POPULARITY
Categories
563 episodes with Broad
338 episodes with Broad
250 episodes with Broad
338 episodes with Broad
171 episodes with Broad
118 episodes with Broad
122 episodes with Broad
79 episodes with Broad
114 episodes with Broad
85 episodes with Broad
95 episodes with Broad
84 episodes with Broad
72 episodes with Broad
49 episodes with Broad
53 episodes with Broad
19 episodes with Broad
63 episodes with Broad
41 episodes with Broad
40 episodes with Broad
51 episodes with Broad
65 episodes with Broad
33 episodes with Broad
47 episodes with Broad
41 episodes with Broad
25 episodes with Broad
32 episodes with Broad
40 episodes with Broad
11 episodes with Broad
19 episodes with Broad
12 episodes with Broad
18 episodes with Broad
16 episodes with Broad
17 episodes with Broad
10 episodes with Broad
9 episodes with Broad
18 episodes with Broad
14 episodes with Broad
12 episodes with Broad
7 episodes with Broad
4 episodes with Broad
16 episodes with Broad
11 episodes with Broad
26 episodes with Broad
18 episodes with Broad
11 episodes with Broad
11 episodes with Broad
10 episodes with Broad
15 episodes with Broad
11 episodes with Broad
8 episodes with Broad
8 episodes with Broad
10 episodes with Broad
32 episodes with Broad
9 episodes with Broad
16 episodes with Broad
13 episodes with Broad
5 episodes with Broad
5 episodes with Broad
4 episodes with Broad
7 episodes with Broad
7 episodes with Broad
7 episodes with Broad
8 episodes with Broad
17 episodes with Broad
9 episodes with Broad
6 episodes with Broad
8 episodes with Broad
20 episodes with Broad
7 episodes with Broad
6 episodes with Broad
5 episodes with Broad
7 episodes with Broad
7 episodes with Broad
5 episodes with Broad
15 episodes with Broad
12 episodes with Broad
12 episodes with Broad
6 episodes with Broad
4 episodes with Broad
7 episodes with Broad
7 episodes with Broad
5 episodes with Broad
10 episodes with Broad
6 episodes with Broad
7 episodes with Broad
4 episodes with Broad
5 episodes with Broad
11 episodes with Broad
4 episodes with Broad
6 episodes with Broad
3 episodes with Broad
7 episodes with Broad
5 episodes with Broad
4 episodes with Broad
4 episodes with Broad
12 episodes with Broad
9 episodes with Broad
6 episodes with Broad
3 episodes with Broad
5 episodes with Broad
3 episodes with Broad
11 episodes with Broad
2 episodes with Broad
7 episodes with Broad
3 episodes with Broad
3 episodes with Broad
5 episodes with Broad
7 episodes with Broad
13 episodes with Broad
4 episodes with Broad
4 episodes with Broad
3 episodes with Broad
5 episodes with Broad
4 episodes with Broad
3 episodes with Broad
3 episodes with Broad
3 episodes with Broad
7 episodes with Broad
4 episodes with Broad
2 episodes with Broad
3 episodes with Broad
6 episodes with Broad
4 episodes with Broad
11 episodes with Broad
4 episodes with Broad
3 episodes with Broad
5 episodes with Broad
3 episodes with Broad
8 episodes with Broad
10 episodes with Broad
3 episodes with Broad
5 episodes with Broad
8 episodes with Broad
6 episodes with Broad
8 episodes with Broad
5 episodes with Broad
3 episodes with Broad
4 episodes with Broad
8 episodes with Broad
4 episodes with Broad
11 episodes with Broad
3 episodes with Broad
2 episodes with Broad
4 episodes with Broad
2 episodes with Broad
2 episodes with Broad
4 episodes with Broad
4 episodes with Broad
4 episodes with Broad
5 episodes with Broad
7 episodes with Broad
3 episodes with Broad
2 episodes with Broad
3 episodes with Broad
9 episodes with Broad
4 episodes with Broad
4 episodes with Broad
4 episodes with Broad
9 episodes with Broad
6 episodes with Broad
5 episodes with Broad
3 episodes with Broad
3 episodes with Broad
5 episodes with Broad
6 episodes with Broad
3 episodes with Broad
8 episodes with Broad
3 episodes with Broad
4 episodes with Broad
4 episodes with Broad
4 episodes with Broad
One of the biggest determinants of your future net worth will be your asset allocation – how you apportion your portfolio to cash, bonds, and stocks (and the types of stocks you choose). In Month 3 of our 2026 Financial Planning Challenge, Amanda Kish joins host Robert Brokamp to discuss:-Risk capacity vs. risk tolerance-How factors such as your job and your past behavior could influence your portfolio-Biases that may result in sub-optimal decisions-Broad allocation guidance to consider-Recommended tools for tracking and analyzing your portfolioHost: Robert Brokamp, CFP®Guest: Amanda Kish, CFP®, CFAEngineer: Bart Shannon Disclosure: Advertisements are sponsored content and provided for informational purposes only. The Motley Fool and its affiliates (collectively, “TMF”) do not endorse, recommend, or verify the accuracy or completeness of the statements made within advertisements. TMF is not involved in the offer, sale, or solicitation of any securities advertised herein and makes no representations regarding the suitability, or risks associated with any investment opportunity presented. Investors should conduct their own due diligence and consult with legal, tax, and financial advisors before making any investment decisions. TMF assumes no responsibility for any losses or damages arising from this advertisement.We're committed to transparency: All personal opinions in advertisements from Fools are their own. The product advertised in this episode was loaned to TMF and was returned after a test period or the product advertised in this episode was purchased by TMF. Advertiser has paid for the sponsorship of this episode.Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
It was another wild week in the markets, and today we're breaking down the biggest stories that moved price action across the globe. From escalating conflict in the Middle East to sharp swings in equities and commodities, traders had plenty to digest. The ongoing Iran war has sent shockwaves through energy markets, with oil prices surging as fears grow about disruptions to global supply and shipping through the critical Strait of Hormuz, which normally handles roughly 20% of the world's oil shipments. In today's episode of Trading Week Wrap Up, we'll connect the dots between the geopolitical headlines and what they actually mean for traders. We'll cover: The latest developments in the Iran conflict and its market impact Why oil prices surged and how energy markets are reacting The broader weakness across equities and risk assets What traders should watch as geopolitical risk increases I'll also answer a viewer question on trading taxation, a topic every active trader needs to understand before tax season sneaks up on them. And of course, I'll provide updates on my trades for the week—what worked, what didn't, and how I'm managing risk in a volatile environment. If you want a clear breakdown of the week's biggest market drivers without the noise, this episode is for you. Listen now:
Listen for the latest from Bloomberg News See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
A lawsuit over whether a Dollar General store should be built just off of Highway 145 is moving forward.
This description has been deemed appropriate for all ages by the FCC. If you're 21 or older, get 35% OFF your first order @IndaCloud with code SUPERMEGA at https://inda.shop/SUPERMEGA ! #indacloudpod Download Cash App Today: [ https://capl.onelink.me/vFut/1y1gs9ys] #CashAppPod. Cash App is a financial services platform, not a bank. Banking services provided by Cash App's bank partner(s). Prepaid debit cards issued by Sutton Bank, Member FDIC. See terms and conditions at https://cash.app/legal/us/en-us/card-agreement. Discounts and promotions provided by Cash App, a Block, Inc. brand. Visit http://cash.app/legal/podcast for full disclosures. Sign up for your $1 per month trial and start selling today at https://Shopify.com/super Follow Matt: @matthwatson Follow Ryan: @elirymagee Follow the show: @supermegashow Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
In this third installment of Claude Sessions, Danny is joined by Subash from Not A Square, who helps e-commerce brands scaling past seven figures implement AI without scaling headcount. Subash walks through real client case studies -- including a TikTok brand that boosted its customer satisfaction score from 4.2 to 4.5 in four weeks using a customer support agent built in Claude. Danny then breaks down OpenClaw, the open-source personal AI agent that exploded in popularity, explains why he chose not to use it despite the temptation, and reveals Claude Flow -- his custom operating system built inside Claude Code with 11 engines, 300+ features, and a persistent memory layer powered by ChromaDB. The episode drives home one core message: document your operations first, pick one platform, go deep, and stop chasing every new tool. Key Topics Documenting operations before automation -- Why you cannot automate what is not documented TikTok customer support case study -- Building an AI agent that raised satisfaction scores in four weeks OpenClaw overview and security risks -- What it does, why it blew up, and why Danny built his own alternative Claude Flow -- Danny's custom operating system inside Claude Code with persistent memory The amnesia loop -- How context loss between sessions kills productivity and how ChromaDB solves it Pixel-less environment -- The shift from structured prompts to contextual AI interaction Go deep on one platform -- Why chasing multiple AI tools guarantees you build nothing Timestamps [00:00] Introduction -- Claude Sessions Week 3, delayed from the road [01:03] Subash introduces himself and Not A Square [02:01] Overview of three client projects and the problem founders face [04:30] Why operational truth is the moat in AI commerce [06:48] Three pillars: reduce costs, better governance, scale without headcount [07:30] TikTok case study -- customer support agent boosting store score from 4.2 to 4.5 [09:04] OpenClaw -- history, capabilities, and the security nightmare [15:30] Six core capabilities of OpenClaw (local-first, universal messaging, persistent memory, browser automation, system access, self-extending skills) [18:00] Why OpenClaw matters -- moving from dumb LLMs to personal AI agents [20:00] Security trade-offs -- 1.5M API keys exposed, malware in skills, Cisco tests [22:00] Claude Flow -- Danny's 11-engine operating system built inside Claude Code [24:26] The amnesia loop -- how sessions lose context and how ChromaDB fixes it [28:19] Why Claude MD, agents, and skills are not enough without hooks and triggers [32:40] Go deep on one platform -- stop chasing every new tool [35:35] Subash on helping sellers adopt Claude Code fundamentals (Claude MD, skills) [39:51] Wrap-up and contact info Key Takeaways Document before you automate -- If your business operations live in the founder's head and not on paper, any AI tool will amplify the chaos rather than fix it. Operational truth is the moat -- Clean inventory, accurate catalogs, honest cashflow reporting. Get these right before touching AI. One AI agent moved the needle -- A single customer support agent on TikTok raised a brand's satisfaction score from 4.2 to 4.5 in four weeks, directly improving store visibility. Persistent memory changes everything -- ChromaDB captures decisions, patterns, and project context across sessions so Claude compounds in usefulness over time (zero entries in session one, 1,700+ by session 25). Scaffolding beats raw building -- Danny's Claude Flow system means a project that took five days six months ago now takes 40 minutes. The investment in infrastructure pays exponential returns. OpenClaw is proof of concept, not production-ready -- Broad permissions, prompt injection vulnerabilities, exposed API keys. Wait for the open-source community to patch the holes before diving in. Pick one platform and go all the way in -- Chasing multiple AI tools means you learn none of them deeply and build nothing of value.
