POPULARITY
Episode 239 : Welcome to the next episode of Pi Perspectives. Today we have Investigator/Paralegal, Troy Fleming joining the show. Troy has over 39 year's experience working as an investigator for a law firm that specializes in Product Liability cases. How do you investigate these cases? Well troy has some great insight and it all starts with Freedom of Information. Please welcome Troy Fleming and your host, NY Private Eye, Matt Spaier Links: Matt's email: MatthewS@Satellitepi.com Linkedin: Matthew Spaier www.investigators-toolbox.com Troy on Linkedin: Troy Fleming,CLI Email: tfleming@foryourrights.com PI-Perspectives Youtube link: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCYB3MaUg8k5w3k7UuvT6s0g Sponsors: https://piinstitute.com/ https://www.skopenow.com https://researchfpr.com/ https://nalionline.org/events/annual-conference-2025/ FBI Tip Line https://tips.fbi.gov/home https://www.fbi.gov/contact-us/field-offices/newyork/about - (212) 384-1000
In this episode, Dr. Andre Bates sits down with Harry Jennings, an expert life sciences attorney at law firm VWV with over a decade of experience in R&D collaborations, IP transactions, and AI governance. Together, we explore the legal landscape of AI in healthcare, the risks of defective AI products, and the regulatory frameworks shaping the future of AI-driven medicine.
In an industry where firms fight over the same cases, Julian Gomez has carved out his blue ocean in auto product liability. Julian's method is surprisingly simple: specialize deeply, share knowledge freely, and let expertise create opportunities. Dominate your market today. Grab a copy of Chris' latest book, Personal Injury Lawyer Marketing: From Good to GOAT. In this episode of Personal Injury Mastermind, discover how understanding which cases truly matter can transform your practice from local player to national authority. We discuss: How to become THE name in your blue ocean The most common auto defects hiding in standard accident cases Key product liability indicators that signal major settlement potential A strategic framework for evaluating auto product cases Building authority through relationship marketing over advertising Creating work-life integration while handling complex litigation Guest Details Julian Gomez is a nationally recognized auto product liability attorney who pioneered litigation strategies in catastrophic defect cases. After clerking at the Fifth Circuit and working the first Ford Explorer Firestone case, he built a nationwide practice focused almost exclusively on auto product litigation. Julian Gomez: LinkedIn The Julian C. Gomez Law Firm: Website, Instagram Chris Dreyer and Rankings Details Chris Dreyer is the CEO and founder of Rankings.io, the elite legal digital marketing agency. Rankings: Website, Instagram, Twitter Chris Dreyer: Website, Instagram Newsletters: The Dreyer Sheet Books: Personal Injury Lawyer Marketing: From Good to GOAT; Niching Up: The Narrower the Market, the Bigger the Prize Work with Rankings: Connect Additional Episodes You Might Enjoy 80. Mike Papantonio, Levin, Papantonio, & Rafferty — Doing Well by Doing Good 84. Glen Lerner, Lerner and Rowe – A Steady Hand in a Shifting Industry 101. Pratik Shah, EsquireTek — Discovering the Power of Automation 134. Darryl Isaacs, Isaacs & Isaacs — The Hammer: Insights from a Marketing Legend 104. Taly Goody, Goody Law Group — Finding PI Clients on TikTok 63. Joe Fried, Fried Goldberg LLC — How To Become An Expert And Revolutionize Your PI Niche 96. Brian Dean, Backlinko — Becoming a Linkable Source 83. Seth Godin — Differentiation: How to Make Your Law Firm a Purple Cow 73. Neil Patel, Neil Patel — Digital A New Approach to Content and Emerging Marketing Channels
In this end-of-the-year "hangout" featuring Preston Pysh, James Lavish, Susie Reilly & Paula Pendley, we discuss: Holiday and personal updates Reaction to $100k Bitcoin and short-term price action Should Natalie sell Bitcoin to buy a home? Macro outlook from Preston & James Michael's Saylor's brilliant strategy The chances of a U.S. Strategic Bitcoin Reserve New Year's resolutions ---- Coin Stories is powered by Bitdeer Technologies Group (NASDAQ: BTDR), a publicly-traded leader in Bitcoin mining that stands alone as the only vertically-integrated, technology-focused Bitcoin mining company. Learn more at www.bitdeer.com. ---- Natalie's Promotional Links: Secure your Bitcoin with collaborative custody and set up your inheritance plan with Casa: https://www.casa.io/natalie For easy, low-cost, instant Bitcoin payments, I use Speed Lightning Wallet. Get 5000 sats when you download using this link and promo code COINSTORIES10: https://www.speed.app/sweepstakes-promocode/ River is where I DCA weekly and buy Bitcoin with the lowest fees in the industry: https://partner.river.com/natalie Safely self-custody your Bitcoin with Coinkite and the ColdCard Wallet. Get 5% off: https://store.coinkite.com/promo/COINSTORIES Master your Bitcoin self-custody with 1-on-1 help and gain peace of mind with the help of The Bitcoin Way: https://www.thebitcoinway.com/natalie Bitcoin 2025 is heading to Las Vegas May 27-29th! Join me for my 4th Annual Women of Bitcoin Brunch! Get 10% off Early Bird passes using the code HODL: https://tickets.b.tc/affiliate/hodl/event/bitcoin-2025 Protect yourself from SIM Swaps that can hack your accounts and steal your Bitcoin. Join America's most secure mobile service, trusted by CEOs, VIPs and top corporations: https://www.efani.com/natalie Connect with Bitcoiners and Bitcoin merchants wherever you live and travel on the Orange Pill App: https://signup.theorangepillapp.com/opa/natbrunell ---- Guests & Links: Preston Pysh is an entrepreneur, investor, podcast host and General Partner at Ego Death Capital. Follow him on X at https://x.com/PrestonPysh James Lavish is an investor, macro expert, hedge-fund veteran, and Managing Partner at the Bitcoin Opportunity Fund. Subscribe to his newsletter: https://www.jameslavish.com/newsletter and follow him on X at https://x.com/jameslavish Dr. Susie Reilly, DDS is a retired dentist and Bitcoin enthusiast. She and her husband divested of their businesses and home to buy more Bitcoin. Check out our talk on Coin Stories: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Okdkdz1iWDM and follow her on X at https://x.com/SusieBdds Paula Pendley is a dynamic, client-focused lawyer in California and Texas -- specializing in high-stakes Product Liability, Mass Tort, and emerging technology sectors, including Bitcoin mining. Follow her on X at https://x.com/paulapendleylaw ---- This podcast is for educational purposes and should not be construed as official investment advice. ---- VALUE FOR VALUE — SUPPORT NATALIE'S SHOWS Strike ID https://strike.me/coinstoriesnat/ Cash App $CoinStories #money #Bitcoin #investing
In this episode, we sit down with StackAware Founder and AI Governance Expert Walter Haydock. Walter specializes in helping companies navigate AI governance and security certifications, frameworks, and risks. We will dive into key frameworks, risks, lessons learned from working directly with organizations on AI Governance, and more.We discussed Walter's pivot with his company StackAware from AppSec and Supply Chain to a focus on AI Governance and from a product-based approach to a services-oriented offering and what that entails.Walter has been actively helping organizations with AI Governance, including helping them meet emerging and newly formed standards such as ISO 42001. Walter provides field notes, lessons learned and some of the most commonly encountered pain points organizations have around AI Governance.Organizations have a ton of AI Governance and Security resources to rally around, from OWASP, Cloud Security Alliance, NIST, and more. Walter discusses how he recommends organizations get started and where.The U.S. and EU have taken drastically different approaches to AI and Cybersecurity, from the EU AI Act, U.S. Cyber EO, Product Liability, and more. We discuss some of the pros and cons of each and why the U.S.'s more relaxed approach may contribute to economic growth, while the EU's approach to being a regulatory superpower may impede their economic growth.Walter lays our key credentials practitioners can explore to demonstrate expertise in AI security, including the IAPP AI Governance credential, which he recently took himself.You can find our more about Walter Haydock by following him on LinkedIn where he shares a lot of great AI Governance and Security insights, as well as his company website www.stackaware.com
