Podcasts about Gottlob Frege

Nicla Vassallo"Metafore dell'animo"Mimesis Edizioniwww.mimesisedizioni.it“Poetry, I feel, is a tyrannical discipline. You've got to go so far so fast in such a small space; you've got to burn away all the peripherals.”Sylvia Plath“Nicla Vassallo scrive poesie con un cervello così acuminato da perforare il cuore”.Le parole di Vittorio Lingiardi risultano ancora più vive a proposito di questa nuova raccolta di poesie della grande filosofa, che torna a indagare i misteri dell'anima con la consueta profondità in grado diestrarre l'essenza della realtà.Nicla Vassallo  è professoressa di Filosofia teoretica presso l'Università di Genova, dove ha insegnato anche Filosofia della conoscenza ed Epistemologia, e ricercatrice associata presso l'Istituto di Storia dell'Europa Mediterranea (ISEM) del Centro Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), specializzatasi al King's College London. È stata visiting professor presso l'Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele di Milano. Membro di consigli direttivi e comitati scientifici di numerose riviste specialistiche, oltre che di associazioni e fondazioni, è presente nel dibattito pubblico, ha scritto su riviste internazionali e ha collaborato con diverse testate giornalistiche, tra cui “La Repubblica”, “Corriere della sera” e il supplemento domenicale de “Il Sole 24 ore”. Ha dedicato diversi volumi e articoli in italiano e in inglese all'opera di Gottlob Frege, le sue ricerche riguardano la natura della conoscenza, le relazioni tra filosofia e scienza, e hanno coinvolto ampi settori dell'epistemologia, della filosofia della conoscenza, della metafisica, dei gender studies; negli ultimi anni ha indagato differenti aspetti dei rapporti affettivi e amorosi e gli stereotipi del sex&gender. Tra i suoi libri: Per sentito dire. Conoscenza e testimonianza (Milano 2011); Breve viaggio tra scienza e tecnologia, con etica e donne (Napoli-Salerno 2015); La Donna non esiste. E l'Uomo? Sesso, genere e identità (Torino 2018); Non annegare. Meditazioni sulla conoscenza e sull'ignoranza (Milano 2019); Fatti non foste a viver come bruti. Brevi e imprecisi itinerari per la filosofia della conoscenza (con Stefano Leardi, Milano 2021); Parla come mangi. Massa e potere (a cura di, Milano 2022); Donne, donne, donne (Milano 2023). Ha pubblicato la raccolta di poesie Orlando in ordine sparso. Poesie 1983-2013 (Milano 2013), centrata sulle tematiche dell'amore, dell'identità personale, del dolore e della bellezza, cui hanno fatto seguito Metafisiche insofferenti per donzelle insolenti (Milano 2017) e Pandemia amorosa dolorosa (Milano 2021).IL POSTO DELLE PAROLEascoltare fa pensarewww.ilpostodelleparole.itDiventa un supporter di questo podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/il-posto-delle-parole--1487855/support.

Nicla Vassallo"Mente e Logica"Festival Filosofiawww.festivalfilosofia.itFestival Filosofia, SassuoloSabato 14 settembre 2024, ore 18:00Nicla VassalloMente e logicaUna relazione complessa e intriganteCome si sono delineati i rapporti tra epistemologia e psicologia nella scienza del pensiero? Da Aristotele a Reichenbach, qual è lo stato attuale del dibattito, tra intersoggettività e ragionamento umano, e oltre le divisioni?Nicla Vassallo  è professoressa di Filosofia teoretica presso l'Università di Genova, dove ha insegnato anche Filosofia della conoscenza ed Epistemologia, e ricercatrice associata presso l'Istituto di Storia dell'Europa Mediterranea (ISEM) del Centro Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), specializzatasi al King's College London. È stata visiting professor presso l'Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele di Milano. Membro di consigli direttivi e comitati scientifici di numerose riviste specialistiche, oltre che di associazioni e fondazioni, è presente nel dibattito pubblico, ha scritto su riviste internazionali e ha collaborato con diverse testate giornalistiche, tra cui “La Repubblica”, “Corriere della sera” e il supplemento domenicale de “Il Sole 24 ore”. Ha dedicato diversi volumi e articoli in italiano e in inglese all'opera di Gottlob Frege, le sue ricerche riguardano la natura della conoscenza, le relazioni tra filosofia e scienza, e hanno coinvolto ampi settori dell'epistemologia, della filosofia della conoscenza, della metafisica, dei gender studies; negli ultimi anni ha indagato differenti aspetti dei rapporti affettivi e amorosi e gli stereotipi del sex&gender. Tra i suoi libri: Per sentito dire. Conoscenza e testimonianza (Milano 2011); Breve viaggio tra scienza e tecnologia, con etica e donne (Napoli-Salerno 2015); La Donna non esiste. E l'Uomo? Sesso, genere e identità (Torino 2018); Non annegare. Meditazioni sulla conoscenza e sull'ignoranza (Milano 2019); Fatti non foste a viver come bruti. Brevi e imprecisi itinerari per la filosofia della conoscenza (con Stefano Leardi, Milano 2021); Parla come mangi. Massa e potere (a cura di, Milano 2022); Donne, donne, donne (Milano 2023). Ha pubblicato la raccolta di poesie Orlando in ordine sparso. Poesie 1983-2013 (Milano 2013), centrata sulle tematiche dell'amore, dell'identità personale, del dolore e della bellezza, cui hanno fatto seguito Metafisiche insofferenti per donzelle insolenti (Milano 2017) e Pandemia amorosa dolorosa (Milano 2021).IL POSTO DELLE PAROLEascoltare fa pensarewww.ilpostodelleparole.itDiventa un supporter di questo podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/il-posto-delle-parole--1487855/support.

Analytic Philosophy is a branch of philosophy that emphasizes clarity and logical analysis. Key figures include Gottlob Frege, Bertrand Russell, and Ludwig Wittgenstein, who contributed to the development of symbolic logic and the philosophy of language. Logical Positivism, emerging from the Vienna Circle, focused on empirical verification and logical necessity. The philosophy of language explores theories of meaning, such as the referential theory, use theory, and speech act theory. Semantic externalism, proposed by Hilary Putnam and Saul Kripke, argues that meaning is influenced by external factors. Ordinary language philosophy, associated with J.L. Austin and later Wittgenstein, analyzes everyday language to resolve philosophical problems. The philosophy of science, with contributions from Karl Popper and Thomas Kuhn, examines the nature of scientific knowledge and methods. W.V.O. Quine's critique of the analytic-synthetic distinction emphasizes the holistic nature of knowledge. Metaphysics in analytic philosophy addresses questions about reality, including the realism vs. anti-realism debate and the nature of properties and universals. Key concepts include propositional logic, predicate logic, and the theory of descriptions.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/library-of-philosophy--5939304/support.

