Podcasts about search and seizure

Ever wondered where a traffic stop actually ends, or why a simple order to step out of the car can ignite a constitutional fight? We brought on a rare voice who has lived both sides of the badge—a former highway patrol sergeant turned Harvard Grad attorney, Anthony Bandiero—to demystify search and seizure with plain, usable rules. Together, we press into the places cops and citizens collide: Qualified Immunity, the moment a warning becomes a ticket, what Pennsylvania v. Mims truly permits, and how to handle speech without letting emotion drive enforcement.We move from the curb to the front door and into the yard, where curtilage is the most violated and least understood terrain. You'll hear a clean framework—consent, recognized exception, or warrant—for any search or seizure at a home, plus clear guidance on arrests at a suspect's domicile versus third-party residences under Steagald. We unpack real scenarios: loud backyard parties and exigency, knock-and-talks that drift into unlawful entry, and what “reason to believe” someone is present actually looks like.Then we widen the lens to modern surveillance. Flock cameras, fusion centers, and private feeds don't automatically trigger Katz today, but a mesh of cameras tracking your movement like virtual GPS might. We talk policy, FOIA pitfalls, and how agencies can protect privacy while still solving crime. And yes, we tackle qualified immunity—where it makes sense, where it fails, and why courts should be forced to answer whether a right was violated before awarding immunity. The fix isn't just legal; it's cultural: more training, better articulation, less ego. That's how you cut lawsuits, strengthen cases, and earn trust.If you care about the Fourth Amendment, practical policing, or simply understanding your rights, this conversation delivers clarity without the legal fog. Subscribe, share this episode with a friend who loves a good legal debate, and leave a review with the one rule you think every officer and citizen should know.send us a message! twocopsonedonut@yahoo.comPeregrine.io: Turn your worst detectives into Sherlock Holmes, head to Peregrine.io tell them Two Cops One Donut sent you or direct message me and I'll get you directly connected and skip the salesmen.Support the showPlease see our Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/c/TwoCopsOneDonut Join our Discord!! https://discord.gg/BdjeTEAc *Send us a message! twocopsonedonut@yahoo.com

The Fourth Amendment is the part of the Bill of Rights that prohibits "unreasonable searches and seizures." But — what's unreasonable? That question has fueled a century's worth of court rulings that have dramatically expanded the power of individual police officers in the U.S. Today on the show, how an amendment that was supposed to limit government power has ended up enabling it. This episode originally published in 2024.Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoicesNPR Privacy Policy

The Trends Journal is a weekly magazine analyzing global current events forming future trends. Our mission is to present Facts and Truth over fear and propaganda to help subscribers prepare for What's Next in these increasingly turbulent times. To access our premium content, subscribe to the Trends Journal: https://trendsjournal.com/subscribe Follow Gerald Celente on Twitter: http://twitter.com/geraldcelente Follow Gerald Celente on Facebook: http://facebook.com/gcelente Follow Gerald Celente on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/geraldcelentetrends Follow Gerald Celente on Gab: http://gab.com/geraldcelente Copyright © 2025 Trends Research Institute. All rights reserved.

In this quarterly Legal Chat, self storage attorneys Scott Zucker and Carlos Kaslow tackle the toughest legal challenges operators face in 2025. From military tenants and bankruptcy stays to lean sale objections and law enforcement searches, this conversation dives deep into the real-world scenarios that take storage owners out of the office and into the courtroom. Whether you're a new facility owner or a seasoned operator, this episode will give you clear legal context and practical strategies to protect your business. Topics Covered: When storage owners are forced to go to court Navigating military tenant protections (SCRA) Handling bankruptcies the right way State-specific rules on lien sale objections Search & seizure: When to cooperate with law enforcement You can watch this episode over on the YouTube channel- Watch Episode 5 on YouTube Make sure to subscribe to watch future episodes. Hosts: Carlos Kaslow & Scott Zucker with the Self Storage Legal Network Brought to you by Lighthouse Storage Solutions

This episode corresponds with the Bill of Rights issue of The Houston Lawyer magazine.  It addresses several of the rights in the “bright constellation of rights,” including free speech, bearing arms, protection from unlawful search and seizure, and jury trials. Houston lawyers, academics, and a jury consultant tackle issues associated with these rights. Segments One and Two: Second Amendment Professor Josh Blackman of South Texas College of Law Houston and Professor Martin Levy of Thurgood Marshall School of Law provide different academic perspectives on the historical background of the Second Amendment and recent and upcoming cases that interpret the right and the history related to it.  Segment Three: First Amendment Randy Hiroshige of the Texas Civil Rights project discusses a case involving the First Amendment that is currently being played out in Houston: Food Not Bombs v. City of Houston. It is an ongoing case, and this interview provides the plaintiff's perspective.  The City of Houston did not respond to a request for comment.  BTL Interviewer Rachael Thompson is the interviewer on this segment.Segment Four: Fourth AmendmentLaisha Harris, and Assistant Public Defender in the Felony Trial Division of the Harris County Public Defender's Office, discusses how technology and artificial intelligence impact the rights secured by the Fourth Amendment. Segment Five: Jury Trial Dr. Samantha Holmes of Edge Litigation Consulting, LLC, provides insight into the right to a jury trial from a jury consultant, data scientist, and social psychologist's perspective.  Dr. Holmes also provides some data from her ongoing research relating to the public's perception of our judicial system.  This is the final episode of Season Four of Behind the Lines: The Houston Lawyer Podcast. Thanks so much to our guests, the Editorial Board of The Houston Lawyer magazine, and the Houston Bar Association staff for their work and support throughout the season.  And congratulations to our outgoing Editor in Chief, Liz Malpass, and our incoming Editor in Chief, Andrew Pearce.  Talk to you soon – in Season Five! For full speaker bios, visit The Houston Lawyer (hba.org). To read The Houston Lawyer magazine, visit The Houston Lawyer_home. For more information about the Houston Bar Association, visit Houston Bar Association (hba.org).*The views expressed in this episode do not necessarily reflect the views of The Houston Lawyer Editorial Board or the Houston Bar Association.

