POPULARITY
5 episodes with Reform Act
5 episodes with Reform Act
3 episodes with Reform Act
2 episodes with Reform Act
4 episodes with Reform Act
3 episodes with Reform Act
4 episodes with Reform Act
5 episodes with Reform Act
2 episodes with Reform Act
In this concise yet critical clip from See You In Court, real estate attorney David Metzger explains Georgia's new Squatters Reform Act, detailing how it empowers law enforcement to address squatting cases swiftly and effectively. You'll learn about: ✅ How the law specifically targets unlawful squatting ✅ The new role of law enforcement issuing citations directly to squatters ✅ The three-day documentation rule squatters must now follow Stay informed and protect your property rights under Georgia law!
In this week's video, we take a look at a key change introduced by the Leasehold & Freehold Reform Act 2024. This relates to the ‘two year rule'.
The 1832 Reform Act was a landmark moment in the development of modern British politics. By overhauling the country's ancient representative system, the legislation reshaped constitutional arrangements at Westminster, reinvigorated political relationships between the center and the provinces, and established the political structures and precedents that both shaped and hindered Britain's slow lurch towards democracy by 1928. Mapping the State: English Boundaries and the 1832 Reform Act (U London Press, 2024) leads to a fundamental rethinking of the 1832 Reform Act by demonstrating how boundary reform and the reconstruction of England's electoral map by the little-known 1831–1832 boundary commission underpinned this turning point in the development of the British political nation. Eschewing traditional approaches to the 1832 Reform Act, it draws from a significant new archival discovery—the working papers of the boundary commission—and a range of innovative quantitative techniques to provide a major reassessment of why and how the 1832 Reform Act passed, its impact on reformed politics both at Westminster and in the constituencies, and its significance to the expansion of the modern British state. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/history
The 1832 Reform Act was a landmark moment in the development of modern British politics. By overhauling the country's ancient representative system, the legislation reshaped constitutional arrangements at Westminster, reinvigorated political relationships between the center and the provinces, and established the political structures and precedents that both shaped and hindered Britain's slow lurch towards democracy by 1928. Mapping the State: English Boundaries and the 1832 Reform Act (U London Press, 2024) leads to a fundamental rethinking of the 1832 Reform Act by demonstrating how boundary reform and the reconstruction of England's electoral map by the little-known 1831–1832 boundary commission underpinned this turning point in the development of the British political nation. Eschewing traditional approaches to the 1832 Reform Act, it draws from a significant new archival discovery—the working papers of the boundary commission—and a range of innovative quantitative techniques to provide a major reassessment of why and how the 1832 Reform Act passed, its impact on reformed politics both at Westminster and in the constituencies, and its significance to the expansion of the modern British state. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science
The 1832 Reform Act was a landmark moment in the development of modern British politics. By overhauling the country's ancient representative system, the legislation reshaped constitutional arrangements at Westminster, reinvigorated political relationships between the center and the provinces, and established the political structures and precedents that both shaped and hindered Britain's slow lurch towards democracy by 1928. Mapping the State: English Boundaries and the 1832 Reform Act (U London Press, 2024) leads to a fundamental rethinking of the 1832 Reform Act by demonstrating how boundary reform and the reconstruction of England's electoral map by the little-known 1831–1832 boundary commission underpinned this turning point in the development of the British political nation. Eschewing traditional approaches to the 1832 Reform Act, it draws from a significant new archival discovery—the working papers of the boundary commission—and a range of innovative quantitative techniques to provide a major reassessment of why and how the 1832 Reform Act passed, its impact on reformed politics both at Westminster and in the constituencies, and its significance to the expansion of the modern British state. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/european-studies
The 1832 Reform Act was a landmark moment in the development of modern British politics. By overhauling the country's ancient representative system, the legislation reshaped constitutional arrangements at Westminster, reinvigorated political relationships between the center and the provinces, and established the political structures and precedents that both shaped and hindered Britain's slow lurch towards democracy by 1928. Mapping the State: English Boundaries and the 1832 Reform Act (U London Press, 2024) leads to a fundamental rethinking of the 1832 Reform Act by demonstrating how boundary reform and the reconstruction of England's electoral map by the little-known 1831–1832 boundary commission underpinned this turning point in the development of the British political nation. Eschewing traditional approaches to the 1832 Reform Act, it draws from a significant new archival discovery—the working papers of the boundary commission—and a range of innovative quantitative techniques to provide a major reassessment of why and how the 1832 Reform Act passed, its impact on reformed politics both at Westminster and in the constituencies, and its significance to the expansion of the modern British state. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network
The 1832 Reform Act was a landmark moment in the development of modern British politics. By overhauling the country's ancient representative system, the legislation reshaped constitutional arrangements at Westminster, reinvigorated political relationships between the center and the provinces, and established the political structures and precedents that both shaped and hindered Britain's slow lurch towards democracy by 1928. Mapping the State: English Boundaries and the 1832 Reform Act (U London Press, 2024) leads to a fundamental rethinking of the 1832 Reform Act by demonstrating how boundary reform and the reconstruction of England's electoral map by the little-known 1831–1832 boundary commission underpinned this turning point in the development of the British political nation. Eschewing traditional approaches to the 1832 Reform Act, it draws from a significant new archival discovery—the working papers of the boundary commission—and a range of innovative quantitative techniques to provide a major reassessment of why and how the 1832 Reform Act passed, its impact on reformed politics both at Westminster and in the constituencies, and its significance to the expansion of the modern British state. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/geography
The 1832 Reform Act was a landmark moment in the development of modern British politics. By overhauling the country's ancient representative system, the legislation reshaped constitutional arrangements at Westminster, reinvigorated political relationships between the center and the provinces, and established the political structures and precedents that both shaped and hindered Britain's slow lurch towards democracy by 1928. Mapping the State: English Boundaries and the 1832 Reform Act (U London Press, 2024) leads to a fundamental rethinking of the 1832 Reform Act by demonstrating how boundary reform and the reconstruction of England's electoral map by the little-known 1831–1832 boundary commission underpinned this turning point in the development of the British political nation. Eschewing traditional approaches to the 1832 Reform Act, it draws from a significant new archival discovery—the working papers of the boundary commission—and a range of innovative quantitative techniques to provide a major reassessment of why and how the 1832 Reform Act passed, its impact on reformed politics both at Westminster and in the constituencies, and its significance to the expansion of the modern British state. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/british-studies
In Season 2 Episode 2 of this series, A. Valerie Mirko, Partner at Armstrong Teasdale and Leader of the firm's Securities Regulation and Litigation Practice, and William Nelson, Director of Public Policy and Associate General Counsel at the Investment Adviser Association, speak with veteran securities litigator, Daniel Sommers, Partner at Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC, about the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PSLRA) as the statute approaches its 30th anniversary this year. The PSLRA marked a sea change for securities class actions, impacting how those cases are brought, who brings them, and how they are decided. Drawing on his more than three-decade career, Daniel addresses with William and Valerie the evolving landscape of securities class actions, the most significant provisions of the PSLRA, what parts of the PSLRA Daniel thinks have worked (and which have not), and recent developments and trends.