“Als het één van de taken van de filosofie is om de heerschappij van het woord over de menselijke geest te verbreken - ten eerste door misverstanden over de relaties tussen concepten te verhelpen die bijna onvermijdelijk ontstaan door ons taalgebruik, en, ten tweede, door onze gedachten te bevrijden van datgene waarmee zij door de uitdrukkingsmiddelen van de alledaagse taal worden opgezadeld - dan kan mijn Begriffsschrift een nuttig werktuig zijn voor de filosoof” Zo beschrijft Gottlob Frege het belang van zijn filosofische project: het opschonen van de wiskundige en filosofische taal.  Waarom was de introductie van onder meer de kwantor zo'n revolutie in wiskunde en filosofie?Op welke manier kwam hij met een antwoord op de oude filosofische droom van onder andere Leibniz?En hoe bracht hij de linguistic turn in gang? Te gast: Wim VanrieDe denker die centraal staat: Frege

Support me by becoming wiser and more knowledgeable – check out books by Bertrand Russel and Frederick Copleston for sale on Amazon here-https://amzn.to/3TAuyt1, and here-https://amzn.to/4cE0HZx respectively. If you purchase a book through either of these links, I will earn a 4.5% commission and be extremely delighted. But if you just want to read and aren't ready to add a new book to your collection yet, I'd recommend checking out the ⁠⁠⁠Internet Archive⁠⁠⁠, the largest free digital library in the world. If you're really feeling benevolent you can buy me a coffee or donate over at ⁠https://ko-fi.com/theunadulteratedintellect⁠⁠. I would seriously appreciate it! __________________________________________________ Bertrand Arthur William Russell, 3rd Earl Russell (18 May 1872 – 2 February 1970) was a British mathematician, philosopher, logician, and public intellectual. He had a considerable influence on mathematics, logic, set theory, linguistics, artificial intelligence, cognitive science, computer science, and various areas of analytic philosophy, especially philosophy of mathematics, philosophy of language, epistemology, and metaphysics. He was one of the early 20th century's most prominent logicians and a founder of analytic philosophy, along with his predecessor Gottlob Frege, his friend and colleague G. E. Moore, and his student and protégé Ludwig Wittgenstein. Russell with Moore led the British "revolt against idealism". Together with his former teacher A. N. Whitehead, Russell wrote Principia Mathematica, a milestone in the development of classical logic and a major attempt to reduce the whole of mathematics to logic. Russell's article "On Denoting" has been considered a "paradigm of philosophy". Russell was a pacifist who championed anti-imperialism and chaired the India League. He went to prison for his pacifism during World War I, but also saw the war against Adolf Hitler's Nazi Germany as a necessary "lesser of two evils". In the wake of World War II, he welcomed American global hegemony in favor of either Soviet hegemony or no (or ineffective) world leadership, even if it were to come at the cost of using their nuclear weapons. He would later criticize Stalinist totalitarianism, condemn the United States' involvement in the Vietnam War, and become an outspoken proponent of nuclear disarmament. In 1950, Russell was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature "in recognition of his varied and significant writings in which he champions humanitarian ideals and freedom of thought". He was also the recipient of the De Morgan Medal (1932), Sylvester Medal (1934), Kalinga Prize (1957), and Jerusalem Prize (1963). __________________________________________________ Frederick Charles Copleston (10 April 1907 – 3 February 1994) was an English Roman Catholic Jesuit priest, philosopher, and historian of philosophy, best known for his influential multi-volume A History of Philosophy (1946–75). Copleston achieved a degree of popularity in the media for debating the existence of God with Bertrand Russell in a celebrated 1948 BBC broadcast; the following year he debated logical positivism and the meaningfulness of religious language with his friend the analytic philosopher A. J. Ayer. Audio Source: ⁠⁠here⁠⁠ --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/theunadulteratedintellect/support

fWotD Episode 2390: Quine–Putnam indispensability argument.Welcome to featured Wiki of the Day where we read the summary of the featured Wikipedia article every day.The featured article for Monday, 20 November 2023 is Quine–Putnam indispensability argument.The Quine–Putnam indispensability argument is an argument in the philosophy of mathematics for the existence of abstract mathematical objects such as numbers and sets, a position known as mathematical platonism. It was named after the philosophers Willard Quine and Hilary Putnam, and is one of the most important arguments in the philosophy of mathematics.Although elements of the indispensability argument may have originated with thinkers such as Gottlob Frege and Kurt Gödel, Quine's development of the argument was unique for introducing to it a number of his philosophical positions such as naturalism, confirmational holism, and the criterion of ontological commitment. Putnam gave Quine's argument its first detailed formulation in his 1971 book Philosophy of Logic. He later came to disagree with various aspects of Quine's thinking, however, and formulated his own indispensability argument based on the no miracles argument in the philosophy of science. A standard form of the argument in contemporary philosophy is credited to Mark Colyvan; whilst being influenced by both Quine and Putnam, it differs in important ways from their formulations. It is presented in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy:We ought to have ontological commitment to all and only the entities that are indispensable to our best scientific theories.Mathematical entities are indispensable to our best scientific theories.Therefore, we ought to have ontological commitment to mathematical entities. Nominalists, philosophers who reject the existence of abstract objects, have argued against both premises of this argument. An influential argument by Hartry Field claims that mathematical entities are dispensable to science. This argument has been supported by attempts to demonstrate that scientific and mathematical theories can be reformulated to remove all references to mathematical entities. Other philosophers, including Penelope Maddy, Elliott Sober, and Joseph Melia, have argued that we do not need to believe in all of the entities that are indispensable to science. The arguments of these writers inspired a new explanatory version of the argument, which Alan Baker and Mark Colyvan support, that argues mathematics is indispensable to specific scientific explanations as well as whole theories.This recording reflects the Wikipedia text as of 00:43 UTC on Monday, 20 November 2023.For the full current version of the article, see Quine–Putnam indispensability argument on Wikipedia.This podcast uses content from Wikipedia under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License.Visit our archives at wikioftheday.com and subscribe to stay updated on new episodes.Follow us on Mastodon at @wikioftheday@masto.ai.Also check out Curmudgeon's Corner, a current events podcast.Until next time, I'm Kendra Neural.