The Special Investigative Unit conducted a search and seizure operation at the Desmond Tutu Refugee Centre in Marabastad in Pretoria YESTERDAY (FRIDAY). This after a whistleblower tipped off the Department of Home Affairs to unlawful activities occurring at the centre where officials are allegedly being bribed to issue fraudulent documents to unregistered foreign nationals. The department in partnership with the Special Investigative Unit and the Hawks acquired a search warrant to search the premises of five refugee centres including those in Cape Town, Durban, Musina, Port Elizabeth and Durban. electronic devices, like cellphones and laptops  were confiscated by authorities for further investigation. Lawyers  for Human Rights have welcomed this operation and for further reaction udo Carelse spoke to   the National Director, Wayne Ncube 

The protection against unreasonable search and seizure was in part a reaction against the general warrants issued by the British that so enraged American colonists in the prelude to the Revolution. The Fourth Amendment and state constitutions protect against unreasonable searches and seizures. Center for Civic Education

The Fourth Amendment is the part of the Bill of Rights that prohibits "unreasonable searches and seizures." But — what's unreasonable? That question has fueled a century's worth of court rulings that have dramatically expanded the power of individual police officers in the U.S. Today on the show, how an amendment that was supposed to limit government power has ended up enabling it.To access bonus episodes and listen to Throughline sponsor-free, subscribe to Throughline+ via Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org/throughline.Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoicesNPR Privacy Policy

The Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation (Hawks) YESTERDAY raided SAFA house in a search and seizure operation. The raid follows reports allegations of fraud and theft amounting to R1.3 million. For more Sebenzile Nkambule spoke to Hawks spokesperson Colonel Katlego Mogale...

Join former deputy sheriff Alfred Anderson as he takes us through the murky waters of constitutional rights and police interactions. With his unique insider perspective, Anderson demystifies the legal jargon and empowers listeners with the knowledge to protect their civil liberties. Tune in for a masterclass in understanding the law.

Overview of the Fourth Amendment: The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution is a cornerstone of individual privacy rights within the legal system. It protects citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures by law enforcement. This section will provide a comprehensive overview of the Fourth Amendment, delving into its historical context, the text of the amendment, and its interpretation by the courts. Understanding the Fourth Amendment is essential for grasping the delicate balance between law enforcement's investigative powers and the protection of individual liberties. Warrants and Probable Cause: The issuance of warrants and the requirement of probable cause are critical components of the Fourth Amendment's safeguards. We'll explore the intricacies of obtaining search warrants, the necessity of establishing probable cause—reasonable grounds to believe a crime has been committed—before a warrant is issued, and the role of judges in this process. This section aims to provide a nuanced understanding of how the Fourth Amendment sets the standard for lawful searches conducted with judicial oversight. Exigent Circumstances and Exceptions to Warrant Requirement: While warrants are a fundamental aspect of lawful searches, there are exceptions, especially in exigent circumstances. We'll delve into situations where law enforcement may bypass the warrant requirement due to immediate threats or emergencies. Understanding these exceptions is crucial for appreciating the flexibility built into the Fourth Amendment to address rapidly evolving situations while maintaining constitutional protections. Searches Incident to Arrest and Vehicle Searches: This section focuses on specific scenarios where the Fourth Amendment permits searches without a warrant. Searches incident to arrest, designed to ensure officer safety and prevent the destruction of evidence, will be explored. Additionally, we'll discuss the rules governing searches of vehicles, which balance law enforcement's need to investigate potential criminal activity with individuals' expectations of privacy in their personal spaces. Technological Advances and Privacy: The advent of technology has introduced new challenges to traditional notions of search and seizure. This part of the session will delve into how technological advances, such as electronic surveillance, drones, and data collection, intersect with the Fourth Amendment. We'll discuss landmark cases and evolving legal standards that address the privacy implications of modern technology, emphasizing the dynamic nature of constitutional protections in the digital age. Supreme Court Decisions Shaping Search and Seizure Law: The Supreme Court plays a pivotal role in interpreting the Fourth Amendment. We'll analyze key decisions that have shaped search and seizure law, including landmark cases such as Terry v Ohio, Katz v United States, and recent rulings that reflect the evolving landscape of privacy rights. Understanding these decisions provides insights into how the judiciary navigates the tension between law enforcement needs and individual privacy protections. Summary: Session 6 provides an extensive exploration of the Fourth Amendment and Search and Seizure Law. It begins with establishing the foundational principles of the Fourth Amendment, discussing warrants, probable cause, and the delicate balance between individual privacy and law enforcement's investigative powers. The session then delves into exceptions to the warrant requirement, examining exigent circumstances and scenarios such as searches incident to arrest and vehicle searches. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

What can or cannot be collected by law-enforcement during the course of a search and seizure of your home, your car, your vehicle, your backpack? In this episode of Law With Mr. Lafayette, the exclusionary rule so-called is discussed and explained.

Consent Searches: Waiving Fourth Amendment Rights One exception to the warrant requirement is the consent search. When individuals voluntarily waive their Fourth Amendment rights and grant permission for a search, law enforcement can proceed without a warrant. However, understanding what constitutes valid consent is crucial. We'll examine the requirements and limitations surrounding consent searches. Plain View Doctrine: Unanticipated Discoveries The plain view doctrine allows law enforcement to seize evidence that is in plain view during a lawful observation. We'll explore the parameters of this doctrine and how it applies to situations where law enforcement comes across evidence without actively searching for it. Stop and Frisk: Balancing Officer Safety and Individual Rights Terry v Ohio introduced the "stop and frisk" doctrine, enabling law enforcement to stop and briefly detain an individual if they have reasonable suspicion of criminal activity. This session will delve into the requirements for a valid stop and frisk, emphasizing the delicate balance between officer safety and protecting individuals from unreasonable searches. Border Searches: Balancing National Security and Privacy At the border, the government's interest in protecting national security sometimes clashes with individual privacy rights. We'll explore the scope of border searches, including searches of persons, vehicles, and electronic devices. Recent cases, like United States v Cotterman, have addressed the challenges posed by digital searches at the border. Emerging Issues in Search and Seizure Law: Technology and Privacy The digital age has ushered in new challenges for search and seizure law. How does the Fourth Amendment apply to emerging technologies like drones, facial recognition, and other surveillance tools? We'll discuss recent cases and legal debates surrounding the intersection of technology and privacy rights. International Implications: Extradition and Evidence Search and seizure issues extend beyond national borders, especially in cases involving extradition and the gathering of evidence from foreign jurisdictions. We'll explore how international law intersects with Fourth Amendment principles, considering cases that have tested the limits of extraterritorial searches. Practical Skills: Drafting Search Warrants Understanding the theoretical aspects of search and seizure law is essential, but practical skills are equally crucial. In this extended session, we'll delve into the art of drafting search warrants. What elements are necessary for a warrant to be valid? How can legal professionals ensure that warrants withstand judicial scrutiny? --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Join T, Fortenberry, Gary, and Marty as they discuss headlines of the day.Hillary Called Trump a what? Illegal Search of high school kidsLost Forty Brewing companylifefromthepatio.comWatch us on YouTubeFollow us on TikTok