Speakers: Professors Daniel Monk (Birkbeck University of London) & Rebecca Probert (University of Exeter)The enactment of the Divorce Reform Act 1969 was a landmark moment in family law. Coming into force in 1971, it had a significant impact on legal practice and was followed by a dramatic increase in divorce rates, reflecting changes in social attitudes.Fifty Year of the Divorce Reform Act 1969 brought together scholars from law, sociology, history, demography, and film and literature, to reflect on the changes to divorce law and practice over the past 50 years, and the changing impact of divorce on different people in society, particularly women. As such, it presents a 'biography' of this important piece of legislation, moving from its conception and birth, through its reception and development, to its imminent demise. Looking to the future, and to the new law introduced by the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020. It hopes to suggest ways for evaluating what makes a 'good' divorce law.Rebecca Probert's research focuses on the law and history of marriage, bigamy, divorce and cohabitation. She is currently working on a history of bigamy from 1604 to the present day. Daniel Monk's research has research has explored a wide range of issues relating to families, children, education and sexuality. His current research is about law and friendship and how to make family law visual.Daniel Monk's research has research has explored a wide range of issues relating to families, children, education and sexuality. His current research is about law and friendship and how to make family law visual.This seminar was co-hosted by the Cambridge Socio-Legal Group, an interdisciplinary discussion forum promoting debate on topical socio-legal issues and empirical research methodology, and the Cambridge Family Law Centre.The CSLG organises and supports events and publications relating to socio-legal research, drawing participants from within the University of Cambridge and around the world. A donation would be instrumental in allowing the Cambridge Socio-Legal Group to continue its cross-disciplinary work:https://www.philanthropy.cam.ac.uk/give-to-cambridge/the-cambridge-socio-legal-group
Speakers: Professors Daniel Monk (Birkbeck University of London) & Rebecca Probert (University of Exeter)The enactment of the Divorce Reform Act 1969 was a landmark moment in family law. Coming into force in 1971, it had a significant impact on legal practice and was followed by a dramatic increase in divorce rates, reflecting changes in social attitudes.Fifty Year of the Divorce Reform Act 1969 brought together scholars from law, sociology, history, demography, and film and literature, to reflect on the changes to divorce law and practice over the past 50 years, and the changing impact of divorce on different people in society, particularly women. As such, it presents a 'biography' of this important piece of legislation, moving from its conception and birth, through its reception and development, to its imminent demise. Looking to the future, and to the new law introduced by the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020. It hopes to suggest ways for evaluating what makes a 'good' divorce law.Rebecca Probert's research focuses on the law and history of marriage, bigamy, divorce and cohabitation. She is currently working on a history of bigamy from 1604 to the present day. Daniel Monk's research has research has explored a wide range of issues relating to families, children, education and sexuality. His current research is about law and friendship and how to make family law visual.Daniel Monk's research has research has explored a wide range of issues relating to families, children, education and sexuality. His current research is about law and friendship and how to make family law visual.This seminar was co-hosted by the Cambridge Socio-Legal Group, an interdisciplinary discussion forum promoting debate on topical socio-legal issues and empirical research methodology, and the Cambridge Family Law Centre.The CSLG organises and supports events and publications relating to socio-legal research, drawing participants from within the University of Cambridge and around the world. A donation would be instrumental in allowing the Cambridge Socio-Legal Group to continue its cross-disciplinary work:https://www.philanthropy.cam.ac.uk/give-to-cambridge/the-cambridge-socio-legal-group
In this episode, learn about the U.S. Energy Permitting Reform Act and how a music class inspired a student to gain new insights on climate change. We also explore how listening enhances climate communication skills. For full show notes, transcript, and links, visit www.cclusa.org/radio Barbara Wankollie's Soundscape: Climate and Colonization Through Sound We highlight Barbara Wankollie, a Liberian political science student at Bucknell University. She created a soundscape reflecting on colonization and Africa's role in the Anthropocene, inspired by Gabrielle Hecht's essay The African Anthropocene. Barbara's piece blends original music with field recordings, starting with rain and drums to symbolize harmony with nature, then shifting to industrial sounds representing colonization's disruption. A powerful moment in her work came from an accidental recording during a trip to Baltimore, where she and her international friends reflected on Black community and identity. This soundscape offers a unique lens on the intersection of climate and colonization. The Nerd Corner: The Energy Permitting Reform Act Dana Nuccitelli unpacks the bipartisan Energy Permitting Reform Act, which aims to streamline clean energy projects while boosting fossil fuel extraction. A "super team" of experts modeled the bill's impact, estimating it could reduce U.S. climate pollution by up to 25% by 2050, with fossil fuel provisions having minimal effect on increasing emissions. This act could play a key role in a cleaner energy future. Resilience Corner: The Power of Listening Tamara Staton explores how deep listening enhances collaboration, reduces stress, and builds emotional resilience, which is crucial for long-term climate action. She connects listening to improved trust, creativity, and support within the climate movement, highlighting its value in both personal and professional resilience.
