Facial feature
POPULARITY
Categories
America's favorite amigo Mike Finoia returns with a story of a gigantic serpent that chose to make a home in his backyard shed. Mike was on the phone with Jay when he first discovered this 10-foot reptile and Jay recorded the call. Jay plays the recorded call into the microphone so the listeners can hear the terror in Mike's every move. | Jay discovers that men lose their eyebrows as they grow older and compares young photos to Bobby now. Jay has fantastic eyebrows but cannot properly use his bidet and Jacob reprimands him for it. | Jay plays public domain music instead of copywritten songs because he claims the suits are cracking down on the Bonfire. Mike Finoia will be performing at Governor's @ McGuire's Comedy Club all weekend in Bohemia, New York. *To hear the full show to go www.siriusxm.com/bonfire to learn more FOLLOW THE CREW ON SOCIAL MEDIA: @thebonfiresxm @louisjohnson @christinemevans @bigjayoakerson @robertkellylive @louwitzkee @jjbwolfSubscribe to SiriusXM Podcasts+ to listen to new episodes of The Bonfire ad-free and a whole week early. Start a free trial now on Apple Podcasts or by visiting siriusxm.com/podcastsplus.
We bleached Kenzies eyebrows! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
A speech is given. Consequences ensue. DiCaprio Devereaux hands out some business cards. Doc Hop tries to stealthily steal while disarmed. Rex Maximus incurs the unholy wrath of a goddess. STARRING - Austin Yorski: https://bsky.app/profile/austinyorski.bsky.social Laura Kate Dale: https://bsky.app/profile/laurakbuzz.bsky.social Quinn Larios: https://bsky.app/profile/rollot.bsky.social SUPPORT - Patreon.com/AustinYorski Patreon.com/LauraKBuzz Patreon.com/WeeklyMangaRecap AUDIO - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MHrF-ZfdwIk Kirby Super Star OC ReMix by TSori & Others: "Until the Next Dance" [Meta Knight: Ending]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aeEvMkYAU1o Katherine Cordova - YouTube Dragon Warrior VII OC ReMix by Bluelighter...: "Deeper in the Heart" [Days of Sadness] (#3762) DISCORD - https://discord.gg/YMU3qUH
Real/Tarded: Our favorite game as we find a Tiktok weirdo and try to figure out if they are real or retarded. Delco Pooper: Lady makes headlines and becomes Internet famous for shitting on a car during a road rage disagreement. Suicide Pod: Would you use the succ machine in the suicide pod THE BEAR!, FUCK YOU, WATCH THIS!, DAVE BLUNTS!, 10 PERCS!, YE!, COUSINS!, REAL OR RETARD!, REALTARDED!, TIKTOK!, FART UP MY NOSE!, FEDERAL WHISTLE BLOWER!, TARD OR REAL!, GANGSTALKED!, PARIS HILTON!, CRAZY!, PUT ON!, BALD!, EYEBROWS!, SHAVED!, MEWING!, SERVING!, HOMELESS!, ASK FOR MONEY!, GREEDY!, DELCO!, REAL!, CRYING!, DELCO POOPER!, SHERIFF!, ROAD RAGE!, DIARRHEA!, SERIOUS!, NO LAUGHING MATTER!, CLOUT!, ATTENTION!, DOO DOO KAREN GOES OFF!, SNEAKO!, KANYE!, PIERS MORGAN!, TROLLING!, WALK OUT!, DICK SIZE!, STREAMERS!, AKADEMIKS!, HH!, HEIL!, REDBAR!, COVER!, VIRAL!, YE CRIED!, SUICIDE POD!, NETHERLANDS!, EUTHANASIA!, SUCK MACHINE!, BLOWJOB MACHINE!, GETTING SUCCED IN THE SUICIDE POD!, ANCHOR PASS OUT!, FAINT!, NEWS!, LIVE! You can find the videos from this episode at our Discord RIGHT HERE!
Send us a textIn Episode #102 of the Tatter-a-fact PMU Podcast, Teryn Darling is back with Kat for a deep dive into your most frequently asked questions in permanent makeup! From aftercare best practices to pigment choices for Fitzpatrick 5 and 6 clients, this episode is jam-packed with real talk, expert advice, and proven techniques from a PMU veteran.Here's what we cover in this episode:✅ PMU Aftercare Tips: What aftercare ointments Teryn uses (and avoids) for brows, eyeliner, lips, and areolas✅ Best Numbing Creams & Anesthetics: What to use now that Face & Body is gone and why we love Microcaine and TAG 45✅ Pigments for Fitz 5 & 6: The safest pigments for darker skin tones, why carbon black can be risky, and choosing organic vs. inorganic pigments✅ Eyeliner Removal with Li-FT®: Can you safely remove bad eyeliner tattoos? Yes and here's how!✅ Blotting for Retention: Why blotting is the #1 aftercare step that artists and clients MUST understand✅ Product Rants, Industry Realness & Giving Grace: A candid talk about pigment bashing, PMU machines, and giving artists and brands the grace they deserveWhether you're a beginner permanent makeup artist or an advanced PMU pro, this episode brings clarity to some of the most confusing (and controversial!) topics in the industry.
Are you curious about how eyebrow hair transplants work—or if they're the right solution for thinning or overplucked brows? In this episode of The Plastic Surgery Revolution, Dr. Steven Davis breaks down everything you need to know about this increasingly popular procedure. From the evolution of beauty trends to the role of advanced hair restoration techniques, this conversation dives into why more people are turning to eyebrow transplants to enhance facial balance and restore confidence. Dr. Davis explains what makes a good candidate, how donor hair is used, and what kind of results patients can expect over time. You'll also hear about the artistry behind shaping brows to complement your natural features and how this procedure fits into a broader trend of personalized aesthetic treatments. Whether you've considered an eyebrow transplant or you're just fascinated by the possibilities of modern cosmetic procedures, this episode delivers real insights in a way that's easy to understand and packed with value.
Rumble Live show! Youtube Live Show! Click for Cookbooks Amazon CBC Store
Listeners! It' election day and I cannot be bothered so it's AI shownotes this week. Enjoy! Hosts: Joel Hill & Dave (Cooker Watcher Supreme)(00:00:00) Introduction & WelcomeJoel welcomes listeners and introduces guest host Dave, replacing Jack the Insider.Shoutout: CB Co Beer for election night viewing. Mention of a competition involving a boat trip.Election Calls to Action:Vote 1 Fiona Patton in the Victorian Senate, preference 2 Purple Pingers.(00:01:48) Tinfoil Tales Follow-Up: The Next Pope?Discussion on cooker theories about the next Pope (King Charles?).Lindsey Graham's tweet suggesting Donald Trump for Pope.00:02:38 Dave reads the tweet.Trump's blue suit vs. Obama's tan suit controversy revisited.Brief thoughts on the late Pope's legacy and potential successor.(00:04:37) Dave's Cooker Report: Cessnock & CPACDave attended a meeting with Joel Jammal ("Eyebrows") in Cessnock (his 8th visit).Jammal debriefed the local unnamed "Freedom Group" (often linked to One Nation) on his CPAC trip.Local Candidates Present:Stuart Bonds (One Nation candidate for Hunter).Jennifer Stefanak (Trumpet of Patriots Newcastle) - Flat Earther, aliens are fallen angels, won NCAT case after dismissal from child services. Not allowed to speak despite attending.Mysterious Host: Christine Stevens, credited by Jammal as "brains behind the Wollongbae Road campaign" (a local road widening project used by cookers).Stevens now campaign manager for Stuart Bonds (referred to as "boss"). Possible links to broader far-right organising.Joel Jammal's Gifts: Rolled-up maps for Cessnock's 6 cooker councillors showing ALP vs. Voice 'No' vote intersections. Maps available for purchase from Jammal.Jammal's CPAC Trip: Won the trip via the "Shark Bites Pitching Contest" at CPAC Australia (Sky paywall).Winners expected to produce content upon return.Included a communication seminar with Steve Bannon.Stuart Bonds' Candidacy (Hunter):Odds discussed ($10 on Sportsbet).Labor's Dan Repacholi favoured ($1.15).Bonds' history: 21% primary in 2019, left One Nation, rejoined. Consistent far-right vote in the region.Bonds' desire to "start a conversation about coal mining" (already ongoing).Discussion on Labor's telehealth plan and cooker opposition.(00:24:07) Trumpism & Dutton's CampaignDiscussion on the "blueprint for Trump 28".Chris LaCivita (Trump advisor) reportedly helped Peter Dutton's campaign. Joel questions the effectiveness given global trends.Mainstream media's difficulty rallying behind Dutton.(00:25:52) Cooker Report Part 2: Gosford & MyPlaceDave attended the Lisa Bellamy independent campaign launch in Gosford.Follow-on from "Coasties Who Care" (MyPlace environmentalist council ticket).Shadowy Figure: Kate Mason (anti-renewable circuit, IPA/Advance events). Launched Bellamy's campaign.Campaign barely mentions climate change, focuses on opposing Aboriginal Land Council developments.Key Figures on Stage:Jake Cassar (musician, prepper).Lisa Bellamy (MyPlace coordinator, seen at Convoy with Kate Mason).Vicki Burke (MyPlace food/water security organiser, believes in aliens/other planets).Group suggests increased One Nation vote would benefit them. Bellamy received ~3000 votes previously.Kate Mason's Agenda: Reshaping the environment movement to focus on conspiracies (15-min cities, anti-meat).Shapeshifted from anti-vax (IMOP) -> Voice 'No' -> Anti-artificial food/Bellamy campaign.Significant Telegram following despite "gobbledygook" posts.Rally vs. Darkinjung Land Council/Woolworths Development: Focus remains on Land Council projects. Racist undertones ("love the land as much as we do").Links to Garingai (now potentially split/rebranded). NRL Welcome to Country discussed.Jake Cassar Deep Dive: Constant self-promotion, minimal concrete environmental vision beyond opposing the Land Council. Attacks Labor/Greens. Right-wing presence at events. Ballarat missing person search (found dog with SES). Yowie encounter at Woy Woy tip. Lack of accountability in Facebook environmental groups (anti-immigration/Aboriginal rhetoric).(00:40:33) Monica Smit's Private Prosecution of Dan AndrewsMonica plans a private criminal prosecution against Dan Andrews (and Jacinta Allan).Website Quote: "The wait is over righteous justice begins now" - Monica Smit.Topher Field involved as cheerleader/promoter.Basis: "New evidence" (Document 34 FOI email) allegedly showing curfew decision made before consulting CHO Brett Sutton. Implication: tyranny, not health advice.Joel suggests it was likely capitulation to police enforcement ease.Fundraising: Claimed $124,605 raised (via manually updated widget). Monica paid herself $1000/week stipend already.Monica's Justification ("Why me?"): Stood toe-to-toe and won, relentless energy, prison time (refused bail), won appeal, resisted database handover, won unlawful arrest case (appealing costs decision), claims past refund integrity, lives simply, no distractions (children/friends).Bender (@SpambotX) Twitter Thread: Brutal takedown of Monica as a "despicable con woman".Highlights Consumer Affairs conviction ($66k pocketed from unregistered fundraiser).Accuses Topher Field of seeking a cut.Details legal failures, self-orchestrated "martyrdom", $250k legal bill after rejecting settlement.Criticises "journalism" and book ("Cell 22").Predicts prosecution failure and abandonment once donations dry up.Bender's Legal Analysis (Round 2):Private prosecution (Crimes Act s 321) needs prima facie case, not conspiracy.Document 34 likely inadmissible hearsay.Misconduct charge needs proof of knowing, malicious law-breaking (R v Quach).Lockdowns upheld (Loielo v Giles), backed by Public Health Act & CHO advice.DPP can shut down frivolous cases (Public Prosecutions Act s 22).Previous treason case tossed out.Criticises fundraising transparency (Fundraising Act 1998), $52k/year salary.Highlights past legal issues (incitement charges dropped, health order conviction, Judge Tran's comments).Past Precedent: 2021 private prosecution for treason (Anthony Herman) recalled - chaotic online hearing.Monica's Timeline & Updates:Initial plan: Assemble legal team by April 24, first meeting April 30.Reality (May 1): No team announced. Video claims it will take "a few weeks" to pick lawyers.Met with a lawyer ($500/hr, 2 hours booked).Posted picture near a waterfall instead of legal updates ("reset and reload").Now targeting Jacinta Allan as well.Promises refund of remaining balance if no prospect of success.Discussion on cooker lawyers (Matouk, Buckley). Monica's motivation seen as attention/clout chasing.