Podcast appearances and mentions of Matthew Kroenig

Nuclear weapons are regularly in the news. Ukraine's drone attack on Russian nuclear bombers. The threat of North Korea and Iran. European countries rearming. If we are entering a new age of nuclear weapons, how is it different to the Cold War? Nuclear deterrence specialist Matthew Kroenig says the threat of China makes the superpower competition more dangerous than before.The World in 10 is the Times' daily podcast dedicated to global security. Expert analysis of war, diplomatic relations and cyber security from The Times' foreign correspondents and military specialists. Watch more: www.youtube.com/@ListenToTimesRadio Read more: www.thetimes.com Picture: Getty Images Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In the spirit of a new Cold War, Matthew Kroenig and Dan Negrea have written a new book, We Win, They Lose: Republican Foreign Policy and the New Cold War, which tries to fuse the foreign policies of Ronald Reagan and Donald Trump. The result is a foreign policy Frankenstein.Original article: We Lose, They Lose: A Reagan-Trump Fusion

In the spirit of a new Cold War, Matthew Kroenig and Dan Negrea have written a new book, We Win, They Lose: Republican Foreign Policy and the New Cold War, which tries to fuse the foreign policies of Ronald Reagan and Donald Trump. The result is a foreign policy Frankenstein.Original article: We Lose, They Lose: A Reagan-Trump Fusion

Matthew Kroenig and Dan Negrea, authors of We Win, They Lose: Republican Foreign Policy and the New Cold War, do not wonder whether a new cold war against the Chinese Communist Party is afoot. Instead, they join the show to explain that when it arrives, America will need a fusion of Ronald Reagan and Donald Trump foreign policies to ensure complete and total victory. Whether it's kinetic military capabilities, diplomatic willpower, or economic maneuvering, defeating China will require a whole-of-country approach.

Is a regional war across the Middle East about to erupt? And what to make of a Venezuelan regime that doesn't honor election results? Matthew Kroenig, Vice President and Senior Director of the Atlantic Council's Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security and coauthor of the book We Win They Lose: Republican Foreign Policy and the New Cold War, joins Hoover senior fellows John Cochrane and H.R. McMaster to discuss lessons from deterrence (or a lack thereof) past, present, and future. Next, John explains how a market meltdown underscores a fragile world economy, followed by a discussion of two historical milestones: 50 years since Richard Nixon's resignation (with public trust in government today significantly lower than in Watergate's heyday); and Herbert Hoover's 150th birthday (as to his humanitarian pursuits, where would our fellows be without Hoover's namesake institution?).

When Ronald Reagan was a presidential candidate, he was asked about his strategy for the Cold War. He had a simple answer: “We win, and they lose.”Former President Reagan was crystal clear about the Soviet Union and its intentions, but today, few seem to understand the Chinese Communist Party's true intentions towards America.“We Win, They Lose” is the title of a new book by Matthew Kroenig and Dan Negrea, both working with the Atlantic Council. They outline what a Reaganesque foreign policy—updated for today—would look like.Mr. Kroenig is vice president and senior director of the Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security, and Mr. Negrea is senior director of the Freedom and Prosperity Center.Views expressed in this video are opinions of the host and the guests, and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.

Will the United States and China go to war over an island of 24 million people nearly 6,500 miles from California? Why is this a possibility? What is the history and significance of Taiwan to America and China? Guest: Lyle Goldstein, former professor US Naval College, now at Brown University. Taiwanese expert, Syaru Shirley Lin, founder of the think tank, Capri. An essay by Lyle Goldstein on how Taiwan features in US foreign policy. In the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists.   https://home.watson.brown.edu/research/research-briefs/trouble-taiwan  About Shirley Lin's CAPRI, a foundation that studies the Asia Pacific region.  https://caprifoundation.org/syaru-shirley-lin/ A controversial essay on how nuclear weapons could be used in a war over Taiwan by Matthew Kroenig, a professor at Georgetown University and senior director at The Atlantic Council. Mr. Kroenig's article is considered an outlier on the subject https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-research-reports/report/deliberate-nuclear-use-in-a-war-over-taiwan-scenarios-and-considerations-for-the-united-states/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this week's “A Reagan Forum” we present our Reaganism Podcast on GOP Foreign Policy. During the podcast, Reagan Institute Director Roger Zakheim sat down with Dr. Matthew Kroenig who serves as the Vice President and Senior Director of the Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security at the Atlantic Council, and with Dan Negrea who serves as the Senior Director of the Freedom and Prosperity Center at the Atlantic Council. They discuss Dr. Kroenig and Mr. Nagrea's new book, “We Win, They Lose: Republican Foreign Policy and the New Cold War.” This book provides a blueprint for Republican policymakers to engage with and win the great power competition with Communist China.

“Here's my strategy on the Cold War: We win, they lose.” - Ronald Reagan What will it take to win the New Cold War with America's rising enemies: Russia, China, and Iran? And in particular, how can energy policy impact this conflict? Heritage Vice President Victoria Coates sits down with Dan Negrea and Matthew Kroenig, the authors of We Win, They Lose: Republican Foreign Policy and the New Cold War to talk about strategy, energy, and ensuring peace. — Have thoughts? Let us know at heritageexplains@heritage.org—Buy We Win, They Lose: Republican Foreign Policy and the New Cold Warhttps://www.amazon.com/We-Win-They-Lose-Republican-ebook/dp/B0CHN5WRQ3Follow Dan Negrea on X: https://twitter.com/DanNegreaUSAFollow Matthew Kroenig on X: https://twitter.com/MatthewKroenigFollow Victoria Coates on X: https://twitter.com/VictoriaCoates Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

“Here's my strategy on the Cold War: We win, they lose.” – Ronald Reagan  What will it take to win the New Cold War with America's rising enemies: Russia, China, and Iran? And in particular, how can energy policy impact this conflict?  Heritage Vice President Victoria Coates sits down with Dan Negrea and Matthew Kroenig, […]

As Washington confronts increasing belligerence from China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea, does the West face the start of a new “cold war”? How should policymakers define victory? And what would a second Trump administration mean for the confrontation? In this episode, Jacob Heilbrunn speaks with Dan Negrea, the Senior Director of the Freedom and Prosperity Center at the Atlantic Council and coauthor with Matthew Kroenig of the new book We Win, They Lose: Republican Foreign Policy and the New Cold War. From 2019 to 2021, Negrea was the State Department's Special Representative for Commercial and Business Affairs. He previously served as a member of the Secretary of State's Policy Planning office between 2018 and 2019, where he was responsible for the economic portfolio.Music by Aleksey Chistilin from Pixabay

The Republican Party is clearly divided on Ukraine, as recent votes in Congress have underscored. But beyond that, is it more united on foreign policy than we imagine? A new book argues just that. Matthew Kroenig is an FP columnist and a co-author of We Win, They Lose: Republican Foreign Policy and the New Cold War. He joins FP Live to discuss what a Trump 2.0 foreign policy might look like and who would be at its helm.  Suggested reading: Matthew Kroenig and Dan Negrea: Republicans Are More United on Foreign Policy Than it Seems Emma Ashford and Matthew Kroenig: Are Both U.S. Parties Divided on Foreign Policy? Stephen M. Walt: Another Trump Presidency Won't Much Change U.S. Foreign Policy Ravi Agrawal: Does Trump Have a Foreign-Policy Vision? For more podcasts, check out the latest episode of Disorder, 'How Small States Can Save the World,' featuring Former President of Armenia Dr Armen Sarkissian: https://linktr.ee/disorderpod

America is in a fight for its cultural, political and economic life -- and it's not just a battle against Democrats who want to destroy the Constitution and usher in a new system. of governance more in line with socialism and communism and Marxism. It's a fight against China. The communists in China are coming on strong to dominate the world stage, and if America doesn't get its act together, then freedom will suffer -- and not just in the United States. The world needs America to win this war, else China communism will spread like a cancer all around the world. Matthew Kroenig discusses his new "We Win, They Lose," and how America can most effectively lead on foreign policy.

