Podcasts about sanctuary cities

We break down a jam-packed show starting with Dr. Josh McConkey, a board-certified emergency medicine physician and military flight surgeon, who joins us to untangle the real medical science behind new military testosterone screenings. While critics and the mainstream media try to spin this as a push for "toxic masculinity," Dr. McConkey explains how extreme operational stress routinely tanks hormone levels in service members over 30 and why routine screenings prolong critical careers. We also dive into the terrifying reality of the nationwide cyclospora outbreak. Dr. McConkey warns that this explosive diarrhea parasite can linger for up to six weeks, cannot be killed by household Lysol or hand sanitizer, and requires a strict cooking temperature of 158°C to neutralize on leafy green vegetables. Dawn gets fiery over the tragic death of Pennsylvania State Trooper Michael Fiera, who was struck and killed by an illegal Haitian migrant operating a massive tractor-trailer on a commercial driver's license. We play the powerful audio of President Trump honoring Trooper Fiera at the Pennsylvania Defense and Innovation Summit and react to the shocking revelation that the suspect had a documented history of severe medical seizures yet was still allowed on the road. Dawn highlights Trump's massive new economic commitment—a $10 billion defense investment in Pennsylvania to build national security multi-mission vessels at the Philadelphia Shipyard, bringing over 4,000 proud jobs back to the local workforce. We react to Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner's bizarre public video attacking House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan. Krasner lashed out at Jordan's formal investigation into Philly's sanctuary city policies, accusing him of writing "nastygrams" and "doing dirt in the dark." Dawn exposes the true numbers, pointing out that over 78,000 non-citizens reside in Philadelphia County, and calls for full transparency on how much local taxpayers are actively shelling out for daily city services. Finally, economist Dr. Michael Bussler of Stockton University joins the show to dissect the dipping inflation numbers and explain how artificial intelligence spending might temporarily boost demand while ultimately driving prices down by supercharging worker productivity.

Host Charlie James continues his discussions with South Carolina voters, beginning with a returning caller, John, who emphasizes the dissatisfaction surrounding establishment "RINO" politicians in both Columbia and Washington, D.C. Following this, a listener named Jeff from Lancaster raises logistics questions regarding the upcoming August 11th special election date overlapping with the first day of the school year. Next, a caller named Barbara details her experience using homemade alternative medical remedies including a concoction of organic lemon and grapefruit peels to treat illness, referencing historical treatments. Finally, Christina from Travelers Rest calls in to compliment James' interview style and notes another candidate's response alignment with policy approaches used by Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker regarding sanctuary state policies, leading James to recount South Carolina's own past encounters with local sanctuary jurisdictions like North Charleston under former Sheriff Kristin Graziano.

During the fourth hour of The Charlie James Show, host Charlie James engagingly navigates a variety of pressing political topics alongside call-in listeners. Callers voice structural concerns regarding the South Carolina Republican Party's focus, sparking intense debates about state demographics, localized sanctuary city policies, and alternative medical treatments. The program shifts focus to national politics, highlighting an upcoming speech by Donald Trump on election integrity and tracking cyber-meddling assertions. Finally, James maps out the official timeline for South Carolina's special primary election to fill the vacant Senate seat, revealing that candidate filing opens on July 21st, and shares early Emerson College poll numbers showing Ralph Norman leading the field.

Missouri Senator Eric Schmitt joins The Marc Cox Morning Show with a heartfelt tribute to the late Senator Lindsey Graham, calling him the most entertaining man in the Senate and a true friend across the aisle. But the conversation quickly turns to business — Schmitt exposes the insanity of Senate Democrats like Mazie Hirono fighting his bill to denaturalize and deport violent criminals and fraudsters who came to America illegally, and breaks down exactly what sanctuary jurisdictions really mean for public safety. Schmitt also updates listeners on the stalled Save America Act, his own legislation targeting mail-in ballot fraud, and doesn't hold back his concern over the rise of democratic socialists and open communist rhetoric infecting the Democrat Party. Closing strong, Schmitt confirms his full support for Missouri's Amendments 4 and 5, arguing eliminating the state income tax would make Missouri as competitive as Tennessee. Straight answers from a straight shooter — that's what you get on The Marc Cox Morning Show. Coming up: Michael Morris of the Media Research Center on Big Tech's suppression of the Graham Platner story. Hashtags: #MarcCoxMorningShow #EricSchmitt #LindseyGraham #SanctuaryCities #ICE #Deportation #SaveAmericaAct #Amendment4 #Amendment5 #MissouriPolitics #DemocraticSocialists #Communism #Conservative #GOP #FaithFamilyFreedom

Legal expert Hans von Spakovsky joins Marc Cox with a personal story about Senator Lindsey Graham from three decades ago, calling his loss a real blow to the Senate. Then the conversation turns to the DOJ's lawsuit against Maryland over its sweeping sanctuary state law, Illinois allowing non-citizens to serve in law enforcement, and the growing legal minefield around AI-generated financial and legal advice. Hans also breaks down the Supreme Court's decision to take up Illinois' assault weapons ban after a string of Second Amendment wins. Common sense law and order, straight from a senior legal fellow who's been in the trenches. You don't want to miss this one. Hashtags: #MarcCoxMorningShow #HansVonSpakovsky #LindseyGraham #SanctuaryCities #ImmigrationEnforcement #SecondAmendment #AIRegulation #RuleOfLaw #ConservativeValues #AdvancingAmericanFreedom

New York City Councilwoman Vickie Paladino joins The Karol Markowicz Show for a candid conversation about standing as one of the city’s most prominent Republican voices, winning over voters in a heavily Democratic district, and why she believes New York City is at a critical turning point. Paladino discusses her opposition to Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s agenda, her concerns over the direction of the Democratic Party, the future of New York politics, sanctuary city policies, and her fight to protect free speech amid a legal battle with the City Council. She also shares how her background as a small business owner, PTA parent, and community activist shaped her approach to public service. Karol and Vickie also reflect on why so many families have left New York, whether the city can return to what it once was, and the importance of staying optimistic, building trust, and taking on challenges one step at a time.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

A devastating deadly crash in Pennsylvania is putting the spotlight on immigration enforcement and public safety. Forty-four-year-old State Trooper Michael Pahira was killed after being struck by a semi-truck driven by a 33-year-old Haitian national. Former Acting DHS Secretary Chad Wolf joins FOX's Bill Melugin to discuss the tragic incident and the Trump administration's intensifying crackdown on sanctuary cities. With Walmart and Sam's Club having slashed prices on a wide range of goods, a mix of administration policies and falling energy costs are reshaping the retail landscape. FOX Business White House correspondent Edward Lawrence joins to discuss how President Trump's import decisions have driven down the cost of beef, what the Federal Reserve's latest leadership shift means for the future of interest rates, and why escalating tariff pressures are forcing major manufacturers like Toyota to bring production back to the United States. PLUS, commentary by Tomi Lahren, co-host on FOX News Channel's The Big Weekend Show and the host of Tomi Lahren is Fearless on Outkick.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

