Podcasts about Reexamination

Welcome to today's episode of "AI Lawyer Talking Tech," where we delve into the latest trends and developments shaping the legal industry. In this episode, we'll explore the growing significance of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in legal services, the impact of comprehensive federal privacy legislation, and the ethical considerations surrounding AI implementation. With a focus on improving efficiency, adhering to data privacy regulations, and embracing innovation, we'll uncover how AI is reshaping the legal landscape and discuss its potential implications for legal professionals. Stay tuned for an insightful discussion on the transformative power of AI in the legal industry. GenAI in professional services: The future is automated17 Apr 2024Thomson Reuters InstituteHow to Manage the Top 3 Most In-Demand Practice Areas in 2024: Technology, Data Privacy, & AI - Oh My!17 Apr 2024AxiomLaw.comJorn Vanysacker & Jeroen Thierens from Henchman: We Are Building the “Chief of Staff” For Each Legal Professional17 Apr 20243 Geeks and a Law BlogDistinguished Law and Public Sector Professionals to Speak at RPLG's Fifth-annual Public Law Fellowship Program17 Apr 2024Renne Public Law GroupMassachusetts AG Says Consumer Protection, Civil Rights, and Data Privacy Laws Apply to Artificial Intelligence17 Apr 2024National Law ReviewThe Spear in AI's Back17 Apr 2024oftwominds-Charles Hugh SmithIs That A Professional-Grade, Legal GenAI Assistant In Your Pocket Or Are You Just Happy To See Me?17 Apr 2024Above The LawKeep The Focus On Clients And Deliver A Superior Client Experience While Efficiently Managing Your Firm's Business17 Apr 2024Above The LawHow GenAI can enhance your legal work without compromising ethics17 Apr 2024Financial Thomson Reuters6 ways law firms can set themselves up for innovation success17 Apr 2024Financial Thomson ReutersLegal professionals with GenAI see increased efficiency and productivity, as shown in new report17 Apr 2024Financial Thomson ReutersConsumer Data Privacy Regulation Is Now In The Spotlight17 Apr 2024Forbes.comSterne Kessler's Reissue, Reexamination, and Supplemental Examination Practice Tips17 Apr 2024JD SupraDWP could violate human rights with plan to snoop on benefit claimants' bank accounts17 Apr 2024The Big IssueProspect of Comprehensive Nationwide Privacy Legislation Reemerges17 Apr 2024Kirkland & Ellis LLPAmerican Privacy Rights Act – Another Shot at a Comprehensive Federal Privacy Law17 Apr 2024Mintz LevinCharting Your Course Through Data Privacy: What Every Business Should Know17 Apr 2024Spencer Fane

Ari and Chris welcome back NEI President and CEO, Steve Martin, back to the show to talk about his recently published journal aritcle, "A Reexamination of the Relationship between Training Practices and Welfare in the Management of Ambassador Animals"! Steve talks about how the article came about, the steep learning curve involved in the ins and outs of creating a peer-reviewed document, the revisions we went through for over a year to get to the final product, and what he hopes the professional animal care field could gain from reading it. A great chat about an important topic! For more information, click here to read Steve's article from the journal Animals.  If you have a suggestion for a question, topic, or guest you'd like to hear on a future episode of the show, let us know at podcast@naturalencounters.com! --------------------------------- The TEC Talk Podcast is proud to be sponsored by Audible.com! To support the show and get a free 30-day trial of everything Audible has to offer, visit http://www.audibletrial.com/tectalk- thanks Audible!

Recently, the open access scientific journal Animals published a special issue entitled: Zoo and Aquarium Welfare, Ethics, Behavior.  Many of the peer-reviewed papers within this special issue focus on and in some instances call for improvements to animal welfare assessment, husbandry, training, housing, and overall management. The goal of the invited editors, which includes the host of Zoo Logic, was to highlight advances and current best practices across a range of species, and to inspire further progress, while also addressing public perceptions and expectations of zoos and aquariums. One such paper, "A Reexamination of the Relationship between Training Practices and Welfare in the Management of Ambassador Animals," by lead author, and long time trainer and founder of Natural Encounters, Steve Martin and veterinarian and researcher, Dave Miller (and yours truly) examines the history and current state of ambassador animal welfare and the need for choosing the right species and individual animals for such programs (and avoiding the wrong ones). The authors make no secret that animal ambassador welfare has generally not kept pace with other advancements in zoo animal well being. It is vital that zoological facilities devote the necessary resources in terms of time, money, animal selection, and staff training to properly handle and ensure the best welfare outcomes for these animals with a unique role. Animal Care Software    

Please join Troutman Pepper's Intellectual Property and Health Sciences practice groups for our podcast series focused on strategies, trends, and other happenings in post-grant proceedings.In the final installment of this three-episode series, Troutman Pepper attorney Andy Zappia moderates a discussion with his colleagues Michael Goldman and Megan Thisse O'Gara on the mechanics and strategic considerations for using reexamination as a means to amend claims in IPR and PGR proceedings.