On this episode of Reaganism, Reagan Institute Director Roger Zakheim sits down with Dr. Matthew Kroenig who serves as the Vice President and Senior Director of the Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security at the Atlantic Council and with Dan Negrea who serves as the Senior Director of the Freedom and Prosperity Center at the […]

On this episode of Reaganism, Reagan Institute Director Roger Zakheim sits down with Dr. Matthew Kroenig who serves as the Vice President and Senior Director of the Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security at the Atlantic Council and with Dan Negrea who serves as the Senior Director of the Freedom and Prosperity Center at the Atlantic Council. They discuss Dr. Kroenig and Mr. Nagrea's new book entitled, “We Win, They Lose: Republican Foreign Policy and the New Cold War.” This book provides a blueprint for Republican policy makers to engage with and win the great power competition with Communist China.

President Reagan knew a detent with the Soviet Union wouldn't win the Cold War. If we take off the gloves and force Soviet communism to compete with American democracy, he thought, the U.S. will prevail. In a phrase: “We win, they lose.” He was right. The U.S. won. The Soviet Union collapsed. But in the decades since as America's role in the world diminished and the rules-based order decayed, Russia relapsed. And as he puts back the pieces of a shattered Soviet Union one illegal land-grab at a time, Putin is hardly the only despot hellbent on resurrecting an imperial renaissance in the shadows of American retrenchment.Also jonesing for a rise from the ash heap of history are the Islamist regime in Tehran and Chinese Communist Party in Beijing. Together with Moscow, they've formed a neo-imperialist axis to take on the West in a New Cold War. With the U.S. facing multiple nuclear-powered adversaries in a conflict for the first time ever, the second Cold War is shaping up to be far more dangerous than the first. With such high stakes, CWII's outcome will no doubt be a decisive chapter in modern history. The task of navigating the free world through this crisis falls on one desk (you know the one). And while he who will sit behind it remains uncertain, the possibilities can be narrowed down to two. Both have sat there before. So far, only one has a tailored roadmap for winning Cold War II, and it's based entirely on Reagan's playbook. The experts behind the strategy (AKA their new book: We Win, They Lose: Republican Foreign Policy and the New Cold War) are Matthew Kroenig and Dan Negrea. They join host Cliff May who has some questions for them.

President Reagan knew a detent with the Soviet Union wouldn't win the Cold War. If we take off the gloves and force Soviet communism to compete with American democracy, he thought, the U.S. will prevail. In a phrase: “We win, they lose.” He was right. The U.S. won. The Soviet Union collapsed. But in the decades since as America's role in the world diminished and the rules-based order decayed, Russia relapsed. And as he puts back the pieces of a shattered Soviet Union one illegal land-grab at a time, Putin is hardly the only despot hellbent on resurrecting an imperial renaissance in the shadows of American retrenchment.Also jonesing for a rise from the ash heap of history are the Islamist regime in Tehran and Chinese Communist Party in Beijing. Together with Moscow, they've formed a neo-imperialist axis to take on the West in a New Cold War. With the U.S. facing multiple nuclear-powered adversaries in a conflict for the first time ever, the second Cold War is shaping up to be far more dangerous than the first. With such high stakes, CWII's outcome will no doubt be a decisive chapter in modern history. The task of navigating the free world through this crisis falls on one desk (you know the one). And while he who will sit behind it remains uncertain, the possibilities can be narrowed down to two. Both have sat there before. So far, only one has a tailored roadmap for winning Cold War II, and it's based entirely on Reagan's playbook. The experts behind the strategy (AKA their new book: We Win, They Lose: Republican Foreign Policy and the New Cold War) are Matthew Kroenig and Dan Negrea. They join host Cliff May who has some questions for them.

Drawing inspiration from President Ronald Reagan's goal for the contest with the Soviet Union - “We win, and they lose” - Matthew Kroenig and Dan Negrea's new book, We Win They Lose: Republican Foreign Policy & the New Cold War, articulates a conservative strategy to defeat the Chinese Communist Party as America navigates a New Cold War.Dissecting the major national security challenges implicated in the New Cold War, from the Chinese partnership with authoritarian powers and American adversaries across the globe to the disaster unfolding on America's unsecured southern border, Kroenig and Negrea explain how a conservative approach is best positioned to address these complex challenges and make the 21st century an American century. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Foreign Election Interference- Could the United States slowly be turning away from our best ally in the Middle East, Israel?  The Biden administration is putting enormous pressure on Israel to stop fighting the war that the terrorist organization Hamas started on October 7, 2023.  In a recent speech, Jewish Senator Chuck Schumer even advocated for the removal of Israel's sitting Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, and for holding new elections in that country to find a more moderate government.  Online Opinion Editor for the Washington Times, Cheryl Chumley, gives us her expert take on what's really going on in this standoff.  Also, ... We Win; They Lose- Dr. Wendy Patrick and co-host Larry Dershem interview Dr. Matthew Kroenig about his new book We Win; They Lose: Republican Foreign Policy and the New Cold War.  What is the biggest threat against the United States today?  Is it China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, or is it a badly run U.S. foreign policy that's edging the world toward a tipping point of no return.  Be sure to listen to our mesmerizing interview with one of the top foreign policy experts in the United States today.  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In their new book, "We Win, They Lose: Republican Foreign Policy and the New Cold War," authors Matthew Kroenig and Dan Negrea argue that a GOP foreign policy consensus is emerging, which they call the Trump-Reagan Fusion. They believe that any viable GOP foreign policy must build on the legacies of Trump and Reagan. The authors argue that the Trump-Reagan fusion is superior to progressive alternatives and can guide the GOP, the United States, and the American people to greater levels of peace, prosperity, and freedom. They also discuss the challenges posed by China and Russia, and the need for a strategic approach to these threats.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Former Trump administration official Dan Negrea and national security strategist Matt Kroenig join Jamie to discuss their book We Win, They Lose. Jamie challenges their thesis that a Trump-Regan foreign policy fusion is possible. The Agenda: -The current international landscape -China's aggressive military operations and Taiwan -Can Americans stomach backing Taiwan in war? -Trump's switch on a TikTok ban -The Biden administration's failure to deter Russia -Is there really a Trump-Regan policy fusion? Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this episode of Building the Future, Dan is joined by Dan Negrea and Matthew Kroenig from the Atlantic Council to discuss their new book, We Win, They Lose: Republican Foreign Policy and the New Cold War.

