Podcasts about Urbana

Lisandro Catalán, el nuevo ministro del interior, afirmó: “Dejó establecida hoy la mesa donde él la preside, forma parte también el jefe de gabinete de ministros, Guillermo Francos, forma parte el ministro de Economía, Luis Caputo, y me incorporo yo como ministro del Interior. Creo que está toda la institucionalidad representada como para tener un diálogo serio, maduro y fluido con los gobernadores”.Carlos Bianco, señaló:  “Yo con Francos, si con Catalán y con Javier Milano, que también trabaja con ellos, he tenido varias reuniones, les he pedido varias reuniones, siempre me han recibido muy amablemente en la Casa Rosada y también les fui a llevar varias veces reclamos de obras públicas, etc. Me recibieron, entregamos los papeles, obviamente no... Tampoco depende de ellos, porque la obra pública depende de Toto Caputo, depende del Ministerio de la Jefatura de Gabinete”.Cristian Girad afirmó: “Es mentira que hay un impuesto nuevo. Es mentira que si tenés una billetera virtual, Arba te va a sacar guita de la cuenta Es mentira que se hayan subido impuestos Lo que se recaude a través de De las retenciones Para billeteras virtuales se deja de recaudar A través de O las retenciones bancarias o pagás menos Cuando vence la declaración jurada No es que ahora pagas más ingresos brutos”.Alejandro Fantino dijo: “Yo no la veo bien ahora, no la veo bien ahora porque me preocupó este resultado, o sea me hizo ver algo que yo no había visto. No soy necio, entonces digo bueno hay tiempo de cambiar y de girar. boludo, estoy viendo los candidatos estoy viendo que pasa, porque además se demostró otra cosa, que la propia Libertad Avanza lo detectó, chicos, esto no lo estoy descubriendo yo, evidentemente no traccionó, como se esperaba la marca la marca puramente dicho, la marca”.Eduardo Feinmann,  en una conversación con Iezzi, señaló: Feinmann: ¿Esa cárcel es una joda? Iezzi: En la unidad carcelaria esto no pasa. Pero la prisión domiciliaria no regulada desde el punto de vista penitenciario permite estas cosas.Feinmann: Que también se manifestó según se difundió en cuentas kirchneristas rechazando la proscripción de Cristina Kirchner. Y la visita que quizás, repito, reciba y no nos enteramos. Claro, todo porque levantó un cuadro de Vita Perón que le regalaron. Exacto. Entonces Cristina la llamó y le dijo y fue mamá mía es una vergüenza es una vergüenza lo digo señores jueces ¿en serio se dejan forrear? ¿en serio se dejan tocar el culo por esta señora que hace lo que se le canta? que feo, pero bueno.Cristina Pérez aseguró: “Cuando las bandas son creíbles, esto lo explicó el presidente con este papelito. Cuando las bandas son creíbles, las propias fuerzas del mercado, si toca el techo, lo llevan hacia adentro y cuando te acercas a la banda de abajo, las flechitas empujan hacia arriba. En esto estaba pensando Milei cuando hizo el discurso en el que aceptó la derrota”.Ante la llegada del vuelo con argentinos deportados de EEUU, Alec Oxenford, señaló: “Argentina es de los países del continente con menos casos. Literalmente han habido, creo que la lista de deportados es muy grande, no quiero decir un número equivocado, pero muy grande, y el número argentino es infinitésimo. Estamos hablando como que te diga un millón y diecisiete. Es más o menos cero”.Donald Trump dijo lo siguiente: “me llena de dolor y rabia el atroz asesinato de Charlie Kirk en un campus universitario de Utah. Charlie inspiró a millones, y esta noche, todos los que lo conocieron y amaron se unen en la conmoción y el horror. Charlie fue un patriota que dedicó su vida a la causa del debate abierto y al país que tanto amó, los Estados Unidos de América”.Noticias del jueves 11 de septiembre por María O'Donnell y equipo de De Acá en Más por Urbana Play 104.3 FM

Daniel “Gordo Dan” Parisini, influencer libertario, afirmó: “Bueno, a no ser trolos, con la mirada bien en alto, al frente, a ganar las elecciones en octubre, a recuperarnos de este pijazo, aceptando siempre que fue un flor de pijazo atómico en el orto, y vamos a poner todo para ganar en octubre, muchachos. ¿A arrasar? Sí, señor. Porque acá lo que está en juego no son carguitos, no son intereses personales, a mí lo que menos me interesa es eso. Lo que más me importa es la sagrada causa de la libertad de los argentinos y las cartas están echadas”.Alejandro Fantino afirmó: “Hay mucha gente desencantada que no fue a votar. Bueno, yo digo esto y va a sonar polémico, pero honestamente tampoco tengo ganas de callarme las cosas. O sea, no están haciendo nada hasta ahora. No acusaron el golpe No tomaron en serio lo que pasó Hasta ahora no se han movido muchachos”.Cristina Pérez señaló: ““Me puse al frente de la mesa política, me acabo de poner la campaña al hombro. Esto no es cosmética”. Palabras de Javier Milei. Desde hoy el presidente asume la conducción política que tanto había intentado delegar. Javier Milei asumió la conducción política. de las dos mesas políticas y de la campaña”El gobernador de Santa Fe, Maximiliano Pullaro, aseguró: “Hoy por hoy, si no hay una crisis social o si hay paz social en la República Argentina, es porque los gobernadores nos hemos hecho cargo de muchos temas que antes se hacía cargo Nación. ¿Qué es lo que quiero decir con esto? Que el equilibrio fiscal no se puede hacer a costa de los demás, a costa de las deudas, que sean las deudas. A mí no me pagan ni siquiera el flujo del déficit de la caja de jubilaciones. Ni el kirchnerismo fue tan cruel con la provincia de Santa Fe. ni el kirchnerismo, no pagaban lo que correspondía, pero al menos pagaban una parte”.El gobernador de Corrientes, Gustavo Valdés, afirmó: “sentémonos a dialogar políticamente. Nosotros queremos colaborar, queremos ayudarnos. Somos personas ni gobernadores que queremos que la Argentina explote. Al contrario, Nosotros somos gobernadores que queremos que a la Argentina le vaya bien. Es más, nosotros apostamos y votamos el cambio para que la Argentina realmente mejore. Ahora, si nosotros cuando decimos que queremos colaborar nos dan la espalda, es muy difícil”.El gobernador de Salta, Gustavo Sáenz, señaló: “Sigo queriendo que le vaya bien al gobierno, porque si le va bien al gobierno, nos va bien a todos. Pero también quiero que el gobierno y su funcionario y el presidente quiera que le vaya bien a Salta y a los salteños, y que me vaya bien a mí. Y yo he notado en todo este tiempo un destrato muy grande, mentiras, y la verdad que no cumplieron con la palabra, empeñada después no no contestaban los teléfonos de los armados de lista todo lo que nos habíamos comprometido no se cumplió y bueno, tentarse hablar con gente que no ha cumplido y ya se ha perdido la confianza por lo menos de mi parte es muy difícil”.Luis Juez rompió en llanto, y manifestó: “Sí, estoy dolido, estoy ofendido. Se metieron con lo más sagrado que tenemos en mi casa. Y necesito que se disculpen, carajo. Necesito que levanten un teléfono y... Y me pidan perdón. Perdóname, pero lo necesito. Necesito que me digan, perdonad, loco, no fui buena mierda”.Noticias del miércoles 10 de septiembre por María O'Donnell y equipo de De Acá en Más por Urbana Play 104.3 FM

Guillermo Moreno con Gregorio Perez por Radio Urbana Dero 95.9

David Penn es uno de los artistas de música house más importantes del mundo y todos los martes de 22:00 a 23 horas presenta en LOS40 Dance, su radio show LOS40 Dance Urbana. El programa para los amantes de la música

Guillermo Francos, jefe de gabinete, afirmó: “Fue más que viento, ¿no? Fue una, no digo un huracán, pero fue un viento muy fuerte, por lo menos, ¿no? Sí. Sí, por supuesto, como lo explicó ayer en sus palabras el presidente, es momento de hacer autocrítica, de ver, de analizar, de ver en qué fallamos, tanto en lo político como por qué los resultados macroeconómicos no llegan a la gente y hay una distancia entre lo que la gente opina y lo que el gobierno propone como política que claramente no va a cambiar, como lo explicó el presidente. Nosotros estamos convencidos que el equilibrio fiscal es la base de un crecimiento económico. Ahora, también es cierto que el pase de la macroeconomía a la micro Para la gente es muy importante”.Maximiliano Bondarenko, diputado electo por la Libertad Avanza, aseguró: “Todo tiene que ver, mi mamá es jubilada, tiene 91 años y no llega fin de mes, el día 15 para ella fin de mes, todo tiene que ver, sabemos la problemática, nuestro presidente Javier Milei cuando asumió dijo que íbamos a tener que ajustarnos, se hizo ese ajuste, los argentinos lo bancaron, lo siguen bancando, una gran parte de los argentinos lo siguen bancando y evidentemente otra parte de los argentinos nos está diciendo que abramos los ojos en algunas cuestiones”.Daniel Parisini, influencer libertario, apuntó contra Maximiliano Bondarenko: “Esto es lisa y llanamente traición. Y lo digo, es la soltada de mano más rápida que yo vi en mi vida. 24 horas después, digamos, de que fuiste electo como diputado por la Libertad Avanza, salís a endilgarle la culpa al equipo económico de tu derrota electoral, digamos. Al equipo económico que destruyó la inflación en Argentina, que sacó a 12 millones de personas de la pobreza y que bajó la pobreza del 57% al 31% en un año y medio. ¿En qué quedamos, loco?”.Alejandro Fantino dijo: “ Imagínense que a Pareja, yo le saqué la médula por la boca a Pareja, runfla, peroncho, bien, bien, bien runfla, todo lo que el votante de la Libertad Avanza odia, armó pareja en la provincia de Buenos Aires. Pajerta es el primer perdedor”.Eduardo Feinmann explicó: “Fuerte voto castigo para el presidente Milei. Creo que ayer el presidente en su discurso, que yo lo vi bastante tranquilo, bueno, si no estaba tranquilo ayer, hoy me parece que se incendiaba todo. Hoy tendrá que hacer algo. Calculo, calculo que va a empezar a replantearse algunas cosas. No solo no le puso, no le puso el último clavo al cajón de los K, sino que me parece que le sacó la tapa al cajón y el muerto parece que está a punto de levantarse”Antonio Laje dijo: “Es lo que se votó, pero parece patético. Sobre todo en una provincia que está estallada. Pero viste cuando yo decía la semana que viene, esperá, vamos a ver, vamos a esperar. Cuando hablamos de inseguridad, vamos a ver, vamos a ver. Vamos a ver. Veremos si van a ver cómo votar. No nos quejemos más o no se quejen más. Cuando tengas inseguridad, cuando no hay policía, cuando te maten, porque acaban de votar. Sí. O sea, también, seamos honestos, era la elección bonaerense, Era la elección para mandarle un mensaje al gobernador que estás haciendo una gestión espantosa. Le mandaron un mensaje que está haciendo una gestión bárbara. Ni una queja más de la inseguridad, de las escuelas, de la falta de infraestructura”.Cristina Perez aseguró: “Al votante peronista no le importa la corrupción, no le importan las instituciones, es más, fíjate, no les importa ni siquiera la inseguridad o que en cada lluvia se queden sin nada. Fueron y votaron peronismo. Al votante no peronista, que es gran parte, es una parte importante del votante de Milei, que tal vez no es su núcleo duro, le importan estas señales. y hay cosas que le deben hacer mucho ruido. Entonces vos tenés que recuperar, reconectar con el electorado y recuperar la credibilidad”.

Pianist and composer Conrad Tao is based in New York City, but was born in Urbana and spent a portion of his childhood in Chicago. He returns to the Windy City this week to perform at the Nova Linea Musica series. Tao discusses how he got into piano playinh in his childhood, creating his own compositions, and the Chicago music scene.      The 21st Show is Illinois' statewide weekday public radio talk show, connecting Illinois and bringing you the news, culture, and stories that matter to the 21st state. Have thoughts on the show or one of our episodes, or want to share an idea for something we should talk about? Send us an email: talk@21stshow.org. If you'd like to have your say as we're planning conversations, join our texting group! Just send the word "TALK" to (217) 803-0730. Subscribe to our podcast and hear our latest conversations. Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/6PT6pb0 Find past segments, links to our social media and more at our website: 21stshow.org.

Escuche esta y más noticias de LA PATRIA Radio de lunes a viernes por los 1540 AM de Radio Cóndor en Manizales y en www.lapatria.com, encuentre videos de las transmisiones en nuestro Facebook Live: www.facebook.com/lapatria.manizales/videos

Ana Mendes Godinho (PS), Marco Almeida (PSD), Rita Matias (CH) e Pedro Ventura (CDU) debatem a estratégia para a habitação, os problemas com a higiene do concelho e o trânsito entre Sintra e Lisboa. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Javier Milei desde el bunker aseguró: “Hay que ser claro es que sin ninguna duda en el plano político hoy hemos tenido una clara derrota y si alguien quiere empezar a reconstruir y salir adelante lo primero que hay que aceptar son los resultados y hoy los resultados no han sido positivos y hemos tenido un revés electoral y hay que aceptarlo”. A la vez, comentó: “Esto va a dar lugar a un profundo análisis de los datos y naturalmente eso va a conllevar a una profunda autocrítica donde aquellas cosas en las que nos hemos equivocado las vamos a corregir. No hay opción de repetir los errores. De cara al futuro vamos a corregir todos nuestros errores” y agregó: “No se retrocede ni un milímetro en la política del gobierno. El rumbo no sólo que se confirma, sino que lo vamos a acelerar y profundizar más. Porque no estamos dispuestos a entregar un modelo que tomó la tasa de inflación en niveles del 300% y lo llevó al 20%”.Axel Kiccilof gobernador de Buenos Aires en su discurso aseguró: “gran jornada democrática, la democracia ante todo, y basta de decir, basta de pegarle al peronismo y acusarlo, miren, ha habido una costumbre de acusar al peronismo de que no es democrático y que no es pacífico, cortenla y se los digo a todos, democracia, paz y peronismo, muchas gracias” y sentenció: “Van a tener que rectificar el rumbo. Las urnas le dijeron al presidente Milei que no se puede frenar la obra pública. Las urnas le explicaron que no se le puede pegar a los jubilados. Las urnas con 13 puntos de diferencia le explicaron que no se puede abandonar a las personas con discapacidad. Las urnas de ley gritaron que no se puede desfinanciar ni la salud, ni la educación, ni la universidad, ni la ciencia, ni la cultura en la Argentina”.Militantes de Fuerza Patria antes y durante el discurso de Axel Kicillof cantaron: “Para Axel la conducción”.