Personal Revival, Nation Awakening & Generational ReformationFor all the latest on all things Victory, be sure to check out our website at https://victoryfla.com and follow us on social media.Download our app at: https://victoryfla.com/appFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/victorychurchfla/Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/victorychurchfla/X: https://twitter.com/victorychurchfla
If you watched President Trump's recent State of the Union address, you probably heard about the new Trump accounts, also known as 530A accounts. In this episode, I break down how these tax-advantaged investment accounts are designed to work, who qualifies, and—just as importantly, what we still don't know. There's been a lot of excitement, especially around the $1,000 seed money for eligible children. But before you rush to open one, there are several unanswered questions that deserve your attention. What Are Trump Accounts—and Who Qualifies? Trump accounts were introduced under the 2025 "Big Beautiful Bill Act" and are designed to help U.S. children build long-term wealth. Parents, grandparents, and others can contribute up to $5,000 per year per child until age 18. To jumpstart participation, children born between January 1, 2025, and December 31, 2028, are eligible for a $1,000 federal seed contribution. Unlike a Roth IRA, these accounts do not require earned income to contribute. That's a major difference. Most children can't fund retirement accounts because they don't have income. These accounts are meant to give them a head start from birth. To qualify, a child must be a U.S. citizen, have a valid Social Security number, and be under age 18. Parents can apply either by filing IRS Form 4547 with their 2025 tax return or by visiting trumpaccounts.gov. You'll Want to Hear This Episode If You're Interested In… [01:00] How the $5,000 annual contribution limit works [01:45] Why these accounts don't require earned income [02:35] How to open an account through your tax return or online [03:00] The upcoming authentication process in May 2026 [03:40] Whether you can invest in individual stocks like Nvidia or Tesla [04:30] Why Treasury guidance suggests broad index funds instead [05:10] Whether billions in seed money could move the stock market [06:00] Which financial institutions may (or may not) offer these accounts [07:45] Potential gift tax filing requirements for contributions [08:45] How withdrawals at age 18 might be taxed The Investment Confusion and Market Impact One of the biggest points of confusion right now is how the funds will actually be invested. The Trump accounts website shows mockups featuring individual stocks like Nvidia, Caterpillar, Home Depot, and Tesla. That certainly grabs attention. But Treasury guidance suggests investments may be limited to broad U.S. equity index funds or mutual funds, not individual stocks. If that holds true, I actually think that may benefit most investors. Broad-based index funds have historically outperformed many individual stock pickers over time. But it's important to understand what you're signing up for before you contribute. Another question I address is whether these accounts could meaningfully impact the stock market. With over 3 million sign-ups already, the initial $1,000 seed funding could total more than $3 billion. Add in private contributions and potential employer matches, and that number could grow to $7–8 billion invested when markets reopen after July 4. That sounds significant, but compared to total daily trading volume, it's less than 2%. It may provide a small positive impact, but it's unlikely to cause a dramatic market surge. Taxes, Custodians, and the Big Unknown at Age 18 There are still major tax questions. Because contributions are considered gifts and the child doesn't have immediate access to the funds, this could create gift tax reporting complications. Even if contributions fall under the $19,000 annual exclusion (for 2026), a gift tax return may still be required due to the lack of "present interest." Then there's the big question: how will withdrawals be taxed at age 18? There's no upfront deduction for contributions, which means this isn't structured like a traditional IRA. But it's also not clearly a Roth. My expectation is that only the gains will be taxed, but we don't yet know whether that will be ordinary income or capital gains. Until we get final guidance, I strongly believe record-keeping will be critical. Track contributions carefully. If custodians change or records are lost, your child could face unnecessary tax complications later. For now, here's what we do know: if your child, or a grandchild, niece, or nephew, qualifies for the $1,000 seed money, make sure the account gets opened. Even with unanswered questions, that initial funding is meaningful. Resources Mentioned TrumpAccounts.gov RetireWithRyan.com Retirement Readiness on Demand Discount Code: RETIRE99 Connect With Ryan Subscribe to the Retire With Ryan YouTube Channel Download my entire book for FREE
“If you argue correctly, you're never wrong.” Join Ian, & Liam for our 320th episode as we light up the slick, fast-talking, morally elastic world of Jason Reitman's Thank You For Smoking (2005). It's spin, satire, and strategic deflection this week as we ask whether winning an argument is the same thing as being right. This week we discuss: Aaron Eckhart's Nick Naylor — charming, composed, and ethically slippery. Is this one of the great “bad good guy” performances of the 2000s? The art of spin — how the film weaponises rhetoric, reframing, and misdirection to hilarious — and unsettling — effect. Satire with teeth — does the film actually challenge corporate lobbying culture, or does it admire its own cleverness too much? We break down the film's tonal balance — sharp comedy undercut by quiet moments of moral reckoning. Liam explores the father-son dynamic — does the film ultimately soften Nick, or does it merely reposition him? Ian questions the target — is Big Tobacco the point, or is the film more interested in the machinery of persuasion itself? The MOD Squad scenes — Big Tobacco, Big Alcohol, Big Firearms. Broad caricature or disturbingly accurate power structures? Katie Holmes' subplot — narrative necessity, tonal misfire, or commentary on transactional journalism? The ending — redemption arc, compromise, or simply another pivot in a long career of strategic positioning? We debate whether satire ages well — does this feel timeless, or does it belong firmly to its Bush-era moment? And finally, whether Thank You For Smoking is the Best Film Ever — or simply one of the smartest, slickest comedies of its decade. Become a Patron of this podcast and support the BFE at https://www.patreon.com/BFE We are extremely thankful to our following Patrons for their most generous support: Juleen from It Goes Down In The PM Hermes Auslander James DeGuzman Synthia Shai Bergerfroind Ariannah Who Loves BFE The Most Paul Komoroski Duane Smith (Duane Smith!) Andy Dickson Chris Pedersen Randal Silva Nate The Great Rev Bruce Cheezy (with a fish on a bike) Richard Ryan Kuketz Dirk Diggler Stew from the Stew World Order podcast NorfolkDomus John Humphrey's Right Foot Timmy Tim Tim Aashrey Youth Hosteling with Chris Eubank Buy some BFE merch at https://my-store-b4e4d4.creator-spring.com/. Massive thanks to Lex Van Den Berghe for the use of Mistake by Luckydog. Catch more from Lex's new band, The Maids of Honor, at https://soundcloud.com/themaidsofhonor Also, massive thanks to Moonlight Social for our age game theme song. You can catch more from them at https://www.moonlightsocialmusic.com/
The Handley Judges are hosting Broad Run in a Class 4 State Quarterfinal match up. Randy Woodward and Josh Kirby have coverage starting at 6:45pm on The River 95.3, Fox Sports Radio 1450, theriver953.com and App.Josh speaks with Judges Head Coach Zach Harrell-Zook about the Judges exciting victory over an undefeated EC Glass team along with the adversity that his team has faced and how that adversity is helping his team in the later stages of the playoffs.