(01:17:54) Return to The Cali (Caledonian Hotel, Singleton)Dave attended Pauline Hanson & Stuart Bonds event ($20 lunch that never happened).Low turnout (~45 people in beer garden). Regulars, pensioners, Chris Sky filming, James Ashby present.Stuart Bonds Guardian article discussed (misogyny, anti-vax, "Little Hitlers"). Worn as badge of honour.Homeschooling attempt due to "woke trans agenda".Red Ensign described as "real flag".Unregistered campaign trailer incident.Pauline Hanson: Speech built to "greatest hits" (Aboriginal industry). Mumbles less the longer she speaks.Cali Update: Corruption Whistleblower book sold at bar (credit card accepted). Eureka beer on tap (FJB beer rebranded/gone?). Frenchies brewery connection? Pub seems to be returning to normal operations, but Red Ensign still flies. Food looks good, beer selection poor (Lion Nathan). No coal miners attended the event despite Bonds' background.(01:36:30) Candidates Forum: Patterson (Port Stephens)Dave attended forum; ABC filming due to anti-wind turbine mob presence.Low turnout of protesters (~5 loud individuals). Meryl Swanson (Labor incumbent) well-prepared.Marginal seat: Libs (Lawrence Ancliffe), aligned Independent, One Nation, Trumpet, Family First running against Swanson.History of intimidation (boat incident during Mayoral campaign).Betting odds discussed (Labor $1.66, Coalition $2.37). YouGov poll (Labor 51.8%).Irony: Libs proposed nuclear plant at Port Stephens in 2007.Bizarre Moments:Trumpet candidate Peter Arena: Wind turbines interfere with missile detection; mentioned fighting audience member over wife littering.(01:42:37) Billy Bay vs GAP Feud UpdateDr. William Bay told people not to vote for GAP (Great Australian Party) despite running for them.Rod Culleton's response.Billy Bay's letter to Culleton: Mock SovCit style ("Office of Vexatious Litigants and Spiritual Audits"), demands apology, foot kissing, $8 trillion. Full of threats (librarian grievance, livestream in lab coat, seizing karma balance). Written on GAP letterhead.Feud background (payment disputes) covered previously by Tinfoil Tales.(01:46:51) Amelia Hamer (Liberal, Kooyong) vs The PeopleRecap: Fake renter scandal (owns 2 properties + trust fund beneficiary).A-Frame sign spamming controversy vs Monique Ryan (Teal MP).Council imposed one-sign limit due to safety/obstruction complaints.Liberals took council to Supreme Court over implied freedom of political communication.Court upheld freedom but allowed council safety enforcement (opaque outcome).Likely outcome: confrontations over sign placement. James Patterson claiming victory. Joel predicts local backlash.(01:51:08) Election Odds & PredictionsSportsbet: Labor $1.05, Coalition $9.50.YouGov: Labor 53 / Coalition 47 (2PP). Projecting 84 seats for Labor (75 needed for majority).Dickson (Dutton's seat): YouGov 50.2% LNP / 49.8% ALP. Sportsbet has Dutton favourite ($1.28 vs $3.35).Joel laments betting ban but expresses optimism for Labor win, potential Dutton loss.(01:53:29) Wrap Up & OutroJoel thanks Dave for his "invaluable" and "brave" cooker reporting.Standard Patreon plugs etc. skipped.Sign off & enjoy the election.
CanadaPoli - Canadian Politics from a Canadian Point of View
Jagmeet loses seatPoilievre loses seatMay keeps seat, Freeland, McGuinty Carney wins his seat with 74% of the voteWhy would they steal this election? To get their carbon swap thing going from cop29EU electricity grid down,#Cpd #lpc, #ppc, #ndp, #canadianpolitics, #humor, #funny, #republican, #maga, #mcga,Sign Up for the Full ShowLocals (daily video)Sample Showshttps://canadapoli2.locals.com/ Spotify https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/canadapoli/subscribePrivate Full podcast audio https://canadapoli.com/feed/canadapoliblue/Buy subscriptions here (daily video and audio podcast):https://canadapoli.cm/canadapoli-subscriptions/Me on Telegramhttps://t.me/realCanadaPoliMe on Rumblehttps://rumble.com/user/CanadaPoli Me on Odysseyhttps://odysee.com/@CanadaPoli:f Me on Bitchutehttps://www.bitchute.com/channel/l55JBxrgT3Hf/ Podcast RSShttps://anchor.fm/s/e57706d8/podcast/rsso
The story so far: After shooting himself through the hand with a surprise gun, Dan's in need of medical attention.Hello. Do you like Zu's? You should! This week, we get lost in the incredible, non-stop, zany, over-the-top masterpiece Zu: Warriors from the Magic Mountain. Dan does his best to summarize the plot, but Greg and Eric keep him distracted with cloth magic, eyebrows, and muscle grandpas. Also there's a whole let's-heal-Dan's-hand thing that goes places by the end. It's a whole thing, you'll see.Leave us a 30 second voicemail and if we like it we'll play it on the show: (949) 4-STABBY (949-478-2229)Next movie announced every Wednesday. New episodes every Monday. Follow us on the things: Linktree: https://www.linktr.ee/stabbystabby Instagram: @stabbypod https://www.instagram.com/stabbypod/ Letterboxd: https://boxd.it/dp1AC Merch: https://www.big-other.com/shop/stabby-stabbySend us a text
Testosterone is the single most important hormone for men. It affects everything from physical development—such as muscle mass and bone density—to libido, and even your emotional state by regulating mood and increasing confidence and competitiveness. If you have low testosterone as a man, your quality of life will decline, rapidly. Today, Mark is covering some telltale signs that may indicate low testosterone. If you find that many of these signs apply to you, it might be worth looking into ways to boost your testosterone levels and getting your masculine aggression back. Apply for Mark's 3-Month Coaching Program Here: https://coachmarksing.com/coaching/ Check Out The Perks Program: https://coachmarksing.com/perks/ Follow Mark on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/coachmarksing/ Watch UMP Episodes on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCybix9PZoDgcyyt5hNxPLuw Grab Mark's Free Program: "The Approach Formula": https://www.CoachMarkSing.com/The-Approach-Formula Contact Mark Directly: CoachMarkSing@Gmail.com
On April 18, 2025, Judge Steven Hippler ruled on a motion in limine concerning witness identification in the case of Bryan Kohberger, who is charged with the 2022 murders of four University of Idaho students. The defense sought to exclude testimony from D.M., a surviving roommate, who described the intruder as having "bushy eyebrows." They argued that her observation was unreliable due to factors like intoxication, fatigue, and limited visibility, and that such testimony could unfairly prejudice the jury. However, Judge Hippler denied the motion, stating that D.M.'s description is based on her personal knowledge and is relevant to the case. He emphasized that the credibility of her testimony should be assessed through cross-examination, not pretrial exclusion.The judge acknowledged that while D.M.'s recollection might be limited, her consistent mention of "bushy eyebrows" across multiple interviews adds weight to her account. He noted that the description does not inherently implicate the defendant and does not pose a risk of unfair prejudice that would warrant exclusion under Idaho Rule of Evidence 403. Judge Hippler concluded that it is the jury's responsibility to evaluate the significance of D.M.'s testimony in determining whether Kohberger is the individual she encountered.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource041825+Order+on+Defendants+Motion+in+Limine+RE+Witness+Identification+by+Bushy+Eyebrows.pdf
On April 18, 2025, Judge Steven Hippler ruled on a motion in limine concerning witness identification in the case of Bryan Kohberger, who is charged with the 2022 murders of four University of Idaho students. The defense sought to exclude testimony from D.M., a surviving roommate, who described the intruder as having "bushy eyebrows." They argued that her observation was unreliable due to factors like intoxication, fatigue, and limited visibility, and that such testimony could unfairly prejudice the jury. However, Judge Hippler denied the motion, stating that D.M.'s description is based on her personal knowledge and is relevant to the case. He emphasized that the credibility of her testimony should be assessed through cross-examination, not pretrial exclusion.The judge acknowledged that while D.M.'s recollection might be limited, her consistent mention of "bushy eyebrows" across multiple interviews adds weight to her account. He noted that the description does not inherently implicate the defendant and does not pose a risk of unfair prejudice that would warrant exclusion under Idaho Rule of Evidence 403. Judge Hippler concluded that it is the jury's responsibility to evaluate the significance of D.M.'s testimony in determining whether Kohberger is the individual she encountered.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource041825+Order+on+Defendants+Motion+in+Limine+RE+Witness+Identification+by+Bushy+Eyebrows.pdf
In this episode of Talking Smack 415, Jamie the Great and I chat with permanent makeup artist extraordinaire Andrea Cerini-Fawthrop. Andrea is a licensed esthetician, makeup artist, and certified permanent makeup artist through the American Academy of Micropigmentation, specializing in brow shaping and makeup artistry.We discuss:How growing up in the salon from age 14 inspired Andrea to combine brow shaping, makeup, and her art background to create perfect permanent enhancements tailored to each face.The convenience permanent makeup offers for active lifestyles.The evolution of permanent makeup and how Andrea uses cutting-edge techniques to create hyper-realistic brows to achieve natural-looking results.The profound role permanent makeup plays in helping patients with cancer, thyroid conditions, and female pattern baldness regain confidence and feel like themselves.Andrea's advice: “Don't be afraid of this. It's life-changing. Just research your artist.”See Andrea's phenomenal work on Instagram @browhaus_studio_nj or visit her website at Browhaus Studio. Special shoutout to Kathryn, Andrea's mentor, who kept my and Jamie the Great's brows on point from middle school until I moved to San Francisco. Kathryn continues to help women in Cherry Hill look fabulous.Get active, jump in the ocean, do yoga—and listen to this episode on the way. Imagine how amazing you'll look after microblading or lip blushing!Don't forget to share with friends and family and leave us a review—it helps others find us.Share this episode with your friends and family who love to laugh. Subscribe to Talking Smack 415 and leave us a rating and review so more peeps can find us for laughter and friendship to feed your soul!