Artificial Intelligence holds the potential to transform much of our lives and healthcare professions are embracing it for everything from cost savings to diagnostics. But who is to blame when AI assisted healthcare goes wrong? How is the law developing to balance the benefits and risks? In this episode, Pam and Rich are joined by health policy expert Michelle Mello and Neel Guha, a Stanford JD/PhD candidate in computer science, for a discussion on the transformative role of AI in healthcare. They examine AI's potential to enhance diagnostics and streamline workflows while addressing the ethical, legal, and safety challenges this new technology can bring. The conversation highlights the urgency of adapting regulatory frameworks, the complexities of liability among hospitals, developers, and practitioners, and the need for rigorous testing to ensure patient safety as AI integration in healthcare advances.Connect:Episode Transcripts >>> Stanford Legal Podcast WebsiteStanford Legal Podcast >>> LinkedIn PageRich Ford >>> Twitter/XPam Karlan >>> Stanford Law School PageStanford Law School >>> Twitter/XStanford Lawyer Magazine >>> Twitter/XLinks:Michelle Mello >>> Stanford Law page(00:00:00) Chapter 1: Understanding AI in MedicineThe episode begins with a broad introduction to AI's applications in medicine. Neel Guha explains generative AI systems and their rapid advancement, including practical applications like chatbots, imaging, and decision-making tools. Michelle Mello highlights AI's widespread integration, from diagnostic tools like radiological imaging and predictive algorithms to administrative uses that aim to reduce physician burnout.(00:07:04) Chapter 2: The Benefits and Risks of AI in HealthcareThe group explores the advantages of AI in medicine, such as enhanced diagnostic precision, reduced administrative burdens, and improved patient outcomes. Michelle Mello identifies potential risks, like automation bias, where reliance on AI might lead to unchecked errors, highlighting the tension between time-saving tools and maintaining human oversight.(00:08:22) Chapter 3: Legal Challenges and Liability in AI-Driven MedicineThe conversation turns to the legal implications of AI in healthcare. Neel Guha outlines scenarios where AI contributes to patient harm, discussing negligence claims, product liability, and the complexity of determining accountability. Michelle Mello and the hosts analyze how liability standards might evolve, comparing AI's systematic errors to human fallibility and addressing the interplay of human-AI collaboration in preventing mistakes.(00:14:47) Chapter 4: The Challenges of AI and Transparency in Decision-MakingThe group explores parallels between medical and anti-discrimination fields in understanding machine learning's opaque decision-making. Neel Guha delves into the evolution of AI systems from rule-based programming to complex machine learning, emphasizing challenges in identifying points of failure across stakeholders like hospitals, physicians, and developers.(00:17:35) Chapter 5: Regulation and Liability of AI in HealthcareMichelle Mello discusses the regulatory framework for AI as a medical device, comparing outdated 1976-era regulations to modern challenges. The conversation shifts to gaps in tort liability and the risks of developers limiting their liability through contracts. Proposals for redistributing liability to incentivize better private governance are examined alongside the need for robust AI quality assurance akin to crash tests or clinical trials.(00:23:13) Chapter 6: The Road Ahead: Balancing Innovation and SafetyThe speakers analyze the distinct challenges of regulating AI across diverse healthcare environments. Neel Guha and Michelle Mello discuss adapting evaluation practices to align with AI's real-world complexities. Optimism prevails as Michelle highlights AI's potential to address critical issues like diagnostic delays, advocating for guardrails to ensure safety without stifling innovation. The episode concludes with reflections on Stanford's interdisciplinary approach to these pressing issues.
In this episode of the BulkLoads Podcast, Lewie Pugh from OOIDA discusses the fight for trucking regulations in D.C., covering crucial issues like "nuclear verdicts," insurance challenges, and tort reform. The conversation highlights OOIDA's grassroots advocacy, strategies to engage younger drivers, and ongoing battles against mandates while underscoring the importance of unity and effective legislative efforts. Watch this episode on YouTube & Subscribe! https://youtu.be/91zeIF8Y85s Free Video Shoot From BulkLoads? https://links.bulkloads.com/widget/form/bfbbWKvA8xQZJKKYfc2Z 2025 Bulk Freight Conference New Semi-Sam Book 2025 Calendar Request OOIDA: https://www.ooida.com/ https://www.linkedin.com/in/lewie-pugh-944055229/ https://fightingfortruckers.com/ How can we pray for you? Email us: prayer@bulkloads.com Check out our companies! BulkLoads - https://www.bulkloads.com/ Insurance - https://www.bulkinsurancegroup.com/ Factoring - https://www.smartfreightfunding.com/ Transportation Management (TMS) - https://www.bulktms.com/ Permitting- https://www.bulkloads.com/tools/permitting/ Timestamp: 00:00 Applying Convoy Hope's ideas to our conference. 05:26 Join the membership to influence ongoing issues. 09:08 OOIDA grew to 150,000 international members. 11:46 OIDA returned $100M to small business truckers. 12:56 Joined Oida for advocacy; support small business. 19:15 Join our consortium for compliance and reminders. 21:27 Assistance for contracts, broker issues, leasing, specs. 25:25 OADA offers truck parking and supportive staff. 27:54 Balancing diverse needs for the greater good. 32:10 Regulation threatens independent trucking business operations. 35:01 Owner operators' choice: cameras, speed limiters, compliance. 37:39 Oida fights insurance increase driven by attorneys. 42:30 Trucking, new target for lawsuits, safety tech mandatory. 46:13 Increasing product liability cases challenge manufacturers' choices. 47:49 Great truckers' grassroots influence legislative efforts. 53:15 Book hotel now, 50% off on rooms. 55:49 Join our podcast and receive free gifts. 57:29 Prayer at organization: glorifying God, serving others.
In this episode of the Africa Legal Podcast, host Craig Sisterson speaks with Amala Umeike, partner at Stren & Blan Partners in Nigeria, and Samantha Silver, partner at Kennedys LLP in London, on Africa's rapidly growing health and pharmaceutical sectors and evolving product liability law, with a focus on Nigeria. Amala explains how Africa's healthcare growth, driven by increased investment and demand, faces regulatory challenges that highlight the need for robust product liability frameworks. He emphasises the regulatory progress in Nigeria, particularly through the African Medicines Agency (AMA), but notes the complexities of defending product liability claims in Nigerian courts. Proactive compliance and strategic defense, he says, are essential for managing these challenges. Samantha shares insights from her global experience, highlighting increased scrutiny on pharmaceutical and medical devices in the UK and EU, which is influencing African standards. She advises that multinationals adopt strong compliance and risk management practices to navigate Africa's evolving regulations. Effective risk management, recalls, and insurer collaboration are crucial to reducing liability exposure. Both guests agree on the growing importance of regulatory alignment with global standards in Africa. As consumer awareness rises, product liability claims are likely to increase, making compliance and adaptability essential for businesses in Africa's dynamic market.