A devastating deadly crash in Pennsylvania is putting the spotlight on immigration enforcement and public safety. Forty-four-year-old State Trooper Michael Pahira was killed after being struck by a semi-truck driven by a 33-year-old Haitian national. Former Acting DHS Secretary Chad Wolf joins FOX's Bill Melugin to discuss the tragic incident and the Trump administration's intensifying crackdown on sanctuary cities. With Walmart and Sam's Club having slashed prices on a wide range of goods, a mix of administration policies and falling energy costs are reshaping the retail landscape. FOX Business White House correspondent Edward Lawrence joins to discuss how President Trump's import decisions have driven down the cost of beef, what the Federal Reserve's latest leadership shift means for the future of interest rates, and why escalating tariff pressures are forcing major manufacturers like Toyota to bring production back to the United States. PLUS, commentary by Tomi Lahren, co-host on FOX News Channel's The Big Weekend Show and the host of Tomi Lahren is Fearless on Outkick.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

A devastating deadly crash in Pennsylvania is putting the spotlight on immigration enforcement and public safety. Forty-four-year-old State Trooper Michael Pahira was killed after being struck by a semi-truck driven by a 33-year-old Haitian national. Former Acting DHS Secretary Chad Wolf joins FOX's Bill Melugin to discuss the tragic incident and the Trump administration's intensifying crackdown on sanctuary cities. With Walmart and Sam's Club having slashed prices on a wide range of goods, a mix of administration policies and falling energy costs are reshaping the retail landscape. FOX Business White House correspondent Edward Lawrence joins to discuss how President Trump's import decisions have driven down the cost of beef, what the Federal Reserve's latest leadership shift means for the future of interest rates, and why escalating tariff pressures are forcing major manufacturers like Toyota to bring production back to the United States. PLUS, commentary by Tomi Lahren, co-host on FOX News Channel's The Big Weekend Show and the host of Tomi Lahren is Fearless on Outkick.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

 Rep. Mike Lawler and Rep. Jamie Raskin just had one of the most explosive House Judiciary Committee clashes we've seen in a long time.During a hearing on sanctuary-city policies, Lawler brought up the killing of 18-year-old Sheridan Gorman and challenged Democrats directly over whether they show the same outrage for victims like Sheridan Gorman and Laken Riley as they do in other politically charged cases.Then everything erupted.Raskin fired back. Lawler refused to back down. The hearing descended into shouting, finger-pointing, and one of the most intense moments on Capitol Hill this year.But beneath the political fireworks is a grieving family, a murdered daughter, and a much bigger question America cannot ignore:Are sanctuary-city policies protecting communities — or putting innocent people in danger?In this video, we break down the full exchange, what Lawler said, why Raskin exploded, what Jessica Gorman told Congress, and why this moment may become a defining flashpoint in the national immigration debate.Sources include House Judiciary hearing coverage, ABC7 Chicago, Chicago Sun-Times, and Mediaite reporting.Comment below: Did Lawler go too far — or did he say what needed to be said?For free and unbiased Medicare help, dial (656) 218-0931 to speak with my trusted partner, Chapter, or go to https://askchapter.org/nez✅ Reach out to me: https://bio.site/professornez✅ ORIGINAL MADE IN U.S.A 250TH AMERICA DESIGNS: https://professornez.myspreadshop.com/✅ Check out our Official Clips Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@professornezclips▶ Support the Channel and Buy us a Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/professornezEducational Commentary & Original AnalysisThis channel presents educational, lecture-style analysis created by a university professor and educator. Content focuses on contextual examination, historical background, legal frameworks, and evidence-based analysis of widely reported events, public records, and institutional processes.The approach emphasizes academic methodology, media literacy, and source-driven interpretation rather than advocacy, persuasion, or real-time news reporting. Viewers are encouraged to consult primary sources and form independent conclusions.All content is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, medical, or professional advice. Views expressed are solely those of the creator.This channel may include references or links to third-party websites or products for informational purposes. Some links may be affiliate links, which may generate a commission at no additional cost to the viewer.In this video expert Professor Nez analyzes and educates on what happened and why with fact based, data based, verified and researched expertise reporting.All original content is protected by copyright. Fair use applies where permitted by law.Category: News Analysis & Educational CommentaryMethodology: This report utilizes primary source verification and comparative analysis of public records.Subject Matter Expertise: Political Strategy, Regulatory Policy, and Media Literacy.#MikeLawler #JamieRaskin #SheridanGorman #JessicaGorman #SanctuaryCities #HouseJudiciary #ImmigrationNews #BorderCrisis #ChicagoCrime #LakenRiley #PoliticalNews #BreakingNews #Congress #CapitolHill #ProfessorNez #AmericaFirst #ViralPolitics #LawlerVsRaskin #SanctuaryCity #IllegalImmigration

An absolute political firestorm is unfolding!

The news of Texas covered today includes:Our Lone Star story of the day: Abortion if illegal in Texas but abortion trafficking is not. So why are some cities and counties, including rural areas, refusing to pass bans on abortion trafficking? Often these are electorates of very conservative pro-life people but their commissioners and city council folk are hostile to the pro-life movement. Are they just more fake “Republicans” who claim the title simply to gain office?We spend the show talking with Mark Lee Dickson, the undisputed leader in Texas of advancing the Sanctuary City and County for the Unborn effort.Our Lone Star story of the day is sponsored by Allied Compliance Services providing the best service in DOT, business and personal drug and alcohol testing since 1995.Listen on the radio, or station stream, at 5pm Central. Click for our radio and streaming affiliates, or hear the podcast of the show after 6pm Central here.www.PrattonTexas.com

The Democratic Party's stance on sanctuary cities and the abolition of the carceral system is a misguided approach that neglects the needs of the law-abiding citizens. President Trump attended the grand opening ceremony for the newly-built Theodore Roosevelt Presidential Library in North Dakota today. Seth references the words of Roosevelt, who emphasized the importance of protecting society from the enemy of the law-abiding citizen - the criminal. We’re joined by Don Spini from Sun Valley Wealth. Producer David Doll talks about the best and worst foods at the Great American State Fair, according to The Washington Post.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

A political question this week -- what are sanctuary cities and where do they come from?Join us on Mondays this summer for rebroadcast episodes and on Thursdays for new Pop Quizzes. Stay tuned for some additional original content in the coming weeks!

We open this segment of The Dawn Stensland Show with guest host Kathy Barnett reacting to the emotional testimony of Jessica Gorman before the House Judiciary Subcommittee on sanctuary city policies. We listen to a mother detail the tragic loss of her 18-year-old daughter, Sheridan Grace Gorman, who was murdered in Chicago by an illegal immigrant from Venezuela who remained on the streets despite an outstanding warrant. The crew breaks down how failed border policies, a refusal to cooperate with ICE, and misplaced priorities among elected politicians continue to fail American citizens. Kathy Barnett welcomes commentator Mary Walter to the program to dissect how the left pursues power at any cost, detailing a system where local law enforcement is blocked from reporting criminals to immigration authorities. We call out the Senate for taking extended summer vacations while major legislative items like the SAVE Act sit stalled, highlighting how entrenched politicians protect their positions instead of securing elections. We argue that the ruling elite across the country operates under a dangerous illusion of immunity from the long-term consequences of failing to uphold basic laws. We close out the hour by diving directly into the stated platform on the Democratic Socialists of America website to expose their explicit plans for the future of the nation. Dawn's guest host walks listeners through the radical pledges of socialist candidates winning seats in Pennsylvania and beyond, including calls for open borders, complete immigrant amnesty, non-citizen voting rights, and the total demilitarization of the United States border. We issue a fierce warning to parents to stop taking American liberties for granted, challenging families to read the Declaration of Independence to their children and actively combat the internal dismantling of our country.