On this edition of the morning update, we dive right back into the headlines from overnight and see where things currently stand as of this morning and we are taking a look at the news that cold cases will be re-examined in the wake of Bryan Kohberger's arrest. (commercial at 9:03)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho murders update today: Bryan Kohberger's arrest prompts review of Pennsylvania cold cases amid report he was fired from WSU | The IndependentThis show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5003294/advertisement

Whenever a person is accused of the type of grizzly crimes that Bryan Kohberger is accused of, people are going to wonder if this person has killed before. That is the question that is being asked in this episode as law enforcement officials from several counties where Bryan Kohberger previously lived or attended school took a fresh look at cold cases to see if they could be connected to Bryan Kohberger.In this episode we hear form several officials from these counties who discuss the results of these investigations and the motivation for taking another look at the details in the wake of the arrest of Bryan Kohberger.(commercial at 7:54)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Cold case files reopened in Pennsylvania after Idaho murders - USTimesPost

Whenever a person is accused of the type of grizzly crimes that Bryan Kohberger is accused of, people are going to wonder if this person has killed before. That is the question that is being asked in this episode as law enforcement officials from several counties where Bryan Kohberger previously lived or attended school took a fresh look at cold cases to see if they could be connected to Bryan Kohberger.In this episode we hear form several officials from these counties who discuss the results of these investigations and the motivation for taking another look at the details in the wake of the arrest of Bryan Kohberger.(commercial at 7:54)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Cold case files reopened in Pennsylvania after Idaho murders - USTimesPost

Question: Can a request for ex parte reexamination filed on or after January 16, 2018 be filed with a reduced filing fee? Answer: Yes, requests for ex parte reexamination filed on or after January 16, 2018 may be filed with a reduced filing fee. This reexamination filing option was created to make it financially less burdensome for requesters with limited resources. Chapter Details: The answer to this question can be found in chapter 2200 of the MPEP. This chapter covers Citation of Prior Art and Ex Parte Reexamination of Patents. The answer is from the 9th Edition, Revision 10.2019. Depending on future changes… The post MPEP Q & A 273: Can a request for ex parte reexamination filed on or after January 16, 2018 be filed with a reduced filing fee? appeared first on Patent Education Series.

Please join Troutman Pepper's Intellectual Property and Health Sciences practice groups for our podcast series focused on strategies, trends, and other happenings in post-grant proceedings.In this first of a three-episode series, Troutman Pepper attorney Andy Zappia moderates a discussion with his colleagues Michael Goldman and Megan Thisse O'Gara on the pros and cons of reissue versus reexamination as a means to amend claims in the context of IPR and PGR proceedings.Be on the lookout next month for our second episode in this three-part series, which will focus specifically on reissue strategy in the context of IPR and PGR proceedings.

Whenever a person is accused of the type of grizzly crimes that Bryan Kohberger is accused of, people are going to wonder if this person has killed before. That is the question that is being asked in this episode as law enforcement officials from several counties where Bryan Kohberger previously lived or attended school took a fresh look at cold cases to see if they could be connected to Bryan Kohberger.In this episode we hear form several officials from these counties who discuss the results of these investigations and the motivation for taking another look at the details in the wake of the arrest of Bryan Kohberger.(commercial at 7:54)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Cold case files reopened in Pennsylvania after Idaho murders - USTimesPost

Whenever a person is accused of the type of grizzly crimes that Bryan Kohberger is accused of, people are going to wonder if this person has killed before. That is the question that is being asked in this episode as law enforcement officials from several counties where Bryan Kohberger previously lived or attended school took a fresh look at cold cases to see if they could be connected to Bryan Kohberger.In this episode we hear form several officials from these counties who discuss the results of these investigations and the motivation for taking another look at the details in the wake of the arrest of Bryan Kohberger.(commercial at 7:54)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Cold case files reopened in Pennsylvania after Idaho murders - USTimesPost

Rethinking Scripture PodcastEpisode 57: Acts 15 - Who Were Those "Appointed to Eternal Life?"October 19, 2022 - Host: Dr. Gregory HallIn Acts 15, a decision is made. The question on the table was how to keep peace between the different cultural expectations of those who had come to faith in Jesus.  The list of action items they came up with might be a little surprising to our modern ears. But what's really interesting… is something that didn't make the list at all.Resources Referenced and/or Read:Witherington, B., III. (1998). The Acts of the Apostles: a socio-rhetorical commentary (pp. 440–441). Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.Savelle, C. H. (2004). A Reexamination of the Prohibitions in Acts 15. Bibliotheca Sacra, 161, 464–465.Show Music:Intro/Outro - "Growth" by Armani Delos SantosTransition Music - produced by Jacob A. HallPodcast Website:The All-America Listener Challenge Updates: https://rethinkingscripture.comMy New Podcast Studio... The Upper Room: https://rethinkingscripture.com/podcast-episodes/More information about The Homes and Help Initiative: https://rethinkingscripture.com/homes-help-initiative/Sister site: RethinkingRest.comRethinking Rest... the Book: Coming January 19, 2023!More information about the book: https://rethinkingrest.com/the-book/Social Media:Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/RethinkingScripture Twitter: @RethinkingStuffInstagram: Rethinking_ScriptureYouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6YCLg2UldJiA0dsg0KkvLAPowered and distributed by Simplecast.