The Fourth Amendment: Protection Against Unreasonable Searches and Seizures. The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution safeguards individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. Key principles include: Warrants: Generally, the government must obtain a warrant based on probable cause to conduct a search or seizure. Warrants specify the place to be searched and the items or individuals to be seized. Probable Cause: To obtain a warrant or justify a search or seizure without one, law enforcement must have probable cause, which means a reasonable belief that a crime has been or is being committed. Exceptions: There are exceptions to the warrant requirement, such as searches incident to arrest, plain view doctrine, and consent searches. These exceptions are carved out based on the need for law enforcement to act swiftly or when individuals voluntarily consent to searches. The Exclusionary Rule: Deterrence of Unlawful Searches and Seizures. The exclusionary rule is a legal doctrine that prohibits the use of evidence in a criminal trial if it was obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment. Its primary purpose is to deter law enforcement from conducting unlawful searches and seizures. Key points include: Fruit of the Poisonous Tree: The exclusionary rule extends to evidence derived from the initial illegal search or seizure, known as the "fruit of the poisonous tree." If the primary evidence is tainted, so is any evidence subsequently discovered as a result of the illegal action. Good Faith Exception: Evidence may not be excluded if law enforcement acted in good faith based on a warrant they believed to be valid, even if it later turns out to be defective. Standing: To invoke the exclusionary rule, an individual typically must have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the place or item searched or seized. Case Study: United States v Johnson - Application of the Exclusionary Rule. To illustrate the application of the exclusionary rule, let's examine United States v Johnson. In this case, law enforcement conducted a search of the defendant's home without a warrant and discovered incriminating evidence. The defendant argues that the evidence should be excluded because the search violated the Fourth Amendment. Here, the court must determine whether the search was indeed unlawful and whether the evidence should be excluded as "fruit of the poisonous tree." The case underscores the importance of upholding Fourth Amendment protections and the consequences for law enforcement when those rights are violated. Now for question number 1: How do law enforcement officers determine what constitutes probable cause for a search or seizure? Probable cause is typically determined by evaluating the totality of the circumstances. Law enforcement officers must have enough facts and evidence to reasonably believe that a crime has been committed or is being committed. This determination often involves reviewing available information, witness statements, physical evidence, and any other relevant factors. It's a critical step in obtaining a search warrant or justifying a warrantless search or seizure. Now for question number 2: Can the exclusionary rule be applied in civil cases, or is it limited to criminal cases? The exclusionary rule is primarily applied in criminal cases to deter unlawful searches and seizures by law enforcement. Its purpose is to protect individuals' Fourth Amendment rights in the context of criminal prosecutions. However, there are situations where the exclusionary rule might have indirect implications in civil cases, such as when evidence obtained illegally in a criminal case leads to civil liability. Still, its direct application is in the criminal justice system. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

In this session, we will explore the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, a pivotal component of the Bill of Rights. The Fourth Amendment serves as a crucial safeguard against unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. It outlines the conditions under which searches and seizures are considered lawful, emphasizing the importance of warrants and probable cause. Throughout this session, we will delve deep into the Fourth Amendment, dissecting its key provisions, examining landmark Supreme Court cases, and providing real-world examples to illustrate its practical implications. Introduction to the Fourth Amendment. The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution reads as follows: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."* At its core, the Fourth Amendment is designed to protect the privacy and security of individuals against overreach by the government. It establishes a fundamental principle: government officials, including law enforcement officers, cannot search or seize a person's property without a valid reason and proper authorization. Key Elements of the Fourth Amendment. Let's break down the essential elements of the Fourth Amendment: 1. The Right to Be Secure. The Fourth Amendment begins by recognizing the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects. This acknowledgment emphasizes that individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy in various aspects of their lives, including their bodies, homes, personal documents, and belongings. 2. Protection Against Unreasonable Searches and Seizures. The heart of the Fourth Amendment lies in its prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures. This means that government agents, such as law enforcement officers, cannot conduct searches or seizures unless they meet specific legal requirements. 3. Warrants and Probable Cause. The Fourth Amendment establishes a two-part test for the legality of searches and seizures: Warrants: Searches and seizures should generally be authorized by warrants issued by a neutral and detached magistrate. These warrants must meet specific requirements, including a description of the place to be searched and the items or individuals to be seized. Probable Cause: To obtain a warrant or justify a search or seizure without one, law enforcement officers must demonstrate probable cause. This means they must have reasonable grounds to believe that a crime has been committed or that evidence of a crime can be found in the location or on the person to be searched or seized. 4. Specificity. The Fourth Amendment also requires that warrants describe with particularity the place to be searched and the items or individuals to be seized. This ensures that government agents do not engage in general, exploratory searches. 5. Exceptions to the Warrant Requirement. While warrants based on probable cause are the preferred method for conducting searches and seizures, the Fourth Amendment recognizes that certain situations may necessitate exceptions to this rule. Some common exceptions include searches incident to arrest, consent searches, and exigent circumstances. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Public Defender Claire explains how she was able to get her case dismissed after the police unlawfully searched her client. Check out the case law she used here: https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-542.ZO.htmlCONNECT WITH US ON SOCIAL MEDIA FOR ADDITIONAL CONTENT! RATE and REVIEW: https://www.podchaser.com/MembersOfTheJuryTIKTOK: https://www.tiktok.com/@membersofthejury?lang=enINSTAGRAM: https://www.instagram.com/membersofthejury/FACEBOOK:  https://www.facebook.com/MembersoftheJurypodYOUTUBE:  https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCaN3uRTq_zmH_3FKaVbTreATWITTER: https://www.twitter.com/MOTJpodcastWebsite: https://membersofthejury.buzzsprout.com/Music: https://youtu.be/ip-QZ-9JIzIProvided by YouTube by Routenote. “We March Together” – HaxhigeaszyiTunes: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/members-of-the-jury/id1549484183Support the showhttps://membersofthejurypod.com/https://www.facebook.com/MembersoftheJurypodhttps://www.tiktok.com/@membersofthejury?lang=enhttps://www.twitter.com/MOTJpodcastInstagram: @MembersofthejurySupport the showhttps://membersofthejurypod.com/ https://www.facebook.com/MembersoftheJurypod https://www.tiktok.com/@membersofthejury?lang=en https://www.twitter.com/MOTJpodcast Instagram: @Membersofthejury