The left loves their sanctuary cities, but don't bother US Representative Pramila Jayapal about it too much. People are dying, but she's got bigger fish to fry. 

This Day in Legal History: Shelby County v. HolderOn this day in legal history, June 25, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Shelby County v. Holder, a major case on the future of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. In a 5–4 decision, the Court struck down Section 4(b) of the Act, which contained the formula used to decide which states and local governments were subject to federal oversight before changing their voting laws. That oversight system, known as preclearance, had required covered jurisdictions to get approval from the federal government before making changes to election rules. The purpose of preclearance was to stop discriminatory voting practices before they could affect an election. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the majority opinion, concluding that the coverage formula was based on outdated data and no longer reflected current conditions.The Court did not strike down preclearance itself, but without a valid coverage formula, the preclearance system was largely left without practical effect. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg dissented, joined by Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan. Ginsburg argued that Congress had created a strong record showing that voting discrimination still existed and that the law remained necessary. Her dissent included the now-famous warning that throwing out preclearance because it had worked was like “throwing away your umbrella in a rainstorm because you are not getting wet.” The decision had immediate consequences because several states that had previously been covered by the formula moved forward with voting-law changes soon after the ruling. Supporters of the decision viewed it as a limit on outdated federal control over state election systems. Critics saw it as a major weakening of one of the most effective civil-rights laws in American history. The case remains central to modern debates over voting access, election administration, federalism, and Congress's power to enforce the Fifteenth Amendment.A federal judge has rejected the Trump administration's attempt to force New Jersey cities to comply with federal immigration enforcement demands. The ruling is a major victory for sanctuary cities and immigrants' rights advocates. Here's the context: Sanctuary cities are municipalities that limit their cooperation with federal immigration authorities. These cities typically instruct their police departments not to ask people about immigration status during routine stops, and they decline to detain people solely based on federal immigration requests (called “detainer requests”) unless there's a warrant signed by a judge.The Trump administration argued that sanctuary city policies undermine immigration enforcement and violate federal law. The administration sued, claiming cities cannot refuse to cooperate with ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement). New Jersey cities argued they have the right to set their own police practices and that cooperating with federal immigration enforcement diverts local police resources from public safety priorities. They also pointed out that when police are seen as working with immigration authorities, immigrant communities become afraid to report crimes or cooperate with law enforcement, which makes the entire community less safe.Local police have limited resources. A city police officer has to decide whether to use their time investigating a robbery or helping federal immigration agents deport someone. Local communities have a right to prioritize local public safety. Moreover, if immigrant families fear that any contact with police will result in deportation, they won't report crimes, won't testify as witnesses, and crime will increase. The federal judge agreed with New Jersey. The court found that cities have the authority to set their own police practices and cannot be forced to participate in federal immigration enforcement, particularly when federal authorities can get judicial warrants if they believe someone should be detained.The ruling protects sanctuary city policies This decision affirms that local communities can set their own law enforcement priorities and aren't required to become extensions of federal immigration enforcement. It recognizes that immigrants are part of communities and that community safety depends on immigrants trusting local police. The ruling will likely inspire other sanctuary jurisdictions to defend their policies against federal challenges. It represents a significant pushback against the Trump administration's aggressive immigration enforcement agenda.Judge tosses Trump administration's challenge to New Jersey cities' ‘sanctuary' policies | ReutersNew Jersey's Supreme Court has ruled that police departments cannot keep their use of facial recognition technology entirely secret. The decision represents a significant victory for transparency in law enforcement. Here's what happened: Police departments have increasingly used facial recognition software to identify suspects by comparing surveillance video or photos to databases of mugshots and driver's license photos. The technology can help solve crimes, but it also raises serious concerns about accuracy, bias, and privacy. Civil liberties groups have argued that if police use facial recognition to investigate people, the public and defendants have a right to know about it.Transparency is especially important because facial recognition technology has known accuracy problems, particularly when identifying people of color. If a police department relies on facial recognition to identify a suspect, and that technology is biased or inaccurate, the defendant needs to know that to challenge the evidence in court. New Jersey police departments had been claiming that their use of facial recognition was a “trade secret” or “law enforcement technique” that they could keep secret. The New Jersey Supreme Court said no.If the government uses technology to investigate you, you have a constitutional right to know about it and to challenge it. You can't mount a proper defense if you don't know what evidence was used to identify you or how reliable that evidence is.The court found that transparency about police use of facial recognition is essential to the defendant's right to a fair trial and to public accountability. Facial recognition technology is too important and too prone to error for police to keep its use secret. This ruling sets a precedent that police departments cannot hide behind “trade secrets” to avoid disclosing their investigative methods. It opens the door to litigation challenging facial recognition evidence on grounds of accuracy and bias. It also signals that courts recognize the dangers of artificial intelligence and surveillance technology and will require transparency and accountability around their use.New Jersey court limits secrecy around police use of facial recognition tools | ReutersA federal judge has ordered the Trump administration to provide a detailed explanation for covering a mural at the Kennedy Center that depicts civil rights imagery and historical figures. The ruling centers on questions of censorship, government power, and artistic freedom.The Kennedy Center, a performing arts venue in Washington, D.C., displays a mural that includes imagery related to the civil rights movement and depicts various historical and cultural figures. The Trump administration decided to cover the mural with tarps, presumably because it objected to the political or social messaging of the artwork. Civil liberties groups and artists sued, arguing that covering the mural violated the First Amendment by suppressing speech and political expression. The Trump administration claimed it had legitimate reasons for covering the mural, though it didn't initially specify what those reasons were. The federal judge said the government cannot simply cover up art without explaining why.The First Amendment protects people's right to speak and express themselves, including through art. When the government covers up art or speech, it's engaging in “prior restraint”—stopping speech before it happens. Courts are extremely skeptical of prior restraint because the whole point of the First Amendment is to prevent the government from censoring expression it dislikes. The government has to have a very good reason to suppress speech, and it has to be transparent about its reasons. The Kennedy Center mural at issue appears to have been covered by the administration for political reasons—it objected to the message. That's exactly the kind of censorship the First Amendment is designed to prevent. The judge's order requires the administration to explain its reasoning, which will allow the court to evaluate whether the government's stated reasons are legitimate or whether this is simply political censorship.This ruling protects artistic expression and prevents the government from secretly censoring art it dislikes. It affirms that the Kennedy Center's mural is protected speech, not just decoration. It also sends a message that when the government restricts speech or expression, it must be transparent and justify its actions in court. The case reflects broader concerns about executive power and the limits of what a president can do to suppress expression, art, or speech that the administration objects to.US judge orders Trump administration to explain tarp obscuring Kennedy Center facade | Reuters This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

Send us Fan MailPop in with Price Van Ray who supervises Hakeem and Reggie Brown on Pop City Culture. On Episode #231 we discuss:  Deja Vu wether o not the government is controlling ths or if it is a natural occurring phenomenon.  Remember you heard it ere first. "Pop City Culture"  Keeping it real and keeping it REAL and RAW!!!!!