Matthew Kroenig, exfuncionario del Departamento de Defensa de Estados Unidos, se refirió en La W a la respuesta que podría dar el presidente Joe Biden tras el ataque con drones en Jordania que dejó varios soldados muertos.

FBI Director Christopher Wray says China is currently the most significant threat facing the United States--especially when it comes to cybersecurity. Underscoring that is a recent Washington Post report that says China has infiltrated critical infrastructure systems in the U.S., making our power grid or water supply vulnerable to a cyber-attack. On the Rundown, Matthew Kroenig, Vice President and Senior Director for the Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security for the Atlantic Council, explained to host Dave Anthony how China's cyber tactics suggest the nation is preparing for war. Kroenig discusses the strategy behind China's cyberwar efforts and how they find weaknesses in our private and public online networks. The foreign policy expert also discussed what companies and government workers must do to improve their cyber practices and be ready to counter an attack from a foreign adversary. We made edits for time and thought you might like to hear our entire conversation with the Atlantic Council's Matthew Kroenig. On today's FOX News Rundown Extra, you'll hear even about China and other country's cyberwarfare tactics and what America must do to prepare for a future conflict. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

FBI Director Christopher Wray says China is currently the most significant threat facing the United States--especially when it comes to cybersecurity. Underscoring that is a recent Washington Post report that says China has infiltrated critical infrastructure systems in the U.S., making our power grid or water supply vulnerable to a cyber-attack. On the Rundown, Matthew Kroenig, Vice President and Senior Director for the Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security for the Atlantic Council, explained to host Dave Anthony how China's cyber tactics suggest the nation is preparing for war. Kroenig discusses the strategy behind China's cyberwar efforts and how they find weaknesses in our private and public online networks. The foreign policy expert also discussed what companies and government workers must do to improve their cyber practices and be ready to counter an attack from a foreign adversary. We made edits for time and thought you might like to hear our entire conversation with the Atlantic Council's Matthew Kroenig. On today's FOX News Rundown Extra, you'll hear even about China and other country's cyberwarfare tactics and what America must do to prepare for a future conflict. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

FBI Director Christopher Wray says China is currently the most significant threat facing the United States--especially when it comes to cybersecurity. Underscoring that is a recent Washington Post report that says China has infiltrated critical infrastructure systems in the U.S., making our power grid or water supply vulnerable to a cyber-attack. On the Rundown, Matthew Kroenig, Vice President and Senior Director for the Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security for the Atlantic Council, explained to host Dave Anthony how China's cyber tactics suggest the nation is preparing for war. Kroenig discusses the strategy behind China's cyberwar efforts and how they find weaknesses in our private and public online networks. The foreign policy expert also discussed what companies and government workers must do to improve their cyber practices and be ready to counter an attack from a foreign adversary. We made edits for time and thought you might like to hear our entire conversation with the Atlantic Council's Matthew Kroenig. On today's FOX News Rundown Extra, you'll hear even about China and other country's cyberwarfare tactics and what America must do to prepare for a future conflict. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Before Congress heads to winter break for the rest of 2023, there are some big decisions that remain to be made. Will Republicans launch a formal impeachment inquiry into President Biden? Can the Democrats and GOP agree on funding both foreign aid to Ukraine and U.S. border security? And how much will New Hampshire Governor Chris Sununu's endorsement of former South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley impact the GOP primary? FOX News Decision Desk Director Arnon Mishkin joins the Rundown to break down these uncertain factors that could soon play a big role in voters' decisions in 2024. FBI Director Christopher Wray says China is currently the most significant threat facing the United States--especially when it comes to cybersecurity. Recent reporting by the Washington Post shows that China continues to attack critical infrastructure in the U.S., including both public and private targets. On the Rundown, Matthew Kroenig, Vice President and Senior Director for the Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security for the Atlantic Council, explains how China appears to be preparing for war, where our infrastructure systems are vulnerable, and why companies must improve their cyber practices. Plus, commentary from FOX News contributor Joe Concha. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Before Congress heads to winter break for the rest of 2023, there are some big decisions that remain to be made. Will Republicans launch a formal impeachment inquiry into President Biden? Can the Democrats and GOP agree on funding both foreign aid to Ukraine and U.S. border security? And how much will New Hampshire Governor Chris Sununu's endorsement of former South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley impact the GOP primary? FOX News Decision Desk Director Arnon Mishkin joins the Rundown to break down these uncertain factors that could soon play a big role in voters' decisions in 2024. FBI Director Christopher Wray says China is currently the most significant threat facing the United States--especially when it comes to cybersecurity. Recent reporting by the Washington Post shows that China continues to attack critical infrastructure in the U.S., including both public and private targets. On the Rundown, Matthew Kroenig, Vice President and Senior Director for the Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security for the Atlantic Council, explains how China appears to be preparing for war, where our infrastructure systems are vulnerable, and why companies must improve their cyber practices. Plus, commentary from FOX News contributor Joe Concha. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Before Congress heads to winter break for the rest of 2023, there are some big decisions that remain to be made. Will Republicans launch a formal impeachment inquiry into President Biden? Can the Democrats and GOP agree on funding both foreign aid to Ukraine and U.S. border security? And how much will New Hampshire Governor Chris Sununu's endorsement of former South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley impact the GOP primary? FOX News Decision Desk Director Arnon Mishkin joins the Rundown to break down these uncertain factors that could soon play a big role in voters' decisions in 2024. FBI Director Christopher Wray says China is currently the most significant threat facing the United States--especially when it comes to cybersecurity. Recent reporting by the Washington Post shows that China continues to attack critical infrastructure in the U.S., including both public and private targets. On the Rundown, Matthew Kroenig, Vice President and Senior Director for the Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security for the Atlantic Council, explains how China appears to be preparing for war, where our infrastructure systems are vulnerable, and why companies must improve their cyber practices. Plus, commentary from FOX News contributor Joe Concha. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

September 21, 2023 - Join us for a program that addresses the new nuclear dynamics of Northeast Asia produced in cooperation with the Atlantic Council's Scowcroft Center. This panel discussion investigates how regional shifts in nuclear weapons capabilities and evolving doctrines affect the Korean Peninsula and beyond, with a focus on North Korea's quickly developing nuclear and missile deterrent, the maturing nuclear capabilities of the People's Republic of China, the US-ROK Alliance's evolving nuclear posture, Russian aggression, and the role of trilateral US-Korea-Japan security cooperation. The panel consists of: Matthew Kroenig, Vice President and Senior Director of the Atlantic Council's Scowcroft Center for Strategy, Markus Garlauskas, director of the new Indo-Pacific Security Initiative of the Atlantic Council's Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security, Dr. Sue Mi Terry, and Major Jessica Taylor, USAFR and Princeton University, in conversation with Korea Society policy director Jonathan Corrado. For more information, please visit the link below: https://www.koreasociety.org/policy-and-corporate-programs/item/1712-new-nuclear-dynamics-of-northeast-asia