On April 18, 2025, Judge Steven Hippler ruled on a motion in limine concerning witness identification in the case of Bryan Kohberger, who is charged with the 2022 murders of four University of Idaho students. The defense sought to exclude testimony from D.M., a surviving roommate, who described the intruder as having "bushy eyebrows." They argued that her observation was unreliable due to factors like intoxication, fatigue, and limited visibility, and that such testimony could unfairly prejudice the jury. However, Judge Hippler denied the motion, stating that D.M.'s description is based on her personal knowledge and is relevant to the case. He emphasized that the credibility of her testimony should be assessed through cross-examination, not pretrial exclusion.The judge acknowledged that while D.M.'s recollection might be limited, her consistent mention of "bushy eyebrows" across multiple interviews adds weight to her account. He noted that the description does not inherently implicate the defendant and does not pose a risk of unfair prejudice that would warrant exclusion under Idaho Rule of Evidence 403. Judge Hippler concluded that it is the jury's responsibility to evaluate the significance of D.M.'s testimony in determining whether Kohberger is the individual she encountered.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource041825+Order+on+Defendants+Motion+in+Limine+RE+Witness+Identification+by+Bushy+Eyebrows.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
On April 18, 2025, Judge Steven Hippler ruled on a motion in limine concerning witness identification in the case of Bryan Kohberger, who is charged with the 2022 murders of four University of Idaho students. The defense sought to exclude testimony from D.M., a surviving roommate, who described the intruder as having "bushy eyebrows." They argued that her observation was unreliable due to factors like intoxication, fatigue, and limited visibility, and that such testimony could unfairly prejudice the jury. However, Judge Hippler denied the motion, stating that D.M.'s description is based on her personal knowledge and is relevant to the case. He emphasized that the credibility of her testimony should be assessed through cross-examination, not pretrial exclusion.The judge acknowledged that while D.M.'s recollection might be limited, her consistent mention of "bushy eyebrows" across multiple interviews adds weight to her account. He noted that the description does not inherently implicate the defendant and does not pose a risk of unfair prejudice that would warrant exclusion under Idaho Rule of Evidence 403. Judge Hippler concluded that it is the jury's responsibility to evaluate the significance of D.M.'s testimony in determining whether Kohberger is the individual she encountered.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource041825+Order+on+Defendants+Motion+in+Limine+RE+Witness+Identification+by+Bushy+Eyebrows.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
On April 18, 2025, Judge Steven Hippler ruled on a motion in limine concerning witness identification in the case of Bryan Kohberger, who is charged with the 2022 murders of four University of Idaho students. The defense sought to exclude testimony from D.M., a surviving roommate, who described the intruder as having "bushy eyebrows." They argued that her observation was unreliable due to factors like intoxication, fatigue, and limited visibility, and that such testimony could unfairly prejudice the jury. However, Judge Hippler denied the motion, stating that D.M.'s description is based on her personal knowledge and is relevant to the case. He emphasized that the credibility of her testimony should be assessed through cross-examination, not pretrial exclusion.The judge acknowledged that while D.M.'s recollection might be limited, her consistent mention of "bushy eyebrows" across multiple interviews adds weight to her account. He noted that the description does not inherently implicate the defendant and does not pose a risk of unfair prejudice that would warrant exclusion under Idaho Rule of Evidence 403. Judge Hippler concluded that it is the jury's responsibility to evaluate the significance of D.M.'s testimony in determining whether Kohberger is the individual she encountered.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource041825+Order+on+Defendants+Motion+in+Limine+RE+Witness+Identification+by+Bushy+Eyebrows.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
On April 18, 2025, Judge Steven Hippler ruled on a motion in limine concerning witness identification in the case of Bryan Kohberger, who is charged with the 2022 murders of four University of Idaho students. The defense sought to exclude testimony from D.M., a surviving roommate, who described the intruder as having "bushy eyebrows." They argued that her observation was unreliable due to factors like intoxication, fatigue, and limited visibility, and that such testimony could unfairly prejudice the jury. However, Judge Hippler denied the motion, stating that D.M.'s description is based on her personal knowledge and is relevant to the case. He emphasized that the credibility of her testimony should be assessed through cross-examination, not pretrial exclusion.The judge acknowledged that while D.M.'s recollection might be limited, her consistent mention of "bushy eyebrows" across multiple interviews adds weight to her account. He noted that the description does not inherently implicate the defendant and does not pose a risk of unfair prejudice that would warrant exclusion under Idaho Rule of Evidence 403. Judge Hippler concluded that it is the jury's responsibility to evaluate the significance of D.M.'s testimony in determining whether Kohberger is the individual she encountered.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource041825+Order+on+Defendants+Motion+in+Limine+RE+Witness+Identification+by+Bushy+Eyebrows.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
In the latest pretrial rulings for Bryan Kohberger's upcoming murder trial, Judge Steven Hippler has made several key decisions. He ruled that testimony from a surviving roommate, who described seeing an intruder with "bushy eyebrows," is admissible. Despite the defense's objections regarding the reliability of this observation, the judge emphasized that the witness's account is consistent and relevant, allowing the jury to assess its credibility. Additionally, Judge Hippler permitted prosecutors to present evidence linking Kohberger to an Amazon purchase of a knife similar to the one believed to have been used in the crime, as well as surveillance footage of a vehicle matching his Hyundai Elantra. Conversely, the judge granted the defense's request to exclude emotionally charged terms like "psychopath" and "sociopath" from the trial proceedings.Regarding Kohberger's mental health, Judge Hippler decided that evidence of his autism spectrum disorder or obsessive-compulsive disorder cannot be introduced to explain his courtroom demeanor unless he chooses to testify. The judge noted that Kohberger's behavior in court has been appropriate and that introducing such evidence without his testimony could confuse the jury. However, if Kohberger testifies, or if his mental health conditions become directly relevant to specific aspects of the case, the court may revisit this decision.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho murders trial judge rules on Bryan Kohberger's autism defense and if roommate can say 'bushy eyebrows' | Daily Mail Online
A judge has ruled that a former roommate of four University of Idaho students, who were tragically murdered in 2022, is allowed to testify about witnessing an intruder with distinctive “bushy eyebrows” around the time of the incident.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
In the latest pretrial rulings for Bryan Kohberger's upcoming murder trial, Judge Steven Hippler has made several key decisions. He ruled that testimony from a surviving roommate, who described seeing an intruder with "bushy eyebrows," is admissible. Despite the defense's objections regarding the reliability of this observation, the judge emphasized that the witness's account is consistent and relevant, allowing the jury to assess its credibility. Additionally, Judge Hippler permitted prosecutors to present evidence linking Kohberger to an Amazon purchase of a knife similar to the one believed to have been used in the crime, as well as surveillance footage of a vehicle matching his Hyundai Elantra. Conversely, the judge granted the defense's request to exclude emotionally charged terms like "psychopath" and "sociopath" from the trial proceedings.Regarding Kohberger's mental health, Judge Hippler decided that evidence of his autism spectrum disorder or obsessive-compulsive disorder cannot be introduced to explain his courtroom demeanor unless he chooses to testify. The judge noted that Kohberger's behavior in court has been appropriate and that introducing such evidence without his testimony could confuse the jury. However, if Kohberger testifies, or if his mental health conditions become directly relevant to specific aspects of the case, the court may revisit this decision.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho murders trial judge rules on Bryan Kohberger's autism defense and if roommate can say 'bushy eyebrows' | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Judge Hippler's Decisions Are Raising Eyebrows In Idaho Murder Case #judgehippler #bryankohberger #idaho4update In a stunning turn of events, Judge Hippler's Idaho murder case rulings have left many in shock. From controversial decisions to eyebrow-raising statements, the judge's actions have sparked widespread debate and outrage. In this video, we delve into the details of the case and examine the implications of Judge Hippler's rulings.
In the latest pretrial rulings for Bryan Kohberger's upcoming murder trial, Judge Steven Hippler has made several key decisions. He ruled that testimony from a surviving roommate, who described seeing an intruder with "bushy eyebrows," is admissible. Despite the defense's objections regarding the reliability of this observation, the judge emphasized that the witness's account is consistent and relevant, allowing the jury to assess its credibility. Additionally, Judge Hippler permitted prosecutors to present evidence linking Kohberger to an Amazon purchase of a knife similar to the one believed to have been used in the crime, as well as surveillance footage of a vehicle matching his Hyundai Elantra. Conversely, the judge granted the defense's request to exclude emotionally charged terms like "psychopath" and "sociopath" from the trial proceedings.Regarding Kohberger's mental health, Judge Hippler decided that evidence of his autism spectrum disorder or obsessive-compulsive disorder cannot be introduced to explain his courtroom demeanor unless he chooses to testify. The judge noted that Kohberger's behavior in court has been appropriate and that introducing such evidence without his testimony could confuse the jury. However, if Kohberger testifies, or if his mental health conditions become directly relevant to specific aspects of the case, the court may revisit this decision.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho murders trial judge rules on Bryan Kohberger's autism defense and if roommate can say 'bushy eyebrows' | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
The Sex Tapes continueBy LiminallySpaced. Listen to the Podcast at Explicit Novels.Sandy looked at her gorgeous friend. Sandy loved her, truly; as did Don; and they both wanted so badly for her to be happy. They had all been friends for so long. Sandy thought back to the night they met, to the experience the three of them shared, and she felt something tingle inside her. It wasn't the first time she had thought about it, in fact there were many nights where she and Don would relive those events as they made love. They would sometimes expand on them, fantasize about them, and even though they never said it out loud, there was one element always missing."What if,” Sandy considered, “what if it wasn't with someone new?" Her hand went to Don's thigh. She felt him choke on his drink.The silence was deafening. Sandy tried not to squirm, to worry about what she might have just suggested. The next thing Kelly said was going to be extremely important."What do you mean?" Kelly said.They all knew exactly what Sandy meant.Kelly hadn't run screaming from the room though, and that was a good sign to Sandy."I mean, um, what I mean is,” for once Sandy was tongue tied. Despite their experience with other people, other couples even, Sandy wasn't sure how to proceed. This wasn't some random hook up, this was her best friend. Her best friend and her husband; the two people she loved most in the world.The two people she loved most.Looking her best friend in the eye she knew there was only one thing she could say. Sandy took one last big gulp of her drink, and slowly melted off the couch, down to her knees in front of her husband.Kelly still didn't move.Sandy's hands danced around Don's belt. She looked at her husband with her dark, seductive eyes. He nodded almost imperceptibly in approval.Kelly shifted in anticipation as Sandy's hands adeptly worked Don's belt and zipper. She tried to play it cool, but couldn't stifle a small gasp when her eyes took in the sight of Don's exposed cock. Thick, hard, and wonderful, it was exactly as she remembered it.Sandy warmed at the sigh her husband let out as her fingers danced up and down his length. Then she turned to Kelly. Instantly she was transported back in time to that night they all first met. This time, however, there was so much more between the three of them. So many years of love and friendship. She could see the flushing in her friend's chest already, and this time she knew the answer to the question even before she asked it."You wanna join us?"Kelly's throat was dry, probably because all the moisture in her body had been redirected between her legs. This felt wrong, it felt taboo, but good God, she was drenched. She had replayed