In this episode, learn about the U.S. Energy Permitting Reform Act and how a music class inspired a student to gain new insights on climate change. We also explore how listening enhances climate communication skills. For full show notes, transcript, and links, visit www.cclusa.org/radio Barbara Wankollie's Soundscape: Climate and Colonization Through Sound We highlight Barbara Wankollie, a Liberian political science student at Bucknell University. She created a soundscape reflecting on colonization and Africa's role in the Anthropocene, inspired by Gabrielle Hecht's essay The African Anthropocene. Barbara's piece blends original music with field recordings, starting with rain and drums to symbolize harmony with nature, then shifting to industrial sounds representing colonization's disruption. A powerful moment in her work came from an accidental recording during a trip to Baltimore, where she and her international friends reflected on Black community and identity. This soundscape offers a unique lens on the intersection of climate and colonization. The Nerd Corner: The Energy Permitting Reform Act Dana Nuccitelli unpacks the bipartisan Energy Permitting Reform Act, which aims to streamline clean energy projects while boosting fossil fuel extraction. A "super team" of experts modeled the bill's impact, estimating it could reduce U.S. climate pollution by up to 25% by 2050, with fossil fuel provisions having minimal effect on increasing emissions. This act could play a key role in a cleaner energy future. Resilience Corner: The Power of Listening Tamara Staton explores how deep listening enhances collaboration, reduces stress, and builds emotional resilience, which is crucial for long-term climate action. She connects listening to improved trust, creativity, and support within the climate movement, highlighting its value in both personal and professional resilience.
Given the wide array of responses the climate advocacy community has had to the introduction of the Energy Permitting Reform Act of 2024, this training will provide volunteers with the supportive mindset and resources to respond to questions earnestly and openly. We'll review an updated resource to help with some general guidance and perspective on how to respectfully engage with others who have critiques regarding one of CCL's policy agenda areas in permitting reform. Skip ahead to the following section(s): (0:00) Intro & Agenda (2:26) Background & Where To Find (11:04) Framework In Action (20:06) Community Engagement Background & Example Tonight's slides: https://cclusa.org/challenging-conversations-permitting Resource: https://community.citizensclimate.org/resources/item/19/564 Training: https://community.citizensclimate.org/topics/clean-energy-permitting-reform/intro-to-permitting-reform
Join CCL's Research Coordinator Dana Nuccitelli for a training that will provide updates to what the emission reductions potential is for the Energy Permitting Reform Act of 2024 based on modeling by Resources For the Future, RMI, Jesse Jenkins, and Third Way. Senators Manchin (I-WV) and Barrasso (R-WY) introduced a bipartisan permitting reform bill called the Energy Permitting Reform Act. This bill is a significant advancement in CCL's clean energy permitting reform policy agenda, that we have been advocating for over the past two years. Skip ahead to the following section(s): (0:00) Intro & Agenda (1:51) What's In The Bill? (5:18) Transmission Provisions (17:06) Fossil Fuel Provisions (29:37) The Bill's Climate Pollution Cuts & Other Concerns Presentation Slides: https://cclusa.org/energy-permitting-slides Research Summary: https://www.thirdway.org/memo/quantifying-the-emissions-impacts-of-the-energy-permitting-reform-act-of-2024 Training Page: https://community.citizensclimate.org/events/item/24/16643 Log Your Training: https://community.citizensclimate.org/log_training?sf_id=a5y8X000000lMgFQAU
ACT Budget with Advocacy for Inclusion ACT. In episode 27 of Disability Reform, Sarah interviews Craig Wallace, Head of Policy at Advocacy for Inclusion, about their analysis of what's in the recent ACT Budget for people with disability. Sarah also reads extracts from the summary they published on their website https://www.advocacyforinclusion.org/whats-in-the-2024-act-budget-for-people-with-disability-a-preliminary-analysis/.
Original Air Date: July 12, 1993Episode 136Website: thefacthunter.comEmail: thefacthunter@mail.comSnail Mail: George Hobbs PO Box 109 Goldsboro, MD 21636
The GSP was approved by the Ways & Means Committee last week. Listen to Two Minutes in Trade for more information on HR 7986.
Tune in to our latest industry insights podcast featuring Miriam OJ, Senior VP of Government Affairs at AARC! Discover the successful journey of the SOAR Act, enhancing oxygen access and reshaping healthcare legislation. Learn about coalition building, advocacy strategies, and the vital role of storytelling in shaping policy. Don't miss out on this engaging discussion on driving change in the respiratory care landscape. Listen now for exclusive behind-the-scenes insights and expert perspectives!
Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-VA), senior member of the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability, joins Bob to talk about the current state of the U.S. Postal Service, as we approach the second anniversary of the Postal Reform Act's enactment into law. At the time of the legislation's development and enactment, Rep. Connolly served as chairman of the Subcommittee on Government Operations, the panel with jurisdiction over the Postal Service. The congressman and Bob discuss postal performance and accountability, and what's the next step to ensure the agency remains vital.
