Podcasts about Facial recognition

Revisited: Guardian journalist Michael Safi looks into the world of artificial intelligence, exploring the dangers and promises it holds for society. Help support our independent journalism at theguardian.com/infocus

Are we heading straight toward a Chinese-style social credit system in America? Following massive legal settlements and new government regulations aimed at social media companies, platforms like Meta are being forced to implement strict age verification tools. We break down how mandatory facial scans, digital IDs, and government-backed authentication could mark the end of online anonymity. From Australia's online ID regulations to the global push for digital tracking, discover what these massive shifts mean for your privacy, your accounts, and your everyday freedoms online!

We are now looking at our own faces more than ever before, thanks to mirrors, selfies, Zoom, and social media. This hour, we explore how our relationship with our faces has changed. Plus, a look at the rise of facial recognition technology, from your phone to security cameras. And we talk with an artist about what it means to paint faces. GUESTS: Cal Revely-Calder: Writer and Literary Editor of The Telegraph Kashmir Hill: Journalist at The New York Times and author of Your Face Belongs to Us Jessica Helfand: Artist and writer. She is the author of Face: A Visual Odyssey Music featured (in order): Put On A Happy Face – Dick Van Dyke (Bye Bye Birdie OBC) Look at That Face – Sammy Davis Jr. My Smile Is Just a Frown (Turned Upside Down) – Carolyn Crawford I’ve Just Seen A Face – The Beatles Smiling Faces Sometimes – The Undisputed Truth I’ve Grown Accustomed to Her Face – Andrew Bird, Alan Hampton Support the show: http://www.wnpr.org/donateSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Andrew covers a fast-moving smart home news roundup before diving into the latest Apple smart home rumors, including signs of a new Smart Home Hub, a possible Home OS, and related accessories.Key topicsHomey adds solar forecasting and export pricingComcast's Wi-Fi Motion featureEufy's new NVR security camera systemShelly's battery-powered flood sensorTCL's Matter-enabled smart lockMalware found in cheap Android TV boxesSonos hardware leaks and Live Activities supportApple's rumored Smart Home Hub and Home OSPossible pricing, sensors, and wall-mounted/tabletop versionsHighlightsApple's smart home roadmap is starting to look more realWidgets and live activities may be central to the user experienceThe episode also covers the smartest new devices and biggest risks in the broader smart home marketSend me your smart home questions and recommendations with the hashtag #SmartHomeInsider. Tweet and follow your host at:@andrew_osu on Twitter@andrewohara941 on ThreadsEmail me hereSponsored by:Quo: Try QUO for free PLUS get 20% off your first 6 months when you go to https://quo.com/HOMEKIT!Hims: Visit https://hims.com/homeinsider to get a personalized plan that gets you!Smart Home Insider YouTube ChannelSubscribe to the Smart Home Insider YouTube Channel and watch our episodes every week! Click here to subscribe.Links from the showHomey solar energy updatesSonos soundbar leaksSonos Live ActivitiesAndroid streaming box botnet Reddit postFBI streaming box PSAComcast motion trackingTCL D2 Pro smart lockShelly Flood Gen 4macOS Tahoe leakThose interested in sponsoring the show can reach out to us at: andrew@appleinsider.com

OA1288 - What happens when a hotheaded cop who isn't interested in putting in much effort to solve a crime meets up with another cop who thinks computers are infallible? A man with no criminal record who lives 300 miles from the crime scene and has no conceivable connection to the crime gets arrested. Hear the ACLU lay out the case for strict guardrails on the use of facial identification software, and training officers to… like do their job at all. Bonus: Learn about Jenessa's doppleganger / who to blame if she ever gets arrested. Compl., Dillon v. City of Jacksonville Beach, No. 2:26-cv-1936-JES-KRH, (M.D. Fla. 07/13/26) Check out the OA Linktree for all the places to go and things to do!

https://rumble.com/user/TheCultureWarshttps://x.com/NewsK365https://buymeacoffee.com/courtpresshttps://www.youtube.com/@NewsK365Email: newsk365@protonmail.com

https://rumble.com/user/TheCultureWarshttps://x.com/NewsK365https://buymeacoffee.com/courtpresshttps://www.youtube.com/@NewsK365Email: newsk365@protonmail.com

https://rumble.com/user/TheCultureWarshttps://x.com/NewsK365https://buymeacoffee.com/courtpresshttps://www.youtube.com/@NewsK365Email: newsk365@protonmail.com

https://rumble.com/user/TheCultureWarshttps://x.com/NewsK365https://buymeacoffee.com/courtpresshttps://www.youtube.com/@NewsK365Email: newsk365@protonmail.com

https://rumble.com/user/TheCultureWarshttps://x.com/NewsK365https://buymeacoffee.com/courtpresshttps://www.youtube.com/@NewsK365Email: newsk365@protonmail.com