that night they met over and over in her mind over the years, using the images and sounds burned into her memory as fuel for countless self-induced orgasms. She played out fantasies and scenarios about what would have happened if she had said yes to their invitation.She even told Pete about it once while they were making love. She rode on top of him, slowly grinding on his cock as she recounted every detail of the evening. Pete spurred her on with lewd, probing questions that only made her wetter, and him harder. Finally, just before they exploded together in mutual orgasm, he asked her if she wished she had accepted. Through ragged breaths and the beginnings of full-body spasms she choked out "Yes!"It became a fantasy they would play out from time to time, especially on nights the two hung out with Sandy and Don. After a nice night out, Kelly and Pete would retire to their bedroom, and on more than one occasion, while Kelly was sucking his dick, Pete would instruct her to close her eyes and imagine the cock in her mouth was Don's. It always had the desired effect, and Kelly's orgasms were always extra hard.Kelly sat there, eyes darting back and forth from Sandy, to Don, to Don's cock, to Sandy, for what felt like an eternity. She reached up and undid another button from her shirt, revealing the top of her cleavage.Don's cock throbbed.Sandy smiled.She doesn't remember moving, but all at once Kelly was on her knees next to Sandy, in front of Don's hard, straining erection. Her hand floated up. Her body suddenly flashed with hot electricity as her fingers brushed its firm, hot skin.Her eyes turned toward the throbbing member, and she licked her lips."Go ahead," Sandy's voice floated into Kelly's ear.Kelly gripped the bottom of Don's shaft gently, but firmly, parted her lips, and dropped her wet mouth over the head of Don's cock.All three of them groaned at the same time.A devilish smile of disbelief was on Sandy's face as she watched her best friend take her husband's cock in and out of her mouth. Judging by the look on Don's face, he couldn't believe it either.Kelly savored every inch of that cock. This had been a long time coming, and she wanted to experience it fully. Her cunt throbbed, wet and desperate, and she felt her body heating up with lust. This cock felt so good in her mouth. Not just because it was Don's cock, but because it was a good cock too. It was satisfying. Sliding up and down on it, practically drooling, she began to think of other ways it could be satisfying. She felt her cunt buzz again.In a feverish, lustful haze, Kelly regained awareness of her surroundings all of a sudden, and pulled all the way off Don's slippery rod with a loud pop. She sat back on her ankles, breath ragged. She coyly wiped her mouth, and then looked at her two friends."I'm sorry," she said between breaths, trying to regain composure. Sandy began to form a statement meant to reassure Kelly she did nothing wrong, but was stopped as Kelly finished her thought: "I didn't even offer you any."Sandy smiled, and leaned in, taking her husband's cock into her mouth herself.Kelly watched Sandy bob on Don's cock. She had never fully appreciated how sexy her friend was, but now she had a front row seat. She felt her cunt flood, and her nipples ache. Intense heat flooded her body, and without even realizing it, Kelly began unbuttoning the remaining buttons on her blouse.Don's gaze left the wet, pleasureful ministrations of his wife's mouth, and bounced over to Kelly as she removed her shirt. His cock surged; he had wanted to see those breasts ever since the night they met. Pale, supple, smaller than Sandy's but still substantial, Don's mouth (and cock) began to drool slightly. The tops of her globes held high and firm by a tasteful bra, deep breaths made them heave and push against the fabric. Her cleavage looked deep and tight, and Don fantasized about what it might feel like to slide himself between them. Pleasure boiled deep inside him.Sandy stopped her wet worship to watch the show as well, her thoughts coming very close to those of her husband, and used the opportunity to pass his cock back to her horny friend. Kelly didn't hesitate, sliding back into position, but a low croak from Don's throat stopped her before her mouth slipped back down his length"Wait," he croaked, the two gorgeous women turning quickly to check in with him, surprised to hear his hesitation. Don looked down at Kelly's big, doe eyes, her tongue idly working the edge of her lip in anticipation, and managed to get out two words: "bra too?"Sandy and Kelly both began to chuckle, and Kelly whispered back a syrupy "sure, Don, whatever you want."Those last three words sent a chill through Don's body, and he and his wife both watched in rapt attention as their friend reached up with one hand, unhooked the clasp, and let her bra slide down her arms and off her body.Don let out a low, appreciative moan. They were everything he had hoped for. Taking his cock back in her hands, slowly stroking him, Kelly gave him a moment to admire her free, naked breasts. She could tell by the locked gaze and slight smirk that he liked what he saw. And Kelly liked showing him, too. She liked the feeling of his eyes on her tits, it made her feel sexy. It made her feel wanted.Most of all it made her wetter than she'd been in years. Feeling the tingle of desire running through her, she leaned forward, and took Don's cock back into her mouth.Sandy watched her friend desperately devour her husband's penis, and made a decision. She slipped her own shirt off, followed quickly by her own bra, letting her two massive breasts swing free. Climbing back up onto the couch, she tucked herself in right next to her moaning, gasping husband, made sure her tits were in squeezing distance should he feel the need, and began lovingly stroking his chest and stomach as they both watched Kelly work.This was her night. She needed this. Sandy wanted her to have what she needed.The over stimulation of Kelly's mouth and Sandy's body was too much, and suddenly Don began to shiver and convulse.Kelly's tongue passed over the fat, smooth head of Don's cock and felt it flare. His balls pulled tight, and his cock grew even harder in her hands. Kelly smiled to herself.Sandy watched, her eyes darting back between her desperate, sucking friend, and her writhing, spasming husband. She squeezed her legs together, sending a bolt of pleasure through her body. A smile pulled at her lips as her best friend summoned a hard orgasm out of the man she loved. "That's it, baby, that's it," was all she said. She didn't know which one she was saying it to.Kelly felt a final strong surge in Don's shaft and then moaned as he began to fill her mouth with hot cum. She sucked and stroked, happily swallowing everything she was gifted. This was the first time in three years she had made a man cum. She was happy it was Don. His semen tasted good. She wanted it inside her.Eventually the pulses slowed, the spasms stopped, and all three felt their breathing return to normal. Kelly slowed the sweet suckling of her lips, and gently disengaged from Don's wilting member, a thin viscous strand of their shared fluids desperately clinging between her lips and his tip.Kelly modestly brought a hand to her mouth as she swallowed the last of Don's load, and the three friends sat in stunned silence, trying to figure out what just happened."Now what?" Kelly said, looking at the two of them. It was a loaded question, for sure.After considering the question for a moment, Sandy stood up. She looked down at her spent husband, and her clearly still horny best friend. Reaching down, she took Don's hand, then after a moment reached for Kelly's as well.The two new lovers stood up. Sandy leaned in and kissed Don hard, then did the same to Kelly. She could taste his semen on her lips."Round two." She said with a smile. She turned, and led her husband and her best friend by their hands into the bedroom.The erotic evening of discovery continued. Despite overwhelming feelings of lust and arousal at the lips of her friend, Kelly drew the line of exploration with Sandy at kissing (at least for this first night). This didn't limit their activities, however, as the two shared Don's recuperating cock between them, sucking, kissing, licking and stroking him back to rejuvenated hardness. It didn't take him long to get there, and pretty soon Don was fully hard and throbbing, thanks to the loving mouths of his wife and her best friend.He felt a certain sense of disbelief as soon the scene from the couch was mirrored in the bedroom, only this time Sandy was tucked in tightly to Kelly's side as Don pleasured Kelly with his tongue."Enough," Kelly said, "I want it. I need it."Kelly held her best friend tight. She could feel Sandy's nipples pressing into the side of her own breast. Her body tingled. Her breasts heaved atop wanton, nervous breaths as Don rose up from between her legs.His hands spread her thighs, and then lined up the thick flared head of his cock with her dripping cunt. He teased her for only a moment, spreading her juices around his tip, and then slowly pushed.Kelly felt Sandy's lips on her neck, and hands on her breasts as Don became the first man to enter her in three years.Her body was inflamed with sensation, and Sandy held her tight, guiding her through the feelings as Don thrust deeply and rhythmically.Soon Kelly writhed and shook, her breathing becoming ragged and labored, as orgasm seized control of her from head to toe. The image of Kelly cumming on his cock was too much, and Don too began to buck and shake. He pushed deep into Kelly's gasping tunnel and emptied himself into her warm center.Sandy gasped and cried out in joy as the two people she loved most shared such a beautiful, intimate moment.The three lovers collapsed into each other, a delirious, giggling tangle of vibrating flesh. Soon the wheel of pleasure slowly turned, and now it was Kelly pressed tight to Sandy as Don's tongue and fingers drove her toward ultimate pleasure.Her fingers danced over Sandy's steaming body. She had never touched another woman like this before. It was exciting and scary all at once. Soon she felt her best friend's body tremble, and shake, and heard the cries and moans of her pleasure. Kelly leaned in close, feeling the ragged breath of Sandy's orgasm on her cheek, and kissed her best friend.Sandy's body exploded in pleasure, an electric current of lust and love formed by Kelly's lips on her mouth and Don's lips on her cunt.The three lay together for a long while, each fully satisfied. Kelly knew things were changing, but somehow she also felt like this was how it was always supposed to be. Her thoughts drifted to the future; what this would be, where it would go, what other pleasures and experiences might be in store. She was ready for them. She wanted them. She wanted to have them with Sandy and Don."I think I have a lot of questions," she said finally, feeling Sandy's large breast sit heavy in her hand."I think we have a lot to tell you." Sandy chuckled."I can't wait." Kelly said, a smile beaming.Basking in the glow of her newfound satisfaction, Kelly's eyes lazily drifted across the room. She took in her surroundings, until her eyes caught the big lens of a home video camera on a tripod, pointed toward the bed."What's that for?"Chapter 22: Tim finishes watching the video"No, nope, nuh-uh, no way," I said, pacing back and forth across the living room. I was in shock.My upstairs neighbors and longtime family friends Sandy and Don had asked me to house sit for them. I had planned on a pretty quiet night until my best friend Tara had joined me. This led to us accidentally discovering a treasure trove of Sandy and Don's personal, explicit, home sex videos. This wasn't entirely surprising, given what I knew about Sandy and Don's rather adventurous sex life, and the first half of the video we chose to explore lived up to that expectation as it featured Sandy both sucking and cumming on a cock that didn't belong to her husband. It was the second half, however, that caught me so off guard; the part of the video we currently had paused; the part where Sandy took the camera into the bedroom and revealed her best friend bouncing enthusiastically on Don's dick.Her best friend who also just so happened to be my step mother Kelly."No, I don't, how is this possible? How could she,” I couldn't form a coherent thought. Kelly hadn't been on even a single date since my father died, and was a devout, church-going Christian, to boot. I could not reconcile that the sweaty, smiling woman with Don's thick cock up inside her was Kelly. I just couldn't."I mean, she's still a woman," Tara said, "everybody's got needs, right?""This isn't NEEDS, Tara, this is, GROUP Sex!" I practically shouted."I don't know, Miller," she said, a lusty smile on her face, "I think it's pretty cool, actually. Girl knows what she wants and goes out and gets it."I just stood there, aghast and livid, hands on my hips, shaking my head. Tara began to giggle."This isn't funny!" I croaked, but all she did was laugh harder.
Prince Harry is back in the UK — but not for tea with Charles. Mark Consuelos may be baring it all for fashion — but behind the scenes, ABC executives are baring their teeth. Actor Adam Mondschein, who played the OBGYN in the now-infamous birth scene, is speaking out — and he’s not holding back. Don't forget to vote in today's poll on Twitter at @naughtynicerob or in our Facebook group.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
George Clooney hit the red-carpet solo at the opening of his passion project, Good Night, and Good Luck, Thursday night in NYC — with no Amal in sight. Music icon Sir Elton John, 78, quietly relied on a teleprompter to guide him through SNL. The Gronk dove into revealing territory — casually chatting about who’s packing what in post-game showers. Rob is joined by his dear pal Garrett Vogel from Elvis Duran and the Morning Show with all the scoop. Don't forget to vote in today's poll on Twitter at @naughtynicerob or in our Facebook group. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
- Who hates on eyebrows??