What does a taxidermied man have to do with women getting the vote? Well, as it turns out, quite a lot! The 1800's ushered in a new way of life for everyone and the Industrial Revolution wasn't called that just because of the machines. This new reign of technology heralded in a new era in workers rights or in fact highlighted that...there were none! Pair this with the fact that only 4500 men in England were allowed to vote, this meant working class people had no say in what happened to them and they were angry! However, a new way of thinking was making it's way into parliament and that was because of a now taxidermied man who lived in a case...Today on Macabre London, we uncover the origins of the women's suffrage movement and the path to the universal vote.This is part two in my industrial revolution / Suffragette series - episode one is here: https://youtu.be/X-skf7cLV0E------------------------Podcast: https://podfollow.com/1180202350Macabre London is a fortnightly podcast and YouTube show that delves into London's haunted and gruesome history alongside discovering Macabre mini Mysteries from all over the world!Be sure to check out my other podcast, Killers, Cults & Queens with Cheryl Hole https://podfollow.com/queens---------------------------SUPPORT ME————————ONE OFF DONATIONS: Paypal - paypal.me/macabrelondonKO-FI: ko-fi.com/macabrelondonPATREON: www.patreon.com/macabrelondonAMAZON WISHLIST - http://amzn.eu/dJxEf1VMERCH! - https://macabrelondon-shop.fourthwall.comPATREON - www.patreon.com/macabrelondon——————————-Thank you to our executive producer patrons - Christina, Christophe, Lisa, M, Ravelle, Sally, Sam, Sarah, Terri, Teresa, Vee, VeronicaAnd to all of our wonderful £5 tier patrons...Lindal Victoria ZozoLAMLucy Talli Claire Verena Inge Kim Amy ClaireAndreaKathryn Jo David ShannonCreepy PaperRachelDeniseHelenSabrinaAndrew And thanks to all other patrons too!————————SOCIAL MEDIA---------------------------------------------Insta: @nikkimacabrelondonX: @macabrelondonTikTok: @macabrelondonFacebook: @macabrelondonEmail: macabrelondon@hotmail.comSources-------------https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/lsehistory/2023/03/28/remembering-the-suffragettes-black-friday/#:~:text=Over%20100%20women%20were%20arrested,modern%20day%20Parliament%20in%20colour.https://www.nationaltrust.org.uk/discover/virtual-visit/podcasts/women-and-power-serieshttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilitarianismhttps://www.gov.uk/government/history/past-prime-ministers/james-ramsay-macdonald#:~:text=Born%2012%20October%201866%2C%20James,from%20a%20working%20class%20family.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1842_general_strike#:~:text=The%201842%20general%20strike%2C%20also,to%20South%20Wales%20and%20Cornwall.https://www.parliament.uk/about/living-heritage/transformingsociety/electionsvoting/womenvote/parliamentary-collections/1866-suffrage-petition/presenting-the-petition/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sophia_Duleep_Singhhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reform_Act_1832 Get bonus content on Patreon Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
After being rated as one of the worst places in the country for their youth legal system, Maryland law makers decided to implement an overhaul of said system. After two years of study and advocacy, the state was guilted into action. Now, after less than 18 months in effect, police and prosecutors have convinced law makers into chipping away at the reforms. Today, Hunter is joined once again by the Public Defender of Maryland, Natasha Dartigue, and by Deputy District Public Defender for Baltimore City, Alycia Capozello, to discuss the anecdotes and fear driving legislators towards bad criminal legal policy. Guests: Natasha Dartigue, The Public Defender of the State of Maryland Alycia Capozello, Deputy District Public Defender, Baltimore City, MD Resources: Maryland before the JJRA https://www.baltimoresun.com/2020/12/21/maryland-among-the-worst-in-protecting-kids-in-the-justice-system-commentary/ https://humanrightsforkids.org/wp-content/uploads/State-Ratings-Report_2020.pdf https://southernmarylandchronicle.com/2022/07/09/report-reveals-claims-of-youth-crime-wave-unfounded/ https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/in-maryland-many-juvenile-offenders-languish-in-prison-without-parole JJRA Report https://djs.maryland.gov/Pages/Juvenile-Justice-Reform-Council.aspx Child Interrogation Protection Act https://www.baltimoresun.com/2024/01/16/lawmakers-seek-to-preserve-child-interrogation-protection-act-despite-criticism/#:~:text=Passed%20in%202022%2C%20the%20Child,they%20are%20taken%20into%20custody. https://www.wypr.org/wypr-news/2024-01-18/maryland-black-lawmakers-want-no-changes-to-child-interrogation-protection-act https://www.aclu-md.org/en/press-releases/child-interrogation-protection-act-goes-effect-saturday Current Talks About JJRA https://www.wboc.com/news/growing-calls-for-maryland-to-repeal-controversial-youth-crime-law/article_5d8d7ffe-6889-11ee-b7b3-afd7f826e5d0.html https://www.marylandmatters.org/2024/02/02/juvenile-justice-reform-bill-proposes-tweaks-to-the-system/ Office of the State Public Defender Maryland https://opd.state.md.us/ Contact Hunter Parnell: Publicdefenseless@gmail.com Instagram @PublicDefenselessPodcast Twitter @PDefenselessPod www.publicdefenseless.com Subscribe to the Patron www.patreon.com/PublicDefenselessPodcast Donate on PayPal https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=5KW7WMJWEXTAJ Donate on Stripe https://donate.stripe.com/7sI01tb2v3dwaM8cMN
Matter of Panin, 28 I&N Dec. 771 (BIA 2024)bond; collateral estoppel; INA § 236(a); Bail Reform Act United States v. Ortiz-Orellana, No. 16-4844 (4th Cir. Jan. 10, 2024)crime of violence; VICAR; felony murder; divisibility; means vs. elements; impotance of jury instructions; crime of violenceSponsors and friends of the podcast!Kurzban Kurzban Tetzeli and Pratt P.A.Immigration, serious injury, and business lawyers serving clients in Florida, California, and all over the world for over 40 years.Docketwise"Modern immigration software & case management"Stafi"Remote staffing solutions for businesses of all sizes"Promo Code: stafi2024Get Started! Promo Code: FREEWant to become a patron?Click here to check out our Patreon Page!CONTACT INFORMATIONEmail: kgregg@kktplaw.comFacebook: @immigrationreviewInstagram: @immigrationreviewTwitter: @immreviewAbout your hostCase notesRecent criminal-immigration article (p.18)Featured in San Diego VoyagerDISCLAIMER:Immigration Review® is a podcast made available for educational purposes only. It does not provide legal advice. Rather, it offers general information and insights from publicly available immigration cases. By accessing and listening to the podcast, you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the host. The podcast should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed attorney in your state.MUSIC CREDITS:"Loopster," "Bass Vibes," "Chill Wave," and "Funk Game Loop" Kevin MacLeod - Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 4.0 Support the show
Hogan Lovells Counsel Andrew Eaton and Senior Associate Dervla Simm discuss the interplay between UK financial services regulatory reform and the Government's wider ongoing initiatives to diverge from EU law post-Brexit. The two explore the Financial Services and Markets Act 2023 and the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Act 2023, looking at how these two pivotal pieces of legislation interact with each other in financial services and what this means for businesses in the year ahead.
What is the Government Surveillance Act 2023, and what provisions does it provide? The Patriot Act and the Foreign intelligence surveillance Act. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/stephanie-pierre-louis/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/stephanie-pierre-louis/support
The opinion of the Supreme Court in Health and Hospital Corporation of Marion County v. Talevski (2023) Access Additional resources about this case at oyez.org: https://www.oyez.org/cases/2022/21-806 Follow What SCOTUS Wrote Us for audio of Supreme Court opinions. Anywhere you listen to podcasts.