Could facial recognition become the biggest breakthrough in catching criminals since DNA matching?Live facial recognition is becoming an increasingly powerful tool for police — but as the technology expands, so does the debate over privacy, surveillance, regulation and the rights of innocent people caught on camera.In this episode of Crime Time Inc., former Scottish detectives Tom Wood and Simon McLean examine the growing use of facial recognition technology, CCTV and digital evidence in modern policing.Tom argues that facial recognition could become as important to criminal investigations as fingerprints, CCTV and DNA, while Simon puts the opposing arguments to him: should police be able to routinely scan thousands of innocent people simply because the technology can identify wanted suspects?They discuss the need for safeguards, regulation and courtroom scrutiny, as well as the increasing importance of CCTV, doorbell cameras and other visual evidence in major investigations.The conversation also explores identification evidence and corroboration in Scottish criminal law. Tom explains why identifying a suspect is only part of the evidential picture — and why another independent strand of evidence can be crucial.Then the discussion turns to police warrants and the reality of tracking down wanted people. Tom and Simon explain the different types of warrants officers encounter, including non-payment warrants, non-appearance warrants, arrest warrants, search warrants, European Arrest Warrants, extradition and surveillance warrants.Drawing on their own policing careers, they recall the days of folders containing hundreds of outstanding warrants, early-morning attempts to trace wanted suspects, prisoner escorts across Britain — and one memorable flight involving a prisoner facing 22 years behind bars and a final whisky.Finally, Tom considers what happens when artificial intelligence, facial recognition and police databases begin working together. Could officers eventually receive real-time alerts identifying wanted people as they move through towns and cities? And could technology help policing compensate for growing pressure on resources across the criminal justice system?In this episode:00:00 — Cold Open00:59 — Facial Recognition: The Future of Policing?03:00 — Privacy, Regulation & CCTV Evidence06:21 — The Biggest Breakthrough Since DNA?07:48 — Identification, ID Parades & Corroboration10:34 — Warrants and Wanted Suspects14:06 — Prisoner Escorts & the “Last Whisky”16:55 — Arrest, Search, European & Surveillance Warrants19:53 — AI, Facial Recognition & Police ResourcesHosted by former detectives Tom Wood and Simon McLean.Real cases. Real detectives. Real talk.About Crime Time Inc.Season 5 of Crime Time Inc. broadens its reach across two sides of the Atlantic.This season features cases from Scotland and across the wider UK — rooted in real investigative experience — alongside deep dives into some of the most infamous murder cases in American history.Hosted by former detectives Simon and Tom, with experience in both the UK and the United States, including time working alongside the FBI, the show strips away sensationalism to explain how crime and justice really work.Two crime worlds. One podcast.New episodes released regularly throughout the season.Our Website: https://crimetimeinc.com/If you like this show please leave a review. It really helps us.Please help us improve our Podcast by completing this survey.http://bit.ly/crimetimeinc-survey Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Former detectives Tom Wood and Simon McLean examine the PC Alan Greer investigation, the death of Elizabeth Jane Ross in Athens and FIFA's controversial proposed commercial deal.Crime Time Inc. Weekly News returns with real investigative experience applied to major stories from the UK and beyond.Tom and Simon begin with FIFA, discussing the influence of money in football, the proposed multi-billion-pound commercial arrangement, the Sepp Blatter era and the powers used by the FBI to pursue corruption and racketeering.They then examine the allegations surrounding Police Scotland officer PC Alan Greer. What role does PIRC play when police conduct or contact must be independently reviewed? Were there warning signs that colleagues or supervisors should have recognised? And how can one individual cause lasting damage to public confidence in the wider police service?The conversation moves to the death of Elizabeth Jane Ross, whose body was reportedly discovered inside a suitcase in an abandoned building in Athens. Tom explains how detectives would secure and preserve such an unusual scene, how the suitcase and its contents would be examined, and why investigators must never allow an early assumption to compromise vital forensic evidence.Tom also describes the three broad types of murder investigation—from cases resolved rapidly to the long, painstaking inquiries that require what he calls “quiet persistence.”Finally, the discussion turns to the Isabel Rose Welsh case, the danger posed by outstanding arrest warrants, facial-recognition technology, criminal intelligence and the remarkable ability experienced officers can develop to remember faces, vehicles and registration numbers.Viewer discretion is advised. This episode includes discussion of death, serious sexual offences and child abuse.Some matters discussed were ongoing at the time of recording. Allegations should not be treated as proven unless established through the appropriate legal process.If you value informed true-crime analysis from people with genuine investigative experience, please like the video, subscribe to Crime Time Inc. and share the episode. Your support helps us continue producing independent true-crime documentaries, interviews and detective analysis.REAL CASES. REAL DETECTIVES. REAL TALK.CHAPTERS00:00 Cold Open00:53 Welcome to a New Season01:09 FIFA's Proposed Multi-Billion-Pound Deal06:00 World Cup Policing and the Tartan Army09:52 Sepp Blatter, FIFA and the FBI11:07 Power, Promotion and Police Leadership14:15 PC Alan Greer: Allegations and Investigation15:26 What Is PIRC?19:30 Independent Scrutiny of Police Investigations21:20 Were Warning Signs Missed?26:19 The Golden State Killer and Small Town Dicks27:39 Elizabeth Jane Ross and the Athens Suitcase Death31:23 How Police Handle a Body Found in a Suitcase32:51 Three Types of Murder Investigation36:05 Preserving Evidence and Avoiding Assumptions39:24 Isabel Rose Welsh and the Outstanding Warrant43:35 Facial Recognition and Modern Policing44:02 Detectives with Extraordinary Memories47:06 Policing Before Cars47:24 Closing#TrueCrime #CrimeTimeInc #PoliceInvestigationAbout Crime Time Inc.Season 5 of Crime Time Inc. broadens its reach across two sides of the Atlantic.This season features cases from Scotland and across the wider UK — rooted in real investigative experience — alongside deep dives into some of the most infamous murder cases in American history.Hosted by former detectives Simon and Tom, with experience in both the UK and the United States, including time working alongside the FBI, the show strips away sensationalism to explain how crime and justice really work.Two crime worlds. One podcast.New episodes released regularly throughout the season.Our Website: https://crimetimeinc.com/If you like this show please leave a review. It really helps us.Please help us improve our Podcast by completing this survey.http://bit.ly/crimetimeinc-survey Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Play! Pokémon announces new prizes for attending local events. Pokémon GO returns the Marathon Pikachu during the Fire & Chill event. Now that the first week of Nap Island is done in Pokémon Sleep, we share our thoughts on this new feature added to the game. Pokémon Center Mega Tokyo reopens soon after a tragic incident. Six pop-up shops in Japan are to test facial scans to stop people from reselling Pokémon cards. TIMESTAMPS00:00:00-Introduction00:04:55-New Play Pokémon Prizes00:15:10-Fire & Chill Event00:22:40-Nap Island Thoughts00:39:00-Pokémon Center to Reopen00:47:35-Facial Recognition to Stop Scalpers01:07:30-CreditsLINKS