C3 Metals CEO Dan Symons joined Steve Darling from Proactive to report new drill results from the company's Khaleesi copper project in southern Peru, highlighting encouraging early-stage exploration success. C3 Metals has completed 12 diamond drill holes totaling 6,300 metres, with copper mineralization observed in all completed holes across a footprint measuring approximately 1,000 metres by 500 metres. Step-out drilling has extended up to 300 metres, marking the first-ever drill testing at the greenfield Khaleesi project. Assay results from the first two holes were previously released. The company has now received assays from an additional four holes, with multiple intercepts of broad skarn- and diorite-hosted copper mineralization. Highlights include hole KHZ5825-001: 101.1 metres grading 0.30% copper, 0.045 g/t gold, 0.84 g/t silver, and 48 ppm molybdenum (0.37% CuEq) from 23.4 metres downhole and KHZ5950-001: 243.7 metres grading 0.24% copper, 0.020 g/t gold, 0.87 g/t silver, and 41 ppm molybdenum (0.29% CuEq) from approximately 200 metres vertical depth. Symons said results from the first six assayed holes, combined with visual observations from the remaining six holes, suggest potential for higher-grade mineralization in the western and southwestern areas of the project. Mineralization in the eastern and northeastern portions appears more distal from what management describes as the system's “heat engine.” With additional drilling, the company aims to better define the geometry of the mineral system and vector toward higher-grade zones, potentially associated with a porphyry source. Following completion of the initial 6,300-metre Phase 1 program, C3 Metals has launched an aggressive 2026 drill campaign. The company plans to drill an additional 15,000 metres this year, targeting a total of 21,300 metres by year-end. Management is continuously refining its geological model to better target skarn-hosted mineralization and evaluate the potential for an underlying porphyry system. #proactiveinvestors #c3metalsinc #tsxv #cccm #otcqb #cuauf #KhaleesiProject #KhaleesiProject #CopperExploration #PeruMining #SkarnMineralization #PorphyryTarget #DiamondDrilling #DrillResults #CopperGold #Molybdenum #ResourceExpansion #GreenfieldProject #MiningExploration #CopperDiscovery #BaseMetals #Phase1Drilling #2026DrillProgram #GeologicalModel #AndeanMining #CuEq
The Broad Arrow Amelia Auction 2026 is coming up soon, and there's a ton of interesting cars to pick apart. But given an unlimited-budget, what five cars would you pick from this year's lot? In this episode, Jason and Derek explore just that. === Visit http://JasonSentMe.com to get a Hagerty Guaranteed Value (TM) collector-car insurance quote! === Before picking favorites, Derek goes over some of the highlights of this year's listing - starting most notably with the Black over Red 2003 Ferrari Enzo, estimated to hit $12-16M. The Ferrari Monza SP2 is also a big deal, as it is one of the first publicly sold examples to exist. And of course, the 1988 Porsche 959 Sport is estimated to make a big splash with a $4.25-5M estimate. Jason and Derek then discuss their five picks, aiming to surprise each other with their choices. Jason unexpectedly chooses a number exotics, including the 1991 Testarossa, the F40, the Ford GT Heritage Edition, and the 1973 Dino 246 GTS. Derek is a bit more predictable - choosing some lesser known cars like the Siata 208S, the Lancia B24 Spider America, and the “Rote Sau” recreated Mercedes-Benz 300 SEL 6.3 with a 6 speed manual. All this and more on this week's episode of The Carmudgeon Show. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
On this episode of the It's All Your Fault podcast presented by Farm Bureau Insurance of Tennessee, host Jeremy K. Gover invites Nick Kieser of Lower Broad Hockey onto the show to discuss....Could the Nashville Predators actually buy at the NHL Trade Deadline?What players could they sell off?What players should they sell off?Could any unexpected names be moved?What could be the return for pending UFA's like Erik Haula, Michael Bunting or Michael McCarron?Could GM Barry Trotz decide to sign any of those guys to an extension?If Nashville stands pat and tries to make the playoff with who they have, do they stand a chance?Follow our host on Twitter at @ItsGovertime and our guest at @KieserNick. And don't forget to follow the show at @IAYFpodcast!
Jim McTague reports that a hotter-than-expected PPI report signals rising costs, leading "gun-shy" consumers to stretch paychecks and avoid impulse buys at supermarkets during a broad economic slowdown. 5.1912 COSL BRESKERS
Daniel is joined by Ajit Manocha, president and CEO of SEMI, the global industry association serving the semiconductor and electronics manufacturing and design supply chain. Throughout his career, Manocha has been a champion of industry collaboration as a critical means of advancing technology for societal and economic prosperity.… Read More
Guest Bio: Ivana Taylor has spent 35 years translating complex marketing into simple, executable strategies. She's the founder of DIYMarketers.com, where she helps entrepreneurs compete without enterprise budgets. She's a self-described AI power user who tests tools for six hours a day. And she's built follow-up systems for everyone from manufacturing companies to consultants. Key Points: 1. Cold Outreach Requires Far More "Touches" Than It Used To A "touch" is no longer just a phone call or email. Every interaction counts. It includes: · Social media posts · Website visits · Content consumption · LinkedIn engagement · Webinars · Direct mail · Comments and DMs 2. Most Small Businesses Skip the Foundational Steps Before worrying about sequences, automation, or buying lists, you must clearly define your ideal customer, understand the problem you solve, identify the desired outcome your buyer wants and know how your buyer makes decisions. Without this groundwork, marketing becomes expensive guesswork. 3. Cold Email Alone Is Weak (and Often an Avoidance Strategy) Response rates to pure cold email are extremely low. Buying lists and blasting emails often feels productive, is easy to automate and produces poor results. Cold email works best as a second step, not a first step. 4. Start Manual Before You Automate The recommendation: · Begin with real conversations · Aim for consistent outreach (calls or personal messages) · Learn from live interactions · Identify patterns in objections, desired outcomes, and buying triggers Only after recognizing patterns should you build automated sequences. 5. The Phone Is Still the Fastest Path to Revenue Despite all the marketing tools available, the most consistent answer to "What's working?" was picking up the phone and having conversations. Why? · Immediate feedback · Faster learning curve · Real-time objection handling · Faster path to booked appointments 6. Mindset Matters: Service, Not Persuasion Cold outreach works best when: · You see yourself as helping, not convincing · "No" is viewed as clarity (not rejection) · Your goal is conversation, not immediate conversion A clear "no" frees you to pursue someone who will say yes. 7. Specific Targeting Beats Big Lists Instead of buying 10,000 names: · Define clear parameters (industry, role, company size, revenue, keywords) · Start with a focused segment · Refine messaging based on real conversations · Build segmented sequences based on actual buying motivations Broad targeting = poor response. Specific targeting = stronger engagement. 8. Automation Is Powerful — But Only After Strategy Automation should amplify a proven message, a clearly defined audience, validated buying patterns. It cannot replace foundational work. 9. Marketing Is Not Magic — It's Consistent Work There is no shortcut. Successful outreach requires: · Repetition · Iteration · Conversations · Testing · Refinement The "eat your vegetables" truth: the people succeeding are doing the work. Bottom Line Cold outreach still works — but not as a blast-and-hope strategy. What works: · Clear targeting · Strong positioning · Multi-channel touches · Real conversations · Strategic follow-up And above all, start with the fundamentals before scaling with tools. Guest Links: Free Gift: An AI Outreach Ebook IMPORTANT – You must Double Opt-in and confirm your email to receive this free gift. Learn More Visit DIYMarketers.com – Simple, actionable marketing strategies for small business owners who want to do marketing on less than $17 a day. Fix Your Marketing Problem in Less Than 24 Hours – Fill out the form, tell me your marketing challenge, and I'll send personalized recommendations in less than 24 hours. About Salesology®: Conversations with Sales Leaders Download your free gift, The Salesology® Vault. The vault is packed full of free gifts from sales leaders, sales experts, marketing gurus, and revenue generation experts. Download your free gift, 81 Tools to Grow Your Sales & Your Business Faster, More Easily & More Profitably. Save hours of work tracking down the right prospecting and sales resources and/or digital tools that every business owner and salesperson needs. If you are a business owner or sales manager with an underperforming sales team, let's talk. Click here to schedule a time. Please subscribe to Salesology®: Conversations with Sales Leaders so that you don't miss a single episode, and while you're at it, won't you take a moment to write a short review and rate our show? It would be greatly appreciated! To learn more about our previous guests, listen to past episodes, and get to know your host, go to https://podcast.gosalesology.com/ and connect on LinkedIn and follow us on Facebook and Instagram, and check out our website at https://gosalesology.com/.