What is a Plain-View Search and Seizure

Anthony Bandiero is a retired law enforcement officer with a passion for helping other law enforcement officers make better decisions during search and seizure procedures. In this episode Anthony discusses the issues surrounding power, decision-making, and the rising complexities of the current law enforcement climate. Anthony is an attorney and owner of Blue to Gold, a search and seizure law enforcement training company.   Key Takeaways: How Anthony developed a passion for the Fourth Amendment Why the responsibility of law enforcement has changed over the years How Blue and Gold helps officers make educated decisions in nanoseconds Why the next generation of law enforcement is focused on change Quote of the Show (28:00):   “My philosophy after I train these cops is that when they get recorded, they should be thinking to themselves, awesome. I cannot wait to go home to my family and let them know I did my job out there, and I got recorded. Let's turn on YouTube and watch what a great job I did today.”   Join our Anti-PR newsletter where we're keeping a watchful and clever eye on PR trends, PR fails, and interesting news in tech so you don't have to. You're welcome.   Want PR that actually matters? Get 30-minutes of expert advice in a fast-paced, zero-nonsense session from Karla Jo Helms, a veteran Crisis PR and Anti-PR Strategist who knows how to tell your story in the best possible light and get the exposure you need to disrupt your industry. Click here to book your call: https://info.jotopr.com/free-anti-pr-eval   Ways to connect with Anthony Bandiero: Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/anthony-bandiero/ Website: https://www.bluetogold.com/ YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@BluetoGold/videos   Ways to get more Disruption/Interruption:  Amazon Music - https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/eccda84d-4d5b-4c52-ba54-7fd8af3cbe87/disruption-interruption   Apple Podcast - https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/disruption-interruption/id1581985755   Google Play - https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cub21ueWNvbnRlbnQuY29tL2QvcGxheWxpc3QvODE5NjRmY2EtYTQ5OC00NTAyLThjZjktYWI3YzAwMmRiZTM2LzNiZTZiNzJhLWEzODItNDhhNS04MDc5LWFmYTAwMTI2M2FiNi9kZDYzMGE4Mi04ZGI4LTQyMGUtOGNmYi1hZmEwMDEyNjNhZDkvcG9kY2FzdC5yc3M= Spotify - https://open.spotify.com/show/6yGSwcSp8J354awJkCmJlD   Stitcher - https://www.stitcher.com/show/disruption-interruption   See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

YouTube - https://youtu.be/jDMWUKExL5g Criminal Defence Lawyers Joseph Neuberger, Liam Thompson and YouTube personality, legal researcher and host of the UnTrue Crime podcast Diana Davison, sit down and discuss the aftermath of their trials and the emerging and alarming changes to our legal system. A behind the scenes inside look into real courtroom drama. Website: http://www.NotOnRecordpodcast.com Sign up to our email list - http://eepurl.com/hw3g99 Social Media Links Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/NotonRecord Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/notonrecord... TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@notonrecordpo... Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/notonrecord Telegram: https://t.me/NotOnRecord Minds: http://www.minds.com/notonrecord Audio Platforms Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/4F2ssnX... Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast... SoundCloud: https://soundcloud.com/notonrecord Stitcher: www.stitcher.com/podcast/notonrecord Google Play: https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0... Video Platforms Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/NoUC... Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-842207 For more information on criminal law issues go to Neuberger & Partners LLP http://www.nrlawyers.com. Produced by Benjamin Dichter & Max Silverberg

If you have a run-in with the police, they may try to search your person or property or seize your property as evidence of a crime. When is this legal and when is it illegal? Attorney Jay Ruane gets to the bottom of it in this episode and this season of our podcast. For assistance dealing with a potential search and seizure violation, contact our office at 203-925-9200.

In this episode we explore the police powers of search and seizure with Abhinav Sekhri, a criminal lawyer and the author of the wonderful blog Proof of Guilt. During their investigation, law enforcement authorities like the police and customs and tax officials have the power to search our person and property, ranging from homes and godowns to laptops and other electronic devices. They can also seize objects they believe to be incriminating or relevant to their investigation. The exercise of these powers can create very distressing situations for people, especially if they are unaware of their rights. Abhinav helps us understand what the extent of these police powers are and emerging legal developments that may lead to reform.  If you like our podcast do consider supporting us with a donation at the link below: https://www.dakshindia.org/donate/ CREDITS: Host: Anindita Pattanayak This is a Maed in India production. Producer: Nikkethana K Sound Mixing: Lakshman Parsuram Project Supervisor: Shaun Fanthome