In this episode of The Cybersecurity Defenders Podcast, we discuss some cutting-edge intel coming out of LimaCharlie's community Slack channel.VMRay's analysis on Latrodectus highlights the malware family's development, detailing how it evolved from simple loaders to highly evasive, sophisticated malware.The WarmCookie malware is a recent, persistent threat known for its self-updating capabilities, specifically designed to evade security tools and establish long-term presence in systems. Fortinet recently disclosed a critical zero-day vulnerability in its FortiManager product, assigned CVE-2024-47575, which has been actively exploited in the wild.The European Union (EU) recently updated its product liability framework to better address the challenges of the digital age and support the shift toward a circular economy. Linux creator Linus Torvalds recently reaffirmed the expulsion of Russian maintainers from the Linux MAINTAINERS file due to sanctions compliance, sparking discussion within the open-source community.
Morrison Foerster Investigations + White Collar Defense partner Nate Mendell, former Acting U.S. Attorney for the District of Massachusetts, hosted the fourth episode of When Your Life Sciences Are on the Line, where leading practitioners and thought leaders share the insights and advice needed to manage business and legal risk in the life sciences sector. In this episode, Nate spoke with Julie Park, Managing Partner of Morrison Foerster's San Diego office whose practice is focused on product lifecycle and mass torts. Julie and Nate talk about product liability risks for life sciences companies, particularly in connection with the use of artificial intelligence in medical devices. Nate and Julie also discuss potential sources of liability for companies driving these innovations, as well as strategies for avoiding unwanted scrutiny from enforcers and the plaintiffs' bar. In addition to sharing what safeguards can protect your business when bringing new technology to market, Nate and Julie address what is necessary to manage a crisis in the event that product liability litigation presents itself.
The rapid integration of AI and machine learning in the medical device industry offers exciting capabilities but also new forms of liability. Join us for an exciting podcast episode as we delve into the surge in AI-enabled medical devices. Product liability lawyers Mildred Segura, Jamie Lanphear and Christian Castile focus on AI-related issues likely to impact drug and device makers soon. They also give us a preview of how courts may determine liability when AI decision-making and other functions fail to get desired outcomes. Don't miss this opportunity to gain valuable insights into the future of health care.
Send us a Text Message.This episode's guest is Alex Andrews, of Marsh & McLennan Agency-Specializing in bicycle industry insurance programs. Bike Shops, Product Liability for manufacturers/suppliers, professional trail building contractors, advocacy groups, and everything in between.In today's episode we chat about state of the insurance industry, best tips and practices, we cover post pandemic needs, e bikes and trends.Support the Show.
Developments in the product liability arena are ever-evolving, which is why you need to hear about this brand-new IADC program. IADC Speaks Host Mollie Benedict (Tucker Ellis LLP) speaks with Co-Chairs Brandee Kowalzyk (Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP) and Whitney Watt (Stites & Harbison PLLC), along with program speaker Matt Cairns (Textron Inc.), about the Product Liability Roundtable, held September 12 at J&J World Headquarters in New Brunswick, New Jersey. Learn about what to expect from this roundtable and why, if your practice involves drug device or product liability, you want to make sure you don't miss this event.
Lowenthal & Abrams, P.C., a leading law firm with offices throughout Pennsylvania, announces an expanded focus on medical malpractice and product liability wrongful death cases in Reading, PA. The firm is committed to providing top-notch legal representation for clients facing complex injury claims. Lowenthal & Abrams, P.C. City: Bala Cynwyd Address: 555 E City Ave. Website: https://lowenthalabrams.com/
In the fifth episode of our podcast series on Product Liability, Jacques-Antoine Robert and David Kidman delve into the complexities of anxiety damage within the context of class actions and discuss cases of law in different sectors. They navigate the contrasting landscapes of the UK, where claimants have generally struggled with product liability group litigation, and France, where class actions can be initiated by patient organisations and where claimants were sometimes compensated for both physical injury and anxiety damage.
In the first episode of Simmons and Simmons' podcast series on Product Liability, partners Jacques-Antoine Robert from the Paris office and David Kidman from the London office delve into the complex definition of anxiety damage. They provide a comparative analysis of how anxiety damage is approached in the UK and France, particularly in the context of product liability. |
We've all bought something before. Have you bought something that has harmed you? Whose fault is that? We'll learn about product liability law with attorney Trey Bourn from Butler Snow.The website https://www.butlersnow.com/ has a long long list of News & Events you can select from to learn more about many subjects. More information about our guest can be found as well as the blog: Product Lines https://www.butlersnow.com/news-and-events/category/product-lines-blogIf you're interested in the topic of product liability, In Legal Terms did another podcast on the topic a couple of years ago.http://inlegalterms.mpbonline.org/in-legal-terms-product-liabilityIf you need help selecting a lawyer there's a “How to Select A Lawyer” article on the Mississippi Bar website. https://msbar.org/for-the-public/how-to-select-a-lawyer/Spoliation: The destruction or alteration of evidence resulting from a party's failure to preserve evidence relevant to a litigation or investigation. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Product liability continues to be the most common legal and reputational risk for life sciences companies. How prepared are public and private companies when faced with litigation claiming that their product has caused injury to one or more people? Join Rich Leavitt, Rob Lane and Will Eustace as they discuss the best practices to shield your company from product liability claims. Learn how to build a rapid-response team, secure essential insurance coverage and avoid hidden dangers that could derail your defense.
Insurance Talk - Product Liability
Expanding across Pennsylvania, Lowenthal Abrams, P.C. now offers comprehensive legal support for individuals harmed by defective products in areas from Reading to Pittsburgh and Philadelphia. This growth underscores their dedication to consumer protection in navigating complexities of product liability law to achieve justice for clients. Lowenthal & Abrams, P.C. City: Bala Cynwyd Address: 555 E City Ave. Website: https://lowenthalabrams.com/
Join us on the latest episode of Grow Sessions as we dive into the world of insurance with Michael DeNault from World Insurance. In this episode, titled “Insuring Growth: Navigating Risk in the Cannabis Industry,” we unravel the complexities of insurance requirements and surprisingly find it quite intriguing. Insurance, who would've thought!In this episode, we will dissect insurance needs of commercial cultivation businesses. From Workman's Comp Insurance to Product Liability coverage. We also shine a light on the importance of Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) as a preventive measure for cultivators, especially in the absence of historical data to steer best practices in product safety. Michael highlights the industry's early stages, emphasizing the need for data to establish standards that will ultimately impact insurance rates and coverage.Discover how premiums have changed over the years, all while adhering to CCC insurance regulations. We chat about general and product liability coverage, outlining limits, deductibles, and evolving insurance costs in the cannabis sector.Commercial property and equipment coverage take the spotlight, underscoring the importance of safeguarding inventory, equipment, and crops. Crop coverage guarantees the protection of living crops, from seeds to plants and harvested products. However, it's essential to note that insurance won't cover poor growing practices, highlighting the importance of a skilled head grower for large-scale operations.Learn about specific coverage like Equipment Breakdown Coverage, which shields against crop and inventory loss due to system failures. We explore state-specific variations in coverage, with Massachusetts standing out for its well-defined requirements.Michael imparts valuable advice stressing the importance of guiding clients through common losses and state-specific regulations and emphasizing the importance of longevity, highlighting that profitability isn't just about revenue but about effectively managing the money businesses earn.Exciting developments lie ahead, including the potential impact of federal legalization on insurance and the merging of agricultural coverages with the cannabis industry. We also shed light on technological advancements and the shift from traditional lighting systems to LEDS for enhanced coverage and reduced premiums. Did you know insurance companies may turn you down for growing with HPS lighting due to the high risk of fire? Did you know that traditional LEDs with drivers still pose a risk to growers? Did you know that TSRgrow's data-driven LED lighting solutions can help growers receive an even larger insurance discount because the drivers are removed from the grow room?"Insuring Growth" acts as your compass through the intricate realm of cannabis insurance, providing a blend of industry expertise and practical insights to empower businesses in this ever-evolving industry.About Michael DeNaultMy name is Michael DeNault, I am the leading the Cannabis Practice within World Insurance Associates. My goal is to build brand awareness, provide the necessary tools for Producers, and relay the wants and needs to cannabis business owners to insurance carriers and industry partners alike. I am working with clients and partners all over the country, and I am always looking to grow my network, so lets connect and set up a meeting! I look forward to the conversations we will have!If you have any questions, you can reach Michael DeNault at michaeldenault@worldinsurance.comFor more information on World Insurance visit: www.worldinsurance.com.Thanks for listening. Be sure to subscribe to our podcast to receive upcoming episodes.