The Department of Justice has brazenly disregarded the clear mandates of the Epstein Files Transparency Act (EFTA), particularly the disclosure requirements and statutory deadlines laid out in Section 3. The law required the DOJ to release defined categories of records, provide detailed explanations for every redaction, and identify all government officials and politically exposed persons named in the materials. Instead of complying in full, the department released a narrow, heavily redacted collection of documents while withholding a vast volume of responsive records. The unredacted disclosure deadline came and went without meaningful compliance. What was produced lacked the comprehensive index and specificity the statute demanded. Millions of pages reportedly remain unreleased, despite Congress mandating transparency. The Section 3 report failed to deliver the granularity required by law, particularly in identifying who was named and on what basis redactions were made. Broad exemptions were invoked without the level of explanation the Act contemplated. Rather than submitting to the spirit and letter of the law, the DOJ controlled the scope of disclosure on its own terms. The result is selective transparency under a statute that was written to prevent exactly that outcome.The EFTA was designed to remove executive discretion from this equation and impose a binding transparency framework in a case defined by secrecy and institutional failure. By withholding large categories of material and failing to meet statutory deadlines, the DOJ has treated a congressional mandate as optional guidance. The department has cited privacy, investigative integrity, and classification concerns, but the Act anticipated those issues and required structured justification for each redaction. Instead, the response has been partial compliance coupled with procedural delay. When a federal agency declines to meet a legislated transparency deadline in a case involving powerful figures and systemic misconduct, it deepens public distrust. The failure to provide a full accounting of withheld records leaves Congress and the public unable to assess the completeness of the release. Courts traditionally defer to executive agencies on classification and disclosure decisions, limiting immediate judicial remedies. That places enforcement squarely back in the hands of Congress, which must decide whether to escalate through oversight powers. At its core, this is no longer just a records dispute; it is a constitutional test of whether statutory transparency mandates carry real enforcement power. The DOJ's approach has transformed the EFTA from a promised reckoning into a prolonged institutional standoff.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
Darshan H. Brahmbhatt, Podcast Editor of JACC: Advances, discusses a recently published original research paper on Prognostic Value of CMR-Derived Left Ventricular Filling Pressure in Broad Referral Populations.
Ashor Sarupen – Deputy Minister of Finance & Schalk Human – Chief Financial Officer, Sars. Volg RSG Geldsake op Twitter
The Department of Justice has brazenly disregarded the clear mandates of the Epstein Files Transparency Act (EFTA), particularly the disclosure requirements and statutory deadlines laid out in Section 3. The law required the DOJ to release defined categories of records, provide detailed explanations for every redaction, and identify all government officials and politically exposed persons named in the materials. Instead of complying in full, the department released a narrow, heavily redacted collection of documents while withholding a vast volume of responsive records. The unredacted disclosure deadline came and went without meaningful compliance. What was produced lacked the comprehensive index and specificity the statute demanded. Millions of pages reportedly remain unreleased, despite Congress mandating transparency. The Section 3 report failed to deliver the granularity required by law, particularly in identifying who was named and on what basis redactions were made. Broad exemptions were invoked without the level of explanation the Act contemplated. Rather than submitting to the spirit and letter of the law, the DOJ controlled the scope of disclosure on its own terms. The result is selective transparency under a statute that was written to prevent exactly that outcome.The EFTA was designed to remove executive discretion from this equation and impose a binding transparency framework in a case defined by secrecy and institutional failure. By withholding large categories of material and failing to meet statutory deadlines, the DOJ has treated a congressional mandate as optional guidance. The department has cited privacy, investigative integrity, and classification concerns, but the Act anticipated those issues and required structured justification for each redaction. Instead, the response has been partial compliance coupled with procedural delay. When a federal agency declines to meet a legislated transparency deadline in a case involving powerful figures and systemic misconduct, it deepens public distrust. The failure to provide a full accounting of withheld records leaves Congress and the public unable to assess the completeness of the release. Courts traditionally defer to executive agencies on classification and disclosure decisions, limiting immediate judicial remedies. That places enforcement squarely back in the hands of Congress, which must decide whether to escalate through oversight powers. At its core, this is no longer just a records dispute; it is a constitutional test of whether statutory transparency mandates carry real enforcement power. The DOJ's approach has transformed the EFTA from a promised reckoning into a prolonged institutional standoff.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
The Department of Justice has brazenly disregarded the clear mandates of the Epstein Files Transparency Act (EFTA), particularly the disclosure requirements and statutory deadlines laid out in Section 3. The law required the DOJ to release defined categories of records, provide detailed explanations for every redaction, and identify all government officials and politically exposed persons named in the materials. Instead of complying in full, the department released a narrow, heavily redacted collection of documents while withholding a vast volume of responsive records. The unredacted disclosure deadline came and went without meaningful compliance. What was produced lacked the comprehensive index and specificity the statute demanded. Millions of pages reportedly remain unreleased, despite Congress mandating transparency. The Section 3 report failed to deliver the granularity required by law, particularly in identifying who was named and on what basis redactions were made. Broad exemptions were invoked without the level of explanation the Act contemplated. Rather than submitting to the spirit and letter of the law, the DOJ controlled the scope of disclosure on its own terms. The result is selective transparency under a statute that was written to prevent exactly that outcome.The EFTA was designed to remove executive discretion from this equation and impose a binding transparency framework in a case defined by secrecy and institutional failure. By withholding large categories of material and failing to meet statutory deadlines, the DOJ has treated a congressional mandate as optional guidance. The department has cited privacy, investigative integrity, and classification concerns, but the Act anticipated those issues and required structured justification for each redaction. Instead, the response has been partial compliance coupled with procedural delay. When a federal agency declines to meet a legislated transparency deadline in a case involving powerful figures and systemic misconduct, it deepens public distrust. The failure to provide a full accounting of withheld records leaves Congress and the public unable to assess the completeness of the release. Courts traditionally defer to executive agencies on classification and disclosure decisions, limiting immediate judicial remedies. That places enforcement squarely back in the hands of Congress, which must decide whether to escalate through oversight powers. At its core, this is no longer just a records dispute; it is a constitutional test of whether statutory transparency mandates carry real enforcement power. The DOJ's approach has transformed the EFTA from a promised reckoning into a prolonged institutional standoff.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
The Department of Justice has brazenly disregarded the clear mandates of the Epstein Files Transparency Act (EFTA), particularly the disclosure requirements and statutory deadlines laid out in Section 3. The law required the DOJ to release defined categories of records, provide detailed explanations for every redaction, and identify all government officials and politically exposed persons named in the materials. Instead of complying in full, the department released a narrow, heavily redacted collection of documents while withholding a vast volume of responsive records. The unredacted disclosure deadline came and went without meaningful compliance. What was produced lacked the comprehensive index and specificity the statute demanded. Millions of pages reportedly remain unreleased, despite Congress mandating transparency. The Section 3 report failed to deliver the granularity required by law, particularly in identifying who was named and on what basis redactions were made. Broad exemptions were invoked without the level of explanation the Act contemplated. Rather than submitting to the spirit and letter of the law, the DOJ controlled the scope of disclosure on its own terms. The result is selective transparency under a statute that was written to prevent exactly that outcome.The EFTA was designed to remove executive discretion from this equation and impose a binding transparency framework in a case defined by secrecy and institutional failure. By withholding large categories of material and failing to meet statutory deadlines, the DOJ has treated a congressional mandate as optional guidance. The department has cited privacy, investigative integrity, and classification concerns, but the Act anticipated those issues and required structured justification for each redaction. Instead, the response has been partial compliance coupled with procedural delay. When a federal agency declines to meet a legislated transparency deadline in a case involving powerful figures and systemic misconduct, it deepens public distrust. The failure to provide a full accounting of withheld records leaves Congress and the public unable to assess the completeness of the release. Courts traditionally defer to executive agencies on classification and disclosure decisions, limiting immediate judicial remedies. That places enforcement squarely back in the hands of Congress, which must decide whether to escalate through oversight powers. At its core, this is no longer just a records dispute; it is a constitutional test of whether statutory transparency mandates carry real enforcement power. The DOJ's approach has transformed the EFTA from a promised reckoning into a prolonged institutional standoff.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
SERMON: "DON'T UNDERESTIMATE THE UNDERDOG: MY DECISION TO WIN"
SERMON: "DON'T UNDERESTIMATE THE UNDERDOG: MY DECISION TO WIN"
Your Faith Journey - Finding God Through Words, Song and Praise
Today, we had a special musical performance of O Love, How Deep, How Broad, How High by the Faith Chancel Choir at Faith Lutheran Church in Okemos, Michigan. Published Under License From Essential Music Publishing, LLC
We're at the halfway point of the Virginia General Assembly session, and the VADA legal team is breaking down exactly what the "Crossover" deadline means for your dealership. Join VADA Live host Dan Carrigan as he sits down with Anne Gambardella, Executive Vice President and General Counsel, and Mimi Perka, Director of Legal and Legislative Affairs, for a Capitol "vibe check." From dodging unexpected solar canopy mandates to navigating new employment laws and surveillance pricing, Anne and Mimi share behind-the-scenes accounts of VADA's defensive wins. Tune in to find out which bills survived, which ones died, and how you can make your voice heard at the upcoming Dealer Day. Chapters: 00:00 - Welcome & General Assembly "Vibe Check" 03:27 - What is "Crossover" and why does it matter? 09:48 - Bullets Dodged: Predictive Scheduling & Surveillance Pricing 12:21 - The unexpected legislative fight over Solar Canopies 15:58 - Broad workplace initiatives: Minimum wage & Paid Family Leave 19:18 - Dealer Modernization Bills & prepping for Dealer Day 22:51 - Right to Repair updates & defeating the tax on repair services 27:30 - The ultimate takeaway for Virginia dealers About VADA Live: VADA LIVE is the official podcast powered by the Virginia Automobile Dealers Association, offering rich insights and information about the automotive industry in the Commonwealth of Virginia. Join VADA staff, members, and partners for behind-the-scenes accounts of our efforts in the legislature, regulatory, and industry worlds, and stay equipped with everything you need to know to be a successful and competitive automotive dealer in Virginia.