Question: What type of applications and proceedings may submit photographs, color drawings, grayscale drawings, and other drawings that are not black and white line drawings via EFS-Web? Answer: Photographs, color drawings, grayscale drawings, and other drawings that are not black and white line drawings may be submitted via EFS-Web in only the following types of applications and proceedings: (1) Nonprovisional design patent applications, including reissue design patent applications; (2) Provisional applications; (3) Nonprovisional utility patent applications, including reissue utility patent applications; (4) U.S. national stage applications; (5) International design applications; (6) Reexamination proceedings for utility or design patents; (7) Supplemental… The post MPEP Q & A 256: What type of applications and proceedings may submit drawings that are not black and white line drawings via EFS-Web? appeared first on Patent Education Series.

This week we conclude our discussion of the Edmund Fitzgerald, with special returning guest Kaylee!Topics include- search efforts on the night of November 10, 1975- modern analysis of the wind and wave conditions on the night of the sinking- literature published about the Fitzgerald since 1977- controversy and disagreements over investigations of the wreckSources and further reading:Flesher, John. "Book Photo, Video of Crewman's Remains Angers Victims' Families." AP News, 3 Nov 1995. https://apnews.com/article/a2e00a029453cf06801b1c210655bacfHemming, Robert J. Gales of November. Contemporary Books, 1981.Hultquist, Thomas R., Michael R. Dutter, and David J. Schwab. “Reexamination of the 9-10 November 1975 ‘Edmund Fitzgerald' Storm Using Today's Technology.” Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, vol. 87, no. 5, May 2006, pp. 607 - 622. Justice, Jacqueline. “Classical Tragedy and the Wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald: Why the Legend Lives On.” The Journal of American Culture, vol. 36, no. 2, June 2013, pp. 88 - 98.Kieselburg, James R. “Midwestern Images of Labor: Wisconsin Artists and Their Portrayal of Industry.” The Journal of the Society for Industrial Archaeology, vol. 34, no. 1-2, 2008, pp. 135 - 148. Marine Casualty Report, United States Coast Guard.  https://www.dco.uscg.mil/Portals/9/DCO%20Documents/5p/CG-5PC/INV/docs/boards/edmundfitz.pdfRafferty, Colin. “Surfacing.” Fourth Genre: Exploration in Nonfiction, vol. 12, no. 2, Fall 2010, pp. 17 - 26. Schumacher, Michael. Mighty Fitz: The Sinking of the Edmund Fitzgerald. University of Minnesota Press, 2012.Schumacher, Michael. The Trial of the Edmund Fitzgerald: Eyewitness Accounts From the U.S. Coast Guard Hearings. University of Minnesota Press, 2019. Stonehouse, Frederick. The Wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald. Avery Color Studios, 1996. Thompson, Mark L. Graveyard of the Lakes. Wayne State University Press, 2004. Support the show

Sometimes you gotta ask yourself if your belief resonates with yourself. Plus, what's your idea of love? What do you expect from a relationship? And also, what is your life about?

Women, Philanthropy, Recipes, and Social Progress: A Reexamination of Primary Resources These presentations were made at the Illinois History Conference at the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library and Museum in October, 2021. Since this is ongoing research, there will be additional information learned after this event. “The Mary Ethel Crofton Cookbook,” circa 1895 and earlier, Nicole Stocker, Museum Educator, Lake County Forest Preserves, Bess Bower Dunn Museum “Politics, Gender, and the Local Woman's Club Records,” Nancy Webster, Archivist, Highland Park Historical Society “Comparison and Contrast of The Ossoli Club community Cook Book, circa 1911, and Highland Park Woman's Club Cook Book, circa 1925” Catherine Lambrecht, Chicago Foodways Roundtable, Greater Midwest Foodways, and Highland Park Historical Society Recorded on January 13, 2022 via Zoom. http://www.culinaryhistorians.org https://www.lcfpd.org/museum/ (Dunn Museum) http://www.HighlandParkHistory.com

Continuing from last week's episode, we decided to provide more context regarding sin and what it is. In Genesis chapter three we see the disobedience of Adam and Eve. Exercising freedom of choice, It was one action that enabled sin to enter their nature. They were immediately stricken with a sense of shame and unfitness, which is why they hid from God's presence. The harsh reality is that they were deceived by a lie. Also, keep in mind that those who aren't followers of Christ today, have been deceived with many lies. When the love of God was broken between humanity and God, humans were left with a condition of sin. With no love there is only fear and a lack of trust. The embracement of self and the concern of only ones self becomes what is the center. As Christmas is celebrated in many homes, let's not forget the reason for the season: you can't have Christmas without Christ.

