it was the temple that burned. In fact, post event "prophecies" do make this distinction.We have overthrown the wall of Zion and we have burnt the place of the mighty God (II Baruch 7.1). [I.e. the temple. For this sense, cf. II Mace. 5.17-20; John 11.48; Acts6.14; 21.28; etc.]They delivered ... to the enemy the overthrown wall, and plundered the house, and burnt the temple (II Baruch 80.3).And a Roman leader shall come to Syria, who shall burn down Solyma's [Jerusalem's] temple with fire, and therewith slay many men, and shall waste the great land of the Jews with its broad way (Sibylline Oracles 4.125-7).It seems to me that if this were being written post AD 70, then the prophecy would have been altered to distinguish the fates of the city and temple. Christians did come to see the burning of the Temple as God's judgment on the Jewish leadership, but the events do not correspond closely enough to require Christ's parable to be a reference to it or the wording to be an after the fact description. A final note on Matthew and the city can be found in Matthew 27:8 ("For this reason that field has been called the Field of Blood to this day."). Matthew seems to view the city as still intact when he writes that.Likewise, the cryptic statement in Matt 24, "let the reader understand" need not mean the "this prophecy has been fulfilled." Whenever Matthew wants to say that a prophecy has been fulfilled, he says so (for example, Matt 1:22; 2:15; 2:23; 3:15; 4:14; etc).I understand Matthew 24 to be referring to the parousia. Matthew states that the distress of those days will be followed immediately by the coming of the Son of Man (24:29). This did not happen in AD 70. If Matthew is trying to portray Jesus as an unmatched prophet, he failed by including material that did not happen.* While Matthew contains a high Christology, this by no means means it has to be written after Mark who does not present such a high theology. (Easily explained if Mark's Gospel is meant for an audience who is new in the faith.) Paul's letters contain a high Christology, and most scholars date Paul (died ~64) before Mark (who they place ~70). Moreover, Paul's letters show that Christian traditions even earlier than his had a high Christology.* The same can be said for Matthew's high liturgy. In fact, one of the verses that is brought out to show Matthew came late in the first century or beyond is Matthew 18:17 based on the word "church." However, this ignores that the Greek word used there, ecclesia, enjoyed wide usage in the Septuagint to translate qahal, "sacred assembly," and was used by diaspora Jews.Textual Evidence* There are a significant number of places in Matthew where the parallel account in Mark makes more sense to have been edited down than for Matthew to expand. It is possible to read Mark with the hypothesis that it came from Matthew and run into no redactional problems that challenge said hypothesis. However, reading Matthew as a redaction of Mark does cause such problems.* There are places where Mark uses a certain word but Matthew does not, even though he used that word in other places (for example "pherein"). This makes more sense with Mark editing Matthew than of Matthew copying Mark.* There are places where Matthew has phrases he likes and uses them consistently. Mark has parallels of most of these accounts and is very free in his translations of the phrases. It makes more sense for Mark to be free styling from Matthew than it does for Matthew to be forcing the phrase into his wording whenever he sees it in Mark. One of these phrases is opias de genomenes, found first in Mt 8:16 and Mk 1:32. Markan priority has to conclude that Matthew copied the form exactly as Mark had it the first time, then always and consistently used the same grammar whenever he found a similar phrase in Mark and introducing it himself in Mt 20:8 which has no parallel in Mark.* There are places where Mark combines details from both Matthew and Luke. An example of these duplicate expressions can be seen in Mark 1:32 compared to Mt 8:16 and Luk 4:40.Mk 1:32 When evening came, after the sun had set, they began bringing to Him all who were ill and those who were demon-possessed.Mt 8:16 When evening came, they brought to Him many who were demon-possessed; and He cast out the spirits with a word, and healed all who were ill.Lk 4:40 While the sun was setting, all those who had any who were sick with various diseases brought them to Him; and laying His hands on each one of them, He was healing them.In these parallels, Mark combines the introductory phrases from both Matthew and Luke. In this case, Markan priority would require that Luke know of both Matthew and Mark and consciously choose to use the exact phrase that Matthew does not. However, if Matthew writes first and Luke second, there is no such problem.* Matthew leaves semitisms in place where Mark smoothens them. This includes wording and patterns that Mark breaks. Yes, Mark has eight semitic words, but Matthew has many more semitisms (so does Luke, a plethora of semitisms). Many of Mark's semitisms seem to be added for drama while Matthew's flow naturally.Adding to the semitisms are 12 times where Matthew (and Luke) uses the participle of a verb while Mark uses the past tense. Using a participle for the second verb in a set (and he answered, saying) is well-known when coming from a semitic language (all over the Septuagint) but is not used in normal Greek. Mark also uses these participles but not as often. It would be more likely to edit them out than to edit them back in.Many more examples exist where Matthew and Luke agree with one another in wording and Mark is different.* Matthew and Luke both record 8 healing miracles. Mark has 10. The two left out of both Matthew and Luke are the saliva miracles (Mark 7:32-35 and 8:24). Did they both decide to skip the same miracles independently or did Mark add them from another source?More details can be found here and here. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.whydidpetersink.com