This week the Punching Up crew discusses the new Zelda figures from Hasbro, Facial recognition for Pokémon Cards, Link's actor on Breath of the Wild and more! Timestamps: Please keep in mind that our timestamps are approximate, and will often be slightly off due to dynamic ad placement.0:00 - Intro21:15 - Hasbro Zelda Figures/Donkey Kong LEGO39:43 - Facial Recognition for Pokémon Cards50:16 - What We're Playing1:23:17 - Capcom Wants Resident Evil to Be a Yearly Franchise1:31:25 - Double Fine Layoffs1:37:34 - Pokémon Pokopia DLC Launching Soon1:41:26 - Link Actor on Breath of the Wild1:46:27 - Closing Questions Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

At least four San Francisco Grocery Outlet stores have deployed SAFR facial recognition technology to identify repeat shoplifters — and privacy advocates are predictably outraged. This in a city that banned government use of facial recognition back in 2019, while simultaneously watching retailers hemorrhage thousands of dollars a day to brazen, consequence-free theft.The numbers tell the story clearly: a nearby Safeway was losing an estimated $7,000 per day to shoplifting before corporate pulled the plug. One documented offender had 77 known incidents on record. When the stores close, the neighborhood loses its grocery access — but the critics are busy worrying about camera databases. San Francisco's soft-on-crime political culture created this crisis; facial recognition is what fills the vacuum when the will to prosecute simply isn't there.The legal picture is complicated but revealing. Private businesses can still deploy this technology even after SF's 2019 public-sector ban. The EFF has raised misidentification concerns. The SAFR president has pushed back on fears about ICE data-sharing. It's a genuine debate — but it only exists because Sacramento and City Hall spent years refusing to enforce the law. Corporate fights back with cameras because city government checked out a long time ago.CHAPTERS0:00 San Francisco Grocery Outlets Deploy…1:44 SF Grocers Deploy Facial Recognition…2:15 Grocery Outlet Deploys Facial…3:08 We Already Have No Privacy Anywhere3:47 SF Grocery Outlets Build Shoplifter…4:30 Repeat Shoplifter Had 77 Known Incidents5:58 Can Stores Legally Ban Known Shoplifters6:44 SAFR on Data Sharing With Law…7:15 Facial Recognition Misidentifies Black…8:09 Security Cameras Already Dominate…10:10 Soft-on-Crime Laws Leave Stores…12:06 What Happens After Facial Recognition…13:01 Defund the Police Made Shoplifting Worse14:32 Is Crime Finally Trending Down in SFSubscribe to @reasonablenews for daily commentary on Pacific Northwest politics and national stories the mainstream media won't tell you straight.#NFRP #SanFrancisco #FacialRecognitionGO PREMIUM WITH REASONABLE+ FOR UNCENSORED ACCESS

Week 2 of Pitch Black, and this time we're diving deep into the world of rogue decks. We've got Mega Dragonite ex, we've got Toucannon, and even more nonsense!--Hope you enjoy this week's episode once again hosted by  @gyrosean  and  @AtrociousJake  --If you have any ideas or suggestions please let us know in the comments!--We have a Discord server! Join here: https://discord.gg/5DhX4sbJu3--Reach out to us with any thoughts or topic suggestions viaTwitter: https://twitter.com/metapodtcg Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/metapodtcg/TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@metapodtcgCheck out the Meta Pod YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWcPqrzElSZKqYOIkMgOZuwFollow our Threads: https://www.threads.net/@metapodtcg-- Here are a few of the other places where we make content: Sean's YouTube: https://youtube.com/gyrosean Jake's YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/atrociousjake Sean's Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/gyrosean Jake's Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/atrociousjakeSean's Threads: https://www.threads.net/@gyroseanJake's Threads: https://www.threads.net/@atrociousjake

Your face could soon be your ticket to get through the turnstiles for a sports game. Facial recognition technology is being rolled out across the Tasman as an alternative to digital or physical tickets for selected live events. The new ticketing method has been met with mixed reactions from footy fans and academics. Sports reporter Felicity Reid spoke to Melissa Chan-Green.

This week, we talk about restrictions that the General Assembly imposed on law enforcement regarding facial coverings, displaying your name/badge#/agency, informants, and facial recognition technology.

In the last couple months, Vermont, Alabama, and Oklahoma have passed data privacy laws. Massachusetts is negotiating its own version. Meanwhile, congressional lawmakers have introduced national privacy bills that would preempt these state laws. In light of all this legislation, we're revisiting an interview from February about how the United States' data ecosystem makes it possible for any number of government agencies and businesses to buy our private data, from facial scans to health records to location tracking. Host Flora Lichtman talks with law professor and tech policy expert Laura Moy, who has testified in Congress about privacy laws and how data brokers profit off of personal data. Guest: Laura Moy is an associate professor of law at Georgetown Law, based in Washington, D.C. Transcripts for each episode are available within 1-3 days at sciencefriday.com. Subscribe to this podcast. Follow our show on Instagram, TikTok, Facebook, and Bluesky @scifri and sign up for our newsletters. Got a science question that's keeping you up at night? Call us: 877-472-4374 Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Welcome back! On this episode with James from Plunder World explores the rapid expansion of Flock cameras, AI-powered surveillance, privacy, government overreach, and the balance between public safety and civil liberties. We examine accountability, corruption, and the long-term consequences of normalizing mass surveillance. #LOOKITUPPLUNDER WORLD CARDSSPEAK IN COAD DUDES LIVES MATTER T_SHIRT -USE CODE #LOOKITUP BUY THE LIMINAL TREES BOOK NOW ☂️☂️☂️ALERT OPERATIONS: CRYPTID WARFARE // // GET 15% OFF AT CHECK OUT USING "PARANOI" at FLAVORS OF THE FORESTTHE TREBLES SHOWStay humble but don't you dare be invisible. 