Fourteen years after Christopher Vaughn was sentenced to four consecutive life terms for the murders of his wife and three children we revisit the evidence that led to his conviction. In this episode we'll break down the circumstantial and forensic evidence that possibly led to a conviction based on what could be emotional and confirmation bias. Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

To celebrate the reunion of Ben Affleck and Jennifer Lopez and the triumphant feeling of vitality they have brought us all, Daniel and Kyle decided to watch 2003's infamous “Gigli,” a film they have both never seen and won't soon forget. A movie that is shockingly as much about thumbs and other assorted body parts as it is anything else, The Boys dissect exactly what went wrong, what went right (?!) and how Ben and Jen's respective careers mirrored each other post-“Gigli.” It's a tale of paparazzi culture, the influence of Us Weekly, the city of Boston and the way we must reckon with Justin Bartha's performance as a special needs adult. Plus, a discussion about the best real-life film couples of all-time. Strap in, it's “Gigli” time!

“Experiencing fulfillment leads you to it.” – Stephen Shedletzky On this episode of The Leadership Locker, Rich is joined by Head of Brand Experience at Simon Sinek Inc, Stephen Shedletzky. Listen in as Rich and Stephen discuss business culture, the challenges of transitioning, and why it's important to have worthy rivals. Stephen Shedletzky engages with people in meaningful ways so that we connect with depth and live in a more fulfilled world. With a knack for sharing the right words at the right moment, he delivers evidence-based content in a provocative, captivating and light-hearted way. Feeling stifled on his corporate track, Stephen was struck by Simon Sinek's vision of a more inspired, safe and fulfilled world. He joined Sinek's team in 2012. What started as a position answering fan email, Stephen now leads Brand Experience and the team of Igniters to ensure every product, partnership and communication reflects the organization's most deeply held beliefs. ----- 00:09 – Introduction 03:00 – Stephen tells us about himself 03:48 – “Customers will love a company only if the employees love it first.” 06:21 – Being mentored by your predecessor 12:05 – The challenges of transitioning 19:04 – Being methodical vs. jumping in 23:01 – Is a bad business culture reversible? 29:04 – Worthy rivals 35:19 – Preparing your team to be ready for difficult times 38:16 – Reexamination and recalibration 41:01 – When your idea of fulfillment turns out to be wrong 42:42 – The loneliness of going your own way 45:30 – How to find Stephen online 46:01 – Rich's closing thoughts  ----- https://www.amazon.com/Give-Take-Helping-Others-Success/dp/0143124986/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&keywords=give+and+take&qid=1623441487&sr=8-1 (Give and Take: Why Helping Others Drives Our Success) by Adam Grant https://www.amazon.com/Turn-Ship-Around-Turning-Followers/dp/1591846404/ref=sr_1_3?crid=2W5JSAFXO2Z6L&dchild=1&keywords=turn+the+ship+around+david+marquet&qid=1623441700&sprefix=turn+the+ship%2Caps%2C316&sr=8-3 (Turn the Ship Around!: A True Story of Turning Followers into Leaders) by L. David Marquet https://www.amazon.com/Winning-Unforgiving-Race-Greatness-Grover/dp/1982168862/ref=sr_1_2?crid=3138YCUMXZGOR&dchild=1&keywords=winning+by+tim+grover&qid=1623441775&sprefix=winning+by%2Caps%2C562&sr=8-2 (Winning: The Unforgiving Race to Greatness) by Tim Grover ----- Connect with Stephen: https://www.linkedin.com/in/stephenshedletzky/ (LinkedIn) https://simonsinek.com/ (SimonSinek.com) ----- Connect with Rich: http://www.richcardonamedia.com/ (Website) https://www.linkedin.com/in/richcardona/ (LinkedIn) https://www.instagram.com/richcardona_/ (Instagram) https://www.facebook.com/richcardonamedia/ (Facebook) https://www.youtube.com/c/RichCardona (YouTube)

Question: What are the “Appropriate circumstances” to vacate the order granting reexamination? Answer: “Appropriate circumstances” exist to vacate the order granting reexamination where, for example: (A) the reexamination order is facially not based on prior art patents or printed publications; (B) reexamination is prohibited under 37 CFR 1.907; (C) all claims of the patent were […] The post MPEP Q & A 224: What are the “Appropriate circumstances” to vacate the order granting reexamination? appeared first on Patent Education Series.

Can you believe it’s episode 116 and we haven’t yet done a deep dive specifically on “flexible dieting”? Well, we couldn’t either, so in this episode, we did just that. You’ll learn what the origins of flexible dieting are in the research and also the fitness industry and how they diverged to the point they became wholly separate. You’ll learn why IIFYM is not always flexible, what the data on flexible dieting suggests, and where the research stands today as newer concepts like intuitive eating have emerged.