Episode 2375: Our featured article of the day is Logic.Welcome to featured Wiki of the Day where we read the summary of the featured Wikipedia article every day.The featured article for Sunday, 5 November 2023 is Logic.Logic is the study of correct reasoning. It includes both formal and informal logic. Formal logic is the science of deductively valid inferences or logical truths. It studies how conclusions follow from premises due to the structure of arguments alone, independent of their topic and content. Informal logic is associated with informal fallacies, critical thinking, and argumentation theory. It examines arguments expressed in natural language while formal logic uses formal language. When used as a countable noun, the term "a logic" refers to a logical formal system that articulates a proof system. Logic plays a central role in many fields, such as philosophy, mathematics, computer science, and linguistics.Logic studies arguments, which consist of a set of premises together with a conclusion. An example is the argument from the premises "it's Sunday" and "if it's Sunday then I don't have to work" to the conclusion "I don't have to work". Premises and conclusions express propositions or claims that can be true or false. An important feature of propositions is their internal structure. For example, complex propositions are made up of simpler propositions linked by logical vocabulary like ∧ {displaystyle land } (and) or → {displaystyle to } (if...then). Simple propositions also have parts, like "Sunday" or "work" in the example. The truth of a proposition usually depends on the meanings of all of its parts. However, this is not the case for logically true propositions. They are true only because of their logical structure independent of the specific meanings of the individual parts.Arguments can be either correct or incorrect. An argument is correct if its premises support its conclusion. Deductive arguments have the strongest form of support: if their premises are true then their conclusion must also be true. This is not the case for ampliative arguments, which arrive at genuinely new information not found in the premises. Many arguments in everyday discourse and the sciences are ampliative arguments. They are divided into inductive and abductive arguments. Inductive arguments are statistical generalizations, like inferring that all ravens are black based on many individual observations of black ravens. Abductive arguments are inferences to the best explanation, for example, when a doctor concludes that a patient has a certain disease which explains the symptoms they suffer. Arguments that fall short of the standards of correct reasoning often embody fallacies. Systems of logic are theoretical frameworks for assessing the correctness of arguments.Logic has been studied since antiquity. Early approaches include Aristotelian logic, Stoic logic, Nyaya, and Mohism. Aristotelian logic focuses on reasoning in the form of syllogisms. It was considered the main system of logic in the Western world until it was replaced by modern formal logic, which has its roots in the work of late 19th-century mathematicians such as Gottlob Frege. Today, the most used system is classical logic. It consists of propositional logic and first-order logic. Propositional logic only considers logical relations between full propositions. First-order logic also takes the internal parts of propositions into account, like predicates and quantifiers. Extended logics accept the basic intuitions behind classical logic and extend it to other fields, such as metaphysics, ethics, and epistemology. Deviant logics, on the other hand, reject certain classical intuitions and provide alternative explanations of the basic laws of logic.This recording reflects the Wikipedia text as of 05:13 UTC on Sunday, 5 November 2023.For the full current version of the article, see Logic on Wikipedia.This podcast uses content from Wikipedia under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License.Visit our archives at wikioftheday.com and subscribe to stay updated on new episodes.Follow us on Mastodon at @wikioftheday@masto.ai.Also check out Curmudgeon's Corner, a current events podcast.Until next time, I'm Joanna Neural.

Un saludo queridos oyentes y mecenas. Continuamos con el bloque del desarrollo científico en el XIX y hoy lo hacemos tratando el espectacular avance que tuvieron las matemáticas durante dicho siglo. Nombres como los de Cantor y Frege están ya consagrados al adelanto universal de las teorías matemáticas. 📗ÍNDICE COMPLETO 1. INTRODUCCIÓN. >>> https://go.ivoox.com/rf/116935067 2. LAS MATEMÁTICAS. (Tratado en el audio de hoy). 3. GEOMETRÍAS NO EUCLIDIANAS. 4. LA TEORÍA DE LA EVOLUCIÓN BIOLÓGICA. 5. LA FÍSICA DEL XIX. 6. LA LINGÜÍSTICA. 7. EL NACIMIENTO DE LA PSICOLOGÍA EXPERIMENTAL. 8. EL ORIGEN DE LA SOCIOLOGÍA CIENTÍFICA. ***** 🎼Música de la época: Sinfonía nº4 de Mahler compuesta en 1900 y estrenada en Munich en 1901. **** 🎨Imagen: El alemán Gottlob Frege, considerado el padre de la lógica matemática y de la filosofía analítica, **** 👍Pulsen un Me Gusta y colaboren a partir de 2,99 €/mes si se lo pueden permitir para asegurar la permanencia del programa ¡Muchas gracias a todos!

Welcome to our podcast, where we explore the fascinating world of formal languages. In this article, we delve into the use and significance of formal languages in various fields, including computer science, mathematics, and logic. We also explore the work of Gottlob Frege, the components of formal languages, the Kleene star, reversal, string homomorphisms, and the importance of the programming language grammar. Finally, we discuss how semantics can be added to formal languages to assign meaning to the elements. source:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formal_language

Welcome to our podcast episode, where we'll be exploring the intriguing world of the Philosophy of Language. Join us as we journey through its rich history, influential figures, and ongoing debates that continue to shape this field. We'll be discussing topics such as Gottlob Frege's mediated reference theory, Kripke's modal argument, Noam Chomsky's critique of the philosophical study of reference, the debate between realists and nominalists, and more. source:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy_of_language

Nicla Vassallo"Testimonianza"Festival Filosofiawww.festivalfilosofia.itFestival Filosofia, SassuoloLezione Magistrale di Nicla Vassallo"Testimonianza"Parola parlata e deposito di scritturaDomenica 17 settembre 2023, ore 15:00In quale modo può esser ricostruita la genesi della testimonianza, tenendo presente l'imprescindibile dimensione proposizionale e contestuale nella quale si formano i significati?Nicla Vassallo è professoressa di Filosofia teoretica presso l'Università degli Studi di Genova. Qui ha insegnato anche Filosofia della conoscenza ed Epistemologia. E' ricercatrice associata presso l'Istituto di Storia dell'Europa Mediterranea (ISEM) del Centro Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), specializzatasi al King's College London. È stata visiting professor presso l'Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele di Milano. Membro di consigli direttivi e comitati scientifici di numerose riviste specialistiche, oltre che di associazioni e fondazioni. E' presente nel dibattito pubblico, ha scritto su riviste internazionali e ha collaborato con diverse testate giornalistiche, tra cui “La Repubblica”, “Corriere della sera” e il supplemento domenicale de “Il Sole 24 ore”. Ha dedicato diversi volumi e articoli in italiano e in inglese all'opera di Gottlob Frege. Le sue ricerche riguardano la natura della conoscenza, le relazioni tra filosofia e scienza, e hanno coinvolto ampi settori dell'epistemologia, della filosofia della conoscenza, della metafisica, dei gender studies. Negli ultimi anni ha indagato differenti aspetti dei rapporti affettivi e amorosi e gli stereotipi del sex&gender. Tra le sue opere recenti: Per sentito dire. Conoscenza e testimonianza (Milano 2011); Breve viaggio tra scienza e tecnologia, con etica e donne (Napoli-Salerno 2015); La Donna non esiste. E l'Uomo? Sesso, genere e identità (Torino 2018); Non annegare. Meditazioni sulla conoscenza e sull'ignoranza (Milano 2019); Fatti non foste a viver come bruti. Brevi e imprecisi itinerari per la filosofia della conoscenza (con Stefano Leardi, Milano 2021); Parla come mangi. Massa e potere (a cura di, Milano 2022); Donne, donne, donne (Milano 2023). Ha pubblicato la raccolta di poesie Orlando in ordine sparso. Poesie 1983-2013 (Milano 2013), centrata sulle tematiche dell'amore, dell'identità personale, del dolore e della bellezza, cui hanno fatto seguito Metafisiche insofferenti per donzelle insolenti (Milano 2017) e Pandemia amorosa dolorosa (Milano 2021).IL POSTO DELLE PAROLEascolare fa pensarewww.ilpostodelleparole.itQuesto show fa parte del network Spreaker Prime. Se sei interessato a fare pubblicità in questo podcast, contattaci su https://www.spreaker.com/show/1487855/advertisement