Welcome to Omni Talk's Retail Daily Minute, sponsored by R&S Logistics, Duvo and Mirakl.In today's Retail Daily Minute, Omni Talk's Chris Walton discusses:The European Union's new Ecodesign regulation bans large fashion brands from destroying or landfilling unsold clothing and footwear, squeezing luxury houses' scarcity playbook.The House passes the Common Cents Act, setting nationwide rules for rounding cash transactions as the U.S. Mint halts penny production.Grocery Outlet rolls out SAFR Guard facial recognition cameras in four Bay Area stores, reigniting privacy concerns after Rite Aid's FTC ban.The Retail Daily Minute has been rocketing up the Feedspot charts, so stay informed with Omni Talk's Retail Daily Minute, your source for the latest and most important retail insights.

When San Francisco police drone video surveillance was accidentally livestreamed on the internet last month, it revealed how extensively, and at what great detail, the city is watched from above. The use of surveillance technology is rapidly growing in the Bay Area, with increasing drone and AI-powered surveillance networks partnering with local law enforcement and government agencies. In 2024, the SFPD launched the Real Time Investigation Center, which included major investments in license plate readers, safety cameras and a drone program and Alameda County just approved the renewal of a $2.25 million contract with Flock Safety. It's all raising concerns about privacy, data leaks, civil liberty infringements and the use of the technology to aid immigration deportations. We'll discuss the state of surveillance tech in the Bay Area, and what it means for public safety and privacy. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

From the use of facial recognition technology to the deployment of geofencing, our government overlords continue to find new ways to spy on American citizens.

Mai menü: A 22-es csapdája Can Clothes Make You Invisible to Facial Recognition? (Dark Reading) ransomware megy ki a divatból DarkReplica (redis rce) Elérhetőségeink:TelegramTwitterInstagramFacebookMail: info@hackeslangos.show

Facial recognition technology is becoming part of everyday life. You can use your face to enter a stadium, board a flight, or even pay for food at a game. It's fast. It's convenient. And for most of us, it's become completely normal.But what are we actually giving up in exchange for that convenience?In this episode, we explore how facial recognition technology works, where it's being used—from the FIFA World Cup to professional sports venues—and why growing concerns around privacy, data security, surveillance, and algorithmic bias deserve more attention. We also examine documented cases of wrongful arrests, questions surrounding biometric data retention, and what digital literacy looks like in an age where your face has become a form of payment.This isn't an anti-technology conversation.It's an informed technology conversation. And there's a difference.

Grocery Outlet is dabbling in some controversial tech, Timewise launches a new app and loyalty program, and Lidl US brings its app from Europe to the U.S. 

- 7/1/26- Chuck Talks About The News That He Finds!Fireworks, Physical Copies, Facial Recognition, New TrendAnd Much More On This Episode Of Casually Uncomfortable, News Edition!Call the showhttps://www.speakpipe.com/CasuallyUncomfortable

This week we have a technical segment based on the response to "Atomic Arch", an updated open-source tool to help you catch malicious packages. In the security news: Exploitarium A hot messy summer of vulnerabilities AI Squatting Linux LPE - no shortage of those Fingerprinting Favicons Windows 10 extended Can Clothes Make You Invisible to Facial Recognition? Fable and Mythos for All Do we care about Quantum? Execs have AI risk under control Biological warefare in Spyware The scripts in-scope for PCI We don't have privacy, but we may get age restrictions Visit https://www.securityweekly.com/psw for all the latest episodes! Show Notes: https://securityweekly.com/psw-933

This week we have a technical segment based on the response to "Atomic Arch", an updated open-source tool to help you catch malicious packages. In the security news: Exploitarium A hot messy summer of vulnerabilities AI Squatting Linux LPE - no shortage of those Fingerprinting Favicons Windows 10 extended Can Clothes Make You Invisible to Facial Recognition? Fable and Mythos for All Do we care about Quantum? Execs have AI risk under control Biological warefare in Spyware The scripts in-scope for PCI We don't have privacy, but we may get age restrictions Show Notes: https://securityweekly.com/psw-933

This week we have a technical segment based on the response to "Atomic Arch", an updated open-source tool to help you catch malicious packages. In the security news: Exploitarium A hot messy summer of vulnerabilities AI Squatting Linux LPE - no shortage of those Fingerprinting Favicons Windows 10 extended Can Clothes Make You Invisible to Facial Recognition? Fable and Mythos for All Do we care about Quantum? Execs have AI risk under control Biological warefare in Spyware The scripts in-scope for PCI We don't have privacy, but we may get age restrictions Visit https://www.securityweekly.com/psw for all the latest episodes! Show Notes: https://securityweekly.com/psw-933

In today’s episode, Ben O’Shea reveals a new native title claim on Rottnest Island has put tourism developments in doubt. Plus, NDIS fraud revealed & who was caught by WA Police facial recognition camera trial.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