Dr. Matthew Kroenig is Vice President and Senior Director of the Atlantic Council's Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security and the Council's Director of Studies. In these roles, he manages the Scowcroft Center's bipartisan team of more than thirty resident staff and oversees the Council's extensive network of nonresident fellows.His own research focuses on US national security strategy, strategic competition with China and Russia, and strategic deterrence and weapons nonproliferation. Kroenig is currently a commissioner on the Congressional Commission on the Strategic Posture of the United States. He previously served in the Department of Defense and the intelligence community during the Bush, Obama, and Trump administrations. He received the Office of the Secretary of Defense's Award for Outstanding Achievement. He was a national security adviser on the presidential campaigns of Mitt Romney (2012) and Marco Rubio (2016).Kroenig is also a tenured professor of government and foreign service at Georgetown University. A 2019 study in Perspectives on Politics ranked him one of the top twenty-five most cited political scientists of his generation. He is the author or editor of seven books, including The Return of Great Power Rivalry: Democracy versus Autocracy from the Ancient World to the US and China (Oxford University Press, 2020)and The Logic of American Nuclear Strategy: Why Strategic Superiority Matters (Oxford University Press,2018). Kroenig co-authors the bimonthly “It's Debatable” column at Foreign Policy. His articles and commentary regularly appear in major media outlets, including: the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, the Washington Post, Politico, CBS, BBC, CNN, Fox News, and NPR.He has held fellowships at the Council on Foreign Relations, Harvard University, and Stanford University. He is a life member of the Council on Foreign Relations and holds an MA and PhD in political science from the University of California at Berkeley.EPISODE NOTES:Follow NucleCast on Twitter at @NucleCastEmail comments and story suggestions to NucleCast@anwadeter.orgSubscribe to NucleCast podcastRate the show

Matthew Kroenig, professor in the Department of Government and the Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University and contributor to the New Makers of Modern Strategy, joins the show to talk about one of the most influential strategic thinkers of all time, Niccolo Machiavelli. ▪️ Times  • 02:21 Introduction  • 03:52 Teaching Machiavelli  • 05:38 Machiavelli's relevance • 07:49 Who was Niccolo? • 10:00 A lasting effect  • 12:16 The Art of War • 15:52 A bad reputation • 19:58 A return to republic • 22:25 The Prince • 25:45 An early realist  • 30:35 Classical influences • 35:12 Bullish on democracy Follow along on Instagram

Bloomberg Washington Correspondent Joe Mathieu delivers insight and analysis on the latest headlines from the White House and Capitol Hill, including conversations with influential lawmakers and key figures in politics and policy. Joe spoke with Matthew Kroenig, Deputy Director of the Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security at the Atlantic Council on geopolitical tensions and General Mike Minihan's internal memo that the US and China risk going to war in 2025, Democratic Congresswoman Gwen Moore of Wisconsin on federal police reform efforts after the killing of Tyre Nichols. Plus, our politics panel, Bloomberg Politics Contributors Rick Davis and Jeanne Sheehan Zaino on the China war risk, Kevin McCarthy's debt ceiling meeting with President Biden, police reform in Congress and Trump on the campaign trail.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Foreign Policy Playlist recommends: FP LiveThis week on FP Playlist, we're featuring FP Live, Foreign Policy's forum for live journalism. FP editor in chief Ravi Agrawal sat down with FP columnist and Council on Foreign Relations fellow Edward Alden, International Institute for Strategic Studies fellow Lynn Kuok, and FP columnist Matthew Kroenig of the Atlantic Council to discuss the main takeaways from the G-20 summit this week. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

On this episode, Ben sits down with Deputy Director of the Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security, Matthew Kroenig, to discuss the latest updates from the potential Russian nuclear threat in Ukraine. Plus, they look at why the Chinese military may become even more confrontational in the coming years. Later, Ben makes his predictions for what will happen in the Midterm Elections. Follow Ben on Twitter: @BDomenech Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The Russians are on the back foot in the war in Ukraine and have just evacuated the occupied Ukrainian city of Kherson. The setbacks for Moscow have led to increasing concern in western capitals about the prospect of President Vladimir Putin using a nuclear weapon. But what are the real chances of Russia moving from nuclear threats to nuclear action. And how might the NATO powers respond?Joining David Aaronovitch in The Briefing Room are: Sir Lawrence Freedman, Emeritus Professor of War Studies, King's College, London. Matthew Kroenig, Professor of Government at Georgetown University and Acting Director, Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security at the Atlantic Council Patricia Lewis, Director of the International Security Programme at Chatham House.Producers: Kirsteen Knight, Daniel Gordon and Simon Watts Editor: Penny Murphy Sound engineer: Neil Churchill Production co-ordinator: Siobhan Reed and Helena Warwick-CrossImage: Russian President Vladimir Putin. Credit: Mikhail Svetlov / Getty Images

Stimson Center senior fellow Emma Ashford and University of Birmingham professor and Cato adjunct scholar Patrick Porter discuss the intensification of the war in Ukraine, Putin's nuclear threats, realist perspectives on Russian objectives, and possible US policy responses. Emma Ashford bioPatrick Porter bioEmma Ashford, “In Praise of Lesser Evils,” Foreign Affairs 101, no. 5 (September/October 2022).Justin Logan, Benjamin H. Friedman, and Patrick Porter, “We're Not All Ukrainians Now,” Politico Europe, May 17, 2022.Emma Ashford and Matthew Kroenig, “How Should the West Respond to Putin's Military Mobilization?” Foreign Policy, September 23, 2022.Patrick Porter, “The Realist Boogeyman,” The Critic, June 15, 2022. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

[00:00:00] Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) [00:18:25] Rich Lowry [00:36:46] Matthew Kroenig [00:55:09] Ken Burns & Lynn Novick [01:13:30] David Sokol [01:31:53] Martha MacCallum & Bill Hemmer Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Joe spoke with Matthew Kroenig, Acting Director of the Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security at the Atlantic Council on Ukraine's successful northern counteroffensive and what comes next in the war, Bloomberg Government Congress reporter Emily Wilkins on the Democratic pushback on attaching Senator Joe Manchin's energy permitting proposal to the government funding bill. Plus, our politics panel, Bloomberg Politics Contributors Jeanne Sheehan Zaino and Rick Davis on the risk of a government shutdown weeks before the midterm elections and President Biden's speech on highlighting government efforts to end cancer. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

On June 22, 2022 the U.S. Army Heritage and Education Center in Carlisle, Pennsylvania, presented a lecture by Georgetown University Professor, Dr. Matthew Kroenig. In this lecture, Dr.Kroenig provided an in-depth analysis of the return to great power competition and how the democratic system of the United States is advantageous compared to the autocratic systems of Russia and China.To learn more about the USAHEC, find education support for teachers, researchers, and soldiers, or to find more programs at the USAHEC, please visit our website https://ahec.armywarcollege.edu