Today, we share ideas for creating elegant yet understated looks for Winters using their neutral colours.  Duration total: 51.35 minutes   SHOW NOTES Jorunn's email: jorunn@fargeporten.no Christine's email: christine@12blueprints.com Your Best Blue Jeans on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLpw6BSi5oM Your Best Silver blog post showing the spider ring in the Silver: True Winter to Brights image: https://12blueprints.com/blogs/blog/your-best-silver Neutral eyeshadow palettes at 12 Blueprints: https://12blueprints.com/collections/eyes/eyeshadow-palette?sort_by=best-selling Terry Wildfong's website: https://yournaturaldesign.com Comments or Questions? Please visit Chrysalis Colour to find each episode in the Podcast directory and add your thoughts in the Comments box. We'd love to talk!    

– Veien fra kunnskap til kompetanse, er når man får sette læringen inn i en sammenheng og reflekterer over den. Det å jobbe med å forstå hva jeg har lært og hvordan bruke det i praksis og få muligheten til å bruke det i praksis og repetere. Det sier Pär Lager. Han er gjest sammen med kollega i selskapet Brights Learning, Johan Bäck Persson, i denne episoden av OBF-podden. Der er temaet livslang læring, det å lære å lære og de velkjente, men kanskje ikke alltid korrekt benyttede, begrepene «upskill» og «reskill». I en interessant episode med to svenske læringseksperter, kan du også få svar på spørsmål som: Hvordan har Brights jobbet med å reskille over 3000 personer? Hvordan måler man egentlig læring? Hvorfor legger så få bedrifter til rette for læring? Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Möt Fredrik Bardon, VD för Brights när han gästar mig och Proleadpodden. Fredrik är en av de främsta gällande moderna former av lärande och kompetensförsörjning. Du får mängder av tips på hur du kan se på vikten av ständigt lärande och hur kompetensutveckling behöver se ut för att passa dagens föränderliga utmaningar. Ett riktigt sympatiskt och nyttigt avsnitt! Välkommen! // Jan Blomström

En verksamhet är bara så innovativ som sina medarbetare. Vi har ett samtal med Claudia om hur vi tar tillvara på vår potential i en digital era.

The Atterbury group and Truworths have inked a deal for the creation of a new distribution centre in Cape Town. The clothing retailer's new facility will be built in King Air Industria, which is an Atterbury Property and Old Mutual Properties development. Truworths will lease the new building, which will consolidate all of its various Cape Town facilities under one roof. The development's 53 000 m2 initial phase consists of a 3 000 m2 office and 50 000 m2 warehouse, and includes the option to expand to 70 000 m2. Designed to target an internationally recognised EDGE sustainability certification, the development will break ground this month, with the building scheduled for completion in September, next year. “As a result of business growth we have spent some time looking to build a larger, state-of-the-art distribution centre to accommodate our future requirements,” says Truworths CFO Emanuel Cristaudo. “This positions us well for the future and we are looking forward to the completion of this project.” The value of the development is not disclosed. Atterbury's King Air Industria development manager Arno du Plessis adds that the development roll-out of King Air Industria is making “excellent progress and attracting a high calibre of businesses that want to be near the airport, but also seek quality, efficient premises that support both their business and sustainability goals”. King Air Industria is located between Airport Approach, Borcherds Quarry, Robert Sobukwe and Pallotti roads, and connected to the city and inland region with access to the N2 and R300 freeways. The 72 ha development is already home to The Courier Guy, operating in a 10 112 m2 facility, and Morgan Cargo, operating in a 7 500 m2 provincial head office building that includes a specialised cold storage facility. “We are enjoying great leasing momentum in the Western Cape, not only at King Air Industria, but also at other properties, including Richmond Park, where the demand-driven development roll-out is proceeding at an exciting pace,” says Atterbury leasing manager Mia Kitshoff. Atterbury has signed a deal with online retailer Takealot for a 20 400 m2 second phase of its Richmond Park distribution facility, which will take the total size to 44 000 m2 when it is completed in June next year. The property group has also signed hardware retailer Brights for a 6 000 m2 facility, which will be completed in November next year.