The opinion of the Supreme Court in Health and Hospital Corporation of Marion County v. Talevski (2023) Access Additional resources about this case at oyez.org: https://www.oyez.org/cases/2022/21-806 Follow What SCOTUS Wrote Us for audio of Supreme Court opinions. Anywhere you listen to podcasts.
What are the coming changes for Postal employees and retirees health benefits and premiums? We find out in this second portion of an interview with Federal Insurance expert, Kerin Barngrover. There are landmark changes coming with the new Postal Health Reform Act. Elizabeth Inman is leading a nationwide campaign to help you, the Federal and Postal employee get educated and manage the changes that are coming soon to one of the nation's largest health programs. You need to be informed so as these changes take place, you can make the best decisions for you and your family. FEBC has the information you need. To watch part one and two of this interview: Part One: https://youtu.be/orCgmHeRvSg Part Two: https://youtu.be/XoIyDA98ObA Subscribe today so you don't miss anything! The Postal Reform Act raises these concerns for Postal & Federal Retirees: 1. Am I going to have enough income in retirement? 2. What if something significant happens to my health? FEBC Online Resources: https://febcnow.com/resource-center • The TSP Calculator: https://febcnow.com/tsp-millionaire-calculator • What is my Risk Number? https://go.riskalyze.com/start-rq Free Download Resources from FEBC: • The TSP Millionaire Book: https://febcnow.com/#formblock • The TSP Risk-Guard Exec Summary: https://febcnow.com/riskguard-form • Six Keys to Understanding the New TSP Mutual Fund Window: https://febcnow.com/landing-tsp-transition • Free 17-point Assessment for Federal Retirement: https://febcnow.com/17-point-assessment Subscribe today for more valuable information and FREE resources. Contact Us: Federal Employee Benefit Coordinators Website: www.FEBCnow.com Call FEBC Offices: (918) 396-5171
What are the coming changes for Postal employees and retirees health benefits and premiums? We find out in this second portion of an interview with Federal Insurance expert, Kerin Barngrover. There are landmark changes coming with the new Postal Health Reform Act. Elizabeth Inman is leading a nationwide campaign to help you, the Federal and Postal employee get educated and manage the changes that are coming soon to one of the nation's largest health programs. You need to be informed so as these changes take place, you can make the best decisions for you and your family. FEBC has the information you need. To listen to part one of this interview, click here:https://youtu.be/orCgmHeRvSgSubscribe today so you don't miss anything! The Postal Reform Act raises these concerns for Postal & Federal Retirees: 1. Am I going to have enough income in retirement? 2. What if something significant happens to my health? FEBC Online Resources: https://febcnow.com/resource-center • The TSP Calculator: https://febcnow.com/tsp-millionaire-calculator • What is my Risk Number? https://go.riskalyze.com/start-rq Free Download Resources from FEBC: • The TSP Millionaire Book: https://febcnow.com/#formblock • The TSP Risk-Guard Exec Summary: https://febcnow.com/riskguard-form • Six Keys to Understanding the New TSP Mutual Fund Window: https://febcnow.com/landing-tsp-transition • Free 17-point Assessment for Federal Retirement: https://febcnow.com/17-point-assessment Subscribe today for more valuable information and FREE resources:Contact Us: Federal Employee Benefit Coordinators Website: www.FEBCnow.com Call FEBC Offices: (918) 396-5171
What are the coming changes for Postal employees and retirees health benefits and premiums? We find out in this first-of-three episodes of the FEBC podcast. Elizabeth Inman has a candid conversation with a senior insurance executive. There are landmark changes coming with the new Postal Health Reform Act. Elizabeth Inman is leading a nationwide campaign to help you, the Federal and Postal employee get educated and manage the changes that are coming soon to one of the nation's largest health programs. You need to be informed so as these changes take place, you can make the best decisions for you and your family. FEBC has the information you need. Subscribe today so you don't miss anything! The Postal Reform Act raises these concerns for Postal & Federal Retirees: 1. Am I going to have enough income in retirement? 2. What if something significant happens to my health? Previous Postal Health Reform Episodes from Season Three: Part One: • Postal Reform–Par... Part Two: • Postal Reform–Par... Part Three: • Postal Reform–Par... Part Four: • Postal Reform–Par... Part Five: • Postal Reform–Par... Part Six: • Postal Reform–Par... Part Seven: • Postal Reform–Par... Part Eight: • Postal Reform–Par... Part Nine: • Who is Bryan Fent... Part Ten: • https://youtu.be/TyBsOJDoxZkFEBC Online Resources: https://febcnow.com/resource-center • The TSP Calculator: https://febcnow.com/tsp-millionaire-c... • What is my Risk Number? https://go.riskalyze.com/start-rq • Free 17-point Assessment for Federal Retirement: https://febcnow.com/17-point-assessment Free Download Resources from FEBC: • The TSP Millionaire Book
Guest: 110 years since The Land Reform Act was passed, Ruth Hall joins Mike as The African Research Chair in Poverty, Land and Agrarian Studies to discuss her studies of the ways that that it shaped the trajectories of most South Africans' lives.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Salisbury, who'd secured his position in the Conservative Party by his clever political work over Gladstone's 1884 Reform Act, was now Prime Minister. But only at the head of a minority government. That wasn't something he could live with for long, since it meant that the Liberals had a Commons majority hanging over his head, ready to kick him out whenever they decided it was time to use their strength against him. The election, when it came, would have nearly three million more voters on the registers than previous time around. Many of them would be Irish, including quite a few Irishmen living in England. So issues to do with the government of Ireland, and in particular Irish Home Rule, would be a key factor in the outcome. Both main parties had contacts with Parnell and his Irish Parliamentary Party. Gladstone, though he had come around to supporting Home Rule himself, encouraged Parnell's conversations with the Conservatives, rather hoping to have them introduce Home Rule rather than having to do so himself, if he came back to office heading a new Liberal government. Salisbury was having none of that since he was opposed to the whole idea of Home Rule. On the other hand, with Irish votes at stake, he didn't mind people thinking he might be considering the possibility. So Parnell spoke to both sides. Then, when the election results were announced, it turned out Gladstone had won but without a majority, with the Conservatives second. Parnell's Irish party had taken 86 seats, the 86 of 86 as they were called, since the parliament only met in 1886. He held the balance of power. In the meantime, a bold action by Gladstone's son with the British press, the so-called Hawarden Kite, had seen the Liberal leader identified as the champion of Home Rule. Parnell could put him back into office. Maybe it was time for him to stop flirting with both sides and commit himself to the Liberals who seemed committed to the goal he was pursuing. Or were they? Illustration: Herbert John Gladstone, First Viscount Gladstone, by Sir Leslie Ward, published in Vanity Fair, 6 May 1882. This is Herbert, Gladstone's son and a Liberal MP, who was responsible for flying the 'Hawarden Kite'.National Portrait Gallery 3288 Music: Bach Partita #2c by J Bu licensed under an Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivatives (aka Music Sharing) 3.0 International License.