Last month, the documentary “Framing Britney Spears” reignited a cultural conversation about misogyny, the superstars’ treatment by a ruthless tabloid press and the complicity of all of us who consumed the story.  We sit down with the director of the doc Samantha Stark as well as Vox writer Constance Grady to dive into the documentary and how it’s forced us to re-examine our treatment of female celebrities in the nineties and early aughts. Guests:  Samantha Stark, director of “Framing Britney Spears,” part of “The New York Times Presents,”  a series of standalone documentaries currently available to stream on FX and Hulu; she tweets @starksamantha Constance Grady, culture writer for Vox, where her recent piece is “Who is responsible for what happened to Britney Spears?”; she tweets @constancegrady

The long winter is coming! See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The Lord’s Supper leads to REEXAMINATION - of our lives: v. 28. Our position in Christ: 2 Corinthians 13:5 Our purity before Christ: Psalm 24:3-4a Our performance for Christ: 2 Corinthians 5:10 The Lord’s Supper leads to REPENTANCE - from sin: v. 29. Romans 14:10-13 The Lord’s Supper leads to RESTORATION - of relationships: vs. 17-18. Matthew 5:21-24 The Lord’s Supper leads to REMEMBRANCE - of His sacrifice: vs. 24-25. The Lord’s Supper leads to REJOICING - in our redemption and His return: v. 26. The Lord’s Supper leads to RENEWAL - of our commitment to Him.

Daybell Vallow and George Floyd Cases Update -Justin Bieber Sues - Elijah McClain Reexamination Case and More!

Welcome to Linda Liu & Partners on air！My name is Felix Song, a mechanical patent attorney of Linda Liu & Partners. I have been working in Linda Liu & Partners for more than 2 years. Before I came to Linda Liu & Partners, I worked in Chinese Patent Office as patent examiner for almost 8 years. I specialize in mechanical engineering and civil engineering.My topic today is reexamination procedure in China.

Question: Name one instance when issuance of a NIRC action would be proper in an inter partes reexamination proceeding. Answer: The following are the only instances when issuance of a NIRC action would be proper in an inter partes reexamination proceeding: There is no timely response by the patent owner to an Office action requiring […] The post MPEP Q & A 189: Issuance of NIRC Action in Inter Partes Reexamination Proceeding appeared first on Patent Education Series.

A reexamination of ruthlessness --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app

Sheldon Richman, author of the new book Coming to Palestine, joins me to discuss the rights and wrongs of Israel and the Palestinians.

Question: List one of the basic characteristics of ex parte reexamination. Answer: The basic characteristics of ex parte reexamination are as follows: Anyone can request reexamination at any time during the period of enforceability of the patent; In ex parte reexaminations, prior art considered during reexamination is limited to prior art patents or printed publications […] The post MPEP Q & A 182: Characteristics of Ex Parte Reexamination appeared first on Patent Education Series.

In an effort to get more done and be our best selves, many of us have turned to "life hacks" that we find in blogs, books, and podcasts. I've personally experimented with several life hacks in the past decade, and we've even written about some on AoM. But are there downsides to trying to hack your way through life?  My guest took a look at both the positives and negatives of life hacking in his book, Hacking Life: Systemized Living and Its Discontents. His name is Joseph Reagle, and he's a professor of Communication Studies at Northwestern University. We begin our conversation with a history of the life hacking movement and how blogging in the early 2000s made this obscure cultural movement amongst computer programmers go mainstream. Joseph then discusses how he distinguishes between "nominal life hacking" and "optimal life hacking" and between "geeks" and "gurus." We then discuss some of the beneficial productivity and motivation hacks out there, but also how there are ways they can go astray -- including only working for a certain class of people and becoming too much of a focus in life. We also discuss how the minimalism movement can sometimes lead to contradictory impulses, and end our conversation talking about how using spiritual practices like meditation or Stoicism as hacks can strip them of their deeper contexts. Get the show notes at aom.is/hackinglife.

Question: List 2 submission types that may not be filed via EFS Web. Answer: The following is a list of submission types that are not permitted to be filed using EFS-Web: Plant patent applications and follow-on documents associated with plant patent applications, other than third party preissuance submissions. Requests for Reexamination for plant patents and […] The post MPEP Q & A 174: Submission Types that May Not be Filed Via EFS Web. appeared first on Patent Education Series.

In this episode I go over one of the procedures you can use at the Patent Office to invalidate someone else's patent, called an Ex Parte Reexamination.

Shakespeare: greatest writer in English language history or political hack? Martin, Robert and Francis rehabilitate Richard III, talk about Tudor Dynasty propaganda and there's Angel's Envy bourbon too! Check out Paul Murray Kendall's Richard III to know what we're on about.