O que o nome de uma rua pode revelar sobre as pessoas que ali vivem? De acordo com o professor Gilton Luís Ferreira, TUDO! Pelo menos, no século XX, os logradouros de Vitória indicavam características específicas da sociedade da época. Das pessoas que ali moravam aos hábitos e práticas de determinados grupos sociais, cada apelido eternizava a história daquele espaço urbano. Conforme a cidade foi se modernizando, parte desses significados coletivos se perdeu… “Além de referências a fatos históricos sociais ou do cotidiano - ou ainda de relevantes acontecimentos históricos -, as ruas da cidade de Vitória registravam também curiosas e singelas histórias da vida de sua gente comum”, destaca em sua tese de doutorado em História Urbana. Em entrevista à CBN Vitória, o professor da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES) Gilton Luís Ferreira relembra alguns nomes de ruas que marcaram a sociedade capixaba. Ouça a conversa completa!

El primer sencillo de este proyecto musical se llama Lateo junto al artista Juan Duque

Este reportaje, elaborado por Enrique Domínguez Uceta, propone Liubliana como destino de turismo urbano, destacando su encanto, tamaño manejable y rica oferta cultural. En palabras de la conversación, Liubliana es una ciudad muy verde, muy elegante y está llena de arte, ideal para una escapada fácil y agradable.

“Hoy en Hora Urbana te traemos a una artista que está cambiando las reglas del juego… Ella es Faenna, desde Málaga pa'l mundo . Con solo 21 años ya ha demostrado que el rap no entiende de límites. Se crió entre flamenco, poesía y música de barrio, y cuando cogió el micro, lo hizo para contar verdades con el corazón en la mano. ❤️ Su EP ‘Espabilá' es un golpe de energía, de fuerza y de sinceridad. Y ojo, porque no se queda ahí: ha roto esquemas junto a María Terremoto en ‘Arrastrao', uniendo rap y flamenco con un mensaje claro: empoderamiento y autenticidad. Faenna no busca copiar a nadie, ella viene con su propio sello, con raíces bien firmes y un futuro que pinta enorme. Esta noche a las 00:00 en CLM Activa Radio te contamos su historia en Hora Urbana. No faltes, que esto apenas empieza. ✨” #Faenna #HoraUrbana #CLMActiva #RapEspañol #Málaga #Flamenco #HipHopConAlma

Urbana Radio Show By David Penn Chapter #702 1. Mr. Belt & Wezol, Ruze - Ain't Nobody - The Cuckoo's Nest 2. Offaiah, David Penn & Thando - Always ft. Eric B Turner - Fool's Paradise 3. David Penn & Jewel Kid - You Can Do It - Nervous 4. Kiddy Smile - Spank - Glitterbox Recordings 5. Tom Novy - I Don't Want Nobody (Stuart Ojelay Bootleg) 6. Duke & Jones - Sugar Honey ft. Bee-B 7. Ridney, Capri, Roland Clark - Take You There - Dvine Sounds 8. Jewel Kid - Free - Toolroom 9. Thomas Newson, Marco Lys - Body On Me - Toolroom Trax 10. Qubiko - Moving On - HouseU Records 11. Chris Maze - Snap Crackle Pop - Club Maze 12. KPD - Rock - Brook Gee Records 13. Hatiras - Hypnotized - Toolroom 14. Paul Harris - Words - Toolroom Thanks to all the labels and artist for their music. All tracks selected and mixed by David Penn DJDAVIDPENN.COM FACEBOOK DJDAVIDPENN INSTAGRAM @DJDAVIDPENN INGENIUM BOKINGS EUROPA MUSIC MANAGEMENT Encoded by MUSICZONE PODCAST SERVICES.

Luis Juez en sesión afirmó: “Quiero con el corazón agradecerle a todos, sin distinción de bancada, de pensamiento, de ideología, en nombre, y los quiero mirar a los ojos, en nombre de mi hija Milagros, sus hermanos, mi señora, los cientos de miles de criaturas, inmensa cantidad de asistentes terapéuticos, rehabilitadores, transportistas, en nombre de ellos, muchísimas gracias, en nombre de mi familia, muchísimas gracias, en el mío propio. En serio, me callé la boca porque no podría haber expresado mejor de lo que lo hicieron algunos senadores, que la verdad que fue importante. Ellos se merecen esto que ustedes le han dado, visibilidad a un problema que históricamente pretende ser escondido. Así que, muchísimas gracias”.José Mayans senador nacional por formosa por el frente nacional y popular en sesión sostuvo: “Cuando vetó, no sabía lo que se venía. Primero vetó a los discapacitados en forma despiadada y dijo que esto arruinaba su equilibrio fiscal. ¿Y de dónde vamos a sacar la plata? Bueno, que deje de robar un poquito Karina y ya está. O si no, que baje su arancel. En vez del 3% con el 1.5% ya está. Que bajen el arancel Karina. Que bajen el arancel los hijos de puta que están ahí en el sistema financiero robando a dos manos”. En una entrevista el senador comentó: “Lo de la ministra de seguridad, un desquicio total. Yo creo que debería hacerlo en juicio político y destituirla a la ministra. Porque primero, por amenazas, abuso de poder, acusaciones infundadas a dos periodistas o a tres periodistas, tratando de amedrentarlos, pero es gravísimo el tema, porque les acusa de terroristas, aliados con el narcotraficante con los narcotraficantes después también la otra acusación es que son espías, que no son periodistas y aparte ligados con servicios de inteligencia de la KGB soviética, le faltó y el superagente 86, porque la verdad es que la barbaridad que dijo no tiene nombre".Martín Lousteau en sesión, afirmó: “La Suizo, que es la droguería involucrada, multiplicó por 31 veces sus ventas al Estado. 31 veces. ¿A qué Estado? A ese que Milei decía, este ministerio se va, este ministerio se va, este ministerio se va, este ministerio se va. Dice que achicó la estructura, pero la Suizo vende 31 veces más. La que está acusada de pagar las coimas”.

Saudações amigos ouvintes. Sim, estamos com mais um Giro de Notícias, apenas com as melhores e mais crocantes notícias do nosso meio musical. Aqui falamos de traição no show do Coldplay, Madonna pedindo ajuda ao papa, banda de IA fazendo mais sucesso que bandas de verdade, uso não-autorizado de música da Legião Urbana, treta entre... O post Giro Groundcast #7 – Corra que a notícia vem aí apareceu primeiro em Groundcast.

Javier Milei durante el acto en Moreno sostuvo: “Y ya en la desesperada total, van contra la familia. Imagínense cómo deben estar las cosas en este momento en la provincia de Buenos Aires para que hayan hecho los tres tipos de operaciones todas juntas. Trataron de acusarnos de chorros, digamos, y fueron contra nuestras vidas humanas y además se metieron con mi hermana. ¡Vaya que están asustados! ¡Y el domingo le vamos a pintar la provincia de Violeta!” y agregó: “Quiero agradecer al jefe, a Karina Milei, agradecerle al jefe por haberse encargado de la odisea que fue organizar el partido a nivel nacional y por acompañarme a diario en esta lucha por las ideas de la libertad, a pesar de las injurias y operetas que vomitan desde los rincones más oscuros de la política todos los días”.Patricia Bullrich lanzó un spot en el que afirma: “No podemos dejar que sigan impunes después de tanta corrupción, después de que hayan convertido a la provincia en un paraíso para los delincuentes, después de que hayan hundido en la miseria a millones de argentinos. Por eso este 7 de septiembre tenemos que ser millones los que votando a los candidatos de la libertad a balsa nos digamos fuerte y claro, kirchnerismo nunca más”.Axel Kicillof comentó: “No, es muy grave porque fue un capricho de Milei, pero además un capricho rodeado de, primero, como decía, tiene unos antecedentes, que es que no lo pudieron cuidar al presidente, no lo pudieron cuidar, se tuvo que ir corriendo de un acto que además era una provocación, porque se dirigía en el que hizo el Loma de Zamora, que es el único distrito peronista, si querés hablar, y donde todos tratamos de evitar que fuera peor de lo que fue, Lo salvó la policía de la provincia, porque ellos van con esa camioneta descubierta insultando a la gente que le responde. Era justo los días estos que están surgiendo los temas de las coimas, del 3%, le decían cosas, y les contestaban, les gritaban provocando”

Federico Furiaso, director del BCRA sostuvo: “Ningún volantazo, el esquema de bandas cambiarias sigue igual. El Banco Central no interviene adentro de las bandas, solamente interviene en el piso vendiendo pesos, en el techo comprando pesos. Lo que hoy ocurrió es una situación puntual donde el tesoro para proveer liquidez en el mercado de cambios y asegurar el buen funcionamiento del mercado” y agregó: “Esta medida, como la hicimos transparente, como todos los pasos que fuimos dando, se lo comunicó con el Fondo. Al Fondo le pareció genial que sea transparente y que se avise al mercado. Está al tanto de esto. Y como todo lo que venimos haciendo, esto lo podemos hacer porque tenemos un programa de estabilización que fue preparado para estar blindados ante cualquier ataque político”.Axel Kicillof en un acto en San Martín por el Día de la Industria afirmó: “Yo recuerdo que cuando Sergio era ministro de Economía, el FMI apretaba y apretaba al país. Obligó una devaluación entre las PASO y las generales. Y ahora a este gobierno le soporta todo. Hoy mismo acaba de romper la regla cambiaria que acordó con el FMI y el FMI. No dijo nada. Hoy abandonó la banda de flotación. Se hundieron. No flotan más”.Alejandro Fantino se refirió al momento en el que el equipo económico visitó su programa y gritó que el dólar flotaba, y comentó: “Lo que surgió como una especie de broma, por eso hay que evitar esas cosas también, hay que aprender boludo, hay que aprender, hay que aprender, hay que aprender. Cuando todo el equipo económico acá me gritó “flota”, en épocas virales, en épocas de permanencia, menos es más. Hay que tirarla como siempre digo, en el tenis un metro dentro de la cancha, no a los flejes”.Karina Milei en un nuevo audio difundido en el stream uruguayo “Dopamina” dice: “Hay que estar abajo de Martín. Hay que porque yo digo Martín es el que tiene la información. Qué hay que hacer… de como es llevando acá. Desde mi punto que me toca a mí yo respeto a Martín como cabe…" “Hay que estar abajo de Martín. Hay que porque yo digo Martín es el que tiene la información. Qué hay que hacer… de como es llevando acá. Desde mi punto que me toca a mí yo respeto a Martín como cabe…“.

Speaker: Bryan ScottSeries: The TrinityScripture: John 1:1-5Reflection Question: How does the delight of the Father to reveal himself through the Son inform your knowledge of God?To see more about this sermon, go to tcbc.cc/sermonsTCBC is a non-denominational church in Urbana, IL. Visit us at tcbc.cc, follow us on Facebook and Instagram @mytcbc. Contact us at office@tcbc.cc or call (217) 344-0641

David Penn es uno de los artistas de música house más importantes del mundo y todos los martes de 22:00 a 23 horas presenta en LOS40 Dance, su radio show LOS40 Dance Urbana. El programa para los amantes de la música

Patricia Bullrich sostuvo: “Hace poco tiempo nosotros denunciamos una injerencia de personas ligadas a ex servicios de inteligencia rusos y ya veíamos que en la campaña podía suceder esto, que esto podía ser parte. ya veíamos que Venezuela podía influir bueno, todos estos elementos más un canal de extraña procedencia de un señor que es tesorero de la AFA y periodistas que desde nuestro punto de vista más que periodistas están siendo parte de esta difusión para operar el sentido de una elección”. A su vez, agregó: “lo que ha llegado a pasar ahora es algo realmente inédito, increíble. Siempre se ha hablado de operaciones de inteligencia, hemos visto la operación PUF, hemos visto un montón de operaciones de inteligencia, pero ahora esta operación de inteligencia, que es grabar en la misma sede del Poder Ejecutivo, en la Casa Rosada, es algo que nos pone en una situación de una indefensión de todos los ciudadanos”.Jorge Rial denunció: “Lo que están intentando con esto es que no sigamos investigando. Lo que están haciendo con esto es confirmar que los audios de Spagnuolo son verdaderos, que lo que dice Spagnuolo es verdad, que Spagnuolo dicen que son corruptos y es cierto, que Spagnuolo dicen que pasaron del 5 al 8% y que ese 3 se lo lleva Karina. Bueno, es cierto que Lule Menem es el recaudador de la corona, es cierto. Porque no salen a desmentir eso. No echaron a Lule, no echaron a Martín Menem, no echaron a Karina, no le piden allanamiento, no le piden el teléfono porque está más sucio que una papa, porque tienen el culo sucio. Entonces vienen contra la prensa. Es un tiro en el pie, muchachos, esto”. Marcela Pagano, diputada nacional de "Coherencia" afirmó: “Yo pido que no haya censura en Argentina. Pido que se respete la libertad de expresión en este país, como en todas las democracias. Nadie fue tan lejos para querer acallar voces, creo que en ningún gobierno”.