Product defects are handled by a San Gabriel Valley law practice, which offers victims of defective products legal help and skilled legal representation in obtaining just compensation for clients. The firm also handles the complexity of product liability injury law. Steven M. Sweat Personal Injury Lawyers City: Los Angeles Address: 11500 W Olympic Blvd. #488 Website https://www.victimslawyer.com/ Phone +1 866 966 5240 Email ssweat@stevensweatapc.com
Understanding Strict Liability. Strict liability is a legal concept that holds a party responsible for certain actions or injuries, regardless of their intent or level of care. Unlike negligence or intentional torts, strict liability focuses on the inherent risk associated with certain activities or products. Cases Where Strict Liability Applies. Strict liability is often applied in the following scenarios: Ultra-Hazardous Activities: Activities that are inherently dangerous and pose a high risk of harm may give rise to strict liability. These activities are considered so risky that those who engage in them are held strictly liable for resulting harms. Example: Blasting operations in densely populated areas are considered ultra-hazardous activities. Product Liability: Strict liability is frequently applied in cases involving defective products. If a product is found to be defective and causes harm, the manufacturer or seller may be held strictly liable for the injuries. Example: If a consumer is injured due to a manufacturing defect in a household appliance, strict liability may apply to the manufacturer. Elements of Strict Liability. To establish strict liability, certain elements must be present: Engaging in an Ultra-Hazardous Activity or Product Defect: The defendant must either engage in an ultra-hazardous activity or be involved in the production or distribution of a defective product. Causation: The plaintiff must establish that the harm suffered was a result of the ultra-hazardous activity or the defect in the product. Harm: As with other tort claims, the plaintiff must have suffered harm or damages as a result of the defendant's actions. Ultra-Hazardous Activities. Ultra-hazardous activities are those that involve a high degree of risk of harm, even when conducted with utmost care. Some factors that may determine whether an activity is ultra-hazardous include: High Risk of Harm: The activity must pose a high risk of harm, even when conducted with reasonable care. Inability to Eliminate Risk: The risk associated with the activity must be such that it cannot be completely eliminated, regardless of the precautions taken. Not a Common Activity: The activity should not be a common one in the community. Product Liability and Defective Products. In the realm of product liability, strict liability can be imposed for injuries caused by defective products. There are three main types of product defects that may lead to strict liability: Design Defects: These occur when the design of the product is inherently dangerous, making it defective even before it is manufactured. Manufacturing Defects: These defects arise during the manufacturing process, causing certain units of a product to be different from the intended design. Marketing Defects (Failure to Warn): A product may be defective if it lacks proper warnings or instructions regarding its use, resulting in harm to the consumer. Defenses to Strict Liability. While strict liability imposes liability without proving fault, there are some defenses available to defendants: Assumption of Risk: If the plaintiff voluntarily assumes the risk associated with the ultra-hazardous activity or the use of the product, it can serve as a defense. Example: If a person knowingly participates in a hazardous recreational activity, they might be considered to have assumed the risks associated with it. Contributory or Comparative Negligence: In some jurisdictions, the plaintiff's own negligence in causing the harm may reduce or eliminate the defendant's liability. Example: If a person's negligence contributes to their injury while engaged in a risky activity, the defense of contributory or comparative negligence may be raised. Product Misuse: If the plaintiff's misuse of the product is a substantial factor in causing the harm, it may be a defense. Example: If a consumer uses a product in a way that is not intended or recommended and gets injured, the defense of product misuse may apply. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support
Express Warranties. Introduction to Express Warranties. Express warranties are explicit promises or representations made by a seller regarding the quality, characteristics, or performance of a product. Law students should comprehend the essentials of express warranties: Nature of Statements: Express warranties can be made through statements, affirmations, or descriptions of fact about the goods. Basis of the Bargain: The representation must become part of the basis of the bargain, meaning the buyer relies on it when making the purchase. Implied Warranties. Implied warranties are inherent in every sale of goods, regardless of whether they are explicitly stated. Law students should understand the two primary types of implied warranties: Implied Warranty of Merchantability: This warranty assures that the product is fit for its ordinary purpose and meets industry standards. Implied Warranty of Fitness for a Particular Purpose: This warranty applies when the seller knows the buyer's specific purpose for the goods and recommends a product to meet that purpose. Disclaiming and Limiting Warranties. Sellers have the ability to disclaim or limit warranties, but certain rules apply: Clear Language: Disclaimers must be clear and conspicuous, and limitations must be reasonable. Implied Warranties: Disclaimers for implied warranties, especially the implied warranty of merchantability, are subject to strict scrutiny. Product Liability. Introduction to Product Liability. Product liability law holds manufacturers and sellers responsible for defects in their products that cause harm. Key points include: Three Main Theories: Product liability cases typically revolve around strict liability, negligence, and breach of warranty. Consumer Protection: Product liability law serves as a crucial element in consumer protection, ensuring accountability for the safety of products. Strict Liability in Product Liability. The Concept of Strict Liability. Strict liability holds manufacturers and sellers responsible for injuries caused by defective products, irrespective of negligence. Law students should grasp the elements of strict liability: Defective Product: The product must be defective, either due to its design, manufacturing, or inadequate warnings. Causation: The defect must have caused the injury. Types of Product Defects. Understanding the types of defects is essential: Design Defects: Inherent flaws in a product's design that make it unsafe. Manufacturing Defects: Defects that occur during the production process, making individual products dangerous. Marketing Defects (Failure to Warn): Inadequate warnings or instructions related to product use. Negligence in Product Liability. The Role of Negligence. Negligence is another theory in product liability cases, involving failure to exercise reasonable care in the design, production, or marketing of a product: Duty of Care: The manufacturer or seller owes a duty of care to consumers. Breach of Duty: The breach involves actions or omissions that fall below the standard of care. Causation: The breach must be the direct cause of the consumer's injury. Defenses to Negligence Claims. Defendants may assert various defenses: Assumption of Risk: The consumer was aware of and accepted the risks. Comparative Negligence: The consumer's negligence contributed to the injury. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support
Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: Principles For Product Liability (With Application To AI), published by johnswentworth on December 10, 2023 on LessWrong. There were several responses to What I Would Do If I Were Working On AI Governance which focused on the liability section, and had similar criticisms. In particular, I'll focus on this snippet as a good representative: Making cars (or ladders or knives or printing presses or...) "robust to misuse", as you put it, is not the manufacturer's job. The commenter calls manufacturer liability for misuse "an absurd overreach which ignores people's agency in using the products they purchase". Years ago I would have agreed with that; it's an intuitive and natural view, especially for those of us with libertarian tendencies. But today I disagree, and claim that that's basically not the right way to think about product liability, in general. With that motivation in mind: this post lays out some general principles for thinking about product liability, followed by their application to AI. Principle 1: "User Errors" Are Often Design Problems There's this story about an airplane (I think the B-52 originally?) where the levers for the flaps and landing gear were identical and right next to each other. Pilots kept coming in to land, and accidentally retracting the landing gear. Then everyone would be pissed at the pilot for wrecking the bottom of the plane, as it dragged along the runway at speed. The usual Aesop of the story is that this was a design problem with the plane more than a mistake on the pilots' part; the problem was fixed by putting a little rubber wheel on the landing gear lever. If we put two identical levers right next to each other, it's basically inevitable that mistakes will be made; that's bad interface design. More generally: whenever a product will be used by lots of people under lots of conditions, there is an approximately-100% chance that the product will frequently be used by people who are not paying attention, not at their best, and (in many cases) just not very smart to begin with. The only way to prevent foolish mistakes sometimes causing problems, is to design the product to be robust to those mistakes - e.g. adding a little rubber wheel to the lever which retracts the landing gear, so it's robust to pilots who aren't paying attention to that specific thing while landing a plane. Putting the responsibility on users to avoid errors will always, predictably, result in errors. The same also applies to intentional misuse: if a product is widely available, there is an approximately-100% chance that it will be intentionally misused sometimes. Putting the responsibility on users will always, predictably, result in users sometimes doing Bad Things with the product. However, that does not mean that it's always worthwhile to prevent problems. Which brings us to the next principle. Principle 2: Liability Is Not A Ban A toy example: a railroad runs past a farmer's field. Our toy example is in ye olden days of steam trains, so the train tends to belch out smoke and sparks on the way by. That creates a big problem for everyone in the area if and when the farmer's crops catch fire. Nobody wants a giant fire. (I think I got this example from David Friedman's book Law's Order, which I definitely recommend.) Now, one way a legal system could handle the situation would be to ban the trains. One big problem with that approach is: maybe it's actually worth the trade-off to have crop fires sometimes. Trains sure do generate a crapton of economic value. If the rate of fires isn't too high, it may just be worth it to eat the cost, and a ban would prevent that. Liability sidesteps that failure-mode. If the railroad is held liable for the fires, it may still choose to eat that cost. Probably the railroad will end up passing (at least some of) that cost throug...
In this episode... Renaud hosts this episode on the EU's forthcoming directive on product liability which should get you nervous if you sell into Europe. Clive Greenwood and Prof. Simon Choi are two highly experienced compliance experts and Professor Choi brings a fresh outlook on how this affects manufacturers in China and EU importers in legal terms. Show Sections 00:00 - Greetings and introducing today's topic. 04:23 - What is the intent of the directive? 06:53 - What does this directive change for economic operators on the distribution and retail side of things? 12:47 - Transparency in the supply chain. 16:56 - Even if a factory in, say, China can now be held liable for product problems as a supply chain actor under this new legislation, realistically, can an importer obtain compensation from them? 24:47 - How the burden of proof for manufacturers is changing. 28:45 - Product labelling must make it easier for any parties, especially consumers, to bring a case against a product's seller. 32:50 - Foreign manufacturers are going to be under a lot of pressure to change the way they do things. 34:02 - Why the product safety's burden of proof is on the party who brings the product into the EU. 37:17 - Will this directive even be possible to enforce in manufacturing in China? 39:38 - Wrapping up. Related content... How ISO 37301 Might Improve Chinese Suppliers' Compliance Exploring 9 Quality Management Challenges in China [Podcast] The EU Ecodesign Regulation Is Coming, But Are You Prepared? [Podcast part1] Exploring Product Safety & Reliability Issue Liability [Podcast] Get in touch with us Connect with us on LinkedIn Send us a tweet @sofeast Prefer Facebook? Check us out on FB Contact us via Sofeast's contact page Subscribe to our YouTube channel Subscribe to the podcast There are more episodes to come, so remember to subscribe! You can do so in your favorite podcast apps here and don't forget to give us a 5-star rating, please: Apple Podcasts Spotify Google Podcasts TuneIn Amazon Podcasts Deezer iHeartRADIO PlayerFM Listen Notes Podcast Addict Podchaser
Defining Strict Liability. Strict liability is a legal doctrine that holds a party liable for certain actions or injuries regardless of their intent or level of care. Unlike negligence or intentional torts, strict liability focuses on the inherent risk associated with certain activities or products. Cases Where Strict Liability Applies. Strict liability commonly applies in the following situations: Ultra-Hazardous Activities: Activities that are inherently dangerous and pose a high risk of harm may give rise to strict liability. Examples include blasting, transporting hazardous materials, and keeping wild animals. Product Liability: Strict liability is often applied in cases involving defective products. If a product is defective and causes harm, the manufacturer or seller may be held strictly liable for the injuries. Elements of Strict Liability. To establish strict liability, certain elements must be present: Engaging in an Ultra-Hazardous Activity or Product Defect: The defendant must either engage in an ultra-hazardous activity or be involved in the production or distribution of a defective product. Causation: The plaintiff must establish that the harm suffered was a result of the ultra-hazardous activity or the defect in the product. Harm: Like other tort claims, the plaintiff must have suffered harm or damages as a result of the defendant's actions. Ultra-Hazardous Activities. Ultra-hazardous activities are those that involve a high degree of risk of harm, even when conducted with utmost care. Some factors that may determine whether an activity is ultra-hazardous include: High Risk of Harm: The activity must pose a high risk of harm, even when conducted with reasonable care. Inability to Eliminate Risk: The risk associated with the activity must be such that it cannot be completely eliminated, regardless of the precautions taken. Not a Common Activity: The activity should not be a common one in the community. Product Liability and Defective Products. In the realm of product liability, strict liability can be imposed for injuries caused by defective products. There are three main types of product defects that may lead to strict liability: Design Defects: These occur when the design of the product is inherently dangerous, making it defective even before it is manufactured. Manufacturing Defects: These defects arise during the manufacturing process, causing certain units of a product to be different from the intended design. Marketing Defects (Failure to Warn): A product may be defective if it lacks proper warnings or instructions regarding its use, resulting in harm to the consumer. Defenses to Strict Liability. While strict liability imposes liability without proving fault, there are some defenses available to defendants: Assumption of Risk: If the plaintiff voluntarily assumes the risk associated with the ultra-hazardous activity or the use of the product, it can serve as a defense. Contributory or Comparative Negligence: In some jurisdictions, the plaintiff's own negligence in causing the harm may reduce or eliminate the defendant's liability. Product Misuse: If the plaintiff's misuse of the product is a substantial factor in causing the harm, it may be a defense. Case Example: Ultrahazardous Activity - Blasting Operation Imagine a scenario where a company engages in a blasting operation to clear a construction site. Despite taking all reasonable precautions, the blasting operation causes vibrations that result in damage to neighboring properties. In this case: Ultra-Hazardous Activity: Blasting is considered an ultra-hazardous activity due to its high risk of harm, even with reasonable care. Causation: The harm suffered by the neighboring properties is a direct result of the blasting operation. Case Example: Product Liability - Defective Automobile Airbags. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support