Carlo Penco"Artificiale e naturale"Festival Filosofiahttps://festivalfilosofia.itFestival Filosofialezioni magistraliCarlo PencoArtificiale e naturaleCodifiche logiche e tecnologiche del linguaggioVenerdì 15 settembre 2023, ore 15:00, SassuoloIn che modo la formalizzazione del linguaggio diviene strumento fondamentale della ricerca, capace di compensare i limiti del linguaggio naturale? Cosa dimostra il linguaggio degli algoritmi, con i vari bot intelligenti da Eliza a ChatGPT4? Carlo Penco è stato a lungo professore di Filosofia del linguaggio presso l'Università degli Studi di Genova, dove continua ad insegnare Teorie della comunicazione. Ha insegnato anche Filosofia della scienza presso l'Università di Lecce ed è stato visiting presso l'Università d'Islanda a Reykjavik, l'Università di Barcellona, il King's College e l'Institute of Philosophy (Londra), l'Università di Pittsburgh. È stato presidente della Società Italiana di Filosofia Analitica e ha lavorato nei comitati editoriali e scientifici di diverse riviste. Ha dedicato numerosi studi alle filosofie di Ludwig Wittgenstein e Gottlob Frege, curando anche edizioni di autori quali Michael Dummett e John L. Austin. Ha indagato temi di filosofia del linguaggio, di filosofia analitica e di filosofia della mente, esplorando i rapporti tra pragmatica e semantica, i fondamenti della scienza cognitiva, le forme di Intelligenza Artificiale e le modalità di ragionamento di senso comune, insieme all'ontologia e alle teorie della comunicazione. Ha scritto articoli su riviste scientifiche internazionali e tra le sue ultime pubblicazioni in italiano ricordiamo: Frege (Roma 2010); Significato e teorie del linguaggio (a cura di, con Andrea Bottani, Milano 2013 2a ed.); Introduzione alla filosofia del linguaggio (Roma-Bari 2004, 20167); Come non detto. Usi e abusi dei sottintesi (con Filippo Domaneschi, Roma-Bari 2016); Frege. Logica, Pensiero e linguaggio. I fondamenti dell'aritmetica e altri scritti (a cura di, con Eva Picardi, Roma-Bari 2021).Carlo Penco"Come non detto"Laterza Editorihttps://ilpostodelleparole.it/carlo-penco/carlo-penco-non-detto/IL POSTO DELLE PAROLEascoltare fa pensarehttps://ilpostodelleparole.itQuesto show fa parte del network Spreaker Prime. Se sei interessato a fare pubblicità in questo podcast, contattaci su https://www.spreaker.com/show/1487855/advertisement

Support me by becoming wiser and more knowledgeable – check out Bertrand Russell's collection of books for sale on Amazon here: https://amzn.to/3xm8NFI If you purchase a book through this link, I will earn a 4.5% commission and be extremely delighted. But if you just want to read and aren't ready to add a new book to your collection yet, I'd recommend checking out the ⁠⁠⁠Internet Archive⁠⁠⁠, the largest free digital library in the world. If you're really feeling benevolent you can buy me a coffee or donate over at ⁠https://ko-fi.com/theunadulteratedintellect⁠⁠. I would seriously appreciate it! __________________________________________________ Bertrand Arthur William Russell, 3rd Earl Russell, (18 May 1872 – 2 February 1970) was a British mathematician, philosopher, logician, and public intellectual. He had a considerable influence on mathematics, logic, set theory, linguistics, artificial intelligence, cognitive science, computer science and various areas of analytic philosophy, especially philosophy of mathematics, philosophy of language, epistemology, and metaphysics. He was one of the early 20th century's most prominent logicians, and a founder of analytic philosophy, along with his predecessor Gottlob Frege, his friend and colleague G. E. Moore and his student and protégé Ludwig Wittgenstein. Russell with Moore led the British "revolt against idealism". Together with his former teacher A. N. Whitehead, Russell wrote Principia Mathematica, a milestone in the development of classical logic, and a major attempt to reduce the whole of mathematics to logic. Russell's article "On Denoting" has been considered a "paradigm of philosophy". Russell was a pacifist who championed anti-imperialism and chaired the India League. He went to prison for his pacifism during World War I, but also saw the war against Adolf Hitler's Nazi Germany as a necessary "lesser of two evils". In the wake of World War II, he welcomed American global hegemony in favour of either Soviet hegemony or no (or ineffective) world leadership, even if it were to come at the cost of using their nuclear weapons. He would later criticise Stalinist totalitarianism, condemn the United States' involvement in the Vietnam War and become an outspoken proponent of nuclear disarmament. In 1950, Russell was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature "in recognition of his varied and significant writings in which he champions humanitarian ideals and freedom of thought". He was also the recipient of the De Morgan Medal (1932), Sylvester Medal (1934), Kalinga Prize (1957), and Jerusalem Prize (1963). Audio source ⁠here⁠⁠ Full Wikipedia entry ⁠here⁠ Bertrand Russell's books ⁠here --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/theunadulteratedintellect/support

Is it time for the English-speaking world to move on from analytic philosophy?Looking for a link we mentioned? It's here: https://linktr.ee/philosophyforourtimesFocusing on logic and the meaning of words, analytic philosophy sought to put philosophy on a scientific footing. Yet a century on and critics argue the core questions about the relationship between language and the world have been largely abandoned as insoluble, while the focus on logic and the aping of science is out of sync with the contemporary environment.Should we see analytic philosophy as the high point of an enlightenment scientism that has been in retreat almost since its inception and which is no longer relevant? Or can it be revived by applying its focus on rationality and the logic of words to the divisive and emotional disputes that beset current culture?Distinguished philosopher of language and the senses Barry Smith, Wittgensteinian expert Maria Balaska and maverick post-post modern philosopher Hilary Lawson lock horns over whether philosophy's fixation on language has held us back. Rufus Duits hosts. There are thousands of big ideas to discover at IAI.tv – videos, articles, and courses waiting for you to explore. Find out more: https://iai.tv/podcast-offers?utm_source=podcast&utm_medium=shownotes&utm_campaign=[iai-tv-episode-title] See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

The most significant figure in the history of logic after Aristotle is 19th-century German philosopher Gottlob Frege. Frege's work in logic and philosophy is foundational to the “analytic” tradition in philosophy and has had a strong influence on mathematics and computer science. This lecture discusses his revolution in logic and critiques its philosophical foundations. Recorded live on July 6, 2022 as part of the Objectivist Summer Conference.