Entrevista con Cristina Martín, Javier Alejandro García Gómez y Nixon Santiago Coque Colorado

Javier Milei afirmó durante su discurso en el Encuentro del Consejo Interamericano de Comercio y Producción (CICYP): “Cuando lanzamos nuestra campaña inventaron salvajadas de venta de candidaturas, que íbamos a habilitar la venta de órganos, que permitiríamos que los niños compraran armas por Internet. Y cuántas de tantas aberraciones que dijeron, como el incesto, como la zoofilia, se cansaron de decir todo tipo de barbaridades. La opereta de esta semana no es más que otro ítem en la larga lista de artilugios de la casta y tal como en todas las anteriores, una nueva mentira”.“Era muy emocionante ayer, digamos, enfrentar toda la lluvia de piedras con el profe Espert y mi hermana y algunos de los candidatos de la tercera sección. Era un espectáculo increíble. Es decir, se veía la desesperación. La verdad que eso a mí no me va a asustar. Yo cuando jugaba al fútbol, jugaba en Chacarita y seguí la campaña de Chacarita 84, 85, 86. La cantidad de veces que quedé en el medio de una lluvia de piedras, ustedes no se dan una idea”, agregó Milei.El presidente señaló: “Y eso es lo que está haciendo el kirchnerismo, está tirando todo en esta elección. ¿Por qué? Porque esto es un techo para el kirchnerismo el 7 de septiembre. Es decir, el 26 de octubre con un mejor sistema de elección, porque vamos a tener la boleta única papel, porque se tiene que validar la gestión nacional, porque ya habrán utilizado el aparato en septiembre y no en octubre, más las divergencias y discrepancias que tienen ellos, eso lo que va a hacer es que el resultado que tengan en octubre va a ser peor que el que tienen en septiembre. Nosotros sabemos que nuestro septiembre es un piso y que lo mejor vendrá en octubre”.Manuel Adorni aseguró: “El Gobierno Nacional apenas tomó conocimiento del tema, inició una auditoría interna en la Agencia Nacional de Discapacidad, designó un interventor y desplazó al ex titular que está siendo investigado por la Justicia. Además, tanto Martín como Eduardo Menem aclararon que no tuvieron vínculo alguno con las contrataciones de la Agencia Nacional de Discapacidad. No es casualidad que estos audios que presuntamente fueron grabados el año pasado salgan a la luz a dos semanas de las elecciones de la provincia de Buenos Aires. Nunca debemos olvidar que quienes se rasgan las vestiduras hablando de corrupción son aquellos que tiraban bolsos por encima de un convento”.El diputado Lisandro Almirón se refirió a los incidentes durante la visita de Karina y Martín Menem en Corrientes: “Es gente que vino con una mala intención, es gente que quiere que al país le vaya mal, es la misma gente que destruyó no solamente el país sino las instituciones y lamentablemente están hoy quizás muchos queriendo volver a una situación de privilegio que tenían a costa de un montón de argentinos y lamentablemente hoy la libertad avanza, sigue creciendo, sigue apostando al cambio, sigue sumando gente joven, gente que no viene de la política y eso parece que le molesta”.Noticias del viernes 29 de agosto por María O'Donnell y equipo de De Acá en Más por Urbana Play 104.3 FMSeguí a De Acá en Más en Instagram y XUrbana Play 104.3 FM. Somos la radio que ves.Suscribite a #Youtube. Seguí a la radio en Instagram y en XMandanos un whatsapp ➯ Acá¡Descargá nuestra #APP oficial! ➯  https://scnv.io/m8Gr 

Menedżer sportowy w rozmowie z Grzegorzem Milko komentuje powołania, które wysłał dzisiaj Jan Urban. Omawia również sytuację wokół powrotów piłkarzy takich jak Kamil Grosicki czy Paweł Wszołek.

Speaker: Bryan ScottSeries: The TrinityScripture: John 1:1-5Reflection Question: How does the hope of the Trinity provoke you to pursue your deepest longings in the Father, Son, and Spirit?To see more about this sermon, go to tcbc.cc/sermonsTCBC is a non-denominational church in Urbana, IL. Visit us at tcbc.cc, follow us on Facebook and Instagram @mytcbc. Contact us at office@tcbc.cc or call (217) 344-0641

Como a tecnologia pode ajudar na otimização das entregas e experiência do consumidor? Neste Enzimas, recebemos Thiago Cordeiro, Fundador e CEO da GoodStorage, que compartilha insights sobre como as cidades precisam operar de forma completamente diferente para atender às demandas dos consumidores modernos. Além disso, ele dá detalhes sobre a estratégia de demanda preditiva com apoio da tecnologia e seu potencial de transformar a eficiência das entregas, além de reduzir impactos ambientais. Ficou curioso? Então, dê o play! Links importantes: Newsletter Dúvidas? Nos mande pelo Linkedin Contato: osagilistas@dtidigital.com.br Os Agilistas é uma iniciativa da dti digital, uma empresa WPPSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Milei se refirió a Diego Spagnuolo durante su recorrida por Lomas de Zamora: “Todo lo que dice es mentira y nos vamos a llevar a la justicia y vamos a probar que mintió”.José Luis Espert se refirió a los incidentes ocurridos en Lomas de Zamora durante la visita de Javier Milei: “No tengo pruebas, pero no tengo dudas, y sin duda el impresentable de Otermin, maldito kirchnerista, ha estado detrás de esto porque la violencia, así muy cortita que sufrimos, porque enseguida la custodia presidencial, la custodia de las tuercas, fue muy muy fuerte, de parte de un muy reducido grupo de personas. Debo decir que el grueso de la gente, el 90% de la gente, estaba con nosotros, estaba feliz de que nosotros estuviéramos con ellos, estaba feliz de ver al presidente de un grupo de violentos, lamentablemente tiñó este acto y por seguridad del presidente de la nación y de la presidenta del partido de la ley de alta avanza, obviamente se terminó la caravana”.El intendente de Lomas de Zamora, Federico Otermin, afirmó: “Es algo raro que no se hizo nunca, qué sé yo. A Macri le ha ido muy bien en elecciones y no hizo algo de esta naturaleza, porque también tiene que ver con los contextos adecuados para hacer un acto, una actividad. a ello puede haber un teatro, un club un lugar donde vos invites a la gente que tenga ganas de escucharte, de compartir me parece importante también reflexionar sobre sobre eso, digo, creo que pero sin ánimo de polemizar, porque no quiero que se empañen el repudio a cualquier hecho de violencia pero tiene que haber una toma de nota también de que hay mucha gente que está enojada por un montón de situaciones”.La ministra de Seguridad Patricia Bullrich aseguró: “Hoy tenemos claramente a la intendencia de Lomas de Zamora metida, una de las intendencias cuyo ex intendente fue uno de los más corruptos de la historia argentina, metida en lo que fue el intento democrático de presentar nuestra propuesta y nuestros candidatos en Lomas de Zamora. Estuvo muy bien la policía de la provincia que se interpuso en un momento que la caravana ya veía que venían violentos, se desvió y entonces las fuerzas federales quedaron en la zona donde estaban los violentos y la policía de la provincia estaba más cerca de la caravana del presidente y lo ayudó, se puso como barrera. Así que la verdad que nosotros lo destacamos y lo felicitamos”.Cristina Fernández de Kirchner envió un mensaje al acto de Axel Kicillof: “Mirá que les iba a interesar bajar los precios de los medicamentos. Dale, si cobraban coimas por los porcentajes sobre medicamentos facturados para los discapacitados. Y no es un relato, kuka. No, no. Lo escuchamos todos, toditos los argentinos. Nada más ni nada menos que de la boquita del abogado y amigo personal de mi ley al que nombró director de la Agencia Nacional de Discapacidad. Y después rajó cuando se armó el quilombo. sí, escuchamos hasta el porcentaje de la coima que cobraba la hermana del presidente compatriotas”.Noticias del jueves 28 de agosto por María O'Donnell y equipo de De Acá en Más por Urbana Play 104.3 FMSeguí a De Acá en Más en Instagram y XUrbana Play 104.3 FM. Somos la radio que ves.Suscribite a #Youtube. Seguí a la radio en Instagram y en XMandanos un whatsapp ➯ Acá¡Descargá nuestra #APP oficial! ➯  https://scnv.io/m8Gr 

Quase 59 mil inquilinos continuam sem receber o Apoio Extraordinário à Renda, lançado pelo anterior Governo de António Costa. O pagamento foi suspenso pelo Instituto da Habitação e Reabilitação Urbana devido a incongruências nos dados, deixando milhares de famílias em esperaSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Martín Menem, presidente de la Cámara de Diputados, se refirió a que el contenido de los audios de Spagnuolo es falso: "Nadie te puede aseverar que esos audios sean, digamos, auténticos o no. Primer punto. (...) Ponele que sea la voz de Spagnuolo. Estaban editados o estaban editados. Ahora, el contenido de los audios, lo que dice es absolutamente… Absolutamente falso. Habla de supuestos. y aparte hay algo que te muestra cómo actúa el Poder Ejecutivo. Ante la aparición de estos audios se decide apartar automáticamente al funcionario”.“Esto puede ser una buena operación, se trata de una monumental operación para tratar de frenar a un gobierno que viene a toda marcha generando muy buenas expectativas y esperanzas en toda la población. ¿Te acordás cuando decían que iba a haber hasta gente vendiendo órganos por la calle o no sé cuánta barbaridad dijeron?”, agregó Martín Menem.El senador Luis Juez afirmó: “me putearon como voté con el tema de la discapacidad. Me mataron con el tema del Garrahan, me mataron en las redes. Me mataron, traidor, hijo de puta, vos comés con mi ley, mirá lo que hacés. y ahora resulta que tengo que ver la televisión que no había plata para la asistente terapéutica de mi hija pero si hay para la cometa, entonces te quiero decir que yo necesito a grito que el tema se aclare”.Jonatan Viale señaló: “Lule Menem citó a Spagnuolo tres veces en 15 días a su despacho de la Casa Rosada apenas asumió en la agencia entre febrero y marzo de 2024. Es lo que tiene que explicar el gobierno, que así ha metido Lule Menem, la mano derecha de Karina Milei, en la Agencia Nacional de Discapacidad. ¿De qué hablaban? ¿De fútbol?”.Juan Grabois sostuvo: “Espert, un tipo que financió su campaña en el 2019 con los aportes de Fred Machado, que es el narco más importante que pisó este país. Espert financiado por los narcos. Espert y Spagnuolo. Spagnuolo, mafia de los remedios. Fentanilo. Hay una cosa de la narcopolítica”.Axel Kicillof aseguró: “Él ganó casi sin fiscales, siendo un partido nuevo con la boleta tradicional de papel. O sea, si fuera un instrumento del fraude, él no sería presidente. Si el peronismo o la provincia... Mirá, en la provincia de Buenos Aires tenemos este sistema de votación con boleta de papel tradicional por fuerza política desde siempre. Perdió el peronismo con Vidal, con esa boleta. o sea que la verdad que me parece que no, pero si no hubiera habido denuncia fraude en alguna elección, no hubo nunca hubo”.Noticias del miércoles 27 de agosto por María O'Donnell y equipo de De Acá en Más por Urbana Play 104.3 FMSeguí a De Acá en Más en Instagram y XUrbana Play 104.3 FM. Somos la radio que ves.Suscribite a #Youtube. Seguí a la radio en Instagram y en XMandanos un whatsapp ➯ Acá¡Descargá nuestra #APP oficial! ➯  https://scnv.io/m8Gr 

In questo episodio vi porto nel cuore di Midtown per scoprire due luoghi simbolo di New York: la New York Public Library, con i suoi iconici leoni Patience e Fortitude, e Bryant Park, il salotto verde della città.Racconteremo la storia della biblioteca, dalla sua nascita sul sito dell'antico serbatoio Croton alle sale iconiche come la Rose Main Reading Room, fino alle collezioni rare custodite nei suoi magazzini sotterranei.Poi usciremo all'aperto per vivere Bryant Park, dalla sua trasformazione da zona degradata a spazio pubblico modello, oggi teatro di eventi, attività e momenti di relax in ogni stagione. Vi darò anche consigli su dove prendere da mangiare e gustarlo al parco per vivere l'esperienza come un vero newyorkese.

Send us a textIn this episode, I sit down with two longtime friends of the podcast: Osahon Obazuaye, pastor and activist, and Grant Young, who holds both undergraduate and graduate degrees from one of America's leading evangelical universities. Both of them bring firsthand experience as Black men navigating predominantly white evangelical spaces—churches, classrooms, and institutions that shaped their faith journeys in both inspiring and challenging ways.We discuss the powerful new documentary, “Black + Evangelical”—a film that shines a spotlight on the history, struggles, and contributions of African American evangelicals. The documentary amplifies voices that too often go unheard, voices like Dr. Vincent Bacote, theologian and ethicist at Wheaton College; the late Dr. William E. Pannell, co-founder of the National Black Evangelical Association; historian and author Jemar Tisby; and the unforgettable preacher Tom Skinner, whose Urbana '70 sermon still resonates today. We even revisit the legacy of Howard O. Jones, the first Black associate evangelist with Billy Graham.This conversation is eye-opening, personal, and at times raw—but it's also deeply hopeful. We unpack the film, share stories, and challenge assumptions about what it really means to be both Black and evangelical in America.So join us —you'll come away inspired, challenged, and ready for more.Support the showBecome a Patron - Click on the link to learn how you can become a Patron of the show. Thank you! Ken's Substack Page The Podcast Official Site: TheBeachedWhiteMale.com

In today’s deep dive, class is back in session at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and a new chancellor is on campus.

Hacer click aquí para enviar sus comentarios a este cuento.Juan David Betancur Fernandezelnarradororal@gmail.comHabía una vez en el Quito colonial una joven de nombre Bella Aurora. La joven vivía en el corazón mismo de Quito, desde su balcón se podían escuchar claramente las campanas de la Catedral cuando estas tocaban a misa marcando los ritmos de aquella población. Su belleza era tal que los vecinos decían que el sol se demoraba en salir solo para verla despertar. Era hija única, criada entre tapices bordados, libros de canto y jardines de geranios. Su voz, dulce y clara, voz que cruzaba sin dificultad los muros gruesos y llegaba a los oídos de todos aquellos que pasaban por debajo del balcón de la casa 1028.En el medio de la ciudad estaba la plaza mayor, que luego se conocería como la plaza de la independencia. Allí como era la costumbre de la época se celebraban las más importantes de las fiestas y entre ellas las muy tradicionales corridas de toro que enmarcaban las múltiples fiestas religiosas de la señorial ciudad. Durante una de aquellas fiestas se programa una gran corrida de toros y como era costumbre la crema y nata de la sociedad debía hacerse presente en los palcos alrededor del ruedo. Siendo que ya Bella aurora  ya había sido presentada en sociedad sus padres decidieron llevarla a la corrido para mostrarle a toda la gente prestante de Quito cuan bella era sus hija Aurora. Ella aunque tímida acepto y gracias al acompañamiento de su madre que le escogió un bello mantón de color marfil y una preciosa peineta de nácar que le hacia juego con su vestido de núbil doncella, salió simplemente radiante hacia la plaza. Camino junto a sus padre por las calles empedradas de la sin igual Quito. Los transeúntes paraban y se enmudecían al ver la belleza de aquella joven que iluminaba su paso con su sonrisa y su gracia al caminar..La plaza estaba llena. Con prontitud se dirigieron a su palco que se encontraba en el lado sur  de la plaza, justo debajo de la gran catedral de quito. Desde allí podrían observan en detalle los acontecimientos taurinos. El aire olía a pólvora, sudor y flor de naranjo y la expectación crecía con cada segundo mientras los toreros desfilaban por la arena. Finalmente los primeros clarines sonaron, y de la puerta de toriles emergió un toro negro, enorme, de pelaje brillante como obsidiana y ojos que no parecían de este mundo. Aquel astado era realmente imponente y al salir todos los asistentes simplemente callaron. Pero aquella bestia negra No corrió. No embistió. Simplemente caminó con lentitud, como si cada paso fuera parte de un ritual antiguo. Todos miraban con estupor sin comprender porque ese animal recorría la plaza tomando su tiempo e ignorando la presencia de el torero que ya se acercaba a el con el capote desplegado con sus dos brazos extendidos. Pero el Toro negro siguió dando la vuelta a la plaza mirando al público allí presente. De pronto al llegar frente a la catedral se detuvo, justo al frente del palco donde Aurora lo observaba curiosa. Y en ese instante sus ojos de animal se cruzaron con la mirada dulce de la joven. El toro estaba mirando a Aurora y solo a ella.  Pero no era una mirada animal. Fue una mirada larga, profunda, como si la conociera desde antes de nacer. Como si supiera que el destino le tenía preparado aquel encuentro. .La joven sintió un escalofrío en todo su cuerpo. No podía apartar su mirada de aquel toro negro que se encontraba a escaso metros de ella. Su respiración se cortó. El mundo se volvió borroso. Y cayó al suelo, desmayada.Sus padres, alarmados, la tomaron en brazos y salieron de la plaza entre murmullos y miradas. La llevaron a casa, donde los criados encendieron velas, prepararon agua de toronjil y rezaron oraciones antiguas. Bella Aurora no

We continue our series of in-depth conversations with candidates for U.S. Senate, who are vying for Senator Dick Durbin's seat. Congresswoman Robin joins us live in our studio in Urbana.    The 21st Show is Illinois' statewide weekday public radio talk show, connecting Illinois and bringing you the news, culture, and stories that matter to the 21st state. Have thoughts on the show or one of our episodes, or want to share an idea for something we should talk about? Send us an email: talk@21stshow.org. If you'd like to have your say as we're planning conversations, join our texting group! Just send the word "TALK" to (217) 803-0730. Subscribe to our podcast and hear our latest conversations. Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/6PT6pb0 Find past segments, links to our social media and more at our website: 21stshow.org.