Introduction to Express Warranties. Express warranties are promises, affirmations, or descriptions of fact made by the seller to the buyer as part of the basis of the bargain. These warranties can be explicit statements about the product's quality, performance, or characteristics. It's essential for law students to understand the key elements of express warranties: Statements and Promises: Express warranties can be created through statements, affirmations, or promises made by the seller. Basis of the Bargain: The representation must be part of the basis of the bargain. In other words, the buyer must rely on the statement when making the purchase. Implied Warranties. Implied warranties are inherent in every sale of goods, whether or not they are expressly stated. They are not explicitly promised by the seller but are implied by law. Law students should grasp the two primary forms of implied warranties: Implied Warranty of Merchantability: This warranty guarantees that the product is fit for the ordinary purposes for which it is used. In essence, it must meet the standards for what is considered acceptable in the trade. Implied Warranty of Fitness for a Particular Purpose: This warranty applies when the buyer relies on the seller's expertise to select a product suitable for a specific use. If the seller knows the buyer's purpose and recommends a product, it implicitly warrants the product's fitness for that purpose. Disclaiming and Limiting Warranties. Warranties, both express and implied, can be disclaimed or limited. It is vital to understand the legal mechanisms for doing so: Disclaimers: A seller may disclaim warranties in clear and unambiguous language. However, there are legal limits on disclaimers for implied warranties, especially the implied warranty of merchantability. Limitations: Sellers can also limit their liability for breach of warranty in certain cases, such as limiting the buyer's remedies. These limitations must be fair and reasonable. Product Liability. Introduction to Product Liability. Product liability is a field of law that deals with the responsibility of manufacturers and sellers for injuries caused by their products. It encompasses issues related to product defects, warnings, and the safety of products. Key points include: Three Main Theories: Product liability cases generally revolve around three main theories: strict liability, negligence, and breach of warranty. Consumer Protection: Product liability law serves as a critical aspect of consumer protection. It holds manufacturers and sellers accountable for producing and distributing safe products. Strict Liability in Product Liability. The Concept of Strict Liability. Strict liability is a legal doctrine that holds manufacturers and sellers responsible for injuries caused by defective products, regardless of whether they were negligent. This doctrine significantly affects product liability cases: Elements of Strict Liability: To establish strict liability, the plaintiff must typically demonstrate that the product was unreasonably dangerous and that the defect caused their injury. No Need to Prove Negligence: Unlike negligence claims, plaintiffs pursuing a strict liability claim do not need to prove that the manufacturer or seller was negligent. Types of Product Defects. There are three primary types of product defects under the theory of strict liability, and students should have a comprehensive understanding of each: Design Defects: These are inherent flaws in a product's design that render it unsafe for its intended use. Manufacturing Defects: Manufacturing defects occur during the production process and make individual products dangerous. Marketing Defects (Failure to Warn): These defects pertain to inadequate warnings or instructions related to product use. Negligence in Product Liability. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support
In the latest episode of Fashion Counsel, AFS Chairman Anthony V. Lupo is joined by Thomas Crispi, AFS Product Liability and Mass Torts Practice leader, to discuss how retailers and manufacturers can anticipate potential product issues and have a plan in place to handle US Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) inquires, class actions, and probable liability.
The corporate rep depo is a powerful tool to expand discovery and solidify facts in your case. Today's discussion covers what information you should seek in a corporate rep depo, effective ways to organize comprehensive topics and questions, and how to address common objections.
The corporate rep depo is a powerful tool to expand discovery and solidify facts in your case. Today's discussion covers what information you should seek in a corporate rep depo, effective ways to organize comprehensive topics and questions, and how to address common objections.
Your product liability case isn't just about a single product. Design changes, comparable models, previous incidents and marketing materials should be carefully examined to find the potential flaw or “profit over people” claim for liability. We'll offer more tips on where to look to find this information and how to use it.
Your product liability case isn't just about a single product. Design changes, comparable models, previous incidents and marketing materials should be carefully examined to find the potential flaw or “profit over people” claim for liability. We'll offer more tips on where to look to find this information and how to use it.
Are you familiar with the factors involved in an injury case? Liability and damages play a crucial role. But have you ever wondered how the courts handle these cases? Join host Kris Flammang and guest Mitchell Panter as they discuss the ins and outs of injury cases on the latest episode of The Confident Retirement podcast. Discover the importance of liability and fault, the role of insurance coverage, and the challenges of navigating the judicial system. Whether you've been involved in an accident or simply want to learn more about the legal process, this episode is a must-listen. Tune in now and gain valuable insights from these legal experts! Mitchell J. Panter is the Managing Partner of Panter, Panter & Sampedro, a personal injury law firm in Miami consisting of 5 attorneys and 11 full time staff members. The firm not only advocates for injured individuals but also for keeping the community at large safer through law changes and holding negligent parties accountable for correcting hazards. In addition, both Mitchell and the firm have been a pilar in the community for more than 30 years. As past president of several legal and community organizations, Mitchell continues to actively participate in various causes throughout South Florida. He has lectured and taught for associations including Bar Associations, high schools and business groups. Mitchell primarily practices in the areas of Personal Injury, Wrongful Death, Product Liability, Medical Malpractice and Premises Liability cases. Early in his career, he argued the case of American Aerial Lift v. Jose Perez in the Florida Supreme Court addressing the issue of Strict Liability and Product Liability. This precedent setting case involved the award of a $1.7 million dollar verdict obtained by the firm in the trial court for Mr. Perez as a result of injuries he sustained due to a defective scissor lift. Mitchell has secured several million-dollar settlements and verdicts for his clients and continues to represent individuals injured due to the negligence of others. Together, Kris and Mitchell discuss discuss the misconceptions about personal injury law, emphasize the role of communication between lawyers and clients, and explain the steps involved in an injury case. Panter emphasizes the need for effective communication, managing client expectations, and providing realistic outcomes and compensation amounts. They also discuss challenges in personal injury law, such as educating clients on structured settlements and navigating changes in the political and regulatory landscape. Ultimately, the podcast highlights the importance of finding passion in your career, specializing in areas you enjoy, and advocating for clients in the legal field. Here is what to expect on this week's show: Mitchell's legal career Specializing in personal injury law The importance of liability and fault Managing client expectations Community advocacy Navigating the judicial system The role of insurance coverage Connect with Mitchell: https://panterlaw.com/staff-member/mitchell-j-panter/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
The scope of your pleadings dictates the scope of your discovery, and it's important to make sure your pleadings are broad enough to allow discovery into all the product issues you need to explore. This two-part discussion outlines a discovery checklist for product liability cases, including what documents and persons may be pertinent to your case and how to track them down.
The scope of your pleadings dictates the scope of your discovery, and it's important to make sure your pleadings are broad enough to allow discovery into all the product issues you need to explore. This two-part discussion outlines a discovery checklist for product liability cases, including what documents and persons may be pertinent to your case and how to track them down.
Our discussion on building a product liability case continues, with a focus on pre-suit discovery, regulations, industry standards and potential defendants that are often overlooked.