The Atterbury group and Truworths have inked a deal for the creation of a new distribution centre in Cape Town. The clothing retailer's new facility will be built in King Air Industria, which is an Atterbury Property and Old Mutual Properties development. Truworths will lease the new building, which will consolidate all of its various Cape Town facilities under one roof. The development's 53 000 m2 initial phase consists of a 3 000 m2 office and 50 000 m2 warehouse, and includes the option to expand to 70 000 m2. Designed to target an internationally recognised EDGE sustainability certification, the development will break ground this month, with the building scheduled for completion in September, next year. “As a result of business growth we have spent some time looking to build a larger, state-of-the-art distribution centre to accommodate our future requirements,” says Truworths CFO Emanuel Cristaudo. “This positions us well for the future and we are looking forward to the completion of this project.” The value of the development is not disclosed. Atterbury's King Air Industria development manager Arno du Plessis adds that the development roll-out of King Air Industria is making “excellent progress and attracting a high calibre of businesses that want to be near the airport, but also seek quality, efficient premises that support both their business and sustainability goals”. King Air Industria is located between Airport Approach, Borcherds Quarry, Robert Sobukwe and Pallotti roads, and connected to the city and inland region with access to the N2 and R300 freeways. The 72 ha development is already home to The Courier Guy, operating in a 10 112 m2 facility, and Morgan Cargo, operating in a 7 500 m2 provincial head office building that includes a specialised cold storage facility. “We are enjoying great leasing momentum in the Western Cape, not only at King Air Industria, but also at other properties, including Richmond Park, where the demand-driven development roll-out is proceeding at an exciting pace,” says Atterbury leasing manager Mia Kitshoff. Atterbury has signed a deal with online retailer Takealot for a 20 400 m2 second phase of its Richmond Park distribution facility, which will take the total size to 44 000 m2 when it is completed in June next year. The property group has also signed hardware retailer Brights for a 6 000 m2 facility, which will be completed in November next year.

Welcome back to the Future is Bright? So sorry you have to hear Brights voice twice in one week but here we are! This week Bridget tells Lindsay about the Hinterkaifeck murders. This is a German case that took place in the years following World War I. It was a brutal murder of a family on a farm. The killer was thought to have stayed in the house after the murders while the family was left in the barn outside the house. And the crazy part is...its unsolved! No one knows who killed this family on that day almost 100 years later. So buckle up because this one is brutal and doesn't have a solid ending Check out our Instagram @fibpodcast. Like and follow our Facebook page @futureisbrightpod. Follow us on Tik Tok @fibpodcast! Please download, like, follow, and leave us a review it really helps out the show! If you have any suggestions for stories or person stories email us at futureisbrightpod@gmail.com Links to Our Sources: https://www.investigationdiscovery.com/crimefeed/murder/the-gruber-family-murders-remains-one-of-the-strangest-unsolved-mysteries-ever https://filmdaily.co/obsessions/true-crime/hinterkaifeck-farm-murders/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hinterkaifeck_murders https://www.history.com/news/political-assassinations-germany-weimar-republic#:~:text=By%201922%2C%20at%20least%20354,defeat%20in%20World%20War%20I. https://www.ranker.com/list/hinterkaifeck-farm/cat-mcauliffe --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app