An appeals court is preparing to hear arguments from Epic, Apple, the State of California and even the US Department of Justice in the ongoing battle between developers and Apple. Hackers gained access to Uber's systems and we're not sure how bad it was yet. And Nvidia is announcing new GPUs today! See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Audio of the 1967 opinion of the Court in Katz v. United States. Charles Katz was a gambling man. Since he lived in Los Angeles and his bookies lived in Miami and Boston, he placed his bets over the phone. And since all of this was illegal, Mr. Katz placed these phone calls on public pay phones just in case the feds were onto him and decided to tap his phone. Katz wasn't being unduly paranoid, either because the feds were onto him and, in fact, the FBI was a step ahead of him. So, federal agents placed attached recording device to the outside of the phone booths Katz was known to use to place his bets. Katz was indicted on eight counts for the illegal transmission of gambling information from LA to Boston and Miami and subsequently convicted. He appealed, arguing that the recordings could not be used as evidence against him. The Court of Appeals rejected Katz argument since the recording device was not placed inside the phone booth itself, but attached to the outside. When the Supreme Court granted certiorari in this case, the question before them was whether the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures required the agents to first obtain a search warrant to wiretap the public pay phone even though the device technically wasn't a wiretap. In a 7-1 decision, the Court said that it did.   Access this SCOTUS opinion with citations and other helpful information at: https://www.oyez.org/cases/1967/35   Music by Epidemic Sound

President Trump files....and this week's Liberal idiot is....

John Guarnieri hosts a podcast here at the Network called Silver Spear, and he spent eight years protecting President Barack Obama. To say he's a weapon would be light work. He's a Security expert and specialist for Nickleback and Shinedown, and now he interviews guys like Flash Gordan for shits and giggles. He knows EXACTLY how the Secret Service works, and I wanted John to give us his impression of the role of SS and his unfettered thoughts on the FBI threats and the search and seizure at Mar-A-Lago. The Fake Trucker church is no more. They failed to pay rent, like ever, did constructions with no permits, and now they are squatting at St. Brigid's church because they refused to obery the eviction notice. We'll explain.

Seattle SWAT called out to residence for domestic violence call in Beacon Hill. National Review's Andy McCarthy weighs in on the FBI search at Mar-a-Lago. 50 million empty flats in China could be a ticking timebomb. Liz Cheney poised to lose big in her primary tomorrow in Wyoming. // Bryan and producer Greg check the texts. // Chinese dream of home ownership could be crumbling before our eyes. Former President Trump apparently told Merrick Garland he wanted the lower the temperature in the country.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

On Know Your Rights, Danielle McLaughlin discusses our right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure.

Norm only has half the time on this Friday Law and Legitimacy Live. That is the cost of being a full time and highly in-demand attorney. But he makes the most of the hour he has.  Norm opens the segment shadowboxing with Senator Richard Blumenthal's platform that appears to favor a federal police power and lack of accountability over the summer riots of 2020.  Norm spends time giving listeners a crash course the fourth amendment's guarantee against unreasonable searches and seizures. He also discusses the remedy of suppression, a prudential element of law which precludes the admission of evidence gathered pursuant to an unreasonable search.  But is the suppression remedy constitutional? Norm uses his knowledge of legal precedent and pragmatic intellect to persuade listeners that perhaps not.  Like, share, and subscribe! Norm is live every weekday from 12pm ET to 2pm ET on WICC 600AM/107.3FM. Stream Norm live at https://www.wicc600.com/. Follow @PattisPodcast on Twitter!

Norm only has half the time on this Friday Law and Legitimacy Live. That is the cost of being a full time and highly in-demand attorney. But he makes the most of the hour he has.  Norm opens the segment shadowboxing with Senator Richard Blumenthal's platform that appears to favor a federal police power and lack of accountability over the summer riots of 2020.  Norm spends time giving listeners a crash course the fourth amendment's guarantee against unreasonable searches and seizures. He also discusses the remedy of suppression, a prudential element of law which precludes the admission of evidence gathered pursuant to an unreasonable search.  But is the suppression remedy constitutional? Norm uses his knowledge of legal precedent and pragmatic intellect to persuade listeners that perhaps not.  Like, share, and subscribe! Norm is live every weekday from 12pm ET to 2pm ET on WICC 600AM/107.3FM. Stream Norm live at https://www.wicc600.com/. Follow @PattisPodcast on Twitter!

[Note: we recorded this episode before Attorney General Merrick Garland gave a statement about the warrant the FBI received to search Donald Trump's residence at Mar-a-Lago.  In the statement, Garland said the Department of Justice has filed a motion to unseal that warrant and the property receipt. As of right now, we don't know if Trump will support or oppose that motion, but it will be up to a federal judge to decide either way.] Lanae Erickson (Senior Vice President for the Social Policy & Politics Program at Third Way) and Catherine Sanderson (Poler Family Professor of Psychology and Chair of Psychology at Amherst College) join host Ron Steslow to unpack some of the most important stories of the week: (03:00) The FBI's search of Mar-a-Lago (21:20) Republicans' reaction to the search (39:39) Lessons from John Fetterman's campaign to win over rural voters in Pennsylvania [Politicology+ Members Only] Liz Cheney's primary election is next week. Her latest ad attacking Donald Trump features her father, Dick Cheney. // To get your private, ad-free Politicology+ podcast feed with extra episodes, go to politicology.com/plus or subscribe in Apple Podcasts. Follow this week's panel on Twitter: https://twitter.com/RonSteslow https://twitter.com/LanaeErickson https://twitter.com/SandersonSpeaks Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In a development following the controversial raid by federal agents on Donald's Trump's estate in Florida, the US Attorney General Merrick Garland has confirmed he personally approved the FBI search. FBI agents have taken away some documents from the former President's Mar-a-Lago property - but so far the reasons for the search have not been revealed. Mr Garland says the FBI is asking the courts to release details of the warrant which could reveal the reasons for the search, documentation has been filed with the court this morning. Mr Trump's lawyer claims the FBI removed around 12 boxes from the residence. US correspondent Ron Elving has the latest on the search and seizure.