Ben has two very different, but vital conversations. He speaks with Deputy Director of the Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security, Matthew Kroenig, to discuss how the United States and NATO allies can navigate the complex geopolitical strategy in responding to Russia's war on Ukraine. Plus, how the war has changed China's calculus towards Taiwan. Then, Ben shifts gears and brings on Washington Post columnist and author of 'Rethinking Sex,' Christine Emba, to discuss the challenges of dating under the umbrella of the 'Me Too' movement, online dating, and hook-up culture. The two discuss how both men and women, in separate ways, are left feeling empty due to complex modern standards in the dating world. Later, Ben breaks down why prominent journalists such as Brian Stelter and Anne Applebaum struggled to answer questions from students at the University of Chicago on media bias and disinformation. Follow Ben on Twitter: @BDomenech Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Amerikan dış politika elitleri arasında Çin ve Rusya'yı “ikiz tehdit” olarak gören ciddi bir eğilim söz konusu. Bu bağlamda “Liberal Enternasyo- nalistler” ile “Neoconlar”ın bakış açıları şahin bir çizgide çakışıyor. Dış politikada “Real politikçiler” veya “Realistler” olarak bilinen kesimler ise bu görüşlere bir hayli mesafeliler. Hem Liberal Enternasyonalistler ve hem de Neoconlar, “Realistler”e adeta savaş açtılar. Hedefe konulan ilk isimlerden biriyse, yıllar önce NATO'nun Doğu'ya Genişlemesini eleştiren siyaset bilimci Prof. John Mearsheimer olmuştu. Diğer yandan sıkı Trumpçı Cumhuriyetçiler özellikle “Rusya” konusunda kendilerini “Neoconlar”dan ve “Merkezci-Cumhuriyetçiler”den ayrıştırıyorlar. Benzer bir ayrışma “Demokrat Parti”nin ana akım Merkezci kanadıyla daha Sol'daki kanatları arasında da yaşanıyor tabii. “Demokrat Parti” ve “Cumhuriyetçi Parti”nin merkezci kanatları arasındaysa Rus ve Çin karşıtlığı konusunda ciddi bir çelişki söz konusu değil. Kendilerini Trumpistlerden, Merkezci Cumhuriyetçilerden ve “Neoconlar”dan ayıran “Ulusal Muhafazâkârlar” ise ABD'nin Çin ve Rusya ile yeni Soğuk Savaşı'na karşılar. Bu kesime göre “Rusya” Avrupalıların çözmesi gereken bölgesel bir sorundur, Çin ise, ABD için doğrudan bir tehdit oluşturmuyor. Çin ve Rusya'yı küresel düzenin önde gelen iki büyük çözücüsü olarak gören şahinler ABD'nin her iki güce karşı aynı anda savaş vermesi gerektiğini savunuyorlar. Buna göre Washington ve müttefikleri Rusya ve Çin'i aynı anda caydırabilecek, gerekirse yenilgiye uğratabilecek eş-zamanlı savunma stratejisi geliştirmelidirler. “Amerikan Askeri-Endüstriyel Kompleksi”yle bağlantılı Şahinler, Biden Yönetimi'nin ulusal savunma stratejisini biçimlendirmek için yoğun bir çaba harcadılar. “Foreign Policy” dergisinde Şubat'ta Matthew Kroenig tarafından yayınlanan bir yazı şahinlerin bakış açısını çok açık şekilde yansıtıyordu. Kroenig, 2020'de Oxford Üniversitesi tarafından yayınlanan “Büyük Güç Rekabetinin Dönüşü: Antik Dünyadan ABD ve Çin'e Otokrasiye Karşı Demokrasi” başlıklı kitabıyla da tanınıyor. Halihazırda Atlantik Konseyi Scowcroft Strateji ve Güvenlik Merkezi Direktör Yardımcısı görevi yapan Kroenig, “Foreign Policy” dergisindeki makalesinde Washington'un Çin ve Rusya ile ayn anda savaşa hazır olmak zorunda olduğunu savunuyordu. Kroenig bu yargısını yazısının başlığına kadar taşımıştı. ABD'nin Avrupa ve Hint-Pasifikler arasında bir seçim yapmasının hata olacağını savunan Kroenig Washington ve müttefiklerinin Rusya ve Çin'i aynı anda caydırabilecek ve gerekirse yenilgiye uğratabilecek eşzamanlı bir savunma stratejisi öneriyordu. Kroenig'e göre ABD ve Batılı müttefikleri küresel GSYİH'nın yaklaşık yüzde 60'ına sahip oldukları için Rusya ve Çin'e karşı askeri güç dengesini lehlerine sağlayacak durumdalar. Askeri harcamaların eski Soğuk Savaş dönemindeki oranları yakalaması gerektiğini savunan Kroenig, ABD'nin rakiplerinin yerel avantajlarını dengelemek için nükleer silahlara daha fazla güvenebileceğini bile ifade ediyordu. Yeni Soğuk Savaş'taki karşı güçlerin öncekinden çok daha tehlikeli olduklarını savunan Kroenig, ABD'nin eski Soğuk Savaş taktik kitabından yararlanmasını salık veriyordu. Yazarın, Biden Yönetimince ABD Kongresi'ne sunulması geciktirilmiş olan 2022 Ulusal Savunma Strateji Belgesi'ni etkileme çabası gözden kaçmıyordu.

Matthew Kroenig, Professor in the Department of Government and Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University and Director of Studies at the Atlantic Council, joins the show to discuss Russian nuclear doctrine and what it means for the war in Ukraine. Times 00:49 - Introduction 01:07 - Forecasting Russia's potential gains in Ukraine 02:45 - The nuclear dimension in Ukraine 05:05 - Russian nuclear doctrine: escalate to de-escalate 10:52 - Potential U.S. responses to Russian nuclear strikes on NATO allies 12:54 - Perceptions of nuclear weapons, from the Cold War to now 15:46 - Battlefield nuclear tactics 18:32 - Russian thinking on employing chemical weapons 21:05 - U.S. nuclear weapons policy 25:44 - Scenarios when Russia would use nuclear weapons 27:16 - Putin's rationale and next steps 29:21 - Russian strikes and potential fault lines in Western unity 32:30 - U.S. reliance on Russia's brokerage of a nuclear deal with Iran

The Mitchell Institute invites you to listen to our virtual Nuclear Deterrence and Missile Defense Forum event with Barry Pavel, Senior Vice President and Director of the Atlantic Council's Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security and Matthew Kroenig, Deputy Director of the Atlantic Council's Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security. They join us to discuss implications new technologies are having upon nuclear deterrence and how the U.S. should adapt its operational concepts, strategies, and associated capabilities. Lt Gen David Deptula, USAF (Ret.), Dean of the Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies, moderates the discussion and facilitates audience Q&A. Links: Subscribe to our Youtube Channel: https://bit.ly/3GbA5Of Website: https://mitchellaerospacepower.org/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/MitchellStudies Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Mitchell.Ins... LinkedIn: https://bit.ly/3nzBisb Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/themitchell... #MitchellStudies #AerospaceAdvantage #Nuclear Thank you for your continued support!