This week we have a technical segment based on the response to "Atomic Arch", an updated open-source tool to help you catch malicious packages. In the security news: Exploitarium A hot messy summer of vulnerabilities AI Squatting Linux LPE - no shortage of those Fingerprinting Favicons Windows 10 extended Can Clothes Make You Invisible to Facial Recognition? Fable and Mythos for All Do we care about Quantum? Execs have AI risk under control Biological warefare in Spyware The scripts in-scope for PCI We don't have privacy, but we may get age restrictions Show Notes: https://securityweekly.com/psw-933

SPONSORS: 1) SHOPIFY: Sign up for your one-dollar-per-month trial today at shopify.com/julian 2) MARS MEN: For a limited time, our listeners get 50% off FOR LIFE, Free Shipping, AND 3 Free Gifts at Mars Men at https://Mengotomars.com. JOIN PATREON FOR EARLY UNCENSORED EPISODE RELEASES: https://www.patreon.com/JulianDorey CLIPPERS DISCORD: https://discord.gg/8QmWEKJ3BT (***TIMESTAMPS in Description Below) ~ Anthony Pompliano is an Operation Iraqi Freedom veteran, venture capitalist, YouTuber, writer & investor. POMP'S LINKS: - TWITTER: https://x.com/apompliano?s=21&t=5fXT2gjxOw5SVv4h7J1URA - INSTAGRAM: ​​https://www.instagram.com/pompglobal/?hl=en - YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/@AnthonyPompliano - SUBSTACK: https://pomp.substack.com/ FOLLOW JULIAN DOREY INSTAGRAM (Podcast): https://www.instagram.com/juliandoreypodcast/ INSTAGRAM (Personal): https://www.instagram.com/julianddorey/ X: https://twitter.com/julianddorey JULIAN YT CHANNELS - SUBSCRIBE to Julian Dorey Clips YT: https://www.youtube.com/@juliandoreyclips - SUBSCRIBE to Julian Dorey Daily YT: https://www.youtube.com/@JulianDoreyDaily - SUBSCRIBE to Best of JDP: https://www.youtube.com/@bestofJDP ****TIMESTAMPS**** 0:00- AI, Inflation & Palantir 10:44 - Inflation Crisis Explained 22:45 - AI Jobs & Birth Rates 33:22 - AI Replacing Jobs 43:17 - Trump, Mamdani & AI 55:32 - Palantir & AI Investing 1:08:19 - Facial Recognition & Surveillance 1:17:58 - Elon Musk, Peter Thiel & AI 1:32:26 - Peter Thiel & Javier Milei 1:42:34 - Middle Class Collapse 1:54:00 - AI Regulation 2:02:32 - Peter Thiel & Bitcoin 2:11:44 - Epstein Files & Brian Johnson 2:25:42 - Epstein Cover-Up & Howard Lutnick 2:35:21 - Corruption, Power & Politics 2:45:21 - Jeff Bezos & Parenting 2:53:15 - AI Data Centers 3:05:31 - AI Energy Crisis 3:15:40 - Data Centers Debate 3:24:24 - Humanoid Robots & AI 3:32:01 - Pomp's Work CREDITS: - Host, Editor & Producer: Julian Dorey - COO, Producer & Editor: Alessi Allaman - https://www.youtube.com/@UCyLKzv5fKxGmVQg3cMJJzyQ - In-Studio Producer: Joey Deef Julian Dorey Podcast Episode 440 - Anthony Pompliano Music by Artlist.io Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