After nearly five years in power, the strains inside the second Gladstone government were beginning to show. Indeed, both main parties were having trouble, above all with their respective awkward squads. The Radicals in the Liberal Party were always demanding more and greater reform. Meanwhile, the ‘Fourth Party' launched inside the Conservatives by Lord Randolph Churchill (father of the more famous Winston) demanded more ‘Tory democracy', though it's not clear what that meant, except that it always seemed to lead to the political progress of Churchill himself. With the Reform Act of 1884 as its only major accomplishment, Gladstone's government staggered on towards its end. Both main parties realised that the Irish MPs would be crucial to the formation of a new government after the next election, the first to be held on the basis of the extended electorate brought in by the Reform Act, and both were therefore courting Parnell. He, indeed, worked with the Tories to bring down Gladstone in a Commons vote on a financial question. Then, with Salisbury leading a minority government to cover the time until the new electoral register was complete and an election could be held, Parnell took part in negotiations with both sides, in the hope of advancing his cause of Irish Home Rule. That led to a lot of secret negotiations hidden behind a veil of universal dishonesty. The consequence was that Home Rule was now firmly back on the political agenda. It would be the great issue of the next couple of years. Which, in turn, would make it the determining factor in convulsions about to rock the British political system. Illustration: Lord Randolph Churchill by Harry Furniss.National Portrait Gallery 3559Music: Bach Partita #2c by J Bu licensed under an Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivatives (aka Music Sharing) 3.0 International License.
In this impromptu episode we discuss the unusual and rarely talked about incident of Continental 2574. There is very interesting numerology, where the crash happened, and the "AIR 21 ACT" that was passed by congress just 17 months prior to 9/11. We also discuss Peter Flaherty going rogue at the Berkshire Hathaway annual meeting, and a dire message from SouthernPrepper1. Show notes:Continental Express Flight 2574https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continental_Express_Flight_2574Wendell H. Ford Aviation Investment and Reform Act for the 21st Centuryhttps://www.congress.gov/bill/106th-congress/house-bill/1000The 9/11 Commission Reporthttps://www.9-11commission.gov/report/911Report.pdfFranklin child sex ring: http://cavdef.org/w/index.php?title=Franklin_child_sex_ringNational Legal and Policy Centerhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Legal_and_Policy_CenterWarren Buffetthttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_BuffettThe Giving Pledgehttps://givingpledge.orgSputhernPrepper1 on YouTube: https://youtu.be/TKs4fwhDTng
As the second Gladstone government approached its end, it had little enough to point to as major successes. Some measures had been passed to try to pacify Ireland, but that sad country was still far from reconciled to British rule. There'd been colonial disasters in South Africa and Sudan. There'd been the Labouchère amendment, not perhaps seen as all that significant at the time, but something that would open the doors for eighty years of shameful treatment of gays, leading to Oscar Wilde's imprisonment and Alan Turing's suicide. Then, at last, the government came up with one really major achievement. That was the 1884 Reform Act, which added nearly three million new voters to the electorate. They were all men and still only 60% of them, but it was still a significant advance. Lord Salisbury, who'd got his fingers burned in the painful and ultimately failed campaign to block the Arrears Act for Ireland, this time adopted a cannier approach and worked hard to stiffen up his support. He took the line of refusing to let Reform through the House of Lords, where the Conservatives had a built-in majority, unless it was accompanied by Commons seat redistribution, to mitigate the damaging effect on his party's electoral chances. This time he was successful, reversing the damage to his standing caused by the earlier failure, and putting him in a strong position to become sole leader of the Conservatives when the existing dual leadership with Stafford Northcote ended. Reform had proved successful for both main party leaders. Illustration: Cover of the Reform Act 1884. © ParliamentaryArchive Music: Bach Partita #2c by J Bu licensed under an Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivatives (aka Music Sharing) 3.0 International License.
Mona, Rebecca and Mark are joined by Sam Newbold to discuss the Pitfalls of Phase 2 EB-5 Project Documentation.In this episode, you will be able to: Overcome challenges presented by regulatory changes and program lapses in EB-5 projects.Integrate direct pooled raises with regional center components for successful ventures.Transition from old offerings to new ones while adhering to updated rules.Assess the implications of COVID-19 on the EB-5 market, interest rates, and investment opportunities.Implement fund administration tools effectively to comply with the EB-5 Reform Act. My special guest is Sam Newbold.Have a topic or question you would like covered on a future episode of EB-5 Investment Voice?Let us know over at https://mshahlaw.com/contact-us/ or using the contact details below.Phone: 212-233-7473Email: info@mshahlaw.comTo discover the show notes on this episode as well as other topics, information, and resources; please head over to https://mshahlaw.com/Podcast/
Tuesday on Political Rewind: More voices are calling for Congress to pass a bill that would address police misconduct. The bill passed the U.S. House in 2021 but was never taken up by the Senate. Plus, Southern Democrats urge President Biden and the Democratic National Committee to hold their convention in Atlanta. The panel: Chuck Kuck, @ckuck, immigration attorney Chuck Williams, @chuckwilliams, reporter, WRBL-TV Columbus Kendra King-Momon, political science professor, Oglethorpe University Tamar Hallerman, @TamarHallerman, senior reporter, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution Timestamps: 0:00 - Introductions 2:00 - The latest from Fulton County's election probe and how it impacts Trump's reelection campaign. 8:00 - Pressure on Congress to pass bills addressing police misconduct. 29:00 - President Biden is facing criticism on both sides for his immigration policy. 44:00 - Southern Democrats petition the DNC and Joe Biden to hold their convention in Atlanta. Wednesday on Political Rewind: The Washington Post's Matt Brown joins the panel.