The uniparty is in an absolute tailspin, and the full truth is dropping like a landslide!

The uniparty machine is in absolute panic mode!

This Day in Legal History: Title IXOn June 23, 1972, President Richard Nixon signed the Education Amendments of 1972, a sweeping federal education law that included what became one of the most consequential civil rights provisions in American history: Title IX. Title IX stated that no person in the United States, on the basis of sex, could be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving federal financial assistance. The language was brief, but its legal effect was enormous because it tied sex-equality obligations to the federal funding received by schools, colleges, and universities. That structure gave the federal government a powerful enforcement tool: institutions that accepted federal education money also had to comply with anti-discrimination rules.Although Title IX is often remembered for transforming women's and girls' athletics, the law was never limited to sports. It also affected admissions, scholarships, hiring, classroom access, pregnancy discrimination, and later legal debates over sexual harassment and institutional responsibility. Before Title IX, many educational institutions openly limited opportunities for women, including through quotas, unequal athletic resources, and restricted access to professional programs. The statute helped turn those practices into legal liabilities rather than accepted traditions. In later decades, courts and federal agencies would shape Title IX's meaning through regulations, enforcement actions, and major cases interpreting what counts as sex discrimination in education. Its influence reached far beyond individual lawsuits because schools had to rethink policies, reporting systems, athletic budgets, and equal-access obligations.Title IX also became a model for how civil rights law can operate through spending power, using federal money as the hook for national anti-discrimination standards. Its passage showed that a single sentence in a larger statute could become a foundation for generations of legal, political, and cultural change. On June 23, 1972, the federal government did more than amend education law; it created a durable legal framework for challenging sex discrimination wherever public money supported educational opportunity.A federal judge in California dismissed the Trump administration's lawsuit challenging Los Angeles's limits on cooperation with federal immigration enforcement. The administration had argued that the city's ordinance was unconstitutional because it restricted the use of city resources to support federal immigration operations and limited the collection of citizenship-status information. U.S. District Judge Fernando Olguin rejected that argument, finding that Los Angeles was regulating the conduct of its own employees and agencies rather than trying to control the federal government. The dismissal was not necessarily the end of the case, because the judge allowed the administration to file an amended complaint. Los Angeles City Attorney Hydee Feldstein Soto praised the ruling, saying it confirmed that local governments can decide how to use their own personnel and resources. The lawsuit was filed after immigration-related protests in Los Angeles and after Trump sent troops to the city in response to unrest over deportation operations. The case is part of a broader Trump administration effort to challenge local “sanctuary” policies in Democratic-led jurisdictions. Similar administration lawsuits against Boston and Chicago have also been dismissed by federal judges. The White House did not immediately comment on the ruling. The decision leaves Los Angeles's ordinance intact for now while giving the federal government another chance to revise its legal claims.US court dismisses Trump administration lawsuit over Los Angeles immigration policy | ReutersA federal judge in Washington, D.C., blocked the Trump administration from using a revised immigration database to help states check voter rolls. The database, known as SAVE, is used by the Department of Homeland Security to verify citizenship and immigration status, but the administration had changed it to make bulk searches easier for state and local officials reviewing voter eligibility. U.S. District Judge Sparkle Sooknanan sided with voting-rights and privacy groups that argued the changes made the system less reliable and could wrongly remove eligible voters from registration lists. The challengers said the database can be outdated, especially when naturalized citizens are still incorrectly listed as noncitizens. The judge also found that the revamped system raised serious privacy concerns because it gave users access to sensitive information, including Social Security numbers. DHS criticized the ruling and framed the case as part of its effort to prevent noncitizen voting. The ruling comes as the Trump administration has tried to expand the federal government's role in election administration before the November 2026 midterm elections. Courts have already blocked several related efforts, including parts of executive orders involving proof-of-citizenship requirements and mail-ballot restrictions. The administration has also faced setbacks in lawsuits seeking full voter-roll data from states. For now, the decision limits how the federal government can use immigration records in voter-roll checks.Judge blocks Trump's use of revamped immigration database for voter checks | ReutersIn my Bloomberg column this week, I wrote about OpenAI's request that Treasury update an outdated R&D tax credit rule for computer-related research expenses. My argument is that OpenAI's position should not be dismissed as just another technology company asking for a more generous tax benefit. The problem is that the existing rule was designed for an older world of identifiable physical computers, not modern cloud computing, data centers, GPUs, and reserved compute capacity. Section 41 allows a research credit for certain amounts paid to another person for computer use in qualified research, but Treasury regulations narrow that benefit by requiring that the computer be owned and operated by someone else, located off the taxpayer's premises, and not be a computer for which the taxpayer is the “primary user.” That “primary user” test made more sense when a taxpayer could point to a discrete machine, but it becomes unstable when a company is buying access to capacity inside a provider-owned cloud or data center.I argue that reserved or exclusive use of computing capacity should not automatically be treated as ownership or abuse, because modern AI research may require dedicated capacity for security, speed, and performance reasons. The real question should be whether the taxpayer is buying a third-party service or has effectively acquired, operated, or taken control of the infrastructure. Treasury can still protect against abuse without treating ordinary commercial cloud arrangements as disguised ownership. I suggest that a practical safe harbor could presume service treatment where the provider owns, operates, maintains, and houses the equipment off the taxpayer's premises while bearing the incidents of ownership. That presumption should remain rebuttable where the taxpayer bears ownership-like risks or is simply routing its own equipment through another entity to claim the credit.The broader point is that modernizing the rule would not need to turn the R&D credit into an AI subsidy machine, but it would prevent an old regulatory framework from excluding a major category of modern research. The column closes with the idea that tax rules meant to police fake outsourcing should not end up penalizing real outsourcing just because the computing world no longer looks like it did when the rule was written.OpenAI's Call for Modernized R&D Credit Rule Makes Perfect Sense This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

Send us Fan MailPop in with Price Van Ray who supervises Hakeem and Reggie Brown on Pop City Culture. On Episode #230 we discuss:  THE RISING: Human like people are coming out of the sewers all over the world by the thousands. This episode is dealing with them coming out of the sewers of Ne York City. These are scary times and we have to be vigilant.  Remember you heard it ere first. "Pop City Culture"  Keeping it real and keeping it REAL and RAW!!!!!

6/12/26 (Host – Josh Silver) MTA President Max Page w/ Congressional Candidate Mariah Lancaster: running for an open seat for the 6th Congressional District, Primary in September Director Rose Schwietz Malla, Assistant Director Hia Ghosh, Actor Caleb Koval: Silverthorne Theater Company's Sanctuary City by Martyna Majok, Performances now through June 21 at Hampshire College Theater (Emily Dickinson Hall). Director Jen Polins: The School For Contemporary Dance & Thought presents Hatchery Dance Company's Asteroid B-612: A Love Story inspired by The Little Prince at The Workroom Theater in Northampton. June 12 (sold out) & June 13 2 & 730 pm Josh Silver: Easthampton Override & Easthampton's World Cup Watch Parties MTA President Max Page & Senator Ed Markey: Public Education, The Big Ugly Bill & Markey facing Seth Moulton for the Democratic nomination for U.S. Senate in the September 1 primary.