Apple onthulde woensdag een boel. Vier nieuwe iPhones, waaronder de iPhone 14 Pro's met het nieuwe Dynamic Island. Ook waren er nieuwe Apple Watches, zoals de Apple Watch Ultra voor sporters, en de nieuwe AirPods Pro, die er hetzelfde uitzien maar op elk vlak verbeterd zijn. Erwin kon de nieuwe Apple-gadgets alvast proberen, bekijken en beluisteren. Hij praat ons vanuit Californië bij over alle vernieuwingen.Tips uit deze aflevering:Erwins eerste indruk: iPhone 14 en Apple Watch UltraProgramma: Bright op Banden. Ons eigen programma over vernieuwend vervoer: de nieuwste stekkerauto's, e-bikes, stapjes en meer. Brights bandenbijters Bram van Dijk, David Lemereis en Rutger Middendorp gaan zes weken lang op pad met die voertuigen, en dat levert een even inhoudelijk als vermakelijk programma op. Bright op Banden is vanaf 10 september zes weken lang elke zaterdag te zien op RTL Z, elke zondag op RTL 7 en wanneer je wilt op Videoland.Artikel: iOS 16, de belangrijkste functies op een rij. Vanaf maandag 12 september is iOS 16 voor iedereen beschikbaar. Ook dit jaar weer veel nieuws, met grote nieuwe functies als het vernieuwde lock screen maar ook veel kleins verrast positief. We hebben alles voor je op een rijtje gezet, voor de voorpret.Zie het privacybeleid op https://art19.com/privacy en de privacyverklaring van Californië op https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: That Alien Message, published Eliezer Yudkowsky on LessWrong. Imagine a world much like this one, in which, thanks to gene-selection technologies, the average IQ is 140 (on our scale). Potential Einsteins are one-in-a-thousand, not one-in-a-million; and they grow up in a school system suited, if not to them personally, then at least to bright kids. Calculus is routinely taught in sixth grade. Albert Einstein, himself, still lived and still made approximately the same discoveries, but his work no longer seems exceptional. Several modern top-flight physicists have made equivalent breakthroughs, and are still around to talk. (No, this is not the world Brennan lives in.) One day, the stars in the night sky begin to change. Some grow brighter. Some grow dimmer. Most remain the same. Astronomical telescopes capture it all, moment by moment. The stars that change, change their luminosity one at a time, distinctly so; the luminosity change occurs over the course of a microsecond, but a whole second separates each change. It is clear, from the first instant anyone realizes that more than one star is changing, that the process seems to center around Earth particularly. The arrival of the light from the events, at many stars scattered around the galaxy, has been precisely timed to Earth in its orbit. Soon, confirmation comes in from high-orbiting telescopes (they have those) that the astronomical miracles do not seem as synchronized from outside Earth. Only Earth's telescopes see one star changing every second (1005 milliseconds, actually). Almost the entire combined brainpower of Earth turns to analysis. It quickly becomes clear that the stars that jump in luminosity, all jump by a factor of exactly 256; those that diminish in luminosity, diminish by a factor of exactly 256. There is no apparent pattern in the stellar coordinates. This leaves, simply, a pattern of BRIGHT-dim-BRIGHT-BRIGHT... "A binary message!" is everyone's first thought. But in this world there are careful thinkers, of great prestige as well, and they are not so sure. "There are easier ways to send a message," they post to their blogs, "if you can make stars flicker, and if you want to communicate. Something is happening. It appears, prima facie, to focus on Earth in particular. To call it a 'message' presumes a great deal more about the cause behind it. There might be some kind of evolutionary process among, um, things that can make stars flicker, that ends up sensitive to intelligence somehow... Yeah, there's probably something like 'intelligence' behind it, but try to appreciate how wide a range of possibilities that really implies. We don't know this is a message, or that it was sent from the same kind of motivations that might move us. I mean, we would just signal using a big flashlight, we wouldn't mess up a whole galaxy." By this time, someone has started to collate the astronomical data and post it to the Internet. Early suggestions that the data might be harmful, have been... not ignored, but not obeyed, either. If anything this powerful wants to hurt you, you're pretty much dead (people reason). Multiple research groups are looking for patterns in the stellar coordinates—or fractional arrival times of the changes, relative to the center of the Earth—or exact durations of the luminosity shift—or any tiny variance in the magnitude shift—or any other fact that might be known about the stars before they changed. But most people are turning their attention to the pattern of BRIGHTS and dims. It becomes clear almost instantly that the pattern sent is highly redundant. Of the first 16 bits, 12 are BRIGHTS and 4 are dims. The first 32 bits received align with the second 32 bits received, with only 7 out of 32 bits different, and then the next 32 bits received have only 9 out of 32 bits different from the s...

Buckle up! Mechinations is back to discuss the conclusion of the Kai and a Spy arc in Ep. 27 A Spy on Board and Ep. 28 Across the Atlantic Ocean. With a range of takes on how well the Kai/Miharu saga works for us, there is one thing we can agree on: the Z'Gok is very good and the Grabro is not. Sorry, Grabro fans. Ep. 27 discussion: 32:14 Ep. 28 discussion: 1:34:19 Intro Disc: Stephen Hero (Metroid II) Ignis Madax (Melty Blood: Type Lumina) Thanks to @fretzl for the intro/outro music Thanks to @JJostar23 for the art Write to us MechinationsPod@gmail.com or tweet us @MechinationsPod Mechinations is co-hosted by Ignis Madax (@IgnisMadax), Stephen Hero (@_stephen_hero), and pmcTRILOGY (@pmcTRILOGY) --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/mechinations/support