Sex Panther, Mad Max and Arch look at what they said in October and assess where they are now at the halfway point. Is Sex Panther still happy with his Warriors to win the finals bet? Is Arch still happy with his Field bet to win? Will Mad Max pick a side now?    Come hangout and bs with us on Discord: https://discord.gg/rFC3vEa Follow us on Twitter: twitter.com/bettingabsolute  

HOW TO MAKE SURE AMAZON DOESN’T DELETE YOUR BOOK REVIEWS #150: Daily Mentoring with Trevor Crane on GreatnessQuest.com SUMMARY Today, I share with you another strategy to help you publish your book on Amazon and having a BILLION dollar company as a PARTNER with you by marketing and selling your book to new people. GET THE APP: Text: TREVOR To: 36260 #greatnessquest #trevorcrane #unstoppable #idealbusiness #ideallife

Amanda and Sam discuss jury trials in civil suits - when you can have them, when you can’t, and lots of sidebars!

Question: An attorney of record may have to submit information in reply to an Office action, a reissue application, or a reexamination proceeding. List 2 different types of information this may include. Answer: An attorney of record may have to submit information in reply to an Office action, a reissue application, or a reexamination proceeding; […] The post MPEP Q & A 152: Information an Attorney of Record May Have to Submit in Reply to an Office Action, Reissue Application, or Reexamination Proceeding appeared first on Patent Education Series.

Question: Who does the duty of disclosure in reexamination proceedings apply to? Answer: The duty of disclosure in reexamination proceedings applies to the patent owner; to each attorney or agent who represents the patent owner, and to every other individual who is substantively involved on behalf of the patent owner. Chapter Details: The answer to this question can be found in chapter 2200 of the MPEP. This chapter covers Citation of Prior Art and Ex Parte Reexamination of Patents. The answer is from the 9th Edition, Revision 07.2015. Depending on future changes to the MPEP, the question and answer may… The post MPEP Q & A 148: The Duty of Disclosure in Reexamination Proceedings appeared first on Patent Education Series.

I've recently been doing a series on creativity on the podcast. Edward de Bono has featured heavily, but there are other creativity-related topics and authors who I also want to talk about. In this episode, we look at the research on brainstorming, the technique for coming up with new ideas. The provocative title of this episode needs a little clarification. The most strongly supported finding in the research is that brainstorming in a group is not as effective as coming up with ideas individually, and then pooling them. Since brainstorming almost always refers to a group activity, I took the liberty of naming the episode this way. Strictly speaking, brainstorming on your own may not have such terrible effects, though less is known about this. Research on brainstorming is surprisingly abundant and has been continuously going on for over 50 years. (Sometimes researchers baffle me with what they find important to study - it seems that there is very little research on other, broader topics that also interest me from an educational standpoint, such as interest or prestige.) As a result, there are a lot of other interesting findings to talk about, some of which extend in their relevance beyond brainstorming itself. As a widely-used and rarely challenged technique for idea generation, I think many will find it useful to hear what we actually know about brainstorming, including how to make the most of it. Enjoy the episode.   Articles referred to in this episode: Alex Osborn (1957). Applied Imagination. [Book] Charles H. Clark (1958). Brainstorming: The Dynamic New Way to Create Succesful Ideas. [Book] Taylor et al. (1958). Does Group Participation When Using Brainstorming Facilitate or Inhibit Creative Thinking? Bouchard and Hare (1970). Size, performance and potential in brainstorming groups. Lamm and Tromsdorff (1973). Group versus individual performance on tasks requiring ideation proficiency (brainstorming): A review. Diehl and Stroeber (1987). Productivity Loss in Brainstorming Groups: Toward the Solution of a Riddle. Paulus and Dzindolet (1993). Social Influence Processes in Group Brainstorming. Paulus et al. (1993). Perception of Performance in Group Brainstorming: The Illusion of Group Productivity. Sutton and Hargadon (1996). Brainstorming Groups in Context: Effectiveness in a Product Design Firm. Camacho and Paulus (1995). The Role of Social Anxiousness in Group Brainstorming. Shepherd et al. (1996). Invoking Social Comparison to Improve Electronic Brainstorming: Beyond Anonymity. Michinov and Primois (2005). Improving productivity and creativity in online groups through social comparison process: New evidence for asynchronous electronic brainstorming. Dennis (2015). A meta-analysis of group size effects in electronic brainstorming: more heads are better than one. Larey and Paulus (1999). Group Preference and Convergent Tendencies in Small Groups: A Content Analysis of Group Brainstorming Performance. Dennis et al. (2012). Sparking Creativity: Improving Electronic Brainstorming with Individual Cognitive Priming. Feinberg and Nemeth (2008). The "Rules" of Brainstorming: An Impediment to Creativity? Rossiter and Lilien (1994). New "Brainstorming" Principles. Isaksen et al. (1998). A Review of Brainstorming Research: Six Critical Issues for Inquiry. Isaksen and Gaulin (2005). A Reexamination of Brainstorming Research: Implications for Research and Practice. Hender et al. (2001). Improving Group Creativity: Brainstorming vs Non-Brainstorming Techniques in a GSS Environment.   Music by podcastthemes.com.