6/12/26 (Host – Josh Silver) MTA President Max Page w/ Congressional Candidate Mariah Lancaster: running for an open seat for the 6th Congressional District, Primary in September Director Rose Schwietz Malla, Assistant Director Hia Ghosh, Actor Caleb Koval: Silverthorne Theater Company's Sanctuary City by Martyna Majok, Performances now through June 21 at Hampshire College Theater (Emily Dickinson Hall). Director Jen Polins: The School For Contemporary Dance & Thought presents Hatchery Dance Company's Asteroid B-612: A Love Story inspired by The Little Prince at The Workroom Theater in Northampton. June 12 (sold out) & June 13 2 & 730 pm Josh Silver: Easthampton Override & Easthampton's World Cup Watch Parties MTA President Max Page & Senator Ed Markey: Public Education, The Big Ugly Bill & Markey facing Seth Moulton for the Democratic nomination for U.S. Senate in the September 1 primary.

6/12/26 (Host – Josh Silver) MTA President Max Page w/ Congressional Candidate Mariah Lancaster: running for an open seat for the 6th Congressional District, Primary in September Director Rose Schwietz Malla, Assistant Director Hia Ghosh, Actor Caleb Koval: Silverthorne Theater Company's Sanctuary City by Martyna Majok, Performances now through June 21 at Hampshire College Theater (Emily Dickinson Hall). Director Jen Polins: The School For Contemporary Dance & Thought presents Hatchery Dance Company's Asteroid B-612: A Love Story inspired by The Little Prince at The Workroom Theater in Northampton. June 12 (sold out) & June 13 2 & 730 pm Josh Silver: Easthampton Override & Easthampton's World Cup Watch Parties MTA President Max Page & Senator Ed Markey: Public Education, The Big Ugly Bill & Markey facing Seth Moulton for the Democratic nomination for U.S. Senate in the September 1 primary.

6/12/26 (Host – Josh Silver) MTA President Max Page w/ Congressional Candidate Mariah Lancaster: running for an open seat for the 6th Congressional District, Primary in September Director Rose Schwietz Malla, Assistant Director Hia Ghosh, Actor Caleb Koval: Silverthorne Theater Company's Sanctuary City by Martyna Majok, Performances now through June 21 at Hampshire College Theater (Emily Dickinson Hall). Director Jen Polins: The School For Contemporary Dance & Thought presents Hatchery Dance Company's Asteroid B-612: A Love Story inspired by The Little Prince at The Workroom Theater in Northampton. June 12 (sold out) & June 13 2 & 730 pm Josh Silver: Easthampton Override & Easthampton's World Cup Watch Parties MTA President Max Page & Senator Ed Markey: Public Education, The Big Ugly Bill & Markey facing Seth Moulton for the Democratic nomination for U.S. Senate in the September 1 primary.

6/12/26 (Host – Josh Silver) MTA President Max Page w/ Congressional Candidate Mariah Lancaster: running for an open seat for the 6th Congressional District, Primary in September Director Rose Schwietz Malla, Assistant Director Hia Ghosh, Actor Caleb Koval: Silverthorne Theater Company's Sanctuary City by Martyna Majok, Performances now through June 21 at Hampshire College Theater (Emily Dickinson Hall). Director Jen Polins: The School For Contemporary Dance & Thought presents Hatchery Dance Company's Asteroid B-612: A Love Story inspired by The Little Prince at The Workroom Theater in Northampton. June 12 (sold out) & June 13 2 & 730 pm Josh Silver: Easthampton Override & Easthampton's World Cup Watch Parties MTA President Max Page & Senator Ed Markey: Public Education, The Big Ugly Bill & Markey facing Seth Moulton for the Democratic nomination for U.S. Senate in the September 1 primary.

The secrets of Ninjutsu are closely guarded. Why has the sanctuary city question ever come up to SCOTUS? The powers local cities and states have over immigration. What ever happened to the Fulton County water main break? Follow The Jesse Kelly Show on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@TheJesseKellyShowSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Peter Greenberg, travel expert and host of Eye on Travel on WGN Radio, joins Lisa Dent from San Diego to discuss how the DHS is making plans to halt processing of international flights in sanctuary cities, if Cuba is affected by a lack of tourism, and more!

Joyce talks about :Education in America and the pushback against pride and American values. The media's bias reporting. Investigations find more fraud schemes in Minnesota involving two Somali immigrants. Governor Gavin Newsom wants an 100% tax on payouts from the "Anti-weaponization Fund" to be provided to January 6th protesters.Sanctuary cities and crimes committed by illegal immigrants. War games between the US and Iran.Derek from TMZ calls in to talk about The New York Knicks win! Mackenzie Shirilla documentary, the search for Alaskan Bush People's Matt Brown, and the passing of Kyle Bush. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

New synthetic opioids, immigration and customs at sanctuary city airports, long-term responsibility for drunk drivers, and preparing for Christ's return. Plus, Daniel Darling on the Christian worldview movement, school commute on farm equipment, and the Thursday morning newsSupport The World and Everything in It today at wng.org/donateAdditional support comes from Pensacola Theological Seminary... Preparing students to preach God's Word. go.pcci.edu/startseminaryFrom St. Dunstan's, inviting young men into the building arts and the adventure of holiness on a Blue Ridge Mountains farm... stdunstansacademy.orgAnd from WatersEdge. Today's investment, tomorrow's thriving churches. 3.25% APY on demand. WatersEdge.com/invest WatersEdge securities are subject to certain risk factors as described in our Offering Circular and are not FDIC or SIPC insured. This is not an offer to sell or solicit securities. WatersEdge offers and sells securities only where authorized; this offering is made solely by our Offering Circular.