Speaker: Bryan ScottSeries: Let the Word DwellScripture: 2 Timothy 3:16-17Reflection Question: How can you appreciate and/or allow the work of the Spirit & Scripture in your life?To see more about this sermon, go to tcbc.cc/sermonsTCBC is a non-denominational church in Urbana, IL. Visit us at tcbc.cc, follow us on Facebook and Instagram @mytcbc. Contact us at office@tcbc.cc or call (217) 344-0641

Presença de árvores nas cidades varia de bairro para bairro, mas áreas mais valorizadas costumam ser as mais verdes

En este episodio conversamos con Sergio Juariqua, activista y vecino de la colonia Juárez, sobre la lucha vecinal contra la gentrificación, los desalojos y el despojo que han transformado el centro de la Ciudad de México. Busca La Ciudad Que Queremos en donde encontraste este episodio y empieza a seguirlo. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Este episodio forma parte de una selección para el verano de EL PAÍS Audio. Este episodio se emitió el 11 de diciembre de 2024. La vivienda continúa subiendo, tanto la compra como el alquiler. Oficialmente, las casas son más caras que nunca. Frente a ese panorama, hay pequeñas iniciativas como la que desarrolla en Lleida la cooperativa Obrint Portes que quieren enfrentarse a un mercado inmobiliario salvaje con el objetivo de frenar la especulación y el racismo inmobiliario a través de la rehabilitación y el alquiler asequible. En la Cataluña rural la masovería era una práctica común. Los agricultores, los masovers en este caso, acordaban con los propietarios de las tierras trabajarlas a cambio de una cantidad de los beneficios y el derecho a vivir en la propia finca. Esa práctica del campo traída a la ciudad es lo que se conoce como masovería urbana. “Son los propios jóvenes los que participan en la rehabilitación de lo que será su futura vivienda”, explica Èric Morros, uno de los fundadores de la cooperativa. Es una alianza de conveniencia entre propietarios sin capacidad de inversión e inquilinos: los primeros rehabilitan su vivienda y los segundos obtienen un alquiler asequible. Créditos: Un reportaje de: Dani Sousa Diseño de sonido: David Gutiérrez Presenta y dirige: Silvia Cruz Lapeña Edición: Ana Ribera Sintonía: Jorge Magaz Para leer más: El 63% de los jóvenes cree que los políticos no entienden la complejidad del problema de la vivienda: https://elpais.com/sociedad/2024-12-10/el-63-de-los-jovenes-cree-que-los-politicos-no-entienden-la-complejidad-del-problema-de-la-vivienda.html El precio de la vivienda no cede y sube otro 8,1% en el tercer trimestre, su mayor repunte en dos años y medio: https://elpais.com/economia/2024-12-05/el-precio-de-la-vivienda-no-cede-y-sube-otro-81-en-el-tercer-trimestre-su-mayor-repunte-en-dos-anos-y-medio.html

En este episodio conversamos con Sergio Juariqua, activista y vecino de la colonia Juárez, sobre la lucha vecinal contra la gentrificación, los desalojos y el despojo que han transformado el centro de la Ciudad de México. Busca La Ciudad Que Queremos en donde encontraste este episodio y empieza a seguirlo. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

O convidado do programa Pânico dessa segunda-feira (18) é Orlando Morando.Orlando Morando Júnior nasceu em 24 de agosto de 1974, em São Bernardo do Campo, onde construiu sua vida pessoal, profissional e política. Entrou na vida pública, inicialmente, com o objetivo de trazer melhorias para o bairro Batistini, onde nasceu e foi criado, em São Bernardo.Empresário no setor de supermercados, é casado com a deputada estadual Carla Morando e tem dois filhos: Orlandinho e Antonella.Foi vereador de São Bernardo por dois mandatos (1997 a 2000 e 2001 a 2002). Em 2002, decide concorrer ao cargo de deputado estadual, sendo eleito pela primeira vez. Como parlamentar estadual foi reeleito em outras três oportunidades: 2006, 2010 e 2014 (sendo esta última o terceiro mais votado em todo o Estado de São Paulo, ao receber 237.020 votos). Autor da Ficha Limpa Estadual.Em 2016, vence a eleição para prefeito de São Bernardo, no segundo turno, com 213.661 votos, e torna-se chefe do Executivo municipal para o mandato 2017-2020. Em 2020, concorre à reeleição do cargo de prefeito e venceu a eleição em primeiro turno após obter 261.761 votos (67,28%) para o exercício de 2021-2024.Entre os dois mandatos como prefeito, promoveu o maior pacote de realizações já entregues no município, com mais de 100 obras estruturantes. Deixa o governo com 81% de aprovação, conforme instituto Real Big Data.Em dezembro de 2024, recebeu o convite do prefeito Ricardo Nunes para assumir a Secretaria Municipal de Segurança Urbana de São Paulo. Desde janeiro de 2025, vem se dedicando à tarefa de modernizar e fortalecer a segurança urbana da maior cidade do país, com foco na prevenção, no uso de tecnologia de ponta e no fortalecimento da Guarda Civil Metropolitana. À frente da pasta, Orlando Morando tem coordenado ações estratégicas, entre elas a ampliação do Smart Sampa, maior programa de monitoramento com reconhecimento facial da América Latina.Redes Sociais:Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/orlandomorando/

El Sexto Ejército espera una batalla fácil, pero la oposición de las fuerzas soviéticas es dura. Pese al domino del aire y la sistemática destrucción de la ciudad, la resistencia no deja tocar el Volga a los alemanes. Lo que había parecido un paseo semanas antes, se está convirtiendo en una pesadilla. La batalla urbana no deja un segundo de respiro a ninguno de los bandos. Y el invierno se acerca... para los dos bandos. Considerada la reina de todas las batallas, marcó el punto de inflexión en el Frente del Este, y probablemente de toda la Segunda Guerra Mundial. El cerco y destrucción del 6º Ejército puso también en retirada a los alemanes del Cáucaso y golpeó fuertemente a la moral alemana, que no pudo recuperarla nunca. Te lo cuentan Pablo González, Antonio Muñoz Lorente, Antonio Gómez y Dani CarAn. ⭐️ ¿Qué es la Edición Especial de Verano? Se trata de reediciones revisadas de episodios relevantes de nuestro arsenal, para que no pases el verano sin tu ración de Historia Bélica. Casus Belli Podcast pertenece a 🏭 Factoría Casus Belli. Casus Belli Podcast forma parte de 📀 Ivoox Originals. 📚 Zeppelin Books (Digital) y 📚 DCA Editor (Físico) http://zeppelinbooks.com son sellos editoriales de la 🏭 Factoría Casus Belli. Estamos en: 🆕 WhatsApp https://bit.ly/CasusBelliWhatsApp 👉 X/Twitter https://twitter.com/CasusBelliPod 👉 Facebook https://www.facebook.com/CasusBelliPodcast 👉 Instagram estamos https://www.instagram.com/casusbellipodcast 👉 Telegram Canal https://t.me/casusbellipodcast 👉 Telegram Grupo de Chat https://t.me/casusbellipod 📺 YouTube https://bit.ly/casusbelliyoutube 👉 TikTok https://www.tiktok.com/@casusbelli10 👉 https://podcastcasusbelli.com 👨💻Nuestro chat del canal es https://t.me/casusbellipod ⚛️ El logotipo de Casus Belli Podcasdt y el resto de la Factoría Casus Belli están diseñados por Publicidad Fabián publicidadfabian@yahoo.es 🎵 La música incluida en el programa es Ready for the war de Marc Corominas Pujadó bajo licencia CC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/ El resto de música es bajo licencia privada de Epidemic Music, Jamendo Music o SGAE SGAE RRDD/4/1074/1012 de Ivoox. 🎭Las opiniones expresadas en este programa de pódcast, son de exclusiva responsabilidad de quienes las trasmiten. Que cada palo aguante su vela. 📧¿Queréis contarnos algo? También puedes escribirnos a casus.belli.pod@gmail.com ¿Quieres anunciarte en este podcast, patrocinar un episodio o una serie? Hazlo a través de 👉 https://www.advoices.com/casus-belli-podcast-historia Si te ha gustado, y crees que nos lo merecemos, nos sirve mucho que nos des un like, ya que nos da mucha visibilidad. Muchas gracias por escucharnos, y hasta la próxima. ¿Quieres anunciarte en este podcast? Hazlo con advoices.com/podcast/ivoox/391278 Escucha el episodio completo en la app de iVoox, o descubre todo el catálogo de iVoox Originals

Who are the black evangelicals? How has contemporary evangelicalism reckoned with racial justice? Theologian Vincent Bacote joins Mark Labberton to discuss Black + Evangelical, a new documentary exploring the in-between experience of black Christians in white evangelical spaces. Bacote—professor of theology at Wheaton College and director of the Center for Applied Christian Ethics—shares his personal faith journey, early formation in the Navigators, growing racial consciousness, and decades-long engagement with questions of race, theology, and evangelical identity. Together, they work through the tensions, challenges, and possibilities for a more truthful and hopeful evangelical witness. Episode Highlights “The goal of the documentary is not to be a kind of hit piece about the evangelical movement. It's to tell the story of the church.” “To be for Black people is not to be against somebody else.” – Tom Skinner “I couldn't understand why the Bible people weren't leading the way on questions of race.” “Participation in evangelical spaces can't mean leaving part of yourself outside.” “Realism allows you to have honesty, but also remember the good news is the greatest news of all.” “God wants all of us—our whole selves—not a muted version.” Helpful Links and Resources Black + Evangelical Documentary (Christianity Today) Black + Evangelical Documentary Trailer The Political Disciple: A Theology of Public Life by Vincent Bacote Reckoning with Race and Performing the Good News by Vincent Bacote Breaking Down Walls by Raleigh Washington & Glen Kehrein Tom Skinner's Urbana 1970 Address (Full Audio) *The Color of Compromise* by Jemar Tisby About Vincent Bacote Vincent Bacote is professor of theology at Wheaton College and director of the Center for Applied Christian Ethics. He is the author of several books, including The Political Disciple: A Theology of Public Life and Reckoning with Race and Performing the Good News: In Search of a Better Evangelical Theology. His research and teaching address public theology, ethics, and the intersection of race and evangelical identity. Bacote is a widely cited commentator and a frequent voice in conversations about Christian faithfulness in public life. Show Notes Mark Labberton welcomes Vincent Bacote, professor of theology at Wheaton College and director of the Center for Applied Christian Ethics. Introduction to the Black + Evangelical documentary, a project Bacote helped conceive and produce. Bacote's upbringing at Shiloh Baptist Church of Glenarden, Maryland—unknowingly part of the Progressive National Baptist Convention. Conversion experience around age ten, preceded by years of genuine faith. College years at the Citadel; involvement in the Navigators campus ministry. Influence of a summer training program in Memphis focused on African American ministry. Early exposure to evangelical culture through radio preachers like Chuck Swindoll, Charles Stanley, John MacArthur, and James Dobson. Initial tensions over the lack of evangelical engagement on issues of race. Graduate studies at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School with the initial goal of becoming a pastor. Encounter with Raleigh Washington and Glen Kehrein's Breaking Down Walls, grounding racial reconciliation in Ephesians 2. Observations of the scarcity of black theologians in evangelical seminaries. 1993 Geneva College conference on black evangelicals—learning from leaders like Bill Pannell, Tom Skinner, Tony Evans, Carl Ellis, and Eugene Rivers. Writing an editorial titled “Black and Evangelical: An Uneasy Tension?” for the student paper at Trinity. Realization that evangelicalism is both a biblical and socio-cultural movement with contextual blind spots. Arrival at Wheaton College in 2000 with a focus on public theology and ethics beyond race alone. Genesis of the Black + Evangelical project at a 2008 Fuller Seminary gathering with Ron Potter. Partnership with Christianity Today and filmmaker Dan Long to shape the documentary. Filming over forty hours of interviews with twenty-four participants, distilled into a ninety-four-minute film. Mark Labberton highlights Tom Skinner's impact and his “Blackface” critique of white evangelicalism. Bacote reflects on his “racially optimistic” early years and growing awareness of systemic realities. Analysis of the Promise Keepers movement and the need for sustained relational work beyond large gatherings. Challenges in building genuine multiethnic churches versus surface-level diversity. The documentary's aim: to tell the church's story, honour lived experiences, and inspire commitment to mission. Bacote's “four stages” for minorities in evangelical institutions: delight, dissonance, distress, and decision. Emphasis on “sober hope”—honesty about pain while holding onto the good news. The gospel's call to bring one's full self into the life of the church. Closing encouragement to watch and share Black + Evangelical as a story worth hearing for the whole church. Production Credits Conversing is produced and distributed in partnership with Comment magazine and Fuller Seminary.