Question: Who is barred from filing a request for ex parte reexamination of a patent? Answer: “Any person” may file a request for ex parte reexamination of a patent, unless prohibited by AIA 35 U.S.C. 315(e)(1) or 35 U.S.C. 325(e)(1). Accordingly, there are no types of “persons” who are excluded from being able to seek reexamination. Corporations and/or governmental entities are included within the scope of the term “any person.” The only “person” who is barred from filing a request for ex parte reexamination of a patent is one who is barred from doing so by the estoppel provisions of AIA 35 U.S.C. 315(e)(1)… The post MPEP Q & A 134: Who is Barred From Filing a Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of a Patent? appeared first on Patent Education Series.

Question: List one way inter partes reexamination differs from ex parte reexamination. Answer: Inter partes reexamination differs from ex parte reexamination in matters of procedure, such as when the third party requester can participate, the types of Office actions and the timing of issuance of the Office actions, and the requirement for identification of the real party in interest. Inter partes reexamination also differs from ex parte reexamination in the estoppel effect it provides as to the third party requesters and when the initiation of a reexamination is prohibited. Inter partes reexamination does not, however, differ from ex parte reexamination… The post MPEP Q & A 109: How Inter Partes Reexamination Differs From Ex Parte Reexamination appeared first on Patent Education Series.

Question: List one of the ways an inter partes reexamination proceeding may be concluded. Answer: Inter partes reexamination proceedings may be concluded in one of three ways: The prosecution of the reexamination proceeding may be brought to an end, and the proceeding itself concluded, by a denial of reexamination, or vacating the reexamination proceeding, or terminating the reexamination proceeding. (In these instances, no reexamination certificate is issued). The proceeding may be concluded under 37 CFR 1.997(b) with the issuance of a reexamination certificate. The proceeding may be concluded under 37 CFR 1.997(e) where the reexamination proceeding has been merged with… The post MPEP Q & A 77: Conclusion of an Inter Partes Reexamination Proceeding appeared first on Patent Education Series.

Question: Who does the duty of disclosure in reexamination proceedings apply to? Answer: The duty of disclosure in reexamination proceedings applies to the patent owner; to each attorney or agent who represents the patent owner, and to every other individual who is substantively involved on behalf of the patent owner. Chapter Details: The answer to this question can be found in chapter 2200 of the MPEP. This chapter covers Citation of Prior Art and Ex Parte Reexamination of Patents. The answer is from the 9th Edition, Revision 07.2015. Depending on future changes to the MPEP, the question and answer may… The post MPEP Q & A 75: Duty of Disclosure in Reexamination Proceedings appeared first on Patent Education Series.

Question: What is one way an ex parte reexamination proceeding may be concluded? Answer: Ex parte reexamination proceedings may be concluded in one of four ways: The prosecution of the proceeding may be brought to an end, and the proceeding itself concluded, by a denial of reexamination, or vacating the reexamination proceeding, or terminating the reexamination proceeding. (In these instances, no Reexamination Certificate is issued). The proceeding may be concluded under 37 CFR 1.570(b) with the issuance of a Reexamination Certificate. The proceeding may be concluded under 37 CFR 1.570(e) where the reexamination proceeding has been merged with a reissue… The post MPEP Q & A 59: Concluding an Ex Parte Reexamination Proceeding appeared first on Patent Education Series.

Question: List one of the required elements of a request for ex parte reexamination. Answer: The required elements of a request for ex parte reexamination are as follows: “A statement pointing out each substantial new question of patentability based on prior patents and printed publications.” “An identification of every claim for which reexamination is requested, and a detailed explanation of the pertinency and manner of applying the cited prior art to every claim for which reexamination is requested. “A copy of every patent or printed publication relied upon or referred to in paragraph (b)(1) and (2) of this section accompanied… The post MPEP Q & A 22: Required Elements of a Request for Ex Parte Reexamination appeared first on Patent Education Series.