Atlantic Council senior fellow Emma Ashford discusses how Russia's invasion of Ukraine has played out so far, what the broader implications for international security and the global economy will be, and what comes after the conflict for the United States, Europe, Russia, and China. Emma Ashford bioEmma Ashford, “It's Official: The Post-Cold War Era Is Over,”New York Times, February 24, 2022.Emma Ashford and Matthew Burrows, “Reality Check #4: Focus on Interests, not on Human Rights with Russia,” Atlantic Council, March 5, 2021.Emma Ashford and Matthew Kroenig, “Is Belarus Putin's Next Target?”Foreign Policy, August 14, 2020. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Europe's largest nuclear plant, located in Ukraine, caught fire after coming under attack by Russian troops. Clint Watts, Joe Cirincione, Peter Baker, Michael McFaul, Kira Rudik, Tom Nichols, James Acton and Matthew Kroenig join.

Negotiations between the United States and the Islamic Republic of Iran have not gone well. President Biden may soon have to choose between two unappealing options: allowing the theocratic regime to become a nuclear-weapons power or using military force to prevent that outcome. Mark Dubowitz, FDD's chief executive, and Matthew Kroenig, a former senior policy advisor at the Pentagon, now a professor of government at Georgetown University, and director of the Atlantic Council's Scowcroft Strategy Initiative, recently published an op-ed in The Wall Street Journal arguing that one of those options is decidedly worse than that other. They join Foreign Podicy host Cliff May to discuss.

Negotiations between the United States and the Islamic Republic of Iran have not gone well. President Biden may soon have to choose between two unappealing options: allowing the theocratic regime to become a nuclear-weapons power or using military force to prevent that outcome. Mark Dubowitz, FDD's chief executive, and Matthew Kroenig, a former senior policy advisor at the Pentagon, now a professor of government at Georgetown University, and director of the Atlantic Council's Scowcroft Strategy Initiative, recently published an op-ed in The Wall Street Journal arguing that one of those options is decidedly worse than that other. They join Foreign Podicy host Cliff May to discuss.

Great power conflict; the US role in abetting China's rise; realism as both prescription and description; prospects for the future US-China relationship; the drivers of China's nuclear expansion; a listener asks about US diplomatic engagement in the China-Taiwan dispute; and Marcus (again) thinks the answer is more diplomacy. Further reading: John J. Mearsheimer. 2021. “The Inevitable Rivalry: America, China, and the Tragedy of Great-Power Politics.” Foreign Affairs. Matthew Kroenig. 2018. The Logic of American Nuclear Strategy: Why Strategic Superiority Matters. Oxford University Press. Ask a question or leave a comment for a future podcast episode at www.speakpipe.com/cheaptalk

Matt Kroenig of the Atlantic Council and Georgetown University has written a new book, The Return of Great Power Rivalry, which lays the basis for a very optimistic view of how America's competition with China will unfold. He joins Mike and Marshall to explain his argument in detail and defend it against alternative views.

In this week's episode, A'ndre and Ryan talk with Ash Jain and Ambassador (ret.) Daniel Fried about the importance of democratic multilateralism. Ash and Amb. Fried advocate for expanding the G-7 into a D-10, which would be a broader forum for the world's leading democratic countries. They also discuss whether the world is currently defined by the divide between democracy versus autocracy, and how the United States can spearhead the advancement of liberal values on the world stage. The conversation concludes by emphasizing the importance of democracy both in the United States and around the world. To learn more about the proposed D-10, check out Ash's recent report with Matthew Kroenig, as well as our 100 Days episode featuring Ash's idea of creating a D-10 Steering Committee. 

In the final installment of The Burn Bag Podcast’s miniseries with the Atlantic Council’s Scowcroft Center, A’ndre and Ryan have Barry Pavel and Matthew Kroenig, the Center’s Director and Deputy Director, on to reflect on the Biden Administration’s performance in the actual first 100 days with respect to security policy. We discuss how the first 100 days might indicate future trends in policymaking, such as with alliance building and the swift toughness the Biden Administration has shown on China and Russia. Both Barry and Matt provide their praise and criticism of some decisions, praising the quickness with which President Biden has addressed some issues such as cyber, while expressing concern over  a lack of policy on North Korea and an underestimation in terms of the “need for speed” with regards to China’s developments. We spend the rest of the interview going over some overarching themes and trends within the first 100 Days, and the challenges that lie ahead for President Biden.

STEVE POMPER, Former Seattle Police Officer, Author, "The Obama Gang" and "De-Policing America," Contributor, National Police Association, Writer, The Tatum Report, @stevepomper ROBERT CHARLES, Former Assistant Secretary, State at the State Department’s Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs in the Bush Administration, Author, "Eagles and Evergreens," @RCharles4USA MATTHEW KROENIG, Professor, Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service, Georgetown University, Author, "The Return of Great Power Rivalry: Democracy versus Autocracy from the Ancient World to the US and China," @MatthewKroenig MINISTER SALIH HUDAYAR, Founder, East Turkistan Awakening, Prime Minister, East Turkistan Government-in-Exile, @SalihHuayar  

Nuclear modernization is key to maintaining the U.S. nuclear deterrence capability. Dr. Kroenig and Mr. Costlow, two established experts in nuclear deterrence strategy and policy, join the Mitchell Insitute to discuss the modernization of the ICBM force; how our nuclear deterrent affects our allies, partners, and adversaries; and what China and Russia's modernization means for our own nuclear forces.