This episode, Hannah and Amber dive deep into Heir of Fire, chapters 24-26. *This podcast contains spoilers for the entire TOG series, more specific time stamps provided for other SJM series provided below. Episode Outline: What's Bookin' Good Lookin: 5:30 Chapter Recaps: 12:30Glass Reflections: 47:00Wyrd Gate Theories: 51:00Book Recs:The Dawn of the Cursed Queen by Amber V Nicole, The Ravenhood Series by Kate Stewart, In the Likely Event by Rebecca Yarros, The Seven Husbands of Evelyn Hugo by Taylor Jenkins Reid As always, thank you for being a part of our book club! Please be sure to rate and review the pod!Patreon: patreon.com/HouseofWindBookClubAudible Trial: www.audibletrial.com/houseofwindEmail us your theories or questions: houseofwindpodcast@gmail.comTheme Music: Age of Mythology by Feysilian Studios*The story and all characters portrayed in voiceover intro as well as discussed in the podcast belong to Sarah J Maas*
In Case Number CR01-24-31665, defendant Bryan C. Kohberger has filed a reply to the State's response concerning his Motion in Limine #7, which seeks to exclude testimony related to a witness's identification of the intruder based on "bushy eyebrows." The defense argues that such testimony is highly subjective and could lead to wrongful convictions, emphasizing that mistaken identifications have historically been a leading cause of such outcomes in the United States. They contend that allowing the witness, referred to as D.M., to describe the intruder's "bushy eyebrows" would be tantamount to an in-court identification of Kohberger, which they believe is inappropriate given the circumstances.Furthermore, the defense highlights that D.M. has a personal interest in drawing eyes and eyebrows, suggesting that her focus on this feature may not be a reliable basis for identification. They also point out that D.M. was interviewed multiple times by law enforcement, and her descriptions evolved over these interviews, raising concerns about the consistency and reliability of her testimony. The defense asserts that admitting such subjective identification could unfairly prejudice the jury and undermine Kohberger's right to a fair trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Ty ABecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
For Pete's Sake 03.29.25 - Three of the Most Important Stories of the week -Selena Gomez's fiance finally gives in & trims up the bushy eyebrows -NBC is already selling commercials for Super Bowl LX (SB 60)-If you're single, using a dating app, and can't cook, your chances of getting chosen just went way doooowwwn To subscribe to The Pete McMurray Show Podcast just click here
In Case Number CR01-24-31665, defendant Bryan C. Kohberger has filed a reply to the State's response concerning his Motion in Limine #7, which seeks to exclude testimony related to a witness's identification of the intruder based on "bushy eyebrows." The defense argues that such testimony is highly subjective and could lead to wrongful convictions, emphasizing that mistaken identifications have historically been a leading cause of such outcomes in the United States. They contend that allowing the witness, referred to as D.M., to describe the intruder's "bushy eyebrows" would be tantamount to an in-court identification of Kohberger, which they believe is inappropriate given the circumstances.Furthermore, the defense highlights that D.M. has a personal interest in drawing eyes and eyebrows, suggesting that her focus on this feature may not be a reliable basis for identification. They also point out that D.M. was interviewed multiple times by law enforcement, and her descriptions evolved over these interviews, raising concerns about the consistency and reliability of her testimony. The defense asserts that admitting such subjective identification could unfairly prejudice the jury and undermine Kohberger's right to a fair trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Ty ABecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
Bryan Kohberger goes on trial this summer for the fatal stabbings of Kaylee Goncalves, 21, Madison Mogen, 21, Xana Kernodle, 20, and Ethan Chapin, 20 in Moscow, Idaho. The four University of Idaho students were found dead on November 13, 2022. Kohberger refused to plead to the charges in an Idaho state court, so a not guilty verdict was entered on his behalf. Prosecutors filed a large amount of information about evidence they plan to present to the murder trial. On March 17, deputy prosecutor Ashley Jennings filed information about four exhibits she intends to file to show that Kohberger had bushy eyebrows at the time of the murder. This is now a key focus after a surviving witness in the house where the students were murdered described seeing a man with "bushy eyebrows" leaving the property just after the murders. What does this all mean for the state's case? Will the defense have to change their strategy? And what does Kohberger's selfie tell us about his state of mind...? STS #BestGuests include: Attorney Joshua Ritter Attorney Greg SkordasAttorney Tara Malek Get Joel's Book: Https://amzn.to/48GwbLxAll Things STS: Https://linktr.ee/stspodcastSupport the show on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/SurvivingTheSurvivorCatch us live on YouTube: Surviving The Survivor: #BestGuests in True Crime - YouTube
Bryan Kohberger is charged with the murders of Ethan Chapin, Xana Kernodle, Madison Mogen, and Kaylee Goncalves in Moscow, Idaho. In his case, the state and the defense recently had several filings dealing with Amazon, autism spectrum disorder, eyebrows, a selfie, and the death penalty. Pre-order our book on Delphi here: https://bookshop.org/p/books/shadow-of-the-bridge-the-delphi-murders-and-the-dark-side-of-the-american-heartland-aine-cain/21866881?ean=9781639369232Or here: https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/Shadow-of-the-Bridge/Aine-Cain/9781639369232Or here: https://www.amazon.com/Shadow-Bridge-Murders-American-Heartland/dp/1639369236Join our Patreon here! https://www.patreon.com/c/murdersheetSupport The Murder Sheet by buying a t-shirt here: https://www.murdersheetshop.com/Send tips to murdersheet@gmail.com.The Murder Sheet is a production of Mystery Sheet LLC.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
In the case of State v. Bryan Kohberger, the defense filed Motion in Limine #7, seeking to exclude witness identification based on the description of "bushy eyebrows." The defense argued that the surviving roommate's (identified as D.M.) description was unreliable due to her limited observation under distressing conditions, potential impairment from alcohol, and the generic nature of the "bushy eyebrows" characteristic, which could apply to many individuals. They contended that admitting this description could unfairly prejudice the jury against Kohberger.In response, the prosecution opposed the motion, asserting that D.M.'s consistent description of the intruder's "bushy eyebrows" was both relevant and reliable. They emphasized that D.M. consistently provided this specific detail across multiple interviews, and that such a distinctive feature could assist in identifying the perpetrator. The prosecution also highlighted that a photograph of Kohberger, taken shortly after the incident, depicted him with prominent eyebrows, supporting the witness's account. They argued that the determination of whether Kohberger's eyebrows match the description should be left to the jury.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:031725-States-Response-Defendants-MiL-7-RE-Witness-Identification-Bushy-Eyebrows.pdf
In the case of State v. Bryan Kohberger, the defense filed Motion in Limine #7, seeking to exclude witness identification based on the description of "bushy eyebrows." The defense argued that the surviving roommate's (identified as D.M.) description was unreliable due to her limited observation under distressing conditions, potential impairment from alcohol, and the generic nature of the "bushy eyebrows" characteristic, which could apply to many individuals. They contended that admitting this description could unfairly prejudice the jury against Kohberger.In response, the prosecution opposed the motion, asserting that D.M.'s consistent description of the intruder's "bushy eyebrows" was both relevant and reliable. They emphasized that D.M. consistently provided this specific detail across multiple interviews, and that such a distinctive feature could assist in identifying the perpetrator. The prosecution also highlighted that a photograph of Kohberger, taken shortly after the incident, depicted him with prominent eyebrows, supporting the witness's account. They argued that the determination of whether Kohberger's eyebrows match the description should be left to the jury.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:031725-States-Response-Defendants-MiL-7-RE-Witness-Identification-Bushy-Eyebrows.pdf
In the case of State v. Bryan Kohberger, the defense filed Motion in Limine #7, seeking to exclude witness identification based on the description of "bushy eyebrows." The defense argued that the surviving roommate's (identified as D.M.) description was unreliable due to her limited observation under distressing conditions, potential impairment from alcohol, and the generic nature of the "bushy eyebrows" characteristic, which could apply to many individuals. They contended that admitting this description could unfairly prejudice the jury against Kohberger.In response, the prosecution opposed the motion, asserting that D.M.'s consistent description of the intruder's "bushy eyebrows" was both relevant and reliable. They emphasized that D.M. consistently provided this specific detail across multiple interviews, and that such a distinctive feature could assist in identifying the perpetrator. The prosecution also highlighted that a photograph of Kohberger, taken shortly after the incident, depicted him with prominent eyebrows, supporting the witness's account. They argued that the determination of whether Kohberger's eyebrows match the description should be left to the jury.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:031725-States-Response-Defendants-MiL-7-RE-Witness-Identification-Bushy-Eyebrows.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
In the case of State v. Bryan Kohberger, the defense filed Motion in Limine #7, seeking to exclude witness identification based on the description of "bushy eyebrows." The defense argued that the surviving roommate's (identified as D.M.) description was unreliable due to her limited observation under distressing conditions, potential impairment from alcohol, and the generic nature of the "bushy eyebrows" characteristic, which could apply to many individuals. They contended that admitting this description could unfairly prejudice the jury against Kohberger.In response, the prosecution opposed the motion, asserting that D.M.'s consistent description of the intruder's "bushy eyebrows" was both relevant and reliable. They emphasized that D.M. consistently provided this specific detail across multiple interviews, and that such a distinctive feature could assist in identifying the perpetrator. The prosecution also highlighted that a photograph of Kohberger, taken shortly after the incident, depicted him with prominent eyebrows, supporting the witness's account. They argued that the determination of whether Kohberger's eyebrows match the description should be left to the jury.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:031725-States-Response-Defendants-MiL-7-RE-Witness-Identification-Bushy-Eyebrows.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
One of the surviving roommates in the murder of four University of Idaho students described seeing a masked man walking through the house wearing all black with "bushy eyebrows." The roommate has given several statements to law enforcement and testified in front of the grand jury. Bryan Kohberger's lawyers want the judge to bar her from saying "bushy eyebrows" at his trial. They're also trying to keep the roommates text messages and 911 call out of the trial. Law&Crime's Angenette Levy goes through the roommates statements and timeline in this episode of Crime Fix — a daily show covering the biggest stories in crime.PLEASE SUPPORT THE SHOW: If you've ever been injured in an accident, you can check out Morgan & Morgan. You can submit a claim in 8 clicks or less without having to leave your couch. To start your claim, visit: https://www.forthepeople.com/YouTubeTakeoverHost:Angenette Levy https://twitter.com/Angenette5Guest: Mark Weaver https://x.com/MarkRWeaverCRIME FIX PRODUCTION:Head of Social Media, YouTube - Bobby SzokeSocial Media Management - Vanessa BeinVideo Editing - Daniel CamachoGuest Booking - Alyssa Fisher & Diane KayeSTAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:Watch Law&Crime Network on YouTubeTV: https://bit.ly/3td2e3yWhere To Watch Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3akxLK5Sign Up For Law&Crime's Daily Newsletter: https://bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletterRead Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3td2IqoLAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lawandcrime/Twitter: https://twitter.com/LawCrimeNetworkFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/lawandcrimeTwitch: https://www.twitch.tv/lawandcrimenetworkTikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@lawandcrimeSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Eyewitness Testimony: Are Bryan Kohberger's Eyebrows Enough for Identification? Could Bryan Kohberger really have been framed, or is his defense team just throwing spaghetti at the wall to see what sticks? In the latest twist, his attorneys are now claiming the infamous knife sheath—with Kohberger's DNA on it—was planted at the crime scene. That's right, the defense is going full OJ, suggesting someone wanted to make sure Kohberger took the fall for the brutal University of Idaho murders. But if that's true…who would go to such extreme lengths to frame him, and more importantly, why? Former prosecutor and defense attorney Eric Faddis joins Tony Brueski to dissect the legal gymnastics of this claim. How often do frame jobs actually happen in court? Could a jury buy this theory? And let's be real—how exactly would someone even get their hands on Kohberger's DNA to plant it in such a specific way? Plus, the eyebrow-raising (literally) witness testimony the defense desperately wants thrown out. Is this a bold legal move or just a sign of desperation? #BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #CrimeNews #LegalAnalysis #MurderTrial Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
Could Bryan Kohberger really have been framed, or is his defense team just throwing spaghetti at the wall to see what sticks? In the latest twist, his attorneys are now claiming the infamous knife sheath—with Kohberger's DNA on it—was planted at the crime scene. That's right, the defense is going full OJ, suggesting someone wanted to make sure Kohberger took the fall for the brutal University of Idaho murders. But if that's true…who would go to such extreme lengths to frame him, and more importantly, why? Former prosecutor and defense attorney Eric Faddis joins Tony Brueski to dissect the legal gymnastics of this claim. How often do frame jobs actually happen in court? Could a jury buy this theory? And let's be real—how exactly would someone even get their hands on Kohberger's DNA to plant it in such a specific way? Plus, the eyebrow-raising (literally) witness testimony the defense desperately wants thrown out. Is this a bold legal move or just a sign of desperation? #BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #CrimeNews #LegalAnalysis #MurderTrial Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Could Bryan Kohberger really have been framed, or is his defense team just throwing spaghetti at the wall to see what sticks? In the latest twist, his attorneys are now claiming the infamous knife sheath—with Kohberger's DNA on it—was planted at the crime scene. That's right, the defense is going full OJ, suggesting someone wanted to make sure Kohberger took the fall for the brutal University of Idaho murders. But if that's true…who would go to such extreme lengths to frame him, and more importantly, why? Former prosecutor and defense attorney Eric Faddis joins Tony Brueski to dissect the legal gymnastics of this claim. How often do frame jobs actually happen in court? Could a jury buy this theory? And let's be real—how exactly would someone even get their hands on Kohberger's DNA to plant it in such a specific way? Plus, the eyebrow-raising (literally) witness testimony the defense desperately wants thrown out. Is this a bold legal move or just a sign of desperation? #BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #CrimeNews #LegalAnalysis #MurderTrial Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Rock Concerts and Pie and Eyebrows, oh my! Time for an installment of Better Heel or Face discussing the most electrifying man in ALL of entertainment, The Rock! Whether you boo him or cheer him, he'll still say "You're Welcome." Become a Patreon Palski and support the show while getting access to the live chat, the Watchalong Wednesday series, the pre-show and more all for just 5 bucks! http://www.patreon.com/pwpalskis Get official merchandise at www.dragonwagonshop.com Smark out with the boys on our official Discord https://discord.gg/gcRb48rkw3 Pro Wrestling Palskis is part of the Dragon Wagon Radio independent podcast network.