Today on the Brett Winterble Show we continue to discuss the fallout from the raid at Mar-a-Lago this week with attorney and columnist Jonathan Emord. Emord explains why he sees the raid as unlawful despite being approved by a magistrate judge and an "abuse of prosecutorial discretion," + what the possible fallout could be if the documents seized are related to the events of January 6, 2021 and why the matter could be destined for the Supreme Court of the United States. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Professor Buzz Scherr discusses the procedure for search and seizure related to the FBI raid at Mar-a-lago searching for classified documents not returned by President Donald Trump. Learn more about the International Criminal Law and Justice Program at https://law.unh.edu/iclj Get an email when the latest episode releases and never miss our weekly episodes by subscribing on Apple Podcast, Google Play, Stitcher, and Spotify! UNH Franklin Pierce School of Law is now accepting applications for JD and Graduate Programs at https://law.unh.edu  Legal topics include criminal law, federal, classified documents, FBI, Department of Justice, search and seizure

VIN AND SORI GEAR www.teespring.com/stores/the-village-market PAYPAL vinandsorimerch@gmail.com Patreon https://www.patreon.com/Vinandsori MAIL US SOMETHING AT Vin and Sori P.O. Box 7024 Lewiston, Maine 04243 EMAIL US vinandsori@gmail.com MIDDLE AMERICA WITH VIN AND SORI https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCojH...The VillageXchange https://www.amazon.com/s?me=A837LP212... https://www.facebook.com/vinand.sori.9 Vin and Sori P.O. Box 7024 Lewiston, Maine 04243 EMAIL US vinandsori@gmail.com MIDDLE AMERICA WITH VIN AND SORI https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCojH...The VillageXchange https://www.amazon.com/s?me=A837LP212... https://www.facebook.com/vinand.sori.9 --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/conversations-with-vin-and-sori/support

VIN AND SORI GEAR www.teespring.com/stores/the-village-market PAYPAL vinandsorimerch@gmail.com Patreon https://www.patreon.com/Vinandsori MAIL US SOMETHING AT Vin and Sori P.O. Box 7024 Lewiston, Maine 04243 EMAIL US vinandsori@gmail.com MIDDLE AMERICA WITH VIN AND SORI https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCojH... Website https://vinandsori.comFacebook https://www.facebook.com/VinAndSori/Twitter https://twitter.com/VinAndSoriInstagram https://www.instagram.com/vinsoriseven/ Music in this video --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/conversations-with-vin-and-sori/support

Alex Shalom the prolific NJ Supreme Court litigator and  Director of Supreme Court Advocacy at the ACLU-NJ rejoins the podcast to wrap-up a couple of interesting cases decided by the NJ Supreme Court in 2021 and to preview the important cases coming up in 2022.https://www.aclu-nj.org/about/leadership/alexander-shalom#:~:text=Alexander%20Shalom%20is%20Senior%20Supervising,disproportionately%20impact%20people%20of%20color.

Three things to know today Tired of disruption of work?    Why you shouldn't be    Microsoft's launch day is tomorrow, but does anyone know?  AND Search and seizure laws in play with three cases   Want to get the show on your podcast app, or get the written versions of the stories? Subscribe to the Business of Tech: https://www.businessof.tech/   Support the show on Patreon:  https://patreon.com/mspradio/   Want our stuff?  Cool Merch?  Wear “Why Do We Care?” - Visit https://mspradio.myspreadshop.com   Follow us on: Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/mspradionews/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/mspradionews/ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/mspradio/ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/28908079/      

Please join us for our study this week as we look at how the roots of our nation have been pulled up, our founding documents disregarded, and what we can do about it in honor of the Lord. 

The protection against unreasonable search and seizure was in part a reaction against the general warrants issued by the British that so enraged American colonists in the prelude to the Revolution. The Fourth Amendment and state constitutions protect against unreasonable searches and seizures. Center for Civic Education

This episode of the LEGAL ONE Podcast will review the legal parameters of student searches in light of the landmark United States Supreme Court decision in  T.L.O. This will include a review of the legal standard that must be met by school officials to justify a search, a review of the factors related to determining the scope of the search, the due process rights of students and parents and considerations related to searching student belongings, lockers and cars, the different standard applied to searches by law enforcement, and a discussion of how the law on student searches is evolving in the age of social media. Finally, the episode will include a discussion of the importance of schools and parents working together to ensure that all parties understand their rights and obligations related to student searches. http://bit.ly/2OHibhx (View resources discussed during this episode, including available online courses.)

#BIKERS #INSANETHROTTLE #PAGANSMOTORCYCLECLUB Website- http://www.harleyliberty.com Insane Throttle Discord Server- https://discord.gg/kd9JTUfN9t Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXJgel_T8vy6dKmx6vPp2uA/join Pagan Motorcycle Club Member Sentenced understanding search and seizure --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/motorcyclemadhouse/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/motorcyclemadhouse/support

In this segment, I deep dive into Presidential Executive Order 13848. This is the one that allows Trump and his cabinet to China and the Democrats accountable for what's happening. Using the order itself, articles, and other sources I speculate about what may be coming in the next few days. You don't want to be caught off guard! If you would like to donate to our cause please click here: https://www.americanreveille.com/american-reveille-donateEnjoy!Please follow me on Parlor at - http://ow.ly/QNma50AwfEgListen to the ARP on Spotify - http://ow.ly/gOON50zPya7Listen to the ARP on Apple Podcasts - http://ow.ly/Nlsw50zvkUTWatch on Rumble - https://rumble.com/c/c-309065Listen to the ARP on iHeartRADIO - http://ow.ly/eDYB50A7gc8Listen to the ARP on Tune In / Alexa - http://ow.ly/QOH650A7gdcPlease visit the American Reveille Podcast website www.americanreveille.com

We look at the 4th Amendment. What does the right to privacy mean, and what rights do we have as American citizens to protection from an unreasonable search and seizure? What is the difference between “reasonable” and “unreasonable?” What rights do government actors have, both with and without a warrant? Moreover, how are we to understand what is admissible and what isn't in a court of law?

The Vallejo Police Department has a history of violating residents’ Fourth Amendment rights, a lesson Vallejo’s children learn from a young age.

In this podcast, the panelists discuss the landmark decision of Terry v. Ohio, the 4th Amendment, and Stop and Frisk.   