David and Roifield go over the start of UK party politics from Exclusion Crisis to the Great Reform act of 1832 Make the point that the growth of political parties is closely linked to the growth in the power of parliaments in Britain, and the exercise of politics in parliament rather than court, in the public eye (importance of war in that process)What are political parties? A few definitionsParliamentary politics before the Stuarts & the shock of the Civil Wars, & the arrival of adversarial parliaments; the concept of representation & involvement in politicsThe Exclusion crisis and the Glorious Revolutions: The appearance of Whig and Tory, and what they stood forThe Whig Dominance, Hanoverians, Walpole and the unconstitutional office of PMGeorge III and the attempt to turn back the clock – putting the Bute inPitt, the French Revolution and Tory dominance The Great Reform Act & it's impact. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Given that we live in an era roiled by concerns about how democratic supposedly democratic countries actually are and when skepticism abounds about how truly representative our electoral systems are, a scholarly study of debates on many of these issues among leading theorists of democracy in Victorian Britain is just the ticket. That is what is on offer in Gregory Conti's book Parliament the Mirror of the Nation: Representation, Deliberation, and Democracy in Victorian Britain (Cambridge UP, 2019). Conti employs the tools of the fields of political theory and political and intellectual history to render vivid and touching the fierce debates among such well-known figures as John Stuart Mill and Walter Bagehot, as well as “in-between” figures such as Thomas Hare (1806–1891). Fierce in terms of the sometimes cruel lampooning of their respective opponents and touching in that many of the proponents of these proposed reforms (e.g., proportional representation and the single transferable vote) were convinced that their nostrums would usher in a golden age for Britain's parliament and, thereby, the nation. Note, though, that for many of the figures in this book it was the proper workings of Parliament and its capacity for reasoned deliberation that they cared about, not so much democratic processes per se in terms of how representatives got elected to it. Indeed, much of what was advocated was designed to keep certain groups out of Parliament and government generally. For many of the thinkers discussed in this book, Parliament in its member makeup should mirror the composition of the nation at large. This was particularly true of adherents of the variety-of-suffrages theory who pined for the hodgepodge of electoral constituencies (especially those in the countryside that were controlled by aristocrats and which were derisively referred to as “rotten boroughs” or “pocket boroughs”) that prevailed before passage of the Reform Act of 1832. Bagehot was of this school. Others, like Mill and Hare, were enamored of the rather complex system of proportional representation, believing that it would militate against what they saw as the evil of too much power devolving to political parties, which they feared would be dominated by intellectually inferior plebians. The word “swamped” was often used. Finally, there were straight-up democrats such as the future leader of the Labour Party and future prime minister, Ramsay MacDonald, who opposed proportional representation as fundamentally elitist and a hindrance to robust debate and effective government. Conti's book is a fascinating exploration of a relatively neglected period in the history of discourse on what democracies need to thrive, who should be allowed to vote, how voting should be done and whether votes mattered so much as seats in Parliament. There were even arguments that if some people did not get to vote but their interests were represented, that was good enough. Let's hear from Professor Conti himself about this lively period of democracy talk. Hope J. Leman is a grants researcher. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network
Given that we live in an era roiled by concerns about how democratic supposedly democratic countries actually are and when skepticism abounds about how truly representative our electoral systems are, a scholarly study of debates on many of these issues among leading theorists of democracy in Victorian Britain is just the ticket. That is what is on offer in Gregory Conti's book Parliament the Mirror of the Nation: Representation, Deliberation, and Democracy in Victorian Britain (Cambridge UP, 2019). Conti employs the tools of the fields of political theory and political and intellectual history to render vivid and touching the fierce debates among such well-known figures as John Stuart Mill and Walter Bagehot, as well as “in-between” figures such as Thomas Hare (1806–1891). Fierce in terms of the sometimes cruel lampooning of their respective opponents and touching in that many of the proponents of these proposed reforms (e.g., proportional representation and the single transferable vote) were convinced that their nostrums would usher in a golden age for Britain's parliament and, thereby, the nation. Note, though, that for many of the figures in this book it was the proper workings of Parliament and its capacity for reasoned deliberation that they cared about, not so much democratic processes per se in terms of how representatives got elected to it. Indeed, much of what was advocated was designed to keep certain groups out of Parliament and government generally. For many of the thinkers discussed in this book, Parliament in its member makeup should mirror the composition of the nation at large. This was particularly true of adherents of the variety-of-suffrages theory who pined for the hodgepodge of electoral constituencies (especially those in the countryside that were controlled by aristocrats and which were derisively referred to as “rotten boroughs” or “pocket boroughs”) that prevailed before passage of the Reform Act of 1832. Bagehot was of this school. Others, like Mill and Hare, were enamored of the rather complex system of proportional representation, believing that it would militate against what they saw as the evil of too much power devolving to political parties, which they feared would be dominated by intellectually inferior plebians. The word “swamped” was often used. Finally, there were straight-up democrats such as the future leader of the Labour Party and future prime minister, Ramsay MacDonald, who opposed proportional representation as fundamentally elitist and a hindrance to robust debate and effective government. Conti's book is a fascinating exploration of a relatively neglected period in the history of discourse on what democracies need to thrive, who should be allowed to vote, how voting should be done and whether votes mattered so much as seats in Parliament. There were even arguments that if some people did not get to vote but their interests were represented, that was good enough. Let's hear from Professor Conti himself about this lively period of democracy talk. Hope J. Leman is a grants researcher. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/history