In this episode I talk with Kal Rivet, the host of the "Universalism Against the World" podcast. We mention Jacob Faturechi, John Hick, Chris Langan, Bertrand Russel, Kurt Godel, Gottlob Frege, Keith Ward, Chris Date, Jon VanZeen, Preston Sprinkle, James White, John Vervaeke, Paul Vanderklay, and more. Universalism Against the World: https://open.spotify.com/show/3d4QlAnRwp51f9psDU04xh

Episode: 2805 Gottlob Frege and Formal Logic.  Today, a man of logic.

Bereits 1918 wurde die Drei-Welten-Lehre oder die Drei Welten Theorie von Gottlob Frege in seiner Arbeit „Der Gedanke“ formuliert. Später nahm Karl Raimund Popper diese Lehre auf. Diese Drei-Welten-Lehre möchte ich gerne neu definieren. Auch bei mir gibt es drei Welten, die einen großen Bezug zur Energie und Schwingung haben.

Falls euch cogitamus gefällt, lasst bitte ein Abo da und/oder empfehlt uns weiter. Ihr könnt gerne bei YouTube in den Kommentaren oder über cogitamus@posteo.de mit uns diskutieren. Für neue Gedanken sind wir immer offen. Ihr dürft uns gerne bei YouTube abonnieren: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC2YdZ5ryFQ32Zd75m2AW5cw Unterstützen könnt ihr uns ebenfalls: paypal.me/cogitamus oder cogitamus@posteo.de. Bevor ihr euch in die Theorie stürzt, empfehlen wir unsere Einführung zur neuen Reihe Existenz & Sprache: #13.1 Bin ich (d)ein Mensch? Diese Folge wird klassisch philosophisch. Wir stellen euch Gottlob Frege (1848-1925) und seine Theorie zum Sinn und zur Bedeutung von Eigennamen sowie Sätzen vor. Sprache ist ein entscheidendes Merkmal aller Menschen, weshalb die Sprachphilosophie einen Teil der Reihe ausmacht. Was unterscheidet den „Morgenstern“ vom „Abendstern“, obwohl beide Begriffe die Venus bezeichnen? Was ist Sinn und was Bedeutung? Zum Ende darf eine kurze Diskussion nicht fehlen. Timemarker 00:00 Intro, Sprachphilosophischer Kontext 05:50 Sinn und Bedeutung bei Frege 12:33 Beispiele 28:40 Dritte Kategorie: Vorstellung Literatur/Links/Quellen Gottlob Frege – Über Sinn und Bedeutung (1892) Zu Frege und generell zur Sprachphilosophie: Gerald Posselt & Matthias Flatscher – Sprachphilosophie. Eine Einführung Bild: https://www.britannica.com/biography/Gottlob-Frege

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: The Best Textbooks on Every Subject, published by lukeprog on LessWrong. For years, my self-education was stupid and wasteful. I learned by consuming blog posts, Wikipedia articles, classic texts, podcast episodes, popular books, video lectures, peer-reviewed papers, Teaching Company courses, and Cliff's Notes. How inefficient! I've since discovered that textbooks are usually the quickest and best way to learn new material. That's what they are designed to be, after all. Less Wrong has often recommended the "read textbooks!" method. Make progress by accumulation, not random walks. But textbooks vary widely in quality. I was forced to read some awful textbooks in college. The ones on American history and sociology were memorably bad, in my case. Other textbooks are exciting, accurate, fair, well-paced, and immediately useful. What if we could compile a list of the best textbooks on every subject? That would be extremely useful. Let's do it. There have been other pages of recommended reading on Less Wrong before (and elsewhere), but this post is unique. Here are the rules: Post the title of your favorite textbook on a given subject. You must have read at least two other textbooks on that same subject. You must briefly name the other books you've read on the subject and explain why you think your chosen textbook is superior to them. Rules #2 and #3 are to protect against recommending a bad book that only seems impressive because it's the only book you've read on the subject. Once, a popular author on Less Wrong recommended Bertrand Russell's A History of Western Philosophy to me, but when I noted that it was more polemical and inaccurate than the other major histories of philosophy, he admitted he hadn't really done much other reading in the field, and only liked the book because it was exciting. I'll start the list with three of my own recommendations... Subject: History of Western Philosophy Recommendation: The Great Conversation, 6th edition, by Norman Melchert Reason: The most popular history of western philosophy is Bertrand Russell's A History of Western Philosophy, which is exciting but also polemical and inaccurate. More accurate but dry and dull is Frederick Copelston's 11-volume A History of Philosophy. Anthony Kenny's recent 4-volume history, collected into one book as A New History of Western Philosophy, is both exciting and accurate, but perhaps too long (1000 pages) and technical for a first read on the history of philosophy. Melchert's textbook, The Great Conversation, is accurate but also the easiest to read, and has the clearest explanations of the important positions and debates, though of course it has its weaknesses (it spends too many pages on ancient Greek mythology but barely mentions Gottlob Frege, the father of analytic philosophy and of the philosophy of language). Melchert's history is also the only one to seriously cover the dominant mode of Anglophone philosophy done today: naturalism (what Melchert calls "physical realism"). Be sure to get the 6th edition, which has major improvements over the 5th edition. Subject: Cognitive Science Recommendation: Cognitive Science, by Jose Luis Bermudez Reason: Jose Luis Bermudez's Cognitive Science: An Introduction to the Science of Mind does an excellent job setting the historical and conceptual context for cognitive science, and draws fairly from all the fields involved in this heavily interdisciplinary science. Bermudez does a good job of making himself invisible, and the explanations here are some of the clearest available. In contrast, Paul Thagard's Mind: Introduction to Cognitive Science skips the context and jumps right into a systematic comparison (by explanatory merit) of the leading theories of mental representation: logic, rules, concepts, analogies, images, and neural networks. The book is o...

More at https://www.philosophytalk.org/shows/frege-and-language-reason. At the end of the 19th Century, the German philosopher Gottlob Frege invented a new language, based on mathematics, designed to help people reason more logically. His ideas have had a lasting impact on philosophy, math, computer science, and the study of artificial intelligence. And many of the questions that influenced his thinking are still hotly debated today: How much does language influence the thoughts you can think? Could there be a way of speaking that taps into deep philosophical insights about the nature of reality? What's the relationship between math and logic? Josh and Ray try to make sense of Frege with host emeritus John Perry, author of "Frege's Detour: An Essay on Meaning, Reference, and Truth."

In this episode, Olivia Branscum speaks with Professor Gary Ostertag, Affiliated Associate Professor at the City University of New York and Chair of the philosophy department at Nassau Community College. We discuss the life, context, and achievements of Emily Elizabeth Constance Jones, an early analytic philosopher who was working at the same time as people like Gottlob Frege and Bertrand Russell. Gary and Olivia also talk about the positive philosophical value of writing about other people's ideas, and the question of what it means to point out that Jones may have anticipated the work of Frege. Gary closes by offering some suggestions for where to start with reading Jones's work.   Petru Rosu provided research for this episode.