This Day in Legal History: Shelby County v. HolderOn this day in legal history, June 25, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Shelby County v. Holder, a major case on the future of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. In a 5–4 decision, the Court struck down Section 4(b) of the Act, which contained the formula used to decide which states and local governments were subject to federal oversight before changing their voting laws. That oversight system, known as preclearance, had required covered jurisdictions to get approval from the federal government before making changes to election rules. The purpose of preclearance was to stop discriminatory voting practices before they could affect an election. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the majority opinion, concluding that the coverage formula was based on outdated data and no longer reflected current conditions.The Court did not strike down preclearance itself, but without a valid coverage formula, the preclearance system was largely left without practical effect. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg dissented, joined by Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan. Ginsburg argued that Congress had created a strong record showing that voting discrimination still existed and that the law remained necessary. Her dissent included the now-famous warning that throwing out preclearance because it had worked was like “throwing away your umbrella in a rainstorm because you are not getting wet.” The decision had immediate consequences because several states that had previously been covered by the formula moved forward with voting-law changes soon after the ruling. Supporters of the decision viewed it as a limit on outdated federal control over state election systems. Critics saw it as a major weakening of one of the most effective civil-rights laws in American history. The case remains central to modern debates over voting access, election administration, federalism, and Congress's power to enforce the Fifteenth Amendment.A federal judge has rejected the Trump administration's attempt to force New Jersey cities to comply with federal immigration enforcement demands. The ruling is a major victory for sanctuary cities and immigrants' rights advocates. Here's the context: Sanctuary cities are municipalities that limit their cooperation with federal immigration authorities. These cities typically instruct their police departments not to ask people about immigration status during routine stops, and they decline to detain people solely based on federal immigration requests (called “detainer requests”) unless there's a warrant signed by a judge.The Trump administration argued that sanctuary city policies undermine immigration enforcement and violate federal law. The administration sued, claiming cities cannot refuse to cooperate with ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement). New Jersey cities argued they have the right to set their own police practices and that cooperating with federal immigration enforcement diverts local police resources from public safety priorities. They also pointed out that when police are seen as working with immigration authorities, immigrant communities become afraid to report crimes or cooperate with law enforcement, which makes the entire community less safe.Local police have limited resources. A city police officer has to decide whether to use their time investigating a robbery or helping federal immigration agents deport someone. Local communities have a right to prioritize local public safety. Moreover, if immigrant families fear that any contact with police will result in deportation, they won't report crimes, won't testify as witnesses, and crime will increase. The federal judge agreed with New Jersey. The court found that cities have the authority to set their own police practices and cannot be forced to participate in federal immigration enforcement, particularly when federal authorities can get judicial warrants if they believe someone should be detained.The ruling protects sanctuary city policies This decision affirms that local communities can set their own law enforcement priorities and aren't required to become extensions of federal immigration enforcement. It recognizes that immigrants are part of communities and that community safety depends on immigrants trusting local police. The ruling will likely inspire other sanctuary jurisdictions to defend their policies against federal challenges. It represents a significant pushback against the Trump administration's aggressive immigration enforcement agenda.Judge tosses Trump administration's challenge to New Jersey cities' ‘sanctuary' policies | ReutersNew Jersey's Supreme Court has ruled that police departments cannot keep their use of facial recognition technology entirely secret. The decision represents a significant victory for transparency in law enforcement. Here's what happened: Police departments have increasingly used facial recognition software to identify suspects by comparing surveillance video or photos to databases of mugshots and driver's license photos. The technology can help solve crimes, but it also raises serious concerns about accuracy, bias, and privacy. Civil liberties groups have argued that if police use facial recognition to investigate people, the public and defendants have a right to know about it.Transparency is especially important because facial recognition technology has known accuracy problems, particularly when identifying people of color. If a police department relies on facial recognition to identify a suspect, and that technology is biased or inaccurate, the defendant needs to know that to challenge the evidence in court. New Jersey police departments had been claiming that their use of facial recognition was a “trade secret” or “law enforcement technique” that they could keep secret. The New Jersey Supreme Court said no.If the government uses technology to investigate you, you have a constitutional right to know about it and to challenge it. You can't mount a proper defense if you don't know what evidence was used to identify you or how reliable that evidence is.The court found that transparency about police use of facial recognition is essential to the defendant's right to a fair trial and to public accountability. Facial recognition technology is too important and too prone to error for police to keep its use secret. This ruling sets a precedent that police departments cannot hide behind “trade secrets” to avoid disclosing their investigative methods. It opens the door to litigation challenging facial recognition evidence on grounds of accuracy and bias. It also signals that courts recognize the dangers of artificial intelligence and surveillance technology and will require transparency and accountability around their use.New Jersey court limits secrecy around police use of facial recognition tools | ReutersA federal judge has ordered the Trump administration to provide a detailed explanation for covering a mural at the Kennedy Center that depicts civil rights imagery and historical figures. The ruling centers on questions of censorship, government power, and artistic freedom.The Kennedy Center, a performing arts venue in Washington, D.C., displays a mural that includes imagery related to the civil rights movement and depicts various historical and cultural figures. The Trump administration decided to cover the mural with tarps, presumably because it objected to the political or social messaging of the artwork. Civil liberties groups and artists sued, arguing that covering the mural violated the First Amendment by suppressing speech and political expression. The Trump administration claimed it had legitimate reasons for covering the mural, though it didn't initially specify what those reasons were. The federal judge said the government cannot simply cover up art without explaining why.The First Amendment protects people's right to speak and express themselves, including through art. When the government covers up art or speech, it's engaging in “prior restraint”—stopping speech before it happens. Courts are extremely skeptical of prior restraint because the whole point of the First Amendment is to prevent the government from censoring expression it dislikes. The government has to have a very good reason to suppress speech, and it has to be transparent about its reasons. The Kennedy Center mural at issue appears to have been covered by the administration for political reasons—it objected to the message. That's exactly the kind of censorship the First Amendment is designed to prevent. The judge's order requires the administration to explain its reasoning, which will allow the court to evaluate whether the government's stated reasons are legitimate or whether this is simply political censorship.This ruling protects artistic expression and prevents the government from secretly censoring art it dislikes. It affirms that the Kennedy Center's mural is protected speech, not just decoration. It also sends a message that when the government restricts speech or expression, it must be transparent and justify its actions in court. The case reflects broader concerns about executive power and the limits of what a president can do to suppress expression, art, or speech that the administration objects to.US judge orders Trump administration to explain tarp obscuring Kennedy Center facade | Reuters This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

Police Kill 10,000 Dogs Every Year… Why Does Nobody Care? POLICE KILL 10,000 DOGS EVERY YEAR… WHY DOES NOBODY CARE? A family was celebrating a big Knicks victory when police arrived over a noise complaint. Minutes later, their beloved dog was dead. The owner sat on the ground sobbing while officers stood nearby. No arrests. No charges. No consequences. And here's the shocking part: this isn't rare. Experts estimate that police kill more than 10,000 dogs every year in America — roughly 25 to 30 every single day. That's nearly ten times the number of people killed annually by police. Many of these animals are family pets on their own property. Animal welfare groups, including the ASPCA, have called for mandatory reporting, better training, and accountability when officers use deadly force against animals. So why is this still happening? Because dogs have no legal rights of their own. They can't sue. They can't testify. And in the eyes of the law, they're often treated as property rather than family members. Today, Karel asks a difficult question: Why are police allowed to kill thousands of beloved pets every year with little oversight or accountability? PLUS: • Are bars and clubs using facial recognition technology to collect your personal information without your knowledge? • Why are businesses scanning your face and storing your data for weeks? • What Toy Story 5 reveals about childhood, imagination, friendship, and our growing dependence on screens. The Karel Cast is heard on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, iHeartRadio, Spreaker, and all major podcast platforms. Watch live Monday through Thursday at 10:30 AM Pacific on YouTube. Please like, subscribe, share, and support independent media. Support the show: Patreon.com/reallykarel Karel is a history-making broadcaster, entertainer, and commentator broadcasting from Las Vegas alongside his faithful service dog, Ember. #PoliceDogs,#DogLivesMatter,#AnimalRights,#DogLovers,#PoliceAccountability,#CivilRights,#PetSafety,#JusticeForPets,#AnimalWelfare,#DogsOfYouTube,#BreakingNews,#PoliceReform,#PetOwners,#FamilyDogs,#ASPCA,#DogAdvocate,#PetProtection,#FacialRecognition,#PrivacyRights,#Surveillance,#ToyStory5,#Parenting,#Technology,#SocialCommentary,#CurrentEvents,#NewsAnalysis,#IndependentMedia,#TheKarelCast,#ReallyKarel,#YouTubeNews https://www.youtube.com/live/fK0UhkEA8gc?si=UvuwJ2om9taVKAcY