Given that we live in an era roiled by concerns about how democratic supposedly democratic countries actually are and when skepticism abounds about how truly representative our electoral systems are, a scholarly study of debates on many of these issues among leading theorists of democracy in Victorian Britain is just the ticket. That is what is on offer in Gregory Conti's book Parliament the Mirror of the Nation: Representation, Deliberation, and Democracy in Victorian Britain (Cambridge UP, 2019). Conti employs the tools of the fields of political theory and political and intellectual history to render vivid and touching the fierce debates among such well-known figures as John Stuart Mill and Walter Bagehot, as well as “in-between” figures such as Thomas Hare (1806–1891). Fierce in terms of the sometimes cruel lampooning of their respective opponents and touching in that many of the proponents of these proposed reforms (e.g., proportional representation and the single transferable vote) were convinced that their nostrums would usher in a golden age for Britain's parliament and, thereby, the nation. Note, though, that for many of the figures in this book it was the proper workings of Parliament and its capacity for reasoned deliberation that they cared about, not so much democratic processes per se in terms of how representatives got elected to it. Indeed, much of what was advocated was designed to keep certain groups out of Parliament and government generally. For many of the thinkers discussed in this book, Parliament in its member makeup should mirror the composition of the nation at large. This was particularly true of adherents of the variety-of-suffrages theory who pined for the hodgepodge of electoral constituencies (especially those in the countryside that were controlled by aristocrats and which were derisively referred to as “rotten boroughs” or “pocket boroughs”) that prevailed before passage of the Reform Act of 1832. Bagehot was of this school. Others, like Mill and Hare, were enamored of the rather complex system of proportional representation, believing that it would militate against what they saw as the evil of too much power devolving to political parties, which they feared would be dominated by intellectually inferior plebians. The word “swamped” was often used. Finally, there were straight-up democrats such as the future leader of the Labour Party and future prime minister, Ramsay MacDonald, who opposed proportional representation as fundamentally elitist and a hindrance to robust debate and effective government. Conti's book is a fascinating exploration of a relatively neglected period in the history of discourse on what democracies need to thrive, who should be allowed to vote, how voting should be done and whether votes mattered so much as seats in Parliament. There were even arguments that if some people did not get to vote but their interests were represented, that was good enough. Let's hear from Professor Conti himself about this lively period of democracy talk. Hope J. Leman is a grants researcher. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science
Given that we live in an era roiled by concerns about how democratic supposedly democratic countries actually are and when skepticism abounds about how truly representative our electoral systems are, a scholarly study of debates on many of these issues among leading theorists of democracy in Victorian Britain is just the ticket. That is what is on offer in Gregory Conti's book Parliament the Mirror of the Nation: Representation, Deliberation, and Democracy in Victorian Britain (Cambridge UP, 2019). Conti employs the tools of the fields of political theory and political and intellectual history to render vivid and touching the fierce debates among such well-known figures as John Stuart Mill and Walter Bagehot, as well as “in-between” figures such as Thomas Hare (1806–1891). Fierce in terms of the sometimes cruel lampooning of their respective opponents and touching in that many of the proponents of these proposed reforms (e.g., proportional representation and the single transferable vote) were convinced that their nostrums would usher in a golden age for Britain's parliament and, thereby, the nation. Note, though, that for many of the figures in this book it was the proper workings of Parliament and its capacity for reasoned deliberation that they cared about, not so much democratic processes per se in terms of how representatives got elected to it. Indeed, much of what was advocated was designed to keep certain groups out of Parliament and government generally. For many of the thinkers discussed in this book, Parliament in its member makeup should mirror the composition of the nation at large. This was particularly true of adherents of the variety-of-suffrages theory who pined for the hodgepodge of electoral constituencies (especially those in the countryside that were controlled by aristocrats and which were derisively referred to as “rotten boroughs” or “pocket boroughs”) that prevailed before passage of the Reform Act of 1832. Bagehot was of this school. Others, like Mill and Hare, were enamored of the rather complex system of proportional representation, believing that it would militate against what they saw as the evil of too much power devolving to political parties, which they feared would be dominated by intellectually inferior plebians. The word “swamped” was often used. Finally, there were straight-up democrats such as the future leader of the Labour Party and future prime minister, Ramsay MacDonald, who opposed proportional representation as fundamentally elitist and a hindrance to robust debate and effective government. Conti's book is a fascinating exploration of a relatively neglected period in the history of discourse on what democracies need to thrive, who should be allowed to vote, how voting should be done and whether votes mattered so much as seats in Parliament. There were even arguments that if some people did not get to vote but their interests were represented, that was good enough. Let's hear from Professor Conti himself about this lively period of democracy talk. Hope J. Leman is a grants researcher. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/intellectual-history
The post Presidential Election Reform Act should win swift congressional approval appeared first on NC Policy Watch.
Aug. 9, 2022 - Sen. Jeremy Cooney, a Rochester Democrat, makes the case for his new legislation, billed as the Health Equity Affordability and Reform Act, which includes a major eligibility expansion for the state's Essential Plan.
The MTA says ridership is still not back to pre-pandemic numbers. Most people say crime is the reason they don't ride. Jake Novack Interview: Novak told Mark that when gas was at $4.00 a gallon in 2007 President Bush dropped some regulations for the oil industry and prices started to drop within a few months.
Michael is joined by Matthew Seligman, a Fellow at Stanford Law School's Constitutional Law Center, as the two discuss the newly introduced Electoral Count Reform Act of 2022 and its implications on America moving forward. Later, Michael answers questions and receives comments from callers on the matter. Original air date 22 July 2022.
Rasmussen asks if Clinton, Romney, Cruz, or Sanders should run again and the results will not surprise you. The defense rested Thursday morning in the trial of Bannon without calling a single witness. A bipartisan group of senators (Rinos) are working to reform the Electoral Count Reform Act, and Fridays Fun Fat Fact.
Last week the President signed into law the Ocean Shipping Reform Act (OSRA). The OSRA is the first major legislation related to the Shipping Act in 20 years. Among other things, the OSRA will help ensure that U.S. shippers are not charged unreasonable fees by carriers and that U.S. exporters will be granted access to cargo unless refusal is explicitly justified.
Twenty years ago Congress was fixated on passing the Bipartisan Campaign Finance Reform (BCFR) Act (2002), as an attempt to prevent special interest groups from corrupting politics. To try to accomplish this, the BCFR Act regulated monetary contributions from special interest groups. The BCFR Act was seriously flawed from the beginning; it put significant restrictions […] The post Federal Election Commission v. Ted Cruz—The Supreme Court strikes down another part of the Bipartisan Campaign Finance Reform Act. appeared first on WebTalkRadio.net.
© 2020-2025 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