  In today’s podcast, Richard L. Duquette will discuss Combating Road Rage.   Civil and Criminal Actions   As cyclists we all know there is a lot of road rage going on out there. Richard has seen a man actually jump out of his truck and start attacking a fellow cyclists!   Often times drivers try to harass you by buzzing you and then driving away.   If you are hit by a driver in CA, it’s considered assault with a deadly weapon. Those drivers can lose their license for life.      You can combat road rage through civil and criminal actions.   Reexamination of Motorists Driving Privilege   Another way you can combat road rage is by reporting the incident. You can report the road rager to the DMV or a law enforcement officer.    The DMV can determine if they are a competent driver. For instance, they could have a history of drug or alcohol addiction or a mental health condition.  Conditions which could make them unsafe to drive.   To hear more about Combating Road Rage, download and listen to the entire episode.   If you are short on time, here are the highlights of Combating Road Rage:   Assault with a deadly weapon (2:00) Civil v criminal case? (3:45) What are punitive damages? (4:15) Jail time (5:45) Your strategy is important to maximize damages (6:00)   Connect with Richard L. Duquette at the following links:   Richard's Website Email Richard Call Richard: 760-730-0500 Connect with Richard on Facebook Follow Richard on Twitter DMV and Justice article   © 2016 Law Firm of Richard L. Duquette  

Question: Who must a disclaimer be signed by in a patent or a reexamination proceeding? Answer: A disclaimer filed in a patent or a reexamination proceeding must be signed by either: the patentee (the assignee, the inventor(s) if the patent is not assigned, or the assignee and the inventors if the patent is assigned-in-part), or an attorney or agent of record. Chapter Details: The answer to this question can be found in chapter 1400 of the MPEP. This chapter covers Correction of Patents. The answer is from the 9th Edition, Revision 07.2015. Depending on future changes to the MPEP, the… The post MPEP Q & A 16: Signature Required for Disclaimer in Patent or Reexamination Proceeding appeared first on Patent Education Series.

In this episode of the Litigation Quality Patents® Podcast, Craige talks about a case where the Patent Office, in an Inter Partes re-examination, rejected a technology patent by correctly construing most claim terms but improperly ignoring evidence of industry praise and licensing. The federal circuit reviewed the case and upheld the anticipation rejections, but reversed the obviousness rejections. This federal circuit decision continued the trend of emphasizing the importance of objective evidence of non-obviousness.  Craige's special guests are, Richard Bragg, a Patent Attorney practicing in the Minneapolis area, Mike Heinrich, an attorney and consultant in engineering and intellectual property areas and Dr. John Leighton, an associate attorney at Thompson Patent Law.  Litigation Quality Patents® Podcasts The Litigation Quality Patents® Podcast, hosted each week by Craige Thompson (a.k.a., “The Examiner Whisperer”) contains substantive discussion designed to keep you current with what’s going on in the world of patents, encompassing everything from patent prosecution and re-examination to patent licensing and litigation.  

In this episode of the Litigation Quality Patents® Podcast, Craige warns patent owners facing reexamination procedures to beware of picking the wrong patent counsel! As you're about to hear, choosing counsel lacking experience in overcoming obviousness rejections, in a post KSR world, is a recipe for disastrous consequences. Craige also offers Litigation Quality Patent tips and guidance on how patent owners can check out the capabilities of their reexamination counsel. Craige's special guest is Richard Bragg, a Patent Attorney practicing in the Minneapolis area. Listen to the Podcast: EPISODE 23 - The Examiner Whisperer - Ex Parte Antor Media - Sep 12 2013 Litigation Quality Patents® Podcasts The Litigation Quality Patents® Podcast, hosted each week by Craige Thompson (a.k.a., “The Examiner Whisperer”) contains substantive discussion designed to keep you current with what’s going on in the world of patents, encompassing everything from patent prosecution and re-examination to patent licensing and litigation.

Double spook-show. Living in a pitch black vacuum. Another satisfied cinematic customer. Dario Argento’s leading ladies. Reexamination of female empowerment? Associations between space and horror. Not that kind of space. Colored light and Dario Argento’s stage love. Camera work with … Continue reading → Continue reading →

Suffolk University, Suffolk University Law School, Boston, Patent Law, USPTO, post grant review, PGR, Patentability Standard, Congress, First Inventor to File, American Invents Act, Business Method Patents, Inter Parties Review, Reexamination

Scott McKeown, partner and co-director of the Post Grant Practice Group at Oblon Spivak, discusses post grant review. Learn more about Mr. McKeown at http://bit.ly/GGUcmu.

Lando, Anastasi, Suffolk University, Suffolk University Law School, Boston, MA, Intellectual Property, IP Law, Patent Law

The reexamination of patents in the United States Patent & Trademark Office has become a powerful and effective tool to clearly define the boundaries of a patent. In this podcast, Peter Lando and James De Vellis of Lando & Anastasi, LLP discuss how, when, and why to request or defend the reexamination of a patent, and how doing so can further business objectives in litigation, licensing, and other situations.

This article presents a reexamination of the Sørensen model. This model derives the pattern of individual careers from structural considerations. If longitudinal data on individual careers are available, Sørensen's model provides two methods to infer the underlying structural parameter. This structural parameter gives a useful measure for unequal career chances. An implementation of these methods, using firm data, shows, however, that they lead to contradictory conclusions; this is shown to be the result of some unrealistic assumptions Sørensen uses in his derivation. Some more realistic assumptions are suggested that produce reasonable results. Finally, it is shown that despite these modifications, the main conclusions of the Sørensen model are preserved. This seems to be promising for future work with this model.