Speaker: Bryan ScottSeries: Let the Word DwellScripture: Ephesians 5:18-21Reflection Question: How is God's will, revealed in Jesus, transforming you?To see more about this sermon, go to tcbc.cc/sermonsTCBC is a non-denominational church in Urbana, IL. Visit us at tcbc.cc, follow us on Facebook and Instagram @mytcbc. Contact us at office@tcbc.cc or call (217) 344-0641

How should we understand the words, “in him all things were created” in Col 1.16? Although commonly taken to mean Christ created the universe, this view has contextual, structural, and exegetical problems. In what follows I’ll name six problems with old-creation readings before laying out why a new creation approach makes sense. I presented this talk at the 2025 Unitarian Christian Alliance (UCA) conference in Uxbridge, England. Scroll down to see the full-length paper. For those listening to the audio, here’s a quick reference to Colossians 1.15-20 Strophe 1 (Col 1.15-18a) 15a      who is (the) image of the invisible God, 15b      firstborn of all creation 16a      for in him were created all things 16b                  in the heavens and upon the earth, 16c                  the visible and the invisible, 16d                  whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities 16e      all things have been created through him and for him 17a      and he is before all things 17b      and all things hold together in him 18a      and he is the head of the body of the Church,[12] Strophe 2 (Col 1.18b-20) 18b      who is (the) beginning, 18c      firstborn from the dead, 18d                  in order that he may be first in all things, 19        for in him was pleased all the fulness to dwell 20a      and through him to reconcile all things in him, 20b      making peace through the blood of his cross 20c                  whether the things upon the earth 20d                  or the things in the heavens Here’s Randy Leedy’s New Testament Diagram Here are the slides in the original PowerPoint format Download [13.82 MB] Here are the slides converted to PDF Loading... Taking too long? Reload document | Open in new tab Download [3.16 MB] To read the paper, simply scroll down or read it on Academia.edu.   Listen on Spotify   Listen on Apple Podcasts —— Links —— Check out these other papers by Sean Finnegan Support Restitutio by donating here Join our Restitutio Facebook Group and follow Finnegan on X @RestitutioSF Leave a voice message via SpeakPipe with questions or comments and we may play it out on the air Who is Sean Finnegan?  Read his bio here Get Finnegan’s book, Kingdom Journey to learn about God’s kingdom coming on earth as well as the story of how Christianity lost this pearl of great price. Get the transcript of this episode Intro music: Good Vibes by MBB Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-SA 3.0) Free Download / Stream: Music promoted by Audio Library. Below is the paper presented on July 25, 2025 in Uxbridge, England at the 2nd annual UCA UK Conference. Access this paper on Academia.edu to get the pdf. Full text is below, including bibliography and end notes. Colossians 1.16: Old Creation or New Creation? by Sean P. Finnegan Abstract  How should we understand the words, “in him all things were created” in Col 1.16? Although commonly taken to mean Christ created the universe, this view has contextual, structural, and exegetical problems. In what follows, I will explain the difficulties with the various old creation readings of Col 1.16 along with five reasons for a new creation approach. Then I'll provide a new creation reading of Col 1.16 before summarizing my findings in the conclusion. Introduction  Colossians 1.15-20 is a fascinating text of great importance for Christology. Commonly understood to be a hymn, it is fascinating in its cosmic scope and elevated Christology. Although many commentators interpret Paul[1] to say that Christ created the universe in his pre-existent state in Col 1.16, not all scholars see it that way. For example, Edward Schillebeeckx writes, “There is no mention in this text of pre-existence in the Trinitarian sense.”[2] Rather he sees “an eschatological pre-existence, characteristic of wisdom and apocalyptic.”[3] G. B. Caird agreed that Paul's focus in Col. 1.15-20 was not pre-existence (contra Lightfoot), rather, “The main thread of Paul's thought, then, is the manhood of Christ.”[4] In other words, “All that has been said in vv. 15-18 can be said of the historical Jesus.”[5] James Dunn also denied that Paul saw Christ as God's agent in creation in Col 1.15-20, claiming that such an interpretation was “to read imaginative metaphor in a pedantically literal way.”[6] James McGrath argued that “Jesus is the one through whom God's new creation takes place.” [7] Andrew Perriman likewise noted, “There is no reference to the creation of heaven and earth, light and darkness, sea and dry land, lights in the heavens, vegetation, or living creatures,”[8] also preferring a new creation approach.[9] To understand why such a broad range of scholars diverge from the old creation interpretation of Col 1.16, we will examine several contextual, structural, and exegetical problems. While explaining these, I'll also put forward four reasons to interpret Col 1.16 as new creation. Then I'll provide a fifth before giving a new creation reading of Col 1.15-20. But before going any further, let's familiarize ourselves with the text and structure. The Form of Col 1.15-20  To get our bearings, let me begin by providing a translation,[10] carefully structured to show the two strophes.[11] Strophe 1 (Col 1.15-18a) 15a      who is (the) image of the invisible God, 15b      firstborn of all creation 16a      for in him were created all things 16b                  in the heavens and upon the earth, 16c                  the visible and the invisible, 16d                  whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities 16e      all things have been created through him and for him 17a      and he is before all things 17b      and all things hold together in him 18a      and he is the head of the body of the Church,[12] Strophe 2 (Col 1.18b-20) 18b      who is (the) beginning, 18c      firstborn from the dead, 18d                  in order that he may be first in all things, 19        for in him was pleased all the fulness to dwell 20a      and through him to reconcile all things in him, 20b      making peace through the blood of his cross 20c                  whether the things upon the earth 20d                  or the things in the heavens Here I've followed the two-strophe structure (1.15-18a and 18b-20) noted more than a century ago by the classical philologist Eduard Norden[13] and repeated by James Robinson,[14] Edward Lohse,[15] Edward Schweizer,[16] James Dunn,[17] Ben Witherington III,[18] and William Lane[19] among others. By lining up the parallel lines of the two strophes, we can clearly see the poetic form. Strophe 1 15a who is (the) image… 15b firstborn of all creation 16a for in him were created all things… 16e  all things have been created through him… Strophe 2 18b who is (the) beginning, 18c firstborn from the dead … 19 for in him was pleased all… 20a and through him to reconcile all things in him… Such striking repeated language between the two strophes means that we should be careful to maintain the parallels between them and not take a grammatical or exegetical position on a word or phrase that would disconnect it from the parallel line in the other strophe. Some scholars, including F. F. Bruce,[20] Michael Bird,[21] David Pao,[22] among others proposed vv. 17-18a as an independent transitional link between the two strophes. Lohse explained the motivation for this unlikely innovation as follows. Above all, it is curious that at the end of the first, cosmologically oriented strophe, Christ is suddenly referred to as the “head of the body, the church” (1:18a κεφαλή τοῦ σώματος τῆς ἐκκλησίας). Considering its content, this statement would have to be connected with the second strophe which is characterized by soteriological statements. The structure of the hymn, however, places it in the first strophe.[23] For interpreters who prefer to think of the first strophe as cosmogony and the second as soteriology, a line about Christ's headship over the church doesn't fit very well. They restructure the form based on their interpretation of the content. Such a policy reverses the order of operations. One should determine the form and then interpret the content in light of structure. Lohse was right to reject the addition of a new transitional bridge between the two strophes. He called it “out of the question” since vv. 17-18a underscore “all things” and “serve as a summary that brings the first strophe to a conclusion.”[24] Now that we've oriented ourselves to some degree, let's consider old creation readings of Col 1.16 and the problems that arise when reading it that way. Old Creation Readings  Within the old creation paradigm for Col 1.16 we can discern three groups: those who see (A) Christ as the agent by whom God created, (B) Wisdom as the agent, and (C) Christ as the purpose of creation. Although space won't allow me to interact with each of these in detail, I will offer a brief critique of these three approaches. As a reminder, here is our text in both Greek and English. Colossians 1.16 16a      ὅτι ἐν αὐτῷ ἐκτίσθη τὰ πάντα 16b                  ἐν τοῖς οὐρανοῖς καὶ ἐπὶ τῆς γῆς, 16c                  τὰ ὁρατὰ καὶ τὰ ἀόρατα, 16d                  εἴτε θρόνοι εἴτε κυριότητες εἴτε ἀρχαὶ εἴτε ἐξουσίαι· 16e      τὰ πάντα δι' αὐτοῦ καὶ εἰς αὐτὸν ἔκτισται· 16a      for in him were created all things 16b                  in the heavens and upon the earth, 16c                  the visible and the invisible, 16d                  whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities 16e      all things have been created through him and for him 1. Christ as the Agent of Creation Scot McKnight is representative in his claim that “The emphasis of the first stanza is Christ as the agent of creation … and the second is Christ as the agent of redemption.”[25] This view sees the phrase “in him were created all things” as Christ creating the universe in the beginning. However, this position has six problems with it. Firstly, the context of the poem—both before (vv. 13-14) and after (vv. 21-22)—is clearly soteriological not cosmogonical.[26] By inserting vv. 15-20 into the text after vv. 13-14, Paul connected the two together.[27] V. 15 begins with ὅς ἐστιν (who is), which makes it grammatically dependent on vv. 13-14. “It is widely accepted,” wrote Dunn, “that this passage is a pre-Pauline hymn interpolated and interpreted to greater or less extent by Paul.”[28] By placing the poem into a redemptive frame, Paul indicated how he interpreted it. The fact that God “rescued us from the authority of darkness and transferred (us) into the kingdom of his beloved son” is the controlling context (v. 13).[29] As I will show below, I believe vv. 15-20 are ecclesiology not protology, since ecclesiology naturally flows from soteriology. Rather than remaining in the old domain of darkness, vulnerable to malevolent spiritual powers of this age, Colossian Christians are transferred into the new domain of Christ. The context makes it more natural to interpret the creation language of vv. 15-16 in light of Christ's redemptive work—as references to new creation rather than old creation. Doing so retains the contextual frame rather than jumping back to the beginning of time. A second problem arises when we consider the phrase “image of the invisible God” in v. 15. Although some see a Stoic or Wisdom reference here, I agree with F. F. Bruce who said, “No reader conversant with the OT scriptures, on reading these words of Paul, could fail to be reminded of the statement in Gen. 1:26f., that man was created by God ‘in his own image.'”[30] Immediately after making humanity in his own image, God blessed us with dominion over the earth. Philo also connected humanity's image of God with “the rulership over the earthly realms.”[31] But if the Christ of v. 15 is the pre-existent son prior to his incarnation, as the old creation model posits, “How can he be the ‘image of God,'” asked Eduard Schweizer, since “the one who is thus described here is not the earthly Jesus?”[32] It is precisely by virtue of his humanity that Jesus is the image of God not his pre-existence.[33] Thus, image-of-God language points us to the creation of a new humanity. A third problem is that “firstborn of all creation” prima facia implies that Christ is a member of creation (a partitive genitive). This is how Paul thought about Christ as firstborn in Rom 8.29 when he called Christ “firstborn among many brothers and sisters.” Clearly he saw Christ as a member of the “ἀδελφοῖς” (brothers and sisters). Furthermore, “πρωτότοκος πάσης κτίσεως” (firstborn of all creation) in v. 15 parallels “πρωτότοκος ἐκ τῶν νεκρῶν” (firstborn from the dead) v. 18. Although the former (v. 15) can be taken as a genitive of subordination (firstborn over creation) or as a partitive genitive (firstborn of creation), the latter (v. 18) is unambiguously partitive. Because v. 18 includes the word ἐκ (from/out of), instead of a multivalent genitive, it must mean that Jesus was himself a member of the dead prior to his resurrection. Likewise, he was the firstborn member of creation. To take v. 15 as a genitive of subordination and v. 18 in a partitive sense allows theology to drive exegesis over against the clear structural link between v. 15b and v. 18c. In fact, as the BDAG noted, Christ is “the firstborn of a new humanity.”[34] He is chronologically born first and, by virtue of that, also preeminent.[35] Fourthly, the phrase, “ἐν αὐτῷ” (in him), implies soteriology not protology as it does throughout the Pauline corpus. The prepositional phrases “in Christ,” “in the Lord,” “in him,” and others that are similar occur more than a hundred times in Paul's epistles. McKnight elucidated the sense nicely: “This expression, then, is the inaugurated eschatological reality into which the Christian has been placed, and it also evokes the new-creation realities that a person discovers.”[36] Creation in Christ is not likely to refer to Genesis creation. In fact, apart from Col 1.16, there is no text within Paul or the rest of the Bible that speaks of the origin of the universe as something created “in Christ.”[37] Sadly translators routinely obscure this fact by translating “ἐν αὐτῷ” as “by him.”[38] Amazingly, the NASB and ESV render “ἐν αὐτῷ” as “in him” in every other usage apart from Col 1.16![39] For the sake of consistency, it makes better sense to render “ἐν αὐτῷ” as “in him” and let the reader decide how to interpret it. Fifthly, the line, “and he is the head of the body, the Church” (v. 18a) clearly roots the first strophe in redemptive history not creation. Our English translations follow Robert Estienne's verse divisions, which confusingly combine the last line of the first strophe (v. 18a) and the first line of the second (v. 18b), obscuring the native poetic structure. As I made the case above, the structure of the text breaks into two strophes with v. 18a included in the first one. As I mentioned earlier, vv. 15-20 are a pre-existing poem that Paul has modified and incorporated into the text of Colossians. Ralph Martin pointed out that the poem contains “no less than five hapax legomena” and “about ten non-Pauline expressions.”[40] Additionally, there appear to be awkward additions that disrupt the symmetry. These additions are the most explicitly Christian material. It is likely that the original said, “and he is the head of the body” to which Paul appended “the church.” Edward Schillebeeckx commented on this. In Hellenistic terms this must primarily mean that he gives life and existence to the cosmos. Here, however, Colossians drastically corrects the ideas … The correction made by Colossians is to understand ‘body' as a reference to the church, and not the cosmos. This alters the whole perspective of the cultural and religious setting … The cosmic background is reinterpreted in terms of salvation history and ecclesiology. In fact Christ is already exercising his lordship over the world now … however, he is doing this only as the head of the church, his body, to which he gives life and strength. Thus Colossians claims that the church alone, rather than the cosmos, is the body of Christ.[41] If this is true, it shows Paul's careful concern to disallow a strictly old creation or protological reading of the first strophe. For by inserting “of the church,” he has limited the context of the first strophe to the Christ event. “The addition of ‘the church,'” wrote Dunn, “indicates that for Paul at any rate the two strophes were not dealing with two clearly distinct subjects (cosmology and soteriology).”[42] Karl-Joseph Kuschel wrote, “The answer would seem to be he wanted to ‘disturb' a possible cosmological-protological fancy in the confession of Christ … to prevent Christ from becoming a purely mythical heavenly being.”[43] Thus Paul's addition shows us he interpreted the creation of v16 as new creation. Lastly, theological concerns arise when taking Col 1.16 as old creation. The most obvious is that given the partitive genitive of v. 15, we are left affirming the so-called Arian position that God created Christ as the firstborn who, in turn, created everything else. Another thorn in the side of this view is God's insistence elsewhere to be the solo creator (Isa 44.24; cf. 45.18). On the strength of this fact, modalism comes forward to save the day while leaving new problems in its wake. However, recognizing Col 1.15-20 as new creation avoids such theological conundrums. 2. Wisdom as the Agent of Creation Dustin Smith noted, “The christological hymn contains no less than nine characteristics of the wisdom of God (e.g., “image,” “firstborn,” agent of creation, preceding all things, holding all things together) that are reapplied to the figure of Jesus.”[44] Some suggest that Col 1.15-20 is actually a hymn to Wisdom that Paul Christianized.[45] The idea is that God created the universe through his divine Wisdom, which is now embodied or incarnate in Christ. Dunn explained it as follows. If then Christ is what God's power/wisdom came to be recognized as, of Christ it can be said what was said first of wisdom—that ‘in him (the divine wisdom now embodied in Christ) were created all things.' In other words the language may be used here to indicate the continuity between God's creative power and Christ without the implication being intended that Christ himself was active in creation.[46] Before pointing out some problems, I must admit much of this perspective is quite noncontroversial. That Jewish literature identified Wisdom as God's creative agent, that there are linguistic parallels between Col 1.15-20 and Wisdom, and that the historical Jesus uniquely embodied Wisdom to an unprecedented degree are not up for debate. Did Paul expect his readers to pick up on the linguistic parallels? Afterall, he could have just said “in her were created all things” in v. 16, clearly making the connection with the grammatically feminine σοφία (Wisdom). Better yet, he could have said, “in Wisdom were created all things.” Even if the poem was originally to Wisdom, Paul has thoroughly Christianized it, applying to Christ what had been said of Wisdom. However, the most significant defeater for this view is that applying Wisdom vocabulary to Christ only works one way. Wisdom has found her home in Christ. This doesn't mean we can attribute to Christ what Wisdom did before she indwelt him any more than we can attribute to the living descendants of Nazis the horrific deeds of their ancestors. Perriman's critique is correct: “The point is not that the act of creation was Christlike, rather the reverse: recent events have been creation-like. The death and resurrection of Jesus are represented as the profoundly creative event in which the wisdom of God is again dynamically engaged, by which a new world order has come about.”[47] Once again a new creation approach makes better sense of the text. 3. Christ as the Purpose of Creation Another approach is to take ἐν αὐτῷ (in him) in a telic sense. Martha King, a linguist with SIL, said the phrase can mean “in association with Christ everything was created” or “in connection with Christ all things were created.”[48] Lexicographer, Joseph Thayer, sharpened the sense with the translation, “[I]n him resides the cause why all things were originally created.”[49] William MacDonald's translation brought this out even more with the phrase, “because for him everything … was created.”[50] The idea is that God's act of creation in the beginning was with Christ in view. As Eric Chang noted, “Christ is the reason God created all things.”[51] G. B. Caird said, “He is the embodiment of that purpose of God which underlies the whole creation.”[52] The idea is one of predestination not agency.[53] Christ was the goal for which God created all things. A weakness of this view is that purpose is better expressed using εἰς or δία with an accusative than ἐν. Secondly, the parallel line in the second strophe (v. 19) employs “ἐν αὐτῷ” in a clearly locative sense: “in him all the fullness was pleased to dwell.” So even though “ἐν αὐτῷ” could imply purpose, in this context it much more likely refers to location. Lastly, Paul mentioned the sense of purpose at the end of v. 16 with “εἰς αὐτὸν ἔκτισται” (for him has been created), so it would be repetitive to take “ἐν αὐτῷ” that way as well. To sum up, the three positions that see Col 1.16 as a reference to old creation all have significant problems. With these in mind, let us turn our attention to consider a fourth possibility: that Paul has in mind new creation. Reasons for a New Creation Reading I've already provided four reasons why Col 1.15-20 refers to new creation: (1) calling Christ the image of God points to the new humanity begun in Christ as the last Adam;[54] (2) since the firstborn of the old creation was Adam (or, perhaps, Seth), Jesus must be the firstborn of the new creation; (3) saying Jesus is the head of the church, limits the focus for the first strophe to the time following the Christ event; (4) the context of the poem, both before (vv. 13-14) and after (vv. 21-22) is soteriological, making an old creation paradigm awkward, while a new creation view fits perfectly. The Catholic priest and professor, Franz Zeilinger, summarized the situation nicely: “Christ is (through his resurrection from the realm of death) Lord over the possession granted to him, of which he is the ἀρχή (beginning) and archetype, … and head and beginning of the eschatological new creation!”[55] Additionally, a new creation paradigm fits best with Paul's elaboration of what visible and invisible things in heaven and on earth he has in mind. Once again, here's our text. 16a      for in him were created all things 16b                  in the heavens and upon the earth, 16c                  the visible and the invisible, 16d                  whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities 16e      all things have been created through him and for him By specifying thrones, dominions, rulers, and authorities, we discern Paul's train of thought. Form critics are quick to point out that v. 16d is Paul's addition to the poem. Without it, the reader may have thought of sky, land, and animals—old creation. However, with v. 16d present, we direct our attention to political realities not God's creative power or engineering genius. Martha King noted the two possible meanings for εἴτε: (1) specifying the “invisible things” or (2) giving examples of “all things.” Taking the second view, we read “in him were created all things, including thrones, dominions, rulers, and authorities.”[56] Randy Leedy also presented this position in his sentence diagrams, identifying v. 16d as equivalent to v. 16c and v. 16b, all of which modify τὰ πάντα (all things) at the end of v. 16a. (See Appendix for Leedy's diagram.) Perriman pressed home the point when he wrote: The fact is that any interpretation that takes verse 16 to be a reference to the original creation has to account for the narrow range of created things explicitly listed. … The Colossians verse mentions only the creation of political entities—thrones, lordships, rulers and authorities, visible and invisible—either in the already existing heaven or on the already existing and, presumably, populated earth. What this speaks of is a new governmental order consisting of both invisible-heavenly and visibly-earthly entities.”[57] Understanding v. 16d as equivalent to “all things” in v. 16a nicely coheres with a new-creation paradigm. However, taken the other way—as an elaboration of only the invisible created realities—v. 16d introduces an asymmetrical and clumsy appendix. A New Creation Reading of Col 1.16 Now that we've considered some problems with old creation views and some reasons to read Col 1.16 from a new creation perspective, let's consider how a new creation reading works. New creation is all about the new breaking into the old, the future into the present. G. F. Wessels said, “Paul made clear that there is a present realized aspect of salvation, as well as a future, still outstanding aspect, which will only be realized at the eschaton.”[58] New creation, likewise, has future and present realities. Exiting Old Creation Before becoming part of the new creation, one must exit the old creation. “Our old humanity was co-crucified“ (Rom 6.6). “With Christ you died to the elemental principles of the world” (Col 2.20). “As many as were baptized into Christ Jesus, were baptized into his death” (Rom 6.3). We were “co-buried with him through baptism into the death … having been united with the likeness of his death” (Rom 6.4-5). Our death with him through baptism kills our allegiance and submission to the old powers and the old way of life “in which you formerly walked according to the zeitgeist of this world, according to the rule of the authority of the air, the spirit which now works in the children of disobedience” (Eph 2.2). Entering New Creation As death is the only way out of the old creation, so resurrection is the only way into the new creation. “You have been co-raised with Christ” (Col 3.1). God “co-made-alive us together with him” (Col 2.13).[59] By virtue of our union with Christ, we ourselves are already “co-raised and co-seated us in the heavenlies in Christ Jesus” (Eph 2.6). The result of this is that “we also may walk in newness of life” (Rom 6.4). For those who are “in Christ, (there is) a new creation; the old has passed away, behold (the) new has come into existence” (2 Cor 5.17). “They have been ‘transported,'” wrote Schillebeeckx, “they already dwell above in Christ's heavenly sphere of influence (Col 1.13)—the soma Christou … that is the church!”[60] Community For the people of God, “neither circumcision is anything nor uncircumcision but a new creation” is what matters (Gal 6.15). Those who “are clothed with the new” are “being renewed in knowledge according to the image of him who created, where there is no Greek and Jew, circumcision and uncircumcision, barbarian, Scythian, slave, (or) free, but Christ (is) all and in all” (Col 3.10-11). Through Christ God has nullified the law “in order that he might create the two into one new humanity in him” (Eph 2.14-15). Thus, within new creation, ethnic identity still exists, but it is relativized, our identity in Christ taking priority ahead of other affiliations and duties. Lifestyle When the lost become saved through faith, they become his creation (ποίημα), “created in Christ Jesus for good works” (Eph 2.10). This means we are to “lay aside the former way of life, the old humanity corrupted according to deceitful desires” and instead be clothed with “the new humanity created according to God in righteousness and holiness of the truth” (Eph 4.22-24). Rather than lying to one another, we must “strip off the old humanity with its way of acting” and “be clothed with the new (humanity), renewed in knowledge according to the image of the one who created it” (Col 3.9-10). “The ones who are Christ's have crucified the flesh with the passions and the lusts” and instead “walk by the spirit” (Gal 5.24-25). Ultimately, All Creation Although new creation is currently limited to those who voluntarily recognize Jesus as Lord, all “creation is waiting with eager expectation for the unveiling of the children of God” (Rom 8.19). Because of the Christ event, the created order eagerly awaits the day when it will escape “the enslavement of corruption” and gain “the freedom of the glory of the children of God” (v. 21). Like a bone out of joint, creation does not function properly. Once Christ sets it right, it will return to its proper order and operation under humanity's wise and capable rulership in the eschaton. Eschatology God predetermined that those who believe will be “conformed to the image of his son, that he be firstborn among many brothers and sisters” (Rom 8.29). Thus, the resurrected Christ is the prototype, “the first fruits of those who have fallen asleep” (1 Cor 15.20). Whereas “in Adam all die, so also in Christ all will be made alive” (v. 22). We await Christ's return to “transform the body of our humble station (that it be) shaped to his glorious body according to the energy which makes him able to also to subject all things to himself.” (Phil 3.21). This is the end goal of new creation: resurrected subjects of God's kingdom joyfully living in a renewed world without mourning, crying, and pain forevermore (Isa 65.17-25; Rev 21-22). The Powers Taking Col 1.16 as a new creation text adds key information about the present governing powers to this richly textured picture. In Christ God created thrones, dominions, rulers, and authorities. He made these through Christ and for Christ with the result that Christ himself is before all things, and in Christ all things hold together (Col 1.17). He is the head of the body, the Church (Col 1.18). We find very similar language repeated in Ephesians in the context of Christ's exaltation.