In this episode of SEARCH AND SEIZURE, host Bruce-Alan Barnard explains how the definition of a Fourth Amendment search has changed as well as the direction in which it is trending.  Specifically, Bruce will discuss: The “old-school” trespass definition of a search in Olmstead v. United States (1928). The radically expanded privacy definition of a … Continue reading What is a Fourth Amendment SEARCH? →

Welcome to SEARCH AND SEIZURE … a podcast for law enforcement officers on search and seizure law.  In this introduction, Bruce-Alan Barnard describes what will follow in future episodes.

We start off talking about Uber. Of course Cappin Morgan has never been in an Uber. And Ced had a run in with an Uber Eats driver. Nick Cannon and Eminem are still beefin all these years later. Juice World died. Lizzo showed her ass. Kanye West was looking like the tin man. Why the fuck are all the Wal-Mart employees always walking to the back? We talk about the white vans. We got the best songs of 2019 chosen by the internet. We talk about the doorknob bitch. These hoes have hit a new low. We got fan mail and our annual End of the Year Award categories. Our nominees for each category will be announced next episode. Remember to vote on each category on our twitter page (@powertrippinpod). Follow us on twitter and instagram: @powertrippinpod Like the facebook page: Power Trippin Podcast

Dr. Dan talks to attorney Darryl Brown about Due Process.Darryl R. Brown (2 of 6)Darryl R. Brown (3 of 6)Darryl R. Brown (4 of 6)Darryl R. Brown (5 of 6)Darryl R. Brown (6 of 6)

Dr. Dan talks to attorney Darryl Brown about Due Process.Darryl R. Brown (1 of 6)Darryl R. Brown (3 of 6)Darryl R. Brown (4 of 6)Darryl R. Brown (5 of 6)Darryl R. Brown (6 of 6)

Dr. Dan talks to attorney Darryl Brown about Due Process.Darryl R. Brown (1 of 6)Darryl R. Brown (2 of 6)Darryl R. Brown (4 of 6)Darryl R. Brown (5 of 6)Darryl R. Brown (6 of 6)

Dr. Dan talks to attorney Darryl Brown about Due Process.Darryl R. Brown (1 of 6)Darryl R. Brown (2 of 6)Darryl R. Brown (3 of 6)Darryl R. Brown (5 of 6)Darryl R. Brown (6 of 6)

Dr. Dan talks to attorney Darryl Brown about Due Process.Darryl R. Brown (1 of 6)Darryl R. Brown (2 of 6)Darryl R. Brown (3 of 6)Darryl R. Brown (4 of 6)Darryl R. Brown (6 of 6)

Dr. Dan talks to attorney Darryl Brown about Due Process.Darryl R. Brown (1 of 6)Darryl R. Brown (2 of 6)Darryl R. Brown (3 of 6)Darryl R. Brown (4 of 6)Darryl R. Brown (5 of 6)

***  This is a continuation of yesterdays show that discussed in general various separate areas where the presumption of guilt has taken over, where asset forfeiture, sex allegations like Kavanaugh, and Red Flag laws, were the main ones.  I had a free ranging opening with lots of news before we got to the main topic.  Hong Kong protests, the fact that we have listeners in Afghanistan now, and my replacement poem for the Statue of Liberty.  Josie, regular caller joined us about 25 minutes in.  Lots of topics including her own family who did some in lawfully under asylum laws.  Then I covered Red Flag laws with great detail over several articles starting about 10 minutes before the second hour.  Pianki joined me in the second hour going over these for a bit, and then I got a call from a very special guest.  ***  Gregory Wrightstone, geologist, climate expert, whom I asked to call if he could, talked about the CO2 SHORTAGE!  You heard me.  Also the vast "greening" of the Earth that is going on because of natural CO2.  Man made CO2 isn't enough to mention really, so relax cupcakes, there is no global warming.  Except as it turns out, in all the "cooked" books of the government "experts" who are changing all the numbers and temperatures in the official data to show a warming, where there isn't any, and this is a total fraud.  It was a great show!!! Stay connected by going to the "Action Radio with Greg Penglis" Facebook page:   https://www.facebook.com/radiolegislature/ All Action Radio shows are at:  BlogTalkRadio.com/citizenaction Our citizen bill writing site is:  www.WriteYourLaws.com Podcasts are on iTunes, Stitcher and Tunein - now at:  Action Radio Online with Greg Penglis Twitter is at:  GregPenglis@ActionRadioGP

During this podcast, defense attorney James Doerr discusses the recent decision of Taylor v. Saginaw and the impact it may have on parking enforcement schemes.   

The details of the search and seizure warrant for Mark Vincent's gun arrest are revealed. Also a look at life in the early years.   To support our coverage of the Doreen Vincent cold case, please become a patron on Patreon at www.patreon.com/fadedoutpodcast.

In this episode, Prof. David Dorfman, Professor of Law at the Elisabeth Haub School of Law, explains how to answer a question concerning the right to search and seizure. Professor Dorfman explains the history of the Fourth Amendment and walks us through the relevant case law. The discussion ends with a clear explanation of how to answer a law school exam question concerning police investigation of a GPS system.

In this podcast, defense attorney James R. Doerr discusses the use of drug-sniffing dogs by police, permissible use during traffic stops under the Fourth Amendment, and issues with their use.   

This episode covers a recent United Supreme Court Case regarding the Fourth Amendment. The federal government obtained court orders directing wireless carriers to disclose cell-site location information (CSLI) under the Stored Communications Act (SCA)  for an individual accused of committing crimes across two states. Todd & Craig, discuss the case and the decision by the higher court. Todd, has an ongoing case where Miranda is an issue. The question is when is Miranda appropriate? When does an individual feel that he or she is not free to leave? Great conversation regarding a marijuana case and Miranda. Great Show!! 