Get the facts, without the spin. UNBIASED offers a clear, impartial recap of US news, including politics, elections, legal news, and more. Hosted by lawyer Jordan Berman, each episode provides a recap of current political events plus breakdowns of complex concepts—like constitutional rights, recent Supreme Court rulings, and new legislation—in an easy-to-understand way. No personal opinions, just the facts you need to stay informed on the daily news that matters. If you miss how journalism used to be, you're in the right place. In today's episode: DOJ Opens Criminal Investigation Into E. Jean Carroll (0:12) Former President Biden Sues DOJ to Block Release of Audio Recordings (6:18) DHS Secretary Proposes Pulling CBP Agents from Airports in Sanctuary Cities (~18:12) Quick Hitters (~23:10) Rumor Has It: North Carolina's Controversial "Life at Fertilization" Bill Explained (~32:04) Critical Thinking Segment (~46:10) ⁠Watch⁠ this episode on YouTube. Follow Jordan on ⁠Instagram⁠ and ⁠TikTok⁠. All sources for this episode can be found ⁠here.⁠  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The power of the MAGA endorsement strikes again following Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton's decisive runoff victory, signaling a significant shift in the Republican landscape as the fight for Congressional control continues. Senator Jim Banks (R-IN) joins the Rundown to discuss whether this primary momentum can be sustained through November. Plus, he breaks down his legislative push for the "Delilah Law," which would restrict commercial driver's licenses for illegal immigrants, and a bold proposal from the DHS secretary to pull federal customs agents from sanctuary city airports as a form of jurisdictional retaliation. The upcoming hurricane season is bringing a mix of relief and uncertainty as rare global weather patterns clash with record ocean warmth. FOX Weather Meteorologist Ian Oliver joins to discuss NOAA's recent predictions for a quieter-than-usual year, the inner workings of a massive Pacific warming trend that acts as a natural shield against storm development, and how groundbreaking AI technology is being used to better predict severe weather and protect coastal communities. PLUS, commentary by Kaylee McGhee White, FOX News contributor and the editor-in-chief of IW Features. PHOTO CREDIT: ASSOCIATED PRESS Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Tony talks about Markwayne Mullin drawing up plans to halt international flight processing in sanctuary cities. Tony also talks about the Ebola outbreak. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The power of the MAGA endorsement strikes again following Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton's decisive runoff victory, signaling a significant shift in the Republican landscape as the fight for Congressional control continues. Senator Jim Banks (R-IN) joins the Rundown to discuss whether this primary momentum can be sustained through November. Plus, he breaks down his legislative push for the "Delilah Law," which would restrict commercial driver's licenses for illegal immigrants, and a bold proposal from the DHS secretary to pull federal customs agents from sanctuary city airports as a form of jurisdictional retaliation. The upcoming hurricane season is bringing a mix of relief and uncertainty as rare global weather patterns clash with record ocean warmth. FOX Weather Meteorologist Ian Oliver joins to discuss NOAA's recent predictions for a quieter-than-usual year, the inner workings of a massive Pacific warming trend that acts as a natural shield against storm development, and how groundbreaking AI technology is being used to better predict severe weather and protect coastal communities. PLUS, commentary by Kaylee McGhee White, FOX News contributor and the editor-in-chief of IW Features. PHOTO CREDIT: ASSOCIATED PRESS Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

This Day in Legal History: The Indian Removal Act of 1830On this day May 28, 1830, President Andrew Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act, authorizing the federal government to “negotiate” the relocation of Native American tribes east of the Mississippi to lands in what is now Oklahoma. On its face the statute framed displacement as voluntary, treaty-based, and compensated; in practice it became the legal scaffolding for the forced expulsion of the Cherokee, Choctaw, Chickasaw, Creek, and Seminole nations, culminating in the Trail of Tears.The bill passed the House by just five votes, with Davy Crockett among its most prominent dissenters. The years that immediately followed produced the Marshall Court's foundational Indian law trilogy — Johnson v. M'Intosh, Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, and Worcester v. Georgia — the last of which Jackson famously (and probably apocryphally) refused to enforce. The doctrinal residue of the Removal era is still in force today: tribes remain “domestic dependent nations,” Congress still claims a “plenary power” over them, and the Supreme Court is still relitigating what reservation boundaries actually mean — most recently in McGirt v. Oklahoma in 2020 and Haaland v. Brackeen in 2023. The 1830 Act was not the beginning of dispossession in North America, but it was the moment Congress took ownership of the policy and dressed it in the language of statute. Whatever else May 28 marks on the calendar, in legal history it marks the day removal became American law.Dutch coatings giant AkzoNobel, the maker of Dulux paint, told Sherwin-Williams and Nippon Paint Wednesday that their €12.5 billion ($14.6 billion) joint takeover proposal is not a “superior proposal” and that the board would stay the course on its already-agreed merger with Axalta Coating Systems. The rejected offer, made at €73 per share, would have carved AkzoNobel up — Nippon taking the decorative paints business, Sherwin-Williams taking industrial coatings — and was the second pass after an earlier bid that the board had swatted away in April.AkzoNobel's reasons read like a Dutch corporate-law primer: the offer “did not come close to adequately reflecting” long-term value, the deal-certainty risk around regulatory clearances was too high, and the “interests of AkzoNobel stakeholders” were not adequately safeguarded. That last word is the legal tell. Under Dutch law, a listed company's board is not bound by anything resembling Delaware's Revlon duty to maximize shareholder value in a sale; it answers to a stakeholder model that explicitly weighs employees, creditors, suppliers, and the long-term interests of the enterprise alongside the shareholders. That gives a Dutch board far more room to reject a premium cash bid than a comparable U.S. target would have, especially with a friendly all-stock merger of equals (the Axalta deal) already on the table.The combined AkzoNobel-Axalta entity, announced last November and worth roughly $25 billion, plans to list on the NYSE with dual HQs in Amsterdam and Philadelphia and Dutch tax residency — a structure that itself preserves the Dutch governance model post-close. The CMA in the U.K. has already opened a public comment period on the Axalta deal, and antitrust review is likely the live front to watch from here.AkzoNobel Snubs €12.5B Sherwin-Williams, Nippon Paint Bid | Law360The Trump administration is preparing to halt federal immigration and customs processing at airports located in jurisdictions it deems “sanctuary cities” or “sanctuary states,”, according to a report Reuters published. The mechanism, if implemented, would have Customs and Border Protection officers stop staffing inbound international arrival processing — meaning international passengers landing at, say, San Francisco, Boston, or Seattle would be unable to clear customs at those airports and would have to be diverted. The legal architecture here is unusual because CBP staffing decisions sit at the discretionary end of federal administrative law: the agency has wide latitude to deploy officers where it wants, and there is no statutory entitlement for any particular city to host a federal port of entry.That said, a decision to use that discretion as punishment for a state or municipality's refusal to honor ICE detainers would invite a familiar set of challenges — South Dakota v. Dole-style coercion arguments dressed up as preemption, anti-commandeering claims under Murphy v. NCAA and Printz v. United States, and APA challenges under State Farm to whatever administrative record the agency assembles. Several of the targeted jurisdictions have already won injunctions in earlier rounds of sanctuary-city funding fights, including against the prior conditioning of Byrne JAG grants on detainer compliance. The political move is obvious; the legal move is less so, and the administration will need to articulate a non-pretextual reason for the staffing change if it wants to survive arbitrary-and-capricious review. Whether airlines, airport authorities, or the states themselves will have standing to sue — and what kind of irreparable harm a redirected flight inflicts — is going to be the first set of questions a court has to answer.US draws up plans to halt immigration, customs processing at ‘sanctuary city' airports | ReutersThe Supreme Court reversed and remanded the Fourth Circuit's decision reviving the National Association of Immigration Judges' First Amendment challenge to a federal rule restricting what sitting immigration judges may say publicly about the agency that employs them. The per curiam opinion's holding is narrow but striking: the Fourth Circuit, the justices said, committed an abuse of discretion by reviving the suit on a theory neither party briefed, a “drastic departure from the principle of party presentation” laid out in cases like United States v. Sineneng-Smith. The party-presentation principle is one of those background structural rules that doesn't get a lot of airtime — the basic idea is that federal courts are passive instruments that decide the cases the parties bring them, not the cases judges wish the parties had brought — but here it became outcome-determinative.Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, wrote separately to say the Fourth Circuit was also wrong on the merits because it ignored Elgin v. Department of the Treasury, the 2012 decision holding that the Civil Service Reform Act's administrative-channeling regime is the exclusive route for covered federal employees to challenge adverse employment actions, even constitutional ones. The practical effect is that the immigration judges' union now has to litigate its First Amendment claim through the Merit Systems Protection Board and then the Federal Circuit rather than in district court, and the case bounces back to the Fourth Circuit to redo the analysis on whatever ground the parties did actually raise. The Court also denied a cross-petition from the union. The case is Margolin v. National Association of Immigration Judges, No. 25-767; the merits cross-petition was No. 25-1009.Justices Order Redo In Immigration Judges' Free Speech Suit | Law360A Sixth Circuit panel on Tuesday affirmed the dismissal of an attempt by Right to Life of Michigan and a group of parents to block enforcement of Proposal 3, the 2022 Michigan ballot initiative that wrote a fundamental right to reproductive freedom into Article I, Section 28 of the state constitution. The panel did not reach the merits — the case stopped at standing — and the opinion, written by Judge John K. Bush, is a clean illustration of how high the Article III standing bar is for pre-enforcement challenges of this kind. Standing requires the plaintiff to show an injury that is fairly traceable to the defendant's conduct and likely to be redressed by a favorable decision, and the parents here couldn't make the traceability link work: their theory was that the amendment might allow schools or other actors to help minors obtain contraception or abortion care without parental consent, but the complaint identified no specific enforcement action by Governor Whitmer, Attorney General Nessel, or Secretary of State Benson that was causing or threatening any such injury.The panel reiterated the Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife framework and quoted approvingly the rule that a “general allegation” that an executive officer is “generally responsible for executing” state law does not, by itself, establish standing to sue that officer. The court also rejected the plaintiffs' attempt to bootstrap standing off the AG's and governor's authority to enforce Michigan's consumer protection and civil rights statutes, calling those allegations too speculative. This is going to be the template for the next several rounds of post-Dobbs challenges to state constitutional reproductive-rights amendments: the merits questions about scope and federal preemption will keep coming, but plaintiffs are going to need a concrete enforcement target to even get a hearing.6th Circ. Rejects Mich. Reproductive Rights Challenge | Law360 This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