This event is sponsored by the Asia Initiative Lecture Series at The Institute of World Politics. About the lecture: The United States of America has been the most powerful country in the world for over seventy years, but recently the U.S. National Security Strategy declared that the return of great power competition with Russia and China is the greatest threat to U.S. national security. Further, many analysts predict that America's autocratic rivals will have at least some success in disrupting-and, in the longer term, possibly even displacing-U.S. global leadership. Brilliant and engagingly written, The Return of Great Power Rivalry argues that this conventional wisdom is wrong. Drawing on an extraordinary range of historical evidence and the works of figures like Herodotus, Machiavelli, and Montesquieu and combining it with cutting-edge social science research, Matthew Kroenig advances the riveting argument that democracies tend to excel in great power rivalries. He contends that democracies actually have unique economic, diplomatic, and military advantages in long-run geopolitical competitions. He considers autocratic advantages as well, but shows that these are more than outweighed by their vulnerabilities. Kroenig then shows these arguments through the seven most important cases of democratic-versus-autocratic rivalries throughout history, from the ancient world to the Cold War. Finally, he analyzes the new era of great power rivalry among the United States, Russia, and China through the lens of the democratic advantage argument. By advancing a “hard-power” argument for democracy, Kroenig demonstrates that despite its many problems, the U.S. is better positioned to maintain a global leadership role than either Russia or China. A vitally important book for anyone concerned about the future of global geopolitics, The Return of Great Power Rivalry provides both an innovative way of thinking about power in international politics and an optimistic assessment of the future of American global leadership. About the speaker: Dr. Matthew Kroenig is the deputy director of the Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security at the Atlantic Council and the director of the Center's Global Strategy Initiative. He is also a tenured professor of government and foreign service at Georgetown University. A 2019 study in Perspectives on Politics ranked him one of the top 25 most cited political scientists of his generation. He is the author or editor of seven books, including The Return of Great Power Rivalry: Democracy versus Autocracy from the Ancient World to the US and China (Oxford University Press, 2020) and The Logic of American Nuclear Strategy (Oxford University Press, 2018). His articles and commentary have appeared in Foreign Affairs, Foreign Policy, Politico, the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, the Washington Post, and many other outlets. He co-authors the bi-monthly “Its Debatable” column at Foreign Policy. Dr. Kroenig provides regular commentary for major media outlets, including PBS, NPR, BBC, CNN, and C-SPAN. He previously served in several positions in the US government, including in the Strategy office in the Office of the Secretary of Defense and the Strategic Assessments Group at the Central Intelligence Agency. He regularly consults with a range of US government entities. He has previously worked as a Stanton Nuclear Security Fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations and a research fellow at Harvard University and Stanford University. His work has been supported by the National Science Foundation, the Carnegie Corporation of New York, the Smith Richardson Foundation, the Hertog Foundation, and the Stanton Foundation. He is a life member of the Council on Foreign Relations and holds an MA and Ph.D. in political science from the University of California at Berkeley.

Zack, Jenn, and Alex break down one of the DC foreign policy world’s hottest new catchphrases: “great power competition.” It’s the idea that international politics in the 21st century will be dominated by a struggle for influence between the US, China, and (to a lesser extent) Russia. The gang talks about what the concept actually means and whether it’s a useful framework for understanding international politics today and in the future. References: Dan Nexon’s Foreign Affairs article inspired the Worldly crew to record this episode. The Atlantic had an excellent piece explaining how “great power competition” became a DC buzzword. The National Interest had an op-ed detailing why great power competition could be a problem. Matthew Kroenig wrote in Foreign Policy on how the US should outline goals for its competition with China. The Congressional Research Service has a comprehensive report on what “great power competition” has meant in recent years. Hosts: Zack Beauchamp (@zackbeauchamp), senior correspondent, Vox Jennifer Williams (@jenn_ruth), senior foreign editor, Vox Alex Ward (@AlexWardVox), White House reporter, Vox   Consider contributing to Vox: If you value Worldly’s work, please consider making a contribution to Vox: bit.ly/givepodcasts   More to explore: Subscribe for free to Today, Explained, Vox’s daily podcast to help you understand the news, hosted by Sean Rameswaram.   About Vox: Vox is a news network that helps you cut through the noise and understand what's really driving the events in the headlines.   Follow Us: Vox.com  Newsletter: Vox Sentences Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Great powers don’t always go great together, often viewing each other as rivals, if not enemies. After the Cold War, the United States was viewed as the last superpower standing. But not only has Russia and its nuclear arsenal stubbornly refused to go away, China has kept on rising.Now, people at the highest levels of government are trying to figure out whether China and the United States can play nice together, but whether the 21st will be the Chinese Century.Joining us to help understand the situation is Matthew Kroenig. Kroenig is both a political scientist and national security strategist at the Atlantic Council. He is also the author of the Return of Great Power Rivalry: Democracy Versus Autocracy from the Ancient World to the U.S. and China Matthew Kroenig.Recorded 8/21/20The innovatorsInnovating with government moneyWhere China’s labor comes fromChina’s soft power strategyA coming generational struggle See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

In the third of our series on the world after the coronavirus, we talk about great power politics and U.S.-China relations, with returning guest Joshua Shifrinson of Boston University. 1. Joshua Shifrinson Bio: https://www.bu.edu/pardeeschool/profile/joshua-shifrinson/2. Joshua Shifrinson, International Security, “Partnership or Predation? How Rising States Contend With Declining Great Powers.” 3. Emma Ashford and Matthew Kroenig, Foreign Policy, “Is This The Beginning of a New Cold War with China?” See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

The United States has enjoyed a position of relative primacy in the international system since the end of World War II, but are those days numbered as China and other powers continue to rise? Or does Washington still have a few more decades left in the tank? Matthew Kroenig, a political scientist and the Deputy Director of the Atlantic Council's Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security, has a decidedly more optimistic view of the capacity of American democracy to help the country prevail in the new rivalries with China and Russia. On the podcast, Kroenig discusses these questions by taking a critical look at the strengths of weaknesses of democracies vs. autocracies by highlighting seven different confrontations between rivals, from from ancient Greece to the Cold War. In his new book, "The Return of Great Power Rivalry: Democracy versus Autocracy from the Ancient World to the U.S. and China," he argues that although democracies do not always win wars, they do have outsized strategic advantages in comparison to autocracies, from culture to innovation to the financial strength of a world reserve currency. When you are "the capital of capital," Kroenig argues, you have a major advantage in your ability to deficit spend and build up your capabilities, and we've always seen international finance exist in more open societies, from Venice to Amsterdam to London to Wall Street. "Autocracies historically don't do well when it comes to international finance," Kroenig says. "People don't trust investing in autocratic countries, and it's also because to have a financial system you have to allow the free flow of currency, money, in and out of your borders, and autocracies don't like allowing things flowing in and out of their borders." In this regard, he points out, China is not even particularly trying hard to make the RMB a reserve currency, while President Xi appears to be prioritizing political control over economic growth by increasing the Communist Party's control over the economy. Numerous others we've had on the podcast take the opposite view, that we are witnessing the final days of American hegemony. Time will tell us who is right, it seems.

In the decades since the collapse of the Soviet Union, the United States has held sole global leadership. However, that leadership role is today contested by Russia and especially China. The crisis over the COVID-19 pandemic has illustrated the danger of the West’s dependence on Chinese exports and highlighted China’s pursuit of global technological and military dominance.Yet, as a democracy, the United States stands a good chance of maintaining its global leadership role. In his new book, "The Return of Great Power Rivalry," Matthew Kroenig argues that the human and social values embodied in the American system makes it far stronger and enduring than autocratic regimes. Join our all-star panel for a discussion of this important new work. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

In the first of a three-part series, Emma Ashford and Trevor Thrall explore what international relations might look like after coronavirus. Today’s guest is Dan Drezner, a professor at Tufts University, who joins them to talk about global economic relations. Daniel Drezner bio: https://fletcher.tufts.edu/people/daniel-drezner Daniel Drezner, “There is No China Crisis,” Reason Magazine: https://reason.com/2020/04/25/there-is-no-china-crisis/ Daniel Drezner, “The Most Counterintuitive Prediction About World Politics and the Coronavirus,” https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2020/03/30/most-counterintuitive-prediction-about-world-politics-covid-19/Emma Ashford and Matthew Kroenig, “Will Trump’s Decision To Cut WHO Funding Accomplish Anything?” Foreign Policy: https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/04/17/will-trumps-decision-to-cut-who-funding-accomplish-anything/Christopher Preble, “How Will Coronavirus Change US National Security Strategy?” Responsible Statecraft: https://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/how-will-covid-19-change-us-national-security-strategy See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

On this episode of the DefAero Report Daily Podcast, sponsored by Bell, our guest is Matthew Kroenig, a professor of government and foreign service at Georgetown University, and the deputy director of the Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security at the Atlantic Council on his new book The Return of Great Power Rivalry: Democracy Versus Autocracy From the Ancient World to the U.S. and China.