Grain markets mostly higher with wheat leading. Soybeans supported by oil values. Corn aided by Chinese demand. Livestock mixed. Energy, metals, and dollar show moderate movements.
The Rod and Greg Show Daily Rundown – Tuesday, February 17, 20264:20 pm: Matt Germer, Policy Director in Governance at the R Street Institute, joins the program to discuss why he says it would be a good idea to slow the implementation of the SAVE Act for federal elections because of timing and administrative concerns.4:38 pm: Tim O'Brien, a contributor to PJ Media, joins Rod and Greg to discuss his piece about how the most recent meltdown from Hillary Clinton at the Munich Security Conference is just another in a long line of Hillary Clinton hissy fits.6:05 pm: Guy Ciarrocchi, political commentator and contributor to Broad and Liberty, joins the show for a conversation about how Marco Rubio has shown he wants to unite the United States and Europe.
In addition to deciphering to meaning of 6 7, we dig into more news than we can chew: Information on parking ban during week of January 24 Front Street construction between Broad & Sackett Quirk center reopens after repairs Old high school pipes froze Congratulations Diana Colavecchio on retirement. Mary Spaugy has taken her position of Community Development Director Portage Crossing sold Missing man at Brandywine Falls, Michael Vangelas, found dead Dewitt Fifth grader Brayden Heiner got to be Mayor for a Day Child predator Spencer Kearney arrested Website impersonating Summit County Fiscal Office St Patrick's Day downtown pub crawl March 14 Paint & Sip at Tiki Underground Feb 26 Jenks born again Saturday, March 7 Bat out of Hell musical one right only at the Akron Civic, March 29 Devo's Mutate, Don't Stagnate tour coming to the Civic June 3 PUZZLES PUZZLES PUZZLES PUZZLES PUZZLES PUZZLES!!!!! Thank you for listening. We are always in the market for article submissions and suggestions for podcast interviews. If you are interested in volunteering with on The Falls Free Press or the Fallscast, or are a musician wishing to showcase your music on the podcast, drop us a line on facebook or at fallsfreepress@gmail.com. If you enjoyed the show, be sure to rate and review us on Apple Podcasts to let others know to listen. Fallscast theme composed and performed by Alex Hall. Interim music: “Waiting on the Sun” by the Doors (1968)
Breast cancer screening fails most often where access is constrained: limited appointments, geographic gaps, dense breast tissue, and reliance on self-exams that depend entirely on human touch. Awareness alone doesn't close those gaps.In this episode, Dr. Karny Ilan, co-founder and CEO of Feminai, shares how physician-led product design, multidisciplinary collaboration, and rigorous clinical trials shaped a new model for breast screening access. The conversation explores a shift in how breast health is managed—from episodic screening to continuous, individualized monitoring. Rather than relying on infrequent appointments alone, it examines tools designed to track changes over time, at home, while remaining connected to clinical decision-making. Timestamps(00:11) Breast cancer risk shaped by genetics and lived exposure(08:37) Limits of traditional self-breast exams(09:09) Personal experience shaping breast health urgency(10:15) How at-home breast scanning detects change over time(12:42) Designing screening tools for dense breast tissue(17:03) Addressing breast size, shape, and post-surgical variation(18:31) Clinical trials revealing real-world usability gaps(20:13) Why ease of use affects screening reliability(29:29) Access gaps amplified by pandemic-era screening delays(38:09) Broad inclusion across age, risk, and body types Guest BioDr. Karny Ilan — Co-Founder and CEO, FeminaiDr. Karny Ilan is a general surgery resident at Sheba Medical Center and the co-founder and CEO of Feminai, a breast health company developing an AI-enabled disposable wearable patch and app for at-home breast exams. With a strong family history of breast cancer, she brings clinical experience and patient-centered design to building scalable screening tools that expand access and personalization.LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/karny-ilan/Key PointsAccess constraints drive missed detection: Feminai targets screening gaps caused by geography, capacity, and avoidance.Physician-led design builds trust: Clinical credibility accelerated adoption with providers and investors.Dense breast tissue is a priority use case: The technology is designed to perform well where mammography often struggles.Personalized baselines change detection logic: Each scan is compared against the user's own prior data.Usability directly affects accuracy: Instructions, fit, and behavior shape downstream AI performance.Deep Dives1. At-home breast exams as infrastructureDesigned for frequent, low-friction useComplements rather than replaces imaging2. Patch and app workflowRisk stratification via medical questionnaireBluetooth-enabled scan uploads to secure cloudAI analysis with physician review3. Designing for every bodyStretch materials accommodate size variationDense tissue explicitly accounted forAdditional sizes planned as rollout expands4. Clinical trials beyond performance metricsUsability drove multiple design iterationsInstruction format affected adherenceShape changes required algorithm updates5. Personalized longitudinal trackingEach woman compared only to herselfChanges flagged based on deviation, not population averages6. Leadership and multidisciplinary teamsEngineers exposed to clinical sitesPatient stories shared to reinforce missionStability in leadership communication protected executionLinks & ReferencesBreast cancer screening beyond mammography (Mayo Clinic): https://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/mammogram/in-depth/breast-cancer/art-20047233Breast cancer screening recommendations (USPSTF): https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/breast-cancer-screening
In this week's episode, we take a look at five Instagram tips for writers, and we also discuss recent Facebook ad changes. This coupon code will get you 25% off the ebooks in the Ghost Night series at my Payhip store: CAINA25 The coupon code is valid through February 23, 2026. So if you need a new ebook this winter, we've got you covered! TRANSCRIPT 00:00:00 Introduction and Writing Updates Hello, everyone. Welcome to Episode 290 of The Pulp Writer Show. My name is Jonathan Moeller. Today is February 13th, 2026, and today we're looking at five tips for Instagram marketing for writers. We will also have Coupon of the Week and an update on my current writing and publishing projects. So let's first start with Coupon of the Week. This week's coupon code will get you 25% off the ebooks in the Ghost Night series at my Payhip store, and that code is CAINA25. The coupon code is valid through February the 23rd, 2026 so if you need a new ebook for this winter, we've got you covered. And now on my current writing and publishing projects. I'm currently 91,000 words into Cloak of Summoning, which will be the 14th book in my Cloak Mage urban fantasy series. I am hoping to finish the rough draft in the coming week, and then it's going to need a fair bit of editing because I've decided to change things and move things around to improve it. So if all goes well, I hope that book will be out in the first week of March, assuming nothing comes up before then. I am also 8,000 words into Blade of Wraiths, which will be the fourth book in my Blades of Ruin epic fantasy series, and I am hoping that will be out in April, if all goes well. In audiobook news, Blade of Storms is completely finished and I believe as of right now you can buy it at my Payhip store, Kobo, and Google Play, and it is currently working its way through processing at all the other audiobook stores. Hollis McCarthy has finished recording Cloak of Titans, which is the 11th book in the Cloak Mage urban fantasy series, and if all goes well, my proofer should be able to listen to it this week and then hopefully the audiobook will be available to you sometime in March. So that's where I'm at with my current writing and publishing and audiobook projects. 