Our discussion on building a product liability case continues, with a focus on pre-suit discovery, regulations, industry standards and potential defendants that are often overlooked.
Are you missing a product liability claim ? Product liability cases can be complex, challenging, and sometimes hard to recognize. John, Tim and Erich discuss how to recognize and evaluate a product liability claim as well as how to overcome some of its most common challenges.
Are you missing a product liability claim ? Product liability cases can be complex, challenging, and sometimes hard to recognize. John, Tim and Erich discuss how to recognize and evaluate a product liability claim as well as how to overcome some of its most common challenges.
Sidley Austin Partner Jennifer Saulino joins IMS Jury Consulting & Strategy Advisor Dr. Christina Marinakis to discuss their work on a recent product liability case. They also share insights on the goals of jury research, voir dire and jury selection strategies, rural and metro venue considerations, cross-examination, and closing arguments.Jennifer Saulino is a seasoned trial lawyer who specializes in complex commercial disputes, product liability, and white-collar crimes. Dr. Christina Marinakis has more than 20 years of experience in jury research, jury study, and applied practice in law and psychology. Find the IMS Insights Podcast on YouTube or your favorite listening platform, and don't forget to subscribe. Visit our website for more podcasts and articles featuring top litigators, consultants, and industry experts.IMS has delivered strategic litigation consulting and expert witness services to leading global law firms and Fortune 500 companies for more than 30 years, in more than 43,000 cases. IMS consultants become an extension of your legal team from pre-suit investigation services to discovery and then on to arbitration and trial. Learn more at expertservices.com.
What's the best way to create a work product when you're working on a personal injury case? Laura Keegan, an LNC who brings to her work 28 years of widely varied nursing experience, gives you the answers you need. Her most important piece of advice is: Always ask the attorneys what they want. You'll get a range of responses. Second: You may have your own ideas of how a chronology or summary should be organized, but don't assume you're right. Give the attorneys what they want in terms of organization, detail, and types of comments. Follow these rules, and you will have long and happy relationships with your attorney clients. Laura extensively comments on different types of personal injuries. In addition to vehicular accidents, personal injury may include toxic torts, equipment failures, slips and falls, and other kinds of injuries. She also emphasizes the value of deep investigation of providers named in the report and the importance of reviewing bills. She also emphasizes that, while when you find something injurious to your client's case, you need to present the bad news with tact and care. This is a podcast you don't want to miss. The advice in it will ease any uncertainties about how to give the attorneys what they want. Following these guidelines will help you increase your income. Join me in this episode of Powerful LNC Chronologies - Laura Keegan How do attorneys differ in what they want from chronologies? How do you do a depo summary? Why is an LNC a better choice for a summary or chronology than a paralegal? What shouldn't you put in a chronology or report? How can you interest the client in additional services? Listen to our podcasts or watch them using our app, Expert.edu, available at legalnursebusiness.com/expertedu. https://youtu.be/BaF59DMIULg Announcing LNC Success™ Virtual Conference 8 October 26,27 & 28 LNC Success™ is a Virtual Conference 3-day event designed for legal nurse consultants just like you! Pat Iyer and Barbara Levin put together THE first Legal Nurse Consulting Virtual Conference in July 2020. They are back with their 8th all-new conference based on what attendees said they'd find most valuable. This new implementation and networking event is designed for LNCs at any stage in their career. Build your expertise, attract higher-paying attorney clients, and take your business to the next level. After the LNC Success™ Virtual Conference, you will leave with clarity, confidence, and an effective step-by-step action plan that you can immediately implement in your business. Your Presenter of Powerful LNC Chronologies - Laura Keegan Laura is a certified Legal Nurse Consultant for the past 7 years and Registered Nurse with 27 years of experience. She holds a BSN from University of Illinois at Chicago and a Bachelor's in Psychology from Florida State University. Her clinical experience includes ER, ICU, Med/Surg, Adolescent, and Home Health. Laura provides services to both Plaintiff and Defense Attorneys including several high-profile clients across the US. Her experience includes Personal Injury, Med Mal, Toxic Tort, and Product Liability cases. She is a mentor to LNCs that are interested in learning how to provide personal injury case reviews and reports. Connect with Laura https://www.luxlegalnurse.com/ or on LinkedIn or by email below https://www.linkedin.com/in/laura-lux-keegan-bsn-bs-rn-clnc-4b270632Email: luxlegalnurse@gmail.com
In this podcast, David Bennett and Maura McIntosh discuss product liability group actions, which have been an area of steady growth since these claims started to emerge in the English courts at the end of the last century. The podcast looks at how such claims are brought, how prevalent they are, and the main causes of action that are typically relied on. The presenters are both authors of Class Actions in England and Wales, a textbook authored by Herbert Smith Freehills lawyers and published by Sweet & Maxwell. This is the sixth in our series of podcasts to mark the launch of the second edition of this leading textbook. Future editions will look at other topics of interest relating to class actions or areas where we expect to see growth.
Join Rahul and Ben for their discussion with Andrew Garza, founder of the Connecticut Trial Firm. Andrew talks about how he started his plaintiff's practice while working as a bartender at night to make ends meet. He worked hard to become a better trial lawyer and to develop cutting edge approaches to developing cases and preparing them for trial. Andrew describes how he applied these strategies recently to obtain a $100 million verdict in a negligence and product liability case tried in Connecticut State Court—the largest personal injury verdict in the State's history. About Andrew Garza Biography Personal injury clients face many challenges. After an injury, they may struggle to pay bills, find a replacement vehicle, or even obtain medical care. Time and again, insurance companies take advantage of the injured in order to increase their corporate profits. Andrew understands what it means to overcome adversity. He grew up in public housing in Groton and worked his way through college and law school by waiting tables and tending bar. He has devoted his practice to helping those who are most vulnerable to obtain justice. Andrew uses his skills to level the playing field for his clients. When he is not practicing law, Andrew is probably hosting a great party for his family and friends or building furniture in his workshop. Education Andrew received a Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of Connecticut. He graduated cum laude from New England School of Law, where he was a New England Scholar and served on the executive board of The New England Law Review.