[61] Ephesians 1.20-23 20 Which [power] he energized in Christ having raised him from the dead and seated (him) on his right (hand) in the heavenlies 21 far above all rule and authority and power and dominion and every name named, not only in this age but also in the one to come; 22 and he subjected all things under his feet and gave him (as) head over all things in the Church, 23 which is his body, the fullness of the one who fills all things in all. The parallels are striking. Both speak of Christ's resurrection, Christ's exalted position of authority over all the powers, Christ's role as head of the church, and both mention the fullness. It's easy to miss the connection between these two passages since most think of Eph 1.20-22 as ascension theology and Col 1.15-20 as creation theology. But, if we adjust our thinking to regard Col 1.16 as new creation, we see how the two fit together. In Ephesians we see Christ's ascension to God's right hand as the reason for a cosmic reordering of authorities with the result that all rule, authority, power, and dominion are subjected to him. (Though we may be accustomed to reading these powers in Eph 1.21 as only malevolent owing to Eph 2.2 and 6.12, the list here must be mixed, since only benevolent powers will survive the final judgement and continue into the age to come.) Instead of exaltation, in Colossians Paul employed the language of creation to describe Christ's relation to the powers. Perhaps lesser terms like reassign, reorder, or establish were just too small to adequately express the magnitude of how the Christ event has changed the world—both in heaven and on earth. The only term big enough to convey the new situation was “creation”—the very same word he routinely used elsewhere with the meaning of new creation.[62] We can gain more insight by considering what the powers of Eph 1.21 and Col 1.16 mean. McKnight saw them “as earthly, systemic manifestations of (perhaps fallen) angelic powers—hence, the systemic worldly, sociopolitical manifestations of cosmic/angelic rebellion against God.”[63] I partially agree with McKnight here. He's right to see the powers as both heavenly and earthly, or better, as the heavenly component of the earthly sociopolitical realities, but he has not made room for the new authority structures created in Christ. John Schoenheit helpfully explained it this way: Not only did Jesus create his Church out of Jew and Gentile, he had to create the structure and positions that would allow it to function, both in the spiritual world (positions for the angels that would minister to the Church—see Rev. 1:1, “his angel”) and in the physical world (positions and ministries here on earth—see Rom. 12:4-8; Eph. 4:7-11).[64] We must never forget that Paul has an apocalyptic worldview—a perspective that seeks to unveil the heavenly reality behind the earthly. He believed in powers of darkness and powers of light. In Christ were created thrones, dominions, rulers, and authorities (Col 1.16). He is “the head of all rule and authority” (Col 2.10). These new creation realities make progress against the old powers that still hold sway in the world outside the Church. Although the old powers are still at work, those who are in Christ enjoy his protection. With respect to the Church, he has already “disarmed the rulers and authorities” (Col 2.15). We can don “the armor of God that we be able to stand against the methods of the devil” (Eph 6.11) and “subduing everything, to stand” (v. 13). We find glimpses of this heavenly reality scattered in other places in the Bible. Peter mentioned how Christ “is on the right hand of God, having gone into heaven, angels and authorities and power having been subjected to him” (1 Pet 3.22). In John's Revelation, he addressed each of the seven letters to the angels of their respective churches.[65] Although it's hard for us to get details on precisely what happened at Christ's ascension, something major occurred, not just on earth, but also in the spiritual realm. Jesus's last recorded words in Matthew are: “all authority in heaven and upon earth was given to me” (Mat 28.18-20). Presumably such a statement implies that prior to his resurrection Jesus did not have all authority in heaven and earth. It didn't exist until it was created. Similarly, because of his death, resurrection, and ascension, Christ has “become so much better than the angels as the name he has inherited is superior to them” (Heb 1.4). Once again, the text implies that Christ was not already superior to the angels, but “after making purification of the sins, he sat on the right hand of the majesty on high” at which time he became preeminent (Heb 1.3). Perhaps this also explains something about why Christ “proclaimed to the spirits in prison” (1 Pet 3.19). Another possibility is that Christ's ascension (Rev 12.5) triggered a war in heaven (v. 7) with the result that the dragon and his angels suffered defeat (v. 8) and were thrown out of heaven down to the earth (v. 9). Sadly, for most of the history of the church we have missed this Jewish apocalyptic approach that was obvious to Paul, limiting salvation to individual sins and improved morality.[66] Only in the twentieth century did interpreters begin to see the cosmic aspect of new creation. Margaret Thrall wrote the following. The Christ-event is the turning-point of the whole world … This Christ ‘in whom' the believer lives is the last Adam, the inaugurator of the new eschatological humanity. … Paul is saying that if anyone exists ‘in Christ', that person is a newly-created being. … In principle, through the Christ-event and in the person of Christ, the new world and the new age are already objective realities.[67] New creation is, in the words of J. Louis Martyn “categorically cosmic and emphatically apocalyptic.”[68] In fact, “The advent of the Son and of his Spirit is thus the cosmic apocalyptic event.”[69] In Christ is the beginning of a whole new creation, an intersecting community of angelic and human beings spanning heaven and earth. The interlocking of earthly (visible) and heavenly (invisible) authority structures points to Paul's apocalyptic holism. The Church was not on her own to face the ravages of Rome's mad love affair with violence and power. In Christ, people were no longer susceptible to the whims of the gods that have wreaked so much havoc from time immemorial.[70] No, the Church is Christ's body under his direct supervision and protection. As a result, the Church is the eschatological cosmic community. It is not merely a social club; it has prophetic and cosmic dimensions. Prophetically, the Church points to the eschaton when all of humanity will behave then how the Church already strives to live now—by the spirit instead of the flesh (Gal 5.16-25). Cosmically, the Church is not confined to the earth. There is a heavenly dimension with authority structures instantiated under Christ to partner with the earthly assemblies. God's “plan for the fulness of the times” is “to head up all thing in the Christ, the things upon the heavens and the things upon the earth in him” (Eph 1.10). Although this is his eschatological vision, Zeilinger pointed out that it is already happening. [T]he eschatological world given in Christ is realized within the still-existing earthly creation through the inclusion of the human being in Christ, the exalted one, by means of the proclamation of salvation and baptism. The eschaton spreads throughout the world in the kerygma and becomes reality, in that the human being, through baptism, becomes part of Christ—that is, in unity with him, dies to the claim of the στοιχεῖα τοῦ κόσμου (2.20) and is raised with him to receive his eschatological life. The people thus incorporated into the exalted Christ thereby form, in him and with him, the new creation of the eschaton within the old! The body of Christ is thus recognizable as the expanding Church. In it, heavenly and earthly space form, in a certain sense, a unity.[71] The Church is a counter society, and embassy of the future kingdom shining the light of the age to come into the present in the power of the spirit with the protection of Christ and his heavenly powers over against the powers of darkness, who/which are still quite active—especially in the political realities of our present evil age (Gal 1.4). We bend the knee to the cosmic Christ now in anticipation of the day when “every knee may bend: heavenly and earthly and subterranean” (Phil 2.10) and “every tongue may confess that Jesus Christ (is) Lord” (v. 11). Christ's destiny is to fulfil the original Adamic mandate to multiply, fill, and have dominion over the earth (Gen 1.28). He has already received all authority in heaven and earth (Mat 28.18). God has given him “dominion over the works of your hands and put all things under his feet” as the quintessential man (Ps 8.6). Even so, “Now we do not yet see all things subjected to him” (Heb 2.8), but when he comes “he will reign into the ages of the ages” (Rev 11.15). Until then, he calls the Church to recognize his preeminence and give him total allegiance both in word and deed. Conclusion We began by establishing that the structure of the poetic unit in Col 1.15-20 breaks into two strophes (15-18a and 18b-20). We noted that Paul likely incorporated pre-existing material into Colossians, editing it as he saw fit. Then we considered the problems with the three old creation readings: (A) Christ as the agent of creation, (B) Wisdom as the agent of creation, and (C) Christ as the purpose of creation. In the course of critiquing (A), which is by far most popular, we observed several reasons to think Col 1.16 pertained to new creation, including (1) the image of God language in v. 15a, (2) the firstborn of all creation language in v. 15b, (3) the head of the Church language in v. 18a, and (4) the soteriological context (frame) of the poem (vv. 13-14, 21-22). To this I added a fifth syntactical reason that 16d as an elaboration of “τἀ πάντα” (all things) of 16a. Next, we explored the idea of new creation, especially within Paul's epistles, to find a deep and richly textured paradigm for interpreting God's redemptive and expanding sphere of influence (in Christ) breaking into the hostile world. We saw that new Christians die and rise with Christ, ending their association with the old and beginning again as a part of the new—a community where old racial, legal, and status divisions no longer matter, where members put off the old way of living and instead become clothed with the new humanity, where people look forward to and live in light of the ultimate transformation to be brought about at the coming of Christ. Rather than limiting new creation to the salvation of individuals, or even the sanctifying experience of the community, we saw that it also includes spiritual powers both “in the heavens and upon the earth, the visible and the invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities” (Col 1.16). Reading Col 1.15-20 along with Eph 1.20-23 we connected God's creation of the powers in Christ with his exaltation of Christ to his right hand “far above all rule and authority and power and dominion and every name named, not only in this age but also in the one to come” (Eph 1.21). The point from both texts is clear: as “the head of the body, the Church” (Col 1.18; Eph 1.22), Christ is “before all things” (Col 1.17), “first in all things” (Col 1.18), and “far above all” (Eph 1.21), since God has “subjected all things under his feet” (Eph 1.22). Christ is preeminent as the firstborn of all new creation, “the new Adam … the starting point where new creation took place.”[72] Although the old powers still hold sway in the world, those in the interlocked heaven-and-earth new creation domain where Christ is the head, enjoy his protection if they remain “in the faith established and steadfast and not shifting away from the hope of the gospel” (Col 1.23). This interpretation has several significant advantages. It fits into Paul's apocalyptic way of thinking about Christ's advent and exaltation. It also holds together the first strophe of the poem as a unit. Additionally, it makes better sense of the context. (The ecclesiology of Col 1.15-18a follows logically from the soteriological context of vv. 13-14.) Lastly, it is compatible with a wide range of Christological options. Appendix Here is Col 1.16 from Leedy's sentence diagrams.[73] Of note is how he equates the τὰ πάντα of 16a with 16c and 16d rather than seeing 16d as an elaboration of τά ὁρατά. Bibliography Bauer, Walter, Frederick William  Danker, William F. Arndt, F. Gingrich, Kurt Aland, Barbara Aland, and Viktor Reichmann. A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature. 3rd ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2000. Bird, Michael F. Colossians and Philemon. A New Covenant Commentary. Cambridge, England: The Lutterworth Press, 2009. Brown, Anna Shoffner. “Nothing ‘Mere’ About a Man in the Image of God.” Paper presented at the Unitarian Christian Alliance, Springfield, OH, Oct 14, 2022. Bruce, E. K. Simpson and F. F. The Epistles to the Ephesians and the Colossians. The New International Commentary on the New Testament, edited by Ned B. Stonehouse. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1957. Buzzard, Anthony F. Jesus Was Not a Trinitarian. Morrow, GA: Restoration Fellowship, 2007. Caird, G. B. New Testament Theology. Edited by L. D. Hurst. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press, 2002. Caird, G. B. Paul’s Letters from Prison. New Clarendon Bible, edited by H. F. D. Sparks. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 1976. Carden, Robert. One God: The Unfinished Reformation. Revised ed. Naperville, IL: Grace Christian Press, 2016. Chang, Eric H. H. The Only Perfect Man. Edited by Bentley C. F. Chang. 2nd ed. Montreal, QC: Christian Disciples Church Publishers, 2017. Deuble, Jeff. Christ before Creeds. Latham, NY: Living Hope International Ministries, 2021. Dunn, James D. G. Christology in the Making. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1996. Dunn, James D. G. The Epistles to the Colossians and to Philemon. New International Greek Testament Commentary, edited by Gasque Marshall, Hagner. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1996. Heiser, Michael S. The Unseen Realm: Recovering the Supernatural Worldview of the Bible. Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2019. King, Martha. An Exegetical Summary of Colossians. Dallas, TX: SIL International, 1992. Kuschel, Karl-Joseph. Born before All Time? Translated by John Bowden. New York, NY: Crossroad, 1992. Originally published as Beforen vor aller Zeit? Lane, William L. The New Testament Page by Page. Open Your Bible Commentary, edited by Martin Manser. Bath, UK: Creative 4 International, 2013. Leedy, Randy A. The Greek New Testament Sentence Diagrams. Norfolk, VA: Bible Works, 2006. Lohse, Edward. Colossians and Philemon. Hermeneia. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 1971. MacDonald, William Graham. The Idiomatic Translation of the New Testament. Norfolk, VA: Bibleworks, 2012. Mark H. Graeser, John A. Lynn, John W. Schoenheit. One God & One Lord. 4th ed. Martinsville, IN: Spirit & Truth Fellowship International, 2010. Martin, Ralph. “An Early Christian Hymn (Col. 1:15-20).” The Evangelical Quarterly 36, no. 4 (1964): 195–205. Martyn, J. Louis. Theological Issues in the Letters of Paul. Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press, 1997. McGrath, James F. The Only True God: Early Christian Monotheism in Its Jewish Context. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 2009. McKnight, Scot. The Letter to the Colossians. New International Commentary on the New Testament, edited by Joel B. Green. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2018. Norden, Eduard. Agnostos Theos: Untersuchungen Zur Formengeschichte Religiöser Rede. 4th ed. Stuttgart, Germany: B. G. Teubner, 1956. Originally published as 1913. Pao, David. Colossians and Philemon. Zondervan Exegetical Commentary of the New Testament, edited by Clinton E. Arnold. Grand Rapid, MI: Zondervan, 2012. Perriman, Andrew. In the Form of a God. Studies in Early Christology, edited by David Capes Michael Bird, and Scott Harrower. Eugene, OR: Cascade Books, 2022. Philo. The Works of Philo. The Norwegian Philo Concordance Project. Edited by Kåre Fuglseth Peder Borgen, Roald Skarsten. Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias Press, 2005. Robinson, James M. “A Formal Analysis of Colossians 1:15-20.” Journal of Biblical Literature 76, no. 4 (1957): 270–87. Schillebeeckx, Eduard. Christ: The Experience of Jesus as Lord. Translated by John Bowden. New York, NY: The Seabury Press, 1977. Schoberg, Gerry. Perspectives of Jesus in the Writings of Paul. Eugene, OR: Pickwick Publications, 2013. Schweizer, Eduard. The Letter to the Colossians. Translated by Andrew Chester. Minneapolis, MN: Augsburg Publishing House, 1982. Smith, Dustin R. Wisdom Christology in the Gospel of John. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2024. Snedeker, Donald R. Our Heavenly Father Has No Equals. Bethesda, MD: International Scholars Publications, 1998. Thayer, Joseph Henry. A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1996. Thrall, Margaret. The Second Epistle to the Corinthians. Vol. 1. The International Critical Commentary, edited by C. E. B. Cranfield J. A. Emerton, G. N. Stanton. Edinburgh, Scotland: T&T Clark, 1994. Wachtel, William M. “Colossians 1:15-20–Preexistence or Preeminence?” Paper presented at the 14th Theological Conference, McDonough, GA, 2005. Wessels, G. F. “The Eschatology of Colossians and Ephesians.” Neotestamentica 21, no. 2 (1987): 183–202. Witherington III, Ben The Letters to Philemon, the Colossians, and the Ephesians: A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary of the Captivity Epistles. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2007. Yates, Roy. The Epistle to the Colossians. London: Epworth Press, 1993. Zeilinger, Franz. Der Erstgeborene Der Schöpfung. Wien, Österreich: Herder, 1974. Footnotes [1] Since the nineteenth century biblical scholars have been divided over whether Paul wrote Colossians. One of the major reasons for thinking Paul didn't write Colossians is his exalted Christology—the very conclusion this paper seeks to undermine. A second major factor to argue against Pauline authorship is the difference in vocabulary, but this is explainable if Paul used a different amanuensis. The theologically more cosmic emphasis (also evident in Ephesians) is likely due to Paul's time in prison to reflect and expand his understanding of the Christ event. Lastly, the proto-Gnostic hints in Colossians do not require dating the epistle outside of Paul's time. Although Gnosticism flourished at the beginning of the second century, it was likely already beginning to incubate in Paul's time. [2] Eduard Schillebeeckx, Christ: The Experience of Jesus as Lord, trans. John Bowden (New York, NY: The Seabury Press, 1977), 185. [3] Schillebeeckx, 185. [4] G. B. Caird, Paul’s Letters from Prison, New Clarendon Bible, ed. H. F. D. Sparks (Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 1976), 177. [5] Caird, 181. [6] James D. G. Dunn, The Epistles to the Colossians and to Philemon, New International Greek Testament Commentary, ed. Gasque Marshall, Hagner (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1996), 91. “[W]hat at first reads as a straightforward assertion of Christ's pre-existenct activity in creation becomes on closer analysis an assertion which is rather more profound—not of Christ as such present with God in the beginning, nor of Christ as identified with a pre-existent hypostasis or divine being (Wisdom) beside God, but of Christ as embodying and expressing (and defining) that power of God which is the manifestation of God in and to his creation.” (Italics in original.) James D. G. Dunn, Christology in the Making, 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1996), 194. [7] James F. McGrath, The Only True God: Early Christian Monotheism in Its Jewish Context (Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 2009), 46. [8] Andrew Perriman, In the Form of a God, Studies in Early Christology, ed. David Capes Michael Bird, and Scott Harrower (Eugene, OR: Cascade Books, 2022), 200. [9] In addition, biblical unitarians routinely interpret Col 1.16 as new creation. See Anthony F. Buzzard, Jesus Was Not a Trinitarian (Morrow, GA: Restoration Fellowship, 2007), 189–90, Robert Carden, One God: The Unfinished Reformation, Revised ed. (Naperville, IL: Grace Christian Press, 2016), 197–200, Eric H. H. Chang, The Only Perfect Man, ed. Bentley C. F. Chang, 2nd ed. (Montreal, QC: Christian Disciples Church Publishers, 2017), 151–52, Jeff Deuble, Christ before Creeds (Latham, NY: Living Hope International Ministries, 2021), 163–66, John A. Lynn Mark H. Graeser, John W. Schoenheit, One God & One Lord, 4th ed. (Martinsville, IN: Spirit & Truth Fellowship International, 2010), 493–94, Donald R. Snedeker, Our Heavenly Father Has No Equals (Bethesda, MD: International Scholars Publications, 1998), 291–92, William M. Wachtel, “Colossians 1:15-20–Preexistence or Preeminence?” (paper presented at the 14th Theological Conference, McDonough, GA, 2005), 4. [10] All translations are my own. [11] Stophes are structural divisions drawn from Greek odes akin to stanzas in poetry or verses in music. [12] Throughout I will capitalize Church since that reflects the idea of all Christians collectively not just those in a particular local assembly. [13] Eduard Norden, Agnostos Theos: Untersuchungen Zur Formengeschichte Religiöser Rede, 4th ed. (Stuttgart, Germany: B. G. Teubner, 1956), 250–54. [14] James M. Robinson, “A Formal Analysis of Colossians 1:15-20,” Journal of Biblical Literature 76, no. 4 (1957): 272–73. [15] Edward Lohse, Colossians and Philemon, Hermeneia (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 1971), 44. [16] Eduard Schweizer, The Letter to the Colossians, trans. Andrew Chester (Minneapolis, MN: Augsburg Publishing House, 1982), 57. [17] Dunn, The Epistles to the Colossians and to Philemon, 84. [18] Ben  Witherington III, The Letters to Philemon, the Colossians, and the Ephesians: A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary of the Captivity Epistles (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2007), 129. [19] William L. Lane, The New Testament Page by Page, Open Your Bible Commentary, ed. Martin Manser (Bath, UK: Creative 4 International, 2013), 765. [20] E. K. Simpson and F. F. Bruce, The Epistles to the Ephesians and the Colossians, The New International Commentary on the New Testament, ed. Ned B. Stonehouse (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1957), 65. [21] Michael F. Bird, Colossians and Philemon, A New Covenant Commentary (Cambridge, England: The Lutterworth Press, 2009), 50. [22] David Pao, Colossians and Philemon, Zondervan Exegetical Commentary of the New Testament, ed. Clinton E. Arnold (Grand Rapid, MI: Zondervan, 2012), 87. [23] Lohse, 42. [24] Lohse, 43–44. [25] Scot McKnight, The Letter to the Colossians, New International Commentary on the New Testament, ed. Joel B. Green (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2018), 144. [26] Col 1.13-14: “who rescued us from the authority of darkness and transferred (us) into the kingdom of his beloved son in whom we have the redemption, the forgiveness of the sins.” Col 1.21-22: “And you being formerly alienated and hostile in thought in the evil deeds, but now he reconciled (you) in his body of the flesh through the death to present you holy and blameless and irreproachable before him.” [27] In fact, we can easily skip from vv. 13-14 to vv. 21-22. [28] Dunn, Christology in the Making, 187–88. [29] Sadly, most translations erroneously insert a paragraph between vv. 14 and 15. This produces the visual effect that v. 15 is a new thought unit. [30] Bruce, 193. [31] Moses 2.65: “τὴν ἡγεμονίαν τῶν περιγείων” in Philo, The Works of Philo, The Norwegian Philo Concordance Project (Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias Press, 2005). See also Sirach 17.3. [32] Schweizer, 64. [33] For a helpful treatment of how the image of God relates to Christology, see Anna Shoffner Brown, “Nothing ‘Mere’ About a Man in the Image of God” (paper presented at the Unitarian Christian Alliance, Springfield, OH, Oct 14, 2022). [34] Walter Bauer et al., A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature, 3rd ed. (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2000), s.v. “πρωτότοκος,” 2.a. [35] Franz Zeilnger wrote, “Christ is temporally the first of a series that essentially proceeds from him, and at the same time its lord and head.” Franz Zeilinger, Der Erstgeborene Der Schöpfung (Wien, Österreich: Herder, 1974), 182. Original: “als “Wurzel” ist Christus zeitlich der erste einer Reihe, die wesentlich aus ihm hervorgeht, und zugleich ihr Herr und Haupt.” [36] McKnight, 85–86. [37] The closest parallels are 1 Cor 8.6; Heb 1.2; and John 1.3, which employ the preposition δια (through). Upon close examination these three don't teach Christ created the universe either. [38] ESV, CSB, NASB, etc. Notably the NET diverges from the other evangelical translations. Roman Catholic, mainline, and unitarian translations all tend to straightforwardly render “ἐν αὐτῷ” as “in him” in Col 1.16; cf. NABRE, NRSVUE, OGFOMMT, etc. [39] Chang, 150. [40] Ralph Martin, “An Early Christian Hymn (Col. 1:15-20),” The Evangelical Quarterly 36, no. 4 (1964): 198. [41] Schillebeeckx, 186. [42] Dunn, Christology in the Making, 191. [43] Karl-Joseph Kuschel, Born before All Time?, trans. John Bowden (New York, NY: Crossroad, 1992), 336. [44] Dustin R. Smith, Wisdom Christology in the Gospel of John (Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2024), 5–6. For more on wisdom Christology in Col 1.16 see Dunn, The Epistles to the Colossians and to Philemon, 89, Roy Yates, The Epistle to the Colossians (London: Epworth Press, 1993), 18–19, 23, G. B. Caird, New Testament Theology, ed. L. D. Hurst (Oxford, England: Clarendon Press, 2002), 46, McGrath, 44, 46. [45] See Dunn, The Epistles to the Colossians and to Philemon, 89. See also Yates, 18–19, 23. [46] Dunn, Christology in the Making, 190. [47] Perriman, 199. [48] Martha King, An Exegetical Summary of Colossians (Dallas, TX: SIL International, 1992), 53. [49] Joseph Henry Thayer, A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1996), s.v. “ἐν,” 1722. He recognized the cause was both instrumental and final. [50] William Graham MacDonald, The Idiomatic Translation of the New Testament (Norfolk, VA: Bibleworks, 2012). [51] Chang, 147. Similarly James McGrath wrote, “[I]f all things were intended by God to find their fulfillment in Christ, then they must have been created “in him” in the very beginning in some undefined sense, since it was axiomatic that the eschatological climax of history would be a restoration of its perfect, original state.” McGrath, 46. [52] Caird, Paul’s Letters from Prison, 172. [53] “God so designed the universe that it was to achieve its proper meaning and unity only under the authority of man (Gen. 128; Ps. 86). But this purpose was not to be implemented at once; it was ‘to be put into effect when the time was ripe' (Eph. 110), when Christ had lived a human life as God intended it, and had become God's image in a measure which was never true of Adam. Only in unity with ‘the proper man' could the universe be brought to its destined coherence. For one who believes in predestination it is but a small step from this to saying that the universe was created in him.” Caird, Paul’s Letters from Prison, 178. [54] See also Paul's Adam Christology in Rom 5.12-21; 1 Cor 15.21-22, 45-49. [55] “Christus ist (durch seine Auferstehung aus dem Todesbereich) Herr über den ihm verliehenen Besitz, dessen ἀρχή und Urbild er ist, … und Haupt und Anfang der eschatologischen Neuschöpfung!” Zeilinger, 188. [56] King, 54. [57] Perriman, 200. [58] G. F. Wessels, “The Eschatology of Colossians and Ephesians,” Neotestamentica 21, no. 2 (1987): 187. [59] I realize my translation is awkward, but I prioritized closely mirroring the Greek over presenting smooth English. The original reads, “συνεζωοποίησεν ὑμᾶς σὺν αὐτῷ.” [60] Schillebeeckx, 187. [61] Scholars who make this connection include Caird, New Testament Theology, 216, Caird, Paul’s Letters from Prison, 177, McGrath, 44, Perriman, 201. [62] In fact, only two of the texts I cited above explicitly say “new creation” (2 Cor 5.17 and Gal 6.15). In all the others, Paul blithely employed creation language, expecting his readers to understand that he was not talking about the creation of the universe, but the creation of the new humanity in Christ—the Church. [63] McKnight, 152. [64] Mark H. Graeser, 493. [65] Rev 2.1, 8, 12, 18; 3.1, 7, 14. [66] See Gerry Schoberg, Perspectives of Jesus in the Writings of Paul (Eugene, OR: Pickwick Publications, 2013), 280–81, 83. [67] Margaret Thrall, The Second Epistle to the Corinthians, vol. 1, The International Critical Commentary, ed. C. E. B. Cranfield J. A. Emerton, G. N. Stanton (Edinburgh, Scotland: T&T Clark, 1994), 423, 26–28. [68] J. Louis Martyn, Theological Issues in the Letters of Paul (Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press, 1997), 122. [69] Martyn, 121. [70] Whether the old gods actually existed or not is a topic beyond the scope of this paper. Interested readers should consult Michael S. Heiser, The Unseen Realm: Recovering the Supernatural Worldview of the Bible (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2019). [71] “[D]ie in Christus gegebene echatologische Welt verwirkliche sich innerhalb der weiterhin existenten irdischen Schöpfung durch die Einbeziehung des Menschen in Christus, den Erhöhten, mittles Heilsverkündigung und Taufe. Das Eschaton setzt sic him Kerygma wetweit durch und wird Wirklichkeit, indem der Mensch durch die Taufe Christi Teil wird, d. h. in Einheit mit ihm dem Anspruch der στοιχεῖα τοῦ κόσμου stirbt (2, 20) und mit ihm auferweckt sein eschatologisches Leben erhält. Die so dem erhöhten Christus eingegliederten Menschen bilden somit in ihm und mit ihm die neue Schöpfung der Eschata innerhalb der alten! Der Christusleib ist somit als sich weitende Kirche erkennbar. In ihr bildet himmlischer und irdischer Raum gewissermaßen eine Einheit.” Zeilinger, 179. [72] “Der neue Adam … Ausgangsort, in dem sich Neuschöpfung ereignete,” Zeilinger, 199. [73] Randy A. Leedy, The Greek New Testament Sentence Diagrams (Norfolk, VA: Bible Works, 2006). This is now available in Logos Bible Software.