9 - 8-21 PT2 DOES FLASHING BRIGHTS LEAD TO GANG VIOLENCE by Maine's Coast 93.1

In this episode, Todd and Nathan talk about the different labels we use to describe ourselves as nonreligious people. Terms like atheist, agnostic, secularist, freethinker, and bright all have specific definitions – but they are also loaded with connotations and carry different social stigmas. What do these terms mean and how should they be understood? We assign a highly scientific, highly objective score out of 10 to each label! We also discuss whether a “true atheist” can lie about their beliefs or use money with a monarch on it.In the bonus content, available exclusively for Patrons on our Patreon page, Todd describes a recent run-in with the mayor of his town in New Jersey and describes how he used what he learned from previous guests to get his point across to a political leader.Nathan's article, “An Atheist with a Tall Hat On: The Forgotten History of Agnosticism”: https://thehumanist.com/magazine/march-april-2019/philosophically-speaking/philosophically-speaking-an-atheist-with-a-tall-hat-on-the-forgotten-history-of-agnosticism/How Humanist Are You? (Quiz from Humanists UK): https://humanists.uk/humanism/how-humanist-are-you/On the “Brights”: https://ahsplus.blog/2021/08/23/were-the-brights-really-such-a-bad-idea/Upcoming virtual book launch (September 15th) for the two-volume Cambridge History of Atheism: https://atheismsecularismhumanism.wordpress.com/seminars/Follow Nathan on Twitter: https://twitter.com/NathGAlexanderNathan's website: https://www.nathangalexander.com/If you find the podcast valuable and want to support it, check out our Patreon page, where you will also find bonus content: https://www.patreon.com/beyond_atheism You can also contribute by going to https://anchor.fm/beyond-atheism and clicking the “Support” button. We are grateful for every contribution.

Liv sits down with singer-songwriter, producer, editor and multi-instrumentalist, Bernadette Malavarca (Bern & The Brights) to chat about authenticity, coming out and the music that speaks to all these moments. Topics discussed on this week's episode include Bern and Liv's undying love for Jeff Buckley, the challenges of coming out to an Italian-American, Catholic family and how love always leads the way. Music featured on this week's playlist includes songs by Bern and the Brights, Joni Mitchell, Sarah Jaffe, Jeff Buckley and more. 

The Brights say a tearful goodbye to one of their foster babies, as she gets adopted by her forever-family. Later on, Freddie cheers everyone up with his tales from his adventures in Thailand... does it sound like a holiday romance is on the cards?!This is a Somethin' Else & Insanity Group production. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

It's Christmas, so it's all about hanging out with friends and family. The Brights siblings take a trip together, Lydia catches up with fellow ex-TOWIE castmate Georgia Kousoulou, and Lydia catches up with little sister Roma.This is a Somethin' Else & Insanity Group production. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

It's party time for the Brights, as big sister Georgia hits the big 3-0! Sixteen girls (plus Dinky) head out for a rural retreat to celebrate... but are these Essex girls made for the countryside?! Plus, Lydia gets her first proper look at Dinky, at her 4D scan.This is a Somethin' Else & Insanity Group production. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

After dropping the bombshell that Lydia's expecting, the Brights are hosting a gender reveal party... and you're invited! Lydia's reveal-planinvolves balloons, flower walls and her family having to know lots about her... but do they know her at all?! This is a Somethin' Else & Insanity Group production. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

WE'RE BACK! Season 3 of The Brights is coming, and it's going to be bigger and better than ever, because Baby Bright is on the way! Join Lydia for all the highs and lows on her journey to becoming a Mummy. This is a Somethin' Else & Insanity Group production. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Season one finished with love in the air, but a lot can change in a few short months, here's a taster ahead of a big new series!Now is the perfect time to dip into season one and meet The Brights - real life turned up to 11! Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

What we do on Christmas Day in The Brights (and a song, we're so sorry)! Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Seahawks head coach Pete Carroll joined Brock Huard and Mike Salk on 710 ESPN Seattle to recap both the mistakes and highlights from Seattle's loss to the Los Angeles Rams.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In the Brights household this week, Lydia walks out on her boyfriend Lee after a fiery row but decides to confront their issues head on. Meanwhile mum Debbie tries to not to criticise her son Freddie but finds it impossible not to! Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

The show will cover Lydia Bright and her family, from UK television's The Only Way Is Essex.. Visit https://podnews.net/update/the-brights-reality-podcast for the story links in full, and to get our daily newsletter.

Launching October 2018 - The Bright family let you into their home. Expect laughs, tears and a lot of love. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Driving with brights aka high beams for nine years -- all about it, actually. Includes a special musical number. This is a pretty bad reading of a wonderfully written post that can be found here: http://rol.ph/1m