The US and Iran engage in a narrative battle over the terms of the new deal, the UK government advances sweeping new social media restrictions, and Americans embrace the launch of America 250 festivities. Reporting by Ben Domenech. Plus, we speak with Behnam Ben Taleblu & Bev Turner. - - - Ep. 2843 - - - Wake up with new Morning Wire merch: https://bit.ly/4lIubt3 - - - Today's Sponsors: Quince - Elevate your summer wardrobe. Go to https://quince.com/wire for free shipping on your order and 365-day returns. Now available in Canada too. Vanta - Whether you're a fast-growing startup or a global enterprise, Vanta is here to help you automate your security and compliance, and earn and prove trust. Get started today at https://vanta.com/morningwire - - - Privacy Policy: https://www.dailywire.com/privacy morning wire,morning wire podcast,the morning wire podcast,Georgia Howe,John Bickley,daily wire podcast,podcast,news podcast Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

WATER WARS HAVE BEGUN: The Colorado River Crisis Is Exploding The American West is facing a crisis that could reshape life for millions. The Colorado River supplies water to nearly 40 million people across the Southwest, but record drought, shrinking snowpack, rising temperatures, and increasing demand have pushed the river to a breaking point. California, Nevada, and Colorado all need the water. None want to give up their share. And now negotiations are collapsing. Could the next battle over the Colorado River be fought in court? As Lake Mead and Lake Powell continue to face pressure, states are preparing for what could become one of the biggest legal and political fights in modern American history. Plus: • Why are bars in San Francisco's Castro District using facial recognition technology on customers? • Is it legal, and what does it mean for privacy? • The latest political headlines from Washington. • Health and fitness news that could affect your daily life. The future of water in the American West isn't a distant problem—it's happening right now. Join history-making broadcaster Karel as he breaks down the stories shaping our lives, our freedoms, and our future. Support The Karel Cast: Patreon.com/reallykarel Subscribe: YouTube.com/reallykarel Listen on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, iHeartRadio, Spreaker, and everywhere podcasts are available. LIVE Monday through Thursday at 10:30 AM Pacific. #ColoradoRiver,#WaterWars,#LakeMead,#LakePowell,#Drought,#ClimateChange,#WaterCrisis,#California,#Nevada,#Colorado,#AmericanWest,#EnvironmentalNews,#BreakingNews,#Politics,#CurrentEvents,#ClimateCrisis,#WaterRights,#Southwest,#WesternStates,#FacialRecognition,#Privacy,#Technology,#Surveillance,#WashingtonDC,#HealthNews,#FitnessNews,#NewsAnalysis,#ReallyKarel,#KarelCast,#YouTubeNews https://youtube.com/live/pYC_rzWM-RU

ALIENS vs GOD? Would Disclosure Shatter Religion? What happens if humanity learns we are not alone? Steven Spielberg's upcoming film Disclosure Day raises a question that has fascinated scientists, theologians, and governments for generations: If extraterrestrial life is proven beyond any doubt, what happens next? Would confirmation of alien civilizations strengthen religious belief—or challenge it? Does the Bible leave room for intelligent life beyond Earth, or would disclosure force humanity to rethink some of its oldest stories about creation and our place in the universe? Karel explores the philosophical, religious, and political implications of alien disclosure, government secrecy, and whether the public has a right to know if world leaders already possess evidence of extraterrestrial life. Also on today's show:

and our laws are doing almost nothing to protect us...

06-14-26 Facial Recognition by Lisa Evers HOT97

China, Russia, and... the UK? We're talking about mass surveillance. Did you know the UK is in the 5 most surveilled countries in the world? AI facial recognition technology is causing alarm for its recent deployment at protests. It's being rolled out across the UK at a pace outstripping the rules designed to govern it. More than 6.6 million faces have been scanned since 2023. And guess what? Black and Asian people are most likely to be mismatched and criminally pursued in error. But surveillance these days isn't always as obvious as cameras on police vans. In today's world, it's about data. And governments aren't collecting it on their own – they're contracting private corporations to do it: via shady contracts that pay these companies not just in multimillion pound deals, but goldmines of our private information. Palantir is at the top of that list – and the US tech firm that's been providing ICE agents with private health data to help them target migrant communities has now got its claws in the NHS. Social media platforms are surveillance companies in their own right. And the media that's supposed to hold them to account often functions as a tool in the data-gathering industry. How are we supposed to navigate this minefield?! To help us through the maze, we're joined by Jasleen Chaggar, Senior Legal and Policy Officer at Big Brother Watch, and investigative tech reporter Jade Ruyu-Yan. This episode is hosted and produced by Mathilda Mallinson (⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@mathildamall⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠) and Helena Wadia (⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@helenawadia⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠)  The music is by⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ @soundofsamfire⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Follow us⁠ ⁠⁠@mediastormpod⁠ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Jim Love covers three headlines for June 10, 2026: OpenAI has filed confidential paperwork for a US IPO, with Reuters suggesting it could come as early as September amid a broader wave of potential blockbuster listings also involving Anthropic and SpaceX; the report reviews OpenAI's shift from non-profit to commercial powerhouse, prior governance turmoil around Sam Altman, planned conversion to a public benefit corporation, and disputed private-company revenue/user figures compared with Anthropic. Meta is aggressively rebutting a Wired report that found facial-recognition references in smart-glasses software that reportedly disappeared after inquiry, amid rising scrutiny of always-on recording and proposed notice laws. Kevin O'Leary apologized for missteps around Utah's Wonder Valley AI data center plan, which has been cut roughly in half after local opposition focused on water transfers, power, costs, and environmental impacts. 00:00 Headlines and intro 00:29 OpenAI files for IPO 02:14 OpenAI vs Anthropic numbers 03:35 Meta denies facial recognition 04:50 Smart glasses privacy backlash 05:58 Kevin O'Leary data center apology 07:02 Wonder Valley water and power fight 07:49 Lessons for AI infrastructure 08:54 Wrap up and support the show