Urbana Radio Show By David Penn Chapter #701 LAST EPISODE OF THE SEASON, WE ARE BACK IN SEPTEMBER 01. Saint Etienne x David Penn - 7 Ways To Love - Heavenly Recordings 02. Ferreck Dawn & Haley May - Deep Inside - Defected Records 03. David Penn x Vintage Culture x Raphaella - Just Stay The Night - Defected Records 04. Jonas Blue & Malive - Edge Of Desire - Defected Records 05. David Penn x Mat.Joe - No Scrubs - Golden 06. Crusy, Karretero - Feels Much Better - Nothing Else Matters Records 07. Mason, David Penn & Erire - Dusk Till Dawn - Altra Moda 08. David Penn, Kurtis Mantronik & KPD - Get Down - Tinted Records 09. Wh0 & David Penn - La Fiesta - Toolroom 10. David Penn & KPD - Jingo - Urbana Recordings 11. David Penn - Bambadem - Jackies Music 12. David Penn & Crusy feat. Kadoc - The Night Train - Altra Moda 13. Hatiras - Hypnotized - Toolroom 14. Qubiko - Moving On - HouseU Records Thanks to all the labels and artist for their music. All tracks selected and mixed by David Penn DJDAVIDPENN.COM FACEBOOK DJDAVIDPENN INSTAGRAM @DJDAVIDPENN INGENIUM BOKINGS EUROPA MUSIC MANAGEMENT Encoded by MUSICZONE PODCAST SERVICES.