The power of the MAGA endorsement strikes again following Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton's decisive runoff victory, signaling a significant shift in the Republican landscape as the fight for Congressional control continues. Senator Jim Banks (R-IN) joins the Rundown to discuss whether this primary momentum can be sustained through November. Plus, he breaks down his legislative push for the "Delilah Law," which would restrict commercial driver's licenses for illegal immigrants, and a bold proposal from the DHS secretary to pull federal customs agents from sanctuary city airports as a form of jurisdictional retaliation. The upcoming hurricane season is bringing a mix of relief and uncertainty as rare global weather patterns clash with record ocean warmth. FOX Weather Meteorologist Ian Oliver joins to discuss NOAA's recent predictions for a quieter-than-usual year, the inner workings of a massive Pacific warming trend that acts as a natural shield against storm development, and how groundbreaking AI technology is being used to better predict severe weather and protect coastal communities. PLUS, commentary by Kaylee McGhee White, FOX News contributor and the editor-in-chief of IW Features. PHOTO CREDIT: ASSOCIATED PRESS Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Howie Kurtz on Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton's landslide primary victory over veteran Senator John Cornyn, a chaotic clash in New Jersey as ICE agents fire tear gas at U.S. Senator Andy Kim, and the White House's controversial plan to implement a government-wide employee non-disclosure agreement. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Joyce talks about the newly enacted Community Trust Act in Maryland that prevents law enforcement from sharing immigration information with immigration officials.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

This is the morning All Local update for Saturday, May 23rd 2026.

Today's Headlines: The Department of Homeland Security is threatening to cut customs staffing at major international airports in sanctuary cities like New York, LA, Chicago, and DC — which would affect not just tourism but cargo shipments and the broader economy — because DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin apparently thinks international trade can just reroute to Florida. Trump, meanwhile, said he's "in no hurry" to end the Iran war while also telling reporters he might skip his own son's destination wedding in the Bahamas because of "this thing called Iran," which is either a convenient excuse or the most relatable thing he's ever said. The Traitor Fund — formerly known as Trump's $1.776 billion slush fund — is getting wilder by the day: Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio wants $2-5 million, Mike Lindell is asking for $400 million, a January 6th rioter who compared herself to Jesus during sentencing wants $10 million, George Santos might file, and the couple who pointed guns at BLM protesters is reportedly interested. Acting AG Todd Blanche went to Congress to lobby Republicans not to block the fund — and offered to cut them in on it, specifically noting that senators whose records were secretly subpoenaed are eligible to file claims, which is a sentence that exists. The Senate responded by going home for a few weeks rather than dealing with it, which is technically a dereliction of their constitutional duty to approve funding, but here we are. Mortgage rates also hit a nine-month high this week at 6.51%, Trump is claiming he can build his DC arch without congressional approval, and a design commission approved the arch's look, which is one of many steps still required — Congress included, no matter what Donald says. On the Epstein files, Jeffrey Epstein's former personal assistant Sarah Kellen testified before the House Oversight Committee in a session described as deeply informative and genuinely harrowing — revealing she was recruited at 21, sexually and psychologically abused by Epstein for over a decade, and was "being paid in part to be raped." She also told the committee that the federal government included her name in Epstein's 2008 nonprosecution agreement without ever speaking to her, effectively branding her a criminal in a secret deal made with her own abuser. And finally, last night was Stephen Colbert's last show, which aired after this episode was recorded. Resources/Articles mentioned: The Atlantic: Homeland Security's Plan to Squeeze International Flights NYT: Trump Says He Will ‘Try and Make' Son Don Jr.'s Wedding, but Timing ‘Not Good' CBS News: Trump says Netanyahu will do "whatever I want" on Iran, and he's "in no hurry" to make a deal The Independent: Jan 6ers and other Trump allies already lining up to get their hands on slice of his $1.8B ‘slush fund' X - Paula Reid: https://x.com/PaulaReidCNN/status/2056842557334904940 USA Today: Fuming at Trump over 'slush fund,' Senate GOP skips town without passing ICE bill WaPo: Trump officials say they can build 250-foot arch without Congress's approval WSJ: Mortgage Rates Hit a Nine-Month High in Blow to Prime Buying Season ABC News: Former Jeffrey Epstein assistant tells House Oversight Committee he abused her for years AP News: Stephen Colbert is saying goodbye to 'The Late Show.' How it ends is still a secret Subscribe to the Betches News Room and join the Morning Announcements group chat. Go to: betchesnews.substack.com Morning Announcements is produced by Sami Sage and edited by Grace Hernandez-Johnson Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The border is far more secure under President Trump, but Tom Homan says the next major immigration battle is happening inside the country. In this exclusive interview, Homan breaks down how sanctuary cities and states are obstructing ICE, releasing criminal illegal immigrants back into communities, and forcing federal agents into more dangerous street operations instead of safer jail pickups. We discuss who the worst offenders are, whether Democratic leaders are intentionally provoking confrontations with ICE, what changed after Minnesota, how the administration plans to fight sanctuary resistance, and what Americans should expect from immigration enforcement over the next six months. Homan also addresses the recent border apprehension uptick, whether cartels are testing the administration, and what success should look like by the end of the year. This is the immigration fight now: secure the border, enforce the law, and stop sanctuary politicians from putting politics over public safety. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Explore the growing Muslim Brotherhood threat inside America, Virginia's controversial AR-15 ban, Democratic gerrymandering tactics and the dangers of sanctuary city policies. In Episode 094 of The Alan Sanders Show, we break down how these issues impact national security, Second Amendment rights, fair elections and public safety. From radical Islamist networks to gun control overreach, partisan map manipulation and open-border consequences, this episode delivers unfiltered analysis and the latest developments you need to know. Stay informed on the threats facing our Republic and what must be done to protect American sovereignty and freedoms. Please take a moment to rate and review the show and then share the episode on social media. You can find me on Facebook, X, Instagram, GETTR, TRUTH Social, TikTok, YouTube and Rumble by searching for The Alan Sanders Show. And, consider becoming a sponsor of the show by visiting my Patreon page!