Tech Justice Law Director and Founder Meetali Jain discusses the latest in a wrongful death lawsuit filed against ChatGPT. Northwestern Pritzker School of Law Professor Matthew Kugler joins Legal Face Off to discuss the latest in the class action facial recognition lawsuit against Disney. Harvard Law School Professor Rebecca Tushnet joins Rich and Tina to discuss […]

-Wired uncovered the dormant tool that contained algorithms which would have converted photos of faces into biometric identifiers stored on-device and cross referenced with each new facial scan. -Meta is once again asking a court to intervene in its long-running battle against spyware maker NSO Group. -The UK government is reviewing its National Health Service partnership with US data firm Palantir to decide if it will end the contract early. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Timestamps: 0:00 Intro 0:17 Steam Machine and Steam Frame Launch Window 1:32 Anthropic Urges AI Slowdown 3:01 Meta Facial Recognition 5:50 QUICK BITS INTRO 6:02 Nvidia RTX 50 Super Cards Back on Track 6:37 Leaked Microsoft Documents 7:26 YouTube Premium Price Increase 8:16 Bot Web Traffic Surpasses Humans 8:47 Waymo Used as a Getaway Car NEWS SOURCES: https://lmg.gg/0V72u Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

This week on The Queue, the crew accidentally uncovers a fascinating question about the future of themed entertainment.  First, Disney faces a new lawsuit over facial recognition technology at Disneyland, sparking debate over privacy, convenience, biometric data, and whether theme parks are becoming too dependent on surveillance technology. Then, we dive into Universal's Epic Universe one-year anniversary and the surprising new "Open Hub" concept that could completely change how theme parks operate in the future. Is Universal quietly building the first true next-generation theme park? Finally, Disney quietly launches new "Disney Store Limited Time" retail locations in malls across America — and fans are unexpectedly emotional about it. Did Disney underestimate how important physical Disney Stores were to fandom and nostalgia? Along the way, the crew discusses: facial recognition in theme parks Epic Universe expansion and innovation Disney vs Universal philosophy the future of immersive entertainment mall nostalgia Disney Store memories technology vs emotional connection and what fans REALLY want from themed entertainment in 2026. Join the conversation and let us know: Would you trade privacy for convenience in the parks? Has Epic Universe changed the industry? And do you miss Disney Stores? Civil discussions encouraged. Email us at show@magicourway.com, call or text 815-MOWICAN (669-4226), or slide into our social media DMs. Every thought and opinion will forever be welcome on this Disney fan podcast. This is show #630. Magic Our Way — Where Every Opinion Is Welcome.

From supermarkets to corner shops, live facial recognition could be coming to retailers near you. Jessica Murray on the AI systems increasingly used by the police and stores. Help support our independent journalism at theguardian.com/infocus

Today we speak to data scientist Tristan Lee. He tells us about his new project: Epstein.photos, a site that allows users to connect the Epstein cabal using facial recognition... No ads and all exclusives: patreon.com/popularfront Discounted 50% off the best internet privacy for all our listeners: proton.me/popularfront INFO | MERCH | NEWS | JAKE | SUBSTACK

In episode 2047, Jack and guest co-host Jamie Loftus are joined by creator and host of JennaWorld, Molly Lambert, to discuss… Indiana BMV Finds A Woman's Doppelganger Through Their Facial Recognition Software, The Ballad of Emily Hart, Trump Reclassifies Marijuana--Potentially Making It Uncool Forever and more! Indiana BMV Finds A Woman's Doppelganger Through Their Facial Recognition Software I Stalked Down My 'Law & Order' Doppelganger and Now We're in Love MAGA Influencer Emily Hart Exposed as Indian Man Trump administration moves to ease federal restrictions on marijuana Trump To Reclassify Marijuana 'As Soon As Wednesday,' But Prediction Markets Are Skeptical Trump officials reclassify medical marijuana as lower-risk drug Trump’s cannabis order will still leave users at risk of prosecution, experts say The Science behind the DEA's Long War on Marijuana Donald Trump Is Going to Ruin Legal Marijuana Why the New Cannabis Classification Matters Is Trump really considering relaxing laws on cannabis? Meet The Cannabis Industry’s Trump Whisperer How the cannabis industry leveraged a big win from Trump Trump could forgive cannabis convictions if he wanted to Weed Arrests Fall Nationwide, But Gaps Persist Colorado man detained by ICE for weeks due to decades-old marijuana charge Judge blasts ICE ‘sloppiness’ for claiming 4-year-old kid had a marijuana conviction LISTEN: The Thief in Marrakesh by Arc de SoleilSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.