Talk about a champion of both physical and mental growth. Emily is the epitome of discipline, control and practicing what you preach. The world of natural bodybuilding is layered and admirable. Listen as this Carbondale gal talks about the fascinating world of bodybuilding, prepping your body for competition, earning pro status, posing, the world of steroid use and natural competitions, reintroducing your body to a norm after competition, trauma and disordered eating and exercise, adding tools to your toolbox, letting go of control, certifications, playing macro Tetris, art and art therapy, putting puzzles together for others, being a coach and being coached. She has learned how to turn life's hurdles into pivot points for changing courses while adding goals and challenges. Emily is a champion of both physical and mental growth. Champaign-Urbana Football is a part of The Central Illinois Youth Football League (CIYFL) organization that provides the youth of Champaign, Urbana and surrounding areas with an opportunity to play competitive full contact football in a supervised environment. Please help fund the 50 scholarship goal for eligible kids this fall. Email CIYFLinformation@gmail.com if interested in helping.Thank you so much for listening! However your podcast host of choice allows, please positively: rate, review, comment and give all the stars! Don't forget to follow, subscribe, share and ring that notification bell so you know when the next episode drops! Also, search and follow hyperlocalscu on all social media. If I forgot anything or you need me, visit my website at HyperLocalsCU.com. Byee.

 This trio is a community-driven powerhouse of commitment and dedication to kids and the game of football.  Listen as this mix of townies and transplants talks about youth football in our community, the popularity peak in the late 80s/early 90s, the fade out in the early 2000s and the rise again as Champaign-Urbana and surrounding towns build and strengthen youth football teams to participate in "the ultimate team sport," their personal experience in college-level football, feelings behind their own children playing football, safety concerns and guidelines and why playing contact football at a young age imprints important safety techniques and finally why we believe there is no other youth sport that fosters development six days a week, two hours a day like this extraordinary program of heart, mental toughness and physical strength.Champaign-Urbana Football is a part of The Central Illinois Youth Football League (CIYFL) organization that provides the youth of Champaign, Urbana and surrounding areas with an opportunity to play competitive full contact football in a supervised environment. Please help fund the 50 scholarship goal for eligible kids this fall. Email CIYFLinformation@gmail.com if interested in helping.Thank you so much for listening! However your podcast host of choice allows, please positively: rate, review, comment and give all the stars! Don't forget to follow, subscribe, share and ring that notification bell so you know when the next episode drops! Also, search and follow hyperlocalscu on all social media. If I forgot anything or you need me, visit my website at HyperLocalsCU.com. Byee.