The Analytic Philosophy vs Continental Philosophy divide is a faultline running through modern philosophy. In this episode we explore the origins of this divide and why these two paths diverged when their founders were in close contact. Edmund Husserl and Gottlob Frege were the two men that gave rise to Continental Philosophy and Analytic Philosophy respectively and surprisingly they were in close contact — critiquing each other's work. But despite this closeness, there is a historical backdrop to their concerns that invites us to reconsider this difference. Much like the Empiricism/Rationalist divide of the two centuries before Frege and Husserl, the Continental/Analytic divide ran along the line of the English Channel and seems to have been as much a divide of temperament as of philosophy. The British empiricists and the Anglo-American Analytic tradition are concerned more with a non-human standpoint — what reality is out there and how we can gain purest access to it. On the other the Rationalists and Continentals are more concerned with the human element — what it's structure is like and what that tells us about the structure and nature of reality. This difference in focus on the human and non-human element widened into an irreparable chasm by the time of Martin Heidegger and Bertrand Russell. _________________ ⭐ Support the channel (thank you!) ▶ Patreon: patreon.com/thelivingphilosophy ▶ Ko-fi: ko-fi.com/thelivingphilosophy_________________⌛ Timestamps:0:00 Introduction1:14 A Tale of Two Schools3:28 The Continental Arising7:18 The Analytic Tradition9:12 A Metaphilosophical Problem?

'What we cannot speak about we must pass over in silence'. Thus ends the only book the philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein published in his lifetime. But it's a book that's had people talking ever since it was published a century years ago. In an event hosted by the Austrian Cultural Forum, and in collaboration with the British Wittgenstein Society, Shahidha Bari discusses the contexts and contents of the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus at 100 with Wittgenstein's biographer Ray Monk, the philosophers Juliet Floyd and Dawn Wilson, and Wittgenstein's niece Monica Nadler Wittgenstein. In the Preface to his Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, Ludwig Wittgenstein claims to have solved all the problems of philosophy. The youngest son of one of the wealthiest families in Europe, based in Vienna, Ludwig moved to England in 1908 to study the then cutting edge-topic of flight aerodynamics. From there he developed an interest in pure mathematics, which led him to philosophy, and to the revolutionary work of the logician Gottlob Frege. Frege recommended he went to Cambridge to study with Bertrand Russell, who quickly recognised him as "perhaps the most perfect example I have ever known of genius as traditionally conceived". The work that Wittgenstein began in Cambridge eventually led to the composition of the Tractatus, but not before the intervention of the First World War, during which he signed up to the Austro-Hungarian Army and fought in some of the fiercest battles on the Eastern Front, even volunteering for an observation post in no-man's-land. Finished whilst he was still in military service, the Tractatus combines an innovative account of the nature of logic with searching investigation of personhood and mysticism. Written in an aphoristic style that seems to conceal as much as it reveals, it is a major work of Viennese Modernism as well as a foundational text of analytical philosophy. You can find a playlist of conversations about philosophy on the Free Thinking website which include Wolfram Eilenberger, David Edmonds, Esther Leslie with Matthew Sweet looking at the different philosophical schools current in the 1920s Clare Mac Cumhaill and Rachael Wiseman on reclaiming the role of women in British 20th century philosophy Stephen Mulhall and Denis McManus, and the historian and New Generation Thinker Tiffany Watt Smith on Wittgenstein's Private Language Argument https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p07x0twx Producer: Luke Mulhall

Gottlob Frege, matemático logicista, cuestionó la manera en que la filosofía planteaba sus preguntas. Para él, el lenguaje debía ser sometido a una estructura lógica. Con su "Sentido y referencia" planteó sus ideas que desencadenaron en la filosofía del lenguaje.

Doç. Dr. Serhan Yarkan ve Halil Said Cankurtaran'ın yer aldığı, Bilim Tarihi Serisi'nin Kümeler Kuramı odaklı ikinci kısmında: Georg Cantor'un kuram üzerine yaptığı çalışmaların yankıları, kendisini kuram üzerine adamış bilim insanlarının hayatları ve Kümeler Kuramı'nın topoloji, cebirsel yapılar, olasılık kuramı, ölçüm kuramı, analiz, hesaplama ve yarı iletkenler üzerine olan etkileri üzerine konuşulmuştur. Bu süreçte, kuramın gelişimine ve diğer çalışma alanlarında ortaya çıkan etkilerde katkısı olan Georg Cantor, David Hilbert, Leopold Kronecker, Richard Dedekind, Jean Baptiste Joseph Fourier, Henri Léon Lebesgue, Félix Édouard Justin Émile Borel, Gottlob Frege, Bertrand Arthur William Russell, Ebû Ca'fer Muhammed bin Mûsâ el-Hârizmî, Udny Yule, Andrey Nikolayeviç Kolmogorov ve Giuseppe Vitali gibi pek çok önemli bilim insanına değinilmiştir. Keyifli dinlemeler. Kümeler Kuramı I. Kısım: https://youtu.be/pSksJkWK6wU David Hilbert'in, 1926 yılında Mathematische Annalen'da yayımlanan makalesi (Almanca): https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01206605 Makalenin İngilizce'ye çevirisi (On the Infinite, David Hilbert): https://math.dartmouth.edu/~matc/Readers/HowManyAngels/Philosophy/Philosophy.html Tapir Lab. GitHub: @TapirLab, https://www.github.com/tapirlab Tapir Lab. Instagram: @tapirlab, https://www.instagram.com/tapirlab/ Tapir Lab. Twitter: @tapirlab, https://www.twitter.com/tapirlab Tapir Lab.: http://www.tapirlab.com

Dnes sa zamyslíme nad niektorými myšlienkami nemeckého filozofa, logika a matematika menom Gottlob Frege, ktoré rozpracoval vo svojej slávnej eseji „Über Sinn und Bedeutung“ („O zmysle a význame“; v ang. preklade „On Sense and Reference“) z roku 1892.----more---- Táto esej je už dnes známou klasikou a mnohí ste o jeho základnom rozlíšení medzi zmyslom a významom slova už určite počuli; asi ale nie z pohľadu logiky, ale napr lingvistiky, ktorá pracuje s rozdielom medzi tzv. konotáciou a denotáciou slova. Použitá a odporúčaná literatúra: Edward N. Zalta,  „Gottlob Frege", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2019), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/frege. Michael A.E. Dummett, „Gottlob Frege“, Encyclopædia Britannica(2019), https://www.britannica.com/biography/Gottlob-Frege. Hank Green, „Language & Meaning: Crash Course Philosophy #26“, YouTube (2016),https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zmwgmt7wcv8. Bryan Magee a britský filozof A. J. Ayer v rozhovore o Fregem a Russellovi v otázkach logiky, jazyka a poznania (1987), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZOnzBSWIAzo. ***Dobré veci potrebujú svoj čas. Pomohla ti táto dávka zamyslieť sa nad niečím zmysluplným? Podpor tvoj obľúbený podcast sumou 1€, 5€ alebo 10€ (trvalý príkaz je topka!) na SK1283605207004206791985. Ďakujeme! Viac info o podpore na pravidelnadavka.sk Zdroj obrázka:  www.knaw.nl/en/news/calendar/frege2019s-der-gedanke 