Topics: Tay's 5am night, Lady Gaga's new album Mayhem, The Traitors finale recap, Summer House, Ken Burns is fighting for Lure Fishbar, Tamara Judge says she quit RHOC, Nuts or Not: overstaying your welcome, TD's Traitors partySponsors:Factor: Get started at FACTORMEALS.com/FACTORPODCAST and use code FACTOR PODCAST to get 50% off your first box plus free shippingBellesa: FREE TOYS OR GIFTCARDS FOR TOYS! Everyone who signs up to my giveaway with Bellesa wins something! https://www.bboutique.co/vibe/tasteoftaylor-podcastTrade: Right now, Trade is exclusively offering our listeners 40% off your first order at drinktrade.com/taylor Quince: Go to Quince.com/taylor for free shipping on your order and 365-day returns.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
The Eyebrow Argument: A Legal Battle in the Idaho Murders The legal team defending Bryan Kohberger is trying to erase two words from the courtroom: bushy eyebrows. That's right. In a case involving the brutal stabbing deaths of four University of Idaho students, where DNA, phone records, and surveillance footage have all been presented as evidence, the defense is zeroing in on eyebrows. Why? Because one of the surviving roommates described the intruder as having thick eyebrows, and the prosecution sees this as a key detail linking Kohberger to the crime. But the defense says it's unreliable and could unfairly sway the jury. Let's take it back to the night of November 13, 2022. It was a quiet college town—Moscow, Idaho—until it wasn't. Sometime in the early morning hours, four students—Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin—were brutally stabbed to death in their off-campus home. Two roommates were inside but unharmed. One of them, Dylan Mortensen, later told police she saw a masked man dressed in black walking past her. He had one distinct feature—bushy eyebrows. And just like that, those two words became a central part of the case against Bryan Kohberger. Kohberger, a Ph.D. student in criminology at nearby Washington State University, was arrested in December after investigators tracked a white Hyundai Elantra seen near the crime scene. Cell phone data placed him in the area multiple times before the murders. Then came the DNA—a sample found on the sheath of a knife left behind at the scene was linked to Kohberger. This was the kind of evidence that made headlines. But here we are, debating facial hair. Kohberger's attorneys argue that the eyebrow description is problematic. First, they say it's vague—lots of people have thick eyebrows. Second, they point out that Dylan was in shock, possibly in a frozen fear response, which could have affected how she processed and remembered details. And third, they've gone a step further, claiming that her own artwork—yes, her drawings—showed an unusual focus on eyes and eyebrows, making her observation even less reliable. That's a pretty creative argument, but the prosecution isn't buying it. For them, the eyebrows aren't just a random detail. They argue that this was one of the few physical descriptors given at the time, and it matches Kohberger. They also point out that while Dylan never identified him directly, her statement about the eyebrows is just one piece of a much larger puzzle. Taken with the other evidence—like his car, phone records, and the DNA—those eyebrows become more than just facial hair. They're another link in the chain. The defense isn't stopping at eyebrows, though. They're also pushing to keep words like “murder,” “murder weapon,” “psychopath,” and “sociopath” out of the trial. They argue that using these terms before a conviction is reached is unfair and could bias the jury. Essentially, they're trying to control the language of the trial as much as they can. The prosecution, of course, is pushing back, saying that calling a murder a murder isn't exactly a stretch. With the trial set to begin in August, these pre-trial battles are setting the stage for what's to come. The prosecution is expected to seek the death penalty, and Kohberger's attorneys will continue to fight every piece of evidence, every witness statement, and apparently, every eyebrow reference that comes their way. Kohberger's next court appearance is in April, where the judge will rule on these motions. Until then, the legal chess game continues, with both sides maneuvering for an advantage before the jury is ever seated. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
The Eyebrow Argument: A Legal Battle in the Idaho Murders The legal team defending Bryan Kohberger is trying to erase two words from the courtroom: bushy eyebrows. That's right. In a case involving the brutal stabbing deaths of four University of Idaho students, where DNA, phone records, and surveillance footage have all been presented as evidence, the defense is zeroing in on eyebrows. Why? Because one of the surviving roommates described the intruder as having thick eyebrows, and the prosecution sees this as a key detail linking Kohberger to the crime. But the defense says it's unreliable and could unfairly sway the jury. Let's take it back to the night of November 13, 2022. It was a quiet college town—Moscow, Idaho—until it wasn't. Sometime in the early morning hours, four students—Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin—were brutally stabbed to death in their off-campus home. Two roommates were inside but unharmed. One of them, Dylan Mortensen, later told police she saw a masked man dressed in black walking past her. He had one distinct feature—bushy eyebrows. And just like that, those two words became a central part of the case against Bryan Kohberger. Kohberger, a Ph.D. student in criminology at nearby Washington State University, was arrested in December after investigators tracked a white Hyundai Elantra seen near the crime scene. Cell phone data placed him in the area multiple times before the murders. Then came the DNA—a sample found on the sheath of a knife left behind at the scene was linked to Kohberger. This was the kind of evidence that made headlines. But here we are, debating facial hair. Kohberger's attorneys argue that the eyebrow description is problematic. First, they say it's vague—lots of people have thick eyebrows. Second, they point out that Dylan was in shock, possibly in a frozen fear response, which could have affected how she processed and remembered details. And third, they've gone a step further, claiming that her own artwork—yes, her drawings—showed an unusual focus on eyes and eyebrows, making her observation even less reliable. That's a pretty creative argument, but the prosecution isn't buying it. For them, the eyebrows aren't just a random detail. They argue that this was one of the few physical descriptors given at the time, and it matches Kohberger. They also point out that while Dylan never identified him directly, her statement about the eyebrows is just one piece of a much larger puzzle. Taken with the other evidence—like his car, phone records, and the DNA—those eyebrows become more than just facial hair. They're another link in the chain. The defense isn't stopping at eyebrows, though. They're also pushing to keep words like “murder,” “murder weapon,” “psychopath,” and “sociopath” out of the trial. They argue that using these terms before a conviction is reached is unfair and could bias the jury. Essentially, they're trying to control the language of the trial as much as they can. The prosecution, of course, is pushing back, saying that calling a murder a murder isn't exactly a stretch. With the trial set to begin in August, these pre-trial battles are setting the stage for what's to come. The prosecution is expected to seek the death penalty, and Kohberger's attorneys will continue to fight every piece of evidence, every witness statement, and apparently, every eyebrow reference that comes their way. Kohberger's next court appearance is in April, where the judge will rule on these motions. Until then, the legal chess game continues, with both sides maneuvering for an advantage before the jury is ever seated. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The legal team defending Bryan Kohberger is trying to erase two words from the courtroom: bushy eyebrows. That's right. In a case involving the brutal stabbing deaths of four University of Idaho students, where DNA, phone records, and surveillance footage have all been presented as evidence, the defense is zeroing in on eyebrows. Why? Because one of the surviving roommates described the intruder as having thick eyebrows, and the prosecution sees this as a key detail linking Kohberger to the crime. But the defense says it's unreliable and could unfairly sway the jury. Let's take it back to the night of November 13, 2022. It was a quiet college town—Moscow, Idaho—until it wasn't. Sometime in the early morning hours, four students—Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin—were brutally stabbed to death in their off-campus home. Two roommates were inside but unharmed. One of them, Dylan Mortensen, later told police she saw a masked man dressed in black walking past her. He had one distinct feature—bushy eyebrows. And just like that, those two words became a central part of the case against Bryan Kohberger. Kohberger, a Ph.D. student in criminology at nearby Washington State University, was arrested in December after investigators tracked a white Hyundai Elantra seen near the crime scene. Cell phone data placed him in the area multiple times before the murders. Then came the DNA—a sample found on the sheath of a knife left behind at the scene was linked to Kohberger. This was the kind of evidence that made headlines. But here we are, debating facial hair. Kohberger's attorneys argue that the eyebrow description is problematic. First, they say it's vague—lots of people have thick eyebrows. Second, they point out that Dylan was in shock, possibly in a frozen fear response, which could have affected how she processed and remembered details. And third, they've gone a step further, claiming that her own artwork—yes, her drawings—showed an unusual focus on eyes and eyebrows, making her observation even less reliable. That's a pretty creative argument, but the prosecution isn't buying it. For them, the eyebrows aren't just a random detail. They argue that this was one of the few physical descriptors given at the time, and it matches Kohberger. They also point out that while Dylan never identified him directly, her statement about the eyebrows is just one piece of a much larger puzzle. Taken with the other evidence—like his car, phone records, and the DNA—those eyebrows become more than just facial hair. They're another link in the chain. The defense isn't stopping at eyebrows, though. They're also pushing to keep words like “murder,” “murder weapon,” “psychopath,” and “sociopath” out of the trial. They argue that using these terms before a conviction is reached is unfair and could bias the jury. Essentially, they're trying to control the language of the trial as much as they can. The prosecution, of course, is pushing back, saying that calling a murder a murder isn't exactly a stretch. With the trial set to begin in August, these pre-trial battles are setting the stage for what's to come. The prosecution is expected to seek the death penalty, and Kohberger's attorneys will continue to fight every piece of evidence, every witness statement, and apparently, every eyebrow reference that comes their way. Kohberger's next court appearance is in April, where the judge will rule on these motions. Until then, the legal chess game continues, with both sides maneuvering for an advantage before the jury is ever seated. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Welcome back to our weekend Cabral HouseCall shows! This is where we answer our community's wellness, weight loss, and anti-aging questions to help people get back on track! Check out today's questions: Sharon: Hello Dr. Cabral. I recently listened to your podcast on the use of binders. I have also seen other functional practitioners recommend Igg immunoglobulin supplements for gut issues. I don't see anything like this in your store. But the supplement is described elsewhere as binding toxins. Can you explain the difference between this and the other binders you recommend and if you believe these supplements are useful for certain situations and if and when they might be recommended vs the traditional binders you discussed. I also see this recommended to heal gut lining. Do you find this useful for that purpose instead of glutamine? Lee: Hi Dr Cabral, I wanted to tap into your expertise as iv noticed a change rand wondered what could be behind it. I'm a 42 year old female, relatively fit & healthy but could do better in all areas! Iv noticed both my eyebrows are starting to thin at the inner edges so from the bridge of the nose. I'm now having to use an eyebrow pencil to colour that part in and even them up! Any thoughts are appreciated. Lara: Hi, dr. C.. I'm wondering whether you've been following the longevity journey of Bryan Johnson.. the documentary just came to Netflix and it's called Don't Die because he literally wants to do everything in his power not to die, ever.. some of the things seem pretty dangerous to me (like gene therapy and taking immunosuppressants) and also he's selling some products like the Blueprint olive oil (I'm guessing it has lots of polyphenols, like the one you use as a supplement).. I was just wondering what you think about it all :) Anonymous: Hi, I tested my vit D at home & the test said I had levels above 100ng/mL - this test only goes up to 100ng/mL because most people don't have higher levels, so I don't know exactly how high they are. I understand this could be dangerous for my kidneys & arteries & maybe other things as well? I am wondering what could have caused my levels to get this high? I was using 4000iu per day since beginning of autumn & I didn't get really tan this summer either. There's additional 400iu in the multi I take, but is 4400iu really too much in the winter months? Considering I have fibromyalgia & hormone & gut problems I thought I would have some trouble with absorption of it all anyway so this really came as a shock! I am really interested in the explanation, the reasons why this can occur. Thank you Anonymous: I was reading about vit D a lot & a naturopath I follow is really against supplementing with it, considering it's a secosteroid hormone & if we live where there's no Sun strong enough in the winter months, the nature obviously didn't intend for us to be having it in those months. She says that the tests only look at the reserves & there is no way of knowing how much of active vit D you have. Supplementing with it is therefore taking hormone therapy, that we should get it from Sun exposure in the summer months and then use up those reserves in the winter as nature intended. I really value your opinion so please explain in depth what is your take on this? Thank you Thank you for tuning into today's Cabral HouseCall and be sure to check back tomorrow where we answer more of our community's questions! - - - Show Notes and Resources: StephenCabral.com/3284 - - - Get a FREE Copy of Dr. Cabral's Book: The Rain Barrel Effect - - - Join the Community & Get Your Questions Answered: CabralSupportGroup.com - - - Dr. Cabral's Most Popular At-Home Lab Tests: > Complete Minerals & Metals Test (Test for mineral imbalances & heavy metal toxicity) - - - > Complete Candida, Metabolic & Vitamins Test (Test for 75 biomarkers including yeast & bacterial gut overgrowth, as well as vitamin levels) - - - > Complete Stress, Mood & Metabolism Test (Discover your complete thyroid, adrenal, hormone, vitamin D & insulin levels) - - - > Complete Food Sensitivity Test (Find out your hidden food sensitivities) - - - > Complete Omega-3 & Inflammation Test (Discover your levels of inflammation related to your omega-6 to omega-3 levels) - - - Get Your Question Answered On An Upcoming HouseCall: StephenCabral.com/askcabral - - - Would You Take 30 Seconds To Rate & Review The Cabral Concept? The best way to help me spread our mission of true natural health is to pass on the good word, and I read and appreciate every review!