Episode Summary Anyone familiar with the popular television series, Yellowstone, will recognize the peculiar challenges of trying plaintiffs' cases in Montana. Yet, Montana trial lawyer, Zander Blewett, has been doing it successfully his entire career. Join Ben (www.gideonasen.com) for his in-depth discussion with Zander, describing the unique circumstances that brought him to the practice of plaintiff law, his many landmark cases and verdicts, and his approach to success as a trial lawyer, family man and leader in the community. About Zander Blewett Founding PartnerThe University of Montana Law School has been renamed the "Alexander Blewett III School of Law at the University of Montana." Alexander (Zander) Blewett III has earned an AV® Preeminent Peer Review Rating by Martindale-Hubbell™, the highest recognition possible in the legal industry, for his professionalism and ethics. Practice AreasPersonal InjuryTrucking & Auto AccidentsBrain InjuryWrongful DeathProduct LiabilityInsurance Bad FaithWorkplace InjuriesRailroad LawClass ActionsBicycle AccidentsMotorcycle Accidents AdmittedMontana, 1971U.S. District Court, District of MontanaU.S. Court of Appeals, 6th and 9th CircuitsU.S. Supreme Court EducationUniversity of Montana, J.D., 1971Montana State University, B.S., 1967 Associations and membershipsThe Inner Circle of Advocates (Only Montana Member in National Organization limited to top 100 trial lawyers in the United States)State Bar of Montana; Montana Trial Lawyers AssociationThe Association of Trial Lawyers of America (Member, President's Club)American College of Trial LawyersAmerican Board of Trial Advocates (Advocate)International Society of Barristers Notable Cases$27 million settlement in a brain injury case (Vangsnes vs. North American Mission Board of the Southern Baptist Convention, Inc. et. al.)$21.3 million verdict in a Great Falls malicious prosecution case (Seltzer v. Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher)$7 million verdict in a Billings railroad crossing accident (Dorn v. BNSF)$5 million verdict against the US government after a fire destroyed a ranch (Hughes v. USA)$3.9 million verdict in a Missoula brain injury claim (Ginn v. Smurfit Stone Container)$3.2 million verdict in a Great Falls auto accident (Bumgarner v. Farmers Union Mutual Insurance) Biographical detailsMontana Trial Lawyers Association, Montana Trial Lawyer of the Year, 1993 – 1994 and 2006 – 2007Only Montana lawyer named in Lawdragon Hall of Fame (national publication).Only Montana lawyer named in Lawdragon 500 Leading Lawyers in America, 2018 & 2019Only Montana lawyer named in Lawdragon 500 Leading Plaintiff Consumer Lawyers, 2019 – 2021Only Montana personal injury lawyer named to the Top 100 Mountain States Super Lawyers® for 2012Listed in Top 100 Mountain States Super Lawyers® in 2007 – 2012, 2014 – 2016, 2019 – 2021Selected, Best Lawyers in America since 2005.Delegate, 9th Circuit Judicial Conference, 1990 – 1993Montana State Coordinator, National Board of Trial AdvocacyFellow, International Academy of Trial Lawyers (Montana State Chair)Certified, Civil Trial Advocacy Specialist, National Board of Trial Advocacy, 1983
On this week's episode of The Encrypted Economy, we our final panel discussion on MiCA. We give an overview of current EU legislation and discuss achieving real viability and effectiveness with Markets in Crypto-Assets regulation. Be sure to subscribe to The Encrypted Economy for more insight on innovative regulatory frameworks in web 3.0. Topics Covered:· 3:30 Discussing ESMA and EBA and Their Roles Regarding MiCA· 22:40 Understanding European Legislation· 31:40 Will Regulators Become Even More Stringent?· 33:30 The Scope of EBA in Regards to MiCA· 37:00 What Regulations are Going to Impact MiCA?· 53:00 Blacklisting Under New Regulation· 1:12:00 Can an Asset Fall Under Both MiFID and MiCA?· 1:17:00 Developments with the Data Act· · 1:32:50 Discussing DORA and Product Liability · 1:42:40 How Does PSD2 Factor into this? Resource List:· Alexandru's LinkedIn· Marina's LinkedIn· Francesco's LinkedIn· William' s LinkedIn· SLV Legal· The European Crypto Initiative· Crypto Policy Updates· MiCA· GDPR · MiCA Overview and Categorization of Crypto Assets · Digital Operational Resilience Act· ESMA· Transfer of funds regulation· EU payment services directive PSD2· The competing priorities facing U.S. crypto regulations Follow The Encrypted Economy on your favorite platforms!TwitterLinkedInInstagramFacebook
How much do you really know about the products you're using? Just because it's on the shelf doesn't mean it's safe.Ever wonder why some products have warning labels? Or why personal care products have to list out ingredients on the packaging? The answer is product liability lawyers who fight for consumers' rights and protection. Veronica is in the house with Montlick attorney Alan to discuss the role of attorneys in consumer safety, and how a lawyer can help if you've been injured by a product. Also joining is Nikki Montlick to talk label literacy: ingredient lists, what they really mean, and where they can fall short.The purpose of this show is to provide general information about the law. Our guests will not provide any individualized legal advice. If you have a personal situation and need legal advice, contact us nationwide at 1-800-LAW-NEED for your free legal consultation with a Montlick attorney. Follow us on social @montlicklaw or visit lawyersinthehouse.com for more info, clips and tips.
This week I welcome attorney Fred Penney who Injury Lawyer has rated the highest AVVO personal injury attorney rating of a 10– “Superb Lawyer”. He is an AV Preeminent rated Attorney by Martindale Hubbell, one of the most prestigious ratings system in the United States. This is the highest possible rating in both legal ability and ethical standards. Mr. Penney has also been rated AV Preeminent by the opinions of the members of the Judiciary. For over 30 years Mr. Penney and his firm have handled many high profile and substantial injury cases including product liability, trucking accidents, escalator and elevator accidents, helicopter and plane accidents, boating accidents among others.He is also the author of numerous personal injury articles and is the host of Radio Law Talk, a radio show discussing the latest trending legal topics and news. Radio Law Talk is broadcast throughout many areas and can be found on SRN Radio networks. His law firm, The Penney and Associates firm has now expanded to offices in Sacramento, Roseville, Chico, Rocklin and Irvine with satellite offices in Fairfield, Sunnyvale, Santa Clara, San Francisco and Southern California. Penney and Associates Cases have been featured on the National Nightly News, local nightly news, radio news programs and numerous articles in print media. Thank you very much to Fred for joining us this week on The Alden Report.For more information on Fred Penney and his law firm, you can visit: https://www.penneylawyers.comThank you to this episode's sponsor:Spotlight Production and Media ManagementImagine spotlighting yourself, your brand or your book on virtually every major network all of the country and appearing in people's homes week after week after week. No worries about whether or not your ad on social media is actually being fed to people. You WILL be in their homes in front of them. With our experience and know how we can take an unknown person, brand, book, product or service and turn it into a household name. https://www.mikealden.com/author-spotlight
This week I welcome attorney Fred Penney who Injury Lawyer has rated the highest AVVO personal injury attorney rating of a 10– “Superb Lawyer”. He is an AV Preeminent rated Attorney by Martindale Hubbell, one of the most prestigious ratings system in the United States. This is the highest possible rating in both legal ability and ethical standards. Mr. Penney has also been rated AV Preeminent by the opinions of the members of the Judiciary. For over 30 years Mr. Penney and his firm have handled many high profile and substantial injury cases including product liability, trucking accidents, escalator and elevator accidents, helicopter and plane accidents, boating accidents among others.He is also the author of numerous personal injury articles and is the host of Radio Law Talk, a radio show discussing the latest trending legal topics and news. Radio Law Talk is broadcast throughout many areas and can be found on SRN Radio networks. His law firm, The Penney and Associates firm has now expanded to offices in Sacramento, Roseville, Chico, Rocklin and Irvine with satellite offices in Fairfield, Sunnyvale, Santa Clara, San Francisco and Southern California. Penney and Associates Cases have been featured on the National Nightly News, local nightly news, radio news programs and numerous articles in print media. Thank you very much to Fred for joining us this week on The Alden Report. For more information on Fred Penney and his law firm, you can visit: https://www.penneylawyers.comThank you to this episode's sponsor:Spotlight Production and Media ManagementImagine spotlighting yourself, your brand or your book on virtually every major network all of the country and appearing in people's homes week after week after week. No worries about whether or not your ad on social media is actually being fed to people. You WILL be in their homes in front of them. With our experience and know how we can take an unknown person, brand, book, product or service and turn it into a household name.https://www.mikealden.com/author-spotlight
In this episode, we cover the latest news on Amazon fees and storage. We talk about product liability insurance, and how to create QR codes for your business.