William did his undergraduate at the University of Washington, majoring in Biochemistry and English literature (mostly critical theory) with minors in Ancient Greek and Latin. Before attending a PhD program at the University of California, Irvine he spent three years working in a mouse genetics lab. Bill taught himself enough philosophy to get into the Logic and Philosophy of Science program at UCI. (LPS focused on mathematical logic, set theory, metalogic, analytic philosophy, evolutionary game theory, history of (select) philosophy, philosophy of the biosciences, linguistics). He enjoyed studying Gottlob Frege and Kant is one of his favorites. Williams is a freelance writer now and guest lectures at UW on occasion. He currently works on philosophy, reading science, keeping up with politics and being a clown on twitter.   Thank you for listening to the 13 Questions podcast by Mantranscending. With your paid monthly, yearly or lifetime subscription you will receive a new link for the podcast with extended bonus questions, and interviews for each episode. As well as the extended podcast, you will also receive the following... - A weekly newsletter from our staff with journaling prompts for self-discovery and improvement. - Bonus podcasts from our partners. - Exclusive content from our affiliates such as five different communication courses from TJ Walker totaling over a hundred hours of content.  - A live private Discord chat room for Members only and private forums.  - The ability to record your own fathers, grandfathers, or even yourself to be submitted for the podcast. We are also adding new content all the time, so take the plunge today, the community is waiting...   https://www.13questionspodcast.com/sign-up/   Closing Music by Supaman - Why https://supamanhiphop.com/  

4 minutes pour aborder les plus grandes répliques du cinéma, vous êtes bien dans Ma ligne de chance, sur Radio Campus Paris. Ma ligne de chance consacre deux émissions à un film d’Arnaud Desplechin. Célèbre pour son personnage fétiche Paul Dédalus, le cinéaste en retrace l’adolescence puis les débuts d’adulte. Ce film, c’est Trois souvenirs de ma jeunesse, qui va nous intéresser pour une réplique sur le visage. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQL_n7t__No « Ton visage tient toute la signification du monde dans ses traits. » Cette réplique de Quentin Dolmaire nous a donné à penser. Voici donc notre interprétation, subjective bien sûr, de cette trouvaille des scénaristes Arnaud Desplechin et Julie Peyr.   C’est en plein milieu d’un musée que Paul Dédalus, alias Quentin Dolmaire, dit cette phrase à Esther, alias Lou Roy-Lecollinet. Celle-ci l’a mis au défi d’expliquer en quoi le tableau d’Hubert Robert qu’ils contemplent, Terrasse d’un palais à Rome, lui fait penser à elle. Paul se lance alors dans une longue description croisée entre le tableau d’un côté, le corps et la personnalité d’Esther de l’autre. C’est l’occasion de sa réplique pour le moins éloquente.   Cette réplique ne peut pas ne pas nous faire songer à une autre célèbre description. Dans L’Iliade d’Homère, est décrit sur plus de 100 vers le bouclier d’Achille forgé par Héphaïstos. La multitude des objets qui y sont représentés en font un objet impossible à imaginer pour nous. Nous allons nous demander dans quelle mesure ce que dit Paul du visage d’Esther reprend cette idée. Le visage d’Esther est-il donc un objet impossible ? Un détour par une distinction de Gottlob Frege nous fera comprendre que cette réplique est en réalité éloignée du bouclier d’Achille. En revanche, elle constitue une objection très convaincante à une thèse actuelle. Cette thèse, soutenue par le philosophe allemand contemporain Markus Gabriel, est que le monde n’existe pas. En quoi la réplique de Paul s’y oppose-t-elle ? Venez le découvrir en écoutant nos deux podcasts !   Les références de l'émission:        Pour aller plus loin : Quant à la distinction entre sens et signification: « Sens et dénotation » de Frege dans ses Ecrits logiques et philosophiques. Sur les tableaux d’Hubert Robert : les commentaires de Diderot qu’on peut retrouver dans Salon de 1767. A propos du rapport qui lie les détails à l’ensemble, les parties et le tout : la pensée de Ruskin.

Just how much difference — or not — do the quirks of an individual make to the tide of history? In this month's episode we welcome historian-turned-Cabinet minister Andrew Adonis, who claims every election is won by the more talented leader. We hear from Wittgenstein's biographer, Ray Monk, who argues that one of the greatest philosophical minds of the lot—Gottlob Frege—lived in a husk of a man. Finally, the globe-trotting journalist, Wendell Steavenson, who followed a refugee family from Syria to the US, describes the heartening signs that America's open-armed tradition towards immigrants surviving the personality of Donald J Trump. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

O que é um número? Neste episódio falarei um pouco sobre a construção lógica do conceito de número realizada pelo matemático, lógico e filósofo Gottlob Frege..

O que é um número? Neste episódio falarei um pouco sobre a construção lógica do conceito de número realizada pelo matemático, lógico e filósofo Gottlob Frege..

Philosopher Starship Crews.   Zachary and Mike compare notes on their ideal philosopher starship crews. Find out which philosophers from the history of philosophy that Zachary and Mike would choose to fill the various roles in a typical starship crew: conn officer, communications officer, operations officer, science officer, tactical officer, chief of security, chief engineer, first officer, and captain. Zachary and Mike also consider some honorable mentions for the roles of ship's counselor, transporter chief, bartender or chef, the ever-present admiral or "badmiral," diplomat or ambassador, and holodeck technician.   Philosophers covered in this episode of Meta Treks include (in alphabetical order) Aristotle, George Berkeley, Dietrich Bonhoeffer, David Brewster, Jacques Derrida, Albert Einstein, Epicurus, Michel Foucault, Gottlob Frege, Sigmund Freud, Galileo Galilei, Martin Heidegger, Hippocrates, Thomas Hobbes, David Hume, William James, Immanuel Kant, C. S. Lewis, Karl Popper, John Rawls, Gene Roddenberry, Arthur Schopenhauer, Socrates, Sun Tzu, Dallas Willard, and Ludwig Wittgenstein.   Chapters Welcome (00:01:07) Introducing the Topic (00:03:09) Helm Officer (00:09:53) Communications Officer (00:13:18) Ops Officer (00:17:05) Science Officer (00:19:41) Tactical Officer (00:27:45) Chief of Security (00:32:32) Chief Engineer (00:38:36) Chief Medical Officer (00:44:52) First Officer (00:51:10) Captain (01:00:04) Honorable Mentions (01:06:33) Final Thoughts (01:18:04)   Hosts Zachary Fruhling and Mike Morrison   Production Dennis Castello (Editor and Producer) Norman C. Lao (Executive Producer) C Bryan Jones (Executive Producer) Matthew Rushing (Executive Producer) Charlynn Schmiedt (Executive Producer) Will Nguyen (Content Manager) Richard Marquez (Production Manager)   Send us your feedback! Twitter: @trekfm Facebook: http://facebook.com/trekfm Voicemail: http://www.speakpipe.com/trekfm Contact Form: http://www.trek.fm/contact Subscribe in iTunes: http://itunes.com/trekfm   Support the Network! Become a Trek.fm Patron on Patreon and help us keep Star Trek talk coming every week. We have great perks for you at http://patreon.com/trekfm