00:01:51 Thoughts on Facebook Ads Before we get to our main topic, I want to have a brief digression into another part of the Meta empire, specifically Facebook ads and my recent experiences therein. I've mentioned before that I stopped using Facebook ads in October since the Advantage Plus system, which is their AI targeting system, was giving me headaches. For a brief summary of my experience with Facebook ads. I started using them in 2019, did really well with them in 2020, then Facebook randomly started banning accounts during this craziness of summer 2020. I got my account reinstated, used them less frequently more and more until October of 2025 when I stopped using them altogether because Advantage Plus made targeting so hard. Since then, I've relied mostly on Amazon ads and BookBub ads to good results. However, I've also read various blog posts from people who have been struggling with the Advantage Plus system as well, and they've been investigating it thoroughly as internet marketers tend to do, and they've uncovered something interesting that isn't mentioned at all in Facebook's documentation about the new changes, specifically that Advantage Plus uses the text content of your ad to target it. Under the old system, it didn't work that way at all. You would select interests that match your ad, usually popular authors in the fantasy genre (like J.R.R Tolkien, Robert E. Howard, George R.R. Martin, Brandon Sanderson, and so forth) and then you wrote the text of the ad and supplied an image, which was usually called a creative. The creative was like 80% of a successful Facebook ad. You just needed a good picture, more or less. The Advantage Plus system by contrast targets according to the text in the ad. So while you still need a good creative, you need to be precise in the ad text. So for example, you need to write something like this: "Fans of The Lord of the Rings, Conan the Barbarian, Mistborn, and Game of Thrones will love this free epic fantasy available for Kindle readers." Now, I found the arguments in these blog posts persuasive, so I decided to give it a try. The results are on the better side of okay-ish, I will admit. I didn't lose any money and did make a bit of money. The results were definitely better than I expected, though the ad using Advantage Plus typically only has a shelf life of six to 10 days before it stops working. That said, the old system was still better because the interests were more granular and I could assign them more precisely. I used to be able to advertise Frostborn, Cloak Mage, The Ghosts, and Demonsouled all at the same time because I could target the ads so precisely and granularly. There's absolutely no way I could do that now because the Advantage Plus system is a black box. It basically boils down to "trust us, the AI will figure it out" when it very obviously can't. So for the moment I will have one Facebook ad in the rotation until Meta changes something and everything breaks. There's no way I'll run as many Facebook ads as I did in 2020, when sometimes I had eight different Facebook ads going at once. Apparently in the last three years, Meta spent around 130 billion on AI, give or take, and what they got for that money is an ad targeting system that frequently doesn't work, and when it does work, doesn't work as well as the old system did. Spending unfathomable sums of money to replace a system that worked pretty well with one that intermittently doesn't work, and then when it does function, doesn't work as well as the previous system seems to be a pretty good summary of the "AI revolution" so far. 00:05:05 Main Topic: 5 Tips for Instagram Marketing for Indie Authors Now onto our main topic this week, five tips for Instagram marketing for indie authors. Because I'm looking for new alternatives to Facebook ads for reasons I just discussed, I have just started using Instagram as part of my marketing strategy, and many indie authors, especially in the romance genre, have reported a lot of success marketing through Instagram so I wanted to learn more about it and share what I learned. In today's episode, I'm going to focus on marketing through your author account, not paid Instagram ads, which could be a separate podcast topic in the future. Here are five tips that might help you with running an author Instagram account. #1: Find a strategy beyond book promotion. Like any other form of social media, if all you post is promotion for your books, it'll be hard to gain a following. Before you start posting regularly, you'll have to think about what else you have to offer your audience. Even if you want to keep your posts exclusive to writing, there are other types of posts you can make, like behind the scenes peeks, extra facts about a character, or using the poll/question feature to engage with your followers about the books. Follow other author accounts from writers in your genre to learn about their successes and how they engage with their followers. That said, a warning with that, spending a lot of time looking at posts from engaging with other authors creates a closed loop and doesn't further your goal of getting your books into the hands of your readers. Looking at other author accounts and engaging with them definitely falls into the category of what I've called writing adjacent activities that can easily give you the illusion of progress but not actual progress that I've talked about on this podcast before. Ideally, you should spend most of your time on Instagram with readers, not other authors. It's also important to find the balance between providing personal content to make readers feel more connected to you and having it drift too far into being a personal account. Most of us have seen author accounts and social media accounts that post far too personal of relationship details or various long types of rants on various topics that I find it hard to believe help sell any books. The balance will be different for everyone, but always keep in mind that your primary goal on your author accounts is to be a space for your brand as an author. In that same vein, posting negative reviews of other books or negative comments about other writers is not a smart idea in the long run. At best, it looks like you're attacking someone else to make yourself look better, and at worst, you can end up as part of one of the many Bookstagram dramas that crop up with predictable and tedious frequency and in the process, you may make yourself some enemies for life. Nobody wants that. Spamming your books by promoting them in other author's accounts, comments sections, or worse, DMing them is considered bad form and not even remotely effective in the long run. #2: Your space, your rules. Don't be shy about blocking people or deleting comments, especially from spam accounts. Remember that it's your space, not theirs. The flip side of that is turning off comments altogether will limit your reach on Instagram. Although engagement with other accounts matters on Instagram, not every single comment or DM needs a reply, and it would be a waste of precious writing time to even try. Many authors find a compromise in liking non-spammy, well-intentioned comments instead of replying to each one. Although it's important to post regularly, putting out a public schedule for what you'll post is an invitation for people to get upset when you miss a day. #3: Captions matter. Although Instagram is about images and video, substantial captions are important for helping people to find your content. The algorithm rewards decent size but not overly long captions with good hashtags, even if people don't read them. The more specific you make your hashtags, the more effective they will be. Broad ones like "writing" and "author" won't be as effective as "Arthurian Fantasy" or "Enemies to Lovers Historical Romance." There are also a lot of genre specific abbreviations, especially in romance such as "HEA" (which stands for happily ever after) or the pepper emoji to suggest that the romance is a spicy one (which is a euphemism for saying that it gets explicit). Take the time to learn these by following other authors or accounts in your genre because it'll help others find your posts. #4: Try Instagram Reels. The algorithm for Instagram Reels (the short videos on Instagram) rewards interaction more than videos on TikTok. So it's best to watch videos in your genre, post regularly, and expect that you won't get a lot of views starting out or the views might come much later after the initial post than they would on TikTok. Some authors report that it took months of regular posting before they saw success, or that videos would take off weeks after posting. So keep on posting consistently, even if you're not seeing a lot of followers and engagement at first. Some authors use Reels for off topic things like memes and lighthearted content so their posts remain completely about their writing. Pick a strategy of things you can consistently post Reels about two to three times per week because the algorithm rewards frequent posting of Reels. #5: Don't pay influencers or accounts to promote your content. If someone approaches you to pay for reviews or promotion, it is 99.9% likely that it is a scam. Delete and move on. When in doubt, assume it is a scam. Even if that person or account who wants to be paid to promote you is magically legitimate (which is, as I mentioned, very unlikely) the Bookstagram community is very savvy and distrustful of paid reviews. It's not good strategy. Real reviews from real, unpaid people take time, but the results are far more effective. You could try a raffle giveaway of your book to get reviews instead of paying an influencer or offering a special Smashwords coupon code just on your Instagram account. Above all, Instagram will work if you're authentic, post regularly, and are patient in building up a following. Taking shortcuts like buying followers or spamming other accounts is not an effective strategy. Like so many things, there isn't a magic pill that substitutes for hard work over time, which if there was an overwhelming theme of this podcast over the last 290 episodes, I think that hard work over time is probably the lesson we want to take away here. So that's it for this week. Thank you for listening to The Pulp Writer Show. I hope you found the show useful. A reminder that you can listen to all the back episodes at https://thepulpwritershow.com. If you enjoyed the podcast, please leave your review on your podcasting platform of choice. Stay safe and stay healthy and see you all next week.
SERMON: DON'T UNDERESTIMATE THE UNDERDOG: IT'S YOUR TURN TO DEFY THE ODDS.