The coronavirus pandemic is likely to redefine the US-China relationship in the months and years ahead. President Trump as well as the Democratic presidential hopeful Joe Biden have both leveled heavy criticism against China, charging that the country exacerbated the problem by misleading the world about the origins and the nature of the threat. The US wariness over the increasing economic and military power of China has been further complicated by the Trump administration's on-and-off trade war in recent years. Now, the relationship will take on a global public health dimension due to the Covid-19 pandemic that has exacted enormous costs on the world. The SETA Foundation at Washington DC is pleased to host a webinar event to discuss these questions and the future of US-China relations with James J. Carafano of The Heritage Foundation and Matthew Kroenig of Georgetown University. This session is moderated by Kilic B. Kanat, Research Director at SETA DC. --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/seta-dc/support

As Russia and China advance their nuclear forces and North Korea and Iran continue to pursue nuclear capabilities, the U.S. nuclear arsenal slowly decays. Deterioration of the nuclear enterprise has become so serious that a failure to deliver systems like the Ground Based Strategic Deterrent or the W80-4 warhead on time could result in a critical gap in the U.S. nuclear deterrent.In the new book from the Center for Security Policy Press, Growing Challenges for America’s Nuclear Deterrent, nine national security experts examine the threat to the U.S. nuclear arsenal and what it takes to deter nuclear attack, assure U.S. allies and partners, achieve U.S. objectives if deterrence fails, and hedge against future threats. On May 5, hear three of these expert contributors, Fred Fleitz, Dr. Matthew Kroenig, and Dr. Michaela Dodge, discuss the nuclear force necessary to deter, fight, and win a nuclear conflict. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Matthew Kroenig, Director of the Global Strategy Initiative at the Atlantic Council, explains why he believes pessimism about great power competition with Russia and China is unwarranted Todd Harrison, Director of the Aerospace Security Project at the Center for Strategic & International Studies, discusses how the coronavirus is reshaping the way the Pentagon is spending its money during this fiscal year Sophia Edwards, Founder and CEO of SharpEDG, describes the biggest challenges that IT leaders are up against as they make the shift to telework and recommendations for agencies during this time

Georgetown Professor Matthew Kroenig joins host Ben Domenech to discuss his new book, "The Return of Great Power Rivalry: Democracy versus Autocracy from the Ancient World to the US and China."

Shadi and Damir talk Europe, its problems of integrating of foreigners, and how European mental reliance on the state as a solution to everything is a long-term problem for the continent. Required Reading: Emmanuel Macron’s interview in the Economist magazine: https://www.economist.com/europe/2019/11/07/emmanuel-macron-in-his-own-words-english Riada Akyol in Al-Jazeera: https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/macron-remarks-bosnia-dangerous-191110133224396.html Bruno Maçaes in Politico Europe: https://www.politico.eu/article/emmanuel-macron-islamophobic-undercurrent-french-vision/ Ash Jain and Matthew Kroenig at Atlantic Council: https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-research-reports/report/present-at-the-re-creation/

On GPS: Pres. Trump & Kim Jong Un fail to reach a peace deal. Fareed and a great panel discuss what's next, and where did all the love between them go? Then, India & Pakistan's long enmity flared this week as each side claimed victory in the skies, but is there hope of reconciliation on the subcontinent? GUESTS: Richard Haass, Robin Wright, Matthew Kroenig, Ravi Agrawal, Mosharraf Zaidi, Chuck Robbins

Providence Managing Editor Drew Griffin sits down with Matthew Kroenig — author, professor and fellow at the Atlantic Council to discuss Trump’s State of the Union Address, Russia, North Korea, and the potential changes in US policy regarding each. He also discusses his new book: The Logic of American Nuclear Strategy.

Matthew Kroenig joins Ben Domenech for a discussion on nuclear strategy, CIA director Gina Haspel, missile defense, and the situation in Venezuela. Kroenig is the Deputy Director for Strategy, Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security at Georgetown University.

On July 13th, Hudson Institute hosted a discussion a recent study by the National Institute for Public Policy titled "A New Nuclear Review for a New Age"

On July 13th, Hudson Institute hosted a discussion a recent study by the National Institute for Public Policy titled "A New Nuclear Review for a New Age"

What do Iran’s elections and Trump’s international trip mean for the nuclear deal and US-Iran relations? Professor Kevan Harris discusses the history behind the latest news and paints a different picture of Iranian politics than usually seen in America.   For More on This Topic: Look for his upcoming book, A Social Revolution: Politics and the Welfare State in Iran   Further Reading: Attacking Iran's Nuclear Facilities Would Likely Radicalize the Islamic Republic's Government and Politics, Matthew Gratias, University of Southern California History Shows that President Obama is Wise to Retain a Military Option to Cripple Iran's Nuclear Facilities, Matthew Kroenig, Georgetown University

Paul Huth, editor of Journal of Conflict Resolution, interviews guest editors Erik Gartzke and Matthew Kroenig about the April 2014 Special Issue: Nuclear Posture, Nonproliferation Policy, and the Spread of Nuclear Weapons. 

3-D printing may enable the most sensitive pieces of a nuclear weapons program to be more easily produced and transferred undetected around the globe. Tristan Volpe and Matthew Kroenig launch their new article and explore how the United States can adopt both top-down and bottom-up strategies to combat this threat to international security‪. ‬Bruce Goodwin moderates.

In this podcast, Tong Zhao and Matthew Kroenig discuss U.S. policy options in the event that nuclear negotiations with Iran fall through and the future outlook of NATO nuclear posture in Europe.

Hudson Institute hosted a lunchtime panel of experts to discuss the Obama administration's Iran policy. Senior Fellow Lee Smith moderated a panel featuring Michael Doran, Matthew Kroenig, and David Samuels.

Hudson Institute hosted a lunchtime panel of experts to discuss the Obama administration's Iran policy. Senior Fellow Lee Smith moderated a panel featuring Michael Doran, Matthew Kroenig, and David Samuels.

In an interview with Nayan Chanda, Editor of YaleGlobal Online Dr. Matthew Kroenig, Assistant Professor of Government at Georgetown University, discusses the pros and cons of an Israeli and US attack on Iranian nuclear installations and the arguments for Washington establishing a red line to deter Iran's nuclear weapons program.