  What’s in a name? In his 1892 paper, “Sense and Reference,” the German philosopher Gottlob Frege gave an unconventional answer to this question. Up until that point, most philosophers thought of names as simple labels or pointers that referred to physical objects. If you wanted to know the meaning of “Clark Kent,” you just had to look at the guy typing away behind his desk at the Daily Planet. But Frege asked us to think about the fact that sometimes a single object has two names that mean very different things. For example, “Superman” refers to the same physical object as “Clark Kent,” but Superman can fly, while Clark Kent can’t. In this episode we explore Frege’s response to the puzzle of how names work. We also get the inside scoop on some of DC Comic’s most ridiculous super villains, learn about Frege’s mysterious secret diaries and complete a crash course in how elections should really work.

Das ist die gesprochene Version des Artikels Über Sinn und Bedeutung.Diesen Artikel herunterladen (Hilfe)Dauer: 09:23Sprecher: Jan SchreiberGeschlecht: männlichDialekt: Deutsch (Hochdeutsch)Version: 28. Juli 2014Autoren: Siehe Autoren-Aufschlüsselung oder Versionen/AutorenSiehe auch: WikiProjekt gesprochene Wikipediamp3-Datei herunterladen

In this episode, Patricia Blanchette explains why Gottlob Frege and other early 20th century philosophers wanted to understand all of mathematics as really being about logic. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Melvyn Bragg and his guests discuss the Continental-Analytic split in Western philosophy. Around the beginning of the last century, philosophy began to go down two separate paths, as thinkers from Continental Europe explored the legacy of figures including Friedrich Nietzsche and Martin Heidegger, while those educated in the English-speaking world tended to look to more analytically-inclined philosophers like Bertrand Russell and Gottlob Frege. But the divide between these two schools of thought is not clear cut, and many philosophers even question whether the term 'Continental' is accurate or useful.The Analytic school favours a logical, scientific approach, in contrast to the Continental emphasis on the importance of time and place. But what are the origins of this split and is it possible that contemporary philosophers can bridge the gap between the two? With:Stephen MulhallProfessor of Philosophy at New College, University of OxfordBeatrice Han-PileProfessor of Philosophy at the University of EssexHans Johann-Glock Professor of Philosophy at the University of ZurichProducer: Natalia Fernandez.

Melvyn Bragg and his guests discuss the Continental-Analytic split in Western philosophy. Around the beginning of the last century, philosophy began to go down two separate paths, as thinkers from Continental Europe explored the legacy of figures including Friedrich Nietzsche and Martin Heidegger, while those educated in the English-speaking world tended to look to more analytically-inclined philosophers like Bertrand Russell and Gottlob Frege. But the divide between these two schools of thought is not clear cut, and many philosophers even question whether the term 'Continental' is accurate or useful.The Analytic school favours a logical, scientific approach, in contrast to the Continental emphasis on the importance of time and place. But what are the origins of this split and is it possible that contemporary philosophers can bridge the gap between the two? With:Stephen MulhallProfessor of Philosophy at New College, University of OxfordBeatrice Han-PileProfessor of Philosophy at the University of EssexHans Johann-Glock Professor of Philosophy at the University of ZurichProducer: Natalia Fernandez.

Melvyn Bragg and his guests discuss the history of logic. Logic, the study of reasoning and argument, first became a serious area of study in the 4th century BC through the work of Aristotle. He created a formal logical system, based on a type of argument called a syllogism, which remained in use for over two thousand years. In the nineteenth century the German philosopher and mathematician Gottlob Frege revolutionised logic, turning it into a discipline much like mathematics and capable of dealing with expressing and analysing nuanced arguments. His discoveries influenced the greatest mathematicians and philosophers of the twentieth century and considerably aided the development of the electronic computer. Today logic is a subtle system with applications in fields as diverse as mathematics, philosophy, linguistics and artificial intelligence.With:A.C. GraylingProfessor of Philosophy at Birkbeck, University of LondonPeter MillicanGilbert Ryle Fellow in Philosophy at Hertford College at the University of OxfordRosanna KeefeSenior Lecturer in Philosophy at the University of Sheffield.Producer: Thomas Morris.

Melvyn Bragg and his guests discuss the history of logic. Logic, the study of reasoning and argument, first became a serious area of study in the 4th century BC through the work of Aristotle. He created a formal logical system, based on a type of argument called a syllogism, which remained in use for over two thousand years. In the nineteenth century the German philosopher and mathematician Gottlob Frege revolutionised logic, turning it into a discipline much like mathematics and capable of dealing with expressing and analysing nuanced arguments. His discoveries influenced the greatest mathematicians and philosophers of the twentieth century and considerably aided the development of the electronic computer. Today logic is a subtle system with applications in fields as diverse as mathematics, philosophy, linguistics and artificial intelligence.With:A.C. GraylingProfessor of Philosophy at Birkbeck, University of LondonPeter MillicanGilbert Ryle Fellow in Philosophy at Hertford College at the University of OxfordRosanna KeefeSenior Lecturer in Philosophy at the University of Sheffield.Producer: Thomas Morris.

Melvyn Bragg and his guests discuss the history of logic. Logic, the study of reasoning and argument, first became a serious area of study in the 4th century BC through the work of Aristotle. He created a formal logical system, based on a type of argument called a syllogism, which remained in use for over two thousand years. In the nineteenth century the German philosopher and mathematician Gottlob Frege revolutionised logic, turning it into a discipline much like mathematics and capable of dealing with expressing and analysing nuanced arguments. His discoveries influenced the greatest mathematicians and philosophers of the twentieth century and considerably aided the development of the electronic computer. Today logic is a subtle system with applications in fields as diverse as mathematics, philosophy, linguistics and artificial intelligence.With:A.C. GraylingProfessor of Philosophy at Birkbeck, University of LondonPeter MillicanGilbert Ryle Fellow in Philosophy at Hertford College at the University of OxfordRosanna KeefeSenior Lecturer in Philosophy at the University of Sheffield.Producer: Thomas Morris.

Gottlob Frege was one of the founders of the movement known as analytic philosophy. In this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast Michael Dummett explains why his ideas about how language relates to the world have been so important. Philosophy Bites is made in association with the Institute of Philosophy.