SERMON: UNCOMMON PEOPLE CALLED BY GOD TO DO AN EXTRAORDINARY TASK
Welcome to RetroLogic! I'm Dan Caporello here with John Cummis and Shannon Eno and Sam Wagers, alongside special guest: author of the Definitive Book of SNES RPGs vol 1 Moses Norton AKA The Well Red Mage But RetroLogic isn't just a podcast. It's a community of retro gamers! - We've got an active, friendly, and free discord. - Giveaways - Contests - AND Dive into our family of Retro podcasts! Like RetroGroove, a music history podcast, and On Topic Retro, a podcast dedicated to 1 video game per episode hosted by our very own John Cummins. - you can find everything at our website retrologic.games Tell me one thing that happened this week! Housekeeping Sam: Streaming Armored Core (Mon) and Path of Radiance (Sat) Ham Ham Heartbreak Saturday! On Topic Retro: Zelda Phantom Hourglass RetroGroove:Albums of the year: 1975, 1985, 1995, 2005, 2015, 2025 FilmLogic: The Adventures of Buckaroo Banzai The Price Is Retro - 17:40 If this is your first time playing Price Is Retro, here's how we play. I'm going to list off 4 or 5 games and everyone has to guess how much the lot is worth in total. Whoever is closest to the actual value wins that round! Everyone has a list and everyone guesses on each other's list. At the end, the player that won the most rounds wins the episode! But watch out for the robot Deus Guess Machina! He averages all of our guesses together for his own guess Dinosaur - Leonard - adds up original costs, retail value Ghost - Polterguest - always guesses 300 Shan's list Sam's list Dan's list - 1 John's List - 1 Moses List - 2 Rampage - 1 Sam's Spot the Fake Break: 50:10 Show Topic- Game Genres WRM - How did you choose what games to include in the book? (What is an RPG anyway?) RPG Edge cases - discuss What's the point of classifying genres anyway? -group like things together -help people find more things they like -Is Game genre the same sort of thing as genre in other media?(film, literature, art, cuisine) -notably, some other media can distinguish genre from things like "movements" (landscape is a genre, cubism is a movement) –for that matter, does food have genres? How different genres get defined: (maybe) JRPG vs CRPG: (?) Broad focus : Action, strategy, puzzle, Adventure, Stealth, Racing Mechanical elements: (turn based strategy vs. real time strategy) Camera? (1st person shooter vs third person shooter) Theming/aesthetics: Horror, Cozy(?), Sports(?) Newer genre terms: Metroidvania, Roguelike/Roguelite, MOBA, Soulslike Platform Fighter (sometimes tied to claims about smash bros. legitimacy as a competitive fighter What do we call Culdcept/Dokapon/Fortune Street? Genre Hybrids: are these genres or just descriptors? NES color guide: Community Couch Thanks for listening to the RetroLogic Podcast! We are proudly part of the Nintendo Dads family of podcasts. If you like what you hear, check me out on Bluesky at @retrologicgames.bsky.social. You're also welcome to jump into our friendly and 100% non-toxic Discord Community! The link to that is in my Blusky bio. You can also find everything on our website Retrologic.games
Peter Tuchman reports from the NYSE after a wild week ending on Friday the 13th/Valentine's Day. He says the Dow closed up around 49,500, inching back toward 50,000 after Thursday's significant, broad-based selloff, while buyers stepped in with intent on solid volume (about 1.4B shares) and strong advances over declines. He notes transports and industrials were up, tech remained under pressure, and he discusses anxiety around the AI narrative while arguing the tech trade is pausing rather than broken. He adds CPI came in a bit lower than expected, earnings have been softer, and more clarity is needed from upcoming economic data, inflation/employment updates, interest-rate-cut expectations, and political headlines. He mentions gold and silver had surged then pulled back, crypto remains under pressure, and margin calls may be forcing some selling elsewhere. He closes with Valentine's Day wishes and a reminder that a three-day market closure can create added weekend uncertainty. 00:00 Einstein of Wall Street Intro from the NYSE Floor 00:50 Friday the 13th Market Close: Dow Near 50K, SPY Recap 01:13 Today's Bounce After the Selloff: Volume, Breadth & Sector Check 01:55 AI/Tech Anxiety vs. the Bigger Bull Narrative 03:17 What's Driving Uncertainty: CPI, Earnings, and Lack of Clarity 03:46 Looking Ahead: February Catalysts, Fed/White House Headlines 04:16 Gold, Silver, Crypto Pressure & Spillover Into Stocks 04:44 Valentine's Day Sign-Off + 3-Day Weekend Warning 05:20 Final Goodbye: Trade Like Einstein Closing Remarks All investing involves the risk of loss, including loss of principal. This podcast is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or legal advice. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial advisor before making any financial decisions or investments.
What does it really take to build a successful novel? Kate Broad discusses leaving her romance author career to write literary fiction and how her debut novel, Greenwich, required multiple drafts and rewrites. She shares what it's like to scrap early drafts, rebuild the story from the ground up, write complex characters that are hard to like, and what she tells herself when the writing feels hard. If you need a reminder that your first draft can become something magical, that struggling is just part of the work and process of bringing a novel to fruition, and that you're not doing anything wrong, you'll enjoy our conversation. Timestamps 00:00 – Why Revision Is Where the Magic Happens 00:19 – Welcome to Write It Scared 01:29 – Meet Kate Road 03:20 – Writing Greenwich and Starting Over 05:03 – Themes of Wealth, Power, and Privilege 07:34 – Crafting Complex, Unlikable Characters 15:47 – How the Book Changed in Revision 21:40 – Self-Doubt and Staying in the Work 30:25 – Resilience and the Reality of the Writing Life 39:43 – Final ReflectionsKate Broad holds a BA from Wellesley College and a PhD in English from the CUNY Graduate Center. She is a Bronx Council on the Arts award winner for fiction, and her writing has appeared in The Rumpus, No Tokens, Electric Literature, LitHub, The Baltimore Review, and elsewhere. Her debut novel, Greenwich, was released in 2025 from St. Martin's Press and was named one of People Magazine's Best New Books, a Vanity Fair Summer Read, and an Amazon Editor's Pick for Best New Literature and Fiction. Originally from Massachusetts, she lives in the Bronx. GREENWICH - Out now from St. Martin's Press / Macmillan!https://katebroad.comHave a comment or idea about the show? Send me a direct text! Love to hear from you.Support the show To become a supporter of the show, click here!To get in touch with Stacy: Email: Stacy@writeitscared.co https://www.writeitscared.co/wis https://www.instagram.com/writeitscared/ Take advantage of these Free Resources From Write It Scared: Download Your Free Novel Planning and Drafting Quick Start Guide Download Your Free Guide to Remove Creative Blocks and Work Through Fears
Want to know your English level? Take our free English-level quiz here to find out what your current English level is. Do you love All Ears English? Try our other podcasts here: Business English Podcast: Improve your Business English with 3 episodes per week, featuring Lindsay, Michelle, and Aubrey IELTS Energy Podcast: Learn IELTS from a former Examiner and achieve your Band 7 or higher, featuring Lindsay McMahon and Aubrey Carter with Jessica Beck in previous episodes Visit our website here or https://lnk.to/website-sn If you love this podcast, hit the follow button now so that you don't miss five fresh and fun episodes every single week. Don't forget to leave us a review wherever you listen to the show. Send your English question or episode topic idea to support@allearsenglish.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Send a textIn Part 1 of this in-depth conversation, Steven sits down with Brandon to break down the true foundations of sprint speed. The discussion centers on acceleration mechanics, horizontal force production, and why the broad jump may be one of the most underrated indicators of sprint performance.Brandon shares his philosophy on training sprinters based on their natural tendencies—whether they're twitchy, elastic athletes or strength-dominant performers—and explains how resistance training, box squats, sumo deadlifts, and bounding can be used to build explosive power without sacrificing efficiency. Real coaching case studies highlight dramatic improvements in 200-meter times, state championship performances, and how mastering the first three steps can unlock an athlete's speed ceiling.This episode is a deep dive into individualized sprint training, balancing technical execution with physical preparation, and understanding how force application and elasticity drive performance.https://youtube.com/@platesandpancakes4593https://instagram.com/voodoo4power?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=https://voodoo4ranch.com/To possibly be a guest or support the show email Voodoo4ranch@gmail.comhttps://www.paypal.com/paypalme/voodoo4ranch
1977, a group of school children in Broad Haven in the West of Wales, were certain they had all seen a UFO. But before anyone could doubt them, teachers and more students also saw it, and then so did local residents. The area become known for UFOs and even alien sightings. But was it really visitors from another world? Athena and Tiernan look into all the clues to help you decide. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
In this episode of the Broad Street Review Podcast, host Darnelle Radford welcomes director Morgan Green to discuss the Philadelphia Theatre Company's adaptation of Shakespeare's Julius Caesar. They explore the shared leadership model in Philadelphia theatre, the unique interpretations of the cast, and the relevance of the play in today's society. The conversation delves into character analysis, choreography, and the audience's engagement with the production, highlighting the emotional and political themes that resonate with contemporary issues.A Bold and Modern New AdaptationCaesarAdapted by Tyler Dobrowsky From Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare Directed by Morgan GreenWhat would you do to protect your home?Shakespeare's classic political tragedy is reborn as a gripping contemporary thriller in this bold new adaptation by Tyler Dobrowsky. Caesar stays true to Shakespeare's original language but trims the story to its leanest, most urgent core—cutting to the heart of ambition, authoritarianism, and the cost of protecting democracy.Brutus, a principled Roman senator, joins a conspiracy to assassinate Julius Caesar, fearing the rise of tyranny. But once the deed is done, the fragile dream of liberty spirals into violence, unrest, and civil war. As alliances shift and Rome descends into chaos, the play asks: Who gets to hold power? And at what price?Running just 95 minutes, Caesar is fast-paced and fiercely relevant, inviting audiences to draw parallels between ancient Rome and the political tensions of our world today.In a season about what it means to be home, Caesar asks: who gets to shape the future of a nation? And what are we willing to risk to defend the place—and people—we love?ABOUT MORGAN CLAIRE GREENPTC: Debut. Off-Broadway: Five Models in Ruins, 1981, LCT3; Staff Meal, Playwrights Horizons; School Pictures, Playwrights Horizons. Regional: Hilma (Opera), Eternal Life Part 1, School Pictures, Fat Ham (digital; Pulitzer Prize for Drama), Wilma Theater. Additional premieres include Five Models in Ruins and The Karamazovs (film). Awards: Obie Award. Leadership: Co-Artistic Director of Philadelphia's Tony Award–winning Wilma Theater, where she has directed numerous world premieres and new theatrical collaborations.FOR TICKETS AND INFORMATION: https://philadelphiatheatrecompany.org/caesar/