- Jeff's Bagel Run sponsorship and promotion - Expansion of Jeff's Bagel Run locations - Description of bagel flavors and specialty spreads - Vegan options available at Jeff's Bagel Run - Monthly prize giveaway for using #TDBagel - Encouragement to send photos to Jeff's Bagel Run - Introduction to the Friday free show of A Mediocre Time with Tom and Dan - Samantha Haar returns as a guest from the Semantics Podcast - Discussion about Samantha's old workspace being left untouched - Joke about Tracy undoing Samantha's previous work - Announcement of BDM Appreciation Week in April - Joke about a golden ticket promotion for BDM members - Tom's history of organizing boating experiences for listeners - Mention of two listeners passing away after participating in boating experiences - Acknowledgment of a BDM member who passed away - Teasing details about an "Ultimate Tom and Dan Experience" - Joke about canceling streaming subscriptions - Discussion about jailbroken Fire Sticks - Mention of Maisie encountering inappropriate content on Tubi - Tom recounting a frustrating phone call experience Tom's complaint about his phone and other devices not working - Tom refuses to answer phone calls due to excessive scam calls - Discussion on how voicemail and mail have become obsolete due to spam - Tom's reliance on texts and the internet instead of phone calls - Jokes about Tom's inability to use VPNs for accessing adult content - Complaints about lack of variety in adult content on certain websites - Discussion about encountering unexpected adult content categories - Tom being spammed with phone calls and assuming it was a scam - GM Financial attempting to contact Tom about his car payment - Tom ignoring the calls, assuming they were sales pitches - Crystal discovering a letter about Tom being behind on car payments - Tom realizing he was two and a half months late on payments - Discussion about automatic payments and how they failed - Argument that wives take over responsibilities, leading to learned helplessness - Comparison to neighbors doing small tasks for others leading to dependency - Tom's realization that the missed payment was the final payment on his truck - Bank policies allowing repossession for being one payment behind Frustration at banks repossessing vehicles even if only one payment is left - Tom jokes about ignoring the repo and letting them keep his truck - Tom initially thought the GM Financial call was a scam or sales pitch - Frustration with companies not using text messages for important notifications - Complaints about doctors scheduling appointments without asking for availability - Discussion about call centers switching doctor recommendations without consent - Observation that society is now fully saturated with video surveillance - Crystal sending Tom a Ring doorbell video she found interesting - Joke about a racist woman confronting a black man in his own home - Tom describes a Ring doorbell video of a lizard defecating on the camera - Debate over whether the lizard video is truly rare or unique - Video footage of an asteroid impact captured for the first time - Discussion on the increasing likelihood of rare events being caught on video - Skepticism about the reported details of the meteorite incident - Reflection on how past events lacked video documentation - Nostalgia for meeting celebrities before taking photos became common Mention of old radio days and past events that went undocumented - Tom reflects on meeting celebrities like Shaq, Don Shula, and Beetlejuice without taking photos - Discussion on whether Tom would have asked for selfies with famous people - Tom's conflicting feelings of respect and violent urges towards certain figures - Debate on whether everything significant in modern times has now been caught on video - Complaints about the prevalence of cameras and the necessity of being constantly aware of being recorded - Mention of Jelly Roll's public nose-picking incident and comparisons to Tom's habits - Tom's conscious effort to avoid bad habits on camera during live streams - Discussion about the difference between wiping and eating a booger in public - Joke comparing indecent acts in different public places - Teasing a new segment where Sam presents unusual stories - Introduction of a band called Sunshine Slackers and their song “Sewer” - Promotion for Pinball Dudes, a company that rents and sells pinball machines - Tom and his family enjoying their in-studio pinball machine - Announcement of a private pinball gathering for Twitch listeners - Introduction to the story of Peter the Dolphin, a NASA-funded experiment in the 1960s - Margaret Lovett's involvement in researching dolphin communication in the U.S. Virgin Islands - Debate on why the dolphins were given human names like Peter, Pamela, and Sissy Explanation of the living arrangement designed for Lovett and Peter the Dolphin - Margaret Lovett cohabitated with Peter the Dolphin for six days a week in an attempt to teach him human speech - The dolphin struggled with pronouncing the "M" sound without making bubbles - Peter, being a young male dolphin, frequently became aroused, disrupting the research - Lovett initially allowed Peter to visit female dolphins to relieve himself but found it disruptive - Lovett decided to manually relieve Peter to maintain focus on the research - Discussion on dolphin anatomy and how their reproductive organs function - Lovett described the act as "sensual" but not sexual, aiming to strengthen the bond for research purposes - Hustler magazine exposed the story, sparking public outrage - NASA-funded research also included giving LSD to dolphins, though it had no observable effects - The research was eventually defunded due to public backlash and negative press - The dolphins were relocated to a repurposed bank building in Miami with smaller tanks and fewer enrichment activities - Peter the Dolphin, deprived of attention and stimulation, reportedly committed suicide by voluntarily ceasing to breathe - Discussion on how dolphins must consciously breathe and have the ability to choose not to - Reflection on how common dolphin suicides might be and whether other dolphins have received similar treatment - Speculation on whether drowning feels euphoric for dolphins, similar to how it is sometimes described for humans - Tom recalls a personal near-drowning experience while surfing General surprise at learning new facts about dolphin physiology and behavior - Margaret Lovett married the photographer who documented her dolphin research, and they converted the research facility into their family home - Discussion on how Lovett's daughters might feel about discovering their mother's past research - Lovett faced online harassment and ridicule over the dolphin-handling story - Introduction of Sam's new segment, "Who's Coming to Get You," inspired by Thomas Mann - Discussion of previous guest appearances, including Cadillac Pat discussing Oak Island Treasure - Cadillac Pat's continued belief in the legitimacy of the Oak Island show despite skepticism - Introduction of a UK court case where a woman was sentenced for "cyber farting" - Rhiannon Evans sent multiple videos of herself farting to her boyfriend's ex-partner, leading to distress and police involvement - Evans was sentenced to community service, a restraining order, rehab sessions, and alcohol abstinence - Debate on whether sending fart videos qualifies as harassment or cyberbullying - Comparison to other forms of harassment like repeated phone calls or offensive messages - Discussion on how intent plays a role in determining harassment cases - Chat room suggestion to create a "Fart Week" competition, similar to Shark Week - Debate on piercings and which types have aged well over time - Tom and Sam discuss tongue rings and how they can seem out of place in professional settings Tom critiques his wife having a belly ring while working as a corporate project manager - Eyebrow piercings are making a comeback - Discussion on how certain piercings, like gauged ears, feel outdated - Complaints about stretched earlobe holes not closing and emitting an unpleasant smell - Tom expresses a desire to have his gauged ears surgically closed - Discussion on Cardi B getting a butt crack piercing - Concerns about infection risks and healing complications of butt crack piercings - Talk about micro-splits at the top of the butt crack and related discomfort - Tom and his daughter Maisie both experiencing deep, sensitive ass cracks - Joke about childhood bullying related to a "double butt crack" - Debate on whether butt crack piercings can heal properly or get irritated by clothing - Concerns about the practicality of wearing thongs with a butt crack piercing - Discussion about gold teeth and Tom wanting one for his fang - Comparison of gold teeth to Joe Pesci's character in *Home Alone* - Introduction of the story of Olympic figure skater Dick Button passing away at 95 - Jokes about the unfortunate name "Dick Button" and comparisons to worse names - Discussion on why someone named Richard Button would choose to go by "Dick" Debate on whether people were aware of unfortunate name choices 95 years ago - Discussion on the evolution of slang for genitalia, including terms like "Button Dick" and "Mushroom Head." - Debate on whether the term "button" was even relevant in ancient times, referencing the Roman Empire. - Reflection on how funny names are less common now due to parents being more conscious. - Argument against giving children names they may not live up to, like "Champion." - Criticism of Patrick Mahomes' children's metal-themed names (Sterling, Bronze, Gold). - Speculation on what the next name in Mahomes' lineup would be (e.g., Copper). - Discussion about participation trophies and naming a kid something like "Certificate." - Breakdown of the lawsuit battle between Blake Lively, Justin Baldoni, and Ryan Reynolds. - Explanation of sexual harassment and smear campaign lawsuits between Baldoni and Lively. - Discussion of leaked videos, text messages, and voicemails between the involved parties. - Breakdown of a late-night voicemail from Baldoni and how it was used in the legal battle. - Debate on how releasing out-of-context information distorts public perception. - Reflection on self-destructive behavior and the impulse to "burn everything down" even at personal cost. - Speculation on whether Ryan Reynolds inserted the character "Nice Pool" in *Deadpool 3* as a jab at Justin Baldoni. - Description of "Nice Pool" as a man-bun-wearing, feminist character mocking Baldoni. - Discussion on Ryan Reynolds' passive-aggressive, creative nature and his love of getting the last word. Confirmation that Reynolds has full control over *Deadpool* as its writer, producer, and director. - Ryan Reynolds allegedly forced his way into rewrites on *It Ends With Us*, upsetting people. - Discussion on holding grudges and how they waste time and energy. - Debate on the thrill of self-destructive behavior, like "lighting the fuse" on drama. - Comparison of the rush from revenge to the pleasure dolphins get from being "relieved." - Candace Owens is investigating the Blake Lively vs. Justin Baldoni drama. - Allegations that Reynolds inserted "Nice Pool" as a parody of Baldoni in *Deadpool 3*. - The character *Nice Pool* played by "Gordon Reynolds" was a possible hidden insult. - Allegations that Reynolds used prosthetic makeup to resemble Baldoni in the film. - T.J. Miller and Martha Stewart have both publicly called Ryan Reynolds an asshole. - Candace Owens claims Reynolds orchestrated the smear campaign against Baldoni. - Speculation that the feud was started to deflect from *It Ends With Us* tanking. - Comparison to the Johnny Depp vs. Amber Heard trial, predicting more public drama. - Criticism that the public is tired of nonstop celebrity feuds and scandals. - Discussion of celebrities inserting "Easter eggs" in media to attack rivals. - Resurfaced interview where Blake Lively admitted to wearing bronzer to appear Black. - Criticism of Lively's attempt to frame the blackface incident as "just being a geek." - Speculation that Blake Lively lacks a publicist or stylist due to poor public decisions. Lively allegedly acted as her own intimacy coordinator but later claimed harassment. - Discussion on Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds being control freaks who try to do everything themselves. - Joke about becoming a Nazi Facebook group moderator as a nerdy activity. - Brief mention of the *Bad Baby* vs. *Alabama