Join Grace Matthews and Connor Murphy on today's show: Mueller's Illegal Emails Trump's legal team claims Mueller gained emails unlawfully. Jerry Richardson, owner of Carolina Panthers will sell the team after sex harassment allegations. NBC paid a sex harassment claimant of Chris Matthews. Dustin Hoffman sex assault victims keep coming forward, some underage. What will happened to office romances? Sarah Palin's son arrested on multiple charges, Sarah blames PTSD from serving in Iraq. Power outage at Atlanta airport causes standstill of 13 hours. McCain returns home to Arizona before voting on tax bill. Royal Caribbean trying to sanitize ship after passengers get sick. Washington train derailment, six dead. Kaepernick visits inmates at Riker's to talk police brutality. CEO of ESPN resigns citing substance abuse issues. US base in UK is on lockdown. Pentagon investigating UFOs. For a list of source links, visit http://therightleftchronicles.com/podcasts/1005/dueling-dialogues-podcast-ep-52/

Join Grace Matthews and Connor Murphy on today's show: Mueller's Illegal EmailsTrump's legal team claims Mueller gained emails unlawfully.Jerry Richardson, owner of Carolina Panthers will sell the team after sex harassment allegations.NBC paid a sex harassment claimant of Chris Matthews.Dustin Hoffman sex assault victims keep coming forward, some underage.What will happened to office romances?Sarah Palin's son arrested on multiple charges, Sarah blames PTSD from serving in Iraq.Power outage at Atlanta airport causes standstill of 13 hours.McCain returns home to Arizona before voting on tax bill.Royal Caribbean trying to sanitize ship after passengers get sick.Washington train derailment, six dead.Kaepernick visits inmates at Riker's to talk police brutality.CEO of ESPN resigns citing substance abuse issues.US base in UK is on lockdown.Pentagon investigating UFOs.For a list of source links, visit http://therightleftchronicles.com/podcasts/1005/dueling-dialogues-podcast-ep-52/

Join Grace Matthews and Connor Murphy on today's show: Mueller's Illegal EmailsTrump's legal team claims Mueller gained emails unlawfully.Jerry Richardson, owner of Carolina Panthers will sell the team after sex harassment allegations.NBC paid a sex harassment claimant of Chris Matthews.Dustin Hoffman sex assault victims keep coming forward, some underage.What will happened to office romances?Sarah Palin's son arrested on multiple charges, Sarah blames PTSD from serving in Iraq.Power outage at Atlanta airport causes standstill of 13 hours.McCain returns home to Arizona before voting on tax bill.Royal Caribbean trying to sanitize ship after passengers get sick.Washington train derailment, six dead.Kaepernick visits inmates at Riker's to talk police brutality.CEO of ESPN resigns citing substance abuse issues.US base in UK is on lockdown.Pentagon investigating UFOs.For a list of source links, visit http://therightleftchronicles.com/podcasts/1005/dueling-dialogues-podcast-ep-52/

“Don’t let your struggles define you, you define them,” shares our speaker today Marc Hoberman. He is the author of “Search and Seizure: Overcoming Illness and Adversity.” After suddenly moving from New York to Florida during high school, Marc suffered a grand mal seizure while driving and was diagnosed with epilepsy. Hoberman tells us his story and how he came to terms with this diagnosis while still planning for college. “I am not who I am in spite of my illness, I am who I am because of my illness,” declares Hoberman. Read More... The post THCC98 – Helping Teens Succeed Through Adversity Interview with Marc Hoberman, Author “Search and Seizure: Overcoming Illness and Adversity” appeared first on Taming The High Cost of College.

“Don't let your struggles define you, you define them,” shares our speaker today Marc Hoberman. He is the author of “Search and Seizure: Overcoming Illness and Adversity.” After suddenly moving from New York to Florida during high school, Marc suffered a grand mal seizure while driving and was diagnosed with epilepsy. Hoberman tells us his story and how he came to terms with this diagnosis while still planning for college. “I am not who I am in spite of my illness, I am who I am because of my illness,” declares Hoberman.

“Don’t let your struggles define you, you define them,” shares our speaker today Marc Hoberman. He is the author of “Search and Seizure: Overcoming Illness and Adversity.” After suddenly moving from New York to Florida during high school, Marc suffered a grand mal seizure while driving and was diagnosed with epilepsy. Hoberman tells us his story and how he came to terms with this diagnosis while still planning for college. “I am not who I am in spite of my illness, I am who I am because of my illness,” declares Hoberman. Read More... The post THCC98 – Helping Teens Succeed Through Adversity Interview with Marc Hoberman, Author “Search and Seizure: Overcoming Illness and Adversity” appeared first on Taming The High Cost of College.

TODAY WE WILL BE DISCUSSION SEVERAL TOPICS FROM AROUND THE WORLD AND HERE ON THE UNITED STATES. WILL GOOD LUCK JOHNATHON'S LUCK RUN OUT IN NIGERIA'S PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION U.S. SUPREME COURT, GPS TRACKERS ARE A FORM OF SEARCH AND SEIZURE SHE'S BEEN OUT OF PRISON FOR 20 YEARS AND EMPLOYERS STILL SEE HER AS A CONVICT

People v. Gonzalez-Carrera, 2014 IL App (2d) 130968 (September).  Episode 025 (Duration 15:41) Search and seizure law dark side revealed. Subscribe: Apple | Google | Spotify | Android | RSS | Direct Download APPLE PODCASTS GOOGLE PODCASTS SPOTIFY ANDROID RSS DIRECT DOWNLOAD This is an example of a case with a less than completely honest deputy. Very important facts were withheld […] The post Illinois Search and Seizure Rules Encourage Officers To Withhold Information first appeared on IllinoisCaseLaw.com.

In this edition of the ESI Report, host Gina Jytyla, Managing Staff Attorney in the Legal Technologies division at Kroll Ontrack, welcomes Joe DeMarco, Partner with DeVore & DeMarco LLP and Jason Paroff, Senior Director of Computer Forensics Operations at Kroll Ontrack to discuss a recent case from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, United States v. Comprehensive Drug Testing, Inc. Mr. Demarco and Mr. Paroff will take an in-depth look into the court's analysis, including the potential impact on law enforcement agencies who conduct investigations where digital evidence is at issue. In the Bits & Bytes Legal Analysis segment, Kroll Ontrack Legal Correspondent, Kelly Kubacki will take a look at the discovery order issued in United States v. Sensient Colors, Inc.