Daniel is joined by Dr. Christophe Maleville, Chief Technology Officer and Senior Executive Vice-President of Soitec's Innovation. He joined Soitec in 1993 and was a driving force behind the company's joint research activities with CEA-Leti. For several years, he led new SOI process development, oversaw SOI technology transfer… Read More
In this episode of the Broad Street Review podcast, host Darnelle Radford speaks with actors Brandon Tyler and Max Lynch about their upcoming production of 'Dear Jack, Dear Louise' by Ken Ludwig. The conversation delves into the characters, the historical context of World War II, and the emotional depth of the story, which is based on real letters exchanged between the two main characters. They discuss the rehearsal process, the significance of letter writing in building connections, and the parallels between past and present relationships. The episode concludes with reflections on what audiences can take away from the production.Chapters00:00 Introduction to the Podcast and Guests02:19 Exploring 'Dear Jack, Dear Louise'05:09 Character Insights and Rehearsal Process09:59 Thematic Connections to Modern Relationships16:05 Audience Expectations and Emotional Moments22:59 Final Thoughts and TakeawaysKen Ludwig's Dear Jack, Dear LouiseDirected By Peter Reynolds February 11 - March 1, 2026Regional Premiere. A love story begins when two strangers meet by letter during World War II. U.S. Army Captain Jack Ludwig, a military doctor stationed in Oregon, begins writing to Louise Rabiner, an aspiring actress and dancer in New York City, hoping to meet her someday, if the war allows. Tony Award-winning playwright Ken Ludwig tells the joyous, heart-warming story of his parents' courtship during World War II, and the results are anything but expected.Max Lynch as Louise Brandon Tyler as JackFOR TICKETS AND INFORMATION: https://hedgerowtheatre.org
This is one of the hardest—and most important—questions a trader can ask. In today's episode, we tackle a viewer's candid question about struggling with trading and whether there comes a point where you should keep pushing forward… or step away. Is trading really for everyone? Are losses a rite of passage—or a signal you're forcing the wrong path? I'll share my unfiltered thoughts and real experiences, talk about the difference between temporary struggle and structural mismatch, and explain how to evaluate yourself honestly—without ego, guilt, or desperation driving the decision. We'll also zoom out and look at the current broad market action, because context matters. Some environments punish even good traders, and knowing that difference can change everything. This episode isn't about quitting. It's about choosing the right way to win. Listen now:
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Customer feedback for developers is one of the fastest ways to improve a product—and one of the easiest ways to derail it. When you're building something you care about, every comment feels important. The challenge is learning how to listen without letting feedback pull you in ten different directions. This episode explores how developers can use customer feedback to sharpen focus, avoid scope creep, and move faster—without losing the original vision that made the product worth building in the first place. About Tyler Dane Tyler Dane has dedicated his career to helping people better manage—and truly appreciate—their time. After working as a full-time Software Engineer, Tyler recently stepped away from traditional employment to focus entirely on building Compass Calendar, a productivity app designed to help everyday users visualize and plan their day more intentionally. The tool is built from firsthand experience, not theory—shaped by years of experimenting with productivity systems, tools, and workflows. In a bold reset, Tyler sold most of his belongings and relocated to San Francisco to focus on growing the product, collaborating with partners, and pushing Compass forward. Outside of coding, Tyler creates YouTube videos and writes about time management and productivity. After consuming countless productivity books, tools, and frameworks, he realized a common trap: doing more without actually accomplishing what matters. That insight led him to break productivity down into its most practical, nuanced components—cutting through hustle culture noise to focus on systems that actually work. Tyler is unapologetically honest and independent. With no investors, no sponsors, and nothing to sell beyond the value of his work, his focus is simple: help people get more done—and appreciate the limited time they have to do it. Follow Tyler on LinkedIn, YouTube, and X. Customer feedback for developers: Why "this is great, but…" matters Most useful feedback doesn't sound negative at first. It usually starts with, "This is great, but…" That "but" is where the signal lives. For developers, the mistake isn't ignoring feedback—it's stopping at the compliment. The real value is understanding what's missing, confusing, or blocking progress. Teams that grow fastest learn to treat that follow-up as actionable data, not criticism. The "This Is Great, But…" Checklist Capture the "but" immediately before it gets softened or forgotten Translate it into a concrete problem statement you can validate Customer feedback for developers: how to find the right people to talk to Not all feedback is equal. Talking to the wrong audience can send you down expensive paths that don't actually improve your product. Customer feedback for developers works best when it comes from people who: Actively experience the problem you're solving Would realistically adopt or pay for your solution Share similar workflows and constraints Broad feedback feels productive but often leads to vague changes. Focused conversations lead to clarity. Customer feedback for developers: filtering input to prevent scope creep Scope creep rarely starts with bad intent. It starts with trying to please everyone. The fix isn't saying "no" to customers—it's filtering feedback through a clear lens: Does this solve the core problem? Does this help our ideal user? Does this move the product forward right now? Avoid Scope Creep Without Ignoring Customers Separate "interesting ideas" from "next priorities." Keep a backlog for later so good ideas don't hijack today's focus Customer feedback for developers: balancing vision with real user needs Strong products sit at the intersection of vision and reality. If you only follow feedback, you become reactive. If you ignore it, you risk building in isolation. Customer feedback for developers should challenge assumptions—not erase direction. The goal is refinement, not reinvention, with every conversation. Customer feedback for developers: building momentum with faster shipping One consistent theme is speed. Slow feedback loops kill momentum. Shipping faster—even in small increments—creates learning. Fast cycles: Reveal what actually matters Improve judgment over time Reduce emotional attachment to individual decisions Build Momentum With Speed and Structure Short shipping cycles reduce overthinking Volume creates clarity faster than perfect planning Customer feedback for developers: choosing a niche in a crowded market General tools struggle in saturated spaces. Customer feedback for developers becomes clearer when you narrow your audience. Niching down doesn't limit opportunity—it increases relevance. How to position against "feature-parity" giants You don't win by copying large platforms. You win by serving a specific workflow better than anyone else. Self-direction when you don't have a manager Without an external structure, prioritization becomes your job. Customer feedback replaces task assignments—but only if you actively use it to set direction. Clear priorities beat unlimited freedom. Conclusion Customer feedback for developers isn't about collecting opinions—it's about building judgment. When you listen to the right people, filter ruthlessly, and ship quickly, feedback becomes a growth engine instead of a distraction. If you're building something of your own, treat feedback as fuel—not a steering wheel. Stay Connected: Join the Developreneur Community We invite you to join our community and share your coding journey with us. Whether you're a seasoned developer or just starting, there's always room to learn and grow together. Contact us at info@develpreneur.com with your questions, feedback, or suggestions for future episodes. Together, let's continue exploring the exciting world of software development. Additional Resources Embrace FeedBack For Better Teams Feedback And Career Help – Does The Bootcamp Provide It? Turning Feedback into Future Success: A Guide for Developers Building Better Foundations Podcast Videos – With Bonus Content
1. SAVE America Act (Election Law & Voter ID) Core Argument The SAVE America Act would: Require proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote Require photo ID to vote Democrats are portrayed as unanimously opposed, preventing passage due to the Senate’s 60‑vote threshold. Strategic Claim Cruz argues Republicans should: Force a “real” filibuster (continuous floor speeches) Make Democratic opposition politically and physically costly He frames Democratic resistance as intentional rather than procedural. Public Opinion Framing Polling is cited (CNN, Pew) to claim: Broad bipartisan and multiracial support for voter ID Democratic leadership (especially Chuck Schumer) is accused of ignoring their own voters. 2. Voter Fraud & Ballot Harvesting Claims Presented Ballot harvesting is described as: A system that enables fraud, especially among elderly or vulnerable populations Democrats are accused of: Supporting policies that increase fraud opportunities Reversing recommendations from the Carter–Baker Commission There is justification for: Photo ID laws Restrictions on mail-in voting Limits on third-party ballot collection 3. Somali Welfare Fraud in Minnesota Central Allegation Massive welfare fraud in Minnesota tied to programs serving the Somali immigrant community. Figures cited include: Up to half of $18 billion in welfare spending allegedly lost to fraud Disproportionately high welfare participation rates among Somali households Democratic state officials are accused of: Knowing about the fraud Allowing it to continue for political gain Silencing whistleblowers Stolen welfare funds indirectly finance al‑Shabab, a terrorist organization 4. Medical Policy Shift on Gender Surgeries for Minors Key Development The American Society of Plastic Surgeons and the American Medical Association are described as: Reversing prior support for “gender‑affirming surgeries” for minors Now recommending deferral until adulthood Causal Explanation The reversal is attributed to: A high‑profile malpractice lawsuit by a detransitioner Legal and financial risk to medical institution Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz X: https://x.com/tedcruz X: https://x.com/benfergusonshowYouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruzSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Professor John Yoo of Berkeley Law compares actions against Venezuela to Jefferson's Barbary pirate war, arguing the executive has broad authority to initiate conflict without prior congressional approval.1820 JEFFERSON AND FRANKLIN
© 2020-2026 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