It's Thursday, May 14th, A.D. 2026. This is The Worldview in 5 Minutes heard on 140 radio stations and at www.TheWorldview.com.  I'm Adam McManus. (Adam@TheWorldview.com) By Jonathan Clark Chinese communists arrest 6 Christians for teaching Sunday School Communist authorities in southwest China recently arrested six Christians for conducting Sunday school classes. The Christians face charges of “organizing minors to engage in activities undermining public order.” Dr. Bob Fu, founder and president of ChinaAid, said, “This case — both the charges and the process — mark a shocking new phase in China's persecution of religious minorities. … Criminalizing Sunday School and the peaceful sharing of faith with children is an outrageous abuse of law and a direct assault on the fundamental rights of parents and churches.” In Matthew 19:14, Jesus said, “Let the little children come to Me, and do not forbid them; for of such is the kingdom of Heaven.” Trump to talk to Chinese president about imprisoned Christians U.S. President Donald Trump arrived in Beijing, China yesterday.  He plans to discuss Taiwan, trade, and the Iran war with Chinese President Xi Jinping. President Trump said he would also discuss recent and high profile cases of Christians being imprisoned in China. Listen to his comments first about pro-democracy publisher Jimmy Lai followed by comments about Pastor Ezra Jin. TRUMP: “Jimmy Lai, he caused lots of turmoil for China. He tried to do the right thing. He wasn't successful, went to jail, and people would like him out. And I'd like to see him get out too. I'll bring him up again. I have brought him up. “And there's another gentleman, a pastor, as you know, with a beautiful daughter and son-in-law, that would like to see him get out. I'm going to bring his name up.” California mayor resigns after spying for China In the United States, a California mayor resigned on Monday, May 11th, after acting as an agent for the Chinese government.  The Justice Department recently charged Eileen Wang, the mayor of Arcadia, with acting as an illegal agent for China. Arcadia is located 13 miles from downtown Los Angeles. Wang agreed to plead guilty to the charges. She worked on behalf of Chinese officials by promoting their propaganda in the United States. FBI Director Kash Patel wrote on X, “FBI and our federal partners continue to move aggressively to root out this kind of influence in American institutions all over the country.” Businesses abandoning California over high taxes and regulation More businesses are exiting California for states with lower taxes and less regulations.  The latest example is KB Home, reports The Washington Times. The American homebuilding company is moving its headquarters from Los Angeles to Tempe, Arizona.  Other major companies that have relocated their headquarters out of California include Oracle, Tesla, Chevron, Charles Schwab, and Hewlett Packard Enterprise. The most popular destination states include Texas, Tennessee, Arizona, Nevada, and Florida.  Proverbs 29:2 reminds us, “When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice; but when a wicked man rules, the people groan.” Democrat California Governor Gavin Newsom is on the wrong side of that equation. Texas town is 97th American city to ban abortion Life News reports a Texas town became the 97th city in America to ban abortion. The City of Muleshoe, Texas voted 4-1 on Monday, May 11th, to adopt the Sanctuary City for the Unborn ordinance.  Mark Lee Dickson, founder of Sanctuary Cities for the Unborn, said, “This vote would not have been possible without the residents who gathered signatures and stood for the protection of pregnant mothers and unborn children. Muleshoe has now joined dozens of Texas communities taking a stand against abortion trafficking and the exploitation of vulnerable women and children.” U.S. overdose drug deaths fell last year The number of reported drug overdose deaths fell in the United States last year. The Centers For Disease Control and Prevention found there were over 68,000 drug overdose deaths in 2025. That number is down 14 percent compared to the previous year. However, overdose deaths are up 30 percent from a decade ago.  The states with the biggest drop in overdose deaths last year included New York, Virginia, and Oregon. But a few states saw a significant uptick in such overdose deaths, including New Mexico, Arizona, and Colorado.   White House hosts 9-hour prayer event on National Mall And finally, the White House is hosting a nine-hour prayer event at the National Mall in Washington, D.C. on Sunday.  The event is called Rededicate 250: A National Jubilee of Prayer, Praise & Thanksgiving. It's one of many events this year to celebrate the 250th anniversary of the founding of the United States. Top U.S. officials speaking at the prayer event include Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and House Speaker Mike Johnson. The event's website describes the jubilee as a “historic gathering to give thanks for God's providence, reflect on our nation's story, and rededicate America as One Nation under God.” Close And that's The Worldview on this Thursday, May 14th, in the year of our Lord 2026. Subscribe for free by Spotify, Amazon Music, or by iTunes or email to our unique Christian newscast at www.TheWorldview.com.  Plus, you can get the Generations app through Google Play or The App Store. I'm Adam McManus (Adam@TheWorldview.com). Seize the day for Jesus Christ.

Boortz criticizes sanctuary city policies, arguing they prevent cooperation with federal immigration authorities and allow dangerous criminals to remain in communities. Using examples from New York, he highlights violent crimes committed by undocumented immigrants and contends that local leaders are prioritizing politics over public safety.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Boortz criticizes sanctuary city policies, arguing they prevent cooperation with federal immigration authorities and allow dangerous criminals to remain in communities. Using examples from New York, he highlights violent crimes committed by undocumented immigrants and contends that local leaders are prioritizing politics over public safety.Atlanta's ONLY All Conservative News & Talk Station.: https://www.xtra1063.com/See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

...

In this episode of John Solomon Reports, we tackle the critical connection between the open border policies under the Biden administration and the rampant fraud in entitlement programs that are being exploited by individuals posing as refugees. As we examine the alarming developments in states like Minnesota and California, we hear from Chairman of the House Oversight Committee, James Comer, who has been at the forefront of investigating these issues. Comer reveals how the fraudulent activities are part of a larger Democratic strategy to manipulate federal fund distribution and gain political power through sanctuary cities.We also discuss the recent findings from the U.S. Census Bureau, where errors in the 2020 census disproportionately favored Democratic states, potentially costing Republican states several House seats. This powerful allegation underscores the ongoing battle for political clout and representation in America.In the middle segment, we welcome national security expert Gordon Chang to discuss the implications of China gaining access to multiple states' voter registration databases back in 2020. He provides insights into how this intrusion could affect the upcoming elections and what measures we can take to safeguard our electoral processes.Finally, we have a conversation with country music artist Natasha Owens, who has defied the odds in the face of cancel culture. Owens shares her journey of creating music that aligns with her values while bypassing traditional media blockades, inspiring other artists to do the same.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.