Barker* beef. - Recap of Bhad Bhabie's rise to fame from *Dr. Phil* to rapper to OnlyFans millionaire. - Discussion of Bhad Bhabie's cancer diagnosis and her success despite her early controversies. - Introduction to Alabama Barker, Travis Barker's daughter, and her public feud with Bhad Bhabie. - Explanation of Alabama Barker's background and appearance, contrasting with her rap persona. - Accusations that Alabama Barker is adopting a Black accent and style despite her background. - Mention of Alabama Barker's diss track, *Cry Baby*, and its reception. - Discussion of Bhad Bhabie's diss track, *Overcooked*, accusing Alabama of sleeping with Soulja Boy and Tyga. - Claims in the diss track that Alabama Barker got pregnant by Tyga and had an abortion. - Alabama Barker denies all accusations, stating she has never been pregnant or involved with Tyga or Soulja Boy. Soulja Boy threatens to sue Bhad Bhabie over her diss track. - Criticism of modern rap beefs being settled with lawsuits instead of violence. - Discussion about Drake suing Kendrick Lamar to prevent a song from being performed at the Super Bowl. - Debate over whether Alabama Barker is a legitimate rapper. - Commentary on Drake's credibility as a rapper given his past on *Degrassi*. - Soulja Boy demanding $10 million from Bhad Bhabie in response to her diss track. - Mention of Soulja Boy's past financial struggles and attempts to sell game consoles. - Segue into a new segment called *Selling Your Dreams*. - Brief discussion of the band *Drew and Ellie Holcomb* and their song *Memory Bank*. - Promotion of *Sports Subaru* and *Donnelly Chevrolet* dealerships. - Mention of a *BDM Subaru group* and listener loyalty to Subaru. - Discussion about a past promotion where listeners test-drove Subarus. - Samantha Haar promoting *Semantics Podcast* and an upcoming cruise. - Idea of Tom and Dan following the cruise on a separate boat. - Jokes about needing guns to defend against pirates while following the cruise. - Discussion about Facebook Marketplace and people selling items that were once their passions. - Introduction of the *Sell Your Dreams* segment, highlighting people giving up on hobbies or projects. - Mention of Jim Colbert selling a Nissan Z race car project after six years. - Discussion of Dan's unfinished electric conversion project for his 1959 Vespa. - Recognition of how many listeners have abandoned saltwater fish tanks and podcasts. - Introduction of Travis Baller as the first guest for *Sell Your Dreams*. Travis selling a *one-wheel* due to injury. - Discussion of Butler introducing Dan to the *Onewheel* and how it led to his employment. - Butler's *Onewheel* accident resulting in a fractured wrist and torn rotator cuff. - Debate over whether Butler initially resisted selling his *Onewheel*. - Technical issues with the show's internet and phone lines. - Acknowledgment of frequent internet disruptions due to construction. - Discussion about seeing abandoned hobbies for sale on Facebook Marketplace. - Mention of Howard Stern's return to listening habits. - Butler ultimately deciding to sell his *Onewheel* due to injuries and pressure from his wife. - Explanation of the *Onewheel* community's term “float life.” - Tom joking about past failed dreams, including an abandoned above-ground pool. - Debate over whether riding a *Onewheel* actually feels like floating. - Tom considering buying Butler's *Onewheel* to add to his collection. - Mention of *Tom's Triforce* idea: having three *Onewheels* for him, Tommy, and Max. - Tom admitting to not telling Crystal about Butler's accident to keep *Onewheels* available for his sons. - Joke about Tom oversharing information unnecessarily. - Reference to *Corey Feldman's* character in *The Goonies* hoarding other people's wishes. - Tom wanting to “own” Butler's dream by buying his *Onewheel*. - Discussion of Butler's other interests, including *Star Wars*, but correcting the assumption he's into spears. Butler trying to determine a selling price for his *Onewheel XR*. - Butler's segment goes wrong, leading to jokes about his bad luck with setups. - Discussion about starting a *Tradeo* segment where listeners trade items. - Tom offers to help Butler sell his *Onewheel* on the show. - Tom's sons are uninterested in *Onewheels* or bikes, preferring screens. - Technical difficulties continue, causing more frustration. - Discussion about a Russian *mermaid performer* being bitten by a fish during a stunt. - Mention of the *Goliath grouper* and its controversial nickname. - Butler offers his *Onewheel* for $600 cleaned or $500 with blood still on it. - Debate over the fair market price of a *Onewheel XR* on Facebook Marketplace. - Butler confirms he still paints *Star Wars* models and will be at *Megaton* taking commissions. - Joke about *Mel Gibson* appearing at *Megaton* and a reference to his past controversies. - Tom shares a bizarre dream where he caught Butler in bed with his wife, but everyone acted like it was normal. - Jokes about Butler wearing a *T&D polo* with no pants in the dream. - References to *Mel Gibson's infamous rants* and jokes about his lines being used in relationships. - Transition from *"Sell Your Dreams"* segment to *"Tell Your Dreams"* as Tom unexpectedly shares a personal dream. Butler is credited with getting Tom to open up about a dream for the first time on the show. - Butler signs off with a joke about appearing in Tom's dreams. - Discussion about having Butler call in during *Megacon* to report on the event. - Debate about *Mel Gibson* appearing at *Megacon* and his continued work in Hollywood. - Speculation on whether Gibson is making *Passion of the Christ 2* for money or personal reasons. - Discussion about Gibson's financial situation and investments. - Mention of Gibson's past controversies and the difficulty of making a public comeback. - Observations on Gibson's *new teeth* and how his hair has aged. - Discussion about why someone as wealthy as *Mel Gibson* would do convention appearances. - Mention of Gibson's vocal support for certain political views and the people who align with him. - Debate over *Jack Black* distancing himself from *Kyle Gass* after a controversial joke. - Comparison of *Jack Black's* situation to what would happen if Tom and Dan had a similar falling out. - Discussion about business priorities vs. personal loyalty in entertainment. - Internet detectives analyzing *Jack Black's* reaction to *Kyle Gass's* joke. Debate over whether Jack Black's *apology* was genuine or just PR damage control. - Discussion about how celebrities are now held more accountable due to constant video recording. - Mention of *Fat Mike* from NOFX making controversial jokes about the Las Vegas shooting and facing backlash. - Conversation about how society and technology have changed public perception and accountability. - Example of *Mel Gibson's* past racist and anti-Semitic remarks resurfacing. - Debate over whether public scandals truly affect celebrities long-term. - Awareness of being recorded and cautious email communication. - Tom and Dan recalling the early days of email in radio and how things were handled before digital records. - Daniel recounting an email he sent about an ex-girlfriend that got him in trouble. - Discussion on how internet search history can be used in legal cases. - Tom joking about searching incriminating things on public computers as a prank. - Debate about whether bath towels have a *slick side* and what type of towels are best. - Tom discussing his recent upgrade to *bath sheets* and how they changed his life. - Tom appreciating a set of pillows Dan gifted him, calling them life-changing. - Discussion about *Tom's change in personality* over time, comparing "Old Testament Tom" vs. "New Testament Tom." - Debate about *gift-giving*, with Tom being praised for giving thoughtful gifts. - Sam explaining her mismatched towel situation at home. - Tom describing how *Crystal* keeps fancy towels rolled up as decoration, while they use mismatched towels. Tom admitting to using black towels for personal hygiene purposes. - Discussion about *Semantics Podcast* celebrating eight years with an event at *Rock Pit Brewing and Distilling* on February 23rd. - Debate on whether quitting a podcast before hitting 10 years is the right move. - Talk about *Tom & Dan's* potential rebranding after 20 years. - Conversation about inappropriate discussions regarding animals. - Story about a woman twerking on special needs individuals at a care facility. - Debate over whether the twerking was disrespectful or if the individuals enjoyed it. - Mention of *Miley Cyrus* twerking on *Robin Thicke* at the VMAs and comparing it to the special needs incident. - Discussion on the sexual implications of twerking on different body parts. - Tom joking about his wife sitting on his face to the point of suffocation. - Caller accusing the show of repeating old topics, specifically about dolphins. - Hosts debating whether they actually repeated content or if they just forgot. - Realization that years of podcasting have led to some repeated topics. - Acknowledgment that long-time listeners remember things the hosts have forgotten. Joking about whether memory loss is due to aging or marijuana use. - Discussion on whether it matters if they repeat topics on the show. - Joke about playing an old segment simultaneously with the new one to compare. - Mention of *Sky Rizzy* joke being made twice within an hour. - Reflection on 16-17 years of podcasting and whether they'll make it to 20. - Plan to revisit *Peter the Dolphin* topic on the 20-year anniversary. - Joke about bringing a dolphin to their 20-year event. - Concerns about recycling topics as they age. - Mention of appearing on the *Who's the Baddie* podcast to discuss *Shawshank Redemption.* - Daniel previously discussed *Coco* on the same podcast. - Discussion on *Blake Lively* laughing during *Shawshank Redemption* and her being bad at interviews. - Promotion of *Who's the Baddie* and *Crespo and Cabin Boy Matt's* podcast. - Clarification that *Cabin Boy Matt* now just goes by *Matt,* but listeners still refer to him by his old nickname. - Joke about Tom still being called *Drunkie the Bandit.* - Mention of *GapeToberfest.* Closing the show with jokes about legal implications of their humor. **Social Media:** [Website](https://tomanddan.com/) | [Twitter](https://twitter.com/tomanddanlive) | [Facebook](https://facebook.com/amediocretime) | [Instagram](https://instagram.com/tomanddanlive) **Where to Find the Show:** [Apple Podcasts](https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/a-mediocre-time/id334142682) | [Google Podcasts](https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9mZWVkLnBvZGJlYW4uY29tL2FtZWRpb2NyZXRpbWUvcG9kY2FzdC54bWw) | [TuneIn](https://tunein.com/podcasts/Comedy/A-Mediocre-Time-p364156/) **The Tom & Dan Radio Show on Real Radio 104.1:** [Apple Podcasts](https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/a-corporate-time/id975258990) | [Google Podcasts](https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9mZWVkLnBvZGJlYW4uY29tL2Fjb3Jwb3JhdGV0aW1lL3BvZGNhc3QueG1s) | [TuneIn](https://tunein.com/podcasts/Comedy/A-Corporate-Time-p1038501/) **Exclusive Content:** [Join BDM](https://tomanddan.com/registration) **Merch:** [Shop Tom & Dan](https://tomanddan.myshopify.com/)
Senator Tammy Duckworth expresses her disappointment with her Republican colleagues for voting for Donald Trump's unqualified defense secretary nominee, Fox News personality Pete Hegseth, with only Senators Murkowski and Collins voting "no" until, somewhat unexpectedly Senator Mitch McConnell also cast a vote against.
We kick off Hour 2 by discussing why we have not heard from De'Vondre Campbell since he quit in the middle of an NFL game. Then, we have a new episode of Off Rohd-ing from Lucy's trip to Austin for the College Football Playoff Game between the Texas Longhorns and Clemson Tigers. Hook ‘em. Plus, Amin has thoughts on why the public feud between JJ Reddick and Charles Barkley may have actually just been a misunderstanding. Then, Mina Kimes joins the show in the midst of her evacuation from the fires that continue to rage on in Los Angeles and details her experience. We do our best to cheer her up with some discussion about the National Football League as she runs through topics such as CJ Stroud's struggles, Derrick Henry and Lamar Jackson, Sam Darnold bouncing back, and who is between between the Lions and Bills. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices